Modular Cat Trees: A Mailbag Episode

The global industrial renaissance is transforming our world.

Over the next decade, industries like energy, infrastructure, and technology will need an estimated $75 to $100 trillion to modernize and meet demand.

Long-term projects need long-duration capital.

That's where Apollo steps in.

With scale, flexibility, and a focus on growth, we're partnering with companies to drive the future, one innovation at a time.

Learn more at thinkitnew.com/slash renaissance.

Promotional products aren't just giveaways, they're strategic brand tools.

That's why so many businesses turn to 4imprint.

With thousands of customizable options from premium apparel, drinkwear, tech, totes, and more, 4imprint offers the variety to fit your goals and budget.

Many items come with no setup charge to help you maximize value even more.

With expert support, fast turnaround, and a 360-degree guarantee, you can be 4imprint certain your order will be done right on time.

Explore more at 4imprint.com.

4Imprint for certain.

How many vendors does it take to meet all your organization's food needs?

Just one.

EasyCater, the workplace food platform that lets teams order from a huge variety of restaurants, over 100,000 nationwide, all through a single vendor.

In addition to all that variety, EasyCater also gives you full visibility of your organization's food spend with invoicing, centralized reporting, and seamless integration with expense management systems, all on one platform.

EasyCater, your business tool for food.

To learn more, visit easycater.com/slash podcast.

Bloomberg Audio Studios.

Podcasts, radio, news.

Hello, and welcome to the Money Stuff Podcast, your weekly podcast where we talk about stuff related to money.

I'm Matt Levine, and I write the Money Stuff column for Bloomberg Opinion.

And I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

Katie, we have traveled into the future.

Yes.

Five minutes ago, we were recording a Money Stuff episode for, I'm going to say,

September 13th.

Is that possible?

Friday the 13th.

Friday the 13th.

And now,

still before Friday the 13th, we're recording an episode for, I'm going to guess, Friday the 20th.

You're so right.

Yeah, seven days to 13, you get 20.

All right.

So here we are.

We asked for questions.

We asked you from eight days ago.

Yeah, we asked you for questions and boy did you deliver.

Our inbox flooded.

Well, we haven't delivered yet.

Well, no.

We haven't delivered.

But you did.

Singing mailbag.

Mailbag.

It's our first real mailbag episode.

First all-mailbag episode.

Yeah.

So

let's dive right in.

A writer who asked to stay anonymous asks, why are private markets the new public markets?

And is it bad that private markets are the new new public markets?

It's a topic we explore frequently.

And I guess we should talk about whether or not it's like a good development.

I feel like my potted answer on this is like, why are the new public markets?

Because there's so much money in private markets, right?

It used to be that if you wanted to raise a lot of money, you went to the public markets because like

the best way to reach people was to like advertise broadly.

But now like there are a lot of rich people.

Financial markets are very globalized.

So you can call the rich people in Saudi Arabia instead of having to like get the rich people in America.

And technology is such that it's like pretty easy to canvass all the people with a lot of money.

And so it is much less necessary to go out to public markets to raise a lot of money because like it is relatively straightforward to access giant pools of money in the private markets.

And other than the money, like private markets are a lot easier, right?

It's like you don't have the same disclosure rules.

You don't have the same governance rules.

You don't have the same getting sued by shareholders.

It's a lot easier to stay private in many ways.

And if you can access as much money as

OpenAI or SpaceX can access in the private markets, then they sort of become the default place.

And then our questioner also asks, is it bad that private markets are the new public markets?

I mean, the standard story is that the point of public markets is in part to allocate capital to the best uses or whatever, but it's also in part like there are a lot of people who have like retirement savings and you'd like them to have adequate retirement savings.

So true.

And like, you know, the stock market is a way to invest in like the growth of the economy, right?

You can buy stakes in big companies and as the economy grows, the value of your stakes grows and you end up more than keeping pace with inflation and have a lot of money to retire on.

And if all of the cool, fast-growing, innovative, small companies that will become large are in the private markets and the public markets are just for kind of older, more stable companies that are no longer growing dynamically, then that's worse for retirement state risks than there is for ordinary people because only essentially rich people and like institutions can access the fast-growing companies.

And people say this, you know, Jay Clayton, when he ran the SEC, was fond of saying things like this.

People sometimes then make the further leap of like, therefore, we should let retail investors have more access to private investments.

Like perhaps through an ETF from Apollo.

Sure.

A nice callback to eight days ago.

To roughly 25 minutes ago.

Time was a flat circle.

It's a concept.

It's a concept.

But the problem is that, like,

if you give retail investors access to private, like, there's no such thing as private markets, right?

Like a public market, it's like you can buy all the stocks on the public market because they just trade publicly.

The private market, there's no market, right?

It's just like you can invest in SpaceX if Elon Musk likes you.

You can invest in OpenAI if OpenAI calls you.

If they don't call you, you can invest in a different private company.

But if you're just a random person, the private company opportunities that you get are not as good as the ones that Warren Buffett gets or whatever.

And so the problem of ordinary retail investors not having access to the best private market investments is not solved by giving them access to the worst private market investments.

Right.

It's made worse.

Well, a follow-up question that someone DM'd me about is, can companies just stay private forever?

I mean, the answer in a lot of cases is yes.

But I mean, do you think about OpenAI?

What it has a hundred fifty billion dollar valuation.

SpaceX, I forget what they're at.

But if you're in that position, is there any pressure to go public?

I mean, companies stay private forever, right?

I mean, Coke Industries has been private for decades or whatever.

Everyone in this room is gesturing at the room to suggest another private company that exists.

You know, like the big names are like OpenAI, SpaceX, and Stripe.

Yeah.

Like these big, like Silicon Valley venture-funded tech companies, there is an expectation among your venture capital investors and among your employees that they'll be able to cash out their stock, right?

Like they bought stock or they got paid in stock and they want to cash out.

And the ordinary way to cash out is you do an IPO and then they can sell their stock.

Those companies have found a way to avoid that, which is they do tender offers.

They raise money from new investors and they use it to buy back the old investors.

It's not as good.

It's not as nice for the investors.

It's more complicated.

It's more work and like more managerial attention possibly than just letting stock trade on the open market.

But you avoid managerial attention to other things like disclosure.

I don't know.

I mean, my bet is like these companies probably could stay private forever.

I think they have some pressure to make it easier to sell.

But, you know, like if you're an open AI employee and you want to sell your $10 million of stock and the company says, we're not going to go public, but we'll do a tender and like it'll be a little bit administratively annoying, but you'll probably get your $10 million.

That's fine because

you got so much money from working at this hot startup, right?

If in 10 years they're not growing fast, you know, it's like more administratively annoying to not go public.

But you get a lot of runway if you are a hot startup and there's so much money in the private markets to let you cash out early investors.

Well, we've gotten through one question.

Great.

So let's move swiftly along here.

Jeff writes, Howdy, you've spent a lot of time talking about regulatory fines.

For example, the SEC collected almost $400 million in 2023 as a result of off-channel business communications.

My question is, where does that money go?

The off-channel communications example isn't necessarily harming anyone in particular, so I don't imagine it gets paid out as restitution to victims.

Right.

Off-channel communications means like people texting about work on their cell phones, which is like the SEC's big enforcement priority.

I write a lot about the SEC being like a machine for generating fines, right?

And like the cell phone stuff is such a good way to generate fines because every single bank has employees who have texted about work.

And so you can find all of the banks, you know, nine-figure sums.

The answer to the question.

So the SEC is funded by fees.

that it charges for registration of securities.

So the SEC has a budget and it goes to Congress for its budget, but then the government doesn't pay for it.

Like the securities industry pays for it, like companies registering securities pay for it.

So the SEC is like free to the government, sort of.

And it last year had like a budget of like $2 billion, like employees and stuff, and it collected about $5 billion in fines, which is like pretty good return on capital.

Most of that, I think, is like what is referred to as disgorgement,

which means like you made money illicitly and you have to give it back.

Some of that is going to be disgorged to victims, right?

Like a lot of that is like you stole money and you have to give get the money back that you stole.

But there is like a lot of money left over for the SEC.

A lot of that goes, I think they paid out like $900 million to victims and they paid out $600 million to whistleblowers.

Nice.

They pay a commission.

Not a bad business.

All these fines, right?

Like, you know, $600 million divided by $5 billion is, you know, they pay like 12% fees to the whistleblowers who bring them the fines.

And then the rest just goes to the treasury.

Just goes back to the U.S.

government.

Nice.

It's a revenue source for the U.S.

government.

I don't know that the SEC thinks of itself itself that way.

I think they must think of themselves as...

They have a higher- Yeah, they're like protecting investors and like upholding the rule of law and whatever.

But I like to think of them as doing a certain amount of like, you know, revenue maximization.

And they're good at it.

Good for them.

The global industrial renaissance is transforming industries and reshaping our world.

Over the next decade, sectors like energy, infrastructure, and technology will require an estimated $75 to $100 trillion in CapEx to modernize and meet the growing demand.

This unprecedented level of investment is beyond the scope of public markets alone.

Long-term projects need long-duration capital.

That's where private capital comes in.

And that's where Apollo leads.

With significant scale, the flexibility to adapt to evolving CapEx needs, and a steadfast focus on enabling economic growth, we're partnering with companies to provide the financing solutions that fuel the future.

Learn more at thinkitnew.com slash renaissance.

Introducing the all-new Adobe Acrobat Studio now with AI-powered PDF spaces.

Do more with PDFs than you ever thought possible.

Need AI to turn 100 pages of market research into five insights with a click?

Do that with Acrobat.

Need templates for a sales proposal that'll close that deal?

Do that with Acrobat.

Need an AI specialist to tailor the tone of your market report to sound real smart in real time?

Do that with the all-new Adobe Acrobat Studio.

Learn more at adobe.com/slash do that with Acrobat.

For enterprise organizations, managing all your food needs is a tall order.

But with Easy Cater, you get a single workplace food vendor with the tools and resources to make it easy, giving teams across your organization an easy way to order from a huge variety of restaurants, all on one platform, all while consolidating your corporate food spend so you can control costs, streamline billing and payment, and simplify reporting.

EasyCater, your business tool for food.

To learn more, visit easycater.com slash podcast.

We have a question for me.

So you're going to read this question for me.

Paul asks, Katie, what is the value of writing a big story as Katie did last week?

Last week.

Which is actually two weeks ago.

Katie wrote a big story about single stock.

Single stock leveraged ETFs.

Leveraged ETFs.

We got so many questions about.

And so he says a big story, at least one that is widely circulated and cited in financial media.

It was cited by such luminaries as the Money Stuff Newsletter.

True.

And Cliff Hasnus.

Really, just the two institutions that I care about the most.

Anyway, what was the,

how did you feel about that?

Well, first off,

I am glad that we got so many questions about leveraged ETFs because we end up talking about ETFs a lot on this podcast.

And I feel like that is a lot of my influence.

So I'm glad that people are somewhat interested.

Right.

It would be a shame if everyone's like,

my one note is less ETFs.

Please stop talking.

I think it's pretty human.

It's fun to see the hit count on an article that is widely circulated.

It's also nice when people talk about the thing that you wrote about because usually when I pitch an article on a topic that I find cool and then people read it a lot and talk about it a lot and tweet about it and also think it's cool, That is gratifying.

And also just when you write an article that has an impact, it tends to open up communication to people that you would like to talk about, who you would think are interesting.

So you get more inbound from interesting people.

So I always find it like super gratifying when I write about a thing where I'm like, This is ridiculous and arcane and of interest only to me.

And then like that gets me the best feedback and people like, oh, I love this, right?

It's really satisfying.

Yeah, like there are people like me out out there, you know?

Yeah, it is really nice.

And also,

I mean, I can see my hits.

So like, it's instant gratification for something that,

you know, if you write

that story, I mean, it didn't take me too long, but I probably worked on it for like a week and a half.

And then to just get the instant gratification always feels good.

Yeah.

Yeah.

I don't look at my clicks, but

you don't?

I mean,

you read spikes

on the terminal every single day that you publish.

Read spiking is when you get a certain amount of clicks in a certain amount of time.

And Matt always reads spikes.

So we have a rough thing you've told me, but I don't otherwise know.

I have read spike alerts.

So

Justin writes, both Icon and Ackman have been living rent-free in my mind lately, thanks to Matt's columns.

And it made me think about how it would be funny if Ackman took an activist position on IEP, given the history of public feuds between the two and the recent precipitous fall of that stocks price, could this actually play out?

That would be amazing.

I go back and I watch that CNBC clip.

It's like the most famous piece of fanciful television ever.

I probably watch it once a month.

It's just so good.

Just to remind myself, like, what is it?

Wait, who is on?

Is it

Ackman was on an Icon Called Inn or vice versa?

I think Ackman was on an Icon Called Inn.

That's right.

And they just let it run.

I never said that I want to be friends with you, Bill.

I wouldn't be friends with you.

And I wait.

You said to me you'd like to be friends so that we could invest together.

Carl, I have no interest.

Do you think I want to invest with you?

Okay, let's

invest with you.

Let's be the best man on Earth.

Let's move on.

This is like 10 years.

This is like more than 10 years ago.

I know.

But I watch it to remind myself what peak financial television looks like.

Greatest fight on financial television ever.

It's so good.

I don't think they've like, yeah, anyway.

They have kissed and made up.

They've appeared on stage together.

Okay, fine.

They're friends now.

But let's, for the purposes of

pod friends would not be so good.

Can we just give up our seats to them?

The Ackman Icon show.

Yeah, we'll just leave them alone in this box of a room.

That'd be so good.

Yeah.

But failing that, IEP is Icon Enterprises, which is Carl Icon's publicly traded company, which has had a precipitous fall because a short seller accused it of being a Ponzi's game and it lost a lot of its value.

The answer is no.

Ackman can't really do much activism in IEP just because Carl Icon owns 85% of it.

And so that's not much activism that he can do.

Now,

he had margined a lot of that stock and had his banks seized and sold his stock, then there might be something there.

But that would be a bigger problem for him than just Bill Ackman being in the stock.

But

the real answer to this question is no, Ackman can't do that, but the reverse is possible.

True.

And in fact, Elliot built an activist stake in Bill Ackman's European public vehicle in 2017, which he has talked about.

He revealed it on a podcast.

His podcast with Carl Ackhut.

Not this podcast.

I think it was Lex Friedman.

Yeah.

And so it's a little unclear exactly what happened because it's just his version of the story.

And they didn't actually do any activism because I think basically they were building a stake and

Ackman was able to head them off.

But I don't know.

I was looking idly through the filing for Pershing Square USA and it sort of looked like there weren't that many anti-activist protections.

So if he does end up taking that thing public,

God willing

wants to borrow against this IEP stock to try something.

It'd be fun.

I mean, my fantasy lineup is PSH,

IPOs, trades at a discount.

Boaz Weinstein does activism.

Right.

But I think Boaz Weinstein and Bill Ackman are like...

They're friends.

They're friends.

I know.

Well, that's the thing.

Like, is Boaz morally obligated?

To do closed unfund activism wherever the opportunity for his own?

Maybe, maybe he is.

That's what I'm saying.

We're going to have a podcast with them.

Yes.

Yes.

Jeff.

I wonder if I said the same Jeff.

Jeff asks, so whether I'm in the long or short micro-strategy leverage ETFs, I'm guaranteed to lose money over the long term.

Is it possible to borrow these shares to short them?

And isn't this a guaranteed money maker?

No, you're not guaranteed to lose money.

You tell them.

Jeff, what are you doing?

It happens to be the case that this microstrategy ETF that Katie wrote about Lowies two weeks ago, it's like a triple-levered ETF that microstrategy was up a lot over the year and the ETF was down a lot because the way the math works is that if you leverage a volatile stock enough, then even though the stock goes up, your triple-levered stock can go down.

But that just, you know, was kind of bad luck.

And in fact, lots of other triple-levered ETFs, including the NVIDIA one, like go up when the stock goes up.

Like normally it goes up when the stock goes up.

It has to be, things have to go pretty wrong for it to go down when the stock goes up.

But then we also got a question from Ben.

If a leveraged single-stock fund produces worse long-term returns than the volatile underlying stock, then would you get better returns than the underlying stock if the fund gave you less than 100% of the stock's daily returns, e.g., a fund that gives you 50% of the daily return of micro strategy?

I think the answer is yes.

That's really interesting.

I think if you

can create that yourself, right?

Do you create that by like taking $100

and putting $50 $50 of it into MicroStrategy stock and just keeping the other $50 in cash?

And then you have half as much volatility as MicroStrategy.

And then the key is you keep it 50-50.

You rebalance each day.

So if MicroStrategy goes down, so you have like $45 of MicroStrategy, then you rebalance, you put $250 into MicroStrategy.

So now you have $4,750 of cash, $4,750 of MicroStrategy.

MicroStrategy goes up on the other end, you sell MicroStrategy and keep some cash.

So each day you always start 50 50

and what that strategy is is just buying low and selling high right it's you're sort of assuming that micro strategy will be like more volatile than directional like it'll bounce around a lot without going anywhere and if that's true then each time it goes down you'll buy each time it goes up you'll sell and you'll make money over the long term that happens to work sometimes but it's just a guess on what the stock will look like if the stock is very volatile and doesn't go anywhere that'll make money but if the stock goes up a lot you'll be sad that you did that instead of just buying the stock well might as well launch it you don't even need to have you just need to

i mean fine

geez louise this week

you mean this week you mean last week

what are your favorite types of stock malfeasance is that how i say malfeasance yeah malfeasance to cover short seller witch hunt wait no short

That was one sentence.

Short seller witch hunts, gnarly bankruptcies,

insurance fraud, question mark.

Which one?

Well, I always love clever ones, right?

I love the Spotify architecture.

No, that's about it.

You mean the one that we covered last week?

Last week, yeah.

The Spotify one from last week.

Last week, 30 minutes ago.

I love clever ones.

I love things that like.

use leverage.

So like there's some really good insurance frauds where like the thing to notice about insurance is like

and this is true of a bank too.

It's maybe more intuitive with a bank.

A bank is like a pot of a billion dollars with like $100 million of equity, right?

Like a bank, you can buy control of a bank by buying its stock and the stock is just a tiny fraction of the value of money in the bank, right?

The bank is mostly leverage.

And so if you buy a bank stock, you control all that money in the bank and then you can like give it to yourself.

And of course, of course, of course.

In banking and regulation, I mean banking and insurance, there's regulation to stop you from doing that extremely obvious trade.

But people find ways, mostly in insurance, sometimes in banking too.

But like in insurance, you buy this like little insurance company.

It has this big pot of premiums that it's written and like money that it controls.

And then you give that money to yourself.

Yeah.

And it's great.

It's very clever.

The other thing I really like to write about is, I've been writing about it a lot recently, is fake takeover offers.

Because you think.

It's like the stereotype of fake takeover offers, which is that it's like you buy a stock, you put out a fake press release saying that you're buying the company, the stock goes up, you sell the the stock, you make money.

And in fact, there are a lot of cases like that.

In almost every case, they don't make money because they are bad at it and they like don't sell in time.

And so they lose money.

It doesn't matter.

That's like regular fun.

But there are a lot of cases of like fake or quasi-fake takeovers where they're not trying to do that, where they just want to go on television.

They just want to be a big shot.

You know, they want to like...

have a little merger negotiation.

To which I say, just start an AI company.

You'll get on TV.

I know, but I'm so sympathetic to that because as like an M ⁇ A guy, like it's like, I understand.

It's fun to negotiate a merger.

And like, if you don't have the money to buy a big company, just pretend you have the money to buy a big company.

Who are we talking about?

Lots of people.

I know, but recently, in the past three months, who did that?

There was the guy who tried to buy Virgin Orbit.

Yep.

And he went on television a lot.

Yeah.

And he was bad on TV.

Many of them are.

It was stressful.

Well, they don't have media training because they're not legit.

They don't.

Anyway.

Right.

They're so excited to be there.

Yeah.

They freaking out.

I get it.

I get it.

It is amazing.

Before, you know, closely paying attention to money stuff, I wouldn't have thought that there would be plural, that many plural.

Yeah, I have to say, it's a thing I've noticed more recently.

The other thing about it is like, it's a continuum with real takeover reference because very few people offer to buy a company saying, I've got a pot of cash right here sufficient to buy the company.

They're like, if you engage with me and we negotiate a deal, I will get financing.

Like someone will lend me the money to buy the company or I'll be able to to sell, you know, I'll be able to raise this money.

But like, I don't have it now.

I have to talk to you about the merger first.

Yeah.

And like, that can be very legitimate.

And, like, that's how Elon Musk bought Twitter, right?

I mean, it's like a real thing.

It's how most big dollar MA gets done.

It's like you start it without having all the money lined up.

But like, there's a continuum down to the guy with like literally one dollar in his bank account calling up Virgin Orvit and being like, I could probably get the money.

He couldn't, right?

But it's like, you know, it's all on a continuum.

God bless.

Introducing the all-new Adobe Acrobat Studio.

Now with AI-powered PDF spaces, do more with PDFs than you ever thought possible.

Need AI to turn 100 pages of market research into five insights with a click?

Do that with Acrobat.

Need templates for a sales proposal that'll close that deal?

Do that with Acrobat.

Need an AI specialist to tailor the tone of your market report to sound real smart in real time?

Do that with the all-new Adobe Acrobat Studio.

Learn more at adobe.com slash do that with Acrobat.

For enterprise organizations, managing all your food needs is a tall order.

But with Easy Cater, you get a single workplace food vendor with the tools and resources to make it easy, giving teams across your organization an easy way to order from a huge variety of restaurants, all on one platform.

All while consolidating your corporate food spend so you can control costs, streamline billing and payment, and simplify reporting.

EasyCater, your business tool for food.

To learn more, visit easycater.com/slash podcast.

Every business has an ambition.

PayPal Open is the platform designed to help you grow into yours with business loans so you can expand and access to hundreds of millions of PayPal customers worldwide.

And your customers can pay all the ways they want with PayPal, Venmo, Pay Later, and all major cards so you can focus on scaling up.

When it's time to get growing, there's one platform for all business: PayPal Open.

Grow today at PayPalopen.com.

Loan subject to approval in available locations.

All right, what's up?

Now it's a question for me.

Okay.

Your questions are very intense.

This is a good question for me, though.

I have a real answer.

Thomas also asks,

Katie, what's your pitch for the next great cat-based business?

Financial fundamentals need not apply.

So I have a real answer for this, and I'm going to steal it from my husband.

But we've been talking about this for a while.

He goes home and discusses cat-based businesses.

Yes.

Let me tell you.

So, you know cat trees, Matt?

Yeah, I know cat trees.

Have you ever had a cat?

No.

Oh, well,

okay.

But I've had a dog who was really interested in cats.

Okay, so that doesn't count.

No.

But cat trees, if you have a cat, you have to get a cat tree.

You know, they're usually beige.

They usually have some scratchy posts and little platforms that the cat can hop up on because cats like to go high.

We end up buying a cat tree every couple of years because they get gnarly or just like your cat is bored of them.

Kitty, when I say that I know about cat trees, when I lived in Brooklyn,

every so often a cat owner would buy a new cat tree and throw out the old cat tree on the street and my obsessed dog would sniff it and sit by it and lurk hoping there was a cat inside.

Yeah, I get that.

So I'm aware of the discarding of cats.

They're probably really stinky of cats.

No, yeah, so yeah, because the cat spends so much time on their cat tree.

But you have to switch them out every few years because they get grody and your cat gets bored.

Modular cat trees.

Okay, I like that.

So that you can mix and match.

And it's also good.

I saw a TikTok recently.

I should stop revealing how much time I spend on TikTok, but I get a lot of cat behavioral videos, like a lot of Jackson Galaxy.

I'm nodding knowledgeably.

A lot of Jackson Galaxy and stuff.

And someone made the point that you should make every day a little bit different for for your cat because your cat stays in your apartment and you want them to be fun and stimulated.

And I think it would be nice if you had modular cat trees that you could switch up easily so that your cat encounters something new more often than every couple of years.

This is a really good idea.

Thank you.

How fund your modular cat business is.

So many great ideas that we just never execute.

A lot of great ideas.

I'm a little worried that you've disclosed it all.

Now, fortunately, this podcast will air eight days after that's true so you have eight days to to really act as this yeah okay

i'll get to work

lw asks

how can you both be a broker and a dealer as in sec registered broker slash dealers isn't being both at the same time a problem a straightforward conflict i.e some trades you broker and some trades you take a principal position.

I love this question.

It's on my wavelength.

How can you you be both a broker and a dealer?

Are you LW?

Wow.

Did you write in?

No, I just, it's just like, you know, like it's a, it's like a phrase, like an SEC broker, dealer.

Everyone says broker dealer, but like, right, there's a different way of doing that.

Let's unpack that.

A broker is someone who like matches up a transaction.

So like you want to buy, someone else wants to sell.

I sit in the middle.

I take a commission.

I sell from them to you.

Right.

A dealer is someone who like, trades directly with the customer.

So you want to buy.

I'm like, I'll sell it to you.

Right.

And many businesses in the world are dealer businesses, right?

Like if you want to buy a car, you go to a car dealer and they'll sell you a car that they own.

And many businesses are broker businesses, right?

They want to buy a house, you go to a real estate agent and they find you a house and take a commission, but they don't own the house.

You know, in a lot of financial markets, there is a broker-dealer model where like you want to buy a security and you go to your bank is the generic term and they will either be your broker or they'll be your dealer.

They'll either like find it for you or they'll deal directly off their balance sheet with you.

And is that a conflict?

I mean, like, yeah, of course, it's a conflict, but it's also, it's like, it's just good service, right?

Like, it's like the reason that exists is because there is someone you can call and you say, I want to buy this bond.

And if they have the bond, they'll sell it to you.

And if they don't have the bond, they'll find it for you.

Right.

And they have some amount of, you know, regulatory and also just like sort of custom expectation that they will do the best thing they can for you.

Right.

You see this in like retail stock trading where like your retail broker who is only a broker and will just route it to like a big market maker.

Your retail broker will route your order to a big market maker and the big market maker will either fill it out of inventory at a better price than you could get on the stock exchange or they will send it to the stock exchange and they'll do whatever they think is best and they have like an obligation to best execution and have you know they're getting measured by the broker to like make sure they're giving you the best price.

So you know, in general, it's a good service, right?

And I often think of like, like I've written a lot about private credit.

And like, one thing in private credit is like, if you're a company looking for financing or like a private equity sponsor looking to do an LPF, and you go to a bank and you say, I want to borrow money for this LBO, like the bank will be like, okay, we can probably find you that money.

We got to go find investors and get you that money.

If you go to a private credit fund, they'll just be like, yeah, we have money.

Like, you take the money.

Right.

And that's in some ways a better service.

And I've written about how like banks, because they're getting into private credit, because they can like broker private credit trades, banks should be able to offer you either we'll give you the financing or we'll syndicate the financing.

Right.

And I think there's some of that in real banking.

And that's a broker-dealer model, right?

That's like for some price, we can just give you the money.

We can just face you on the trade.

And for some other price, we can find someone else to face you on the trade.

And we'll do both because we're working for you however we can.

It obviously raises the possibility of conflicts because what you could do is the opposite, right?

What you could do is if it's the best deal for you, you take it.

And if it's not the best deal for you, you send it to someone else.

But yeah, that's why it's a regulated business.

It's a good thing you wrote yourself that question because that was an interesting answer.

There you go.

There you go.

This is a long one.

Anonymous asks, why does there need to be an actual stock to borrow when shorting?

Seems like there would have been a more direct derivative contract that mimics the risk slash reward slash cash flow structure of a short, but without having to worry about the actual shares of stock floating around to various parties.

Is that the key?

That three slash four four parties each bring something unique to the deal in relation to the short seller, and derivatives contracts aren't typically coordinated between multiple parties?

If this does in fact exist, please don't make me look stupid on air.

Okay.

Okay.

So there's two points here.

Yeah.

One is like, what is a derivative?

So like, are there derivative contracts to short stocks?

Yeah.

Like there's puts and there's total return swaps.

Like you can, if you're a big hedge fund and you want to short a stock, you can easily go to a bank and say, I want to get short this stock on swap.

So the derivative absolutely absolutely exists, but that doesn't matter because like a derivative is like you go to a bank to say, I want to get short this stock on swap.

The bank says, fine, we'll charge you for it.

And we will go hedge that derivative by shorting the stock ourselves.

So you still need the shares of stock to borrow because you can't like manufacture the short out of nothing.

The bank is not going to just make that bet against you like on its own account.

It's going to hedge that bet and the way it hedges it by shorting.

Now, it doesn't have to hedge by shorting.

It can hedge by finding someone on the long side of the swap, right?

So like if you want to get short on swap, the bank can find someone who wants to get long on swap, and they can match you up.

And then no stock needs to be borrowed.

But why would someone want to get long on swap rather than by buying the stock themselves?

The answer is, I mean, they wouldn't, right?

Because then they're taking credit risk and it's like weird and it's like harder to get out of.

It's just more inconvenient.

The reason they do it is like if they get long on swap, they could get paid more than by owning the stock themselves.

But that ultimately sort of leads you back to the stock borrowing market, right?

If like a stock is difficult to borrow, then it's going to be just as pricey and difficult to get short on swap, to get short via derivative as it would be to get short in the cash market because like everyone involved knows that.

And like if you get short on swap with the bank, either the bank has to short the stock, which is expensive for the bank, so it won't do it, or the bank has to find someone to get long on swap.

And the person getting long on swap knows that the stock is expensive to borrow and they could make a lot of money by owning it in cash and lending it out in the stock borrow market.

So it doesn't work.

The derivative contract doesn't work.

It kind of works, but it doesn't solve the problem, which the problem is there are some stocks that are hard to borrow and therefore you can't short them.

You can't, for the most part, practically get around that by using derivatives.

You know, you can do options.

You can like sell put options on the stock or even buy put options on the stock.

But again, the pricing is going to be affected by the borrow market.

The second part of the question is like, why do we have that as a rule?

And why not just allow naked short selling?

Yeah, why not?

And like, yeah, I've kind of written that like tentatively.

Yeah.

People get really mad.

People get really mad.

People really don't like naked short selling.

They think it's like a way to manipulate stocks.

There's probably some limit where it could be a way to manipulate stocks, right?

Where like if you could just manufacture an infinite amount of stock and sell it, you could probably drive the price of the stock down and like maybe do some damage.

I don't think that's as big a concern as people who get mad about naked short selling think it is.

But it's like a real concern.

It's like fine.

You probably can't have like unlimited naked short selling.

You also have like weird voting effects with naked short selling yeah because like if you manufacture an unlimited number of shares the people who buy the shares don't know if they own actual shares and they can vote or if they own fake shares and they can't vote so that's a little weird but i don't know i've always been sort of fond of the idea that like there has to be some way to allow naked short selling to because it would make markets more efficient it would just like allow you to bet against overpriced stocks and you see that there are certain stocks where they're hard to borrow and i won't name any names there are stocks that are hard to borrow and that trade at very, very inflated prices, where people would probably like to bet against them and be correct, but they can't do it because it's so expensive to borrow them.

And if you could short stock without borrowing it, those prices would be more efficient.

And I mean, mostly Trump media, but also, also, there's a few others.

Sent Hill from Chicago.

He writes, Since you both acknowledge being needy, no shame in that, and wanted more questions about yourselves, how do you talk to your children and/or or nibbling at all about money stuff?

How do you?

I

don't talk to my children a ton about money stuff.

No.

They have listened to the podcast in the car and I found it very amusing.

Yeah.

My sons were like, listened and heard you talk to me and said, why'd she call you Matt?

Because to them, I'm not Matt.

I guess you're either dad or Mr.

Levine.

Yes, I'm Mr.

Levine to my children.

Yeah, but like it is just a kick for them to just hear my voice in a format that normally plays, you know, Olivia Rodrigo.

I don't talk about the newsletter that much, but I do remember that I was once with my daughter and we met like another dad who was like a money stuff reader.

And he's like, oh, I found out the newsletter.

And my daughter didn't like fully understand the economic model after he left.

She was like, Does he give you money for writing such a good newsletter?

And I was like, ah, in a sense.

Indirectly.

He does, sweetie.

That's really cute.

Every so often I will try to like explain a financial news or malefeasance story at the dinner table, but they're a little young for that.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Do you talk to your siblings?

So my family are Money Stuff fans.

They've been Matt Levine fans.

The question is, Katie, how do you talk to your parents?

More directly, how do you talk to your dad?

No, but my brothers are as well.

My mom likes you, but she is indifferent.

She isn't particularly interested in the newsletter.

But my parents do listen to the podcast quite a bit.

I feel like my brothers listen on the side.

But I said this in one of the trailers.

Like, having this podcast is great proof that we actually are friends.

Because before we launched it, and like you would come up in our conversations, like when we were gathered as a family, I'd be like, oh, yeah, like I know Matt Levine.

Like we're friends.

And they'd be like, yeah, okay.

I talked to your dad on your phone once.

I know.

I know.

But still, I feel like my one brother in particular was skeptical.

And then I actually met at meal.

I brought you to a Capital One cafe.

He was a Capital One Cafe in the Bloomberg Building.

Yeah, and he was there.

And I think he truly was like surprised.

He didn't expect me to show up.

Yeah.

No, he thought it was like an elaborate long-con that we were actually friends.

So this podcast is a continuation of the long-con.

It is great, great proof to stick it to him that I have friends.

Yeah.

And some of them are Matt Levine.

With as many as one of them.

Yeah.

As many as one.

My parents do listen to money stuff a lot and I do get comments like on episodes that we recorded weeks ago.

And then my dad has another point that he wants to tell me about.

And I'm like, I cannot remember what episode-wise.

I would have him on as a guest.

Yeah, he would have been my daughter.

Oh, my gosh.

That would be great.

All right.

That was the money stuff.

Mailbag.

Mailbag.

Thank you so much for these questions.

It went great.

We appreciate from the bottom of our hearts

you sending us questions.

It was hard to whittle it down.

So we didn't get to everyone, of course.

But keep sending us questions.

We'll do it again.

This is great.

Thank you.

And that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

I'm Matt Levian.

And I'm Katie Greifeld.

You can find my work by subscribing to the Money Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg.com.

And you can find me on Bloomberg TV every day on Open Interest between 9 to 11 a.m.

Eastern.

We'd love to hear from you.

You can send an email to moneypot at bloomberg.net.

Ask us a question and we might answer it on air.

You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening right now and leave us a review.

It helps more people find the show.

The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anna Mazarakis and Moses Andam.

Our theme music was composed by Blake Maples.

Brendan Francis Noonam is our executive producer.

And Sage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts.

Thanks for listening to the Money Stuff Podcast.

We'll be back next week with more stuff.

How many vendors does it take to meet all your organization's food needs?

Just one.

EasyCater, the workplace food platform that lets teams order from a huge variety of restaurants, over 100,000 nationwide, all through a single vendor.

In addition to all that variety, EasyCater also gives you full visibility of your organization's food spend with invoicing, centralized reporting, and seamless integration with expense management systems, all on one platform.

EasyCater, your business tool for food.

To learn more, visit easycater.com/slash podcast.

Hiscock Small Business Insurance knows there is no business like your business.

Across America, over 600,000 small businesses, from accountants and architects to photographers and yoga instructors, look to Hiscox Insurance for protection.

Find flexible coverage that adapts to the needs of your small business with a fast, easy online quote at Hiscox.com.

That's HISCOX.com.

There's no business like small business.

Hiscox Small Business Insurance.

Running small and medium-sized businesses is hard work.

Business owners need to be sure that their ads are working just as hard as they do.

Amazon streaming TV ads helps put small and medium businesses front and center on premium content and shows that people are already watching.

With Amazon ads, you don't have to sacrifice relevance for reach.

Trillions of browsing, shopping, and streaming insights help you reach the right audience.

And measurement tools show you what's working the hardest to help you optimize your campaign in real time.

Game the Edge with Amazon Ads.