Mona Charen: A Moment of Truth

40m
Trump is trying to seize powers he doesn't have—like unilaterally rewriting laws and deciding on his own how he wants to spend money Congress appropriated for a particular purpose. Will the Supreme Court stop him? And if it rules against him, will he obey the court's orders? Plus, the money angle behind RFK, Jr.'s conspiracies, and Elon's attempt at a mass buyout is not about making the government leaner and meaner. He's trying to replace good, smart people with lackeys and flunkies, like Tucker Carlson's son. Mona Charen joins Tim Miller.



Mona Charen joins Tim Miller.

show notes





Press play and read along

Runtime: 40m

Transcript

Speaker 1 is Martha Stewart from the Martha Stewart Podcast. Hi, darlings.
I have a little seasonal secret to share. It's the new Kahua Duncan Caramel Swirl.

Speaker 2 Kahlua, the beloved coffee liqueur, and Duncan, the beloved coffee destination, paired up to create a treat that is perfect for the holidays. So, go ahead, treat yourself.

Speaker 1 Cheers, my dears.

Speaker 4 Must be 21 or older to purchase. Drink responsibly.
Kahlua Caramel Swirl Cream Liqueur, 16% Alcohol by volume, 32 proof. Copyright 2025 imported by the Kahlua Company, New York, New York.

Speaker 4 Duncan trademarks owned by DDIP Holder LLC. Used under license.
Copyright 2025, DDIP Holder LLC.

Speaker 5 Dude, this new bacon, egg, and chicken biscuit from AMPM, total winner-winner chicken breakfast. Chicken breakfast? Come on, I think you mean chicken dinner, bro.
Nah, brother.

Speaker 5 Crispy bacon, fluffy eggs, juicy chicken, and a buttery biscuit? That's the perfect breakfast. All right, let me try it.
Hmm, okay, yeah. Totally winner-winner chicken chicken breakfast.

Speaker 5 I'm gonna have to keep this right here.

Speaker 6 Make sure every breakfast is a winner with the delicious new bacon, egg, and chicken biscuit from AMPM. AMPM, too much good stuff.

Speaker 5 Hello, and welcome to the board podcast. I'm your host, Tim Miller.
We have an insane week ahead of us. The confirmation hearing of RFK Jr.
is happening as I speak.

Speaker 5 Cash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard's hearings are set for tomorrow. This pod will be on the normal schedule, but we're doing some special programming to accommodate all the madness.
So mark this stuff down.

Speaker 5 Tonight at 8 p.m., the next level is live for Bulwark Plus members. So keep an eye out for that link.
It will be in the podcast feed for everybody on Thursday morning.

Speaker 5 And then Thursday, we're live on YouTube. Basically all day.
Will and Sam in the morning, a little Mona cameo, JVL and I in the afternoon.

Speaker 5 At the end of all of the hearings, we'll have a wrap-up with the whole gang for Bulwark Plus members only. You can join at thebulwark.com slash subscribe.
If you join, you also get this pod ad-free.

Speaker 5 And you get a special secret podcast called Just Between Us, hosted by our next guest, policy editor at the Bulwark, my friend Mona Sharon. Hey, Mona, welcome back to the pod.
Great times. Isn't it?

Speaker 5 Oh, yeah.

Speaker 5 It's a golden age.

Speaker 3 The only thing that makes it bearable is that we have each other. That's true.

Speaker 5 I'm happy to have you. I guess this is an announcement for a couple of listeners who noticed the meowing on yesterday's podcast.
I have a cat too. So we have each other, a cat.

Speaker 5 Many listeners have been upbraiding me for listening to the cat food advertisement where I say we have a neighborhood cat where we feed. And they're like, that's your cat now.
You have to take it in.

Speaker 5 And while I was snowed out in New York, my family took it in without me. So, you know, we have each other and a stray cat.
So that's what we got.

Speaker 3 There is something in the bulwark water because JVL also got a cat, like in the last few weeks.

Speaker 5 So I know, astray as well. I don't know.
You know, we're just,

Speaker 5 we can't help the people. So maybe we're going to help the feline community.
All right. You've got a new pod.
I do. Mona Charon Show.
You've had a couple of episodes now.

Speaker 5 So I wanted to give you a chance to talk about that, what the goal is, and then we'll get into the parade of horror. Yeah.

Speaker 3 So the podcast is, I mean, I was reluctant to part with Beg to Differ, which I loved doing. We did that for five years.
My great colleagues.

Speaker 5 It's crazy. It was five years.

Speaker 3 It was five years. It was amazing, right? I know, I know.
We've been living in this reality for such a long time.

Speaker 3 But anyway, so, but I felt like with the, with the election and the, the new era that we're living in, I felt a strong desire to have a podcast where I can go deeper on some of these issues and talk to experts and

Speaker 3 devote one podcast per subject matter or at least per guest and let the guest have a little bit more opportunity. So yeah, so far we've had two and

Speaker 3 I think it's it's going well.

Speaker 5 Yeah. And the most recent one, which I was listening to is Steve Vlad.
It was interesting because he got into sort of the legal questions of it all. And like, there's just so much happening right now.

Speaker 5 You know, we had the article this morning in the Borg from Don Kettle. It was like, there's just this high-speed power grab.
It's hard to keep track of everything.

Speaker 5 And part of that is because a lot of the stuff is going to get challenged. So I don't know.
What were your main takeaways for that conversation with Steve?

Speaker 3 I thought it would be useful to just go into like what is the source of the president's authority.

Speaker 3 He has authority under Article II as commander-in-chief, for example, and he's supposed to take care that the laws are faithfully executed, which is actually a limitation on his power rather than an elaboration of it.

Speaker 3 But he also has power through legislation. And unfortunately, as Steve and I talked about, the Congress has been shoveling power out the door now for decades.

Speaker 3 They have been creating agencies, creating laws that give all of the discretion about how things should be done to executive agencies.

Speaker 3 Okay, so that is a huge problem because if you get an irresponsible president, he has already been given vast discretion.

Speaker 3 So, for example, on tariffs, all he has to do is say, well, it's a national emergency or it's a matter of national security, and therefore I have to impose steel tariffs on Canada.

Speaker 3 Like, you know, that dangerous country to our north, our severe enemies.

Speaker 5 Their beady little eyes.

Speaker 3 Exactly. So, there's that.
There's the fact that they have given him all of this power.

Speaker 3 But now, Tim, we are in a totally new world where not only does he, is he, you know, being incredibly aggressive about the powers that he definitely has, but he is being unbelievably transgressive in seizing powers that he definitely does not have, at least he didn't under our system.

Speaker 3 And we are at a moment of truth, honestly, getting right to the nub of it, because

Speaker 3 if there is no resistance in the courts and in public opinion to his attempts to simply rewrite laws unilaterally, decide how to spend federal funds on his own say-so,

Speaker 3 even though Congress has already passed and appropriated funds for a particular purpose, then our republic is,

Speaker 3 let us say, not, it's transformed. I don't want to say it's over, but it's pretty damn serious.

Speaker 5 I had David French on, I guess, on Friday. I don't know how long Bag to Differ went.
I don't know who I talked to when, but

Speaker 5 he pointed out that this court, at least the first time through, the court's been remade a little bit since Trump's first term with the Coney Barrett seat, but rejected the administration more times than any president had been rejected since I think FDR.

Speaker 5 And so he was maybe a little bit more bullish than sometimes you hear from some of our friends on the left about the fact that that might be the case again.

Speaker 5 I was kind of wondering what you think, what Steve thought,

Speaker 5 because all of these challenges are going to come down the pike, whether it's, and we're going to get into the offering of severance and the mass firings of people in the administration and the grant freezing.

Speaker 5 Like all that stuff is going to end up, the immigration stuff, like all that stuff's going to come across their robed desks here eventually. So I'm wondering how you assess that.

Speaker 3 So there are two aspects of this. The first is, what will the Supreme Court do regarding these assertions of presidential power? Will they

Speaker 3 become creative and expand presidential scope as they did with the immunity decision? Or will they put their feet down, their collective 18 feet,

Speaker 3 and say, no, no, I mean, you know, we do after all have other branches of government and you can't just trample what they've done. So that's the first question.

Speaker 3 And Steve Laddick was more bullish than some people that are in our orbit about the chances there.

Speaker 3 He also, along with David French, thinks, look, you know, the court did push back a lot on Trump in the first Trump Trump term.

Speaker 3 And he does think that there's some, you know, some spine, some steely determination there. I think it's not too much to say.
That's his view.

Speaker 3 I told him, look, I would have said that before the immunity decision, but now my confidence in their fealty to the Constitution has been really badly shaken. That's the first piece.
We'll see.

Speaker 3 Will they actually assert the primacy of the constitutional system?

Speaker 3 And then the second question, which is maybe as big or bigger, is

Speaker 3 will Trump obey?

Speaker 3 He did in the first term. He obeyed the court's orders.

Speaker 3 If he doesn't this time around, if he, in obedience to what J.D. Vance recommended, right, J.D.
Vance said he should just say to the court, you've made your decision, now enforce it. A la

Speaker 3 President Jackson, who probably never said that, but that's never mind. But Andrew Jackson, reputed to have said the Supreme Court has made its decision.
Now let them enforce it.

Speaker 3 J.D. Vance

Speaker 3 said that that's exactly what Trump should do. And Tim,

Speaker 3 I don't know what would happen in this country if Trump did that. I don't know.

Speaker 3 I don't have the sense that people would rise up on their hind legs and say, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, now you've gone too far. I don't know.
What do you think?

Speaker 5 I'm trying to just think one day at a time. You know, I'm trying to think about RFK today.
I hear that.

Speaker 5 It's hard to just have lived the last 10 days and think that there is a groundswell of people prepared to stand up and oppose Donald Trump if he disobeys an order that's kind of procedural and arcane that doesn't affect their lives, right?

Speaker 5 You know what I mean? Like maybe there's a certain type of thing, you know, sending the troops in places.

Speaker 5 I think that there are certain types of things that I think would awaken the American people from their slumber. But on some of this stuff,

Speaker 5 if he says, sorry, I disagree, I can fire people, I can fire bureaucrats at will, and the Supreme Court says no, and he's like, I'm going to do it anyway.

Speaker 5 I'm taking away their whatever, past key codes to get inside the EOB or whatever office building they work in. It's hard to see mass protests over that.

Speaker 3 Okay, let me try something out on you.

Speaker 5 Okay, good.

Speaker 3 One of the reasons that Biden was a failure is that people wanted him to restore normalcy and they didn't get normalcy, they felt.

Speaker 3 Trump was re-elected to bring prices down and get things under control on the border. But the fact is that the overwhelming.

Speaker 5 I'm not sure that prisoners were single gender. Oh, yeah, yeah, right.
I thought I saw that. The third item.

Speaker 5 The floor, making sure our prisons had boys in one prison and girls in the other prison. That was pretty cute.

Speaker 5 And influence.

Speaker 3 I'm for that. I'm not sure.

Speaker 5 Same, same. I just, yeah, that's fine.
Well, I'm for it in most cases. I don't know.
I think that they're probably, we could probably make some case-by-case exceptions. But

Speaker 5 anywho, that was the third prong of his mandate.

Speaker 3 Yes. Okay.
You know, the overwhelming majority of what the federal government does, it doesn't do through federal bureaucrats.

Speaker 3 It does through contractors because Actually, over the years, like Congress has wanted to hide how much the federal government does.

Speaker 3 So they mostly do things by doing grants and stuff to private contractors who actually carry out the work of the federal government.

Speaker 3 Well, when you look down the list of things that are going to be affected by this freeze, this is going to piss off a lot of people.

Speaker 3 Like, all right, first of all, 20% of Americans get their health care or their like their services in retirement homes paid for by Medicaid. That's not excluded from this freeze, right?

Speaker 3 They only excluded Medicare and Social Security, but Medicaid, 20% of the country, every Meals on Wheels program, every Head Start program, you know, there are a million things that actually will touch people's lives.

Speaker 3 Now, we don't know how long this freeze is going to go on, but it could be that all of this disruption is going to be perceived as not, you know, the dawn of a golden age, but chaos.

Speaker 5 Yeah. I want to talk about this.

Speaker 5 So let me just tick through for the people who've decided that they don't want to follow the minute-by-minute of this and are getting their just afternoon updates here on their constitutional with the Bulwark podcast.

Speaker 5 Like among the things that you mentioned that have been in these executive orders that have led to this chaos and a lot of uncertainty, as you mentioned, this freeze on grants that was the first day read to be like a total freeze on all spending to all grants with the exception of, as you mentioned, Social Security, Medicare, military.

Speaker 5 They updated that 24 hours later to, you know, only include, there was like this weird line about like, we're freezing grants to non-government organizations that are not advancing the interests of America.

Speaker 5 It was like a very urbanist sort of sentence. Like, well, okay, well, what's that?

Speaker 5 Who covers, who counts in that? You know, so again, so it's still very vague.

Speaker 5 As part of that, the Medicaid system i guess payment system was down for a while i guess that's now back up yeah we also we just discussed there was a firing of i think over a dozen of the inspectors general there was a firing of over a dozen people that were a part of the investigations against trump There have been some pretty ham-fisted ICE raids, including detention of Puerto Ricans who are American citizens that Adrian has been covering for us.

Speaker 5 Then there was yesterday this, it seems to be written by Elon Musk because it is read exactly the same as what he sent to Twitter employees. It was the same subject line.

Speaker 5 There's a fork in the road, but there's a message to people like you can quit by February 6th if you want. If you just say resign and we'll pay you a severance.
So all this has happened.

Speaker 5 And so there's the question of like, okay, well, what if this will actually end up

Speaker 5 affecting people in a month? Who's to say, right? Because most of it is unconstitutional or illegal.

Speaker 5 And the stuff that is legal is written in such a way that it's like, we don't actually know how to interpret it because they don't they don't really know how to interpret it so to circle back to your question i think the more that they actually do the worse it is for him right i i honestly right because his best position in all this is to do put up a lot of smoke and have you know a lot of people like us clutch our pearls about it and you know and talk about how fascism is coming and then have like not that much change in people's day-to-day lives and then he's like see these whatever these crazy you know alarmists and and you know whatever the only people for whom lives are really changing are asylees and and trans people like people that are vulnerable but like yeah but most the vast majority of americans don't experience it that is his best position if they actually do the rust vote stuff right and like meals on wheels is shut down i i do think the more of that they do the worse it is and the more then maybe a backlash starts to emerge that that's kind of my view i don't know what you think about that.

Speaker 3 So, you know, remember in the first term, we all talked about how Trump had picked a lock, in a sense, about American politics.

Speaker 3 He said, you know, what needs to happen to the Republican Party is it needs to stop all this talk about cutting government. People love their government services.

Speaker 3 And Trump's great insight was, I'm not going to cut anything. You know, you can vote for me and you won't have to, you know, worry about that.

Speaker 3 I'm not interested in the budget deficit or cutting spending and sure enough you know during the first Trump term he didn't cut anything and he ballooned the deficit but now he's brought in these you know Project 2025 crew and Russ Bought and all of this and they are fanatics who want to drastically cut government and so there is I think going to be a little bit of a

Speaker 3 you know, a little bit of a contradiction going on here. You know, the communists used to say we have to maximize the contradictions of capitalism.

Speaker 3 Well, we're going to see them maximizing the contradictions within Trumpism because part of Trumpism is you'll never have to feel any pain. I will never cut anything you like.

Speaker 3 That is coming hard up against this new sweeping, you know, let's go in there and just set the whole thing on fire.

Speaker 5 Yeah, they're betting. Sonny Bunch and I were talking about this on Slack.

Speaker 5 They bet here, and this is from the Elon and Roosevelt perspective, is that they can do what Elon did at Twitter and say, I'm going to cut a huge part of the staff and most people won't notice any difference.

Speaker 5 Like, there'll be some things that are annoying. You know, there'll be more Nazis on the platforms.
I don't want to minimize it, right?

Speaker 5 The search function won't work quite as well as it used to, you know, but like all things considered, like most people's lives weren't disrupted by the fact that some Twitter engineers were cut.

Speaker 5 The government isn't quite the same as that, right?

Speaker 5 Like there, there are certainly some parts of the government that can be cut where people's lives wouldn't be disruptive, but when you're talking about payments to Medicaid systems, you know, talking about who knows what's going to be happening with this bird flu going around, like the other services.

Speaker 5 I got news for you. There are a lot of red state MAGA Americans that rely on various government services in different ways, right?

Speaker 5 And I think this, like the way in which they're going about this,

Speaker 5 I think betrays a misunderstanding of something that Trump like just kind of got instinctively and that they don't because they have an actual ideological perspective.

Speaker 3 Yeah, 100%. And I would just add that, you know, it is sort of a staple of right-wing commentary, you know, to dunk on, you know, bureaucrats.
And I mean, even this goes back decades.

Speaker 3 I mean, Reagan used to make jokes about federal bureaucrats, and some of them were pretty funny, you know. Like they were saying there's so many bureaucrats.

Speaker 3 Like a guy is crying at his desk at the Department of Agriculture and somebody says, What's the matter? And he says, my farmer died. So that was 40 years ago or more.

Speaker 3 But the fact is, the truth, the dirty little secret of how we do things in our federal government is we actually don't have more bureaucrats now than we had like 40 years ago.

Speaker 3 We don't have a huge amount of bureaucrats. We do it through private contractors.
And, you know, maybe some of them are not efficient. I'm sure they're not.

Speaker 3 Government is never as efficient as a private business by its very nature. And it never will be, no matter how many Elon Musks you try to bring in because the incentives are different.

Speaker 3 But the fact is, you can't just say, I'm going to fire 20% of the federal workforce, and then it'll all be leaner and meaner. No, it doesn't, just not going to work.

Speaker 5 We also just went through sequestration, by the way. You know what I mean? If we're going to get really nerdy about the budget stuff, like the real budget problems are the big ticket items, right?

Speaker 5 Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, defense. We already sort of did the,

Speaker 5 again, there's more stuff that could be cut, but like the sequestration that happened, you know, 10 years ago sort of covered a lot of the Doge, the things that would be under the Doge remit.

Speaker 5 I did want to bring this up. So we both have been kind of dancing around, but I had Chris Hayes on yesterday.
I've got my friend Tehran Tommy Vitor on tomorrow. So I was like, we're sandwiched.

Speaker 5 We got libs all around us. And so I did want your kind of perspective on this.

Speaker 5 I don't know, my conservative muscles were flexing a little bit when it came to the letter goes out from Elon, or not from Elon, but from Elon, you know, that's saying, People, all right, you got to actually come into the office to work.

Speaker 5 And if you don't want to come into the office to work, then that's fine. We'll pay you an eight-month severance

Speaker 5 and you can leave.

Speaker 5 And there's a lot of outrage about this. And there's a little part of me that was like, I don't know,

Speaker 5 it seems like a pretty good deal. It seems like a pretty good deal.
I don't know.

Speaker 5 There are other problems with it, but I just, I'm wondering, are there any of your conservative muscles flexing when you're hearing stuff like that?

Speaker 3 100%.

Speaker 3 Not that part in particular, because, I don't know, it's very much of a sledgehammer and you would need to know in particular cases whether these particular workers need to be in the office. Sure.

Speaker 5 I don't know.

Speaker 3 But I'll tell you, I do not like DEI stuff. I think it is destructive.
I think it's a really, really bad idea to encourage people to think in racial terms, both to encourage

Speaker 3 minorities to think of themselves as oppressed and to encourage majorities to think of themselves as guilty. I mean, I don't think that's healthy for society.

Speaker 3 If I had a magic wand, yeah, I'd get rid of all DEI programs. That doesn't mean I'd get rid of affirmative action.
That's different. But DEI is a particular thing.

Speaker 3 By the way, it also encourages anti-Semitism in many instances. It's a mess.

Speaker 5 Okay,

Speaker 3 but there is a difference between saying, I like this particular outcome, you know, or I agree that DEI is very problematic and

Speaker 3 doing something in a completely high-handed, lawless way. If Congress has mandated programs, then you can't just change it.
You have to ask Congress to rescind it.

Speaker 3 By the way, last time I checked, he has control of both houses, right?

Speaker 5 Right.

Speaker 3 I mean, hello. Just do it.
So just change the effing law.

Speaker 5 Yeah, just do it. No, but they can't.
They can't. Because, again, it goes back to the contradictions of Trumpism.
There's certain stuff that is liked in a lot of this. Yeah, I'm with you.

Speaker 5 I just, just so my position is clear on all this, there is some really dumb DEI stuff. We've been covering this.

Speaker 5 I do think that, and again, it's like terms, what rubric, there's some value in the federal government in certain elements of this, right?

Speaker 5 Like the CIA needs people that can speak different languages, right?

Speaker 5 The FBI, it should be good for them to have a leadership program for people that come from marginalized communities, from urban urban centers right like like there's certain elements of it that are pernicious and certain that are that are good and i feel that that's absolutely right yeah and i feel this way about the firings too like if there were actual

Speaker 5 smart people and experts if they're like going to do this how they did it and you know the fucking American president or in the Clinton administration or in the right right you know what I mean like Democrats used to do this right they would be like we're going to bring in experts we're going to review the books you know we're going to look at to see you know which of these programs are outdated or not efficient anymore or not working.

Speaker 5 We're going to offer people severance and let them go. Right.
Like, sure. Like,

Speaker 5 I'm for all of that. Right.
I'm for all of that. It is that these guys have taken that from us because what they are trying to do with this is not actually make the government more efficient.

Speaker 5 They're trying to bully good and smart people out of the government so that they can replace them with. Buckley Carlson, Ducker's son, or whoever.
You know what I mean?

Speaker 3 Yes, Tim, 100% true. And And also, let's recall that the part of the government that they are focusing on is such a small part of the federal budget.

Speaker 3 I mean, if they were actually serious about cutting spending and we do seriously have a debt problem, hello, then they would be grown-ups and say, okay, you know, we got to talk about reforming Social Security and Medicare.

Speaker 3 But as we said earlier, they're not doing that. They won't do that.

Speaker 3 And, you know, all of this other stuff is just nibbling around the edges, honestly, if it's a matter of cost savings i mean on the matter of policy it is significant all right there you go people sorry you have to hear about entitlement reform if you're gonna come to the ball or podcast all right you got tommy tomorrow

Speaker 5 okay libs all right we're gonna do a little entitlement reform once a week

Speaker 8 Noticed unwanted facial volume loss after GLP1 weight loss? The weight came off, but volume loss and dull, sagging skin are making you look older. Now you can reclaim your youthful looking appearance.

Speaker 8 Learn more at faceafterweightloss.com. That's faceafterweightloss.com.

Speaker 9 Time for a sofa upgrade. Introducing Anibay sofas, where designer style meets budget-friendly prices.
Every Anibay sofa is modular, allowing you to rearrange your space effortlessly.

Speaker 9 Perfect for both small and large spaces, Anibay is the only machine-washable sofa inside and out. Say goodbye to stains and messes with liquid and stain-resistant fabrics that make cleaning easy.

Speaker 9 Liquids simply slide right off. Designed for custom comfort, our high-resilience foam lets you choose between a sink-in feel or a supportive memory foam blend.

Speaker 9 Plus, our pet-friendly, stain-resistant fabrics ensure your sofa stays beautiful for years. Don't compromise quality for price.
Visit washable sofas.com to upgrade your living space today.

Speaker 9 Sofas start at just $699 with no risk returns and a 30-day money-back guarantee. Get early access to Black Friday now.
The biggest sale of the year can save you up to 60% off.

Speaker 9 Plus, free shipping and free returns. Shop now at washable sofas.com.
Offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

Speaker 5 You also wrote this week about birthright citizenship.

Speaker 5 I did want to just talk to you about that just briefly because the way that I was drawn to conservatism, like birthright citizenship was so entwined in kind of like me as an 80s, 90s kid growing up, like the conservative worldview, right?

Speaker 5 It's like this, the shining city on the hill, the greatness of America. We want people to come here.

Speaker 5 Like that was just really directly to me tied with my identification with why this was, you know, an appealing movement. And it is now like that part is just gone now.

Speaker 5 And so I was just interested to hearing you kind of talk about that because I think to some people, particularly younger people, if you're one of those kids at the MAGA TPUSA thing that I went to, the culture is so changed and the rhetoric has so changed around conservative politics that it's probably hard for them to even understand why a conservative would be for birthright citizenship.

Speaker 5 So anyway, I just wanted to hear you riff on the article a little bit.

Speaker 3 What I was trying to say is that it, well, first of all, throat clearing. There's the whole problem of it being completely unconstitutional to try to change this via executive order.

Speaker 3 It's in the Constitution.

Speaker 5 Did you see, just really quick on this, did you see Caroline Lovett yesterday? This is the first press conference.

Speaker 5 I got to give her one thing. She was much better than Spicer.
Okay. So kudos to you for a much better Spicer.
And she also, this will be just for my elder millennial listeners, Mona.

Speaker 5 So I don't know if you ever watched Cruel Intentions, but she has the Sarah Michelle Geller vibe from Cruel Intentions just down totally.

Speaker 5 I will say, I don't think that she has in the movie, and Sarah Michelle Geller had in the cross necklace cocaine that she would do to kind of drive home the point about how, to drive home the point about how fake it was.

Speaker 5 I'm not accusing Caroline of that, but besides that, she had the whole vibe down. But anyway, she just bluntly was like, yeah, this administration sees birthright citizenship as unconstitutional.

Speaker 5 It's like, what?

Speaker 5 It's really up is down Orwell stuff.

Speaker 3 Yeah,

Speaker 3 exactly. Exactly.
Okay. So first of all, it's completely bogus.
And so said a Reagan-appointed federal judge. I said this was laughable.

Speaker 3 But the other part of it, though, is a matter of the meaning of America. And that is exactly what the executive order was labeling.
The meaning of American citizenship, they said they were upholding.

Speaker 3 Actually, they are destroying it because birthright citizenship is tied up with the fact that we are a nation of immigrants. We are a nation of people who came here and became Americans.

Speaker 3 We were something else before everybody except Native Americans came here.

Speaker 3 And this is not a country of blood and soil. It's not, you know, that we all have the same ethnicity or ancestry or language or color or any of that.

Speaker 3 It's that we have chosen to be part of this great experiment. And every person who is born here is as legitimate and perfect and pure an American as any descendant of the Mayflower.

Speaker 3 And that is a very equalizing concept. And it's important, I think, to maintain that because otherwise we're going to have tiers of citizens.

Speaker 5 You know, we're going to have the people who can trace their ancestry back many generations and then they are the real americans and then everybody else is something else you know that is antithetical to my perception of what this country is about amen all right we have uh we got to move on to the hearings that we've got coming this week i don't know if i've played the ranking game with you megset's already in unfortunately so so he's off of the board but we've got cash patel tulsi and rfk if you had a magic wand and you got to protect the country from from one of them Who would be first, who would be second, and

Speaker 5 who would you stick us with?

Speaker 3 Okay, so Tulsi, I would put at the top that she is the most dangerous

Speaker 3 because

Speaker 3 the one thing you want above everything else is good judgment in a post like that, where you are in charge of our secrets.

Speaker 3 And she has shown appalling judgment in her sideling up to a vicious murderer like Hafez Assad in her defense of Edward Snowden, in her willingness to be a mouthpiece for Putin, such that the TV people on RT call her our girlfriend.

Speaker 5 RT being Russia today, the Russia TV station? Yeah.

Speaker 3 Russia today.

Speaker 3 That is who Trump thinks should be entrusted with our secrets.

Speaker 3 It is like something out of the onion. It is so beyond belief.

Speaker 3 But because we live in the world we do, we've had members on the Hill sort of quietly say, Well, I have my hesitations, I have doubts, rather than saying, This is a goddamn outrage.

Speaker 3 Under no circumstances will she be whatever. But look, I guess we have to take what we can get.
We've heard,

Speaker 3 you know, even Trump total patsys like Lindsey Graham express reservations. So let's see what happens.

Speaker 8 Noticed unwanted facial volume loss after GLP1 weight loss? The weight came off, but volume loss and dull, sagging skin are making you look older. Now you can reclaim your youthful looking appearance.

Speaker 8 Learn more at faceafterweightloss.com. That's faceafterweightloss.com.

Speaker 9 There's nothing like sinking into luxury. Anibay sofas combine ultimate comfort and design at an affordable price.

Speaker 9 Anibay has designed the only fully machine washable sofa from top to bottom. The stain-resistant performance fabric slip covers and cloud-like frame duvet can go straight into your wash.

Speaker 9 Perfect for anyone with kids, pets, or anyone who loves an easy-to-clean, spotless sofa. With a modular design and changeable slipcovers, you can customize your sofa to fit any space and style.

Speaker 9 Whether you need a single chair, love seat, or a luxuriously large sectional, Anibay has you covered. Visit washable sofas.com to upgrade your home.

Speaker 9 Sofas start at just $699 and right now get early access to Black Friday savings up to 60% off store-wide with a 30-day money-back guarantee. Shop now at washablesofas.com.

Speaker 5 Add a little

Speaker 9 to your life. Offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

Speaker 5 All right, we've got RFK today.

Speaker 5 As I mentioned at the top, we'll have a live debrief, a TNL live debrief on YouTube tonight at 8 p.m. And you can get that on the next levels feed tomorrow.

Speaker 5 But I want to just play for you a little bit you know maybe a little highlight reel of rfk i think some of the live virus vaccines are probably

Speaker 7 uh so averting more problems than they're causing

Speaker 5 um there's no vaccine that is you know safe and effective covet 19 is targeted to attack uh caucasians and and uh and

Speaker 5 black people. The people who are most immune are Askenazi Jews

Speaker 5 and Chinese.

Speaker 7 A woman in a van in front of me hit a bear and killed it. Pulled over and I picked up the bear and put him in the back of my van because I was going to skin the bear.
I realized I couldn't go home.

Speaker 7 I had to go to the airport. I said, let's go put the bear in Central Park and we'll make it look like you got to get by a plane.

Speaker 7 But the next day, it was like

Speaker 7 it was on every television station. I mean, there are cell phone tumors, but cancer is not the worst thing.
They also, you know, it opens up, Wi-Fi radiation opens up your blood-brain barrier.

Speaker 7 And so all these toxics that are in your body can now go into your brain.

Speaker 10 Well, how does Wi-Fi radiation open up your blood-brain barrier?

Speaker 7 Yeah, now you're going beyond my

Speaker 7 expertise.

Speaker 5 I love that one at the end.

Speaker 5 It's beyond his expertise. He floats the fact that our blood-brain barriers are being opened by the Wi-Fi.
And in everybody that he's like, it's kind of beyond my expertise.

Speaker 5 And that sort of sums it up, right? We just have a just asking questions conspiracist who's going to be in charge of the health department of the U.S., I guess.

Speaker 3 Yeah.

Speaker 3 Who doesn't believe in pasteurization? You know, we might as well just, you know, go back to the 18th century, I guess.

Speaker 5 How was life expectancy back then? Was it better or worse than now?

Speaker 5 Can I see a chart?

Speaker 3 Again, it is mind-boggling. RFK.

Speaker 3 And then the other point, and this was a point that was actually made by the Wall Street Journal, which deserves opprobrium for having not opposed Trump's election, but they are saying, appropriately, that the other angle that you have to pay attention to on RFK is the money angle, that he has been raising all of these conspiracy theories about vaccines, for example, as a way to personally profit because then he sues the manufacturers and they settle with him.

Speaker 3 And he's made millions this way. And his cousin, Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg, gave an impassioned statement.

Speaker 5 We actually have a clip of that. Let's just listen to a little bit of that.

Speaker 11 And Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Agencies that are charged with protecting the most vulnerable among us is an enormous responsibility and one that Bobby is unqualified to fill.

Speaker 11 He lacks any relevant government, financial, management, or medical experience. His views on vaccines are dangerous and willfully misinformed.

Speaker 11 These facts alone should be disqualifying.

Speaker 11 But he has personal qualities related to this job, which for me pose even greater concern.

Speaker 11 I've known Bobby my whole life. We grew up together.
It's no surprise that he keeps birds of prey as pets because Bobby himself is a predator.

Speaker 5 That's amazing. Other than that, Mrs.
Lincoln.

Speaker 5 Yeah.

Speaker 5 Whoa. She goes on to talk about his drug problems, which

Speaker 5 says that he got over them, but many of their family members that he exposed to the drugs did not. And talks about his weird animal killing fetishes.

Speaker 5 And she also gets into the money aspect of it and how he's conflicted.

Speaker 3 The money. And also she points out that while he encourages other people not to vaccinate their kids, he vaccinated all of his own kids.
You know, what a piece of, well, you know.

Speaker 5 I just, I just want to say, I've been keeping a scorecard over here. One full curse for Mona, two near curses, zero from me so far.
So I'm just.

Speaker 3 I give you the times, the times we're living in. It's driven me to this.

Speaker 5 It does remind me of the, it wasn't included in the mashup, but my favorite Bobby Kennedy is related to him vaccinating his own kids. It's the time that he talks about how he goes hiking in LA

Speaker 5 and

Speaker 5 he goes up to strangers with children and tells them not to vaccinate their children. That is insane.
Over the bear killing and the beheading of the whales and all the vaccine.

Speaker 5 To me, it's just like to go up to a mother with a baby and accost them about vaccination status.

Speaker 5 For whatever reason, that is the one to me that is the worst.

Speaker 3 Yeah. And by the way, the Bulwark gave a lot of coverage to what happened in Samoa, but people should familiarize themselves with that because he has blood on his hands already.

Speaker 3 He encouraged this conspiracy about the vaccines being unsafe in Samoa. And hundreds, I think, or at least scores of babies died of measles in that outbreak.
And it's down to him.

Speaker 3 I mean, yeah, that's a great. Thank you, Mr.
Trump. That's a great idea for who should be in charge of our health care agencies.
Thank you.

Speaker 5 Well, I'm monitoring closely the senator from my state now, Louisiana, Dr. Bill Cassidy.

Speaker 5 I expect nothing. I expect him to go along and rubber stamp this.
But I do want to say when there are people like there's no other alternative option.

Speaker 5 Cassidy, in Louisiana, we have a top two primary situation. So it's like kind of a different system where it's a jungle primary, everybody votes.
Oh, that's good. Cassidy voted to convict Trump.
Yes.

Speaker 5 So I think Cassidy is boned. no matter what, if it's a straight Republican primary situation.
People don't mention him. He is actually free to vote his conscience.
He is a doctor.

Speaker 5 And to me, there is an outside chance. I don't think it's a great chance.
There's an outside chance that he could run for governor in three years

Speaker 5 and get into a top two situation where it's like a MAGA person in him, where he gets a coalition of Democrats and normal Republicans.

Speaker 5 I want to say that's a very outside chance, but I don't think he's less likely to win going that route than by trying to MAGA himself after he voted to convict Donald Trump.

Speaker 5 So anyway, Bill Cassie will be watching you.

Speaker 3 So does the jungle primary system basically amount to the same thing as like Alaska where they have ranked choice voting or no ranked choice.

Speaker 5 It's like it's a it's like California. It's everybody runs all parties run in the first vote.
And then the top two, you have a runoff with the top two.

Speaker 5 So in a place like California, you could have two Democrats. In a place like Alexander, you could have two Republicans in the top two.

Speaker 3 Gotcha.

Speaker 3 But it means that he doesn't necessarily have to be beholden to the MAGA base.

Speaker 5 Yeah. That's what I'm saying.
You mentioned we were chatting on Slack. Anything on the Trump pivot with regards to Russia and Putin and sort of thoughts on that?

Speaker 3 Trump made a statement about Putin and Ukraine that surprised people because it was kind of tough sounding, whereas he's never sounded like that toward Putin before.

Speaker 3 And it's just such a window into Trump's soul because remember, Trump admires aggression and wickedness, honestly.

Speaker 3 When Putin rolled his tanks into Ukraine, let's not forget, Trump was giddy with excitement over this act of naked aggression. And he called it genius.
And he said, wow, you know, this is great.

Speaker 3 And only later did he sort of try to clean it up. That's who he is.

Speaker 3 And I just feel that if the war were going better for Putin right now than it is, that Trump would not have sounded the note that he did.

Speaker 3 But what he is now feeling is disappointment in Putin for not having won.

Speaker 5 Yeah.

Speaker 5 The statements coming out of Russia are basically, I think they think they have his number.

Speaker 5 There was a conventional wisdom that they thought they had a deal, that the deal was that Putin was like, all right, I got this guy in, we got a deal.

Speaker 5 I think they think, no, we can push forward because, you know, Trump's not going to find the political will to push back on us. So

Speaker 3 we'll see.

Speaker 3 That's another area of the contradictions of Trumpism, because, you know, on the one hand, he claims no more wars, no,

Speaker 3 but then he also wants to credibly threaten other countries, right? Right. And you can't have it both ways, right? You can't credibly threaten if you say, I will never engage in war.
So there we are.

Speaker 5 All right, everybody. Thanks, Dimona Chair.
And I already mentioned we got Tommy'd up tomorrow, and we've got a full slate over on YouTube of live streaming these hearings.

Speaker 5 Mona will be on for a little while tomorrow. I'll be on for a little while tomorrow.
So come hang out with us. One more thing.

Speaker 5 Just as since we've been on coming across here, my colleague Adrian Carastillo has the story about Trump turning schools into an immigration battleground. It's heart-wrenching.

Speaker 5 So you can go check that out at thebulwark.com. Thank you, Mona.
Everybody else.

Speaker 3 Good to be with you.

Speaker 5 We'll be seeing you around here tomorrow.

Speaker 7 Peace.

Speaker 7 If you just lay down your tracks

Speaker 7 You could have an airplane flying

Speaker 7 If you bring your blue sky back

Speaker 7 All you do is call me

Speaker 7 I'll be anything you need

Speaker 7 You could have a big diver

Speaker 7 going

Speaker 7 up and down

Speaker 7 around the bends.

Speaker 7 You could have a funeral

Speaker 7 bumping.

Speaker 7 There's amusement never

Speaker 7 ends.

Speaker 7 I wanna be

Speaker 7 your sledgehammer.

Speaker 7 Why don't you call my name?

Speaker 7 Oh, let me be your stage hammer.

Speaker 7 This will be my tasting morning.

Speaker 7 Show me round your fruit cage.

Speaker 7 Cause I will be your honey lippy.

Speaker 7 Open up your fruit cage

Speaker 7 where the fruit that is sweet as can be.

Speaker 7 I wanna be

Speaker 7 your Senshima.

Speaker 7 I don't care

Speaker 7 my name.

Speaker 7 You better call the Senshima.

Speaker 7 Let there be no doubt about it.

Speaker 5 The Bullard Podcast is produced by Katie Cooper with audio engineering and editing by Jason Brown.

Speaker 3 Gas, groceries, eating out?

Speaker 9 It all adds up fast. With the Verizon Visa card, you get rewarded every time you spend.
Get 4% in rewards on gas, dining, and at grocery stores.

Speaker 9 And you can put those rewards toward your Verizon bill or on new tech like a smartwatch and earbuds. Apply today at Verizon.

Speaker 9 Application required subject to credit approval must be a Verizon mobile account owner or manager or Fios account owner. See Verizon.com/slash Verizon Visa card for terms or restrictions.

Speaker 9 The Verizon Visa signature card is issued by Syncreti Bank pursuant to a license from Visa USA Inc.

Speaker 6 There are two types of fishing.

Speaker 6 The kind I'm doing out here that brings me calm.

Speaker 6 And the kind of fishing hackers do online.

Speaker 6 They're always casting their lines, impersonating users, phony logins.

Speaker 6 Anything to get someone to bite.

Speaker 5 But here's the thing.

Speaker 6 With Cisco Duo, fishing season is over.

Speaker 6 Because Duo goes beyond multi-factor authentication, providing full fishing resistance, session theft protection, and AI-powered monitoring, all at half the cost of most solutions.

Speaker 6 So while hackers keep casting, I just enjoy the calm. No ripples, no splashes, just a hook that never gets a bite.

Speaker 6 Learn more at duo.com. duo.com.
Cisco Duo. Fishing season is over.

Speaker 1 This is Martha Stewart from the Martha Stewart podcast. Hi, darlings.
I have a little seasonal secret to share. It's the new Kalua Duncan Caramel Swirl.

Speaker 2 Kahlua, the beloved coffee liqueur, and Duncan, the beloved coffee destination, paired up to create a treat that is perfect for the holidays. So go ahead, treat yourself.

Speaker 1 Cheers, my dears.

Speaker 4 Must be 21 or older to purchase. Drink responsibly.
Kahlua Caramel Swirl Cream Liqueurs, 16% Alcohol by Volume, 32 Proof. Copyright 2025, Imported by the Kahlua Company, New York, New York.

Speaker 4 Dunkin' trademarks owned by DDIP Holder LLC. Used under license.
Copyright 2025, DDIP Holder LLC.