Explosive Science with Kate the Chemist

gonna put you on, nephew.

All right, Uncle.

Welcome to McDonald's.

Can I take your order?

Miss, I've been hitting up McDonald's for years.

Now it's back.

We need snack wraps.

What's a snack wrap?

It's the return of something great.

Snack wrap is back.

Hey, you wondering how you can invest in yourself and work towards a goal that will last?

Rosetta Stone makes it easy to turn a few minutes a day into real language progress.

You've heard me talk about Rosetta Stone in the past, and you know that I love the anytime, anywhere bite-sized lessons that allow me to go ahead and continue to learn Spanish so that I can know exactly what my mother-in-law is saying about me.

Maybe you're gearing up for a trip to another country, or maybe you're going to reconnect with family roots, or maybe you just want to impress people with the fact that, yeah, you know another language.

Well, now, Star Talk Radio listeners can grab Rosetta Stone's lifetime membership for 50% off.

Visit RosettaStone.com slash Star Talk to get started and claim your 50% off today.

Jasla or Miamigos, RosettaStone.com/slash Star Talk.

Chuck.

Yeah.

I think that show we just recorded had good chemistry.

Yes, I especially like the explosions.

Or how to make one coming up on Star Talk.

Welcome to Star Talk,

your place in the universe where science and pop culture collide.

Star Talk begins right now.

This is Star Talk.

Neil the Grasse Tyson, you're a personal astrophysicist.

We're doing cosmic queries today.

That means Chuck is in the house.

Chuck.

Hey, hey.

All right, you got the queries.

I do right here.

And where'd they come from?

They come from our people at Patreon.

Nice.

The supporters who give us money, and that is why we like them.

no we like them because they're curious well that's that's right yes that that's why we like them

so today it's going to be all about chemistry nice

we love chemistry i know a little bit of chemistry but not enough to do a cosmic queries on it and i know enough to listen

we we combed the landscape for a chemist and we've went to the top shelf.

Yes.

Top shelf.

There we found.

Kate the chemist.

Yes.

The McCallum 30.

The 30-year-old Scotch of chemists, baby.

Top shelf.

Top shelf chemist.

Kate the chemist.

Welcome back to Star Talk.

Thank you for having me.

I love visiting y'all.

Oh, my gosh.

And let me get your full last name in here.

I don't, does anyone in the world know this?

Bieberdorf?

Married into that.

Wow.

Just, just, just, don't blame me.

That's it.

That is so funny.

Married into that.

Wow.

Okay.

So is your husband a scientist?

He is a scientist.

We met in grad school.

That makes sense.

All right.

All right.

I think we talked about him on a previous thing.

Did you meet at University of Texas?

We did.

Yeah.

I remember that.

No, it's like you.

Yeah, I was high.

Okay.

That was.

Okay.

Okay.

You are a professor for the public understanding of science.

Yes.

We need more of those professorships.

100%.

Yes.

I know in England they have several of those that were funded by, who was it?

One of the Microsoft guys.

Well, the one in Oxford is the Simonye one.

Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, Simone.

Charles Simone.

Yeah,

he's a Microsoft billionaire.

That's perfect.

My understanding is he also used to date Martha Stewart.

Yes, he did.

He dated her when he went into space.

Oh, I know.

And had her make the food for everybody on the space station.

On the space station.

From prison, she made it.

The prison stint was short.

And it was after that.

So, Kate, so you're also an author.

And you're a host, Seeking a Scientist.

Yes.

Do you find them after you seek them?

I do.

Yes.

I seek one every time, at least once.

And it works every time.

Very glad to hear that.

So you're at Notre Dame.

Yes.

Just took this job.

Yeah.

And, oh, it's new.

Yep, September.

Okay.

Well, welcome.

Thank you.

Yes, yes.

Not welcome.

Congratulations.

I'll take it.

Yes.

Yeah.

I was there a few years ago, gave a public talk.

Yes, they speak very highly about it.

Very proud institution.

Do you teach classes, but there are special classes?

So I don't teach right now, but in a couple years, I'll be teaching science communication courses.

So we're going to build a science communication minor and hopefully turn it into a major.

So good.

It's important right now.

Will this be in collaboration with the communications department?

A little bit.

So it's a part of the program.

Art journalism department?

Yes, that.

So the arts and letters program.

So both of our colleges are going to come together, and so we'll take their expertise in the actual communication, our expertise with science, and kind of blend it together.

And I think it's going to be

so badly.

Journalism is so broken.

Yeah.

And science might be a way to sort of stitch that, a force to help stitch it back together.

Well, you know, I'm not even sure if journalism is as broken as we think.

I believe that people have siloed to an extent where they can't accept whatever journalistic

point of view is being put forward because they can't think critically.

So they just go, what the hell, man?

That's not cool.

What you just said there because, you know, I don't agree with you.

That becomes the whole argument.

But you need somebody to fix that.

Right.

You know?

But I think science is a way of

actually bridging the gap.

Yeah.

Because when people learn

how science works as a way of thinking, it changes their entire life.

100%.

So if you got the journalism department involved, very good.

And

they, so are you teaching scientists to be better communicators or journalists to be better scientists?

Both.

That's

clutch, right?

We have to do both of these.

That's amazing.

So for the scientists trying to

come into being,

I thought it was so fetch, but

I'm just getting past fetch.

It's important.

It's so clutch.

I love it.

All right.

It's necessary.

We have to teach the scientists how to communicate, right?

And that could be a number of different mediums, like podcasts, books, written, right?

Journalism.

because in the science degrees don't care about that they don't we're not trained in talking to the public in any medium we're really not we're taught to talk to each other right and we're taught to write in in passive voice which i don't know if you've ever read passive voice it's boring it's super boring so if you're trying to connect with the non-scientist passive voice is not the answer right you know but both are necessary that to be able to talk to scientists but then be able to translate to the lay person is what's really important.

And for some reason, it's, I don't know, how can I put it?

I don't want to say that it's, that it's counter to the way scientists are as people.

Like my son is right now studying to become a molecular biologist.

Nice.

Okay.

When did that happen?

You didn't tell me that.

Yeah, that's what he decided, you know, and he got a full ride.

Yeah, you as a father and he wants to be in molecular biology.

How'd that happen?

That's why he wants to be in molecular.

He looked at my life and was like, oh, no

i need something to get let me say something comedy is not the way to go but i told him i was like dude that's great you know with your kind of personality you would make an excellent communicator for that and he was like yeah i don't want to do that oh yeah i don't want to talk i don't i don't want to talk to people about it i just want to do it and i think A lot of scientists feel that way.

Yeah, you just want to go in the lab.

I just want to do it.

I don't want to talk about it.

Yeah, shut up and get back to the lab.

Exactly.

Right.

Well, I mean, as scientists, we have three categories.

The first thing we do is we ask a question.

The middle thing we do is we seek the answer, we do our research, and then the last thing is actually sharing it with the public.

But that's where we drop the ball.

We really don't do it enough.

And it takes a skill.

My husband is introverted.

He's a great chemist.

He's a great software engineer, but he would hate to do what I do.

And so it takes a certain personality to get out there and put yourself out there.

And you also have to have a thick skin.

People will come after you for what you say.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

So, so, what, what we are here in my office

at the Hayden Planetarium.

What brings you to New York?

Oh, I'm here for a spot on the Today Show.

So we're just like, we just squeezed us in.

Yeah.

I mean,

we are a straight-up booty call.

You answered.

Whoa.

So

if you're on the Today Show, then you don't need, if you're on a Today Show, then what do you, why you don't, what do you be?

Well, I like talking to you.

Was that the question?

I think

it's different, right?

So, the Today Show, you're talking to a certain audience.

It's the American public, right?

And they're usually people who aren't necessarily signing up for a science lesson.

That's a nice idea.

You just called our audience smart.

They are smart.

They're science enthusiasts, right?

Wouldn't you say so?

No, no.

So, no, very important point.

Here, we already know our audience, and it's a science audience.

The Today Show, people tune in not expecting science.

100%.

And then you slip that in,

and now they can get excited about it.

That's the goal.

That's the goal.

So do a little fire, do a little dance, and maybe teach one thing.

If I can teach one thing, I consider it a successful segment.

Which host will you be with on the Today Show?

So Al Roker, Craig Melvin, and Dylan Dreyer.

Oh, cool.

You got to bring in the weatherman because they know science.

And Al's always.

Yeah, Al's great.

Al's.

He's an actual science enthusiast.

Yes, he is.

As is Dylan.

They're both meteorologists, so they have that science background, and it's very fun to do stuff with them because they ask the questions, too.

They're interested, and they have that science background.

So they want to push it just a little bit, which I love, right?

You need the buddy.

So I probably, we probably did this the last time you came through because I want to get to the questions we asked because we have a million questions that our audience wants to ask.

They all know you.

Yeah, they all know you.

So just a couple of fast ones here.

When you were a kid, did you like burn holes in the carpet and

explode the kitchen?

It's science, mommy.

What kind of, were you like girl nerd where this is, I got to do this?

Yes and no so I was more of an athlete.

I was a soccer player.

So that was the true love.

All right.

You're very nice.

I was a very one who asked a lot of questions.

So my parents would count the number of questions I would ask in a car ride because it would drive them nuts.

My mom was more of a helicopter mom, so there was no blowtorch anywhere near me.

There's no chance I would have ever been able to set something on fire.

Wow, wow, okay.

But I was able to.

I could see this in a sitcom.

The over curious kid just, hey, mommy, daddy, how about daddy?

And then the car, and then the next scene, you're just out on the street.

Just leave you.

I'm sure they thought about that.

I am positive.

More kindly.

They drop you at a museum somewhere and then they keep driving you.

Yes, that's perfect.

Okay, but so how did, if she's a helicopter mom, what freedoms did you still have to express yourself?

Okay, so this is where I really appreciate what she did when I was younger.

So she made one bathroom safe.

Like there were no chemicals, like, you know, like cleaning chemicals, I should say.

But there was food coloring, there was shampoo, bath soap, bubble bath.

Stuff that can't kill you.

Stuff that can't kill you.

Put it it in this.

She had this big green plastic bowl and it was like, go to town.

I will say the food coloring was removed after the first time.

Does it have green at the end of that?

I think so.

I think it doesn't come off very easily.

Well, if you look at my Instagram, I'll show you.

I had my face was just covered in green food coloring very recently.

I had something go wrong.

I just made that up.

You're saying that actually happened?

It does.

Oh, it happens all the time.

I did this one experiment where I intentionally cover myself in soapy green bubbles and it comes right off in the shower.

Just two face washes.

You're good.

Okay.

All right.

I ain't doing that.

I am.

Oh, you're willing to.

That's why.

You are Kate the Kevin.

Yes, that's right.

I like it.

So, Chuck, give us some of our cosmic curiosity.

Let's get right to it then, shall we?

This is Sean Browning.

And he says, hello, this is Sean Browning.

I'm coming from Hood River, Oregon.

Hood River, yeah.

Why does cesium have such a violent reaction when exposed to oxygen?

And what are some of its practical uses that the average person would not know about?

Okay.

In the periodic table, the periodic table is kind of shaped like a U.

And so cesium is in the bottom left-hand corner.

And so the bottom left-hand corner is where your biggest atoms are.

And so cesium is really big.

And what that means is it has a very, very positively charged core, its nucleus, but its electrons are very far away.

So it can barely reach the electrons.

And so because it's so big and their charges are so separated, oxygen, which likes to take electrons from a neighbor, it is exactly, yes, loves to steal electrons.

Steal the electrons.

That's a book title, The Electrons.

The Electron Theater.

That's your next book, okay?

We'll write together.

But yeah, so it's so big.

And so that's oxygen can come in, grab the electrons, and the electrons gladly jump to oxygen because it's much, much smaller and it can be.

It's easy enough.

I'll see you later.

Yeah.

You don't just have me.

I can't do bad all by myself.

Oxygen over there has been coined me forever.

Oxygen, I'm coming, honey.

I can see it.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

There it is.

There it is.

Okay, so

now it reaches for oxygen.

What is the result of that chemical reaction?

Is it exothermic, endothermic?

Probably exothermic, would be my guess.

It really depends on the situation and like where their energy levels are.

It will form an ionic salt, and so it either forms cesium oxide or cesium superoxide.

So just either two cesiums and one oxygen or two oxygens and one cesium.

And it forms these two products.

and that in itself is quite stable.

The oxides usually are.

Okay, so what does it look like?

What does this, because he said violent, what does this violent reaction look like?

So my guess is he's thinking about when you throw these group one metals into water.

So we've seen this with sodium before, if you've Googled that.

Love me some sodium and water.

Right, right.

Oh my gosh.

So you can cut it with a knife?

The metal, cut it with a knife, toss it in water, it basically blows up.

Yeah, it's definitely exactly.

But that's reacting with water.

It is.

Or is it the dissolved oxygen that it's reacting with?

It's the same process as happening.

It's the electrons being pulled from the group one metal.

Got it.

All right.

Yeah.

And then it's an exothermic process, like you said, so that will ignite when you throw it in water.

Okay.

The other part of the questions you asked about, like, what are some things that people might not know about cesium?

And so cesium-133, I think, is used for an atomic clock.

And so what happens is you basically disturb these atoms.

They give off a frequency, and you can use that frequency to measure time.

And how are you exciting the atoms?

It's a disturbance, so usually it's like a push.

You want to get it to vibrate.

And so it's just, you just have to move it a little bit.

And that frequency is then mapped out to keep track of time.

And it's so

consistent that it's you can easily use it.

You can set a clock by it.

Exactly.

In fact, the duration of the second is defined by how many cycles of the cesium.

atom okay so how many vibrations do you get in a second with cesium it's like nine decimal places i'm sorry so it's that that's why it's an atomic clock and that's why it's very precise Right.

Because if you got nine decimal places in one second, that's pretty damn active.

You got you.

Yes.

Yeah.

You're good for all time.

But no pun intended.

What?

Chuck, stop it.

He's on a roll.

He's on a roll.

You want to know how precise this is?

Right.

For that vibration?

For the vibration.

It is 9,192,631,770

cycles of that vibration.

is the exact definition of a second.

Of a second.

Yes.

There you go.

Yes.

Yes.

And if I can add to that,

if I may, until that was defined with that precision, the second was a predefined fraction of the year 1900.

Okay.

And so that involved Earth's rotation

around

the bang.

The rotation of the Earth was built into the definition of the second.

Why wouldn't it be?

Right.

Because of 60 seconds.

Because we use that as 60 seconds and a minute to make up the

Okay, why wouldn't it be?

Right.

Why wouldn't it?

But that meant if Earth were slowing down or speeding up, there'd be no way to know that.

Exactly.

Because the mechanism that's giving you the second is changing.

So you offload it onto your cesium atom.

Now you say, yo, Earth.

What?

What?

And so since we...

We don't need you, Earth.

We totally don't.

We don't need you.

Not only that, you're acting up.

So since 1972.

Plus, you're slowing down anyway.

Since 1972, we've had to add 20, some five, seven leap seconds just to account for Earth slowing down.

It's all because of your cesium, Adam.

Isn't it that?

My cesium.

I love it.

I love it.

I don't know any other uses, though.

Is there?

Not really.

I mean, I'm sure there's other ones.

I mean, let's be honest.

That's enough.

What more can you do?

I mean, seriously,

measuring time down to a billion literature.

Yeah, a billion microseconds.

Come on.

That's pretty damn good.

Yeah.

All right.

Tron Aries has arrived.

I would like you to meet Ares, the ultimate AI soldier.

He is biblically strong and supremely intelligent.

You think you're in control of this.

You're not.

On October 10th.

What are you?

My world is coming to destroy yours, but I can help help you.

The war for our world begins in IMAX.

Tron Aries, dated PG-13, maybe inappropriate for children under 13.

Only in theaters October 10th.

Get tickets now.

The best business-to-business marketing gets wasted on the wrong people.

Think of the guy on the third floor of a 10-story apartment block who's getting bombarded with ads for solar panels.

What a waste.

So when you want to reach the right professionals, use LinkedIn ads.

LinkedIn has grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals and 130 million decision makers.

And that's where it stands apart from other ad buyers.

You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company, role, seniority, skills, company revenue.

So you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience.

It's why LinkedIn Ads generates the highest business-to-business revenue on ad spend of all online ad networks.

Seriously, all of them.

Spend $250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get a free $250 credit for the next one.

No strings attached.

Just go to linkedin.com slash Star Talk.

That's linkedin.com/slash Star Talk.

Terms and conditions apply.

Hello, I'm Vicky Brooke Allen, and I support Star Talk on Patreon.

This is Star Talk with Nailed Grass Tyson.

This is Will.

And Will says, Dr.

Bieberdorf, Dr.

Tyson, and dear Lord Nice, thanks, Will, for including a title for me,

which is not real.

Will from Euclid, Ohio here.

Euclid?

Euclid.

There's a town called Euclid?

There's a Euclid, Ohio.

I've never heard of it until just now, but guess what?

I'm glad to know that it's there

yeah uh he says most gracious thanks for using my question you probably had this question a zillion times but i've never heard an answer to it so here it is

we've all heard by now that the mentos and diet coke thing okay cool one what's the history and who thought of that and two

what causes the chemical reaction that everybody puts on YouTube to make the video.

Yes.

The soda geyser.

Okay, so that went back to about 1910.

It was originally done with those winto green lifesavers.

Which I was about to say, we didn't have Mentos in 1910.

We didn't.

No, we didn't.

So it was originally done with the Winto Green Life Savers.

Winter Green.

Winto Green.

I remember that.

Oh, apostrophe green.

Lifesavers are that old?

They are.

Yeah, there are.

And so they go into the soda, like a soda pop, right?

And so it had that little hole in the center.

And so it would make this really neat geyser and it would come out.

It was through the hole in the middle of the lifesaver.

Yep.

But then in the 1990s, the lifesaver company company changed the size of the lifesaver.

The science teachers were upset and they said, all right, throw this experiment to the students.

Let's figure out how to replicate this now that the lifesaver doesn't fit in there.

They did a science.

He's a committed chemist, right?

It's awesome, though.

I can totally see high school teachers just grabbing their students and grabbing all the candy, all the soda, and say, all right, figure out what is

experiment.

Exactly.

So what's special about the surface?

of a mentos because it does have a hole in it right and if i remember correctly there's they're they're they're solid candies right it's solid candy but it has these nucleation sites, so these little divots, and they attract

on the surface.

And so it attracts the carbon dioxide in the soda.

The carbon dioxide slams into each other, builds up pressure, and it just shoots out the top.

And then they found that Diet Coke has the best reaction because it has the highest carbonation.

Okay, I thought, however, that that's not why they use Diet Coke.

Oh, please tell me then if it's otherwise.

Okay, I didn't.

think that was why.

There's part.

So one part is that it doesn't have the sugar.

That's why.

And so it's not as big of a mess for.

It's a mess.

yeah right diet coke you just hose that but sugar then it the the coke evaporates and everything is gummed up i thought that was the main reason it is one of the main reasons but if you are on a flight i don't know if you fly commercial still but if you are on a flight what do you think

i want some way to get here okay perfect

i don't know you're fancy i don't know what you're profiting

commercial

okay for the rest of us when we have a flight attendant go down in a plane watch them when somebody orders diet coke just watch how they pour it it takes way longer for all that carbonation to sink and for them to top it off.

So you can actually watch it happen right on a plane iron.

Compared to a non-diet.

Like a Mountain Dew or a Coke or anything.

It just has that carbonation.

It's an experiment.

Please do.

You see it.

Plus, at the lower pressure in a plane,

there's less to press down on the CO2 anyway.

Also, true.

So that there's more bubbling action, regardless.

Yeah, that's a good point.

I will check that out.

Please do.

Please do.

All right.

So that means if I have

a soda maker machine, a carbonator, whatever those machines are called.

Because I have three, I do own one, but I have their three settings.

There's low, medium, and high.

If I go to high and then repeat that three times, that's the liquid you want probably in your experiment.

I'm also going to blow apart your kitchen.

You just made a bomb.

Thank you for saying that.

Okay.

Next.

Andy, here from Thousands of Nilks.

I've heard the human nose is an incredible chemical sensor that not only detects very faint traces of a molecule, but also tens of thousands of types of molecules.

My question is, do you use this fact in the science of chemistry to aid in your work in any way?

Or do you generally avoid smelling experiments due to unknown noxious effects?

I love that.

Remind me, because chemistry for me was a long time ago.

You don't actually stick your nostril on top of the test tube.

100%.

But there is this thing.

So often.

There's this thing.

So that can dilute it to a level that you can know whether you should get closer.

Exactly.

Yes.

So the rule number one is do not eat anything or smell anything or drink anything in lab.

Rule number two is, okay, we know you're going to smell it.

So let me teach you how to do it safely.

So yep, it's wafting.

You're pushing the molecules towards you.

Some of the molecules.

Yes, true.

Some.

A small portion of them.

But I think part of the question is asking, like, do you ever do this?

And do you ever use your nose?

I did something just recently where I had to do this, where people helped me by bringing two beakers out to my performance stage, basically my stage table,

and they weren't labeled.

One had water, one had vinegar.

And I immediately just stuck my nose right in there because we can tell the difference between it.

And then I was able to do the experiment without any doubt or anything.

But you use it, you use your nose to protect yourself.

It's a way for us to know whether or not chicken is bad or good or anything like that.

So it is a tool that you can use if you're safe about it in the chemistry lab.

Is there anything that

smells good that will also kill you?

Ooh, I'm sure.

Or, or

has that gene pool been removed from our species long ago?

Hilarious.

That's a fair question.

It is a fair question.

Right?

Yeah, I am sure there is something that smells good that will kill us.

I can't think of anything off the top of my head right now.

Do you have one in mind?

No, but I have the opposite, which is we know that hydrogen sulfide, okay, is especially deadly at some level well below the level that we can detect it.

So when you smell it, you say, this is nasty.

I'm going to go in the opposite direction.

It was still far from killing you.

But anyone who's, but you know what?

Hydrogen sulfide is like rotten eggs.

Fart.

Fart.

Fart.

Okay.

Yeah.

I was going to say rotten eggs, but fine.

Everybody knows.

You're a comedian.

You can do a fart joke.

Listen, that's the first time I got in trouble in

elementary school.

Right.

We made, we had hydrogen sulfide and

I took it and put it in an eyedropper and went around and putting it on people so they would smell like fart.

Yes, I did.

And the teacher said, I thought you should be in

trouble for it.

I did, yes.

You should be a comedian.

That's what they said.

I wouldn't have gotten in trouble for it if I had just kept it to the dog on students, but I had to get aggressive.

So anyway.

Yeah, so

there's a suspicion in our evolutionary past that

there's an idea that hydrogen sulfide can build up in the bottom of the ocean.

If the ocean oxygen cycle stops, then you have anaerobic life forms.

Okay.

And hydrogen sulfide is one of the byproducts of them.

And if it builds up to a big enough bubble, it'll come up.

And if you're on the shore when that happened and you liked the smell of farts, you would go to it and just die.

And if you sort of didn't care, you died.

If you didn't like it, you went to the hills.

And so the argument is this happened with some frequency in the history of our species

that it it was built into us.

That's interesting.

I hadn't heard that before.

So, all the uncles that said, pull my finger, ended up dead.

That somehow we still do that.

We still do that.

Evolution.

Never the anthem does it.

It's just the uncle.

So

it's the guy gene that carried it forward.

All right.

All right.

Give me some more.

This is John.

He says, hello, Dr.

Tyson, Dr.

Kate, Lord Nice.

John here from Arkansas.

I used to teach high school chemistry, but I still struggle.

All right.

Teacher applause.

But I still struggle with electron configurations, especially in the transition metals.

What is it about that section of the periodic table that makes it so dog-gone convoluted?

Yeah.

And why are they called transition metals?

Because the edges,

they're pretty clean.

clean.

We can understand them.

You got the gases, the noble gases, and you got the, you know, and you go into the middle and

their representation on the table is different.

Yes.

Right.

And you have, and these others that are a series, then they pull those out.

What's up with that?

What's up with that?

So one of the reasons.

I can make that cleaner for the rest of us so we can learn it.

I can try.

So one of the reasons why transition metals are called transition metals is because they go through different color changes.

And so you can actually see them transition through their oxidation states.

And so maybe they're of plus two or a plus three.

You can see the color change across the table.

Okay.

Yeah.

So you could just sit there and watch your reaction go from, I'll just make up some colors, some blue to green to red, and you're watching it go through different oxidation states.

So you can actually monitor it.

So inorganic chemists, which is what I do, we usually like color changes.

And that's one of the reasons why we're drawn to that field is because we work with transition metals.

In high school, and also what I taught, which is general chemistry, so the first year of college chemistry, we do general trends.

And so we say if something is like this, it'll operate like this.

We just try to identify trends.

And so the S block and the P block, so the outside areas of the periodic table, they really follow these trends but the middle the d block the transition metals don't really follow the trend like prison you d block

what do you get now

and so and so that's what's hard about teaching it especially in high school because there are no like typical trends you can go by.

Gotcha.

No general rules.

So there are general trends that you can go by.

And there are certain ones that always break rules, like your jewelry medals.

So copper, silver, and gold will always, they're supposed to, I'm going to nerd out on you, but they're usually D9, but because of the way the electrons fall, they go to D10.

And so they can just redistribute their electrons.

I cannot get as excited about

it.

I'm sorry.

But it's an explanation of why taking these metals, right?

Oh, it does.

I used to be in D9, but now I'm in D10.

It's the inorganic flaring.

We talk about our d orbitals and where our electrons are.

And so I just love that part.

And it's just where your electrons are sitting.

They move around to be stable.

If you have, let's say you have five orbitals, there's five d orbitals.

If you have two electrons in each one, five d orbitals.

You all knew it.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

We totally knew that.

If you you have two electrons in each one, that provides stability.

But if you have two, two, two, two, and then one, it's less stable.

And so what it does is it takes another electron and move it over here to provide stability.

And so these specific atoms like copper and silver and gold will do that just naturally.

And that's why it can be confusing for high school students because you don't usually teach these exceptions.

And for grown-ups.

And for grown-ups, yeah, for everybody, true.

But he's a high school teacher.

So I just wanted to pull it back.

Yeah.

Okay.

Cool.

Because in astrophysics, nine out of 10 atoms in the universe is hydrogen.

Yeah.

And there's nothing easier than the hydrogen energy levels.

Right.

And we don't even have to think about orbitals.

There's just

a layer.

There's just levels and the electron moves back and forth.

But when you have all of these electron clouds, it gets way more

realistically described, but complicated.

Yeah.

It's really hard because you have to figure out how the orbitals are actually going to overlap.

Are they going to be complementary?

Will it be bonding, non-binding, anti-bonding?

There's all these different categories.

There are molecules in space, and we have to, but then they're sort of astrochemists at that level.

I can do most of my astrophysics completely ignoring that, it turns out.

Well, that's kind of interesting.

Yeah,

not to say that.

Yeah, you make me cry.

You have to leave right now.

That was not meant as a,

yeah.

Okay.

Chuck, what else do you have?

All right, this is Mihir.

Date, I think.

Mihir says this, hey, Kate, Neil, Chuck, there are books on complex topics like quantum physics for babies.

How effective do you think these books are?

Should graduate-level science topics be introduced formally at the elementary level in an engaging and understandable way?

The cool experiments seen in school provide momentary excitement, but they don't leave a lasting impact.

Books, however, might.

By high school age, the kids' ship has already sailed.

Grab their attention while you can, I say.

So, wait, tell us about your books first.

Okay, I have seven children's books.

Five of them are about Little Kate the Chemist.

She's 10 years old, run around her neighborhood in the soil science.

Was this a shill?

No, no.

Was this a planet?

No, I didn't.

But I do.

That's her mother.

Her mother is.

Thanks, mom.

Is that Teresa?

Yeah, so go ahead.

I have five fiction books.

I have two non-fiction books, and I have one for adults.

It's called It's Elemental.

So I just write to try to share science with the general public and try to make it fun.

So are the kids' books doing what you want them to do?

Yeah, yeah, definitely.

Because

the two nonfiction books each have 25 experiments that you can do at home with materials you probably already have in your craft drawer.

And so, what I want them to do is for parents to pick up that book and use it over spring break and do science experiments with their kids.

Okay,

that's cool.

That works.

That's what I love.

I love that.

Okay, so, and it seems to me, yes, I think an experiment can be lasting.

Contrary to the claim of the question,

an experiment, yes, it comes and goes,

but it can trigger curiosity

that whether or not you fully understood the chemical reactions that made it happen, you just don't forget it.

And then, and so I think educators overvalue the lesson plan relative to the inspiration.

I think so too.

And research actually supports what you're saying too, but it also is that you can have a connection with the scientists.

So if you show up one time and do an explosion, okay, fine.

Maybe you'll spark the interest.

But if you keep going back and you form a connection with the students and you form that bond, that's when you can actually make a difference.

And so showing up really does have value.

Yes.

But can I push back on the quantum, what is it, quantum physics for babies?

Quantum physics for babies.

There's another one.

There's an abstract.

There's astrophysics for babies.

That's right.

Yeah.

There's a series of these books.

But what do they mean by babies?

They're not talking about actual babies.

They're board books that you can flip through.

And so they're really small.

But I think those are primarily for the parents who can't read another book about the cow goes moo.

And so it's intellectually stimulating for the parents.

They can be better parents.

But at the end of the day, exposing kids to all this vocabulary is just good.

So that when they get to the science class, they've been exposed.

They're not hearing the word molecule for the first time.

They already have a general understanding of what it is.

Maybe, maybe.

Hunter here from Columbus, Georgia.

We saw Neil a few weeks ago.

I was just there.

Gave a public talk.

Oh, okay.

Columbus, Georgia.

I wanted to ask Kate a question about the periodic table.

If the island of stability is real, what kind of properties do you think we might be able to expect from atoms in it?

Ooh.

Okay, so.

So, were you talking about the island of stability, Neil?

Or they just wanted to point out that they saw you a couple weeks ago.

Yeah.

So, this is something that I think is really interesting because, as a chemist, I'm familiar with the band of stability, but the island of stability is a little bit outside of my reach.

So, can I do band and then I throw to you for island?

Sure, unless they're the same thing and we just call them something different.

Could be.

What's your band of stability?

So, the band of stability basically.

Which is another boy band name

the band of stability actually that would be cold play okay all right

okay got it so

the band the band of stability is all about um figuring out what ratio of neutrons to protons makes an atom most stable and so if you have 20 protons or fewer the ratio is one to one if you have more than 20 protons that number alters a little bit and so for uh chemistry specifically atoms you have 1.5 neutrons to every one proton.

That gives you your most stable atom.

So that's how I think about it.

Where does the island of stability come in?

Is that an extension?

Oh, yeah.

So, okay.

So I can only tell you how I have come to learn it, and we can maybe dovetail with what you described.

Above a certain atomic number,

the nucleus is so large and

every one of them are unstable.

You can ask, well, what makes a stable element?

Is it stable forever or just for a few years or a few minutes, right?

So there might be some practical definition of what we call stable, but for our purposes, all those big atoms do not live for long.

And the ones we're discovering, you know, 101, 102, 103, which is the limit of the table when I was in school.

103 was Laurentium, I think it was, or still is.

It turns out that the calculations for the stability of the nucleus, when you go beyond the ones we're currently discovering into the 120s, 130s, somewhere in there, and I forgot the exact range, somewhere in there is an island of stable, very heavy elements.

And so you have to get past the unstable ones.

Typically, you make another element by cramming protons and or neutrons into a pre-existing.

Californium.

You slam Californium into a different other one.

Yeah, exactly.

You're slamming unstable elements into other unstable elements.

See if another unstable element shows up.

And some of them live for thousandths of a second.

So

if you slam Californium into Alabamium,

you're definitely going to come up with something unstable.

No, damn, I'm telling you, I can't believe it came over here like that.

Alabamium.

Oh, you got me with that one.

Well, known liberals, I tell you.

It'll be the color purple.

That's how you get out of that.

So this has been described in physics as an island of stability, which we are all just, our appetite is wetted for it.

Because if you have a new element that is stable, what are you going to do with it?

What properties does it have?

And that all happens on the chemical side, not the physics side.

Yeah.

Right.

So with the island of stability, then, are we saying that it's...

Because I know like Oganesian or whatever lasts for less than a second, right?

So are we saying that?

Organision, so that's the 118.

118, that's the highest one we know about.

The highest numbered one.

Yeah.

So I guess what I'm curious about is then, would these atoms then stay around for, are we talking seconds?

Are we talking years?

Like what do we think?

Again, my understanding is that they're permanently stable.

But what it would mean is your

rules either have a new manifestation in those heavier nuclei

or somehow that rule shows up again.

But we're all, I can't wait till we get there.

Right.

Right.

I'm really intrigued by that because I'm curious if it's just like relative stability where it lasts maybe a second still.

Instead of a thousandth of a second, right, right, right.

Yeah, you couldn't still have a water in your hand.

That's what I'm curious about.

Right, right.

As am I.

As am I.

Listen.

That's the sound of the fully electric Audi Q6 e-ron.

The sound of captivating electric performance.

Dynamic drive, and the quiet confidence of ultra-smooth handling.

The elevated interior reminds you this is more than an EV.

This is electric performance, redefined.

The fully electric Audi Q6 e-tron.

This is Jessica.

Hello, Dr.

Tyson, Lord Nice, and Dr.

Kate.

This is Jess from Toronto and Dubai.

Well, Ladi Dad, Jessica.

Anyway.

Lottie.

She says, people show off where they've been.

Listen, you got it.

I haven't been to Dubai, so I'm going to give it to you.

I'm probably the only person here who hasn't hasn't been to Dubai.

I haven't been to Dubai.

Okay.

Okay.

I've been several times.

Well, we love to do that.

Well, laudy down.

So, in space where there's no oxygen and gravity is minimal, how do chemical reactions, especially combustion, change at the atomic level?

Could studying these reactions in a vacuum reveal new insights into quantum effects like wave function behavior in molecule bonding or energy transfer?

And quantum mechanics says everything is probabilistic is there a tiny chance my candle would light just to mess with me thank you neil and i love you and by the way that's the different kind of probabilistic so go ahead

so we should separate it into two areas there's what are you doing with no air yep right but you have two molecules that might perhaps know about each other's existence quantum mechanically

through through entanglement maybe that was a little bit in there the other one is just in zero g right and zero g combustion is fun tell us about that well what's interesting about in zero g is that all of our reactions behave like gas phase reactions because we don't have gravity right and so we are we get to kind of do stuff that we couldn't do on earth we can do it up in space because you can move things around they expand more like a a pencil would never float around here on earth it would stay at the bottom of a beaker right same thing whereas if you're trying to do that pencils and beakers well i'm just i'm just trying to give a solid because if i give a just a random molecule people might not know but you can visualize a pencil in a beaker right?

A pencil molecule, a pencil molecule, yes.

It's staying at the bottom of a beaker.

We know where it's going to sit.

It's going to be at the bottom.

It will have interactions

the whole time.

But when we go to space, now it moves around.

So we have solids that essentially get to behave like a gas.

And so the chemistry is just different.

And you get to look at it.

My question is: do we have combustion reactions outside of Earth and outside of the International Space Station?

I mean, do we have to have oxygen to have combustion?

Yeah.

So I guess what I was really referring to, which was accurately portrayed in the movie Gravity, okay, there was a small fire that began

and they just let it go and it extinguished itself.

Because normally on Earth, where there's 1G,

the heated gas rises,

bringing fresh oxygen in to continue the combustion.

But here, it's just, it ate up the oxygen, no more oxygen in town.

And

the CO2, whatever, the byproducts, can't feed the flame and it snuffed it out.

Wow.

So you can't burn a candle in zero G is the point.

Unless you have a gentle breeze.

Right.

You have to have something moving more oxygen molecules that way.

Into it.

Into it.

That's so cool.

Right, right.

So that means...

I did not know that.

So you didn't know that?

I didn't know that.

You cannot be romantic in space.

So anything that combusts, it assumes that it's just moving through the material to burn the whole thing, right?

A piece of paper burns the whole thing.

And we take it for granted.

It's relying on hotter gases being less dense and rising.

Yeah.

Right.

So do you ever try to think about those experiments?

I have not.

really thought about it because all of my chemistry happens on earth and i'm terrified of leaving earth and so that's usually where i stop

that's it chemistry i do is on earth okay

no but if we needed you for space to consult I'd say call someone else.

It's not happening.

There you go.

I don't do that.

That scares me.

I didn't go to space.

No.

No.

I don't know why that's my line.

It just scares me.

I don't want to.

I don't want to.

You're slim in a plane.

You're like halfway through a rocket.

I don't, I don't know.

No, no, but in a plane, you still have 1G.

Right.

Okay.

All right.

What I think about, though, is how you could do different experiments in space.

Like you can do the experiments of a womb because you can kind of replicate that and how the baby moves around with not zero gravity, but they have that vibe, right?

They're able to float around.

So you can do those type of experiments in space.

That's what I think about.

Right.

Okay.

And so there's some reactions.

What's a reaction that could only happen

in zero-g?

I'm curious.

Well, not only, but there's certain ways you could do it because I could think about taking two different

solutions and have the drops come and collide with each other that you wouldn't be able to do on the other side.

Well, and create these mini reactions right there

as they're floating.

That's amazing.

And just what have what have that unfold right in front of you so solid rockets could you do it inside like what what's in the solid rockets it's solid fuel no no it isn't yes it is it's a combination of no no the solid rocket boosters yes you can go in there and like bang on the fuel it's it's solid that's why it's called solid rocket that's why they're called solid rockets

no but generally there's another tank that can be that's what i'm talking about that oh okay that tank that

has hydrogen and oxygen right so liquefied

which is way denser than air right okay And then you take the hydrogen and oxygen.

And so now take us from there.

I got a tank twice as big holding liquid hydrogen and half that size holding liquid oxygen.

And you got to keep it really cold because they're liquefied.

Right.

And that's why,

if you ever see the launch,

you ever see slow-mo rocket launches from Florida, you see this chunks of ice falling off the bottom.

Falling off the rocket.

That would make it cold.

Florida is a moist environment and the rocket is cold and it just, all the moisture gathers on it.

If you do that in a desert, you're not going to have condensation freezing on it.

Right, cool.

Okay, so tell me what's happening when you combine, because in the subject of space, you have liquid

hydrogen, liquid oxygen.

And I just wave my hands and say, yes, it makes water and there's energy.

But take me into that.

So a traditional combustion reaction, traditional, not what you're talking about, has a source of fuel that has carbon associated with it.

You treat it with oxygen and you produce water and carbon dioxide.

What's really neat about that.

That That would give you energy.

Yeah, and it releases energy.

It's exothermic.

That's anything that burns, basically.

Anything that burns.

Anything organic that burns.

Yes.

That's why it turns black when it's done because it lays bare the carbon.

Yes.

Yes.

Okay.

Perfect.

But when you remove the carbon, you can have a combustion reaction that's much cleaner.

And so that's what you're talking about.

So you have hydrogen plus oxygen will give us water.

It'll still be combustion.

Still be combustion.

But that more

cleaner kind.

So that the exhaust of that rocket is water.

Water.

There you you go.

There you go.

We did it.

That's awesome.

It's very neat.

So do you think in quantum physics, two molecules can see each other before they make contact?

See each other?

In a way that they say, I want to get a little closer to you.

I mean, I always.

That's the music.

In my mind, all chemistry is driven around the rearranging of atoms, and that's all driven by electrons, either electron repulsion or attraction.

So that's how I think about interactions, is where are the electrons?

Are are they attracted to each other?

What would be cool is if two entangled particles

made an entangled molecule.

Wouldn't that be weird?

Whoa, that would be fun.

It would be wild.

So that would be weird.

One quantum molecule with its bits separated.

Right.

That'd be so weird.

That would be weird.

But they have to be identical.

So maybe hydrogen makes a molecule H2.

A lot of oxygen, that's not nitrogen.

We breathe O2 and N2.

So they're quantum entangled to make one molecule.

That's a sci-fi story, right?

That is.

Wow.

That'd be really weird.

Super cool.

It is cool.

Okay.

All right, here we go.

This is Alyssa Feldhajash.

But you're Kate the Earth Chemist.

Yes.

So that's not a

handbook coming out.

Thank you.

All right.

Alyssa Feldhaas says this.

Hello, Alyssa from Rocket City Huntsville.

My daughters, Amelia and Olivia, just love you.

My question is, what is the biggest, most impressive, kid-friendly experiment I can do with a four- and an eight-year-old that will keep them interested in science for years to come?

We love a good bang and aren't afraid of getting dirty.

Ooh.

Wow.

Okay,

that's full carte blanche there.

That's a loaded one because four-year-olds getting with a bang makes me nervous.

But I think if you have adults involved, you could do the exploding paint can experiment, which is really fun.

That sounds good.

You know, hey, with a four-year-old and an adult,

why don't you give us some paint?

Wait, wait, the way she said it.

Yeah, everybody knows the exploding painting can.

I picture it that they could help you set it up and then the adult would actually trigger the reaction.

So it's very simple.

You just need a paint can, empty, never had paint in it before.

Put about an inch of baking soda at the bottom.

Take a cup, plastic cup, fill it with vinegar, food coloring, if that's your flavor, and then nestle the cup into the baking soda.

Into the vinegar.

Into the vinegar.

Yep, in the liquid.

And then you can put the cup of vinegar into the baking soda.

So like nestle nestle it in like a sand castle.

Then you're going to put the lid on the paint can, use a mallet to hammer it shut.

You want it completely shut, no place for gas to escape.

Now get the kids out of there.

They can go far away, put their safety goggles on.

Then adults also with safety goggles on.

Always safety goggles.

Yeah, shake it up, but keep your head back because what will happen is a neutralization reaction.

You'll release carbon dioxide, just like we were talking about earlier with the Mentos and Diet Coke.

Yep, exactly.

And then the lid flies up.

It's really colorful.

It's cute.

Now wait a minute.

It's annoying.

But why doesn't you have to sit it down afterwards, right?

You can't hold that.

Yeah, you should put it down.

Yeah, good place.

But how do you know when it's about to blow up?

It happens very fast.

So what I do is I go shake, shake, shake, and I slam it down on the table and then I step back and then I move on to my next one.

And while I'm shaking my second one, the first one goes off.

Wow.

Okay.

So why doesn't, so I thought paint can lids were stronger than that.

You know, I think paint can lids are tight, especially if you mallet it shut, but apparently not.

Not enough.

It's no match for CO2.

Exactly.

Because it's not secured.

It's not locked in.

It's not clamped.

It's not clamped, exactly.

So if you have all those CO2 molecules coming in, going bop, bop, bop, in that lid, it will shoot it straight up in the air.

It's very fun.

Wow.

I love that one.

And that happens in seconds.

Yeah.

And the only reason why you put it in a small plastic cup is to keep it separate long enough to hit the lid to lid.

Exactly.

Because otherwise,

it will escape.

All the expanding gas will escape before you get a chance to mallet it down.

Exactly.

So when you nestle it in like that, you keep everything separate.

You mallet it down.

Now you mix it.

Bang.

And you throw it up first, so the liquid's going to go up, and then it all slams down at one time.

And so, when you shake it, it actually really nicely distributes the vinegar all over.

It grabs that baking soda, and then you get the cool acid-base neutralization reaction.

All right.

Very fun.

But keep your head back.

Keep your head back because you could get hit in the face.

Yeah, see, I'm going to let my kid do that.

How old is your kid?

This is the money maker.

I don't care how old the kid is.

It don't matter.

You can't have a paint can blow it up in this.

Like, sorry, baby, this is what pays.

This is what pays the mortgage.

So, you shake that can and put it down as quickly as possible.

But you can't overstate the need for goggles

through all your experiments.

Yeah, I usually wear goggles, a lab coat, and gloves.

It is a little overkill sometimes, but I like to set a good example.

It would break my heart if a kid got injured doing something they watched me.

Gotcha.

Gotcha.

All right.

Hello, Dr.

Tyson and Dr.

Bieberdorf and Lord Nice.

James from Denmark here.

What would you say are the most promising developments in applied chemistry today?

Oh, man.

Do you claim

material scientists in your community?

Ooh.

I do, yeah.

Chemistry is all chemistry.

It's chemistry.

It's all chemistry.

And it's usually a branch of inorganic chemistry as well.

So I don't know.

Which is your bailiwick.

Yes, that's my favorite.

Those guys are awesome.

So what's on the horizon there?

Oh, there's so many different things right now.

One of the things I'm really interested in is how we are bonding with AI, and we're kind of trying to use it to help us.

And so one thing that I just read is that they asked Microsoft AI,

what could we do to replace lithium in our lithium-ion batteries?

And it took a week, but it came up with an answer.

And so now we are able to- Hamsters and a hamster wheel.

Thank you, AI, for that brilliance.

Exactly.

But so now we have an answer.

We can use it and go troubleshoot and see if that will work.

And so what I'm really interested in right now is how those two worlds are kind of merging together and how we can use that to do better research, more effective research.

And so, that's that's what's happening right now.

And I am really excited about that.

That's what AI is best at.

Yeah, so it's AI-guided aspirations.

Yeah, yes, I think it's faster.

And looking at molecules is easy for AI.

It's like, you know, well, it has a lot of information that it can

catch everything.

And it can think in terms of, I use the term think, it can think in terms of future combinations that we could never even get to.

We would not have time to get to it because it can calculate them all at once.

Aren't there books that have all the chemical potentials of all reactions?

Oh, are you talking about the CRC?

Yes, CRC.

I have one.

It's a huge book.

What is that?

Oh, what does that stand for?

Something like...

Cambridge Rubber Company.

I mean, a consolidated rubber company.

Is that true?

So they're these compilations of all these properties that have been discovered piecemeal and assembled into these volumes.

And each scientist, we have a CRC on our shelves.

Whoever that company was, they decided to compile all the the information you could ever want in science.

There you go.

Okay.

You know what I did?

I found at auction

a CRC from my birth year.

So I bought it so that

that is a slice in time of what we knew about the chemistry, the physics, the bio.

It is all science in there, including math.

Okay.

So here's the point.

It's a thousand pages.

It would take me a lifetime to read through it, but AI could ingest it

and come up with

chemicals.

Couldn't it?

Right.

It's the best of both worlds.

Because you list,

is the word chemical potential?

What is the

how the likelihood that two atoms will come together?

What do you, what's the well, atoms or electrons?

Because potential chemicals are.

Yeah, usually potential when we're talking about activation potentials or whatever.

Sure, activation energies.

Energies.

So they know it.

So the book has it.

Right.

But you're not going to sit there and read thousands of things and come up with a new molecule.

Let it do it.

But let it do it while you're out on the beach sipping a pina colada.

and then you get a notification on your phone i found that new

you've been looking for and then you say ai write the paper publish it's like the best grad student you could have yeah it's so funny all right

it's been said

primarily because it's basically true that there's no

understanding

of

chemistry without physics and there's no understanding of biology without chemistry chemistry.

And so I come to the table as a physicist.

So when I look at the world, I see the interaction of matter, motion, and energy.

The biologist sees the interaction of all life.

Yet the chemist is situated between those two.

Because to go from inorganic molecules to self-replicating life, There's some complex chemistry involved.

In fact, biology is the most complex form of chemistry we know.

But it's not only that, it's everything around us.

Everything is made of atoms and molecules, and we take it so much for granted that somebody at some point in our past thought about that.

What those atoms would do when they were brought together.

to make a solid object, to make a liquid object, to make rocket fuel, to make those ice packs that you shake and put on your injury one of them turns cold the other turns hot a chemist was in the middle of that

so i don't think we spend enough time paused in reflection of what role chemistry and the chemists who are behind it all have done for civilization

and that's a cosmic perspective

I think that's all the time.

Okay, you got to come back more often.

Thank you for having me.

I love that.

Oh, my gosh.

And your podcast is

seeking a scientist.

And that's with NPR?

It's with NPR, out of KCR.

It's out of Kansas City.

Excellent.

And you interview other scientists.

Yes.

And you engage them with their expertise, and you bring your chemistry

patina to it.

Perhaps, yes.

I definitely try to bring the science communicator out of the people I interview.

Because not all of them would necessarily be communicating.

Yeah, and dudes, kind of like what you and I do, where we feed off each other and kind of fact-check a little bit.

Yeah, yeah, fact-checking is fun.

I have the same kind of conversation.

And so it's just, it's really nice to feature scientists that might not normally get featured.

And I love that.

There you go.

Right, cool.

Bieberdorf.

Well, thanks for stepping through.

Congratulations on your new gig at University of Notre Dame.

Yeah, the Fighting Irish.

Fighting Irish.

Yeah, there it is.

All right.

We'll look to and try to come back more often.

I will.

Thank you so much.

I appreciate it.

It's always fun talking to you guys.

Oh, yeah.

All right.

Chuck, always good to have you, man.

Always a pleasure.

This has been Star Talk Cosmic Queries, the Chemists Edition.

Until next time, as always, keep looking up.

Did you know Tide has been upgraded to provide an even better clean and cold water?

Tide is specifically designed to fight any stain you throw at it, even in cold.

Butter?

Yep.

Chocolate ice cream?

Sure thing.

Barbecue sauce?

Tide's got you covered.

You don't need to use warm water.

Additionally, Tide pods let you confidently fight tough stains with new coldzyme technology.

Just remember, if it's gotta be clean, it's gotta be Tide.