#481 – Norman Ohler: Hitler, Nazis, Drugs, WW2, Blitzkrieg, LSD, MKUltra & CIA

following is a conversation with Norman Oler, author of Blitz, Drugs in the Third Reich, a book that investigates what role psychoactive drugs, particularly stimulants, such as methamphetamine, played in the military history of World War II.

It is a book that two legendary historians, Ian Kershaw and Anthony Beaver, give very high praise to.

Ian Kershaw describes it as very well researched, serious piece of scholarship, and Anthony Beaver describes it as remarkable work of research.

And it is indeed a remarkable work of research.

Norman went deep into the archives using primary sources to uncover a perspective on Hitler and the Third Reich that has before this been mostly ignored by historians.

He also wrote Tripped, Nazi Germany, the CIA, and the Dawn of the Psychedelic Age, and he's now working on a new book with the possible title of Stoned Sapiens.

Great title.

Looking at the history of human civilization through the lens of drugs.

And now a quick few second mention of each sponsor.

Check them out in the description or at lexfriedman.com slash sponsors.

It is in fact the best way to support this podcast.

We got Uplift Desk for beautiful standing desks, Finn for AI agents, Shopify for selling stuff online, Element for Electrolytes, and Hampton for connecting with CEOs.

She's wisely, my friends.

And now, onto the full ad reads.

I try to make them interesting, but if you skip, please still check out the sponsors.

I enjoy their stuff.

Maybe you will too.

To get in touch with me for whatever reason, go to lexfriedman.com/slash contact.

Alright, let's go.

This episode is brought to you by Uplift Desk, my go-to for all office and podcast studio furniture.

This very podcast, ladies ladies and gentlemen, had

three desks, uplift desks involved, and a fourth desk in the same room.

So that desk you see, sort of me place my hands on that wooden color desk.

That's uplift desks.

And I've had those for many years and I've enjoyed them for many years,

long, long, long before they became a sponsor.

I'm a huge supporter of what they do.

I'm a huge supporter of the product they create.

I spent so much time behind a a desk that really, it might be silly to say, but things like a desk or a kinesis keyboard are sources of

little and big moments of happiness throughout the day.

And the days add up to weeks and the weeks add up to years into a lifetime.

And so the amount of happiness that Uplift Desk has brought me is

a lot, immeasurable, really.

I'm sitting behind an uplift desk now as I'm recording this.

Anyway, they have a huge number of combinations and sizes and colors and all that kind of stuff that you can pick if you go to upliftdesk.com/slash lex and use code LEX to get four-free accessories, free same-day shipping, free returns, a 15-year warranty, and an extra discount off your entire order.

That's U-P-L-I-F-T-D-E-S-K

dot com/slash LEX.

This episode is also brought to you by Finn, an amazing world-class AI agent for customer service.

It's trusted by over 5,000 customer service leaders, including Anthropic and Synthasia.

You know what an AI company trusts another AI company?

They're good.

Finn is powered by their Finn AI engine, which continuously improves.

based on the interactions during the analyze, train, test, deploy, loop.

And so your customer service keeps getting smarter and smarter and smarter.

It's built to handle complex, multi-step queries like returns, exchanges, disputes, all that kind of stuff.

If you haven't tried it, you absolutely must.

Go to fin.ai/slash lex to learn more about transforming your customer service and scaling your support team.

That's fin.ai/slash lex.

This episode is also brought to you by Shopify, a company that brings a smile to my face every time.

I bring it up in part because of the incredible conversation I had with the legendary DHH.

He is a person.

He is a programmer.

He is an entrepreneur.

As a philosopher, as a human, inspires me.

And

he and Shopify work closely together.

Obviously, we've talked a lot about Toby, the CEO of Shopify.

It's an incredible company.

The engineering behind the company is incredible.

And if you haven't listened to that episode and you're at all interested in programming, you should.

Because if you're not interested in Ruby on Rails, first of all, it's very likely that you will be by the end of the episode, but you at least will get a chance to listen to a human being that sees the beauty in the programs he creates.

So to know that a little bit of that love went behind the engineering of Shopify is really great to know.

Anyway, it is also a company, and it is also a company that helps companies sell stuff online.

So you should sign up for a $1 per month trial period at shopify.com/slash Lux.

That's all lowercase.

Go to shopify.com slash Lux to take your business to the next level today.

This episode is also brought to you by Element,

my daily zero-sugar and delicious electrolyte mix that I'm currently drinking as I dread the prospects.

After I'm done speaking these words,

I will be doing a very long run in the Texas heat.

And that's why I'm drinking electrolytes because I'm not bringing any water or electrolytes with me on the run.

And it's very possibly going to be 8, 10, 12 plus miles.

If I have the guts, it will be over 12 miles.

Let us see.

One thing is for certain.

If I don't get electrolytes into my system beforehand and afterwards, I'm just not going to feel good.

Cold water with some watermelon salt flavor, it is a big component of happiness for me.

On a daily basis, get a free eight-count sample pack for free with any purchase.

Try it at drinklmut.com/slash flex.

This episode is also brought to you by Hampton, a private community for high-growth founders and CEOs.

You can talk to LLMs all day.

You can read clickbait articles about what it's like to start a business, to grow a business.

But so much of that information quite honestly from the bottom of my heart is bullshit you have to talk to other leaders you have to talk to other ceos that have done it that are doing it that are in the middle of the battle anytime i talk to somebody uh like jason calcanis who i'm a big fan of and he's here in austin now aside of course from the all-in podcast that i'm also a fan of.

He's the host of this week in startups that I recommend you listen to.

The reason I bring that up is because he has seen and he has helped so many people in that battle of creating a business, of growing a business.

And it's so fun to talk to him because he has a lot of wisdom about the different ways to do it.

And that's what I'm trying to get at is you need to talk to the people that have done it that are not 5, 10, 20 years ago, but are doing it now.

And that's what Hampton is good at.

It connects you with other people that are in the midst of that battle.

And you can have candid conversations with them.

They have groups forming in New York City, Austin, San Francisco, LA, Miami, Denver, and other top cities nationwide.

Quit reading the bullshit online and go talk to actual founders, actual people that are building high-growth companies.

Find your group at joinhampton.com slash Lex.

That's joinhampton.com slash Lex.

This is the Lex Friedman podcast.

To support it, please check out our sponsors in the description or at least freedman.com/slash sponsors.

And consider subscribing, commenting, and sharing the podcast with folks who might find it interesting.

And now, dear friends, here's Norman Oler.

Tell me the origin story of meth, methamphetamine, and purvitin, its brand name drug version in the context of Nazi Germany in the late 1930s.

Let's start there.

I think you're right to ask about the context, because without the context, it's not really understandable.

So, what was the situation?

In the 20s, the Nazi movement basically started, and it started in Bavarian beer halls.

So, alcohol alcohol was the drug of choice of the early Nazi movement.

The only guy that didn't drink was Hitler.

He was a teetotalag, as you say.

So that was happening in Munich.

So alcohol and national socialism are very closely connected.

At the same time in the 20s, in Berlin, there was a completely different thing going on.

People were taking all kinds of drugs.

This had to do actually with the defeat of Germany in the First World War.

I mean, the context is a big context.

The Versailles Treaty had the effect that the German economy was not really able to recover after the end of World War I.

The Versailles Treaty was written basically by the Western victorious powers.

Germany had no say in the negotiations.

And

I'm certainly not a German nationalist, not even a German patriot.

But even I would say that the Versailles Treaty treated Germany somewhat unfair.

I mean, it laid all the blame on Germany.

And, I mean, a war is a very complex thing.

And the First World War,

to examine how it actually started, is a very complex, you know, story.

And there's many factors to it.

But the Versailles Treaty just said it was Germany's fault.

And then Germany had to do all these

payments to the Allies.

It couldn't create a new economy.

It couldn't have a new army.

So it was, the economy really went down.

Everything in Berlin was cheap and the people were using also substances that were very cheap in huge quantities.

So while in Bavaria they were drinking alcohol and alcohol in the brain

stimulates behavior, a group behavior, us against them.

You can actually examine this as a neuroscientist would know exactly how this works.

While in Berlin, the drugs that were used were

morphium, there was cocaine, there was mesculine, there was ether.

So people were experimenting.

Everyone developed a different mindset.

It was all, you know, you didn't behave in a way

that some kind of authority would like you to behave in, because the authority had just lost the First World War and there was no real authority in Berlin.

People were doing whatever they wanted to do and they were intoxicating themselves in the way they wanted to do it.

So the population, in a way, if you just look at at Munich and Berlin, was growing apart.

Like there were the alcohol people in Munich, the Nazis, and then there were these weird, diverse

LGBTQ, whatever

scene in Berlin, like actresses sniffing ether in the morning and then making crazy moves.

Could you speak to the nature, the motivation of the drug use in

Berlin at the time?

Was it a rebellion?

Was it a way to deal with the difficult economic depression?

Was it just the natural thing that young people do to explore themselves, to understand the world, to develop their culture?

Like, what do we understand about drug use there?

All of these factors come together.

But it was the first time in modern history,

in Germany at least, that there was no emperor.

Like before that, Kaiser Wilhelm, everything was very strict, you know, you had to, you couldn't, you couldn't go crazy, you know, as a young person.

You couldn't be a young person.

But now in the Weimar Republic in the 20s, you could.

No one stopped you.

So people went crazy.

Like that's what made Berlin into the city that it still somehow is.

And maybe later we talk about contemporary Berlin.

It kind of it's it still has that vibe, you know.

That's why people still come to Berlin.

Drugs are cheap.

You can move however you want.

There's no authority.

So that created a rift between the Nazis in Munich and they always hated Berlin and what was going on in Berlin.

So for example Goebbels, the later propaganda minister, he called the situation in Berlin diehaste asphaltreality, the hated asphalt reality of Berlin.

He hated that.

And when the Nazis then were able to take power in 1933, one of the first things they did was to really prosecute people who were taking drugs because they wanted to, you know, bring everyone back into the fold.

And I think that's, you asked what was the reason for people taking so many drugs.

They were accessible.

They were cheap.

But I think the most important thing is that they

let you find yourself maybe or lose yourself, you know?

Also possible, you know.

Can we also take a tangent there?

Because

you have a connection to this place, Berlin, and this part of the world.

Can you just briefly speak to that so we can contextualize even deeper the personal aspect of this?

Because you understand the music of the people,

the land, its history.

There's something you can only really understand if you have been there and you have taken it in.

And we'll return to this topic in multiple contexts, but in this particular way, as one human being who writes about this place, what's your own story?

I grew up in West Germany, and this was during the Cold War.

Berlin, the walled-in city, was always like a big fascination because there was a wall.

There was actually a wall in the city preventing people to move into another part.

And I was from the West, fortunate enough to be from the free West.

So I could travel to Berlin and I could leave.

I could look at it.

And I always loved Berlin.

I thought it was a very vibey place.

And then when the wall came down, I was still in school, but I like immediately got into the car of my parents and drove there.

I wanted to see how it came down.

And then Berlin really in the 90s became a place that was was very attractive to me.

And I moved there then in the 90s.

I was first living in New York.

I wrote my first novel in New York.

And I loved New York before Giuliani became mayor.

It was, he ruined the city.

Before that, it was not gentrified.

Let's say he introduced gentrification.

And gentrification is a big topic.

I still lived in the ungentrified New York City for like 300 bucks a month rent.

And everyone I knew was an artist.

You loved the diversity of it?

Yeah, I loved it.

I wrote my first novel there.

I took LSD for the first time in downtown Manhattan on a Saturday night.

So you're kind of like a German Kerouac type character, but moved a few decades forward.

I wouldn't compare myself to another writer, but I think Kerouac is pretty cool.

But he's an amphetamine writer.

On the Road was apparently written in two weeks on amphetamines.

But it's good.

You know, amphetamines are not...

bad per se.

We can also talk about the so-called bad drugs, you know, because basically they're neutral.

But let's not lose the thread.

Yes, yes.

Even though New York,

yes.

Oh, yeah.

And then I was in New York.

I was in a health food store, one of the first, like there weren't health food stores back then a lot, but there was one on First Avenue.

And suddenly there was an announcement, which was unusual in the health food store.

I think it was called

Prana Foods.

And the announcement was that Kurt Cobain had just shot himself.

It was like...

And I had been actually and still am a Nirvana fan.

I've seen one of the last concerts of Nirvana in New York City, and it was amazing.

But he killed himself and like the next day I received a music cassette from a friend of mine from Berlin with electronic music.

And I realized that there had been a paradigm shift, obviously.

Rock music with the hero on stage was dead.

Now it was, you know, dance electronic music, which a lot of people today think

It's kind of simplistic

music form, but it's actually a very highly intelligent music form.

At least it was in the 90s.

People were really experimenting with that music.

That was the new music.

That was actually the reason I moved to Berlin.

I really, I decided I leave New York City.

I'm going to move to Berlin.

And then in Berlin, to answer your question,

I fell in love with something that probably reminded me of the 20s, even though I wasn't there in the 20s.

But

that really, the city was very open.

The wall had just was still, you know, I mean, it's a few years later, but still the wall, it felt like it just came down.

That was, Germany was, uh, Berlin was not yet the capital of Germany.

That was still in Bonn.

So Berlin was a very

cheap and cultural and crazy city, probably a bit like in the 20s, actually.

And

that's how I fell in love with it, and that's how I became interested in this electronic scene.

I mean, I visited many dance venues then,

so-called clubs.

Yeah, it's one of the hubs in the world of electronic music.

They claim that techno was kind of invented in Berlin, but it was also it also comes from Detroit.

So Detroit and Berlin are like the techno hubs, I would say.

Yeah, electronic music is a soundtrack for some of the most interesting experience this earth has ever created, right?

Just it gets people together in uh some interesting ways.

So it's not just the music itself, it's the experiences that the music enables.

Well, in Germany we had a situation that the wall actually kept people apart.

People didn't know each other.

But because the wall came down, people suddenly met in

abandoned buildings in the center of Berlin, which had been owned by the socialist state of East Germany.

The most famous club, Tresor.

Trezor means like vault.

It was the big vault with the big doors.

So that's where Tresor was the club.

It's so funny that 100 years later, Berlin had all these

left partiers, young people using drugs in the Munich with the beer.

And then that's where Hitler came out.

So is that what we're supposed to imagine in the early days of the Nazi Party when Hitler's giving the speeches to just a handful of folks?

They're all drunk?

Well,

it is a fact that the movement came out of the Burger Breukelle.

It's a certain restaurant pub in Munich.

And that was not only a beer hall, that was also a political venue.

And it was a right-wing venue.

It was for right-wing populist people like communists wouldn't use it, even though communists are in many ways quite similar to the right-wing,

especially back then.

But it was used by right-wingers and Hitler didn't mind because people who are drunk are more susceptible to right-wing populism, I would claim now here.

And Hitler would agree.

So he did not think it was bad that these people were a bit drunk or maybe even very drunk.

Because if you're drunk, you also get aggressive against others.

He could play with that, you know.

So drunk, aggressive aggressive towards others, but drunk in a group.

It constitutes the group also.

If everyone is on the same alcohol,

you just go to Oktoberfest in Munich, which is not a political thing, but everyone, you know, you can kind of sense how it originated.

And actually the first time the Nazis tried to grab power was the so-called Beer Hall puts.

I mean, that's a historical event.

It took place in 1923.

And it was after a drunk night where they suddenly decided, now we're going to do it.

So they came out of the Burger Breukelle

and they were all drunk except of Hitler.

And they just tried to overtake the Munich government and they miserably failed because it was just a stupid drunk idea.

Like they were like, yeah, let's just do it.

And the Bavaria police, quite sober that day, they just, you know, shot him to the ground.

Hitler was almost killed.

Like he just jumped

behind his bodyguard.

Göring during the Beerhole Putsch was wounded in his stomach with, I think, a gunshot.

That's why why he became a morphine addict.

So this Bierhol Putsch in 23 had severe effects.

Also, they were sentenced to prison, and Hitler wrote Mein Kampf in prison.

All of these little events come together.

It's so interesting that for them, it was just life.

But now we look back, these critical moments in history that turned the tides of human civilization, right?

So Hitler could have died there, and these characters occurring that became larger than life, life that influenced the the lives and the deaths and the suffering of millions

all first of all could have been stopped then

and whatever that means when you look back at history but all all those are just human beings developing their ideas growing developing groups developing ideologies and using drugs or drinking I mean, that's why I thought it's interesting, for example, to examine Hitler's drug use.

When I announced that to a historian while I was doing research, he helped me a lot with methamphetamine in the army, proper medicine historian from the University of Ulm.

And then I said, no, I'm interested in Hitler.

He said, no, don't, this is not interesting.

This is not serious.

This is not serious history, but it's, you know, even Hitler was a person, you know.

And if you understand, for example, the substance abuse of a person, of course you understand more about that person.

And historians never had had that idea before.

Kershaw, for example, who is really a great, he's very knowledgeable about national socialism, like many British historians, they always know more about German history than the German historians.

But Kershaw really does.

I think he's really good.

But in his biography of Hitler, he just writes one sentence like,

and then he had a crazy doctor called Morel who gave him dubious medications and drugs.

And he stops there.

And then he goes on to describe whatever.

Yeah, we we should say that Ian Kirscher is widely considered to be probably one of the greatest biographers of Hitler.

I think he wrote the best biography of Hitler.

Which is

so important.

Your work is really important because it opens a whole new perspective on the lives of the individuals and the machinery of the Nazi military that historians haven't looked at.

It's so interesting that you can unlock those perspectives.

And that's the underlying, really the foundation of our conversation today and of your work is there's layers to this thing.

You can look at the

tactics of war, this strategic level of war, the operational level of war.

You can look at the human suffering of war, the love stories.

You can look at the hate, the psychology of propaganda, or you could look at the individual things, substances consumed by the individuals that make up the Nazi Party leadership and the soldiers.

And all of those are critically important to understand the war, right?

And this piece of drug use and supplement use have been ignored by historians.

That was very surprising to me, you know.

I didn't know this myself.

I never planned to write this book.

It kind of happened to me.

And

I decided to team up with the leading German historian of National Socialism, Hans Mommsen,

who has passed away by now.

He was quite old, but quite ready to be my mentor for this book Blitz.

And he

was

maybe even shocked when I came back from the military archive of Germany with like

a lot of copies.

all relating to the systematical drug use of the German army, including an experiment done by the Navy, who had always pretended to be the clean,

German we say, Waffengatung, weapon.

Like you have the army, you have the Air Force, you have the Navy,

and in Germany they had the SS.

And the Navy always pretended to be like, we weren't really Nazis, we were like, you know, the German Navy,

we had our ethics code.

But I found in the archive that the Navy did human experiments in the concentration camp of Sachsenhausen trying to find a new wonder drug because they had new what they called wonder weapons or what Hitler called wonder weapons.

He always talked about these wonder weapons.

Wonder weapons were basically mini submarines, one or two people going in, staying underwater for up to a week and torpedoing

Allied ships.

So the Navy was trying to do to develop a drug that would keep you awake and combat ready for seven days and seven nights without sleep and without burning out, very difficult to find so they hired a penalty unit in the concentration camp they hired the SS had the so-called shoe walking unit it was a penalty unit in the concentration camp testing shoe soles for the German shoe industry walking for like days and then they would measure like

how the soles you know kept up in the stress and they had different

layers in the concentration camp, like all the all the surfaces that German soldiers would touch when they conquer Europe.

So this is a very elaborate thing, you know.

And if you go to the concentration camp today, it's a museum, you can still see that running track of the shoe runners unit.

So the Navy hired the shoe runners unit from the SS, paid them money, and then gave them drugs, different kinds of drug combinations, methamphetamine combined with cocaine and in a chewing gum and like all kinds of things.

So this is a

this is a big thing, you know, and there's documents to it and momson who knew everything about national socialism the old you know

authority and i'm like the young like i'm i didn't study history i just you know i just try to make sense you know but i present him all these uh documents he's reading like from this pill patrol and he said wow like he said we historians we never do drugs we don't understand drugs this we missed this you know so he was very clear that we missed this and he said this is actually the missing link that historians did not have especially to explain hitler's degeneration as a leader like he he he made very good decisions good in meaning militarily effective decisions in the beginning of the war and very bad decisions for the german war effort towards the end and you you can you can link that to drugs.

You can explain a lot of Hitler through the drugs, but you can also look at this point that historians so far had not been able to figure out basically what happened to Hitler.

Why did he get crazy?

And I mean, he was crazy or he was, but why did he get so bad as a leader?

Because he was very effective for a long time.

And then there's this moment where it turns.

Yeah, the generation of decision-making,

psychology, behavior, all of that.

You cannot understand that fully without understanding his drug use.

And we should also say that some of the historians you mentioned, Ian Kershaw and Anthony Beaver, these legends of history, they all gave you compliments.

So Kershaw said that your work is very good, extremely interesting, and a serious piece of well-researched history.

Anthony Beaver said that it's a remarkable work of research.

So props to them.

You have received a bunch of criticism from historians, but you've also received,

obviously, a lot of props.

I mean, Kershaw's

the legendary historian of Hitler, complimenting how deep your work is.

That's

that must feel good.

Maybe, maybe this is a good moment to also just, since we're talking about historians, to address some of the criticism.

So Richard Evans has been

also a great historian,

has been one of the bigger critics.

He said that your work is crass and dangerously inaccurate account and is morally and politically dangerous.

I think that's grounded in the idea that

if you say that, well,

all the Nazi forces and Hitler was on drugs, so therefore they're evil can be, they're not really evil.

It's just accountability can be removed because they were using drugs.

Right.

And also another criticism of his,

which I also understand and probably can steal, man, is

if you look too much through the singular lens of drugs,

you can

overemphasize it.

You can overemphasize how important it was as an explainer of the effectiveness of Blitzkrieg, for example.

Because

there is some, I mean, I should say

there is something really compelling about a singular theory that explains everything, and you can fall in love with it too much as an explainer.

So can you steel man his criticism or criticism you received and also argue against it?

I think he's absolutely right that you shouldn't argue in a mono-causal way.

And this is actually what Mumson also said to me, because of course I was enthusiastic about all my drug findings.

And he said, don't argue in a monocausal way, especially the war.

There's a lot of variables, a lot of factors, a lot of things going on, yes.

So that sentence of his, don't argue in a monocausal way, that always stayed with me.

And I think that

I didn't deviate from that path, actually.

But it was still interesting that Evans

thought that I put too much emphasis on the drugs.

I think

it's a totally fine opinion.

I would disagree.

Otherwise, I wouldn't have written the book.

What I can state here is that I invented nothing.

In all of my three nonfiction books, nothing is invented.

If you are a good good writer and I trained as a novelist, for me it was also very unusual to write a non-fiction book.

I wanted to write a novel about Nazis and drugs.

My publisher said, No, this is, he looked at the, you know, at the facts.

You know, he said, someone has to write the facts.

So I said, but non-fiction books are boring.

He said, not necessarily.

Maybe you can find a way to write it with your novelistic style, but

based

100% on the facts.

And that is like

in German we we say spagat.

How do you say that?

Split?

Like when you do with your legs?

Like

it's hard, you know?

Yeah.

Because with a very fluent, sophisticated language, you can easily overpower the reader.

If I describe how the German guys, 19-year-old guys, took the math and went into the tank.

And the math started kicking in, five guys on math after like one hour of ride into France.

You can write that in a powerful way that if you are the reader, you would think, yeah, I mean, the Blitzkrieg without meth is unthinkable.

There is a bit of a,

man, I wish I found that kind of feeling for historians, right?

Like, how did I miss this piece?

So, some historians, like great historians like Kershaw, obviously, see, they kind of give you a

like a slow clap, applaud.

And some historians are a little bit skeptical, like this is a little too good.

So, totally understandable.

And

also they have different

techniques to write texts like this.

I used a totally different technique.

And I have an apparatus.

So it really feels like it could be an academic work.

But still, it's written in a way that it kind of overpowers.

It kind of colonializes the story in a weird way.

I never thought about

it like that.

But while I was writing it, I was just trying to write it as well as I could.

I didn't think about these questions we're talking about now.

I just,

I got carried away, obviously, but I never left the area of facts.

Yes.

So we should talk about your process.

That's also super fascinating.

You went to the archives.

You went to the sources.

What's that take?

What does it feel?

What does it smell like?

What does it look like?

What does it entail?

How much text is there?

What language is it in?

What's the process there?

I never thought of going to the archives.

And my girlfriend at the time, she said, you have to go to the archives.

And she's an academic.

So she, and I was like, yeah, okay, I'll go.

I'm fine.

I'll check it out.

And then when I

met

a historian, he claims that without methamphetamine, there would be no Blitzkrieg victory of Germany.

Like he's monocausal.

But he was also extremely helpful to me.

And he's an academic.

He gave me the signatures, it's called in German, where you find stuff in the archives.

Signature is like, then it says like H2

slash five three eight, something like this.

And these were the files of Professor Rank.

And Professor Rank was

he was the head of the Institute for

Army Physiology.

His job was to improve

the performance of the soldier.

And all of his stuff was

filed in a certain place in the military archives, which in Germany is in Freiburg in the south in a small town, not in Berlin, because Germany is a bit of a decentralized country.

We don't want to put everything into Berlin again like the Nazis did.

We try to avoid our mistakes.

So the military archive is in Freiburg, and I went there.

And because I had this signature, immediately I got

original documents that were all relating to my research.

Like, I could read, I had the original.

What does it look like?

Is it sheets of paper?

Yeah, it's like

it's so it's not scanned.

Well, it's different things.

Like, the guy who did the math into the army, the professor Rank,

he was

writing a war diary.

That's what the name was, war diary.

So, every day he would write it by hand.

So, this war diary was given to me.

So, you're reading that

dated, like you have a date.

Yeah.

It was a bit funny with him because

he took a lot of meth himself because he thought it was great.

He just thought it increases your performance.

By now we know a little bit more that methamphetamine is not so healthy because you get used to it and you burn out.

You get depressed and then you have to take more.

Big problem.

And he became depressed and burned out and he didn't realize it's because of the meth that he's like describing to the whole German army.

Like he was, he made a convincing case and I can explain that in detail how that actually happened.

But just to have his war diary was great.

And then

also,

he would type letters writing to the

company of Temla how fast they could produce stuff in which time.

So you have all these original documents.

You have like 500 documents, and it goes like he writes reports what happened in this battle on Methamphetamine.

Like there's a lot of stuff you can find in the archives if you find them.

them.

But

the tricky thing is that you can only look,

you kind of look at a so-called find book.

And the find book, you cannot type in drugs.

It wouldn't find anything because at the time when they were taking all the notes from this doctor, his war dive, everything, they didn't put the label drugs there.

They put the label his name, his position, World War II, French campaign, stuff like that.

So, because at the time they didn't know that I would at one point come and look for drugs in that, you know, but he was the drug guy, but also they didn't realize he was the drug guy.

You know, no one realized that he was the drug guy.

So, it's not easy to find stuff in the archives.

So, the archives, you go, it's a Kafka-sk experience.

You go into this building and you have to understand the rules, and you will never fully understand what's going on.

Also, the archivists, they don't really know what's going on because there's so many documents.

No one's read them all.

You know, no one knows.

Like, there's history kind of lying there,

somehow organized, somehow stored.

I mean, it does sound like a very Kafka-esque

thing.

But it's great if you find something, but you can also sit there for a week and not find anything.

So, what was the process for you?

You're just reading open-minded,

seeing, trying to see, is there some truth here to be discovered?

Well, I have a friend, he's a DJ, and we talked about Berlin, and we'll probably talk about it more.

And he takes a lot of drugs.

And he knows his drugs.

Let's put it that way.

He knows his drugs.

And one day he said to me when I was trying to figure out what I would write about next, he said, the Nazis took a lot of drugs.

You should write about that.

And I said, the Nazis didn't take drugs.

Because, you know, when you grow up in Germany, you get...

educated about the Nazis quite intensely, especially in West Germany.

Like they teach you everything, but they don't teach you drugs.

I mean, now they do, maybe, you know, but it was not known.

So, and the Nazis always had this

aura of being law and order.

No drugs, of course, no chaos, everything.

My grandfather, he was a Nazi, always said, well, at least there was discipline in the country, there was law and order.

So, this doesn't match with drugs, you know?

You know, I should also say, I think that's the experience for a lot of people.

Before reading your book,

you know, I had the same kind of feeling that the nazi ideology was all about like law and order and purity and surely they would not be doing drugs so this was like this really blew my mind i think i was i wasn't quite ready similar to like richard evans like this is a big like

okay

a narrative transforming into a deeper more complicated understanding what nazi forces and uh the hitler in the circle actually look like that's why i didn't believe Alex.

Always take the DJ,

the drug expert, with a grain of salt.

I didn't believe him, but I said it's a great topic.

Maybe I could invent it.

He said, no, you don't invent this.

This is real.

I said, how do you know?

And he said,

I have a friend and I know this guy by now.

I met him.

He's an antique dealer in Berlin.

And he had bought an old medicine chest in an old Berlin apartment.

This was in 2010.

And he found Pavitine tablets inside, which were the methamphetamine product that was marketed in Germany in the late 30s.

And this guy, the antique dealer, took some tablets and they were quite old, you know, 70 years old, but they still had an effect on him.

And I later asked him, and

he

said, well, we took them for about a month.

It was the greatest month we ever had.

Like, we had so much fun.

We were so productive.

Because that methamphetamine back then was also

like a quality product.

It was not crystal meth made made in a

trailer lab.

So this is many decades later.

They were still potent.

They were still potent.

Especially Alex convinced me because Alex has a high tolerance and he said, okay, they still had some.

So I said to him, can I have some also?

And I took one.

And he's like, this was, we were standing in my writing tower, which is at the river in Berlin.

And he was like, I took one

and I could feel something.

Then I took another one.

And then it's, you know, I could feel more.

And then I took a third one.

It's like typical Alex, he would like take three, you know, instead of just taking one.

He's taken, he took three methamphetamine tablets from the 40s and he said, and then I felt like, and he looked at the river and there was a big, like

big ship, like a cargo ship going by.

And he said, I felt like this ship.

Suddenly there was a shoop, he said in German, like a motion that was like energy that was grabbing me.

And I could like, I felt so powerful.

And he told me this and I was like, wow, this is like, and I googled like methamphetamine in Nazi Germany.

This was in 2010.

And there was this one professor at the university in Ulim who said the blitzkrieg was only possible because of methamphetamine.

So I called up this guy and he said, sure, I'll meet you.

And then he gave me the signature for the archive.

Then I went to the archive and then I really started to do my own research.

And then I went to different archives and I tried to find everything on Nazis and drugs.

And that came, everything is in the book.

So that crazy meeting with Alex in my writing tower, that kind of got me on this research journey.

It makes me wonder what other mysteries like that are in the archives.

Do you think there's stuff like that in there that we deeply don't understand?

About, for example, there's a bunch of mysteries that we think we understand,

maybe about the concentration camps, maybe about the Eastern Front, the interplay between Stalin and Hitler, maybe

about Britain that could be discovered in the letters, in the data that were completely missing?

I think so.

And I think that also there are archives that are not open.

Let's say the Vatican archive.

Some secret archives that some very powerful structures have, structures that we might not even know, you know, now off the top of our head, which still have a huge influence.

So I think that the human history is quite different from

what

most historians write.

I think that's

just one version.

I think there's several versions.

And I think that it goes much deeper and is much more interesting.

And

so I guess this history is a very active thing, which I also didn't know.

You know, I was writing a historical

non-fiction book and I suddenly realized that this is like a shark pool, like because the history defines the future or is very connected.

Our history teacher always said, if we don't know where we come from, we cannot know where we go.

And that is, I think, true.

That is what I now really am interested in for my next book.

I'm trying to really understand human history.

And obviously, I'm not the first.

There's a few, you know, alternative historians that go like, because you have to go back in time quite a bit.

And then it's not easy to write about it, but it's very interesting to think about.

And I would love to find

like the truth on Atlantis, which I don't believe in actually.

And we can also talk about that.

But maybe there's an archive where we can actually see that they had this king ruling.

I don't think this could be found, but

I think we can still also find a lot of documents, but I think especially in closed archives.

So we won't find them.

You said a lot of really interesting things.

It's so important to have people like you that do the daring work of going into the archives of the sources, the evidence, and trying to find a thing that completely transforms history as we thought we understood it.

That's revisionist history at its best.

Revisionist history has a sort of negative connotation sometimes because you go to conspiratorial land without much evidence, and you're just being a rebel for rebel's sake.

But when you ground it in data and dare to challenge the historical narrative, that's really powerful.

So So now, I should also mention that we've been just setting the laying out the context.

Yeah, we're still in the context phase.

Context phase.

And for the next 10 hours and maybe for the rest of our lives, we will be continuing just setting the context.

But let us dare return to the original question of Purveton.

How did that come about?

Take me to the 1930s, Nazi Germany, the Munich

and the Berlin tension that we all laid out beautifully.

How did Purveton come into the picture?

Well, the Nazis managed to grab power on January 30th, 1933,

and they immediately become an anti-drug regime that is important to them because the only intoxication they allow from now on in Germany is the Nazi intoxication, is the ideological intoxication.

So they quickly install concentration camps, which were at the time run by the SR, not the SS, takes over later and turns the concentration camps into an industry.

The first SR concentration camps were in cellars in Berlin or in the countryside.

And

some of the first people that landed in these cellas and were disciplined were drug users.

Also anti-Semitic policies, which were

very important from the day one for the Nazis.

Like they, anti-Semitism is the defining pillar of National Socialism,

the core of it, really.

They quickly connected anti-drug policies with anti-Semitic policies.

They claimed the Jews in Germany, the German Jews, were taking more drugs than

the non-Jewish Germans.

And

National Socialism's

goal was to purify the German body.

So they saw the whole Folk,

Folk Folk, the country, the people,

as

one body, and that has to be purified.

So all Jews are poison.

But not only Jews, everyone who thinks differently, communists are also poison.

Jews are the worst poison, but you know, a lot of, you know, yeah, and then you create this clean body.

And obviously, drugs play have no position in that.

If you're addicted to drugs, that's weak, you know, you're morphinist.

You use cocaine, that's all degenerate, that's Jewish, that's Jewish doctors, they're all morphinists you know um

so that nazi germany and hitler was the shining example of the person who doesn't take drugs he was he didn't have a private life he didn't even have he didn't even have a body he just

led the the the the folks body you know so hitler was on not putting any poisons into him he stopped quote smoking cigarettes uh i i in the 20s already he never touched alcohol

Vegetarian.

Vegetarian.

No

caffeine even.

So he was, that's what he was in the beginning.

Story, of course, changes at a certain point in time, but he started as this.

As far as you understand, that's true.

Yeah,

I'm pretty sure that this is true.

Also, vegetarianism was a right-wing thing in Germany.

It was an elitist thing.

If you were vegetarian, you had a higher frequency, which kind of gave you

a superiority over, let's say, like these workers who need to eat the sausage so you can do the work.

Like Wagner, the composer, he was a vegetarian.

Hitler was impressed by Wagner.

So vegetarianism, I think that's all true.

I think Hitler was like that.

And it's hard to be like that, actually.

And I think that gave him

an attraction inside the movement, which were all like you know, drunkers and Göring using morphine all the time because of his pain.

He got used to morphine.

So they were, it was not, the movement wasn't like this, but he was like this.

So he was,

he symbolized, but he symbolized that whole approach of

cleanliness, like purity.

So then how does methamphetamine come into the picture?

It's totally absurd.

That's why I thought it was fun.

researching this because it doesn't make sense, you know.

And, you know, they use this simple trick by, you know, defining what is a drug, an illegal drug, and what is not.

Because drugs don't have it written on them, this is an illegal, dangerous drug.

You know, drugs are basically neutral.

These are molecules, you know.

So the methamphetamine molecule was found in a Berlin-based company called the Temler Company.

And the head of Temla, he was very upset with the Olympics in 1936 because an Afro-American athlete, Jesse Owens,

was running faster than German superheroes with the best genes.

You know,

how can this be?

So they thought that he was on something because he won, I think, five gold medals.

It was ridiculous.

You know, this was supposed to be Germany's games, you know, and then the Afro-American runs better than the Aryan Übermensch.

So the only explanation is he took a drug.

He took probably

benzedrine,

which was a legal amphetamine.

And also there were no doping checks at the Olympics.

And if you take an amphetamine, of course, you can run a bit faster maybe that, you know, when it kicks in.

This has to do with the immense release of dopamine in the brain.

But it was never proven that Owens used any.

type of drugs.

But the head of the Temna company, he said, we have to prevent this.

We have to invent a better

amphetamine.

We have to make a German amphetamine that is stronger than the American Benzedrine.

So his main chemist, Hauschild,

Fritz Hauschild, he did research and he found that in 1917 in Tokyo, a Japanese chemist had made methamphetamine.

And he remade that methamphetamine and they tested it among themselves, the chemists in the Berlin Pharmaceutical Lab, and they loved it.

They made pure methamphetamine and

they had a really good time and they were like more active.

They were talkative, because that's what happens on methamphetamine.

So the company really thought this is a great product and they turned it into a product.

They went to the patent bureaucracy and got the patent for methamphetamine.

And then it quite quickly came onto the market.

It was labeled as Pervitine,

which is kind of a great name because it has like the perverse already in it.

And this Pervitine Perverdin

was available in any pharmacy.

So you just, you didn't need a prescription.

A child could go and buy 10 packs of pure methamphetamine.

So methamphetamine was also very cheap.

So it became quite popular because people, you know, talked about it.

Did they understand the side effects and negative effects of methamphetamine?

Did they care?

They didn't really know what it was.

I mean, I also read, I went to the archive of that company also, of course.

So they were like, what is it good for?

Like, I just feel great when I take it and I have more energy.

And they didn't know if that could be a product.

Like, it was 1937, 38 when they were discovering it.

But also, did they

how did they think about the fact that this is a drug?

Well, it, it was, they called it a performance enhancer.

Got it.

Is drinking a coffee in the morning a drug?

I mean, it is a drug, but we don't think of it as a drug.

You know, it's legal.

And this was kind of how meth was treated in Germany.

It was normal to use it.

Like, you had

very important business meeting.

Of course you would take a pavitine.

There's a movie by Billy Wilder called 123, a very good movie.

And he shows the American executive.

It was, it the movie said right after the

end of the Second World War.

So we see like, I think it's a Coca-Cola executive, American, and he says to his secretary,

how should I have the morning coffee?

I think half of a pavitine.

So pavitine was also normal.

It wasn't stigmatized.

It was not the American just say no propaganda where your teeth fall out.

And I mean, it was a German quality product.

People liked it.

Of course, they did tests at universities,

but most of them were quite positive.

Like, yeah, it reduces your fear.

Today we might look for different things, but this was also a performance-driven totalitarian society moving towards war.

So if someone takes Pavitine and says in the clinical tests at the university,

I'm not afraid of anything anymore.

So that's positive.

That's actually what got the guy who worked for the German army interested because he read university reports.

I also saw all of these reports.

They were also in the military archive.

So he's like, okay, you're not afraid anymore if you take methamphetamine.

You don't need to sleep anymore.

You don't need to eat so much because your appetite is lowered.

This is perfect for a soldier.

So

negative effects only became public in 1940 when the first Pavitin opponent, he was actually a relative of Albert Speer, Hitler's architect and later

arms minister.

He was this Speer psychologist.

He was the first one who said, wait a minute.

First of all, methamphetamine is against the Nazi ideology because now we're all taking a drug to be high performers.

We have to be high performers without a drug.

And he also said, you know,

the obvious, this is going to make you addicted, et cetera.

This will create a tolerance.

So only then

the first negative reports came out.

Before that, what Temler did and then what the universities did, they all thought methamphetamine is really good.

So what was the process of convincing the German military, the Wehrmacht army, to use it at scale?

Well, Professor Ranker was employed by the army, so it was his job to find things that would improve the performance of the German soldier.

I always imagine him like

a James Bond character, like Q, who develops gadgets and stuff, because he also developed gadgets.

So he was quite a, you know, he was an academic, but he was also a soldier, you know, he was employed, but he was basically running this institute, examining it.

And he was so convinced that Pavitine is the answer to his

question: how to beat the main opponent of the German soldier.

And that was not the British soldier, not the French soldier, not the Russian soldier, that was fatigue.

He had been looking for a way to keep a soldier awake longer.

So when he read these reports

from universities, He did his own tests in the military academy with young medical officers.

They came together at 8 p.m.

in the evening and then they received either methamphetamine, caffeine pill, or placebo, or Benzedrine.

Like he had different experiments.

And he always concluded at the end, like at like they start at 8 p.m.

and like at 10 a.m.

in the morning, one time he notes the Pavitine people still want to go out and party while like the caffeine guys are like sleeping on the bench.

And

it was clear that Pavitine is the strongest.

It gives you the most energy, lets you work for the longest time.

So he was convinced, but

his superior, like the Surgeon General of the German army, he was like an old-school dude.

And he was like, he didn't even react to these, like, Frank would write letters, we have to use

a synthetic drug in the next campaign, which was against Poland, which he knew about.

And because Pavitin was quite known in the civil society, people were using it already.

So, he said, he even said, a lot of soldiers will just take it with them and we should control that.

We should make it an official drug.

But the Surgeon General didn't understand.

He didn't reply.

So Germany attacked Poland without a clear

regulatory system on methamphetamine.

And indeed, a lot of soldiers used it.

And what Rank then did was he requested from all the medical officers in the field in Poland.

The war was over after a few weeks, but the German army was occupying Poland.

He said, send me all back reports and tell me what, did your people take Pavitine and what were the effects?

And he collected all these reports, which are also studied in the military archive.

And he came to the conclusion, this is a really good fighting drug.

And it probably is because people are still using it today.

Methamphetamine is still being used.

And Ranke discovered this.

He had everything in front of him.

And

Poland was beaten.

And then Hitler wanted to attack the West.

And the West was a different story than Poland because the West was

the world empire of Great Britain combined with La Grande Armée, the strongest army in the world, the French army.

These two combined, you know, how can you win that?

Poland, they could overpower.

They had, you know, better army than Poland.

But is the German Wehrmacht really better than both of these armies combined?

His officers didn't think so.

High command said, no, we're not going to attack the West.

We're going to lose.

And Hitler...

Hitler was fanatic about it.

He really wanted to attack it.

They were planning a coup against him in November 1939 just to prevent him ordering the attack on the West because it would have been a catastrophe for Germany.

Because they really cared.

You know, if you're a high command, you don't want to start a war that you're going to lose.

You know,

very bad.

Can you just briefly

give us a sense of, do you think this is genius or insanity on Hitler's part to think that he can take on

probably

what's perceived as to be the most powerful military in the world, which is the French military, or at least in Europe.

I think his hatred for the French was very, very deep.

He really wanted to go to war with them.

It was an ideological, irrational decision.

That's why he was he was not he didn't hate the empire.

He kind of looked down, he admired it and looked down on.

And France had been the airfind, the

genetic enemy of the German people, at least right-wingers would say so.

There had been two wars.

The first one, Germany had won, then First World War, Germany had lost.

So Hitler wanted to kind of revenge and also stop the Versailles Treaty.

So he really needed to attack the West, at least in his mindset.

But it was an irrational decision, and that's why high command said, no, we're not going to do it, basically.

And Hitler's position at the time was not that he could do anything he wanted.

I mean, high command is still a high command of the German Wehrmacht.

That's a very old, you know,

it's a tradition.

They do whatever they want, you know.

But also they have to obey Hitler's orders, so it's a power struggle, basically.

But to invade France was a totally stupid idea.

But it changed

on the morning of February 17th, 1940.

Hitler invited three young tank generals to his office, and they had a plan, which was the plan to go through the Ardennes Mountains.

That was the victorious idea.

So it's not the drugs, actually that idea to go through the Ardennes Mountain.

If you think monocausal, you would say that's the reason.

That idea was genius, and Hitler immediately understood it.

Because before,

the plan was to attack in the north of Belgium, which is the same as World War I.

It comes a stalemate and they fight for months and no one really moves and it's bloody and nothing's happening.

It's a bad thing.

But that was the only plan that they had.

That's why the high command said, No, we're not going to do it.

It's stupid.

But these three tank generals, they had kind of like

somehow they were able to snuck into Hitler's office and they said, Look, if we go with the whole army through the Ardennes Mountains, and like Hitler had, this is not possible.

This is like a mountain range.

How can the whole German army fit through this eye of a needle?

Basically, and they said, No, we can do it because everyone misunderstands what tanks can do tanks are not

slow

machines in the back that kind of wait for the action to happen and then you know i don't know support this somehow we're gonna use tanks in the front as race cars basically we're gonna over

power the enemy we're gonna be in france before the french who are stationed all with the with the british uh in northern belgium and also on the maginot line but not really in the ardenn mountains that was hardly fortified because no one could imagine that Germany would go through there.

And before they know it, we are already behind them, basically.

We are already in France and they're still hanging out in northern Belgium because it takes quite a while to travel.

This was a different time also.

So

he was convinced and he then ordered the attack.

The attack would happen.

But it would only work if you would reach Sedon, the border city of France, within three days and three nights.

So the whole army, or at least the avant-garde

of the machinery, had to be like a big part of the army, had to be in Sedan after three days and three nights.

And that was only possible if you don't stop.

And that was the problem.

The sleep was really then suddenly became a huge problem.

And Hitler said,

When I was fighting in World War I, of course I could stay awake for a week.

I'm a German.

Even though he's not even German, he's an Austrian.

But that was a problem.

But suddenly Rankke realized that his moment had come because he had the recipe

how people could stay awake for three days and three nights.

So Rank suddenly became, before that, he was kind of an outsider, like the freak with the drug idea.

Suddenly he became like, okay, tell us, how does it work?

And he gave like lectures in front of the officers and he wrote a stimulant decree where like a a whole army is prescribed a drug in this case methamphetamine how much should be taken at what intervals what are the side effects so this was a this became a very big thing and then temla had to deliver 35 million dosages to the to the front lines which were no not the front yet i mean it was they they were stationed in in the west of Germany.

And then on May 10th, they took their methamphetamine and they started the surprise attack through the Ardennes Mountains.

So 35 million dosages for the French campaign.

I mean, we could probably talk for many hours about this particular campaign because

it is, I think it's fair to say, the most successful military campaign from the German side.

Ended with a big mistake.

Dunkirk.

Dunkirk.

It was brilliant up until that point.

That is a turning point.

That was the first big mistake Hitler did.

And it also had to do with drugs.

We'll talk about it, but let's just linger on this three days right so uh we should also mention that's where blitzkrieg really shined so it wasn't just the tanks it was the infantry it was the aircraft moving very fast uh behind the the french lines i mean what can you speak to just the execution of that campaign and the role of drugs in it uh and it is we should say a really bold strategic decision to uh use meth.

I mean, it's a big risk.

There's a lot of risks taken here, which could be seen as military genius or military insanity and are a mixture of both.

Well, they were very lucky that it all worked out.

Like, also, the guys in the tanks could all have freaked out on the meth because then it was never tested before.

Can you actually be in a combat situation in a tank in enemy territory on meth?

Can people actually cope with that and be better fighters?

Going through in the mountains

against the biggest military in Europe.

Well, what meth does is

because I read reports of

depressed atmosphere right before the attack started because they were afraid.

They thought they would lose.

Like, they didn't want that.

You know, soldiers, maybe some, you know, really hardcore Nazi soldiers, but most people were just normal guys, you know, they didn't want to start that.

But once they had the methamphetamine, it kind of it you're like in a party mood.

So also when you're in the tank, you know, and everyone likes it, you know, it's rather an uplifting thing.

Like they were, they were really getting into it and they really, you know, they started fighting.

Then

it's also intoxication, you know, it's a it's a rush.

Like, what is what is

what does meth feel like?

Well, meth creates the so-called fight or flight motors.

So either you like it releases all the neurotransmitters in the brain, which are released in situations of high danger, for example.

So in a highly dangerous situation, you become very alert so you can cope with the situation.

If you're like, if you're like under life threat and you don't even react to it, you're probably going to be dead, you know.

But the body does that and methamphetamine does that.

So you take a pill of methamphetamine or you snort a line of methamphetamine and you're like, and you're like this, you're like...

And then that's the fight or flight mode.

Either you run away, like it's too much, you know,

but on math, you usually don't run away.

You kind of think it's really cool what's happening.

You like to move.

You like to be with your pals.

You like to, you know, be in a tank is great.

So there is a party aspect to it.

I think it was very joyful for the German soldiers because it was springtime.

They had immediate successes.

And it wasn't heavy fighting.

It was just being in the tank.

I mean, there was, of course, fighting and there were also war crimes.

And I read a report when Rommel, high on math, like

at night doesn't stop, of course, because they all, you know, they don't stop at night, but every army usually stops at night.

So the French army were stopping.

They were in a village, camping out, and the German Rommel was going with the tank through that village, with his division, just running over people.

And he was standing like in the open lid of the tank and he was like...

going through that thing, you know, and you know, like a berserk

type of you know warrior.

And that that was when, that to me is a war crime.

That is when the Wehrmacht lost its innocence in that push of Rommel through the French countryside.

Because you don't do that, you know, your enemies sleeping.

Because the French also had a drug regulation.

They received three quarters of a liter of red wine per man per day.

So of course at night they're going to be sleepy on red wine and the Germans were like on math and they were just running over them.

There's descriptions of the chains of the tank becoming bloody.

I don't think he did it.

He was like, oh my God, what did I just do?

I'm sorry.

You know, what am I doing here?

He was

in the movie, you know?

This is the dark thing about human nature that in war, if you dehumanize, if you allow your brain to dehumanize the enemy, the opponent, the humans and the other side,

you can actually...

I think hate can take over.

And in that hate, you can find pleasure when you murder the other.

And

people have written about this, have talked about this.

It's probably a thing that a person like me can't possibly comprehend unless I experienced it.

And you have to be in the mania, in the hysteria, in the insanity, intensity of war.

I mean, what Evans, for example, said is that I excuse the Germans of the war crimes because they were just in an intoxication.

I understand that argument.

But and if you look at individual soldiers, it's quite tricky.

Like it's a 19-year-old guy.

He's been drafted.

And in Nazi Germany, if you don't go, you land in the concentration camp.

So you can choose, you know, concentration camp or you just join the ranks and then you get pavitine and then you invade France.

There was a trial in Germany because someone said all soldiers are murderers.

And I think then the German Bundeswehr like sued him.

No soldiers are not murderers.

And he actually won in court.

So it's legal in Germany to call every soldier a murderer.

But

it's a tricky question.

Yeah, I remember seeing the documentary on the ordinary people.

There's also social pressure.

Again, insane it is to say.

I think the documentary, The Ordinary People, was looking at the Germans that were a part of the shooting squads.

And, you know, they didn't understand what they're signing up for.

And they were told that they're free to leave once they understand what they're doing.

And many of them didn't.

And they didn't have hate for Jews or for the people who they're murdering.

You are, again, a 19, 20-year-old young kid.

Like, it's so hard to comprehend the moral insanity that's happening all around you.

And you just kind of want to fit in.

I mean, that's why I wrote the book, The Bohemians, because there were a few people in Berlin that didn't react this way, but they reacted in a different way.

They said, we cannot be part of this.

But it's hard to be the part of it.

It's very hard, yeah.

And most people are part of it because it's much more safe, or at least it seems more safe.

I mean, it has its own perils, you know.

Because you might become a genocidal murderer, you know, that might happen.

Like,

are you responsible?

I would say you are responsible, but that's just my personal gut feeling.

I always thought my grandfather was responsible for the genocide because he was working for the German railway system and he once saw a train car full of Jews in a cattle wagon.

And he only said to me, yeah, this was against German railway regulations.

And I said, so what did you do?

And he said, well, there were SS at the station when I was working and I was too...

too scared.

I didn't do anything.

So I thought that he was, he

made himself guilty, I thought.

that's and my father, for example, reacted very strongly because of that.

He never called him by his first name,

the father of his wife, because he still had that, you know, he was a Nazi, because he was working for the railway.

So

I wouldn't excuse people, actually,

and I certainly would not excuse high-ranking politicians that make policies, because

the the genocidal policies that the Nazis developed and the war policies that they developed had nothing to do with drugs.

And I never write that in any, you know, because there's no documents.

If I would find documents that say, yeah, when we, you know, but this, the Nazi ideology has nothing to do with drugs, maybe with alcohol, you know, but it's.

And I spoke with my father, who had been a high judge in Germany.

What does actually the law say?

And the law says if you plan a crime

and then maybe when you commit it, you are under the influence, it does not diminish your responsibility.

Your responsibilities only diminish, let's say, you're a totally normal person, never done any harm to anybody,

and suddenly you take a drug that or you're totally drunk and you don't know what you're doing and you kill someone.

Then a judge could say maybe you have a lesser responsibility.

But this is not the case.

with the crimes of national socialism.

And I never even hint at that in my book.

So I I think that criticism by Evans

was short-sighted.

I wouldn't, I think he's, he's not right about that.

Yeah, I think I agree with you totally.

I didn't get that sense.

He thought the book was very successful because a lot of right-wing people bought it.

But that's not simply not true.

I think your book did a masterful job of never

making itself amenable to that kind of narrative.

To the contrary, I got an angry letter by a German army

employee, quite a high officer and a military historian.

And he said that

I

he also thought I overemphasized the drug use of the methamphetamine in the Western campaign because he said the German army was just so good.

And you kind of diminish their capability by saying they were only so good because they took methamphetamine.

I thought that was kind of funny because the Wehrmacht doesn't exist anymore.

And the new German, the current German army is called the Bundeswehr.

And they're not historically, they're not supposed to be connected.

Like there was a clear cut, but he still felt that I was kind of hurting the pride of the Wehrmacht.

I generally sort of agree with him.

In general, it seems like great historians often.

I'm just a human, so I'm not a historian, but they undermine

the importance of the heroes that make up an army.

The Soviet army, the British Army, the French army, the German army.

Like, these are humans.

And some of the great military campaigns involve people really stepping up.

Now, like, the effectiveness of the military tactics with Blitzkrieg, the effectiveness of meth, the strategic decisions around where to invade, the timing, the speed, all of those are important.

But there's humans there.

There's real heroes.

And sometimes historians kind of diminish that.

I don't know what to make sense of it.

I might be just an idiot, but I've had a great conversation with James Collin.

I've gotten to know him well.

He kind of analyzed the mistakes made by Hitler and by Stalin in the

Operation Barbarossa.

But I just, through generations, because I grew up

in the Soviet Union, you hear these stories of these heroes.

You know, my grandfather

was a machine gunner and miraculously survived.

And like, I just knowing those stories, Stalingrad would not have happened without the heroes on the Soviet side.

And it's easy to say there's a lot of blunders, a lot of bad tactics, all this kind of stuff.

But to me, from the human side, I just know through my bloodline, the people that have...

fearlessly given their life to defend their homeland.

And that sometimes can be a little bit easily dismissed.

So I don't know what to make sense of it.

Maybe I'm romanticizing, or maybe I'm speaking to the suffering that the people have felt.

And they just

propagate themselves through my life story.

And then maybe the gratitude I have

for the people who have stopped the Nazi forces.

I think it's amazing what the Russian soldiers actually did because they beat the Wehrmacht.

It was really the Red Army on the ground that did the job, you know.

And did they love communism and their system?

I don't think so.

And I think they were, I mean, of course, some people, but basically, they were defending their country.

And

I'm also very grateful to them.

Yeah, they're defending their families.

Quick pause.

Bath and break?

Okay.

All right.

We're back.

So can we say a bit more about the French campaign?

So

it was over in six weeks.

It took six weeks to completely defeat and occupy most of France.

And the initial operation, three days, was from a military perspective successful.

What else can we say about the role of drugs, the effectiveness, what was learned from that experience by the Wehrmacht?

I mean, for me, to research the Western campaign was very interesting because I didn't really know anything about it except that Germany won very quickly.

So to actually

look at the details is very interesting.

And the drugs give you kind of a way in.

What are some things you found in the archives that were interesting?

Like about maybe letters, reports, diaries, they gave you some insights about the

human story of it all.

Well, there is letters.

For example, by Heinrich Berl, who won the Nobel Prize later in literature, he writes to his parents describing in detail what Pavitine did to him, how it kept his mood up and that without Pevitine he wouldn't have been able to do the job.

But also military documents I found very interesting.

For example, I could see exactly how the methamphetamine was distributed because it was not distributed equally.

It was done in a way that the tank troops who were leading the advance received the most meth, and they also needed it.

I could see how many pills on which date were delivered to Rommel's troops.

And Rommel became, I call him the crystal fox in my book

for obvious reasons.

Like his division was using a lot of math.

And he was using math as well?

I just have descriptions how he like totally crazy stands in the open lid of the tank and all his people.

Well, they had the math.

But there's no,

maybe they didn't use it.

Maybe he didn't use it.

But it looks like he used it.

Like there was also never any reports that all the meth was given back.

I mean a lot of soldiers write that they take it but Rommel specifically

like I wouldn't write in my in Blitz that

like Rommel would take methamphetamine like on such a day or something if there was no record for it.

But Rommel, there is a record for it that Rommel's division

used the most meth of any tank division.

So I'll write about that.

And that's that all that already makes him the crystal crystal fox because

in his division, crystal meth is rampant.

You know, it's like in animal farm when the pigs discover alcohol, animal farm by George Orwell.

There's no evidence that they drank.

It's just the next day that they're all hung over.

I mean, Rommel is a very interesting character in general because later he turned, apparently turned against Hitler.

He was part of the conspiracy of the Operation Valkyrie.

He received, you know, the offer to shoot himself in the forest, which he did, instead of being tried and executed.

Is he just part of this general tension that the generals, the military had with Hitler?

That'd be fair to say.

I would say so, yes.

I'm not an expert on the Wehrmacht.

This is a very complex, large organization, but I see most of the officers of the Wehrmacht as not necessarily Nazis in the way that they would shout Heil Hitler all the time.

They were highly intelligent, highly trained, super professionals that ran a very effective war machine.

And at one point, more and more of these generals realized that the orders that Hitler were given were not really helping.

you know and they have their men dying because of it so that creates a lot of tension and that's

that led to the mistake that Hitler did in Dunkirk, basically.

What Churchill called the sickle cut, which was the idea to storm through the Ardennes Mountains and kind of cut off the British and French troops who were still, you know, in the north of Belgium trying to figure out what was going on.

Suddenly, the Germans are behind them.

So that they kind of cut as like a sickle into enemy territory, the sickle cut.

That was so successful that basically the campaign was won.

already.

So then the Germans invaded, like occupied all the cities on the canal back to England to kind of cut off the British completely.

So they couldn't, you know, even flee.

But there was just Dunkirk was open, the last port that was open.

And the German army was like,

you know, they were already on the outskirts of Dunkirk.

They could have just taken it and closed that, you know, that

hole for the British military to get out.

But Hitler then did his famous, and this is all the dynamic of the Western campaign.

You know, a lot of things happen every day.

And then they're saying, like, we're going to have Dunkirk tomorrow, and then it's over.

And then Hitler stops the tanks.

It's his famous Haltebefiel,

the order to stop.

And, you know, they were all on math, you know, they didn't want to stop.

But Hitler was not on meth.

Hitler was.

He basically...

It was a little bit similar than Berlin-Munich

thing.

Hitler didn't really understand that campaign.

It was too fast for him.

Because they didn't say, like, oh, they're all on math.

They're not going to sleep.

They're going to behave erratically.

They didn't discuss this.

They discussed this in the old-fashioned terms.

And Hitler was seeing, like, they do not protect their flanks.

What if the British come from the north?

This is terrible.

Like, militarily, it was...

They were already fighting.

World War II while Hitler was still fighting World War I, and especially the Allies, they were still fighting World War I.

But the tank generals on math or the tank generals without math, the tank generals per se, they were fighting a new type of war.

And Hitler

then

got a visit from Goering, the head of the Air Force, the Luftwaffe.

And Göring was a morphinist.

That is very well documented.

He was on morphine.

He was high as a kite most of the time.

And that comes with...

losing touch with reality, I would say.

Or at least it changes your grip on reality.

Maybe you're still a good decision maker, but it could lead to,

if you're intoxicated, let's say you're writing and you're intoxicated, you think it's great, but the next day you read it and shit.

So

Goering was using morphine in the morning, then met Hitler at the Felsenest, which was Hitler's headquarters, to command the Western campaign, the Felsennest.

And Göring said to him,

if the army generals are now going to to take Dunkirk, then basically the army has won this campaign.

And that will give army high command, which is already against you,

because they were, you know, for them, Hitler was always like the

Kleinege Freiter, like the small kind of regular army guy, because that's what Hitler had been in the First World War.

And now suddenly he was the big decision maker.

So they never, they thought they make much better decisions than him.

So Göring says their power will be so

overwhelming overwhelming that they will from now on call the shots how this war will continue and what will be done next.

You should let me with the Luftwaffe do the job from the air.

The National Socialist Luftwaffe is going to end the Western campaign.

So he thought that he could destroy,

it doesn't make sense, you know, even destroy the British.

military from with planes, maybe you can do it.

But certainly he couldn't do it.

So the the tank generals received received the Haltebefehl, the stopping order.

They didn't believe it when they received it because the victory, this would have been complete victory over Great Britain.

This would have been the end of Great Britain.

The whole British military was encircled.

But they did get out through Dunkirk.

That's why the movie Dunkirk by Christopher Nolan is not good, because he doesn't describe what happened on the German side.

It's just this heroic British thing.

Yeah, we just got out and we reformed and then we beat, you know, this was just because Hitler was afraid of the power

of

Army High Command and convinced by Göring's morphine-high

vision that he would stop it with the Air Force,

which he couldn't.

I mean, he bombed, and then the British, you know, they weren't ships, and a few ships were sunk, but basically they got out.

You need to do this on the ground.

At least back then, you would have needed to do it on the ground.

So that was a big mistake by Hitler.

That's why von Marnstein, one of the three tank generals from February 17th, was Rommel, von Marnstein, and Guderian.

And von Marnstein, he later said, he spoke of a Felorna Sieg, a lost victory.

He said the Western campaign was a lost victory because we really could have achieved the victory.

We could have dominated, you know, British.

They could have invaded Britain.

There was no more military.

Well, okay, on land.

There was still the Royal Air Force.

And the Navy.

And the Navy, yeah.

So, like, so

invading Britain, I think any invasion of actual Britain is a gigantic mistake on the Nazi part.

But if Britain doesn't have a standing army anymore, it's much easier

to still have one.

I think it's still extremely difficult to invade, but it's much easier to sort of neutralize,

make sure that

Britain is not a player in the war.

For sure.

Maybe Hitler wouldn't have invaded at all anyhow.

Also, because of his sort of not respect, but non-hatred of the British Empire.

Because they're also white supremacists.

So

why would we fight them?

You know, it doesn't make sense.

While the French, they were already like half black, basically, in Hitler's eyes.

If we were to talk about counterfactual history

of the possible trajectories of the war that would lead to Nazi victory,

one of the big mistakes

is

the invasion of Britain.

So you already mentioned the mistake with Dunkirk, but beyond that, if they even captured mainland Europe,

they could have just neutralized the British threat and not invaded Britain.

And then

go after the oil, which is much needed, maybe in the Middle East.

So focus on that campaign before invading the Soviet Union.

And then maybe wait for the Soviet Union to invade them through Poland, which would be likely coming.

Or wait until 1943, something like this, to invade East without the Western Front having to be

been there.

And the other really big mistake is

declaring war against the United States, having complete disrespect for the United States and

declaring war on the United States, which didn't have to be done at all.

So it's collecting enemies when those didn't have to be

done.

So there is, to me, actually, there's a lot of paths there,

as dark as it is to imagine, for

Nazi Germany to be successful in the invasion of the Soviet Union, even.

Aaron Ross Powell, well, I think that's why the Wehrmacht officers were pissed at Hitler, because they knew that they could actually win if it was done in a certain way.

But Hitler's ideology and his stupidity

and later also his...

the degeneration of his cognitive abilities did not allow the Wehrmacht to fight in the most effective way.

So they had a...

Hitler was a very bad leader after Dunkirk.

So can you speak to the morphine?

What kind of drug is morphine?

Morphine

was developed in the 19th century by a German, a young chemist called Sertürna.

And he wanted to know what is

the potent alkaloid in opium, because opium is a natural drug, drug but there's something in the opium that actually is decisive and that's morphine so he was able to extract that from the opium so he basically this young guy he invented morphine which then became you know very

important in wars especially like the american civil war is unthinkable without morphine or at least it would have been very different because with morphine you can treat people you can amputate people can fix people up and send them back into battle.

And that also corresponded with the development of the hypodermic needle, the injection needle, that was around in the mid-19th century.

So the injection needle and morphine together became a very efficient way to treat soldiers.

And that prolonged, for example, the Civil War in America.

So Goering was taking morphine.

Yeah.

Morphine is like the classic.

It's like

you don't eat opium, you know, that's you take what is active in opium and and you inject it uh and that's a much that's a very potent you know that

numbs all your pain like you don't have you don't have pain anymore if you're on morphine also affects judgment i've never taken morphine um so i can't don't i cannot really say uh i like there's a few junkies

that are highly creative on it.

Like a lot of musicians in the 60s were using heroin, which is a more potent form form or like a it's a it it's a half synthetic it's an opioid morphine is an opiate and and heroin is an opioid um

i guess you could be quite sharp on it also that's why hitler liked oikodal which is oxycontin oxycodone and yeah he injected that actually

another opiate heroin like it was a product by the merck company from darmstadt germany they made oikodal which when germany lost the war, the patent was basically taken by America and then ended up in an oxycodone.

So if you inject Oikodal, that was a very popular drug in the 20s, because apparently it gives you the most beautiful high on earth.

You're like super high, like you feel extremely well, and you can think very clearly, and you feel like this is how this is how life should feel.

High on Oikodahl, this is like Klaus Mann, the son of Thomas Mann, he used Oikodahl.

quite a few doctors actually used it also and probably quite a few jewish doctors also used it because this was like a doctor's drug doctors knew how to you know set the the injection and it was you know a great experience and hitler he really loved to be on oikodahl like he would use oikodahl every second day

in the beginning 10 milligrams intravenously then he raised to 20 milligrams and i spoke to someone who's actually done exactly that drug application because i wanted to know how hitler felt, and I didn't feel like doing it myself for some reason.

I was, I don't like needles, so I didn't want to put a needle in my vein to have like the Hitler drug experience.

I should have done it.

Like a historian, a proper historian never does that, okay?

So I take, I, but I thought I should take quite a few drugs that I write about to understand it better.

But this drug I didn't take.

I didn't, I never shot oxycodone intravenously into my veins.

But I met someone who did, and he said it's, it's like the

it's like the king's high.

I don't know if you do that properly, obviously you get addicted to it.

I'd be scared to try.

Very intense experience.

I think it's a very badass thing to do for a historian, by the way.

But I think it's a big risk.

There is a risk that comes along with it, right?

Well, but not for Hitler, because he got the Oikodahl from the pharmacy.

He knew exactly, like his doctor knew exactly what was inside.

It was made by a...

pharmaceutical company.

No, I mean the risk of addiction.

Yeah, that is a big risk.

That is a big risk.

But there's also the risk of getting impure stuff and heroin on the street and die from an overdose.

But the addiction thing is very, I think it happens quite quickly with oikodi because it's such a great feeling.

So why wouldn't you do it over and over again?

And then the opioid receptors in the brain

want you to take it.

And if you don't take it, you get withdrawal symptoms and you feel like shit.

And you have to.

So that's the problem with opioids, with morphine.

That's what happens.

And that's what happened to Hitler.

I generally say yes to most things,

but

those drugs, like cocaine doesn't scare me, heroin scares me.

Like the opioids scare me.

Oxycodone scares me.

Because they really make you physically dependent.

I don't even know if cocaine makes you physically dependent.

It makes you psychologically addicted, but they actually you have to get it, otherwise you feel bad.

That's a physical, terrible

addiction.

For life life to feel like less when you're not on it right that scares me that's the problem also with methamphetamine people who use a lot of methamphetamine on days they don't use it they don't feel great at all especially not compared to the methamphetamine days so that became a problem in germany when people were really using more and more of the pavitine all right you got to take me through the full drug cocktail that uh hitler was on patient a

of morels let's start at the beginning We're big on setting context here.

So tell the story of Dr.

Theodore Morel.

How did he meet Hitler?

Well, Morel was, he had his practice on Kurfürstendamm, which is like the main boulevard of Berlin, in the west of Berlin, kind of a fancy street.

And he was a celebrity doctor.

Which was a new type of doctor in a way, Dr.

Feelgood.

He kind of was one of the first Dr.

Feelgood.

So you didn't go to him when you had a disease.

You went to him when you were, let's say you were like an opera star in the Berlin Opera and you had a big premiere.

So you would go to Morel in the afternoon and he would give you a nice shot and then you would, you know, be really good on stage.

So he, but he was not a quack.

I mean, he was serious.

He just knew his drugs and

he believed in, you know, why shouldn't you treat someone even if that person doesn't have a disease?

If you can make that person feel better it's good especially if that person pays like he said everyone who pays my and he wasn't cheap who comes to me and wants a testosterone testosterone hormone injection or a vitamin injection or

an opioid injection you get it from him he didn't have any scruples I mean but we should also say he was pretty innovative and

extremely knowledgeable.

So you mentioned hormones, but also, you know, like probiotics.

Yeah.

Just he knew his shit.

He was a bit of a nerd.

Yeah.

He was like a legit doctor, just didn't have boundaries about what he used.

He had a very unappealing physical appearance.

And I think that was a problem for him.

And he was known to have very bad eating habits, like the sauce was running.

And so people were easily disgusted by him.

He was like an outsider.

He was really like a freak.

But when people looked at him after he had given them an injection and they said, thank you.

and I feel so great now, that's what kind of made his day, you know.

So one day a man entered his doctor's office on Kurfesendam named Hubertus Hoffmann.

And Hubertus Hoffmann was a photographer and he had gonorrhea.

And Morel,

because he knew about alternative ways to treat, he actually cured him.

And Hubertus Hoffmann said to Morel,

I have a good friend and I think you should meet him.

And I'm going to have a dinner in Munich and I think it would be really worth your time to come.

And Morel came and the good friend was Hitler because Hubertus Hoffmann was the photographer of Hitler.

And they were, in German, we have a U, a formal U, which is C.

If I don't know you so well, I say Z.

And if you're my close friend, I say do, you.

And Hitler only had like four people he would say you to.

He was was always like the C, like the distance.

It was always about distance and respect and borders and boundaries.

What are the two again?

C and what?

Do.

C and do.

Yeah.

C is the formal one and do is the is the informal one.

Yeah, you know, in Russian there's the same thing, v and t.

And so there's a big, that's a big thing.

Also in French.

In French, you also have that.

You have that in Spanish.

Only in English you don't have it.

And it is part of the cultural sort of discourse

of like when you upgrade upgrade from the wü to the t from the sea to the do or from the dew to the sea from the sea to the dew that would be the upgrade because you become more intimate yeah like and you ask can I go from the sea to do yeah like the older person must suggest it I think yeah okay the beautiful language so Hoffmann was a do Freund a Dutch Freund we say of Hitler so he was quite close to Hitler and so that's why he could also make that close connection so he had a dinner with just him Hitler Eva Braun, Hitler's girlfriend, and Morel came.

Like they sent a plane to Berlin to pick him up.

So it was like VIP treatment.

It was the whole thing.

And this is

36.

Yeah, they had spaghetti with tomato sauce on the side.

I read in the, there's like a description of this event.

The tomato sauce was on the side, and there was mouscat.

What is mouscat?

It's a spice.

Nutmeg.

Nutmeg.

Yeah, it was with nutmeg, which is an unusual recipe, I I guess, but that's what they had.

And spaghetti wasn't a fancy thing.

You know, it came from Italy, from Mussolini,

who invented fascism in Italy and who was like Hitler's role model for a long time until Hitler surpassed him, obviously.

So the spaghetti, the spaghetti, they came from Italy and it was like a big thing.

And Morel had the big problem that spaghetti is hard to eat, right?

And he couldn't even like, it was a catastrophe.

But he got out of it because Hitler complained about stomach problems, because Hitler was a terrible vegetarian.

He was a so-called cake vegetarian.

He would only eat like sweets, like cake, no meat, of course, but like he wouldn't like

eat healthy stuff.

So he was bloated the whole time.

Because if we only eat like cake and white bread and it's not good.

So he voiced that.

And there was also Brandt was there, like his, an official doctor

from the SS that was like his doctor.

And Hitler said, my doctors can't cure me.

And Morel was like this is my chance.

Thank you, God.

And he told Hitler about the probiotics, which Hitler had never heard of.

And like also Brandt, the doctor, he hadn't heard of, because that was a new thing that you give.

And Hitler was asking, what is that?

And Morel said, these are live bacteria

from

like German soldiers from the war in the First World War that were fighting in Serbia.

There was one guy who didn't get the stomach flu and all the others like drank the water in Serbia and all got sick.

But this one guy, so his bacteria, and this is a true story, his gut bacteria were cultivated into a medicine called mutaflor.

And Moral told Hitler about this, and he said, This is amazing.

Like, I have to try this, you know.

And it helped, you know, he got the mutaflor, he did the mutaflor kind of therapy, and it cured him.

He suddenly had no bloating anymore.

And the farting of Hitler was really bad, so bad that it would like, he like const, constantly, like, it diminished his

ability to work.

So suddenly he could work.

So he felt better.

He didn't have the pain.

He felt great.

So he really thought that Morel is a wonder doctor.

And he asked Morel pretty quickly afterwards, do you want to be my personal physician?

And Morel was like, his wife was very much against it because she said, if you become the personal physician of Hitler, you won't have any time for me anymore.

And he said, like, come on, man.

This is like the chance you only get once in your life.

Yeah, I mean, at this point, Hitler is a really big deal.

He's the most powerful man in Europe.

And

there have not been war crimes because the war hasn't started yet.

Obviously, there's concentration camps and a lot of crimes have been committed, but it's also kind of hushed up.

You know, it was, it's not such a huge thing as now we know it became.

So Morrel never really

has any conscientious problems.

He just thinks it's great.

You know, I'm going to be the doctor.

I'm going to be part of history.

So he becomes the personal physician and

being this vitamin guy, like vitamins were really his thing.

Like he believed in the power of vitamins.

And today I think we know that he was right.

Vitamins are good.

But back then, no one knew.

And Hitler was like, okay, he told Hitler and then Hitler said, okay, I want to try this vitamins.

And what they did from the beginning was injections, because Hitler didn't want to take a pill, because a pill takes too long and it goes through the

tract that he has the problems with, like the digestion.

Like he didn't want to take a pill.

He believed in the injection.

And Morel was the masterful injector.

So Morel, because the needles were thicker than they are today, but Morel could give you an injection without you feeling any pain.

So Hitler was quite impressed.

So he got like a vitamin C injection.

But Hitler loved the daily injection.

So he got hooked on the daily injection.

Once he got the injection, the day was good.

And he never got sick, actually.

And he could stand for a long time with the arm raised.

He did like,

he went to the gym, basically.

I mean, he had a gym where he was like doing exercise.

So he could have the arm up for like hours when a military parade would walk by.

So he was quite fit and he was never sick.

And Moral was giving him the daily injection.

And

they lived happily ever after basically until the soviet union attacked well wait he literally lifted so he can do the the the how hitler salute yeah i found a doc i found a document for that

that's funny oh god that's dark he had an expander we say i don't know to use that word in english expander oh like uh a band yeah it's like this you do like yeah yeah i have one of those yeah that's what that's what that's what he did in front of those kinds of front of the window

well at least he's not doing it in front of a mirror.

Okay, wow.

That's dark.

Okay.

I mean, those little details,

yet another reminder that he's just a human being.

I mean, it's hard to keep your arm up for like hours.

You can't let it down.

If you keep it up, that's what it's all about.

I mean, he was very much about the facade, right?

He's very important to present himself in a certain kind of way when he's giving the speeches.

Yeah, it was everything was orchestrated.

The Nazis were masters in propaganda.

They really knew how to create the perfect image.

Okay, so let's go into the cocktail.

Started with the vitamins.

This is in 36.

Right.

I think it was pretty harmless in the beginning.

But the addiction to the injection was the main thing that I think happened.

That Hitler needed his doctor.

But from 36 to 41,

only like vitamins are being injected and glucose.

So I don't think it really harms you.

I mean, it might benefit you.

He never got sick.

He was fit.

I mean, this is the thing that...

There was phase one of his drug use with the vitamins until 41.

So you think the tweaking at the Olympics, though you've talked about before, but still...

So you're saying this person we're watching a video of here is not on drugs?

I don't know.

I don't think so.

So that's no race.

I think it's fake.

Because I think someone read my book that Hitler was on, thought that Hitler was always on math and created this.

But I might be wrong.

And the narrative takes hold.

And I think the thing you mentioned is he could be on sugar.

So it could be a lot of elements.

He was also a weird guy.

Maybe he was really just rocking because he was so happy what he saw.

You know, maybe he really got into it.

Maybe it was a sexual thing for him what he saw.

I don't know.

There's no document showing that he took a drug on that day.

Let's put it that way.

I think I've been, especially like, stay up all night.

I'll get

i've been fidgety you can just be caught in a certain moment when you're being like very like like fidgety i think he probably rocked a few times and then the video was cut in a way that he rocks more or something also methamphetamine wasn't yet available in 1936 that's important to say

for sure he did he was not so what is what is said here uh on hitler tweaking on meth at the 1936 olympics is definitely false okay there you go so when did it start getting more serious?

The injection and the kind of drugs he was taking?

This was a day in August of 1941.

Germany had

invaded the Soviet Union on June 22nd.

So this is about six weeks into the campaign, which was called Unter Neimen Babarossa.

And Germany was doing pretty well.

And it came to a crucial moment where high command said, now we're going to take Moscow.

And Hitler said, no, we're going to split up the troops and take Leningrad, which is now St.

Petersburg, in the north.

And in the south, we're going to go for

the oil fields, basically.

That was his plan.

He said, no, let's not do Moscow.

And high command was like, this is the biggest mistake.

We must take Moscow.

If we take Moscow, we're going to win.

And Hitler became ill for the first time

on the day this decision, I mean, this is a dynamic thing that's going on.

You know, they're moving and now they have to decide, will we split up or we will continue towards Moscow?

And he had the Russian flu, in German, the Gruh, which is like a flu-type disease with very high fever.

It comes, like they were in the field, so they were in the east, you know, camping out.

Maybe he drank water that wasn't good, or he had some, you know, they tested everything meticulously, but he got, you know, he got sick, high fever, he felt like shit.

And he said to Morel, and you know, you can see that in Morel's notes.

Like, Morel describes this very vividly in his notes, which are at the Federal Archives,

which no historian ever looked at except me, the non-historian, which is kind of funny.

So he describes how Hitler then asks of him, basically says vitamins are not enough anymore.

Like he's very weak.

He

must go to the military briefing.

But if you the flu is quite a severe disease, I think.

If you have a heavy flu, you really feel like you're going to die.

You can't go to a military briefing.

But Moraz kind of fought with himself and then he decided to inject an opioid into Hitler's veins intravenously, like the strongest application possible.

And this was dolantine, which is a German opioid that was legal.

And

I was once an exchange student in Flint, Michigan,

1988.

And I was number one of the tennis team because I was quite a good tennis player.

And we were playing our main enemy.

I think I was at Flint, Powers Catholic High School in Flint, Michigan.

And I think it was Powers Central.

And they had a number one Mark Resteiner.

Still remember.

Wow.

He was feared.

And

no one could beat him.

Yes.

And on the day of the match, I had the Russian flu basically.

And I was the hope.

I was the number one, the wonder kid from Germany.

And they took me to a doctor, and the doctor gave me an injection.

And I don't know until this day because I just,

I was, you know, kid, I got the injection.

I was 17.

And I felt great.

Like the flu was gone like this.

It was probably an opioid,

something that just shuts off all the pain and gives you, you know, energy.

And I beat this guy in a way I totally,

I thought of a new technique by playing like very high balls.

Like

in a direct, like fierceful competition, I would have lost.

So I played something that in Germany we call Fudel, which is something you don't really do.

You just play high balls.

Yeah.

which is not pretty to look at, but it's very effective.

And

he just lost his nerve.

And I beat him like 6-0, 6-0, something like that.

Sensational.

So Hitler receives this

Dolantin injection.

And he gets up, he goes into the meeting room, he dominates the meeting room, he feels great.

He decides, you know, in front of everybody, and no one is able to, no one overpowers him in that meeting.

He was very good in the room.

And the troops are split up.

Like Leningard is now a target.

This weakens the general thrust towards Moscow.

This is probably why they didn't take Moscow.

They probably could have taken it.

Or maybe not, you know, but the decision was made in August to.

I think it's one of the biggest blunders of the

straight shot, given this organization.

They had the one-time thing, the one-time moment where they could have done it.

And the German war machine could only win in so-called speed wars, like lightning war, only if they would do it very fast and surprise, surprise, because they were always weaker, basically.

They just had this moment, this dynamic moment.

And this was fueled by the methamphetamine.

Also, in the Soviet Union, hundreds of millions of dosages were given.

So the Germans were really going.

And at one point, this ends, you know, you can't take meth for the rest of your life.

You're just going to end up being a nervous wreck.

But you can do it for like two months.

You could do it.

But then it stops.

I think if you're really honest about where

you have the asymmetry of power, which is in the speed of the blitzkrieg.

So that's similar to Genghis Khan, who had a very small military,

but their advantage was, I mean, I think at the peak, it would be probably 100,000.

But every soldier of Genghis Khan's had five horses.

So

the whole point was they can move really fast.

And they not just fast, but they can move on all terrain.

So they can go around.

You know, if wars were fought on normal roads, you're supposed to travel a certain kind of way.

If you go fast and around,

not on paths that are usually taken attack from all kinds of sides, that's why you can conquer as much as Genghis Khan was able to conquer.

And the same thing with the Nazi forces.

This is their biggest advantage.

And not using that

is essentially the end

of its effectiveness.

I think that's also why the tank troops were were such a good weapon, because they can go off-road

while military vehicles, cars cannot do it.

Like a tank can even go through a forest and just, you know, kill, you know, small trees and just run over it.

So that was that, that's, those are kind of the five horses that that was the idea that they had at this working breakfast.

That's what they presented to Hitler.

We're going to use the tank force in a very different way.

And that's going to enable us to win the Lightning War campaigns.

Was that one of the first times

he tried an opiate like that, an intense one?

That was the first time.

And then that was it for him?

Well, not immediately.

Like you can see when you study his medications that that is a turning point in a way that now he

deviates from the vitamins.

Like he becomes more interested in what's out there.

And like from 41 to 43, he tries out a lot of medications that he didn't try out before.

Before that, it was quite conventional, mostly vitamins and glucose.

But now he becomes experimental and he discusses this with Morel.

And Morel is also very experimental.

Like they got really, they really nerded themselves into like, what can we use, like bulls, testicle extracts.

So Morel, in order to

present those things to his patient A, he created a pharmaceutical company

he ran.

He was the personal physician of Hitler, and he was also the CEO of Hammer Pharmaceuticals, which had its production site in occupied Czechoslovakia.

And,

for example, at one point when Germany had invaded the Ukraine, Morel

asked for a monopoly for all the organs of all the slaughtered animals from all the slaughterhouses in the Ukraine.

So this was a huge logistical logistical operation.

Like all the slaughtered animals, all the organs were removed for the personal physician of the Führer,

sent in military trains back to

the factory in occupied Czechoslovakia.

And like the military became really upset with that because they said, we need our trains to transport back our wounded soldiers.

Now we're like...

cars are full with like awful and pigs hearts and pigs and livers and it was totally bizarre.

But Morel then became like, he was this like good-natured Dr.

Filgud in the beginning.

And then when Ukraine was occupied, he became this like

business freak who like made a lot of money with his dubious hormonal concoctions where like he would threaten the army if you don't let the train

with my raw materials go to my factory, I will tell Hitler and you will have a problem.

He was acting like like that.

He became quite an asshole, actually.

And a war criminal, because he also at his factory where he would make the famous pick liver extract that was then tested by Hitler.

And Hitler said it was,

that's a good medication.

I feel more, I have more energy.

So this can also be sold to the German military.

That's how it worked.

the regulations at the time were

that it was very difficult to bring out a new medication onto the market because medications to bring them onto the market you need certain test phases and all of that stuff so that's hard to do in a war in a war especially in world war ii so hitler said to morel i'm going to be your guinea pig you just make it in your factory i test it and if i think it's good then i'm just going to write a today you would say like a decree you know because i'm the president you know i can like order it that it's going to be legal all over germany so hitler was a real drug guy he liked drugs Well, he liked to experiment, I would say,

with drugs and with Morel.

They never, like, he was against drugs, you know.

He was.

But that's a crazy thing for a guy who didn't do anything, right?

It's a big

contradiction, or it's a big irony, or it's very weird.

But isn't it even a bit of a mystery?

Because at that stage, I'm sure he was paranoid about being killed and all that kind of stuff.

So he must have really trusted Morel, right?

Yeah, he trusted Morel because Morrel was not part of any organization.

He was the loner coming from the VIP doctors, his own VIP doctor's office, and now he was basically Hitler's toy.

Like, Hitler could get access to all kinds of medications through him, and Morel would never say it to anybody.

You know, he would just write it down.

But this was kept quite secret.

No one knew what was going on between the two men.

This is so interesting because, like, why, why would he?

There might be.

Can you maybe even speak to that?

Why did Hitler trust another human being this much?

Because you could probably make the case nobody was closer to Hitler than Morel.

That is certainly the story I'm telling.

Isn't that crazy?

Like, what is that?

What is it about Morel?

This guy who's,

I guess he's fat and weird and like

nobody really likes him?

He was not a threat to Hitler.

Like, Hitler hated all the super super smart medicine people.

Like he didn't, he never undressed before them.

He never let himself be seen naked because he didn't want anyone to know anything

about him that he couldn't control.

So Morai was harmless.

Morale would basically did what Hitler wanted.

They wouldn't say we're going to take today we're going to take drugs together.

It's going to be fun.

Hitler was always about optimizing his performance because he knew only I'm doing this.

I have to

and he always thought he's going to die young.

So he always like, I don't have unlimited time.

The clock was always ticking.

So I have to be always the high performer.

So Hitler,

when he first experienced

the beauty of the

opioid high that was given to him in August 1941, intravenously, when he experienced that, kind of his eyes opened.

And he didn't think this was a drug.

I mean, this is a medicine.

This is a medicine that helps me function.

This is a medicine that my doctor gives me in a very controlled manner.

And that lets me be extremely sharp for like eight hours.

I can convince all the generals I can do my job.

I'm happy.

Because Hitler was also depressed, you know.

I mean, this is

he need,

he need, like, he really appreciated what the drug gave him.

But he never thought, no, I'm becoming like a drug addict.

So it begins to, oxycodone in general begins to work within 30, 60 minutes and lasts for about 46 hours.

So this is a long-lasting thing.

Yeah, but these are, this you swallow.

If you get an intravenous injection, it works after one second.

Wow.

Get the injection, you're high.

But it lasts for many hours.

Yeah.

That's why people love heroin who take it because you feel like shit.

You take the injection, you feel great.

I mean, it's in your system for quite a while.

Like, you can go into the meeting quite comfortably.

Into the meeting.

Yeah, okay.

I mean, there's the briefing.

It starts at 1.

Morel comes and you can see this in the notes.

Like I have to be at the Führer in his bedroom at 12.

And then, you know, you chat a bit and then Hitler rolls up his uniform sleeve and then he gets the injection maybe at maybe 12.30.

Then the high comes on and then it's very stable.

Like you feel great.

This is a pure

product from the Merck company.

This is not some heron from the street.

And Morel knows exactly what dosage you want want right now.

So you feel at the top of your game.

You don't feel, you're not intoxicated.

I mean, you are, but it makes you clear, you know.

So the mind is clear.

The mind's totally clear.

Your body feels fantastic.

You know exactly your points.

You know exactly how the others, because the others are just mortals, you know, because they're sober.

They just sit there and they just, they haven't slept very well or they have problems with them, you know, and you're way above them.

What do we know about general psychological effects of it?

So, does it boost your confidence?

Does it boost aggressiveness?

What effect did it have on his vision of the world?

It makes you feel extremely confident.

You have a lot of energy, but it's not too much.

Like, let's say you take cocaine or methamphetamine, you're like, that's why Hitler was never a math guy.

That's also why I think this video is fake.

He didn't take math.

I mean, I studied Morel's

the things he gave them.

He gave a lot of things and only twice was meth.

So that's not a lot for Hitler, like twice.

I read that the multivitamin had some amphetamine and maybe meth, a little bit or no?

Multi.

I mean I

vitamultine.

I mean vitamultine is interesting because it was a little bar of a sweet that was lying next to his food.

So he would just eat and then at the end he would take this.

It was nice tasting.

It had some sugar in it.

And I read through all of the

ingredients of the, there were different types, and never, there's never methamphetamine in it.

But there isn't, okay.

There was an SS doctor, Schenk, and he claimed that Morel made special vitamultine in his lab with meth in it.

But I think he just made that up.

Okay.

There's, there's, there was never any proof of that.

I mean, that's a really important line to draw the army, the Nazi army, at scale.

Not everybody, but some fraction, especially during the French campaign, used meth.

Right.

And then there's Hitler, which used a lot of drugs, but meth was not one of them, really.

No, meth for him was just for the foot soldiers, you know.

I mean, he didn't even talk about meth.

This is nothing that concerned him, you know.

This is something that makes you function.

Maybe he signed, I mean, it went over his desk, the stimulant decree, but I don't know if he really read it or understood it.

I mean, mean, he probably knew Pervitin because everyone knew it.

And maybe, you know, they discussed it, but they would probably also not.

I mean,

there's a point when there's a conflict about methamphetamine in the army.

This is when the Secretary of Health of the German government, the Nazi government, Conti, He starts writing to the army and he says, you must stop this.

This is against Nazi ideology.

But the army basically doesn't listen to him and keeps on on using meth all the way to the end.

So maybe that guy, Conte, maybe he discussed this with Hitler, but also Hitler never, you know, if Hitler would have said we stopped the methamphetamine, he probably would have stopped.

But Conte saying that wasn't enough.

I don't think Hitler was really into meth.

It was not his thing.

He was more into the opioids,

into these weird hormonal things.

Those things were, especially the opioids, were interesting to him because you can function on opioids for a long long time.

If you have a proper product and

a doctor that gives you the injections, I mean, Goering

was addicted to morphine from 1923 until when the Americans captured him in 1945.

That's 22 years he was functioning on morphine.

And when they captured him, he had, I write about it in Blitz, like the amount of morphine capsules he had on him.

So what the Americans did was first to take away all the morphine from him, and then he went through withdrawal in American, you know, incarceration.

And he lost, you know, a lot of pounds, and he became like a more of a haggard

Göring, which was then in Nuremberg, you know, this haggard kind of guy defending what he did.

And

so, um, Hitler was really an Hitler was really an opioid guy while the army was really messed up.

That's that's how you could sum it up briefly.

He did try cocaine.

Why didn't he get into cocaine?

He started cocaine after the bomb attack by Stauffenberg on July 20th, 1944,

when this bomb went off, which actually killed a few people in the room.

This was during a military briefing.

Stauffenberg put a bag with explosives under the table, and the table actually saved Hitler's life because it was a good German quality oak table.

So the table was so stable that the bomb explosion kind of just kind of blew up the table, but Hitler behind the table was protected by this table.

Yeah, this is the the closest assassination attempt.

Yeah.

Probably.

I mean, it's very weird that it didn't succeed because he had the bomb.

He put it next to Hitler.

He took out some of the explosives before he went into the room.

This is one of the big mysteries.

Why did Stauffenberg take out some of the explosives?

There's no explanation for it.

But Hitler survived, but he was quite injured, which Nazi propaganda always...

denied like they always did the hit the the Fuhrer was miraculously unharmed but he was quite harmed there were like over 100 splinters from the wood everywhere his eardrums were blown which was you know it's quite an injury i guess you know he was bleeding internally and he was shell-shocked basically and then a new doctor comes in his name is giesing

because morale was not a in germany we have Well, I guess it's worldwide.

It's the ear, nose, and throat specialist, right?

So an ear, nose, and throat specialist from the German army called Dr.

Giesing, he was ordered to come into headquarters after the bomb attack to treat Hitler's blown ear

drums.

And Giesing gave Hitler cocaine because cocaine at the time was being, was, you know, it was used.

It was not Schedule I, you know, it was, it had the effect that it would numb the pain and you could you could like use it

You would like put it on a certain place where you had the pain, and then it would numb that area.

But Hitler was like,

he'd never taken cocaine before, but he got very interested in it.

And Giesing writes a meticulous report about his experiences with Hitler.

Alone, that report is really fun to read.

It's about a 15-page report that he did for the American military after the war.

When he was being interrogated by the American military, he like described what happened with Hitler and him.

And he realized that Hitler really liked the cocaine.

And then he's like, started saying, now give it in the nose.

And then it was a liquid that he could apply like with a dab, like into the nose.

It wasn't cocaine powder, but he could like

liquefied cocaine.

And Hitler loved it.

And he's just saying things like, finally, I can think clear again.

And he had this cocaine rush, which is a rush of superiority.

It's a dangerous drug because you think you know more than the other.

It's not very humble drug, you know.

It just increases the ego.

And

that actually,

he liked that because that was,

you know, after the bomb attack, he thought everyone is a traitor.

Like, he didn't feel safe anymore in his own bunker, you know.

And he was like, Nazis and the right wing is always paranoid.

Like, who's the enemy?

Like, they're behind us, like, they're stabbing us in the back.

So, Hitler was this type of person.

So, the cocaine kind of stabilized him.

And Giesing realized that this guy is like a drug guy.

Like he didn't know.

He came in, he saw the Fuhrer for the first time.

He was like, he was like in awe.

And like a drug wreck was approaching him.

And as soon as he had some cocaine in his system, because this was summer of 44, he already had taken a lot of opioids and a lot of drugs.

So he, and a lot of these dubious hormonal concoctions, which led to autoimmune diseases in Hitler, maybe even had Parkinson's.

He was morale basically turned him into a physical wreck.

Giesing also writes about this.

Like, he's like trembling before he goes into the room for the first time where the Fuhrer is.

And then this

old guy, like in a blue kind of pajama is kind of coming up to him and kind of shaking his hand.

That's the Fuhrer, you know.

And Giesing is like totally shocked because he's like, you know,

the destiny of the German nation, the whole Europe, everything is like

hangs on this guy, you know.

And then whenever he takes cocaine, he's a little bit better.

But the cocaine had the problem that

giesing was more of a at least later in his discussions with the u.s

he described himself as a conscientious guy and he's like

i became like i had a kind of problems giving hitler more cocaine and yeah i mean and i'm sure hitler could have sensed that and then more

started disliking giesing because Hitler spent more time now with Giesing than with him.

And there was

what I call the doctor's war ensued, because Giesing then tried to get rid of Morel, because Giesing could suddenly see that Hitler was receiving a lot of drugs.

And

he was taking cocaine with Giesing.

Giesing left the room.

Then Morel would come in and give him Oikodal, the opioid, intravenously,

which is the speedball effect.

cocaine and an opioid you know at the same time that's like that creates a really crazy high but that's a high that's not stable anymore you know,

that's a high that you, that's like at the end of your drug career, you take the speedball.

So speedball is a combination of a stimulant and a depressant.

Cocaine and joint heart depressants.

Yeah, so combining cocaine and heroin, huh?

Wow.

I've never had a speedball, but I think it's like the most hardcore drug experience you can have.

And Hitler had this in the summer of 1944 for quite some time.

And then the doctors really fought for influence over Hitler.

And Giesing teamed up with Himmler, head of the SS, and basically said to Himmler, this Morel guy.

And Himmler was already suspicious of Morel, obviously, because Morel is spending so much time with Hitler.

There's no control.

Like Himmler was a control freak.

What is he actually giving to the Führer?

The Führer doesn't look good anymore.

So Giesing was trying to get Morel out.

Maybe because he wanted Hitler to have a better health, maybe he wanted to have the job himself.

He certainly tried to get rid of Morel.

And it came to like the high noon situation, like the duel between the two doctors.

It's, by the way, why I think it's completely insane that Hollywood hasn't bought the rights yet, alone this Doctor's War.

You mean for the entire Blitz story?

Yeah, of course.

Yeah, yeah, that's really, I mean, some of the greatest movies, I mean, like Fear Unloads in Las Vegas.

You can do a drug movie on the Nazis.

You know, one of my favorite movies, probably Downfall, which is Hitler in the bunker, which does, I guess, does Downfall have a drug angle?

No,

they missed the drug angle.

Because my book hadn't been out yet.

They didn't know about it.

That's why they can't.

It's a different story.

They can't really explain why Hitler became a physical wreck.

There's no explanation for it except the drugs, the opioid addiction.

You could explain it.

It is a part of it that

it's an extremely stressful position he's in.

in.

Yeah, but it's become a physical wreck.

The physical wreck aspect, yeah.

And there were two bedrooms in the bunker in Berlin.

Two bedrooms.

One, of course, for Hitler, the other one for Morel.

No one else was sleeping in the bunker.

I mean,

you can see the importance of, especially in those last months of Morel in the bunker.

And they didn't get that when they made the movie The Downfall.

But it's still an interesting movie, but I can't take it seriously seriously because they didn't see this.

It has a drug component.

It's missing.

Again, I don't think it has to be

the main thing, but it has to be a part of it.

A serious movie on Bliss would be really nice.

It's not easy to do.

No.

There's something about drugs.

If you do a movie on drugs

that involve drugs, that it makes it...

You can go too far into like Tarantino territory

where it's more like, which is also incredible and awesome, but it's a different thing.

He invents history and he's like very open about it.

Like, this is not what actually happened.

I think a Blitz movie would have to stick to the facts.

And I've spoken with some directors, very good German directors, and it's just very hard to do.

But but if you do it well, that's a legendary movie.

Yeah.

Yeah, that would be incredible.

What can you just speak high level from from what is it?

You said forty one to forty five.

What were some

behavioral changes or changes in decision making that we can trace

in Hitler

that could be attributed to drugs?

Like, how did it change him?

Well, an interesting event is July 1943 in a villa in northern Italy where Hitler meets Mussolini.

And Mussolini is basically fed up with the war and he wants Italy to leave the axis of evil.

And Hitler is really pissed when he hears that.

He knows that's what the meeting is all about.

And Mussolini, I mean, the Italians invented that modern type of fascism.

And they were all, Italy was the role model for Nazi Germany, but by now Nazi Germany, of course, has been much more powerful.

But, you know, Italy is the most important ally.

And now Mussolini is like quitting in the middle of the war.

I mean, what is going on here?

So Hitler becomes, and Morel writes about this quite a lot.

He's in a terrible mood.

He really, he doesn't want to go.

Like

he might lose his, you know, temper or whatever.

He's not happy.

And that's actually, that's the day when he receives the Oikodal for the first time.

And he, because he says to Morel, I'm under such stress, I'm not going to go.

He threatens, like, he calls off the whole thing.

Like, the plane's already waiting in Uber-Salzberg.

Everything is ready.

And he says, I'm not meeting this guy.

And then Morel gives him Oikodal, and you can see

the time when he gets the Oikodal.

And that's when he has this effect for the first time.

This, like, I can do anything.

This is great.

I'm going to explain to Mussolini that he's not going to leave the war effort.

And on the way to the plane, he says to Morel that this Oikodal is really helping him.

And he wants another shot.

And he receives another shot.

So

he has quite a lot of oikodal in him when he speaks to Mussolini.

And there's like

the people who take who write the protocol of the meeting and also other people around it's not like it's not just two people in the room it's like I don't know 15 or 20 people in the room and a lot of people talk about that meeting in their memoirs and Mussolini is not able to say one word basically because Hitler is so high and so charged and he's like just telling the whole time how great this is you know what they're doing right now and of course there's not even a it's not possible that you're gonna leave you know we are in this together from the you know, he explains everything, you know, the whole thing for like two hours and Mussolini is just like

it's like

Then a messenger comes in and says Rome has just been bombed

He's like

he knows he can't say anything and he stays, you know, so that was very much influenced that meeting by his Oikodal and that's probably because it was so successful in Hitler's eyes.

What happened is why Oikodal became a very attractive drug for him.

And this happened, this was the first time in July 1943.

And then, so he didn't take Oikodal through the whole time.

You know, it only started in July 1943.

He started with

a regular opioid use.

You can see that he takes it more and more regular now.

Not every day, but sometimes, like there's a September 1944, he takes Oikodal every second day, which is like a junkie rhythm.

You take it, then the next day you don't take it.

Then you take it again.

Why is that junkie rhythm?

You don't take it all the time because you need to,

I don't know, relax or

you don't.

You take it maybe

Saturday night, you take it and the high last till Sunday morning.

And then Sunday, when the high slowly wears off, you sleep and then you wake up and you're hungry.

Maybe you eat.

And then the next day, Monday, you're going to do it again.

So that's this rhythm.

And it was more potent than, what is it, Dalantine?

Dalantine?

Dalantine.

It's said to have the best effect, the best

in the sense of it's not about strength.

You know, you just increase the dosage and you have a stronger effect, but you can't increase it too much because then you're going to die.

You know, that's also the problem with opioids.

If you take too much, you're going to die because you just have a heart attack.

There's nuanced differences that it's hard to convert into words, I guess.

Yeah.

Different molecules have different effects.

So Oikodal apparently had the best effect.

That's why you had the oxycodone epidemic in America, because people take this pill.

I mean, thank God they're they're not injecting it all like Hitler did.

They take a pill, so it's not so dangerous as injecting.

But apparently, the effect is so pleasant of this oikodal,

of this particular type of opioid, that it just is more attractive, maybe than Dolantin.

Is it possible to

try to reverse engineer the effect of Hitler's drug use on the outcome of World War II?

So, if he didn't use any drugs,

would

the Nazis be more successful or less successful?

What do you think?

I think it would be speculative to answer, but I can try.

But it's very,

the war is so complex.

I mean,

there's many different ways this war could have played out and ended, but I think it would always have ended with a German defeat.

I don't think it would have ended with a German defeat.

Well, if you don't attack the Soviet Union, then of course you can win.

But as soon as you attack the Soviet Union, that would be.

As we talked about, I think the probability of success is low.

But I would put it like,

I don't know, 10%.

Again, extremely speculative.

But yeah, if you do Blitzkrieg type of attack, very rapid, don't split the forces in Operation Barbarossa, go straight for Moscow.

Don't invade Britain.

Don't declare war on the United States.

And really focus

on gaining oil from the Middle East.

So maybe making the Africa campaign the central

point

in the very beginning so that you have the resources that are essential for the industrial capacity of Germany that's required to keep manufacturing and keep fueling the planes, the tanks,

the mechanized aspect of the army.

So there's a lot of paths to this.

But

I think it's probably fair to say that reasonable, thoughtful, calculated, disciplined

leader would not have done any of the things Hitler did even in the beginning.

I mean, it requires insanity.

It requires hatred.

It requires ideological self-capture where you tell yourself narratives that rapidly deviate from like ground truth, from first principles of things.

And you just, you're an insane person.

You're an insane dictator that's drunk on power, and it's impossible for you to make great military decisions at that point.

Yeah, you would need like an impossible Hitler that is as crazy as he was, but still wouldn't make any irrational mistakes.

So that doesn't exist.

Hitler can only be imagined or understood as this

in a way as the drugs.

Hitler without drugs is unthinkable for me.

And

he was the drug guy.

You cannot separate this.

So Hitler was a self-destructive personality, and National Socialism is a self-destructive movement.

That's why I said I think the Germans would have lost in any case, you know, except if there was this

perfect Hitler, which is theoretically impossible.

Theoretically impossible in the 20th century.

I mean, you could think of Genghis Kahn or Alexander the Great type characters that would really internalize the sense of, in the case of Hitler, that the German people are like without the hatred, without the ideology, but with the murderous,

with the ability to dehumanize the rest of the world and see as the German people as

the superior, and so it's fair to do the Lebenstraum and all of that kind of stuff.

It's hard to.

It's just,

the reason you want to think about that kind of stuff is Hitler got, to me at least, close to capturing a very large part of the world.

And

it's terrifying and

sort of unbelievable that somebody could get close to that.

I mean, what you described as this feeling of superiority and conquering countries, that was basically what the Wehrmacht High Command, that's what they were going for.

And they wanted to eliminate Hitler in the Operation Valkyrie, not because they thought he's an evil guy killing the Jews, or they wanted to eliminate him because he was not this effective decision maker anymore that they needed to win the war or to end it in a different way.

And

I spoke with Anthony Bieber once about

the

attempt of British intelligence to assassinate Hitler.

And he had seen some evidence that at a point in time they dropped those plans because they knew

that

drugged Hitler or malfunctioning Hitler, which he was

after the summer of 1943,

is better for Britain than killing Hitler and then having to deal with some kind of maybe the army would have taken over the country.

And that would have been more uncomfortable for Great Britain than having this having the continuation of the degenerating maniac.

What do we know about the very end, Hitler and the bunker?

The

moments, the days, the weeks, the months leading up to the suicide,

all those kinds of things.

It's quite well documented because people at the time were keeping diaries and writing about it, writing about their experiences.

Also, Morel wrote quite a bit what happened in the bunker.

One thing that changed was that

Eukodal was not available anymore.

So the drug that Hitler actually had become physically addicted to was suddenly not available anymore.

This had to do with the bombardment of the Merck company, the factory, in December 1944.

British bombers destroyed the production facilities.

And Morel, there's a report of Morel, the

overweight

person

riding on a motorcycle through bombed-out Berlin from pharmacy to pharmacy, basically going into the pharmacies, trying to score Oikodal, and he couldn't find it anymore.

It was nowhere to be found.

And that's when Hitler goes into withdrawal.

What I find surprising is that he didn't use another opioid because morphine was available all the way till the end.

But he never kind of made that switch then.

Like, he doesn't.

Also, he didn't realize for a long time that he becomes physically dependent on a drug, that he becomes a drug addict.

But this realization happens in the last weeks in the bunker.

Because Goebbels, he understood it.

And Goebbels wanted that bedroom, the second bedroom.

So he said to Hitler,

do you understand what's going on that Morel turns you into a drug addict?

And he does like, and at one point he realized what Goebbels is saying is true because he felt the withdrawal.

He was shaking.

He felt like shit.

And

Morel is like giving him weird stuff in the end.

Like one time he gives him harmine, which is an MAO inhibitor, which is part of ayahuasca actually.

Because he still had that in his doctor's bag.

It hadn't been used yet.

So it gives him that, which also creates some kind of a weird high.

But, you know, Hitler at one point realizes really what's going on.

This is late April, so very late in the game.

And there's a few reports of what actually happens.

Like some say that Morrel has to kneel in front of him and that Hitler puts a gun on his head and says, you've been making me addicted to opioids.

Get the hell out of the bunker.

For sure he fires him that day and Morrel is described as being in tears.

Leaving the bunker, he gets one of the last planes out of Berlin.

He has a research lab in the south of Bavaria, close to the Berkhof, and he makes like one of the last or the last plane out of Berlin.

He survives.

Yeah.

And he goes to this research lab.

And this is like May 2nd, 1945.

He has like a little apartment in his research lab.

His wife is still in Berlin.

He's like all alone.

And he starts doing his taxes.

And that kind of shows you that he was probably insane at that point, you know?

He's just totally out of touch.

Why would you do your tax?

Maybe he was bored, you know, maybe it's like he didn't do his taxes for so long because he always had to treat Hitler.

And then he thinks like, no, what am I going to do?

You You know, I'm just going to do my tax.

At least I'm going to do my taxes now.

Very German thing to do.

He's just a strange character.

I mean, you tell

the whole thing.

I would put that in the movie for sure.

Him doing his taxes.

That's how the movie ends.

Well, then the Americans move into Bavaria, liberate Bavaria from National Socialism, which was a great job they did there.

And

so I'm also thankful not only to the Red Army, but also to the American forces.

Really very thankful that they, because National Socialism was hard to beat.

It was a beast, you know, it was hard to beat.

So they capture Morel

and they interrogate him and he actually lives for another two years in American custody in Germany in a military prison.

And after these two years, his health is really bad.

He has heart problems and

the Americans dump him in front of the Munich train station in a much too small kind of uniform jacket, like probably an American uniform.

And he's like lying lying on the pavement in front of the train station.

And a half-Jewish nurse walks around there, finds him, and he says, I'm Theo Murl.

And it's like, it's really like in a movie.

I'm Theo Murrel.

I was the personal physician of the funeral.

She's like, this is 1947.

Germany's in ruins.

Yeah.

And she brings him to a hospital.

His wife comes from Berlin for a last time.

They meet in a hospital at Teganze,

beautiful lake in Bavaria, and then he dies.

So that was the end of Morel.

So we know pretty much what happens in the end.

Did somebody try to talk to Hitler about this?

Like, what about Eva Braun?

Has anybody close to him tried to talk about the Gubbels did?

Well, that at the very end, but you would imagine maybe the generals or friends are inner circle.

I mean, the reason I mentioned Eva is because, you know, like personal and people close to him.

There is a certain tension between Eva Braun and Morel, and I could very well imagine that she talked with Hitler about it, but there's no record, so I don't know exactly.

But they had a very intimate relationship.

So Eva Brand was not just the dumb blonde that plays no role.

They actually spoke every day.

And when Hitler was in the military headquarters, he would phone her every night at 10 p.m.

They would have a long phone conversation.

So they had a very deep relationship.

And I'm pretty sure she didn't really like Morel because, you know, for the obvious reasons.

He was closer to Hitler than herself.

And, you know, if you

count one plus one, it's two, you know.

But she could have maybe not liked him because she might have cared for Hitler.

And you can see the effects of drugs on humans that you care for.

She also had a good relationship with him at times because he was often at the Berkhof.

The Berkhov was like the

what is it called?

Mar delago.

Oh,

the Mar-a Lago, yeah.

Yeah, that's that was kind of what it was.

And it was actually, it became an official headquarter for Hitler, so he would actually make decisions from there.

It was not just a vacation place.

And Morel was often there.

And Eva Bronn was always there.

That was her place.

She was running that place.

She was like the woman of that place.

And Hitler was often, of course, in the field, in the headquarters.

But he came as much as he could to the Berkhof because it's quite beautiful.

I went up there.

It's quite interesting.

And she also had a good relationship with Morel.

And there's like a paper that I found where

they were were very intimate and very close.

Like there's a paper of Morel

where

she comes to him in the morning and she has like scratch marks.

So apparently they had violent sex.

So Morel is like also kind of witness to that.

That I found in Washington, D.C.

in the National Security.

Where Hitler and Neva had violent sex.

What do we know about Hitler's sex life?

It's like not known, right?

I found it interesting that Morel describes these scratch marks.

i mean it's it's interesting so they they they had some kind of kinky sex maybe maybe they also had normal sex and sometimes it was kinky or yeah maybe hitler was aggressive in bad but it doesn't really matter it's just what happened between eva and him yeah i don't think that affected no military operations of the world drug use did his sex If he would have had sex with like a lot of people, maybe with his generals, maybe then, you know, it would be worth writing about it because maybe he dominated his generals in bed or something, but he was just having sex with Eva, and I don't think that's historically relevant.

It might be interesting for the movie, but

I don't want to see Hitler having sex.

I don't think anyone wants to see Hitler.

But Eva Braun is an interesting character because she had more of a say than historians for a long time attributed to her.

Then a biography was written on her by a female German historian, and that's a very good biography.

It really shows that she had quite a lot to say in this relationship she was not the dumb blonde that just

she was quite you know opinionated and and active so it's it's and she was she was filming him a lot like she had she was always filming in the beer cove you can go online and look at the eva braun clips and you will see hitler in colour at the beerkhof how he's like

meeting children, patting their head.

And

she was contributing to the myth of this private, the private man, the good private man.

So Eva Braun is an interesting character for sure.

But I found one note that she, in the beginning, when Morel started with his drugs, said to Morel that she wants the same drugs, the same medications, not drugs, the same medications as Hitler, so she would be on one, the same wavelengths with him.

She wanted to be, she didn't want to lose this world.

But I mean, Hitler became such a drug polytoxychomanic user that, of course, Eva couldn't keep up with that.

They weren't a drug couple.

I didn't see any evidence for that that they would like take all the crazy drugs together and then have crazy sex or something like that.

That's not how it was.

So I think she was sympathetic to Morel in the beginning and then changed her opinion.

And I'm pretty sure she talked with Hitler about it, but there's no records about their private conversations.

Let's talk about another perspective on this whole story that you document in your book, The Bohemians.

The subtitle is The Lovers Who Led Germany's Resistance Against the Nazis.

So this is the story of the people who resisted from within Germany.

Right.

Can you tell their story?

And in particular, it's told to the story of the

two key figures in the movement who happened to also be in love.

Well, the main guy is Harold, Harold Schulze-Boezen.

He caught my attention when I was doing research in an archive in Munich,

researching drugs in the Luftwaffe, Goering's Luftwaffe, Göring being the morphinist.

I mean, the Luftwaffe was a drug,

a very promiscuous place, like a lot of people in the Luftwaffe.

High.

Oh, so more for entertainment versus the practical aspect of.

So it's less about the meth, optimizing the human performance and more about just

exploring.

Like the number three of the Luftwaffe, Ernst Udet,

he committed suicide in the fall of 1941

and he had had seven Purvitin tablets for breakfast.

Okay, so he was really high on math.

He really enjoyed it.

But he loved to take math and then drink.

Alcohol was a big thing in the Luftwaffe.

You can drink a lot more when you're in methamphetamine.

And I found this letter, and it was really a coincidence while I was looking through like the drug stuff.

I was searching for, you know, drugs.

And I found this letter by Haro Schulze Boysen,

who had nothing to do with drugs, but still I found this letter.

I don't know why.

I can't remember how exactly it happened that I was suddenly reading this letter and it was the last letter that he wrote in his life.

He wrote it to his father and he said that everything I have done,

I'm totally fine with it.

And I know it's very hard for you.

And I really am mostly sad for you and mother and my brother

that you have to go through this.

And I'm very sorry but I'm fine with it and I have a clean conscience.

I did what I could to stop this madness.

I'm like, what?

Who is this guy?

And I googled him and there were not so many hits on him, but I read a little bit and he actually had formed, together with his wife Libertas, which means freedom.

Good name.

He had formed the largest resistance network against the Nazis that ever existed.

Over a hundred people in Berlin that were all connected and they were

they were like from all flights of life.

Like there were some were artists, other were workers, some were leftists, other were patriots.

How

always believed that people could come to an agreement, like it's possible to actually talk about things and

he was a true Democrat maybe you could say or a true I don't know libertarian or you know he was a

he had to learn a hard lesson that with Nazis you cannot argue because they they are always right they're not they they it

it doesn't work at least it didn't work during the third reich like he could he had he had published a newspaper during the Weimar Republic called Gegna which means opponent and in the Gegna,

opponents could all write, like who would be on the streets, opponents, they could all write in the opponent.

And so it was a

you read all kinds of texts and

opinions.

And he thought when Hitler took over power in 1933 that he could continue to publish the opponent, because the opponent, he thought, even

in a Nazi-led Germany, this keeps the discourse.

You have to have a discourse, we have to discuss, we have to disagree.

And then in April 1933, two months after Hitler took power, they had a meeting with the editorial staff and they discussed the new issue.

And then there was a knock on the door and it was the SS and they

beat up everybody and they destroyed the typewriters and the printing press that they had in the office in Berlin.

And they took Haro and his best friend, who was half Jewish, to one of these early concentration camps.

And they tortured both of them.

And

the Jew was killed.

He didn't make it.

Henry Erlanger and Haro, at that moment, he realized who he's against, you know, that he has to, he decided to become, to fight this system.

And the way he fought the system

was

later during the 60s.

We also had a 60s kind of cultural

and political changes in Germany.

And

our 60s,

they called it march through the institutions.

That is a way to infiltrate the system, like to become part of the system, and then, you know, change the system from within.

So you don't leave the country, you stay, you go into the institutions.

You march through the institutions.

So Hao decided to go into the Luftwaffe, and he was working in the Air Force, Luftwaffe Ministry, a huge building still intact today in Berlin, Wilhelmstrasse.

Quite an interesting building that was like the power center of the Luftwaffe, like one of the most important structures in the whole Nazi regime.

And he was working there and he worked his way up

and he received quite a lot of information.

For example, when Germany, for the first time, became militarily active again.

This was in 1936 when the Germans supported the fascists in Spain in the Spanish Civil War.

This was a clandestine operation.

The Luftwaffe did this.

And they, like, German soldiers went to Spain in plain cloth,

posing as vacationers, but then they

were actually soldiers and supporting Franco's, you know, were part of Franco's victory later on.

And Haaro had this information and

he tried to pass this on to the BBC.

He failed passing it on.

Well, he met a BBC journalist during the Olympic Games in Berlin and told him about this.

And the BBC guy was too afraid to make make this public and he kind of buried that information.

So Haaro

is just a very interesting character and he was in love with Libertas and Libertas with him.

Haaro came from like a bourgeois family, very educated.

His great-granduncle was von Tierpitz who built up the marine, the navy for the Kaiser.

So he came from this like influential German family, but they were all patriots.

They were not Nazis.

They were Democrats, patriots and militarists, I guess you could say, or like even very straight-laced also in a way.

And Libertas, she came from a castle north of Berlin.

She was this like bohemian, like aristocratic bohemian type, very good looking, always playing music.

And they fell in love.

They met on the Vanse on boats.

They were both on a, on, Hauer was rowing and she was on a sailboat.

of a guy that Hauer also knew.

So he was rowing and he saw his friend on the sailboat and he looked at Libertas, she looked at him and they were in love in 1934.

And the other guy, the friend of Haaro, he left his sailboat because he realized I'm like the

fifth wheel on the car, like right, not really needed, right?

Like, how do you say that in sailboat terms?

I don't know.

The

third sail, it's not needed, you know.

But what happened at night?

How didn't sleep with Libertas.

For her, that was very unusual because everyone wanted to sleep with her.

But Hao, like, he wanted to keep his clothes on it was a very warm night and I researched this quite thoroughly like I know exactly the temperature and so also the bohemians when you read the bohemians you really experience the life of these people what like what they experience but everything is nothing is invented which is very tricky to do

So what happens that night?

Like Libertas wants to take off his clothes and he doesn't want to take them off because why?

From the torture in april 1933 he has quite a lot of scars they even burned swastikas into his thighs like not burned sorry they uh with knives the ss so he doesn't want to show that to her he just

and he hadn't had a girlfriend for a while like he can't open up emotionally because he's fighting the Nazis.

It's very secret.

Like no one knows about this, that he's long-term planning his life to fight the system that he hates so much because they killed his best friend in front of his eyes.

But at one point, Libertas does, you know, take off his clothes and she sees this and she's like naive.

She's even a member of the Nazi Party, but she's not a very active party member.

She's just, you know, she works for MGM actually in Berlin.

Mary Hollywood Film Studio office in Berlin.

Germany was one of the biggest movie markets.

And she was the press girl.

She did the campaigns for the big Hollywood movies in Germany.

So she's a regular German girl.

Well, she wasn't regular.

She was from a a very high family.

Actually, her grandfather had been in a relationship with the German emperor, which is a side story that I found out when I researched the Bohemians.

The German emperor apparently was bisexual and was going to that castle, and they had homosexual kind of meetings there with Libertas' grandfather.

So she came from a very

unusual family.

But what I mean, actually, in the usual German girl,

what I mean by that is it's not obvious that a person like that

would hold a crucial role in the resistance against the Nazis.

Not at all.

That was always a problem because for her it was weird that someone was against the system.

But

Hao was totally convinced that fascism is wrong and that he has to fight it.

And

more and more libertas was convinced and then more friends

kind of came into into the group.

And the way how organized this resistance group

was through parties.

Like they were like a power couple of Berlin and they had a great loft apartment.

They moved together to a loft apartment on also a side street from Kudam, a huge room.

And there they had parties every second Thursday night and they would invite friends.

And then

once they trusted someone personally, then they would spill the beans and say, this is actually not just a party, but they would like test it.

At the party, they would say something critical of the regime.

And you immediately, you know, either the person jumps on it, responds, or like, you know, goes somewhere else, gets a drink at the bar, you know, not into it.

So that was the way of recruiting people.

And that was such an efficient way that the Gestapo was not able to understand this group for a long time, not even recognize that there is a group, because

Gestapo was very good in infiltrating for example communist resistance groups because you just had to go in as a Gestapo guy and be a communist

just say the right words and they would at one point you know take you but with Hago and Libertas it wasn't so easy you know they would immediate they would sniff you out you know these parties were what like intellectuals like

like artists and that kind of stuff?

Yeah, yeah.

They had music, they would dance, they would sleep with each other.

So sex stuff, too.

Well, they had, and this is again kind of a parallel to the 60s, they had the idea that if you're against fascism, if you're for

freedom of

everything.

The whole thing.

Yeah,

they had free love, but it wasn't a dogma.

Like there were also, there was a doctor, a female doctor there.

She was quite...

square, I guess you would say.

And she was like against this and she said, this is too complicated.

We are a resistance group.

Like, what if there's jealousy?

And what, like, that this could compromise operations?

And it did sometimes.

So, that's why the Bohemians are a very interesting subject, because sometimes it just doesn't work.

In a way, it works, that love really bonds them together.

But also, especially Libertas and Hau, they have a terrible marriage sometimes.

Like, they really fight because Libertas

is not so much

intellectually convinced.

She's more resistance fighter from the heart.

Like, she feels that the Nazis are not good.

But Hao is more like the analytical guy.

So they have a lot of friction also.

And

it's a fascinating

story.

And they came quite far.

I mean, they made,

there was a point in time when Hao had militarily relevant information through his position at the Luftwaffe Ministry.

And he passed that on to allies, to Western allies, and to the Soviet Union.

So he went a step further than just being like a resistance guy.

He became, you could say, a traitor.

He would give information to the Soviets.

Yeah, he would.

Because he said as part of the resistance.

Yeah, they can beat Germany.

But that was also discussed in the groups.

Very interesting to see.

Like, some say, we can't do this because the Soviet Union is also a totalitarian regime.

But then Haus says, yeah, but they are going to beat Hitler.

The Bohemians is a very interesting topic.

What lessons do you learn from these folks,

maybe about

why so few resisted Hitler

and Germany?

I mean, it was extremely dangerous.

Is purely the danger?

Is it also people believed

it's hard to take yourself, like be an independent thinker and take yourself outside

the propaganda?

Because they're also swimming in propaganda.

I mean,

the chances of succeeding are quite small because the system was extremely strong.

And if you made a joke about Hitler and the wrong person heard it, like in a restaurant and would

rat on you, you would land in a concentration camp.

So people were very, very careful.

Also at parties with like Hawaiian Libertas and she was singing and they were drinking and dancing and then suddenly the political discussion started.

That's, you know, you have to have guts to then actually not leave the party, but to stay because they were risking their lives, basically.

As soon as they would be found out they would be dead and people don't want to die when they're like in their mid-20s they were all they were they were pretty young and the and also libertas you would often say like we can't win you know it's why are we risking our lives for like for like what you know so one time they did a

um

klebetzettel action kleber settler uh

like they produced because one guy had access to a printing press and they produced leaf like small papers that had glue on one side and the paper said

um

what the nazis did uh they they set up a huge um exhibition hall which was called the soviet paradise and this exhibition hall was in the center of berlin i'd never heard about this before i found this when i researched the bohemians and it was the most popular exhibition during the whole of the of the war like two million people two million germans saw this they went into this uh

exhibition and they saw how horrible the Soviet Union is, how horrible communism is to people.

So it was a propaganda show.

And the group decided to make these leaflets, which didn't say the Soviet paradise, but it said the Nazi paradise, torture, SS torture, hunger, war, how long will it last?

And they glued over a thousand of these stickers everywhere in Berlin

in May 1942

at night.

And they organized it in a way that they always two, a man and a woman, would go out and they had like the stickers with them.

And then they would pretend to kiss and would like lean on a wall.

And then while they were kissing, one would like put the put the sticker on, then they would move on in the dark.

So in the morning of that May 1942,

tens of thousands of Berliners saw that the city was like

saw these things.

So

does it make a difference?

It made one on that day.

You know, it was a very dangerous thing to do, and

no one got caught.

And in the morning, a lot of people saw that there is actually resistance, that there are people who do something against it.

So, I think they did something.

Yeah, I was reading about protests in recent human history, and then most of them, many of them

don't have an effect

until they do.

It's like this threshold effect.

It's very hard to know.

It's very hard to know because

it's a match that lights a fire.

And sometimes it's a spark that takes a little bit of time to propagate through the whispers.

What happens is it's the people whispering.

It's the whisper network of people talking.

And sometimes it just takes that one sticker to begin the whispers.

And then a few months later, the regime is overthrown.

It's funny.

But it's hard to sort of trace back what was affecting and what was not.

I mean, Haro was convinced that the system would lose.

So he thought that maybe we can make a contribution, that it's going faster.

Maybe we will be that spark.

So

unless I, when I think that there's this possibility, I must try it.

You know, that's...

That was his conviction.

So he would put his life on the line for that possibility.

How did they get caught?

They were approached by the Soviet Union, who wanted to recruit them as spies, and they

didn't want to do that.

Haro refused the Soviet intelligence.

These are documents that were found in the early 90s.

One of the sons of one of the members of that group,

a good friend of Haro, one of his sons, went to Moscow to look at the files and he found a kind of furious Soviet KGB kind of descriptions of this weird guy, Haro, that doesn't want to be a proper Soviet spy and just says, Yes, I'm going to give you information so you can hurt Hitler, but I'm not going to play your game.

I'm not going to be one of you.

So,

still, they did collaborate with the Soviet Union.

They accepted a radio transmitter from the Soviet Union with which they were supposed to send military information via radio to Moscow.

And they like struggle with the technology.

The Russians give them an apparatus, only with a Russian instruction, and it's very difficult.

They make mistakes.

But what actually then gets them caught is the Russians at one point answer and send a message to them through the ether.

And that message is

coded.

But the Nazis intercept that message and are able to decode it and in the message it gives the clear names of haro and his address which is a total like intelligence blunder or

maybe they just wanted to give them up and and and had their revenge because

stalin did crazy stuff like that you know so they suddenly know the gestapo knows how schulzeboysen the high-ranking officer in the luftwaffe ministry is giving military information uh to the Soviet Union.

And apparently, like he's meeting with all kinds of friends.

So they started, the Gestapo started observing the group for months.

And the group at one point realizes that they've been basically found out, but then it's already too late.

Then they capture quite a few of them, and quite a few get

trial, military trial, and receive the death penalty.

and are also being executed.

And Hao and Libertas are among them.

And

also, that last chapter of their lives is very well documented.

And it actually ends with that letter, you know, that I found in the beginning.

That's the last thing that Haro does is write that letter.

To his father.

That's very interesting what happens with Libertas because she gets in custody.

The Gestapo

asks one of their secretaries, Getrude Breiter, to go in and pose as a friend to Libertas.

And Libertas actually falls for it and starts telling that secretary who pretends to be her friend and kind of helps her with certain things, tells her secrets, and that kind of breaks the neck of the group.

It's a very tragic ending.

So, while my books always contain as much humor as possible, that is not a funny story, but it's a very dramatic story.

Even though they had a lot of humor, obviously, I mean,

they had parties to recruit people.

what lessons can you learn from that

about uh how to resist totalitarian regimes

is there some deeper wisdom

i just think it's admirable to be brave and uh not

uh

not do things that you cannot really uh

that you cannot really justify in front of your own conscience.

I don't know if I would have been so brave.

I don't even know, obviously, how my conscience would have been, but I'm probably more the fleeing type.

Like a lot of writers would just leave Germany.

Like Thomas Mann just left Germany and lived in Pacific Palisades.

And then maybe write, criticize, but leave first.

And he criticized it from the outside, and he was quite influential.

Like he worked for the BBC.

They did like shows against the Nazis.

So you can all, maybe you can do more when you leave.

It's just you have, it's like today, let's say we see something, we live in a system that suddenly changes and we're not happy with it anymore.

Do we just go along and

continue to stare at our smartphone or do we do something against it?

What do we do?

I mean, every situation has very different

conditions, you know.

I think it's probably even harder now to be in the resistance than it was back then.

But I think it does, at the end of the day, boil down to facing yourself, looking yourself in the mirror, that you're facing your conscious, and then doing

the the courageous thing.

And I think that in itself, that like

it's the tree falling in the forest, even if there's nobody there to hear it.

Just the fact that that exists somehow through the karma channels of the world can materialize into progress,

into

a revolution against oppression.

Something about that.

That human spirit still shining through can start a revolution.

I mean, it is that spirit that actually made us human.

It is that

neuroplastic, neuroplasticity in our brain that

we

do not just repeat the conditioned

sets that we ought to repeat, but that we actually

dim down the command center in the brain and let other parts of the brain react, which is the psychedelic experience, basically.

That I think

contributes to the evolution of our species, and our species is certainly threatened by extinction.

So I think if we are somehow care for the human race,

then resistance becomes a very

immediate and important topic.

Because you can resist, obviously.

Your brain is yours.

You can resist in many ways.

By thinking, just by thinking.

That's actually why I became a writer when I was a teenager.

I was very political.

I wanted to change the system.

I thought

this is not good.

What's happening?

This was in the Cold War.

Very cons,

I don't know if conservative is even the right word, but Ronald Reagan was president.

So I thought my writing

could change the brainwaves of the readers, basically, and therefore have

a neuroplastic effect on the reader.

And just because that is what literature is.

Literature.

And I started off

as a novelist, and that's really literature.

It's about what do you see right now?

How do you describe it?

So you do it in ways that when you read it, when you read a good book, you feel good because suddenly you see different things, your brain changes, you become more free, I think, if you read good literature.

That was always my form of resistance.

Communist resistance cells would probably say this is nothing, you know, but I think it is resistance.

And that's a little bit,

I think it resembles a little bit what this group did.

Just living differently,

not living, you know, that's why I said in the beginning, Nazis are bad dancers because they

think they were good dancers at the parties, you know, and they were like,

I think it's

dancing can be a form of resistance.

Yeah, but I also like the scale.

When you resist, and through that resistance, you have impact at scale.

And I do think writing is that.

So if you can encapsulate

your sort of the spirit of that resistance into writing, that's beautiful.

And some of the greatest literature does exactly that.

Right.

That is the aim of my next book.

So is this still called Stone Sapiens?

Yeah, it's called Stone Sapiens.

Great title.

Great title.

So

what is this lens that you're looking at at all of human history through?

I discussed this with already mentioned Anthony Beaver, who is like the master in historical nonfiction books.

I said, said is it also possible to write a world history like about everything basically and he said yes it is possible it's not easy because you have to understand like a lot you know and obviously it will always be

a selection it's clear you know

that's why I also think that the historical science is basically a fictional science.

I mean, I have a foreword, the Blitz forward basically tells that story.

Don't take it with a grain of salt.

Not only Blitz, but every historical book.

Because we weren't there.

That's what Johnny Depp said

when the guy said, so you had like a mega pint of red wine.

He just said, were you there?

And the guy wasn't there.

So

historical sciences is a fiction.

But

it's a certain type of fiction and it's based on facts.

So I'm not inventing anything in Stone Sapiens.

And I'm highly interested in the very early human history, and there are not a lot of sources.

So the beginning of the book

is more speculative than, for example, the Vietnam War chapter.

In the Vietnam War chapter, I'm in Hanoi speaking to Viet Cong generals, asking them did they supply heroin to the GIs, which would dimin which diminished their fighting capability.

You can research that, and

that's also a chapter.

And by the way, way, the Vietnam War is not called the Vietnam War in Vietnam.

It's called the American War.

And also I was like sitting with these Viet Cong generals in Hanoi just like a few weeks ago for researching for stone sapiens.

And I said, so did the Viet Cong bring heroin?

Because it's there's

there's never been evidence that it happened this way.

And they just looked at me and they said, there's no Viet Cong.

Like, what are you talking about?

You are the Viet Cong.

I said, no, this is an American propaganda term.

We were the North Vietnamese Army.

We never call ourselves the Viet Cong.

So the book is full of surprises, obviously.

But the very early beginning of Stone Sapiens goes back to about 1.5 million years ago when Homo Erectus, which who also has become kind of famous by now, Homo Erectus, it's like the first human that really gets shit done.

Yeah, they get moving.

Yeah, they move.

And why were they moving?

Why were they moving?

I mean, then you can examine exactly where they originated which was i mean it's also disputed by now that it's the great rift valley that only the most fossils have been found there but that doesn't mean that they originated there maybe they originated in the central african rainforest where fossils disintegrate and only there in the rift valley we still find it so uh

but we know for sure that in the great rift valley there was a plant called cut which is like a plant speed

So they were using that.

It's still being used now in these countries, in Ethiopia, Yemen, around the horn of Africa.

Cut is very normal to use.

You chew the leaves and it gives you, it's like an amphetamine.

It's a plant amphetamine, basically.

So Homo erectus, you can write.

There's no proof that they actually used it, but they were living in that area and the plant was there.

So

you can write about that.

So it's interesting because

they were able to do certain things like they shed the fur

they were the first ones to have to suddenly be naked and that has the effect that sweat glands are produced homo erectus could sweat it out basically when they when they when they were very hot what animals couldn't do because they had the fur so an antelope can run faster as a homo erectus but at a at like after 10 minutes the antelope has to like stop like what's what dogs do like they the tongue goes out and humans didn't have to do that because they were sweating.

So they could, they developed the jog jogging mode, basically.

So they were jogging.

They were not sprinting to get the animal.

They were jogging it.

And when the animal couldn't do it, had to rest, then the humans would come and hunt it down.

So Homo erectus was

evolutionary, very good.

And then later that one of the species coming out of Homo erectus is Homo sapiens.

And Homo sapiens, at one point, there were only like about 1,500 people left.

There were not a lot of Homo sapiens.

There was a point in time when there were quite a few of them.

And the problem became inbreeding.

And there was a real danger of extinction.

They were vulnerable.

They were not on top of the food chain yet.

So they had to develop.

consciousness.

Consciousness is what say what basically saved us from extinction.

Without the human consciousness, we wouldn't be here.

That is what made us in the end then superior to the other animals.

So how did this happen?

You can kind of trace how they moved.

You can trace that they went through the Central African rainforest.

And there's one plant there which elephants like, and that's iboga.

And iboga now is like the hot thing of the psychedelic renaissance, iboga, iboga, iboga.

But it's also the oldest drug in the book, basically.

They saw that elephants were eating iboga.

the root and the leaves and suddenly we were like walking backwards and we're behaving in an unusual way And then people were also using this.

And this was going on over like 100,000 years in the rainforest.

So you can

write a story about that.

Was it maybe Iboga?

Of course, you can't prove it.

Maybe the frontal cortex grew by itself.

That's a really compelling story.

That's one of the great mysteries of

how did the light turn on.

The magic of human cognition and consciousness and the...

Like Sapiens by Harari, which is is a great book he also misses that like in at when when he comes to those moments he writes like we don't understand how the first cognitive revolution and the second cognitive revolution actually happened so i find it interesting to kind of look could have could it have been drugs like i include like everything he he leaves out i try i i i look at uh thoroughly i mean he does

he does a good explanation of interesting consequences

you know our ability to imagine ideas and share them and, you know, collaborate on them and the imagination, all that kind of stuff.

But the why, the transitions of why did it happen?

He doesn't provide, right?

I mean, there's some theories, but if Iboga is one of them, that's a compelling one.

That's a really compelling one.

Yeah, I mean, I'm still researching this book and writing it.

I also want to go there because they still take Iboga

in Gabon, for example.

I also um

interviewed one of the leading iboga experts at columbia university and um

for stone sapiens and he described how iboga works in the brain because that's and he's never taken iboga himself oh interesting he just relies on the data he doesn't want to be

personally influenced but he said he will take it at a certain point in time but right now he's still just working on data just on with patience you know and what he found and also examining in the brain through brain scanners what actually happens.

And like classic psychedelics like LSD or osilosibin, they dock at certain points, they interact with certain receptors.

It's quite well understood how they work.

And he said, Iboga is completely different.

It's like, and he also showed this with his hands, he's so mesmerized by his own findings.

Like it kind of...

It's kind of everywhere at the same time in the brain.

He says it's like a spa for the neurons, basically.

it's it's it is his findings show and these are academic findings at Columbia

that Iboga it's like as if he says he said to me as if Iboga would know our brain from a long time like it knows exactly like if you're addicted to something

or if you're depressed a depression literally is a depression in the neuronal network a depression is a thought loop, for example, or you know a system of thought loops that you're that I'm not worthy, I'm not, whatever, I can't do it.

I, you know, you always go back, like, this is, it really kind of depresses your brain in a way.

And Iboga sees this immediately and kind of takes the depression out and

makes your brain basically well again.

So that this is this is what he, this is what his findings are.

So it seems, he says he's totally convinced this is like a, he doesn't call it a plant, he calls it like a neurotechnology of the 22nd century.

So So Iboga really seems to be

in a different kind of category.

That's why I really feel that Stone Sapiens must be written, because there's so much

that historians just shied away from.

And

it all started when I was on the island of Crete, the biggest island of Greece.

Crete, that's another like Harari moment.

On Crete was the first what is called high culture of Europe, the Minoan culture.

You might have heard of the Minoan culture.

And no one can explain so far

why

there on Crete, suddenly in Europe they started making

amazing structures and amazing art.

And how did it happen there that this like totally backwards place, Crete, became,

I mean, backwards as any other place, you know, why did it happen there that such intricate objects were being made and that the culture was

developing so intensely?

And I was kind of thinking about that.

That's how the book started.

I was with my kids on vacation in Crete.

And if you go to like Knossos or Festos, the big archaeological sites, or to the museum in Herakleon, you don't find an answer.

Why did it happen there?

And then

I found like an old book in an old bookshop, and it described an excavation site at the sea, and that it was like maybe a maritime

place where like a harbor basically.

And then while I was swimming there, I found on the sea floor the remnants of a wall that was a harbor wall that was out

that was breaking the waves.

And then I climbed over the fence because the archaeological site is still fenced off.

Like it's not explained officially what it is.

And the walls in there are the biggest walls of the whole bronze era.

And it was actually quite a big harbor.

And then the next step is what did they trade?

And they traded olive oil because Crete was the first place to produce olive oil.

And then I also found, and this is historically documented, opium was made in Crete and the poppy flower flower was growing there.

And this was the harbor.

Basically, they became incredibly wealthy through olive oil and opium trade through that harbor.

So you could say that the whole of the European high culture, which goes from Minoa, it goes to Athens.

So it all started basically with,

you know, they were drug dealers in a way.

Or they, I mean, it was the most potent medicine because it was the only medicine that

numbs the pain

for sure.

You know, opium works, and the Minoans developed that.

So, I mean,

it's kind of, it's a bit similar to the Blitz experience.

The more I start, I did research, the more I found that there's this whole component to human history that could be a really critical component.

I mean, I am really interested about the origin.

There are certain leaps, like the...

the origins of human civilization and then the origins of Homo sapiens.

Those are really big leaps i mean there's some evidence you know like they came through the area where iboga was but it's there's no academic proof so i guess an academically trained historian couldn't really write about that

um but i can write about it i can i can i can write about possibilities yeah sometimes i mean that's what the the farther into history you go the more it's about writing the possibilities.

I mean, it's also interesting why did the Neanderthals die out?

And what we can compare is the cave art.

And the cave art of the Neanderthals is much simpler than ours.

Like, if you really get into the cave art, I don't know if you've done that.

I have not, no.

It's quite fascinating.

Picasso looked at some of the cave paintings in southern France, and he said we didn't learn anything new.

And if you study them, they're really good, but only the humans are good.

The Neanderthals,

they were like worse artists than us.

And you can also see there's a very famous one that comes from Algier with like a shaman, and around his body, like mushrooms grow out of his body.

So he was like a mushroom shaman.

So mushrooms seem to have been like part, at least in that area.

And I mean, that's the stoned ape theory that

Terence McKenna

did.

And I think

a lot of evidence kind of points to to it that we were able to develop our consciousness in a better way than the Neanderthals who did not have a drug culture.

They were basically too sober for the future.

We assimilated them.

They had no chance against our

impetus of boldly going where no one has gone before.

They were much more like happy with what they had.

They were not progressing all the time.

Like we have the transcendental kind of moment, which is the psychedelic experience, psychedelic experience.

I guess you could think of it without it, but to imagine sapiens

makes more sense to imagine sapiens as stone sapiens, as a species that was able to incorporate psychoactive components into his development.

It makes a lot of sense.

What about one of the great, if you could think of it that way, technologies that humans have developed is religion, religion of all different kinds.

Do you think there's a connection between psychedelics and religion, the development of religion throughout different parts of the world?

Well, I think Moses is quite interesting.

Moses was

a traumatized man that had fled Egypt where he had

killed a man who had been

beating up a Hebrew.

So Moses kind of took revenge and killed him.

So he was running from the law.

And he was

together with, in the Bible it says I think 66 people they were in the desert in this in the Sinai and they had been fasting for days and no alcohol so it was kind of a psychedelic retreat basically I mean this is being examined

by Israel Israeli scholars and I think it's very interesting work like they examine in detail

What does the Bible say?

And the Bible mentions in that passage where Moses sees the burning bush and then gets gets the 10 commandments in that Bible passage there's a lot of

several times the acacia is mentioned and the acacia the the the Egyptian acacia grows right in the in the in that Sinai area and contains DMT

so there's a there there's this Israeli research that Moses was actually having a trip basically that he he was seeing he had he was hallucinating the burning bush was, you know, if you take LSD and you look at a bush in the heat, you know,

it will move.

You know, it might resemble like a burning and you, you know, experience.

And then he went up the mountain, which takes three hours, while the others were staying down.

And with a DMT type of experience, it's not that everyone in the group has the same experience, similar to ayahuasca.

Sometimes like one guy has like incredible experience while another person might not feel that much at all.

And Moses felt a lot.

And you do feel a lot when you, you know, when you are,

when you have something to work through.

And he had certainly something to work through, the trauma of killing a man.

So it's also no surprise that he receives one of the commandments, you should not kill, you know.

So for him, it's like extremely,

extremely important.

And

what he receives on the mountain, like, God, it's like, there's someone speaking to me, and he understands that God is not, that there's not many gods, just one God.

Like, he has a revelation, you know.

And I think

when I read, you know, these examinations by these scholars, I think it makes a lot of sense to imagine that the Jewish religion comes from Moses' trip.

And also, if you look at the Jewish religion, they are quite open to drugs.

I don't know if that, you know, that could be an unconscious reaction to

that kind of trippy beginning.

Like they have purim, where it's like you're supposed to get intoxicated to get closer to God.

They're not as straight-laced as the Christians.

Like they were just, you know, they just allow alcohol.

It's like the blood of Christ.

So also Stone Sapiens is a book about religion.

Also,

the Islam and intoxication is also a very interesting topic because you have the Sufis who intoxicate themselves to get into ecstasy, to be closer to God.

And then you have like the conservative Islamist scholar Ibn Taymiyyah who defended Damascus against the Mongols by combining anti-drug rhetoric.

Like they're bringing drugs to us and they are not good Muslims.

So it's

drugs and religion.

Sometimes drugs kind of

help religion to like are used in religious contexts.

But then you can also see that religions work as prohibitionist movements against drugs, like the Christian Church.

Also the purity law for example, it's very famous in Germany, it's called the Reinheitsgebod.

Beer can only contain three things, water, hops, and barley or something.

Like that's that's the purity law and that was done by the church in the 16th century.

And in Germany for a long time, this was seen as like, this is like a quality control, like beer has to be pure, only has these ingredients, but it's actually a move by the church to weed out all the other ingredients that had been put in beer before, like nightshade plants.

So, beer, also, witches were brewing crazy beer, you drink it, and you have like visions, and you dance around the fire.

It's like, and the church didn't like this, so the church said, This is the beer now, and especially the hops was the new ingredient for the beer.

And this was so the purity laws is the first prohibitionist law

in the Middle Ages in Europe.

Another fascinating yeah i i think as society becomes develops more and more it seems to resist

certainly psychedelics seems to resist drugs i don't know what that's about

one of the very fascinating

turning points that i have been able to kind of

uh pinpoint or at least i think this is what happened is uh

when do the first kings come up up?

They weren't kings for a very long time.

The first king that I can identify was in the so-called Sumerian high culture, was in Uruk, was Gilgamesh, and they wrote the Gilgamesh epic about, you know, the great king.

But that was

four or five thousand years ago, something like that.

But what happened in the thousands of years before?

There's no source that there were rulers.

It seems like humans were quite good in organizing themselves without kings before these first kings came.

And I mean thousands of years from the end of the ice age until the Sumerian high culture, there were no kings.

So people were quite able to organize their communities.

There was for example Qatal Huyuk in eastern Turkey.

That was working for like 2,000 years without any hierarchies.

I think that is quite interesting.

And then why do suddenly the hierarchies start and what makes the hierarchy stronger?

And again, I'm still researching this, but in Sumeria, we can see that it's the beer that destroys the hierarchy-free society.

Because

they are able, I mean, beer is quite old.

The first beer was made in Gobekli Tepe,

the famous first kind of structure of mankind.

I also write about that because it's very interesting.

Small detail.

What is Gobekli Tepe?

No one knows.

How did they make it?

No one knows.

But they made made it.

But why did they make it?

I think they made it because they were creating a meeting place.

And why was that so important?

There were not so many humans at the time.

There were like one to four million, those are the estimates on the whole planet.

And they were usually living in small communities of like 100 people, up to 500, not more.

So the problem then is again inbreeding.

Inbreeding means

it's a degeneration.

So

it's a problem.

We are genetically not so diverse, actually, as humans.

But Kobekli Tepe, people were meeting from different areas, having sex with people they usually wouldn't see, creating healthy children.

And Kobek Li Tepe was working for 1,600 years.

And I think it was like an evolutionary kind of machine.

Like without that idea, we're going to create like a fucking place or a party place.

It was a party basically.

they were eating very well they found a lot of bones but no one lived there they just came together there for parties and then after 800 years they start making beer there and then the situation slightly changes they found these beer

these places where they made beer you can still find the chemicals and kind of it's it's sure that they made beer there And then once they make beer, they create different stone circles.

And then

somehow it changes.

and

we can see clearly how it changes in the Sumerian high culture when beer beer then becomes a business beer become is being done by the by the priests by the ruling class or ruling class emerges like

monasteries often brew beer and that was also the case in

in in the sumerian high culture

they make beer they they they labeled the beer like the the temple that would make the beer the beer would be attributed to that temple.

It would be sold.

So that temple kind of rises in status, makes money.

So that's how hierarchies started up.

So the hierarchy, which is the big problem right now, that we have these hierarchies, that we have these kings everywhere that kind of steal our money

or at least...

make it very difficult for us as humans to organize on an egalitarian planetary scale, which is our only chance for survival.

If we at one point overcome the hierarchies, overcome the nation states, states and create a planetary, probably AI-assisted, open source AI-assisted planetary society and everyone has the same political rights.

There's no more borders.

There's a planetary minimum income.

So no one is starving.

Everyone has at least what everyone needs, which is totally possible.

It's just a problem of organizing and of breaking the resistance of those who don't like that.

And there's a lot of resistance, obviously.

I mean, I'm talking about what's happening on the planet in 50 years, not what's going to happen tomorrow.

But that is where we slowly are moving towards.

And you can see that this actually comes from, you know, a time when we were able to organize ourselves without kings.

We don't need kings.

Kings always say, if you don't have me, then someone else, some other guy will come.

But, you know,

that's why I'm not, you know, if a nation state makes war against another nation state, I'm not taking a position and saying this country is like better.

Basically, the both nation states are doing war and who has to suffer is us, you know, is stone sapiens, is the human, is the human species.

Speaking of which,

I have to ask you.

So I've done psilocybin a bunch

and I've done ayahuasca,

but I have never done LSD

acid.

And you have quite a bit.

So maybe the big general question is, what's LSD like in the space of psychedelics, which funny enough, we haven't really spoken a lot about psychedelics, except in the context of stoned sapiens.

What's LSD like?

Well, this is probably the third book that

we want to talk about.

It's tripped because tripped is an examination of the history of LSD.

And

that sounds maybe less interesting than it actually is.

I mean,

I find it fascinating.

I had tried LSD.

It was given to me by my girlfriend at the time,

Anya,

in lower Manhattan on a Saturday night, 1993.

So I was like 23.

And she said, let's take LSD.

And I'd never really taken any drug.

Like I maybe smoked a bit of weed, but

I didn't know what a strong drug is.

And she gave me this paper and I took it and we walked around in the East Village, pre-gentrified East Village.

It's pretty cool actually.

And it didn't work for like one hour.

I felt nothing and then I went into the toilet.

I had a falafel or something.

I went into the toilet and there was a mirror.

Like I was peeing and then there was this mirror and

but

the walls had like lines, like they were painted in line.

Suddenly these lines were started to like vibrate and that's then then the trip started.

And it was such an empowerful experience

that I thought I would go insane.

Like it was the worst trip I've ever had.

Like it was because it was so strong.

I was totally scared.

I didn't know what it was.

I suddenly...

I walked,

I said to my girlfriend, it's working.

And she said, yes, it's working.

I feel it also.

And I went into Notel Motel, which was my favorite bar, just to be in a familiar environment.

It's not a good idea on your your first very strong LSD trip to be out in lower Manhattan on a Saturday night, but I also didn't know this.

So I was in the bar and I saw my friend Dora Espinosa from Peru.

She was quite a

small woman.

Like she was only like, I don't know, the American system, like maybe one meter 50.

So she was quite short.

Short is the right word.

But on LSD, she was like this.

So I saw her down there.

Like,

and I said, Dora,

do I look normal?

Because you look very small.

Yeah.

And Dora's like, no, you look fine.

I'm like, okay, I gotta get out of here.

And then we walked up to Second Avenue and we saw like a bunch of Puerto Rican kids

killing one of their, it was like a gang kind of, it was more of a druggie kind of, I mean, Manhattan back then was kind of dangerous in the East Village.

And one of the killed one of them on the hood of the car in front of our eyes.

We saw it.

And I said, do you see this?

Like, my God.

And then they resurrected him.

Like, they gave him mouth to mouth.

And the guy was fine again.

And we walked past.

We were not sure anymore what we were seeing.

And

this was a very strong hallucination.

And then we saw a full-blown racial riot on Second Avenue.

Like, people were smashing in.

taxi windows, pulling the drivers out, like getting, like, it was like a

GTA.

Grand has auto-right, it was like that.

And

most of this is basically a hallucination.

I think so, yeah.

And I have taken it.

But it felt real.

It felt totally real.

And

so I was happy when this trip was over because I thought I have gone insane, basically.

I thought, like, there was a switch in my brain that had been like

something chemical, like I have, I have now a chemical imbalance in my brain.

I'm going to be crazy for the rest of my life.

I thought that.

But after like 10 hours, it suddenly got, you know, the effects wore off, and I became normal again.

And I thought that was quite fascinating.

So, in hindsight, I thought it was a great experience, even though it was quite scary.

But it also had moments of

incredible

perceptions.

Like, I could see that the atoms are not, you know, rigid.

Obviously, everything is moving in our universe.

Everything, there's nothing fixed, you know.

So, I could see that.

I could see that

everything was basically alive, and and that my previous perceptions how the world is it's just my conditioned perception and that the world was very different and you know just how you look at it, it looks different.

So it's freeing in a way.

Yeah, totally freeing.

Also, it was much stronger than all the LSD I've taken since and I've taken high dosages.

So I'm not even sure if that was LSD.

Like there's also other compounds that are quite rare like DOM or whatever.

Maybe it was something else.

But then I also spoke to

LSD experts by now, also for the book tripped.

And

it can happen that your first trip is much stronger than all the other trips because your brain is kind of reacts very strongly to it.

Because what happens in the brain is basically that the default mode network receives less energy and other parts of the brain there think more, communicate better.

So if this happens for the first time, like your brain maybe is totally surprised by this like firework that's going on and then creates like hallucinations to somehow make sense of it.

Like there's a lot of things firing and then so you see things that maybe are not there.

But that's not usual on an LSD trip.

Like you don't have, I've never had such hallucinations afterwards again, you know.

What's the usual experience on LSD?

It really depends on the dosage.

If you microdose, it's just like drinking an espresso that lasts maybe for two, three hours in a very pleasant way.

So you're just slightly buzzed.

Is it visual artifacts?

Like no, color.

Then you would take like more.

Maybe if you take 50 micrograms, you start, the colors become more intense.

But if you take a microdose of 10 micrograms, nothing happens.

The trip starts with about 100 micrograms.

And then you could see maybe

it would be

like I took uh I took a swimming trip uh in Thailand uh in January and I took about 200 micrograms, which is quite a lot.

I just because it was so beautiful on this island and it was kind of, will it be more beautiful if I'm on LSD now?

And of course, every LSD trip also

tells you about your life, like some things you didn't understand.

Suddenly you see, like, oh, it's like this.

Like, you, it's very good for, you know, reflecting on your life, but it's also a lot of fun.

So I swam for like three hours through the ocean, which is something you usually don't do.

You know, I like swimming, but after like 10 minutes or 20 minutes, I go out, but I was swimming and swimming.

And

so.

so, yeah, for me on the psilocybin in ayahuasca,

there's an intensification of beauty of the world around you, whether that's nature, whether that's people, or whether that's your own memories of your past, or maybe

your imagination manifesting itself in different kinds of visuals.

You know, on ayahuasca, I saw dragons of different kinds, and they were just really beautiful.

And I've never taken like a heroic dose of psilocybin, but but it was always everything was just always so beautiful, and I was just grateful to be alive and grateful to be in this world and get to appreciate in this most intense way.

There's something about, like, like you saw, you said you could see the individual atoms.

Like, there are certain ways to deconstruct or maybe visualize or reinterpret, re-visualize the world that makes you like appreciate, holy shit, this is really,

this is really awesome.

This is really special.

And that can only be done through the process of like

showing you a different version of it a little bit.

I mean, when the Swiss pharmaceutical company Sandos developed LSD in 1943, like they were having the

to solve the big question, what is it good for?

Like, Albert Hoffman, the chemist, he found it basically unvoluntarily

and

he reported to the CEO.

I had very strong reactions basically in the brain.

So they set up an intoxication room.

I found the documents about this intoxication room in the Novatis archive when I researched TRIPT

because Novartis bought Sundos in the 90s.

So all the LSD stuff is in the Novatis archive.

And this intoxication room, I always think it's kind of interesting to imagine.

This was 1943.

There's a world war going on everywhere in Europe, except in Switzerland, which is a neutral country.

But Basel, where the LSD was found, is like a stone throw from the German border.

So you actually hear the war going on.

And so they created a nice room within the company.

And then all the employees voluntarily could go and take LSD.

So they were the first people to take LSD.

And they had no idea that there was at one point, you know, MK Ultra.

And you know, they were just

trying out something that one of their guys had developed.

And I read through all these reports, and they all had a great experience.

They were like sitting in a nice chair, and they looked outside the window, and they were like reporting stuff.

Like, I just had to laugh the whole time.

I felt so good.

I realized about my life.

And

or

it kind of created in them the feeling, like a heightened sensitivity and a feeling of of that this is the life this is how life should feel kind of so the ceo natur stoll he was really trying to figure out what he could market it for because he thought maybe this is a game changer in mental health because this was before antidepressants before antipsychotics and it was in the middle of world war ii which had created already millions of traumatized people how do you treat these people so they thought lsd could be

really a big a big big, big, big thing.

And

I mean, I came up,

I just told you when I first took LSD and I somehow was interested in LSD, but I never thought I would write a book about it.

I just used it once in a while when I wanted to understand something about my life or just enjoy a day in the ocean.

But I read a study that microdoses of LSD at one point help against Alzheimer and my mother has Alzheimer's.

So I discussed this with my father who takes care of my mother.

And this was an academic study.

I discussed this also with a leading Alzheimer expert that I interviewed for Tripped and he's like, wow, this is amazing.

Like, because LSD interacts with the very same receptors, the five H2A receptors in the brain that LSD interacts with those receptors and Alzheimer destroys those receptors.

So

LSD basically does the opposite that Alzheimer does.

And I discussed this with my father and he said, so why can't I buy LSD in the pharmacy if it's so good?

He was a judge before.

He actually put people in prison for drugs.

So he said, you better bring me the story.

So I did the kind of a research loop.

This is the whole tripped.

Then I came back to him in the end with the true story of why LSD has been made illegal.

And

that is quite fascinating because the Swiss CEO, Stoll,

he had learned biochemistry.

This is very nerdy, but I think it's quite interesting.

He had learned biochemistry from the Jewish-German god of biochemistry, Wilstetter.

Richard Wilstetter was Nobel Prize winner for chemistry.

And his work was he would extract the potent alkaloids from so-called poisonous plants and make, you know, the poison.

Parat Celsus taught us it's the dosage that makes the poison.

You know, if you take too much of a potent alkaloid, maybe it's a poison, but if you extract a potent alkaloid, maybe you can turn it into a medicine.

So Stoll learned this from Wilstetta.

And there was another guy that was learning from Wiltstetter, Richard Kuhn.

So it was Kuhn and Stoll.

Those were the two students of Wiltstetter.

And

Stoll left and became the CEO of Sandos and developed the pharmaceutical branch of Sandos.

And Kuhn became Hitler's leading biochemist and was responsible in finding a truth drug and also developing nerve gas.

So, but the two guys, Kuhn and Stoll, stayed friends also when the Nazis took power.

Like I researched the papers of Stoll in the archive.

And in the 20s, he would communicate all the ergot research.

LSD is an ergot product.

Ergot is a fungus that grows on rye.

He would communicate all this with Kuhn and Kuhn would come to the Sandos lab and they did experiments together.

And then in 1943, Kuhn was a hardcore Nazi scientist and especially looking for the truth drug at the time.

And I was looking through the archive.

I wanted to find the connection that Stoll

also

sent

LSD to Kuhn.

Because when I was researching for Blitz in Dachau, I had found that the SS had done in the concentration camp of Dachau experiments with mescaline and another hallucinogenic substance which was not named.

And mescaline has the problem.

The truth idea is I give you something without you noticing it, like something that doesn't smell or doesn't taste like anything.

And then after like half an hour, I know that something's working in your brain and you become insecure because suddenly something's working in your brain and I can play with that situation and therefore extract all the secrets from you because it's a power.

I'm suddenly above you because I know something about you that you don't know.

that was the idea the problem with mescaline was it has a bitter taste and it's kind of hard to make it and LSD is very easy to make not very easy but it's quite easy and LSD is odorless and tasteless so I was trying to I somehow had the notion that LSD has a Nazi past, you know, which is something that no one ever thinks about.

LSD is like the hippie drug, right?

It's a drug of the peace people.

But

I wanted to see all the papers of this, of the CEO, of Stoll, and the archivist, he already knew, like he was the Swiss archivist.

And this is not a public archive.

In a public archive, you basically, like a national archive of the United States, you see what's there, you have the right to see it, freedom of information.

But a company archive, like Novartis Archive, the archivist can just say, no, you know, I can't find this right.

You know, you basically

at his mercy.

So I bribed him with LSD, because he didn't want to show me, he didn't want to show me the Stoil papers.

And I said to him, just to distract him, I said, did you ever, have you ever seen LSD?

And he's like, no.

Well, how would I see it?

And I said, well, I have some

here.

And I had some.

I just had gotten it from a friend.

What does LSD look like?

Tabs?

Yeah, tab.

I had a paper.

And the funny thing about, yeah, there's a different, you know, different design.

And you can put it on your tongue.

Is that right?

People usually take it.

Yeah, then you take it like that.

And the one I had was given to to me by a Swiss friend, and it had, like, here you see certain prints on it.

Oh, yeah.

And he had the print was the old logo of Sandos from the 40s.

So the guys who make this illegal LSD in Basel in some kind of lab, they know where it comes from.

So they made like a joke to make the old logo of Sandos.

So I showed this to the archivist.

He said, This has the old logo of our company.

I said, Well, it was made by your company.

He said, I know this, but it was, it's not, this is very interesting, actually.

And I said, you, I'm gonna, I'm gonna, gonna i'm gonna gift you one of these trips now and he said wow you really you would do this and i said you can archive it and he's like ha ha ha then he actually took one he was then the ice broke that's great and then he said okay i'm gonna show you now the correspondence of stoll our ceo it's no problem and he just went to the next room and he looked for like 10 minutes and then he brought me these boxes And then I saw actually the correspondence between Stoll and Kuhn, between the Swiss CEO and the German Nazi scientist, what they were talking about.

And then I found a smoking gun in October 1943.

Kuhn acknowledges that he receives half a gram of ergodamine, which is the precursor drug to LSD.

And so

it's highly likely that the Nazis used LSD together with mescaline in Dachau.

And when the Americans

liberated the Dachau camp, they had a special unit called Alsos with them.

And Alsos' job was to find German scientists and kind of interview them, get their knowledge for the nuclear program, mostly, but also for biochemical weapons.

And one of the first persons they interrogated was Richard Kuhn.

And Richard Kuhn immediately collaborated because he didn't want to go to the Nuremberg trial.

He wanted to continue his career, actually.

He was an opportunist.

So I guess his Nazi convictions were not so strong after all, because he also liked the Americans.

So he told the Americans immediately about LSD.

And

the next day, a very high general flew flew from the States to Frankfurt, went to Heidelberg, spoke to Kuhn again, went then, took off his uniform and went in civil clothing to Basel because Switzerland is neutral and received the first LSD from Stoltzang.

So the American general had LSD.

This was in 1945 in the summer.

And then the American military started to

examine LSD.

Could LSD be the true drug?

Because if the Nazis think so, maybe it's true, you know, because the Nazis were cutting-edge scientists, as evil as they were.

In Dachau, this was presumably used for the different experimentation that was done.

Well, I read one report from a guy who was an inmate, and he received it in coffee, and he had a full-blown psychedelic trip.

And he had this SS guy who was like asking him questions.

And the guy had such a great trip.

I would always imagine you have a terrible trip in a concentration camp, and he was like seeing fractals and colors, and he could see that there was something bigger than these Nazis, and there was something bigger than the concentration camp.

And he only said it was so horrible when the trip ended, and he kind of became sober again and was just an inmate again in the concentration camp.

I mean, one of the things you get from books like Man Search for Me Meaning by Victor Franco is that in the concentration camp, actually, the slightest good things

are so rich of

feeling.

You just get, so like, I would actually expect to have incredible trips there because you're just grateful for anything positive, anything positive.

Yeah, I didn't, I didn't think about that.

It becomes intensified.

But from the perspective of the Nazis, they're trying to develop the truth drug.

They miserably failed because LSD is not the truth drug.

LSD maybe leads you closer to your own truth because when suddenly the default mode network receives less energy and other parts of the brain think more and the brain becomes a neuroplasticity, you know, the neuroplasticity of the brain is enhanced and is stimulated,

you might understand something about your life.

You might not, you know, I mean, LSD doesn't necessarily turn you into a more knowledgeable person.

You could also focus that on your orthodox belief system, but many people realize different things, have different ideas.

So it doesn't work as this conditioning drug.

But also the CIA

then kind of took over the LSD experiments that the U.S.

military took over from the SS.

So now it's in CIA hands.

In 1947, Central Intelligence Agency is founded.

Because America didn't have a Central Intelligence Agency before.

They had like the military agencies like OSS.

Now they have the CIA and the CIA makes it Dallas,

the first director, he says.

The brain warfare is going on now between the Soviet Union and us.

This is Cold War.

We have to, you know, maybe they are using something against us.

We have to be really on our, you know, we have to be prepared, you know, for the brain warfare because communism is a propagandistic system.

So they were always like either really afraid or just pretending to be afraid the Soviet Union would, you know, develop the truth drug quicker than them.

So the LSD

truth drug program, which was labeled MK Ultra, the infamous MK Ultra, is a mind control program.

I mean, it is.

And LSD played a a big part in it.

It's a deeply illegal one.

Certainly, yeah.

I mean, it was never approved by the Congress or anything like that.

Probably deeply unethical.

Maybe one of the more un-American, unethical things

done in recent times.

It's certainly unethical.

It continues the Nazi human experiments.

That's what the CIA did.

It's continuing one of the worst aspects of what the Nazis were doing.

Absolutely.

Defeated the Nazis and carried the flag flag forward.

It's just dark.

And this is basically the reason why LSD at one point became illegal, because it did not get the chance.

Stoll still wanted to put it on the market.

But Sidney Gottlieb, the head of MK Ultra, he really didn't want LSD to be on the market.

He wanted, not because he thought it's...

not good or dangerous for anybody.

He just wanted to control LSD.

He wanted LSD to be his so he could use it for MK Ultra, for experiments.

But he couldn't really stop.

There was also legit LSD research always going on until it was prohibited in 1966.

There was legit LSD research done in universities, which came to all kinds of conclusions.

But the decisive thing was a visit by Gottlieb.

in the office of Stoll in Basel, where he basically says

he comes with a suitcase with 240,000 US dollars to buy the world supply of LSD.

And because he has the information from the American ambassador, like he has, he said,

I think we think by now Sandos has produced like 400 kilograms of LSD.

So that was the price for these four.

And Stoll said, no, actually, we have produced only 400 grams.

But I'll sell everything to you, of course.

I mean, because the pressure that he received from the CIA was, because the CIA and the FDA, they're like quite friendly organizations.

So the CIA has a certain influence on the FDA, at least back then, you know.

So the pressure was, if you want to put your medicines on the market, which is, of course, the biggest market in the world, and Sandos, you know, I'm sure you want to thrive.

And as a pharmaceutical company, then LSD is not going to be one of these products.

And Stoll

basically betrayed LSD.

So he said, okay, and LSD was only distributed as a research drug.

It was never sold by the company.

So researchers could actually write to Sundos and say, I'm doing this and this test and I'm a new neuroscientist.

I need LSD.

And then they would receive it.

But mostly

what happened to the LSD was it went into the CIA's hands and then it was used in MKUltra.

But then it spilled out, obviously.

Because one of the guinea pigs was Ken Kesey.

He received 75 US dollars for taking LSD for the CIA.

And he was working in Menlo Park in a psychiatric ward.

And on LSD, he basically had the idea to write one flu over the cuckoo's nest.

He understood, you know, that these people maybe are not crazy.

It's just a different way of seeing.

That's like an LSD revelation.

These are not bad, crazy people.

They just see the world differently.

Because that neuroplasticity that kind of leads you away from one way of thinking, you realize that there's different ways.

So it does, I would say, LSD.

The tendency of LSD is more

to increase empathy.

Is that kind of empathy, diversity, all these, all, all, all these things.

So, because

you mentioned the effect of LSD on you as a writer, that it at least changed the way you write.

Well, I mean, the book Tripped is a book where I come back with that story to my father, and then my father decides to give LSD to my mother.

And we did do the LSD, The Three of Us, on Christmas.

And we did mushrooms on Mother's Day.

And whenever my mother takes LSD, and Alzheimer is a horrible disease, obviously.

For example, on Mother's Day, there was the newspaper lying on the balcony.

We were like sitting in the sun and

she was on mushrooms.

It's just micro-dose.

You know, it's not that you have a trip, but you have that stimulation of

your brain.

That's what you have.

And her brain attacked by Alzheimer reacted stronger than my father.

Like he always says, I never feel anything from a microdose.

And you're not supposed to feel anything.

But my mother suddenly picked up the newspaper, which she hadn't looked at for a year.

So on mushroom microdosis, she picks up the newspaper and starts reading the headline to us, which was about the Ukraine war.

She'd never heard about the Ukraine war.

So when she like, she had problems like pronouncing the word Ukraine because that was a new word for her because she hadn't been part of the news cycle in about a year.

And this was because of the mushroom microdose so this book

how did it change my writing this

on a on a on an emotional level writing

right taking lsd and then writing about lsd

changed something in my family like it improved the health of my mother that made me very

uh happy of course very satisfied you know yeah there's a deep personal connection but i i even mean on the kankize side like i know what you mean

I mean, what does it do?

Like, listen, writing, I don't know.

Again, me as a fan of writing, it feels like writing is

suffering, kind of.

When I see like just these great writers in history talk about writing, it seems like it's really hard.

It's a kind of torture.

You know, Hemingway and you know, you have the Kerouac stories that you just kind of flows out of you.

But a lot of times it's like really disciplined disciplined day after day.

You're really digging and digging.

And so it's interesting what that looks like under the different supplements, right?

Like

Stephen King famously, I mean, there's a lot of people, you know, they go to the drugs, to the alcohol.

You have the Hunter S.

Thompson who goes, you know, when given the option, just says yes to all of it.

And the mind is a weird thing.

And a lot of writers talk about like they're not really developing the ideas.

They're plugging into some, they're channeling

a voice from somewhere else.

And with psychedelics, that certainly it feels like you're modifying the channel

or you're expanding the channel or you're directing the channel to a different direction.

That's why I ask.

I think for me, writing has two

important parts.

And one of them is the actual writing part.

And that's the painful part that you talk about.

It's basically discipline,

focus.

It becomes harder and harder to focus because of the telephone.

Yeah, distractions.

There's a place in Switzerland, the Nietzsche House.

I go there as much as I can to write.

It's in Silsmaria.

It's quite high up.

Nietzsche went there every summer from 1882 to 1888, with the exception of 1887.

Didn't go that that summer.

I don't know why.

And in those, he stayed there for for three months and wrote most of his work

in that room.

And that room is still there.

And his desk is still there.

And you can rent rooms in that Nietzsche house.

And I rent,

it's great.

And I do this as often as I can.

And only there am I able to switch off the phone in the morning.

I don't even switch it on.

I'm like a soldier.

I'm in the Nietzsche house.

Also, Nietzsche was magical.

So it gives you,

I would never take drugs in the Nietzsche house because it would disturb that clarity that is in that house.

When Nietzsche wrote, like Tsaratustra, and

you can sense his presence a little bit?

Yeah, I speak to him quite a bit.

Like, his door is always open.

Is he an asshole?

Is a nice guy?

No, he's a nice guy.

Nice guy.

His room cannot be rented.

It's always, it's like a museum type room.

And

I mean.

I never thought of him as an asshole.

I mean, he's a total weirdo, obviously.

Had issues, like, struggled getting laid.

Yeah, I think he had a lot of problems.

That's one of them.

Yeah, but he had a lot of good qualities, too.

And he's also part of Stone Sapiens because he did experiment with drugs there and he writes about it.

It's very hard to find, but in the Nietzsche house, I found a book on Nietzsche's

medicine history.

And he takes quite a bit of hashish.

He smokes.

Does it help with the stomach issues or whatever?

Oh, he's interested in what happens in the brain.

And this comes back to your question.

How did the drugs change my writing?

Well, first of all, it's this one, it's this discipline.

I can do it up in the Nietzsche house.

I can also do it sometimes in Berlin.

It's just sitting there trying to focus and writing.

But what you need, of course, is the inspirational part.

And LSD helped me just the first trip to realize that it's not all black and white.

The world's quite colorful and

there's like the abyss and there's also the horror.

And like I was I was a happy-go-lucky kid you know I never thought it the world is so deep as I understand it now so the LSD makes the world deeper so I think for me to understand the world better to understand myself better it improved my writing but I would not write on LSD

because On LSD, you're like, you want to walk in the forest or you want to go up the mountain or that's what I like.

I would never like sit in front of the ugly computer with a stupid like screen and write, you know, maybe I would lie in the mountains with a notebook and kind of write like poetic lines.

And I could, that could be done on LSD because you have

like when I was researching Stone Sapiens, I did one LSD trip from the Nietzsche house.

I went quite high up in the mountains on LSD and I came and it was not,

I just, it's just, I just thought about the book and kind of looked at the different chapters.

Does it work together like kind of like macro without taking too many notes just kind of letting it

you know play out in front of in my mind and that but then when I walked down I came I passed the cave

and I realized a lot about people's relationship to caves and the cave paintings

how you know actually the the the the cave walls, you see all the arteries of the rocks.

And I mean, on LSD, you see all of that and you like see how alive that is and how beautiful it actually was by humans to then use that canvas and

work your cave paintings in there.

I mean, I never had the appreciation of that before.

Yeah, you're right.

You are able to detect the on psychedelics the aliveness of the details, if you can put it this way.

It's a very for me, it's a very creative drug.

But for other people, it might not be, you know,

so I cannot also I cannot advertise it.

Because also if you have a psychological problem, maybe it's overwhelming.

Yeah, that's actually a good thing to say at this moment.

Like from my perspective, and maybe you can comment on it.

And generally, when people ask me, because I've done psilocybin a few times and I did ayahuasca and I've talked about it.

When people ask me if I recommend those things,

as a general statement, I say no,

you know, to the general population.

And then as a second step, if I'm talking to specific people on a case-by-case basis, I can just discuss my experience and let that be kind of an inspiration.

Because I'm very hesitant to recommend a thing that could be so powerful because I don't know.

Like, I had a tremendously positive experience, and I was sure I would be meeting some demons.

Like, I thought I would have some demons in the basement or something, but I didn't meet them, not yet.

But people might have some demons that they meet, and it might destroy them, or it might.

change them in the way they don't like.

And actually, it's a good question for me whether it's good to do psychedelics when you're in a good place in life or in a bad place in life.

Because I know that, you know, even scientifically, there have been studies where psilocybin helps with extreme sort of depression and PTSD and all these kinds of things.

But I'd be very nervous about that too

because

Like the mind is such a powerful thing and it's such a complicated thing that with these really powerful tools, it's unclear where it's going to take you.

But I have heard a lot of stories of people have taken incredible journeys, sometimes difficult journeys with psychedelics and have come out much happier and much

freer and have healed some of the things they've been going through.

But if when people ask me to recommend or not,

I'm just too afraid to say yes.

I think I think the right thing is always as a general no.

Be very careful.

Yeah, I think it would be irresponsible to recommend it to people you don't see.

Right.

You know?

Yeah.

Maybe if you know a friend and a friend asks you, maybe then you could, maybe I would say to a friend, yeah,

I think you would be fine taking it.

But even that is a big responsibility, you know, because LSD in German, the book TRIPT is called the strongest substance, and it is actually the strongest substance because it works in microgram dosages.

Like even the strongest snake poison, cobra toxine, if you use that in microgram dosages, you don't feel anything.

But if you take 250 micrograms of LSD, it can totally overpower you.

And if you have an instable psyche, it could

turn you mad.

Do you understand how it compares to psilocybin and ayahuasca and DMT?

How does LSD compare to those?

Is it similar land territory?

Just more tense?

LSD and psilocybin are like cousins.

Distant cousins or?

No, quite close cousins.

And I spoke to a neuroscientist from a university clinic in Zurich

who's been researching psilocybin and LSD since the early 90s.

And he puts people in

brain scanners, for example.

So he sees exactly what happens

in the brain on LSD or in psilocybin.

And he he said to me when I asked him that very same question, he said, LSD is the more sophisticated molecule.

He meant by that is that

LSD

docks onto more receptors than psilocybin.

Like psilocybin interacts with like five recept different types of receptors in the brain and LSD like with nine.

So that makes LSD more complex molecule.

So that's why it already works in very small quantities because it's like the key is like perfect for our brain.

Our brain really reacts strongly to LSD.

For psilocybin, you have to take milligrams, not micrograms, but milligrams.

So mushrooms is also described as the softer

psychedelic experience because it only lasts for like five hours, while LSD lasts like eight hours.

And LSD can be more

LSD is also a mushroom, but

it's ergot, which is a mushroom, but it's turned into a diaphragm.

You extract the potent acid

from

ergot, which is lysergic acid, and you turn that into a diathlamide.

So it's a processed drug in a way.

It's a potent processed drug that works also for mass movements quite well.

That's why it was so popular in the 60s, because people could just make it.

While mushrooms, they kind of have to grow.

Like the hippie movement, they could never have know sustained on mushrooms because so many mushrooms don't even grow but

a good LSD chemist can make LSD for the whole world basically can we go back to something we talked about in the in the beginning about Berlin

is it just it'd be fascinating to learn more about this culture do you still are you still connected I'm sure you've been to some wild parties I've been told that Berlin has some wild parties well it had them in the 90s I mean, it had the best clubs that I, I mean, it was just a dream.

You know, you go into this club.

But I was also in my mid-twenties.

So I go into this club.

I take MDMA.

And the DJ is amazing.

And the sound system is crazy.

And there's like 500 people on MDMA just dancing for like eight hours.

And that's when electronic music was really.

Yeah, it was really good.

Yeah.

Like a friend of mine, he

he runs now Club of Visionaries, which is kind of a famous underground club in Berlin.

And he asked me in the early 2000s when this club was was offered to him, should I do this?

I said, I said, Gregor, techno is over, you know, electronic music is dead, but obviously it's not dead.

It's still going on.

But in the 90s, it was new.

So it was, you really went into the club and you heard something you'd never heard before.

And

the first time I came from New York, and New York was a very old school kind of urban place.

I mean,

rock and roll or grunge music.

And I came to Berlin.

It was in a club called Eimer Bucket in East Berlin.

It doesn't exist anymore, like in in a rundown, totally rundown like

squad.

And I went to the bar and I had a beer and I looked and there was just a few people on the dance phone and this like electronic music, which I'd never heard before.

And the guy in front of me, he was like,

he looked like an East Berlin skinhead kind of type of guy, but...

like totally smiling.

I'm sure he was in ecstasy.

And he was disassembling like an imaginary machine.

And I just looked at this guy.

He was like for one hour, he was just like doing the most complicated like things.

And I was like, this is totally, a totally different way of moving.

And I liked that, actually.

I liked to dance in clubs.

And I did this for like two years very intensely with my girlfriend at the time.

We went out a lot.

Like from Friday to Monday, basically.

But it means and a lot of people still do that in Berlin, but it means that you cannot really work.

I mean.

Yeah, you escaped that.

It's interesting that you were able to do that for a short time, just as an experience, and then go on to be extremely productive.

For me, it was also kind of research, even though I didn't know this.

I mean, life is research in a way, if you allow it to be.

I could not have written these books on history and drugs without having had these drug experiences because that, I mean, I also, like, when I wrote about methamphetamine and the Nazis, I asked, at the time, weed was illegal in Germany.

So I asked the friend of mine, she's a cannabis dealer, I guess you would say.

I said, can you also get me crystal meth?

She's like shocked, like, no,

because she was a weed dealer.

But then she found like a Polish guy who actually had crystal meth.

I just wanted to have it.

It was like the Paul Schrader thing when he wrote the screenplay to taxi driver.

He had like a gun in his drawer.

So he would get the vibe of like danger.

And so I wanted to have this crystal meth.

So this Polish guy sold it to me and he gave me a zero without me saying anything.

And maybe my French, maybe she said he's a writer or something.

But he gave me a Xerox cop.

He gave me the methamphetamine, one gram, and the Xerox copy of

the patent of Pavitine from 1938.

So this was a crystal meth dealer that actually had a historical

knowledge about it.

Did you ever try it?

Yeah, well, then I tried it because I really wanted, I could not really

write about it in the same way without having tried it.

I can't recommend it.

It feels very toxic.

Like when you take a psychedelic, I can say this with a clear conscience.

It's not toxic.

LSD is not toxic.

It doesn't poison you.

You might have reactions in your brain that are too much for you.

But if you snort crystal meth, it goes on your central nervous system.

Your heart starts pounding.

Your blood.

pressure rises.

So it's stressful on the organism.

It's toxic, you know.

But still, you know, the effect in the brain is not so interesting as with LSD.

Like, you couldn't go crazy, I would say, on crystal meth.

You just have like, you're just very much awake, but you don't have like crazy thoughts that you can't, you know, evaluate anymore.

So it's a very, very, very different drug.

But taking that, of course, made me understand better how a soldier feels in the tank taking it.

Yeah, yeah, I think that's really, really important to do.

I have to ask your friend Alex, who's, it sounds like he's taken every single drug there is.

Has he spoken about what's the most

interesting drug?

Like, what's his favorite drug?

He seems like a connoisseur, right?

But he's not a psychedelic guy.

Oh,

well, then, okay.

He's more into the addictive drugs.

It's very difficult, I guess.

Yeah, that would be a special person that can be a really sort of

Yeah, a full-on

explorer of the drug space.

Because if you get into psychedelics, then you don't really want to do the hard drugs.

If you get the hard drugs, you don't want to

contradict each other.

They do contradict each other.

Yeah.

That's why we spend less and less time together.

Since you mentioned Kerouac, listen, I love Kerouac.

Do we know any sort of famous writers that have used drugs as part of the writing?

So Kerouac is one.

Do we know any famous writers who have not used drugs as part of their writing?

Interesting.

So, wait, I didn't actually know, to be honest, the story.

I love it.

That's the good thing about being a writer.

You can take drugs on the job and no one will cancel you for it.

If you're like a politician, you can't really do it.

That's right.

You could be a rock star, you can be a writer.

You can be an artist and take drugs.

You mentioned that Kerouac did what?

Amphetamine.

Amphetamine.

Speed.

Basically, speed.

The legend has it that On the Road was written in two weeks on speed, basically without sleeping and using an endless

paper roll in this typewriter.

So he was just writing.

And I can imagine that you can write a hell of a lot on amphetamines.

And I do it sometimes, but I don't do it a lot, you know.

So I can take amphetamines and have a really good time and write like 20 pages, but then the next day

I wouldn't do it anymore.

But he decided, okay, for 14 days.

I'm going to do it.

Philip K.

Dick was an amphetamine writer.

And also, I think if you take a lot of amphetamines, you get into kind of psychedelic spaces at a certain point in time where you start hallucinating.

And like if you write a Blade Runner, maybe it helps you.

So amphetamines are also,

they can be creative, I guess.

It's just not, I don't, it's not my type of

drug.

And they're certainly not as creative as, but it also depends on the person.

Like Malcolm Laurie,

Under the Volcano, he was drinking a lot, or Hemingway was drinking a lot, and they could only write when they're drunk.

When I'm drunk, I can't write.

I just can't do it.

Write drunk, edit sober.

And that's advisable.

Like, if I would write something on amphetamines, I would certainly edit it sober, of course, because on amphetamines, your self-criticism is lowered because you feel so good, like you feel so confident, you just write.

But writing is about nuances, especially literary writing.

Maybe a non-fiction book would be easy on amphetamines, but a novel, it's all about you have to be very, very open.

Amphetamines close you.

You become like a machine, like you write.

But if you are on the right track, like Kerouac with On the Road, he had the right, you know, he was on, he was going, you know.

But you could also be on the wrong one and then write 200 pages and you just have to throw it away.

And probably he did a lot of that also, you know.

Yeah, yeah.

And also On the Road is a particular kind of book.

It's an amphetamine book.

You want the spontaneity,

the speed of.

It's about speed.

It's about moving fast.

It's about not stopping.

It is a speed book.

Yeah.

But it's a great book.

It's such a great book.

It's such a great book.

But then I've recently been uh rereading all of Dostoevsky.

So so going to notes on the ground to The Idiot to Crime and Punishment to Brothers Karamazov.

And that which was your favorite?

Brothers Karamazov.

Well, I read it in both Russian and English.

And for the longest time, it was the idiot.

Until

it's a complicated philosophical issue.

When I was younger, I thought Prince Mishkin, the main character in the idiot,

was not

as flawed as I believe he is now.

I think Dostoevsky tried to create a Jesus-like character in Prince Mishkin, and I think kind of failed

because he was too giving in a way that it was actually counterproductive and destructive to the world, which is he tried to fix in the Brothers Karmazo with Alyosha Karmazov.

But anyway, I don't think that you could do that.

I would be very surprised to learn that Dostoevsky did any drugs.

Also, there was not so much available.

That's true.

Alcohol, of course.

Nicotine, coffee.

Those are already powerful drugs.

And I'm also doing a podcast with Chuck Polnik, author of Fight Club and many other other amazing books.

Yeah, he's a great writer.

Fight Club influenced me quite a bit.

I think the novel is even better maybe than the movie.

Yeah.

But the movie's great.

I mean, in that case, as he said, like the movie is great and that it's almost like a bigger than life

thing.

And sometimes like the book and the movie and those things can influence culture.

That certainly influenced culture.

To where like, okay, this has a life of its own.

I'd like to think some of your work might influence the

how we perceive history.

That's really important.

That's really powerful.

To not just change, but to sort of expand our conception of history, which is important to do.

Is there particular books, fiction or non-fiction?

So you were both a fiction writer and a non-fiction writer.

Is there books that had an influence on you?

Yeah.

It's Ulysses by James Joyce.

Ulysses is good, but only when you're like in your early 20s living in New York and you're writing your first book and you just have taken LSD.

Oh, nice.

Then I read it and then it opens up.

It makes sense?

Well, it just showed,

it's just a very experimental novel, so it opens up.

You don't have to understand everything, but it shows you that there's many different ways of telling a tale.

And that was quite interesting to me.

But the most influential book maybe is The Stranger by Camus,

Because I like the language so much and I'm really

mostly interested in language.

I don't really care what it's about.

I was lying on the beach in Morocco when I was 20 and reading The Stranger.

And then

a Moroccan came and he said, why are you reading a racist book?

I'm like, what are you talking about?

This is world literature.

He said, yeah, right.

He's like killing an Arab without consequence.

No, actually, there is consequence, but no reason, basically, just because he's bored.

So this is racist.

That was like made no sense to me, that argument, because I was just interested in how Camus constructed.

It was just for me a stylistical

experience to read that.

I always love books.

And Stranger is a short book.

I love books.

They're able to accomplish so much in so little, in so little pages, in so few pages, in so few words.

Yeah.

The Stranger.

There's nothing unnecessary in The Stranger.

And I always try to write a book where every sentence is

just, there's nothing unnecessary in the book.

But that's very hard to do, actually.

Nietzsche could do this.

Peterson talked about this, that every sentence in Nietzsche is like chiseled and it's like perfect.

And I think not every, I mean, but it's that's his tendency.

He tries to write like this, and that's very hard to achieve.

That's actually where the writing becomes poetic.

So for me, Nietzsche also is like a poet.

The aphorisms is poetry.

So Nietzsche also, stylistically, since you asked, was very important to me.

So Camus, Nietzsche, James Joyce.

And then just in Kafka also, I like Kafka always.

And I like Thomas Mann.

I don't know how well he translates, but in German it's interesting, his take on how to, it's funny.

He's a very funny guy, even though he's like, he talks too much, but he's good.

So I always wanted to have these guys as my colleagues, basically.

Are they there somewhere in your head as you're writing?

Less and less, but it was like an incentive to be part of that club.

Like to be able to write a book and it's out there and it's perfect and it's and you're on one level with Camus.

It's very hard to do.

Let's say you become a carpenter, which is also a very challenging job, but you don't have these kind of great well, you have Jesus, I guess, as your call potential colleague.

Yeah, sure.

But for the it I just like these writers, these two, so the ones I mentioned, and also then

Thomas Pynchon, who wrote Gravity's Rainbow, which I think is one of the best novels of the 20th century.

And I read that in Berlin in the late 90s, and it really blew my mind.

I think it's an absolute masterpiece.

The intensity of this novel, Ravity's Rainbow,

is unparalleled and I'm still puzzled by how he did it.

And it's not known known how he did it because he lives a completely obscure life.

No one knows basically who he is.

So he's also a very interesting colleague.

It's widely regarded as one of the most challenging and significant works of postmodern literature.

Set primarily in Europe at the end of World War II.

The novel centers on the design, production, and deployment of the German V-2 rocket.

The narrative follows several characters.

It lists the characters.

Well, Slothrob is the American agent who's the main character.

He works for

Allied Intelligence, and he's really a funny guy.

He smokes a lot of weed, and he's like in Berlin and bombed out Berlin after the war.

And it's just funny to go with him through that.

He's a great character.

It's a great novel.

It really is.

So it does give a window into history also.

It does, yeah.

But that's not why it's interesting to me.

But it makes it...

especially interesting because the way he describes these situations.

It's just the way he writes is phenomenal.

It's a Paul Surprise and also.

Oh, but I'm sure he didn't take it.

On lists.

Yeah, he declined.

Well, no one knows who he is.

I know a little bit.

I know who his wife is, but I'm not going to talk about it.

He really wants to protect his privacy.

And I think that's also amazing.

I think that's a beautiful thing.

But for me, from my perspective, he wouldn't appear in the podcast.

He would not.

It would be great if he would apply.

He would not.

Well,

I believe it's possible, but with people like that, it has to be a long journey.

For me, for example, I just interviewed Terence Tao, who's one of the greatest mathematicians, one of the greatest living mathematicians, probably one of the greats in history.

And there's another I want to speak with, which is Grisha Grigory-Perlman, who's a Russian mathematician, who's more akin to Thomas Pynchon.

He declined the Millennial Prize, the $1 million.

He declined all the prizes, the Fields Medal, the Breakthrough Prize in Mathematics.

He declined everything.

And he's just lives with his mom now, quit mathematics.

Like Kiro Ike also lived with his mom.

There's something really beautiful about a human being like that.

Right.

Especially because in his case it was done for principles.

Like he has a certain set of principles and

no amount of money, nothing can buy him.

Yeah, that's amazing, actually.

Yeah.

I had somebody

tell me this.

A really interesting guy I met a few days ago

said that

there's nothing more exhilarating.

Perhaps only a rich person can say this, but there's nothing more exhilarating than saying no to a lot of money.

But he said it with so much confidence that I somehow believed him.

But it is

the more the deeper truth there is,

living by principles and having integrity.

There is something deeply fulfilling.

If that means saying no to money, or if that means standing up to Hitler,

and then risking your life, that's a deeply fulfilling thing.

Big, ridiculous question.

I thought you were a good person to ask.

What's the point of this whole thing?

What's the meaning of life and our existence here on earth?

I somehow think that the universe

has a big story to tell, or it's telling a big story the whole time, and our consciousness is part of that bigger story.

So, the consciousness of the whole of the universe,

the big, the huge story, is something that is probably the meaning of life.

Or the meaning of life of our individual life is to understand that story.

And that is something, for example, that I understood quite well on LSD when I walked in the mountains about a month ago.

Because the mountains,

they actually, you know, they're quite high up into the atmosphere and they are made of all kinds of minerals.

And so they are receiving cosmic energy that comes, you know, that hits our planet.

And

walking up there,

and it doesn't, I guess if you're on LSD, you're more open somehow because you're not closing with your default mode network that,

you know, this is the tree and this is the path and this is the mountain and now it's two o'clock and i have to go back and the rain like this you're more you're more open so you're more like

perceiving i i that's at least the that's the impression i had and i couldn't put it in words what exactly i was perceiving but i was perceiving more of the bigger story and i think that is inspiration and i think those moments bring you

quite close to the meaning of of life and I wouldn't put that meaning on life in words.

It is an experience

and I think that

for me as an artist it was an important experience to make, to get close to that and that is

that is what you can achieve in each of your professions.

like a mathematician, he comes to that point when he like hears more, like he grasps like connections.

And he might not be able to put it into a formula yet, but if

he's an open person,

he might be a better mathematician because he can understand a bit more of

the meaning of everything.

Of this bigger story that's being written.

Yeah.

And I mean, I mentioned to you my substack, which I think is going to be the best substack.

Do you think it's possible it's the greatest substack of all time in history?

That's what it's going to be.

It's going to be, yeah.

Stone sapiens substack.

But something else.

I just hope you actually do it.

You should become a subscriber.

I will definitely subscribe.

I really realize that there is a greater, a bigger story.

And it's somehow interesting to try to open up.

Because if we live, that's why I like to be in nature also quite a lot.

You get how you have a better access.

We live boxed in, Walter Benjamin called us like the boxed.

human beings like we're living in the cities we're doing we're waking up we're doing a it's good to be therefore, it's good to be outside the system.

And I hope that my art can contribute to, you know, freeing the brainwaves to

understanding a bit more.

What that is, I don't know, but I think the process of understanding more and connecting in different ways,

that is what I'm going for, because I think that is the meaning of life.

Well,

thank you for doing that with all of your work and for inspiring us all to do the same.

Thank you so much for talking today.

It was great.

Thank you.

Thanks for listening to this conversation with Norman Ohler.

To support this podcast, please check out our sponsors in the description and consider subscribing to this channel.

And now, let me leave you with some words from the great Terence McKenna:

Nature loves courage.

You make the commitment, and nature will respond to that commitment by removing impossible obstacles.

Dream the impossible dream, and the world will not grind you under.

It will lift you up.

This is the trick.

This is what all these teachers and philosophers who really counted, who really touched the alchemical gold, this is what they understood.

This is the shamanic dance in the waterfall.

This is how magic is done: by hurling yourself into the abyss and discovering that it is, in fact, a feather bed.

Thank you for listening and hope to see you next time.