Cosmic Queries – Dimensional Waterfall

Tron Aries has arrived.

I would like you to meet Aries, the ultimate AI soldier.

He is biblically strong and supremely intelligent.

You think you're in control of this?

You're not.

On October 10th.

What are you?

My world is coming to destroy yours, but I can help you.

The war for our world begins in IMAX.

Tron Aries, suited PG-13.

Maybe inappropriate for children under 13.

Only in theaters, October 10th.

Get tickets now.

I'm going to put you on, nephew.

I don't.

Welcome to McDonald's.

Can I take your order?

Miss, I've been hitting up McDonald's for years.

Now it's back.

We need snack wraps.

What's a snack rap?

It's the return of something great.

Snack wrap is back.

Chuck, another installment of Cosmic Quarry.

Yes, and in this one, we figured out what dark matter really is.

Tune in and find out.

Welcome to Star Talk.

Your place in the universe where science and pop culture collide.

Star Talk begins right now.

This is Star Talk.

Yelda Grass Tyson, your personal astrophysicist.

We're doing cosmic queries today.

And that means Chuck is sitting right next to me.

Yes.

How you doing, Chuck?

Hey, what's happening?

Is this a topic or is it gravity?

I don't even know what it is.

Oh.

It's galactic goals.

That, that, that, right, that, that, black.

There on people won't give no in here.

I'm going to give them a soon.

Put them down there.

I'm going to put them.

Put it on some guy on pepper.

Didn't he die like 20 years ago?

I don't.

Paul Prudhomme?

Is that his name?

I don't know his name.

Have you seen him lately?

No.

No, I have not.

And my boy was packing some weight.

I haven't seen him in 20 years.

Well, we thank him for granting you that accent.

Damn that.

That's right.

Don't go and see his name.

So this is random, but they're all Patreon members.

Every day one.

But it's only Patreon members.

Correct.

Okay, I haven't seen any of these questions.

No, you do not get to see them.

And I'm supposed to see them, but I'm lazy.

So I don't see people.

Okay.

All right, here we go.

This is Writer's Eye, who says, Hello, everyone.

I hope your day is filled with protons from only friendly stars.

Ooh.

Oh, maybe he meant photons.

Photons, yeah.

Did he say protons or did you misread it?

No, it says protons.

You didn't misread it Because sometimes you, you know, you wouldn't read the reading thing.

I thought maybe.

Reading is fundamental.

It is fundamental.

No, I thought maybe he was, you know, talking about like a pulsar or something.

And so

he was sending particles out.

Okay.

But no, he probably didn't mean photons.

All right.

From friendly stars, he says, how far are we away from being able to track gravity waves?

I know we can detect them, so tracking them would be the next obvious step, in my humble opinion, that is.

If we could track them, eventually we could map the universe edge to edge.

Am I correct in thinking that?

So a couple of things.

First, a technicality.

Right.

The kind of waves made by

two colliding black holes.

Okay, those are called gravitational waves.

Gravitational waves, right.

Okay.

Gravity waves is something else that acoustical people, it's a term people use when they refer to a medium that's rising and falling in response to a

pressure impulse that goes through it.

So those are gravity waves that they cause.

So we have to make sure that the kingdom is separated there.

The lexicographic...

Nice.

The lexicographic reference is

correct.

Distinct.

So gravitational waves.

So

we detect them when they wash over us.

Right.

That's what LIGO did.

That's what earned the Nobel Prize.

Right.

And you know who earned the Nobel Prize?

Kip Thorne, who was one of the executive producers on.

Wait a minute.

Wait a minute.

Wait, it's the String Theory movie with Matthew McConaughey.

It's called

Interstellar.

Yes, good.

So in fact, we took our crew out to Pasadena, where he lives, went to his home office and interviewed Kip Thorne.

Very cool.

Yeah, yeah.

You can find it on our archives.

And he showed us his Nobel Prize.

Oh, wow.

That was cool.

You just keep that thing, huh?

I know, right?

What do you wear on your neck?

What do you do?

I would take it everywhere.

You know what I mean?

Excuse me, do you know what time it is?

I'm like, oh, excuse me, let me move my Nobel Prize out of the way so I can see my watch.

How did that get there?

Where did that come from?

Oh, my goodness.

Is that my Nobel Prize and where my watch should be?

Oh, my goodness.

So here's what I learned recently, that, yes, we can detect certain energy levels of gravitational waves that wash over Earth.

Right.

And there's certain other phenomena in the universe that do make gravitational waves that those detectors cannot see.

Okay.

Okay.

Now, there's something I only know a little bit about here, so I just want to put it on the table.

Okay.

All right.

That there's a research program that's going to be put into play that wants to detect the effect of gravitational waves moving across your field of view.

So if you have a pulsar, which has very, very precise spinning rates,

the most accurate

you can set a clock by it, okay?

If a gravitational wave passes by it,

there's a change in the rate.

Right.

You'll see the rhythm change.

The rhythm change just briefly.

Yes.

And so the idea is you monitor all the pulsars, you get their rhythms known.

Right.

And then you see one change.

And then you look to see if it.

Is there if it coincides with a gravitational wave?

Well, that would be the evidence that would be.

Now you see if it moves to the next one and then the next one.

Oh, right.

And now you would see the consistency across each pulsar.

Correct.

And you'd be watching a gravitational wave move across the medium of space.

Yes.

That's amazing.

Yes.

Yes.

And we're not there yet, but that's the same thing.

Unfortunately, we had to cut that

the funding for it's been cut already.

We've saved so much money by not even thinking about it.

You know it.

I know it.

On that subject, let me remind you how much money NASA gets from the government.

What?

This is the space station, space shuttle, Hubble, JWST, James Webb.

Everything that NASA does.

Everything NASA does.

We're going back to the moon.

Including looking back at Earth and weather and everything?

No, the weather would be Noah.

That's Noah.

Okay.

Okay.

But there's a strong collaboration between them.

Yeah, the two two are right you know i it was like 10 years after noah was founded that i caught on that it's like pronounced like noah like noah's ark like noah's ark yeah because he was the first weatherman what do you think about oh my god all right so i didn't i'm just catching that you just caught that now just now you had to actually spell it out yeah he was the first weatherman yeah hey hey it's gonna rain

God says it's gonna rain, man.

People are like, what are you talking about, Noah?

You're talking about, it hasn't rained.

It has never rained here never

i'm telling you man i'm building a boat

it's gonna rain

old crazy noah there he goes again you know so

well he did grow grapes is my understanding he might have made some wine

may man made a little wine the bible references that he did drink yeah yeah but go ahead so The Noah, by the way, if he did drink, I'm just saying, that's rough.

Just like, I'm telling you right now.

It's going to rain.

The Lord has spoken to me.

Oh, it's raining.

Yeah, who's going to believe that?

Right.

Told me to get three of every animal.

I think it was two.

Anyway, go ahead.

Let's move on.

So, of course, they spelled N-O-A-H and then N-O-A-H.

National

Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

So, yeah, no one makes those.

So, just to remind people,

of your tax dollar,

it is four-tenths of one cent.

So, it's not even a full penny.

Yeah, so you can say I want to save money there,

but then what total impact is that going to have given all the rest of the spending that's going on?

Right.

It's not a very efficient means of cost cutting.

Yeah, so if you have a department of efficiency, it could be more efficient about where it's being efficient.

Right.

I think we need to be efficient with the department of efficiency.

Exactly.

Okay.

All right.

Next one.

Here we go.

Let's move on to to Maurice van der Linden.

This is Maurice van der Linden.

He says, hey, Neil, hey, Chuck, I've been wondering about something Janet Levin said once in your episodes that it might be possible that if you look far enough into the cosmos, your line of sight can loop around and the universe can end up at your position just along the timeline.

Doesn't this imply that if true, the universe is a perfect 4D sphere.

You would see your past location, in your case, a young solar system, from every angle, so it would appear smeared out across the cosmic horizon.

Love the show, Kan Regards, Maurice from Harlem in the Netherlands.

Oh, Harlem.

Yes.

Yes, Harlem.

It's where we got our name, Harlem.

Harlem.

Here in New York.

Yeah, back when the Dutch were running.

They owned it all.

They owned it all.

They put in all the canals because they...

We have Canal Street.

Yes.

You know, and that's what they do.

Absolutely.

Even back then.

Oh, nothing but canals.

So I don't know if I can answer it in the precision that's

talking about, but I can tell you that we do live in an open universe, which means we're expanding out forever.

Right.

So there is no sight line that will come back to where we are.

It goes out.

Because the sight line is continually moving.

Correct.

And out away from us.

And out away from us.

So there's no way that you could loop back.

Okay, so

in a closed universe,

the universe will re-collapse so that a sight line, in principle, will ultimately come back.

And the way to think about that is just the surface of a sphere.

Right.

We'll call it a balloon, a perfect spherical balloon.

We're all crawling around on the surface of that balloon.

And

if you send out a beam of light, it will go away from you.

but then come around, come back and hit you in the back of the head.

Right.

Right.

But that would be later.

Right.

Okay.

And as the balloon begins to shrink back, because it's, well,

wouldn't have to shrink.

It just has to be closed.

But if it's closed, it will shrink.

Hmm.

Don't look at me.

I'm not the best of physicists.

So the cosmic microwave background.

Right.

We have done some experiments to test for this.

Oh.

So the microwave background is in every direction.

Right.

So if you look this way, and you get an exact,

I know exactly the patterning that's happening there.

And then you just

look that turn around.

Is that exact pattern?

Pattern pattern?

Because if that's the thing, then that means they are the same place.

Right.

That means that was a line that went around and met on the other side.

Right.

Okay.

We haven't found that.

We haven't?

No.

But we've looked.

We've looked.

We've looked very carefully for statistically significant repeated patterns

all throughout the cosmic microphone.

Gotcha.

Okay.

Yeah.

Okay.

So that's the best I can answer that.

No, that's a great answer.

Jana might have come in with some more teeth in that answer.

But yeah, well, leave it to Dana.

The best business-to-business marketing gets wasted on the wrong people.

Think of the guy on the third floor of a 10-story apartment block who's getting bombarded with ads for solar panels.

What a waste.

So when you want to reach the right professionals, use LinkedIn ads.

LinkedIn has grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals and 130 million decision makers, and that's where it stands apart from other ad buyers.

You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company, role, seniority, skills, company revenue.

So you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience.

It's why LinkedIn ads generates the highest business-to-business revenue on ad spend of all online ad networks.

Seriously, all of them.

Spend $250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get a free $250 credit for the next one.

No strings attached.

Just go to linkedin.com slash StarTalk.

That's linkedin.com slash StarTalk.

Terms and conditions apply.

To realize the future America needs, we understand what's needed from us.

To face each threat head on, We've earned our place in the fight for our nation's future.

We are Marines.

We were made for this.

Did you know Tide has been upgraded to provide an even better clean and cold water?

Tide is specifically designed to fight any stain you throw at it, even in cold.

Butter?

Yep.

Chocolate ice cream?

Sure thing.

Barbecue sauce?

Tide's got you covered.

You don't need to use warm water.

Additionally, Tide pods let you confidently fight tough stains with new coldzyme technology.

Just remember, if it's got to be clean, it's got to be tide.

I'm Jasmine Wilson, and I support Star Talk on Patreon.

This is Star Talk with Neil deGrasse Tyson.

All right, this is Igor

Vihanek.

Vihanek Igor, this is not Young Frankenstein.

Okay, Igor.

I think in Young Frankenstein, he's Igor.

He's Igor.

But he's also Marty Feldman, who has big giant bug eyes.

So I think they were.

He says, hello, gentlemen.

And is he Dr.

Frankenstein?

Dr.

Frankenstein.

But I thought I E is an E and EI is an I.

Yeah, Einstein.

Oh, Einstein.

And I-E is an E.

You didn't know that?

You never heard that?

Listen, I can barely get I before E except after C.

And except in Neil.

Right.

And except in science.

And except in Keith.

Yeah.

So I think they got rid of that rule.

And I spell all those words wrong.

I think they got rid of it.

I'm not even lying.

Yeah.

I'm an exception to that rule.

And so is a whole lot of

other words.

All right, here we go.

He says, hey, gentlemen, my name is Igor from Zagreb, Croatia.

I'm a first-time caller.

I like what he did there.

Excellent.

Excellent.

He says, I've always wondered if there are higher dimensions.

Could the expansion of the universe be caused by space-time falling into another dimension?

Like if our 3D space was a waterfall falling into a higher dimension and we simply perceive it as expanding in all directions, what would it mean for dark energy?

Thank you.

Man.

Interesting.

First of all, let me just tell you, Igor, I do not know what kind of weed you are smoking in Croatia.

Stop.

But that is, please.

Send some here.

Yes, send us some of that Croatian weed over here.

Go ahead.

What a weird concept of

our space-time

falling into another dimension.

Right.

There's no evidence that one dimension is susceptible to another dimension in that way.

Correct.

So, for example,

let's take the surface of a table.

Right.

How many dimensions is that?

That's two.

Two.

It just has a length and a width.

Right.

No depth.

No depth.

And then I have another surface of a table.

So I can make that table infinite, right?

Correct.

Now I can have another table that's separated from it that's also infinite.

And they're just running parallel with it.

They're just running parallel.

And they're not, there's no one.

Yeah, there's no interaction.

And it's in a third dimension.

And there's no, I can embed a two-dimensional surface in three dimensions, and it'll just sit there as two-dimensional as two dimensions.

It's inside of a three-dimensional

medium.

It does, it's not calling to you right okay but here is something that's related okay again it's not exactly answering the question but it addresses the question all right that's good right in our world we have quantum physics where a lot of mysterious things happen it's not mathematically mysterious it's just intellectually mysterious particles pop in and out of existence right matter and energy are equivalent particles behave in the same way over large they're entangled you know there's weirdness that's going on

we can describe it mathematically, though.

Is that weirdness completely normal in a higher dimension?

Let's just ask for that.

So what would be an example?

Let's go back to our 2D world.

Okay.

And we're there.

We're walking around or slithering around.

2D people get around.

We're line drawing.

Yeah, we are only our perimeters to each other.

Right, right.

Suppose we're looking around and we see a dot.

Right.

It just came out of nowhere.

Yes.

It's like particles popping in in our sense.

It's a dot.

Where'd that come from?

I don't know.

Right.

And then we keep watching.

We study it.

We're scientists.

We study it.

And the dot becomes a circle.

And the circle grows.

And we say, and we're studying it.

We're making measurements.

Then it grows to like a maximum point.

And then it starts shrinking back.

And it gets smaller and smaller.

Then it's a dot, then it disappears.

Wow.

We'd be coming up with all kinds of theories, right?

Aliens.

Aliens.

Because we live in rural America.

The rural part of the paper.

City people see it.

We're in the rural part of the paper.

The two dimensions.

Where the two-dimensional, where the dot.

Okay, I was out in the middle of the night.

Dot showed up.

Got bigger and bigger.

Okay, go ahead.

So we can't explain that, right?

We don't understand it.

Right.

And is it like

studying the elephant, but you don't see the whole elephant?

Yeah.

Okay.

You get seven different descriptions.

The trunk, the tusk, the leg, the toenails, the tail,

the side.

None of those comport until you take a step back and say, you're all describing the same creature.

Okay.

And that's the full understanding that no one gets at first.

Do you know what I just described?

A hole.

No.

I described a sphere passing through

the paper Because at one point, it's just a dot, because it's a single point of the sphere that's touching the two-dimensional plane.

Exactly.

But as you continue to move the sphere through, then what you have is more points in the 360-degree sphere that keep fanning out, but only in two dimensions.

So they make a hole that keeps getting bigger.

They make a big circle.

A circle.

And then...

And how big does the circle get?

Whatever the size of the dot gets.

The diameter.

And then you come back and then you down one point.

And here we are mysteriously inventing forces and phenomenon and it's just a normal wow it's just a normal sphere wow in the higher dimension of this example which is three dimensions but to us to two dimensions in rope in rural paper stand

paper stand in rural paper stand

that was a serious phenomenon that was a serious and they're reporting that to the government right and people are trying to capture the next one oh wow that's great so if higher dimensions pass through or otherwise interact, it can be very mysterious.

It could be right.

Wow.

Dude, what a great question.

Yeah, that's right.

So he was trying to account for the dark energy.

I don't know what could be happening in a higher dimension to manifest in our dimensionality as dark energy.

That could be a thing.

Right, it could be.

All right, this is Matt Woods, who says, G'day, Professor Tyson and Lord Nice.

Adelaide here from Australia.

That was the best I could do, guys.

That's pretty good.

I tried.

That's good.

Not as good as your French accent.

No, but I tried.

Okay.

Or your gumbo accent.

Yeah.

He said, I was wondering if we can, if we can't ever truly touch anything, could the space between particles be dark matter pulling the particles together or dark energy repulsing the particles?

Well, there's another thing that pulls particles together.

But anyway, I enjoy every podcast.

Editorialized on the man's question.

I was thinking out loud.

I'm sorry.

I'm sorry.

And I'm sorry, Nat.

I enjoy every podcast, and I remain inspired by you guys every day.

Please keep up the good work.

Anyway, excellent.

You answered.

Are you choosing those because people say nice things about you in each one?

I have no idea.

Well, I've never seen you.

Okay.

I should not say that.

No, I would never do that.

He's paid to read them in advance.

No, I see.

Let the record show.

Exactly.

Okay, so now go ahead.

So I forgot the question.

So he's basically saying, like, if we can never touch anything, truly, then could it be dark matter in between the touching that's pushing or pulling?

All right.

So it turns out dark matter

does not interact with itself as potently as regular matter does.

Interesting.

Okay.

So when regular matter gets together,

its molecules grab on.

You can make solid objects.

All kinds of things.

Liquid, gas.

It'll make...

Okay.

So we have regular matter planets.

Right.

We have rocks.

Because that's what regular matter does using the electromagnetic force, which in case you were wondering.

All right.

Dark matter, what we call dark matter, which is really dark gravity, does not respond to the electromagnetic force.

At all.

At all.

Doesn't interact.

Doesn't interact.

Okay.

So it doesn't interact with us that way.

Okay.

Nor does it interact with itself that way.

It does interact gravitationally, though.

So you can have...

pockets of dark matter out there, but nowhere is it so dense that you have solid objects.

Wow.

As far as we can tell, there's no solid dark matter out there.

Okay.

By the way, if it was, if it did, it would just pass through you because it doesn't interact.

It doesn't interact anyway.

With any force that's holding you together, it's got another instruction set.

Let it slip right through my hands.

So particles, we already have accounted for their behavior with the forces that are known.

Right.

There's nothing mysterious there.

Now, he might have known that we don't actually touch things because there was an episode of Cosmos where we did that.

As you bring two things together, you feel like you're touching, but what's happening is the electromagnetic forces are repelling each other and you're responding to the forces thinking that it's a solid thing, but it's not.

And that is why you have four-year-olds all over the world and the backup cards going, I'm not touching you.

I'm not touching you.

I'm not touching you.

Okay.

I'm not touching you.

All right.

Here we go.

Next up.

This is Stetson.

And Stetson says, hello.

So there's like Madonna.

This is just Stetson.

He's a chair.

He's Stetson.

He's fine.

He's just Stetson.

He says, Hello, Dr.

Tyson and Lord Nice.

Stetson here from the U.S., but currently living in Japan.

Oh, well, yes.

Konichiwa.

He says, The study of planets, including ours, is quite fascinating.

The internal structure of our planet is generally agreed upon, but how would we be able to understand the internal structure of other planets, even those nearby?

Great question.

Great question.

So we

make educated guesses and then we test the guess.

Ooh, we making this up.

No, that's not what I said.

We just making it up as we go along.

Oh, my God.

That is breaking news.

Breaking news.

Go ahead.

Let's take Mercury.

Okay, Mercury.

for example.

Okay.

Mercury is tiny.

Right.

Very small.

Small.

And it's closest to the sun, right?

Oh, yeah.

It's the closest planet.

In fact, our moon might even be bigger than Mercury.

What?

Yeah.

Okay.

I have to check that, but it's

small.

It's small.

Okay.

Okay.

But it's a full-up legit planet.

Okay.

Well, what's going on?

Well, we can measure its mass.

Its mass is way higher than it could possibly be if Mercury was composed only of rock, like the moon.

The moon is made of rock through and through.

Mercury, it has much more mass.

So we go to the periodic table of elements and we say, here's the birth ingredients of the solar system.

Wow.

We know that because that's what the sun is made of.

That's what Jupiter is.

Jupiter didn't give up any mass that it was born with.

So you look at the composition on Jupiter, it matches that of the sun.

Okay.

Anybody else who's different, you've been horse trading your ingredients along the way.

All right.

So Jupiter was trying to be the sun.

It's true.

That's what Jupiter was trying.

Jupiter was just like, I'm going to get one day.

In fact, Jupiter is the only planet that radiates more energy than it receives from the sun.

Oh, I didn't know that.

That's how wannabe it was.

That's how wannabe sun it was.

Yeah.

It still does.

It's still ready.

All right.

That's a great factoid.

Go ahead.

So I go to the periodic table and I say, of all these elements, some are very rare.

Some are not basically not really in the solar system.

So I'm going to ignore those.

And which are common?

And so nickel, iron, these are pretty common in the universe.

So maybe

I get the mass of mercury fitting into that volume by throwing in something heavier than rock.

Because we know it's rock on the surface because we see the cratering.

It looks just like the surface of the moon.

Okay.

So, but deep inside, what could be there?

Now, we know when it formed, heavy stuff goes to the middle because it's the fluid thing.

It's molten.

If you're molten and you're heavy, you're going to sink.

You're going to sink.

Okay.

So we ask ourselves how much iron has to be there to give us that

mass at that size, which is basically the density.

So the average density, we construct the average density of the object pulling from the periodic table of elements we know are in the universe.

So we find out it has a huge core of iron.

That's dope.

It's dope.

That is dope.

Okay.

you, god damn it.

That is science right there, buddy.

Oh, it works the other way, too.

Really?

We've discovered asteroids, okay?

And we know they're rocky, but we look at the density and it's like, these are way less dense than rock.

Rock, right?

Less dense.

Right.

What's going on?

Oh, that's so cool.

What's going on?

Because you see the volume of it.

And it's a fuzzy image.

You know, we're not looking.

These are not missions that go there.

It's not like we got binoculars.

Harold!

Look at this asteroid!

Look at Harold's.

I don't.

Anyway, go ahead.

I know, Harold and the purple crayon.

Because Harold went into the sky with his purple crayon.

There you go.

So, I like Harold.

It's a great kid.

Yeah,

so how do you have rock that has less mass than rock?

It ain't rock.

What?

Well, it's got to be made out of stuff that we know about.

Right.

So that was the first idea that maybe some asteroids are piles of rubble.

Nice.

So that there's.

So they're coalesced, but they're not stuck together.

They're not stuck together.

Wow.

So when we look at the total mass and the total size,

the volume, some of that volume is taken up by nothing.

Right.

Confounding our deduction for what its density is.

Like a floating ball of pebbles.

Pebbles.

There'd be so much space in between each pebble that that floating ball will never have the density of a rock.

Overall density is lower than rock.

So that matters because we want to deflect an asteroid.

You can't just go up to it and push on it.

If it's a rubber pop, because that don't...

Now you got a bunch of little rocks coming your way.

You, Bruce Willis, you messed up bad.

So you get to push off a chunk of it and the rest doesn't, it's not attached.

Exactly.

If it's not attached, you didn't have any effect on it.

Right.

So this density estimate, these density estimates are a major part of what folks in the solar system do.

Super cool, man.

So Mercury's small.

It's the smallest planet.

Right.

A title formerly held by

Pluto.

Poor Pluto.

What about a sigh like that?

You in my office.

There's no sympathy for Pluto in my office.

I know, but you're like, you know, you're like Kendrick and Drake.

I mean, you won.

You won.

Why you got to beat the guy up?

Okay.

But go ahead.

Okay, so Mercury and the moon are about the same size.

Mercury might be a little bigger.

However,

Mercury has four times the mass of our moon.

Wow.

Same size, four times the mass.

And we know it's rocky on the surface because they both have equal looking features on the surface.

So what's going on?

We know the moon has hardly any iron.

Right.

Because it was side-swiped off of Earth's crust from the...

It's crusty, baby.

It's crusty.

That's the moon.

The moon is crusty.

So we think iron

rests...

deeply and largely within the center of Mercury,

boosting its total mass relative to other normal objects.

So that's how that's how we roll when we make the calculations.

Very cool.

All right.

Let's see.

It's time for a few more, I think.

Yeah, yeah, we got some time.

Let's rock and roll here.

This is Western.

So we're getting through these quite.

We are getting through these.

We are actually getting this.

This is like the most we've done.

And I hope people are recognizing that we're getting to you as quickly as we can.

Hello, Dr.

Tyson Lord Nice.

I'm Wes from Davenport, Iowa.

And I, for one, want to say I appreciate your programming and expertise.

It requires more than you know.

No, it requires exactly what we know.

We're doing it.

Anyway, it's an expression.

More than you know.

It really is an expression.

I know, and we appreciate it.

My question is.

And by the way, I used to wrestle.

Go ahead.

Iowa knows wrestlers.

Iowa?

Iowa.

Yeah, that's because, you know, when you grow up wrestling cows.

Is that what that is?

Yeah, getting in the circle.

Is that where they kick my ass every time?

I will do it.

They're holding calves.

You holding hauling calves.

Paul, Paul, where did I put the calves?

Put it over there.

Where did I put this?

Shoot over there, dummy.

Yeah.

Anyway.

I wrestle.

Long tradition.

Long, proud tradition.

Of wrestling.

Yeah, very cool.

He says, my question is regarding black holes and what happens when they collide.

With recent theory enhancements from great minds, is there now mathematical equations that work to model this expected action and reaction?

Can we mathematically reproduce the collision of black holes with absolute consistency?

Yes.

And because we have the mathematics of it, it's the math that predicted the black hole to begin with.

So we already had the math.

It's not like here's this object.

Oh my gosh.

How do I describe it?

Einstein's general theory of relativity predicted black holes, even though he was anti-black hole.

Did you know this?

Yeah, well, he was a racist.

They all were back then.

No, he actually wasn't.

No, he wasn't.

No, if you read his ideas and opinions, it's a book.

Right.

It was Hubble who was the racist.

Hubble had issues.

Yeah, he had some issues.

Hubble had issues.

When Marion Anderson, after she was denied singing opportunity, she's an opera singer in

Constitution Hall, Washington, D.C., D.C.

Because that was run by the daughters of the

Confederacy.

That's when Roosevelt said you can sing on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.

Wow.

Einstein is active around then.

This is like the 1930s.

And I think it was the 30s.

But Roosevelt was president regardless.

Okay.

So yeah, it would have been the 30s.

We weren't at war yet.

And

she visited Princeton and visited Einstein on the Princeton campus.

Wow.

He was receiving of people who were otherwise well-known but had issues with dealing with

society.

Yeah.

Societal issues.

Yeah.

So he was a very forward-thinking person.

Very cool.

Well, I mean, it's great to see that being how he was so brilliant.

Yeah.

But also, I mean, as a Jew escaping the rise of Nazi Germany.

He had some motivation.

Yeah, he had, and some empathetic

postures.

Yeah, that makes sense.

Yeah.

Yeah.

And he predicted gravity waves.

I mean, gravitational waves, which means that the math was already there.

Math is already there.

Right, right.

And so math was in place.

And then we say that must be, but he did not believe that matter would do, would be so.

He didn't think the universe would be that mean to matter.

Really?

Yeah.

Interesting.

Yeah.

The matter is closing in on itself.

Right.

And it collapses with nothing to stop it.

Exactly.

Down to a singularity.

Yes.

It doesn't make any sense.

It doesn't make any sense.

So you say it must, but it can't be.

Right, it can't be.

And then we have up there and finding black holes.

Look at that.

That's so crazy.

So, so, yes, it can be completely described.

And what's interesting about it is the two black holes enter each other's event horizon.

That's where it gets fun.

Oh, really?

Yeah.

What if there isn't a dominant black hole?

What if they are both mirror identities?

What happens then?

Oh, you because you're imagining in most scenarios, one black hole is like

dominant.

Yeah, one black hole is just like, you know, you're in my part of space now, and I'm hungry.

Right.

So

I got news for you.

We're going to be one black hole, but it's going to be me.

Did you one time imitate a black hole eating a.

No, you had some voice.

What was that?

No, what did I do?

It was something.

Oh, no.

Because I was saying black holes are just like.

Hey, hey, hey.

That is exactly what they would sound like.

Oh, my goodness.

If they spoke English, where your sound could move through space, that's what they'd be saying.

Another black hole, a testy snack.

Okay.

So, yeah, but that's my point of my concept is that one of them would be dominant always.

But the math doesn't, it doesn't, it doesn't care.

Math doesn't.

What is bigger, smaller, equal?

It doesn't make a difference.

Here's the thing: when they merge, you have a new black hole that is exactly the mass of the two of them summed together.

Oh, and that's all that counts.

That's all that counts.

And then you have a bigger black hole.

There you go.

You think we're new, but we're not new.

Did you know Tide has been upgraded to provide an even better clean and cold water?

Tide is specifically designed to fight any stain you throw at it, even in cold.

Butter?

Yep.

Chocolate ice cream?

Sure thing.

Barbecue sauce?

Tide's got you covered.

You don't need to use warm water.

Additionally, Tide pods let you confidently fight tough stains with new coldzyme technology.

Just remember, if it's got to be clean, it's got to be tide.

This is Jared Higbee, who says, greeting, Dr.

Tyson and Lord Chucky Baby.

This is Jared Higbee from Alamo, Nevada.

Is the north and south sides of a magnet actually different in any way outside of the attraction and repelling effects?

How would you determine which side of a magnet is which?

Interesting.

So, you don't have anything to go on because you can't turn them and attract or turn them and repel.

You have to determine which one is north and which one is south.

It is

completely arbitrary.

Really?

Yes.

Do tell.

Okay.

I will.

What I mean by arbitrary, it's that we all decide what to agree on, and then that's the answer.

It's not a fundamental thing in the universe that tells, this is North.

I got you.

There's no whispering secret force operating on this.

So, by definition, now think this.

Remember, like poles will do what?

They repel.

Repel, and opposite poles attract.

Okay.

Okay.

So, by definition, if you have, let's say, a bar magnet, because it'll work better.

It's easier.

And you hold it with a string in the middle and it'll turn.

The part that points north on Earth is the north pole of the magnet.

And that's it.

You just have to do that once, and that'll set all the other magnets together.

And every other magnet is just like, that's it.

That's it.

It's been decided, guys.

That's right.

There's no need to make a choice.

It's been decided for it.

It's been decided for us.

By that one.

Okay, so now, what that means is: if the north pole of your magnet is pointing to the north pole of the Earth,

where is the Earth's south magnetic pole?

Wait a minute.

If the wait, the north pole of a magnet

is pointed towards the north pole of the Earth.

What attracted it?

The south magnetic pole.

Yes, I'm almost

Now, come back, Chuck.

I need you.

That's insane.

This is the North Pole.

It's the South Pole.

Yes.

Unearthed.

Oh, my God.

That is effing ridiculous.

Yeah.

Oh, geez.

You didn't know that?

No, man.

That's crazy.

Have you thought about that?

No.

How do we, we call it at our North Pole and North magnets point to it.

Now you point a North Pole to a North Pole and it repels.

Exactly.

Something's going.

Oh, something's going on there wow that's crazy yes earth's south magnetic pole is north pole yes that's insane

i don't know what to believe anymore i can't believe anything anymore

okay so now

so now why we had someone ask from from down under you can ask what makes that the north pole of the earth at all right was that arbitrary

as well

okay yeah because from where we're sitting

well the folks in the south pole they they might have another

opinion on the matter exactly okay exactly that's another one troiky anyway that's another one that's decided by decree

arbitrary consensus

okay

and you know how we get it you ask which way is the earth spinning okay okay curl your hand take your right hand curl your fingers in the direction earth is spinning now point your thumb up.

That's the North Pole.

Yeah, look at that.

So that's it.

That's it.

But suppose most people were left-handed then.

There's no left-hand rule.

It's only a right-hand rule.

Okay, so yeah.

And now there's your point.

But plus, most people are not left-handed.

That's my point.

We're discriminating against left-handed.

Oh, I think.

See, if left people dominated,

we were dominantly left-handed, we would have probably done it the other way.

Oh, so then the North Pole would have been in the south.

Yeah, if they did the left-hand rule.

Yeah, okay.

Yeah.

You do that for any rotating object.

Right.

That's how you can say that the planet Uranus is tipped 98 degrees from the vertical.

Okay.

How's that possible if you just have another axis that's up there?

Right.

Because the right-hand ring

takes it down

down below.

That's so cool, man.

Yeah.

That's very cool.

You can have a planet that's 180 degrees flipped.

Right.

Why don't you just say, well, just call that north?

No, because the rotation is the rotation.

Yeah.

Ooh, that's so cool.

All right.

All right.

Here we go.

All right.

I think we have time for one more question.

One more.

Or two if I answer each and half the time.

I did the math.

Okay.

Go.

Here we go.

This is Hugo Dart.

He says, hello, Dr.

Tyson, Lord Nice.

This is Hugo Dart from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Brazil.

He says, with my seven-year-old daughter, Olivia, who is a big fan of your show, here's my question.

If you had to bet on one breakthrough in astrophysics happening in the next 50 years,

what would that one breakthrough be?

We would know for sure whether there was life elsewhere in the solar system, not on Earth.

Cool.

Either in the oceans of Europa or in the soils of Mars.

Right.

With where we think water has gone.

We will know for sure whether there is or there is not.

Right.

And if there is not, that's important information.

Very much so.

And if there is, that's even more important.

I think we'll know that probably in the next 30 years based on missions that are scheduled.

Another question.

So, okay, here we go.

This is Logan Sinette who says hello, Dr.

Tyson, Lord Nice.

Logan's a cool name logan is a cool name that is badass he says this is logan from phoenix arizona here have you mentioned that the best telescope discoveries are unexpected discoveries so i was wondering if the jwst has made any interesting unexpected discoveries thus far and if so which one interests you most

when i was coming up

there was the record for what's the farthest object in the universe.

Okay.

And it's measured by redshift.

So

and the with the letter Z.

And there's a mathematical form for that.

But the bigger is the Z,

the farther away the object is.

In my day, the farthest objects were Z of five.

Okay.

Okay.

When I was growing up, coming up in ranks.

We might have hit six when we built the row center 25 years ago.

The farther away it is, the closer back in time it's getting.

To the beginning of the universe.

Correct.

Right.

But not only that, start from the beginning of the universe, you couldn't make anything until the universe cooled down.

Right.

All right.

to the point where matter forms.

Like, right, atoms form.

Now we have atoms.

Now the atoms can coalesce and make stars.

Before they make stars, the universe is still expanding.

We call that the dark ages.

Hasn't made stars yet.

Oh, wow.

Okay.

We called it the dark ages.

Interesting.

All right.

JWST looks around.

Found galaxies in the dark ages.

Redshift 14.

Oh, my gosh.

14.

That's crazy.

My head is exploding.

Yeah.

So first, what?

A galaxy at Redshift 14?

Holy shit.

Okay.

A.

B.

That's in the dark ages when it ain't supposed to be.

When it's not supposed to be there.

So now we have an incongruency time-wise.

Yes.

Or we don't understand how galaxies are.

We just don't understand how galaxies form.

Correct.

Or we had a totally cool dark galaxy.

Hey, baby.

It's me, your dark galaxy.

You can call me the chocolate galaxy galaxy if you want.

That's all the time we have.

Yes.

That was great.

We got a lot in there.

Man, we got so many questions in.

Okay.

Shut up.

No, don't stop.

Shut up.

This has been Star Talk Cosmic Aquaries Edition.

Neil deGrasse Tyson, your personal astrophysicist.

As always, keep looking up.