The Salt Wars

40m
Salt is a magical substance. It reduces bitterness, enhances sweetness, boosts flavor, and preserves perishable foods. Without it, we would die: the human body can’t make sodium, but our nerves and muscles don’t work without it. It was considered rare until quite recently, so it’s hardly surprising that, throughout history, salt has been the engine behind empires and revolutions. Today, there’s a new battle in the salt wars, between those who think that we eat too much of it and it’s killing us—and those who think most of us are just fine. Join us for a serving of salt, seasoned with science, history, and a little politics.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Listen and follow along

Transcript

Support for this show comes from Pure Leaf Iced Tea.

When you find yourself in the afternoon slump, you need the right thing to make you bounce back.

You need Pure Leaf Iced Tea.

It's real brewed tea made in a variety of bold flavors with just the right amount of naturally occurring caffeine.

You're left feeling refreshed and revitalized, so you can be ready to take on what's next.

The next time you need to hit the reset button, grab a Pure Leaf Iced Tea.

Time for a tea break?

Time for a Pure Leaf.

With a Spark Cash Plus card from Capital One, you earn unlimited 2% cash back on every purchase.

And you get big purchasing power.

So your business can spend more and earn more.

Capital One, what's in your wallet?

Find out more at capital1.com slash SparkCash plus.

Terms apply.

There are times where I've sort of been been like, oh Christ, it's 20 degrees and I have to go down to the beach to get water right now.

Or when I was dealing with the bottom of my trunk being corroded because I'd spilled too much salt water in it

over a few months.

Things like that.

I was like, why the hell am I doing this?

I can just buy salt.

I've made a lot of stuff at home, but I have never thought of making my own salt.

But now you can.

That's just one of the secrets of salt we'll be getting into this week.

You're listening to Gastropod, the podcast that looks at food through the lens of science and history.

I'm Nicola Twilley.

And I'm Cynthia Graeber.

And this week, we are all about what has historically been worth its weight in gold.

But today you can buy it at the grocery store for just a couple of bucks.

But that's the whole history of salt.

People making a big fuss about an edible rock.

I mean, salt was behind empires, wars, revolutions, Indian independence, Venetian palazzos, drilling for natural gas.

It's all built on salt.

And today people are still making a huge deal out of salt.

But now it's all about how much we should be eating.

Scientists and public health officials are trying to get us to eat way less salt.

Plus, don't forget all the foodies with their artisanal handmade salt.

There's a lot of hoopla there, too.

So what is all the fuss about?

Why was salt so valuable?

How much should we be eating today?

And are all those fancy salts really worth it?

Well, salt is an essential nutrient.

In fact, it's the mechanism by which we communicate between cells and between cells and all that surrounding fluid.

So, without an adequate sodium intake, life is not possible.

That's Mickey Alderman, Emeritus Professor at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine.

And he is talking about salt, too, because everyone is this episode.

Sodium is just part of the picture.

The thing we call salt, its chemical name, is actually sodium chloride.

We need both of those substances to live.

Chloride helps with digestion and respiration, and sodium, which our bodies can't make, it transports oxygen and nutrients and nerve impulses it moves muscles including the heart which as you might imagine is pretty important we need sodium chloride we need salt we each have about 250 grams of salt that's like three or four salt shakers worth in our bodies at all times we're constantly losing it and needing to replenish it But the weird thing is, when you're low on salt, how do you know?

That's kind of a mystery.

Mark Kurlanski wrote an entire book on salt.

It's called, appropriately, Salt, a World History.

Well, you know, there were a lot of soldiers in World War II in the Pacific who suffered from salt shortages, and then they gave them salt pills and they were better.

But at no time in this process did they experience a tremendous increase in the urge to eat salt.

There were no sense of, you know, the way if you lack water, you feel thirst.

There's nothing like that with salt.

There's nothing in your body that tells you you're not getting enough salt.

It's just that you feel sick.

It wasn't a problem that we couldn't tell when we needed salt way back in evolutionary history.

We got plenty of it in our normal diets.

It wasn't necessary, it still isn't necessary for hunter-gatherers because, you know, if you have a diet of largely red meat, you get all the salt you need.

The Maasai people in East Africa actually still get all the salt they need just by bleeding livestock and drinking the blood.

But as soon as you get into

agriculture and commerce are the two things that require salt.

Agriculture because all mammals require salt, so you have to provide salt for livestock if you're raising it.

And also,

you don't get sodium chloride from grain and vegetable diets.

So, when people shifted to that kind of a diet, they needed additional salt.

Not just people, all animals need salt.

And if they don't get enough of it in the animals and plants they eat, they find other options.

They usually get them by finding a place where a salty place and licking it.

Most of the roads in North America were originally animal trails of animals going to salt lakes.

This is one of my favorite factoids in Mark's book.

Turns out that the city of Buffalo in New York is named after a salt lake near Lake Erie.

Buffalo had discovered it, and they created a huge trail to get to it.

So that's how animals get their salt.

But once we started farming, we needed to add salt to our diets.

Nobody knows how humans figured that out, but we did.

And then we had to figure out how to get a hold of it.

The oceans were clearly full of salt, but not everybody lived by the ocean.

Salt was undoubtedly produced long before we have any records of it.

Some of the earliest records we have of it are in ancient China.

Some of the earliest records of just about everything are in ancient China because they were very good about making records.

The earliest written record of salt production in China dates to around 800 BC, and it describes how a whole millennium earlier, their ancestors were already putting ocean water in a clay pot and boiling it down to produce salt crystals.

Then, at around 200 BC, salt production in China went high-tech.

Around that time, the governor of what is now Sichuan discovered that these briny pools they used for salt, the water didn't magically appear.

It came from underground.

And he got the idea to go drilling for more.

They pumped brine and

boiled it down.

And when they started to drill for brine, they experienced a lot of fires and explosions, which initially told them that there were dragons or evil spirits or gods that didn't want them drilling.

But eventually they figured out that there was this invisible substance that burned.

So they harnessed it with bamboo tubing and used it for the fires to cook down the brine.

And that's actually the earliest recorded use of natural gas.

This bamboo piping filled with brine and natural gas, it's spread out across the entire landscape like a spider web.

You could even see it up till recently.

Mark has a photo in his book, and it looks like a a roller coaster of tubes on scaffolding, snaking up and down to take advantage of gravity.

And then at about the same time in Europe, the Celts took the lead, but instead of drilling, they went digging.

They had deep mines for salt, and because salt preserves, when they had mine collapses, miners in Celtic clothing have been found in mines dating back centuries, and so that's how we know about that.

The long and short of all of Mark's stories is that our ancestors went to a huge effort to get hold of salt, especially the ones that didn't live near the ocean.

Which is funny because salt isn't rare at all.

In fact, there's tons of it.

But it takes a lot of energy to evaporate it from the ocean, so that wasn't possible everywhere in the world.

There's also a ton of salt in the ground, but until modern geology pointed the way, people had a hard time finding it.

And so the net result was that salt was incredibly valuable.

It's hard to stress just how important it was.

The word salary and soldier both come from the Latin word sal or salt.

Because Roman soldiers were paid in salt, which they could then trade because it was always a very sellable commodity.

So wherever the Roman army went, they produced salt.

Salt literally was money.

But it wasn't usually traded just as white powder.

Instead, it was smuggled around the world inside bood.

Really, the only way of making a food a commodity that could be shipped long distances was to salt it, preserve it in salt.

Anything that you wanted to trade, including things like sauerkraut, but also salt fish and cheese.

You really couldn't trade in milk or dairy products except for cheese, which is a salted product and will last a long time.

Cheese would not exist without salt.

In fact, some of the greatest foods humanity has ever produced are only possible with salt.

Salt preserves food because it draws out water and kills harmful bacteria.

The deliciousness is just a side benefit.

Things like bacon and salted anchovies and not so much in America, but in the Mediterranean and the Caribbean, they still eat salted codfish and ham as a salted food.

These were all

foods that were salted for preservation, but we still eat them just because we like them.

As Mark points out, salted codfish, salt cod, it's one of those foods that's still central to so many diets around the world, in Portugal and Spain, and Brazil.

But salt cod did not achieve its popularity because it was the tastiest fish ever.

Frankly, at least in my opinion, it's not.

Instead, the secret to cod's global domination is that it could be easily preserved.

Fat turns rancid, but cod is lean.

Cod is a particularly good fish for salting because it has almost no fat and it just salts off really well.

Its large flakes work well for salting, too.

And it was a very large fish.

So it became the dominant fish of Europe.

I think something like 60% of fish that was eaten in Europe was cod at one point.

Basically, you have huge, huge quantities of cod, this completely unexploited resource off the coast of North America.

You have hungry Europeans and you have salt, which means those hungry Europeans could eat the North American cod.

Salt cod ended up being so important in European diets from the 16th century on that it's credited with having prevented several famines.

But as we said, until modern geology, salt was considered really precious, which means that the people who had control over the salt had lots of power.

The Venetians were the first to tax salt.

They started in 1281 and made made everyone pay taxes on the powder for hundreds of years.

And that made Venice one of the absolutely richest places in the world.

All those beautiful palazzos and the hydraulic engineering for the canals, pretty much paid for with salt.

Salt built that city.

Salt is behind a lot of power struggles in the world, too.

In fact, just in the last century, and I never learned this in school when I learned about Gandhi, Gandhi's first rebellion against the British, it involved salt.

The British did not allow Indians to make salt and force them to buy British salt from Cheshire.

This salt, of course, was much more expensive than it would have been for them to make their own.

The British really went a little insane on the whole salt thing.

They even planted a giant hedge that crossed the entire country to make sure no one could trade salt from the Indian coasts illegally.

And so Gandhi understood that this was a real popular gripe.

Poor people were being forced to buy this British salt they couldn't afford.

So it was a classic example example of British colonialism and what they hated about the British Empire.

And

he presented this to the Congress Party as something they could do to really move the movement to protest salt.

And they thought he was kind of nuts.

They probably thought he was kind of nuts anyway.

But he was actually very media savvy.

And so he just created this march to the sea.

He said, I'm going to the sea to make salt, which was a crime.

And everybody followed him.

And he contacted all of the media, all the British papers and American papers, and so that they would follow him.

And he turned it into a big media event, you know, and he got to the shore

where salt was just kind of crusting on the beach.

And he picked up a crust and said, there, I've made salt and defied the British Empire.

And it was hugely popular.

It really did a lot to spur the independence movement.

Gandhi still still had an uphill struggle ahead of him, but with the help of salt, he'd really kick-started the movement for Indian independence.

These stories give you a sense of all the economic and power implications of salt.

But the reason we love salt goes far beyond the fact that our bodies need it and it helps preserve food.

It also transforms the flavors of food.

Gary Beacham is the emeritus director of the Monel Chemical Census Center, and he spent his professional life studying salt.

I have often said to the dismay, actually, of some of my colleagues in the medical profession that salt is a magic ingredient.

Salt makes things salty, of course, but it does so much more than that.

Like when salt preserves cheese and pork and fish, the proteins actually break down and rearrange in ways that create all sorts of new umami flavors.

Salt also reduces bitterness.

The Romans must have known this because salad, that also comes from the Latin word sal or salt.

The Romans poured brine on what must have been bitter greens, which turns out to have been a smart move.

Salt, and particularly the ion sodium itself, is a very, very excellent inhibitor of bitter taste.

It doesn't inhibit all bitter tasting substances, but it inhibits a lot of them and inhibits them profoundly.

And so it's our belief that many foods that have salt in them, and particularly the vegetables where there are bitter compounds which are both healthy and yet disliked, that sodium helps knock that flavor down.

In a complex food, what also happens is that if you specifically knock down bitterness, bitterness itself has been inhibiting sweetness, so by adding salt, you can literally make things sweeter.

That's part of why there's so much salt in industrially processed foods, even ones that don't taste salty.

It helps preserve them, it helps get rid of any bitter notes produced during the processing, it helps boost sweetness, which we love, and it even helps with texture and color.

The point is, salt is kind of the wonder drug of the food world.

And now, these days, it's cheap.

Salt, with the exception perhaps of water, is the cheapest thing you can put into food.

So manufacturers would routinely put probably more salt than was needed because there was no cost downside.

And generally speaking, it made the food taste much better.

Support for this show comes from Pure Leaf Iced Tea.

You know that point in the afternoon when you just hit a wall?

You don't have time for self-care rituals or getting some fresh air, so maybe you grab a beverage to bring you back.

But somehow it doesn't do the trick, trick or it leaves you feeling even worse what you need is a quality break a tea break and you can do that with pure leaf iced tea real brewed tea made in a variety of bold and refreshing flavors with just the right amount of naturally occurring caffeine with a pure leaf iced tea in hand you'll be left feeling refreshed and revitalized with a new motivation to take on what's next The next time you need to hit the reset button, grab a pure leaf iced tea.

Time for a tea break?

Time for a Pure Leaf.

This message is brought to you by Apple Card.

Each Apple product, like the iPhone, is thoughtfully designed by skilled designers.

The titanium Apple Cart is no different.

It's laser-etched, has no numbers, and it earns you daily cash on everything you buy, including 3% back on everything at Apple.

Apply for Apple Card on your iPhone in minutes.

Subject to credit approval, Apple Card is issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Salt Lake City Branch.

Terms and more at applecard.com.

So now salt is everywhere in everything.

And the question is, is that a good thing, or is it slowly killing us?

But first, why do we crave it?

Basically, I think my own view is that at least to some degree, our liking for salt, the salty taste of salt at least, is built into us.

That's Gary Beacham again.

And his point is, we love salt.

We're built that way.

And by built into us, what I mean is that the ability to detect it is certainly built in, that's part of our biology.

But even the liking for it is built in because, and this is more speculation than it is science, there's really no health downside to excess sodium consumption, or very little health downside to excess sodium consumption

in a species like us until we reach middle age or later and where hypertension will lead to heart disease and all those consequences.

But from an evolutionary point of view, that doesn't matter because we're past breeding.

And so there's very little downside to consuming too much salt and very big downside to not consuming enough.

Gary mentioned hypertension and heart disease.

And this is where the huge debate is today.

We are about to dive into the salt wars.

Scientists are arguing about how much salt we should be eating.

They're publishing major papers and big-name scientific journals that completely disagree with each other.

And in the middle of all this scientific back and forth, the U.S.

Food and Drug Administration, the FDA, they put out new draft guidelines on sodium reduction.

This is a major statement of the position that the U.S.

government is taking in the salt wars.

So let's get into it.

Who is right and who is wrong when it comes to salt?

We know that we need salt to live, but here's the basic argument for why we might be eating too much of it today.

This is coming straight from another governmental agency, the Centers for Disease Control.

So eating too much sodium increases blood pressure, which is a major risk factor for two leading causes of death, heart disease and stroke.

And one in three U.S.

adults has high blood pressure, and that's 71 million Americans.

90% of us eat too much salt?

Are Sandra and the CDC really saying that almost all Americans eat too much salt?

Yep, they are.

And that's pretty much being the official position globally.

The argument goes, okay, we know if you eat more salt, you have higher blood pressure.

We know higher blood pressure is connected to heart disease.

So basically, everyone said, okay, we should lower salt because that would lower blood pressure, which is a good thing.

And so you end up with the situation where the official recommendation is that 90% of us need to eat less sodium.

I mean, that seems clear.

Bad, but clear.

But there's been a bunch of new research building up over the past decade, and now things are not so clear.

This is what we meant by the salt wars.

We spoke to a bunch of scientists to try to understand what's going on, and we read a bunch of scientific papers, and this is what we figured out.

First of all, recently people started showing that low salt consumption is a problem.

Low, not high, it's bad to eat too little salt.

That makes sense, too.

We know salt is an essential nutrient.

We'll die without it.

And the fact is, every other essential nutrient works the same way.

Too little is bad, too much is bad, in the middle is just right.

So why wouldn't salt be like that too?

Like we say, there are some recent massive studies that seem to show that salt is like that.

That if you eat too little salt, you also have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease.

The reason is a little complicated, but when we don't have enough sodium in our diets, these other hormone systems kick into action, and they can also cause cardiovascular disease.

There's now quite a few studies showing that, in fact, if you get down to the level that the American Heart Association recommends is healthy, that's 1,500 milligrams a day, that's actually dangerous.

And there's something else.

These studies also found that all over the world, in people with very different lifestyles and cuisines, 90% of us eat about the same amount of salt.

Nearly all of us seem to eat between about 2,600 milligrams and about 4,900 milligrams.

And, and this is key, the research did not find any difference in cardiovascular disease in that range.

If you ate 2,600 milligrams, you had about the same risk of heart attack and stroke as if you ate about 4,000 milligrams.

So, Cynthia, why is the CDC telling me I have to only eat 2,300 milligrams?

It's back to that same argument about blood pressure and heart disease.

All the studies that the CDC recommendations are based on do show that higher sodium consumption is related to higher blood pressure.

And we also know that higher blood pressure is related to higher risk of heart attack and stroke.

But here's the problem.

What none of the studies show, because this experiment is really hard to do.

They don't show that if people lower their salt intake, they would lower their risk for heart attacks.

The logic is there, sure, but making sense is not evidence.

So why don't we just do those studies and settle the matter?

Not that simple, sorry.

In order to definitively settle the debate, one would have to do a long-term, large, randomized controlled trial where we randomize half the people to, say, a very low-sodium diet and half the people to a usual diet, and then follow these people up over time, say, five to ten years, and assess their differences for heart attacks and strokes and mortality.

The problem is with a study like that, it's very, very difficult to do.

It's very difficult to get people to consume a low-sodium diet for a long period of time.

Andrew Menti is an epidemiologist at McMaster University, and he's the author of a big new study on salt consumption in the journal The Lancet.

And his point is, no one had done the study that we would need to do to know for sure if lowering salt will save lives because it's too hard.

But just this year, one group of scientists has done that study.

Their results are still impressed, but here's how they did it.

They took a group of people and for some of them, they reduced their salt consumption by about a third, down to the low end of Andrew's normal range, 2,300 milligrams, which is what the CDC recommends.

And then they followed that group for a long time.

They've been following them now for a couple of decades.

Nancy Cook is one of the lead authors of this study.

She's at Harvard Medical School.

And Nancy says that they're seeing that the group on the lower sodium diet does have significantly lowered cardiovascular disease and death, a 25% reduction, which is a big deal.

So this seems to complicate things.

All these studies were showing that it didn't matter whether you ate 2,600 milligrams of sodium a day or 4,900, that it didn't affect your chances of dying from heart disease.

But Nancy's new data is showing that if you lower your sodium consumption, that does reduce your chance of dying from heart disease.

But gives there are some caveats for all these studies.

Nancy's research was done on people who already had high enough blood pressure that the doctors were keeping an eye on them.

It wasn't full-blown high blood pressure, but it was a worry, so maybe it doesn't apply to people who don't have any problem with high blood pressure.

And for that matter, Nancy has some concerns about Andrew's study.

The problem is, it's really hard to know how much sodium people are consuming.

You have to measure their urine to see how much they excrete.

And for her study, Nancy measured people's urine multiple times a day, because your levels do go up and down.

Andrew only measured once a day and estimated from that.

But Andrew says his study is large enough that any error will get canceled out.

So where does all this leave people who want to know how much salt to eat?

What does the science say?

As you can tell, there's no simple answer.

But here is what the two of us are taking away from this debate.

One, everyone seems to agree that if you're an outlier, if you have really high blood pressure, or if you eat a ton of salt in your regular diet, you probably should reduce it.

But the good news is, most people aren't outliers.

Most of us seem to eat within a range that seems to keep us healthy.

So, if you don't have high blood pressure, there's no evidence yet that reducing your salt intake will lower your chance of dying of heart disease.

The science is just not clear that everyone could stand to reduce salt.

Here's what is going on, though.

Even though there's no consensus that everybody across the U.S.

should be reducing their salt intake, the government is now trying to get food manufacturers to put less salt in their processed foods, because that's where most of us get most of our salt.

But if the evidence for reducing salt isn't clear, should we be making that official government policy?

Because we are.

So we called our friend Jimmy Williams.

He's the host of Decode DC.

It's a podcast devoted to making sense of the craziness that goes on inside the beltway.

If anyone can explain how government happens, it's Jimmy.

To help him figure this out, Jimmy called Robert Brackett.

He's a scientist and former director at the FDA.

So, Jimmy, can you lay out for us what the FDA is doing right now with SALT and where we are?

Yeah, so basically, it's this.

This is a voluntary guideline.

This is not the big government telling you that you have to do this.

But what it basically says is we're eating too much of sodium.

And then they they went through and they literally tested basic, or they didn't, the food industry tested what's in their products.

Everything from pimento cheese to kimchi to vegetable juice to ham, you name it.

They tested it and they said, okay, this is the baseline of the sodium amount that's in there.

And this is what we think you should be eating.

And you need to get to this level by this certain date.

And again, it's all voluntary.

Some of the reductions were 4%.

Some of the reductions were 40%.

And again, it all depended on what the product was.

Now, the onus though is not so much on the consumer.

It's actually on the food industry.

And let me also say this.

You know, these

process of what these guidelines are supposed to be, that's currently out in the public sphere.

So basically, what happens is when a government agency here in the United States proposes something, under federal law, they have to give it out.

They have to put it out there to the American people.

And they have to say, okay, what do you think?

Now, I got to break the news to you guys.

I'm pretty sure that 99.99% of the American people do not comment on the FDA website when they propose a rule or a regulation.

I imagine that they don't even know about it.

That's exactly right.

That's exactly right.

But you can do that.

I mean, Cynthia, you can do it.

Nikki, you can do it.

Our listeners can do it.

Anybody can go and do that.

And so it's right now it is a proposed guideline, and the FDA is taking in your thoughts and wishes, et cetera, et cetera, as well as the industries.

So that includes the Salt Institute, the grocery manufacturers of America.

I mean, anybody can comment.

And then the FDA will then take all that information and then they will decide what those salt levels should be.

And they'll put out a final rule and they'll publish that in what is called the Federal Register, which is a book that nobody reads except for people like me because I'm a nerd.

But the point is, is that that's what it'll do.

That's how this process is going to work.

And that is the process by which virtually every single regulation and rule from a federal agency, that's how it happens here in Washington, D.C.

I don't know, Jimmy,

if you know this, but I'm curious, why are they doing this?

What are they hoping to achieve?

Well, I asked Professor Brackett that question, and I said, you know, was this some nerd sitting at the FDA going, hmm, you know, I feel a little bloated today.

Maybe I should eat less salt.

Or was this a trade group that said, you know what, we really, we're tired of doing open heart surgeries.

Therefore, we think Americans should consume less sodium

and that will lead to less hypertension, therefore less cardiovascular diseases.

And the answer is we don't know.

We don't know where this came from.

And the answer to most government regulations and rules is that we don't know because we'll never know.

As open and transparent as the the rulemaking is, where it comes from is usually very secret

and beyond not transparent.

So my gut tells me that the American Heart Association and other industry groups like the AHA came out and said, you know, Americans are consuming too much of this stuff.

When you were talking to the scientists from the FDA,

doesn't the FDA know that the science is actually conflicted about just how much salt the general public should be eating?

Well, when the FDA proposed the rule, they actually said that the science is overwhelming.

I mean, that scientists across the world know that this is the right thing to do.

They don't say it's undisputed, but they do say, in fact, that the overwhelming body of evidence is what they think.

I think the answer is that's why this is a voluntary guideline here.

I think that they can't say conclusively.

I mean, without a doubt, that what we're doing salt-wise or sodium-wise is completely and terribly bad for us.

And when the FDA or a government agency doesn't know, that's when you get voluntary guidelines as opposed to actual rules.

How do you see this playing out?

Do you think this is the start of sort of getting serious about SALT, or will it have no effect at all?

You know what, honestly, I've been in Washington for 24 years.

I don't think people are going to pay any attention to this whatsoever.

A huge thanks to Jimmy for helping us figure out what the FDA is up to.

Decode DC is really the only way to make sense of what goes on in Washington.

So, Cynthia, now we understand how the SALT guidelines are developed at the FDA, but it still really begs the question, why?

I hate to sound like a broken record here, but why is the FDA doing this?

Especially when there are a lot of other things wrong with the American diet that are causing cardiovascular disease that the FDA could be focusing on instead.

Yeah, well, sodium probably is one of the easiest things to fix.

Ideally, obviously, a diet would be, you know, fruits and vegetables and a more healthy diet with whole grains, etc.

But

and in doing that, you'd also lower your sodium.

But it'd be very difficult to tell people to eliminate all processed foods and just eat fresh foods, for example.

Sodium seems to be something that would be easier to target.

Nancy Cook of Harvard Medical School is one of the scientists who did that really difficult study to tease out whether eating less salt can save lives.

And based on what she says and what Jimmy says, you know, it it sounds to us like the FDA probably picked this battle because it's an easy win.

And it can't do any harm, right?

Not so fast.

Here's Andrew Mentey again.

I think it's going a bit overboard because the more focus you have on one thing, that's the less time that you're focused on other things that are more important that could have a bigger impact.

I think reducing sugar intake is much more important, far more important.

Sugar and refined carbohydrates really, I think, are the problem with the food supply.

Better to focus on things like that, focus on increasing physical activity, reducing smoking.

Those are the key things.

And it's better to direct our resources to things that would have a bigger impact rather than diverting resources to things that might not be helpful and may even backfire.

So that's Andrew's take.

And here's what he means when he says this might backfire.

We don't know what will happen if manufacturers reduce their salt.

When the government said that fat was bad, manufacturers cut fat but filled their products with sugar.

And that obviously did not work out well.

So what if that happens with salt?

There may be something added to take the place of the sodium that they might reach.

And anyway, the point is it's an experiment.

It's an experiment that's never been done before to ask industry to reduce the sodium content of foods.

And we don't know what the effect is going to be.

I think that's a leap that's potentially harmful, but with no scientific justification.

At the beginning of the show, we heard from Mickey Alderman, emeritus professor at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and he and Andrew Menti are in the same camp.

Mickey's done multiple studies over the years that show that most of us are fine with how much salt we're eating.

So Mickey is arguing, why take the risk?

This could make things worse, and we don't know that it will make them better, so why do it?

But Nancy isn't worried about that.

I mean, you don't need to substitute anything else for the salt.

You could just reduce the salt.

It's not necessary to have that much salt.

And then, you know, people can always add salt if they want, if they really want something.

I mean, it's not like they're outlawing salt.

They're just reducing the salt in packaged foods.

And it'll actually give people more choice because then they can choose to have lower sodium foods as well.

That's actually the real easy win.

Most of us get lots of salt in processed foods where we can't really taste it.

But if you cut down on processed foods, you can feel free to pretty much go nuts with salt at the table where you can taste it.

The scientists we spoke with said even if you're trying to keep your blood pressure down, it would be difficult to consume too much salt if you're just using it to season home cooked food.

Like we said, our takeaway is that if you're healthy, you can and should enjoy salt.

And it turns out it's a good time to do that.

Salt is going through a renaissance right now.

It's like we've come full circle and salt is valuable again.

So after listening to the scientists duke it out, we celebrated by going to an entire store devoted to salt.

Well, my name is Don Teidman.

and you're in the salt cellar and we're in Portsmouth, New Hampshire.

We're also located, we have another store up in Portland, Maine.

We kind of look at ourselves really as curators of salt because it comes from all over the world, where

artisans will add different ingredients, different kinds of flavors,

minerals primarily.

Don showed us pink Himalayan salt and black Hawaiian salt and gray selgris from France.

The colors come from impurities, minerals, or mud in the salt.

And Don showed us some Peruvian pink salt that was shaped into perfect tiny pyramids.

What's so fun about these crystals of salt is that when you sprinkle them on your food at the table, you get that little bit of crunch as you're eating, and then the salt lingers a little longer.

It also affects the way you taste it.

And then we tried a whole slew of other salts that had had flavor infused in them: truffle salt, and vanilla bean salt, and smoked salts, and sea licorice salt.

And then we asked Don to show us his favorite.

Well, they're like my children I have.

They're all my favorites.

No,

my favorite, I'm going to show you exactly what my favorite is now.

This is a salt that we just got from Iceland.

And

Iceland is an interesting place for salt because it's a very cold country, but they also have the geothermals.

So they're able to go out into the Arctic Ocean, bring back the water, and then use the geothermals to evaporate.

And they make a really amazing salt.

So as a matter of fact, we're going there in four weeks to meet with them.

On a salt hunting expedition?

On a salt hunting expedition.

They're in the West, it's called the West Fjords of Iceland, which almost no one ever goes to.

But this is the one that they use with their thyme.

It's with an Arctic thyme.

It's a wild kind of bland.

So freaking good.

I have been putting it on everything ever since.

I sprinkled truffle salt into olive oil for dipping bread at a recent dinner party, and my guests went wild.

I also sprinkled it on some roasted potatoes, and my friend's six-year-old became obsessed.

I had to tell him the story of how hard it is to get truffles and how expensive they are just to keep him from dumping out the entire container.

These unusual-shaped crystals, and the colored salts, and the flavor-infused salts, I always thought they were sort of booty nonsense, but ever since we visited Dawn, I have been having my own personal salt revolution.

I mean, these fancy salts are super pretty, and they can really add a whole new flavor dimension.

And you know, once you give up the nagging sense that you're killing yourself, it's actually really fun to focus on salt and really taste it.

Don's store might sound a little extreme, though, as you can tell, we had a great time there.

But it turns out Don is not the most salt-obsessed man in New England.

At the start of the show, you heard the voice of Mark Sheehan.

So I'm Mark Sheehan, I'm the chef co-owner of Loyal 9 in Cambridge.

The idea behind the restaurant, we refer to it as East Coast Revival.

You know, the food is inspired by older New England recipes, techniques, ingredients,

you know, dishes, like composed plates that we've found.

Mark's menu is filled with names of dishes like Pandem Nast that I'd never heard of.

Some of them are hundreds of years old, but he makes them modern and really tasty.

And Mark does something else New Englanders used to do.

He makes his own salt.

My mother could actually tell you exactly how to make the sea salt because her stove was taken up with a pot for about a month and a half at one point.

And I drained their entire gas tank for their stove making sea salt.

But

the initial process was

I'd literally go to the beach, put on some big boots.

You know, I was doing this sometimes too in like February, so it was extremely cold.

So, you know, walk out into a tidal pool, fill up the bucket, try to get it back in my car without splashing too much.

And then I'd strain it through, you know, multiple coffee filters.

And then

pretty much bring it up to just below a boil.

So you start to see like steam rise from it.

And then turn it down to the lowest possible setting you have, like if you have a warming setting on your oven or something, and let it hang out.

And then I'll get to a point where I basically have this, this like, this almost like slush.

You'll have like a thin sheet of salt over the top.

It almost looks like a frozen pond.

Underneath, you'll have this slushy mass.

And if I leave that on the stove too long, I'll scorch it.

I'll burn the bottom.

So I'll take that out of the pot at that point gently so I don't break up too much of the crystals.

Put it in like a pan and then I'll go into like a very very low oven to you know 150 degrees something like that and I'd let that go for about two three days and then I'd just put it on the counter.

It is very labor and very energy intensive.

He isn't using this handmade salt for his pasta water for sure.

But for Mark, the flavor and really the whole idea of hyper-local homemade salt that he can sprinkle on top of his dishes, that makes it worthwhile.

There's a very particular area that

when I was kind of thinking about a lot of this food and developing it over the last few years, was spent in at this one beach.

And that sort of inspired the choice to go to that one one beach to harvest salt water to make sea salt.

So that even just for me, every time that a plate walks out the door, like it has that place with it.

Just for me, like the guest doesn't need to know it, but that I know that

that one spot and situate is on every single plate.

Thanks again to the Boroughs Welcome Fund.

They support our coverage of biomedical research.

And a huge thanks this episode to our friends at Decode DC.

Decode DC comes out once a week, and it's vital listening for understanding how politics affects everyday life in America.

Recent episodes cover Native American voting rights, how the Trump family got so rich, and the link between the Second Amendment and slavery.

Check it out at decode DC.com or iTunes.

Their SALT episode features Jimmy's full conversation with Bob Brackett, as well as our lovely voices.

Thanks also to Mark Kurlanski.

His most recent book is Paper Paging Through History.

Mickey Alderman, Nancy Cook, Sandra Jackson, Andrew Mente, and Gary Beacham helped us untangle the science behind salt.

And finally, thanks to Don Teidman of the Salt Cellar and Mark Sheehan of Loyal 9 Restaurant and Cafe in Cambridge.

Thanks also to Ari Lebowitz for all her help.

Links to all of our guests and their work are on our website at gastropod.com.

Where you can also sign up for our mailing list and if you give $9 a month or $5 per episode on Patreon, you can also get on our Super Special Sustaining Supporters email list and we'll send you a newsletter filled with all the good stuff we couldn't squeeze into today's episode.

We're back in three weeks, a week longer than usual, with a special episode built around our first ever live show.

Stay tuned and thanks for listening.

This month on Explain it to Me, we're talking about all things wellness.

We spend nearly $2 trillion on things that are supposed to make us well.

Collagen smoothies and cold plunges, Pilates classes and fitness trackers.

But what does it actually mean to be well?

Why do we want that so badly?

And is all this money really making us healthier and happier?

That's this month on Explain It To Me, presented by Pureleaf.