No Evidence, No Problem: GOP Votes To Impeach (Live from San Jose!)

Speaker 1 The Kia Sportage Turbo Hybrid has a full design, a spacious interior with 232 horsepower, and a 12.3-inch panoramic display to keep the adventure going and fit with the way you live.

Speaker 1 And with SiriusXM, every drive comes alive, bringing you closer to the music, sports, talk, and podcasts you love, right in your vehicle or on the SiriusXM app.

Speaker 1 Every Sirius XM-equipped Kia Sportage Turbo Hybrid includes a three-month trial subscription to SiriusXM, so the experience begins the moment you drive.

Speaker 1 Learn more at kia.com/slash fortage dash hybrid, Kia movement that inspires.

Speaker 2 At 1-800Flowers.com, we know that connections are at the heart of being human. Whether celebrating life's joys or comforting during tough times, 1-800 Flowers helps you express what words can't.

Speaker 2 For nearly 50 years, millions have trusted 1-800 Flowers to deliver thoughtful gifts that help create lasting bonds. Because it's more than just a gift, it's your way of showing you care.

Speaker 2 Visit 1-800flowers.com/slash SXM and connect today. That's 1-800Flowers.com/slash slash SXM.

Speaker 3 Hey, everybody.

Speaker 3 Welcome to Pod Save America.

Speaker 4 I'm Tommy Vitor.

Speaker 5 I'm John Favreau.

Speaker 4 I'm a Disa Domestic.

Speaker 7 I'm John Lovett.

Speaker 8 I'm Dan Pfeiffer.

Speaker 4 Jon Favreau can't be here tonight because he and his wife Emily are expecting a baby any day now, which is

Speaker 4 very exciting. We're excited for him.
Of course, we'll miss him, but we have a great show for you guys. We are so excited to have Adisu joining us tonight.

Speaker 3 Adisu

Speaker 4 who managed Corey Booker's campaign, your governor, Gavin Newsom's campaign of 2018, worked for Obama, Clinton, lots of folks. We're thrilled to have them.

Speaker 3 Our first guest is the youngest member of the California Assembly, Alex Lee. So give it up for Alex.

Speaker 3 And then for our second news section, we're going to try something a little different.

Speaker 4 We're going to focus on the intersection of tech and politics.

Speaker 4 And we'll be joined by Zoe Schiffer, a fantastic tech reporter from Platformer who's going to help us make sense of this town you guys call home. Yeah.

Speaker 3 So you guys can applaud while you try to pretend you don't have your fucking day jobs.

Speaker 5 Say they!

Speaker 4 But first, after a year-long investigation into vague and unfounded claims, House Republicans voted today to formally launch an impeachment inquiry into President Biden.

Speaker 9 Boo for that.

Speaker 4 It was a party-line vote. All Republicans voted yes, all Democrats voted no.
You get the concept.

Speaker 4 As a reminder, Republicans haven't stated the official charges they want to bring against Biden, and they haven't proven any allegations, but that didn't slow them down.

Speaker 4 Here's Republican Senator Chuck Grassley talking about this open and shut case.

Speaker 10 I have no evidence of it, and I'm going to just follow the facts where they are, and the facts haven't taken me to that point where I can say that the president's guilty of anything.

Speaker 4 They got him, guys.

Speaker 4 In related news, Hunter Biden was subpoenaed by Republicans who demanded he appear today in front of the House Oversight Committee hearing and a closed-door deposition.

Speaker 4 Instead, Hunter defied that subpoena and held his own press conference outside the Capitol, where he said he would only testify publicly so Republicans can't cherry pick and leak his testimony.

Speaker 4 So, Dan, it's tempting to treat this impeachment inquiry as a joke because the process is so clearly politicized. But let's talk about what happens next in the political risks here for Biden.

Speaker 4 How do you think Biden's team figures out how to respond to this impeachment inquiry? And what would you be worried about most if you had your old White House job?

Speaker 8 I would just note that everyone here just cheered the defiance of a subpoena.

Speaker 8 We were here in 2019, right about the time Mark Meadows was defying a subpoena and Trump's impeachment. No one applauded that.
I'll tell you that right now.

Speaker 3 No, this was this, the show we did in San Jose in 2019 was the opening of Trump's first impeachment inquiry. Nice.
And you guys had a much different take.

Speaker 8 So I think this impeachment inquiry, like so much Republican politics over the last decade or so, is just like one really unfunny joke.

Speaker 8 But if I was in the White House, I don't know that I would be worried about this. I might be excited about it.
I think if I was sitting in my old office,

Speaker 8 what I would try to convince the president to do, and I understand why he would not do this, because this is obviously very personal to him. This is about his son.

Speaker 8 But from a purely political perspective, I would spend every single day beating the the Republicans up for this, right?

Speaker 8 There's nothing Joe Biden could use more right now than a fight with a bunch of extremist, unpopular Republicans, and that's exactly what this house is.

Speaker 8 And so, like, what I would, I would go out every day. I would say, here are the things I'm working on.
Here's what they're doing instead. I would do press conferences.

Speaker 8 I mean, if I really wanted to play a big card, I would do a joint, I would call for a joint session of Congress, go up there, say, here are the things, here's my agenda to lower your costs and raise your wages.

Speaker 8 And what are you doing instead of that? Take them on, make them pay for this. This is a huge political mistake on their part.

Speaker 8 And be aggressive about it. Like,

Speaker 8 there's, I think a big, huge fight with these people, with these Republicans, would do Joe Biden so much political good right now. And they've given him a gift and he should take it.

Speaker 4 Well said. Speaking of gifts.
Let's watch a clip of CNN's Jake Tapper interviewing the Republican House Oversight Committee Chairman, James Comer.

Speaker 12 And my concern is that Weiss may have

Speaker 12 indicted Hunter Biden to protect him from having to be deposed

Speaker 12 in the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday.

Speaker 13 He indicted him to protect him.

Speaker 5 Yes.

Speaker 3 The classic rubric.

Speaker 13 He indicted him to protect him.

Speaker 12 I got it. Well, look,

Speaker 12 this whole thing's been about a cover-up. You know, you've got two.

Speaker 13 That's why he indicted him to protect him, to cover it up.

Speaker 8 I love Jake, man.

Speaker 5 Wow.

Speaker 4 I love not having to deal with Jake as a flack. Love it.

Speaker 4 Obviously, no president wants to get impeached, but history suggests that the political impact of impeachment is not necessarily a given, right?

Speaker 3 Yeah. I mean, look,

Speaker 3 the crimes are supposed to lead to the impeachment. The impeachment isn't supposed to lead to the crimes.

Speaker 3 So they fucked that up. They got the order wrong.

Speaker 3 Huge blunder.

Speaker 3 You know, I do think that, like, the point Dan's making is really important because I think people have a lot of assumptions or they've sort of taken a lot of conventional wisdom about what impeachment means, but impeachment means exactly what we fight to make it mean.

Speaker 3 I think there are people that say, oh, you know, Bill Clinton's approval ratings went up, but you could, you know, tell that to President Al Gore.

Speaker 3 You know.

Speaker 3 Donald Trump, you know, oh, all of these accusations, impeachment, it washed right off of him, did it? Or did those weeks of attention hurt him politically in that moment?

Speaker 3 And we have the memories of fucking goldfish.

Speaker 3 I think that there's sort of

Speaker 3 two ways to think about it, and I think one actually does have a pitfall that we should just be cognizant of, which is we should not be in the position as Democrats of defending kind of quotidian corruption in Washington.

Speaker 3 Like, I don't think there's anything to be bashful about when you just say, look, Hunter Biden seems like he's quite a sleaze, but they're trying to

Speaker 3 attack Joe Biden for committing the sin of loving his fuck up son. And I think a lot of Americans have fuck up kids and they have fuck-up relatives and we all know

Speaker 3 that

Speaker 3 it's the act of a good person to try to find a way to love that person even when they're fucking up and dragging your name through the mud.

Speaker 3 I'd rather be that than anyone going out of their way to pretend that like some of the shit that goes on in DC, including Republican members of Congress and what their spouses do and what their family members do to trade off the names of their own politicians, I think is worth keeping in mind.

Speaker 3 Beyond that, you know, Hunter Biden thinks he's going to have some kind of moment in a press conference where he's like, have you no decency, sir? I'm not sold on that.

Speaker 3 I'm not excited for his public hearing any more than I was excited about his private hearing.

Speaker 5 I want to say something.

Speaker 8 Is this the joke, Baxter?

Speaker 5 We finally found the joke. He's not ready to tell.

Speaker 3 Here's what I would say.

Speaker 5 Look,

Speaker 3 I would say to Hunter Biden the same thing I would say to George W. Bush or Hitler, which is stick to painting.

Speaker 4 Leaving space to cut that.

Speaker 4 Well, there's a piece of this that's like purely financial, right? And then there's the piece of this that's about Hunter Biden's addictions.

Speaker 4 And he's been very honest about his struggles with addiction.

Speaker 4 And I think if Republicans had the discipline to focus solely on the financial piece of this and the way he potentially used his father's position in office to make money, that would be one thing.

Speaker 4 But we know they don't have any discipline and they're attacking him for addiction problems.

Speaker 4 And I don't know anybody, there's nobody in this country who doesn't have a friend or a relative or someone they care about generally who hasn't struggled with addiction.

Speaker 4 So I do think that's a real risk for Republicans. But Edisu, so even if we concede that getting impeached during an election year is not ideal, Donald Trump has been charged in four criminal cases.

Speaker 4 He was impeached twice, by the way. Do you think voters will see the criminal cases as materially different?

Speaker 5 Well, first, I will concede that

Speaker 5 nobody wants to get impeached, but I'm not going to concede that this impeachment is actually going to happen.

Speaker 5 You know, we only need three or four Republicans to realize it's political suicide

Speaker 5 to vote for this,

Speaker 5 for them to, the article's never to actually come to fruition. So, this inquiry is going to take place.
I think, to your point, Dan, there actually

Speaker 5 will be a moment for the president to stand up there in the State of the Union whenever it comes

Speaker 5 towards the beginning of the year. But

Speaker 5 I'm not sure it's actually going to happen.

Speaker 5 With that said, there is something materially different between the Trump indictments and this Biden impeachment inquiry, and that is that one is bullshit and the other is actually based on facts.

Speaker 5 And

Speaker 5 the reality, I think, here is that the Republicans are trying to blur the line between reality and fantasy, and we can't allow them to do that.

Speaker 5 We can't allow them to do it because talking about this and talking about indictments and impeachments together is actually going to serve their purposes, as it were. And

Speaker 5 they know that this is bullshit, right? You showed the clip from Chuck Grassley.

Speaker 5 I took a quote that I pulled up here from Chief Clown Matt Gates, who called Comer and Johnson's investigations failure theater.

Speaker 5 Fox News' chief clown, Brian Killemead, called the impeachment ridiculous and a waste of time.

Speaker 5 Ken Buck, a Republican congressman, wrote in the Washington Post in September that Republicans in the House who are itching for an impeachment are relying on an imagined history.

Speaker 5 They know this is bullshit.

Speaker 5 And I think voters, to answer your question, voters are smarter than we give them credit for sometimes, particularly the voters that I think we need to stay on our side or come back to our side next year.

Speaker 5 Voters of color, college-educated voters in the suburbs. And once indictments turn to trials, turn to potentially convictions, I think the difference is going to be clear.

Speaker 5 But these are not the same thing. One is based in evidence and one is based in absolute fiction.

Speaker 3 Yeah, there's just no doubt that, like,

Speaker 3 if you're one of the dozen or so Republicans who won in Biden districts, that you are deeply unpleased. Yeah.

Speaker 3 You're deeply unhappy with this situation. This is not what you want to be talking about.
It's not what you want to be answering questions about. This is not what you want to be dealing with.

Speaker 3 And yet...

Speaker 5 They all fucking voted for it today, right?

Speaker 8 Including Ken Buck, who wrote that op-ed.

Speaker 8 The ink was not dry on that op-ed when he turned around and voted for the thing that he said he was not going to vote for in the Washington Post.

Speaker 5 Maybe it is actually very believable. Yeah, it's very believable.

Speaker 4 You forgot about my guy, Dusty Johnson from South Dakota, who said, there's not evidence to impeach.

Speaker 4 I don't like the stonewalling the administration has done, but listen, if we don't have the receipts, then that should constrain what the House does.

Speaker 4 You guys know I've been hard on Dusty Johnson in the past, but that's a pretty solid quote.

Speaker 3 I don't listen to you. I just wait for my turn to talk.

Speaker 4 I just think that's a funny name.

Speaker 5 All right, I love it.

Speaker 3 So Hunter Biden is refusing to sit for this private deposition.

Speaker 4 He's instead demanding that he be allowed to testify publicly.

Speaker 4 During a press conference Wednesday, he said, quote, Republicans do not want an open process where Americans can see their tactics, expose their baseless inquiry, or hear what I have to say.

Speaker 4 What are they afraid of? I'm here. I'm ready.
What do you think of this high-stakes game of political chicken?

Speaker 3 Here's what I think. I think he's making a lot of good points.
I'd like someone else to make those points.

Speaker 3 Like, this idea that we're heading to a big confrontation where Hunter Biden's going to clear his name, that's not how this this goes.

Speaker 3 I would like him to answer questions from Republicans the way those college professors answered the questions from Elise Stefanik.

Speaker 3 Like, loyalty, cold, and dead, just quiet, fucking, shitty, boring answers.

Speaker 3 We have to make the argument that everyone's talking about, right? That like Republicans are in, are, you know, Joe Biden is president as an antidote to Republican chaos, extremism, and corruption.

Speaker 3 This impeachment inquiry is a distraction from that fight, that Joe Biden's success as president is not something Republicans can run against.

Speaker 3 What they can run against is trumped-up charges, efforts to do what Comer is doing, which is, if you watch Comer, he has been doing these interviews with Jake Tapper for literally a year now, and he goes on and he talks in that fucking high-pitched Southern accent for 15 minutes, never saying a goddamn thing while Jake smirks and smiles and says you don't have anything.

Speaker 3 But Comer doesn't care because they're doing what they did with Benghazi.

Speaker 3 They're doing what they've done over the years to try to make it, to just, even if there's no fire, they're going to do everything they can to create the to create the illusion of smoke.

Speaker 3 So our job is to fight that. What Hunter Biden does, I don't really care.
I would like it to be quiet and in his own home is how I feel about it.

Speaker 8 I think it's worth talking for a second about why they're doing this, right?

Speaker 8 Like, how did it, like, there are, as Tommy and Lovett just mentioned, 18 Republicans who are in districts that Joe Biden won.

Speaker 8 And that number is actually probably going to go up because New York, there's a court case in New York and New York is going to redraw its districts. So a bunch of these

Speaker 8 we have cheered subpoena defiance and gerrymandering

Speaker 5 my health.

Speaker 3 But when we do it, it's good.

Speaker 8 The

Speaker 8 short-term political imperative for why they're doing this is there's a the law of Republican physics is if you do one sane thing, which is what the Republicans did when they voted to prevent the government from shutting down, you have to do one much bigger, much more insane thing, and that is this impeachment.

Speaker 8 Now, there's not, like, Edison was right, there may be a chance they will never vote to actually

Speaker 8 impeach Joe Biden, but they want to keep the investigation going the entire time so that there can be some level of suspicion and suspicion in a political environment where the overwhelming majority of Americans think most politicians are corrupt.

Speaker 8 And, you know, one thing that we, you know, in the Republic, in the impeachment of Donald Trump, there were all these subpoenas that were never actually enforced because the Democrats were on a clock.

Speaker 8 They were trying to get it done quickly, so they never pushed it to the envelope or they would force there to be, go all the way up to the Supreme Court some of these subpoenas.

Speaker 8 Republicans would now have a year or 11 months to try to do that. And that's what they're hoping for, is to just keep this out there.

Speaker 8 Maybe they find something that is totally unrelated to Hunter Biden that can be some moment in the campaign. Hillary Clinton's emails did not come from an investigation into her email protocol.

Speaker 8 It came from an investigation into a totally bullshit special committee investigation into Benghazi.

Speaker 3 Yeah, and the Bill Clinton impeachment grew out of a decade-older investigation out of white water.

Speaker 3 The other thing, too, just part of the reason they've pursued this specific investigation is Donald Trump ran an incredibly corrupt White House where his family members profited off the administration, where people who were working for him were doing shady fucking shit to position themselves to get, say, $2 billion from the Saudis after they left office.

Speaker 3 This is also about neutralizing a critique of Donald Trump to try to stir up something that seems to have the contours of the kind of corruption that actually took place when Donald Trump was president.

Speaker 3 That is what they're trying to do with Hunter Biden. That is what they were trying to do when Donald Trump says Joe Biden is a threat to democracy.
It is the I'm Rubber Your Glue 2024 campaign.

Speaker 3 And I, and

Speaker 5 I,

Speaker 5 Dolly, only thing I would add is, obviously we're talking about this because this happened today on Capitol Hill. It's it's news.

Speaker 5 But one of the things for the listeners, for the folks in the audience, like they want us to keep talking about this because it takes up space from all the other things we could be talking about, not just about things that President Biden or Democrats have done in Washington or elsewhere, but the things that Trump did in the past and will potentially do if he becomes president again.

Speaker 5 And so some of this is just about taking up oxygen and making sure that, you know, we're, they, well, they did it to Trump, so they're going to do it to Biden, impeachment, impeachment, and try to get voters out there who are paying less attention than the listeners of the people in the audience to just say, throw up their hand and say they're all the same.

Speaker 5 And so I think it's incumbent a little bit upon us to, sure, talk about it.

Speaker 5 It's important, you know, news of the day, but also like not to let this become the defining issue of the next six months because it's probably not a good place for us to be fighting this election, especially when Trump becomes the nominee in a couple of weeks.

Speaker 8 I don't know. I mean, yes, I don't think we want to spend the next six months on this, but I think they are going to want to have this vote.
They did very little press on the vote.

Speaker 8 They're not going to talk. They did it.
There's a reason they did it right before they went home for the holidays, right? Just to get it done with.

Speaker 8 Now, none of them have to get cornered by Jake Sherman in the hallway of the Capitol and answer for this. They're not going to see voters for weeks.

Speaker 8 They want to keep this kind of a little bit under the radar. Like they're going to go on Fox News and talk about it.
They'll be on Newsmax. I want anyone else to know about it.

Speaker 8 This is why I think that it's worth having a fight over this. And there are political merits to having the fight.

Speaker 8 Like, there's going to be a moment where Donald Trump's a nominee and we're going to pivot hard, and that is going to be the thing.

Speaker 8 The next few months, there's nothing that would be better for, in my view, for Joe Biden's political standing than to get Democrats angry at Republicans.

Speaker 8 And this worked for Donald Trump because Donald Trump's poll numbers, we all cheered that day in December of 2019 when that impeachment was filed.

Speaker 8 Donald Trump's poll numbers went up over the course of that for two reasons. One is his numbers, his approval rating among Republicans went from 80% to 90%.

Speaker 8 So that jumped his approval rating up significantly.

Speaker 8 And it is one of the only times Donald Trump has ever been above 50% with independents in the entire time of his presidency was when the Democrats were impeaching him because the voters thought that that was not what Congress should be spending their time on.

Speaker 8 Yeah. And so to your point, they want to make it about something.
We should make it about something else. And we should have that argument.
We should have it loudly.

Speaker 5 Yeah, maybe it's about not debating the facts. Oh, yes.

Speaker 5 That should be more interesting.

Speaker 8 Exactly.

Speaker 5 That is exactly.

Speaker 5 We shouldn't be debating it. If we're talking details, if you're explaining you're losing is like super extra true.

Speaker 5 Very true in this one. Biden impeachment.

Speaker 4 Yeah. Now, what the voters, if you ask an open-ended question to voters, what are the most important issues facing the U.S.?

Speaker 4 It's inflation, immigration, democracy, like those are the things they want us to focus on.

Speaker 4 Biden has to make the case that this impeachment inquiry is politicized and it's happening because Donald Trump, their MC, said Democrats did this to me, so now you have to do it to them.

Speaker 4 But But Odyssey, for a while, I mean, the reason we know the politics of this are a little unsteady for Republicans is because for a while they were hesitant about impeachment.

Speaker 4 It was the Marjorie Taylor Greens of the world pushing for it while the kind of normal elements of the caucus were saying, I don't know that we have the evidence yet. Now the support is unanimous.

Speaker 4 What do you think changed to get us here?

Speaker 5 I think Republican congressmen are more afraid of Donald Trump and the MAGA base than they are of anything else. And

Speaker 5 when the rubber meets the road, that's where they go. And luckily, next November, we're going to have a chance in those 17 districts or 18 or however many there'll be to show them the opposite.

Speaker 5 But I also think that the idea that the Republican Party hasn't been wholly taken over by the MAGA extreme right is just not. true.

Speaker 5 There are a couple, sure, that hopefully those couple that end up voting or intending to vote against Articles of Impeachment, thus it never moves forward.

Speaker 5 But the super majority of Republican Congress is now MAGA Republicans. And we just have to acknowledge that.

Speaker 5 And I know all of us, myself included, for the good of the country, for the good of the world, wish that there was a... you know, sane opposition on the other side, but it does not exist.

Speaker 5 And I don't think it will exist as long as Donald Trump is still in politics.

Speaker 5 It's why I still am in politics, because I said the day after Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, until that fucker is gone, I'm not going anywhere. And it's because he's a threat to democracy.

Speaker 5 And,

Speaker 5 but anyway, that's where

Speaker 5 I think ultimately the Republican Party has been taken over by Donald Trump.

Speaker 5 That is, that starts at the top, but it's the members of the House in particular, and even honestly, the rest of Congress, I think, is

Speaker 5 their MAGA now, and we just have to acknowledge it.

Speaker 4 And the rest of them have resigned. Okay, we're going to take a quick break, but we come back.
You'll hear from California state rep Alex Lee.

Speaker 7 Have you ever asked yourself, do I have enough Dan Pfeiffer content in my life? Every day. Well, now you do.
Today, Dan's brand new series, Polar Coaster, drops its first ever episode.

Speaker 7 Plus, Dan and Alyssa team up in the second monthly installment of Inside 2024, dropping next Wednesday, the 20th. In light of the Trump vs.

Speaker 7 Biden campaigns, the two will be exploring the strategy behind running an incumbent campaign. To listen to both of these Dan-infused episodes,

Speaker 7 head to crooked.com slash friends to sign up now.

Speaker 14 This episode is brought to you by Progressive Commercial Insurance. Business owners meet Progressive Insurance.

Speaker 14 They make it easy to get discounts on commercial auto insurance and find coverages to grow with your business. Quote in as little as eight minutes at progressivecommercial.com.

Speaker 14 Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, coverage provided and serviced by affiliated and third-party insurers. Discounts and coverage selections not available in all states or situations.

Speaker 15 So, Clorox toilet wand is all I need to clean a toilet.

Speaker 5 You don't need a bottle of solution

Speaker 5 to get into the toilet revolution. Clorox

Speaker 15 feels good. Use as directed.

Speaker 16 At Walgreens, we know it's hard to pay attention to important flu information. What does keep your attention? Sports commentary.

Speaker 3 Here we are, fourth quarter of the year. The clock's winding down and flu season's starting up.
So don't get caught off guard. Make your move to Walgreens and get that flu shot.

Speaker 3 They even know which other vaccines you may need and when you need them. That's how you stay in the game.

Speaker 16 So walk in or schedule an appointment today to get up to date on all your vaccines. That's the human kind of help.

Speaker 15 Walgreens. Vaccines subject to availability, state age, and health-related restrictions may apply.

Speaker 8 Please welcome to the stage your own state representative, Alex Lee.

Speaker 9 Hello, San Jose.

Speaker 8 These are your people.

Speaker 9 I know this is my home city, too, so it's really cool. So you're ending the tour in San Jose.
It's awesome.

Speaker 8 All right. You were 25 when you ran for the seat and won.

Speaker 9 I was 23 when I ran.

Speaker 5 Oh, there you go.

Speaker 9 You were sworn in at 25.

Speaker 5 Yes, sworn in at 25.

Speaker 8 So you were 23 when you were starting to run. I know what I was doing when I was 23.

Speaker 8 Running for office, too? No, no, absolutely not.

Speaker 8 Talk to me about how you... Like, how did you come to a decision to think that this is how you should spend your early 20s? And what gave you confidence that you could win?

Speaker 9 Yeah, so I'm 28 now, so that's three years into.

Speaker 5 So you're basically old now.

Speaker 9 Yes, I'm very old. If you ask my very young staff, they'll say I'm at death's door now.
I'm basically 30. But three years in, it feels like I've been in office for three decades, frankly.

Speaker 9 I started during the pandemic. I won my primary two weeks before this county shut down because of the COVID pandemic and was the first ever in the entire country to do so.

Speaker 8 So you're like Joe Biden in that way.

Speaker 9 I think so, too. I think we are both leaders in our own time, like that, too.
I mean, hey, Joe Biden started very early, too. I don't know if I could be president at his age, too, but frankly.

Speaker 5 We'll get to that.

Speaker 9 We'll see. We'll see, right?

Speaker 9 But you know, one thing that really motivated me to run for office, and I was a legislative staffer before I ran for office, is that I was frankly tired that we had a Democratic supermajority in California, who had Democratic control of all the executive office, and yet we were surrendering to fucking incrementalism.

Speaker 9 We have some of of the worst problems

Speaker 9 in the entire country, and people rightfully sometimes lampoon us for it, but we have to be really innovative in how we tackle these problems.

Speaker 9 And maybe it's because I'm from, I grew up here in Silicon Valley, but I went there, I disrupted things, I said we should think about things differently, we should tax billionaires, we should actually get people housing, and frankly annoyed a lot of people with status quo.

Speaker 9 But I wasn't going to surrender to incrementalism, and that's why I ran.

Speaker 8 And

Speaker 8 how how have your new, older colleagues taken to your non-incrementalism message?

Speaker 9 I think at first a lot of people were taken aback by my approach. You know, frankly, I've been in legislative staff.
I understood that a lot of things were true compromise, right?

Speaker 9 But it was really nibbling away at the edges of so many things. But I am excited as we constantly have a refresh of new members.

Speaker 9 We are more and more embracing of new ideas. And frankly, it's also because how dire the consequences are, or dire the issues are now.

Speaker 9 I mean, we, even though the wealthiest state in the entire country, have the largest population of unhoused people on the streets. And that is a symptom directly of our inequality.

Speaker 9 So, as more and more people understand how dire the issues are, I think more people are turning to issues. And frankly, I even got the governor to say it once, said I was right on something.

Speaker 9 And he doesn't usually say I was right on something.

Speaker 5 What was the thing you said you were right on?

Speaker 9 It was this year we actually investigated the gas gout, the gouging prices by gasoline companies. And I proposed last year

Speaker 9 a windfall profits tax. And then we had a special session to do just that.
So we adopted that proposal.

Speaker 9 It changed along the way, but I was really happy to work with Governor Gavin Nusom on this issue, too.

Speaker 8 All right.

Speaker 8 As you mentioned, and I think this is probably your signature legislative effort, has been introducing legislation to increase taxes on the wealthiest Californians, people with a net worth $50 million or more.

Speaker 8 Apologies if any of those people are in this audience tonight.

Speaker 8 Can you walk us a little bit through that legislation and why you introduced it?

Speaker 9 Yeah, so very much like Senator Elizabeth Warren's proposal to tax mega-millionaires and billionaires just 1% of every dollar of their mega fortune.

Speaker 9 That proposal, at the time when we created it, and we worked with a lot of smart academics and people who worked in policy, worked on Senator Warren's proposal too, would have generated $22 billion

Speaker 9 a year, $22 billion a year. And you know, the funny thing about that is it unequally is skewed towards the billionaires, even amongst super rich people.
The very, very rich people will be paying.

Speaker 9 And we're talking about the Jeff Bezos's the Mark Zuckerbergs, the Elon Musks of the world, which I know you're going to talk about later.

Speaker 9 but those are the people that will be paying an enormous amount of money and I want to highlight to you why a wealth tax an asset tax is so important because our taxation system even in California and in the country is very good at taxing you if you make a paycheck but once you no longer make a paycheck especially the very rich people we know as household names today when you own everything and which is the most classical and ancient form of power is ownership you own everything you need you can leverage more stuff because you own more stuff and that's where the rich can forgo paychecks and salaries and stuff like that because because you don't need anything, you own everything.

Speaker 9 That is true power, and that system goes unchecked. And that's why wealth is so imbalanced.
And especially now, as you've probably seen in the headlines, California is facing a budget crisis.

Speaker 9 We can continue to support our social services, our schools, our educators, all the great things that we want if we just said, let's tax the people that are already evading a taxation system.

Speaker 8 Now, California has a lot of very politically active rich people.

Speaker 8 How, and we're going to talk about some of them later.

Speaker 8 Some of them

Speaker 8 are quite conservative, but many of them are huge supporters of Democratic politics in the state. What has been their response to your proposal in Sacramento?

Speaker 9 I think,

Speaker 9 you know, you have a lot of people who are very scared of the T-Word, and I encourage my fellow party members of Democrats to obviously always talk about taxes because we, and we talked about, and you talked about this in the previous segment, we have to be the responsible adults in the room.

Speaker 9 We have to have a true fiscal responsible conversation. If we want the best schools in the world, actual healthcare system that serves people, we have to talk about how we're going to pay for it.

Speaker 9 Republicans always say there's no such thing as free lunch. I agree.
So how do we together figure out what's the most equitable way to pay for lunch?

Speaker 9 And yet we're so afraid to say how do we pay for things we enjoy?

Speaker 9 And one other thing of why a wealth tax is so important is that for more than half of Californians, they already pay wealth tax on their most important source of wealth. It's called property tax.

Speaker 9 You already pay that. But with rich people, you own more than just one hat.
Well, they own a lot more than one house. They own a lot of things, and that's what a wealth tax gets at.

Speaker 8 One of the critiques that people have had to your proposal is that it would cause, trigger an exodus of wealthy people from California, and that that would diminish the tax base during a time of,

Speaker 8 as you say, a budget crunch. What's your response to that?

Speaker 9 The reality is two things: is that the migration,

Speaker 9 the outbound migration of Californians tends to be upon working class Californians.

Speaker 9 People that can pay the premiums in California, whether or not they bitch and moan about California, they pay the premium. They stay here, frankly, because you can pay the premium.

Speaker 9 It's people who are squeezed in the middle and squeezed at the bottom who have no other options but to leave the state. Those are the people that leave the state.

Speaker 9 And we also know from history, under Governor J.R. Brown, who was a fiscal conservative, we raise income taxes on people.

Speaker 9 And yet the migration of high-income people did not, it was not this exodus that people complain about all the time.

Speaker 9 So frankly, all the times I see people complain about, well, if we do this, the rich will do this, so the rich will do that. I thought we live in a democracy, folks.

Speaker 9 I didn't know we lived in an aristocracy where we did what the nobility wanted us to do.

Speaker 5 Let's talk a little about housing.

Speaker 8 Right.

Speaker 8 It is every conversation you have with people

Speaker 8 all across the country, frankly, is about housing, but particularly as it relates to here in California. What have you been working on to try to address the lack of affordable housing in the state?

Speaker 9 Absolutely. So So when I ran in 2020, and just a small plug is that no one thought I was going to win in 2020, including myself, okay?

Speaker 9 Because I had $32,000 in a half a million people district to just knock on doors. But the most pressing issue that I talked about to people is housing affordability.

Speaker 9 I've shared this often, I am one of the five renters in the entire state legislature, five out of 120 people. And I'm also probably the only person that lives with their parent.

Speaker 9 Because in my area, it costs one, well, it's actually now $2 million, $2 million to to buy a house. Last year is $1.6 million.

Speaker 9 And housing affordability is so critical to the very fabric of California society.

Speaker 9 Because think about this: if I, as someone who works in government and gets pretty decent well-paid, cannot afford to be a homeowner in my own community, as many people do, then what's our long-term hope in this place?

Speaker 9 Are we going to be priced out and so it's only people who pay the premium can be here? So, in the legislature, we're focusing more and more on housing affordable, taking a really active step.

Speaker 9 And under the leadership of our new Assembly Housing Chair, Chris Ward from San Diego, my favorite tree hugger if he's listening,

Speaker 9 I'm really excited about what we're going to do because we can thread so many different issues: climate justice,

Speaker 9 homelessness, social justice through land use, through housing issues. It is very nerdy oftentimes.
We talk about zoning or exclusionaries, policies, or stuff like that.

Speaker 9 But the heart of what I try to tell voters is that the way your community looks and feels is because of land use, is because of housing.

Speaker 9 And I believe that housing is a human right, so we should be doing as much as possible as a government to make sure that everyone has a home.

Speaker 8 This is probably not fair. I don't mean to make you the spokesperson for your entire generation, but one of the biggest challenges.

Speaker 9 Often my colleagues do, but

Speaker 8 one of the biggest political challenges for President Biden and Democrats, frankly, across the country right now is that

Speaker 8 the young voters who propelled our election victories in 2018 and 2020 are

Speaker 8 becoming more disengaged,

Speaker 8 more disengaged from the Democratic Party, not necessarily disengaged from issues, frustrated with President Biden.

Speaker 8 That's probably the group within his coalition where his approval ratings have gone down the most.

Speaker 8 What would your advice be to Democrats about how they win back and re-engage the younger voters who are so critical to any Democratic victory?

Speaker 9 Yeah, I don't, look, as speaking as also a strong progressive in our state legislature, and I'm also chair of the Progressive Caucus, you know, I'm someone who's frustrated with the Biden administration, too.

Speaker 9 But sometimes as a young person, I'm puzzled why

Speaker 9 political analysts are so struggling with how to engage with young people. If you approached us just like every other demographic, it would make sense.

Speaker 9 Because what we're asking is, what are you going to do for us?

Speaker 9 We have asked for student loan relief, we've asked for decisive climate change, we've just added, we've been asking very plainly for decisive action, material change, and yet we fall short, right?

Speaker 9 Especially in the student loan conversation where it's been pause and a little bit of cutoff, a little bit of this, right? But people get very frustrated by that.

Speaker 9 So I think if there is decisive material benefit that's affecting us, I think that's what we want to see.

Speaker 9 And I think this president, as being the most progressive president in our history and the most pro-unionist president in our history, can deliver on those things.

Speaker 8 And

Speaker 9 like in a time when the Republicans, all they want to do is impeach or besmirch his family, all these things, why not show him and say, hey, you know what?

Speaker 8 I'm just going to, like that.

Speaker 9 Your student loan debt is gone. I'm going to make health care for him.
I'm going to do all these things. I'm just going to do it.

Speaker 9 Because it's also just as important as it to brag about our victories and do press releases. And I know as a

Speaker 9 we also have to deliver on these things and make people feel the change. Because if people feel that this government is working for them,

Speaker 9 they really will vote for it, they will turn out for that. But right now, I think a lot of people are disillusioned and they feel there isn't that moral clarity or the decisive action.

Speaker 9 And that's what you know, Democrats want: we want decisive social change. And if we don't see that, it's hard to be inspired.

Speaker 8 Well, I think that's a great place to end it. Please give it up for Alex Lee.

Speaker 4 All right, since we're in San Jose, a city that is sometimes referred to as the city that's an hour south of the capital of Silicon Valley,

Speaker 4 just kidding, I'm just, it's fine.

Speaker 4 We thought we spend the rest of the show talking about the intersection of tech and politics. And to help us sound smart for once, we are joined by Zoe Schiffer.

Speaker 3 She is the managing editor

Speaker 4 at Platformer, excellent, excellent site, and the co-author of the forthcoming book, Extremely Hardcore Inside Elon Musk Twitter. You can pre-order it today, I imagine, right?

Speaker 15 Zoe, welcome to the pod. Thank you so much for having me.

Speaker 4 It's wonderful to have you.

Speaker 5 Okay.

Speaker 5 So.

Speaker 15 Wait, before, can we just get a gauge of the audience so we know who we're dealing with here? How many of you are current Twitter users? Can you raise your hands? No shame.

Speaker 15 And how many of you pay for X premium?

Speaker 3 Applause if you do.

Speaker 5 Okay, we're among friends. We can go on.

Speaker 3 Does any one person in this room pay for X premium?

Speaker 5 If so, please leave.

Speaker 4 Zoe will escort you out.

Speaker 4 Speaking of X, Premium, or regular, so this week, I guess this is premium now, Elon Musk continued the race to the bottom by reinstating none other than Alex Jones.

Speaker 4 You remember Alex Jones, the guy who claimed that Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting was a hoax and got his band of followers to harass the families of the victims.

Speaker 4 So not only did Elon reactivate Alex Jones' account, he invited him to appear in a live Twitter space, whatever you call that, space thing with Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy.

Speaker 5 Here's a clip.

Speaker 17 Gentlemen, I have to go.

Speaker 17 I just want to be sort of, exactly, I want to be clear about my tradition.

Speaker 18 I'm super pro-human, and I mean old humans.

Speaker 18 You know, humans in America, humans, and somebody's got their thing open

Speaker 11 and everywhere else.

Speaker 17 Phone open in the

Speaker 17 Yeah, that's Vivek. Vivek, that's your phone, Vivek.
I'm not able to mute you.

Speaker 17 Vivek.

Speaker 7 Go ahead, Yilon.

Speaker 8 Sorry about that.

Speaker 3 Yes, we did play that clip on Tuesday's show, but Democrats have been promising you guys a P-Tape for six years.

Speaker 4 And it's time we finally delivered.

Speaker 4 Our producer wanted us to try this one. That Vivek's a real whiz kit, huh?

Speaker 4 You got some booze, Alona.

Speaker 4 So, obviously, reinstating Alex Jones is basically a way of signaling you don't actually care about trust and safety or content moderation or anything.

Speaker 4 But it's also part of a broader trend where tech companies like Meta and YouTube have changed their policies on political advertising.

Speaker 4 They've relaxed restrictions on disinformation, like claims that the 2020 election was stolen. Zoe, do you think these companies are basically giving up on content moderation as we roll into 2024?

Speaker 15 Yeah, I mean, none of this is an accident. I think that there is a legitimate attack on free speech happening, but it's not the attack that most people think.

Speaker 15 There's an effort from conservatives to make the work of content moderation seem dangerous and downright illegal. And this is the culmination of that plan.

Speaker 4 Have any tech companies done a good job with content moderation that you've seen?

Speaker 15 I mean, X has now set the bar pretty low. So I would say anything above having Alex Jones of the background of Swami peeing on air is pretty good at this point.

Speaker 8 How's LinkedIn doing? Are they crushing it?

Speaker 3 Well, like the Republicans in Missouri, I believe, are now going after media matters, right? So like

Speaker 3 they claim to be for free speech, but then basically they target people who just simply want accountability or to hold people accountable for their speech.

Speaker 15 Yeah, the thing about free speech on these platforms is it doesn't mean that all speech is allowed.

Speaker 15 Because what happens when you allow all speech is that most people actually cannot speak because they're brutally harassed. And so you need some level of content moderation.

Speaker 15 And there's a real effort right now to make that seem politicized when it's honestly not.

Speaker 4 Yeah. So, DC, I mean, Democrats in particular have gone back and forth on whether we should be on these platforms and fighting it out, whether we should starve them of users and revenue, I guess.

Speaker 4 Where do you land at this point?

Speaker 5 Yeah, maybe an unpopular position for the room, but I actually, I'm not paying for premium, that's for damn sure.

Speaker 5 But, you know, our job in campaigns to win elections at some level is to take the world as it is.

Speaker 5 And if people are using a medium, it's very hard to just take yourself out of the game of talking to the people who are either getting their information, political or otherwise, from that medium.

Speaker 5 And so I had a couple of debates when I ran Senator Booker's campaign for president in 2020. Should we go on Fox News or should we not?

Speaker 5 Should we, I know there's been talk about the president getting off of some of these platforms. People are there, right? And

Speaker 5 again, when you're in a campaign in particular, your job is to communicate your message to people where they are. So my general position is, should we be supporting with advertising dollars?

Speaker 5 Probably not to the extent that we,

Speaker 5 certainly not in the corporate sense, but on the campaign side, it's really hard to say no, don't spend any money talking to voters on meta when that's where they are and you are basically ceding a battleground to Trump and the Republicans.

Speaker 3 Jr.: It's interesting, though.

Speaker 3 I have no disagreement at all, but

Speaker 3 the debate that Elon Musk and these sort of guys want to have is one about kind of like abstractions and ethics, which kind of makes sense because they're the worst people at college, right?

Speaker 3 Like, that's what this group is, like, the worst people you met in college grown up.

Speaker 3 But, like, from a business perspective, and just from a user perspective, yes, like, what are the ethical bounds? What are the more,

Speaker 3 what are the like, the, the like Kantian categorical imperatives around free speech? Like, put that aside. Like, who cares about any of that? Like, is this a place you want to spend your time?

Speaker 3 Is this a fun and exciting and cool and rewarding and enriching experience? Like, the answer is no.

Speaker 3 And so, like, you can have a debate about like the limits of free speech on the internet, but from a business perspective, and for us as users, like, I don't care what that like that ethical line is.

Speaker 3 I got off of Twitter and I'm a little bit happier. And

Speaker 3 that's, and so when they go after Media Matters or they go after the left or they claim, like Elon Musk claims the Anti-Defamation League is silencing him.

Speaker 3 He's like, How dare these Jews claim I'm an anti-Semite?

Speaker 3 These fucking Jews won't stop saying I'm an anti-Semite.

Speaker 3 How many times do I have to tell these fucking Jews to get off my dick? I'm not an anti-Semite. It's just these Jews won't shut the fuck up.

Speaker 3 When will these sneaky fucking Jews stop telling me that I'm an anti-Semite?

Speaker 3 I'm going to sue these rich, sneaky, international cabbal of fucking Jews for calling me an anti-Semite because everyone knows I love humans.

Speaker 3 That's what you could hear in the fucking background of that asshole peeing.

Speaker 3 And so the point is, this intellectual masturbation around free speech is not Elon Musk's problem.

Speaker 3 The problem is that people who are who treat other people like dick, who treat other people like assholes, who make other people feel bad, that's a platform people don't want to be on, which means it's not a platform businesses want to advertise on.

Speaker 3 And that's not an ethical question. That's just a product question.

Speaker 8 Yeah, I mean, you can have a platform that has Alex Jones, or you can have a platform that makes money from advertising. You can't have both.

Speaker 15 I mean, there's a reason that content moderation on these platforms generally always ends up at the same place.

Speaker 15 You start out saying you're a free speech absolutist, and then a foreign government says that you're going to be booted out of the entire country unless you take down speech.

Speaker 15 And so if you're Elon Musk, you take that down real, real fast. And this keeps coming from every angle.
Is child sexual exploitation allowed? Absolutely not. Is this other kind of speech allowed?

Speaker 15 Absolutely not. Oh, this person's getting harassed and doxxed, and now their life is in danger.
Is that allowed?

Speaker 15 And then you end up, well, like Meta or the other platforms, or you end up, as you said, with Alex Schmidt.

Speaker 8 And then one day a impulsive man-child buys your company for $45 billion, and this is where you are.

Speaker 4 When you talk to people who work at other tech companies, the metas, YouTubes, are they like, thank God Elon bought Twitter. This is the best thing that's ever happened to us.

Speaker 4 No one talks about us anymore.

Speaker 15 They don't say that, but I would think that that is the general feeling because the bar has been set at the absolute ground level at this point.

Speaker 4 If I worked at Facebook Comms, I would buy that man a drink. I don't know.

Speaker 15 I mean, Mark Zuckerberg, can we talk about his reputation? Like, he looks incredible. He's had a summer of all summers.
I mean, the PR team there is like...

Speaker 4 Tybo and Terran ACLs and no one cares.

Speaker 5 He's popular now.

Speaker 3 It's like it's like you know he's like an ex-boyfriend and it's not that he it's not that he's better he wasn't a better boyfriend in hindsight. It's just that the boyfriend after him was so awful.

Speaker 5 Exactly.

Speaker 3 It's like yeah

Speaker 15 you're like he looked really good actually.

Speaker 7 What?

Speaker 4 So Republicans and conservative media like to attack the Bay Area in the tech industry as this like lefty liberal paradise. And while it's certainly true that

Speaker 4 a lot of tech company employees are progressive, their bosses and their investors are often more right-wing, or assholes like Elon Musk or Peter Thiel or David Sachs. The list goes on and on.

Speaker 4 Even Twitter founder Jack Dorsey, in between yoga retreats, endorsed RFK Jr. for president.

Speaker 5 So, I mean,

Speaker 4 Zoe, do you have a sense of...

Speaker 8 Are you people surprised or disappointed or both?

Speaker 4 Both. Disgusted.
Disgusted.

Speaker 8 That's the right response.

Speaker 3 I heard a disgusted.

Speaker 5 All right.

Speaker 4 Do you have a sense of which candidates the kind of like big money players in Silicon Valley are supporting? I feel like they've been kind of dabbling in a few along the way.

Speaker 15 I mean, yeah, I think we can watch like the David Sachs's of the world, and they seem to be trending towards Vivek and RFK Jr.

Speaker 15 I know, but I mean, that does seem to be like if you follow where the money is and where the fundraising is happening, that seems seems to be it.

Speaker 8 I mean, Peter Thiel,

Speaker 4 I guess, has decided to sit out this election and not donate to any more candidates in 2024.

Speaker 4 And to get himself there, he did this long interview with the New Yorker to announce his decision because he said it would force him to not change his mind.

Speaker 4 I guess the New Yorker is his accountability partner, as

Speaker 4 Speaker Mike Johnson might say.

Speaker 4 Wouldn't it have been easier to just like tweet it out, dude, not spend like 18 hours with Barton Gelman or whatever he did?

Speaker 5 Yeah, it's a weird move. I mean,

Speaker 8 if you were to tell me that if I did an 18-hour interview with the New Yorker and I would never get another fundraising text in my life, I would do that. That does sound pretty good.

Speaker 5 You know what?

Speaker 3 Dan, you raise a really important point. We're in San Jose.
I'll do my pitch again. It's called Democrat Plus.
You pay a monthly fee, and then you never get a text again.

Speaker 3 Join Democrat Plus today, and then you don't get another text from a House candidate you've never heard of with a picture that says, I'll kill myself if you don't donate right now.

Speaker 15 The sound of those cheers means you just raised $30 million. Hell yeah.

Speaker 7 Got it.

Speaker 3 It's happening. It's happening.
It's already vaporware.

Speaker 5 I mean, this is a hard question, but is there a political ethos in Silicon Valley? No.

Speaker 5 Really?

Speaker 4 This guy says no.

Speaker 3 That drone said no.

Speaker 15 I feel like there's, I mean, I think there's a big difference between, like you said before, the people who have money, who are supporting the Vivex, the Round DeSantises of the world and then the people who are like on the ground working at these companies and are pushing for more progressive policies but I think Silicon Valley kind of has its own ideology and it's like industry first in a lot of ways but that's I don't I wouldn't say that's reflected in the rank and file employees there's also a weird amount of paranoia and I can't tell if the paranoia comes with the industry or the paranoia comes when you have lots of money and you're worried about losing it.

Speaker 4 For example, in that same New Yorker story about Peter Thiel, Sam Altman is quoted the CEO, on again, off-again, CEO of OpenAI.

Speaker 4 And he said that in a global catastrophe, he and Peter Thiel were going to wait it out together in Peter Thiel's sheep ranch in New Zealand.

Speaker 15 Yeah, the prepper community.

Speaker 5 Are you new to this?

Speaker 4 Why are there so many preppers here? Tell us more about the prepper community.

Speaker 15 I don't really know.

Speaker 15 Yeah, I think it's a, from what I can tell, it's like an exciting ideology that men in this industry, this is a generalization, but it's what I've seen,

Speaker 15 seem to feel like if the end of the world is nigh, then that's a very energizing way to go through life. And it justifies a lot of decision-making along the way.

Speaker 15 I mean, you know, it's just my opinion.

Speaker 3 I ultimately

Speaker 3 where I feel like some of these wealthy tech people feel as though they got away with a heist. You know,

Speaker 3 they feel like they got away with something, so it feels a little ill-gotten.

Speaker 3 And so psychologically, it's about to go, it's like, it's like they're like mobsters putting cash in there in the, like it's like, it's like the money that's buried with Ivana on the golf course.

Speaker 3 You know, like, you know, Trump put valuables down there because on some level, he knows it can all go away because it's ill-gotten.

Speaker 3 And if it's, and if he got it, and if he got it the wrong way, it can go just as quickly. And I feel like there's that.

Speaker 3 There's some little broken part of that brain where it's just like, I got away with something. And at some point, the world is going to catch wise, which is...

Speaker 3 Why part of the end of the world is trying to figure out how to get their super soldiers to wear the neck brace that'll explode if they don't follow orders, if money doesn't work.

Speaker 15 You know what I mean?

Speaker 15 I mean, I hear you, I do.

Speaker 8 It's very polite of you to pretend you know what he means. So,

Speaker 3 you guys remember that story that

Speaker 3 the billionaires didn't know what to do when their money stopped working? So, they figured out they'll put little braces, they'll put things around the neck so that the guys keep listening.

Speaker 3 I think they got to go outside.

Speaker 5 Bring us back, Toppy.

Speaker 5 So I'm here.

Speaker 4 The last few years haven't been the best for some parts of the tech community. You had higher interest rates, making it harder for venture capitalists to raise money for the next round of whatever.

Speaker 3 That's what that parade is about. We're going to do that walk-a-thon for them.

Speaker 5 Yes.

Speaker 4 Silicon Valley Bank collapsed. You had these major crypto exchanges going bankrupt.
You have leading figures like Sam Bankman Freed, potentially doing jail time.

Speaker 4 But now, all of a sudden, the price of Bitcoin is back up. The New York Times just wrote an article about a 27-year-old who raised nearly $20 million to build a crypto city in the Mediterranean.

Speaker 4 Sure that'll pan out.

Speaker 3 Is the tech bubble back?

Speaker 15 I mean, have you heard of artificial intelligence?

Speaker 5 Tell me more.

Speaker 4 Tell me everything.

Speaker 15 Yeah, I think we have a new bubble.

Speaker 4 We have a new bubble, and it's AI.

Speaker 8 I mean, I think the tech, there's a lot of money in Silicon Valley still, and we will find ways to funnel, and we, I'm not part of this, they will find ways to funnel it into various projects and I think artificial intelligence you know has more legitimacy I would say than crypto but definitely it's where the money is at now I mean it does feel like there's this real urgency because there hasn't been a new thing since the smartphone was invented so we're at 15 years from now so it's like we're waiting for the thing that's going to create all this new wealth and crypto was supposed to be that thing yeah and then it wasn't and so now it's ai and so if you just put like there are all these i mean you've written many of these stories about these people who just basically put AI in a deck and people are throwing millions of dollars at them.

Speaker 8 It's like it's AI for dog food. And you're like, AI powered dog food.
Take my money.

Speaker 5 Yeah.

Speaker 4 Well, the alternative is that Apple's like, now the phone has four cameras.

Speaker 5 You're like, why?

Speaker 8 And it's like, hey, people, I don't know how much time you spent with your Alexa recently, but I think I've got any smarter in 15 years.

Speaker 3 I want to read you an email I received from my friend Samir on May 30th, 2011.

Speaker 5 This is real.

Speaker 3 Speaking of crackpot financial schemes, anyone want to buy some Bitcoins? I want you to know that we decided not to buy Bitcoins that day because we had a different stock we were interested in.

Speaker 3 It was TiVo.

Speaker 3 Adisu, you're still in politics.

Speaker 4 That's real. Working on campaigns.

Speaker 8 Or you were before tonight.

Speaker 4 The like hope and the anxiety and the Democratic Party is all about the impact of AI potentially on campaigns. Are you seeing any of this play out in this cycle?

Speaker 5 Yeah, if I'm not mistaken, yesterday in a Pennsylvania House race,

Speaker 5 don't ask me why I know this, AI was used to phone bank for the first time. Really?

Speaker 5 conversation with a voter via a robot, basically. I'm going to go out on a limb and say it probably wasn't that effective.

Speaker 5 But I think we're, yes, the short answer is we're at the beginning of what I think is going to be potentially a scary, potentially

Speaker 5 exciting revolution of every industry when it comes to AI, but politics as well. And so it's not, I think, you know, I think back to 08, was it Facebook in 08 or Twitter?

Speaker 5 Maybe it was Facebook in 2012. It was Facebook.

Speaker 5 Facebook and 08 and Twitter in 12. And

Speaker 5 there's always something

Speaker 5 in a cycle that becomes the next big thing until it's not.

Speaker 8 In 2020, it was COVID.

Speaker 5 That stuck around for a while. But

Speaker 5 I'm not sure if this is going to be the AI cycle or another one, but I do think it's coming because because I actually think it can be potentially very helpful to our industry.

Speaker 5 I also think it's very dangerous

Speaker 5 because

Speaker 5 when it comes to jobs,

Speaker 5 you usually have human beings making phone calls, for example. And if AI gets really good

Speaker 5 at phone calls,

Speaker 5 goodbye field organizing, right? It becomes a lot cheaper to do that, et cetera.

Speaker 5 We're not there yet.

Speaker 5 I don't think this is the cycle probably where it takes over, but we're all going to have to figure this out just like we figured out every other tech thing for the last 20 years I've been doing this.

Speaker 3 I do worry, though. Like

Speaker 8 we see

Speaker 3 with

Speaker 3 artificial images that the threat isn't people thinking fake things are real.

Speaker 3 Well, that is a threat, but just as big as the threat that people start seeing real things as fake, that you start to doubt whatever you see and whatever you hear.

Speaker 3 Already, I think I know that I am deluged with text messages and phone calls that I don't answer.

Speaker 3 And even if you have an AI phone phone call that can just as effectively reach people, really, what you're doing is creating a device to make

Speaker 3 phone calls more ubiquitous and then less useful as a result, which,

Speaker 5 like,

Speaker 3 we've been talking about this in a bunch of different ways, but like, so much of what politics is now is figuring out how to break through the noise and break through the clutter.

Speaker 3 And for years and years, like, we basically built a kind of information system that values almost true, kind of dull, kind of

Speaker 3 semi-emotional things that

Speaker 3 feel true but aren't necessarily true. And that's a perfect thing for artificial intelligence to generate vast amounts of.

Speaker 3 And so, like, we kind of devalued information and then built a system that could make it even cheaper.

Speaker 3 And, like, I don't know what happens on the other side of it, but maybe we have to, maybe the only way out is through.

Speaker 8 The intersection of politics in AI is incredibly fascinating, right? There's all the dangers of deep fake videos and all of that.

Speaker 8 And I think Lovett raised a really important point, which is, Edison, I'm sure you've seen this, but

Speaker 8 people are so skeptical right now of politicians and political ads that the only ads that really work are the ones that use a politician in their own unedited voice, where it's just like footage of Donald Trump saying something.

Speaker 8 or a voter making a regular person who's not a politician explaining why it would be bad to take the Affordable Care Act away. The Biden campaign has an add-up like that right now.

Speaker 8 And AI actually has the potential to render

Speaker 8 the first one,

Speaker 8 not actual AI, but the prospect of AI. Donald Trump has already said that a very legitimate video of his was a deep fake.
And he's going to do that throughout this campaign. And so that's a big thing.

Speaker 8 But then there's some other really bad ways in which AI, or annoying ways that AI is going to affect us, which is the only thing that's preventing us from getting more fundraising emails and texts is the time it takes to write those.

Speaker 8 And then when you take that friction out of you're just asking ChatGPT to send you an insane text about, you know, how, why the entire world's going to come to an end if you don't give money to a pack you've never heard of five minutes ago, like that's, and it's going to reward the worst, like most grifty players.

Speaker 8 But there are other ways in which I think it's incredibly, it could be incredibly useful because ultimately

Speaker 8 Politics

Speaker 8 is the marriage of art and science in words and data. And there are ways to think much more, to understand what politicians are saying and at every level, right?

Speaker 8 Whether it's where there's all this scrutiny on what comes out of President Biden's mouth in the campaign, like what, like, what, is that the right message?

Speaker 8 What's mean the speech, what's mean the ads? But you could use, you could then take the data you're using to inform that and apply it across every conversation that every voter is having.

Speaker 8 Not by, this is not saying we're going to create a fake chatbot to add that conversation, but by

Speaker 8 sort of smoothing out the process by which you're using the most optimized messages in every single interaction. And that is like a very, very interesting thing.

Speaker 8 And my DMs are open on LinkedIn if anyone wants to talk about it.

Speaker 3 Zoe, interestingly,

Speaker 4 for all the anxiety about AI and deep fakes and things ahead of us, it does seem like a lot of people have been driven off Twitter recently, not because of deep fakes, but because of people surfacing old videos and saying that they were from Gaza when really they were Syria in 2015.

Speaker 4 Is that a Twitter-specific problem, or what do you think is happening there?

Speaker 15 Yeah, I mean,

Speaker 15 Elon Musk has promoted a crowdsourced fact-checking tool as the first line of defense between telling fact from fiction on his platform.

Speaker 15 And I think we've seen more recently that that's woefully inadequate in times of crisis. We need a multi-pronged approach, especially during an election.

Speaker 15 And that's going to take human content moderators, and it's going to take AI, and it's going to take sophisticated tools. And the trust and safety team at X is a shadow of its former self.

Speaker 15 They've really devalued and underinvested in all of these things. And I think that's going to be an enormous problem in the coming election.

Speaker 8 I hate the community notes thing. It's obviously a ridiculous thing.

Speaker 8 But I will say that someone attacked Taylor Swift for when she was named the Time Woman of the Year, saying, how could this billionaire person who could end the war in Gaza with one Instagram post be reward get this award?

Speaker 8 And the community notes thing was. Traditionally, Instagram posts have not ended century-old conflicts.

Speaker 4 That was truly a great one.

Speaker 3 What What a ridiculous thing to think Taylor Swift could do. That's not what she could do.
What she could do is solve a lot of unsolved murders.

Speaker 4 On Tuesday, a jury in San Francisco ruled in favor of Fortnite maker Epic Games in their lawsuit against Google. Epic Games claimed that Google had an illegal monopoly in the Google Play Store.

Speaker 4 After the win, Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney told The Verge, quote, it's a great day for all developers to see that the Sherman Antitrust Act works in the new era of tech monopolies.

Speaker 4 How big a deal do you think this decision is? And do you think it's going to impact other antitrust cases going forward?

Speaker 15 Yeah, I mean, it's a really big deal, although I will say we're a few years out from knowing exactly what the final answer to this is. Google has already said that it's going to appeal.

Speaker 15 If the ruling stands, then I think we can expect to see a more robust app ecosystem where smaller developers are able to circumvent Google's in-app

Speaker 15 fees, which are 30% right now. And we we might see multiple app stores, and all of that is very good for consumers.

Speaker 15 But I do think it's a little early to know what this could mean for Apple and other big tech companies.

Speaker 8 Because Epic lost the same suit against Apple, right?

Speaker 5 Because Apple makes the phones.

Speaker 8 So they had a different set of rules, is that right?

Speaker 15 Yeah, and also Google won a similar case that was decided by a judge last year. And so I think it's still a total question.
question mark. This was a jury trial, which ended up being quite important.

Speaker 4 This is also a case where I think President Biden has gotten a lot of of credit for putting in place regulators who have a track record of writing and thinking and saying things that I think are a lot tougher on tech monopolies.

Speaker 4 Do you think the toughness of those appointees has played out in practice in terms of, I don't know, even changing behavior in Silicon Valley?

Speaker 15 I don't know. I mean, when we think of the FTC, we certainly have a much stronger FTC and more aggressive FTC than we have in the past.

Speaker 15 At the same time, Lena Kant, like there have been a lot of losses. And I think that was part of the strategy.

Speaker 15 You all might know better than me, but my understanding of her approach was we're going to take really big swings and there will be a lot of losses along the way, but we have to take a stand for consumers and change the definition of what the FTC is really here to do.

Speaker 15 So I think it's actually

Speaker 15 it's kind of yet to be determined what all of that looks like, but people are definitely paying attention.

Speaker 8 It's interesting because Donald Trump likes to pretend he's like this big populace, but there are a lot of these tech companies who are basically putting on pause the idea of merging or acquiring someone to see what happens in the election, because if Donald Trump gets in, that'd be much better in their view for big tech monopolies, right?

Speaker 8 And that's actually again, I think, a,

Speaker 8 that's not the exact argument, but it's part of the overall populist case that Biden can make is that Donald Trump is going to, they're rooting for him because

Speaker 8 it is better for monopolies and big, huge companies under Trump because they're scared that Joe Biden's going to enforce antitrust laws.

Speaker 3 Yeah, I also do think sometimes this debate, like the risks posed by these companies being so big and having monopolies, like that creates one set of very big challenges.

Speaker 3 And I think it's really important that we have aggressive antitrust laws and regulations.

Speaker 3 But I also think it sometimes is a quick thing for, I think, politicians to say to like kind of wave off some of the issues that actually don't have as much to do with the size of these companies, like issues of

Speaker 3 misinformation, privacy issues. I think the fact that these companies are so enormous and have so much power impacts the ways in which they don't have to respect consumer privacy, consumer rights.

Speaker 3 They don't have to worry about regulation in part because of their influence and their lobbying. But

Speaker 3 regardless of whether they break Amazon in half or spin off the, you know, spin off,

Speaker 3 allowing WhatsApp to be under,

Speaker 5 who bought that, Meta? Meta.

Speaker 3 Regardless, we need a privacy law. Like, regardless, we need regulation of these companies.

Speaker 15 Yeah, 100%.

Speaker 5 Okay, we're going to take a quick break, but when we come back, we're going to play a game.

Speaker 5 What's poppin' listeners?

Speaker 19 I'm Lacey Mosley, host of the podcast Scam Goddess, the show that's an ode to fraud and all those who practice it. Each week, I talk with very special guests about the scammiest scammers of all time.

Speaker 19 Want to know about the fake heirs? We got them. What about a career con man? We've got them too.
Guys that will wine and dine you and then steal all your coins.

Speaker 19 Oh, you know they are represented because representation matters. I'm joined by guests like Nicole Beyer, Ira Madison III, Conan O'Brien, and more.

Speaker 19 Join the congregation and listen to Scam Goddess wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaker 21 With TikTok ads, our revenue went up $10 million year over year during back to school season. Penn Foster is online education.

Speaker 21 TikTok is great because the reach is incredible for finding a lot of different types of audiences on the platform. Creator content at scale allowed us to easily develop and distribute creator-led ads.

Speaker 21 Our return on ad spend for TikTok is 21% higher than the Nexbus channel.

Speaker 3 Start growing your business today.

Speaker 18 Head over to getstarted.tiktok.com slash TikTok ads.

Speaker 5 A BetterHelp ad.

Speaker 14 This November, BetterHelp is encouraging people to reach out, grab lunch with an old friend, call your parents, or even find support in therapy.

Speaker 14 BetterHelp makes it easy with its therapist match commitment and over 12 years of online therapy experience, matching members with qualified professionals.

Speaker 14 And just like that lunch with an old friend, once you do reach out, you'll wonder, why didn't I do this sooner? Start now at betterhelp.com for 10% off your first month.

Speaker 5 And we're back!

Speaker 3 Thank you all for joining us this evening.

Speaker 3 The most American questions are the questions the people of San Jose ask every day.

Speaker 3 Can we squeeze any money out of meditation?

Speaker 3 Would people pay a monthly fee to access extra features on their smart blender?

Speaker 3 How can we brand our toilet camera in a way that assuages privacy concerns?

Speaker 3 What if we could make life a little better and worse while getting filthy fucking rich?

Speaker 3 So it's time for a game we're calling, cue the slide,

Speaker 3 Tech Tech Boom.

Speaker 3 Zoe and Dan will be one team.

Speaker 3 Deezu and Tommy will be the other.

Speaker 3 I will alternate asking each team a weird tech industry question. If they can't answer the question, the other team has the chance to steal.
Are you ready?

Speaker 5 Yes. Born ready.

Speaker 3 Question first, we'll start.

Speaker 5 Do we have to buzz or something? No, you go. Okay.

Speaker 3 We'll alternate. Don't worry, I got this.

Speaker 5 Okay,

Speaker 5 I believe you.

Speaker 3 Ish. You question, if it was Ken Jennings, you would just trust him.

Speaker 3 Because I happen to be a drunk idiot.

Speaker 3 Just yesterday, the New York Times profiled a 27-year-old NYU dropout who's raising money to build a crypto city for tech bros and tastemakers in the Mediterranean.

Speaker 3 What is that guy's name, and what is the name of the tech utopia he reportedly tried to build in Ghana before pivoting?

Speaker 8 Praxis is this.

Speaker 5 Yeah, that's the current one.

Speaker 15 His name is Dryden Brown.

Speaker 8 That is correct.

Speaker 3 I was going to give you multiple choice.

Speaker 13 No, no, no.

Speaker 15 Shout out to Santa Barbara. He's from my hometown.

Speaker 5 So we are screwed. Tommy and Adisu.

Speaker 5 We're still in the blank.

Speaker 3 One of the internal slides revealed by the Wall Street Journal's Facebook files is a slide titled, User Experience of Blank is Exacerbated by Our Platform, Complete with a Graph Outlining How Teen girls experience severe negative mental health outcomes by using Instagram.

Speaker 3 What is that user experience? Is this multiple choice? No.

Speaker 15 I think

Speaker 3 their experience of blank.

Speaker 5 I'd like to phone a friend.

Speaker 3 Do you want to steal

Speaker 5 filters?

Speaker 3 No. No, no.
No, no. It's an emotional experience.

Speaker 5 Wait, wait, can you?

Speaker 15 Sorry, can you read that just one more time?

Speaker 3 The user's experience of blank is exacerbated by our platform. And it's about teen girls experiencing negative mental health comes.
Health outcomes.

Speaker 3 I heard body dysmorphia. You're in the ballpark.

Speaker 5 It was a blank.

Speaker 4 It was just downward spiral.

Speaker 3 Their experience of downward spiral.

Speaker 5 We need to work on the mad lips. Yikes.

Speaker 4 That's sad, but hard to guess.

Speaker 5 Yeah.

Speaker 5 Okay.

Speaker 3 And so it was hard. Who cares?

Speaker 3 Who tweeted, Tommy and Odisu, the coronavirus panic is dumb on March 6, 2020?

Speaker 4 Elon Musk. Elon Musk.

Speaker 5 Correct.

Speaker 3 Starting a nearly uninterrupted four-year string of being awesome.

Speaker 5 Dan and Zoe.

Speaker 3 Which startup launched by Jeffrey Katzenberg is considered one of the biggest failed startups in history? Yep, you got it.

Speaker 7 They were in our building.

Speaker 3 Tom, they were in our building. Tommy and Odisu Juicero, a famous flop, sold a 400 wi-fi connected juice press that used proprietary packets of pre-mangled fruits

Speaker 3 bottomed out because why a you could buy juice at the store b there were more affordable juicers c you could squeeze juice with your hands or d you could eat a piece of fruit

Speaker 5 uh

Speaker 4 i remember this story well because I was a little adrift in my career at the time and I had a meeting with a really smart, really nice person. I should think Dan connected me with.

Speaker 3 The life fucking story.

Speaker 4 We talked about a bunch of different interesting things happening in Silicon Valley. I lived in San Francisco at the time, and Juicero came up.

Speaker 4 And I was like, oh, that sounds cool, but I'm not like a juice guy.

Speaker 3 But it turned out you could just squeeze the pack. That's correct.
You could just squeeze the juice out of them.

Speaker 4 You didn't need the $400, like timed release system that sat in your kitchen.

Speaker 3 Insane. Insane.
And remember it was also, it was,

Speaker 3 it was like, it was end-user license agreement, like, like, fucked with so that, like, if your juice packet was past a certain date, the machine wouldn't squeeze it for you?

Speaker 3 Like, the machine would be.

Speaker 3 Yeah, like, the machine would be like, no, no, this juice is not for you. Get out of the juice.

Speaker 5 Are the other answers incorrect, or is that one just super correct?

Speaker 5 Because I think you can just eat some fucking fruit.

Speaker 9 Oh, yeah, that's a good point. That's a good point.

Speaker 8 You got the right answer. I don't know why you're arguing.

Speaker 5 Take the points.

Speaker 5 I'll take the points. I didn't think of that.

Speaker 3 Which disgraced Tech Mogul's lawyer told the media this week that his client may be at the very top of the list

Speaker 3 as the worst person I've ever seen do a cross-examination?

Speaker 8 Sam Bankman Fried. That is correct.

Speaker 3 Lawyer said that to Bloomberg.

Speaker 3 Is he in jail currently or is he on home arrest?

Speaker 15 Wait, I thought he was in jail, but I'm hearing home arrest. But I'm not a crypto.

Speaker 4 I think he got sent to jail for doing too much internet.

Speaker 5 Yeah.

Speaker 3 It's like talking to Michael Lewis like 500 times.

Speaker 5 That is accurate.

Speaker 3 It's a good Democrat you're talking about.

Speaker 5 All right.

Speaker 3 Tech weirdo Brian Johnson made a splash this fall by insisting he had actually lowered the biological age of his penis

Speaker 3 by 15 years.

Speaker 3 How did he claim to do this? Hint, it's your second thought.

Speaker 3 I have no idea.

Speaker 3 How did he claim he lowered the age of his penis by 15 years?

Speaker 4 Like the weights that kind of pull on it?

Speaker 3 So that's your first thought. What's your second thought?

Speaker 3 You guys want to steal it?

Speaker 5 Yeah, I have giggles. I feel like it's all them.

Speaker 3 Anybody out there want to guess?

Speaker 3 That's right, by electrocuting his penis.

Speaker 3 According to Johnson, there's this technology. You have a wand and you sit in a chair and the technician uses the wand and basically shocks your penis.

Speaker 3 Hey, remember remember when smart people used to invent airplanes and antibiotics?

Speaker 3 No one got that one.

Speaker 3 I also just like,

Speaker 3 why did he think it worked?

Speaker 3 During our trial, jurors heard, who's up?

Speaker 5 Let's go this way.

Speaker 3 Tommy, pay attention.

Speaker 3 We have done, this is our last show of the year, guys.

Speaker 3 During her trial, the thing is, the thing they used to shock me, John has it.

Speaker 3 During her trial, jurors heard Theranos' Elizabeth Holmes make a number of false claims to journalist Roger Parloff, who recorded their interviews for Peace and Fortune. Which of these was not a lie?

Speaker 3 Which was not a lie, that Holmes told us during those interviews? A, that Theranos had worked with the U.S.

Speaker 3 military in Afghanistan, B, that Theranos had worked for foreign governments, that C, Theranos had worked with border security, D, that Theranos had worked correctly when performing over 600 tests, making it competitive with Quest Diagnostics.

Speaker 5 That one's a lie, right? Yeah, it's got to be.

Speaker 3 Well, they're all, which is the lie she didn't tell. Oh, okay.
It's such a confusing question. She told.

Speaker 3 It's like Jazz.

Speaker 5 Afghanistan? No, because she would do.

Speaker 4 No, the Afghanistan one I think is real because that was part of their, they had Jim Mattis on the board. Yeah.

Speaker 5 Oh, there you go.

Speaker 5 Afghanistan.

Speaker 8 Defense Secretary.

Speaker 5 I think it's the

Speaker 4 that they worked with people overseas is my guess.

Speaker 5 Let's go with that one.

Speaker 3 Incorrect, it was the border.

Speaker 5 I thought we had to steal.

Speaker 3 Did you know the answer?

Speaker 8 Border patrol, obviously.

Speaker 3 You got it. I believe you.
You're trusting. You got a trustworthy face.

Speaker 5 It was a point.

Speaker 3 Dan and Zoe, which of these unfortunately named failed apps is a real, unfortunately named failed app? In other words, one of these is real.

Speaker 3 A

Speaker 3 Hitler, no vowels.

Speaker 3 A music app designed for users to upload their hits and have them reviewed by other musicians.

Speaker 5 B

Speaker 3 Blow Me, a balloon delivery startup.

Speaker 3 C, Fascism, a fashion app designed for users to upload their looks and have them critiqued by other fashionistas.

Speaker 3 Or D, F My Dog, a Pet Finder app that seems to have been pretty normal except for that rank name.

Speaker 3 One of those is real

Speaker 3 which one is it Hitler blow me

Speaker 3 fascism or F my dog

Speaker 8 What do you think?

Speaker 15 I'm really I'm between fascism and blow me, which I don't like to be but

Speaker 3 That's what it's like to be on Twitter right now.

Speaker 3 You're always stuck between fascism and blow me

Speaker 8 Let's go with fascism? Yeah, that's all right. You got it.

Speaker 5 What?

Speaker 3 And Ashton Kutcher and

Speaker 3 Milakunis invested in it in 2011.

Speaker 5 Of course they did.

Speaker 3 And finally, and anybody can take it, who wrote this tweet? I just gave a squirrel a piece of bread, and it's straight spelled. Travis Kelsey.
We got it. So we got it.
It was Travis Kelsey.

Speaker 3 I just gave a squirrel a piece of bread. Every word spelled wrong.

Speaker 3 Squirrel spelled in, I guess, the British way.

Speaker 15 That's actually how we spell squirrel now, though. He decided it then, and that's the correct.

Speaker 3 I, not before E, a piece of bread, and it straight smashed all of it. I had no idea they ate bread like that.
Ha ha, hashtag crazy.

Speaker 3 That was Travis Kelsey.

Speaker 3 Zoe and Dan, you've won the game.

Speaker 5 Yeah, I think so. Yeah, they did.

Speaker 3 Congratulations, you've won two tickets to Praxis.

Speaker 3 We found it on, and I quote, traditional European Western beauty standards on which the civilized world at its best points has always found success in.

Speaker 5 Cool.

Speaker 7 Cool.

Speaker 3 It's like I always say, inside every techno-libertarian millionaire is a tiny little fascist waiting to pop out like an alien through John Hurts' abdomen.

Speaker 3 Give it up for Zoe, everybody.

Speaker 3 Before we go,

Speaker 4 we thought it would be fun to take a couple questions or maybe hear a couple tech horror stories.

Speaker 3 We're just going to open up. Did you work at Hitler?

Speaker 5 That was a fake one.

Speaker 3 Did you work in fascism?

Speaker 3 We want to know. Did you work in Chicago? You pronounced the E.

Speaker 3 Do we have a mic out there by the way?

Speaker 7 I think Austin's out there.

Speaker 3 We can bring the lights up.

Speaker 3 Oh, then's going out there.

Speaker 5 Sorry.

Speaker 3 We are open to questions or

Speaker 3 what's that website, Demois, the one where you get gossip?

Speaker 3 Anonymous gossip about tech freaks, also welcome. Or questions?

Speaker 5 I have none of that. Isn't this your fifth anniversary? Is it what? Your fifth anniversary.

Speaker 3 Fifth anniversary of what?

Speaker 20 Your company.

Speaker 3 Is it?

Speaker 3 I don't think so. No?

Speaker 5 We started 207.

Speaker 3 Early 2017. I don't remember before this.
I've always been here. I'll always be here.

Speaker 5 Here's my question.

Speaker 3 When you look back on the founding of Crooked Media,

Speaker 20 is where you are now where you thought you would be? Did it grow the way you thought?

Speaker 8 I remember that first meeting when Tommy just wrote on a cocktail napkin, San Jose.

Speaker 3 Here's what I'd say.

Speaker 3 When we were doing the podcast, that was on the ringer and we decided to do Pod Save America and try to launch a company around it, we were protected by just how little we knew.

Speaker 3 We had the confidence of ignorance, true, true ignorance. And that gave us, I think, the freedom to believe that this could work.

Speaker 3 And I think we thought there were a lot of other people that felt like we did that would want to be part of a community like this. But I don't think, A, we understood just how hard it would be to...

Speaker 3 to build a company and how much smarter the people would have to be who would ultimately need to do it.

Speaker 3 And then B, I think like, no, we could have never anticipated

Speaker 3 that we would be here all these years later. I assume, you know, look, we thought we'd give it a year and then I'd be on some kind of failed Roseanne reboot writing jokes for.

Speaker 3 Didn't that almost happen? It did almost happen. That's my other fucking path.

Speaker 5 She got canceled, right? Yeah.

Speaker 4 Yeah, we sat in John Favreau's kitchen for months, which Emily did not like.

Speaker 4 And we created a Medium website, which we barely knew how to do, announced it and called it a company.

Speaker 9 You bet.

Speaker 3 We had to use the website getcrookedmedia.com because crooked media and crooked.com, there was a guy in Prescott, Arizona.

Speaker 3 His career was in porn, but his passion was taking on the liberal media. So eventually we had to, remember that? The porn king of Prescott, Arizona? What happened to that guy? Anyway, we got it.

Speaker 3 The website. Eventually.

Speaker 11 Oh, man.

Speaker 4 What else we got?

Speaker 20 My question is actually for Dan. I'm sorry, it's not a tech question either.
I was just reading some of the bios and in yours,

Speaker 20 it stated that you are banned from going to Russia because of Putin.

Speaker 20 I sat back and I'm like, is that really true? And if it's really true, what the hell did you do to

Speaker 4 Dan dated his daughter

Speaker 5 in the early 20s? Ugly broke. Look, it's messy.

Speaker 8 It is true. And the reason I am banned to this day from traveling to Russia is

Speaker 8 when Russia invaded Ukraine the first time in 2014,

Speaker 8 I was previously scheduled to go on Meet the Press to do an interview about something else because no one sends me on TV to talk about major foreign policy, but it happened basically while I was, after I was already scheduled.

Speaker 8 So our friend Ben Rhodes, whose time is...

Speaker 8 A lot of worldos here, he gave me some very aggressive talking points about why

Speaker 8 Putin's decision to invade Russia was really a sign of weakness, not strength. And so when the Russians banned a whole bunch of people, a bunch of Americans

Speaker 8 in retribution for the U.S. sanctioning a bunch of Russian officials, I got added to that list, which answered the mystery of which people in the world still watch the Sunday shows.

Speaker 5 Wow.

Speaker 4 Great, very observant reading of the bio.

Speaker 5 Well done.

Speaker 4 What else we got out there?

Speaker 22 Okay, I have a question about relational organizing versus AI.

Speaker 3 Let's hear it. Do you want to pause for the topic?

Speaker 22 Well, okay, so the question is, do you think that relational organizing is going to become more important?

Speaker 22 Like walking out and canvassing in person versus the phone calls and texts?

Speaker 5 Wow, that may be a question for me. It's a great question.
It is a really good question. I actually haven't really thought about the implications of AI with it, but that's really interesting.

Speaker 5 For those of you who don't know, relational organizing is really just, you know, in the old days, like five years ago, you would get a list of your neighbors or what have you, or you'd walk into a campaign office and they'd give you a list of voters and you'd go knock the doors and you'd talk to them about your candidate.

Speaker 5 Now,

Speaker 5 sort of in the last two or three cycles,

Speaker 5 the organizing

Speaker 5 hot thing du jour, which I actually think to answer your question, is the right way to do organizing is basically tapping the contacts in your phone and allowing you to sort of define who within your own iPhone or Android or whatever it might be.

Speaker 5 Contact list is a target voter and communicating with them, presuming you are, if they're in their phone, you already know them.

Speaker 5 I think it is a more effective way to organize because organizing is all about relationships.

Speaker 5 And if somebody's in your phone, that presumes that you already know them and you already have a relationship with them. And so your communication with them will be...

Speaker 5 more effective than a stranger coming to their door.

Speaker 5 I don't really know how AI, I mean, I feel like AI could help sort of accelerate it ultimately, but it still comes down to the core power of relational organizing is that you know the person you're talking to before you show up and talk to them about politics.

Speaker 5 And thus they are more likely to accept what you have to say, pick up the phone, whatever it may be. And maybe AI can just help make it basically a little more efficient.
All right.

Speaker 4 Well, listen, thank you, San Jose.

Speaker 3 Thank you, D Su. Thank you, Zoe.
Thanks, Alex Lee, for being here.

Speaker 4 Great to see you.

Speaker 3 Have a great night.

Speaker 3 Good night, everybody.

Speaker 18 If you want to get ad-free episodes, exclusive content, and more, consider joining our Friends of the Pod subscription community at crooked.com/slash friends.

Speaker 18 And if you're already doom scrolling, don't forget to follow us at Pod Save America on Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube for access to full episodes, bonus content, and more.

Speaker 18 Plus, if you're as opinionated as we are, consider dropping us a review. Give us your own takes.
And give us a review. Give us your takes on our takes.

Speaker 7 Pod Save America is a crooked media production.

Speaker 18 Our producers are Olivia Martinez and David Toledo. Our associate producer is Farah Safari.
Writing support from Hallie Kiefer. Reed Cherlin is our executive producer.

Speaker 18 The show is mixed and edited by Andrew Chadway. Jordan Cantor is our sound engineer with audio support from Kyle Seglund and Charlotte Landis.
Madeline Herringer is our head of news and programming.

Speaker 18 Matt DeGroote is our head of production. Andy Taft is our executive assistant.
Thanks to our digital team, Elijah Cohn, Haley Jones, Mia Kelman, David Toles, Kirill Pelavieve, and Molly Lobel.

Speaker 6 Hey weirdos, I'm Elena and I'm Ash and we are the host of Morbid Podcast. Each week we dive into the dark and fascinating world of true crime, spooky history, and the unexplained.

Speaker 23 From infamous killers and unsolved mysteries to haunted places and strange legends, legends, we cover it all with research, empathy, humor, and a few creative expletives.

Speaker 6 It's smart, it's spooky, and it's just the right amount of weird.

Speaker 23 Two new episodes drop every week, and there's even a bonus once a month.

Speaker 6 Find us wherever you listen to podcasts.

Speaker 5 Yay! Woo!