Cosmic Queries– Multiverse Madness with Max Tegmark

47m
Do we live in one of many universes? On this episode of StarTalk, Neil deGrasse Tyson and comic co-host Chuck Nice investigate the theory of the multiverse with physicist, author, and professor Max Tegmark.

(Originally Aired March 22, 2021)

Press play and read along

Runtime: 47m

Transcript

Go from sceptic to electric in the new Toyota BZ.

Hesitant about going all electric? One drive can change your mind.

With up to an EPA estimated 314 mile range rating for front-wheel drive models and available all-wheel drive models with 338 horsepower, the Toyota BZ is built for confidence.

Conveniently charge at home or on the go with access to a wide range of compatible public charging networks, including Tesla superchargers.

Inside, enjoy a 14-inch touchscreen with an available panoramic view moonroof. Learn more at toyota.com slash BZ, the new all-electric BZ.
Toyota, let's go places.

This episode is brought to you by Progressive, where drivers who save by switching save nearly $750 on average. Plus, auto customers qualify for an average of seven discounts.

Quote now at progressive.com to see if you could save. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates national average 12-month savings of $744

by new customers surveyed who saved with Progressive between June 2022 and May 2023. Potential savings will vary.
Discounts are not available in all states and situations.

Welcome to Star Talk,

your place in the universe where science and pop culture collide.

Star Talk begins right now.

This is Star Talk. I'm your host, Neil deGrasse Tyson, your personal astrophysicist.

And this is going to be a Cosmic Aquarius edition, the ever-popular format that we started many years ago, and it just keeps going strong.

And today's topic is going to be the multiverse.

I got with me my co-host, Chuck. Hey, hey, Neil, how are you? Chuck, nice.
You know, you get in such a schooling here with all this cosmic knowledge. And

we're going to have to give you a degree of your own.

No, no, no, because then that, you know, normally once you get the degree, that means that your time at the institution is over unless you start paying more money.

Okay, so they kick you out the front door. Right.

So, so I'm just going to continue to, i'm just staying at school forever that's lifelong learner all right that's it just stay in school

well this topic is in part celebration for the release of the second star talk book and guess what that book is called chuck um let me take a stab at it could it possibly be Cosmic Query.

Cosmic Query is inspired by this very format.

There are questions that people just ask that are so deep and so interesting.

And not all of them can we get to on a podcast and so we have to like take it to the book and so there's a whole section in that book on the multiverse nice yeah yeah and i learned almost everything i know about the multiverse from our guest today and that is the one and the only max tegmark max welcome back i mean i've had you i've had you in other events at the museum for hayden planetarium um panels and things it's just always good to know you're in arm's reach of us thank you but But you know, you just said something dubious.

You said the one and only, Max Pegmark. And if you take the multiverse seriously, I'm not the one and only.
Damn, I just got schooled on my first sentence.

But Max, we go way back. I mean, when you were at the Institute for Advanced Study and I was postdocing at Princeton, I think that's when I first met you and I followed your career.

It's been a brilliant melange of topics that are just so interesting.

And the multiverse is the least among them that I have found interesting in your career. So we'll have to have you back for other topics for sure.

Plus, Chuck. Wow, that is a serious compliment.

If the universe is a side,

it's a side gig.

Multiple universes are the least interesting thing.

I'm sorry.

I'm leveling with you here.

To be honest, guys, it has been officially my side gig all along, just so I wouldn't tank my career with it.

Because like when I was a grad student, I was already fascinated by this, but nobody else seemed to be. And it was generally considered a bit too fringe.

So I played the multiverse very close to my chest.

And I didn't even... I even wrote some papers when I was a grad student.
I didn't show my advisor until after he had signed my PhD thesis. Under a pseudonym, John Doe.
Yes. Okay.

Oh, that's so funny.

And it's so weird how now gradually some of these topics have actually come in a bit from the cold and gone from being just considered career ending to being things that are considered legitimate scientific controversies that we actually talk about openly at physics conferences.

So you're a professor of physics at MIT, of course, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, basically up the street in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

And Chuck, I've always been jealous of this man's name. It's like movie star Max Tegmark.

It does. It's, you know, it could be either the star of the show or the producer.
This is a Max Tegmark. Production.

Yeah,

it works either way.

All of the above.

And Max, you've got a couple of books under your belt, at least.

One of my favorites is Our Mathematical Universe, where you argue that everything is math. And if everything is math, someone could have programmed it that way.
And And so a brilliant exercise there.

And of course, Life 3.0,

where you're exploring the future of what we even think of as life. And I've enjoyed both of those books.

So thanks for, I think of them as a gift to civilization to share in how you think about this world. And I enjoyed the conversation that I heard on NPR about your book, about...

about

mathematical universe. Okay.

But now we have the guy, we got him ourselves

Exactly. You know, actually, I changed the name of that book in the last second for reasons we're going to talk about now.
The first title was The Mathematical Universe.

And then I thought, that's so arrogant. If we really believe that there are other universes, we shouldn't just say the universe, ours.

We should talk about, be more humble and acknowledge that it might just be that our universe. might not be the only one.
Okay. All right.

So we went through a brief last-minute title change so that you wouldn't sound like an a-hole about this.

We used to talk about the solar system and then we realized, oops, there are others, right? Yeah. Or, yeah, or the universe.
And

we're not saying that anymore. It's our universe.
I like that.

It's a good shift for that. You changed the universe into the humble verse.
That's cool. Ooh, humble verse.
Very good. Chuck, making up words on the spot.

So, Max, tell me what motivated people to, you and your, you know, either you early on when you were doing this sort of under the cover of night, to what is now mainstream research on the multiverse?

What motivated it? Well, I think, first of all, throughout human history, you know, we've had this epiphany again and again that, hey, stuff is bigger than we thought.

And we, you know, we used to go into it with this hubristic assumption that all we knew about was all there was, kind of like an ostrich with a head in the sound. And then people realized.

Oh, by the way, the corollary to it's bigger than we thought is we're littler than we thought.

The flip side of that point, we realized actually we're part of this huge, we're standing on this huge round ball in space, which in turn is just part of this gigantic solar system, part of a galaxy, part of a cluster of galaxies, part of a supercluster, part of this that we then would call our universe.

And, you know, why stop there? So

people started wondering, could there be still more? And the earliest people got into much more trouble, you know, than I ever did in grad school.

Like Giordano Bruno, 400 years ago, started talking about how maybe space went on forever. And you know what happened to him, right?

Yeah, he was burned at the stake upside down

with

something plugged into his mouth. Wow.
So that even in death, he could not repeat these heresies.

They drove a stake into his mouth so that even when he died you know you know that's what i liked about that time overkill overkill everything was overkill

so you know

now you know i went to campo dei fiore actually in rome where this happened and i started to think you know compared to that that just getting burned on the job market there's a lot less of a threat so we're making some progress and it's a little bit of progress but uh what's just to be clear that square that uh in in in Italy, there is, in all fairness, there is a statue to him where he's looking very solemn, but it's a very honorific statue in his memory.

It is.

Small consolation for being burned by the state.

I'll take life. You keep your statue.
Is that what you're telling me?

Thank you. Exactly.
But you asked this very good question. What drove us to these things? And it's basically just

natural logical steps. You know, Euclid himself postulated that that space is infinite, right?

And when we were kids and we started wondering, does this space go on forever? It seemed pretty natural that there wouldn't just be an end to it, right?

So if you just take that idea logically, then that means that the part we can see, right, this, is finite because light has only reached us from this spherical region that it could get here from during the 13.8 billion years since our Big Bang.

So if that's what we call our universe, then

by definition, there are others, other regions of space just as big, just as cool. And it's sort of hard to dismiss.

Right now, I don't have a single astrophysics colleague anymore who thinks space magically ends right at that edge.

And in fact, you can just wait one day and you see some more light arriving from farther away, right?

And then,

so that's what I call the level one multiverse. just other regions of space that we haven't had any access to.
But then it it gets it gets kind of weirder so

so initially the it wasn't that people were motivated to try to answer some other question they just more fully explored what we were already thinking and already knew to be true about the universe so in that sense it's not some epiphany it's just an extension of what we're already thinking is that a fair way to think about your level one multiverse i think so and i think a lot of the pushback honestly wasn't really based on science so much but based on arrogant hubris you know uh we

the reason pope urban VIII or whatever was so pissed at Galileo, you know, wasn't because he had a good scientific argument, but he was so stuck to the idea that we, everything orbits around us, you know, we humans are so important.

And we didn't like to be demoted to just being an average planet in an average solar system orbiting a galaxy, et cetera, et cetera. And I think we see still a little bit of that today.

Some people argue that they don't like this idea of reality being even bigger just because it makes their egos feel even smaller.

After the last four years, I can't imagine that people would actually

hold to those sentiments.

All right. So what I don't know, because I haven't quizzed people, is what are they thinking of when they hear multiverse?

And my sense is they're thinking maybe a parallel universe that you might be able to sort of move between at some distant future time.

So is there any truth to the concept of a parallel universe universe in the way it's commonly thought of in the public? Is there an evil Chuck somewhere?

With a goatee? Oh, you already have a goatee.

Is there a clean, shaven evil Chuck?

You are the evil Chuck, Chuck. Oh, you are the good Chuck.

Oh, my God, that's right. Just think that through.

What's incredibly confusing here is that different people mean different things when they say universe and they mean they talk about different kinds of.

And in fact, I remember once, very vividly, Martin Rees had organized a conference in his house about these forbidden topics. And I just heard too much.
Chuck, these are the kind of friends we have.

You get that,

you get invited for tea and you've solved the issues of the universe. Okay, go ahead.

You know, this was considered pretty taboo back then, but because Martin was organizing it, people still came and behaved. And, but I noticed that two people were arguing about the multiverse.

And I realized they're talking past each other. One guy was talking about what we call the inflationary multiverse, which is just really big space.
And we can get back to that.

Another guy was talking about the quantum multiverse. And they thought they were talking about the same thing.
So I felt I have, I stood up and said, hey, wait a minute.

Aren't there actually three different, no, four different kinds of multiverse that we should give different names to to not confuse ourselves so much?

And then I wrote that up in the book you mentioned. But just to be clear, the book that you're talking about is,

you posted something. It's online, which is a very clean and clear exposition of the multiple levels of the multiverse.

And that's what we referenced when we included, when we fleshed out our section on the multiverse in Cosmic Query.

So I just want to be clear that, you know, you're not just pulling this out of your ass. This is, you've thought about this for a long time.
So

I think it's very important to just be clear on what we're talking about. Yeah, thank you.
So if by our universe, we mean what astronomers call our observable universe.

It's just a spherical region of space from which light has reached us so far, you know, this.

Then what I call the level one multiverse is just other parts of space that are so far away that light hasn't reached us yet.

Level two multiverse is what you get if you take seriously Alan Guth and Andre Linde and others and the theory of inflation that made our space so big, which says that far, far away in the same space now, you have something much more diverse than you might have thought, where even the number number of different kind of quarks could be different or the sort of forces that are there are different, and we can talk about why.

And then there's this third kind, and that's what gets more into the parallel evil feeling thing, which has to do with studying not the big, but the very small, studying quantum mechanics, where you can argue, and people love arguing about that at physics conferences, that in some sense,

our reality... feels like it's splitting out into parallel branches.
And that's the whole, if that is true, you can tap into that weirdness by building quantum computers.

And then finally, there's the fourth one, which is so weird that almost nobody except myself believes in it, which is the biggest. And I think of all of this as basically Russian dolls.

They're nested. They're all inside of each other, right? You start with our universe, many of those, that's level one.

Many of those, that makes level two, many of those makes level three, and many of those makes the ultimate one, the fourth level.

So

these are multiverses of multiverses. That's right.
That's right.

But the only one that ever gets any real attention is that kind of, you know,

tree limb version that you put pick that you depicted, this splintering,

you know, where there's so many different infinite paths that are separate, yet existing simultaneously.

That seems to be the one that captures the imagination of every sci-fi writer and even Rick and Morty, which is like a hugely popular show.

I mean, it's like it's, it's, you know,

because I think you could do so much with it. You know, there's an infinite number of Ricks and they're all geniuses.

So they, you know, so how I mean, you have an unlimited

reservoir of stories to tell. Chuck, Chuck Max is Rick.

Meet Saw. His fantasy lineup, not so great.
A no-name QB and an injured rookie running back. But you know what is great?

Getting a single-line unlimited plan for $35 a month and a free Samsung Galaxy A155G at Cricket Wireless. No injuries, just reliable service.

Cricket may temporarily sell data speeds up the network as busy. Must bring your number to Cricket on Select Unlimited Plan.
Pay $40 first month, new lines only.

First month service charge and tax due at sale. Cricket 5G is not available everywhere.
Fees, terms, and restrictions apply. See CricketWireless.com for details.

A question for all the gamers out there. Are you seriously going to miss out on Alienware's biggest gaming sale of the year?

I mean, these are Cyber Monday prices we're talking about, so it's not just another sale. This is some pretty big bang for your buck.

You know, it's Alienware with some of the most advanced engineering out there with systems at the top of reviewers lists. And what about a gift for yourself?

Gift yourself a new Alienware 16 Area 51 gaming laptop. This thing's got performance at the absolute next level with Intel Core ultra-processors.
And even better, you can get it during Cyber Monday.

Plus, you can save on all kinds of displays and accessories, like the Alienware 32 4K QD OLED gaming monitor for ultimate visual fidelity.

These are really incredible deals on PCs with otherworldly performance. So visit alienware.com slash deal soon and grab what you can before the lowest prices of the year go dark.

With masterclass, learning from the world's best fits right into your life.

Explore thousands of bite-sized lessons across 13 categories, from cooking and writing to business and entrepreneurship, all taught by people who have mastered their class.

Hey, maybe you want a personal masterclass from, I don't know, say Neil deGrasse Tyson. Well, guess what? It's there.

And memberships start at just $10 a month and come with a 30-day money-back guarantee. And it works.
83% of members have applied something they've learned.

And most say it had a positive impact on their lives. With Masterclass, you can learn anytime, anywhere, from the best in the world.

Right now, I'm learning more about generative AI, and it is fascinating stuff and a little scary. This holiday season, why don't you give the gift of learning to someone else or yourself?

Masterclass always has great offerings during the holidays, sometimes as much as 50% off. Head over to masterclass.com slash Star Talk for the current offer.

That's up to 50% off at masterclass.com slash Star Talk. Masterclass.com slash Star Talk.

Hi, I'm Ernie Carducci from Columbus, Ohio. I'm here with my son Ernie because we listen to Star Talk every night and support Star Talk on Patreon.
This is Star Talk with Neo DeGrasse

Tyson.

Chuck, you've got questions for us. Let's do it.

Okay, let's just jump right into all the questions that we have taken from our Patreon patrons, people who support us out of their substance to keep our show going.

So, thank you guys for your support. And if you are listening to this and you want to be a Patreon member, go to patreon.com slash start talk

and give us some support. And maybe I'll read yourself how you're going to end that.
Yeah, yeah.

Maybe I'll think about reading you. No, of course I'm joking.
Of course, I'll read your letter and I'll butcher your name. No doubt.

No doubt. Here we go.

All right. This is Eric Gross.
He says, hello, fellow Earthikins. Can you explain the mind-boggling idea

of

infinite infinities?

Oh, wow.

Wow. That's a good one.
Wow. That's a great question.

Wait, so Max,

let's start simple and let me ask you, what does it mean for one infinity to be bigger than another?

And then let's take it from that into that directly into the question. Let's drive the truck right into that question.

One infinity big. Wait a minute, guys.
Give me one second here. Wait, what? Wait, what, Chuck?

All right.

Sorry. I got to get this little pipe here.

You know,

if we're going to talk about one infinity being bigger than another, I'm just saying.

I need to be prepared. The pipe has to be right there.
Okay. So if you have a pile of oranges and you have a pile of apples and you want to know, is it the same number of apples as oranges?

The way you do it is if you can pair up each apple with exactly one orange, you say the two numbers are the same. So now play that game with infinities and weird stuff happens.

Let me, for example, you might think that there are more numbers, one, two, three, four, five, than there are even numbers, two, four, six.

But they're actually the same. because you can pair them up.
I can pair up one with two. I can pair up eight with 16.
I pair up every number with one that's twice as big, which is always even.

So it's very counterintuitive. So for a while, mathematicians start to think.
But just to be clear, you just said something, but not everyone knows this. Yeah.
Max, that

twice any number,

any whole number is always an even number. Thanks for clarifying.
Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah. That is always the case.
So you can't take twice anything and end up twice a whole number and get an odd number.

So when you say twice the number, that's always even, that's a fundamental fact about mathematics. Okay.
That's right. And

the quite weird conclusion is that some infinities, which intuitively would seem like they're much bigger, are actually all the same size.

And some mathematicians start to think maybe all infinities are the same size. But then George Cantor came along and said, no, there are some infinities that are even bigger.

And he proved famously that the number of real numbers, like 3.1415 with infinitely many decimals, that there are actually more of those than the numbers you can count and after that people have realized that there's this whole tower of infinity so what that what's that got to do with parallel universes and this question well it's got a lot to do actually with the level one and the level two multiverse because wait wait chuck has to take a toque okay go ahead

toque break yes exactly so so let me so far this is good this is great i mean take a deep breath because i'm going to tell you one of of the things that I find the weirdest.

This is one of the weirdest things I believe to be true. And if Max finds it weird, brace yourself.
Go. Right, exactly.
It is actually impossible.

It is, according to Einstein's theory of general relativity, possible to take a little piece of space, just finite,

and inside of there, make an infinite space that doesn't stick out anywhere. And actually, infinitely many, and make many different infinite spaces inside of this finite thing.

So Alan Guth, Andre Linde, and others came up with this most popular theory we have so far for what put the bang into our big bang, right?

And made this expanding universe of ours, starting with something tinier than an atom. It's very, very big.

And the ultimate party trick is inside of this tiny region, they can not only make one space, which when you live in it, feels infinite. That's the level one multiverse for you in there.

So it has room for infinitely many of our universes. but you can have infinitely many of those within there.
And so you can have an infinite number of infinitely large universes in a finite universe.

Basically, that's why it feels so utterly weird. And the way that general relativity kind of pulls this trick

is because even though it was a finite volume of space,

it has an infinite amount of future time to play with. And it keeps stretching the space.

And then general relativity has this funny thing where it can kind of mix up space and time so that for someone who lives inside this what they consider to be space was something that you might have considered a little bit of time and uh

i don't want to get too nerdy about this but you know einstein told us that what really we should

only now are you saying you don't want to get too nerdy

it's only just occurred to you now i think i already blew it but

you know einstein told us right that we shouldn't think of reality as a three-dimensional place where stuff happens, but rather as time being just the fourth dimension in this never-changing place called space-time.

So

if life is a movie, then space-time is the whole DVD.

And basically, because you have this infinite future time to mess with, if you can sort of bend your definition of what space is in there, This is how Alan Guth and Andrew Linde and Alex Volankin and others have demonstrated this apparently crazy thing, that maybe everything we see here in infinity of infinities

could actually be emerging inside of this little bubble so just to clarify your dvd analogy what you're saying is we live as prisoners of the present transitioning from our past to our future so we experience a moment in time and many places in space but if you have the whole dvd of the movie then your entire timeline is manifest in that place

in that all at once all at once All the time. Your life is in that DVD, and you can have random access to it

if you can move throughout the time coordinate. Is that a fair

reference to how you use the concept of DVD? It is. It is.
And

that's right. Einstein even told some of his friends that they shouldn't worry much about his death because he argued that it's just from a space-time perspective, an illusion.
It's not like... Right.

Because I'm already dead, man.

And so are you.

We're all dead, man, and we're not. I haven't even been born yet, man.

And I'm dead. What? It is pretty weird, Chuck.
I mean, I'm sure sometimes people come up to you when they're lost and ask, hey, excuse me, but where am I, right?

But they never come and ask, when am I?

Right. In colloquial English, we treat time as a very different sort of thing as space.

Whereas when we say what's the time, that's actually very arrogant.

Just like talking about the universe or the solar system.

What is the time? I mean, that's saying that somehow the instant when we're having this experience is the only time.

I mean, all the other times, past and present in space-time, have just as much claim to be real. They certainly felt real to people who had experiences then, right?

So if we want to be a little bit more rigorous, we should always go ask people, excuse me, when am I? And then you can ask

you right now at this particular time having this experience. Wow.
Okay. So that doesn't have the arrogance that it otherwise would by asking, what is the time?

I mean, it's like going up and saying, what is the place?

Right.

Of course, where I am is the only place.

All right, Chuck, give me some more questions. All right.
Wow, that was

way to kick things off. That is something else.
All right, let's move on to,

you know,

that other level you talk about. This is Chris Hampton.
Could the parallel universe theory and the multiverse theory be combined?

For example, we are living in a universe with billions of other organisms, but what if each organism in the universe is itself

a universe on a relative scale?

Each one, thus, containing billions of organisms, so on and so on. So he's taking your nesting doll and breaking it all the way down to every single organism.
Right, but yeah, he's thinking, I mean,

so Max, if we have as a lead into that, the early concept of the atom, where people said, oh my gosh, atoms have structure and there's a nucleus and there's electrons. orbiting.

So that's just like the solar system. So maybe it's like turtles all the way down.
So how do we go from

any understanding of

scales of

everything's just on a different scale rather than something that's a completely different universe unto itself? Yeah, very good question.

We see, of course, in nature this really beautiful hierarchy, right?

You have some quarks stuck together into neutrons and protons that are stuck together into this big thing we call a nucleus, stuck together in an atom.

And then you can make molecules and cells and you can make Neil deGrasse Tyson and this society and a planet and the galaxy, et cetera. What's different about the hierarchy of universes is

it's not just that the hierarchy exists, but by definition, I like to define a universe, our universe, as everything that we could possibly

have any access to with unlimited funding and never mind other stuff that's in the way, right?

So if you're one person in a society, there are a lot of people you haven't met, but you could in principle meet them.

So they're not part of another universe you could in principle go to uruguay even if you've never been there right but you can never go a hundred billion light years in that direction even if you wanted to it's it's just off limits to you that's basically the definition i think is helpful about universe um okay but otherwise we'd use the term sort of poetically or metaphorically like the cell is a universe unto itself yeah you know so i think that's fair poetically but you're saying from the world of physics no that's not how we use the term yeah exactly and i mean it's whatever

we need to have we should have a word for everything we can access it's very important for us especially in the future both if we're curious that's the limits of what we can observe and if we're ambitious that's also setting very roughly the limits of where we could ever go in the future so if you don't want to call it universe call it schmooniverse or make up another word for it but it deserves to be called something right and we where space i think is a word that's better used to actually describe all of space,

and it's not the same thing. Space is probably bigger than our universe.

We have confirmed that Chuck lives in the Schmooniverse, just to be yes, the schmooniverse is where all dismissive people live, universe, schmooniverse,

yeah, whatever.

I don't mind the tunaverse. Now you're making me hungry.

Uh, well, Chris Hampton, actually, uh, it looks like like he from what you just said is speaking of smoking is that whole hey man there's a universe in my thumbnail like that whole vibe that's that seems to be where he's coming from

but it is you i like what you said neil the reason people use it poetically in that sense is because we think we refer to things poetically as a universe onto its own basically if it really is doing its own thing and not interacting with the rest, right?

Which is what we're trying to capture scientifically here.

Okay. So now,

I want to ask my own question, but I don't want to take up these people's time. Chuck, are you a Patreon member? If not, shut the hell up and read the next question.
Okay.

Well, Neil, I got to tell you, you have bested me, sir, because that was a damn good point.

Oh, my God. Hold on.
Now I got to go online right now.

I got to get on Patreon right now

so I can ask my question. All right, here we go.
This is Curtis.

Oh, man, you really got me with that one. Okay.
This is Curtis, Curtis Lee Zeidelhak,

I think.

Zeitelhack. He says, first and foremost, my name is pronounced Zydelhawk.
Okay, so I okay, I was wrong, but I got it close.

Conceptually, I do not really understand how a multiverse affects our universe. What is the most important

effect

on our universe?

Support for StarTalk comes from the Sierra Club. From space, Earth is a small blue dot spinning and alive because of the intricate systems that sustain it.

America's public lands, such as national parks, are an essential part of those systems that keep our planet healthy.

That's why for over 130 years, the Sierra Club has fought to protect these vital ecosystems.

But right now, public lands are facing monumental threats, heightened by corporate greed, weakened protections, and deep budget and staff cuts to government agencies.

The Sierra Club is fighting back hard to protect public lands through science-based advocacy, legal action, and grassroots organizing. Because the future of our planet is worth fighting for.

Join the fight today. This is the moment to show up together.
Right now, all gifts are matched, increasing your impact to help these natural systems endure. Donate at sieraclub.org slash star talk

and do it today. The holidays are back at Starbucks, so share the season with a peppermint mocha.

Starbucks signature espresso, velvety mocha, and cool peppermint notes, topped with whipped cream and dark chocolate curls. Together is the best place to be at Starbucks.

You know, starting your own business is a dream lots of us share, but too many of us let it remain just a dream.

Don't hold yourself back thinking, what if I don't have the skills or what if I can't do it alone? Turn those what-ifs into why-nots with Shopify by your side.

Shopify is the e-commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world and 10% of all e-commerce in the United States, from household names to brands just getting started.

What if I can't design a website? Shopify has got you from the get-go with beautiful ready-to-go templates to match your brand style. What if I need a hand?

Well, get help with everyday tasks like enhancing product images, writing product descriptions, or generating discount codes with Shopify's AI tools created for commerce.

Turn those dreams into dollars and give them the best shot shot at success with Shopify. Sign up for your $1 per month trial and start selling today at shopify.com slash Star Talk.

Go to Shopify.com slash Star Talk. Shopify.com slash Star Talk.

I love the question you just asked before we got cut off there about what's the evidence for this? Is this just silly.

Yeah, Chuck, who asked that again? That would be Curtis Zeitelhawk. Yeah, he's wondering, do we feel, see

this other universe? And so another official way to say that is, do we have experimental evidence that they exist? Right. Or is this just what you talk about

at the beer halls? It's a really great question because by definition of

what you mean by universe, you are not affected by things outside of it. So isn't that by definition untestable? And the interesting thing is, no,

that's not true.

First of all, if you just take the theory that space is actually much bigger than we thought and with more stuff in it, right?

If that's false, that would mean that actually things kind of end at exactly the edge that we can see now. That's very testable.
You just wait a little bit.

And then light from farther away reaches you and keeps coming into view. And so we've already falsified that many times over.
Now,

there's a more profound way in which you can test this also, though. We have to remember in science, right, we test theories.

And for a theory to be testable, you don't have to be able to test everything that it predicts, just at least one thing. Take Einstein's theory of general relativity, right?

It predicts all sorts of stuff that we can observe. like how Mercury orbits around the sun in a

different way than people thought it was supposed to because of Newton.

We can test that. We can test how light is bent by gravity, et cetera.

But it also predicts what happens inside of black holes, which you know very well, we cannot go and observe a thing, come back and tell our friends about it. Why do we still take it seriously?

What happens inside black holes? Because this theory of general relativity has passed so many of the tests that we could test. that we also start taking seriously its untestable predictions.

And you can't just do, say, well, I know, I kind of like what Einstein's theory predicts for the motion of Mercury and gravitational lensing and yada, yada, yada, but I don't like the interior black holes.

I'm just going to opt out of that. Like if I go to Starbucks and say, I want my coffee, but I'm going to opt out of the caffeine and have decaf.
That's not the way science works.

If you want to opt out of the black holes, then go come up with your own gravitational theory, which doesn't have black holes in it, but still succeeds in everything Einstein's theory did.

That turns out to be such a tall order that despite a lot of smart people trying, you know, for 100 years, they've all failed. So, wow, so what's that got to do with the multiverse?

Well, replace general relativity now with the theory of inflation that we talked about. It makes a bunch of testable predictions.

It predicts that our universe should be expanding, that it should be very uniform.

Just to be clear, you're not actually replacing general relativity, you're enclosing it

in

inflation. Isn't that correct? Correct.
Thank you for correcting me. We take generativity and then we add

some additional assumptions to it, that there is a certain kind of substance there, which behaves in a certain way.

And then we do the math and it predicts all sorts of things that we've tested now successfully with great prediction, like these ripples in the microwave background, their statistical patterns.

For example, I've worked, as you know, a lot on trying to rule out this theory of inflation and I've failed. And because of that, we take it seriously.

And we also have to then take seriously the things inflation predicts that we cannot test, such as that space is actually way bigger than our universe.

Okay, I think that's an excellent, excellent way to think about it.

So, so if the one theory has these multiple consequences, it's okay if some of them you'll never, you can't or you never will, if the ones that you can test turn out to be correct.

And you say, if this is correct, I'm going to take a stronger look over. I'm going to start thinking about this.

By the way, is it fair to say, Max, that if you explore the things you cannot measure, you might come up with a discovery that you can measure.

Very true, too, because very often when people have been going off and thinking about these things, which they knew they could never test,

they came, it led them to ask questions, what led them back

into a whole fresh way. Could test.
Excellent.

For example, another very good reason, not just, we shouldn't think of these cool things just because they're fun, but they often turn out to be very useful.

People started thinking about what the ultimate building blocks of matter were and atoms and so on. And people for a long time thought that was completely useless.

But then by thinking about that, they invented quantum mechanics, which gave us the whole computer technology, which lets us have this podcast now and so on. And

that's a so and that's another example actually of exactly this same question.

The quantum parallel universes, of course, we can't visit them either. But quantum mechanics predicts so much else that we can test.

And it's turned out to be very, very difficult to come up with a theory of physics that predicts only the

sort of creation mechanism for a universe that creates only the part we can see and then stops and doesn't make anything more. So let me ask you this

with respect to what you're saying. Chuck, you're not a Patreon member yet.

That's right. You never know what I did during the break.
I don't know what you did during the break. That's right.

I'll let you slip one in and go. All right.

So, Max, with respect to what you just said, are there things that we are able to observe or at least able to observe the forces thereof that remain a mystery that may in some way be attached to the multiverse theory?

I would say. Isn't that what we just answered?

Are you saying, Chuck, if the multiverse is what it is, is there some piece of it dangling and visible in our own universe?

Yes, that we're observing.

But we're actually observing, but it's still a mystery. Like, you know, are there mysteries that are observable that...
Oh, I got it, Chuck.

I'm going to recast your question. You ready, Chuck? Okay, go ahead.
Are there...

deep mysteries in our own universe that could themselves be evidence of a multiverse and we have yet to put the two together. How's that, Chuck? That's what I'm saying.

But it's not what you said. You so you mangled it.

But I didn't mangle it enough that you didn't know what I was saying.

And I will answer it with a resounding yes. Okay.
Take dark energy, for example.

We all know by now that we have no clue what 95% of our universe is made of, and most of it is made of this weird stuff called dark energy.

And what's really odd about it is when you work out exactly how much there is in the sort of most natural units of measurement that we would do in physics, we get this number, which is 0.00000 with 123 zeros and then one.

And we wonder, like, why is that?

It turns out if you look closer, that if you have a little bit more, we would all be dead. There wouldn't be any galaxies actually ever formed.

And if you had less, so this was a bit negative, we would be inside of a black hole by now and also not having this conversation.

So why is it that our universe was so fine-tuned that the amount of dark energy was dialed into just that very special value that let us have this conversation? That is one of the exact

mysteries, Chuck, I think that you're fishing for here.

Some people said, Well, tough luck. We sometimes we're just lucky.
Let's just be grateful for it and shut up.

Other people said, Maybe this is evidence that we were designed either by a divine being or by some simulator who tuned our universe specially to be able to have life

in the parents' basement. They did this, yes, sir.

And then, but then, if you actually have a parallel, this thing with space being very big, with parallel universes, with all sorts of different values of that knob setting in different places, suddenly you have an actual simple explanation for this.

The picture you get then is that the bigger space is like the Sahara Desert. It's mostly just a barren wasteland with no galaxies.
But in a few places, you know, that knob is set just right.

And you have an oasis where there is life and there are galaxies and there is star talk, you know, and surprise, surprise. Of course, that's where we're going to be having these conversations.

But just to be clear, it's not that it was set that way.

It's that if you have an infinite or a huge number of these universes where the knobs are set at random, one of those random knob settings will be the right combination for us.

It's like tuning your dial up and down. What used to be radio kids? There used to be a thing.

Used to be this thing called radio guys, where you would actually tune your dial, and like most of it was just white noise and empty.

But every once in a while, you would come across somebody talking or some music or something like that.

Oh, that is freaking brilliant. God, I love science.

Okay, keep going. All right, here we go.
Here we go. We got a few minutes left.
See if we can squeeze them all in. All right, here we go.
This is Woody.

And Woody says, What are your thoughts on how a multiverse could actually begin? Would each one require a big bang? And how many of those would end up with a chuck being possible okay

the chuck averse yeah

yeah that ain't

whatever yeah so max does everyone have a big bang just like us that's a great question yeah so i've actually had a total rethink about the big bang concept because first i was taught that that's the beginning

And now it's pretty clear if you take inflation theory seriously, you should think of the Big Bang just as the end of this crazy creative inflation process in our little part of space, when things calm down enough that you can make galaxies and

a kneel and a chuck. And in other places, it kind of keeps going.
And so even if you have only one bang, but that it keeps going at infinitum,

you will end up having many, many different regions where it stops. And you get what we would call a level one multiverse with the universe.
So all it takes is ultimately one bang. to get it all.

And if you have each one of those places where it stops being actually actually infinite then no matter how unlikely it is that you chuck a rise because the particles started out in exactly the right configurations for your mom to meet your dad and all of that the probability wasn't zero because it happened here and you're rolling the dice infinitely many times now right so it's guaranteed

Well, there you go. And by the way, both my parents lost on that bet.
So on the roll of that dice. I mean, with by making you, is that what you're saying?

All right.

Believe me, I was not a good kid. All right.
Keep it going. This is, here we go.
This is Cameron Bishop. Hello, Max.
Hello, Neil. I've always been curious.

Is it flawed to ask what's between these universes?

Is that measurable space?

That's a great question.

So between the different level one multiverses and the level two multiverse, there is still space, but that space in between is still doing this inflation thing and doubling its size over and over and over and in regular intervals that's why it's impenetrable because

if you start flying through go for a while and now you're still farther away from where you're supposed to go it's expanding faster than you can gain distance through it exactly exponentially okay all right that's great that's super cool all right but wait wait but in the quantum multiverse there are actually whole other space-times it's not one space-time system right but yeah the quantum multiverse the level three lives in the bigger space we call Hilbert space, which may even have infinitely many dimensions.

I hear the rents there

out of control. The Hilbert space.
Yeah, property values are just off the charts in Hilberg.

Something has to be done about Hilberg, damn it.

So what would you call what was between those quantum universes?

In the quantum case, it's much more tricky.

When quantum mechanics was first invented, people didn't know about this phenomenon called decoherence.

It was only discovered by Hans Thieter Tse in 1970, and he should be more famous than he is, which is a kind of censorship mechanism that explains why we don't experience all those other weird quantum realities if they're actually there.

Basically, what comes out of the math is that these quantum superpositions, as they're called, they only survive as long as they're kept secret.

And whenever something gets really big, you know, air molecules bounce off, photons bounce off, and the secret is out. It's like you tell a friend, they tell a friend, and so on.

And that's why big things like us always seem to only be in one place at once. And we can only experience and measure quantum weirdness with tiny things that can keep their properties secret.

So, Chuck, time for that last toque on that pipe.

Yeah, man.

I'm telling you right there. That's

wow.

That was cool. What's it called?

What's it called? De-what now? Decoherence. Decoherence.
No, here's Chuck. When your kids are babbling on and you don't know what they're saying, say, stop being decoherent.

Yeah, don't be decoherent, okay?

You quantum dummy. That's worse than incoherent.
You are decoherent. You are decoherent.
Yeah, they're just decohereing the whole conversation.

Chuck, give me one last question and see if Max has a soundbite in him to answer because that's all the time we have left for it. Go.
Okay. This is Jay Hunt.
Greetings, Neil and Max.

This is Jeff from Titan. My question is.

Titan, the moon of Saturn, I guess. Okay.
Yeah, you got to love that, right?

My question is. That means it's full of methane gas, just so you know.

Gotta cut down on those beans, man.

Yeah, watch out for the beans. Right, go on.

My question is,

is a new multiverse created every time we make a this or that decision? So the idea that the infinite number of possibilities are not actually possibilities until we make one of those possibilities.

Fantastic question about the level three multiverse.

Basically, if you make a snap decision that you're really torn about, right, what ends up happening might come down to the position of a single little calcium ion somewhere in some synaptic junction.

and where depending on where it is of your brain yeah off the things go and you end up with a completely different pattern and either you decide to say yes to that date and live happily ever after or say no and do something different right so that can a micro superposition can get amplified into something that's so different macroscopically that this decoherence thing comes along and makes these two things really really separate so in that sense yes when you make a decision that really could have made both ways you are, in a sense, if the level three multiverse is real, creating two parallel realities.

They're equally real. And each one of you is only, of course, aware of one outcome and is going to think that's all that happened.
Oh, my God.

That is crazy. I love that.
That is awesome. I love that.
Oh, my God. Oh, right now.
So it means you created another Chuck, but you're only this Chuck. And so that's all you know.

That other guy is actually happy. And he's having fun.

I try to look at that every time I get a parking ticket, you know, that there's some other parallel universe where I didn't.

But then I think a bit more and realize there's another parallel universe where I got towed.

You win some, you lose some. All right.
Max, we got to call it quits there. It's been a delight to have you on.

It's always great to talk to you and probe your brain for all the fun stuff that you're thinking about. So thanks for being on Star Talk.
Chuck, always good to have you. Always a pleasure.
All right.

This has been Star Talk Cosmic Queries, the multiverse edition neil the grasp tyson bidding you to keep looking up

this episode of star talk is brought to you by mcdonald's there's always somebody who wants to ruin the holidays turns out the grinch has taken over mcdonald's with a meal full of mischief even the fries aren't safe he hits them with the dill pickle grinch salt the collectible socks, marked property of the Grinch, and the Grinch mealbox, gift-wrapped with pure mischief.

So if you're ready to let the Grinch ruin your season, grab a Grinch meal for yourself before he heads back to Mount Crumpet.

Only at McDonald's at participating McDonald's for a limited time while supplies last. Hey, Fidelity.

How can I remember to invest every month?

With the Fidelity app, you can choose a schedule and set up recurring investments in stocks and ETFs. Huh, that sounds easier than I thought.
You got this. Yeah, I do.
Now, where did I put my keys?

You will find them where you left them.

Investing involves risk, including risk of loss. Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC member NYSE SIPC.