Cork Dork: Inside the Weird World of Wine Appreciation

44m
“There’s the faintest soupçon of asparagus and just a flutter of Edam cheese,” says Paul Giamatti in the movie Sideways. Believe it or not, he’s describing pinot noir, not quiche. The world of sommeliers, wine lists, and tasting notes is filled with this kind of language, prices seemingly rising in step with the number of bizarre adjectives. It’s tempting to dismiss the whole thing as B.S., but listen in: this episode, author Bianca Bosker takes us along on her journey into the history and science behind blind tasting, wine flavor wheels, and the craft of the sommelier. You’ll never feel lost in front of a wine list again.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Listen and follow along

Transcript

Support for this show comes from Pure Leaf Iced Tea.

When you find yourself in the afternoon slump, you need the right thing to make you bounce back.

You need Pure Leaf Iced Tea.

It's real brewed tea made in a variety of bold flavors with just the right amount of naturally occurring caffeine.

You're left feeling refreshed and revitalized, so you can be ready to take on what's next.

The next time you need to hit the reset button, grab a Pure Leaf Iced Tea.

Time for a tea break?

Time for a Pure Leaf.

Support for this show comes from OnePassword.

If you're an IT or security pro, managing devices, identities, and applications can feel overwhelming and risky.

Trelica by OnePassword helps conquer SaaS sprawl and shadow IT by discovering every app your team uses, managed or not.

Take the first step to better security for your team.

Learn more at onepassword.com slash podcast offer.

That's onepassword.com/slash podcast offer.

All lowercase.

Robotozin, freshly molded dildo, peppered raspberry, white raspberry, red raspberry, black raspberry.

I don't know what the difference between all those things are or if they even exist.

You get burnt hair, plum, cow shit.

I don't know about you, but I don't think I actually have a good sense of what freshly molded dildo smells like.

Maybe I need to live a little.

I've been stuck on that since Bianca mentioned it in her list of wine descriptions she's heard.

Yes, those are all words people have used to describe the flavor notes they're getting in a glass of wine.

And the Bianca in question is Bianca Boskar.

She's the author of a new book called Corp Dork.

A wine-fueled adventure among the obsessive sommeliers, big bottle hunters, and rogue scientists who taught me to live for taste.

I did just read that subtitle off of my book cover because I wanted to make sure I remembered it.

What is a cork dork, you might ask?

If you are the type of person who licks rocks to train your palate, if you're the type of person who may divorce your spouse so you can spend more time studying wine flashcards, or if you're the kind of person that calls what you do a blood sport with corkscrews, you are a cork dork.

Bianca is a cork dork, but she wasn't originally.

And so she's the perfect person to demystify this whole wine business.

Because really, you're tasting wet dog and band-aid in your $300 bottle of Bordeaux?

I mean, come on.

Isn't this whole thing kind of BS?

That's what we're going to find out this episode.

You're listening to Gastropod, the podcast that looks at food through the lens of science and history.

I'm Cynthia Graeber.

And I'm Nicola Twilley.

And this episode, Bianca is going to help us understand what a sommelier is and does, and how you too can navigate a wine list like a pro.

She'll also help us understand whether expensive wine is actually better than cheaper, whether it's worth it to shell out all that money.

I was a total wine ignoramus when I started this.

So, you know, I think there are people who spend their Saturday nights agonizing over the choice between wine from Burgundy and Bordeaux.

I spent my Saturday nights agonizing over the choice between wines from a bottle and a box.

I mean, I

thought perhaps one was better than the other, but I just couldn't be sure.

So, I,

you know, I have to be honest, like that actually didn't bother me for a very long time.

But then I discovered this world of elite sommeliers who treat wine less as a job than a way of life.

And I was just mystified by what it was that fixated them about wine.

At the time, Bianca was a tech editor at an online publication.

I spent all day, every day at a screen, writing about things that happened on screens.

I mean just to give you an example, I actually made someone do a slideshow called How to Take a Vacation on Google Street View, as if somehow scrolling through pictures on a slideshow was the same thing as sitting on Maui with a Mai Tai in your hand.

And then she met some cork dorks and what they did seemed almost like magic to her.

I mean these were people who could stick their nose into a glass of wine and tell you all these stories about it, right?

Who made it, when, how, where, and like some tiny corner of the planet half the size of Central Park.

And it made me just realize how sterile my life was, how I was really ignoring two of the five senses that were giving to make sense of the world.

And because Bianca is pretty type A, it wasn't enough just to watch other people be cork dorks.

She wanted to see whether she could do it herself.

Could I do what they did?

Could I hone my senses?

And what would change if I did?

And also, would I figure out once and for all what was the big deal about wine?

Like, why do otherwise rational people spend all this time and money on something that eventually becomes expensive pee?

She quit tech journalism and trained to be a sommelier.

So what exactly is a sommelier?

I mean, you can give it a really basic definition.

I mean, they are the people who are in charge of selecting wines for a restaurant and then pairing them with the guests who come to that restaurant.

Sommelier is a fancy French word for a very old job.

We've had some version of sommelier for thousands of years.

The ancient Egyptians had their version of sommeliers, also sometimes called cupbearers.

And what's interesting to me is when you trace back the little-known history of the sommelier, you find that basically since humans have been drinking wine, we've had a dedicated person to serve it to us.

And sommeliers have actually always had a kind of privileged position in the servants' world.

The pharaoh's cupbearers didn't just carry the wine to the table, they were also in charge of storing it and selecting it.

They were experts.

The ancient Romans had dedicated wine servers too for their legendary banquets.

Although Roman sommeliers apparently also had other duties as assigned.

And they were of particular interest to the guests because oftentimes hosts would pair the most attractive young sommeliers with the most distinguished guests, which is where I would say the downside to this job comes through, which is that many sommeliers were also expected to not only serve the wine to the guests, but later accompany them to their bedrooms to take care of their more carnal and lustful appetites.

Thankfully, sommeliers today do not live by the rules of the Roman elite.

Things got significantly better for sommeliers after that, yeah.

But Roman sommeliers also had more practical responsibilities.

And they were, you know, more winemakers of a sort.

I mean, they would actually, like, they could fix flawed wines by adding oyster shells or chalk or I think boiling them with different things.

In the past, sommeliers might have needed to prove their skills at doctoring wine with oyster shells or entertaining Roman aristocracy in the bedroom.

Today, there's a different kind of test.

Bianca decided she wanted to take it.

The exam is called the Court of Masters Sommelier, which is kind of the gold standard of sommelier degrees, if you will.

The test is divided into three sections.

There's a part on service, on theory, and then there's those magical blind tastings.

What's kind of challenging about that is there's no class that you can take to pass that.

It's really something that requires you to learn that information on your own.

So I set about to train as a sommelier, which involved basically doing stages in restaurants, which is a fancy way of saying apprenticeship or acting as unpaid labor.

So what does a sommelier do?

Well, the first thing is some basic profiling.

Yes, your somme is judging you.

They're sizing you up before you even say hello.

Who are they eating with?

Is it a date?

Is it a business outing?

They're eyeing the jewelry.

They're eyeing the bags.

They're eyeing the shoes.

How much money do these people appear to have?

What do you think they want to spend?

What's the dynamic between the guests?

Who's really making the choices about the wine?

Is it the guy with the list in his hand, or is it the boss next to him?

Is it the wife who's giving her husband the evil eye?

Or is it the high roller, you know, flipping through the expensive burgundies?

They do this for a reason.

It's not just to figure out how much money you're going to drop.

They also want to know what you want out of the wine, what you're expecting from the meal.

A good sommelier also understands that pairing a person with a wine is not just about giving them a good tasting alcoholic beverage to drink.

It's about delivering an experience that satisfies the psychological need that they have that evening.

All of those subtle psychological people reading skills, that's something that sommelyers are evaluated on in the test.

But there are also a lot of more esoteric etiquette things that the psalm has to do, right?

Things you or I would never think about.

It just seems very simplistic, right?

Bring the bottle, open it, pour.

That's it, right?

How much can go wrong?

What are you actually judging in a competition about pouring wine?

A whole lot, as it turns out.

When you approach the table, someone should walk clockwise only around a table.

They should find the host.

You have to present the wine in a certain way using a servette.

If you open a bottle of sparkling wine, it should be in a particular place relative to the table.

It should only make a tiny little sound.

The terminology that I was taught was it should be no louder than a nun's fart or the queen's fart.

You should pour exactly the same amount of wine for every glass in one turn around the table.

You should pour open-handed.

Do not under any circumstances backhand someone.

It is considered extremely rude and poor form.

I feel relatively sure that I've backhanded people basically every time I've poured wine.

I have to admit, I'm having a hard time imagining what it's like to not backhand someone.

I'm totally gonna watch the psalm next time I watch dinner.

This part of the whole psalm training turned out to be one of the most challenging for Bianca.

Unfortunately, she was not a ballerina of the restaurant floor.

If there was a way to screw up service, she did.

As part of her training, Bianca entered one of the oldest sommelier competitions in the U.S.

I will say that the service part of the competition had not gone superbly up to this point in time, but here was my final chance to redeem myself.

And so I go over to the table, I stand on the correct side of the host, and they ask me to bring them a bottle of Bordeaux.

Bianca's feeling good.

She knows this Bordeaux and she's doing her whole spiel, presenting it to the host, describing the region, who owns the estate, what the weather was like that year.

So I begin to open the wine.

And I'm feeling, again, very confident.

So I'm trying to make conversation with them, ensure they're having a good time.

These are my mock guests.

And I fail to notice a kind of sickly sounding

red wine everywhere exploding over me, dripping down my white shirt, dripping off my mascara running, dripping off the guest.

It's on the tablecloth, it's on the floor.

It looks like I've been shot.

I mean, there is just red wine oozing all over the place.

You're saying this was not a nun's fart.

I mean, this was a nun with a serious case of food poisoning.

It was not really.

What happened?

Did the cork just kind of slide its way out without you noticing?

So I later talked to

this aspiring Master Somalia, a guy named Morgan Harris, who'd been my mentor.

You know, I described what happened, and I was like shocked.

I mean, I was convinced that there had been an earthquake, like some force of nature had caused this to go on.

And he had a very rational explanation, something about differential pressure.

But basically, I had to do, I think, with removing the cork

too quickly.

I'm really not sure.

I'm still convinced that that it was some fluke micro-natural disaster that happened in that bottle of wine.

But needless to say, I did not win the competition.

And I was rated DNPIM, which is apparently wine judge score for do not put in mouth.

So I was basically the equivalent of a completely ineditable spoiled wine when it came to service.

That's the service section of the test.

Then there's the theory.

There is no wine fact too small to be tested on.

So prepping the test requires at a starting point memorizing the characteristic grape varieties for certain countries, for certain sub-regions within those countries, for the sub-regions of those sub-regions within those countries.

You have to memorize signature producers.

Know what are they best known for?

How do they make their wines?

What kind of grapes do they use?

What are their aging styles?

You know, there's a huge amount of geography that you have to memorize.

What are the distinctive geographical geographical landmarks in these countries, in these regions, in these sub-regions?

The rivers, the climates, the mist, what kind of soil grows in these places?

People make flashcards.

Bianca had more than a thousand by the end.

It's completely insane.

Think of all the wine-producing countries in the world, from Chile to South Africa to Italy, Croatia, New Zealand, but you have to know all the vineyards too.

It is, just to say it one more time, it is absolutely insane.

Plus, there's all the wine-related information, like the names of the bottle sizes from Magnum which is two normal bottles all the way up to Nebuchadnezzar which holds 20 normal bottles.

Bianca shared a good mnemonic to help remember that order from smallest to largest.

Michael Jackson really makes small boys nervous.

Okay here goes.

Magnum, Jeroboam, Rehoboam, Methuselah, Solomonzar, Balthazar, Nebuchadnezzar.

Up until now, I'd only heard of magnums.

Clearly I'm not drinking enough wine.

Think big, Cynthia.

So you have the service, you have the theory section, and then the third part of the test is the blind tasting.

That's the part that originally got Bianca hooked.

When I saw blind tasting for the first time,

I thought that these people had to be freaks of nature.

I figured that these were the illogical equivalents of Michael Phelps, right?

Or Serena Williams.

Like they just were, you know, in a league above the rest of us when it came to their abilities to taste and smell.

As it turns out, that's not true, right?

I mean, any of us can learn to do it.

A blind tasting is not just drinking with your eyes closed.

So basically, a blind tasting is you're given a glass of wine, you don't know anything about it.

Can you figure out what it was made from, where, and when?

This isn't just guessing random wines, hoping you land on the right one.

Bianca talked us through exactly what those blind tasters are doing, everything that she learned to think about in order to come up with the right grape and producer.

So the first thing you do is you'll pick up a glass of wine and you look at at the color.

So if it's a red wine, you know, if it's a little more purple, you might be thinking Sinfandel.

If it's a little more brick red, you might be thinking Pinot Noir.

If it's lost some of its color, you're thinking older wine.

If it still has a lot of color, you're thinking younger wine.

So already, even before you put it in your mouth, you can pick up a good amount of information.

Then you smell the wine.

Different grape varieties have signature smell imprints.

So when you put your nose in the glass, you're looking for distinctive aromas that will begin to tell you, again, whether you're thinking this is a Cabernet Sauvignon, in which case it will have maybe some more kind of green bell pepper, raspberry cranberry notes, or whether you're thinking, man, this smells like peach yogurt, Zinfandel.

To me, Zinnfindel usually smells like peach yogurt.

You're also looking for clues to see whether it's been aged in oak.

That's going to begin to tell you what part of the world it could be coming from, how it's made.

And then eventually you're actually tasting the wine, you're actually putting it in your mouth.

Finally, I was getting thirsty just listening.

And then you're also looking for elements of wine structure.

So, how high is the alcohol?

That could tell you about the climate.

Did it come from somewhere really hot or somewhere that was a little cooler?

You're looking for the tannins, Cabernet Sauvignon is generally much more tannic, it dries out your mouth more than a Pinot Noir.

And so, you're piecing together all of these clues to reach some conclusion about what kind of grape you're drinking, when it was made, where it came from.

Bianca talked herself into special underground tasting groups where this is what they do.

They sit around and test themselves on blind-tasting wines.

She called it her Tuesday morning tongue cardio.

Some of the sums Bianca trained with lick rocks to be able to distinguish mineral flavors.

They give up salt, spicy foods, even coffee.

They make sure that any hot food or soup is not actually hot, just tepid, so they don't burn their tongues.

Bianca stopped wearing perfume and switched to scent-free laundry detergent.

One guy Bianca trained with would always bring his own granola to competitions so he would have the same flavor baseline in the morning, guaranteed.

As part of her training, Bianca even tested herself on precise dilutions of alcohol so that she could distinguish between what 12% alcohol tastes like as opposed to 13%.

But she also told us a trick.

If you look at the trails the wine leaves down the side of your glass after you've swirled it, the more defined and long-lasting those trails are, the higher alcohol your wine.

And higher alcohol wines are often new world, so you have yourself a pretty good clue there.

Bianca herself stops eating or drinking two hours before a blind tasting because she wants to be able to find that hint of bell pepper to know that the wine might be Cabernet Sauvignon.

This is where we get into that whole world of wine speak.

Oh, I'm getting notes of raspberry jam and bird shit, you know?

But what's interesting is we haven't always talked about the flavor of wine that way.

The lexicon of tasting notes as we now know them is really only as traditional as television.

I mean, this is not something that has gone back centuries, right?

I mean, when you look, when you think about some of the great wine connoisseurs through history, Louis Catoz, Thomas Jefferson, the Pharaohs,

they weren't sitting around trying to figure out whether they were smelling dried pomegranate or cranberry.

What's interesting is people have been drinking wine for thousands and thousands of years, but in general, the way that we talk about it has been very terse and really just focused on kind of good or bad without going into the tastes and smells in the glass.

As wine critics and wine writing became a thing in the late 19th and early 20th century, people started to grasp for something more, a way to describe the qualities they saw in different wines.

They used the same vocabulary people used to describe character, refined, graceful, charming, honest.

When you look at the history of the tasty notes that we use to describe wine, they tend to reflect whatever values we happen to prize at that particular time.

So, at the turn of the century, when class distinctions were more important, good wines were classy, they were noble, they were aristocratic.

In the 1920s, the era of Hemingway, an early critic praised a red hermitage.

He called it the manliest French wine I ever drank.

And all these vegetable and fruit and dirt words that we use today, those date back to precisely 1974 in Davis, California.

Most AI coding tools generate sloppy code that doesn't understand your setup.

Warp is different.

Warp understands your machine, stack, and code base.

It's built through the entire software lifecycle from prompt to production.

With the powers of a terminal and the interactivity of an IDE, Warp gives you a tight feedback loop with agents so you can prompt, review, edit, and ship production-ready code.

Trusted by over 600,000 developers, including 56% of the Fortune 500, Try Warp free or unlock Pro for just $5 at warp.dev slash top code.

You're basking on a beach in the Bahamas.

Now you're journeying through the jade forests of Japan.

Now you're there for your alma mater's epic win.

And now you're awake.

Womp, womp.

Which means it was all a dream.

But with millions of incredible deals on Priceline, those travel dreams can be a reality.

Download the Priceline app today and you can save up to 60% off hotels and up to 50% off flights.

So don't just dream about that trip.

Book it with Priceline.

The creator of the modern tasting note is a woman named Anne Noble who is a professor emeritus at the University of California, Davis.

And she's a sensory scientist and she showed up to teach a class that was on the sensory evaluation of wines that was required of all aspiring winemakers in the wine school.

And these winemakers were being asked to go around and sniff and taste the wines and describe them.

And she realized that they had no words to do so.

They were grasping.

They had no shared language to describe what their noses were experiencing.

No vocabulary they could use to communicate what they smelled.

So Anne basically decided that people needed to undergo what she called the kindergarten of the nose, which essentially makes a lot of sense because most of us don't really learn to put words to smells, right?

We identify colors and sounds, but rarely do we ever learn to actually put words to smells.

Anne decided to do something about this.

Her kindergarten of the nose, it trained the winemakers on 150 different smells.

She rounded up all these things that most of us kind of have in our homes and are familiar with, everything from apple to pear to band-aids, and basically put them in front of these students to smell so that they could come up with some alphabet of smells that they could use to communicate with each other when they made wine.

She published on this, and it ended up being a lexicon not only used by winemakers, but obviously by wine drinkers and critics and writers.

And it's become this kind of international language to help people communicate the flavors in a glass of wine.

Anne's vegetables changed the world of wine, but there's a new language of tasting notes taking over now based on science.

You know, I think we've entered an era where we want to quantify every part of our life, including our hedonism.

And that has given rise to tasting notes that are really based off of the chemical content of the wines.

So, for example, when I was in my tasting groups with sommeliers, Instead of saying that a Cabernet smells like green bell pepper, they would say that it has notes of pyrazines.

Pyrazzines are present not only in Cabernet Sauvignon and Sauvignon Blanc, but are also what gives green bell peppers their signature aroma.

That's right.

The chemical name that sommeliers are now using to describe that signature green bell pepper note in Cabernet Sauvignon, that is actually the same chemical in real green bell peppers.

That actually tells us two things.

One is that we're obsessed with science and that's shaping our tasting notes, but it also tells us that the traditional tasting notes are not total bullshit.

You know, when we say that a wine has notes of green bell pepper, it kind of does, because it has the same chemical compound that's present in the vegetable.

So some part of this wine appreciation stuff is not BS.

But how about the idea that you can train yourself to appreciate and pick out those notes?

Is that legit?

There's some conflicting research there.

The caveat is that there seems to be a cap on the number of different smells in a mixture that humans can detect.

No matter how much you study your tray, and you can probably only pick out like three or four, really.

Which seems to suggest that most of wine is bullshit.

So when a sommelier describes a wine as seven different fruits and vegetables, well, some of that must be BS, because we can only really separate out three or four smells.

Then there's a study done at the University of Bordeaux.

A group of students were asked to describe the smell of two wines, a white and a red.

For the white, they used words like grapefruit and lychee.

For the red, they said things like blackberry and prune.

Both, as it turns out, were the same white wine, but one had red food coloring in it.

I think that that study is certainly

does wine experts zero favors.

It doesn't look good for them.

There are two reasons, though, that the finding might not be quite as bad as it looks.

First, these were students.

They hadn't spent quite as long training themselves on wine.

And a second reason they might have failed the wine tasting test is because we tend to trust vision over smell.

So this is not looking good for the wine experts.

There's a cap on how many smells we can distinguish, and we're liable to be confused by visual cues.

That there is actually science showing that somaliers can train themselves to be better at tasting wine than the rest of us.

More specifically,

you can become better at identifying smells, like putting a name to them.

You can become more sensitive to more subtle smells.

You can become better at picking up nuances between smells.

So when something is present in big amounts, small amounts, in distinguishing between two smells, so telling something like coriander from clove.

And all that training, it actually ends up affecting your brain.

So there's a landmark study that basically found that sommeliers' brains look very different than novice drinkers' brains when they experience wine.

In 2005, scientists in Italy put seven sommeliers and seven amateurs in an fMRI machine.

They give them a bunch of different things to drink, red, white, and sweet wines and an odorless glucose solution.

And the fMRI allowed the scientists to see what was happening to the flow of blood in their brains, their brain activity basically, as the subjects drank these different liquids.

When the amateurs tasted wine, not much happened in their brains.

The images showed just a few pinpoints of light showing blood flowing and brain activity.

But when the sommeliers drank the wine, their brains went nuts.

Their brains lit up all over.

The non-experts only lit up in emotional processing, but the experts lit up in cognitive processing, memory, planning, reasoning.

Their training had literally changed the way their brains responded to wine.

And so my hope was to essentially put myself through that same study to understand whether my brain looked like a sommelier's brain.

Bianca went to South Korea to a neuroscience lab.

They sticked me in like...

toast in a toaster.

I basically had a little straw in my mouth that this neuroscientist outside of the fMRI machine used to squirt in red and white wines.

And my job was to basically

process these wines, so basically to taste them.

And he asked me some questions about the wines.

And then I came out.

And then the question was, what had happened to my brain while I was experiencing the flavor of those wines?

And she aced it.

Bianca's brain lit up like a sommelier brain.

And there's another thing lying in the fMRI machine without being able to see a thing, not the color of the wine, the body, nothing.

Bianca called the grape, the region, and the year for both a red and a white wine.

She completely nailed it.

So this seems to show that wine expertise is real.

You can train yourself to distinguish the taste of tannins and the flavor of fruit loops or whatever in wine.

And that training will change your brain in measurable ways.

It will also make your wine taste better, richer, and more exciting.

But here's my question.

Is it really worth spending your hard-earned on the fancy stuff, or is cheap wine just as good?

First thing to know, the price can actually influence your enjoyment of wine just by setting up your expectation.

Remember that professor in Italy?

He also had his students taste two different wines, one they were told was cheaper table wine, and one they thought was a bottle of the good stuff.

They called the expensive one excellent and complex, and the cheap one feeble and flat.

Of course, they were the same wine.

Price is a spice, so if we think wine is expensive, studies have shown we'll think it tastes better.

More recently, scientists have again used an fMRI machine to repeat these findings.

Subjects were served five bottles of Cabernet Sauvignon ranging in price from $5 to $90.

They were told the prices as the wine was squirted into their mouths.

And their brains' pleasure centers lit up for the $90 bottle, much more than for the $10 bottle.

But the scientists were lying.

That $90 bottle was the same $10 wine, the exact same wine.

The pleasure was in the price.

But again, there's some nuance here.

Wine experts look for three key aspects of higher-end wine: balance, complexity, and finish.

One flavor shouldn't elbow out everything else.

It should keep delighting you as you drink it.

The flavor should linger.

And Bianca says people, even non-experts, they know cheap wines from the better stuff.

She had non-wine expert friends over and opened a $40 bottle of Australian Shiraz and an $8 bottle of Yellowtail.

Her friends could pick out the cheap one quite easily.

I have drunk plenty of Yellowtail in my time, and I'm not alone.

The average price Americans pay for a bottle of wine is just under $10.

According to the wine economist Bianca spoke to, that's just too little to cover some of the basic inputs that go into making a really good wine.

A single barrel of French oak, that can cost $1,000.

An acre of Napa Valley real estate where the climate conditions are just right to make wonderful wine, that's $300,000.

You could think of it as in three kind of big tiers of wine quality.

So, you know, for bottles up to, say, you know, $20 or so, they're likely to have been made with some additives.

They've been cutting a couple corners in order to make the wine.

And those are going to be different from the wines that are, let's say,

$40 to $100,

where the inputs have been better.

You know, they cost a little bit more because the products used to make them are higher quality and more expensive.

And then there's a price point beyond which the price is less a reflection of the chemicals and quality in that bottle and more a reflection of the scarcity of that wine or the brand.

At a certain point, an expensive bottle of wine isn't necessarily dramatically better tasting, but it can still be more of an experience.

You know you're drinking something that very few people can get a hold of.

And it can also be an investment.

Those $500 bottles of wine are collectibles.

So there is some economic logic to the price of wine.

But actually, there's an irony when it comes to wine pricing today.

Bianca quotes a British wine writer called Jances Robinson.

She points out that in the 21st century, the difference in price between the best and worst wines is bigger than it has ever been.

Meanwhile, the difference in quality is smaller than ever before.

Wine used to be not just maybe cheaper and a little rougher, but quite literally bad.

Bottles turned into vinegar because they'd been exposed to too much oxygen, or the wine stank of rotten eggs because of too little oxygen.

They could have gotten messed up in any number of ways.

Not today.

Basically, the new technology that exists for winemaking makes it possible to eliminate a lot of the flaws and faults that used to plague the less expensive bottles of wine.

There's been this technological revolution in the winery, such that there are now all of these different tools, techniques, and ingredients that winemakers can put into their wines to control everything from the smell to the texture to the color.

You name it.

I mean, there's really like a...

dial that they can crank up and down on nearly every attribute.

So those include mega-purple.

It's a grape concentrate that can solve a multitude of sins from the color to the tannins to the sweetness.

Mega Purple ends up in about 25 million bottles of red each year.

Bianca says almost every bottle that's under 20 bucks uses it, even though no one will admit to it.

It's one of more than 60 additives that can basically fix anything that might be wrong with a cheap wine.

Apart from how sweet it is, that is, but actually the sweetness is on purpose.

The people who make cheaper wines are deliberately engineering them to taste good to lots and lots of people, and that means designing them to be sweeter than most of the more expensive wines.

Which makes sense because a lot of us

have been raised on a diet of soft drinks and pumpkin spice lattes and things that are sweet.

Right.

Those quote bad wines are actually carefully crafted to taste good to lots and lots of people.

But what if you want to learn how to appreciate something more complex?

All that wine appreciation stuff, it is intimidating, both in terms of price and in terms of knowing where to start.

I mean, I feel pretty lost in front of most wine lists, and I know I am not alone there.

Here's where a sommelier can help.

My advice, one of the most striking things I found was the more that people know about wine, the less specific they are with the sommelier.

What sommeliers often do when they go out to eat is they know that the sommelier at the restaurant knows that wine list better than they ever could.

And so they put themselves in their hands and they give them two pieces of information.

One, how much they want to spend.

Should not be nervous in discussing this.

You can also give a range under 100 or something like that, or you know, under 50 or whatever.

This is for a bottle, of course, not a glass.

And secondly, what do I feel like drinking?

If you know about wine, you can get as specific as you'd like here.

But if you don't know a lot about wine, it's just fine to say that you tend to like Sauvignon Blanc or you tend to like Cabernet Sauvignon.

And from there, the sommelier can direct you to something similar that will suit your taste and budget.

It's really nothing to be scared of.

Basically, Bianca has three pieces of advice.

First, trust your sommelier, and then be honest with them about how much you want to spend.

And then finally, tell them about other wines you've liked similar to ones you're in the mood for that evening.

And then there's my favorite strategy, personally.

When in doubt, choose the most esoteric thing on the list that you've never heard of.

Because in general, if there's some really weird offbeat wine there, it's there because the sommelier loves it it's there not because it's easy to sell because it's certainly not it's often there because it's really something special about it that earned it a place even though it's it's sort of a headache to get into people's mouths so take a risk

have you guys uh looked at the list or no no we have no idea

we're tasting blind all this talking with bianca made us thirsty so we decided and remember cynthia and i are total novices apart from obviously the gallons of wine we've drunk in our lives.

We decided to see whether we could overcome our fears and do this blind tasting business.

I thought this sounded like a great idea and I was also totally sure I would get nothing right.

We were together in San Francisco to perform with Pop-Up magazine and we decided to head over to a wine bar.

So my name is Michael Ireland.

I'm co-owner wine director of High Treason Wine Bar in Inner Richmond, San Francisco, California.

What we have here, we have two wines that are of similar varietal makeup at radically different price points.

And so the idea is to see if you can tell which one is more expensive or less expensive.

I'm a little nervous.

I'm very nervous.

Wine number one down the hatch.

Okay, so that was delicious.

Number two.

Number two.

I'm going to go on the smell alone.

This is the expensive.

That's what I was thinking, too.

Yeah.

Actually, I was more confident on the smell than I am on the taste.

We went back and forth for a while, second-guessing ourselves.

Nikki finally decided that the second one was more expensive.

I had originally thought so, too, based on the smell, but the smoothness of the first one, it made me go back on my original hypothesis.

But it's out of our mystery.

Seriously, can you tell us?

Michael told us what the wines were, both Cabernet-based, one a blend, and one from a single vineyard in Napa.

One cost less than $15 a bottle, he said, and the other cost about $40.

And which one is the more expensive one?

The Raphael from Napa.

Yeah, for sure, for sure.

And the one on the right is the more expensive one.

Yeah, yeah.

And the one on the left is actually out of a keg.

It's on tap.

Oh, yeah.

Uh-huh.

I was totally right.

Okay, okay.

You won round one.

To be fair, Michael loved both the expensive wine and the kegged wine.

I happen to love the cheaper one.

My point here, just because a wine is expensive, it doesn't mean that you will like it better.

I genuinely preferred the less expensive wine.

Time for the next test.

More of a traditional blind tasting.

So we have three red wines, all classic varietals from classic regions.

So there's no curveballs here.

These are all super classic.

Do you want us to name the grape?

I'd love it if you could do the grape in the region.

Oh, would you know?

Wouldn't be all right.

The grape in the region would be, yeah, would be awesome.

Start from the

visual aspects of the wine.

They're all really pretty.

They are.

This is one on the left, the lightest.

This is light.

The clear, which I feel like is kind of in general a Pinot Noir thing.

And then we took a deep sniff of the wine.

This is embarrassing, but it it feels very European.

It feels more like an Italian.

When you're trying to ascertain if it's New World versus Old World, yeah?

There's a couple things you're going to look at, right?

One, ask yourself the question, who's driving the boat?

Is it fruit or is it Earth?

Fruit, typically, a little more New World.

Did we just get more sunshine or ripeness more fruit?

Earth would then be European.

When we taste the wine, you'll look at the structure of the wine, okay?

How's the alcohol level?

How's the acid?

You know, does it make your mouth water a lot?

It comes from what?

Less ripe grapes.

Oh, so that's Europe?

Yeah.

Okay.

I said it was Europeano.

Yeah, I think you're right.

I was just cheating because I know what the wine is.

You think she's right, do you?

I'll give you another hint.

These are all three from the same country.

I think these are all French.

I feel really comfortable saying that.

I totally do too.

These are definitely all French.

This got a little painful because really, we just started saying the the names of grapes we'd heard of.

But we did finally guess, even though I felt like a complete idiot saying my guess out loud.

I said Pinot Noir, Cynthia said gamet.

Once again, I second-guessed myself.

My original guess based on the color was Pinot Noir.

I have to pay attention to my wine instincts here because, of course, Nikki was right again.

And both of us got the region wrong, unsurprisingly.

But onwards to glass number two, which tasted completely different.

I'm gonna guess Grenache.

Not bad guess actually.

I'm glad to.

Wait, can you say that again?

It's not a bad guess.

I just wanted to get it on tape.

Yeah.

I need something here.

The second wine was a gamete.

Michael gave me some credit here because Grenache, it was a good guess because it's actually a really similar grape.

And depending on the production, they can make really similar wines.

So half a point?

Sure.

Whatever you need for your ego not to be completely crushed, Cynthia.

So we've had a Pinot Noir from Burgundy, a Gamay from Beaujolais.

Time for number three.

This is like pure no fruit fruit on the nose.

Yeah, it's really.

It's really earthy.

Is that a Cab Franc?

Yes.

Wow, look at you.

You're going for your sommelier.

Oh, yeah.

Where in France do we find Cabernet Franc?

I have no idea.

Yeah, I've been studying for the theory part.

Guys, I'm totally giving up on this podcasting thing.

Court of Master Sommelier exam.

Here I come.

Clearly, I was born to do this.

I mean, just raw, natural talent.

Nikki, I'm gonna leave the master simulator thing to you.

I loved being able to really focus on the difference in the grapes.

Michael said if we used those three glasses as benchmarks, we'd always be able to recognize Pinot Noir, Gamay, and Cabernet Franc.

But when you get down to all the crazy details Bianca needs to learn, I have no patience, and clearly not Nikki's raw talent or copious wine consumption.

So this is fun.

And the wine was delicious.

And everyone should go to High Treason in San Francisco because it's the best and Michael is wonderful and they have so many delicious wines by the glass.

Plus, the smoked mussels we had as a palate cleanser, seriously good.

But you can also give this a try at home.

Think of it as some homework, perhaps more fun than the school kind.

Buy a few different bottles of wine made from different grapes or from the same grape, but different regions.

Put the bottles in brown paper bags, have someone move them around so you don't know which one is where.

Gather some friends, sip some wine.

You don't have to guess which is which, just what do you taste?

Can you pick out any differences?

I found it kind of addictive, actually.

That kind of detective work, picking up clues from the color and how viscous the wine was and its aroma.

It was fun.

But before you all get super buzzed, back to Bianca's book, Cork Dork and Her Experience Learning to be a sommelier.

First, we are not going to reveal the ending, whether she passed the exam or not.

You have to read the book to find out.

And you should read the book because, as you may have guessed by now, it is totally fascinating, but also very funny and charming.

Overall, Bianca told us that this crazy rabbit hole she fell into, it made her appreciate wine on an entirely new level.

It used to be I would smell a glass of wine.

On a good day, I could tell you it was wine, but really I got very little out of the experience.

After all of this, you know, when I smell a glass of wine now, it tells me a story.

It's pleasurable not only on a physical level, but really on an emotional and an intellectual one as well.

I mean, I find that I can travel through time and space in a glass of wine, which I think is amazing.

For Bianca, training her nose like this and really focusing on her senses, that's something that has transformed her daily lived experience too.

Wine or no wine.

for me It was a particularly vivid example of that was when I was actually driving back from meeting with Ann Noble at her home and I had been with her and one of her students who's blind and he had described how one of his greatest pleasures was driving on the highway with the windows down and taking in the olfactory landscape and I hadn't really thought about that or ever doing it.

And so I actually took his advice and when I drove home that day from Davis back to San Francisco, I kept the windows down and I was just just shocked in the way that I could smell the landscape changing.

As it got later in the evening, I started, went from sort of smelling the woods and the forest and the hay as I was in these more rural areas to starting to smell dinners being made to eventually really smelling what I can only describe as the smell of the city as I crossed over the bridge into San Francisco.

And it was just

you know, this invisible part of the world that has so much richness and information that I, at least, you know, had spent my whole life basically ignoring.

Thanks for this episode to Bianca Bosker, author of Cork Dork, a wine-fueled adventure among the obsessive sommeliers, big bottle hunters, and rogue scientists who taught me to live for taste.

The book comes out at the end of March, and you can pre-order it on our website, gastropod.com.

It is a great gift for any wine lover in your life, or really for anyone who wonders what the whole wine thing is about.

Thanks also to Michael Ireland, the co-owner and wine director at the bar High Treason in San Francisco.

Michael was so generous with his time and expertise, and we absolutely loved the wines and the food.

Don't forget, if you enjoy Gastropod, you can help support the show on our Patreon page or at gastropod.com.

We've got a lot of new Patreon supporters lately.

Thanks to all of you.

And there are other ways to support the show if you can't do so financially.

Write us a review over at iTunes.

It helps new listeners find us.

And finally, like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter at GastroPodcast.

In two weeks, we'll be back with an episode about how our sense of taste works and how we can trick it.

Till next time.

Support for this show comes from Pure Leaf Iced Tea.

When you find yourself in the afternoon slump, you need the right thing to make you bounce back.

You need Pure Leaf Iced Tea.

It's real brewed tea made in a variety of bold flavors with just the right amount of naturally occurring caffeine.

You're left feeling refreshed and revitalized, so you can be ready to take on what's next.

The next time you need to hit the reset button, grab a Pure Leaf iced tea.

Time for a tea break?

Time for a Pure Leaf.