Adam Kinzinger: Bat**** Crazy

Hello and welcome to the Bulwark podcast. I'm your host, Tim Miller.
I am here today with the new contributor to the Bulwark, Adam Kinzinger. He's a former Republican congressman.
He's a senior political commentator on CNN, the founder of Country First, which backs pro-democracy candidates. You're feeling well this time, brother? I'm feeling great.
You know, what, two times ago I was like basically on my deathbed and we,

you had to, country first, which backs pro-democracy candidates. You're feeling well this time, brother? I'm feeling great.
You know, what, two times ago, I was like basically on my deathbed,

and you had to carry me on your shoulders, but you did a good job. You were the wind beneath my

wings. Sometimes you got to do it for each other.
I needed Will Salatin on Monday. I had a jet lag

plus hangover. I did okay? Yeah, you did.
You did. You found something deep within to pull that off, but I'm sure you had to take a couple-hour nap after.
I did. I took a lengthy nap afterwards.
Okay, before we get to business, two plugs real quick. Next week, Kins and I are doing an Ask Me Anything for the founding members of The Bulwark.
We will also be live in Dallas, Texas. That's a big announcement right now.
In Dallas, me and Adam in the flesh drinking beer is september 5th right so mark that on your calendar and so if you want to do either of those things go to the bulwark.com and on the top you can click on founders or events for more information on how you become a member how you come see us live if you just want to listen to the podcast that's fine too but uh yeah those are your ops for more adam and tim time and get it now because it's going to sell out in 48 hours we're going to sell out baby the denver thing is going to be bumping tomorrow it is but i've just been getting lots of texts about it all right let's have a little laugh to start huh people have been telling me i've been a little too dour this week so we're going to start with a little laugh let's take a listen there's a fellow out there with a new book called apprentice in wonderland it's a retrospective on the apprentice and how important it was so you will not be surprised at all to hear that donald trump did six interviews with him for this book six dude it's got nothing better to do running for president won't talk to any media outlets but if you want to call him and talk and talk about the apprentice he will make time for you so so let's just hear a couple of highlights from the republican uh presidential nominee's discussion about his past life as a reality show host let's listen first his thoughts about joan rivers there was some cognitive questions about where he was and what he was thinking and um he would he would from time to time become confused because you wrote at one point about joan rivers him telling you that that she voted for him in 2016 i believe even though confidently told me and declared that joan rivers voted for him when he ran for president and joan rivers died in 2014 joan rivers died in 2014 so she would not have been able to vote for donald trump yeah and you because you talked about his memory you wrote that you know on some days I have the feeling he has no idea who he's even talking to, that he actually forgot or didn't remember that the two of you had spoken at your first sit-down interview. Right, so my first sit-down was in May.
He wasn't doing a lot of interviews, and then we sat down again towards the end of the summer, and when I sat down, I, you know, there was a very blank expression on his face, so I asked, do you remember when we spoke recently? And he said, no, I have no memory of that. And he couldn't recall.
He said it was a long time ago. And then we had to start from scratch.
So the interview started from square one, where he was started telling me the same exact stories that we, that we, I heard in our first interview. Two observations from me there.
One, if he was a young blonde woman, I think Trump would have remembered him. So not the memory is you know, just it's fading.
It's not fully gone. And two, I love just the quick gay fact check there.
It's like, no, Joan Rivers death, 2014, actually. Sorry, bro.
But what do you think about that? Now, we had the CEO meeting this week where some CEOs also had a similar piece of feedback. First off, like, how do you even get on to Joan Rivers? Like, what is the stream of consciousness that leads to Joan Rivers voted for me? Also, weird lie.
Weird person to pick if you're going to lie. You can make up anybody.
Yeah. I mean, he always says Jesus does, so just stick with that or something.
But here's the thing. What he does very well that Joe Biden doesn't is older men, they have these memory lapses.
I have memory lapses and I'm 46, but you know, Joe Biden will stop and think, right. He'll just kind of not freeze, but he'll stop and be like, okay, where was I? Donald Trump just garbage talks his way through it until he's either onto something totally different or he finally catches his place.
But I think this is actually one of the more things that maybe things like the debate, maybe the next whatever is going to bring it out. But Donald Trump is not the mentally sharp guy that his people are trying to betray.
And again, he's just good at covering that up. And by the way, how do you do six interviews for a book? I'm not a bajillionth as famous as Donald Trump.
And I would never sit for more than like two interviews. I'd be like, okay, if you can't do it in two, we're done.
Right? Like I can't, I can't do it. Just like, Oh wait, we're going to talk about me and my reality career.
Just come on by, come on by Mar-a-Lago. You can sit in the golf cart with me.
Whether it was a lie about, like, I don't, I'm not sure if it's worse to be, create a lie that joan rivers voted for you or to be confused and dementia riddled and believing that joan rivers really voted for you both of those have their own flaws let's listen to the other clip from the author here because this i think is the joan rivers thing's kind of funny this one speaks to some deeper derangement related to the 2020 election lies. Let's listen to his confusion about what his role is in Afghanistan.
And he was happiest when he talked to me about hosting The Apprentice. It was the thing that brought him the most joy.
We watched clips of the show together. We watched the theme song and he really lit up.
He watched his firing of Omarosa. And then he would talk about what he did at the White House.
And he would become gloomy and resentful and unhappy and refer to Afghanistan and Joe Biden. But he also seemed to think that he still had some foreign policy powers.
And there was one day where he told me he needed to go upstairs to deal with Afghanistan, even though he clearly didn't. He told you that he while you were interviewing him at Trump Tower, he told you he needed to go upstairs to deal with Afghanistan? With the quote, the Afghanistan is how he referred to it.
That is the strangest thing, Tim. Look, by the way, I sat in the Oval Office where Donald Trump said he wanted to abandon Afghanistan.
I mean, that's a whole nother story. But the fact that he's trying to put this on Joe Biden, first off, this is all Donald Trump.
Joe Biden could have changed it, but Donald Trump left him, set him up to fail. The other point I want to make on that is he lit up when he talked about The Apprentice and he was dour when he talked about being president.
This kind of checks with what people say, where they're like, he hated being president. Okay.
He didn't enjoy it. He's always wanted to be a Hollywood entertainer.
And I think you see that. Yeah.
I think you see that in him. And it's like, I wish he would have just been a Hollywood entertainer.
I make him as famous as Tom Cruise, but at least he's not damaging the country. Look with the, I got to go deal with the Afghanistan.
I mean, either he is like you mentioned, so adept at lying that he just pulled that one out of thin air, or he is truly confused. And I guess only time's going to tell, but it's not something I think we should paper over lightly when we're talking about who's going to be in charge of the most powerful nuclear arsenal in the world.
Yeah, I agree with that. One of my buddies texted me about this kind of topic, about how he did all these interviews and how he lit up you know remembering the highlights of his life like

when he fake fired amarosa love that let's watch the highlight reel from when i pretended to fire

amarosa on a tv show maybe we could have gotten out of this problem if i don't know a network had

just given him another show yeah maybe this would have been the greatest and best use of

the nbc comcast dollars instead of put him in Top Gun 3 like Fatty's Revenge or something like that just do it, you'd be famous you'd have to fly a big heavy jet but you could do that Jeffrey Katzenberg over there at the Biden campaign let's get on this, let's have Yeah, it reminded me of the Afghanistan thing. It reminded me of, I went to cover Lin Wood in South Carolina after the pandemic, right, in 2021.
And Lin, again, it's, you know, who the hell knows with these people? Like, do they believe this? Is it a put on? Is it a little bit of both? But at this event, he was advocating this notion that Trump was still really in charge.

The thing that's why it's worth taking it kind of seriously,

that Trump is delusional and thinks that the generals are still reporting to him or whatever,

is that that's a common trope in MAGA world.

The deep part of MAGA.

Not Fox, not even really Newsmax.

But once you get down the pipeline into real kooky world, into the Telegram feeds and, you know, the Mike Flynn events, like there are people that really do think that like, that Trump is still in charge of the QAnon crowd. Yeah, they do.
And it's weird. It's like a five or 10 year old that plays, you know, pretend, like walking around the house, pretending like he's a cop or something like that.
And I guess I don't know the psychology behind it, but when you spend years convincing yourself that something is right, you spend years accepting lies and in some cases repeating lies over and over. I've got to imagine, I mean, there's a reason that the Bible warns against lying.
And I think it's more than just God likes truth. It's because it does something to you.
These people that are habitual liars, for instance, they often say they can't help themselves. They have to lie.
It feels like it changes the brain chemistry in some way, and it's like people are so desperate for community that they become unmoored from reality. You see that in this QAnon circles, this idea that, you know, you and I have been accused of drinking baby's blood and harvesting adrenal chrome, which by the way, is exactly the plot to Monsters Inc.
But these people believe that there are kids that like you, you scare them and they release adrenaline and then you inject that adrenaline into your body. This is some kooky stuff.
But look, if I truly believe the Democrats were harvesting children's blood, I would probably have a tendency to get violent because why wouldn't you, right? That's the scary part about it. And maybe he just doesn't know when he, you know, it's hard for him to check back and forth because he's talking to Mike Flynn, you know what I mean? So he's got to do the pretend game sometimes and other times.
It's hilarious and it's pathetic, but it's also a little alarming. Just to caitlin collins our friend i did want to ask you about one of the things because i was watching you yesterday with my old pal scott jennings i'm kind of jealous of you and kind of jealous of caitlin you know that you guys that still get to spar with people like on ms the you know the magas don't come right they don't give it a shot what's that been like like have you do you feel like you've still gotten to kind of go back and forth with folks a little bit or a little bit but it's like when you get in a fight like an argument you know 10 minutes later you're like oh i should have said that right that's kind of the thing that haunts you because like at the moment you can push back but yeah i mean like yesterday it was was scott and i and we were talking about this good mcguire race whatever.
He's going to tow the party line, and I've got to call out reality. I enjoy doing that because he was stone-faced.
I think I said something like it's picking between dysentery or the flu, so take your choice. Then we were talking about how people are unwilling to go outside of Mog, and I said, this is exactly how you build a cult.
He said, well, I think of Donald Trump more of a party boss, which I guess I get that analogy too. But no, it's a cult.
A party boss still had people that would like get jobs from him. And that's why they liked him.
They're just scared to death of this guy. So, yeah, I enjoy it.
But it's like at the same time, it's frustrating because, as you know, you get like 20 seconds to respond to something. And, you know, usually it would take 20 minutes to really get into it okay well if any of the mag is in the green room want to come on the bulwark podcast i have some muscles that need to be stretched out you know it's like if you you know get an atrophy it's like if you don't exercise for a while speaking of that good mcguire race i don't want to talk to you about it this is bob good as one of your colleagues for people that don't know this race, neck and neck race, Bob Good was the very fine gentleman.
The primary to our friend Denver Riggleman because Denver officiated a gay wedding. That was literally the reason why this primary happened.
The pictures came out of Denver officiating a gay wedding and Bob Good is like, we can't accept that. Good wins that primary here's how Ron Filipkowski describes Bob Good he's as right-wing as it gets chair of the House Freedom Caucus rock-solid right-wing voting record he also opposed McCarthy but then he endorsed DeSantis against Trump and so that was his big that was his gay wedding officiating.
Bob Good endorsed DeSantis against Trump. And so that was his big, that was his gay wedding officiating.
Bob Good endorsed DeSantis against Trump. And so this guy, McGuire challenged Good literally only on the premise of the fact that he will be totally servile to Donald Trump in every single way and completely serve Donald Trump.
And as we stand right now, it looks like we're going to be in a recount, but by a very narrow margin, Maguire is going to win over good. Who's only crime to MAGA was endorsing DeSantis like that.
That's not party boss. That's cult, right? Yeah, it's cult.
And they spent $10 million in this race between the two sides. And I don't know how that breaks down.
I think Maguire obviously had a lot more, but think about this. Like when you and I were kids in politics, like we may spend 10, well, we wouldn't spend 10 million, but whatever the equivalent was at the time on a race, because the difference is somebody that's like against trade versus for trade or somebody, you know, whatever the issue is.
The only thing that differentiates these two is that, like you said, Bob Good for a brief moment in time endorsed DeSantis. The second DeSantis went out, Bob Good was deeply in with Donald Trump.
And Donald Trump saw that as a slight. There's also another unique side, which is Kevin McCarthy came in and played pretty heavy as a way to enact revenge, which I don't blame McCarthy for doing that.
Because Good was one of the eight or whatever it was that originally, one of the Gates eight that originally, yeah. Yeah.
He kind of led the charge. But look, when I left Congress, Good was the batshit craziest member of Congress.
And now he's not batshit crazy enough. And this is like, I say this to my former colleagues all the time.
I was like, why are you guys staying in? Because literally the price of admission now as a Republican is 100% fealty to a man and you can't vary from it. This is how you build a cult.
And that's why it is a complete cult now because enough people in the cult have been executed that tried to escape or tried to do something outside of that. And now everybody's just completely in.
Soon they'll all drink the Kool-ool-aid it's the ken buck thing for me it's so similar i mean maybe by the time you got there ken was more towards the middle of the caucus but like so i'm from colorado right no never uh but colorado and like ken buck was in that 2010 class with i'm not a witch christine o'donnell and sharon engel that was like this that first wave of tea party candidates that primaried more mainstream republicans he was priming against uh jane norton at the time who was the mainstream lieutenant governor of a guy that i'd worked for when i was a kid and he wins that then loses the senate race and ends up getting in the house but it's like everybody in that race it's like this guy is a lunatic this guy is bad shit he wants to burn everything down like he's not you know and and then he ends up being the one that's like i've got to leave congress things have gotten too crazy for me you know and now good is a guy it's like he's not crazy enough we gotta replace him it really is astonishing yeah and if you think about like when ken buck came he he wrote a book like i don't know we were all kind of making fun of him because he wrote a book his freshman year, but he wrote a book and it was like talking about the cocktail parties of Washington. And, you know, these people get together and consume alcohol while, you know, and we were making fun of that.
Cause it's like, what a, what a prude, you know? Yeah, we all drink and look, he wasn't super good during impeachment. He wasn't super good during January 6th, But I do give him credit because he eventually hit a point where he's like, my moral conscious won't allow this.
And the question to me, Tim, is why does everybody else's moral conscious allow it? I don't get it. Yeah.
It's like if Ken Buck is like, this is getting a little too loony tunes for me. Isn't that a moment for self-reflection, I would guess, with some of your other colleagues? You would think so.
And what about, yeah, the Tom Coles, who's a good guy but plays the game? The people that are there that are playing the game, how can you guys do that? Obviously, it's foreign to me, but some people can make it work. The best way to learn a language? Immersion.
Living where the language is spoken and using it every day. But unfortunately, staying in Bartholomew was not in the cards for me this year.
And if it's not for you either, you can still learn a language the second best way, and that's with Babbel. Don't pay hundreds of dollars for private tutors or waste hours on apps that don't really help you speak the language babbles

quick 10 minute lessons are handcrafted by over 200 language experts to help you start speaking a new language in as little as three weeks babbles designed by real people for real conversations their tips and tools are approachable rooted in real life situations and delivered with conversation-based teaching so you're ready to practice what you've learned in the real world like many of you I guess I've got a child

who's now learning some French

she's in French classes, so it is important for me to be able to basically keep up, you know, learn some of the basics. This is where Babbel comes in handy.
Studies from Yale, Michigan State University, and others continue to prove Babbel is better. One study found that using Babbel for 15 hours is

equivalent to a full semester at college. Here's a special limited time deal for our listeners.

Right now, get up to 60% off your Babbel subscription, but only for our listeners

at babbel.com slash bulwark. Get up to 60% off at babbel.com slash bulwark spelled B-A-B-B-E-L

dot com slash bulwark spelled b-a-b-b-e-l dot com slash bulwark rules and restrictions may apply speaking of the evolution of the party the tariffs topic is pretty interesting to me joe perticone wrote earlier this week for the bulwark you should get his newsletter if you haven't he went back and read one of the articles he wrote when he was at Business Insider, maybe six years ago now, in 2018, where he was interviewing Republican senators who were unhappy with Trump's tariffs. It was Marco and it was all these guys.
And then he went back to the same people now. And obviously all of them have changed their tune.
There's nobody that's speaking out about the fact that trump has a blanket tariff

proposal like he they floated this proposal of eliminating the income tax replacing with tariffs steve ratner put this out this week trump proposal to replace income taxes with tariffs would be a tax hike on the bottom 90 percent and a tax break for the top 10 the top 1 would save 20%, the bottom

20% would lose 25%.

I mean, to call it regressive is just an understatement. It's insane.
It's anti-growth. It's everything.
It's just people are locked stock and two smoking barrels on this thing. It is.
It is. And you think, I mean, you think about the inflationary pressure, like that this would bring.
And here's the weird thing, Tim. So back in 2017, when we did tax reform, which by by the way i'll defend tax reform to the end of the day because i still think it was really beneficial to stop the trump tax reform yeah the one yeah because it's like the main thing wasn't the personal tax it was the corporate tax because he had all the corporate inversions that stopped anyway that's that's another subject and the salt yeah yeah salt sticking it to the connecticut people yeah i was so it didn't, it wasn't great for me, but.
Yeah. You were kind of sticking it to yourself then actually.
That gives you a little bit of credit. Country above party, brother.
Country above self. So one of the things that Paul Ryan wanted to do was a border adjustment tax.
I don't know if you remember this. It was basically, you know, they have a VAT tax overseas, but yet when they ship that good over to the united states they strip the vat tax and so it kind of unfairly competes here and so what they were trying to do was to say okay if you're going to strip the vat tax we're going to add that back at the border so it's kind of a tariff but it puts you know imports on equal footing with domestically produced stuff and uh it would have raised like a trillion bucks it It actually made sense.
The people that stopped it are the very same people. It was Southern Republicans.
They are the very same people now that are all in on this tariff thing. They stopped this because of Walmart.
And this actually was a reasonable thing, which is like a light VAT tax. It would have been great because they have no moral principles.
At the time, it was like, oh, Walmart doesn't want this. Now, it's because Donald Trump's made a, it's ludicrous to think that you're just basically going to have a sales tax and that's going to cover everything.
And that is going to crush poor people. It is going to crush poor people that now go to McDonald's and have, you know, are complaining because they have to spend eight bucks are now going to have to spend $16 while the hedge fund manager can easily afford to go from 50 bucks to a hundred bucks for his lunch because now all of his stuff is tax-free.
It's insane. It's not even serious policy.
This isn't even something that would be welcomed in the old Heritage Foundation to be debated because it's so ludicrous so that's my question

is it because it's so ludicrous that more mainstream people are not speaking out and i understand why marco rubio is not speaking out and i don't really understand but i guess he wants to be donald trump's vice president because he hopes trump dies or because his brain's been broken one of those two things or maybe both but like the walmart ceo went to the trump little gathering the other day.

Why are not, you know,

just more business guys, you know, with public personas, with, you know, public platforms speaking out just about how disastrous this would be both for business and for consumers. Do you think? It's probably two things.
It's a little bit fear, right?

I don't want to go against Trump,

and especially if you think you're the Walmart CEO,

and to you the most important thing is not Ukraine

or any principles or truth.

It's all, you know, I want Donald Trump in there.

But why?

Wouldn't Joe Biden be better for the Walmart CEO

than Donald Trump?

I think so, yeah,

because I actually think a surviving democracy

is probably better, you know, for Walmart, but they don't think that like walmart's struggling right now right no kidding and but i think the other thing really is that nobody's taking it seriously like you kind of alluded at the beginning it's like they're like this is this will never happen it's donald trump being donald trump but at some point can we as americans say if nobody takes what the guy running for president says seriously maybe he shouldn't be president of the united states that's a problem yeah right like it's an issue oh god okay a little something there was some really bad debt news this week the united states were on pace to add trillions of dollars to the national debt over the next decade and we're borrowing more than previously expected. The bigger projected deficits were driven by the student loan cancellation, $100 billion, the cost of new aid packages for Ukraine and Israel, higher than expected outlays for Medicaid and slight softening of the economy.
The numbers are just preposterous. It's just no way that the math works on this.
The Republicans obviously aren't going to do anything about it. So, like, we need a couple of Democrats, some liberals, to actually start taking this a little more seriously.
Yeah, I mean, here's the thing is, even if you take the aid package, the student loan package, and you subtract that from the deficit this year, it's $1.7 trillion, not $1.9 trillion. I mean, we're at the point now where it's like money almost doesn't matter because we're in such debt.
It's modern monetary theory, baby. Yeah, it is.
And this is something that probably won't surprise the listeners here, but would surprise most Americans. We're now spending more in interest on our debt.
Okay. So wasted money than we are on all of national defense.
I remember in Congress, I was, we'd look forward and be like, there will be a day in which we'll spend more in interest than on national defense that days today. So we sit here and we talk about all these expenditures, that interest is ballooning.
The other thing is Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid. As you know, nobody can talk about that.
But that is driving this country to bankruptcy. We should have people your age and my age planning on a different social security system than what our parents get.
And keep in mind, this $1.9 trillion deficit is in a record-breaking economy. What happens if we hit a recession? Where are we going to be? And at that point, I don't see a way out.
All we need to do, we're never going to become debt free as a country. All we need to do is get the trajectory of debt and deficit in a better

trajectory than where we're at now to keep the faith in the American system. And that's easy

enough to do, but that's going to take bipartisanship like a Bulls Simpson approach or something. And

you know, that takes leadership, which we haven't seen much of.

There are a couple of cranks, Republican cranks in Congress who talk about it, but don't back up their talk, right? Like they don't actually force any action on it the way that they would on, on culture issues. Well, they talk about it with like Ukraine.
If they don't want to do Ukraine, they don't talk about it. Like, you know, it's just like, Oh, we can't do Ukraine because of the debt, but you know, they want a sales tax.
You would think there'd be some discussion about this. One thing that I wanted to bring up, because we just don't have a chance to talk about this enough because of all the craziness in our former party, but this is really inflationary.
The weirdest thing, we're in this weird world where it's like, everybody says inflation is the number one issue. Now you look at this amount of poll yesterday, and inflation is basically the one, two, and.
Like one is issue is inflation, two is economy, three is my bills are too high or something. And yet, there is nobody that's actually proposing anti inflationary economic policies in any meaningful way, right? Like the Biden student loan debt proposal is inflationary.
As we've discussed, the Trump economic proposal is inflationary. Even if you go to the states, like state governors who are often like, oh, I'm going to give you a tax break on this.
That's inflationary. When the economy is doing well, when interest rates are high and we're trying to tame inflation, it's actually the right time to try to deal with this.
And literally nobody wants to do anything about it. Yeah, that's right.
And by the way, if you think about World War II, the selling of war bonds, one thing before

I really understood monetary policy, which I'm not an expert in, but is like, I always

wondered why would the federal government sell war bonds when they could print money?

And again, it's an anti-inflationary thing.

It's like, we need to, yes, we're going to put a ton of money into the economy, but we

have to likewise pull money out of the economy so that

we're not Venezuela running 2,000 or 3,000% inflation. That's the risk we run into now because obviously, look, the Treasury prints money.
They buy up the debt. And you end up basically with all this money in the economy now with a trillion dollar interest payments.
it's a danger. And the problem is if we get to a point where we go to auction for bids and debt, and I've been to a debt auction before, it's all automated now, but it's pretty sobering to see.
And all of a sudden, nobody's buying that debt. Then you have to raise interest rates on the debt to attract buyers.
And now you end up in that, what Paul Ryan used to always talk about, that kind of fiscal cliff, that debt spiral. Again, the thing that can prevent it is not going debt-free.
It's not even balancing the budget, but it's putting us in a trajectory where it looks like it's improving because that's all you need is people to keep the faith in the monetary system to keep it together. Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump's pal, met with his other, his pen pal, his love letter, big man, big little man, Kim Jong-un.
It was a very strange scene. Putin lands in North Korea, and the big little man's waiting for him there at the tarmac.
And then they go to a rally where a bunch of automat are like screaming about dear leader. It's giving 1931.
Oh, so Soviet. And it's just like, what do we make of this? Second visit, I guess, from Putin to Kim in the last year.
And they hadn't visited in a while. So clearly something is afoot.
Yeah, this is Putin's desperation. Look, he is he's expended a lot of his ammunition.
If you remember in Ukraine, he was actually on the ropes until Iran ran to his rescue. And then North Korea gave 5 million rounds of ammunition of one, whatever theirs is, 132 or whatever.
And they burned through a lot of it. And a lot of this ammunition is old.
So a significant amount of it is blowing up barrels as you know, the artillery crews. But he is so desperate.
And I think in exchange, he's given some nuclear technology or missile technology, something like that. So he's gone over there to beg for another arms package from Kim.
I'm sure he'll get it because he's got to keep this war going until the U.S. election in November.
Brian Kilmeade did a tweet where he's like, you know, Joe Biden has driven these authoritarians together and Donald Trump never did it. Well, they're coming together because they're increasingly desperate to survive.
You know, Vladimir Putin is going to Kim Jong-un, not because Joe Biden doesn't make him afraid. He's going to Kim Jong-un because he desperately needs him to keep his war machine going.
Look, if you're Ukraine, and this is another thing that gets under my skin when people say Ukraine is losing, when you're a defending country, the only thing you have to do to win is keep defending. If you can keep defending, you're winning.
And Ukraine is winning right now. So this is why it's important to keep a foot on the neck.
But that's what you're seeing right now is this increase in desperation. You know, Xi in China is using Putin's desperation to his advantage because the tables have turned now and Xi can kind of control Russia a little bit.
So it's the Xi's advantage. And then, you know, obviously Putin is desperate not to lose this war.
We should probably do a Ukraine update. I haven't had a Ukraine-focused guest in a few weeks.
What is your sense of the state of play now that the budget has kind of gone through and the latest from the folks you're talking to, the advocates over there? Yeah, it's improving a lot. So basically right before the budget passed, there was real concern that the lines would break.
One of Ukraine's big challenges right now is manpower. They have this asinine law, it's kind of Soviet, where you're not even draftable until you're 27 years old.
You know, in the United States, you're almost not draftable at 27. It's like 18 to 30 or whatever the draft age is.
They've lowered that to 25 or 24. And now they have new people in training.
So the personnel situation is improving.

But that was a big challenge with Ukraine.

And now U.S. weapons are starting to flow to the front line.

It's still not 100% saturation where it needs to be, but it's much, much better.

If you're watching the Internet, you can see many more videos again of Ukrainians blowing Russian stuff up.

I'm sorry, Adam.

I've got to interrupt you there.

There are not any videos of what's happening in Ukraine. I know.
Isn't that happening on the Mac, right? That is the craziest thing. You and I were texting about that.
We're like, people are saying there's no videos, there's no war. Like, what? Just type something in.
That's like madness. But anyway, the administration opening up Kharkiv, which, you know, jokingly we call all of Russia near Kharkiv now, for weapons to attack has made a huge difference.
So basically right now, every offensive that the Russians have tried against Ukraine has been pushed back. I think Russian offensive power has culminated, which means it's kind of at its max point and it can only decline now.
And I think Putin is all he's got left is hoping that Donald Trump wins. And by the way, Tim, almost 600,000 Russian casualties in two years.
That is more, at least close to what the United States lost in all of World War II, liberating two countries. Russia has lost by almost no gains.
Wow. And not to mention the F-16s are coming soon, which will be helpful.
Yeah, and we've talked about this a lot. You get a lot of people that are like, what have we gotten out of this? I mean, talk about just the crippling of this geostrategic vote.
Okay, I want to move down to one more foreign foreign policy issue bb netanyahu speaking in english said in a video earlier this week that it was quote inconceivable that in the past few months the administration has been withholding weapons and ammunitions to israel that's not really true they withheld one weapon a very strange broadside at the biden administration you know before he's about to speak to congress i note the comparison i like the comparison between we're just discussing ukraine like the way zelensky dealt with the republicans who were totally fucking him you know zelensky was still kind deferential making a pitch trying to win them over and yet like joe biden's been shoulder to shoulder with Bibi in the face of a ton of criticism and expresses one or two areas of disagreement. And he's trashing him in a video this week.
I don't understand what's going on. And I don't really understand why he's coming to a joint congressional session.
Maybe you can explain it to me. I've never been super pro Bibi, but I've been probably a little more pro Netanyahu than you were until this moment.
Because I looked at this and I saw this video and it made zero sense to me. Zero sense strategically, zero sense politically and militarily.
Like the United States is literally keeping Israel floating when it comes to these weapons. The only thing I can figure out, Tim, is this, is he is now investing in hoping that Donald Trump becomes president, because Trump's going to love this, by the way.
And the other thing is, he's simply playing to his hard right domestic audience in saying, the U.S. is screwing us.
That's why this isn't going super well. It was a huge blunder.
I don't know what he thinks he's going to accomplish besides creating further daylight between the U.S. and Israel.
And it's worth mentioning, look, we don't drop many 2,000 pound bombs. These are huge.
Okay. 2,000 pound bomb is what you drop.
Yeah. It's what you drop to level a building or a bridge or something like that.
That's the thing we've held back for a little bit. I don't know if it's still being held back out of human rights concerns.
And honestly, and I'm very, again, hawkish on what Israel needs to do, but that is a legitimate concern when you're dealing with a densely populated area. Dropping a 2,000 pound bomb is very hard to be precise in casualties.
A 500 pounder, a 100 pounder, you can be more precise. So I don't think it's unreasonable what the Biden administration has done or asked for.
And Bibi is really screwing himself in Israel, but he probably only cares about his political situation. And yet the joint session.
Yeah. I guess maybe the Democrats don't want to be in a position of, of like protesting him.
And maybe they're calculating that that would be worse than having him here, but man, I don't know. It's a pickle.
It is. And I think, you know, look, obviously Johnson invited him because he, I'm sure he believes, you know, in what's happening.
I don't, I'm not going to take that away from him, but also there is a political advantage, which half of the Democrats, which, by the way, if any of them listen, don't boycott the speech. That never helps your side.
Just go. Go respectful and then criticize.
Then go on TV and criticize. If he criticizes, you can criticize.
But go. He's coming to the Congress.
Go hear what he has to say. Unfortunately, half of them are going to boycott it, and it's going to look really bad for them.
Okay. Last thing, speaking of strange videos by political leaders, I did notice that you had some thoughts about Marjorie Taylor Greene's workout regiment.
Interesting post from her this week. I don't exactly know what the words are on the moves.
You're more of a workout man than me, so you can explain what she was up to but i don't know would you for the listeners who haven't had a chance to see it would you recommend that they go go check that out for their uh on their thursday evening if you're in the mood to be like to wtf your day yeah like here's the thing she posts these videos and she did it like before she was in congress like doing some workout in the hotel room and she tried to play it off like it was some COVID thing. Well, listen, if you want to be a influencer in, in fitness, please go do that.
Like, I think that's great. If you want to be an influencer in fitness, if you want to be a Congresswoman, okay, nobody cares about your workout videos.
The only people, and this is, this is my public service announcement to everybody. The only ones impressed by videos of you working out are you.
That's it. Well, maybe a couple potential lovers.
I get it if you are not a congressperson, if you're a human. And it's like, yeah, it's a little embarrassing and annoying to post your bench press video to your 1,000 Instagram fans because you hope the two people see it.
But sometimes that's just what you got to do because you don't want to send it to the two people because that's even more embarrassing, right? This is a different animal than that when you're in Congress. Yeah, it is.
You've never thought about that, though, bicep curls? I mean, you never thought about just kind of showing off the guns or anything on Instagram? No. I mean, if I did, dude, it would break the internet.
I know that, right? And I want to be known for my head, not my body. So, you know, I've got to be modest.
I appreciate that. Adam Kinzinger, it's so good to have.
You want to be doing this about twice a month. And remember, like I said, if you want to know more about Adam's workout regimen, the one place that you could ask him about that is during the founders.

Ask me anything.

Cause that's private.

That's not going out in public.

That's just for us.

So at the founders, ask me anything.

If you want to join the Bulwark at the founders level, go to thebork.com.

We'll be in Dallas, September 5th.

Adam will be back on the pod in July.

Thanks brother.

Enjoy the rest of the week.

You too.

Great seeing you.

All right.

We'll see y'all soon up tomorrow.

One of my favorite guests besides Adam and a mega mail. So see you all then.
Peace. You want a hot body? You want a blue body? You want another body? You better work, bitch.
You want a Lamborghini? Sit in my jeans? Look hot in a a bikini You better work, bitch

You wanna get fancy

Live in a big mansion

Party and friends

You better work, bitch

You better work, bitch

You better work, bitch

You better work, bitch

Now get your work, bitch