Monologue: Annualized Revenues Are BS

8m

In this week’s monologue, Ed Zitron walks you through how and why OpenAI and Anthropic use “annualized revenues” to hide that they’re nowhere near their yearly revenue projections.

https://www.theinformation.com/articles/anthropic-revenue-hits-4-billion-annual-pace-competition-cursor-intensifies?rc=kz8jh3 
www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-hits-12-billion-annualized-revenue-breaks-700-million-chatgpt-weekly-active-users?rc=kz8jh3

Episode note: I say “$5.5 billion” for OpenAI’s potential revenue in 2025. Calculations I’ve run since suggest it could be lower - around $5.25 billion. Both of these numbers are reasonable.

YOU CAN NOW BUY BETTER OFFLINE MERCH! Go to https://cottonbureau.com/people/better-offline and use code FREE99 for free shipping on orders of $99 or more.

---

LINKS: https://www.tinyurl.com/betterofflinelinks

Newsletter: https://www.wheresyoured.at/

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/BetterOffline/ 

Discord: chat.wheresyoured.at

Ed's Socials:

https://twitter.com/edzitron

https://www.instagram.com/edzitron

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Listen and follow along

Transcript

This is an iHeart podcast.

Hi, I'm Morgan Sung, host of Close All Tabs from KQED, where every week we reveal how the online world collides with everyday life.

There was the six-foot cartoon otter who came out from behind a curtain.

It actually really matters that driverless cars are going to mess up in ways that humans wouldn't.

Should I be telling this thing all about my love life?

I think we will see a Twitch stream or a president, maybe within our lifetimes.

You can find Close All tabs wherever you listen to podcasts.

Cold Zone Media.

Hello, and welcome to this week's Better Offline monologue.

I'm your host, Ed Zitron.

Better Offline.

And I've heard so many nice things from all of you about last week's haters' guide to AI, and I really couldn't be more grateful.

It was a labor of love and hate in some cases, I guess.

As we approach what I see as the precipice of this hysterical era, we're going to start seeing and hearing big tech and big model developers make intentionally vague statements with the intent of misleading you and the media.

And I really want to be clear, I'm sorry there's going to be some maths in this, but it's necessary for you to know how people are trying to swindle you and the media too.

So Microsoft kicked this off this week with this week's earnings, breaking out annual revenue from their Azure Cloud Platform, where they sell the means for people to run applications and organizations in the cloud, but also bury their AI services.

And they did this for the first time in history.

This naturally led people to say that Azure's growth, which is up 34% from 2024, when they didn't disclose it, was driven by artificial intelligence somehow, despite the fact that Microsoft intentionally stopped reporting on their earnings, their AI revenue, in January when they said they had 13 billion of annualized revenue, meaning about $1.08 billion a month.

And God, that term annualized is a tricky one.

Also, by the way, they made over $70 billion on Azure, so $13 billion of annualized revenue is actually not that much.

But anyway, the term term annualized is a really tricky one.

When you read or hear someone say annualized revenue, it means a particular month multiplied by 12.

However, what they want you to think is that annualized means that the company in question will make that much money in the year, in part because there isn't a single goddamn media outlet that seems capable of seeing through this.

I should also be clear that annualized revenue is a one-month snapshot.

If I sell boxes at $100 a piece and sell three in June, I have $3,600 in annualized revenue.

That's $300 times 12, because that's a year.

But if I only sell one box in July, that means I have $1,200 in annualized revenue, which doesn't quite sound so good.

My June annualized revenues of $3,600 make it sound like I'll make that much in a year.

However, if I also tell you that I only sold one box and I had $1,200 of annualized revenues based on July, you'd suddenly be more concerned and quite concerned indeed about the volatility of this box business.

In simpler terms, annualized revenue is a deliberate attempt to to hide something or mislead someone.

Nowhere has this been more obvious than in OpenAI's recent leak of their $12 billion in annualized revenue, which the information, who I genuinely like and appreciate, reported as somehow indicative of OpenAI being on track to make their $12.7 billion in revenue for 2025.

Here's the thing.

$12 billion in annualized revenue means $1 billion in revenue in one month, which is genuinely a milestone.

Kind of impressive.

At least it would be if OpenAI didn't burn upwards of $8 billion this year, even though I think they're probably going to burn more than that.

But anyway, back in May, CNBC reported that OpenAI was up $10 billion in annualized revenue, meaning $833 million.

And back in December 2024, they were at $5.5 billion in annualized revenue.

And that's the thing.

And by the way, 5.5 works out to about $458 million in the month.

But that doesn't mean that they're going to hit $12.7 billion.

In fact, best case scenario, this means that OpenAI has, by my calculations, made just over $5 billion in total revenue through the end of July 2025.

That's in the first seven months of the year.

So anytime you see annualized revenue, you should immediately be suspicious of whoever is leaking it.

OpenAI has likely leaked this number as a means of making people believe that they'll make $12 billion or more in 2025.

They're projected to do $12.7 billion, which would be a remarkable number that they're not even halfway towards reaching, despite what some people might be reporting.

Now, another company playing silly buggers with this figure is, of course, Anthropic, who have leaked so far this year every single month of every single month other than April.

It's kind of crazy.

But they started in January when they leaked that they'd hit a billion dollars in annualized revenue, and then they're $1.4 billion in February, and then $2 billion annualized in March, and then $3 billion annualized in May, and then $4 billion annualized in June.

One might believe this means that Anthropic will make $4 billion this year, but the actual numbers work out to the company making no more than $1.15 billion through the end of June.

And if you want to check my maths, you can.

Billion dollars of ARR would be 83 billion, 1.4116, 2 billion would be 166.

Then May would be 3 billion annualized, so it would be 250 million, and 4 billion ARR would be 333 million.

I'm saying this for the person that emails me.

It's like,

what are the numbers?

Anyway, these are obfuscations.

These are intentional.

Anthropic has made no more than $1.15 billion through the end of June.

That is not going to get them to $4 billion without something ridiculous.

Yeah, I saw a Bloomberg reporter, love you, Ed, but saying

maybe they'll hit $9 billion in annualized revenue this year.

That's an absolute joke.

Open AI barely hit that.

And they have all the...

It's just...

It's all deliberate and it's all intentional.

It's also that you kind of watch the mouth and not the hands.

It's so that you don't think too hard.

Because when you look at the actual numbers, OpenAI has only made like $5.5 billion this year.

That's not it.

They're not even to the lofty goals they have.

They're not even halfway there.

And Anthropic's at 1.15 billion.

These are not huge amounts.

And they're dwarfed by the fact that each, I think OpenAI is going to burn eight to probably 15 billion dollars this year.

And that's after revenue.

And Anthropic, I think they're $3 to $5 billion.

It's an absolute joke.

But you, you, the listener, I want you to know that all of this is intentional.

As Anthropic is currently raising around as large as $5 billion from the bone sore capital of the world, and the media is helping by obfuscating their actual revenue, OpenAI is doing the same thing.

The information reported they're at $7.5 billion of the remaining, well, $30 billion that they actually have to raise with SoftBank covering the let.

The rest, they're trying to hoodwink people.

And I want you, the listener, to know better.

Agree with me, disagree with me.

I'd much rather you knew what these terms mean and why they're being used.

And yes, there's going to be someone who says annualized is a fine term.

People use it ethically.

And that's true.

You can use this term ethically.

You can use this to say, yeah, if things keep up at this pace, we'll be at this.

That's not what these fuckers are doing.

They're doing this as a means of selling it to people that aren't going to think about it too hard.

So that those people don't think about it much more than thinking, ooh, Open AI is going to make so much bloody money.

Ooh, Anthropic's going to do that too.

And it sucks.

It sucks because

this is being used to make people richer, to make Dario Amadei and Sam clammy Sam Altman more and more money.

And it's really sad.

It's sad, but it's also a sign that things are kind of deteriorating.

And yes, there are going to be people that say, well, the revenue is going up.

That means things are going well.

In a situation where things are going well, these companies would talk about the real revenues.

They wouldn't be playing weird card games and weird shuffling, shuffling those.

I'm now, as I'm saying, this forgetting what you call the game with the cup on the ball.

Someone's going to email me and make fun of me for this.

I'm stupid.

You don't get to do that.

But in all seriousness, they're doing tricksy things, and they're doing it because they're trying to raise money.

It's a classic swindle, and it pisses me off to see because people are going to think this is a victory for the AI boom.

When in reality, they're trying to hide something a little more grim than that, which is revenues are nowhere near their ARRs.

They wish they were.

And indeed, I think in the next six to 12 months, we're going to see this sour somewhat.

I look forward to telling you, regardless of what happens, what's actually happening.

Be honest, how many tabs do you have open right now?

Too many?

Sounds like you need close all tabs from KQED, where I, Morgan Sung, Doom Scroll so you don't have to.

Every week, we scour the internet to bring you deep dives that explain how the digital world connects and divides us all.

Everyone's cooped up in their house.

I will talk to this robot.

If you're a truly engaged activist, the government already has data on you.

Driverless cars are going to mess up in ways that humans wouldn't.

Listen to Close All Tabs, wherever you get your podcasts.

Top reasons data nerds want to move to Ohio.

High-paying careers for business researchers, analysts, project managers, and more.

So many jobs, you can take your pick.

What else does the data say?

How about a bigger backyard, a shorter commute, and a paycheck that goes further?

So crunch the numbers and our world-famous pickles, it all adds up, the career you want and a life you'll love.

Have it all in the heart of it all.

Dive into the data at callohiohome.com.

Every business has an ambition.

PayPal Open is the platform designed to help you grow into yours with business loans so you can expand and access to hundreds of millions of PayPal customers worldwide.

And your customers can pay all the ways they want with PayPal, Venmo, Pay Later, and all major cards.

So you can focus on scaling up.

When it's time to get growing, there's one platform for all business, PayPal Open.

Grow today at PayPalOpen.com.

Loan subject to approval in available locations.

Mint is still $15 a month for premium wireless.

And if you haven't made the switch yet, here are 15 reasons why you should.

One, it's $15 a month.

Two, seriously, it's $15 a month.

Three, no big contracts.

Four, I use it.

Five, my mom uses it.

Are you playing me off?

That's what's happening, right?

Okay, give it a try at mintmobile.com/slash switch.

Upfront payment of $45 for three months plan, $15 per month equivalent required.

New customer offer first three months only, then full price plan options available.

Taxes and fees extra.

See mintmobile.com.

This is an iHeart Podcast.