Jared Moskowitz and Zeke Faux: Scams Galore

Looking to transform your business through better HR and payroll?

Meet PayCore, the powerhouse solution that empowers leaders to drive results.

From recruiting and development to payroll and analytics,

PayCore connects you with the people, data, and expertise you need to succeed.

Their innovative platform helps you make smarter decisions about your most valuable asset,

your people.

Ready to become a better leader?

Visit PayCore.com slash leaders to learn more. That's paycor.com slash leaders.
Hello and welcome to the Borg podcast. I'm your host, Tim Miller.
Super pumped to have a reporter today who is focused on something that I'm obsessed with. He's the investigative reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek and Bloomberg News and author of Number Go Up, Inside Crypto's Wild Rise and Staggering Fall, out now in paperback.
It's Zeke Fox to talk all things crypto. How are you doing, Zeke? Great.
Thanks for having me on, Tim. Dude, thanks for doing this.
I'm obsessed with this. I'm of the view that the crypto scams will probably be a top three to five story of the trump years when all is all is said and done and i think that a lot of the media outlets don't give this quite as much attention because like the the demographics of the news consumers don't overlap with crypto world much a lot of them like don't really even understand it and And then a lot of the people in the journalist world have such contempt or just culturally are separate from the types of folks that are really into crypto.
And so it leads to not getting ignored. And obviously, you're not ignoring it.
But I'm wondering if you kind of agree with my assessment of, obviously, I would assume you agree that this is undercover. It's your beat.
I wonder what you think about that, about my assessment for why. Definitely.
I mean, the crypto guys are very good at making it seem like they have a lot of jargon. They make it seem like there's some sort of really complicated and important technology that we're talking about.
And it makes you think in your back of your mind, if you don't know that much about this, like, or even if you do, you're like, it can't possibly be as dumb as it sounds, could it? And the answer is yes. And in fact, it's even dumber.
Okay. So I want to do just a little bit of Crypto 101 for our listeners that don't, you know, follow this stuff.
But if this brief Crypto 101 lesson isn't enough, you did Chris Hayes' Why Is This Happening pod a couple of weeks ago. And it was like 45 minutes like 45 minutes of crypto 101 it was really good so i direct people to that if they don't get enough but um at its basic level right like there's cryptocurrency then there's bitcoin which is you know the most famous or whatever the most renowned but then there are all these other coins so you just kind of explain to people how all these kind of terms interact with each other.
So the original idea for Bitcoin, the first cryptocurrency, was that this would be a alternative to regular currencies like the dollar or the yen. And the big innovation was that instead of being tracked by a central counterparty like a bank, there would be this decentralized network of computers that would keep track of this new currency.
Now, that was 15 years ago. Bitcoin's as old as WhatsApp or Uber.
And this idea of it becoming an alternative currency is largely dead. No one's really using it for that.
But instead, there's been this proliferation of other cryptocurrencies and at this point most of them are not meant to be like dollars they represent all sorts of different things so some of them are kind of like stocks where if you buy a share of this or you buy a coin you're almost like buying a share of some sort of company other times it's like a new network like ethereum or solana where it's like a place where people are creating other crypto things and when you buy one of those coins you're kind of buying into the network and you get a share of its profits so that's almost like buying into like a crypto bank kind of right like it's like it's like investing in a stock for a better an exchange or a bank essentially yeah some of them are a lot like that like sam bankman freed had one that was called ftt that was a basically just stock in his crooked exchange ftx right but at the silliest end we have in which is one of the most popular things in crypto right now, are meme coins. And the first one of these was called Dogecoin.
And it's also like more than 10 years old. It was created as kind of a parody of Bitcoin.
And it was saying, we're going to copy Bitcoin, we're going to change the name, and we're going to put a picture of a dog on it. And it turned out that, I don't know if you think this is a funny joke, but it turned out enough people did think this was kind of interesting that they started to buy it.
Unlike a stock, or unlike one of these ones where you're buying into a network that generates fees, with Dogecoin or other meme coins, there's no way for it to ever generate any money. You're purely buying it on the idea that somebody else might buy it, also for no reason, driving the price up higher.
It's kind of like a new form of gambling game. And in the last couple of years, thousands of these meme coins, maybe even hundreds of thousands of these meme coins have been created.
People are just pumping them out. And there are all these traders that are kind of, they've made it a game to chase the new meme coin.
And if you get in early, the goal is to get in before the masses and then profit when the price spikes and sell it before it inevitably collapses which is like basically no different than like wolf of wall street it's just a modern jordan belford situation right like where they're just trying to run up these penny stocks and then sell them yeah i mean i mean i guess those things had some value maybe but not really well true i think the kind of twist is that in your classic like pump and dump like jordan belfort more of the people that belfort like when he was calling people he's saying hey this stock is hot they just discovered gold in bolivia it's gonna go up and so there was this element of lying about the prospects of this company so people were being defrauded that way in this case you've got people like dave portnoy from barstool sports being like hey i just created this dumb coin it does not do anything it'll probably collapse eventually do you want to buy some for sure and people have sort of organized themselves into this kind of pack of degenerate gamblers who move from meme coin to meme coin and try to make money on it. Okay.
All right. One more 101 question.
And then I want to get into why I wanted to have you on and I think why it's so relevant to what's happening at the Trump 2.0. So you mentioned the kind of wide array of coins or currencies, so to speak, and how they're doing it.

There is also, in addition to Bitcoin, which I guess people aren't really trying to make a currency anymore, but El Salvador invested in Bitcoin.

There's still some people, I guess, that are trying to use Bitcoin to actually trade goods.

There's also some coins that are called stable coins, where they are trying to make them mimic currencies i guess in some fashion is that fair yes so it's kind of funny but the cryptocurrencies that have actually found the most widespread use are ones that are backed by dollars. And this is because in my book, Number Go Up, I was really focused on this one called Tether.
It's the biggest stable coin. It's gotten so large that there's something like $130 billion worth of it outstanding.
And the pitch is that a tether will always be worth a dollar because it's backed by real dollars that tether the company keeps in the bank somewhere. So why would you buy a tether, not a dollar for crime, I guess, because it's not traceable? Yeah, I mean, that's certainly one popular reason.
Criminals all around the world are figuring out that this is very handy because you can keep tether in like an anonymous wallet and you can zap an unlimited amount to somebody other side of the world into their anonymous wallet and unless law enforcement is able to figure out what your secret wallet address is they would have no idea compared to like a bank or a credit card company that's going to ask a lot of questions about your transfers. You've got like Russia using it to evade sanctions.
Chinese gangsters in Cambodia are using it to run this massive fraud and human trafficking operation. And also just crypto traders use it.
Basically, whether you're a criminal or you're selling sneakers, you don't want your currency to go up or down 10% in a day. So the stablecoin is more attractive.
Got it. Okay.
We're going to get back to Tyler. I wanted to ask about that for a reason.
So I want to just kind of get into Trump 2.0. And sometimes, you know, I was talking to my husband last night, and he's like, you're seeming a little bit like the always sunny guy with the yarn and the wall but i mean the amount of connections in trump 2.0 into crypto world is like pretty staggering so obviously you start with the most obvious which is that trump launched one of these meme coins of his own a few days before he was inaugurated a massive influx of comes in.
Talk about what has happened so far with Trump coin. So it's three days before inauguration.
He writes on Truth Social, my new official Trump meme is here. It's time to celebrate.
And honestly, a lot of people in this meme coin world were waiting for this moment because they knew if trump ever did launch a meme coin there'd be a lot of interest and it would go up a lot and that becomes kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy so trump coin shot up as high as 72 dollars on paper trump had 57 billion dollars worth of trump coin at that price uh It's since crashed. It's down to, I think like 17 bucks now.
Now it's a bit complicated, but the best estimates are that Trump by selling this meme coin made about a hundred million dollars because his holdings on paper would be hard to turn into real money without like totally crashing the price but he did make a hundred million dollars of totally real money that's the estimate of selling this meme coin so it really beats like you know a new trump hotel or like trump steaks trump vodka this is like the best way to monetize your celebrity yeah okay so i want to go through the people involved in this trump coin because here's because here's where we get to the yarn. So you've got Steve Whitcoff, who is his envoy, I guess, to negotiations now around the world, this business guy.
He was the lead in the hostage trade with Russia recently. Whitcoff's kids, his kid rather, is a business partner with trump's kids on this trump coin so he also made some cash out of the coin is that right i believe that actually wickhoff was the business partner on trump's first cryptocurrency not the trump coin thank you for clearing that up no i mean if he didn't get in on trump coin too i'm sure he would be mad yeah because that was like a great money-making opportunity right there but trump had an earlier cryptocurrency called world liberty where whitkoff had a uh and his son had a big role okay so his crypto business partner is the lead on this negotiation maybe just a coincidence but we get we get in the hostage trade, we get Mark Fogle, a American teacher.
We're glad that he's home. The Russians get Alexander Vinnick.
He was arrested in 2017 on charges related to the laundering of billions of dollars using virtual currency Bitcoin. So we have a Russian Bitcoin money launderer that is the first person out on their side.
Maybe a coincidence, but pretty noteworthy that that was, you know, the person that was there on the trade with Witkoff, the crypto business partner. One interesting part of that was this guy, Alexander Vinnick, appeared to be just like a crypto criminal who ran an exchange that some people say was even set up to launder the proceeds of hacks.
It's not immediately obvious to me why Russia would want him back or what he had done for Russia. So I was intrigued that he was their side of that trade.

In addition, this also ties to kind of our previous conversations

about how the US is now on the side of the baddies in these world events.

Justin Sun, who is the subject of an SEC enforcement action,

big investor in the first Trump crypto gambit before the more recent coin.

Talk to us about Justin Sun.

So he runs a blockchain called Tron. He's been around for a while.
And the SEC's case against him is that when he launched Tron and sold its new cryptocurrency, he engaged in manipulative trading and fraud to make the price look like it was going up to help sell it to the public. Now, he denies this, but it's a serious case.
Now, so Trump's first crypto world liberty was not an immediate success. And this was launched last year, around September, during the campaign.
Now, Justin Sun, he's someone who I don't think would be allowed to donate to Trump's campaign. I'm not sure of his citizenship, but he doesn't regularly appear in the US.
He bought initially $30 million of this World Liberty coin. Part of the reason the deal wasn't successful initially was that the terms of World Liberty are that if you buy the coin 75 percent of all the money you put in just goes to the trumps as a licensing fee so son ended up putting in another 40 million so that's him giving the trumps 56 million dollars but they get a 20 percent licensing so they get 20 percent of 56 million

they got 75 percent of 75 million got it i mean probably the biggest payment to a president for anything ever right when the trump coin thing happened the thing that people who are daily listeners will know that i keep saying that like they made spiro agnew resign over like 10 grand and it was was bad. It was like 10 or 20 grand.
He was taking paperback money as VP. But it was like pennies compared to the type of money that people are putting into the various Trump coins.
And this guy in particular, and I guess we will watch and what happens with the investigation. We have somebody who's a foreign national giving tens of millions of dollars essentially into Trump's pocket.
He's fighting it and he's saying it should be dropped. Crypto reform and all these cases are kind of on the table, right? And now he's saying, hey, maybe you should really think extra hard about my case.
Here's $56 million. Again, I should say he denies that he's trying to influence anything with his purchase but sure who wouldn't deny after he made the investment he was named an advisor to world liberty so he's kind of in business with the trumps now on this crypto and just pretty a couple weeks after he made the investment he was at this crypto conference in Abu Dhabi and at the conference he was spotted meeting with Steve Wyckoff the envoy and Eric Trump who was there to give a speech about how Bitcoin was going to the moon so it's pretty hard to believe that he would not take an opportunity to mention his his case yeah again how is like justin's son not extremely famous i guess is my question this is kind of what i was talking about at this at the start because i mean if this was you know anything like you know in the past you know like the mark rich pardon or you these sorts of things.
I mean, like the amount of money that was given is nothing compared to what Justin Sun has put it. Yeah, I mean, I obviously think it's pretty interesting.
I'm with you. Anyway, I'm not asking you to be a media critic.
You're on this. That was more of a rhetorical question.
Okay, we got to keep moving because there's more. Howard Lnik our new commerce department secretary he is also a big investor in bitcoin sons now run the business and he is related explain how he's related to tether that the stable coin that you were referencing earlier so even within the crypto world tethers had kind of a dodgy reputation for years.
It had to settle a lawsuit with New York's attorney general who had alleged that Tether had lied about the dollars that were backing the coin. And because of this, Tether had a lot of trouble finding anyone to hold this giant pile of money, which is a key part of the business.

You need someone who has access to like the American financial system to hold your money. But Tether was based like nowhere in the world.
It's one of those sort of stateless companies. And it was having issues with this.
So Lutnick, who runs like a reputable New York investment bank called Cantor Fitzgerald, he stepped up and he offered to hold Tether's money. And without that backing, it would have been a lot harder for Tether to keep growing and be as successful as it's been.
And like we were saying before, this is a cryptocurrency company whose product has become really popular with criminals around the world. So what we've learned since that recently is that Lutnik, as part of agreeing to hold Tether's money, he also was able to purchase a stake in the company, which is a big deal because Tether,'s incredibly profitable the company has like 100 employees and it makes more money than blackrock i think it made 13 billion dollars last year i mean this is a company that was dreamed up by a child actor from the mighty ducks which character from the mighty ducks so not a main character in the beginning Gordon Bombay has a flashback and he plays like young Gordon Bombay who misses the penalty shot.
Okay, young Gordon Bombay, all right. And it's run by this Italian guy who's a former plastic surgeon who has never given an interview.
The guy who until recently was the CEO was so elusive that when I started looking into Tether a couple of years ago, people told me they thought the CEO didn't really exist. I tracked him down and he is real.
This is like a very weird company that was really legitimized by Lutnick. And Lutnick started vouching for them publicly.
He gave an interview to Bloomberg from Davos where he was like, hey, Tether, I've seen their money. They got the money.
You can trust them, something like that. And that also was really helpful.
So it was kind of controversial at his confirmation hearing. He got asked a lot of questions about his relationship with Tether and what he thinks about its use for money laundering.
And he kind of repeated his defense of the company and said, hey, Tether works with law enforcement. They're against crime.
They want to stop it. I've helped them improve their compliance.
He just got confirmed. So he'll be the Commerce Secretary.
That's our Commerce Secretary. Okay.
Elon is also deeply invested in this stuff, was a big pusher of dogecoin eric adams who just you know got pardoned is is mobbed up in crypto world and so i want to talk about the policy side of this but is there any other trump 2.0 connections worth mentioning andreason big advisors big pusher of this his cryptos are david sacks yeah uh is an investor in solana which is like the network that the meme coins run on so so with these meme coins right it seems pretty weird like is the government going to do anything about this is like a question you might ask you think it'll be regulated like i'm for gambling for example i'm pro gambling. Vegas is a very highly regulated industry.

Gambling is a very highly regulated industry.

It's like, if you want to gamble on meme coins, okay.

But like, shouldn't there be regulation?

But like the guy who is ostensibly

would be in charge of that

is now the crypto czar is an investor

in the exchange where they trade the meme coins.

So probably not a lot of incentives.

More or less.

And he's come out and said,

these are collectibles.

These are digital collectibles, which is code for they should be unregulated you know like baseball cards instead so the other things is that we have named to the oversight of this is this brian quintens who worked for mark andreessen's bc firm the firm was the leading backer one of the leading backers of a crypto, pro-crypto political action committee.

So this guy is going to be now at the CFTC. We got, you know, Fox Hen House situation.
They've also been pushing for this Bitcoin reserve where I guess they would put the government, our government would start investing into this. So, you know, talk about any of the policy implications there.
Yeah, the Bitcoin reserve is one of the craziest policies that has been put on the table here. And I saw Trump propose this at the Bitcoin conference in Nashville last year.
And I was just shocked that he was repeating so many of the industry's talking points. And yeah, one Republican senator has sort of spelled out some details for this.
And she would have the U.S. government spend $100 billion to buy Bitcoin.
And as I explained before, people are not using Bitcoin for anything. So the pitch now that Bitcoiners have is that this is digital gold.
The idea with the Bitcoin Reserve is that the price of Bitcoin will inevitably go up. And therefore, if the government should get in early and make money by trading it.
And the thing to me is that this is a handout to anybody who already has Bitcoin. No one has any reason to buy Bitcoin.
Like it's not used for you don't need it for anything. The point of Bitcoin now is the price going up.
And so at this point, the price is very high. So you or I buying Bitcoin is not going to do anything for the price.
They need bigger pools of money. What's the biggest pool of money? The government.
So that's like the Bitcoiners. It's been actually their plan for a couple of years.
It very far-fetched but ever since they got el salvador on board they were a lot of uh bitcoiners were like hey i think we can get other countries in on this too and they didn't have much luck until they came across trump who hasn't done it yet to be fair yeah sure but i mean the fact that they're even talking about it is ludicrous we had the president of argentina javier malay he got in on this scam and uh there was a cryptocurrency libra that launched and there's just this massive run-up of the coin and like this whole pump and dump rug pull thing like just happened on super speed like it just happened a couple hours like huge you can tell me tell me how much money actually went into it, but a huge run up and then crash. You know, Malay is like taking no responsibility for this.
Tell people what happened in this situation. And then my last question is like, to be generous to the authentic Bitcoin advocates, why aren't they matter? I guess would be my point.
Like if you actually did think Bitcoin was valuable, you would think that prominent people like Trump and Malay just running these obvious rug pull scams would have those folks upset. But I guess not, because potentially they're going to put money and a number will go up.
But I don't know. You tell me.
Yeah, I think that's right. And some of them are mad.
But I think the madness is balanced with this idea that it's a pretty helpful conflict of interest. Yeah, it's like, wow, Trump might actually follow through on deregulating crypto.
He's doing it himself. He kind of needs to write a lot of them have been complaining about the scams, but I think it's a little self serving.
With Malay, I thought it was interesting. I mean, this wasn't so different than Trump's meme coin.
He tweeted about a coin, it went up, then it went down, people lost money, other people made some money. And Malay had said, he said it's not a scam, it's not his coin, and there's no crying in the casino.
There's no crying in the casino. I'm sorry, I thought it was a currency.
Is it a currency or is it a casino? Or is it a digital asset? I am a little bit confused. It kind of seems like it changes depending on what is convenient for the talking point at the moment.
Yeah. But it's weird.
The opposition is calling for him to be impeached. And this one seems to have been a real scandal.
Like within crypto world, people seem pretty upset about this compared to the kind of muted reaction to Trump having a meme coin, which also went up a lot and then down quite a lot. Wild.
Zeke, I think that we're going to have a lot of reason to talk. I really appreciate you coming on.
I just I don't know that it's sunk in with folks, just how mobbed up the

Trump inner circle is in crypto world. And people obviously have learned about the coin at this

point, but Whitcoff and Letnick and all that. So I'm sure more will come of this.
I look forward

to reading your reporting and we'll be talking again soon. Thanks a lot, Tim.
Great talking with you. Up next, Florida Congressman Jared Moskowitz.
Hey, y'all. I've been on the content grind, as you have noticed, but I'm getting to the point where if you start having that late afternoon coffee, it prevents me from having a good night's sleep.
So I was turning to an alternative that makes you feel a little less jittery, and that is our sponsor, Mudwater. If you're trying to cut those coffee jitters or just want to avoid that 2 p.m.
crash, Mudwater is the cozy, nourishing drink to help you power through. It's got a blend of chai, turmeric, and adaptogen mushrooms to actually help you feel more focused, not wired.
It's smooth, it's steady, and honestly, it just makes you feel better. So if you're looking for that afternoon coffee alternative, try it today and save big.
Our listeners get up to 43% off your entire order, free shipping, and a free rechargeable frother if you head to mudwtr.com and use the code THEBULWARK at checkout. And now, Mudwater is available at Target and Sprouts locations in the U.S., so it's never been easier to grab a cup of this winter friendly pick me up so once again if you're ready to make the switch to cleaner energy head to mudwater.com and grab your starter kit today right now our listeners get an exclusive deal up to 43 off your entire order plus free shipping and a free rechargeable frother when you use code the bulwark that's right up to 43 off with code the bulwark at dot com.
After your purchase, they'll ask you how you found them. Please show your support and let them know we sent you.
Keep your energy natural and refreshing all year long with mud water because life's too short for anything less than clean, delicious energy. And we're back with Jared Moskowitz, Democratic Congressman from Parkland, Florida.
He was elected in 2022. He's formerly Florida's Director of Emergency Management.
It's Jared Moskowitz. How you doing, Congressman? What's going on, Tim? How you doing? I'm pumped to have you back.
I like this casual look for both of us, by the way. Yeah, we're just hanging.
We're just a couple of guys hanging. That's what the people demanded, right? In the election, just bros hanging out in their t-shirts.
They voted against the status quo, so I took my suit off. Okay, great.
I'm for it. I like what you've been doing altogether, not just your outfit, but you're on Fox engaging with Jesse Waters.
That's good. You've been calling these Republicans on their BS on the budget stuff.
So I want to get into the tactical, but we do have a couple news items we got to do first. Yesterday, there's a press conference where trump explained who he thought was to blame for the ukraine war i want to listen to that but today i heard oh we weren't invited well you've been there for three years you should have ended it three years you should have never started it you could have made a deal i could have made a deal for ukraine that would have given them almost all of the land everything almost all of the land and no people would have been killed and no city would have been demolished and not one dome would have been knocked down but they chose not to do it that way you shouldn't have started it they chose not to do it that way you might think you'd be talking about putin there but he was talking about zelensky uh wondering what you thought about that well it's funny like you almost like want him to keep going because you feel like statement is going to be like, in fact, the deal we had is they were going to keep Ukraine and we

were going to give them Gaza. So we were going to expand Ukraine.
Okay. That was the deal we had

and the Palestinian people would have loved it. You know, like you just wanted him to keep going

just to see like where, where this was headed. But look, Trump and, and he's been doing this

for a long time is very good at taking someone else's argument and weak point and co-opting it, right? Anything that we, you know, he says it's weaponized government, right? And then he weaponizes it more, but he gets away with it because the Democrats weaponized it. He's fixing it with more weaponization.
And this is the same thing. He's literally taking the argument against Russia and using it against Ukraine.
Obviously, this is not productive. It's not where we want the situation to be with Ukraine.
I do want the war to come to an end. I do think that's important.
I do think Ukraine is probably not going back to the pre-2014 border. I think that's probably the case.
But what they give up to get to a deal after that, I think has massive repercussions, not just for Europe, and our relationships in Europe, but also for China and Taiwan. We know that the Chinese are watching what happens here.
And if you look at the European reaction, I mean, they do not seem happy with the developments of the last week. But I then take a step back from that.
And I want to take my own advice that I've been giving myself, which is I'm not going to react to everything that Trump says, you know, in the moment that he says it. I'm just not I'm not doing that the next four years like we did the first four years, because if we were doing that, then, you know, let's just talk about all of these things.
Canada is going to be the 51st state, right? Governor Trudeau, that was kind of funny. I laughed at that one.
Governor Trudeau, right? They're going to be the 51st state. That's not going to happen, of course, because if Canada became the 51st state, there would be two Californias.
Republicans could never win another election. So that's not going to happen.

You know, Panama, we're going to take the canal,

maybe with military force, not taking that off the table.

That's not going to happen.

We're getting green.

We are making the Panamanians take migrants who are not criminals,

who came to the country, like, for religious freedom.

And there's a New York Times article yesterday where an Iranian Christian

came to America hoping for religious freedom,

and we deported them to Panama as part of our effort to bully them over the canal. So that's a real thing that's happening.
Yeah, yeah, no. But obviously the language that Trump was using, okay, none of that's going to happen.
We're going to get Greenland. Also, Tim, we're getting Greenland, okay, you know, from our Danish friends.
You know, that's also not going to happen. And then, of course, Gaza, the Riviera of the Middle East, we're just going to get it.
How are you going to get it, Mr. President? You're going to buy it? No, no, no, we're not going to buy it.
First of all, who would be the realtor for that? That would be a great 6%. Garrett, I think, probably.
Okay, you're going to take it by military force? No, no, no troops. Well, how are you going to get it, Mr.
President? We're just going to get it. And so, you know, all of this distraction that he's great at, that we kind of jump at all of the time, I'm trying to have a different strategy going back to tactics.
I'm just trying to have a different strategy and take a step back. And, you know, we'll have a quick response to it.
But then just, you know, I'm not going to be at a 10 all the time. I have to have degrees of outrage here.
We can't just always be at a 10, just like everything isn't a constitutional crisis. I hear that a lot nowadays.
Oh, that's a constitutional crisis. That's a constitutional crisis.
Well, if everything's a constitutional crisis, nothing's a constitutional crisis. And eventually, if Trump does disregard the Supreme Court, and we do have a constitutional crisis, it won't mean anything because we've already said everything else is is a constitutional crisis.
And so look, obviously, what Trump is saying now is similar to what he said during the campaign, which many people found problematic. There seemed to be a pullback of that language when he in his first couple of weeks as president, but now we're back to trying to curry favor with Putin.
I actually believe, by the way, this is just my belief. I believe that there won't be a deal anytime soon, because I think Trump's going to give Putin kind of everything he kind of wants.
And then Putin's going to say he wants more. And then that's going to blow the deal up.
Let's just talk about the deal real quick. So I want to get back to get back to tactics because this was where I was going next.
I want to listen to Rubio just really quick and I want to talk about the substance of what they're proposing here. Let's listen to Marco.
The credible opportunities that exist to partner with the Russians geopolitically on issues of common interest and frankly economically on issues that hopefully will be good for the world and will also improve our relations in the long term between these two important countries. I don't even really get this deal from like the deal making standpoint.
Like even if you took aside, you know, morals or the US values or allies and just said, let's cut a good deal with Russia that's good for us. What is the deal exactly? What is Russia giving up in this deal? We don't need economic partnership with them.
them they need sanctions relief from us it's not like we're like getting a lot of russian products here that i you know that they're a huge market for us i guess if you're a diamond jeweler in new york or like a really high-end real estate person you might need some russian like other than that like what are we getting out of this deal like it seems to be like we're giving a crane away from nothing just looking at it from just a deal standpoint. Yeah, I mean, look, I like Marco a lot.
I'm happy Marco's the Secretary of State, especially in comparison to some of the other picks. Yes.
Remember, everything's relative. I mean, what did he say yesterday that would have been different from what, I don't know, Corey Lewandowski would have said as Secretary of State? What did he say different? Let's not ever get to the point that we test that difference, Tim.
I'm just wondering. I would like to have heard what he said different.
That's all. Just when you think the line can't go any further, we continue to move it.
So let's not tempt them, please. Your man, Jesse Waters.
Marco didn't blink during that statement, right? And so at the end of the day, there were no specifics there, right? But I do think there is something happening with this gaza stuff and this ukraine stuff which is trump wants to prove to the world that he can solve the most difficult foreign policy things biden couldn't solve it no one could solve it only he can solve it he wants the ukrainians to give up a lot of these, as he says, raw earth materials, right? And apparently he's asked for so much and the Ukrainians have said no, or they've said no to how much he wants. Well, by the way, as soon as they said no to how much he wants, notice the pivot of Trump.
Oh, okay. You won't give me what I want, which is these raw earth materials in exchange for our continued investment no problem i'll pivot and i'll go full you know direction of putin won't even invite you to the meeting i'll get my secretary i thought america first was about getting us stuff we're not getting shit out of this deal like ukraine is giving up everything we're creating conflict with our allies we're adding tariffs to our allies so it's going to cost us more money what do these deals get for us i haven't seen anything that is an america first deal yet to me oh the slogans you're throwing out the slogan i'm just trying i'm just trying to judge him on the metrics that he's set for himself i don't like that i'm a neocon i'm not a real america first realist but what i'm saying is he's failing on his own metrics unless america versus just trump first i do get that that's maybe that's all this is about trump well by the way the trump administration has even stopped posting the metrics of the deportation data right because the data the data is actually below the deportations of joe biden right at this moment in time look this is no different than we're going to fix egg prices on day one egg prices are now the highest they've ever been.
This is no different than 24 hours. I can solve the Ukraine war in 24 hours, right? Well, we're a little beyond that.
Inflation, I'll solve inflation. I'll get interest rates down.
Inflation's bumping. Interest rates are stagnant.
And look, this is the hyperbole of the campaign that we saw the first time around. And it you know, it works, which is why he does it.
You know, people buy it. And then we can distract people with we're buying Greenland, we're buying Gaza, Canada, Panama, right? And, you know, it's like everybody who watches a car accident, you know, and slows traffic down.
Everyone's jumping at these distractions or, you know, when all this other stuff's going on. So, look, we have to watch the ukraine thing it's obviously very concerning the current trajectory coming out of the united states ukraine is going to have to give up something right this idea that this idea that they're not going to russia should probably give up something too russia shouldn't just get stuff that's that's i guess my russia is going to have to retract from some of their positions there's no question oh yeah no question about that and it's also the future what's the future look like for this region but obviously we will have major problems with china and we'll have major problems with our european allies major problems with our european allies if we just look like we're kowtowing to putin in fact let me give you a real scenario trump proposes a deal and they say no what's his repercussion we're gonna not supply the weapons anymore okay fine he says i'm not i'm not gonna supply the weapons here and europe says we'll step up okay so now not only did trump not solve the problem now he's been cut out from the table because Europe decides to move forward anyway, and there's no deal.
And now we have a real Europe-Russia war, which can affect the U.S. economy in dramatic ways.
So he's got to be very, in my opinion, careful on how far he goes to where he pushes Europe into having no choice, but to continue the war without us. Let's move on to what I really want to talk to you about, which is the budget stuff, because they're in a real pickle on this.
And I liked what you, you tweeted, I forget, or said on an interview. They're like, let's say basically I'm for a balanced budget amendment.
Let's do it. Let's balance the budget this year and call them And call them on their BS because getting to a budget is very challenging.
Just as one microcosm. Last night, Trump said on Sean Hannity that he doesn't want to touch Medicaid.
Today, he said, I support the House budget, which cuts Medicaid by like 800 billion or something. So you've got Chip Roy, I got here, said every Republican needs to actually step up to honor what they've campaigned on when they say they want to balance the budget and reduce spending.
So there's Chip Roy, your colleague. Meanwhile, Trump wants extension of the tax cuts, no tax on tips.
Like the math just doesn't math for them. And so the question is, how did the Democrats deal with that? And I'm curious your view.
Well, so there are lots of things going on with this whole situation right first let's just start with the math right and people know this way we've heard we've heard mandate the american people voted for mandate we have a mandate mandate okay we get it except in the house they only have a three vote majority doesn't really sound like much of a mandate very different from 2016 when I think Trump had like a 25 plus vote majority in the House.

2010 or... vote majority doesn't really sound like much of a mandate very different from 2016 when i think

trump had like a 25 plus vote majority 2010 or and you can just go back to any mystery yeah exactly it doesn't sound like much of a mandate in the house so the numbers are a problem in fact the numbers right now they don't even have the three vote majority because you're missing two members from florida they have a one vote majority but but in april they'll go back to a three vote majority Okay, so that's the math, number one.

Number two is you have doge right and doge is doging right it's doing way more than they said it was going to do they said it was going to audit and you know present the findings give it to congress you know they're cutting things and firing people and do all of that and they're saying they're saving all of this money. Let's not dispute that.
Let's just say what they say. We do have to dispute just the one thing really quick.
The New York Times saying that they said that they cut an $8 billion contract, but they got a zero wrong. And it was 8 million.
It was only 8 million. They thought they cut 8 billion, but it was only 8 million.
What's a zero between friends? We do have to just dispute that one fact.

But anyway, besides that, let's not dispute.

Look, there's lots of stuff we can dispute,

but let's just go with their argument, right?

That they have found all this fraud, waste, and abuse,

and it's $100 billion.

That's what they say, okay?

Okay.

Well, the government is going to shut down on March 14th.

We're going to run out of money, okay?

And we've been doing a CR.

That's how we've been running our government,

just by continuing resolution,

which is, by the way, how you get this problem

I'm going to go to the the issue that there are 30 to 40 Republicans that will never vote for a clean CR. Never.
And even if Trump calls them and whittles that number down, let's say the best case scenario for them is 15. Okay.
We whittled it in half. So this is the same thing we've been talking about for the last two years they have to come to the democrats in order to get a cr in order to keep government open well there's just one problem tim let's go back to the hundred billions of dollars of fraud the hundred billion they say a fraud waste and abuse well a clean cr would refund all of that stuff it would refund it.
Okay. you would continue last year's stuff.
Well, we can't do that. You can't tell the American people we have found all this fraud, waste, and abuse and then tell Congress, but refund it all, okay? Not only can you not do that because it's fiscally ridiculous, it's also a trap for Democrats, okay? That they think we're going to walk into where they can be be like they want to keep the government open so bad that we're going to put a clean cr they're going to refund all that fraud waste and abuse and then we're going to come out and be like can you believe the democrats they refunded the condoms to gaza which wasn't a thing but that's what they'll say and so what i've been out there talking ad nauseum on the floor in an interview saying is Speaker Johnson now has less than a month to pass the 12 individual appropriations bills that's how you pass a budget a promise Speaker Johnson made when he became Speaker they had passed seven of them and then stopped why because they're fighting amongst themselves Republicans can't agree amongst themselves so right now we are on a collision course that the government is going to shut down on March 14th.
And Johnson's going to come forward with a clean CR with California wildfire funding. And he thinks we're just going to go for it.
I want to be very clear. I don't want to close the government.
Okay. I don't think Democrats should have a close the government as a strategy.
I don't think we should do that. Republicans did that many times before, but I don't think we should do that.
But I think we should be intellectually honest with the American people. They have told you they have found all this fraud, waste and abuse.
Fine. Then we can't continue it.
We must pass a new budget or Elon, you must be transparent. you must send the list of all of this stuff to Congress so we can attach it to a CR, which would defund all of that stuff for an up or down vote.
So these are the choices I think Speaker Johnson has. A clean CR is not a choice for me as an individual.
Do you think any of your colleagues will be interested in a clean CR with California fires? It would seem like a ridiculous thing to vote for, for all the reasons that you laid out, in addition to the fact that the Democrats don't actually get anything about that. There are Republicans in California.
You didn't get anything about that deal. That would sound to me like the Trump-Ukraine deal.
Well, remember, this goes to the you know how they negotiate which is well if you don't take it we're gonna only send the money you know with strings attached right which is which is the stuff they were floating out there for a couple weeks look i'm a former emergency management director i disaster aid is very important i understand how important it was but back in december when they tied disaster aid to raising the debt ceiling something that had never happened before right democrats did not vote for that and eventually they uncoupled it and we got disaster aid two days later so the disaster aid for california is gonna happen okay it has to happen because if they if they don't send it to california then what they're doing is they breaking the system. And it's only a matter of time until disaster aid doesn't go to Texas or Florida.
And so if they start that game, it's extremely dangerous. That will come.
But I think Democrats need to hold Republicans to their position. And I want to get to the debt.
Doge isn't just about government efficiency, fixing computers, making faster it's not just about you know trying to shrink the workforce it's also about saving money okay well a hundred billion dollars look tim if that's true that's a lot of money we cannot downplay that that to americans is a lot of money but in a 36 it's probably not true but if it is true let's not down that rabbit hole. Let's just say their math is mathing.
They found $100 billion. Well, in a $36 trillion debt, $100 billion is not a lot of money in that relative speak.
It's a lot of money in general. It is, but not in a $36 trillion debt.
So how are we going to get at that debt?

Which is what Doge wants to do.

And that's what the Freedom Caucus has been talking about for a long time,

is we got to get at that debt. Well, we're going to have to probably have steep cuts in some departments.

Okay.

And we're probably going to have to close loopholes

because you're going to have to raise revenue.

Trump did that before, by the way, getting rid of mortgage deduction.

Right. He's done that.
Or maybe not extend the tax cuts on the highest income people. So let's get there, or not extend the tax cuts.
But what they've proposed at this moment in time, even with the cuts to Medicaid, based on math, they want to do a $4.5 trillion tax cut. They want to cut, I think, a trillion and a half dollars.
Well, if that math is correct, it looks like we're adding $3 trillion to the debt. And they floated today, by the way, since they put out that budget, Elon floated today sending people a $5,000 doge check, which would be about another trillion.
So, you know, so $3 or $4 trillion, depending on whether you're listening to Elon or Mike Johnson. So, you know, we got to hold Republicans to their positions.
They care about the debt, then we should add no money to the debt. They care about eliminating money from government, then we should hold them to that position.
They say they found all this money, 100 billion, Doge found it, then hold them to that position, no clean CR. We got to hold them to their positions, and we got to watch the wedges that exist within the Republican party themselves.
We got to let them go at each other, which is what we saw the last two years. That will happen.
And we're going to find out if they're really only fiscal hawks when Democrats are in control. We're going to find out if they really care about the debt.
We're going to find out if Thomas Massey and Chip Roy and 10 or 12 others, if they're willing to hold the line on this. And we're going to find out really if Doge is serious about going after the debt.
If they're serious about going after the debt, which is what Elon always talked about. Elon talked about we're going off the fiscal cliff, we got to cut our spending, right? He's talked about that.
Well, if that is serious, okay, and you're tweeting things like balanced like balanced budget which he has tweeted which is why i'm coming with that resolution then at the end of the day they're either not going to be able to extend the tax cuts right or they're going to figure out how to either balance it with some cuts and raising some revenue okay or they're going to add to the debt and then this whole conversation about the debt no longer has any merit whatsoever ever ever again and yes i know someone's probably thinking well jared trump added you know he added more to the debt in his four years and i would say yes but this time around they've made the debt the issue they've made it the issue so since they've made it the issue. So since they've made it the issue, we got to hold them to it.
I agree. So do you have any Republicans yet co-signing with you on your resolution? On the balanced budget? Yeah, I think I'll get some Freedom Caucus members.
You do? Yeah, but Johnson's not going to pick it up. He's not going to hear it.
That's exciting. I think that it's important that they get on the record on this though though and this is where we are completely aligned and i think that maybe they are coming to realize how big of a pickle they're in the only way out of this frankly for them at the end of the day is trump bullying them all to push through something that is absolutely like fiscally irresponsible in the extreme and maybe that'll happen and maybe chip roy and all those guys will have to swallow their pride i don't know but we'll see they should be forced to make a make a judgment call on that there's three ways out of the situation one is they can make a deal with us right that would be bipartisan and bring responsibility you know i think there are enough democrats that hopefully it's a good deal yeah look i think there are enough democrats you know looking at the fact that yes we need to make government more efficient yes uh we need to figure out how to curtail our spending i think the american people voted for that i think democrats recognize that okay so they could talk to us have they done that yet they have not they have not done that to the government could shut down and when i say they could talk to us, I don't mean Johnson, because he's not in charge, right? I mean the White House, okay? Yeah, Elon.
Correct. Elon hasn't come in front of the committees yet.
Like, they've come to meet with you guys. Like, where can you go to deal? No, none of that.
No, none of that. Okay, so they could talk to us.
Number two is they could shut the government down, right? And, you know, the government could shut down,

I say indefinitely,

just because I don't know how long it would take to reopen.

The government could shut down indefinitely and they could try to pressure campaign,

you know, their way through it.

Or three is the fiscal conservatives,

to your point,

just disregard everything they've ever stood for

for the last couple of decades

and give in to adding to the debt. These are the three three ways out i'm excited to see how that turns out all right last thing for you just because i know something you've been speaking out on i try to not ignore uh when things like this happen there was a protest that got kind of violent yesterday in brooklyn borough park protesting residents of an orthodox jewish neighborhood we continue to see this

around the country and um i just want to make sure it's not being ignored so i don't know if you have any thoughts on that yeah i mean look i could do an hour on this and this is something that's been going on now for probably a solid year right we saw it on college campuses we saw in streets. You know, one thing that people always talk about is that you can be anti-Israel without being anti-Semitic.
And I would say, Tim, I think that is possible. I think you can be anti-Israel without being anti-Semitic.
I think it's possible. It's just not happening, right? I mean, it's theoretically possible, okay? And so they tell us all the time, right? Oh, Jared, don't conflate our criticism of Israel with being anti-Semitic.
And I would say, I'm not conflating it. You're the ones who are conflating it.
I mean, why are you protesting in front of a synagogue? Why are you beating up Jewish kids? Because they're just wearing a Jewish star. You don't know their position on Israel.
You don't know if they support Netanyahu. And so to be clear, everything you're seeing in this country, on these college campuses and in the streets is anti-Semitic protests.
Not every individual person that's there, but the protest, the genesis of these protests are anti-Semitic. They're going to Jewish delis right they see an orthodox guy on the street they're accosting them and every jewish parent around this country when they saw the stuff going on in college campuses knew deep down that if it wasn't a jewish student that was being surrounded and assaulted and prevented going from class but it was another minority group we know it would not have gotten past lunchtime on the first day.
Look, there are a lot of Jewish families in my district, Democrat families that voted for Donald Trump because of this reason. Okay.
Donald Trump only lost my district by a point and a half. And I have a big Jewish population in my district.
What did you win by? I won by five. This was a big deal within the Jewish community, which is about 12% of the voting block here in my district.
And that's because Trump had tough language. So we're going to have to see now what happens.
Trump talked about, obviously, people here on student visas that are going to these pro Hamas rallies, deporting them. Trump's talked about getting firm on the universities.
And look, these universities who didn't enforce their code of conduct, right, who took months and months and months to figure out how do we prevent the assaulting of Jewish students on our campuses and totally failed, right, to watch that hearing last year where the university presidents, right, couldn't explain with an easy question that now has made elise stefanik famous okay this is a big problem in this country it's why i've been fighting against not just my progressive friends who have been silent okay but also the folks on the right who are allowing all this nazi speech online you know because you know in nature of free speech, you can literally see as we have allowed more Nazis on Twitter or on X, you're seeing the number of anti-Semitic, violent anti-Semitic attacks rise, speech and violence are rising at the same time. And so we're at historic levels, historic levels of anti-Semitism since World War II.
And the Jewish community is very worried about where all of this is going. Yeah, it's Parkland week here at the Bulldog.
I started another pod, FY pod. People should go subscribe with your boy Cameron Kasky, who went to Parkland.
We talked about this issue yesterday and anti-Semitism among youth. And it is, in this case, it really is a both sides situation.
Like if you just just look at the numbers it actually was like there was a recent poll where people were asked directly like do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of jews like it was an extremely straightforward question and among the youngest cohort the highest group was republic was trump supporters but not far below that was democrats uh and and the the numbers were like 20% higher than I have in front of me, but significantly higher than among, you know, our age and up. So, and it's a real thing.
No, the alt, the alt right and the far left, it's like one of the few things they agree on. They get there different ways, by the way, the far left gets there by being significant, you know, anti-Israel wanting the country to be wiped off the map.
And the far right gets there with pro-Nazi talk. Thanks so much, Congressman.
And since you were doing it right on Fox, I'm going to leave people with what they used to call it on The Daily Show, a moment of zen, a moment of zen of you giving it back to Jesse Waters. Thanks for coming on the show.
Let's all take a listen to that. And we'll see you back here tomorrow for another edition of the Borg podcast.
Peace. Why do you guys go out there and sing songs and act crazy and look like you're pro-waste, fraud, and abuse? You know, every American now thinks the Democrats are defending waste, fraud, and abuse.
Well, look, what do you want us to do? Storm the Capitol? I mean, that's already been done. That's our job.
That's our job. Leave that to us, Moskovitz.
Give me that mood Straight into my hard drive Give me that mood Straight into my hard drive, baby Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah I'm 15 in my garden skipping My name is Sue Is watching me from a low window Oh mama, did you tell Sue I'm a millionaire Now baby, trading that crypto Oh yeah, look Give me that groove Give me that fire Give me that good. Give me that fire.
Give me that good. Give me that fire.
What? Crying on the street, there is so very soothing. I'm outside my school.
My teacher took me to one sign and told me i was high left than google neoliberal don't be

afraid to make to make money boy don't be afraid to make to make money boy don't be afraid to make my name Straight into my hard drive Give me that it's moved Straight into my hard drive, baby Nonsense a ruler, put it on the table and go Watch it chatter Clearly mum's told to kneel with the RV The next morning he shouts from his door Don't be afraid to make The Borg POP The Bulldog Podcast is produced by Katie Cooper

with audio engineering and editing by Jason Brown.