Sheila Davalloo (Part 2)

Weight loss medications are everywhere right now.

Everyone's talking about them, everyone's on them.

But let's be real.

Have you seen the price tag?

It's hard to believe they're actually accessible.

That's where HERS comes in.

HERS is transforming women's healthcare by providing access to affordable weight loss treatment plans.

They connect you with a medical provider who will work with you to determine the best treatment option for you.

So, if you've been struggling to find a solution to your weight loss journey, it's time to find the best option that works for you through HERS.

Start your free online visit today at forhers.com/slash snapped.

That's F-O-R-H-E-R-S dot com slash snapped for your personalized weight loss treatment options.

For HERS.com slash snapped.

Weight loss by HERS is not available everywhere.

Compounded products are not approved or reviewed for safety, effectiveness, or quality by the FDA.

Prescription required.

See website for full details, important safety information, and restrictions.

Actual price depends on product and plan purchased.

purchased.

This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance.

You chose to hit play on this podcast today.

Smart choice.

Progressive loves to help people make smart choices.

That's why they offer a tool called AutoQuote Explorer that allows you to compare your progressive car insurance quote with rates from other companies.

So you save time on the research and can enjoy savings when you choose the best rate for you.

Give it a try after this episode at progressive.com.

Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates.

Not available in all states or situations.

Prices vary based on how you buy.

50-year-old Sheila Davalu is incarcerated at the Bedford Hills Correctional Center in New York.

For longtime snapped viewers, her saga began more than a decade ago.

First in 2006, after she was convicted of attempting to murder her husband, Paul Christos.

The judge looked at Sheila and said, you tried to murder your husband, you waited for him to die, you pretended to call for help, and then you stabbed him again once you brought him to the hospital.

The judge said to Sheila, you have lied over and over and over.

You are a dangerous threat to society.

After Sheila's conviction, investigative journalist M.

William Phelps took a personal interest in her case and decided to write a book about it.

Obsession really is a book that people can't get enough of.

It's one of my best-selling books.

Sheila is obsessed with everybody, and obsessed with herself, and obsessed with the men in her life.

And now we dive into Sheila Davalu's second episode of Snapped during its ninth season, making her the first woman on the series to be featured twice.

33-year-old Sheila Davalu was a woman in love.

She carries on this steamy affair.

And she didn't let her marriage stand in the way.

He believed she was separated, divorced.

But her lover chose another woman.

That's the ultimate betrayal right there for Sheila.

Then Sheila's rival ended up dead.

She was stabbed numerous times.

Police were at a loss until Sheila's husband was also attacked.

It's during the investigation into her husband's stabbing that Westchester police learn of Sheila's lover, 35-year-old Nelson Sessler, and the murder of his girlfriend four months earlier in Stamford, Connecticut.

At the time, the crime had been reported by an anonymous caller.

You think someone attacked your neighbor?

The caller didn't identify herself or the person allegedly being attacked.

What is your friend's name?

I don't know her name, but she's my neighbor and she lives in a 105.

She lives in apartment 105.

I'm on a 106 Harbor View.

123 Harbor View.

126 Harbor View.

123 Harbor View.

She gave several different addresses, street numbers.

But the caller was was clear on one thing.

A man was attacking her neighbor.

I saw a guy who was going to her apartment.

It does sound like it's an emergency.

So two patrol cops head on over.

They walk up the stairs and they see that the door to Annalise's condo is kind of a little bit open.

Immediately, they're on their toes.

Bang.

You know, what are we going to find in here?

So they creep that door open a little bit, and what they find is a freaking horror show.

the walkway from the front door was a bloody mess things thrown about and and um

knocked about in the far corner uh just past the bathroom and the foyer

was uh a female victim lying on her back

it was 32 year old annalisa ramundo and she was dead

Like Sheila, Annalisa Ramundo was the daughter of immigrants.

Her parents had emigrated to the United States from the Philippines to pursue successful careers in medicine.

Also like Sheila, Annalisa had followed in her parents' footsteps.

Annalisa was super intelligent.

She's a graduate from Harvard.

Not anybody gets into Harvard.

And she worked in pharmaceutical research, which is intense.

Sheila remembers meeting Annalisa in the early 2000s when they were

Annalisa and I both worked at Purdue Pharma with Nelson.

Our jobs didn't require us to interact too much, but I had cordial interactions with her and she seemed very

nice and level-headed.

But there was nothing at the time of Annalisa's murder to connect Sheila to the crime.

Her assailant was gone, and whoever it was had left little evidence behind.

It was, apart from the blood, a pretty clean crime scene.

Despite the lack of obvious clues at the crime scene, there might still be a way to identify Annalisa's killer.

Right away, we felt that this might be a case where DNA might be a prominent type of evidence.

In an edged weapon, assault, or a homicide, it's very common for the hand to slip off the handle or over the hilt and to go down on the blade and the perpetrator cuts themselves.

Crime scene technicians went to work swabbing the bloodstains, particularly in the bathroom adjacent to the foyer.

You see a bloody trail going towards the bathroom.

What does that say?

When I look at that, I see that after the murder took place, that the person went into the bathroom to clean up.

because the killer had to then walk out of the condo in the middle of the day.

So when Nelson shows up at Annalise's condo later that afternoon, the way he's acting makes police think he could be a suspect.

The first thing detectives notice about him is he's not broken up about this.

He's not crying.

He's not saying who could have done this to my fiancé.

He's kind of just sitting there.

And one of the detectives notices he's got an injury, a fresh injury on his hand.

So they kind of keep him in this common room.

They go in there one time to question him.

He's sleeping.

They got to wake him up to question him.

Detectives think Nelson knows more than he's letting on.

It's like he wants to walk away, wash his hands.

Either that, or he had something to do with it.

November 8th, 2002.

32-year-old Annalisa Ramundo has been brutally murdered in her Stamford, Connecticut home.

And her boyfriend, Nelson Sessler, has become the first suspect.

The first thing detectives notice about him is, he's not broken up about this.

Nelson's calm response to the news of Annalisa's death raises the suspicions of the detectives.

You'd think that a normal response would be, what happened in my home?

How did my girlfriend die once he was told she was dead?

We just, we didn't get that from him.

So later that night, the investigators brought Nelson down to the station for questioning.

He's the obvious person of interest.

You right away start thinking due to

the over-the-top violence that it's someone with some personal type of stake in this relationship.

It was a blitz attack.

It was violent.

It was personal.

It was punitive.

And it was meant to make Annalisa hurt.

And according to Sheila, there was plenty of reason to suspect Nelson.

He'd been living a double life for months.

I think that the entire time that Nelson and I were having an affair, They were a couple.

I just, I'm not exactly sure at what level.

I know that Nelson was living with Annalisa at some point.

Almost a week before Anna Lisa's death, Nelson and I were together in North Carolina.

We spent three days together in the same hotel, booked by the company, and

our relationship was just the way it always had been.

But Nelson claims he had no reason to hurt Annalisa.

And when detectives look into his alibi, it seems he's telling the truth.

Whatever suspicions the investigators had about Nelson evaporated the next day when they went to Purdue Pharma.

They have a very good security cameras, security system, and they were able to show what time he punched in, cameras showing his movement, and he was at work when this assault took place.

We could rule him out as the perpetrator.

But was there anyone else who might have a reason to hurt Anna Lisa?

A jealous ex-girlfriend, perhaps?

He had dated other women prior to Annalisa and really didn't see anything that was of any value to us.

Nelson never mentioned Sheila Davalu.

The one thing Nelson Sessler doesn't do is he doesn't say, I'm having an affair with Sheila Davalu, someone I work with.

He does not mention her name.

Why?

I don't know.

I'd like to know.

With no other leads, police focus on their first piece of evidence, the mysterious 911 call reporting Annalisa's murder.

They have yet to learn the identity of the anonymous female caller and believe she may hold the key to finding the killer.

She identified the victim as my neighbor.

That leads us to believe she's living in the complex.

We canvass all the neighbors, but no neighbor in that area matches that voice.

When the police traced the call, it didn't lead back to Annalisa's condo complex at all.

Instead, the call had been placed from a nearby pay phone.

Why would a neighbor leave the complex, the safety of their home, to travel approximately three-quarters of a mile and use a payphone to call this in?

If there was an assault, a dispute going on, and they're in their home, they would just call from the home.

Weeks after the murder, they were no closer to finding Annalise's killer or the 911 caller.

Every interview, we played that tape.

Can you identify this caller?

Does it sound like a friend?

Does it sound like somebody you know?

No one could identify the voice at all.

Not even close.

There was a very frustrating period of weeks, if not months, where it's not moving forward at the speed that everybody would like it to.

But then there's a big break surrounding the crime scene evidence in the case.

When forensics starts to analyze all the blood, it's Annalise's blood.

But then they find one spot on the sink that's not Annalise's blood.

Another person left blood at that scene.

So they have the killer's blood, the killer's DNA.

That's huge.

Now they got to match it to somebody.

After Sheila Davilu is arrested for stabbing her husband, Westchester investigators start working with Stamford authorities to try to solve Annalisa's murder.

The Westchester County detectives went straight to the Stamford Police Department.

In the squad room, they briefed the investigators who had spent the past five months trying to solve the murder of Nelson Sessler's girlfriend, Annalisa Ramundo.

The big breakthrough came when Stamford investigators played the mysterious 911 tape that at first tipped police off to Annalisa's murder.

When we heard the 911 tape, I said to them, you know, that's Sheila Dapalu's voice.

One of the sergeants in charge of major crimes called me up and his exact words were, Craig,

get in here.

Annalisa's breaking wide open.

Then, detectives checked Sheila's work records to see where she was the day Annalisa was murdered.

When the investigators followed up at Purdue Pharma, the same security procedures that had previously confirmed Nelson's alibi revealed that Sheila didn't have one.

She had left around lunchtime and taken an extended lunch.

That's when Annalisa was murdered.

That's when the 911 calls made.

Once again, Sheila claims she has a reasonable explanation for her whereabouts.

Every day, I would leave for extended periods around lunchtime.

oftentimes around 11 or 12 and come back around one or two.

And I would drive home for for lunch and come back.

I was also very depressed about, you know, what I was doing with Nelson, guilty.

Talks of divorce or possibly looming divorce.

So I would take that extended break during the lunch hours.

Despite the fact that Sheila insists that she has nothing to do with Annalisa's murder, the DNA results from the crime scene will tell a different story altogether.

Sheila Davilu is the prime suspect in the murder of Annalisa Raimundo.

And after months of intense investigation, there's finally a break in the case.

They get a hit on a very tiny droplet found in Annalisa's apartment on the tip of a faucet there.

It's our theory that during this frantic struggle and stabbing, that the suspect actually cut herself during that struggle and went into the bathroom to wash.

And the test results had matched that DNA to their prime suspect.

It's Sheila Davalu.

We got her.

Although detectives have the DNA match by 2004, over a year after Annalise's murder, Sheila is already in prison for attempting to murder her husband.

So, investigators take the time they need to build a solid case against her.

On December 29th, 2008, six years after Annalisa's murder, the Stamford police went to the Bedford Hills Correctional Facility and placed Sheila under arrest.

How does Sheila Davalu react to it?

The way she reacted to everything else.

Didn't kill anybody.

Sheila's a narcissist and a terrible liar.

She'll just come out with these things that are so easily proven to be lies, but she seems to think she'll be able to convince anybody of her lies because she's that good.

On January 24th, 2012, nearly a decade after Annalisa Raimundo was murdered, Sheila Davalu finds herself on trial once again.

At 42 years old, she has already spent nearly eight years behind bars for the attempted murder of her husband, Paul Christos.

Prosecutors believe they have an open and shut case.

But Sheila has one more surprise in store.

I decided to represent myself in this case.

Through studies and through correspondent classes, I'd become pretty well versed in the law as it pertains to my case because I had researched it a lot.

I wanted a little bit more control because once you have an attorney in place, you follow along whatever the attorney decides.

According to the prosecution, Sheila killed Anna Lisa and then attempted to kill her husband Paul four months later so she could be with her lover Nelson Sessler.

Paul's own testimony helps prove that Sheila was trying to get him out of the way.

She would ask you to move out for a weekend.

Sometimes it would be one weeknight, other times it was a weekend.

Yeah.

And to keep your wife happy, you would move out.

Yes, I genuinely believed at the time she was spending qually time with her brother.

Paul has even more damning testimony.

He tells the jury that Sheila concocted a story about a love triangle at work.

involving a man named Jack and two women, one named Melissa and the other, Annalisa.

The way Sheila told it, her friend Melissa was heartsick because Jack was choosing Annalisa over her.

What Paul didn't know was that Sheila was actually talking about herself.

Paul is listening to this and he's being sucked in by it.

He's given his wife advice about an affair she's having, about a love triangle she's involved in at work.

And he doesn't know it.

I think she thought that Paul was going to associate her with this love triangle with a woman named Anna Lisa.

And I think she thought she needed to eliminate her husband, not just to get him out of the way so she could pursue Nelson, but to eliminate a witness to statements she had made that might trigger something in him and make him go to the police.

To establish just what Sheila was capable of, Paul concluded by describing the bizarre game that he had been lucky to live through.

As I was trying to guess what that item was, as it was kind of grazing my cheek, all of a sudden I felt like a large thrust on my chest.

Sheila's cross-examination does little to help her case.

What kind of interest do you have in the case and the outcome of the case?

Do you...

Well, it's a case that's been obviously in my life for many years.

After what you did to me.

It almost seemed like we were all witnessing a couple's argument.

It was difficult questioning him and talking about the New York case.

It had been five years since I'd seen him or spoken to him, so it was emotional.

Then the state calls Sheila's ex-lover, Nelson Sessler, to the stand.

He describes how Sheila hid her marriage from him with the same cover story she told Paul.

Sheila

said that she had a

handicapped brother, a mentally challenged

brother.

Nelson tells the jury that as his relationship with Anna Lisa progressed, he stopped sleeping with Sheila.

What happened to the intimacy that you had experienced with Sheila Dow?

It ended.

So on the stand, he's like, ah, we weren't really together.

I was telling her I didn't want to be with her, that sort of thing.

He was making it so it was not a big deal, their relationship.

He wanted to step away from this.

He did a pretty good job of trying to defend himself in that way.

Again, Sheila has her own version of events.

That never happened.

Nelson never called off the relationship.

Nelson would like people to think that he was not with both of us at the same time, but he was in actuality with both of us during the whole entire time.

He was both

with her and with me, except that she didn't know that.

However, Nelson then admits that a few months after Annalisa's murder, he started seeing Sheila again.

And did you start to get even closer at that point?

Yeah.

They showed that Sheila Davalu was Nelson's shoulder to cry on because he had lost his fiancé.

She'd show up at his apartment.

Nelson, you need me.

I can be here to comfort you, not as a girlfriend, but just as a friend.

And she thought that would then blossom back into a relationship.

The state also calls a voice analysis expert to the stand who identifies Sheila as the one who called 911 after Annalisa was killed.

I think the guy

attacked my movie.

When you look,

you listen to it, it sounds like the same person.

When you visually view the spectrograms, it looks looks like the same person.

But Sheila claims she can prove that it's not her voice.

By the mere fact

that

I decided to represent myself in this case,

you've had ample opportunity to listen to my voice.

She was trying to prove that

she was not the one making the call.

It's very

weak evidence, evidence, in my opinion.

Whoever knows me, including my husband at the time and friends, they have said that it does not sound like me.

The 911 operator

says that it sounded like a Spanish-speaking person.

She just thinks, if I say enough times that I am not the voice on the tape, everyone will believe me.

That's what will become the truth.

So she's invested very much in controlling the narrative.

And in Sheila's mind, the fact that she stabbed but not killed her ex-husband proves that she couldn't have been Anna Lisa's killer.

Apparently, I had stabbed somebody before my husband, nine times.

Why did I stop

after two times with my husband, drive him him to the hospital, and stab him again in the hospital.

I didn't have to stop.

She's got elaborate explanations around everything and rationalizations, which is more supportive of a liar than the truth teller.

According to the prosecutor, Sheila left behind the strongest piece of evidence in the case, her own blood.

DNA tests confirm it's her.

But Sheila points out something odd.

I still don't believe the DNA that they have in that case.

Why did this one evidence leave the crime lab?

Will this be able to help her case?

The sink handle, for some reason, was a resubmission to the laboratory.

We can't get to the bottom of why this was resubmitted.

Coming up, Sheila becomes a suspect in a third crime.

They're looking at Sheila for another murder.

This show is sponsored by Liquid IV.

Hey, it's Stephanie Gomolco with oxygen.com.

Soaking up the last bits of summer sometimes means more time in the sun.

I trust Liquid IV to keep me hydrated, whether I'm squeezing in another pool day, weekend trip, or running in the park.

I used to drink so much water and found my lips would still be so dry.

Liquid IV helps me stay hydrated, so that doesn't happen.

Liquid IV is packed with electrolytes, essential vitamins, and clinically tested nutrients that turn ordinary water into extraordinary hydration.

Just one stick and 16 ounces of water hydrates better than water alone.

My favorite flavor, hands down, is Firecracker.

I'm obsessed and I have it every day.

It's delicious with ice-cold water and tastes like summer in a bottle.

Savor the last bits of summer with Liquid IV.

Tear, pour, live more.

Go to liquidiv.com liquidiv.com and get 20% off your first purchase with code snapped at checkout.

That's 20% off your first order with code snapped at liquid IV.com.

The WNBA playoffs are on the horizon, and Tommy Alter's The Young Man in the Three takes you deeper into the action.

Join Tommy for exclusive WNBA insights as he links up with the league's biggest stars and dives deep into WNBA playoff matchups and analysis you won't hear anywhere else.

The Young Man in the Three's WMBA playoff coverage is presented by Quest Nutrition.

From irresistibly crunchy protein chips to rich chocolatey protein bars, these treats make giving in feel so good.

Quest, big on protein, low on sugar, huge on flavor.

Shop Quest on Amazon at amazon.com/slash Quest Nutrition.

And check out all the WMBA action on the Young Man in the Three, wherever you get your podcasts.

DNA tests confirm the blood in Annalisa Raimundo's bathroom came from Sheila Davilou.

But to this day, Sheila believes the evidence was contaminated.

The sink handle, for some reason, was a resubmission to the laboratory.

I can't get to the bottom of why this was resubmitted.

I still don't believe the DNA that they have in that case.

The one item that had my DNA on it, which was a sink handle for the guests' bathroom, left the crime lab

and was returned to the crime lab at a later date.

So why did this one evidence leave the crime lab?

But during her trial, few were convinced by her argument.

She picks apart every single piece of evidence, the voice expert, the DNA, the phone call.

But she doesn't really give a good explanation about any piece of evidence being poor.

You just can't wipe all of that out.

On February 9th, 2012, after a two-and-a-half-week-long trial, the case goes to the jury.

They deliberate for only a day before returning a verdict.

What say you, Mr.

Poor Prison?

Guilty.

At sentencing, Sheila acknowledges Anna Lisa's suffering, but she still doesn't admit any responsibility.

I pray for all victims' crimes.

Especially, especially

for Annalisa Ramundo and her family.

Even now, Sheila refuses to admit involvement in Anna Lisa's murder, but expresses sympathy for her family.

I feel pain for them because, you know, I can't even imagine losing a loved one.

I felt the pain and the anguish and it's all directed at me because they really believe that I did that.

Despite her claims of innocence, Sheila Davalu is sentenced to 50 years in prison.

to begin after she has completed her 25-year sentence for the attempted murder of her husband.

So, Sheila really had 75 years to do when she's found guilty, which would what?

Put her six feet under.

She'd be dead before she gets out of jail.

Shockingly, Sheila's story doesn't end there.

In 2017, after 13 years in prison, there's a new twist in her case.

Sheila gets a call that two detectives are here.

And these detectives aren't from Stanford or Westchester County.

They're from New Windsor, New York.

And this isn't about Annalisa Ramundo or Paul Christos.

They're looking at Sheila for another murder.

I was visited here, right here in this room, by detectives from yet another precinct about a second murder.

They came here to Bedford to question me, and it's a cold case.

The crime occurred 11 months before the murder of Annalisa Raimundo, and the cases are eerily similar.

The many similarities between the cases were somewhat striking, and it was something that had to be looked into.

It involves the murder of a 32-year-old woman and former co-worker of Sheila's named Nancy Smith.

Nancy was my younger sister.

We're five years apart.

She was the typical younger child.

I was the reserved older child.

She was funny, she loved life, she loved music, she loved to dance.

She was fun to be around.

On the morning of Wednesday, December 5th, 2001, Nancy's parents receive a concerning phone call.

They had gotten a call from her boss or whoever she worked with saying that she hadn't come to work, you know, was something wrong.

So they went to her house.

They had a garage door opener for her house.

They went in, they opened the garage and her car was there.

And they went in and they found her.

They found her in her living room

covered with blankets and pillows.

They didn't even know what it was until they started pulling everything off and then they found her there.

And then you just try to wrap your arms around all of that, which there's days, I'm crying now, there's days that you still can't wrap your arms around it.

The Smiths call 911 and investigators rush to the scene.

The room was in disarray.

It appeared that there had been some sort of altercation, and there was a good amount of blood in the area.

Nancy was hit on the head, and she was stabbed multiple times.

She was strangled.

So appeared there was a lot of violence right then and there right at the main level of her house.

Detectives scour the crime scene for clues and a few things stand out.

At the scene we did find a knife and we did believe that knife was used as a weapon to murder her.

Leaving the knife at the scene says a lot.

In fact, leaving the knife at the scene is something Sheila Davalu would absolutely do.

And that's to say, come and catch me.

There was no signs of forced entry.

There was nothing taken from the residence.

That leads most to think that she would have known who the person or persons were that did this to her.

Nancy was very safety conscious.

She did not open the door unless she knew who you were.

She knew the person that did this because she let them into her house.

So who would have wanted to kill Nancy Smith?

In their initial investigation, detectives interview hundreds of potential suspects and follow countless leads.

We have interviewed friends of Nancy, family of Nancy, people that knew her.

There was nothing outstanding that, you know, had led to that she had any enemies.

In the first

few months, we were very optimistic that the person who did this would be found.

As time marches on,

you know, in that first year, it became a little frustrating.

You know, how could somebody do this and walk away and not be caught?

After several months, the killer remains at large and the case goes cold.

But then, in 2008, Sheila Davalu is arrested for the brutal murder of Annalisa Ramundo.

And New Windsor detectives discover something striking.

Like Annalisa Ramundo, Nancy Smith was also a former co-worker of Sheila Davalu.

We know that in the 90s, Nancy and Sheila had worked together at a health care type facility.

Detectives told my family that they had a new lead.

It was a woman who lived in New York who had committed a murder in Connecticut.

She worked at Oxford Insurance, and Nancy worked at Oxford Insurance at the same time period.

So they thought, you know, there were similarities between

the murder that she had committed and Nancy's murder.

When detectives investigate further, many other similarities come to light.

There were many important similarities between Annalise's case and Nancy Smith's case.

They were both successful in living alone.

There was no signs of forced entry.

There was nothing taken from the residence.

Both crimes appeared to be,

you know, there was some sort of struggle, a brutal fight going on.

They were both stabbed multiple times and they had trauma to them.

Add to the fact that they worked together at the same place

and Sheila is definitely in my wheelhouse as a likely candidate to have murdered Nancy Smith.

We know what happens to Sheila Davalu's co-workers if she chooses.

And then another stunning clue adds to the suspicion on Sheila.

In one of Nancy's calendar books, we did find a notation that said Nelson CT.

We did

have a thinking that this could be the Nelson in the Sheila Davilu case.

Was Nancy Smith dating Nelson Sessler?

In 2017, 48-year-old Sheila Davilu is in her 13th year of a 75-year prison sentence at the Bedford Hills Correctional Center in New York.

And she receives an unexpected visit from detectives about a cold case in New Windsor.

She did not know we were coming, so we knew that going in, that it was going to be kind of a surprise for her, and we didn't know what to expect.

She saw us, and it was law enforcement suits basically sitting there, she went to turn back around and said, no, I don't want to do this.

It was explained to her then, kind of like at the doorway or in the hallway, that we were there for something completely separate than what happened in her past, that she was there for.

We told her that our incident involved a former coworker of hers that was murdered, and that's what we were there to talk about.

That piqued her interest, and she agreed to sit with us and hear what we had to say.

I told them straight up that I would be the perfect suspect for that case

because I have the Annalisa conviction.

So if you arrest me, I will be indicted and I will be convicted.

We did show her photos of our victim, Nancy Smith.

She did not appear to recognize her.

She seemed somewhat surprised that she had worked with this person in the past.

This lady and I used to work at Oxford at the time, and I don't really, I don't even recall her at all.

During the course of the interview, Sheila did deny having to do anything with Nancy's murder.

After interviewing Sheila for about an hour, detectives leave with no further insight into the case.

There was nothing specific gained from her interview other than she claimed that she wasn't involved.

We did interview coworkers of both Nancy and Sheila that knew them both at the same time period.

No one could say that they were friends or saw them outside of work or anything like that.

But to try to confirm Sheila's story, investigators know who they need to speak with next: her ex-lover, Nelson Sessler.

Through our investigative means, we found him out of state, North Carolina area, and we went there without letting him know that we were going to show up for an interview.

When first saying hi to Nelson, he was slightly reluctant to speak with us.

He did agree to talk with us.

Nelson did state that he did not know Nancy.

There wasn't much information exchange going on.

There was no new leads gained from him.

He was very reluctant to talk about Sheila.

And he did indicate that he was looking to put this behind him.

And that's for the reason that he didn't want to really speak so much about it.

Detectives had been certain that Nancy's note gave them the key to unlocking her murder.

But the investigation is derailed when they discover that the Nelson on Nancy's calendar wasn't Sessler after all.

It turns out Nelson was actually a band that was having a concert.

Nancy was a fan and

we had found further proof that she attended this concert and that was the date and notation that she had made in that case.

Further insight into Nancy's case is made when crime scene DNA that did not belong to her is discovered.

Sheila's DNA is on file due to her crimes, and there was no match of DNA that was found at the scene there.

It appears that for now, Sheila won't be dragged into a third murder case.

But detectives are not about to give up trying to solve Nancy's murder.

As we have seen and in other investigations, as DNA technology improves, some of these cases are getting solved, especially where DNA evidence is present, like ours.

So we are hopeful for that in the future.

It's very difficult

at times to go through the day realizing that my sister's not here.

I just want it to be solved.

And I don't know that it brings closure, but it brings some sort of peace.

And I'd like that.

I certainly don't want this person who could commit this murder once to ever do it again.

While Nancy Smith's murder remains unsolved, Sheila Davalu continues to maintain her innocence and serve out her prison time.

As early as 2025, she will complete her sentence in New York for the attempted murder of her husband, Paul Christos.

At that time, she will be transferred to Connecticut to begin serving 50 years for the murder of Annalisa Raimundo.

With good behavior, Sheila could be released in 2075.

If she's still alive, she'll be 106 years old.

In the meantime, Sheila is appealing her murder conviction and still hopes to clear her name.

I might not find out exactly who did it, but I will be exonerated.

People get exonerated all the time.

My friend was exonerated last week and went home.

I feel like it's very easy to get convicted because I saw it happen in Connecticut with very little evidence.

I have my federal appeal right now and I'm still on the path of researching it and appealing it and

advocating for myself.

Sheila's appeal centers on her belief that DNA found in Anna Lisa Raimundo's bathroom was a result of cross-contamination.

She also insists that she was nowhere near Anna Lisa's Stamford, Connecticut apartment when she was murdered.

I wasn't there.

I was in New York at the time.

My cell tower records will reflect because I made calls at the time that should reflect that I'm in New York.

But the DA, the prosecutor, is not presenting the cell tower records.

And I feel like only those who feel a sense of injustice in a certain part of their crime would speak up.

That is my

number one reason for doing this.

I want the truth in Connecticut, and I'm going to uncover the truth.

Sheila continues to justify her story, but is it true, or is it all a facade?

When you look at her, you keep scratching your head saying, I cannot believe she did this.

I cannot believe she did that.

But she did it.

And the funny thing about it is, she thinks she's going to get away with it.

Every single time.

For more information on Snapped Behind Bars, go to oxygen.com.

How hard is it to kill a planet?

Maybe all it takes is a little drilling, some mining, and a whole lot of carbon pumped into the atmosphere.

When you see what's left, it starts to look like a crime scene.

Are we really safe?

Is our water safe?

You destroyed our town.

And crimes like that, they don't just happen.

We call things accidents.

There is no accident.

This was 100%

preventable.

They're the result of choices by people.

Ruthless oil tycoons, corrupt politicians, even organized crime.

These are the stories we need to be telling about our changing planet.

Stories of scams, murders, and cover-ups that are about us and and the things we're doing to either protect the Earth or destroy it.

Follow Lawless Planet on the Wondry app or wherever you get your podcasts.

You can listen to new episodes of Lawless Planet early and ad-free right now by joining Wonder Plus in the Wondry app, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify.