“What’s at Stake is Everything”: The Last Columbia Protester in ICE Detention

Speaker 1 Hey everyone, it's Rhiannon. On this special episode of 5-4, I interview two lawyers who represent Laqlat Kordiyeh, a Palestinian woman currently in ICE detention.

Speaker 1 Laqla was one of many who showed up to protest genocide outside Columbia University in the spring of 2024. After that, she was surveilled by ICE and put in detention earlier this year.

Speaker 1 Despite a judge ordering twice that she be released, Leclott remains in detention eight months later.

Speaker 1 Her attorneys talk to me about how the government has used procedural tricks to keep LeClotte detained, how LeClott's targeting connects to the Trump regime's repression of dissent, and what's at stake for all of us in Leclotte's case.

Speaker 1 This is 5-4:

Speaker 1 a podcast about how much ICE sucks.

Speaker 1 We are very, very honored, so appreciative to have a little bit of time today with some of La Ca Kordia's lawyers. We are honored to welcome Emel Febeteh and Sadaf Hassan 254.
Welcome, Emel and Sadaf.

Speaker 2 Thanks so much for having us. It's truly an honor to talk about our favorite person today.

Speaker 1 Yes. Emel is a lawyer with the Clear Project.
Sadaf is a lawyer with Muslim Advocates.

Speaker 1 And they represent La Ka Kordia alongside the Texas Civil Rights Project Project and the Boston University School of Law, Immigrants' Rights Clinic, as well as the private law firm Waters, Krauss, Paul, and Siegel.

Speaker 1 And so Emil and Sadef are joining us today to talk about their client, Le Ca Cordille, the last of the Columbia protesters to still be held in ICE custody.

Speaker 1 You know, our listeners know a little bit about, for example, like Mahmoud Khalil, because we've talked about Mahmoud.

Speaker 1 Mahmoud on 5-4 before, you know, the Columbia University graduate student, a legal permanent resident who was detained by ICE for over 100 days, missed the birth of his child.

Speaker 1 But Mahmoud Khalil has been released. And at the same time, Laqat Kordiyah, who was arrested just days after Mahmoud, has not been released.
She is still in ICE detention.

Speaker 1 So I want to talk to you guys about Laqlat. And so maybe we can start.

Speaker 1 I'm going to start by reading the first paragraph from a piece about Laqla that dropped a couple of weeks ago in The New Yorker, just to set the stage for us.

Speaker 1 On a Monday afternoon in late September, a group of students and professors from Columbia University stood outside the campus gates, holding large printed photos of people whom the U.S.

Speaker 1 government is seeking to deport.

Speaker 1 After two tumultuous years of protests, multiple waves of arrests, and ultimately a $221 million settlement with the Trump administration, the university has returned to something resembling normality.

Speaker 1 But such gatherings remain commonplace, often with members of the faculty holding photos of Mahmoud Khalil and Muhzin Mahdawi, whose highly publicized cases made them symbols of the government's crackdown on student protesters.

Speaker 1 That day, someone held the photo of a woman largely unknown to the public, Laka Kordiyah, who was not a Columbia student, but a quote, simple Palestinian girl, as she describes herself, who's been in ICE detention in Texas for the past eight months.

Speaker 1 So I want to turn it over to you all. Can you just help us understand, tell us a little bit, who is Lakat Cordia? Why is she in immigration detention?

Speaker 3 Yeah, and just before starting, just want to uplift like immense gratitude and appreciation for having us here today to talk about our client, Lakat Cordia.

Speaker 3 We've had the pleasure and privilege of getting to know Leka over the course of our representation during the past eight months in which she's been confined by ICE.

Speaker 3 Lika is a young 32-year-old Palestinian Muslim woman from Patterson, New Jersey.

Speaker 3 She grew up in the West Bank, but spent the better part of the last nine years living in New Jersey and has really deep roots there.

Speaker 3 Lika is a daughter, she's a sister, she's a best friend, she's a co-worker, and a really beloved member of her community.

Speaker 3 Lika is fiercely and unapologetically Palestinian. She has an immense amount of pride for her identity and culture and background.

Speaker 3 And this really really comes out in any and every conversation that you'll have with Leka.

Speaker 3 She's also a devoted Muslim who's deeply connected to her faith. She's the granddaughter of Nekbe survivors and she's unfortunately lost nearly 200 members of her family in Ghazeh.

Speaker 3 Laka

Speaker 3 has a really warm soul, a strong demeanor. She's like a natural-born leader.
She previously worked as a waitress at a restaurant and in a clothing shop prior to being confined by ICE.

Speaker 3 Leca wouldn't admit this, but she's a really wonderful writer and poet. She speaks and writes so eloquently.
She's brought me to tears on several different occasions just with her words.

Speaker 3 And she's written actually several moving statements and letters while confined. Listeners can actually read some of them on the Instagram page that is run by her loved ones at free Leca Cordilla.

Speaker 1 We'll link that in the show notes for everybody.

Speaker 3 Perfect. Perfect.
Leka is also really naturally artistic and creative. She studied fashion design in Ramallah.

Speaker 3 She enjoys tactile art such as painting and making pottery, really anything that requires using her hands. She loves just making things with her hands.

Speaker 3 I mean, actually, before her confinement, she was learning to play the

Speaker 3 in her spare time.

Speaker 3 She has a really good taste in music and she's actually introduced me to like new artists

Speaker 1 I've never heard heard of.

Speaker 3 And lastly, I think I would just add, Leka, like most Palestinians, is really family oriented.

Speaker 3 She keeps close ties with her family, both here in New Jersey and elsewhere in the US, but also abroad in Palestine.

Speaker 3 She speaks often and fondly of her mother, her brother, her sister, her cousins, her and you know extended family members.

Speaker 3 So yeah, I think I would just end on that note and sort of uplift how family oriented she is.

Speaker 2 Yeah, thanks so much, Amel. Yeah, I just feel like Amil so beautifully described Lacan beyond, you know, what we see like in the headlines.

Speaker 2 And I think it's really important for listeners to get like this clear and really rich glimpse into her humanity, which I, you know, I really feel like the government has tried to deny and tried to erase by designing this system of what we've been seeing with not only her, but with others of forcibly disappearing folks into, you know, the black boxes of ICE detention.

Speaker 2 And so, yeah, I feel like just humanizing Laka is really important.

Speaker 2 And I think that's why we're here today, right? Is to just make sure what the government has been trying to do to make her story disappear, that it doesn't.

Speaker 2 And by shipping Laka thousands of miles away from New Jersey to Texas, as Amel said, she comes from a really vibrant, beautiful Palestinian community in Patterson, and she's been confined by ICE for the last eight months, isolated from her family, her legal team, her community.

Speaker 2 And so I just wanted to uplift that this is all by design of the government to, you know, try to erase these stories.

Speaker 2 And just on a personal level, like she's literally the most hilarious, sarcastic, down-to-earth, deeply spiritual, you know, person I've met. Amel and I have learned so much from her.

Speaker 2 And yeah, so I'm really grateful that we're here today to tell her story.

Speaker 1 Yeah.

Speaker 1 So what is different about Laclotte's story, if anything? She's arrested by ICE just days after Mahmoud Khalil is arrested and detained. She has been in ICE detention for that long.

Speaker 1 You know, she's first in New Jersey where she lives. And then all of a sudden, within hours of her detention, she is shipped to

Speaker 1 an ICE detention facility in North Texas called Prairie Land. And, you know, she's never been to Texas.

Speaker 1 In some of the stuff that I've read, like officers themselves, like ICE officers are confused themselves. Like there's just cruelty and chaos at every point of this process.

Speaker 1 They're confused themselves about like what the case is about, who she is and where she's going.

Speaker 1 She's initially told that she's going to be in upstate New York, something like this by officers who thought that. Then all of a sudden she's in Texas.

Speaker 1 And then, you know, there is just the fact of her ongoing detention when other sort of, it seems like similarly situated immigrant protesters have been released from that detention.

Speaker 1 So why is she in immigration detention? Like what is the government saying?

Speaker 2 Yeah, that's a great question.

Speaker 2 I mean, I think Laka's story is interwoven with all the stories you just said of Mahmoud Khalil, Ramay Sa'as Turk, Mohsin Madawi, and others swept up in the ICE abductions that started in March during Ramadan.

Speaker 2 I think what connects all their stories together is the Trump administration's McCarthyan era weaponization of immigration laws to squash organizing and free speech in support of Palestinian liberation.

Speaker 2 I think they're just to uplift, you know, why is she confined by ICE, I think there's kind of two main reasons why.

Speaker 2 And I think one of them, which relates to remittances that she's sent to family abroad slightly and kind of uniquely situates her story a little bit differently.

Speaker 2 But I do think all their stories are just yeah, interconnected in terms of what the government agenda is at the moment.

Speaker 2 And I think those two things are one, she attended a protest outside the gates of Columbia University, like during the 2024 encampments.

Speaker 2 And so it was really like a year later when the current administration began its crackdown on the Palestine solidarity movement that Mlaka was put on ISIS radar.

Speaker 2 And like so many of us, you know, she went to the streets to call an end to the genocide in Ghaza and to advocate for the freedom and liberation of all Palestinians.

Speaker 1 Yeah, she's actually not a Columbia University student, right? She was just attending a a protest, like you said, actually outside the gates of the university.

Speaker 2 With hundreds of other people.

Speaker 2 And I think the other piece that is, I think, unique to Laka's story is, you know, once Laka was put on ISIS radar because of that protest she had attended a year ago, the government essentially went on a fishing expedition to find any excuse to paint her as a so-called danger to the community.

Speaker 2 And they've really outrageously latched on to these money gram and Western Union remittances she sent, quite literally just to provide humanitarian aid to family members abroad in gaza and elsewhere in the middle east who are trying to survive genocide forcible displacement and ongoing occupation and so whatever money like laka could send she did to her family members in gaza and you know what was the money it was just to pay for medical expenses rebuilding after israeli military strikes in gaza to also just buy gifts for her nieces all these like very normal things that immigrants do to send money abroad.

Speaker 2 And, you know, the government has basically tried, as it does in its normal playbook, to paint, you know, money that predominantly Muslim communities sent with suspicion and so-called danger.

Speaker 3 Yeah, and just to quickly add, you know, I really wouldn't distinguish Laka from the others who were swept up by ICE in March, right?

Speaker 3 We know in March, the Trump administration initiated a wave of repression.

Speaker 3 It started with Mahmoud Khalil's confinement and it ended with Lakot's, all with the intention of silencing the movement of Palestine liberation, like Sadaf just mentioned.

Speaker 3 And Lakat's abduction was part of this wave.

Speaker 3 So while she remains the only one still confined, and Sadaf and I will sort of talk about the reasons why and how legally the government has been using procedural loopholes and gamesmanship to keep her confined, while she is the only one who remains confined, I really wouldn't otherwise otherwise distinguish her from mahmoud khalil mahzimadawi or romasa osturk you know she's part of this wave of repression that the government initiated to scare people into silence to distract us from our own government's complicity and and involvement in the genocide in ghaza

Speaker 3 and you know maybe not shockingly actually this wave produced the opposite result right like we're seeing how it galvanized millions to speak out for palestine with with greater conviction than ever before um But with yeah, with Lakot, unfortunately, it's just, it's like, it's unequivocally clear that the government is doing everything in its power to keep her confined.

Speaker 3 They're exerting every effort and relying on gamesmanship so that she is the only one who remains still in confinement.

Speaker 1 Yeah, and I want to talk about like some of those legal maneuvers a little bit,

Speaker 1 just to sort of like, you know, pull back the curtain. Like these are the tricks, honestly, and the chaos and the fear tactics.
And this is like the machine of the repression at work, right?

Speaker 1 And so I want to get into some of that.

Speaker 1 But before I do, I just wanted to talk about like how all of this goes back to what you were talking about, Emel, which is like our own government's complicity in genocide.

Speaker 1 Lakat herself is like personally touched by the genocide. She has lost.
almost 200 members of her family in the genocide.

Speaker 1 You talked about the money that she sends back to her family in Ghaze, in the West Bank, you know, wherever they are, and how that money has gone to support her family in rebuilding.

Speaker 1 It's rebuilding from prior Israeli bombardment on Ghaze. Her aunt lost her home.
Her home was destroyed in an Israeli bombing of Ghaze in 2021. This is before 2023.

Speaker 1 And in total, you know, I read it's something like, this isn't huge sums of money, you know, something like the equivalent of a few thousand US dollars that in total that Lekhat has sent to her, to her family abroad.

Speaker 1 So So I just want to highlight exactly what y'all are saying about like how personal this is and how this attack is targeted at just human beings acting like human beings do.

Speaker 1 And so let's talk a little bit about these legal tricks and the maneuvers, the gamesmanship, as you said. So I know that Laclotte has sort of,

Speaker 1 let's say, like two simultaneous or parallel cases. There's a case in immigration court.

Speaker 1 LaClotte has a claim for asylum in immigration court, but there's also this federal case, a case in federal court that my understanding, and you guys can explain this more, is about the constitutionality of her detention.

Speaker 1 Is it lawful that she was picked up and that the government is trying to deport her in the first place? On that federal case, in federal district court, a federal judge recommended that Laclot be

Speaker 1 released from detention while her case moves forward,

Speaker 1 goes through the system. And the government came back with another argument and obviously kept her in detention.
Can you, yeah, talk about these tricks?

Speaker 3 Yeah, absolutely. I think

Speaker 3 you correctly identified the two parallel tracks in the legal case in which we are seeking her immediate release from ICE custody.

Speaker 3 So after LeCotte was abducted, she was flown across multiple state lines to Texas, a forum that is conveniently favorable to the government in both federal and immigration court.

Speaker 3 And the government has been sending people like Le Cotte to jurisdictions like Texas or Louisiana because they think they have the best chances of winning there.

Speaker 3 It's the same reason why the Trump administration is trying to keep cases out of the federal courts and in the immigration system where the immigration judges serve at the pleasure of the executive.

Speaker 3 So, you know, the two parallel tracks are that there's the immigration case like you identified, which takes place before an immigration judge in which she's actually been ordered releasable on bond, not once, but twice.

Speaker 3 And we'll explain a little bit more why that didn't stick due to ICE's games in court. And then there's the case in the federal court system before a federal judge.

Speaker 3 And that's where we filed the habeas petition. And I think it's important to note that there's a strong interplay between both her immigration and federal habeas cases.

Speaker 1 Federal habeas being like a case where you bring constitutional challenges to your detention, right?

Speaker 4 Exactly. Yeah.

Speaker 3 Exactly. Right.

Speaker 3 So in April, shortly after her arrest and confinement, an immigration judge first held at a hearing that Laka could be released on bond, which her family paid within less than 24 hours.

Speaker 3 ICE prevented her release by invoking a rarely used provision called the automatic stay. Basically, like an automatic pause.

Speaker 3 to her release, while they then would appeal the bond order to the Board of Immigration Appeals, the sort of like body that oversees appeals.

Speaker 3 We then filed a habeas petition in federal court challenging the constitutionality of her confinement and challenging the Trump administration's targeting of Lakot on the basis that it plainly violates First Amendment protections that she has as a person in this country, citizen or not.

Speaker 3 It is clear that she was being punished and is being punished for her speech and advocacy for the Palestinian people, and that's why we brought that claim.

Speaker 3 And so in the federal case, after a hearing in June this year, a magistrate judge recommended to the federal court that she be immediately released, calling ISIS' use of the automatic stay that I mentioned earlier likely unconstitutional.

Speaker 3 And so shortly after this decision came out, the government again shifted goalposts and asked the Board of Immigration Appeals to change the automatic stay to something called a discretionary one.

Speaker 3 And the BIA agreed to this in less than a day without giving Lecoq the opportunity to respond.

Speaker 3 So the government was using these procedural loopholes to keep her confined despite the orders and recommendations that she be released.

Speaker 3 So now, you know, the district judge handed the case back to the magistrate judge and federal court to issue an updated recommendation factoring these changes and developments.

Speaker 3 And we're on pins and needles as we await that new recommendation.

Speaker 1 Is that expected like anytime soon, or it's just like up to them? Is there any timeline?

Speaker 3 There is no timeline. It is totally up to them.

Speaker 3 And,

Speaker 3 you know, at the same time, like while the baton is with the magistrate judge to release a new report and recommendation, Lika again was ordered releasable on bond by the immigration judge for a second time this past August.

Speaker 3 The judge found that the government presented insufficient evidence to keep her confined.

Speaker 3 And again, ICE played the same game by blocking the decision, using that automatic stay, and again, like emergency discretionary stay to keep her confined.

Speaker 3 So she's still confined because of their procedural gamesmanship, which the habeas case could really put an end to.

Speaker 2 I just want to chime in about the automatic stay. I mean, it's basically the government just simply checks a box on a form to halt the immigration judge's release order.

Speaker 2 They don't make any arguments, they don't explain anything, and they're basically, you know, usually like there should be like an individual finding about someone's danger or flight risk.

Speaker 2 And so the government just has like broad overreach authority to just, you know, check a box on this form and block her release. And they've done this, like Amel said, not once, but twice.

Speaker 2 Every time the immigration judge has ordered Laka releasable on bond, they've invoked this automatic pause on the immigration judge's order to release her.

Speaker 2 And then they've also combined that with requesting, as Abel said, something called the discretionary stay, which is just to, you know, essentially put together like with the automatic stay and the discretionary stay, it's serving as indefinite confinement.

Speaker 2 That's arbitrary and at retaliatory at worst. And it explains why she's still confined eight months later, despite an immigration judge finding her releasable on bond twice.

Speaker 2 And so the kind of procedural loopholes and games that they're, that the, you know, ICE has undertaken, we've seen, like Amil said, it's slowing down the relief that we're seeking in federal court, where we're trying to challenge the unconstitutionality of her confinement.

Speaker 1 Yeah, you know, five, four listeners, just a couple episodes ago talked about the difference between immigration law, procedures in immigration court, the rights that somebody has in immigration court, the differences there from the, you know, the rights that a criminal defendant has in criminal court, the constitutional protections that you have, which, yes, of course, in criminal court in this country, it's not like it's just and fair and those constitutional rights are actually respected.

Speaker 1 But in immigration court, just... Honestly, the lawlessness, right? The way it's completely imbued the process step by step with government discretion.
You don't get due process.

Speaker 1 You don't get a hearing when the government accuses you of something, you know, accuses you of being a flight risk. The government is checking a box, right? There's no hearing.

Speaker 1 There's no evidence presented that you're a flight risk, you know, all of this stuff, and then stacking their discretion on top of discretion. The automatic stay, the discretionary stay, right?

Speaker 1 Like they have all of these procedural tools, essentially to do whatever they want, right? And then immigration judges to just green light everything, rubber stamp everything, and that's the process.

Speaker 1 I want to make one more, one more note before we go to the next question, which is, we're talking about ICE, and that is the government institution that is doing this.

Speaker 1 I think that a lot of listeners, a lot of people, the public at large, when you hear ICE, you, of course, think about ICE officers, right?

Speaker 1 That these are officers, federal agents, you know, who are going out on the street, kidnapping people, putting them in ICE detention. And then, you know, those are, you know, it's ICE

Speaker 1 officers too, who are, you know, jailers at these ICE detention facilities, this kind of thing. But when we're talking about in court, I just want to make the point that ICE has lawyers too.

Speaker 1 We're talking about lawyers making these arguments and these are ICE attorneys.

Speaker 1 So it's not just kind of like, I don't know, I just want to make that point to just sort of illuminate like who ICE is and how this, how this system works is that it's not just sort of like police officers.

Speaker 1 It's not just law enforcement out on the street doing this violence. It is turned around in this institution and by the government and lawyers doing it too in court, lawyers who represent ICE.

Speaker 2 I think you're making really, really great. I'm so glad you're uplifting this.
Just, you know, immigration court has a reputation of being called a kangaroo court, right?

Speaker 2 Immigration court sometimes tends to be biased, unfair, predetermined, right?

Speaker 2 To just deny cases, even when folks have like really valid asylum claims, they've provided so much evidence to like prove up their claims rather than, you know, providing what you just said, like an actual fear hearing for really high stakes matters, right?

Speaker 2 These are folks who are like in terms of court trying to make sure they don't get deported or that they are able to get released from, you know, illegal ICE confinement.

Speaker 2 And so, yeah, I just wanted to uplift what you just said, just in terms of how it is very different how immigration court functions as, you know, in stark contrast to like a federal habeas, where we can make arguments about, you know, constitutional arguments about First Amendment rights and we are limited in immigration court to make those same arguments.

Speaker 2 Just to go back in terms of like, who is ICE? I think, yeah, what we see in the media is, you know, masked officers wearing plain clothing.

Speaker 2 And yeah, and are quite literally terrorizing our everyday community and neighbors. Not even in this moment, but honestly, historically, they have been doing this.

Speaker 2 for decades, but we're seeing just in the current

Speaker 2 authoritarian regime, a really heightened level of this where even just ordinary U.S. citizens who are protesting ICE in in the current moment are facing threats of federal prosecution.

Speaker 2 And so, yeah, I think it is important to take a step back to be like, who is ICE? Yes, they have

Speaker 2 enforcement power to like arrest and detain communities. But like you said, there also are attorneys in court who represent ICE and

Speaker 2 they're kind of doing that enforcement, right?

Speaker 2 Deciding whether folks should be deported or not in court. I don't know, Emil, if there's anything else you want to add.

Speaker 3 No, no,

Speaker 3 I think that was perfectly said. And I would just uplift something that Rhiannon mentioned was that they are part of, they work for a system.
And that's exactly what it is. It's a system.

Speaker 3 You know, it's not just a few lone bad officers or agents or, you know, like...

Speaker 1 Or just Donald Trump. Exactly.

Speaker 3 Exactly. Exactly.
Or just, you know, one president or one immigration judge. It's a system that's working exactly how it was designed and intended to work.

Speaker 3 And these agencies, these lawyers, these judges, they are simply, you know, they're carrying out the goals of the system.

Speaker 3 So I think it's helpful, that perspective.

Speaker 2 To center Laka in all of this, of like how her case has been unfolding.

Speaker 2 I mean, I think the huge, huge injustice is just the disproportionate burden that has been put on Laka to prove she's not a danger or a flight risk in comparison to honestly the little to no work the government has been doing to keep her confined.

Speaker 2 Like we just said, checking a box to block immigration judges order to have her released on bond and they're quite literally just throwing spaghetti at the wall and seeing what sticks in immigration court and they've already have conceded actually in her second bond hearing that she does not pose a danger to the community and after you know lakra was forced to provide declarations from every single family member that she provided money to to basically prove that she gave them money to help them survive all the different difficulties that we talked about earlier, They then abandoned that claim after, you know, wrongly insinuating that, you know, her attendance at the protests outside the gates of Columbia University and giving support to loved ones somehow implicated supposed danger.

Speaker 2 So, now where we are, I mean, in terms of immigration court, after they've abandoned their claim that she's not in danger, is this very flimsy flight risk argument that was really a non-issue before, and that's what they're hanging on right now to keep her confined.

Speaker 5 Hey everyone, Leon Napok here with a message about our new sponsor, Give Well.

Speaker 5 At a time when deep cuts to foreign aid have raised real concerns about people's well-being in some of the world's poorest communities, it can be hard to know what's actually happening or how to help.

Speaker 5 GiveWell doesn't claim to have all the answers, but its team of researchers are analyzing the impact of foreign aid funding cuts in real time, identifying highly cost-effective ways to save and improve lives, and sharing what they're learning for free so that everyone can have a big impact.

Speaker 5 GiveWell has spent 18 years researching global health and poverty alleviation and only directs funding to the highest impact opportunities they found.

Speaker 5 Over 150,000 donors have already trusted GiveWell to direct more than $2.5 billion.

Speaker 5 Rigorous evidence suggests that these donations will save over 300,000 lives and improve the lives of millions more.

Speaker 5 You can find all of their research and recommendations recommendations on their site for free.

Speaker 5 And thanks to the donors who chose to sponsor their research, GiveWell doesn't take a cut from your tax-deductible donation to their recommended funds.

Speaker 5 If this is your first gift through GiveWell, you can have your donation matched up to $100 before the end of the year, or as long as matching funds last.

Speaker 5 To claim your match, go to givewell.org and pick podcast and enter 54 at checkout. Make sure they know that you heard about GiveWell from 54 to get your donation matched.

Speaker 5 Again, that's givewell.org, code 54 to donate or find out more.

Speaker 1 Yeah, so we've talked about the federal habeas

Speaker 1 and the immigration case, like moving simultaneously. What's at stake in the immigration case? Like what, if the government does what it wants to do, what happens to Le Cote?

Speaker 3 I think when I think about what's at stake for Le Cote and for all of us, right? I think

Speaker 3 my initial like reaction, my initial gut is to ask what isn't at stake. For Le Cote,

Speaker 3 quite literally everything is at stake for her from her liberty, right,

Speaker 3 her right to live, her right to live freely, free from the shackles of our government, both physically and metaphorically, her ability to protest, her ability to be reunited with her family and her community members, her ability to be reunited with her mother who she holds so close to her heart, particularly after they were already separated for so many years after her parents' divorce.

Speaker 3 You know, continued confinement imposes significant and

Speaker 3 irreparable harm to Lakot.

Speaker 3 You know, not only just the continued loss of liberty and separation from her family and community, but thinking about how her confinement harms other people, like her family members, especially like her mother and brother, who she's the caretaker for.

Speaker 3 So just thinking about like months and months and months of confinement, lost time, this, these are things the government will never be able to give back to Lakat, right?

Speaker 3 She was working like in the middle of starting her own business. She was learning to play the

Speaker 3 she was you know spending time with family friends community these are things that nobody will ever be able to give back to look at so that's everything that's lost and continues to be at stake for Lakat.

Speaker 3 For us, you know, similarly, for everybody else listening, right, like, why should anybody else care about Lakat, right, or her story or her case?

Speaker 3 I think first and most importantly, Lakat's case is important to everyone because caring about Palestinians, caring about the plight of the Palestinian people is part of our shared humanity.

Speaker 3 That's first and foremost. And really the message I want to like center and uplift here.

Speaker 3 Like you should care about Palestinians and about Palestine, and you should care about Lakat, because it is a basic part of our humanity.

Speaker 3 Secondly, I would say

Speaker 3 what the Trump administration has done and continues to do to Lakat doesn't just affect her, right? It doesn't just affect one person. It implicates all of us.

Speaker 3 because we should all be alarmed by our government's willingness to punish and censor voices advocating for Palestine.

Speaker 3 Because while today it's Palestine, tomorrow it could be environmental justice, it could be labor rights, it could be voting rights, it could be any other movement for change.

Speaker 3 And while today it might be non-citizens, tomorrow it could be all of us. And those are reasons why everybody should care about what's happening to Lakat.

Speaker 1 Yeah, there's no ceiling on this. There's no ceiling on repression.
There's exactly

Speaker 1 on violence that is doled out by the government, right? Right.

Speaker 1 The ceiling has to be imposed. It has to be forced actually by the people because without a ceiling, okay, Lakot doesn't have due process.

Speaker 1 The government says she sent money to people we don't like, whatever it is, right? She poses a danger.

Speaker 1 And we're talking about this whole time that she doesn't, there is no like meaningful opportunity to fight that as they just make their procedural decisions over and over again.

Speaker 1 Okay, well, tomorrow, whatever organization you donated to, Ahmed, whatever organization you donated to. Peter, my co-host on the podcast, right? The government doesn't like it.

Speaker 1 Okay, this is why due process process is important, right? This is why we should care about what's happening because there's no ceiling on it. It doesn't stop unless it's forced to stop.

Speaker 2 I totally agree with Amel, like in terms of this idea that, you know, our collective liberation depends on Palestinian liberation. Like every struggle against oppression and injustice is intertwined.

Speaker 2 As Amel just said, it's not about Palestinian rights today. It could be environmental justice.
It can be labor rights. And I think the crackdown on Palestinian speech is at the tip of the spear.

Speaker 2 It's a testing ground for silencing dissent.

Speaker 2 And we've seen right now those floodgates already open in terms of the administration punishing anything that quite honestly, just viewpoints it doesn't like.

Speaker 2 You know, there is an executive order and all these presidential memos that have come out that have basically normalized punishing quote unquote hostile viewpoints.

Speaker 2 And it's really just anything that challenges the government's policies, authorities.

Speaker 2 And we've seen this quite literally in terms of labeling Antifa as a domestic national security threat to what I talked about earlier of just federally prosecuting ordinary U.S.

Speaker 2 citizens for attending a protest against ICE.

Speaker 2 And so what we're seeing in the current moment is, you know, executive overreach, power grabbing in the form of terrorizing our neighbors and community members through active violence, you know, perpetuated by the military and ICE raids in our streets.

Speaker 2 And so I think just to take a step back and zooming out, you know, it's not only about Laga.

Speaker 2 I think Laka's case exposes the brutality of the government's broader agenda of mass confinement and deportation, a system that generates revenue, right?

Speaker 2 It's a for-profit system of immigration confinement.

Speaker 2 And so I think connecting the dots to, you know, to Lagaw's story, it's not only about Palestine, it's also, you know, her Palestinian identity, the surveillance that happened as a result of that.

Speaker 2 And it has to do also with just zooming out the government's just really, really aggressive agenda of trying to mass deport and confine anyone.

Speaker 1 Yeah, you know, you just mentioned surveillance and that reminds me of like this other huge arm, this other huge part of the machine of the repression campaign of authoritarianism, which is that it's not just ICE.

Speaker 1 It's not just ICE raiding apartment buildings. It's not just ICE, you you know, knocking down the door of a family, a neighbor.

Speaker 1 It's not just ICE, you know, pulling somebody literally off the street, but also a massive surveillance infrastructure that allows them to hone in on the targets that they're wanting to target.

Speaker 1 Can you talk about the surveillance process that happened in La Cotte's case, which is obviously like demonstrative of a much wider project?

Speaker 3 I appreciate that you bring up government surveillance because I think that it's had a

Speaker 3 really significant role and in Lakotte's case but not just Lakotte right and many of the other organizers and protesters who were similar who are similarly situated and targeted by the government but generally right like thinking about how our government and our country for decades historically has surveilled our communities Palestinians Muslims people of color And you know, for Lakotte, the same thing has happened here.

Speaker 3 And the consequences have included really invasive invasive and abusive government surveillance, not just of Lakat, but of her community. So of Lakat,

Speaker 3 of her family, of her Palestinian community members in Paterson, New Jersey, they were all surveilled.

Speaker 3 Prior to her confinement, DHS agents, the Department of Homeland Security, visited her mother's home in Paterson. They took a photo of a sign that said Palestine on the family's front porch.

Speaker 3 And they actually used that as evidence in immigration court to the point of proving dangerousness. And in that visit, they interrogated other family and friends in Patterson.

Speaker 3 They questioned her mother.

Speaker 1 Her mom is a U.S. citizen, by the way.

Speaker 3 Yes, exactly. Her mom is a U.S.
citizen. Exactly right.
And it became clear that they were surveilling and sort of tracking payments and transfer, like monetary transfers she had made.

Speaker 3 So, you know, Le Cotte's confinement is part of a broader government crackdown on policy and rights advocacy that follows extensive government surveillance of her and her community in New Jersey.

Speaker 3 And, you know, I think the government and administration is not targeting Lakat just because they want to repress speech it doesn't like, but also because Lakat is Palestinian.

Speaker 3 And I think government surveillance is sort of integral

Speaker 1 in that.

Speaker 2 It's no coincidence that, you know, in terms of the wave of protesters and organizers that were abducted by the Trump administration have included Palestinians.

Speaker 2 So like Mahmoud Khalil and Mohsin Madawi, you know, I think, and including Lakat, they're all being used as ways to chill speech and to show, like, this is what happens when you, you know, organize and speak up for your people.

Speaker 1 Yeah.

Speaker 1 And as Palestinians and other immigrant communities know, like, this massive post-9-11 surveillance apparatus that was erected in the United States, it's now been used for decades to target people from countries that the U.S.

Speaker 1 doesn't like or people who are saying things that the U.S. government doesn't like for decades, honestly, even before 9-11, but more acute and constantly intensifying like since then.

Speaker 2 What we're seeing in the current moment has just added like a new touch, right? Of like our new element of like crackdown on like repressive speech, specifically on Palestine.

Speaker 1 Yeah, we know it well. So we mentioned that Lakhla is currently held in an ICE detention facility in North Texas.

Speaker 1 Do you know anything about like what it's like on the inside, what these conditions are inside that detention facility?

Speaker 2 the kind of conditions that are in you know at the detention center where laka is i think it's not unique to her it's a system designed to essentially break the human spirit and to wear people down so i think for the listeners just you know you can imagine what it would feel like to be abducted by the government and to be forced into an overcrowded detention center thousands of miles away from your family, from your community, along with hundreds of other women in Gaw's case, who are all trying to make sense of their future, right?

Speaker 2 Anxieties are off the roof about not only being possibly deported to a country that you've actively fled, but now in this administration, the risk of being put on a plane to a third country where you've never even lived in, where you could face harm, including death.

Speaker 2 So now add to that the conditions of confinement where it's freezing cold, it's hard to sleep, you have zero privacy, there's barely any nutritious and healthy meals you're isolated from your family and friends you don't really have access to the you know the tablets which is how you know you're able to speak to people on the outside and you're just stuck in a place where you only get a small window during the day to take in a little bit of sunlight and so i think what's been um really humbling to see right in terms of seeing how the conditions have been really difficult for her is just this seeing spiritual resistance as liberation Laqah is a really, really deeply spiritual person.

Speaker 2 Even, you know, when she turned herself into ICE after being surveilled for a week, she didn't take anything else with her that day, but her Quran, which she still has to this day.

Speaker 2 And so I think in terms of, you know, obstacles she's had, like in terms of her religious liberties and inside, it's because ICE knows that, you know, prayer is a really coarse source of strength and survival for folks.

Speaker 2 And so I think for Laka, it's been, yeah, just really inspiring and humbling how that's been like the constant for her, right?

Speaker 2 Despite all the difficulties, every kind of prayer and moment of spiritual connection that God is able to carve out for herself is an act of liberation.

Speaker 2 And so I think that piece is really important, just of how she's been trying to survive the really difficult of difficult conditions of confinement.

Speaker 2 And then also just watching her advocate not only for herself, but for other women in the inside, right?

Speaker 2 She's recognized and she's told us that because she speaks English, it gives her a special access and privilege that

Speaker 2 other women don't have. And she's used that to uplift the dignity that they and honestly all of us have.

Speaker 2 And so, I think Lakawa's experience reflects the cruelties that defined carceral systems generally and that warrant their abolition.

Speaker 1 I've never met Lakawa, obviously, and

Speaker 1 I am

Speaker 1 so proud of Laka,

Speaker 1 and and

Speaker 1 she is so representative of a Palestinian spiritual and political resistance, I think, to oppression, which is that

Speaker 1 you

Speaker 1 oppress me, you confine me, you detain me, you do genocide on my people.

Speaker 1 I am insisting in front of all of that that I am a free person and that I am a person with dignity and I am a person with autonomy and i will exercise it in whatever conditions you put me in and i don't want to cry

Speaker 2 oh you make me emotional too honestly yeah it's it's water works when yeah

Speaker 4 no we talk to like

Speaker 3 every conversation with her like moves me um

Speaker 1 and um

Speaker 1 And so it makes me so proud.

Speaker 1 It makes me so proud and so honored. And I'm deeply, deeply honored to have both of you on 5-4 today to speak about Lakat, to talk about the work that you're doing.

Speaker 1 It is so, so important, true freedom fighters in the legal sense. So thank you so much.
But before we go, I want to turn to, you know, we talked about why people should care.

Speaker 1 Like, why should you care about Lakot, this one person who is in ICE detention right now. And I think we,

Speaker 1 I think you, Amel, and Sadaf too, like, really illuminated how Lakat and others are canaries in the coal mine, right?

Speaker 1 They tell us something about the society that we live in, the government regime that we live under, and

Speaker 1 what problems we face and should be organizing to resist and overcome.

Speaker 1 And so, you should care about Lakat as someone who is showing us all of these things, but you should also care about the canary itself and just caring about our shared humanity.

Speaker 1 So, for the people listening who care about Lakat and care about these issues, is there anything that they can do?

Speaker 1 Do you have any calls to action to share with listeners to advocate on behalf of Le Cot?

Speaker 3 Yeah, I think, you know, we, the legal team, were fighting hard for Lakot's liberty in federal court. And, you know, her immigration attorney likewise similarly is fighting hard for her liberty.

Speaker 3 And, you know, we are seeing the role of the courts as particularly crucial in a climate like this to curb abuses of executive executive power but we know and acknowledge and recognize that the law alone is not the only vehicle for seeking justice and accountability and so if lakot were here right now with us and we were to ask her you know what should people do to support you what should people do to uplift your story and uplift your case she would have one very clear answer she would say take to the streets protest for Ghaza, demand an end to the genocide, advocate for freedom and liberation of all Palestinians.

Speaker 3 She would tell all of us to do what she has been wrongfully prevented from doing for the past eight months. She would ask us to raise our voices and to stand in solidarity through action.

Speaker 2 Yeah, thank you so much, Amel, for uplifting that, because I think that's just core to who Laka is.

Speaker 2 She's always, whenever we talk to her, wanting to use her story to center her people, what's going on in Ghaza, the ongoing occupation.

Speaker 2 And so, if the call of action was to come from Laka, it would be that.

Speaker 2 From the legal team end, right, I think, like

Speaker 2 Emil said, you know, the law alone doesn't say, well, it won't save us. And so, we have to use all the other different types of strategies together.
And one thing that we've been doing very closely,

Speaker 2 you know, is combining the power of organizing and collective action

Speaker 2 with organizers who are embedded in like the Free Palestine movement, the Abolish ICE movement.

Speaker 2 And so, you know, LACAW has a relentless community of organizers and allies, not only in New Jersey, but all the way to Texas.

Speaker 2 And so the past few months, we've been working really closely and trying to combine our legal strategy with organizing on the ground.

Speaker 2 And so one concrete call of action that we work closely with, with the organizers, is policy advocacy. Right now, we need to keep pressuring our friendly political electeds.

Speaker 2 So there's a free LACA campaign petition letter that's circulating at the moment for elected officials to act in New Jersey and Texas to publicly call for her release.

Speaker 2 We're trying to get at least 10,000 signatures. We're already at 3,000 after just releasing the petition.

Speaker 2 You know, we've been seeing local phone banking campaigns happening, which has been really inspiring of folks just calling their representatives to demand her release.

Speaker 2 And so I think together, like the petition

Speaker 2 alongside the phone banking and just calling the electeds, it shows strength in numbers regarding public pressure. And so we need all these things to happen at the same time.

Speaker 2 We need people to keep protesting. We need folks to keep putting pressure on electeds.
And we need people to keep amplifying her story. And so I'd also just put in a plug, you know, like she has

Speaker 2 on Instagram the free La Ca Cordia page, which again has some of the beautiful statements that Emil said in terms of like her writing.

Speaker 2 And I think just in terms of yeah, amplifying her story, I think that's also another way for folks to plug in and to learn more about her.

Speaker 1 Yeah. And we will definitely link the Instagram page, the petition in the show notes.
If everybody listening right now to this interview signs that petition, it will be far past 10,000 signatures.

Speaker 1 And so I am asking five, four listeners, if you are listening, you click the link in the show notes, you sign that petition.

Speaker 1 It takes 15 seconds and we will be past that campaign's goal of 10,000 signatures on that petition.

Speaker 1 So, Sadaf Hassan, Amar Tabate, lawyers on the team for Laka Kordiyeh, I cannot thank you enough for joining us today. I cannot thank you enough for the work you're doing.

Speaker 1 I'm so very grateful and honored. Thank you for joining us.

Speaker 3 Thank you so much.

Speaker 2 Thank you so much. Yeah, if I could just end with some words from Laka, which I think really capture her.
It's something that she said to us, which is: We are Palestinian, we find joy in everything.

Speaker 1 Dude, I'm on my period. I'm sorry.

Speaker 3 Girl, shut up. Even if you weren't on your period, you wouldn't be allowed to cry and it would be okay.

Speaker 2 You do not need a reason. She's such an inspiring person, honestly.

Speaker 3 Like, yeah, she's, yeah, she's amazing. She gives me strength, and I'm not the one in confinement.
Like, we're supposed to be a strength, a source of strength for her, and it's like often reversed.

Speaker 1 Yeah.

Speaker 2 Yeah.

Speaker 1 Don't tell my homies I'm soft.

Speaker 1 All right, folks. Thank you for listening.
We are going to put some links in the show notes of this episode for you to check out, for you to sign that petition.

Speaker 1 You can follow the free La Coat Cordiller campaign on Instagram at free La Coat Cordillera. That's free L E Q A A K O R D I A

Speaker 1 and definitely hit the link for signing her petition down in the show notes.

Speaker 1 We are also going to share a story in the show notes as well, a story that NPR recently did in which you can hear Loca in her own words talking about what's happened.

Speaker 1 Next week, a very relevant case, DHS v. Thoracygeum.
It's a case about the habeas rights of immigrants who are subject to removal proceedings.

Speaker 1 It's an old case, but it has a lot of implications for today.

Speaker 1 Follow us on all social media at 54pod. Subscribe on Patreon, patreon.com/slash/five4pod, all spelled out.
Free locote cordille. We'll see you next week.

Speaker 6 5-4 is presented by Prologue Projects. This episode was produced by Dustin DeSoto.
Leon Nafok provides editorial support. Our website was designed by Peter Murphy.

Speaker 6 Our artwork is by Teddy Blanks at ChipsNY.

Speaker 6 And our theme song is by Spatial Relations. If you're not a Patreon member, you're not hearing every episode.

Speaker 6 To get exclusive Patreon-only episodes, discounts on merch, access to our Slack community, and more, join at patreon.com/slash five fourpot.