What Happens if the Fed is Compromised — ft. Claudia Sahm

Support for the show comes from Anthropic, the team behind Claude.

When you're analyzing market trends or trying to understand what's really driving economic shifts, you need more than surface-level takes.

Meet Claude, the AI thinking partner that works through complexity with you.

Whether you're dissecting earnings reports or exploring the ripple effect of policy changes, Claude helps you dig deeper into the analysis that matters.

Try Claude for free at cloud.ai/slash propgmarkets and see why the world's best problem solvers choose Claude as their thinking partner.

Support for the show comes from Blue Air Purifier.

In markets and in life, the fundamentals matter, and taking care of your health is a big one.

The Blue Signature Air Purifier by Blue Air is the most powerful yet compact air purifier you can get.

It quietly removes pollutants that affect focus, sleep, and longevity.

Blue Air is one of the most awarded air care brands in the US and UK.

Use promo code PropG25 to save 25% at blueair.com.

Support for the show comes from hrefs.

AI is changing how people search from ChatGPT to Google's AI overviews.

With href's brand radar, you can see exactly how your brand shows up across AI, search, and the web, and how it stacks up against competitors.

Track brand mentions, monitor reputation, and uncover AI gaps so you know where to act before anyone else.

It's the platform powered by 150 million prompts and 15 plus years of data.

Stay visible as discovery moves to AI.

Learn more at hrefs.com.

Today's number 116.

That's the age of the world's oldest person, a British woman named Ethel Kateram.

Ed, what does oral sex taste like for seniors?

I don't know.

Depends.

You really don't get that?

I think you've done this before, and I haven't gotten it in the past either.

Old people wear depends.

I don't know what that is.

I don't know what that is.

That's it.

All right, never mind.

Never mind.

Never mind.

I'm at a conference and I'm peeing.

So, and this guy rolls up next to me and he starts peeing and he looks over and he says, not circumcise.

And I'm like, nope, that's just the wear and tear.

Depends.

We should have stuck with depends.

Listen to me.

Markets are bigger than us.

What you have here is a structural change in the wealth distribution.

Cash is trash.

Stocks look pretty attractive.

Something's going to break.

Forget about it.

I love seeing you laugh uncontrollably, Ed.

Yeah, uncontrollably.

I can't help myself.

I think you're just punch drunk.

These jokes are going to get

worse and worse.

I just cannot imagine what's going to happen in like five years.

I'm running out.

Someone needs to buy us and then tell us that we're not allowed to do the jokes anymore.

That's how we get out of this.

I know it'll make you feel better.

It's time for me to take a victory lap.

What did I predict, Ed?

What did I predict?

You had a great prediction, which we forgot to include in our daily episode.

We talked about how Electronic Arts was taken private for $55 billion, largest take-private in history.

And it genuinely slipped my mind.

And I apologize.

You did predict that in 2025, we would see the largest take-private in history.

Let's play the clip.

Private equity firms have almost $3 trillion in capital that they need to deploy.

Some big names have gotten beaten up so badly in the market that I think they're attractive.

I think biggest take private in history is going to is going to happen in 2025.

Your reaction, Scott.

Well, you know what?

I don't like to talk much about myself.

What do we have here?

We have a ton of capital on the sidelines.

We have basically a feckless FTC and DOJ that don't offer review of anything.

We have really deep-pocketed entities in the Gulf who are dying to get,

figure out a way to diversify their economy.

And we have these companies that are looking, are basically kind of, you know, feel like they've run out of juice or they're not sure how they're going to get from 40 billion to 80 billion.

And you have what is historically actually a fairly low interest rate environment.

It may not feel like it's low right now, but historically it is.

And

so it just kind of all adds up to we were going to see a big deal in the gaming.

I didn't, I mean, it's just another observation, and I want to, I would love for you to break down a little bit about the deal because I know you talked about it yesterday.

The thing that struck me is that this would have been the biggest news in the world if we weren't dealing with multiple wars and a guy that just, that is, that is sending our military into our own cities.

This would have been

Hair on Fire, CNBC special episode, special hot take from us.

And we, it, it barely even registered.

It's like, okay, the regular news doesn't

mean much when you have incoming missiles all of the time.

So I would love to get your take on what you think this deal means or any specific atmospherics around the deal.

Well, I think it was a really good idea by the investors.

And yes, it was the Saudis that were involved, but also Silverlake, which is the big private equity firm, also

involved in the TikTok deal.

But the thing that struck us at least is you've got this industry that is massively exploding.

I mean, you've got, I think it's half of the world now playing video games, and that's up more than 60% in the past 10 years.

And yet, despite all of that, despite the fact that you have this industry that is just absolutely exploding, that is eclipsing even television in terms of revenues and in terms of...

influence despite all of that video games only make up three percent of global ad spend

and you know meanwhile you've got your TV, which is commanding like a quarter of global ad spend.

So we think the thesis here is you're just going to see ads pumped into this, into this business, because they aren't really taking advantage of all of the attention that they command.

And it's a lot of attention.

And so our view is this is sort of the perfect private equity play where you take this business that a lot of people have a lot of love and admiration for, and then you figure out, okay, how do we squeeze as much cash as possible out of this thing?

It probably is going to be

to the detriment of the gaming experience.

It probably means that your gaming experience is going to be kind of inundated with ads now, as we see on social media.

But ultimately, we think it's a good play from an investment perspective because this is sort of an oil field that is untapped.

They haven't figured out how to rinse as many ads as possible out of this business.

So $55 billion, a lot of money, largest take private in history.

Our view from an investment perspective, it's a good one.

I thought the gentleman you had on to talk about it was, it was really interesting.

I didn't realize it's sort of the traditional world where EA is strong in terms of consoles and buying games, that that world is declining.

And it's all about free games and all about mobile.

To your point, around if you can capture attention, you can monetize it.

It is an attention, I would argue, an addiction economy.

I made an investment in this space.

I bought solely based on

I saw my 11-year-old just obsessed with addicted to Fortnite.

And

I actually, I'm not one of these people that's like, oh, video games are terrible for people.

I like multiplayer games.

They have a, it's sort of social.

They have kind of missions, achieve successes together.

I'm less down of all the things my kid does on a screen, I'm least worried about video games.

And there's been some research showing that in nations that have really high penetrative, there's no correlation between video game usage thus far and violence, although most recently it appears that a lot of these, these shooters were way too into video games.

Having said that, I made an investment in 2022 in Epic,

and I was so excited about it.

My son literally yells out these battle cries.

I'll hear from four floors down, I'll hear, yeah.

And I know he's, I mean,

I know he's playing a video game with his friends.

And I, I just find it, I remember the first time he did that, I thought, I got whatever he's doing up there, I've got to invest in it.

And I found out in, and Epic has this thing called Unreal Game Engine.

And the lesson here is the following.

I think I am down 40% on my most recent mark on Epic.

And it's because

something that I think a lot of us fail to realize is that there's two sides to the prospects of an investment.

And that is it can be an amazing company.

It is still possible to lose money.

In 2022, I looked at, I think everything I invested in in 2022 of the five investments or six investments I've made, I think all but one are underwater.

Because just as important as the underlying asset is the price you're paying for it.

Exactly.

So I made an investment in a Yellow Pages company that ended up being one of my best investments because quite frankly, we were able to get in at like one and a half times EBITDA.

And we knew the Yellow Pages was going away, but it wasn't going to go away in 18 months.

And I was so excited about Epic and everyone was so excited about digital because we were all at home spending all of our money on digital platforms that everything just skyrocketed.

And almost every

all the vintages in the venture capital community that were deployed in 22 are really struggling.

So lesson here is that there's two sides.

You can get very intoxicated.

I had a chance to invest in Warby Parker.

This is one of my better decisions.

And it was the last private round before they went public.

And this is, I love Warby Parker.

I'm wearing them now.

I like the management team there,

you know, Warden guys.

I just think the amazing supply chain story, differentiation, great stores.

I just absolutely love this company.

And they were raising money in the private markets of like 2.5 or 2.7 billion or something.

And I looked at it and I'm like, no fucking way.

I mean, that's just, that's just crazy in terms of multiple revenues.

And five, seven years later, the company has a market cap of $3.3 billion.

And if you look at dilution,

there's just no way anyone made any money in that round, or maybe they got their money back.

And I think there was real downside there.

So again,

everything,

at some point, everything is a good deal.

And at some point, everything is a bad deal.

And I'm hopeful that this deal inspires a substantial tick up in valuations across the whole sector.

And it is, some of the data on the sector is just striking.

We spend so much time obsessing over movies and strikes and Bob Iger and Jimmy Kimmel.

They're literally pimples on the elephant of games, of video gaming.

This is just such an enormous industry with so much potential upside.

Are you a gamer, Ed?

I certainly used to be.

I've decided I'm not going to get a console because I'm worried I will get addicted.

I'm a little worried because GTA 6 is coming out.

And from what I've seen, that's going to be one of the most remarkable video games of all time.

I don't know if you've seen the commercials for this game, but it looks unbelievable.

It's called GTA 6.

Grand Theft Auto 6.

Oh, really?

I thought that was a new GLP one drug you take to stop jerking off the porn or something.

Grand Theft Auto.

I never played Grand Theft Auto.

I've sometimes thought, okay, well, maybe I'm going to have to get that game because it's going to be this giant cultural moment and I can't miss out.

But I am worried I'm just going to get addicted.

I was just totally addicted to FIFA when I was a kid.

Love FIFA.

I was addicted to Call of Duty when I was a kid.

I mean,

I remember asking my mom for Call of Duty.

She said absolutely no shot.

And then she realized that all of my friends had it.

And she was like, okay, well, I can't let him be a loner.

So she let me get Call of Duty.

I got totally addicted.

So I used to be a gamer, but I don't do it now because I know that it'll be a problem and I'll probably get worse at this job.

I think everyone has a certain level of addiction in their life.

And I think it's important to do an assessment of addictions.

And that is things you do beyond their utility that start to infringe on other parts of your life.

You used to be addicted to Grand Theft Auto.

You gave that up.

What addiction have you replaced it with?

What are Ed Elson's addictions?

I think my addiction is just Instagram reels at this point.

I'm on reels the minute I wake up.

I'm on reels when I go to bed.

And if I lose focus while I'm working, I'm on reels.

I think that's my big addiction right now.

I get a feeling you have that addiction too.

I'm freaked out that anyone that actually picks up my phone and sees my Explorer page is going to go, this is a pervert obsessed with killer whales.

Like, it's either some hot young woman or a killer whale jumping up.

Like, that's it.

That's my life.

This is the guy who's the role model for struggling young men.

Forcas and hot women.

That's what life's all about.

You know, my addictions are, I have two addictions, and I think it's important to keep track of them.

I consume a lot of alcohol and THC, but I don't think I'm addicted to it.

Although last night I was so dying for a beer and I usually don't drink alone and I had a beer alone.

I usually don't do that.

And also, I think I've told you occasionally I get nervous.

I shotgun a beer behind stage and I go on to speak.

That's definitely alcoholism.

You've never told me that.

Is that true?

Are you kidding?

For some reason, especially Bill Maher, they put you in a little dressing room and they have alcohol in there and I shotgun a beer before I go on.

You actually shotgun?

You do a shotgun.

Not like the can, like Will Farrell.

I don't do a beer bong, but I they actually have, for some reason they have Amsterleight and Heineken, two Illumina brands.

I close the door so someone doesn't think this guy's got a problem.

I crack open the beer and daddy just downs it.

And then it's like, okay, it's go time.

I like that, actually.

That's very good.

Anyways, but I don't think those are my addictions.

My two addictions are I'm addicted to money.

I think way too much about it and it infringes on the quality of my life now.

I've spent so much time trying to get economic security.

I can't get off this hamster wheel.

And I think way too much about it.

And I'm in my head about it and obsessed about it.

And if my stocks go down one day, it bumps me out, even though it has no impact on my life.

Anyways, and the second thing is the affirmation of strangers.

I will be bummed out about performing poorly on some stupid fucking show where I get, you know, negative comments and I'm

spending all day Saturday with my kids and I'm not engaged with my kids because I'm worried about what, you know, Dog Lady Madison thought about my appearance on Pierce Morgan.

That's definitely an addiction.

Anyways.

When did that addiction show up for you, the affirmation of others one?

Did that coincide with becoming a public figure or has that always been there?

It was when my dad abandoned me.

I think

the need for the affirmation of others had something to do when my primary role model decided to move to Ohio with a stewardess from Continental Airlines.

I think that has something to do with it, Ed.

You know, just going out on a limb here.

I think that probably has something to do.

Oh, God.

Oh, God.

Hold me, Ed.

Hold me.

That wasn't a fair question for me, was it?

The biggest take private ever.

Oh, God.

Anyways.

Yeah.

No, it's, you know, I think I'm a bit of a,

my ego is way too fucking big.

I'm a bit of of a narcissist, insecurity, wanting affirmation from strangers, not getting enough of it.

I don't know.

Let's move on, but I just, my final question.

I know that you're going to Chelsea, Benfica, tonight.

Oh, yes.

How did you get the tickets?

And I mean, I asked that because I know that you're going to be in the box and

I'm jealous of you.

So give me some,

give me some info.

So this is a flex.

I met.

I met one of the owners at a conference and I mentioned Chelsea in my talk and he texted me and said, would you and your son like to come to a game?

And my son is thrilled and I'm super excited and I just hope Coleman is Cole Palmer injured?

I hope not.

He's injured.

Oh,

nothing's ever perfect.

And we're not doing very well.

We had a terrible loss to Brighton over the weekend.

Yeah,

we're not doing well, but I'm super excited.

My prediction for you is you're going to switch from, you went from Arsenal.

Sorry, no, you went from Chelsea to Spurs to Arsenal.

My prediction for you is you're going to become a Crystal Palace fan by the end of the year.

I like Crystal Palace.

I do.

I like Crystal Palace.

I want to go, I want to go smaller team.

It's so cliche to go to one of the big three.

I want to go with one of the underdogs.

I want to go with one of the smaller teams.

Yeah, that's my prediction for you.

Wish me luck.

We'll be right back after the break.

If you're enjoying the show so far, be sure to give Property Markets a follow wherever you get your podcasts.

Support for the show comes from Anthropic, the team behind Cloud.

When analyzing complex market movements or policy implications, the difference between surface-level commentary and real insight comes down to asking better questions about the data.

Cloud is for AI for minds that don't stop at good enough.

It's a collaborator that actually understands your entire workflow and thinks with you, not for you.

Whether you're strategizing your next business move or diving deep into economic analysis, Claude extends your thinking to tackle the problems that matter.

For finance professionals exploring earnings reports or economic policy ripple effects, Cloud works through complexity rather than rushing to conclusions.

It helps spot connections across multiple sources, challenge assumptions, and develop insights that go beyond the obvious.

Try Claude for free at cloud.ai/slash propgymarkets and see why the world's best problem solvers choose Claude as their thinking partner.

Support for the show comes from Workday.

The to-do list of a small business leader.

Close the books, get your people paid, and bring on new hires.

Look, running a small or mid-sized business can be exciting, but it can also be chaotic.

That's where Workday comes in.

Workday Go makes simplifying your business a whole lot simpler.

Imagine this, the important aspects of your company, HR and Finance, all on one AI platform.

No more juggling multiple systems, no more worrying about growing too fast.

Just the full power of Workday helping small to mid-sized businesses like yours run more smoothly.

And Workday Go activates quickly.

You can be up and running in 30 to 60 business days.

So simplify your business.

Go for growth.

Go with Workday Go.

Visit workday.com slash go to learn more.

I need a job with a steady paycheck.

I need a job that offers health care on day one for me and my kids.

I want a job where I can get certified in technical roles, like robotics or software engineering.

In communities across the country, hourly Amazon employees earn an average of over $23 an hour with opportunities to grow their skills and their paycheck by enrolling in free skills training programs and apprenticeships.

Learn more at aboutamazon.com.

We're back with Prof G Markets.

Okay, here is our conversation with Claudia Somme, chief economist at New Century Advisors and former section chief at the Federal Reserve.

Claudia, thank you very much much for joining us on Profit Markets.

Thank you for having me.

Happy to be here.

So we want to talk about the Fed with you because you worked at the Fed for over 12 years.

You understand all things Federal Reserve and this is a very interesting time for the Fed right now.

I think the big question mark for the Fed probably at the moment is this question of independence.

How independent is the Fed really?

Is its independence being eroded?

That's certainly the question that investors are most interested or anxious about.

So I will just start there.

What is the state of the Fed's independence right now?

So first of all, when I think of Fed independence, I mean, this really boils down to a question of who decides what interest rates are going to be, what the federal funds rate is going to be.

Is it going to be politicians?

I mean, we know President Trump has been very clear what he thinks the federal funds rate should be, something like 1%, under 2%.

Or is it going to be a group of technocrats, right?

So the Federal Open Market Committee, these people are experts.

They're not politicians.

They're not elected officials.

They're the ones that cast the votes.

They're the ones that decide what is the federal funds rate.

Okay, so it's really, it's really a question about who controls interest rates.

And the Fed is in a period of transition right now.

We've seen the first of President Trump's second term nominees, Stephen Meyer, join the board at their last meeting.

And, you know, there's all eyes on who's going to be the new Fed chair.

Right.

And that's a very standard way that the politicians have an influence.

But at the end of the day, that doesn't really control interest rates.

We right now have an independent Federal Reserve.

They are still setting interest rate policies.

They are not following the president's guidance on what the federal funds rate should be.

And yet we are at a moment where that independence is under threat.

And I think particularly the threat escalated when the president in August attempted to remove Fed Governor Lisa Cook from the board.

And this is going through the courts.

The Supreme Court will issue a ruling on whether she can be removed or not as her case proceeds.

And that's really a step.

If the president is successful, we'd be moving into a world where the Fed very much is controlled by the president.

Just to play out what the economy would look like if the Fed were truly not independent, if it were under the influence of politics and the president, what exactly is the risk there?

What happens, say Trump has control over the Fed?

What is the downside?

What is the risk?

There are, you know, modern examples of central banks where politicians take control.

Turkey is one.

Argentina had an episode as well.

And the typical concern is when politicians take control of monetary policy, when they're the ones that set the interest rates, often they'll hold the interest rates really low to try to get the economy going, like boost demand and really have a great,

you know, a real boom.

The problem is that boom often leads then to inflation and other instabilities.

And then say you'd have to raise the interest rates to get the inflation under control.

So the typical concern is that it would end up being inflationary.

And President Trump is also, I mean, he's talked about ultra-low interest rates as his goal.

And that probably at this moment would have some inflationary effects.

Now, I think the other thing that

maybe,

you know, as Marcus try and grapple with these possibilities that maybe isn't talked as much about is it could just get really chaotic.

Like if we think about what's happened with trade policy, it used to be that if we had trade, you know, there'd be negotiations and there'd be treaty.

Like it would be a long process.

And we're at a place now where the president shows up on True Social

some evening and, you know, blasts out four new sets of tariffs.

That unpredictability, because then it really comes down to what does this one person want?

Like, we've gotten used to a Fed that responds to data and the Fed that has tailor rules.

It like has things that we're used to

interpreting and the markets are used to thinking about.

And it would really be a whole new world of just, what does the president want today?

Yeah, when when you think about the signals that we've had that we are moving away from Fed independence, I mean, if I were to just sort of map them out, one, it's the tweeting or the truthing,

um, basically saying and shouting about how interest rates need to come down, uh, interest rates are too high, Jerome Powell's too late, he's a dummy, he's a moron.

So, you've got all of that, that seems new, I guess.

Uh, you've got firing Lisa Cook

or the attempted firing of Lisa Cook, looks like isn't going to go through.

Maybe it'll go through.

We're not sure.

And then you've got the appointment of Stephen Myron, who is still in the White House, still in the administration, but his position is sort of being temporarily put on hold, but he isn't giving it up.

So it appears that he's kind of doing two jobs at the same time.

Those are the big three that I've seen.

I'm just wondering, is there anything else that would indicate that we are seeing the erosion of Fed independence?

And if not,

what do those three things tell us about where the Fed is headed?

So the other one I would add that's come into a discussion, a concern, is

involves the Reserve Bank presidents.

So every five years, the Reserve Bank presidents need to be renewed.

So, and most of that process is at the district level, you know, the board of directors, for say the Atlanta Fed or the Chicago Fed, they do a review of the president and make a recommendation as to whether that president should continue in their role or not.

And the board of governors, so the seven members in DC, they have to sign off on that.

They also sign off whenever a new president is put in place.

Typically, this is kind of a rubber stamp.

I mean, the process is done very well at the district level.

So it would be very strange for there to be a problem that's unearthed when it gets to Washington.

But it has been pointed out that if

come, and the renewal is in March of next year.

So if when we get to that point, if there were a majority of loyalists on the board, you could also have a way to start removing Reserve Bank presidents.

I mean, these things like never should be talked about as possibilities, but it's something that has been a concern.

And I think that's one of the reasons why this whole like,

how quickly could the president get quote unquote control of the board in terms of a majority has taken some extra urgency because as you know the federal reserve, it's a complicated system.

You have the seven governors in DC.

They're all nominated by the president, approved by the Senate.

Then you have 12 Reserve Bank presidents.

So there's the districts.

And five of those 12 vote at any given time.

And for a lot of the monetary policy decisions, you need a majority of the Federal Open Market Committee.

So it's kind of like

the question of the math.

Like how do you get the people?

And the way one of the protections for the Fed to be independent of politics is that the board in DC, they serve 14-year terms.

And so every few years, there should be a governor position come open, but no president comes in and day one gets to like pick a new Fed, right?

Like it's spread out over time.

They have long terms.

Their tenure is protected.

They're only supposed to be able to be removed for cause.

And so that's a key way that the Fed is shielded from some of the

president says, do X.

And the Fed says, no, we're not going to do X.

And they say, well, you're fired.

And we are moving towards that space.

Now,

really, a truly...

big decision point will be what the Supreme Court has to say about exactly how strong are those protections of tenure.

Can the president remove a sitting governor

for unproven allegations?

Like, does the president get to determine what causes?

Do you have any predictions on that?

What do you think they'll say?

The appeals court said no.

Now go back up to SCOTIS.

It's interesting because there are many agencies that have been considered independent, so the Fed is among those, that the president has removed their leaders.

So the National Labor Relations Board, the the Federal Trade Commission, right?

Like, so there, there have been agencies where the president has been removing

independent

leaders of those agencies sooner than their terms would normally be up.

The Supreme Court has stood by that.

What's interesting is in one of the earlier cases this year, the Supreme Court, and they didn't really have to, but they went out of their way to say, hey, the Fed is special.

Right?

It's not like all the other independent agencies.

The removal, there has to be four cause.

You can't, the president can't just remove.

And frankly, if the president can decide what for cause is without judicial review, which is what the White House is saying, that really isn't for cause.

Yeah, they need to prove she's guilty.

Yeah, it's like that's kind of at will.

So I feel like the Supreme Court has planted the flag.

And I do really believe that if Lisa Cook's, if the president's able to remove her, she will not be the last.

person removed by the president.

I mean, over the weekend, he was tweeting out a cartoon or

a true social post of a cartoon of the president firing Powell.

I think it's difficult for many of us to discern the signal from the noise regarding the U.S.

economy right now.

Can you do your best to give us sort of your overview of the cliff notes on the state of the U.S.

economy?

At any moment in time, the U.S.

economy, $30 trillion plus.

I mean, we have a very dynamic economy.

It's hard to read the tea leaves at any point in time.

I think some of the aspects of the economy right now that are

curious or maybe unusual is we've had, and I think some of this is still a little bit of an after effect of all the turmoil that we went through with the pandemic and the economy.

But I mean, we're getting well past that, but I think in particular,

one area that's been of concern is in the labor market, right?

And

we've seen the

hiring rate has really fallen back down to levels that are much more like the early years after the Great Recession, which was not a good labor market, right?

But at the same time, the unemployment rate is 4.3%.

This is, you know, it's not the cycle low, but it's historically a relatively good unemployment rate.

So

you have a very low hiring rate.

The layoff rate

is also extremely low.

So we have what has been kind of coined the low hire, low fire

jobs market.

And what that that means is you get a very bifurcated experience for workers who have a job,

basically like their job, like they're in a good place.

Companies are not laying off their talent.

And some of that I think, you know,

businesses had a really hard time in like the early recovery from the pandemic being able to hire.

Like there were labor shortages, there were issues.

And so you have this kind of people, businesses hang on to their workers.

We're not losing workers.

So that's very good if you have a job.

But if you are someone who is, say, finishing your education, coming out into the labor market, if you are among those who become unemployed,

it has been, and this is not just a new thing.

This is probably almost two years now.

We've had this aspect of the people coming in are the ones having a really hard time.

Now,

how that resolves itself can go different directions, but it is,

it's a vulnerable setup.

Because say something were to happen in the world that pushed up the layoff rate.

You know, I mean, there are all kinds of various economic calamities.

You would be laying off workers into an environment that has a depressed hiring rate.

And so then the unemployment rate, which now is pretty low, could move up and it could move up very quickly.

Overall,

It's not a bad labor market, but it definitely, depending on who you are as a worker, makes a big difference.

The other piece that's been really important in recent years is we've had some big swings in immigration.

So in our labor force.

And that means that there was quite a bit of job creation in the past two, three years that was related to an inflow of immigrants.

And I mean, whatever the politics and the social aspects of it, like it was a piece that was help, and the immigrants were helping boost economic activity.

And since last summer, so towards the end of the Biden administration, immigration restrictions began and they've really intensified under the Trump administration.

And so we've seen this shift from an inflow of immigrants to a real pullback in terms of immigration.

And where that shows up, at least in part, is when we look at

the job creation numbers.

which in the last three months, the U.S.

economy produced less than 30,000 jobs a month on net.

We have like almost 160 million workers.

That's nothing.

I don't see a recession on the horizon.

I think these are real, you know, the labor market is something to be concerned about, and the Fed's trying, you know, lower interest rates and get ahead of things.

And that makes sense.

But overall, you look at the economy and it's still

powering forward.

We'll be right back.

And for even more markets content, sign up for our newsletter at propertymarkets.com/slash subscribe.

All right, remember, the machine knows if you're lying.

First statement: Carvana will give you a real offer on your car all online.

False.

True, actually.

You can sell your car in minutes.

False?

That's gotta be.

True again.

Carvana will pick up your car from your door, or you can drop it off at one of their car vending machines.

Sounds too good to be true, so true.

Finally, caught on.

Nice job.

Honesty isn't just their policy, it's their entire model.

Sell your car today, today, too.

Pickup fees may apply.

Let's be honest.

Are you happy with your job?

Like, really happy?

The unfortunate fact is that a huge number of people can't say yes to that.

Far too many of us are stuck in a job we've outgrown, or one we never wanted in the first place.

But still, we stick it out, and we give reasons like, what if the next move is even worse?

I've already put years into this place.

And maybe the most common one, isn't everyone kind of miserable at work?

But there's a difference between reasons for staying and excuses for not leaving.

It's time to get unstuck.

It's time for Strawberry.me.

They match you with a certified career coach who helps you go from where you are to where you actually want to be.

Your coach helps you get clear on your goals, create a plan, build your confidence, and keeps you accountable along the way.

So don't leave your career career to chance.

Take action and own your future with a professional coach in your corner.

Go to strawberry.me slash unstuck to claim a special offer.

That's strawberry.me slash unstuck.

Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start?

Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to.

Don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin?

Or what that clunking sound from your dryer is?

With thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro.

You just have to hire one.

You can hire top-rated pros, see price estimates, and read reviews all on the app.

Download today.

We're back with Prof G Markets.

So we have 10 companies representing 40% of the total market cap of the S ⁇ P.

70 plus percent of the earnings growth has come from these 10 companies.

Do you see any risks around concentration of

market value and earnings growth coming from such a small number of companies?

And

one of our theses here is that if we were to see an unwinding or a significant drawdown in the markets and that might trigger a recession, that it would likely be

a realization or a sobering of the market.

the market's perception of the potential of AI.

Have you given any thought to this increasing concentration across a small number of stocks and and what impact AI mania, AI, irrational, you know, rational, irrational or rational exuberance might have on the economy and the labor market?

With artificial intelligence, I mean, we're still in early stages of the technology and certainly very early stages in the

how that technology is going to be applied in the economy.

There's big expectations.

That's why the valuations are what they are.

We do know from history when there are transformative technologies that happen, you know, things like the railroads, electricity, right?

Like the historical record is such that you, you do see a period of kind of

overinvestment or exuberance, and there's a correction.

If the technology is what its proponents think it is, like over the long run, it will come out as a positive.

But it is the case that it's at least historically, and I'm not like predicting that the bottom is going to fall out, but it's hard

for these new technologies, for

the real world applications to move as quickly as the expectations.

And I think we've certainly seen at various points, like in the news cycle,

things will come up and people doubt the AI trade.

And so

it wouldn't be surprising to have it

have a period

that in the end will look like a bump in the road, but at the moment will probably feel like more than a bump.

And, you know, the wealth creation, whether it's concentrated or not, this, like looking at households and their balance sheets, we really have seen

a pretty notable increase in household wealth.

And it's not just through the mortgages.

I mean, you know, this isn't equally shared, but it is a piece to it.

And I think that if...

If there were to be an event that called into question the

wisdom of some of the investments being made in AI, it probably would be sufficient to cause, you know, destroy enough wealth quickly enough to cause a recession.

But when I kind of talked about like, this isn't a good environment to have something bad happen because we've got this low hiring.

I mean,

some disruption within the AI space that vaporizes a certain amount of wealth in a short period of time, that is exactly the kind of thing that could happen.

Claudia, you have an economic rule named after you called the SOM rule, which I've read about a lot in the past.

The rule states that, quote, when the three-month moving average of the national unemployment rate is 0.5 percentage points or more above its low over the prior 12 months, we are in the early months of recession.

How did you come up with this rule?

What is its significance?

And does this tell us anything about where we are in terms of recession risk right now?

I came up with this recession indicator for a project I was doing with several colleagues on how to fight the next recession.

And it was a whole volume on what are called automatic stabilizers.

So putting fiscal policy on autopilot, tying them to economic conditions, not to Congress getting its act together and passing stuff.

So kind of getting a plan ahead of time.

I'd worked on a proposal to do stimulus checks, something that the U.S.

government has done in every recession in recent memory.

But like, if we wanted to design this ahead of time, do it really thoughtfully, when would we know?

it's time like send out the checks and to get them out quickly because often fighting a recession if you can get in at the early innings that's the time where you can make a difference so really the project was about how to fight recessions but you know it was a volume where they wanted some specifics like you know what would be the real plan here and so the Sam rule was I mean I was just putting together an indicator that would reliably say we're in a recession it's time send out the checks or enhance the unemployment benefits or and you know because it was something that was meant to be in legislation it needed to be simple transparent i mean it's using the unemployment rate, that's, I mean, a lot of the reason we fight recessions is unemployment.

Rise in recessions, very bad.

It's not a forecast.

It was meant to like, the recession is here.

And the logic of it is just that even small increases in the unemployment rate can often be

bad news, right?

Because the unemployment rate, it tends to at first rise fairly slowly.

A half a percentage point increase is really not much of anything, right?

But once it gets gets historically, once it was past that threshold, it just keeps going.

So in a typical recession, you're talking about two to three percentage points of increase in the unemployment rate.

So it had, you know, worked really well historically, worked in the pandemic.

I think anybody could have known we were in a recession in March of 2020.

But then actually last year, you know, it didn't work.

It triggered last year.

And this was a case where the unemployment rate is

the number of unemployed people out of the labor force.

As I mentioned before with immigration, we had some really big swings in the labor force.

We had a period right after the pandemic where we had labor shortages, people dropped out of the labor force.

Then we had the big swing in immigration.

And so the unemployment rate was just, you know, pushed up just enough from that that it triggered briefly last year.

And at the time, I said, this is not a recession.

Look around at all the other indicators.

You know, no indicator is perfect.

It was exactly, you know, the moment at which the Sommer would break.

As for what's happening right now,

the unemployment rate has risen a bit in the last few months, but it's really been pretty steady within a range over the last year.

The effects of immigration are kind of working in the opposite direction.

So we have, because we're losing

you know,

workers, we don't have the same labor force growth.

So it kind of pushes down down on the unemployment rate.

So I'm watching it.

It's, it is nowhere near triggering, but it probably, given what's happening with the labor force, won't be the first indicator of a recession.

But the idea, and I think this goes more broadly than just looking at the unemployment rate, it's often with the macro statistics,

how much are they changing and how fast are they changing?

So even small changes, if they appear to be getting some momentum, that's often the tell that like things are starting to go south.

I don't see that right now in, you know, looking at the SOM rule or looking at a lot of the other indicators I do, but it's certainly worth,

I mean, it's always worth keeping an eye on.

Claudia Somme is chief economist of New Century Advisors, the founder of Somme Consulting, and a regular contributor to Bloomberg Opinion.

She created the SOM rule, a recession indicator based on increases in the unemployment rate.

Previously, Claudia was a section chief at the Federal Reserve where she oversaw the survey of household economic and decision making.

Before that, she worked for 10 years on the staff's macroeconomic macroeconomic forecast.

For more of her work, you can subscribe to her newsletter, Stay at Home Macro.

That's a great name, Claudia.

Very much appreciate your time and

keep up to good work.

Thank you.

Thank you so much.

This episode was produced by Claire Miller and Alison Weiss and engineered by Benjamin Spencer.

Our research team is Dan Shalan, Isabella Kinsel, Christine O'Donague, and Mia Severio.

Drew Burrows is our technical director, and Catherine Dillon is our executive producer.

Thank you for listening to Profit Markets from Profit Media.

If you liked what what you heard, give us a follow and join us for a fresh take on markets on Monday.

You have

in time

reunion

as the world turns

and the bell flies

and the love

Adobe Acrobat Studio, so brand new.

Show me all the things PDFs can do.

Do your work with ease and speed.

PDF spaces is all you need.

Do hours of research in an instant.

Key insights from an AI assistant.

Pick a template with a click.

Now your Prezo looks super slick.

Close that deal, yeah, you won.

Do that, doing that, did that, done.

Now you can do that, do that, with Acrobat.

Now you can do that, do that with the all-new Acrobat.

It's time to do your best work with the all-new Adobe Acrobat Studio.

As marketing channels have multiplied, the demand for content has skyrocketed.

But everyone can make content that's on brand and stands out with Adobe Express.

You don't have to be a designer to generate images, rewrite text, and create effects.

That's the beauty of generative AI that's commercially safe.

Teams all across your business will be psyched to collaborate and create amazing presentations, videos, social posts, flyers, and more.

Meet Adobe Express, the quick and easy app to create on-brand content.

Learn more at adobe.com slash express slash business.

Mercury knows that to an entrepreneur, every financial move means more.

An international wire means working with the best contractors on any continent.

A credit card on day one means creating an ad campaign on day two.

And a business loan means loading up on inventory for Black Friday.

That's why Mercury offers banking that does more, all in one place, so that doing just about anything with your money feels effortless.

Visit mercury.com to learn more.

Mercury is a financial technology company, not a bank.

Banking services provided through Choice Financial Group column NA and Evolve Bank and Trust members FDIC.