Lose Lose

Speaker 2 WNYC Studios is supported by Apple TV.

Speaker 3 It's 1972. A young British family is attempting to sail around the world when disaster strikes.
Their boat is hit by killer whales and it sinks in seconds.

Speaker 3 All they have left is a life raft and each other.

Speaker 3 This is the true story of the Robertson family and their fight to survive, hosted by me, Becky Milligan. Listen to Adrift, an Apple original podcast produced by Blanchard House.

Speaker 3 Follow and listen on Apple podcasts.

Speaker 4 Radio Lab is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Do you ever think about switching insurance companies to see if you could save some cash?

Speaker 4 Progressive makes it easy to see if you could save when you bundle your home and auto policies. Try it at progressive.com.
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates.

Speaker 4 Potential savings will vary, not available in all states.

Speaker 4 Now's the time to start your next adventure behind the wheel of an exciting new Toyota hybrid.

Speaker 4 With the largest lineup of hybrid, plug-in, hybrid, and electrified vehicles to choose from, Toyota has the one for you.

Speaker 4 Every new Toyota hybrid comes with Toyota Care, two-year complimentary scheduled maintenance, an exclusive hybrid battery warranty, and Toyota's legendary quality and reliability.

Speaker 4 Visit your local Toyota dealer today, Toyota. Let's go places.
See your local Toyota dealer for hybrid battery warranty details.

Speaker 4 Okay, so you you don't know what we're talking about, right? Or you do know what we're talking about or where we're doing lose-lose, right? Right.

Speaker 4 We're going to play an episode from Few Years Back called Lose, Lose. It's an Olympic story, which we're playing now because the Summer Olympics are starting very soon.

Speaker 4 But before we play that episode, I have a related thing that I'm very excited to tell you about.

Speaker 4 Oh. Yeah.
You're going to the Olympics? I'm not going to the Olympics, but I just, I love the Olympics. I don't know if you know this about me.

Speaker 5 And I don't know that about you.

Speaker 4 I really love the Olympics. And like a few years ago, I got really fixated on the medals.
Like,

Speaker 4 why gold, silver, bronze? Why are there three of them? It just seems like kind of a random, like, I don't know. Like, why is it this way? And how did it become this way?

Speaker 6 I'm such a, I didn't even think to question it. I was just like, gold is more expensive than silver, than bronze.

Speaker 4 Well, so, okay, so this is interesting, right? Okay, so let's, oh, so first rewind all the way back to the ancient Olympics, right? Let's say you win. There's one winner per event.

Speaker 4 There's not three winners. There's one winner per event.
Okay. And they get a wreath of olive, like of olive leaves.
They get like an olive branch, right?

Speaker 6 No medal.

Speaker 4 No medal? No medals. Zero medals in ancient Olympics.
But like also, when you think about it, like it's Greece. Olive trees are everywhere.
Like this is.

Speaker 5 This is not a good present.

Speaker 4 This is the lane. It's not a good award.
Prize.

Speaker 4 Like, imagine if you spend your whole life working up to the Olympics, you win the Olympics and they give you, like, it's like, congratulations, you won water polo. Here's a pine cone.

Speaker 4 Like, like, that's what it's like, right? It's so weird.

Speaker 5 They wove it, and you get to wear it.

Speaker 4 It's a little, you know, there's a little bit of care. They did take the olive branches from special trees that were near like Mount Olympus.

Speaker 4 Like, it was like, they were special olive branches, but still, like, it still feels like you're like, come on, it's imbued with meaning, but not actual value. Right, that's right.
Okay, okay.

Speaker 4 Okay, so now, fast forward to the modern Olympics, right? Okay.

Speaker 4 1896, right? They're doing the modern Olympics

Speaker 4 in Athens. Yeah.
They're rebooting it.

Speaker 4 They decide to have medals,

Speaker 4 but listen to how they did it. Okay.
First place,

Speaker 4 silver medal. Oh.

Speaker 4 Second place,

Speaker 4 bronze medal. Huh.

Speaker 4 Third place,

Speaker 4 nothing. You don't get anything for third place.

Speaker 5 So gold isn't even a part of the deal. Was gold too expensive then?

Speaker 4 gold was it felt too vulgar like people felt like yeah it's it's if you're doing it for gold you're doing it for money like it should be more symbolic wow okay yeah and like today it would be like we don't need a diamond medal that's absurd yeah like 10 million like that's right okay that's right huh and so first of all everyone was like okay this olympics oh this was so great like uh this went so well like we rebooted this ancient thing yeah and they're like okay great let's do it again in four years And everyone just assumed that it would be in Athens.

Speaker 4 Okay. But then the guy who's sort of in charge of it,

Speaker 4 Pierre de Coubertin, he was like, no, let's do it in Paris. And everyone's like,

Speaker 4 why would we do it in Paris? Right.

Speaker 4 And then there was kind of a big fight.

Speaker 5 So did he prevail?

Speaker 4 So he prevailed. So it was in Paris.
But partly because the debate over where it should take place took so long, but partly for other reasons.

Speaker 4 The 1900 Olympics in Paris is one of, if not the worst Olympics in history. It was a chaotic disaster of an Olympics.
It was notoriously mismanaged. It was like

Speaker 4 just chaos. So, but, and one of the things they did, because it was so poorly planned, was they were like, okay, you know what?

Speaker 4 We don't know about the medals or whatever. Like, every sport, just fend for yourself.
Like, figure out what your own prizes are.

Speaker 4 And so,

Speaker 4 so you just read the list of like what people won that year. Oh, wow.
And there is, okay, so what's on there?

Speaker 4 there was a lot of, in general, there was a lot of like porcelain, and there was just like a lot of like paintings and really tacky art. One Australian runner won several prizes.

Speaker 4 These are the prizes: a small clock, a lady's purse,

Speaker 4 and a silver letter opener. There's one guy, he was an American pole vaulter, and his prize was an umbrella.

Speaker 4 That's so bad.

Speaker 5 Oh, man, that's so sad.

Speaker 4 And you just picture him like walking away into the sunset with his little umbrella. Wow.

Speaker 4 Okay. So that's one of my favorite Olympics stories.
And then actually the next year, 1904, was also chaos. But at least by that time,

Speaker 4 they had figured out, they'd sort of standardized the medals as we know them today.

Speaker 6 Oh, okay. So by then, it's gold, silver, bronze.

Speaker 4 Then it was gold, silver, bronze. And my feeling was like, it was like by then, like, it was like after all the tacky art and stuff, they were like, okay, like gold doesn't seem so.

Speaker 5 No more umbrellas, no more parapluis.

Speaker 4 Okay, so that was a story from an Olympics in Paris 124 years ago.

Speaker 4 But now the Olympics is, you know, is a well-oiled machine to the degree that, you know, there's... There's very little chaos.
It's all very, very, very perfectly planned in advance.

Speaker 4 But there was one recent Olympics where a bit of chaos did emerge.

Speaker 4 And that little bit of chaos, it felt like a sort of a glitch in the matrix that made you

Speaker 4 made all of us, made the whole world kind of ask, like, wait a second, what are we doing here again? And what is the point of sport? What is fair? What is within the rules?

Speaker 4 And what are you actually allowed to do in the service of winning?

Speaker 5 Yeah. And it's a great story.
You, you reported it. This is a rerun from a while back.
Do we just kick it over, bounce it over, hit it, swat it over to

Speaker 5 you and the old old man of your Robert Krowich.

Speaker 4 Let's serve it up. Okay.

Speaker 4 Wait, you're listening.

Speaker 4 You're listening

Speaker 4 to Radiolab.

Speaker 4 Radio Lab from Ring. WNYC.

Speaker 4 Hi, I'm Robert Krulwich. And I'm Lothif Nasser.
This is Radiolab, and today we're going to do something completely upside down. And inside out.
Yes. It's a sports story.

Speaker 4 Sort of, but like none you've ever heard. And therefore, we found a reporter who is a sports reporter like none you've ever heard.
Yeah.

Speaker 7 I've been to a gym lately.

Speaker 4 Mike Pesca.

Speaker 4 He's the host of the GIST podcast, formerly of NPR, and now he's here telling the story to us. Yeah.
You know, how did you even first hear about this? Were you covering it? Oh, yeah, yeah.

Speaker 7 So.

Speaker 8 This is Morning Edition from NPR News. I'm Renee Monte.

Speaker 7 I was covering the 2012 Olympics for NPR. Good morning.

Speaker 4 Hello.

Speaker 9 And I declare open the Games of London.

Speaker 7 The stories of the Olympics.

Speaker 7 You try to find your own stories that are obscure, but if there's a big story, you chase it. So in those Olympics.

Speaker 8 So for you, what were the most notable achievements in the first week of the Games?

Speaker 7 Well, it's history of the best kind. Michael Phelps breaking the all-time record, obviously.
So in over a hundred years, nobody's won as many medals at the Olympic Games as well.

Speaker 7 And everyone knew that

Speaker 4 Bolt.

Speaker 7 Here comes you safe bolt and his record-setting quest in the hundred would be huge

Speaker 7 but

Speaker 7 then this badminton story pops up

Speaker 7 and everyone rushes to figure out what the heck's going on with badminton

Speaker 4 Because the 2012 London Olympics badminton tournament just it took this somewhat obscure sport and it morphed it into this bizarro thought experiment about competition and integrity and what it means to win.

Speaker 7 Okay. But mostly, I think that the player.

Speaker 4 Although, to be fair, Mike, he jumped on this story for very personal reasons.

Speaker 7 As a New Yorker, I say a lot of words and they're mispronounced and the NPR audience would jump on them, but I always can say the N in badminton and get a lot of plaudits.

Speaker 7 So I'm attracted to badminton.

Speaker 4 Well, what's the wrong way to say badminton?

Speaker 7 Most people say badminton.

Speaker 4 Badminton. Badminton.
Like you're talking to some handwear at wintertime.

Speaker 7 Like you're chastising a playful cat. Right.
Badminton.

Speaker 4 Bad. I see.

Speaker 4 And then also,

Speaker 4 you know,

Speaker 4 you and I probably think of badminton as this backyard, fun, silly game, but

Speaker 4 according to Mike,

Speaker 4 this is anything but.

Speaker 7 It has nothing to do with the badminton you play in your backyard.

Speaker 7 It's much faster than you think it would possibly look. You get these players

Speaker 4 flying all over the court, stretching, reaching, diving.

Speaker 7 The skill of the competitors is, you know, readily apparent. This is pulsating badminton.

Speaker 7 A shuttlecock is a funny thing, and perhaps not as impressive a thing as a tennis ball, but it looks, you know, a lot like tennis. And there's a lot of

Speaker 7 tension, severe pressure, and there's a lot of grunting, and it totally seems like

Speaker 7 every bit of a legitimate and highly skilled sport.

Speaker 4 Wait, I'm gonna start.

Speaker 4 Okay, so,

Speaker 4 Robert, so you haven't seen this yet, but I would like to show you something.

Speaker 4 Okay, this is

Speaker 4 an ad.

Speaker 4 Yeah, this, okay.

Speaker 4 This is the game that is at the center of this whole story.

Speaker 9 Women's Doubles group, a

Speaker 4 women's doubles badminton. It is not a medal round, it's in the group play stage.
There's a huge crowd here, like the place is packed. Yeah.

Speaker 4 So these two teams come out.

Speaker 4 You got China. Yellow in red uniforms, yellow shoes.

Speaker 12 So here come

Speaker 4 versus Korea.

Speaker 4 Purple and white. Yeah.
And let's just skip ahead here.

Speaker 4 Alright, so here we go. Game on.
This is the first serve.

Speaker 4 Korean serve. So the Korean player flicks her wrist.
The shuttle cock goes over the net. China returns.

Speaker 4 Right into the net. That was it.
That was the whole thing. Oh, that was just a

Speaker 4 all right. So Korea, second serve.

Speaker 4 And

Speaker 4 Chinese return. And same thing.
Into the net again. Yeah.

Speaker 4 So the service is turned over. Now the Chinese are serving.

Speaker 4 China, Korea, China.

Speaker 4 Into the net again.

Speaker 4 Yeah,

Speaker 4 this is not exactly scintillating. I just got to tell you.

Speaker 4 Okay, well,

Speaker 4 just watch this next point.

Speaker 4 So the Korean player serves it. Yeah.

Speaker 4 It sails over the net, and then it goes, goes, goes, goes, goes.

Speaker 4 And the Chinese player clearly is right there she has it she then winds up just a slight bit like you can see it's like she has this deep ingrained muscle memory from years of doing this she winds up she's about to hit it and then she stops

Speaker 4 and the shotcock just plunks onto the floor inbounds point to Korea and then tellingly she looks back at the back corner of the court where her coach is sitting.

Speaker 4 They both are. Yeah.
This is a fix. They're fixing this match.

Speaker 4 Yes, but...

Speaker 7 There have been plenty of occasions where one side wants to lose, and it ain't hard to lose. And the more important thing is it ain't hard to get away with it.

Speaker 4 Usually, you wouldn't even notice it.

Speaker 7 You know, it's the difference between a couple serves over the line, a couple balls into the net.

Speaker 4 But in this case, as the match goes on, you start to realize

Speaker 4 the Korean players seem to be trying to lose too. They're serving false.
Yes,

Speaker 4 it's a rally, of course.

Speaker 4 Why would everybody be trying to lose? Like both sides? Well, it's actually a strategy because the way the tournament is laid out, both these teams are going to be moving on to the medal rounds.

Speaker 4 But whoever wins this game is going to have to play another Chinese team, a really strong team. I see.
And whoever loses is going to play a way easier Danish team.

Speaker 4 So both teams are hoping to lose. Yeah.

Speaker 7 And it is the rare instance where you have both sides incentivized to lose that you get something that should be scored by Spike Jones. It's a little bit of a prisoner's dilemma, right?

Speaker 4 Either side could lose, but when both want to lose, it becomes this surreal waiting game. Right.
You know, who's going to crack first and score a point?

Speaker 7 And so

Speaker 4 you got the best players in the world who just

Speaker 4 start hitting the shuttlecock out of bounds. They're surfing fault after fault.

Speaker 7 Faulting on purpose and just hitting the ball straight in the net. Hitting the shuttlecock into the net.

Speaker 4 I'm sorry, you know, it's blindingly obvious what's going on.

Speaker 7 And, you know, they're both trying to lose.

Speaker 4 Sometimes they hit it below the net, and that is unforgivable. They're hitting it straight into the ground.

Speaker 7 All but tripping over their own shoelaces purposefully.

Speaker 4 And so what you get is

Speaker 4 point

Speaker 4 after point of just terrible badminton. And it just devolves into this absurd, repetitive, crazy-making

Speaker 4 losathon.

Speaker 12 This is an absolute disgrace.

Speaker 4 So obviously lame. I mean, this is not, this is not sport.

Speaker 4 But it is kind of a sport because, and this is why I really love it. At a certain point, these two teams have to start competing with each other to lose.
What? Let me play you this point.

Speaker 4 So China serves it. Korea hits it back, but it's going way out of bounds.

Speaker 4 Now, in a normal world, China would obviously let that fall so that they could take the point, but they lunge to save it, right? And they're hitting it back.

Speaker 4 Now, Korea then, they are like, no, no, no, you know what? We're pretty sure we want it out of bounds. They hit it in the opposite direction, even further out of bounds.

Speaker 4 So now China goes to save it once again, but they don't get there in time. So the point goes to China, which China actually didn't want,

Speaker 4 and the Koreans wanted the whole time. So, what are you saying then?

Speaker 4 Well, it's like they invented a whole new sport, which is the exact opposite of badminton. It is photo-negative badminton.

Speaker 4 But then, towards the end of the first set, tournament referee has been called for. Out comes the referee.

Speaker 12 And here comes Torstenberg.

Speaker 15 Hello, Torsten speaking.

Speaker 4 Hi, how are you? Torstenberg was the head Olympic badminton referee who got that call.

Speaker 15 And I also heard the spectators' boo, so I went to watch.

Speaker 15 It looked pretty awful. This was not right.

Speaker 15 And told them that they were not playing seriously and they were making a very serious mistake. And they played stupid and said, No, we're playing, we're trying our best.

Speaker 4 We were actually able to get in touch with

Speaker 4 three of the four players in that match. Both Korean players,

Speaker 4 Jung Kyung-un and

Speaker 4 Kim Hana, and also one of the Chinese players.

Speaker 4 Wang Xiao Li.

Speaker 4 And Wang Xiao-li told me they were trying to lose in that match.

Speaker 14 But what we didn't expect, South Korea would do the same thing.

Speaker 4 And as for the Koreans, Jung Kyung-un said that they too were trying to lose, at least during certain moments in the game. But when the crowd started to boo

Speaker 4 and the ref came out,

Speaker 4 her partner Kim Hanna said that

Speaker 4 they were just

Speaker 4 scared.

Speaker 16 We just wanted to get out of the court as soon as possible.

Speaker 4 So Torsten walks off the court.

Speaker 15 They went on court again.

Speaker 4 And then the second serve after Torsten walks off the court,

Speaker 4 nothing but Nat.

Speaker 4 So for the next few points, it does not get much better. No.

Speaker 15 It didn't look like world-class benchmark at all.

Speaker 4 So the set comes to an end. Korea wins the set.
And while the players are waiting on the sidelines,

Speaker 4 Torsten comes back onto the court. He walks up to the players and he pulls out of his pocket almost subtly and shows to the players

Speaker 4 this black card.

Speaker 15 The black card, which means disqualification.

Speaker 10 This

Speaker 12 is absolutely extraordinary he has given both teams a black card or has he threatened them with a black card i'm really not terribly sure the players have returned to court it was now that they should play or they would be in deep

Speaker 15 sorry maybe i shouldn't say so

Speaker 4 the black card the black card says that pretty clearly

Speaker 15 the black card was out and i told them in in very clear words and and very seriously that in order to help themselves, they better play now.

Speaker 4 The Korean player, Jung Kyung-un

Speaker 4 said that she turned to her partner.

Speaker 16 And I told her, They're them, and we are we, so

Speaker 16 let's just play and do our best.

Speaker 4 The second set starts, and pretty quick.

Speaker 4 China's Wang Xiao Li told me.

Speaker 14 Both sides changed a little bit.

Speaker 15 Instead of just serving into the net, things started to get better.

Speaker 15 They would get the rally going.

Speaker 4 But then, as the points kept coming, you started to notice like they were playing very slowly. There's something still really off here.

Speaker 15 They were not hitting the ball very hard.

Speaker 4 Now, the Korean team wouldn't admit this, but Wang Xiao Li said that both teams didn't change the basic fact

Speaker 4 were still trying to lose.

Speaker 4 Which I have to say is exactly what it looks like when you watch it because for the rest of the match you get a bunch of these points where like where just they'll lob it super high, you know as if to say hey smash it down on us take your point or they will you know hit it out of bounds and then face palm just you know practice their swing after they missed one just to to see say oh, you know, my mechanics are off.

Speaker 4 I just got to just practice this a few more times

Speaker 4 because it's like we've entered a whole third iteration of this game where it's like they're not just trying to lose, they're trying to

Speaker 4 cover up badminton. You're trying to lose, but you're trying to look like you're trying to win.

Speaker 4 I don't think they're seeing anybody here.

Speaker 15 No.

Speaker 4 So finally, after 20 long minutes of this,

Speaker 4 the Korean team loses the match by winning it.

Speaker 4 Tonight has left me with a very nasty taste in the mouth.

Speaker 7 Tonight was not sport. It was a disgrace.

Speaker 4 Good night.

Speaker 4 So all four players walked off the court and Kim Ha-Na told me that

Speaker 4 her parents were in the audience that day.

Speaker 4 And afterwards they asked her what happened.

Speaker 16 What happened and

Speaker 16 why do you have to get the booze from the audiences and etc. And

Speaker 16 I was sad and felt defeated, so I didn't even want to talk to my mom. So I remember I just went to the hotel and had rest.

Speaker 15 And the next morning at 8 o'clock, all four pairs, in fact, were disqualified according to the disciplinary regulations of the Baddington World Federation.

Speaker 4 Which has a rule on the books that you can be disqualified for failing to use your best efforts.

Speaker 15 And the same evening they were on the plane home.

Speaker 4 They were just thrown out of the Olympics.

Speaker 1 A scandal at the Olympics.

Speaker 3 Everyone was talking about some losers.

Speaker 7 Shuckle coats were going out.

Speaker 1 Tippy-tappying the shuttle coke into the net like a five-year-old in the backyard picnic.

Speaker 4 It was downright humiliating.

Speaker 15 It was just sad that

Speaker 15 they were

Speaker 15 committing suicide in that tournament.

Speaker 14 At that time, the punishment hit me quite hard. I was very sad and I felt helpless.

Speaker 4 I was perplexed and didn't know what happened.

Speaker 16 We just cried.

Speaker 4 This doesn't sound like it's getting any better. No, but there's still more after the break.
Okay.

Speaker 4 Radiolab is supported by Capital One. Banking with Capital One helps you keep more money in your wallet with no fees or minimums on checking accounts and no overdraft fees.

Speaker 4 Just ask the Capital One bank guy. It's pretty much all he talks about in a good way.
He'd also tell you that Radio Lab is his favorite podcast too. Aw, really? Thanks, Capital One Bank Guy.

Speaker 4 What's in your wallet? Terms apply. See capital1.com slash bank, capital One N-A, member F-D-I-C.

Speaker 2 Radio Lab is supported by AT ⁇ T.

Speaker 2 There's nothing better than that feeling like someone has your back and that things are going to get done without you even having to ask, like your friend offering to help you move without even having to offer drinks and pizza first.

Speaker 2 It's a beautiful thing when someone is two steps ahead of you, quietly making your life easier. Staying connected matters.

Speaker 2 That's why in the rare event of a network outage, AT ⁇ T will proactively credit you for a full day of service. That's the AT ⁇ T guarantee.

Speaker 2 Credit for fiber downtime lasting 20 minutes or more or for wireless downtime lasting 60 minutes or more caused by a single incident impacting 10 or more towers.

Speaker 2 Must be connected to impacted tower at onset of outage. Restrictions and exclusions apply.
See ATT.com/slash guarantee for full details. ATT, connecting changes everything.

Speaker 4 Radiolab is supported by the National Forest Foundation, a nonprofit transforming America's love of nature into action for our forests.

Speaker 4 Did you know that national forests provide clean drinking water to one in three Americans?

Speaker 4 And that national forests and grasslands cover nearly 10% of the U.S., hosting 150,000 miles of trails and providing habitat for over 3,000 species of plants and animals.

Speaker 4 The National Forest Foundation supports the places where we come alive, keeping the trails, rivers, and forests we love healthy.

Speaker 4 Last year, they planted 5.3 million trees and advanced over 300 projects to protect nature and communities nationwide.

Speaker 4 Their work creates lasting impact by restoring forests and watersheds, strengthening wildfire resilience, and expanding recreation access for generations to come. And when forests struggle, so do we.

Speaker 4 The water in our taps, the air we breathe, and the trails that connect us all. Learn how you can help at nationalforests.org.

Speaker 4 Radiolab is supported by the National Forest Foundation, a nonprofit transforming America's love of nature into action for our forests.

Speaker 4 Did you know that national forests provide clean drinking water to one in three Americans? And when forests struggle, so do we.

Speaker 4 The National Forest Foundation creates lasting impact by restoring forests and and watersheds, strengthening wildfire resilience, and expanding recreation access for all.

Speaker 4 Last year, they planted 5.3 million trees and led over 300 projects to protect nature and communities nationwide. Learn more at nationalforests.org slash radiolab.

Speaker 4 Radiolab is supported by Apple TV. It's 1972.
A young British family is attempting to sail around the world when disaster strikes. Their boat is hit by killer whales and and it sinks in seconds.

Speaker 4 All they have left is a life raft and each other. How will they survive? The true story of a family's fight for survival, hosted by Becky Milligan.

Speaker 4 This is Adrift, an Apple original podcast produced by Blanchard House. Apple TV subscribers get special early access to the entire season.
Follow and listen on Apple Podcasts.

Speaker 4 We're back. I'm Robert Krillwich.
And I'm Letsev Nasser. This is Radiolab.
And when we left off, the Korean and Chinese women's badminton teams had just been disqualified, kicked out of the Olympics.

Speaker 4 So then what happened to the

Speaker 4 players like Ru. What happened to them? Well, all four of them did keep playing badminton professionally after this.
Junk Young-un from Korea even went on to win the bronze in Rio.

Speaker 4 But at the time, this was a brutal punishment for all of them. Well, but, you know,

Speaker 4 they did something wrong. This wasn't right, right?

Speaker 7 I, you know, I don't even, I question whether it's even unethical. I think it's ethical in a way what they did.
Really?

Speaker 4 What the players did.

Speaker 7 I do. I think it's ethical.
How so? Okay.

Speaker 7 So is the definition of ethics in sports to win, sure, without cheating, yes. Does that mean to win every point? No, not necessarily.

Speaker 7 You know, in baseball, there's the thing called the intentional walk.

Speaker 7 In football, a team will take a safety instead of punting and letting the other team score a touchdown.

Speaker 7 So this is a calculation where a point here or there is not as important as the whole and the whole is the game. So, okay, let's move back.
Let's pan out a little more.

Speaker 7 I think an individual game is often lost. Look, we're not going to put our good starter here.
We're going to manage the lineup because the goal is to win the championship.

Speaker 7 And the thing to remember about these players is If what we want is players who are hyper competitive and actually want to win at all costs, That's exactly why they were losing so badly, because they wanted to win the overall championship at all costs.

Speaker 7 And Badminton Federation had a set of rules that all but guarantee that this would happen.

Speaker 13 Well, yeah, I mean, it's stupid to have an event where people are trying to lose if that event is a sporting event,

Speaker 13 especially at the apex of

Speaker 13 the only time people care about badminton.

Speaker 4 It seems really dope. So this is Chuck Klosterman.
We called him in because he writes a lot about sports sports and also because he wrote the ethicist column for the New York Times magazine.

Speaker 13 Now, is this

Speaker 13 some kind of tragedy? Well, it's not. I guess unless badminton's really important to you, then it probably is.

Speaker 4 Well, in this case, I think the thing that people got really upset about is this idea of the Olympic ideal.

Speaker 17 In the name of all the competitors, I promise that we shall take part in the Olympic Games.

Speaker 4 The athlete's oath.

Speaker 17 In the true spirit of sportsmanship, for the glory of the sport and the honor of our teams.

Speaker 4 To transcend in the way that, as a superb athlete, you're transcending your humanity, but then also as like this representative of your country. And to, I think it did poke a lot of people.

Speaker 4 Like, a lot of people did seemingly get kind of upset about it.

Speaker 13 Well, yeah, I mean, for some reason, it is disturbing to see athletes failing on purpose. That just

Speaker 13 seems to

Speaker 13 kind of like tap into some idea.

Speaker 4 It feels immoral somehow.

Speaker 13 left me with a very nasty taste of yes like like like i don't know if not trying in a sporting event is a moral question but it feels that way when you see it happen

Speaker 13 here again one of the interesting things about sports is that we watch these adults playing multi-million dollar games but they're the same games that like a six-year-old or seven-year-old plays so when you have a seven-year-old kid you would say it doesn't matter if you win or lose it doesn't matter what happens just play hard you don't have to succeed it's the trying that matters So when you see people at the highest level not trying,

Speaker 13 it's almost, it sort of wrecks the entire idea of why we play sports at all.

Speaker 13 You know, why if you're at a playground and two kids race across the playground to see who can get to the swing faster or whatever, like that's like a biological thing.

Speaker 13 Maybe we are biologically driven to compete. So that's the baseline expectation of what we have of these badbitten players, that they will try to compete.

Speaker 4 But it seems to me there's an opportunity here for true athleticism in a kind of topsy-turvy way. Flip it and reverse it.

Speaker 4 Flip it and reverse it and see if you can do that as well as you do the other way.

Speaker 13 I mean, sports only work one way, though.

Speaker 4 They don't work both ways.

Speaker 13 I mean,

Speaker 13 it would be like going to your wife and saying, like, okay, you say you really love me. Prove it by hating me in a creative way.

Speaker 13 Or to go to a great piano player and say, like, if you're so awesome at playing piano,

Speaker 13 bang your fist against the keys in a way that

Speaker 13 I will be sickened by it.

Speaker 4 But if we take it out of the, out of matters of the heart and put it back on the field, what would be the most radical solution that you could imagine if your desire was to convincingly and astonishingly athletically lose?

Speaker 13 Well, I suppose if they were both trying to do it in the most convincing way, it would be. That was not really the case here.

Speaker 7 Well, I guess they never confronted it. How do you lose on purpose if the other side's also trying to lose on purpose? And I'm trying to think.
There are some sports.

Speaker 7 So in football, let's say, in American football, let's say both sides wanted to lose. Well, here's how the sport would go.
You can't make the other team score, but you can score a safety on yourself.

Speaker 7 So the quarterback would get the ball and start running towards his own end zone. And then there'd be a jailbreak by the defense to tackle the quarterback before he got to the ball.

Speaker 7 Baseball is hard. You could hit the batter.

Speaker 7 That would be an interesting game.

Speaker 4 Yeah, what?

Speaker 7 What about darts? Instead of aiming at the dartboard, just turning around and aiming at your opponent for yourself.

Speaker 4 So

Speaker 4 that's like the baseball strategy.

Speaker 7 How about sport of bodybuilding? Think about the implications.

Speaker 4 I would win that. I would win that.
Would you? I think I would win this.

Speaker 7 I'd see like a Will Ferrell movie out of this.

Speaker 4 Yes, that's what I've been thinking.

Speaker 7 We get to a point in our team, all right, this is what we need. You got to go out there and lose it.

Speaker 4 No, and then there's a loser on the other team who's also very

Speaker 4 losers. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And then that's a two movie.

Speaker 4 you can hear more of Mike Keske on his podcast, The Gist, more of Chuck Kosterman in his latest book, But What If We're Wrong?

Speaker 4 Big thanks to all the players who talked to us and to those who helped us get those interviews. Joy Lei Lee, Mikyung Kim, Yuni Kartika.

Speaker 4 Thanks to Aparna Nancharla who came in and helped us puzzle this whole match out. And in addition, a special thanks to Gracia Polly.
Gracia was on the Indonesian badminton team in those same Olympics.

Speaker 4 And an hour after the match we featured, she faced off against a different Korean team. All four players in that match were also disqualified for not using their best efforts to win.

Speaker 4 She really helped us

Speaker 4 understand what it was like to be in that situation. This story was produced by Matt Kilty and Annie McEwen and Lattev Nasser.
I'm Robert Quilwich. And I'm Latif Nasser.

Speaker 4 And I guess that ends the game at this point.

Speaker 10 Hi, I'm Rianne, and I'm from Dunny Gauden, Ireland. And here are the staff credits.
Radiolab was created by Jad Abum Rad and is edited by Soreen Wheeler. Lulu Miller and Latif Nasser are our co-hosts.

Speaker 10 Drink Keefe is our director of sound design. Our staff includes Simon Adler, Jeremy Bloom, Becca Bressler, W.

Speaker 10 Harry Futuna, David Gable, Maria Paz Cuteris, Cindu Nana Sambadan, Matt Kielty, Annie McEwen, Alex Neeson, Sarah Cari, Valentina Powers, Sarah Sambach, Ariane Wack, Pat Walters, and Molly Webster.

Speaker 10 Our fact checkers are Diane Kelly, Emily Krieger, Natalie Middleton.

Speaker 7 Here's an idea I have. There's an old riddle, and it goes like this.
A king talks to his two sons, two princes, and he says, here's what we're going to do. Get those horses out of the stable.

Speaker 7 Here's what I want you to do. I want you to jump on your horses and ride to the city gate.
Whichever horse gets the city gate last,

Speaker 7 you're going to inherit the fortune. Maybe it's a crazy king.
So the two princes look at each other, they both think, and then they jump on their horses and they ride fast as they can. Why?

Speaker 4 To

Speaker 4 rein in their horses at the very last minute, jump off the horses and say, whoa, and then wait until the other one, I don't know.

Speaker 4 Are they planning on on just just removing a section of the gate and then just smashing it up against the other horse?

Speaker 7 Yeah, no, that's terrible.

Speaker 4 No, if you like the answer, what is the answer?

Speaker 7 They jumped on each other's horse.

Speaker 7 They drumped on the other brother's horse.

Speaker 4 Maybe.

Speaker 4 Let me just think about that. That was funny.
They jumped on the other's horse, of course.

Speaker 7 You said whichever horse gets there last.

Speaker 18 Hi, this is Tamara from Pasadena, California.

Speaker 18 Leadership support for Radio Lab science programming is provided by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Science Sandbox, a Simons Foundation initiative, and the John Templeton Foundation.

Speaker 18 Foundational support for Radio Lab was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.