Embedded: The FBI Agents Inside January 6th

If you're into wine and wildlife, this is your invitation to Adelaide, Australia.

Swim with seals at sunrise, sip Shiraz at sunset, and in between, whoa, a koala.

Wait, how many wine regions?

18?

Is that a wallaby or a baby kangaroo?

Of course, I'd love to try wine from some of the oldest vines on the planet.

Come sip and see all South Australia has to offer on United, the only airline to fly non-stop from the U.S.

to Adelaide.

The FBI is back onto the national spotlight after recent admissions about the presence of hundreds of agents deployed to the Capitol on January 6th.

The scrutiny comes as Director Cash Patel seeks to reform the Bureau and regain the confidence of the American people.

In this episode, we sit down with investigative journalist Steve Baker to discuss what new details have come to light about the FBI's actions during J6 and how the Bureau can earn back the public's trust.

I'm Daily Wire executive editor John Bickley with Georgia Howe.

This is a weekend edition of OneWire.

By the time the average person reaches 60, they've likely cycled through numerous fad diets, collectively losing and regaining several hundred pounds over the years.

All that yo-yo dieting increases your risk of diabetes, liver problems, and heart issues.

The truth is, most of us need more than willpower to break free from this pattern.

That's where lean comes in.

Unlike those expensive GLP-1 injections, lean is a non-prescription supplement created by doctors specifically for this problem.

And the science behind it is rock solid.

Lean tackles weight loss three ways that actually help you keep it off.

It keeps your blood sugar steady, no more energy crashes sending you into a snack cabinet.

It controls cravings and that constant hunger feeling.

And it helps your body convert fat into energy instead of storing it.

I say it all the time, I was skeptical, but I tried it anyway.

And before I knew it, I was down a pants size and I was going to the Daily Wire kitchen way less.

If you want to lose meaningful weight at a healthy pace and keep it off, add lean to your diet and exercise lifestyle.

Get 20% off when you enter code Morningwire at takelean.com.

That's code Morningwire at takelean.com today.

Steve, thanks for coming on.

Hey, thanks so much for having me.

Good to see you again.

Look, you too.

We've recently had what many consider a bombshell admission from the FBI that not only did they have plain clothes officers in the crowd at the Capitol on January 6th, but they had hundreds of them, 274 to be precise.

First, how significant an admission is this?

The first thing that must be really explained is that

is it really plain clothes officers there?

This is a very important distinction about what was actually on the ground and what was deployed.

There technically is such a thing as a plain clothes FBI officer, but a plain clothes FBI officer would only be in truly plain, unidentifiable attire if they were either there as counter surveillance, actually doing the job of serving and protecting, making sure nobody's hiding a bomb in the crowd or, you know, doing anything otherwise nefarious, or they're actually undercover, which is a completely different distinction altogether.

That's an actual operation when they're on an undercover operation.

These agents, though, are operating in a new day.

It's no longer J.

Edgar Hoover's FBI.

We don't have that FBI anymore.

There's no national dress code standard any longer.

So when they come up to your door and and do a knock and talk or something like that, they could be wearing a flannel shirt, t-shirt, jeans, khakis, whatever.

But they always either have their badge on a lanyard or they might have a logo on their shirt or they might have a jacket with it on.

But when they are called specifically to a crowd control scenario, they will at the very least go put on their tactical vest, like a ballistic vest, which will have the FBI logo on it.

They wear their badges, you know, maybe a ball cap with FBI on on the ball cap they're clearly identified even though they're plain clothes the second thing is these are not the 274

that everybody wants to say were already embedded in the crowd and acting as agents provocateur and inflaming the passions of the maga crowd to go and storm the capitol These were people that were at home, they were off duty, they were on leave, maybe they were in the various offices around Washington, D.C.

and in the Capitol District, but they were called in and that call didn't go out to them till, you know, almost two hours after the violence actually began.

President was still on the stage at the ellipse when that famous Ray Epps barricade breach happened.

And then the violence escalated from there.

And so

with those facts in play, We don't know exactly what the timeline was where the call went out.

And it was actually emails were sent out to the agent saying you need to go some of them were saying deploy some of them were saying self-deploy some of them were saying no don't self-deploy wait on your group commander wait to wait for your supervisor to tell you what to do there's a lot of confusion then we get into the situation about crowd control the fbi is not trained for crowd control there's a lot to unpack here and there's a lot of questions um still to be answered like you said timeline not exactly clear the 274 let me start here the 274 that they confirmed were on the grounds, you know, somewhere around the Capitol.

Is that the number that were actually called into action or the ones that actually made it there, arrived there?

Like you said, there was conflicting orders at times.

Were they all actually on the ground?

I actually have video from my own camera of some of those 274 arriving after 6 p.m.

that night, after the National Guard had already been.

deployed.

They were arriving in various stages.

It wasn't just like, oh, oh, gosh, gosh, we got the call and they were there to assist.

First of all, they never stood the line with the Capitol Police and the Metro Police.

They never protected the building.

And even if they were 100% plain clothes, the first thing that they would do would go up to the line and they would identify themselves to law enforcement and then turn around and assist them.

It never happened all day.

Myself.

and Joe Hanneman, my partner in crime at the Blaze, who writes these stories together, we've done more work on January 6th and just about anybody.

But the one thing I can tell you that we have done more of than anybody else on the planet, and Joe and I have had more access to Capitol CC TV, the actual viewing room there that the Congressional Committee allows access to, than any other journalist.

And our first reaction when we saw this tweet from Patel saying that they were out there doing crowd control, Joe and I, we erupted in our private DMs.

We're like, this is not true.

Because if we had seen them at any one point during that day, we would have made note of it.

It just never happened.

So what is going on there?

You know, this is a pretty serious accusation.

You're leveling at FBI Director Patel that he's mischaracterizing what they were there to do.

What do you think is going on there?

Does he misunderstand what happened?

Is it possible that you're wrong?

The first thing is, is that,

yes, according to the after action report, they were and the testimonies of those 274 agents, they did receive emails saying you're going out to do crowd control, which, by the way, is not something they do.

It's not something they're even trained for all right so they were ordered to go out and do crowd control that day what they did not do was crowd control right so that was the directive but they did not carry through they did not carry it out and they're not trained to do that

right and any control that they ostensibly or may have done it would have been later after the tactical squads including tactical units from the fbi because they were in the building early.

And

that was the first time we saw saw fbi in the building at all it was their tactical squad then we saw the swat team helping escort congress members out of the building we've seen video of that escorting them into the tunnels but we don't see these plain clothes fbi agents ever assisting metro police or any of the other uh capitol police or any of the other uniformed law enforcement that did respond it took over four years to get this admission that there were an additional 274 fbi agents directed to the capitol why was that admission so slow in coming if this is not a big deal why wasn't that said up front and do we have something like a a perjury situation maybe with somebody like a chris ray because of this yeah a chris chris ray has his uh default get out of jail free card which is i'm sorry we can't comment on an ongoing investigation You know, that's what the FBI typically does and always defaults to that when they don't want to answer a question.

And as it relates to this, he was really pressured under great detail and focus to talk about the assets they had on the ground that day.

And he wouldn't reveal the CHSs,

the 26 confidential human sources.

He wouldn't talk about that.

He wouldn't talk about any other deployment.

But it's to your point.

What took them 60 months or 52 months or whatever it was for them to finally tell us about these 274?

And it took them four years to tell us about the 26 confidential human sources.

But as of right now, there is no actual evidence that any FBI agent acted as a provocateur.

Do I still believe that there were agitators, provocateurs, paid influencers over that crowd that day?

100%.

Are there any important elements of J6 that you feel are still being ignored by the media?

What do you think are some of the biggest issues that are not actually being exposed?

Well, if we're talking about being ignored by the media, we have to decide whether we're talking about friendly right-wing media or we're talking about the opposition MSM.

Everything's being ignored by the MSM.

They have a narrative.

Nancy Pelosi directed them on the first anniversary of January 6th.

And this is an exact quote.

She said, we are going to establish and preserve the narrative of that day.

And that's what the point of that first select committee was to do, was to establish and preserve the preferred narrative of that day.

And they have stuck to that.

Now, what has happened, though, is as so many truths have been revealed and so many of their own lies have now come under scrutiny and they've been caught that literally over that four-year period before Biden slept, you know, got out of town, he signed preemptive pardons.

for the members of that committee, including people that testified before that committee under oath.

I think the most important work that I did since January 6th was the revelation that in the first oath keepers trial, two federal officers perjured themselves in that trial.

We have the proof.

I mean,

we caught a special agent,

ironically, again, the lead team member of Nancy Pelosi's security detail.

He lied in that um uh trial and said that he witnessed another officer, Officer Harry Dunn, having an antagonistic encounter with four oath keepers just outside of Nancy Pelosi's office.

The problem with that is that he was in another building at that time.

That special agent was escorting senators into the Senate buildings a quarter of a mile away,

under and through the tunnels.

And, you know, it's like, it's one of those things, you know, your gut instinct when you're watching a trial and you're watching a testimony and you're watching these two guys with this coordinated story and something doesn't feel right.

So when I got access,

I went straight to that and we found special agent David Lazarus, Nancy Pelosi's lead of her security detail.

We found him in another building at a time where he claimed he

witnessed the four oath keepers.

Final question.

Where does the bureau go from here?

What do you hope to see in the coming months and years in terms of some reforms,

some moves toward better transparency, et cetera?

Well, I'll be perfectly honest with you.

The federal government needs a federal Bureau of Investigation.

Nobody has better resourcing.

Nobody has better funding than the federal government to assist law enforcement all over the country and indeed around the world.

But we don't need a federal police force carrying guns, doing SWAT raids on misdemeanor defendants.

And really and truly, the only way that we're ever going to get the FBI right again is to bust it up.

And

that's going to take a lot of courage.

It's exactly what Cash Passelle said he was going to do.

He wrote a book about it, Government Gangsters.

He said he was going to turn the Hoover Building into a museum of the deep state, but he's not exactly doing any of that.

We'll see what transpires over the next few months and years.

Thank you so much for joining us.

Thank you.

That was Steve Baker, investigative journalist at the Blaze, and this has been a weekend edition of Morning Wire.

This episode is brought to you by Life Lock.

It's Cybersecurity Awareness Month, and LifeLock has tips to protect your identity.

Use strong passwords, set up multi-factor authentication, report phishing, and update the software on your devices.

And for comprehensive identity protection, let LifeLock alert you to suspicious uses of your personal information.

LifeLock also fixes identity theft, guaranteed or your money back.

Stay smart, safe, and protected with a 30-day free trial at lifelock.com/slash podcast.

Terms apply.