Trump Subverts Gag Order with Wannabe VPs

1h 14m
Joe Biden surprises Donald Trump with a debate challenge, and Trump accepts. Tommy and MSNBC’s Jen Psaki discuss the strategy behind Biden’s move and how likely it is that those debates will actually happen, Trump’s courthouse surrogate operation, the latest with Israel and Gaza, and whether it’s true that Biden thinks the polls are wrong. Then, Tommy and Jen relive the best White House stories from Jen’s new book, Say More: Lessons from Work, The White House, and the World.

Press play and read along

Runtime: 1h 14m

Transcript

Speaker 1 Lattice is the first comprehensive HR platform where people and AI succeed together.

Speaker 1 It helps every employee grow faster, every manager lead more effectively, and every company unlock their people's full potential. Stop settling for HR tools that hold your company back.

Speaker 1 Build a future where technology doesn't replace people, but actually elevates them. No regrets.
Ready to see the power of people plus AI? Visit lattice.com/slash no regrets.

Speaker 1 That's l-at-t-t-ice.com/slash no regrets. regrets.

Speaker 3 Finding the music you love shouldn't be hard. That's why Pandora makes it easy to explore all your favorites and discover new artists and genres you'll love.

Speaker 3 Enjoy a personalized listening experience simply by selecting any song or album, and we'll make a station crafted just for you.

Speaker 4 Best of all, you can listen for free.

Speaker 3 Download Pandora on the Apple App Store or Google Play and start hearing the soundtrack to your life.

Speaker 4 Welcome to Pod Save America. I'm Tommy Vitor.

Speaker 5 And I'm Jensaki.

Speaker 4 I am thrilled to be joined by my good friend, Jensaki, in studio in Los Angeles.

Speaker 5 I'm so happy to be here.

Speaker 4 It's great to see you.

Speaker 5 It's great to be here. First of all, you have a one-week-old baby?

Speaker 4 A one-week-old baby.

Speaker 4 One week and one-day old now.

Speaker 5 Eight days. It really matters in the beginning.
You count the days.

Speaker 4 Okay, so we have a 17-month-old and now an eight-day old. And just the difference in size.
Suddenly my daughter looks like a giant.

Speaker 5 Yes, it's so true. And seems very advanced.

Speaker 4 She talks a lot. She has a lot to say.

Speaker 5 Not walking very much. How does she like the baby?

Speaker 4 She sort of treats the baby like the dog, which is where we don't grip the hair. We pat, pat, pat.
Gentle. But sometimes pat, pat, pat is a little more like slap, slap, slap.
But we're doing good.

Speaker 4 I think I'm excited for him to have a big sister. Yeah.
Because I think big sisters are a good influence and big brothers can

Speaker 5 get you through. I will say, because you know, I'm a few years ahead of you on the children, but I have a big sister.
My daughter is eight and a half. My son is six.

Speaker 5 They're a little bit farther apart in age. It is the greatest combination because even now, if he's kind of having a meltdown, she'll be like, hey, buddy.
Hey, buddy.

Speaker 4 Take it.

Speaker 5 Calm down. You know, she's like a, she's like another, another little mom in the house.

Speaker 4 We love it. It sounds amazing.
Honestly, it's, it is wonderful. I'm so glad he's here.
And Hannah's doing great.

Speaker 4 Hannah, like, by the way, having a C-section and then bouncing back 24 hours later, like, I don't know how.

Speaker 5 No, been there. I don't know.

Speaker 5 She must be like a complete superhuman. I also think sleep deprivation is a real thing.
Nobody acknowledges. And when you have children, it is, that is the thing.

Speaker 4 Thank God for a couple nights in the NICU.

Speaker 4 Let us sleep. But anyway, everyone's happy, healthy.
We're home.

Speaker 4 Jen, as you guys know, has worked in top communications jobs in the Obama and Biden administration. She's the host of Inside with Jen Saki at MSNBC and the author of a new book, which I'm holding up.

Speaker 4 Say more. Thank you.
Lessons from Work, The White House, and the World. Thank you.

Speaker 5 You've lived through a number of these stories.

Speaker 4 You know, a lot of these stories felt very real. I was kind of there with you for some of them.
Yes.

Speaker 4 And I can't wait to talk about all of them. We got a great show, though, today.

Speaker 4 We're going to talk about the latest headlines from Michael Cohen's testimony in the New York hush money case, the way Trump is using a novel surrogate operation to get around his gas.

Speaker 4 That's such a diplomatic way of saying it.

Speaker 5 Must be your time in the NSC.

Speaker 4 He's inviting the dumbest people he knows to come hang out at the court, like Tommy Tuberville. That guy kills me.

Speaker 4 We're going to talk about the latest from Gaza, the challenge of public messaging about private diplomatic discussions, something Jen did a lot when she was the State Department spokesperson, especially with a government like Danyahoos, which we don't always agree with.

Speaker 4 And frankly, sometimes they want to pick a fight with us.

Speaker 4 We'll talk about an Axios report that Biden is in denial about bad polling and Jen's sense of kind of how information gets in and out of the Oval Office.

Speaker 4 But first, Jen, let's have a debate about debates. Shall we? Shall we? Because

Speaker 4 between when we woke up and when we produced this show, a lot has happened.

Speaker 5 I mean, between when we were texting about the show yesterday and this morning, like an earth of things happening.

Speaker 4 Entirely different schedule. Yeah, I have this huge ramifications for you on your show and MSNBC, for us here.
So there was a lot of skepticism skepticism about whether these two would debate it all.

Speaker 4 This morning, that all seems to have changed.

Speaker 5 I'm still a skeptic a little bit.

Speaker 4 I think it's well, it's well-held skepticism, but let's listen to a clip of President Biden.

Speaker 6 Donald Trump lost two debates to me in 2020. The sense that he hadn't shown up for debate.
Now he's acting like he wants to debate me again. Well, make my day, pal.
I'll even do it twice.

Speaker 6 So let's pick the dates, Donald. I hear you're free on Wednesdays.

Speaker 5 It sounds a little bit like the clip from Home Alone, a movie I've watched recently because of my kids. Great movie.
Make my day, buddy.

Speaker 4 Yeah. Yeah, a little dirty hairy.
I hear you're free on Wednesdays is very funny.

Speaker 4 That's when the trial is off. I liked that.
That was clever.

Speaker 5 Wednesdays, yeah.

Speaker 4 He's free.

Speaker 4 So then Trump went on Hugh Hewitt's radio show this morning and responded in classic Trump style. We'll hear a clip of that.

Speaker 7 You know, he's issuing it. I wonder whether or not he shows up.
Because, you know, he also challenged me to golf. So I'm a very good golfer.
He can't hit a ball 50 yards.

Speaker 7 He said, I'll give him three a side, but he knows he'll never play. This is sort of like that, I think.

Speaker 8 June and September would be great if you can agree on the size of the table and the moderators.

Speaker 7 Why don't you look at the statement? I just put out a statement. You should have it on your hot wires.
You get everything.

Speaker 4 Got to love those hot wires.

Speaker 5 They're golf hot wires. It's just like golf, isn't it? Debating in a presidential campaign.

Speaker 4 Just like a ground of golf. Give him three strokes in the debate course.
I don't know.

Speaker 4 Okay, so before we woke up to now, the two sides agreed to a debate on June 27th at CNN Studios in Atlanta with no audience, a VP debate in July, and then there's going to be another presidential debate on September 10th, hosted by ABC.

Speaker 4 The key detail here is these campaigns are now negotiating directly. They're circumventing the Commission on Presidential Debates, which has set the dates and ground rules since 1988.

Speaker 4 Hating on the commission has become a bipartisan sport in Washington. The RNC pulled out of the commission process in 2022 after saying it was biased.

Speaker 4 The Biden campaign criticized the commission's original proposal because they started the debates after early voting had begun and they prioritized in-person audiences over the people watching at home.

Speaker 4 So, Jen,

Speaker 4 what do you make of this debate, Curtis?

Speaker 5 Well, and then Trump also truthed, is that the term

Speaker 5 truthed about a Fox debate in October.

Speaker 4 A third debate.

Speaker 5 Right, which the Biden team, at least at the moment of our taping, has not agreed to. I'd be shocked if they do.

Speaker 5 But I think this is an interesting play by the Biden team. I mean, when he was asked by Howard Stern a couple of weeks ago, he said, yes, he would debate.
And I don't think he had another choice.

Speaker 5 He had to say that.

Speaker 5 Because if he hadn't said that, it would have sounded weak. And one of the challenges they have right now is this feeling of chaos and weakness.
A lot of these issues are so much more complicated.

Speaker 5 I know we'll dive into a lot of them, whether it is protests on college campuses, what's happening in the Middle East, even kind of Putin still being out there and crazy. But it feels chaotic.

Speaker 5 And I think, and it feels a little weak that he can't unilaterally make all of these things calm.

Speaker 5 And if he had said, I'm considering it, it would have fed into the sleepy Joe narrative that they've done a pretty good job of beating back post, of course, the drugs he apparently took, the night of the state of the union.

Speaker 5 Those did help, apparently.

Speaker 5 So they had to do that. This was interesting because it's now May.
It's hard to believe, but we're talking about a debate in June.

Speaker 4 June.

Speaker 5 We were just talking about how that feels stressful.

Speaker 4 How is that possible?

Speaker 5 Because you have to prep for it. But I think internally they knew that at some point this was going to hit ahead, and they were either going to be ahead of it or be responding to Trump.
That's right.

Speaker 5 So it was smart in that sense.

Speaker 5 I think it was also smart that they put out this letter of their criteria, which basically, I mean, none of this is on the level this entire election in many ways, in terms of how Trump is operating.

Speaker 5 But it did put the Trump team on their back feet where they had to just agree to that. If they tried to litigate things on there, they would have looked a little weak.

Speaker 4 That's right. Yeah.
I mean, also, like, I think doing this a little earlier, it just means it's less existential.

Speaker 5 Yeah. A June debate, I know, a thousand things could happen between

Speaker 5 July and kind of the end of the year.

Speaker 4 Yeah. And I know, like, I talked to some Biden people this morning.
I mean, they just had no confidence in the debate commission anymore. Yeah.
The commission completely screwed up in 2020.

Speaker 4 They let Trump ignore its policies on COVID testing and masking, which nearly infected President Biden.

Speaker 5 And if people watch that video now,

Speaker 5 it will just throw you off because Trump looks unwell.

Speaker 4 He looks unwell. And also, Melania just strolls in with the kids.
They're all unmasked. Melania tested positive five days later.

Speaker 4 So like they could have killed the current president of the United States before he was elected.

Speaker 4 I know that Biden's team also felt like the commission bent over backwards to create a schedule at this time that seemed advantageous to Trump because they were worried about enticing him into this process.

Speaker 5 Pulling him in, right? It was kind of on his game.

Speaker 5 So in a sense, they took control over it. Now, what's hard or not, I mean, you could argue it every which way is that that Trump could certainly say, I never agreed to those

Speaker 5 specifics in the letter. And he probably will.
And that's how this all falls apart. Right.
Even though he's basically said, I would debate him anywhere, anytime. So.

Speaker 4 And also, there is a huge question of who is going to be the moderator. Yes.
Trump will be like, I want the MyPillow guy, but I'll settle for like Sean Hannity.

Speaker 5 Well, in his Fox Truth, he put out, I believe, Brett Baertha. And Martha McCallum.

Speaker 4 Let me read the truth.

Speaker 4 This is what he said. Please let this truth serve to represent that I hereby accept debating crooked Joe Biden on Fox News.
The debate will be Wednesday, October 2nd.

Speaker 4 The host will be Brett Baer and Martha McCallum. Thank you, comma, DJT.

Speaker 5 Hereby, hereby. It was like he was doing an indoctrination or unveiling a scroll.
Yes, yes. Or something along with

Speaker 5 a proclamation. It's a little trickier at CNN and ABC

Speaker 5 because he's attacked probably all of those people. Oh, yeah.

Speaker 4 And you're going to get a real journalist there. Right.

Speaker 5 You'll get a real journalist who's going to ask tough questions. So it's a little bit different.
Yeah.

Speaker 4 So Trump also put in another truth, accepting this challenge, let's get ready to rumble. I'd be lying if I said the prospect of this debate doesn't make me a little anxious.

Speaker 4 Like these events play to his strength as an entertainer, a bullshitter. You know, sometimes sitting presidents get a little rusty, as we learned when Obama

Speaker 4 worked in the first of April.

Speaker 5 This 2012 debate, which I will just, as just like a slight aside, because you're referring to the first debate in 2012, which President Obama, who we both worked for, was not at his best. No.

Speaker 5 I think it's gentle to say. No.
It was not a good debate. Afterwards,

Speaker 5 I don't think he fully knew it wasn't a good debate afterwards. That's my recollection.

Speaker 5 So David Aksra, David Pluffett, to tell him, the next morning, I had the unenviable task of doing a round of the morning shows, including Fox.

Speaker 5 And I very distinctly remember a producer from Fox getting me the microphone and saying, good luck with the vipers out there.

Speaker 5 Because one, it was Fox, but two, it had been terrible, right?

Speaker 4 Yeah.

Speaker 5 No, I also remember Obama the next day, one, I said to him on the plane, yeah, how are you doing, sir? And he was like, I am great. And I was like, oh.

Speaker 4 Are you?

Speaker 5 Well, also, that's a strange thing. That wasn't really his vibe.
But then he gave one of the best stump speeches that day in Denver because I think his back was against the wall.

Speaker 5 And in many ways, it was a wake-up call. But yeah, presidents can be rusty.
So there's some risk. What's also interesting, though, is Trump in his truthing this morning, loves the truth.
Loves it.

Speaker 5 He's also talking about how Joe Biden is a terrible debater. Right.

Speaker 4 He's kind of lowering the bar here.

Speaker 5 Which is kind of, as you and I have done, when your boss is debating, you're like, he barely can write a sentence. I don't even know how he'll be able to deliver a line.

Speaker 5 It's remarkable he made it to the stage.

Speaker 4 I remember the Bush people said John Kerry was the best debater since Cicero. That was their line in 2004.
Yeah, Trump's like, I'm going to debate the shit out of this corpse.

Speaker 5 He's terrible. He's a terrible debater.
So there's that.

Speaker 5 It is a good sign, regardless of how this could fall apart, which I think is quite possible, that Ron Klain, who is the chief debater prepper, I don't even, he is, this is one of his many superpowers.

Speaker 4 Super Bowl, yeah.

Speaker 5 He has agreed to do the debate. I mean, he is very close to the president.
He's prepped nearly every candidate for this. He is a master of it.
So he's agreed to do it, which is a good sign.

Speaker 5 But there's still risks. Of course there are.

Speaker 4 Yeah, I mean, how do you prep for this besides like get your vaccines up to speed, I guess? Yeah, well

Speaker 4 at all.

Speaker 5 Yeah.

Speaker 5 There's a physicality of it. I mean, I keep thinking of the Clinton debates with Hillary Clinton.
And obviously Trump wouldn't do the same thing to Biden, but he's like looming in the background.

Speaker 5 He's looming in the background.

Speaker 5 I also think there is, and you can see the shift in how the Biden campaign has been attacking Trump versus how they did it four years ago, which I think is interesting because four years ago, it was a lot of like highbrow, we're for democracy,

Speaker 5 you're against democracy and there's some of that but they needle him more now um and they needle him on social media they needle him in posts they needle him in speeches and i think there'll be more of that so it's figuring out how to how to land the best needles yeah how to throw a punch land it well not look mean get under his skin i think is the key get under his skin yeah he was real pissed in that first debate last time remember like everyone remember they cut After the debate ended, they cut to Jake Tapper and Jake's like, that's the worst debate I've ever seen in my life.

Speaker 4 And that was like the consensus opinion from straight journalists.

Speaker 5 Yeah, well, now there's the question of debates, but do debates matter? Which we're not quite there. It's an important question.

Speaker 4 We'll find out. Yeah, we'll see.
Well, I think you're right, though. Like, look, this is probably not over this story, but exciting morning.
A lot happens. I don't know what happened today.
Yeah.

Speaker 4 A lot has also happened in New York, where we had former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen on the stand this week at the Hush Money trial.

Speaker 4 We learned that Trump personally directed Cohen to pay off off adult film star Stormy Daniels to cover up Trump's affair with her.

Speaker 4 We learned lots of detail about how Trump and Cohen disguised the payments by calling them retainer fees for legal work. They were not.

Speaker 4 Dan and John will get into all the details of the legal case later with special guest Norm Eisen, who taught us how to be a favorite.

Speaker 4 I know.

Speaker 5 I do love Norm Eisen. He has a new book out.

Speaker 4 He does have a new book out.

Speaker 5 Norm is just a nerdy, and I mean that in the best way possible. I love nerds.
I live in Washington, D.C.

Speaker 5 They're my neighbors and my friends.

Speaker 5 He'll be great. He'll get into all the legal eagleness of it all.

Speaker 4 In a town where sometimes people approach the job without a personality, Norm was the opposite. No idea.
You would hear him coming down the hall. He would make you laugh.
Like he's the best.

Speaker 4 But, Jen, so Trump has been flanked by all these special surprise guests.

Speaker 4 We had Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson. We had Alabama Senator and bona fide idiots Tommy Tubberville.
We had J.D. Vance, the Ohio Senator.

Speaker 4 Here's a clip of Speaker Johnson Johnson from outside the courthouse.

Speaker 9 I called President Trump and told him I wanted to be here myself to call out what is a travesty of justice. And I think everybody around the country can see that.

Speaker 9 President Trump is a friend, and I wanted to be here to support him.

Speaker 5 There's so much to unpack here. Where shall we start?

Speaker 4 Yeah. So what do you make of this, like

Speaker 4 surrogate operation support group? Like, what do we think we're doing here?

Speaker 5 Well, I mean, J.D. Vance was there.
Vivek Ramaswamy is coming. Tommy Tuberville, the gift that keeps on giving in the Senate.
Specifically to Mike Johnson, just for one second.

Speaker 5 Mike Johnson was called to be the speaker by God per his own description. Yet the moment he decides to be out there aggressively supporting President Trump in this manner is...

Speaker 5 him flying to New York City to stand by, not stand by his side and also defend him when the former president is sitting in a a courtroom because he paid hush money to a former adult film star and had an affair an alleged affair with her while his wife was pregnant right good defamation training by the way alleged alleged i heard it but

Speaker 5 is that is god calling you to do that is that so there's a whole hypocrisy thing there this man installed an app on his phone and his son's phone so they wouldn't watch porn called covenant eyes well that was now we sitting in this that was an initial flag that maybe we were going to come to this moment So in some ways, it's validating.

Speaker 5 What? But I would say overall,

Speaker 5 it tells you a lot about the Republican Party and Trump's ownership of the Republican Party. And this big question you guys talk about, I talk about of, is there a post-Trump?

Speaker 5 Well, you have the leading Republicans, people who want to be the vice president, but somebody who is the Speaker of the House, who have basically been saying Trump still won the 2020 election.

Speaker 5 Many of them have, not all, but many of them have, have been laying the groundwork to question the 2024 outcome, which I think people should not miss. Absolutely.
I mean, Lindsey Graham, Tim Scott.

Speaker 5 Tim Scott was pushed on this on Meet the Press a week or so ago, and he basically said, Kristen pushed him multiple times,

Speaker 5 that's my statement.

Speaker 5 It's like, your statement is you're not going to commit exactly to observing the outcome that the American people voted for. And this has now become a weird third litmus test to kind of show up.

Speaker 5 The New York City aspect of it is sort of funny to me because it's like all of these guys are like, we're not from the coasts, but here they are outside the courthouse in New York City.

Speaker 4 I know, desperate for press.

Speaker 5 Desperate for press. They they defend him and then they proudly clip their defense of him and put it on their social media platforms as if they're kind of delivering something to him.

Speaker 5 So it's become another litmus test. And that tells you so much about his ownership over the Republican Party.
And they're also, I will say, doing, and this is a norm question.

Speaker 5 We can throw it back to him. Doing what he can't do.
He can't can't say what they're saying because he would violate the gag order.

Speaker 5 They're all attacking the judge, the judge's daughter, Michael Cohen, jurors, people involved in the trial. If he did that, he would be fine.

Speaker 5 He doesn't seem to care that much, but he would be fined for it. They are like his thugs out there on his behalf.

Speaker 4 Yeah, it's a clever workaround for the gag order. I got to give him that.

Speaker 4 Yeah, and I do love that we're attacking a judge's daughter for working for Democrats, and no one seems to bat an eye at the fact that Aileen Cannon, who is presiding over the classified classified documents case in Mar-a-Lago, was given her job by Donald Trump, as are many of the justices who will rule on appeals, et cetera.

Speaker 5 And she's basically indefinitely dealt with.

Speaker 4 And she's like, hey, turns out I don't get any of this, so we're just going to wait is basically her latest ruling.

Speaker 4 I guess the question I have about this is around messaging, because you got Trump relentlessly calling this rigged and unfair and trying to just influence public opinion before a verdict.

Speaker 4 Do you think it's enough for Democrats to let the courtroom events speak for themselves, the evidence speak for itself?

Speaker 4 Or do we need like Chuck Schumer out there with a bullhorn counter-programming this thing?

Speaker 4 Well, it's just a funny visual. You can see it, right?

Speaker 5 It's a funny visual. I can definitely see it.
I do think that for Democrats at this point, the trial is going to play out in the next couple of weeks.

Speaker 5 There has been polling that suggests that if he is convicted, and there's a lot of things standing in the way of that, including a potential for a hung jury, if just one juror does not want to go along with the others, then that's sort of a different marking point to me.

Speaker 5 If they are out with bullhorns now, there is the risk, and I think this is a tough question, and I can understand all sides of the debate, I'll be honest, of that feeding into this fodder of like, this is a political trial when it's not a political trial.

Speaker 5 What I do think, and I've been thinking about in the last couple of weeks, I've been kind of surprised.

Speaker 5 I mean, I thought that the legal support for this, and from talking to a lot of lawyers and not myself, makes sense and that Bragg didn't get enough credit for that.

Speaker 5 But also I've been surprised, even though there hasn't been video cameras in the courtroom, which has been a real challenge in talking about, believe me, I do on television, you're like, this is what was said.

Speaker 5 Let me have a dramatic reading of what was said. It's not quite the same.
But is watching Stormy Daniels talk about how she blacked out while she was having sex with him.

Speaker 5 That combined not the same thing with the fact that he clearly, and also hearing Michael Cohen talk about his response when he said, well, how is this going upstairs?

Speaker 5 As in with your wife, and he basically said, I won't be on the market too long, combined with the fact that he also doesn't think women should make choices about their own health care.

Speaker 5 There is a total thematic disrespect for women. I don't know how you put that into one ad or one message, but I've been struck by how this trial has told us about his character.

Speaker 5 And that's not the legal case. The legal case is about documents.
Right. But it has told us about his character, not in a surprising way, but it has unearthed some things about it.

Speaker 4 You're right.

Speaker 4 And in part because of choices made by Trump's team, because they went in there denying in a court of law that they had this affair to begin with, that they ever had sex, which Stormy Daniels says isn't true.

Speaker 5 This is the opening statement of

Speaker 5 Todd Blanche.

Speaker 4 And so now they're getting all these lurid details out of Stormy Daniels about the events and how they went down to sort of paint a picture to the jury that says, not only did this happen, but this man is lying to you about it.

Speaker 5 It's completely. Exactly.
Which makes the whole surrogate brigade even more alarming. I mean, alarming is not even the right word.
This is all the last thing I'll say on that.

Speaker 5 I've just been thinking about that question for like the, this is what struck me the most about this week, is that these are the same people, Mike Johnson specifically, who helped him in 2020 and are basically raising their hand and saying, I'm happy to enable and help you challenge the outcome.

Speaker 5 I'm here standing outside the courthouse defending you in this very seedy, salacious situation. So I'm here, and I'm reporting for duty.
And that's it's kind of a potential replay.

Speaker 4 Yeah, and by reporting to duty, I mean to God because he wants me here.

Speaker 5 He's told me for some reason. God's told me to fly to New York City and be here.

Speaker 4 This logic I've constructed in my head.

Speaker 4 Yeah, so that's a mess. Okay, we're going to take a quick break.
When we come back, we are going to talk about the president's approach to Gaza.

Speaker 10 Hey, this is Will Arnett, host of Smartless. Smartless is a podcast with myself and Sean Hayes and Jason Bateman, where each week one of us reveals a mystery guest to the other two.

Speaker 10 We dive deep with guests that you love, like Bill Hayter, Selena Gomez, Jennifer Aniston, David Beckham, Kristen Stewart, and tons more.

Speaker 10 So join us for a genuinely improvised and authentic conversation filled with laughter and newfound knowledge to feed the smartless mind. Listen to Smartless Now on the Sirius XM app.

Speaker 10 Download it today.

Speaker 2 Dogs deserve the best, and that means fresh, healthy food. Unlike other brands, Ollie offers five flavors that are as nutritious as they are delicious, all made in U.S.

Speaker 2 kitchens without harmful fillers or preservatives. Head to Ollie.com, tell them all about your dog, and use code HappyPup to get 60% off your welcome kit with a bonus.

Speaker 2 You'll get a storage container for a mess-free experience. And it comes with a 30-day money-back guarantee if your dog doesn't lick the bowl clean.

Speaker 11 The Kia Sportage Turbo Hybrid has a full design, a spacious interior with 232 horsepower, and a 12.3-inch panoramic display to keep the adventure going and fit with the way you live.

Speaker 11 And with Sirius XM, every drive comes alive, bringing you closer to the music, sports, talk, and podcasts you love, right in your vehicle or on the Sirius XM app.

Speaker 11 Every Sirius XM-equipped Kia Sportage Turbo Hybrid includes a three-month trial subscription to SiriusXM, so the experience begins the moment you drive.

Speaker 11 Learn more at kia.com/slash forage dash hybrid, Kia movement that inspires.

Speaker 4 All right, gentlemen, let's turn to the war in Gaza, because I think the average news consumer in this country would probably have a hard time describing President Biden's policy at this point.

Speaker 4 Last week, we saw the Biden administration pause the delivery of 3,500 bombs to Gaza. In response to that, you saw these hysterical claims by Republicans that Biden is abandoning Israel.

Speaker 4 Like Tom Cotton said Biden had imposed an arms embargo on Israel, which is ludicrous.

Speaker 4 Then Tuesday, yesterday, the Biden administration told Congress that it was moving ahead with a billion-dollar arms package for the Israeli military, though Congress could block that.

Speaker 4 It's a long road ahead for that arms package. But you and I are kind of, we're geeks that follow this stuff closely.

Speaker 4 We could explain to you that what Biden paused was the delivery of 2,000-pound bombs, which should not be used in urban areas because they lead to mass casualties, and he's trying to prevent that from happening again.

Speaker 4 This other package is longer term. But how do you think Biden can message this to voters? Because the takeaway at the moment seems to be: okay, the left was really mad about this policy for a while.

Speaker 4 And now it seems like everyone is mad about the policy. And there's not a lot of clarity.

Speaker 5 Yeah.

Speaker 5 Well, as you just acknowledged, it's very difficult to communicate about diplomacy.

Speaker 5 I do think that in this case, the truth is not the worst thing in the sense of basically what he was doing, he's he's doing here um is trying to use the leverage of diplomacy the leverage of withholding military support to get them to change their behavior because he's saying the humanitarian crisis there and the potential for you to go and level rafa where more than a million people live is inhumane

Speaker 5 even that statement angers a lot of people for a range of reasons. I mean, one is, well, look what's already happened in Gaza.
Two is

Speaker 5 the Israeli people just lived through the worst terrorist attack on their soil on October 7th and hostages are still being held by Hamas.

Speaker 5 Three is, which I think is very valid, is leveling Rafa is not going to eliminate Hamas, which every intelligence official and nerds we still talk to will tell you.

Speaker 4 Including Israeli intelligence.

Speaker 5 Including Israeli intelligence. That also is not a message.

Speaker 5 What I just outlined, it was just an addition to your very useful explanation and context.

Speaker 5 though I do think that it is incumbent upon people like us who have lived through this to do our best to explain these parts because it is

Speaker 5 hard to understand. In terms of the messaging on it, I think that for him, he's got to get to a point where it's a couple of bullets, right? That's the only way to do it.

Speaker 5 And it's hard to do around this, which is something like,

Speaker 5 I recognize

Speaker 5 and honor the horror that Israel went through and

Speaker 5 what the Israeli people are still living through. And we will do everything to to get the hostages back.

Speaker 5 But this is an inhumane and far too aggressive military action. And we can't stand by, even as a supplier of their military assistance, to allow them to do this.

Speaker 5 That's not even quite it, but I think people need to understand where he's coming from from a moral standpoint. I think it's something along those lines.

Speaker 5 Now, the thing that's that's very challenging for them, and I've said publicly, it's interesting because I was asked about this on Colbert, and I basically said, I think they should have used leverage earlier.

Speaker 4 Yeah, me too.

Speaker 5 And what I meant by that, then people kept asking me follow-ups like, oh, you think he would have been helped politically? And I'm like, I'm actually not talking about the politics.

Speaker 5 I'm talking about leverage with the Israelis.

Speaker 5 But the politics of it are also very difficult to navigate, as you alluded to, in part because

Speaker 5 there's a generational shift on views of Israel, right?

Speaker 5 There is also widespread anti-Semitism across the country. I'm not saying the two are conflicting.
I'm just saying they're happening.

Speaker 5 They're both happening, right?

Speaker 5 And for the Biden administration, the challenge is trying to convey your moral concern about what you're seeing in Gaza while also acknowledging the real fear and legitimate fear of the rise of anti-Semitism felt by so many Jewish Americans.

Speaker 5 And it feels right now the debate has become so black and white that it has become like you can't be both.

Speaker 5 And I think that's a huge challenge for them.

Speaker 4 Yeah, it is frustrating how binary the debate has felt and become. I agree with you on the leverage early.

Speaker 4 I mean, for those like the current Israeli government is this coalition of Netanyahu's party and then some of the most like odious right-wing nationalist racist ministers who previously were not allowed to be a part of the government.

Speaker 5 Yes. And this is again a very nerdy part of the story, but an important one for people to contextually understand.

Speaker 5 The Israeli government, to your point, has become significantly more conservative, more pro-settlers, more militaristic than they were even 10 years ago.

Speaker 5 10 years ago, you had Zippy Livny, remember, and others

Speaker 5 and others who were more

Speaker 5 supportive of, say, at the time, Middle East peace negotiations and kind of finding a two-state solution. Those people are no longer in the coalition.

Speaker 5 And Netanyahu,

Speaker 5 who was very unpopular before October 7th, there were protests in the streets because of the overreach of judicial reforms, which by the way, sounds very similar to what's happening, potentially what happened here with Trump.

Speaker 5 He was very unpopular, is now, it's political survival for him. And so

Speaker 5 it's irrational. It's certainly immoral what he's doing with the use of military.

Speaker 5 But he's also dealing with a country that is reeling from the worst thing that has ever happened that has impacted Jewish people across the world.

Speaker 4 Right. Yeah.
I mean, you have Netanyahu with this political setup where if these right-wing ministers pull out of the government, it could topple the entire government. He's out of power.

Speaker 4 He could then face prosecution. So that's just sort of understanding his political.

Speaker 5 Political and judicial survival.

Speaker 4 Yes, judicial survival. You could go to jail for a bunch of corruption charges.

Speaker 4 You have an Israeli public that is understandably scarred and terrified and probably feeling, majorities feel like do whatever it takes to prevent this from happening again.

Speaker 4 And then you have a government, and we experienced this after 9-11, where the response from voters is like, do something. We don't care what it is, do something, show action, take action.

Speaker 4 And I think it's very hard to get people to understand that the action that's happening in Gaza right now, long term, is going to make Israelis less safe.

Speaker 4 And in the near term, is going to kill a lot of really innocent Palestinian civilians, kids, women, children, men. I mean, so

Speaker 4 I think the challenge from the beginning has been,

Speaker 4 I think it was inevitable that there would be disagreements on this policy. And the Biden approach.
Internally, too. Yeah.
Yeah.

Speaker 4 When the Biden approach was like, let's hug Bibi Netanyahu in public and then fight it out in private.

Speaker 4 And I think that was untenable because as challenging as the short-term issues are here about the military conflict in those disagreements, you alluded to the longer-term disagreements, which are, you know, Netanyahu doesn't believe in the creation of a Palestinian state.

Speaker 4 There's a disagreement over who should govern Gaza after the war is over. The Biden administration wants it to be the Palestinian authority.
Netanyahu has rejected that idea.

Speaker 4 So, you know, I think ultimately, like, you need your private and public messaging to align because A, it's going to leak out anyway.

Speaker 4 But B, I mean, Netanyahu might want to pick a fight with you publicly, and you have to be prepared for that.

Speaker 5 Which is what he's done in the past, including your Joe Biden.

Speaker 5 When Joe Biden went there as vice president in 2010 and there was an announcement of settlements, like as he landed in Israel, do you remember this?

Speaker 4 I'm sure you remember you lived it.

Speaker 5 Yeah, I mean, the other dynamics which make this even more complicated is, of course, there is a real threat from Iran. I mean, that's very fresh.

Speaker 5 And it's something where ensuring Israel is protected from that is a real thing, right? The other piece of this is the notion of like a two-state solution being just like an easy next step.

Speaker 5 I mean, I see a lot of, I understand what else are people going to say, but I lived through a year and a half of Middle East peace negotiations.

Speaker 5 Yes, when the Israeli government had more members of the coalition who were much more open to that,

Speaker 5 right? This is, that is a tremendous leap in order for that to happen. But yes, to your point, Tommy, I think they made a bet.
This is what happened.

Speaker 5 They made a bet, you said, I think, where if he could hug Netanyahu, that Netanyahu would moderate his behavior. That's not what happened.

Speaker 5 They made a bet that all of these negotiations by people we know and I tremendously respect, I think you do too, Brett McGurk, Bill Burns, and others, would result in a ceasefire and that keeping it just steady and keeping the relationship close publicly would help with that.

Speaker 5 That hasn't exactly been what resulted. Now, we don't know all the things happening behind the scenes.
That hasn't been what resulted. So it is easy in times to say they should have done this earlier.

Speaker 5 I do think in this case, when history books are written, you know, they may evaluate that as well.

Speaker 4 So last question on this. I mean, you worked in the State Department for a while.
You know, you have seen this diplomacy happening behind the scenes.

Speaker 4 Like, what do you think people should know about the conversations that are happening that they're not seeing, how the process works, why it feels so agonizingly slow to get to a ceasefire, to get to some sort of political combination with Hamas?

Speaker 5 I mean, one is that a lot of these parties don't talk directly to each other. And so that's an added time because the United States is an arbiter at times, as are other countries.

Speaker 5 You know, we don't talk directly to Iran except for periods of time when we sort of did.

Speaker 5 So the United States is an arbiter between these negotiations in many ways, talking to different players or talking to a third country that is talking to Hamas.

Speaker 4 Talking to Qatar, who's talking to Hamas.

Speaker 5 Talking to Qatar, who's talking to Hamas, or the Egyptians or others who are talking to Hamas and then also talking to the Israelis.

Speaker 5 These parties don't trust each other. So it's not like sitting down at a table and just saying, here's our proposal.
What do you think?

Speaker 5 It actually makes the whole thing about the debate seem quite simplistic,

Speaker 5 in many ways.

Speaker 5 In many ways. The third piece is similar to congressional negotiations.

Speaker 5 The intricacies and the details of what they're discussing in the room, even sometimes if one of those details becomes public, it can blow the whole thing up.

Speaker 5 Not because the press and the public doesn't have the right to know.

Speaker 5 It's actually because the parties, if all the parties know all the machinations involved and all of the people who have a stake in it, not necessarily even the parties in the room, it can blow the whole thing up.

Speaker 5 And so that's why it feels quite opaque. It's opaque on purpose.

Speaker 5 And that's why Bill Burns and Brett McGurk and others are so quiet, say nothing, because they're trying to work to a moment where even the slightest, you know, more aid getting through Egypt,

Speaker 5 a few more hostages released. Some of these developments feel incremental, but they're significant and the result of hours and hours and days and weeks of negotiations.

Speaker 4 Yeah, no, that's a really good point.

Speaker 4 And in the past, we've seen good faith actors and negotiations get close to deals, and then extremist groups like A Hamas will do something to try to blow up those talks on purpose.

Speaker 4 So those leaks can actually lead to outcomes where deals don't get done. One more thing before we get to the book, Jen.

Speaker 4 So there was a report in Axios on Tuesday that said President Biden and his top advisors don't actually believe the bad polling numbers we're seeing at outlets like the New York Times, which just dropped some pretty rough swing state polls.

Speaker 4 On some level, my reaction to this stuff is like, who gives a shit? It's May.

Speaker 4 But there is a broader debate that got kicked up on social media about whether President Biden's inner circle is too small, whether he's getting good information or outside information.

Speaker 4 You were the press secretary. You were in the Oval Office every day.
briefing President Biden, talking with him. How does information get to him?

Speaker 4 And like, what do you make of that criticism that the circle is too small?

Speaker 5 Well, I mean, I haven't, I left almost exactly two years ago.

Speaker 5 Wild and wild.

Speaker 5 So I haven't been there in the Oval Office meeting with him in that way in two years. But what my experience was, remember, I didn't come in as a member of the inner circle.

Speaker 5 I didn't work on the Biden campaign. I had worked for President Obama, of course, and of course, knew Vice President Biden through that, but not well.

Speaker 5 And so I came in as not a member of the inner circle. Brian Deese, a friend of ours, too, also same way.

Speaker 5 But both of us found ourselves people who were very much in the inner circle as a part of the briefing process and delivering information to the president.

Speaker 5 My experience was he had an appetite, and this is actually not dissimilar from President Obama. You're very cut off from the world as president.
I mean, poor you.

Speaker 5 You're in the Oval Office and you ring a bell and people bring you a soda or whatever. You can't take a walk.

Speaker 4 You can go to the city. You can't take a walk.
Talk to people.

Speaker 5 What he always wanted to know from me is like, what are reporters asking about? What are they talking about? Because he always felt like that was almost a connection to the outside world.

Speaker 5 When I was there, what would happen is we would have a morning meeting where we would go through what we called NOTD, News of the Day, a News of the Day document, Tommy.

Speaker 5 Like the most likely questions. And through that, you would kind of debate what you would say, what he would say.
But I never experienced withholding information from him.

Speaker 5 Also, he consumes information himself. Presidents today have iPads with news.
They have cable news. They have information.
My bet is he's asking them about the polls.

Speaker 5 And he has, even when I was there, would ask people, why aren't the polls moving? This is the question I also often get asked, right? Why aren't the polls moving?

Speaker 5 This guy's sitting in a courtroom, right? What's happening?

Speaker 5 On the specific New York Times Sienna poll, I mean, you and I have both been a part of like when you're in the war room of all the things on a campaign or in a White House and you're like, you're like, screw it.

Speaker 4 Yeah, you're good.

Speaker 5 Polls are terrible. And you have to do that emotionally on some level.
I've asked them about this because I've seen their pushback and their pushback makes some sense, right?

Speaker 5 You're going to be a reality about polls. One, I think it's not bad for Democrats to be kind of freaked out about the election.

Speaker 5 But this poll, one, a lot of of the numbers that are pushed out there most aggressively are not likely voters. Likely voters is really what matters in terms of the people, the measurement of it.

Speaker 5 Two, some of the New York Times reporting quotes people who are not even registered to vote.

Speaker 4 Oh, I didn't know that.

Speaker 5 Yes, who are not even registered to vote. It doesn't mean it massively, dramatically impacted the poll, but it is a little telling in how they reported it

Speaker 5 that said they voted in the past. You know, and three, I think for them, it's there are other polls that have happened that show the race much tighter, including in a number of these states.

Speaker 5 So I think they're just trying, and I understand this, to like lower the freak out temperature of people, right? And we've all, we've been there, both of us have been there.

Speaker 5 But in my experience, he got all the information and was more curious. He's kind of a political animal, like of why are the polls like that?

Speaker 5 Why is it saying, that's what I expect his, his question would be. Yeah.
Why is RFK getting 10 points in Wisconsin?

Speaker 4 What's going on there? How the hell did that happen? Yeah. I mean, even, I mean, what struck me, and I'm a total outsider here.

Speaker 4 I mean, even if he's not in denial about the polls or rejecting the information, I have noticed that when he's asked, he often responds to questions about polling, which let's just stipulate.

Speaker 4 Every question ever asked about a poll is annoying

Speaker 4 and kind of stupid. But he gets asked about these things and he says stuff like, oh, you're looking at the wrong polls, Jack, or he attacks the polling methodology.

Speaker 5 You're looking at the wrong polls, Jack.

Speaker 4 That's literally a quote.

Speaker 4 I think that's a direct quote. Do you think that's a strategy, or do you think that's something he believes?

Speaker 5 I think it's a strategy

Speaker 5 because he's somebody who does look at the data and does look at the numbers. Every president, every candidate denies they look at the polls.
They all pour over the polls. Like, come on, you know?

Speaker 5 But I think he knows that if he shows like, yeah, the polls are bad, I'm down.

Speaker 5 It projects weakness to people.

Speaker 5 And I think that's a real concern for them, as it is for kind of any candidate, but sort of a traditional, not you're looking at the wrong polls, Jack, but like, we don't even look at the polls right like yes you do you liar but like you know it's everybody says that so I think it's more a public

Speaker 4 strategy than it is how he actually feels and they have like tons of survey data coming into the office like private tons you're right internal data internal polls these thought bubbles of like what words are popping yeah all sorts of things infographics infographics Dan Pfeiffer stuff Dan had made the point that like whether or not they believe these polls and this data they're acting on it like they're campaigning in the key state.

Speaker 5 Well, that's the thing. It's sort of like one, you can't be under your desk in the fetal position on a campaign, even when you're 10 points down, because like, what's the point then?

Speaker 5 You're still trying to win. Why are we here? So you have to use it as a motivator.
And some of that motivator is sometimes like, F the pollsters and the New York Times coverage.

Speaker 5 And we've all been a part of that. These polls are not great for them.
I'm not trying to sugarcoat that. I do think there are some things about the reporting of it that I see their argument on.

Speaker 5 But you also have to use it as a motivator. And it doesn't mean you have to use it as a motivator publicly where you're like, we are crying internally, but we're going to be okay.

Speaker 5 You have to kind of project confidence. Otherwise, what are you doing?

Speaker 4 Yeah, no one's going to support you or donate or show up.

Speaker 4 Last thing on this, and I don't know why I just thought of it. Did you go to the barbecue that President Biden had for Katie Johnson, who is President Obama's personal secretary when she left the job?

Speaker 5 I don't think so.

Speaker 4 Okay, there's like a small group of us.

Speaker 4 She threw this, like 10 people went over there. It's the Naval Observatory.

Speaker 5 Was it fun?

Speaker 4 As we were driving in, I turned to whoever I was in the car with, might have been like Favreau and like retrailer or something.

Speaker 4 I was like, I want to get forehead to forehead contact before I leave this with Joe Biden.

Speaker 4 Cause one of the things he does is people, he gets like real close to voters and kind of like looks them in the eye from like negative inches away.

Speaker 4 Swear to God, within five minutes of being there, I had gotten forehead to forehead contact from Joe Biden during a story about like some horrible segregationist senator senator or something, whatever the fuck he was talking about.

Speaker 5 And I was like, wow. You're like, this happened.
I will tell you, I mean, from, because as I mentioned, I was new.

Speaker 5 And I actually, when I started talking to them about the press secretary job, I said, how am I going to do this job? I really don't know him well. You need to know him well.

Speaker 5 And they were like, you'll get along with him fine. It's going to be great.
And I was like, okay.

Speaker 5 But a couple of weeks into the job, I remember sitting in the Oval Office and I think to myself, I have to, I want to, I want to project to the press that I'm getting them information from him on his thinking, right?

Speaker 5 And you got to ask him the questions because that shows your relationship. And I said,

Speaker 5 sir, well, first I said, this is a weird thing to say to a president, which is always like once that comes out of your mouth, you're like, now I must continue my thought because I've already made it weird.

Speaker 5 And I said, but I feel like I've known you a long time because he has this way of like, pull up a chair. What's going on?

Speaker 5 And I said, sir, how are you doing? How are you sitting with kind of like the weight of the presidency? It was a very dramatic question looking back.

Speaker 5 And he was like, I feel good about that and the choices we've made. I can't find my socks

Speaker 5 because he has a hard time adapting to like people unpacking his

Speaker 4 valets and stuff.

Speaker 5 Right. It's like a different thing than he's existed in.
So, yes,

Speaker 5 the forehead-to-forehead, you know, handhold, we've all experienced that.

Speaker 4 Okay, we're going to take a quick break. But before we do, you guys know the stakes of the 2024 election.
Jen and I have been talking about it for like an hour now.

Speaker 4 And if you want to get involved, but you don't know where to start, we have got you covered. Join Vote Save America 2024, organize or else.
All you have to do is sign up.

Speaker 4 You get assigned a team, and you'll get matched with opportunities tailored to you and causes that you care about.

Speaker 4 Vote Save America will track how many calls you've made, texts you've sent, doors you've knocked, all of it as your team pursues the biggest prize of all, the continuation of American democracy.

Speaker 4 Go to votesaveamerica.com/slash 2024. Go now and get ready to organize organize or else.
This message has been paid for by Vote Save America.

Speaker 4 You can learn more at votesaveamerica.com and this ad has not been authorized by any candidate or candidates committee. When we come back, we're going to talk about Jen's new book, Say More.

Speaker 11 The Kia Sportage Turbo Hybrid has a bold design, a spacious interior with 232 horsepower, and a 12.3-inch panoramic display to keep the adventure going and fit with the way you live.

Speaker 11 And And with SiriusXM, every drive comes alive, bringing you closer to the music, sports, talk, and podcasts you love, right in your vehicle or on the Sirius XM app.

Speaker 11 Every Sirius XM-equipped Kia Sportage Turbo Hybrid includes a three-month trial subscription to SiriusXM, so the experience begins the moment you drive.

Speaker 11 Learn more at kia.com slash sportage dash hybrid. Kia movement that inspires.

Speaker 12 What is the secret to making great toast?

Speaker 5 Oh, you're just going to go in with the hard-hitting questions.

Speaker 12 I'm Dan Pashman from the Sporkfold. We like like to say it's not for foodies, it's for eaters.
We use food to learn about culture, history, and science.

Speaker 12 There was the time we looked into allegations of discrimination at bon appetite, or when I spent three years inventing a new pasta shape.

Speaker 4 It's a complex noodle that you've put together.

Speaker 12 Every episode of The Sporkful, you're going to learn something, feel something, and laugh.

Speaker 4 The Sporkful, get it wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaker 5 Hi everyone, it's Jensaki. I'm excited to tell you that my weekly show on MSNBC, Inside with Jensaki, is also available as a podcast.

Speaker 5 I know from the years I spent on campaign buses in foreign capitals and in the Oval Office that there's always more to a story under the surface.

Speaker 5 On my show, we try to bring you inside all of it, breaking down the things that matter and visiting with some of the most fascinating people in the news today.

Speaker 5 Search for Inside with Jensaki wherever you're listening and follow.

Speaker 4 All right, Jen, let's talk about your book, Say More, Lessons from Work, The White House, and the World, because it has tons and tons of fun stories from your time in politics that I think this audience is going to love.

Speaker 4 Let's start with a simple one. You write about the first time you met President Obama, then Senator Obama.
How'd it go?

Speaker 5 Well, Tommy, I don't know if you remember the first time you met President.

Speaker 4 You worked earlier.

Speaker 4 Horribly embarrassing, so I was hoping we could swap.

Speaker 5 Yes. So when I, you worked for him much earlier than I did.

Speaker 5 And John and I were talking last night about how actually when he gave that amazing speech in 2004, he and I were both backstage with the Kerry daughters who were fighting over who was going to introduce their dad at the convention, which really brings back.

Speaker 5 But that aside.

Speaker 5 I knew I wanted to work for President Obama from the moment I saw that speech.

Speaker 5 And then from when I saw, because I was working at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the response and reaction to him from all these people running for Congress who wanted him to come to their districts everywhere, everywhere.

Speaker 5 I knew I wanted to work for him. I actually turned down a job with the Clinton campaign before knowing I had a job with the Obama campaign.

Speaker 4 I turned down John Edwards.

Speaker 5 There you go. And I remember Dodge there.
And I was, and now this is like kind of a funny detail now. I was like very down the road in being Senator Menendez's communications director.

Speaker 4 I was

Speaker 5 down the road interviewing with him. And I called Robert Gibbs, who we love.

Speaker 4 Our mentor, our budget. Our mentor.

Speaker 5 And I said, listen, I make it a job. I make it a Senate.
comms director job. I have to know if I'm going to have a job.
I need to know soon. And he was like, oh, you have a job.

Speaker 5 Can you move here next week? You know, that's how it started.

Speaker 5 But anyway, long story short, about October of 2007, and I started working in February for the campaign, I was sent to Cincinnati, Ohio to staff him, meaning go with him to his events there.

Speaker 5 And I was waiting in his car when he was going to get off the plane from Chicago because, of course, as you know, they have you wait in the car so that they can get the motorcade going immediately.

Speaker 5 And I was so nervous in the car. I'd never weird.
You're like, it's weird. I'd never met him before.
It's Barack Obama. Are you kidding me?

Speaker 5 And he gets, and I thought to myself, what should I say to him? And he gets in the car and I said,

Speaker 5 you may be wondering who I am and why I'm in your car, which I thought was a pretty good line.

Speaker 5 It is a pretty good line.

Speaker 5 Then I immediately got like the handle of my bag caught on like part of the car and the entire contents of my bag spilled out onto Barack Obama, pens, makeup, tampons, all of the things to which you know him well.

Speaker 5 It was like very cerebral in his response, which was almost worse because you're like, this man thinks I'm crazy and and he will never want to see me again. Now, I worked for him for 10 years.

Speaker 5 He staffed him at nearly every political event he ever did. But

Speaker 5 yes, that was the beginning. That's great.

Speaker 4 I met him.

Speaker 4 By the way, when Robert Gibbs hired me on the 2004 Senate campaign, similar thing. I got a call.
I run out of restaurant and he's like, can you be in Chicago in a week? You're making X amount.

Speaker 4 I thought he said $25,000 a year. I was like, yup, sold.
Turns out it was $2,500 a month. So I got a raise on day one.
Good for you.

Speaker 5 It's so crazy to remember how much money we made. It was like not minimum wage.

Speaker 4 God, it was not good.

Speaker 4 And then when I met him finally, we had this office and like at night, the heat, the AC would go off at like five or something when normally. He was on the Senate campaign.
Yeah.

Speaker 4 And then it was like eight o'clock and I'm sitting, I'm like assembling press packs on the floor. I've like sweating through everything and my shoes off and he fucking walks in and that's my intro.

Speaker 4 I sit up and I'm like, hey.

Speaker 5 And you're like, I really wanted to think about this moment. And that was not what I envisioned.

Speaker 4 You think you're going going to say something profound? You did not.

Speaker 4 The time I met, sort of spent time with President Biden is right after we won in 2008, we had all gone out. I don't like, we had all gone out, out, out, like late.

Speaker 4 And I was so hungover, and I strolled into the office, and I think the only clean pants I had happened to be khakis. So I was like dressed kind of okay.
And I get a call from Fran.

Speaker 4 It's like, hey, can you jump in the VP's motorcade?

Speaker 4 to the airport. And I'm like, why?

Speaker 4 Why do you want me? And did I do something wrong? And I got in. It was me and

Speaker 4 Senator Kaufman. What's his first name? I forget.

Speaker 5 Ted. Ted Kaufman.

Speaker 4 And we rode, and I think President Biden just like talked about paper.

Speaker 4 You were in the car with the I think they were trying to hire me to be like in the VP staff

Speaker 4 or something. And I called it.
It was such an intense first meeting. Dude, it was great.

Speaker 5 I've never heard this story before.

Speaker 4 I called Gibbs later. I was like, what the fuck do I do? And he's like, just don't say a word.
And I didn't. I didn't talk for, I didn't say a word the whole time.

Speaker 5 I love that I think it was hungover

Speaker 4 probably it sounds like you may have been but also that's like a very intense way to meet the future vice president it was a lot uh and also in your book Jen you write about imposter syndrome oh yeah which is uh an affliction I too have suffered from my entire adult life I think it exists in all industries yeah but in politics it's especially weird because you're like oh this person can like invade countries or whatever President Obama.

Speaker 4 How did you get over it? Because I'll be honest, even today, I will see President Obama and I turn into the 23-year-old staffer with his shoes off on the floor. And I just like never feel

Speaker 5 normal. Same.
I feel the same way.

Speaker 5 I think, one, I wanted to talk about it in the book because one, people would be shocked to hear you have a version of imposter syndrome or many of the people I've talked to about this, right?

Speaker 5 Because I think especially for people who are earlier in their careers than you and I are, even though we are very young and hit bucks, obviously,

Speaker 5 it feels a little bit like none of us experience that self-doubt, mistakes.

Speaker 5 I still have that today, of course.

Speaker 5 And I think a lot of people, that would surprise people do. For me, it really took being forced to overcome it.

Speaker 5 And I tell the story in the book about how, you know, when we knew each other on the campaign, we knew each other before this.

Speaker 5 I gave you a tour of the Kerry campaign office and you decided to go work for this guy running for Senate. And I was like, that was dumb.
John Kerry is going to be president.

Speaker 5 I don't even know who that guy is. I was clearly, I was clearly off.

Speaker 4 I used to AOL-IMU when you were at the DCCC. You'd be like, how's it going over there?

Speaker 5 What's happening? Do people want Barack Obama?

Speaker 5 So it took me.

Speaker 5 You know, for the first couple of years of my time in the White House, I really felt like my best role was to be kind of a supporting player, not because people were demanding that upon me.

Speaker 5 In fact, to Robert Gibbs' credit, he got me into the Economic Daily briefing and pushed me into the room. Valley Jared pushed me a number of times.

Speaker 5 I worked for our friend Dan, who was like an amazing boss.

Speaker 5 But I felt that my security was most comfortable if I was like, I'll call back the reporter.

Speaker 4 I'll organize that thing.

Speaker 5 I'll write the memo. And the problem with that is that you never put your own voice into the discussion and your own strategic view.
And it's hard then to make a leap into being seen in that way.

Speaker 5 And it took really going back to work for President Obama in 2012 when Pluff called me

Speaker 5 about coming back to the campaign. And I was like, I must be in trouble.
And then I was like, wait, I don't work there anymore. I can't be in trouble.

Speaker 5 You know, this is like, Pluff is still my boss now. I'm like, what do you need me to do? So

Speaker 5 took him calling me and me going back to the campaign and asking Robert Gibbs, how am I going to get President Obama? There's no other choice. I'm the person from the campaign traveling with him.

Speaker 5 I mean, Pluff was going to travel sometimes. Jay Carney was, of course, but Jay was going to be, you know, in the weeds of like whatever regulations were being announced about a variety of things.

Speaker 5 It was my job to brief him on political stuff.

Speaker 5 How am I going to get him to take me seriously and not see me as this 27-year-old kid who dumped the contents of her purse on his lap, which I'm sure he didn't remember.

Speaker 5 I'm sure he definitely doesn't remember now because I've told this story. So now, who knows? But,

Speaker 5 but it took that and me asking him and him saying, just act like you belong there because you do. And a certain point, people will believe you, including you.

Speaker 5 It's not a fake until you make it in the sense like. You were very qualified for the jobs you did, as was I.

Speaker 5 But it is about pushing yourself to recognize you have to force yourself to be seen in the way you want to be seen and being a supporting actor and being a a wallflower in the room, I would be like, I don't want to go to that meeting with the president because I was like, I'm going to say something stupid.

Speaker 5 I would rather someone else go.

Speaker 5 And it's actually exhausting and paralyzing in many ways. So it really took that.
And the benefit, you know, as you know, I'd wanted to be the press secretary before I got the job for Biden.

Speaker 5 The benefit of doing it when I did is that, you know, you just get a little bit more comfortable in your own skin as you get older, right?

Speaker 5 There's something about like getting married, having kids, having perspective in life, becoming 40. There's nothing magical about that.

Speaker 5 But something about it that when I went back, I could smell the roses more.

Speaker 5 And I also recognized I need, it was incumbent upon me to show President Biden that like I, we could have a trusting relationship. I could give him tough feedback.
But I felt more prepared for that.

Speaker 5 Yeah.

Speaker 4 Well, you were. I mean, you had done like everything at that point.
You had been at the State Department, you'd been at the White House. I mean, of course,

Speaker 4 you were like the best prepared person to be press secretary that I could imagine given that experience. Thank you.

Speaker 4 But that doesn't make it easier to tell the President President of the United States, Barack Obama, that they're wrong. No.
And that they're wrong because your judgment tells them they're wrong.

Speaker 5 And recognize they may say, no, you're wrong. Right.
I mean, that's part of it.

Speaker 4 And you have to say, okay, you're the president. Cool.
Yeah.

Speaker 4 Well, let's talk about Afghanistan because I could tell in the book that that was just a searing experience for everybody that worked there, which is not to compare it to, you know, like the impact of the people who were killed or their families, but just, you know, being in the White White House at that time sounds really brutal.

Speaker 4 But you not only had to manage the communications around what was happening, you had to explain to President Biden why his meeting with some bereaved families, the families of the soldiers who'd been killed at Abbey Gate in that terrorist attack, had not gone well, why that meeting had gone badly.

Speaker 4 Can you tell that story and what that was like?

Speaker 5 Yeah, I mean, I wanted to tell that story for a couple of reasons.

Speaker 5 One is that even people who are well-intentioned, as President Biden is when he shares the story of his own personal loss, which he still gets emotional and choked up about, talking about the loss of Bo, the loss of his first wife and his daughter,

Speaker 5 that it doesn't mean it's always well received. And it's also up to the audience to determine how they receive it.
And in this case, you have these Gold Star families who had lost...

Speaker 5 It was the worst day of their lives, the worst thing that had ever happened to them ever in this attack on Abbey Gate, where they lost men and women who'd been serving our country.

Speaker 5 And even though President Biden's intention was good, it was not what they needed to hear. It was not what was healing them.
And for some of them,

Speaker 5 it was an affront. And they have the absolute right to feel that way.

Speaker 5 And it was my intention in telling that story to convey, one, that I had to give that feedback to President Biden because the New York Times was writing a story.

Speaker 5 And it was also important for him to know that. But how wounding that is when you're telling someone, you sharing the loss of your son is not something that is helping them heal.

Speaker 5 To his credit, what he said was, I thought I was helping them.

Speaker 5 But also my effort was to validate their experience and validate that even if it's not your intention, that that's their response is how they felt.

Speaker 5 Unfortunately, there was a couple of lines included in there about him looking at his watch that will be fixed in future versions of the book. It's not an important part of the story in the sense that

Speaker 5 my objective was to validate their feelings, nothing else. But it is important for people to understand that.

Speaker 5 You know, even as president, even as a CEO, even as somebody with the best intentions with somebody who's been through something difficult, that you have to really read the room and read the audience of the people you're talking to and allow them the space to feel how they feel about what you're conveying to them.

Speaker 4 Yeah. It sounded like, you know, even in that case, what's

Speaker 4 you're, you're sharing something that's so searing and so personally painful in an effort to make a connection. And to know that that failed, I imagine, was just.
incredibly difficult for him.

Speaker 5 Yeah, I almost thought, and I tell this in the book, but I almost thought that he had, that the phone line had dropped because he was so quiet in the moment as he was trying to digest what had happened.

Speaker 4 And he's a band who's experienced so much tragedy and is so generous about sharing his own pain if he thinks it will help others.

Speaker 4 Like, I know Ben Rhodes has a story where he was giving a West Wing tour to a family who had lost a child.

Speaker 4 And for those who don't know, I mean, when you do a West Wing tour, the staffers themselves give it. There's not like a tour guide that walks you around.
You're the one giving the tour to people.

Speaker 4 And Ben and this couple ran into President Biden. And Ben said, you know, that their story just kind of poured out of them, you know, and they were crying and they were telling him what happened.

Speaker 4 And he was sort of consoling them. And, you know, it's like seven o'clock at night, right? Usually these tours happen after we all had eaten dinner from the mess or whatever.

Speaker 4 And President Biden took 10, 15 minutes out of his day, the end of a long day, to just personally console this couple.

Speaker 4 And so Later, this couple sent Ben a note that was like, want you to know that that moment changed our lives. We were able to move on in a way we hadn't and heal in a way we hadn't.

Speaker 4 Can you please pass this message along to President Biden? So Ben relayed that to the vice president. 20 minutes later, Ben gets a call at his desk.
Hey, it's Joe Biden. Can you give me their number?

Speaker 4 I want to check in with you.

Speaker 4 And everyone has a story like that.

Speaker 5 There's so many stories like that.

Speaker 5 And that's important for people to know and understand, too, is that when people are going through grief and loss, there's no magical words that's going to change what they've been through.

Speaker 5 His sharing of his own personal story has helped so many people and his empathy.

Speaker 5 I mean, I, you know, there is this story from 2007 or eight, and I didn't know him at the time, but one of my husband's mentors, her grandson was dying of cancer. He was maybe 10 or 11.

Speaker 5 I don't remember the age. And on a trip to Ohio,

Speaker 5 she was a big Democratic activist.

Speaker 5 The vice president met the grandson and not just met him, he took him in his car to the plane, gave him a tour of the plane, spent all this time with him.

Speaker 5 Does that change the, of course, not, or the grief, but it also shows his empathy and his care. And that is really who he is.

Speaker 5 But I think he also recognizes, because I'm sure there are things that people have said to him over the years that didn't hit right and were well-intentioned, but weren't the right thing to say. Yeah.

Speaker 4 One of the hardest things about being a spokesperson in politics is that you get no leeway for making a mistake in good faith.

Speaker 4 If you convey inaccurate information, you're called a liar. Different people can have different recollections of the same event, as often happens.

Speaker 4 You wrote about a particularly tough case from your time with Senator Kerry, or then Secretary Kerry, that involved a military coup in Egypt and a yacht.

Speaker 4 Tell us a little bit more about that. It's never a good concern.
Never

Speaker 5 thinks, Tommy.

Speaker 5 Yes.

Speaker 5 One, it was a coup. Can we all just admit that now? I think we can.
I couldn't call it a coup at the time. I was caught on a hot mic.
I sucked for you.

Speaker 5 I was caught on a hot mic at the time saying like, these talking points are ridiculous.

Speaker 4 Were you truly? Yes.

Speaker 5 I can't keep saying this. These talking points are ridiculous.

Speaker 5 So it was July 3rd or 4th, right? Which is relevant mainly because this was all, the news was breaking when I was. at a July 4th event with friends, actually.
Kate Bettingfield, now,

Speaker 5 which is a long time good friend of mine. And this news was breaking.
I called

Speaker 5 some of Kerry's aides, traveling aides, to say, there's reporting that suggests he was on a yacht today when this coup was breaking.

Speaker 5 Now, just if we step back for a moment, a Secretary of State can do calls from anywhere and can do work from anywhere. And I should have, that's what we should have said.

Speaker 4 He wasn't going to rappel down into Cairo with a machine gun.

Speaker 5 But also, it was bad optically, let's be honest.

Speaker 5 So in the breakup of the phone call, I heard them say he was not on the yacht. Now, he was on the yacht, but I put out a statement saying he was not on the yacht.

Speaker 5 It became very clear the next day with photos that he was on the yacht. I had not intentionally, it was literally like bad phone connection, and I should have just checked with more people.

Speaker 5 At that moment, I was like, oh my, oh, God.

Speaker 5 And so.

Speaker 5 What I did was I called every single reporter I'd spoken to and apologized and said, this was not my intention, you know? And I also put out a statement falling on the sword. Now, Now,

Speaker 5 people attacked me, all the things that happens over the course of days.

Speaker 5 But I do think with the reporters, some of whom you and I know well, who can be tough and like all the things, I'd established credibility for years before that.

Speaker 5 They didn't think of me as some liar, right?

Speaker 5 And so that helped me in that moment, even though I put them in an awkward position, although I fell on the sword. So the point of that is like, You have to own up to your mistakes when you make them.

Speaker 5 We all make mistakes, you know, and they are hopefully unintentional. I like to think mine are, but in that moment, that's what I did.
And I thought the world was going to end and it didn't.

Speaker 4 Oh, look, I've been there. I mean, I remember there was an example when I was the NSC spokesman.
The U.S. had interdicted some weapon shipments from Iran to the Houthi rebels in Yemen.

Speaker 5 This already sounds really complicated and nerdy. And I'm a nerd.
I'm like, what?

Speaker 4 As one does. Yeah.
No, the Houthis, they've been, they're pretty hot on TikTok right now. There's some hot pirates.
Anyway, so somehow the details don't matter.

Speaker 4 That joke is going to hit with someone else like four people like ben and like one of them someone is gonna hit ben's roaring somewhere so the new york times hears about this interdiction of these weapons to the houthis they call me for comment i go ask john brennan about whether this happened who was the national security advisor to obama at the time john is like

Speaker 4 you have to get them to delay this report this will blow up all our work with the Yemeni government. It will undo years of counterterrorism work, blah, blah, blah.
So I'm like, okay, I'll do my job.

Speaker 4 I call a reporter back. He agrees.
I get him to delay. Like six hours later, the Yemeni Navy puts out a press release taking credit for this operation.

Speaker 4 And this guy calls me and is like, what the fuck? You lied to me. You screwed me, trashed me with his colleagues.
I don't think the guy ever talked to me again.

Speaker 4 I sent like five apology emails or whatever. And it's like, I just, I, I, to this day, I don't know what happened.
Yeah. But there's so much trust.

Speaker 4 Like, listen, I'm not saying that like people were spokespeople. Um,

Speaker 4 they don't have responsibility, but you have to put a lot of trust in the people around you to get good information that you then convey.

Speaker 4 And especially in national security jobs, like we were constantly told, try to get this reporter not to report on something about intercepted intelligence or whatever it might be.

Speaker 4 And like you have to believe that the person you're getting that steer from is trustworthy. And I think John Brennan is like the most trustworthy guy I worked with, by the way.

Speaker 4 I think something weird happened here. I don't think it was John's fault.
But also then the journalists have even less information than you do and they have to trust you.

Speaker 5 I know. There's so many layers of trust in the whole process.

Speaker 5 And it's, and you also have to make the calculation as a spokesperson.

Speaker 5 I mean, I was kind of generally a believer, unless it was like, because some of those examples you're talking about are like, if this is reported, it will put people's lives at risk, right?

Speaker 5 Things along those lines. That's a different category.

Speaker 5 I was of the belief most of the time in my time at the White House, which I can admit now, that if somebody had a story, just let them roll with the story. Yeah, I mean, good on you.

Speaker 5 Good on you, and you're good reporting, right?

Speaker 5 I'm never going to litigate people to, I never, I don't think, litigated people to the death of a story that they accurately reported, even if they were ahead of where we are.

Speaker 5 It can be a pain in the neck, but also that's what freedom of press is, by the way. And that's how democracy works.

Speaker 5 And so at that point, then you just have to manage the impact of it because they did good reporting.

Speaker 4 Good for them.

Speaker 4 One time, I think it was like the Wall Street Journal got a scoop that the U.S., we had conveyed some information to the Iranian government through the United Nations, through Susan Rice.

Speaker 4 So the journal had it.

Speaker 5 Our other channel. We always have channels and talking to people.

Speaker 4 We have lots of channels.

Speaker 14 Yeah.

Speaker 4 But you know how this goes. So one outlet gets a scoop.
Everybody else descends on you to confirm it. And with the New York Times in particular, it would be like eight reporters.

Speaker 4 You'd get big-footed seven different times. And like finally, David Sanger was the final boss who would like stomp on your head.
David Sanger is calling me.

Speaker 4 So Colleen Cooper calls. She's a great reporter from the Times, now covering the Pentagon.
Is like, hey, man, like, I got shit to do. I'm on deadline.
I know this happened.

Speaker 4 Can you just confirm it on background? And I'm like, sure. And she, and then she confirms it as a White House official instead of like the weasel words we normally use.

Speaker 4 And Susan Reyes calls me and is like, motherfucker, did you confirm this?

Speaker 5 Yeah.

Speaker 4 And I was like, I did. I'm really sorry.
I know I wasn't supposed to. Correct.
I did. Yeah.
Because it happened.

Speaker 5 Yeah. This is also part of credibility with reporters because I think over time, you develop a credibility with them because of that.

Speaker 5 And because you're like, you know, there's all sorts of language press people use. It's funny if you could throw yourself back into this.
Like,

Speaker 5 I can't confirm it, but I'm not going to steer you off it. So if you want to confirm it as like an

Speaker 5 on deep background, as an unnamed official, nobody's going to argue you're wrong. It's like a whole circle of stuff.
This is always true with personnel. Like I oversaw the war room for the transition.

Speaker 5 It was like there was a leak every day about some sort of person. But unless it's like somebody's life is at risk, right?

Speaker 5 And when there are negotiations that might topple, obviously that's a factor. But it does establish your credibility so that you can go back to them and be like, your story on this is wrong.

Speaker 5 And then they're like, oh, yeah, I remember the seven times you helped me out. Right.

Speaker 4 Well, and speaking of this sort of like need to know thing, you wrote about how Ron Klain, who was the chief of staff to President Biden,

Speaker 4 future debate prepper. Future debate prepper.
Informer. Informer and just a brilliant guy.

Speaker 4 But he had sort of a need to know approach to reading in spokespeople and information, meaning he would only tell tell you what you needed to know.

Speaker 4 Because I think you said Ron's theory of the case was like, it's too hard to disaggregate in your own mind what is public and private information. So might as well withhold the private information.

Speaker 4 And I read that and look, Ron's a great guy and he was trying to manage like an impossible to manage place.

Speaker 4 But I read that and it struck me as so wrong and frustrating because one, I always felt like press people don't leak for the same reason. Janitors don't throw shit on the floor.

Speaker 4 We're all mopping it up later, right? Right. And then two.
It's last people to leak press people right because like i don't want to have to deal with this yeah and then second

Speaker 5 you alluded to this earlier like reporters know if you are right into something and you have a relationship with the boss and are in the mix or you're just repeating talking points and like you just have less credibility if it's the latter totally and also the context of understanding things from being in the meeting and the discussion helps you be a better communicator you know it's not your job to read from a piece of paper it's your job to explain um

Speaker 5 Yeah, and to his credit, he just had a kind of an older school view of that. He's not the only one who's had that view over the course of time.

Speaker 5 I think there were some through the course of past administrations who had that view.

Speaker 5 I think I benefited from, as you benefited from, when you've been communicating about national security issues, as I did for two and a half years at the State Department, you fully understand how to hold back things that you can't share publicly.

Speaker 5 And I always felt that the days I was best was the days I fully understood the complete scope of an issue to the point where I, you know, I would like, and Jake actually understood this much in a more instinctual way.

Speaker 5 Yeah.

Speaker 5 Where I would not, I didn't, you don't invite yourself to meetings typically, but I would, I went to him a couple of, during a couple of moments like around Ukraine and Russia, around Afghanistan.

Speaker 5 I was like, I have to sit in these meetings. I'm not going to say anything.
He was like, you can say things. I'm like, I don't need to say anything.

Speaker 5 I'm like, I don't, I'm not going to say anything, but I need to understand the scope of what's happening because, because then I can help and I will always come back to you.

Speaker 5 And then what would happen, because sometimes these talking points go through a bureaucratic process that and they say nothing on the end, is I could go back to them and say, here are the five questions I'm going to be asked.

Speaker 5 Here's what I think I should say, right? Walk me back. Sometimes they did, sometimes they didn't.

Speaker 5 But there were times where I was like, I have to be in the room because otherwise I can't be effective at doing the job.

Speaker 4 Well, you talk about imposter syndrome, though.

Speaker 4 When you're literally sitting in a chair behind like the chairman of the Joint Chiefs and the Secretary of Defense and the, you know, Secretary of State. You're like, how did I get it?

Speaker 5 First of all, I don't tell this story in the book, although I do tell the story of ripping my pants in front of Barack Obama, not an extended version, which is a very embarrassing story.

Speaker 5 But there was one day, to your point, where I was, I had kind of invited myself. And I always said this to Jake, I'm not trying to invite myself.
He's like, you're welcome to come. It's fine.

Speaker 5 Stop being weird about it. Right.
But I went to a meeting that was, I think it was, I think it was related to. early days of Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
And it was an important meeting.

Speaker 5 I don't remember what it was about. And it started eight in the morning.
I go to the like ladies' room that's right near the sit room on the bottom floor and I realize I have split my pants.

Speaker 4 And I'm like,

Speaker 5 fuck, what am I going to do? And I was like, well, I'm not missing the meeting. So I'm going to figure it out.
I literally, it was like I had like a leaf structure.

Speaker 5 I had a binder, which I just like walked in front of myself into the sit room room and just like put it on top of my lap.

Speaker 5 And then even as we were chatting afterwards, I just was like holding the binder in front of me and my split pants.

Speaker 5 Now, the funny part of this, if that isn't funny enough, is Chairman Milley, if anybody doesn't know who he is, Google him.

Speaker 5 He would play himself in the version of the movie because no one more looks like the chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff, was sitting right across from me.

Speaker 5 And I was like, that man knows I split my pants. I can like feel it in his bushy eyebrow gaze.
So that happens. He has good intel.

Speaker 4 What? On the pants splitting?

Speaker 5 Well, I don't know, but he has that vibe to him.

Speaker 4 Yeah, he does have that vibe. That bathroom right by the sit room was always the site of the most awkward

Speaker 4 simulpeeing at a urinal. I remember one time I just...

Speaker 5 We didn't experience that in the same way.

Speaker 4 I was up there next to Dave Petraeus one time, and I'm like, how are you, sir? Hey, man. How are you? He literally goes, oh, I am having a great time.
Just started the CIA.

Speaker 4 I've got amazing authorities. If you ever have the chance to do this job, you should take it.

Speaker 4 What the fuck just happened?

Speaker 5 That's an intense engagement at the urinal.

Speaker 4 Yeah. That's right.
One of my best. All right.
I'm going way long. So I'm going to ask you a last question, Saki, because everyone should just buy the book.
Thank you.

Speaker 4 Say more because all these stories are in there and much more. You'll hear about Peter Doocy.
You'll hear about Jen being the subject of relentless Russian disinformation and propaganda.

Speaker 4 When she was at the State Department, that part actually really sucked. If someone asked us about like communications best practices 20 years ago, we probably would have said things like...

Speaker 4 Apologize when you're wrong. Mean it.
Don't ever lie. Answer questions directly.
Take tough questions from reporters. And then Trump comes along.
And he lies all the time. He never apologizes.

Speaker 4 He hides in like the Hugh Hewitt right-wing safe space and he got elected president and he's got a 50-50 chance of doing it again. Were we wrong?

Speaker 13 Is he special?

Speaker 4 Did the world change? Like, what do you make of this?

Speaker 5 Is he special? No.

Speaker 4 He's very special.

Speaker 5 You know, one, I think that

Speaker 5 as dangerous and dark as it is, his message is effective because it's been consistently the same since 2015.

Speaker 5 In a weird, more light way, Barack Obama is similar in that he was hope and change for many, many years. It was consistent.
People knew who he was. But Trump has been the guy,

Speaker 5 the aggrieved candidate who's running against the system and tearing apart the system since he announced his run for president. Consistency is effective.

Speaker 5 Simple message is effective, even as dark and dangerous as it is. Also, emotional message is effective.
He is tapping into people across the country who feel aggrieved. Millions do.

Speaker 5 The economy isn't working for for them. The system isn't working for them.
Government's hugely unpopular. All of those things.
No, he doesn't give a shit about you. He just cares about himself.

Speaker 5 He's really the aggrieved ones he cares about, but that message is effective. Emotional messaging is effective.
And this is where you and I lived through.

Speaker 5 I mean, when you were like negotiating about Hooties and what your story, you can just go down the nerd rabbit hole. I loved every moment of it.
I was doing economic messaging.

Speaker 5 And remember the early days where we communicated about data and GDP and

Speaker 5 bending the cost curve. I talk about that in the book too.

Speaker 5 That is not how people make decisions. They make decisions by emotions and how you make them feel.

Speaker 5 And Trump makes not everybody, he makes a lot of people feel scared for good reason, but he makes a certain percentage of the population feel heard.

Speaker 5 So I don't know if anything's massively changed as much as like the emotional appeal of communications is still a thing.

Speaker 4 Very well said. Jen Taki, great to see you.

Speaker 5 Thank you. Great to see you.

Speaker 4 Everyone should buy the book. Everyone should watch your show on MSNBC.
And love having you here.

Speaker 5 And we need to get you like more sleep and coffee. And congratulations on being a father of two.

Speaker 5 The relationship between them is the most magical thing, even if you want to curse everyone because you're not sleeping.

Speaker 4 We could not be happier. It was a very long, challenging road to get here, and it feels extra, extra special.
And we feel incredibly blessed.

Speaker 5 So, congratulations. Thank you.

Speaker 15 If you want to get ad-free episodes, exclusive content, and more, consider joining our Friends of the Pod subscription community at crooked.com slash friends.

Speaker 15 And if you're already doom scrolling, don't forget to follow us at Pod Save America on Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube for access to full episodes, bonus content, and more.

Speaker 14 Plus, if you're as opinionated as we are, consider dropping us a review.

Speaker 15 Pod Save America is a crooked media production. Our show is produced by Olivia Martinez and David Toledo.

Speaker 16 Our associate producers are Saul Rubin and Farah Safari. Kira Wakeem is our senior producer.

Speaker 15 Reed Sherlin is our executive producer.

Speaker 14 The show is mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick.

Speaker 15 Jordan Cantor is our sound engineer, with audio support from Kyle Seglin and Charlotte Landis. Writing support by Hallie Kiefer.
Madeleine Herringer is our head of news and programming.

Speaker 15 Matt DeGroote is our head of production. Andy Taft is our executive assistant.
Thanks to our digital team, Elijah Cohn, Haley Jones, Mia Kelman, David Toles, Kirill Pelaviv, and Molly Lobel.

Speaker 17 What's poppin' listeners? I'm Lacey Mosley, host of the podcast Scam Goddess, the show that's an ode to fraud and all those who practice it.

Speaker 17 Each week I talk with very special guests about the scammiest scammers of all time. Want to know about the fake heirs? We got them.
What about a career con man? We've got them too.

Speaker 17 Guys that will wine and dine you and then steal all your coins. Oh, you know they are represented because representation matters.

Speaker 17 I'm joined by guests like Nicole Beyer, Ira Madison III, Conan O'Brien, and more. Join the congregation and listen to Scam Goddess wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaker 4 The 2026 Chevy Equinox is more than an SUV. It's your Sunday tailgate and your parking lot snack bar.
Your lucky jersey, your chairs, and your big cooler fit perfectly in your even bigger cargo space.

Speaker 13 And when it's go time, your 11.3-inch diagonal touchscreen's got the playbook, the playlist, and the tech to stay a step ahead. It's more than an SUV.
It's your Equinox.

Speaker 13 Chevrolet, together let's drive.