Not Built For This #4: Unbuilding the Terrace

What does it mean to live a rich life?

It means brave first leaps, tearful goodbyes,

and everything in between.

With over 100 years' experience navigating the ups and downs of the market and of life, your Edward Jones financial advisor will be there to help you move ahead with confidence.

Because with all you've done to find your rich, we'll do all we can to help you keep enjoying it.

Edward Jones, member SIPC.

This episode is brought to you by the Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas.

Las Vegas is magical at night.

When the sun sets, Las Vegas transforms.

And at the heart of it all is the Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas, a luxury resort destination where bold experiences unfold.

Sip a martini inside the chandelier, discover hidden speakeasies, striking art, and unforgettable views of the Bellagio fountains and the Las Vegas skyline from your terrace suite.

From restaurants to cocktail lounges and high-energy nightlife, every moment invites indulgence.

It's not just a hotel stay.

It's an only in Vegas experience.

Book your stay now at thecosmopolitanlasvegas.com.

This is episode four of Not Built for This: Unbuilding the Terrace.

We had a reason

to get back

to Lake Charles.

Lake Charles, Louisiana, is a low-lying city in the southwest corner of a low-lying state.

It's right off I-10, about halfway between Baton Rouge and Houston.

And when I first pulled into town, the city was bigger than I was expecting.

It was nighttime, and from a distance, the skyline was lit up like some giant metropolis.

It's like a gleaming city.

If you looked quickly, you might think you were looking at Manhattan.

But when you get a little closer, you realize those aren't skyscrapers lighting up the night.

It's just nothing but fossil fuel infrastructure.

It's just a series of refineries with lights all up and down the spires of these smokestacks.

It's pretty dramatic.

Lake Charles is a city built among petrochemical plants.

It's sometimes hard to tell where a neighborhood ends and a refinery begins.

Oil and gas companies are some of the largest employers in town, but you don't have to work in the industry to feel its effects.

The spills and the fires and the high cancer rates.

A lot of the gas that comes through this city gets exported and burned overseas.

But the impacts on the climate are felt right back here in southwest Louisiana.

Lake Charles is trying to recover from back-to-back hurricanes, the first from Lawrence.

In recent years, Lake Charles has been hit with more big storms than just about any city in the country.

Well, here's a moniker no one wants, America's most weather-battered city, yet it belongs to Lake Charles, Louisiana.

Even though we know intellectually that the burning of fossil fuels is making the weather more dangerous, it can be hard to really see that connection in our day-to-day lives.

But you can't miss it in Lake Charles.

The causes and the effects of climate change are on full display.

When I visited, the tallest skyscraper downtown was completely abandoned, windows blown out by a hurricane.

And in the distance, you could see that ominous petrochemical skyline, with smoke trailing into the sky.

Of all the storm-battered neighborhoods in this storm-battered city, there's one in particular that I'm here to see.

It's called Greenwich Terrace.

It's a mostly black neighborhood with wide suburban streets and modest single-story homes.

So I'm here in Greenwich Terrace and I'm standing under a tree.

I try to keep cool.

I huddled in the shade of a tree and watched as a tiny bulldozer chomped away at some concrete.

This is the sound of a bobcat that is

tearing up what's left of the house.

All around me were the footprints of homes that no longer exist, with breaks in the sidewalk where the driveways used to be.

Yeah, just a lot of empty, empty land.

These houses weren't ripped up to make way for some big infrastructure project or a new development.

The terrace has flooded so many times in recent years that the government decided to do something dramatic.

They decided to tear down the houses and pay people to move to higher ground.

Here is a sign that says state buyout program, Greenwich Terrace neighborhood demolitions underway.

Throughout the country, thousands of people are living in locations that regularly flood and will only get more flood prone as the climate continues to change.

Many of the people who live in these danger zones are caught in this demoralizing loop, flooding and rebuilding over and over again, and praying each time that the pattern doesn't repeat.

But in places like the Greenwich Terrace, the government is trying to break that cycle.

They're giving up on the idea of rebuilding altogether and instead trying to help residents move out of harm's way.

It sounds simple on paper, but in practice, it's often messy and painful.

And so today, we're going to follow the process of unbuilding a flood-prone neighborhood through the eyes of one resident, we'll see what it's like to watch the place that you live become unlivable, to fight like hell for some help.

But when help shows up, it comes in the form of an offer to leave the place you love.

Because the Greenwich Terrace was just not built for this.

I'm Emmett Fitzgerald.

I'm standing in your old driveway.

This is it.

This is my driveway.

I'm here for 20 plus years.

I'm standing with Tramika Rankins on the empty plot of land where her house used to be.

The only thing left from Tramika's old life is a big old pine tree, which she never cared for anyway.

Don't miss my pine tree because it puts sap during the wintertime and everything on the car.

So.

She may not miss her pine tree, but she does miss this place.

It's bittersweet coming back here now just to see all the houses that are gone because this whole row

were all homes.

Tramika moved to Lake Charles when she was in high school.

She got married here, had kids, and eventually started looking for a home to buy.

And she found a house she could afford in the Greenwich Terrace.

I still house, Iceland neighborhood, older people.

Hey, great, cool.

She had initially thought of the house as a starter home, a stepping stone on a journey to something bigger and better.

But life got in the way, and they ended up spending over two decades in the terrace.

And it was a good place to raise kids.

They had neighbors who looked after each other and also knew how to have a good time.

And I used to at least wake up on a Saturday morning to somebody going down the neighborhood with their chorus music booming.

You hear somebody in the neighborhood fussing.

You hear, you know, you smell the barbecue going or somebody fixing on a car.

She says the terrace was full of funny characters, like her next door neighbor.

He meant well, funny kept the neighborhood ready.

Anytime you step out of the house, you know, he's about to do something fishy.

He wasn't supposed to.

There was a lot of colorful activities that may have happened in the neighborhood.

The terrace wasn't Tramika's dream, but it worked for her, at least until 2017.

That's when Lake Charles got hit with the first in what would be a string of devastating devastating storms.

Hurricane Harvey barreling into the Texas coastline that could render some areas uninhabitable for months.

Hurricane Harvey overwhelmed a drainage canal in the back of the terrace called the Cayuchi Coulee and flooded the neighborhood.

Tramika was shocked.

I've been here for, you know, 17, 18 years.

Nothing ever happened.

So maybe it was a fluke.

Maybe it was a lot of rain that we just could not soak up.

She made repairs, but now now she was worried.

The drainage infrastructure in the terrace couldn't handle Harvey.

It's going to happen again.

When?

We don't know, but it will.

Fast forward to 2020.

Hurricane Laura came through and demolished the city.

One of the strongest storms to ever hit the U.S.

left its mark on just about every part of Lake Charles.

This second hurricane, Hurricane Laura, displaced thousands of people throughout Lake Charles.

The 150 mile an hour winds knocked a tree into the back of Tramika's house, but the terrace stayed dry.

I don't know if you can call that luck, but whatever it was, it didn't last.

Just a few weeks after the warhead came in August, six, maybe six weeks later, here comes Delta.

Before the city of Lake Charles could even attempt to get back on its feet, another hurricane started bearing down on southwest Louisiana.

This time, Hurricane Delta.

It's hard to believe that it's happening again.

Another hurricane hitting the U.S., a second one here, Tramika and her family evacuated to Houston.

They waited out the storm at a hotel, but when they got back home, it was obvious what had happened.

There were worms at the bottom of the bathtub, lizards inside the house, and the whole place smelled awful.

I remember my two-year-old grandson looking at me and he's coming outside and he's just shaking his head.

I'm like, what's wrong, baby?

He said, again,

again, Mama, again.

I was like,

unfortunately, baby, again.

The family was back to square one.

They needed to gut the house and rebuild all over again.

Tramika had tried to get flood insurance after Harvey, but there'd been a mix-up, and so they had to pay for everything out of pocket.

Still, she says that her family was lucky to be able to make repairs at all.

Many of the older folks in the neighborhood who were living on fixed incomes just didn't have the resources.

You know, it broke my heart after Delta.

You know, I was repairing everything, doing what I had to do.

But I watched the older lady open up her door, her screen door, raise up her windows, kept the same curtains in her house, but she tied them up for it to get on sunlight.

She's taking a squeegee and squeezing the water out of home, and she couldn't do nothing else.

You can still see evidence of these hurricanes in Lake Charles today and the uneven way that different neighborhoods were able to bounce back.

In a federally recognized disaster like Hurricane Delta, FEMA will provide direct relief to survivors, but it's often slow to arrive and insufficient when it finally does.

And over the years, FEMA has been widely criticized for giving more relief to white people than it does to people of color.

Meanwhile, people in wealthier neighborhoods are also more likely to have insurance or just be able to pay for rebuilding out of pocket.

The end result of all that is that when you drive around the wealthier, often whiter neighborhoods in South Lake Charles today, you would have no idea that these hurricanes even happened.

But in the mostly black working-class neighborhoods in North Lake Charles, it's a very different story.

You know, there's a, there's, I just passed three houses with blue tarps, four houses right there with blue tarps still on their roof.

There are still so many blue tarps where a roof should be.

It looks like the hurricanes happened months ago, not years.

We're talking, you know, upwards of two, two, three years ago at this point.

You know, you can really see a lot of a lot of damage still from the storm

or storms, really, like a lot of houses that

still don't feel like they've been fully rebuilt.

Many of the people who were displaced in these storms still haven't returned home.

According to data from the U.S.

Postal Service, between 2019 and 2020, Lake Charles lost more of its population to out-migration than any other city in the country.

Back at the terrace, as the waters receded and the repairs began, two very different stories started to emerge.

about why this neighborhood in particular seemed to be so vulnerable to flooding.

The first story, from the local government's perspective, was that the flooding situation was caused by a devilish mix of overlapping problems, including climate change.

You're certainly seeing things that have never happened before.

Jennifer Cobian is the grants director for Kaukashoe Parish, where Lake Charles is located.

She grew up in southwest Louisiana, so she's used to big storms.

But the pileup of disasters in recent years was eyebrow raising.

We were certainly thinking,

this doesn't feel right for it to be back to back like that.

That's the red flag, the indicator of this feels a little different.

As wild as this sounds, Jennifer actually thinks that Lake Charles has been lucky not to get hit with an even bigger storm in the last few years.

We did not see the major catastrophic rain that our neighbors just to the east of us in southeast Louisiana saw, and then the 50 inches of rain that just to the west of us in East Texas saw with Hurricane Harvey.

Which is a crazy thing to think about a city that's been through as much as you have, that there's something worse coming out there.

Jennifer says that these supercharged storms are particularly problematic for Lake Charles because the city is so low-lying.

And although Lake Charles is about 30 miles from the coast, it sits along the Caucasus River, a tidal waterway that is rising with the seas.

And so when there's a big hurricane in the Gulf of Mexico, the storm surge pushes a whole bunch of water all the way up the river to Lake Charles, which makes it harder for the city to drain.

It basically acts like a little stopper to all of our waterways.

When you add rain events, especially historical torrential rain events, on top of that, there's nowhere for the water to go.

It spills out of the bayous and the coolies and into the city, where it starts to pool in the lowest lying spots.

So this is the Greenwich Terrace neighborhood right here.

Jennifer pulls up a map of Lake Charles on her computer.

It shows the ground surface elevation throughout the city.

Higher elevations are red and the lower elevations are blue.

And as she scrolls towards the terrace, the map gets very blue.

It is sort of the low spot of a low spot, if you would.

Yeah, yeah.

So that water is all rolling off and draining towards that neighborhood.

Jennifer says that when the neighborhood was first developed, this was less of a problem because it was surrounded by a lot of empty fields that could absorb runoff during a rainstorm.

But in the 80s and 90s, Lake Charles sprawled outward and enveloped the terrace, encircling the neighborhood in big box stores, parking lots, and the 210 highway.

And so now, when you get a lot of rain in a short period of time, the water runs off all that pavement and heads straight for the low spot on the map.

There are a series of pumps that are supposed to help relieve pressure on the system, but Jennifer says they just haven't been able to handle some of these storms.

They can only pump so much so fast.

And

at the rate of rainfall, it just can't keep up.

And that's when flooding happens.

I asked Jennifer to try and sum up what exactly went wrong during these floods in the terrace.

And she said it was a wicked combination of factors.

Extreme rainfall, a low-lying community surrounded by asphalt, an aging drainage infrastructure that just wasn't designed to cope with this amount of water.

It's sort of a lot of little things that add up to be a big thing.

It may have been true that the terrace was facing a series of interlocking problems that didn't have any easy solutions.

But that wasn't a very satisfying explanation for people who were actually living there.

And here's where the second narrative comes in.

A lot of residents of the terrace felt like the government just hadn't done enough to protect them.

There was a lot of skepticism about those pumps and whether they had even been turned on during that crazy series of storms.

And when Tramika Rankins kept hearing city and parish officials saying that there wasn't much they could do about these unprecedented 100-year floods, it started to drive her crazy.

How you gonna keep telling me it's a freaking 100-year flood?

Well, God dang it.

We in the last days because 100 years coming every six months.

Straight up.

Like don't insult my intelligence.

It's called you guys' infrastructure is horrible.

And Tramika's bigger problem is that not all of the infrastructure in Lake Charles is horrible.

If you go to a newer, wealthier, often whiter neighborhood that was built to more recent standards, you'll see a drain at the end of every driveway.

But that's just not the case in the terrace.

I'm just saying that you did not invest in any kind of infrastructure or drainage structure here in the area that could have maybe offset this.

That's what I'm saying.

What I'm saying is

you have maliciously avoided to even

help this area.

The flooding was new, but for Tramika and for many other residents of the terrace, it also felt like the latest chapter in a much larger story.

A story about how there were no longer any grocery stores in the neighborhood, how the local bank closed down and the Walgreens moved away.

Climate impacts don't happen in isolation.

The climate is changing on top of a pre-existing infrastructure of inequality.

And so when Tramika heard government officials blaming the floods on these unprecedented storms and climate change, it almost felt like a convenient excuse, a way to avoid accountability for failing to invest in her community.

It's a combination of climate change.

I'm not saying that that does not play a fact in it, but

what you allocating your dollars to care for and do has a lot to do with what's happened here.

Tramika started calling the city, demanding that something be done to fix the drainage problem.

Enough is enough.

How do you expect somebody to stay sane and you keep doing the same thing to us over and over?

You don't expect anybody to rise up and say anything about it?

She kept calling and calling.

She even got in touch with the mayor and told him that he needed to do more to protect the terrace.

But she also made extra sure to protect herself.

She got flood insurance for real this time.

Her new policy kicked in on May 16th, 2021.

And I kid you not, just one day after it went into effect, Lake Charles got hit with one of the largest rainstorms in the city's history.

My insurance kicked in May 16th, and May 17th was a flood.

Over a foot of rain fell on Lake Charles in less than a day.

The storm was totally unexpected, and so there was no time to evacuate.

Tramika and her son were actually in their house when water started spilling out of the coolie.

She knew this could get ugly, and so she started running around, unplugging TVs and appliances and just trying to get their most valuable possessions off the ground.

Her son was looking at her like, what are you doing?

He's like, what's wrong, Mama?

I'm like, the water's coming.

I don't know when it's coming, but it's coming.

And then she heard the sound of her son's car in the driveway.

I heard my son's core.

I'll never forget.

It was like, beep, beep, beep.

The car died, submerged in floodwater.

And then the water was inside the house.

I said, the water's here.

And I looked out my window.

And I felt like the people that have felt in the Titanic.

And the water came in so fast and so vigorous that it knocked the shoes off my feet and it made me fall into the water.

And I'm six foot something, as you can tell.

The water was over my waist.

Tramika climbed onto the back of the couch and in the middle of this drenched chaos called her insurance agent just to double check that her new policy, that one that was supposed to kick in the day before, was definitely active.

When I said my house was filling with water, she said, there's no freaking way.

I've never had anyone call me within 20, not even 24 hours.

And are you serious?

I said, yes, ma'am.

I said, I can show you pictures.

And I'm showing a picture of the water.

She's like, oh, my God.

The May 17th storm was a turning point for Tramika.

May 17th literally changed my life.

That changed the way that I saw things because I was like a mental snap.

There's no way I'm going to live in this house any much longer.

Like, I just can't

make it

make sense anymore.

If the government wasn't going to improve the drainage situation, Tramika didn't know what to do.

She didn't feel like she could justify rebuilding her house again in what had clearly become a dangerous location.

She needed help.

Coming up after the break, help arrives, but it's not what Tramika was looking for.

Article makes it effortless to create a stylish, long-lasting home at an unbeatable price.

Whatever your personal style may be, Article offers a curated range of mid-century modern, coastal, and scandy-inspired pieces that not only shine on their own, but also pair seamlessly with nearly any other Article product.

Their carefully selected collections feature high-quality, meaningful pieces that will stand the test of time.

There is no filler, every item is chosen for its craftsmanship, design, and lasting lasting value.

My house is like an article furniture longitudinal study.

I sleep in an article bed.

My wife Joy works at, and we eat at an article dining room table, and we sit in article chairs.

And it has been this way for years and years and years.

All the furniture I've ever gotten from Article is still in service and performing at its peak.

Article is offering our listeners $50 off your first purchase of $100 or more to claim.

Visit article.com slash 99 and the discount will be automatically applied at checkout.

That's article.com slash 99 for $50 off your first purchase of $100 or more.

The moment you realize your business needs to hire someone new, you pretty much have to hire that person like yesterday.

So how do you find amazing candidates fast?

It's easy.

Just use Indeed.

With Indeed sponsored jobs, your post jumps to the top of the page for your relevant candidates so you can stand out and reach the people you want faster.

I ran my own business for most of my adult life and hiring is one of the hugest things that you have to take on when you run a business.

Doing outreach and waiting for people to come back to you, all that stuff is so painful.

I wish there was a podcast ad telling me about Indeed back then.

There's no need to wait any longer.

Speed up your hiring right now with Indeed.

And listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit to get your jobs more visibility at indeed.com slash invisible.

Just go to indeed.com slash invisible right now and support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast.

Indeed.com/slash invisible.

Terms and conditions apply.

Hiring.

Indeed is all you need.

This episode is brought to you by PNC Bank.

Some people think podcasts about architecture are boring.

Yeah, well sometimes the details are boring, but that's what creates stable foundations and construction that lasts.

And that's something that everyone wants.

It's like banking with PNC.

It might seem boring to save, plan, and make calculated decisions with your bank, but keeping your money boring is what helps you live a happily fulfilled life.

PNC Bank, brilliantly boring since 1965.

PNC Bank National Association, member FDIC.

In business, they say you can have better, cheaper, or faster, but you only get to pick two.

What if you could have all three at the same time?

That's exactly what Cohere, Thomson Reuters, and specialized bikes have since they upgraded to the next generation of the cloud.

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure.

OCI is the blazing fast platform for your infrastructure, database, application development, and AI needs, where you can run any workload in a high availability, consistently high performance environment and spend less than you would with other clouds.

How is it faster?

OCI's block storage gives you more operations per second.

Cheaper?

OCI costs up to 50% less for compute, 75% less for storage, and 80% less for networking.

Better?

In test after test, OCI customers report lower latency and higher bandwidth versus other clouds.

This is the cloud built for AI and all your biggest workloads.

Right now, with zero commitment, try OCI for free.

Head to oracle.com slash invisible.

That's oracle.com slash invisible.

When we left off, Tramika Rankins was demanding solutions to the terrace's flooding problems.

And it turns out that someone was trying to figure out a solution.

A man named Pat Forbes.

I'm Pat Forbes.

I'm the executive director of the Louisiana Office of Community Development.

Pat heads up a statewide program called the Watershed Initiative, which tries to make Louisiana more resilient to the floods of the future.

Rainstorms are going to be more intense and more frequent.

And so consequently, what we think we know about where the risk begins and ends from flooding is probably out the window.

Traditionally, the government has managed flooding mostly with hard infrastructure and technology, things like pumps and levees.

But as flood risk increases because of climate change, people like Pat are starting to come around to a different strategy.

It's called managed retreat.

Yeah, I don't hate the idea.

Managed retreat is much more efficient than chaotic retreat, and it's a lot less disruptive to people's lives.

The idea is that with so many looming climate threats, it just isn't possible to protect every place with infrastructure.

Things like bigger levees or better drainage.

We can't hold the line and defend every piece of property against rising seas and supercharged storms.

And so, in particularly risky places, the safest, most resilient option might be to try and get everyone out of harm's way.

There's not enough money in the world for us to build our way out of flood risk.

We're going to have to start getting out of the way where we never should have gotten in the way in the first place.

Managed retreat is not a totally new idea.

There's a famous example where the town of Valmeyer, Illinois moved away from the Mississippi River and onto higher ground after the big flood of 1993.

And Pat has actually moved several flood-prone towns or neighborhoods in Louisiana, including a couple where they have built a whole new community for everyone to move to together.

And so they remain neighbors instead of having that be a diaspora, have them go

live together somewhere else.

But building an entire new neighborhood is really, really expensive.

And so often they'll use a different tool to try and get people to safety.

The buyout.

In a buyout, the government just pays people for their flood-prone homes and lets them choose where they want to move.

Then they demolish the old houses and ideally convert the land back into a wetland or a reservoir or something that can store water during a storm and help reduce flooding throughout the city.

I mean, they can be parks and things like that that flood when it floods, but it won't be people's houses.

For Pat, this is an equity issue.

Because while flooding certainly affects wealthy people with homes along the beach, it's actually a much more common problem for working class communities and communities of color.

There are a lot of reasons why that's the case.

Sometimes racist housing policies like redlining pushed people onto flood-prone land.

Sometimes the government has just failed to maintain the infrastructure.

And often, the lowest-lying land is just cheaper.

Pat sees buyouts as an effort to address the mistakes of the past, the development decisions and housing policies that put a lot of marginalized people at risk.

A lot of people have paid very steep price

for

development in floodplains.

They've essentially had their opportunity for building generational wealth stolen from them because their houses actually depreciated instead of appreciating.

Pat talks about the buyout like a ladder out of a money pit.

Our funds are focused on helping the most vulnerable people in the communities.

We don't go do buyouts for affluent folks, right, on the beach or something.

Those aren't our targets.

It's the people who have been shortchanged in the past and need an opportunity for a restart.

Pat heard about the flooding in Greenwich Terrace from a local official and sent people to check out the area.

And then when that final May flood happened, it was like, okay, this neighborhood meets all the criteria.

And then that's when we set about setting up a buyout program for Greenwich Terrace.

The Watershed Initiative allocated $30 million to buy out the most vulnerable homes in the terrace.

But for a lot of the people actually living in the terrace, the buyout raised this question.

If you've got $30 million to help us out, why not just use that money to fix the drainage?

You know, we could have just fixed the flooding situation and plumbed with all the money that they spun to buy the homes and didn't tear them down.

You could have just invested the money into the plumbing, to the drainage.

This is a man I met who still lives in the terrace.

He didn't want to give his name, but he had a lot to say about the buyout program.

He lives just outside the zone of houses that are eligible, so he wasn't offered a buyout.

But he wishes that money could have been spent on a solution that would have allowed everyone to stay.

You know, as you can see here, we need a drain here on this street.

That way, the water would drain.

Are you worried about more flooding?

I worry about flooding every day when it rains.

You know, that's something we worry about in the area every day.

You know, it's not just flooding here in the Greenwich Terrace, it's flooding in other areas in the city.

But I really believe that to correct the problem is to correct the drainage.

Fix the drainage first, then you'll fix the problem.

Many people I talked to expressed similar feelings, and it's really no surprise that fixing the drainage would be a more popular option than a buyout.

People are always going to prefer a solution that allows them to remain in a community that they love.

Recurring feeling that I feel like a lot of people have of like, we could have used that money differently.

You know, $30 million, why wasn't that money used to protect this neighborhood in some way?

I put this question to Jennifer Kobian, the grants director for Caucasu Parish.

What do you say to that?

Yeah, I mean,

that decision was made at the state level and was sort of

offered to the community to participate in the buyout program.

We did not have an offer on the table to do.

a drainage improvement project.

So we didn't have a choice between a drainage improvement project or

a buyout.

We only had the buyout on the table.

Jennifer says that the parish is trying to get grants to improve the capacity of the pumps in that area, but she's not sure how much they can lower the overall risk.

Drainage improvement will have some improvement to the area, but it will not eliminate the flood risk just given the low topography of the neighborhood.

They're low.

Those houses are sitting really low.

Like if a house was built there today, they'd have to build four feet higher than where they're at right now.

Jennifer said that buyouts should always be the last option, but there just wasn't a great alternative.

And when the state called offering money, it wasn't something she felt she could afford to turn down.

It seemed like the best way to get people help as quickly as possible.

It may well be true that there wasn't a viable way to fix the drainage situation in the terrace.

But I think this situation raises an important question about climate adaptation.

Who is being offered solutions that allow them to remain in place?

And who is being asked to move?

A lot of this is driven by economics.

This is Anna Weber, a senior policy analyst with the NRDC.

She says that a lot of decisions about whether or not to build new protective infrastructure, things like seawalls or new pumps, are determined in part by how much, quote, value the project can protect.

It is more, quote unquote worth it to protect areas of higher value in a financial sense.

And that means that on the flip side, areas of quote unquote lower value in a financial sense are often left out.

They're not put behind the wall.

They're not protected by the structural projects.

And they are more likely to get offered a buyout.

I want to just pause for a second because I think there is a genuine conundrum here.

On the one hand, a buyout is a government benefit.

And so, of course, you want to give that benefit to the people who need it the most.

Communities of color, lower-income communities are much more likely to be faced with the impacts of chronic flooding.

And so, when buyouts are proposed, it makes sense that these communities might be at the top of the list.

They're the ones facing the risks.

They're the ones who should get the first chance to relocate.

That makes sense, logically, right?

But a buyout is a weird kind of benefit.

The kind of benefit that destroys a neighborhood and displaces everyone within it.

And so if you're focusing on giving buyouts to working class communities of color, it also means that these communities are effectively being targeted, not in a malicious way, but they are being prioritized for relocation.

And that has additional effects.

These are communities that have contributed the least to the problem.

These are communities that are facing accumulative impacts, probably, of lots of other kinds of challenges, environmental pollution, disinvestment in infrastructure.

And now they're being told to relocate.

That's a huge problem from a justice standpoint.

Anna is in a funny place when it comes to buyouts.

In many ways, she's one of their chief critics.

I like to clarify clarify when I talk to people about home buyouts, I'm not advocating for buyouts.

People are taking a buyout because it's their last option.

It's their last least bad option.

In a lot of ways, I think the best buyout is one that never has to happen in the first place.

But she also knows as well as anyone that we're going to need more of them in the years ahead.

All throughout the country, there are neighborhoods built on land that is too low or too close to the ocean.

And eventually, the water is going to come.

In the past 30 years, FEMA has bought out about 43,000 flood-prone properties.

But by some estimates, there could be 13 million people living in houses that could regularly flood by the end of the century.

And that's just from sea level rise alone.

There are millions more living in low-lying floodplains that are vulnerable to supercharged storms.

Any way you slice it, there are a lot of vulnerable people who are are going to need to move.

And so even though she knows about all the problems with buyouts, Anna Weber says we can't really give up on them.

We're stuck in this paradoxical situation where the tool that we have to help people move out of harm's way is not very good.

But at the same time, it's the only tool that we have and it needs to scale up in a big way.

And so Anna spends a lot of her time trying to make buyouts better.

She talks to people all around the country about what it's like to go through the process, including Tramika Rankins.

Back in Greenwich Terrace, it wasn't too long after the May 17th flood that Tramika finally got a call back from the city, from the mayor of Lake Charles, who said he had just spoken with the governor, and they had a new proposal.

So I got off the phone with the governor.

How do you feel like us buying out your house?

Tramika didn't want to leave.

She had spent the last several years fighting for her neighborhood.

But after that third flood, the one where she climbed onto the back of the couch to stay dry, the idea of continuing to live in the terrace just started to seem untenable.

She was tired of badgering the city.

But I'm not going to keep calling you.

I'm not going to keep telling you, hey, there's a rainstorm coming.

Nobody came and cleaned these strains.

I shouldn't have to do that.

Tramika had so many good memories in that house, but now she had all these bad ones too.

And she couldn't seem to shake the memory of wading through waist-deep water in her living room.

In the end, the decision wasn't that hard.

I said, well,

I take a pull of those and go straight through it right now, pull it right up.

I don't care.

There's no emotional attachment to the house anymore.

The voluntary buyout program used federal grant money to offer residents the fair market value of their home and more if they moved to a less flood-prone area.

The amount each family would get was determined based on the size of the house and the number of people living there.

The most that any single household could get was 250,000.

After some negotiation, Tramika and her family were offered $242,000, which Tramika knew was way more than she was going to get on the open market for a house that floods all the time.

So in the end, I was like, you're giving me what?

For a house that's probably not worth nothing now because you didn't let it flood so many times.

Oh, where do I sign it?

Tramika Rankins accepted the buyout in January of 2022.

The buyout took about

a year from start to finish.

Believe it or not, that's actually really quick.

Traditional FEMA buyouts have been known to take closer to five years.

But even on that fast track, a full year of housing limbo was really challenging for Tramika.

And she says that filling out paperwork and jumping through hoops felt like this extremely stressful second job.

Yes, the red tape.

I was driving down the street many days, putting my hands in my hair, and my hair was coming out of gobs.

That's just how stressful it was.

Tramika was particularly stressed about her neighbors, many of whom were a lot older than she was, and they were having a hard time following the process.

So she became a volunteer bureaucracy navigator, helping all of the elders on her block understand the ins and outs of the program.

So we all conferred like once or twice a week on what we've been told and things like that.

And it never was the same.

It was like one person say this, but this person say this, this person say this.

And it was crazy.

So if I went through something first, I would say, hey, I hit this roadblock.

One of the biggest roadblocks was just finding a new house to move into.

The two hurricanes had destroyed so many houses throughout the city, and the costs of the remaining housing stock jumped accordingly.

On top of that, the pool of houses that Tramika could choose from was limited by the program.

If she wanted to get the maximum amount of money, she needed to buy a house with significantly lower flood risk.

Every house that you looked at, you had to vet it through, say, Louisiana.

You had to give them the address.

They had to tell you whether it was suitable for their program or not.

Based on flood risk or what?

So it had to be a flood risk risk of zero.

Not only that, the elevation had to be above flood level.

The elevation had to be high.

That's obviously a sensible policy for a buyout program, but it made the housing search a lot more difficult because in Lake Charles, the high ground is hard to come by.

The state turned down multiple homes that Tramika found because they were too flood prone.

But eventually, after months of searching, Tramika found a house that met all her criteria.

It had everything she wanted, except the showers were tiny.

I'm standing in the tub and the shower was like right here.

I'm like, I'm six foot something.

I feel like this is supposed to be for somebody, maybe four or five feet.

Like this will not jive with me.

But Tramika bought the house, tiny showers and all.

It did cost a bit more than what they got in the buyout.

So she and her husband have a mortgage again.

for the first time in years.

They're doing their best to pay it down quickly.

But Tramika says that a new mortgage is a tall order for many of her elderly neighbors.

How are you going to get a loan at 75 years old?

How are you going to justify that, hey, you know, I got a 30-year mortgage.

I'd be 100 and plus years old to get a mortgage.

Yeah, they had no choice.

But even with all the headaches, the lost hair, and the new bills, Tramika says that she knew she made the right decision about the buyout on the day her grandson, Grayson, saw the new house for the first time.

So they picked him up from school and brought him.

He's like, where we at?

They're like, we're home.

So he jumps into bed with me that night.

And the sigh of relief he had,

he snuggled to me.

He woke up at 12 midnight.

He said, do we have to leave again?

I'm like, no, this is home.

Are you sure?

I said, yeah.

So will it be messy again?

I said, I hope not.

Okay, Mama, you did good.

And the sigh of relief that he let out, he went to sleep.

That's the first night that he had a peaceful, like a peaceful, peaceful sound sleep.

Tramika says the new neighborhood has taken some getting used to.

It's part of a new, neatly planned development, and sometimes it feels a little lifeless compared to the terrace.

She misses her noisy neighbors, the sounds of people having barbecues and working on their cars.

But she does like the new drain right at the end of the driveway.

Is this for Halloween?

Oh, wow.

It's pretty spooky.

When I visited her in October, Tramika and Grayson showed me around the new place.

There was a giant inflatable skeleton hanging out on the front porch.

Yeah, what do you want to be for Halloween?

I take a crown.

A what?

A crown.

A clown?

A clown.

Oh.

I'm just like, how does it feel?

Like, does this house feel like a home yet to you?

I'm getting there.

It's home.

You know.

It takes time.

It takes time.

I mean, when I wake up every morning, I thank God, you know, for putting me in a safe place.

You know, thank him for

not having any harm come our way.

You know,

within a year, I was like, okay, we made it for a year.

We're going on two years.

No harm has come this way.

You know, let's keep it that way, please.

Am I in good graces now, you know?

Because

the other house, you had to question yourself, yourself like man did I do something wrong did I piss that I piss off the man upstairs or what

Tramika is trying to embrace her new life but she's still entangled with Greenwich Terrace she's part of an ongoing lawsuit about the flooding trying to get damages from the city or the parish for all of the hardship she's endured over the past years.

As for the buyouts, so far they've only been offered to the most vulnerable residents with houses closest to the coolie.

The rest of the people there are waiting to see if more funding becomes available.

They're also waiting to see what happens with the empty land.

Jennifer Cobian wants to build a park back there that could hold water during a storm.

Tramika would like to see something like that.

She would like to know that by moving, she helped make the neighborhood safer for the people who remain.

I don't know if you've ever visited a city or a neighborhood that you've lived in before and felt the urge to go drive by your old house.

If you've glanced in the window and seen someone else's life just carrying on inside this space that still kind of feels like yours.

For Tramika, there was actually no one living in her old house.

It belonged to the state.

But but she still felt that pull.

She found herself driving by the terrace on the way home from work, even though it wasn't on her route.

Like, I don't know what's drawing me there, but I found myself going out in front of the house, and I found myself doing that once or twice a week.

And then one day, she drove by the old house, and there was a backo punching holes in the roof.

And I sat there, took them all of 15 minutes to do it-15, 20, maybe 25 minutes,

And I cried.

I was just wild that you just happened to be there that day.

I was just like

jumping on it because I wasn't expecting that.

She knew that the house would be demolished soon, but she had no idea it was going to happen while she was sitting right there in her car.

She pulled out her phone and took a video of this bizarre scene to send to her husband.

The little house where they spent decades of their life getting torn apart board by board.

That just happened to Bola on this day.

I really don't know how I feel about this.

I really don't know how I feel about this, she says.

Even though Tramika was sure that taking the buyout was the right financial decision, you can hear the ambivalence in her voice.

And honestly, I don't know how I feel about it either.

When I left Tramika, I drove back to my hotel over the Kaukashu River Bridge, past the glittering lights of the petrochemical plants reflecting off the water.

And in that moment, I honestly felt overwhelmed at the thought of just how many people will need to endure some version of the brutally stressful, bittersweet process that Tramika went through.

How many people will have to move away from a home that they weren't ready to leave, from a kitchen they painted themselves, with the heights of children penciled on the wall.

There's no policy fix for that.

Coming up next week on Not Built for This, we have an unlikely story of a community that didn't need to move.

A town that actually got the protective infrastructure it will need to survive in the years to come.

And it only took them two decades, many trips to the Pentagon, and thousands of tamales.

When we went back to Washington,

we were at the Pentagon.

The first thing that came out was, you get any tamales?

We did not bring your tamales to the Pentagon.

Sorry.

No, like, you know, that was the tamale diplomacy.

This episode of Not Built for This was reported and produced by me, Emmett Fitzgerald, along with producers Jason DeLeon and Sophie Kottner, and managing editor Delaney Hall.

Further invaluable editing from Christopher Johnson, Joe Rosenberg, Kelly Prime, and the boss man Roman Mars.

Mix and sound design by Martine Gonzalez.

Theme and original music by George Langford from Actual Magic with additional music by Swan Rayal.

Fact-checking by Liz Boyd.

Series art by Aaron Nestor.

A huge thank you to everyone we spoke to this week, especially to the incredible Tramika Rankins.

Also, a big thank you to Raychetta Ozane, the director of the Vessel Project.

If you want to support an amazing organization that does climate justice work and grassroots disaster relief in Lake Charles, you can find a link to the Vessel Project on our website.

I also want to thank Deadric Harmon and Cynthia White, aka the Purple Lady.

And finally, a big thank you to my good friends, Casey Coleman, Susan Saykash, and Levon, who put me up and put up with me during my trip to Louisiana.

Not Built for This is a six-part series from 99% Invisible.

New episodes will be coming to you in the 99PI feed on Tuesdays and Fridays, wherever you get your podcasts.

Kathy Tu is our executive producer.

Kurt Colstedt is our digital director.

The rest of the 99PI team includes Chris Barube, Barubay, Vivian Lay, Lasha Madon, Gabriella Gladney, Jacob Maldonado Medina, and Nina Patuck.

The 99% Invisible logo was created by Stefan Lawrence.

We are a part of the Stitcher and SiriusXM podcast family.

You can find 99% Invisible on all the usual social media sites, as well as our new Discord server.

There's a link to that and every episode of 99PI and Not Built for This at 99pi.org.

At RXBar, they believe in simple nutrition without the BS.

That's why they said no to artificial ingredients and yes to deliver intentional, transparent nutrition.

Try their original 12-gram protein bar, the Nut Butter and Oat Bar, or Minis, RXBar, the proud sponsor of No BS.

Use code rxbar on rxbar.com for 25% off, subject to full terms and conditions and to change, valid until September 30, 2025, and may not be combined with other offers.

See rxbar.com for full details and limitations.

Did you know Tide has been upgraded to provide an even better clean and cold water?

Tide is specifically designed to fight any stain you throw at it, even in cold.

Butter?

Yep.

Chocolate ice cream?

Sure thing.

Barbecue sauce?

Tide's got you covered.

You don't need to use warm water.

Additionally, Tide pods let you confidently fight tough stains with new Coldzyme technology.

Just remember: if it's gotta be clean, it's gotta be tied.