How Germany Remembers the Holocaust

27m
What can memorials to tragedy in one country tell Americans about how to remember the legacy of slavery in the U.S.?
Staff writer Clint Smith traveled to Germany to understand how Germany memorializes the Holocaust. He discusses what he saw and the perspectives he encountered with fellow staff writer Caitlin Dickerson, and explains why his experience of several German memorials makes the daunting task of memorializing slavery in the United States seem achievable.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Listen and follow along

Transcript

So, what did you expect to find in Germany?

I mean, were you essentially going to pick up lessons for the U.S.?

Were you starting to become a little bit skeptical of Germany as this ideal for reckoning and atonement?

I mean, what did you have in mind as you set out on this trip?

I think in part, I went to Germany to put it in conversation with the process of the memorialization here in the United States.

I'm Caitlin Dickerson.

Today on Radio Atlantic, staff writer Clint Smith on the Holocaust, America's legacy of slavery, and what it means to memorialize tragedy.

So it wasn't necessarily to compare and contrast as much as it was an attempt to say, okay, what's happening in Germany?

What's happening in the United States?

In what ways are these processes in conversation with one another?

America, in so many places, fails to properly memorialize and remember and account for its relationship to the history of slavery.

What's a place that does this well?

So, where in Germany did you go to try to figure this out?

Yeah, I went to a range of different places, including the House of the Fonse Conference, which is this idyllic mansion outside of Berlin where the leaders of the Nazi Party got together to outline and plan the contours of the final solution.

I'm here standing outside of the

house of the Vanzi Conference.

Already, by the time they met here, people had been killed in mass murders.

But this is where they would plan out

how they would kill millions more.

There's a profound sort of juxtaposition

between the

scenery and the idyllic nature of it and the terrible thing that was planned inside of it.

Behind it is this lake with sailboats that are slowly passing by,

the water sort of lapping against the shore.

You can hear birds and whim chimes.

It's a strange thing.

It's a very strange thing.

You can say your name, your position.

Okay, so my name is Deborah Hartman.

One of the people that I spoke to when I went to the House of the Fonsi Conference was Deborah Hartman, who is the director of that museum.

And one of the things we talked about in particular that I found really fascinating was the need to focus on not only the victims of the Holocaust, but also the perpetrators.

I think we have to learn something about the perspective of the perpetrators, and not only about the perpetrators, also about the bystanders and all those who were in a way involved.

And this could be the neighbor who was not a member of the Nazi party, but you know, was just like

hanging around and

had a nice view out of the window, seeing like the neighbors being deported.

Which was so many people.

Yeah, of course.

It's interesting because I think part of what this place

does in some ways

it dehumanizes both the victims and the

of course there were human beings as well

and

you know in the afternoon people who participated in the mass shootings wrote nice letters to their families at home.

They killed people in the morning and wrote letters to their family and their children.

Exactly.

And this is maybe what's so difficult for us to

understand

and to live with it.

She's challenging in a few different ways the oversimplification of narratives around the Holocaust and also humanizing the perpetrators is worth doing because actually human beings perpetrated this.

It wasn't fantastical characters of evil, but actual human beings.

Yeah, I think one of the things that she takes very seriously in her work is ensuring that we are not falling into the trap of reducing the people

who are part of this history into

two-dimensional caricatures of themselves.

And, you know, then you suddenly see, okay, that the history is much more ambivalent and

it's much more complicated.

And today,

I think that the Germans actually are very proud of what

they have achieved in terms of like confrontation with the past and coming to terms.

But I think it becomes difficult when they feel,

I don't know, the German English maybe relieved.

You understand what I mean?

Yeah.

Because then it can turn into a very problematic direction, maybe.

This idea that

we've already done it.

I mean, here you can see, okay, this is very still very challenging, I think, for Germans, even in the fourth generation today.

How can it be, okay,

that my family was somehow involved in those atrocities?

I mean, there wasn't really a confrontation until the 60s, when the young generation started asking their parents, what did they do during the war?

I went to meet Deidre Berger, who is an American woman who's lived in Germany for many years, and both in America and in Germany.

She has been deeply involved in Jewish organizations, Jewish advocacy groups to ensure that Jewish people and Jewish history are accounted for.

And the two of us got together on a chilly day in October at the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe in downtown Berlin.

And we had the Nuremberg trials in the late 40s.

There was the Auschwitz trials in Frankfurt in the early

mid-1960s.

And still,

most perpetrators were never accused or tried or charged.

And there was the attitude of, let's leave it behind us.

This went right into the heart of families and it tore families apart and so they'd rather not talk about it.

When I came to Germany in the mid-1980s

there was not much of a confrontation within families.

So it took a very long time.

A lot of the international climate was such that I think more of an understanding evolved at least in the German political elite, of the importance of confronting the Holocaust and also on the grassroots level.

So in the 1960s is when the grassroots movement started in Germany to try and understand better what had happened in my town, what happened to the Jews.

And there were quite a lot of

good-minded Germans

who pursued projects, who invited former members of their community who were Jewish back to their towns.

And out of this movement grew the idea that there needed to be a national monument.

So it was a complicated conglomeration of interests that led to the establishment of this monument.

I don't know that there was one government who said, you have to do this, but

it was an understanding in Germany that this was important to have a national symbol of recognition of German guilt for what had happened.

Clint, what does this monument, this symbol of recognition that she's describing, actually look like?

So the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe is a 200,000 square foot memorial at the heart of downtown Berlin.

And when I say at the heart of downtown Berlin, I really mean it.

It's almost as if a massive memorial to slavery was placed in front of the White House.

That's sort of the first thing you notice.

And it's made up of more than 2,000 stone columns that are of different heights.

And as you walk through the stone columns, it's almost

maze-like, and the ground beneath the columns rises and falls like waves and so at different points within the space you know you you have different amounts of light and so sometimes as you your body moves down it'll get darker and darker and and I think it's a place that is meant to be haunting and overwhelming but what's also true is that it is a place that has become such

an enmeshed part of the landscape.

People are driving to work.

People are walking their dogs.

People are running.

There are people who have obviously come there to engage with the space.

And so I would see people who were crying and holding hands and sort of gently touching the stones as if it could sort of transport them back to this moment.

There were also small children who were playing hide and seek.

And so different people engage with the space in fundamentally different ways.

And I think in some ways that's inevitable.

But it's also something that rubs a lot of people the wrong way.

There are many people who've commented that the very name is too passive, the memorial to the murdered Jews of Europe, that it doesn't talk about who did the murdering.

There are those who say it's too abstract.

There are no names on the columns.

But there are also those who believe that its size and its scale and its scope is unlike anything that any other country has ever done.

Do you remember when you first came here?

When you first saw it and experienced it?

Yeah, when it was opened

in 2005.

I find it

very cold and I'm not sure that I need this much concrete detail with all these stones to grasp the dimensions of this crime.

But different people have different reactions.

I think in the Jewish community,

my reaction was fairly widespread.

But on the other hand,

I think there was a certain acceptance and degree of relief almost that there was a Holocaust monument that was finally erected in the heart of Berlin and

very close to the German parliament.

And that's just on the other side, basically.

And that was meaningful.

There's nothing that Japan has built to account for Japanese imperialism of this scale.

There's nothing that the United States has built to account for a history of indigenous genocide or chattel slavery.

This sort of thing at this size doesn't exist anywhere.

And so different people fall on different ends of the spectrum about whether they think it is a space that is a net positive or not, whether it's a place that does more good or more harm.

And that was one of the things that I learned a lot from my conversation with Geidra Berger and others.

I'm not complaining.

I think it's quite remarkable.

Let's keep in mind that in the center of a major city, a country acknowledges its guilt at genocide.

Berger talks about this desire already in the 1940s among some to

move on and to forget.

I'm interested in that impulse.

I remember interviewing David Romo.

He's a historian of the U.S.-Mexico border and actually

found that it was the U.S.

Border Patrol that began using Zyklon B in its own gas chambers that helped to inspire German scientists who then brought them to Germany, turned up the potency of the solution and used it to kill Jewish people.

He talked about

amnesia and about forgetting as a response to shame on both the sides of the perpetrators, but also the victims, it sounds like you've been thinking a lot about just how dangerous that can be.

Aaron Powell, yeah, I think that we have seen the direct implications of that.

I mean, here in the United States, there was a very intentional, proactive attempt to distort and push aside the story of chattel slavery and what the Civil War was fought over.

The idea perpetuated by the widows and the sisters and the mothers who lost their husbands, brothers, who lost their sons, their nephews, that grief animated a desire to tell a very different story of who these men were and what they had died for, because they didn't want to remember their loved ones as someone who

died

perpetuating evil.

They wanted to remember them with love.

They began to talk about how slavery wasn't central to the Civil War, how, even if slavery had been central to the Civil War, it wasn't even that bad.

It was a benign or even a civilizing institution.

And even if someone wasn't actively perpetuating and disseminating misrepresentations about the Civil War and slavery, what there was was silence about it.

And it's interesting because in Germany, there was its own version of silence after the end of the war.

And it took generations before these monuments would be built.

built and this silence was eradicated.

Charlie Sheen is an icon of decadence.

I lit the fuse and my life turns into everything it wasn't supposed to be.

He's going the distance.

He was the highest paid TV star of all time.

When it started to change, it was quick.

He kept saying, no, no, no, I'm in the hospital now, but next week I'll be ready for the show.

Now, Charlie's sober.

He's going to tell you the truth.

How do I present this with a class?

I think we're past that, Charlie.

We're past that, yeah.

Somebody call action.

Aka Charlie Sheen, only on Netflix, September 10th.

Clint, you saw a lot of memorials while you were in Germany.

Which ones stuck out to you most?

I remember the first time I saw the Stopperstein, which are the brass stones that are placed in front of the former residences residences or places of worship or places of work of people who were persecuted and killed by the Nazis.

It was started by a guy named Gunter Demnig in 1996, whose own father was a Nazi soldier.

And in many ways, this art project that he began seems to be a part of his own contrition.

And so these brass stones, these 10 by 10 centimeter stones, are placed in front of these homes.

And they have the birth day, the death date, the deportation date of the people who were taken from these homes.

This is the largest decentralized memorial in the world.

And you'll be walking down the streets of Berlin and there will be two stumbling stones.

And then you walk a little further down and in front of another home there will be four.

And in front of another home there will be seven.

In front of another home there will be twelve.

Where are you from originally in the States?

Uh short answer.

We moved a lot.

Got it.

But uh I tell everybody I'm from Chicago because that's the last American City I lived in before I left.

I met up with Jennifer Neal, who is an author and a journalist who lives in Berlin, calls Chicago home, and is a black woman who is thinking about how Germany memorializes its past and is comparing it to how the United States is remembering its own past.

And one of the things we talked about was the Stolperstein and how prevalent they are, and in so many ways, how effective they are.

I love that memorial because it doesn't give anybody any excuse to forget.

And if you are one of those people who lives in a building that was formerly occupied by that victim,

you see that every single day.

And I think it's one of the most brilliant memorials anywhere.

Do you think that we could do something like that in the States?

Yeah, I can't help but wonder what a version of that tied to slavery would look like.

I mean, I'd be extremely curious to see what that looked like.

I think in general the United States hasn't done

jack shit enough to atone for slavery.

I mean,

where to begin?

I think that's the real question.

I would love to see something along the lines of the Stulbesteiner done in the United States, but I wouldn't want it to stop there.

I would want to see memorials like that all over the South and the North as well to commemorate how slaves escaped from the South and went and moved to the North.

I would love to see memorials like that to commemorate the victims who were forcibly sterilized in the United States.

I would love to see memorials to the victims of

white flight and the housing crisis in Chicago.

I would love to see memorials to the Great Migration.

I would love to see memorials of all sorts like that.

Will that happen?

That's where the question mark is.

It's almost like if we did it the entire, I mean, maybe the entire street, you know, 250 years.

In front of Monticello.

I mean, like,

what would that do to somebody

when

they entered that place?

Well,

yeah.

That's a really powerful idea because I know that a lot of the plantations have been rebranded as like venues for weddings and parties.

There are still so many people who don't seem to understand or know why the U.S.

Civil War was fought to begin with.

and these plantations don't really seem to be advertising what happened there.

I think it's also part of the problem.

But not everybody's a huge fan of the stumbling stones or how ubiquitous they are.

And Deidre Berger has her own complicated feelings about them.

Why should we be stepping on

the memories of the victims?

If anyone, it should be perpetrators.

Although I'm not one for revenge or vindication, I don't think we should step on people, whatever kind of person they were.

There should be plaques on the wall.

Why aren't they?

Because most of the owners of buildings wouldn't accept, even to this day, a plaque saying, here's where a Jewish family lived.

And that's the truth, and that's not what people talk about.

There's a lot of reverence sometimes for this project that I've encountered, and people who work on it sort of, I've done my penance now.

There's enormous projections with this project on dead Jews.

Would it work in the States?

I just don't know.

I'm not sure that it would because there's not a feeling of penance in the same way,

of responsibility, unfortunately.

And the time span is much further.

I mean, why shouldn't we?

But it's the reality.

So Clint, you went to Germany to better understand

how it remembers the Holocaust and to put these two very different sets of circumstances in conversation with one another.

In the United States,

because of the very specific way in which slaves had been extracted from their homes and then were further separated from family, people pretty much know right as much as you and I do that we're the descendants of enslaved people.

And the story often ends there.

You don't have people who can walk around and tell their relatives very specific story from the beginning.

I wonder if that plays a role.

And can you talk about some of the other differences between the ways that they remember this past?

Yeah, you know, the most obvious is that there are still people who are alive today who survived the Holocaust.

Another big difference is that in Germany, there just aren't many Jewish people left, less than 200,000 Jewish people in Germany, which is less than a quarter of a percent of the population.

And that's very different than in the United States, where there are

40 million black people.

Right.

And I wonder, you know, did you come away thinking that anything like what's happened in Germany could happen in the United States?

And what would that take?

I think in the United States, it's a question of scale, right?

I mean, there are people in different parts of the United States who are building memorials and museums that are meant to directly account for this history.

You know, I think about the Witness Stone project in Connecticut that was started by a group of middle school and high school educators who, along with their students, having been inspired by the Stolperstein in Germany, would put down similar stones in places where enslaved people lived.

And they've been doing that project for several years.

It is happening.

And I think what is true is, what I think is true in Germany is that the most meaningful monuments don't necessarily have to be state-sanctioned.

I think so often the most important memorials and museums and monuments are the ones that are created in local communities.

And it is ordinary people who will be the ones to help this country see its history with clear eyes and honesty, even when this country tries to look the other way.

I mean, will you continue to invoke Germany in your talks?

And will you continue to think of it as a type of model for remembering the past?

I will continue to invoke Germany, though with a level of nuance and an additional acknowledgement of its complexity than perhaps I did before.

And my hope is to continue thinking about this question.

I've kind of become obsessed with how people remember the past.

Aaron Powell, I even wonder if this nuance makes it feel more accessible to Americans.

You know, it's not the case that all of German society rallied around these memorials, that everybody agreed that it was the right way to go.

There's something that makes it feel more accessible as a source of inspiration, knowing that it was fraught work.

It still is today, and yet, you know, it's been done again and again.

Yeah, it makes it feel less distant.

It makes it feel less

unachievable.

You know, we're in a moment right now where reckoning looks different than it has at any other point in my lifetime, which isn't to say it has been linear or perfect or without backlash, but even amid the backlash, I think still reflects an opportunity and a moment that is ripe for these sorts of memorials and monuments to come about.

Thanks so much, Clint.

I really appreciate this conversation.

Thank you so much.

I appreciate you having it with me.

This episode of Radio Atlantic was produced by A.C.

Valdez and Theo Balcombe with editing from Claudine Abade.

Thanks to producer Ethan Brooks and our engineer, Rob Smirciak.

I'm Caitlin Dickerson.