Amanda Carpenter: We Are Team Karen (Pence)

Hello and welcome to the Bullwark Podcast. I'm your host, Tim Miller.
A few notes. Yesterday's ad-free pod got cut off at the end, so if you missed one of my favorite widespread panic ditties about being around people and how that helps with your sadness, you can catch up with the playlist in the show notes every Friday at the Bullwark Podcast outro song playlist.
It's right here. We put it in the show notes for you for people that ask.
Also, this is a good chance to inform newbies that if you want to go ad free, you might not even know you could do that. You can go to thebullwark.com slash subscribe, join Bullwark Plus.
You'll also get access to the secret pod and some other goodies and you don't have to, you know, listen to me talk about all of sponsors who we love and appreciate and one more thing the show notes today we're going to if you are looking for some ways to support the firefighters and the victims in california we're going to put some vetted links in the notes so with that my guest today a writer and editor at protect democracy she's co-author of the authoritarian playbook for 2025 prescient how an authoritarianismantle Our Democracy and What We Can Do to Protect It. It's my former colleague, Amanda Carpenter.
How you doing, Amanda? Hey, Tim. Happy Friday.
Is it a happy Friday? It is. You know why it's a happy Friday, actually? Fake it till you make it.
Yeah, we're going to fake it till we make it. You know why it's a happy Friday? I want to start here.
I want to start with Karen Pence. That's unexpected from you tim i know but mother i owe you an apology i was not really familiar with your game she just snubbed donald trump she hard snubbed donald trump at the jimmy carter funeral service at the national cathedral yesterday and um i'm gonna do something that i don't usually do amanda but in honor of mother you know that's the catholics as cradle catholics we're not big on like quoting bibles we're more about the saints than we are about the bible verses but the evangelicals they're very the bible focused as you know and i was wondering if karen had ephesians 6 13 in her mind yesterday for our struggle is not against the flesh and blood but against the rulers against the authorities against the powers of the dark world we'll put on the full army of god so that so when the day of evil comes you may be able to stand your ground and after you've done everything stand firm then with the belt of truth buckled around your waist with the breastplate of righteousness in place and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes with the gospel of peace.
She just turned her cheek. That was it.
She put on her breastplate of righteousness and said, I'm not going to buddy up to you, Donald, like Barack Obama is. I am going to let you know with my eyes that you are evil.
And good on you, Karen Pence. What do you think about that? Am I overthinking it? That's a great Bible verse.
I like that one. I like that one a lot.
You know, it's remarkable. I mean, Michelle Obama notably didn't show up at all.
Apparently she told the press that she had a scheduling conflict while she's on her extended vacation in Hawaii. She had to wash her hair.
She was supposed to sit next to Trump. I would have also had a scheduling conflict.
It's a busy day, bed, bath, and beyond. Got to go to Home Depot.
We got to do some grocery shopping. I got to do some returns.
We got some presents we didn't like over Christmas. I just can't make it.
Yeah, but I mean, what Karen did there, I mean, it is pretty remarkable given the pressures in that room. I mean, obviously, she knew every eye was trained on her, every camera, every photographer there.

And she just sat there, which is, you know, it's a small act.

But that is a major act of defiance, especially given the way her husband, Mike Penn, jumped up, shook his hand.

You know, did the, you know, I'm a sober, responsible person thing.

It was like 2017 again with him.

He did the shoulder shrug, you know, like the little tepid smile, meek smile.

Yeah, there was a lot of interesting body language there. What was it with George Bush tapping Obama on the belly? It's sort of like, thanks for taking one for the team guy.
But you know, I've read there's a lot of people upset that Barack Obama and others didn't have more of a Karen Pence type act of defiance against Trump. I am not sure what the right thing to do is there.
I mean, are you really going to stage a fight at Jimmy Carter's funeral? No. I am.
I am, Amanda. I mean, to each their own.
But me and mother, we're staging a fight at Jimmy Carter's funeral. There was one element of the Trump and Obama exchange that I think is interesting, that I think it's worth discussing before we get into the real news trump had a little presser after the funeral you know the post the traditional post-funeral press conference of course and uh he weighed in on on a very friendly exchange with former president obama what looked to be very friendly what were you talking to barack obama about it did look very friendly I must say I didn't realize it I didn't realize it how friendly it looked I saw it on your wonderful network just a little while ago before I came in and I said boy they look like two people that like each other and we probably do we have little different philosophies right but that we probably do I don't We just got along.
But I got along with just about everybody. That makes me very upset, Amanda.
I don't know. How does that make you feel? Yeah, I kind of felt like you could see the conflict in Trump's mind in that clip that he knows being buddy-buddy is bad for his street cred, right, with the MAGA base.
But this is actually what he wants. He wants to be in the president's club.
He wants to be the guy that is acknowledged and respected at the White House Correspondents' Dinner. And he kind of, in some of the pictures, really looked, I mean, honestly, for the first time in a long time, it looked like he was enjoying himself, which is weird to have that amount of enjoyment at a funeral.
But I do think this speaks to what really motivates Trump. Not if you an angel of death if you're an angel of death funerals maybe you're right up your alley here's what bugs me about it maybe this is a personal thing and maybe i'm like triggered maybe this is jeb ptsd because he did this shit to jeb right he would insult columba and like make racist jokes about about his wife on stage and then he go backstage and be like hey i want to be buddy buddy with everybody like it was just a like trump really does not believe that words have consequences if there are any consequences to these this sort of thing and he doesn't see why it's a big deal it's all just a show it's all just wrestling or the apprentice or whatever i mean he perpetrated a lie about how the first black president was born in Africa for a decade.
And it's like, we're just going to be like, okay, man, well, whatever. 49.9% of Americans who showed up to the polls voted for you.
So now we're just going to like make jokes about it. It's cool.
The Mexican jokes and the, the you were born in Africa, whatever. Like we're just moving on moving on now in the second if Obama was ever going to put himself in this position and it seems like he's taking himself out of it for the indefinite time being if Obama started giving speeches started supporting candidates starting becoming active in public life in a way that posed a challenge to Trump's authority and power, Trump would flip like a dime again.
But the reason why I think they can be, he can be buddy-buddy with Obama, I'm not speaking to Obama's side of it, is that Obama is no longer an obstacle to him. That isn't, and that makes me upset.
So that's why I'm with Karen. Me and Karen and Michelle.
It should. F this guy.
No, nothing guy no nothing you get no quarter okay it's uncomfortable to see them all getting along together i i probably would have done what michelle obama did is just not go at all that's probably not the right thing the right thing is probably what karen pence did i mean what do you do do you ask for separate seating arrangements sure you know obama bush when you were a former first lady of the United States, it's a democratic president's funeral. You could just be like, Hey, I'd like to sit on the other pew.
Yeah. Yes.
And it's not like there's a law. Like who's going to, is somebody going to come arrest me if the presidents don't sit in the president's pew? Yeah.
Don't shout, sit next to all former presidents. According to these fuckers, we're the only ones that follow the rules.
he gets away with it all right i want to do um kind of related actually an unintentionally clean transition there are a couple of rulings yesterday court rulings i want to get your take on supreme court five to four ruling you know said that trump does not get to avoid sentencing in the new york hush money trial this means that he will be inaugurated on January 20th as a convicted felon. Obviously, he's not going to jail or anything.
And MAGA is upset at Amy Coney Barrett about this. She was one of the five that voted for it.
I have a different kind of perspective. I'm curious, does this matter to you at all? One of my New Year's resolutions is I'm not going to pretend to care about things I don't care about.
And it's hard for me to get my dander up about this thing. He's not going to jail.
This isn't real consequences. It's in the history books, I guess, but I don't know.
Can you convince me that I should care about this any more than I do? Yeah. Here's my read of the situation.
Number one, good ruling. Number two, bad that it's only 5-4.
Number three, this is helpful in going forward if I'm looking for the silver lining and that it further draws a line between immunity for official acts, which is broad and alarming, and personal acts, right? Like this is a new world that we're in. The Supreme Court has ruled that Trump and any other president has immunity for official acts.
What this further clarifies is that he cannot get away with everything. There is a line here.
You can't pay a porn star to cover up information to further your campaign. That is not an official act, okay.
So now we do have some kind of line. Again, I'm looking for silver linings here.
Okay. That's a good silver lining, actually.
I hadn't found one yet. So that is true.
Yes. And so while we are all rightly concerned about the broad immunity ruling, We also should be careful to cling to what constraints we can have.
And we will need to further define what can be personal acts from official acts, but things to further his campaign and further his political interest, I think we can feel comfortable drawing a line there and fighting for that. And also we should

remember that this broad immunity does not extend to other people in the White House outside of the president who may carry out official unlawful orders. Now, this is somewhat nuanced because Trump does have the pardon power, which we fully expect him to exercise in pardoning January 6 rioters coming up here, but that would be another step there.
And so as he goes into his second term with all of these plans to expand his power and stamp out independence at federal agencies, that immunity does not apply to everyone at the Department of Justice, to everyone at the Department of Homeland Security, at the Department of Defense. And we should be very clear about that and make that distinction known to everyone who is entering that administration.
That's valuable. And obviously, as you say, the pardon thing is going to be something, a big hurdle and a big fight ahead of us.
And that's inevitable. It's something you guys have been talking about.
You've been talking about for a while. I do wonder your take on the criminology of this with Amy Coney Barrett.
Like I said, Matt, Cat Turd is really upset. You know, the Cat Turd crowd online is very upset.
She's a traitor. And I sort of hope, this is going to sound weird, but I hope Cat Turd is right to be mad at Amy Coney Barrett.
I hope that she is really, trying to draw lines

about is right to be mad at amy coney barrett i hope that she is really you know trying to draw lines about where the appropriate legal lines are for you know a president that is going to act unlawfully again certainly i don't know though to me i kind of feel like this was a freebie that's why it's more concerning to me that like gorsuch and kavanaugh didn't go along with it like this was a freebie for them to just be like whatever like this is the view that all of these justices always make their decisions purely based on their interpretation of the law then okay that's one way to look at this if you're the view that sometimes they're making political decisions like every other actor and that and Roberts and Coney Verde are like well you know he's not actually going to jail. And like, this isn't really that important.
And we can throw a bone here, you know, to demonstrate some independence to give us a little bit of give us a little leeway when things get dicier, because they're about to get dicier. You know what I mean? I don't know.
Maybe that's cynical. That was my read on it.
But I don't know. Maybe that's wrong.
What do you think? I am inclined to think, and I'm saying think because I don't have enough information to fully believe this is true. And maybe it's just kind of what I'm hoping, is that recognizing the fact that these judges are political actors, are they essentially sort of hiding behind Justice Barrett and allowing her to take the hit i don't believe this extends related to justice thomas but you know she forecasts that she believed in this distinction earlier on and so did they just have a pretty good understanding that roberts and coney barrett will take the hit on this and they will make sure that it was a 5-4 decision.
And we can essentially vote no and get all the kudos from MAGA from it that accrues. Right.
Like this is like kind of, you know, voting no is always the safest thing if you can get other people to actually do the policy work that you know is better for the country. I'm wondering if maybe I'm hoping if that is actually part of the dynamic on the Supreme Court.
You's a lot of 5-4 decisions that allow people to take the easy way out. All right.
Well, it's just in as we're talking about this. Donald Trump has now been formally adjudicated as a convicted felon.
So there you go. That and two bucks won't even get you a cup of coffee these days.
All right.'ve got uh we've got some other news that does i mean it's just that it's just hard to hear right it's hard to sit with this stuff and find encouragement and motivation to keep going but that is that is that is what we have to do and i want to be clear when i'm drawing these distinctions about the path that we can fight on going forward, I am certainly not happy that the path has become so narrow. But I think we should be realistic about that is what it is.
And we do have some footing to go forward on. Concur.
One more court item to get to. A federal appeals court rejected Trump's request to block the release of special counsel Jack Smith's final report.
Judge Eileen Cannon was obviously the judge of choice there who was trying to help block it, even though she didn't have any jurisdiction over the matter. this has been overturned uh the reports blocked i guess for three more days absent further appeal

so it could be released as early as sunday Both JBL and Bill Crystal, I think, wrote about this this week about the importance of releasing the report. Do you have any additional thoughts on that? No, it needs to get out.
I mean, we're going through these machinations now, but I cannot imagine that a document of this significance with all the people that have access to it, especially Biden with the as jbl has pointed out he enjoys the same kind of official immunity that donald trump will bingo put it out put it out or what you're gonna say because judge eileen cannon said no it is absurd put it out what the marshal of eileen cannon's courts is going to come and arrest joe biden and mark garland if he puts it out no give me a break hopefully we'll get to see it and that will be something we'll be able to chew over next week there's another news item on to pick your brain on then i want to get bigger bigger picture a little more esoteric about how we're looking at the next four years we talked i guess on wednesday's pod with liam donovan and brendan boyle about the upcoming budget fights. By the way, can I just say something? Leon Donovan was so good.

He on Wednesday's pod with Liam Donovan and Brendan Boyle about the upcoming budget fights. By the way, can I just say something? Liam Donovan was so good.
He was so good at explaining reconciliation. People should save that.
It should be taught to incoming Hill staffers. I just, great, great guest.
I really enjoyed it. Yeah.
He's annoying sometimes. So I don't, you know, I don't love just like, I don't love just buttering him up with so many compliments, but he was very good at that specific task at which I granted, at which I tasked him.
So I appreciated him coming on and doing it. I hope you don't say that about me on future podcasts.
She's really good at this subject, but she's actually super annoying. I would never, Amanda.
Your commenters can say that. We love Amanda, all caps, Amanda.
So anyway, Jody Arrington, who is the budget committee chair, we're talking to Brendan Boyle, who's a Democratic ranking member. Jody Arrington is a Republican member.
It was interesting. There's a punch bowl report out from behind the scenes of the kind of negotiations that are happening over this tax bill and reconciliation and how they're going to fund everything.
and I guess Arrington showed some slides to other members of some of his proposals that included increasing the corporate tax rate, which made people very upset. I guess that was the only thing that made people upset.
It also included deep, deep cuts to Medicaid and other, you know, getting rid of some of corporate write-offs, some some corporate taxes. The nuts of it is that Arrington at least is acting like he cares about our debt right now.
And there are some members of the House Republican conference who have made their bones. Chip Royce, one, I think maybe, do you ever work, were you and Chip on the same staff? Yeah, he was my chief of staff in the cruise office i worked very very closely with him so your old boss chip royce kind of the the the top of this right like there are still some ogt party people in there and a handful of new people who have been running on on debt and deficit and like they have this challenge coming up this year where like if you extend the trump tax cuts, it's going to be $4 or $5 trillion more added to the debt the way they did the budgeting with all the expirations from the 2017 tax cut.
And so these guys, they either got to put up or shut up on whether they care about this, and if so, there have to be offsets. The only way to do that is going to be to increase taxes.
Arrington proposed a corporate tax rate or maybe not extended on rich people. I find that very hard to believe that the Republicans will do that or have these massive cuts with Medicaid being on the top of the list.
And, you know, you might want to mention that there are a lot of there are a lot of mega Americans that are on Medicaid, I should note. So I don't know.
I was just wondering kind of with your former Tea Party hat on, like what you think about the coming fight and whether you think any of your former brethren will actually hold the line on this or if they end up just, you know, doing king of debt part two. Well, holding the line always leads to discussions of government shutdown, which, you know, we've learned many times.
And, you know, Donald Trump hasn't necessarily been hurt by government shutdown. So I don't think I would rule that possibility out.
That said, just for, you know, interesting political dynamics, where's Elon Musk and Vivek when you need him, right? Like, weren't they supposed to be tasked with finding the spending cuts that we were going to need in the future? Like, this would be the time that they should be recommending them to Congress. And so if I were Chip Roy...
Didn't you see that he mentioned on, he mentioned on Mark Penn's podcast, Mark Penn, I didn't even know Mark Penn had a podcast, very low rated podcast, Elon went on it. Let's talk about Mark Penn.
And Elon admitted on that that the Doge

is not going to be able to find the $2 trillion.

So if the tax cut extends over $4 or $5 trillion,

depending on who you talk to.

And Elon is already admitting

that maybe one is the most you could find

for cuts for Doge. The only

way to make the math work is to jack

up the debt more, to raise

taxes, or to have very steep

cuts to entitlements.

Those are the three options.

My question here, if I were Chip Roy, I would be thinking about saying, well, hey, Elon Musk signed up to have spending cuts. And so I look forward to having meeting with him and finding the biggest cuts possible to do this.
I would try to be enlisting him into this because the reality is they want to have this fake, you know, congressional committee spending commission to make cuts to programs they don't like to hurt people that challenge their interests. Right.
Like that's actually what Elon wants to do. But bring him into the fold.
Right. Like you signed up for this, Vivek.
Like we need this many cuts to make this work. Let's let's go.
You know, the Democrats should be similarly like be similarly calling on them. Where is it? Where is it? Because we do need to find a way to get to reality earlier on.
And if this just becomes an endless process of kicking the can down the road, having a reconciliation bill where we don't pay for any tax cuts, which has happened numerous times before, it doesn't really get anywhere. And this is the question of what actual policy wins do Republicans expect to achieve with Trump? And I think that's a very big, big, big open question.
And what was funny to watch earlier this week, Trump went to the Hill to meet with Senate Republicans and people talked to the press after and said, oh, you know, the aides, I guess they were kind of upset. Well, Donald Trump didn't give us any guidance about whether we should do one big, beautiful spending bill or a lot of different spending bills, which is the better policy and is more, you know, hard to do, but it actually does result in a better process.
And it's like, because he doesn't care. He doesn't care.
They would love, if you listen to Larry Cudlow and the others, they just want a big bill, just like the Republicans and Tea Party people have traditionally criticized the Democrats for doing, doing a big bill where everyone has a gun to their head, where they have to absolutely pass everything in a massive, reckless, unsustainable spending bill or get nothing at all. I mean, those dynamics have not changed.
well they've changed one way, actually. Their majority is even smaller.
And literally, it's Tom Massey, who doesn't give an F. He really doesn't.
If there's one person in the House that could not care less about whether Donald Trump gets this. There's a good Massey and a bad Massey sometimes.
I feel the same way about Rand Paul. Rand Paul pushes some really great policies sometimes, like with emergency use and abuse and that kind of stuff.
But then we've just got to find a way to keep him on that. Listen, you believe the debt is out of control.
You have to do something about it. And it is.
There's $36 trillion. So that's it.
I mean, they're in a much bigger pickle than I think that a lot of people realize. And all it takes is two of them.
Your old buddy Chip, so you should start texting him again. And Thomas Massey.
And they can cripple the whole damn thing. He's done it before.
Chip has done it before. They've done it before.
All right, guys, I got to tell you, it is chilly here in the South. We've had a, you know, cold streak.
It was down to, I don't know, 41 degrees or something yesterday. And so in that kind of weather, a good hoodie is essential.
And I don't know about you, but sometimes it's tough to find a hoodie that lasts season after season. And I'm happy to recommend, I think, my favorite hoodie from our sponsor, American Giant.
The American Giant Classic Full Zip Hoodie is made to last a lifetime. You can count on it to bring you comfort and warmth year after year.
Slate Magazine called it the greatest hoodie ever made. And from cotton to zipper, it's made right here in the USA.
Tyler, my husband actually had an American Giant hoodie before their response or way back. And he couldn't have been more pumped when he found out that American giant was now supporting the pod so we can get some new hoodies in, you know, refresh it, get some different colors, get some different weights.
And he had the heavyweight. We tried out the lightweight, just got one in yesterday and boy, it is cozy.
I got to tell you, I also tried out some of the pants, some little khaki chinos from american giant i'm not a big khaki man but i got a one of those colored chinos you know to uh just kind of wear maybe it's probably it's really probably gonna be more for next fall you know when i want to when i want to get into algor earth tones and i was pretty i was pretty happy about those i tried them on yesterday too so go check it out so it's not about the hoodies. American Giant makes staples that are anything but basic like the premium Slub Crew Tee, No BS High Rise Pant and Slim Roughneck Pant.
So this season, snag the hoodie that will bring you comfort for life. The American Giant Classic Full Zip and save 20% off your first order at American-Giant.com when you use code BULWARK at checkout.
That's 20% off your first order at American-Giant.com when you use code BULWARC at checkout. That's 20% off your first order at American-Giant.com, code BULWARC.
I want to talk about Greenland and some of that stuff and some of the bigger picture, but I want to put it into this context. The Gulf of Trump, Gulf of America.
My Gulf of Trump idea where we kind of sell it to him in exchange for something, that hasn't really taken off yet.

It's just a licensing agreement.

Yeah.

It's just a licensing agreement in exchange for, I don't know, there's some, my buddy sent me a link, there's some Norwegians that think that they can, I'm going to mess this up so scientists don't get mad at me in the comments, but like you can take a ship and put bubbles into the Gulf. When you see a hurricane is coming and the bubbles would mess with the water temperature to such a degree that it would calm the hurricane down, send it back out to sea.
So maybe in exchange for the Gulf of Trump, we can, the Norwegians can license it and we can get the bubble solution. You never know.
I don art of the deal but uh all of this is under this rubric uh you posted onto blue sky actually one more note of personal privilege before we get to your blue sky skeet people are like why aren't you on blue sky i'm never going to get onto blue sky minute by minute i'm just not going to do it but i would like to be able to at least occasionally engage, share some of my material.

Here's the problem.

When Blue Sky first started, like a week after it started,

somebody was like, you should get on this.

And so I got on and I have an account.

You tagged me apparently.

It has a lot of followers.

I have no idea what the password is.

I've tried all of the passwords that I've always used.

I'm not going to tell anybody what they are, but I've tried all of them. I've emailed Blue Sky support a couple of times and I can't get into the account.
And so if anybody works for Blue Sky and listens to this, wants to help me get into the account, then maybe I could engage with my 100,000 followers or whatever it is. So that's the answer for people wondering why I haven't skied it.
Anyway, you were telling your, you know, do it, do we have a term for, for blue sky fans, you know, like, uh, believers for Justin Bieber. I don't think so.
The carpenters. Anyway, we'll think about that.
You were telling your carpenters that, uh, they are coming on the pod and asking them what, what, if they had any suggestions for topics. And one of them wrote, how do we spend the next four years focused on the real issues and not reacting to every Trump troll and misdirection? You said you have a lot of thoughts on this.
So I want to hear them. Yeah.
So this is something that I've been contemplating and I expect to launch a newsletter through Protect Democracy. We have a free newsletter.
Please subscribe. It's called If You you can keep it but the biggest challenge we have ahead is number one distinguishing between what are real threats and what's just noise right like you know i wrote a book and god it was 2018 gaslighting america why we love it and trump lies and like we know just because we've lived in Trump's America, how he deliberately manufactures chaos to create confusion, to polarize people, to give himself operating distance and create opacity between himself and the press so that nobody can really understand what he's up to.
And that all accrues to his benefit. So that's like the first layer task.
But the second layer task is that he's going to have immense power, he expects to use it. So how do we focus on the things that really do matter in a productive way.
And so what me and my colleagues at PD have been talking about is, okay, well, what is the most important thing that we can do going forward? And we've sort of landed on the idea that it all revolves around protecting electoral competition in the future, right? Like we need the ability to compete. And I'm not talking about us as, you know, protect democracy, but the greater we, you know, of everyone who engages in politics, how do we compete effectively in 26 and 28? And that really isn't a task that should be left to the candidates at the last minute to organize campaigns, per se.
I think we can see that evidenced by what happened with Kamala Harris, because you really need much more infrastructure at the front end. And the biggest threat that Trump poses is entrenching power, expanding reach to sideline opponents, right? Like that essentially is what everything- Orbanism.
It's preventing orbanism. Yes.
The authoritarian playbook is all about sidelining opponents when you look at the end game of it. And that's all for the purpose of staying in power.
This is why autocrats don't leave power. And this is probably one of the most controversial things that we talk about, that JBL talks about, the idea that Trump will install himself into power and never leave.
That is a very real thing. That is what autocrats do.
He ran for three for president in three consecutive elections and is back now. And maybe if he doesn't stay in power, he doesn't seek a third term, the odds are that he will play as kingmaker and call the shots behind the scenes and continue to play that role.
And so everything that we should be looking at should revolve around finding ways to maintain a level playing field. I think that is the biggest threat.
It's Trump entrenching power. And so we have to find ways to fight for that level playing field.
So what does that practically mean? Number one above all, it's protecting the civic space, our free speech rights, the right to report, the right to speak about things. Because if you lose that, if they are successful in suing critics like Olivia Troy to bully her into silence, if they are able to shut down Liz Cheney because of what she did to speak out against January 6th, you are not going to have the ability to organize a campaign.
Well, in the inverse of that, if these tech oligarchs decide to do only promoted speech of their own stuff. Right? Like, you know, I mean, because Elon pretends to be a free speech guy.
Meanwhile, forcing people to see his propaganda in the For You page and elevating all pro-maga stuff and tamping down critics. And so this can take a lot of different forms, but protecting the space to speak, wherever that comes, is critical.
And next step to do that is protecting individuals and organizations who are targeted because they challenge the administration. This is where the

idea of, you know, you fight to protect Liz Cheney, not because she's Liz Cheney and you like her, but because if they realize they can take her down with these meritless prosecutions and such, they're going to go after other people. So you fight on the first ground, you fight to defend those first targets.
And I think along the way, that can have a unifying effect that helps the organization, that helps the campaigns, that helps the candidates refine these pro-democracy messages in a way that are relatable to the public and not just speaking about it in abstract terms. And that is how you get along to the business of winning elections.
And along the way, making sure that you are protecting the rights to free and fair elections. Because electoral competition, this doesn't just mean, oh, we can go have a vote in November 2028.
Because there's a lot of authoritarian regimes where people have the guise of elections. They're just meaningless because the public already lost the ability to muster any meaningful opposition in the buildup to them.
I'm curious then, I have a couple of specific examples I want to go through, but at the broadest level, I'm curious then, as we look to like, for example, next week, we'll be having confirmation hearings, right? So I assume, but maybe I'm wrong, that you guys are going to be monitoring the ones that have the biggest potential impact on protecting the civic space is going to be Bondi, the AG, Patel. I don't think we have a hearing date yet for Patel.
Anything else that jumps out to you? Yeah, I mean, this gets into the question, which I think is important for everyone in this space.

so knowing that you know if you agree with my thesis if this thesis that is developing that protecting electoral competition all those things that go with it are the most important

thing how do you distinguish between what are just normal policy disputes that are politics as usual

and things that actually fundamentally threaten the future of fair and free elections and electoral competition. So let's take Kach Patel, for example.
It would be within the purview of a new FBI director to come in and say, the president campaign on on stepping up drug enforcement, and I have a plan to go after these drug cartels and allocate a bunch more resources to do that. Like, okay, that is a normal policy.
They are entitled to advance that. You may have political disagreements with it, but that's within the bounds of what an administration is entitled to do in terms of like policies.
That is much different than Kash Patel coming in and saying, I have an enemies list and I am going to essentially harass them, use taxpayer resources against them for the purposes of sidelining them as political opponents and obstacles to our power. Right.
Like those are two different things. And being able to tell the difference amid all the challenges that we have coming, I think is going to be absolutely critical in terms of maintaining a productive means of prioritizing the threats.
So let's kind of talk about what that exactly looks like in the context of, I think the questioner was probably asking, like, okay, because you get this a lot. What are we focused on? We're getting distracted.
He's distracting us, right? And the most obvious distraction effort this week was Gulf of Trump, Gulf of America. We're going to take Greenland.
Canada is going to be the 51st state. He brought that up again at the press conference yesterday.
I think that there are a lot of people that would say, looking at the rubric you just laid out, that that stuff is frivolous. You should ignore it.
I think I have a little bit of a different view that's also just developing. I don't know that anyone has a perfect answer to all this, but I'm curious what your response is under that construct.
There's different roles for different organizations, different people, different sectors of civil society. A lot of this is silly.
But yeah, like, should we let this go? But okay. Part of maintaining that competitive electoral profile means not waiting until 26 and 28.

My sort of... maintaining that competitive electoral profile means not waiting until 26 and 28.

My sort of question, which is outside my lane at PD, is where are the platforms that the Democrats,

because we only have a two-party system, we only have two options essentially in every ballot,

what are they doing to foster and cultivate talent in order to be ready for that moment?

And what that should mean is that we the events and things happening where people can have answers to this and say things like okay you want to go to Greenland like show me how much is going to cost like come back and put the burden the burden of Trump was sort of something I'm thinking about like put the burden back on. He throws all kinds of stuff back out there.
And I was inspired, you know, listening to you speak about this the other day. Say, okay, bring me the proposal.
We have out of control deck. You can't pass a tax bill.
You want to go buy Greenland? You think that's a great idea? But that isn't like the ground we necessarily fight on. But, you know, I always look back to, you know, how did the Tea Party movement gain such power? It did not happen overnight.
It happened over a long period of time with all these conferences and events where people were constantly testing out messages and giving speeches and testing their appeal. Right.
And I just don't see that happening. Why can't the Democratic primary for 2028 start to begin right now? We didn't have one last time because we waited.
Everyone waited to the last minute. What are you waiting for, guys? Yeah, I agree with that.
So here's my here's how I kind of divide all is to your point of there's different rules for different people in civic society. I think that your point and JVL writes about this a lot in the triad is like that protecting democracy, use a pun by protecting our civic space elections.
Like that is the prime thing. Like that is the thing that where people need to fight, where donors and lawyers should be in the field, ensuring that people's basic rights are protected and that our constitutional Republic goes forward without any, without any efforts by an aspiring autocrat to undermine it i totally agree that's the prime work and objective of the next four years okay but also like the democrats now to your next point have a political objective which is to actually win some power back so they can wield power inside the government in 2026 and 2028 and here i think is where you you get to the interesting strategic question, because I think the person that, that skeeted you on blue sky, I think they were saying that there is this conventional wisdom.
That's like Trump distracts us with this stuff. And we should focus only on the serious stuff because that is how you win elections.
And that is how, and you're like, you're not, that's how you don't play't play his game and i don't know i i've just i actually had that view for a little while in the last midterm in particular when it was successful for democrats in the first biden midterm and i'm starting to change my mind on it for this reason you know again we're working this out in real time i don't if anybody had the sure proof answer to this donald trump wouldn't be being inaugurated again in a week but i was watching i was on my little tiktok and i was scrolling through and i stomped on one of my one of the sports podcasts that i that i watch is one of the bros uh no yeah well i mean they're bros but yeah i don't know i don't think it's a sport they didn't have any political guests on it's called pardon my take shout shout out to pft it's a part my take, they were talking about Greenland.

Right?

Like they were talking, like, you think this is a good idea?

Should we buy Greenland?

Go America.

Isn't that awesome?

Go America.

We should buy Greenland.

And like, those are the people that helped Trump win.

Right? Like Trump won because he gained among people that only knew about the Haitians and Greenland and the stupid stuff like they don't care about reconciliation right like they don't care that much about the intricacies of immigration policy even though I do they don't care about protecting civic space you know what I mean like they're only engaging with Trump on the stupid shit that Trump puts out there. Like that's their whole political life, like worldview.
And so that just makes me wonder if the Democrats are making a mistake by saying, okay, no, we're just going to focus on the serious stuff that really threatens people's lives. And we're going to let him do all this silly stuff and dominate the news and dominate the battle space for the next four years and continue to gain ground among these folks that read the news less.
And that is what makes me think, no, actually the Democrats should be playing his fucking game. And I don't exactly know what that means in the Greenland context, but like, you know, I was, when I saw the next level is in the Harvey Weinstein context.
Harvey Weinstein context it's like it's like maybe instead of focusing on whatever that the Democrats should be out there and being like or not Harvey Weinstein when I say everyone I say I meant Jeffrey Epstein sorry sorry I was confusing my sex pass in the Jeffrey Epstein uh context it's like it's like Trump let's see it why haven't you released it oh wait or are you are you the pedo actually were you the were you the person Was the pedo coming from inside the house after all? Like, let's see all the, you know what I mean? Like, stuff that does break through to the broader electorate. I don't know.
So what do you think about that, which is like the counter argument to don't get distracted by the silly stuff? Here's how I see it. Protecting the civic space is a duty, you know, as you mentioned, the lawyers and things like that.
But protecting that space also means taking it up, right? Like, you can maintain a level playing field, but if you don't have people on it, as active participants in the game, what is the point? And so this is something, you know, I am very delighted to see that Sarah is putting a big, bad, bold goal of getting a million subscribers on the free list for Bulwark because that's sort of what it's going to take.

Like we all know traditional media is dead, right?

Cable news ratings are absolutely in the basement because nobody gets their stuff there.

So go to where the audience is, right?

Take up that civic space to communicate with people. And like free media is the media, it's YouTube, it's TikTok, it's all those things.
And I don't know why, like, it's just, it's so odd to see that people are still resisting what is so obviously happening. You know, you always find these and things like that well we need new messengers we need new messages no like just go have conversations where people are at get on youtube and i you know it's hard to do and i really commend bulwark especially for being so pioneering because it is hard to do and to show up but a lot more people need to be getting into the free media space and finding ways to i mean it's not going to be profitable to be able to pay to give people that information in that way i do think there are bad ways to be distracted by trump uh speaking of uh the failures of the establishment media i don't i hate being a media critic I try to do as little media criticism on here as possible because to your point, it's increasingly pointless because it's not where people are getting their news.
But I had to do it on this one on Greenland just so people can understand the distinction I'm talking about. I'm talking about trying to asymmetrically attack Trump by going after these things that are tabloidy and having democratic politicians and people that oppose Trump, you know, try to use his own, his own methods against him.
I'm not talking about the mainstream media taking him seriously. And when before he's actually put his money where his mouth is, as you said.
Amanda, the Politico headline today,

as I was on politico.com looking for topics,

can Trump buy Greenland?

Technically, yes.

Here are his options.

No.

Good.

Do the work for him.

No.

Don't help him.

Okay?

Like, don't help him.

All right?

Like, it's not actually the job of journalists to

like donald trump farted out some stupid thing that somebody told him on the golf course and now it's art now we're gonna put a real serious context around it there was a new york times version of this that somebody sent me that was like donald trump's strategy to buy greenland is actually an effort to mitigate against the threat of climate change i mean isn't it like just scouting out properties for another Trump hotel. Like, isn't that the most probability? The biggest probability is that it looks big on a map.
And he's like, that looks big and cool. And I want the big and cool thing on the map that it, because of the, the way the cartography works.
But when it comes to like having a political answer to this sort of stuff i mean it is i've got to say watching watching john jr go on this trip to greenland while california is burning right california is burning to a crisp yeah and we know that donald trump has explored the idea of withholding wildfire funding for previous cal wildfires, because he didn't think the voters, they were sufficiently supportive. What in God's name? Like, this is where I'm talking about.
Like, why aren't the Democrats starting to, I don't say campaign now, but can't there be a big event to say, Hey guys, do you think climate change is real now? I mean, I know this is not the exact moment to do that, but someone, isn't that like what is staring us in the face? And we don't have any answers, any solutions, then maybe John Jr. wants to build a new hotel in Greenland that he can flee to? What Elon's going to do to spaceship to Mars and the planet burns down I this kind of seems like obvious stuff maybe not right now because it is so horrific but I am kind of I am flabbergasted that you know there's split screen coverage of everyone losing their home and you know what's Trump going to do next is he going to buy Greenland It's just such a jarring thing where, you know, we are living in different realities and we need to fight to have some kind of shared vision of what is going on and what threatens us.
way to think about it as America first. There's a way for Democrats to engage on this in the Americans first context,

which is like, it's real Americans

that are suffering, right? And you said

that you're gaining in California and like they're real Americans

in Altadena that voted for donald trump that are suffering and you're and you're right now angling to get new property in greenland or invade the panama canal that's not america first one last thing with the protect democracy had on the elon uh kind of oligarch corruption part of it all you know i do yeah i do kind of i can't believe oh i'm officially a podcast cut that out okay you hate the other i've said i got sucked in by all the other podcast hosts that use that phrase take out the of it all hold me accountable for my for my verbal tics thank you amanda don't cut it out, Katie, but just let people hear me put on my own hair shirt for using these cliché tics.

I can do better next time.

Elon, though, that is, to me, there's a political argument there that the Democrats could use going after these masters of the universe.

but I'm interested in your view on kind of like the parallels, you know,

to what we've seen,

you know,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in,

in, in, in, in, in,, you know, in autocratic capture in other places around the world. I mean, this feels, there's been this era, you know, in the Gilded Age in America before, but in kind of the modern time in the post-World War II world, like the access that Elon has, the access that these super billionaires have to Trump feels much more like what we see in countries where we're concerned about the end of democracy than it feels like an American, a traditional American, you know, kind of I scratch your back, you scratch mine kind of stuff that we've seen from both parties.
yeah i mean the rush of anticipatory obedience from people i mean elon was obviously first in

line to place all his bets on Trump and get the biggest, fattest seat at the Mar-a-Lago table possible. You see that followed with Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos and others.
And maybe that's just more obvious in a way than we see the other people lining up behind Trump. Like everyone's offering to get their hand in the till and pay for his inauguration.
The ridiculous $15 million defamation suit that ABC News settled while they're laying off people left and right, no longer engaging in the news gathering business. That's all happening.
And yeah, that is what you see in countries where you have to essentially be in with the leader and engage in that form of corruption in order to preserve your business interests, right? Like it is, in many ways, an act of self preservation. Some people are more eager to do it than others.
but aside from that what you were talking about made me think about one of the other challenges

is how do we do our job defending democracy, protecting spaces without defending or apologizing for the status quo, right? I think that's the trap that Harris and Biden and others fell into. And saying that you want to protect institutions doesn't mean that they're perfect.
In knowing and explaining and understanding the difference between what is real reform and what leads to ruin is complicated, but necessary. This is tough for me in particular because I do think the status quo is like basically fine.
Can we have problems? But this is my, this is my small C conservative. Like my inside is like, you guys want change, but I don't know, change might be bad.
And so we should be a little more careful, but that's a political loser. And people, we should be thoughtful about it.
Yeah. Not with healthcare, not with education, not with climate, not with, it's a lot of things in saying that, you know, everyone is fine and the economy is up, so therefore you have more money or paychecks, that doesn't translate to people without pensions, without the stock market, et cetera.
So yeah, that's a whole other thing. I'm aware of the ways in which some of my priors are bad politics.
I've been made painfully aware of that. You are not responsible for this.
Well, excuse me. All right.
Well, I'm, I'm burdening myself. So, okay.
I'm not unburdened by what has been. You shouldn't apologize for yourself.
I am very burdened by what has been Amanda. Um, uh, to that point, final thing, uh, cause we were talking about in the green room, so we should bring it public.
Okay. We got 10 days.
Then he's going to be inaugurated again. That's going to be bad.
I don i've been thinking about it and um i'm going to new york mostly so my family doesn't have to be around me it's going to be healthy to hang out on the msnbc yeah i want tyler to be able to live in peaceful bliss and like and stream yeah some stupid tv show and uh you know go to the park whatever go to crawfish, crawfish season is back and not have me, you know, have to hear his voice in the background. And so that's how I'm dealing with it.
But I think it's going to be tough. I mean, it is such a repudiation of a lot of the good that we have believed about the country.
That doesn't mean that there's no good left in the country, but it's hard to not not think about that and not be depressed or discouraged worse than whatever the maximum version of discouraged is. It's hard not to think about it will be hard not to experience that feeling next week.
So anyway, I thought maybe some listeners could think it could get some value in hearing how you're processing it. Yeah, I mean, it's going to be tough, no doubt.
I don't expect I'm going to tune in to watch it live. I'll see the pictures.
I do want to read the speech to see how he approaches the second term. I can already tell you it's going to be the opposite of American carnage.
He's going to pretend to be everybody's friend and pretend to unite. And we're going to have to gag as people are like, well, look at this.
Trump's turning over a new leaf. You might not have to read the speech.
I'm telling you what it's going to be.

yeah this is part of it like he he gets his moment he won he gets to have the big ceremony he gets to march down the avenues all the pictures will be in melania all the media

coverage is going to be glowing right because they want to give him that sort of sweetener coming in. I don't think I'm going to be able to watch it.
You know, people who are in the political opposition, don't let them see your tears. Don't do it.
Don't do it. Tune out.
Protect your mental health. This is going to be a long slug.
And you're going to have to have the energy. Don't burn it now.
This is all. It's going to be a week of sugar cane coverage.
Let it happen. You can't stop it.
This is not something to stop. It's not something to fight over.
There are going to be big issues down the road. You know, that's why I've worked with my colleagues to develop a framework on distinguishing what really matters and what doesn't.
And him getting us in the picture and the paper with his hand over the Bible and everyone's smiling, isn't it? Good advice. It will be tough for me to follow.
But listeners should follow it if they can. I got to be here for the people that want to suffer with me.
But yeah, I'm with you. No sadness.
I'll listen to you, but I'm not going to watch the event. We'll talk about feelings, but no sadness porn here.
Because as you said, we can't stop it. That's what we're living through.
Amanda, please come back every month so we can talk through it all. It is so good to see you.
And my love to the family, everybody else. We'll be back here on Monday.
It's nine years since we lost David Bowie, so we'll take you out with a little Bowie. We'll be back here with Bill Kristol on Monday.
See you all then. Peace.
I knew something's very wrong. The pulse returns the prodigal sons.
With blackouts, with flowered mules With skull designs upon my shoes I can't give everything I can't give everything away

I can't get everything This is all I ever meant That's the message that I sent

I can't give everything

I can't give everything

Away Away

I can't give everything

Away The Bullwark Podcast is produced by Katie Cooper

with audio engineering and editing by Jason Brough.