#207 Augustus Doricko - CEO of Rainmaker: Manipulating the Weather

A massage chair might seem a bit extravagant, especially these days.

Eight different settings, adjustable intensity, plus it's heated, and it just feels so good.

Yes, a massage chair might seem a bit extravagant, but when it can come with a car,

suddenly it seems quite practical.

The all-new 2025 Volkswagen Tiguan, packed with premium features like available massaging front seats, it only feels extravagant.

This episode is brought to you by Nespresso Virtuo Coffee Machines.

Ready to enjoy the bold flavors of barista-quality Nespresso iced coffee at home?

Simply fill a glass with ice and press the brew button on your Virtuo Pop Machine to enjoy rich double espresso roasted to stand up even when chilled.

Refreshingly bold iced coffee, refreshingly easy to make at home.

Visit nespresso.com to shop now.

Augustus Dorico, welcome to the show, man.

Thanks, dude.

So

weather manipulation is on everybody's mind right now.

And you make it rain.

So I thought this would be a fascinating interview to be able to talk to somebody that knows actually what the hell is going on, hopefully.

So welcome.

Yeah, yes.

Thank you.

Something or other about it, right?

I think about weather mod

most minutes of most hours of most days awake or not.

And it rain and snow, actually.

Snow we're even better at than rain right now.

It's slightly easier.

So talk about the differences.

How much have you looked into

the weather manipulation stuff?

There's a lot of conspiracies out there on it.

Dude, I run a weather manipulation company.

So yeah,

I know.

So on the one hand, I know a lot about the research that the United States is doing, that China is doing, that the Europeans are doing, that the Middle Easterners, Saudi, and the Emirates are doing.

But then also, I get letters in the mail about once or twice a week from guys that have just like totally lost their mind that say, if you repeat this activation phrase, it will rain over you immediately because I've like typed it into the code of the ETH or someone that did like too much DMT or something.

So I've got the full spectrum of the actual science down to the most schizo theories and a lot of stuff in between.

Nice.

Did you see the thing that just happened in Switzerland?

Yeah.

That glacier that

whatever happened, it just cracked off and like completely buried that entire village.

Yeah, it was like a town of 1,300 people or something, I think.

That was a disaster.

Is the suspicion that that was manipulated?

Not yet, but I'm sure it's coming out.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, probably.

It's funny, actually, a lot of what we do right now in the Western U.S.

is snowpack enhancement.

So trying to prevent the glaciers from,

you know, melting away, cracking, becoming unstable and collapsing.

What did you say?

Snow melt?

Snowpack enhancement.

Snow enhancement.

Yeah.

So making more snow.

Making more snow to protect the glaciers.

Wow.

Yeah.

That's happening.

Interesting.

Well, I got a ton of questions.

I know that, you know, we...

There's a lot of, it's not conspiracy.

It's real, right?

The Vietnam stuff, we were trying to

prolong the monsoon season over there to give us some type of an advantage.

Operation Popeye.

We're going to talk about that.

You know about that, right?

Yeah.

Perfect.

Well, everybody starts off with an intro here.

So, Augustus Dorico, founder and CEO of Rainmaker, a next-generation cloud seating company, a USC Berkeley dropout, Thiel Fellowship, and member of El Segundo hard tech scene.

Rainmaker uses weather-resistant drones to increase precipitation and novel radar hardware to measure how much man-made precipitation is created.

Your first priority is reversing the desertification of America, of the American West, and ultimately to

terraform deserts into abundant, green, arable land.

And most importantly, you're a Christian.

Yep.

That I am.

That I am.

That's me.

So

that I am.

That I am.

That's me.

But a couple of things to go through here before we get started.

So we're going to do a whole, we're going to do a life story on you.

And,

but I have a Patreon account and it's community.

Been with me here since the beginning.

And

they're the reason I get to be here sitting with you.

And so one of the things I do is I offer them the opportunity to ask each and every guest a question.

And so this is from

Jason.

Have Have there been discussions about who will be held responsible if a mistake occurs that results in harm to human life or property damage?

Is it fair to say acts of God would become a thing of the past?

It's a really good question.

So we're definitely putting the cart before the horse a little bit here.

But

yes, so

there are regulations right now throughout most states in

America, particularly in the West,

that require any weather modification operators have permits or licenses that are approved by the State Department of Natural Resources, the Department of Agriculture, Departments of Water Resources.

And in order to get that permit or license, you have to use approved materials, you have to have certified meteorologists on staff, and you also have to have what are called suspension criteria.

So if you make it rain or snow more, right,

obviously one thing that people would be concerned about is if there were floods or avalanches.

And what suspension criteria means is if there is already flood risk because a cloud is already naturally going to precipitate a lot, or if there's burn scars from wildfires that would cause really fast runoff and flooding, or if the soil moisture is already too high for the water to be absorbed into the soil and would cause flooding, or if there's too much snowpack and there's avalanche risk from having any more snow, even if our customers want more water, we're we're regulated by the states in which we operate to not continue cloud seeding, to not continue making it rain or snow, to avoid causing any problems like that.

And so, if we don't adhere to those suspension criteria, then we would be held liable for any damage caused.

And I think that's appropriate.

And I wish the federal government had regulations that enforce that as well, rather than it just being done on a state-by-state basis.

Now, with respect to the last part of that question, would that make Acts of God a thing of the past?

You can't totally

manipulate or modify the weather the way that you could the air conditioning in your house at this point in time.

It's a super complicated, super energetic system.

We'll trend towards more and more of that as time goes on.

So

right now,

if you were to cause flooding, that wouldn't be considered an act of God.

You would have caused it.

As time goes on, my hope is that we live in a world that is more green and lush and abundant and symbiotically flourishing between creation and the environment and mankind so that we've engineered weather-related disasters away entirely.

I'm just curious.

I mean, how much do states actually know about this stuff?

I mean,

it's popped up.

It's relatively new on the radar in a lot of people's minds.

And so is this like

when Zuckerberg's in front of, you know, having a congressional hearing and he's talking to 80-year-old people that probably can't even open their email and they want to know how he's regulating Facebook or do these people actually know what the hell they're doing?

Yeah.

It seems to me like you would be light years ahead of them.

So,

you know, one interesting part of all this is that it's not really like a partisan issue, right?

It's not that like Republicans like it and Democrats don't or vice versa,

or that Republicans know about it and Democrats don't.

It's really everything west of the Mississippi, People have some knowledge of this because those are the driest states in the Union.

They've been cloud seeding for the longest amount of time or they've experimented with it the most because they need the water most desperately.

So Colorado and California, Texas and Idaho, they all have weather modification programs that the state funds.

How long have they had those programs?

So cloud seeding was invented in the United States.

It's an American technology that was done for the first time in New York in 1946.

So the very first effective weather modification operations were done in the 40s after World War II.

Then there have been a series of programs that have popped up either domestically or abroad in the decades in between, but we've never actually been able to prove that it works until 2017.

What changed in 2017 was this.

So to give you the overview of what cloud seeding is,

about 93% of all of the liquid water that traverses, liquid and ice water that traverses the lower atmosphere over the U.S.

So the water in the clouds, right?

About 93% of that doesn't precipitate over land.

It just evaporates away or gets recycled by the oceans.

That means that there's a ton of water up there that's just going to waste that you can bring down.

So certain clouds that aren't naturally precipitating or that aren't very efficiently precipitating, you can identify those with radar.

You can measure that there's liquid in them that isn't coming down, fly a drone into them, disperse a material that freezes the liquid in the cloud, and we can talk about what that material is later, but disperse a material that freezes the liquid in the cloud into big heavy snowflakes that become heavy enough to fall down, and if it's warm beneath the cloud, melt into rain.

If it's cold, stay as snow.

And so

if you just blast a cloud, right,

that isn't and then it rains, that isn't necessarily proof that you caused it to rain, right?

Like maybe you're just good at picking clouds that were going to rain anyway.

And so nobody could really justify doing this at scale up until 2017.

And what changed then was the National Center of Atmospheric Research, an organization called NCAR out in Colorado, they realized if you have the right wavelength of radar, of dual polarization radar, which I'll talk about again in a sec too, but if you have the right kind of radar and you fly in a zigzag, right, or in a circle, or in your initials, and you only see precipitation on the radar in your flight flight track, then you can say, oh, that is definitively man-made because we flew in the zigzag or we flew in the spiral and there's only precipitation occurring in that shape.

They did that in Idaho in 2017 multiple times.

And that was the very first time that people were able to show, one, that it was unambiguously working and two, that they can measure how much water they put on the ground.

And so Most folks, even in the scientific community, are still catching up to speed with this tech.

The regulatory community,

some people know about it, think it's cool.

Some people think that it doesn't exist.

Some people don't know the difference between cloud seeding and geoengineering and a bunch of other stuff.

But I'm in that category.

We'll talk about that then.

Yeah.

Everybody gets a gift starting off.

Any guesses?

Vigilance in the gummy bears made in the U.S., legal in all 50 states, at least right now until RFK gets his way.

But I'm

warned here.

Yeah, yeah.

But yeah, just a little gift here.

Thanks, man.

Let's move into your life story.

Yeah, let's.

Where'd you grow up?

I grew up in Stanford, Connecticut.

So little suburban town outside of New York City.

Did a lot of running around on the beach and sailing, that kind of stuff growing up.

What'd your parents do?

So, my dad was in data centers really early.

So, he was building and selling data centers compute first to the

people in New York, then eventually to the tech companies,

like Google, Microsoft, the ones that you can think about.

Then, my mom, she was a pattern maker for Fashion House in Europe before she moved back to America,

met my dad, had me, and she was a stay-at-home mom.

And she

is

both my parents are spectacular people, but but my mom for staying at home, I'm especially grateful for.

How old are you?

I'm 25.

25 years old, making it rain, huh?

Yep.

That's the goal, though.

That's the goal, right?

But that's awesome, man.

Well, what were you into as a kid?

Sailing, a lot of sailing.

And then, you know, candidly, I was

a

pretty big dork.

I was reading a lot of philosophy.

I was into history.

It sounds like super unrelatable.

I played a lot of video games.

There's this one video game called Europa Universalis.

You know the board game Risk?

Yeah, I used to play Risk.

Yeah, okay.

So Risk is great.

Now imagine Risk, but you either have to be super autistic or have a spreadsheet open to play it well because you're managing where your iron supply chain goes and where you get your spices and where the wheat's grown for the economy and all that kind of of.

So, I played that.

And then, another video game that I liked a lot was called a Spore.

And so, Spore basically,

the important part of the game is you're this like space-faring civilization, and you can trade with other civilizations out in space.

You can fight wars, you can explore.

But the thing that I really liked was always terraforming.

So, taking a planet that was totally uninhabitable, and then actually engineering the atmosphere to put colonies down there, sort of like what we're going to do to Mars.

Wow.

So I thought about that a lot as a kid, too.

But yeah, so space, sailing,

philosophy.

What else did I like?

Probably giving my mom heartburn, running around construction sites late at night,

that kind of thing.

Pretty bright kid, right?

I was an ammonoron.

Oh, right.

Yeah.

But no, I mean, I like school.

I like school.

You dropped out of Berkeley.

Yeah, yeah.

So I didn't like it that much, I guess.

But I went to Berkeley because one, you know, my mom was whispering in my ear from the time I was a little kid, like, we have to go back to California because she's from Huntington.

And then

that plus Berkeley having the best physics program that I got into,

that's why I went there.

And the reason why I wanted to study physics was,

you know, I grew up an atheist.

And there's this Heisenberg quote, like the not the guy from Breaking Bad, but the physicist that says, when you take your first drink from the cup that is the natural sciences, you find atheism, but down at the bottom of the glass, there's God staring back at you.

And so I wanted to study physics because I wanted to see whether God was real or not.

And turns out the physics part didn't help so much with figuring that question out.

It was mostly the Bible, actually.

But that's why I went and studied physics there.

You made your determination.

Yeah, yeah.

So I I got baptized April 10th, 2021.

Oh, congratulations.

Yeah, yeah.

Thanks, man.

Glory to God.

Jesus saved my life.

Me too.

Me too.

But you dropped out of Berkeley.

Oh, yeah, yeah.

Sorry.

So I was studying there, right?

But then,

and for what it's worth, just for people listening, because they're going to hear that I went to Berkeley and think that I'm...

a Berkeley person.

What's a Berkeley person?

Well, I mean, there's a bunch of like pretty smart physicists and cool guys, and I have a lot of friends from there, but it's mostly people think of like the folks that like Berkeley.

You don't have to know their eyes.

Yeah, you know what I mean?

I know exactly what you're talking about.

I never dyed my hair blue.

Let's go, right?

And so

what happened, though, was

I was there when the pandemic started.

And at the time, I was like, well, you know, it seems like the world's going to end.

I was pretty spooked initially.

And so I went back from Berkeley to Connecticut for a little bit and then realized pretty quick that I probably wasn't going to die from COVID and didn't really like being locked in my house.

So I moved to Fort Worth, Texas.

And while I was there, you know, I was doing school online.

I was a data scientist full-time.

So like just coding stuff.

And then because I didn't know anybody, I became a personal trainer at a gym down the street from me.

And interestingly, of those three things, Berkeley, data science, and the gym, the gym was like the most productive by far.

One, because when I was a freshman in college, I got there and I was 150 pounds, right?

So I was like skin and bones, got up to like 185 and was lifting a lot.

But two,

while I was there, I met the biggest water well driller.

So the guy that put holes in the grounds for farms and HOAs and factories, the biggest water well driller in DFW in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.

So he's the one that taught me all about water.

He started a business in addition to his drilling company to handle the regulatory reporting for

farmers mostly because all of the aquifers in the western U.S.

are being depleted.

So all the groundwater is running out.

So we're going to have something like, unless Rainmaker does really well, a Dust Bowl 2.0, but this time it'll be way worse because once the aquifers run out, they're permanently empty.

So anyway, the states are regulating how much water you're allowed to pump.

He was doing the reporting for those people.

He was reading how much water they used on their flow meter.

And we co-founded a company that automated the regulatory compliance for farmers.

So, IoT flow meter, some software that I wrote,

just it was like TurboTax for groundwater users, made their life a little bit easier.

And then, when I told my friends back at Berkeley, like, hey, I've got this software thing on the side, they're like, Well, a Berkeley student with a software company is supposed to drop out of college.

And so, that's that's what I did.

Nice, yeah, nice.

How did you so what?

I mean,

you met a driller.

Mm-hmm.

I mean, how old are you?

I'm 25.

No, what back then?

Oh, uh,

21, 25.

21.

So what was, I mean, what was the interest in water?

I had none, zero.

I had no interest in water.

I had no interest in atmospheric science, which eventually is like, you know, became the focus of my life.

I just had nothing to do because I didn't have any friends there yet.

And I, you know, school online was a bit of a joke.

How'd you meet him?

At the gym, dude.

I met him at the gym.

Yeah, I was working out with him.

So I was first,

you know, like a cashier at the front and then started training people.

And

I met him through the gym manager.

It was just like, hey, I guess, you know, honestly,

Justin was the gym owner of ProCore Fitness was the name of it.

I owe him a lot because he made that introduction.

And we just got to talking.

And then

my old co-founder uh jason is his name great guy um

he was like well i'll take a chance on you and like start running this business with you um to handle the the water stuff the paperwork for it at least interesting this show is sponsored by better help these days it feels like there's advice for everything cold plunges gratitude journals screen detoxes but how do you know what actually works for you using trusted resources and talking to live therapists can get you personalized personalized recommendations and help you break through the noise.

Therapy from BetterHelp is helpful for learning positive coping skills and how to set boundaries.

It empowers you to be the best version of yourself and it's for everyone, not just those who've experienced major trauma.

With over 30,000 therapists, BetterHelp is the world's largest online therapy platform, having served over 5 million people globally.

And it works with an average rating of 4.9 out of 5 for a live session based on over 1.7 million client reviews.

It's convenient too.

You can join a session with a therapist at the click of a button, helping you fit therapy into your busy life.

Plus, Switch Therapist at any time is the largest online therapy provider in the world.

BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a diverse variety of expertise.

Talk it out with BetterHelp.

Our listeners get 10% off their first month at betterhelp.com/slash SRS.

That's better

H-E-L-P.com slash SRS.

I've spent years on this show pulling back the curtain and trying to reveal what's really happening in this country.

And the truth is, there's a double standard here in America.

You see time and time again, people defending themselves, defending their family, and then the judicial system goes after them.

It's a double standard.

And if you don't believe me, check out episode number three with Don Bradley.

That is a a perfect example of what I'm talking about.

Because it's not just about what you did, believe it or not, it's how the legal system interprets it.

And that's why I'm a USCCA member.

The USCCA has over 860,000 members because they know the reality is after you stop the threat, the real fight begins.

Your membership gives you the education, elite training, and self-defense liability insurance you need for the second fight, the legal one.

Plus, every member also gets access to a 24-7 critical response team and attorney network in the event of a self-defense incident.

Violent crime happens too often in America.

This isn't about living in fear.

This is about being prepared when things go sideways.

You don't get to schedule danger, and with the world changing so fast, you have to do what you can to protect your family.

Check out the USCCA's risk-free risk-free membership at uscca.com slash SRS.

That's uscca.com slash SRS.

Protect more than just your life, protect your future.

Go right now to uscca.com slash SRS.

And then you got introduced to Peter Thiel.

Yeah, well, so I met

Peter for the first time.

Let's Let's see about when that was.

So I was invited to a

fundraiser for Blake Masters at Peter's house in LA.

And that was the first time that I met him.

That was before I became a Teal Fellow.

I think that was just about as I started Rainmaker.

So I sold my interest in the last company.

The order of events is I moved to Los Angeles partly to grow that last company,

mostly because I was dating a girl in L.A.

Many such cases.

And then sold my interest in that company.

Tell you about how I started Rainmaker later.

And

was trying to get more involved in the tech scene, was trying to raise money for my crazy idea.

For Rainmaker?

For Rainmaker, yeah.

And then got connected to this guy,

former Navy guy, Josh Steinman.

Probably seen him on Twitter.

And he's the one that got me to the Blake Masters fundraiser.

And that's how I met Peter and then eventually got the TO Fellowship for Rainmaker.

How did you get the Teal Pellowship?

TL Fellowship?

So the Teal Fellowship,

have you ever met any other TO Fellows?

So the premise is basically

college is unnecessary and a bit of a scam.

And you can probably learn more and have a bigger impact if you just drop out altogether, try to learn as much as you can independently and by talking to smart people and reading stuff on your own.

And then, you know, like if you are an exemplary person that could have a high impact on the world, that can inspire other people to drop out of college and have a high impact, then Peter will give you a grant

to, you know, live your life, start that company.

And

he thought that Rainmaker was a...

It was a consequential enough idea to inspire other people and to have a big impact.

And so that's why he gave me the grant.

Interesting.

So, so,

I mean, how does he make the determination?

How does he meet fellows?

And it's a lot of crazy guys.

It's a lot of,

yeah, I mean,

is it a competition or you just get in front of him and if he likes what you're doing?

And no, so there's 20 that are selected every year.

And there's probably tens of thousands of applications.

Wow.

And,

you know, it's some mix of having.

You ever read the book, The Right Stuff?

No.

It's by Tom Wolfe.

It's about the initial test pilots that became the first astronauts on the Gemini and Apollo missions.

I think it's something to do with having the right stuff, having proven that you can proving that you're capable enough to start and run a company.

And then, you know, he's a bit of an inscrutable man.

So whatever other factors go into that decision, I'm not not sure.

But he seemed to like this one enough.

What was your pitch?

We're going to turn all the deserts green.

We're going to end water scarcity and make Earth more habitable and green and lush and abundant than it ever has been before.

Backtracking a little bit, I forgot something.

You were, weren't you developing something for the International Space Station?

What were you doing there?

Yeah, so I was in high school.

I mentioned that I was really into space.

In high school.

Yeah, yeah.

So I didn't build anything crazy.

Well,

I didn't build any...

Anyway, long story short, there's something called the Student Space Flight Experiment Program, where a bunch of high schools and universities compete to design experiments that will be conducted on the ISS.

And my team and I in high school designed this experiment to study

essentially just cell replication in space to see if there was any difference between how

organisms grow.

And so we won that competition and then got our experiment launched on a Falcon 9 rocket up to the ISS.

And the astronauts there conducted it.

Are you serious?

Yeah.

In high school, you did that?

Yeah.

Yeah.

Me and a team of other guys.

What does that feel like?

That was the most inspired and proud I'd been in my life up until that point.

And I would say roughly in order, something like getting to know Jesus Christ, having made precipitation, and getting to send something to the ISS were like biggest life accomplishments, probably.

That's pretty amazing.

At age 25,

that's crazy.

Did you follow that experiment?

Yeah,

you know, unfortunately...

We broke one of the test tubes.

So in one of the experiments, there was a bunch of glass in it, which was bad for the cell replication.

Um, but uh, yeah, man, the other results were, and other people have studied this, um,

that things grow very differently in space, one, because of radiation, two, because uh,

you know, gravity and the electromagnetic field of the earth

has a very poorly understood impact on how organisms evolve.

So, like, there's this company right down the road from me in El Segundo called Varda, and they launch small orbital factories into space space because

if you don't have any gravity, you can synthesize all kinds of different materials that are too sensitive, essentially, to be made within Earth's gravity.

And so they're doing all types of new drug discovery.

They're making much more efficient conductors.

We should be making a lot more stuff in space just because of how much cleaner it is, how much more efficient it is.

And I think that we'll see some really incredible stuff in the next 10, 20 years because of it.

What do you think we should be making in space?

Well, one, probably a lot of semiconductors, a lot of chips.

So if you build

a computer chip here on Earth, right, you have to make these insane clean rooms.

You know, like any amount of particulate can destroy millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions of dollars worth of machinery and boards.

And so if you just launch it up into the vacuum of space and manufacture it there, you have an infinitely sized clean room.

So if SpaceX makes the cost of launch cheap enough, which they're doing, then chip manufacturing will become way more efficient in space.

Now, there's the inconvenience of having to get it up and down from space, obviously, but I think that'll be solved for with Starship.

Otherwise, there's a bunch of different medicines that have crystalline structures that are...

too hard to make in gravity.

And so I think we'll be able to cure a lot of diseases with medicine that we synthesize up there too.

Interesting.

And you think that's going to happen within the next decade?

Yeah, yeah, 100%.

I mean, Varda, that's the name of the company that's doing the in-space manufacturing.

They've launched three capsules already and their launch cadence is just increasing.

So that'll definitely happen in the next decade.

Interesting.

DeLion, actually.

DeLion is the name of the founder of that company.

He's a teal fellow as well.

Man, I got to get a hold of them.

That sounds interesting.

All right, let's move into.

I know you know about the know, weather manipulation stuff in Vietnam.

And so, like I said, there's just so many conspiracies about weather manipulation.

Was the Hawaii wildfires?

Was that part of, did that play anything into that?

There's the, you know, Helene, Hurricane Helene in North Carolina.

Did that play anything into that?

Milton in Florida.

Yeah, you know, all these things.

And so let's just start in Vietnam and what we were doing there.

Yeah.

So

I mentioned off the jump the first time that anybody successfully intentionally modified the weather was in 1946 in western New York.

It was this guy, Irving Langmuir, Bernard Vonnegut, and Vincent Schaefer.

They were the scientists that did it.

They made it snow over the Appalachians.

Then by the time that Vietnam came around.

Why were they doing this?

Do you have any idea?

Because

you ever heard the expression do'rock?

It's just like, guys are pretty cool.

Back in the 40s, we were experimenting with a lot of cool stuff: nuclear energy, weather modification, rocketry.

Basically, people just believed in the future.

They wanted to see a new world, right?

And not like a brave new world, like a better, more American, more free, more productive, abundant one.

And so, if you can modify the weather, then

you can make more water for people, you can prevent flooding, you can prevent blizzards, that sort of stuff.

Or at least in theory, when it becomes mature enough.

What the idea was in Operation Popeye, which is what we did in Vietnam, was to

extend the monsoon season, cause more precipitation over the Ho Chi Minh Trail to impede the logistics of the Viet Cong.

So everybody knows about how we

were secretly bombing Cambodia.

That was a big no-no.

Not as many people know about Popeye.

The

problem with Popeye was

we did not have much in the way of satellites at the time, and we also didn't have much radar.

So if you look at the reports of troops on the ground and meteorologists on the ground, they say that they were able to extend the monsoon season, but we have very, very little data to prove that, right?

Like I said, it wasn't until 2017 that we really unambiguously proved that this was possible.

But just for additional context for folks,

the 54th Weather Reconnaissance Squadron in the Air Force, their motto was make mud, not war.

Because the idea was if you could flood out these supply chains, then you could prevent people, the Viet Cong, from getting to the lines and actually shooting bullets at people instead.

So the idea was to drop rain.

Interesting.

Yeah.

You know what's,

I mean, I think a lot of these, nobody trusts the government.

You know, and was it, I have it in my notes here.

It's, was it,

I think we went for, what, three, three or four years of denials from the Secretary of Defense saying that we did any weather modification in Vietnam.

And then a reporter actually uncovered it.

And then we were like, oh, yeah, we did do that.

So, I mean, it would probably be better if they just said no comment rather than

lying.

Yeah.

We didn't do it.

I mean, I get, you know, we need to keep certain things classified, but it just creates this distrust in the government.

And then

now you have all these people that think we did, you know.

well yeah i mean um

i don't blame people for not trusting the government right they haven't had a great track record in the last five years or so right um

less but i don't trust them yeah you trust them no no no um some people in in the government i do but writ large not not so much right um

so like one of the things that rainmaker advocates for that doesn't exist right now is like more intense regulatory scrutiny from the federal government into weather modification, right?

Like technically, there's

two big pieces of regulation on weather modification right now.

There's all the state level stuff.

So like state departments of natural resources will

have your permitting and licensing.

But then the federal government, you're required to tell NOAA.

You're required to notify them if you intend to do weather modification and you're required to report on the results of it.

But it's super open-ended.

And NOAA doesn't really want to touch it because most of the time they just get calls from people that say like, are you poisoning me?

And like the answer is no, probably not.

But they don't really like it and there's not much regulation at the federal level, which isn't good.

Like there should be more stringent reporting requirements so that people can have transparent understanding of the results.

The other thing is, this is a consequence of Operation Popeye.

There's something called NMOD.

which is this treaty from 1972, I think,

that in the international community, so how real international law is, I don't know, up to you, but it technically bans the weaponization of weather modification.

So

it is,

at least on the books, totally illegal to weaponize this tech.

Who else is involved in weather modification?

I mean, we saw UAE flooded their, was it Dubai they flooded out.

I saw, I think China is involved in it.

Who else is involved in this?

So

the lay of the land is this, right?

So first with respect to the UAE,

they

do have a big weather modification program.

They do want to make more water to turn their desert green, right?

Because it's this arid wasteland.

The system that you're referring to in April of 2024, I think, that flooded the city, that was going to flood Dubai naturally, whether they cloud seeded or not.

Like, we know that because it had already rained in Saudi, it had already rained in Qatar.

The system went on and precipitated in Iran, and it caused flooding everywhere.

And none of those cities have any drainage infrastructure because they didn't build the cities for that because they didn't expect rain or expected very rare rain.

The soil also is just sand, so it can't retain much water.

So, whether the Emirates cloud-seated or not,

it was going to flood the city anyway.

So that's worth pointing out from the jump.

Now, with respect to who's doing this globally,

it is really

Rainmaker Technology Corporation, us.

We're trying to take the best-in-class research from American researchers and European researchers.

We're trying to operationalize all the stuff that they've been studying for the last decade.

Then there is the Chinese Meteorological Administration.

The Chinese Meteorological Administration has a $300 million annual budget for this.

They have 38,000 employees.

There are two universities in China that offer bachelor's degrees in weather engineering, not in meteorology, not in atmospheric science, not like predicting and forecasting the weather, specifically in engineering the weather.

They have a weather modification program in every province in China.

They are retrofitting their highest grade military drones to conduct weather modification operations.

More than double-digit percentages of the water in the Three Gorges Dam, biggest dam in China, they attribute to precipitation enhancement operations.

Inner Mongolia, right, the border with Mongolia and China, they're actively turning green by making it rain more there and planting trees.

Oh kidding.

Yeah, and they're doing initial experiments on flood mitigation all over Canton as well.

So they're the most sophisticated by far.

And more still than that, they're collaborating with other governments around the world to export their technology and have control over the weather there.

So like the Thai government has, this is actually a pretty cool thing.

They have what's called a royal rainmaking department because they have a king, right?

I don't know.

It's a cool name for an organization in the government.

They collaborate with the Chinese Meteorological Administration.

So China does a lot of their weather modification.

Then in the Middle East, they have some researchers of their own, but it's really

this

sort of great power politics between the United States government,

which which is not super involved in weather mods.

So, really, it's just me and my pals going there advocating for us, versus all of the best Chinese researchers.

And the Chinese researchers, not only are they using more sophisticated drones, more sophisticated radar to measure what the results of the operations are, they've designed different kinds of nanoparticles that are way more efficient at inducing precipitation than anything that we have stateside right now.

So, lay of the land is there's Rainmaker, which is probably

the best in class in the world, maybe only next to the Chinese Meteorological Administration.

There's the CMA.

There's all of the governments that basically we are bidding against the CMA for like market share in.

And then there's kind of all the snake oil salesmen and guys that are just flying a plane up, blasting something, and then saying, mission accomplished, we did it without any scientific backing.

Interesting.

Interesting.

How many countries is China working with on this?

Do you have any idea?

No, I don't know how many exactly.

You wouldn't be surprised to find out they're pretty obtuse about it, but they have explicitly said, there's a blog post I can send you after this that they published where by 2030 they want to export this tech, not to be explicitly part of Belt and Road,

but to be a means of exerting soft influence over all these countries, right?

Because if China owns all the shipping infrastructure, right?

So like shipping and receiving energy infrastructure, that's already huge leverage over East Africa, Europe, the Middle East.

But if you control the water supply, that's a much more consequential thing to have leverage over.

Yeah,

that's...

Wow.

They're smart, man.

They're smart.

They are, but I believe in American exceptionalism.

I think that...

I mean, for one, what it's worth saying is, like, I am not a pacifist, but I really do not think that war is good.

I think a lot of the time when technology companies talk about china like they saber rattle and sort of froth at the mouth at the idea of war because practically speaking like you can get your bags pumped by the u.s government funding you to do you know weaponization stuff uh i don't like that um i really wish that we had a rivalry with china but were less anxious to fight with them

All of that said, though, I think a lot of that comes from the stuff going on in Taiwan right now.

Totally, right?

And like, we need the chips in Taiwan.

I get that.

But, like,

I don't know.

I would prefer that we're inspired to action and get really serious about weather modification and all these other strategic technologies

because we do want to be the strongest power in the world and we do want an American vision for the world and for space in the future,

but not one that is

on a collision course with China in World World War III.

Well, a lot of people are really skeptical of weather modification.

Me being one of them.

And so let's talk about the difference between geoengineering, chemtrails, and cloud seeding.

Totally.

So

let's open with cloud seeding, right?

Cloud seeding was a technology invented in the United States by American scientists in 1946.

It is super localized in its effect, both in space and time, meaning you can make it rain or snow more over an individual city over 100 square miles at a time.

Precipitation happens 15 minutes to a couple hours after your intervention.

And if you stop operating, right, if you stop cloud seeding, then you stop affecting the weather.

It stops changing, right?

So you can turn it off whenever you want.

Also, because we were doing all of these experiments over the course of the the last 80 years, we have data on its safety, right?

We have data on the materials that we use.

So people have typically used a material called silver iodide to freeze the liquid in the cloud into these big snowflakes that eventually precipitate, melt into rain, or stay a snow.

Silver iodide, its toxicity is like 10 times less than aspirin for one.

But more than that, more importantly than that,

after decades of operations in Utah and Idaho and Colorado and California, because there were all these old programs like i mentioned they only added eight parts per trillion more soil or more silver to the soil and there's already two parts per million silver in american soil as it stands so they added a million times less than what's naturally there there's no adverse ecological consequences agricultural consequences consequences to human health like it's way below the threshold where you'd start to see anything like that so cloud seeding is just a way to make more water it's super local in its effect it's pretty well characterized and we know that it doesn't have any adverse ecological consequences.

It's no secret precious metals like gold and silver are gaining traction.

From the billionaires to the central banks who are stockpiling gold to the growing use of silver for artificial intelligence, the demand is rising.

But how should you buy precious metals?

Where do you start?

And who should you buy from?

Well, I was relieved to find a great company I can trust, and that company is GoldGo.

They are top-rated and keep it simple and transparent.

They are an an award-winning organization with over 7,000 five-star reviews and they've got the best free silver offer out there.

So if you're ready to learn how GoldCo can help you, call 855-936-GOLD or visit SeanlikesGold.com.

You'll get a free 2025 gold and silver kit.

Plus, you'll also learn about how you could qualify for the number one silver offer out there.

So give Goldco a call at 855-936-GOLD or visit SeanlikesGold.com.

Performance may vary.

You should always consult your financial and tax professional.

On the other hand, there is geoengineering, particularly solar radiation modification.

That is

a pretty new technology.

The way that it is proposed to work is dispersing particles in the upper atmosphere

to reflect sunlight and cool the planet down.

Totally unlike cloud seeding.

In order for cloud seeding to work, you need a big fluffy cloud that's already there.

Solar radiation modification, you just put it up at like 60,000 feet.

It's an interesting technology, but it's one that is like almost entirely untested and we should be way more scrutinous of and skeptical of before we deploy it at scale because like well we don't really know what's going to happen yet if we cool the planet down by a degree celsius we don't even know if we want to do that right

So that's the main geoengineering technology that exists.

And then there's chemtrails or contrails, right?

So that's the streaky things in the sky that people see behind airplanes.

The first and most important thing to say is if you see those long streaks in the sky, that's not cloud seeding.

Whether it's contrails or chemtrails or anything else, it is not cloud seeding.

For cloud seeding to work, you have to have a big, fluffy cloud with natural water.

Those long, streaky things, they can't make rain.

They don't turn into big, puffier clouds that eventually make rain.

That doesn't have to do with weather modification.

There are such a thing as contrails, right?

So

the turbulence from planes and the vapor from the jet engines will freeze behind the plane, and

that'll turn into condensation.

What people have suggested to be chemtrails are like the

nefarious addition, it is the nefarious addition of either some sort of neurotoxin or goodness knows what to those contrails to poison people.

I have not yet seen enough compelling evidence to believe that

that's happening.

Have you seen any evidence?

Here's what

is the most compelling point of information that I'm not totally over the line on.

There are different additives in jet fuel for efficiency.

There's different

residues or impurities in jet fuel that can end up in condensation that

probably wouldn't be healthy to eat hand over fist, but is probably way too diffuse to cause any sort of serious toxicity.

So, like,

really no.

And I say that as a guy that, like,

would want to know about it and talks to people about it all the time.

Solar radiation modification, yes, people are doing that.

There is a ton of evidence for that.

Like we know lots of people that are doing that.

But chemtrails themselves, like I guess a question for you would be,

if that was happening, who would be doing it and why would they be doing it?

Yeah, I think about that all the time.

I have no idea, you know, but I do look out and I see it all and I'm like, well,

that probably is not good.

But

that's about the extent of it.

I don't know why they would be doing it

But I don't know why they do a lot of things.

Well, okay, fair enough, right?

One interesting thing about condensation trails,

because we do know what those are, is they actually do have an effect on the weather to some extent.

In that, like,

you're essentially making this blanket, right, in the atmosphere around, like, 30,000 feet.

And so if you...

create a condensation trail in the morning, then you are de facto

blocking some of the sunlight from getting down to the earth and warming the planet up.

So you can sort of locally cool things down if you create a condensation trail at night.

And on the flip side, if you create condensation trails at the end of the day,

like right before sunset, the blanket sort of acts as an insulator, so it keeps more of the infrared in.

So it keeps things warmer locally beneath where they are if you make a lot of them.

So like, maybe there's some reason to do that, but

you know, like I love the idea of getting microplastics out of the water and having, you know about a, you know about how like birth control is in all water now?

I didn't know that.

Yeah.

So

yeah, there's a bunch of stuff that's poisoning us that we should be like really concerned about right now.

So there's birth control and the water.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

So

right now,

lots of women use hormonal birth control, right?

And then we recycle a lot of that water.

We don't actively filter out for the hormones that are in it.

And so when that gets recycled, it gets put back in the water supply.

And then dudes end up drinking it too.

So one, Alex Jones was right about the atrazine and what it does to frogs.

Two, there's a bunch of other stuff that's probably androgenizing us that's not good.

So like, are there a lot of toxins in our environment?

Yeah, totally.

I would prefer that we focus like making America healthy again on getting rid of those things that we do know exist rather than than like

speculating about the World Economic Forum like spraying mind control viruses over us or something.

If nothing nefarious is going on with

the chem and contrails, why do you think all these states are making it illegal?

I mean, I know Tennessee just did it, I think maybe a year or two years ago.

A year ago, yeah.

Yeah.

So Tennessee did it a year ago.

Florida did it just this year.

It's actually a class two felony in Florida now.

So I would go to prison for five years if I conducted business in Tennessee and in Florida.

I think the reason why they're doing it is,

well, first of all, the Western states aren't doing this.

They're not doing it because they're so desperate for water that they're seriously willing to hear out.

the case for cloud seeding, right?

Like Montana proposed legislation to ban all weather modification and geoengineering.

They still banned geoengineering, but they carved out cloud seeding because they know it'll be good for their cattle cattle and for their farms and for their municipal water supplies and for their aquifers.

Texas did the same thing.

The eastern states, you know, most people think of them as pretty wet.

Like you don't need a ton of water, but actually Florida sometimes doesn't have enough.

Like 30,000 acres of Miami-Dade County burnt down in April from wildfire because there was a drought.

The cattlemen and the orange orchards don't have enough water there either.

So like sometimes actually even in the wetter states, they do need it, but they don't feel the pain as acutely of water scarcity as the West.

So it is basically

people rightfully not trusting the government and thinking that something fishy is going on.

Nobody knowing what cloud seeding is or the difference between cloud seeding chemtrails and solar radiation modification and thinking, holy smokes, any of this would be really consequential.

We should just ban it.

so that nothing goes wrong

and sort of take like the brute force blunt approach to it and not reaping any of the rewards of what cloud seating could offer.

And then,

you know, RFK said that like chemtrails should be a crime for which people should be arrested.

So he definitely catalyzed a lot of that too.

And also, like, last thing, I think Rainmaker made enough of a splash in like 2023, 2024 to confirm to people that weather modification was real and it was measurable and we know it's happening.

So we put enough information out there

to tell people it was happening and probably actually scare them because we didn't give them enough context and reiterate the point enough um and so so that that's the origin of these bans i think and then dubai flooding was a horrible look as well how many how many states have banned it so 31 states proposed legislation to ban 31 states yeah

um

me and my team have been to most of them um the only states that have banned it are uh tennessee and florida

and and i mean you think about it this way, right?

Like, I was listening to another one of your podcasts with the retired two-star, the guy that runs the space manufacturing company.

Steve Quast.

Yeah, Steve Quast.

See, that's, I was going to bring, I don't want to cut you off, go ahead.

Well, no, no, please.

I was going to bring that up because in his interview, and I don't remember the chemical or whatever it is that they're using to,

he was talking about how Elon Musk wanted to use this thing where basically you put some type of

additive and a sponge-like substance, and you run fans on it, and it produces all this water.

And

that Elon wanted to use it to cool his rocket pads down there and

got denied because Texas was like,

we don't know how to tax you on this.

So then he had to use all of the regular water,

which seemed like a

huge misstep on Texas for

not allowing him to do that and sucking up all that water in a dry state.

But

yeah,

that's where I was going with that.

Yeah, yeah.

Well, I mean, that's exactly the point that I was bringing up too, right?

Like

China and other countries around the world, the United States back in the 60s was like this.

Like they are investing in things and they are permitting things and they are regulating things smartly that like make more abundance, that make more energy, that make more water, that make everybody's lives better.

The United States, for whatever reason, just like bans and regulates stuff out of existence that makes, one, all of our lives worse and us as a country less competitive.

And so, you know, do I fault people for being scrutinous and skeptical of weather modification and wanting to know what's going on?

Like, no, totally.

This tech is going to be

maybe the most consequential, if not like the second or third most consequential technology in the 21st century.

I think the first is going to be, well, I mean, maybe there's four.

It's really like AI, nuclear energy, rocketry, and weather modification.

Those are the things that are going to make our descendants' lives look like fundamentally, totally different from anything that any other human has experienced.

But if we regulate it in a smart way and permit it to happen in a way that benefits people,

That's like a no-brainer.

Having the most cost-effective way to produce more water when you want it.

Like,

why would you pass up on that if you can prove that it's safe?

I think people, you know,

it's new, you know, people don't like new.

And then

what are the implications of weather modification that we don't know about?

And,

you know, like, how does it manipulate the rest of the weather by changing the ecosystem?

So for, for example, and I don't even know if this is true, but I spent a lot of time in Afghanistan, very dry in a lot of those, in a lot of Afghanistan.

You know, it's a desert.

In the north, it's not.

But

it was rumored that they had chopped so many trees down to

keep themselves warm.

There's no trees, you know, in the southern part anymore.

And it actually changed their whole ecosystem, you know, and turned it into...

turned it into a desert because they had chopped all the damn trees down.

And so, I mean, I think people are really concerned as, you know,

what are the effects that we don't know about and we will not know until this comes to fruition and everybody's cloud seeding.

Yeah, and it's, it's worth asking that question, right?

But

to

one, we have 80 years of data on its safety and on its efficacy.

To reason by analogy, right?

Like

California's Central Valley, it used to be a mix of desert and swamp.

It was a wasteland at the beginning of the 1900s.

And because we built new infrastructure, had new technologies for pumping water and desalinating water, we turned that into the most productive agricultural region in the United States.

It feeds

tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions, people around the world and produces like, what, 40% of all of our fruit.

We changed that ecosystem and it was way better for everybody else.

So

should we regulate these things?

Should we be cautious and like do it maybe with

relatively slowly or with just caution at least totally?

But every day that goes by that people don't have enough water,

you know, I view it to some extent as like

guilt on me for not having made enough water to feed more people, to make everyone's lives better.

Yeah, and that weighs on me a lot.

So

Should we be scrutinous?

Yes.

To your point as well, you know, you said, like, well, what if you totally changed the ecosystem?

Could something bad happen?

I was talking to, was it Will earlier in here?

For the patron, Wyatt.

One thing to think about that is actually sort of a fun thought experiment is like greening the Sahara, right?

Sahara desert, huge wasteland.

If you turn the Sahara Desert green, that actually would not be very good because

the dust from the Sahara that goes over the ocean, over the Amazon,

results in a lot of the cloud condensation and the precipitation.

So if you turn all that green and the dust stops getting kicked up, you might actually reduce the precipitation of the Amazon.

So like...

When Rainmaker gets to the scale in a decade or so of like actively terraforming the planet, making it more lush and green and and symbiotic than it ever has been before

we're going to have questions that we have to answer about like what the the consequences will be globally but um

i i i think that humans are pretty good at engineering solutions and building new technology and building new systems to to make the world better

I mean, I guess the counter

to that would be,

I guess you would just cloud suit more over the Amazon, right?

Bingo, yeah, exactly.

But, you know, is there any

is there any talk of how this would, you know, maybe intensify hurricanes or tornadoes or any other, you know, natural disasters that may not be natural disasters anymore.

Have you heard of Project Storm Fury?

No.

So

about the same time period as Popeye,

the U.S.

Air Force, in collaboration with the U.S.

Weather Bureau, which eventually became like NOAA and the National Weather Service,

they were flying into the Atlantic Ocean to seed hurricanes to try to prevent the amount of damage or mitigate the amount of damage that they did before they broke against the eastern seaboard.

And so the idea was, one,

precipitate water out of the storm so that there's less flooding.

that occurs from it before it reaches land.

And then two,

if you freeze the liquid in the cloud, that releases a little bit of heat.

Freezing is exothermic.

And so if you seed the storm and it releases heat, you have the same amount of energy, but you expand the storm, like the heat advects it out.

And so the wind speeds will be less on the exterior as well.

So you get less damage from flooding, less damage from severe winds.

We tried doing that.

The problem then though was we didn't have anything in the way of satellites.

We had no radar over the oceans, and so we couldn't even measure what the results were, really.

So, we gave it a go.

Nobody really knows whether it was effective or not, but I think that the thing to consider is: like,

Rainmaker right now is just making more water for like farms, utilities, right?

That's our bag.

That is what people immediately need.

Um, we can do it at small scales, it is

worthwhile, um, and people really want that.

We operate all over the western U.S.

Someday, like, I don't think drought is the only thing that we should solve.

If you could engineer away severe weather, flooding, if you could mitigate hurricanes, if you could mitigate hail,

you know, you'd have to

do a lot of experiments to prove it was safe first.

But

why would we let the eastern seaboard of the United States keep getting blasted with hurricanes if we could build a solution for it?

Makes sense.

And then, you know, going back

to what if this does intensify hurricanes or, you know,

or

take the rain away from the Amazon and create a drought?

I mean, once it's happened, I mean,

I guess what I'm saying is

how many people would pay the price

by making the Sahara green

takes the dust down,

eliminates the rain in the Amazon.

Then we've got to figure something out immediately because it's going to affect all those people.

No, we wouldn't because,

you know, it would take decades to make this air green.

You'd have to do that step by step, piece by piece.

It'd be a very slow process.

And you could, with cloud seeding, you could turn it off whenever you want.

So in that long process of trying to do large-scale terraforming, you would be able to stop at any point if you didn't like what was happening from producing more water in one place versus the the other.

So

I don't think we would have to have a solution at the drop of a hat.

And also on the flip,

even if we did, and I think that we don't, right, because it would take so long to deploy this tech, to cause these things.

Like, there is suffering now.

There's $140 billion in damage.

done by hurricanes every year in the U.S.

There's hundreds of billions of dollars in crop failures every every year in the U.S.

from lack of water.

So

it's not that this tech is without risk, but

there is a horrible problem right now because there isn't enough water and because we have severe weather.

And like we, I guess in principle, right?

You're saying you're concentrating on the need.

Yeah, exactly.

Versus what could happen.

You want to fulfill

the immediate need.

I think about both, right?

Because

I don't think that the unknown unknowns are that great.

Like I said, we have 80 years of data on this stuff.

Like we know pretty well how it works and we haven't seen any of this sort of adverse consequence.

I mean, at the very least, right,

we have less and less water every year in the American West than we did before.

So like

maybe

we only get this far, but let's just get back to baseline, right?

Like let's just get back to the amount of water that we had 40 years ago.

Because we knew that it was safe and stable then.

So like, let's make sure that Lake Powell is full.

Let's make make sure that the Great Salt Lake isn't evaporating.

Let's make sure that Phoenix, Tucson, and Salt Lake City, and Las Vegas, and Dallas, and Denver, and all the cities in the Central Valley and California writ large have enough water that the same amount of water that they used to, even.

Let's start with that.

Um, because that's going to take a lot of my time for the next five years or so.

Um, and then after that, we can get into the more pie-in-the-sky stuff.

But for now, more water on the ground so that we get back to baseline is the number one priority.

Roger that, let's take a quick break.

When we come back, we'll talk about how this all works.

If you ever searched yourself online, you'd be shocked at how much of your personal data is out there.

Phone numbers, home addresses, info about your family.

It's all on the open web, all without your permission.

That's why I'm so glad I found Aura.

Aura does all the heavy lifting, automatically removing your info from data broker sites and helping you take back your privacy and peace of mind.

And it's not just data broker removal.

Aura also offers a password manager to lock down your accounts, fraud alerts, and more.

Your data is already out there.

The question is, what are you going to do about it?

For limited time, Aura is offering our listeners a 14-day trial when you visit aura.com slash SRS.

That's enough time for Aura to start scrubbing your personal info off these data broker sites.

That's aura.com slash SRS to sign up for a 14-day free trial and start protecting you and your loved ones.

That's aura.com slash SRS.

Certain terms apply, so be sure to check the site for details.

Do you ever just get stuck on the home screen trying to pick a show to watch?

Or when you're trying to decide what to have for dinner, you just pour a bowl of cereal instead?

Having too many options can be overwhelming.

The same applies if you're a business owner who's hiring.

It can be overwhelming to have too many candidates to sort through, but you're in luck.

ZipRecruiter now gives you the power to proactively find and connect with the best ones quickly.

How?

Through their innovative resume database.

And right now you can try it for free.

It's ziprecruiter.com slash SRS.

ZipRecruiter's resume database uses advanced filtering to quickly hone in on top candidates for your roles.

Skip the candidate overload.

Instead, streamline your hiring with ZipRecruiter.

See why four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day.

Just go to this exclusive web address, ziprecruiter.com/slash SRS right now to try it for free.

Again, that's ziprecruiter.com/slash SRS.

ZipRecruiter, the smartest way to hire.

All right, we're back from the break.

We had a little discussion about the grids.

People walk outside, they see the grids with the cloud seating.

What is that?

It's not grids with the clouds.

I mean, I'm sorry,

with the chemtrails.

Yeah.

Listen, man.

There's an email, contact at rainmaker.com.

If anybody has credible scientific evidence of deliberate contrail chemtrail manipulation of the weather or like poisoning, send it there.

I want to see it.

My chief of staff is going to kill me for saying that because he's going to get a bazillion.

You're about to get bombarded.

But like the crisscrossing thing that people see in the sky, it's just a lot of airlines, man.

There's a lot of planes that fly in different directions.

And so the ones that go east and west and north and south happen to intersect.

And sometimes it looks like a grid.

And humans are really good at recognizing patterns.

So we see that pattern and think something's going on.

Nothing yet, man.

It is what it is.

Yeah, yeah.

A very, yeah, it's just people don't like the boring answer, huh?

There's a lot of crazy stuff that is actually happening.

So like, let's talk about that, you know?

Like, all of our kids' minds are being melted by TikTok, and there's birth control in the water, and there's plastic in everything that we touch.

And China is stealing all of our IP and all of our actual critical industries.

And actually, my company can manipulate the weather.

So like those things are all real.

That's more interesting to me than making stuff.

What was the birth control thing again?

Yeah.

So women are, you know, women take hormonal birth control.

They then...

you know, urinate, that goes into the water system.

A lot of cities recycle their water, but we don't have any specific filtration mechanism for those hormones.

So they just get recycled and pumped back into the municipal water supply.

So is this like a significant amount of birth control in the water?

Yes.

And there's an infertility problem.

Yes.

How does it affect males?

Do you know?

It makes you more asexual.

Yeah.

So it makes you less of a guy and more of a sort of...

I don't know, like the way that most guys are now.

The way that most guys are now.

Yeah.

You know, I've heard there's so many conspiracies about the chemtrails, and I've heard that they're spraying estrogen in the air to.

Well, let me tell you something, though.

Oh, shit.

Here we go.

So the material that we use, it freezes the liquid and cloud into snowflakes that fall, right?

Pure testosterone.

It's not as effective, but it's almost as effective as silver iodide.

So if we really want to make America healthy again, we'll all be showered in testosterone.

I can make that happen.

Oh, man, that's, that's.

Have you ever heard?

Have you ever heard of Soul Bear?

I interviewed them about, I don't know, two, three years ago, and they basically had come up with this formula where

they would chemtrail it with a plane and spray this.

this solution over trees.

And basically what the solution supposedly does is

it's almost like a tanning lotion that you put on the trees.

And it keeps the

it

allows them to

it allows plants to do photosynthesis a lot longer than normal because I think it has to be like 72 degrees or something for that to occur.

And so this enables it to do more, which would clean the air and

all this other stuff.

I didn't know if you had

heard of them or not.

No, I haven't.

But

basically, it helps trees grow a lot faster.

Yeah,

I don't know whether that is healthy or not or what it's made of, but

if it is helping green stuff.

It works.

They gave me a bunch of samples.

I sprayed it all over a bunch of trees and they blew up.

No way.

Yeah, to 100%.

It works.

That's fascinating because long-term, Rainmaker has to do more than just making it rain more, right?

Like we have to automate tree planting.

We have to figure out how to make the trees grow faster, or we have to make sure that the soil retains more water.

So that tech sounds super, super interesting.

So

that's an interesting point because when you were talking about, you know, greening the Sahara, I mean,

where would the soil come from?

So

rather than the Sahara, right, let's take Arizona as an example.

Kingston, Arizona.

A lot of that soil is the same mineral content as the Central Valley.

It's just not productive because there's not enough water, right?

So there's a ton of areas in the world where it's like ready to farm if only for water supply.

So like you can start with those and you don't need to change the soil too much.

Now, in the case of a lot more arid regions,

you know, how do you get the amount of nutrients and water to stay in the soil for actual plants to grow?

Because if you plant a seed in sand, like probably no dice, right?

There's these things called hydrogels or biochar, or just like manure that you can till into the soil to one, put nutrients there and two, allow the soil to retain more water.

So if you just have an automated tractor or combine or something that grates the soil, mixes in

this water-retaining material, then that instantly becomes much, much, much more arable.

Interesting.

Let's talk about how this all works.

Okay.

How does it work?

You have water in clouds, right?

I'll walk you through the form of the tech that we understand very well and then a proposed alternative way.

You have watering clouds.

80% of precipitation-ish that occurs on the planet happens because you have watering clouds and then you have natural dust or you have bacteria that get kicked up from the soil, all natural stuff

that the water freezes onto, turns into big heavy snowflakes, and then falls, falls, either stays as snow or melts into rain.

Rainmaker and cloud seeding mimics this natural process where you have water in the clouds, but the droplets aren't big enough and heavy enough to naturally precipitate.

If you put material in the cloud that has a crystal structure similar to ice, then the water will freeze onto it, grow into those big snowflakes, and fall.

That's sort of like the high level, but the system that Rainmaker uses has a few other important components.

So first of all, you have to be able to detect whether a cloud has enough liquid, because if the cloud is mostly ice, then you can't freeze much more.

But we use radar

to measure how much liquid is in the cloud.

The way that we do that is

one wave of the radar moves vertically, right?

And then the other is oriented horizontally.

So you get the amount of the beam that is reflected in both directions.

And so if you have about an equal amount of the horizontal and vertical beam reflected, then you have a spherical target.

So it's probably a water drop, right?

If you get more of one versus the other, then it's probably more oblong and like a snowflake or like an ice crystal.

So we can use the radar to measure where the liquid water is in the cloud.

If we find that, then we'll launch our drones up into it.

The drones that we've built built are the only ones in NATO that are under 55 pounds that can survive in severe icing conditions.

This is really cold water, right?

So we have these resistors inlaid onto the vehicle that melt the ice off as it accretes onto the drone.

So you find the water with the radar.

You fly your drone up into these conditions, hope that it survives.

You disperse the material.

So we have this air soul dispersion system that basically just emits individual particles that the water freezes onto.

And then with the same radar you found the water with, you can now see it freezing, growing into bigger snowflakes, and then eventually bigger drops and measure how much precipitates downwind.

Aaron Ross Powell, so you're essentially

introducing some type of an agent that has weight to it, and that's pulling the

agent that the water freezes onto.

And then it's just the weight of the water that pulls it down.

So for every

you know pound of this that you put up you get in excess of 40 million pounds down on the ground 40 million pounds of water

40 million wow yeah how many drones does it take to do this uh like three uh that's it so what we do is we juggle them so one drone will go up uh once that reaches altitude the next drone will go up the first drone after dispersing its full payload will come down and you'll just cycle that as long as the conditions persist so sometimes that means you're out there for two hours.

Our Ford operations specialists, though,

it's a lot of former vets, National Forest Service guys, oil roughnecks, people that are willing just to live out on a mountain for nine months at a time.

Speaking of which, apply to rainmaker.com slash careers to become a forward operations specialist because we need like 50 dudes in the next three months.

But they can stay out there for like four days at a time, just taking shifts, operating day and night.

Because you can have an atmospheric river that will last for days.

How bit of a.

I mean, how exact can you pick a location to have it rain on?

So I cannot make it rain over the house of your enemies.

We are not precise enough to target some individual person's house or something like that.

We're not even precise enough to target an individual farm.

So we're talking about 100 to 500 square miles at a time.

In certain cases, up to like 1,000 square miles at a time.

Sorry, go back.

So the smallest would be...

The smallest would basically be like

an average size city.

Okay.

An average size city, the watershed of a hydroelectric dam.

something like that.

So the smallest would be

that sort of scale, like municipal sizes.

Let's talk about the first time you did this where you made it rain.

Yep.

Just walk me through that scenario.

That experience.

Well, I'll tell you, first of all, we failed way more times before we actually accomplished it.

We crashed a lot of drones.

We did not have the system to actually target liquids, so we were flying into clouds that were just ice, so we couldn't affect them at all.

You know,

it was a pretty

everybody that's on the Rainmaker team is

pretty tough for having stuck out that period.

It's sort of like, you know, all startups think about how Elon blew up three rockets before he actually launched one into space.

Like we had a lot of drones crash before we actually were able to make it precipitate.

And so we were up in northeastern Oregon in a town called Pendleton.

It's where Pendleton Wool is from, if you know it.

It's a town of 16,000 people,

2,000 of which are in a prison.

Most of the rest are farmers.

So super, super small spot.

We have a team of forecasters that saw that there was an atmospheric river coming in.

The clouds were about two kilometers thick, almost all liquid.

We were able to, one, finally get the radar system functional enough to measure that water and then launch weather balloons to take in-cloud measurements of the water there.

And then we were just flying drones for hours and hours.

And we didn't have the

processing capability live yet to take live measurements.

So we were just out there operating,

flying drones for a few hours.

And then we pack up, go back to the warehouse that we were all living out of, look at the radar data, and then saw from the time that we started operating, about 15 minutes afterwards, this plume on the radar.

exclusively downwind.

So this whole big cloud system wasn't precipitating.

And only on the radar do you see downwind where our particle plume was an increase in precipitation.

And another thing that I guess this is an opportune time to share is there was a snow day at the local school district 15 miles north of where we were, where the wind was going.

So, that was a pretty cool thing to have done for the kids there locally.

It was, it was, yeah, that was back in that was December, December 12th

of last year.

Wow, so you just got it done within the last

six months.

Six months.

Rainmaker has kind of been like this and then that.

Just like rapid, rapid, rapid growth trajectory since we were able to do it.

Have you been in your own rain?

Snow.

Snow.

Yeah.

Yeah, our own snow.

It's actually way easier to make snow than it is rain.

Why is that?

So you know how the material freezes the liquid in the cloud?

That means that the cloud has to be cold enough for you to freeze it in the first place, which generally means that it's cold beneath the cloud too.

Now, with respect to rain, we're operating in Utah, Colorado, Oregon, California, and Texas.

It's all rain in Texas.

So we've been in our own rain there.

Out in West Texas and the Trans Picas, the Panhandle.

That's been pretty cool.

Yeah, that's got to be pretty.

It's got to be a weird feeling know that knowing that that's your reign

like I said, that's that's the second most important thing that I've ever done in my life

What is the agent?

Yeah, so silver iodide that is what has been used in one form or another for the last 60 years

Its crystal structure is almost identical to ice.

So that plus a couple other material properties make the water water freeze onto it very well.

We use so little of it, about 50 grams per 100,000 plus acres, that there's no accumulation,

no measurable or consequential accumulation in the soil for humans or for farms or for ecosystems.

All that being said though, well actually the first point is

Most cloud seeding operations in the past have used flares.

So they'll burn a flare that aerosolizes the silver iodide.

But in the flare, there's a bunch of other junk materials, right?

People get concerned about aluminum or stuff like that in the flares.

So we don't even, we don't use that because we don't want any additional additives beyond what is explicitly and exclusively for rainmaking.

So our aerosol dispersion system just uses silver iodide.

Something that we're working on right now

is totally organic material found in American soil that is biodegradable, that is more effective effective, and actually costs less per gram than silver iodide.

We have a bunch of lab testing to do before we roll that out to the field, and then we need to do all the regulatory permissions with the EPA and otherwise.

But silver iodide is what we've used for the last seven months.

When do you think you'll introduce the other agent?

January 2026.

Coming up, another six months.

Nice.

Nice.

Let's talk about

some of the benefits of this, other than the obvious.

You know,

what are some of the other benefits that this could bring to the world?

We'll start just with precipitation enhancement, making it rain and snowmore, right?

First of all,

it's going to prevent, it already is preventing farms from running dry, right?

So farms that need more water, we can produce more water for.

All of the aquifers, I said at the very beginning of our discussion, in the American West, are running out.

And so once those aquifers run out, not only are they empty, which is bad because we can't pump more, but also because there's less pressure in the aquifer, the sediment will compress and then you lose storage capacity permanently.

So the longer there's not enough water in there, the less you can store in the future.

So making it rain and snow more so that more water percolates into the aquifer.

That is also super important so that we have storage capacity in the future.

Hydroelectric, right?

It's clean, stable, baseload power.

I think that eventually nuclear is going to be like the primary way that we produce energy.

But while we're getting towards that, making sure that there's as much water flowing through our rivers as possible so that we have as much clean hydroelectric energy, that's a huge one.

And then also data centers and manufacturing facilities and specifically chip plants that use a lot of water.

Like Google Cloud Compute uses...

25% of all of the water in northeastern Oregon.

Yeah, yeah.

So in the northeastern quarter of the state, they use a quarter of all the water.

And it's all farmland, right?

So you would think that the farmers would use like 99%,

but

Google uses a ton.

So if we want to keep using the internet and if we want to invest in AI, then we need to produce more water as well.

Is there a timeline on when these aquifers will be depleted?

Somewhere between the 2040s and 2070s.

So not long.

No.

No.

And we're not reversing the trend right now.

We're slowing it down, but it's still being drawn down.

Interestingly enough, Nebraska and Orange County are the two places in the U.S.

that have great aquifers.

Unfortunately, Orange County's aquifer is full of plastic, and Nebraska's aquifer is full of

pesticides.

So not great, but at least they have the water.

So yeah,

without cloud seeding, we run out of water.

That's number one.

And then with respect to other stuff, like people have proposed means of doing hail hail suppression.

So, targeting a storm before it dumps golf ball or baseball-sized hail.

If you can freeze the

liquid in the cloud into really, really small snowflakes before they

freeze onto bigger stones and grow into bigger stones, then you can reduce the amount of damage done by that as well.

That's another huge application that I think about.

Interesting.

What about wildfires?

This is a very, you know, I live in Los Angeles.

It's a very near and dear thing to my heart.

When there is a wildfire raging, right, generally the heat from that will dry up the atmosphere above it.

You very rarely get enough clouds over a wildfire to conduct cloud seeding, to make it rain directly over the fire.

So can you actively stop a wildfire with this?

Not in most cases, which is unfortunate.

However, in the months preceding the LA fires, there were tons of clouds that could have precipitated, that didn't precipitate.

And because they didn't rain, the ground became drier and drier and drier and created more fuel that fed those fires.

And so for wildfire prevention, cloud seeding is absolutely something that you can do.

And an interesting part about that is, you know, desalination is one way to make water.

Desalination, you can produce about a cubic meter of water for 40 cents.

Cloud seeding is about a tenth of a cent.

So it's way, way cheaper.

But

if you're doing desal, you can't really use that water to do wildfire prevention because you would need a pipe to move it over every square inch of the land that you're trying to make wet.

Well, with cloud seeding, you actually naturally distribute it over the entire area.

So you can keep that soil moist, you can keep those plants green, and then reduce the risk of wildfire going forward.

So I think that really it's going to be keeping farms alive, keeping industrial capacity alive, keeping southwestern cities from running out of water so that people have to to move out of them, and then wildfire prevention as like the main cases for it.

So the wildfire

prevention would be, it would, it would be proactive.

It wouldn't be a immediate response to a wildfire.

It wouldn't be a course of action for as an immediate response to a wildfire.

Correct.

How long would it take to

I would think it wouldn't take very long to

prevent wildfires.

Dude, you get precipitation like 15 to 45 minutes after you start seeding.

15 to 45 minutes?

Yeah, it is super, super fast,

provided you have the liquid in the cloud.

But yeah,

it's super straightforward.

You can see the effect of it in real time.

Do you have an idea of how much it's actually going to rain?

Yeah, yeah.

So what I'm getting at is preventing flooding.

And you know, it's funny when people say like

they're making hurricanes or something, right?

Because it's like...

We can do like

less than an inch of rain or snow right now, given the tech.

And sometimes it's like less than a centimeter, right?

So it is,

it is a lot of water over a large area taken in that context, especially if you keep operating for a long time.

But like you cannot make it dump, or at least we don't know how to make it dump yet.

Then you can also make some inference about like, well, depending on whether there's, depending on how much water is in the cloud, you can, you can make some projections about how much it'll rain as well.

And so if you do,

it also sounds like you're prematurely getting a cloud to rain.

And so

if you enhance the,

if you enhance it.

And it dumps before it gets to where it's going.

I mean,

who would you be pulling water away from?

Flastic question also, Mr.

Ryan.

In the industry that's called stealing from Peter to pay Paul, if you make it rain more in one place, will it rain less downwind?

So I mentioned at the beginning of our conversation, too,

you can think of the water in the sky, the atmospheric rivers, kind of like how you would think about a normal river.

The Colorado River, All of its water is allocated already, right?

Everybody already draws down from that.

It is 100% utilized,

which is why by the time it gets to Mexico, there's not much there.

There is about 10x more water in the atmosphere over the U.S.

that isn't precipitating.

So there's 10 times more that we could tap into before we even get into a question of whether it's going to reduce precipitation downwind.

That's really important because I want to play a positive sum game, right?

There's not scientific publication at this point in time to suggest that there's going to be less precipitation downwind, but I think that as we scale this operation a lot, you're going to see

you know the movie Chinatown?

Yeah.

You're going to see, you're going to see people fighting over cloud water rights, for sure.

I think we're probably like three to five years away from that.

But at some point, people will have to start thinking about, hopefully the federal government, how to distribute that water appropriately.

For the time being, it's exclusively positive sum, more water than what would come down otherwise.

what other questions should i be asking you

yeah um

well uh can you prevent flooding right can you make a system precipitate less um

you heard about the 2008 olympic games in china

so they they uh

did cloud seeding in the preceding days to uh precipitate all the water out locally so that you had sunshine during the games itself.

They also are seeding some clouds to make the droplet sizes smaller so that they're less likely to rain.

That's way harder to prove the effect of

because

if you see the water change from liquid to ice

exclusively in your flight track, then it's pretty easy to say, okay, that's that's man-made, that was where you were flying.

But if you only see

the droplet sizes change,

anyway, it's kind of like a hard radar problem.

Indonesia, though, India, China, they're all spending a lot of money on researching how to make it rain less to prevent flooding too.

So

that's another domain that matters.

Where are you starting with your company?

Are you starting with

geographically or technologically?

Geographically.

So we're based in Los Angeles, which I win win no points in Tennessee for being based in Los Angeles or Florida for that matter.

Mulletman

Tech Bro does not play very well in the state legislature here.

But

we operate in Utah with our Department of Natural Resources, Colorado with their Department of Natural Resources.

We're about to begin in Idaho and Wyoming.

Oregon, California, Texas.

We just started this week our first deployment in Latin America.

So we're down in Tier del Fuego, Argentina, and then one country in the Middle East.

That's where we are right now.

Really, the majority of our business is going to be in the Western United States, the Middle East because it's dry, and then Latin America because it's dry and fairly deregulated.

Southern Latin America, that is.

So let's talk about Western United States.

What does that look like?

Is this experimental still?

No, no, we're making water.

So the state of Utah, I might be a little bit more conservative than this, but the state of Utah Department of Natural Resources measured that we produced 186,000 acre-feet of water in the state this past year.

It's about 6% of all the water that's consumed by the state of Utah.

And that's all in the form of snowpack that melts and runs off into these city's watersheds.

And so why do they want you to do this?

I mean, is it the aquifers or is it farming?

There's no water.

It's all of the above.

So, yeah, the aquifers are running out.

The farms, you know, the states actually pay to the tune of tens of millions of dollars a year.

And then at the federal level, hundreds of millions, they pay farmers not to farm.

They pay them not to farm because they don't want them to use the water.

No kidding.

Yeah.

So what we've provided as an option for them is a way to make more water.

so that the farmers can keep farming and you still have enough water.

So it's a win-win there.

And then in Utah in particular, the Great Salt Lake is is depleting every year.

And as that body of water gets smaller and smaller, all of the arsenic at the bottom of it gets kicked up.

And so you have these respiratory issues that are coming.

And so one of the biggest priorities of the state of Utah is to make more water for the Great Salt Lake.

And so something that I want Rainmaker to participate in in the next two years is preventing the evaporation of the lake.

When you do that, I mean, how big of an area do they want you to cover?

The Bear River Basin.

So there's really one primary river that flows into the Great Salt Lake.

And so we're still finalizing this, but

we're negotiating an interstate compact between Utah, Wyoming, and

Idaho right now

to cloud seed with

about 30 people distributed distributed over a few thousand square miles

as the river flows from Utah into Wyoming, into Idaho, and then back down into the Great Salt Lake in Utah.

Do you ever miss the target?

No,

the target is the whole watershed.

So as long as it ends up between these huge mountain ranges, then you're square.

So that's not an issue.

Sometimes it crash groans, though.

That still happens.

How do do you see this

getting implemented throughout the world as time goes on and more people open up to the idea?

I think that

so our goal for

the operations between October 2025 and

April 2026 is to produce 10 billion gallons of water unambiguously just in this one project in northern Utah.

If we do that and have all the radar data to back it up, that puts us at parity with the production of the biggest desalination plant in the United States.

If we succeed in that mission, then I think we're about two years away from becoming the biggest water utility in the Western United States.

I think that people will think about water utilities and water production as something that cloud seeders do rather than like dam operators do.

It'll yeah, it will be a huge utility first.

And then as time goes on, as we get into all the other sorts of applications, we'll probably work with crop insurers and farmers to help prevent crop failure.

We'll probably turn a lot more hydroelectric power online.

And then the fun terraforming stuff is kind of like five, 10 years away.

Summer's here.

And if you're anything like me, you didn't spend the winter just sitting around.

You stayed sharp and kept moving.

And now it's time your gear caught up.

And that's why I want to introduce you to Roka.

I've been looking for eyewear that can handle any situation with performance and style.

And let me tell you, these aren't your average shades.

I've tested them in the real world from shooting to fishing to off-roading, and they hold up.

They're lightweight, don't slide around on my face, and can take a hit without falling apart.

And the best part, they look good.

They're clean and modern, no frills here, just premium eyewear that performs without compromise.

That's something that I respect, and that's also why every time I head out the door, I reach for my Roka shades.

Roka's based in Austin, Texas, American designed, no cut corners.

The optics are crystal clear, cut through glare, and the fit stays comfortable all day long.

Need a prescription?

They've got you covered with both sunglasses and eyeglasses.

Not only does Roka have awesome shades, they also have these that protect you against blue light.

I wear these every night when I'm winding down for the day and I still got to look at my phone or my laptop or my iPad.

It just helps you wind down and get ready for bed.

They are a one-stop shop for eyewear that's built to handle whatever life throws at you.

Roka is the real deal.

Ready to upgrade your eyewear?

Check them out for yourself at roca.com and use code SRS for 20% off site-wide at checkout.

That's R-O-K-A.com.

What if you could delay your next two mortgage payments?

That's right.

Imagine putting those two payments in your pocket and finally getting a little breathing room.

It's possible if you call American Financing today.

If you're feeling stretched by everyday expenses, groceries, gas, bills piling up, you are not alone.

Most Americans are putting these expenses on credit cards and there doesn't seem to be a way out.

American Financing can show you how to use your home's equity to pay off that debt.

You need to call American Financing today to get ahead of the curve.

Their salary-based mortgage consultants are helping homeowners just like you restructure their loans and consolidate debt all without upfront fees.

And their customers are saving an average of $800 a month.

That's like a $10,000 a year raise.

It's fast, it's simple, and it could save save your budget this summer.

Call now at 866-781-8900.

That's 866-781-8900.

Or you can go to Americanfinancing.net slash SRS.

NMLS 182-334.

NMLS consumeraccess.org.

How precise do you think you'll get?

Do you think you'll get to the point where you can just do a farm field?

There's something called a cloud micro burst.

So when you have a ton of convection and these clouds kind of collapse very suddenly, this happens in nature already.

You can make it rain over

tens of acres at a time.

There are theories about how to do that.

mostly focused on getting the current tech to scale, but yeah, there's a world where that happens before 2030.

How far out does the cloud need to be seeded before it rains?

Yeah, so like I said, it's like 15 to 45 minutes before you get that beginning of precipitation.

So if a cloud is moving at 10 miles an hour, maybe you want to seed it five miles upwind.

That's it.

Wow.

Going to...

I mean, this could also, you know, fix starvation crises all over the world.

Have you heard of,

I think it's Mark Twain who said it.

Whiskey's for drinking and water's for fighting over.

Sorry, I know we were just talking about sobriety earlier.

But

right now, if you look at like the border of Egypt, Sudan, and Ethiopia, Ethiopia just built a dam on the Nile River.

Egypt will collapse if they do not have enough water.

They will go to war with Ethiopia over water if they do not get enough from the Nile.

The Jordan River, which flows through and supplies water to and gets water from

Israel, Palestine, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon,

that's a real hotspot for water rights, right?

If there's not enough water there, tensions will rise.

China is building dams in Tibet to prevent water from flowing into India.

If eastern India doesn't get enough water and those people are at risk of starvation, India will go to war with China to destroy those dams.

Can you prevent someone from building a dam in their own territory?

No, maybe you can negotiate that diplomatically.

But even if they do build a dam, if you can make it rain more on your side of the border, then you can provide water supply to mitigate the risk of conflict like this breaking out.

So I think that for the sake of, one, preventing wars, by ensuring that people have access to enough water, and two, feeding people so that you don't have mass famine.

Like that's absolutely necessary.

And something that people don't think about, right, is like,

okay, in the U.S., everybody can more or less go buy like a bag of chips or something at the store.

Like there are people that are hungry.

There are not that many people that are starving in the United States.

But the less we farm,

the more people around the world will starve because our agricultural exports feed hundreds of millions.

If we run out of water, yeah, fine.

Maybe like folks in Sacramento won't have any issues.

But the people that are eating the pistachios or wheat that we produce,

they will have real like life-threatening problems.

Like water supply,

I think the only thing more important than that is probably like oxygen.

And then after that, energy, right?

We need those three things to have a civilization at all.

And

to keep people from starving, we should be cloud seeding.

So if we're talking about, you know, bringing all this water to Arizona, California, the Western United States, Africa, Middle East, and anywhere else of the world that, you know, is a barren desert.

I mean, how long, you had mentioned decades, but how long does it take?

And what's the process look like

to take somebody that is in a desert environment and turn it into a farming community is what I'm getting at.

So it's easier in places that have good soil mineral content, right?

So like a lot of Arizona is going to be easier than a lot of

Sudan, right?

Because they have the Sahara.

So that's just wasteland.

Arizona,

I think that if we, we don't do any clouds eating there right now.

If we stood up a program, I think that you could start farming in previously inable land in the course of years.

I mean, first things first, you got to meet all of the deficits.

So like there's a lot of farms that are already running dry.

So if you make enough water first from a collab seeding program to make sure that they're taken care of, then how much more can you produce for other communities?

You can probably do that in the course of a couple years.

So maybe like three, three,

then that land starts to come online.

And then with respect to the real wastelands, right?

Like

the Bolivian salt flats, the Sahara Desert, the Australian Outback,

that's going to be multi-decadal.

Like what I think about happening is this.

While Elon sends rockets to Mars to set up the first civilization there, we will get really good at atmospheric engineering here to make the carrying capacity of Earth higher.

And by the time you have like a bubble city on Mars that's self-sufficient and they start melting the ice caps on Mars to create an atmosphere there, we will be good enough at atmospheric engineering here on Earth such that we can start to distribute the water the way that we want to

on Mars.

Now that's like really towards the end of my life, my son will probably be the one responsible for that rather than me.

But that's the time scale that I'm thinking.

Wow, you've really played this out.

You're thinking real long-term.

Yeah, you know, I think that people used to think more like that.

Like, there's that old adage,

something like

a city grows great when men plant trees

under the shade of which they will never sit, or something like that, right?

Like,

I think that if you are a Christian and you think about like helping build the kingdom of God,

if you are a patriot and you want your nation to survive and persist and for future Americans to be better off than any previous generation,

like you should sort of sacrifice your life,

not necessarily like die, right?

But you should probably live your life in service to those future people.

That's what I'm trying to do.

That's interesting.

You know, being a Christian, do you feel that you are playing God in any

sense to create weather conditions?

I'm trying to serve God.

And so what I mean by that is

in Genesis 1, 26 through 28, right, very beginning of time, Garden of Eden, pre-fall,

God gives us the mandate, like he commands us to take dominion over and steward the earth, the seas, the skies, and everything therein, right?

And so what that meant then was tending to the garden, right?

Like taking care of the plants, taking care of the animals.

The way that we've done that more and more over time is with technology and engineering, right?

Like we have lights so that we can work safely at night.

We have fire, which like is a technology so that we can cook our food or defend ourselves from like wild animals.

We built dams so that we could redirect the natural flow of rivers, like the ones that God designed, for the sake of storing water to live in cities and feed people.

And so I think that even though cloud seeding does have to do with the sky, which feels like heaven, and thus feels closer to God for some reason,

it really just is another

instantiation of like the...

mandate that God gave us to be good stewards of the planet.

And so, do I think I'm playing God?

No.

Do I think the technology is sick?

Yeah.

But I think that this is like an act of service.

And I mean, I say that with the understanding that I am a sinner and that I am a faulty man and that I

will fall short.

And so I look to the guidance of my peers and mentors and other people all around me and hope that the U.S.

government regulates this appropriately.

But

so far, I think we've done pretty good at managing that.

You know, that's what I was getting at earlier.

The government

stepping in appropriately,

regulating appropriately.

I mean,

that's what I was getting at when I was talking about, you know, Zuckerberg in front of Congress with a bunch of dinosaurs.

I mean, they just

don't understand tech at all.

Half of them probably can't even open their own email.

And so that's kind of what I was alluding to: is when somebody like you comes along that knows everything about this or, you know, everything that we know today

about this,

How are they going to regulate?

It just doesn't seem like there's that many people that know about this.

Who they look for to regulate it.

You know,

so Doge, super,

a lot of stuff has been said about Doge, about the Department of Government Efficiency, but

one of the guys in Doge, one of the first picks for it, is another teal fellow from my class named Luke Farador.

He is

like 10 out of 10, brilliant, 140 through 160 IQ or something, super faithful kid, grew up in Oklahoma,

or excuse me, in Nebraska.

And

like he's he's the kind of guy that I am happy to see in government.

I think that

if we have more

patriotism, maybe we have to pay bureaucrats more and set up term limits or something.

I think that there's a world where we have good enough people in government to manage and regulate these things.

We did in World War II, right?

We were able to set up a clear, safe nuclear energy regulatory structure and built a lot of energy that way.

So it's possible, right?

Like even though things are bad now, it doesn't mean that they have to be.

It's not a fact of a decaying empire.

Like, I think that we can come back from that.

I mean, the knowledge.

I'm not talking about, we'll get into the corruption and all that kind of shit.

Sure, but just like, how do you mean?

I just mean the knowledge.

You know,

that's what I'm getting at.

And that's what I'm talking about with Zuck and

the government is you have a tech genius talking to 80-year-old people

who didn't, you know, do you see what I'm saying?

And so they don't even have the knowledge to even hold the conversation with them.

How would you do it how would you how would you regulate it well how would you get them on up to speed

how would i do it i would probably

i don't know how i would do it i would i would have to set up some kind of

new agency or something inside noah you know that that

I would have to put a lot of money towards researching this.

And then, you know, I mean, I think,

I mean, they can't use you to set up the regulations because it would probably be a little biased, wouldn't it?

Yeah.

But I guess that's how I would do it.

How would you do it?

Well, Rainmaker's work is built off the work of scientists from the last couple decades at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, in particular, at the University of Utah, at Utah State University, at CU Boulder, at Colorado State University, at MIT.

Probably,

one, not deleting like all the National Science Foundation budgets to keep those organizations alive so there are objective third parties that have done research on it.

Like that's important.

And then using them as gangs of experts.

I've been

running around state capitals testifying.

And

if the departments of environmental protection were able to call on expert witnesses from the scientific community, that would be good.

I I don't even know if people really trust scientists anymore, though.

So,

yeah, it's probably something to the effect of a new agency that

you could do?

You could

copy China's regulation.

Maybe not exactly that, but at least take some inspiration from them, given that they are

benefiting the lives of Chinese people through their program.

What's the

now diving into the corruption?

I mean, lobbying firms, I don't know who you would be pissing off.

I would imagine you're pissing off the utility companies because somebody's making money pulling water out of those aquifers, and they've been making money for a long time, and I'm sure they're very powerful people.

I mean, I would imagine,

in generally, my outlook is those people do not have the best interest of the population.

They have the most interest in,

you know, their estate, their assets, the money they're making.

And so, do you, are you working against them, do you think?

Um,

well, do they have lobbying firms going out and talking to the governments and talking about all the

reasons why you can't do this because it's going to affect their bank account, their bottom line?

I think we're early enough that that hasn't happened yet.

Um,

I think the

convenient thing about us, you know, like

unlike nuclear, we're like oil and gas

advocate against nuclear to some extent, right?

Like that, that's a real trade.

Water,

very few people have enough of it, so I think most everyone wants more.

It's pretty bipartisan.

Like it's pretty hard to say like, no, we shouldn't have more water.

But I think the bad outcome

is one where like weather traders that trade on futures that are betting on severe weather or droughts or crop failures don't want to see this through because you can make money off of those trades.

I think there's that situation, but I haven't yet encountered anybody that seems to be like knowingly, maliciously trying to prevent like a good technology from coming to market.

What could go wrong?

What could go wrong in doing this?

The only thing that comes to my mind

is floods and then

not knowing the effects of who you're stealing the rain from where the wind's blowing but I mean

if there was a miscalculation and it dumped on

what are named insert city yeah I mean so they don't have I mean you just mentioned you know Dubai didn't have the drainage they weren't able to take on that amount of water I mean that could it could be devastating Yeah, I think I think the mud slides.

Yeah,

the simple way to get around that is you just don't operate in highly populated areas, right?

So like the Rocky Mountains, relatively unpopulated, but all of the snow and rain that goes there runs off into the cities that,

into the reservoirs and rivers that do benefit the cities, but tens or hundreds or thousands of miles away.

So you can mitigate for that risk by operating in more remote areas.

You know, what could go wrong beyond that?

Yeah, I think that you covered most of the bases there.

It is if someone was totally irresponsible and totally irregulated, operating over a highly populated area, that you could run the risk of avalanches, but in order avalanches or floods.

But in order to do that, like I said, you'd have to be operating totally irresponsibly.

You'd have to have

either bad science or malicious intent.

You would have to skirt around the existing regulations that require you to suspend operations if there is any risk.

So we have like a pretty pretty solid framework to prevent any sort of disasters from happening there.

You know, like,

what if,

yeah, I don't know.

I think those are, those are probably the big ones.

When you talk about malicious intent, do you think that this could be weaponized?

We know that it can be weaponized.

So we know that it was weaponized in Vietnam.

I would be surprised.

Let me pose this hypothetical, right?

There's a limited window of time in the Straits of Taiwan during which landing craft can easily traverse the straits because the weather is not so severe that

there's not a lot of rain coming down, there's not really rough seas.

If you can modify the weather and you can extend or shorten that window, then the strategic situation around that island changes meaningfully.

Similarly,

if you're trying to move personnel or material and it's wet on the ground, right?

Like a lot of Operation Barbarossa failed because tanks got stuck, armor got stuck in Russia during the spring,

if you could make it more wet on the ground, then that would have some tactical consequence as well.

So, yeah, absolutely possible.

Rainmaker doesn't do that

for whatever it's worth.

You know, I don't think people will believe me, me, but.

I mean, it seems like Taiwan would have a major interest in this just to mitigate that situation.

Have you heard of the fake windmills that Taiwan's building?

No.

So

nominally, they want more clean power, right?

And so what's one thing you can do?

You can build windmills off in the ocean.

Actually, though, also...

You can build something that looks like a windmill that isn't even connected to grid power and then station you know underwater drones or boats or helicopters or aircraft on the pads that are for the windmill um and then be 30 50 kilometers farther out to sea as like a first line of defense interest now at the same time china is building windmills like right next to taiwan's windmills um so there's a bit of a chess game happening right there with uh fake energy resources i think china's just building islands yeah yeah yeah they are what's it it called?

The 9-dash line or something?

Yeah.

7-line?

Yeah, I mean, they're building islands.

They're sending their Coast Guard boats after like fishing ships and stuff.

Their fishing ships are harassing other navies.

There's Chinese fishing boats.

If you look out

at the ocean from El Salvador or Costa Rica or,

I think, Guatemala to, if you look out at the ocean at night, it looks like you're looking at a city because of all the lights.

Those are just enormous Chinese fishing boats that are tearing fish out of the ocean.

Same problem in Argentina.

Their fisheries are getting destroyed.

And up in Alaska even too to some extent.

Like they are harvesting so much fish so unsustainably in other countries' waters

and we don't even do anything about it.

Yeah.

Jeez.

You know, we're wrapping up the interview here, but I think that the UN reported there are approximately 2.2 billion people people without water

or with a very limited supply.

I mean,

if you work the metrics on that, on how big of an impact you would have on putting a dent in that 2.2 billion?

The

ultimate goal is to serve a lot more than 2.2 billion people, right?

Like, eventually there will be 20 plus billion people on the planet.

And we need to figure out how to make water enough for all of them.

And it's not just going to be cloud seeding.

We should build more Diesel.

But

the plan is to make Earth

unrecognizably lush and green and abundant and prosperous.

And we need a lot of water to do that.

And so we're going to have to get, one, the system that we have scaled and deployed throughout all of the world.

And then, two, the system will have to be more sophisticated and efficient than it is now so that we can produce water for the next 10 billion people that live.

We'll start with the people that are in water stress regions right now.

Like we're operating in one of the most water stressed countries in the world, in the Middle East, I mentioned.

And

that's probably what the next three years will look like.

And then after that,

like getting above baseline is going to be the next

problem.

Well, man, it's a fascinating conversation.

Very innovative.

Very innovative.

I love talking to innovators.

Well, then I'll say in closing here,

there's a town in Los Angeles called El Segundo.

It is named after the second standard oil refinery that was ever built in California, El Segundo II.

Half the town is just an oil refinery.

The other half the town is small warehouses that are just full of deep tech startups, hardware startups.

There's three fission companies.

There's a weather modification company.

There's the guys that are building almost all of the drones that are going to Ukraine.

There's a bunch of different advanced manufacturing people and roboticists.

It's the highest density of deep tech and hard tech in the United States.

And it's a bunch of guys guys that

are

having competitions about who has the bigger flag in their office.

I would say that if ever you're in LA, you're welcome to stop by and tour around there.

And you'll probably bump into a couple of my friends from the city as well over the next year or so.

I'd love to do that.

I'd love to do that.

I'd love to get you back, too, as things develop.

Yeah.

Well,

best of luck for you.

Thanks, man.

This is Larry Flick, owner of the Floor Store.

Labor Day is the last sale of the summer, but this one is our biggest sale of the year.

Now through September 2nd, get up to 50% off store-wide on carpet, hardwood, laminate, waterproof flooring, and much more.

Plus two years' interest-free financing, and we pay your sales tax.

The Floor Stores Labor Day sale.

Don't let the sun set on this one.

Go to floorstores.com to find the nearest of our 10 showrooms from Santa Rosa to San Jose.

The Floor Store, your area flooring authority.