Tim Miller: Our WWE Politics

Speaker 1 Get ready for Malice, a twisted new drama starring Jack Whitehall, David DeCovny, and Carise Van Houten.

Speaker 1 Jack Whitehall plays Adam, a charming manny infiltrates the wealthy Tanner family with a hidden motive to destroy them.

Speaker 1 This edge-of-your-seat revenge thriller unravels a deliciously dark mystery in a world full of wealth, secrets, and betrayal. Malice will constantly keep you on your toes.

Speaker 1 Why is Adam after the Tanner family? What lengths will he go to? One thing's for sure: the past never stays buried, so keep your enemies close.

Speaker 1 Watch Malice, all episodes now streaming exclusively on Prime Video.

Speaker 3 Sios as la frace persona per cavida vale pordos. The Colgate Total Active Prevention System is for you.

Speaker 3 Cono pasta ental reformulada, unse piós de dientes innovor, y una enjuade bucal antibacterial diseñados para trabajar juntos y serquín se veces más 5 cases al reducer el casimio de bacterias in just six weeks, starting from week one.

Speaker 3 Compared to a non-antibacterial fluoride toothpaste and flat trim toothbrush, helping you prevent oral health problems like cavities and gingivitis. Before they start,

Speaker 3 Colgate Punto com, yagunal todo, and be dentist ready.

Speaker 4 Welcome to the Friday Bull Work Podcast. I'm Charlie Sykes.
I am back with Tim Miller. So, first of all, happy Friday and welcome to New Orleans, Tim.

Speaker 2 Hey, Charlie. It's good to be with you.
It's good to be here. It was a long drive.
I saw a lot of America. It was enjoyable, but I'm ready.
I'm ready to be in my new home.

Speaker 4 We ought to mention that we're actually taking this show on the road. People wondering, what is Charlie and Tim actually like? What happens when we're in person? We generally don't do this in person.

Speaker 4 We did one podcast. In Austin, Texas.

Speaker 2 That's true. You were batting your eyes at me.
It's like in person. It's like, you know, the sparks, you can't feel it.

Speaker 4 it's a different level of intensity when you're staring me in the eyes yeah it was not the batting of the eye thing i don't know what it was i just i but in any case we're gonna have an audience this is charlie and tim live in new york city thursday may 18th 2023.

Speaker 2 i sense that you're you're a little bit nervous about this the sort of the one-on-one with a crowd I love doing the live stuff. It's so fun.
Our other live events have been so great.

Speaker 2 So I, you know, something about you and me, though, you know, just we have an extra level of energy that who knows what's going to happen up there. Yeah.

Speaker 2 So, I don't know about nervous anxiety, some excited anxiety, but I'm excited. People should make a whole weekend out of it.

Speaker 2 New York is like beautiful for two months a year, and May 18th should be it, right? Like, make a whole weekend out of it.

Speaker 4 May is gorgeous. So, this is a two-part bulwark goes on the road.
You and I go on and we go Mano Amano. Lord knows where that's going to go.

Speaker 4 And then we exit, and JVL and Sarah take over with Molly Jong Fast, who's whose podcast I did this week. So you have basically two, a double deuce, two scoops of the bulwark.

Speaker 4 If you come to New York for all this, you can get the ticket.

Speaker 2 And we'll hang out afterwards. Have a beer.
At least I will. You might be tired.
I don't know. I'll hang out and have a beer.
I don't want to make promises for you.

Speaker 4 I was thinking of the format of the show. People are going to go, you're not going to talk about Trump and DeSantis and all this other stuff, right?

Speaker 4 Because we've heard this on the podcast every single week.

Speaker 4 So what I was thinking of doing was probing a question that I've heard from a lot of listeners, which is, and you know where I'm going on this, Tim,

Speaker 4 does Tim Miller not really know any musicals before 1990? I mean, so, okay, Oklahoma.

Speaker 2 I know the basic song. Oklahoma, where the wind, something, something.
I saw it on Sesame Street. This is good.

Speaker 4 South Pacific.

Speaker 2 I literally never, you messaged me that on the South Stack, and that was the first time I'd ever heard of those.

Speaker 2 I mean, I've heard the term South Pacific, like flying to the South Pacific, but I wasn't aware that it was a show.

Speaker 4 Okay, The King and I.

Speaker 2 Is that about King Lear or?

Speaker 4 My Fair Lady?

Speaker 2 I mean, obviously, I've heard the phrase My Fair Lady, but I would not, I don't know any of the songs.

Speaker 4 I think that what we need to do is I need to play some show tunes and ask people in the crowd. This will be a New York crowd, and they will all know it.

Speaker 4 And I just want, like, okay, we're going to find one of them.

Speaker 4 Tim will recognize it.

Speaker 2 Do I get to do like jam band songs back at you? Like, I saw widespread panic at Madison Square Garden one time. Can we do, can I, like, I saw the strokes there and L C D sound system.

Speaker 2 Can we do do a little, can we do one of those? A little back and forth. We could just do, was there a show like Name That Tune?

Speaker 2 Maybe instead of doing the podcast, we should just do Name That Tune live. I don't know if people would pay $50 for that.

Speaker 4 I would not do well.

Speaker 4 No, I don't know anything about generally anything that has the word panic in it with large crowds. I try to avoid it.
Okay, but I do have something for you this morning. Okay.
And this is relevant.

Speaker 4 Okay. This is not just off the wall.

Speaker 2 All right.

Speaker 4 Let's play this. And by the way, I'm confident that you will be able to recognize this.

Speaker 2 Okay, go ahead.

Speaker 2 You quit that howling down there and go to bed. Joyce, I want my clothes out here.
You shut up. You're gonna get the law, are you?

Speaker 2 You're gonna get feet on a woman and then call her back because she ain't gonna come. You're gonna have a baby.
Listen, you're gonna. I say, haul you in and turn a foul.

Speaker 2 Hey,

Speaker 2 Is this a black and white movie, or was this in color? I'm just trying to get my bearings.

Speaker 2 I think, is it on the waterfront? Is it on the waterfront? I don't even know why that's in my brain.

Speaker 4 This is my way of welcoming you to your new home in New Orleans. It is one of the greatest movies set in New Orleans ever made.
A streetcar named Desire, Marlon Brain.

Speaker 2 A streetcar named Desire. I've heard about that.

Speaker 4 Now that you are officially a resident of New Orleans, I need to watch that one.

Speaker 2 I need to watch that one. Okay.

Speaker 4 Or at least do not let anyone else in New Orleans know that you are not familiar.

Speaker 2 Okay. Well, this makes me feel bad because my husband, we were doing on the road trip, I was doing New Orleans music education for him.
You know, we were doing the meters and Dr.

Speaker 2 John and just, you know, we did a little hip-hop, the No Limit guy. It's like we wanted, we wanted to make Boosie badass.

Speaker 2 You know, I wanted to make sure he knew all the New Orleans tunes, but here I am now. He needs to educate me the other way on the movies, I guess.

Speaker 2 A streetcar name designer, I've seen that skit that you just played there parodied in other places, but you know, the original.

Speaker 4 Yeah, I know. Yeah.
It's become a meme. Hey, speaking of memes, we have to do this because we're talking on Friday morning.

Speaker 4 So by Friday afternoon, this meme will already be beaten to death with hammers, okay?

Speaker 4 But can we talk about the various rapid unscheduled disassemblies that have taken place this week?

Speaker 4 Obviously, SpaceX blowing up after about four minutes.

Speaker 4 You know, in my newsletter this morning, I was tempted to make a snarky remark about the rapid unscheduled disassembly of ron de santis's campaign but i thought that's unfair to the space x rocket which at least made it off the launch pad which is still a question mark i guess

Speaker 2 speaking marks do you have your blue check mark i've lost my blue check mark it's so haphazard have you noticed this this is elon bill crystal still has it does he is he one of the people elon's paying the eight bucks out of his own pocket for i'd say that would be unlikely unlikely it's such a like these losers you know, I mean, who cares?

Speaker 2 All right. Let's just start here.
Like, who literally, who cares? It's embarrassing for Bill to still have his check mark at this point.

Speaker 2 It only matters in, like, there's some legitimate, you know, if you are the emergency services of New Orleans, like, it'd be nice to know what the real one is, for example.

Speaker 2 Like, there's some where it's serious, but who cares about us, like, pundits, whether we have it?

Speaker 4 Yeah, yeah, you're right.

Speaker 4 I mean, there are some real world consequences, and you, you have a lot of these emergency agencies who are going, hey, by the way, you know, we're kind of screwed putting us out of business in various ways.

Speaker 4 Elon doesn't give a shit.

Speaker 2 But the funniest part is, are you ready for this? I bet you noticed this.

Speaker 2 Now, people who don't have blue checks, I'm sorry to you, the unwashed masses, the second-tier citizens that Elon is, you know, righteously fighting for.

Speaker 2 You might not know this, but we, the verified, had a special feed where we could just see things from people who also had blue checks that lived in our rarefied air, you know, kind of like an elite club.

Speaker 2 He's taken away the blue check mark, but we still have all that because he doesn't have any developers left.

Speaker 4 And so we, but who are these people?

Speaker 2 Who are the people on the verified list?

Speaker 4 It's like, okay.

Speaker 2 But I still have all the benefits.

Speaker 2 And now it's just weird people in there. It's like turkey neck replying to me.
I'm like, who's turkey neck?

Speaker 4 There are many turkey necks out there. Okay.
So while we were all distracted by the whole blue check mark thing,

Speaker 4 Elon Musk's Twitter deleted the labels that alerted users. They were reading news from actual state-run propaganda outlets of authoritarian governments.

Speaker 4 So for example, you know, Russia Today, TASS, the Chinese communist news agencies.

Speaker 4 So last week it was like, I'm going to slap this label on NPR and, you know, PBS, like, yeah, because we really need to be warned about them.

Speaker 4 But now he's decided because he's Elon Musk and it's Friday or whatever, he's going to take off all the labels, including Sputnik and everything.

Speaker 4 And it's like, so there's actually a tweet out there, which I believe I retweeted, where the editor-in-chief of RT, which is a Russian propaganda outlet, thanks Elon Musk for freeing her outlet from the state media label and making her appear more in searches.

Speaker 4 This is great.

Speaker 2 Thank you.

Speaker 4 Twitter delabeled me in all of our channels as public-funded media. Now you can find me in the search.
Brotherly Elon Musk from the heart,

Speaker 4 says this Putin shill propagandist. So congratulations.

Speaker 2 Yeah, good news. Well, the good news is, yeah, they don't need to do bots anymore.
You know, that was the whole theory of the bot program, right? Was that they would create

Speaker 2 social media accounts that would appear to be legitimate, that would be tweeting Russian propaganda, but now they don't even have to do that.

Speaker 2 The Russian propaganda accounts could just treat Russian propaganda. We have been doing some stacking on this.
Have you been pushing people over to our substack notes? I'm trying to move over.

Speaker 4 Not as aggressive as I should because it's very good.

Speaker 2 It's excellent stuff. Yeah, I'm trying to move people over.
I mean, I'm a Twitter addict. I'll be there till we die.
It'll be me, the Russian bots, the crypto guys, Tom Nichols.

Speaker 2 I'm like, that'll be it. Maybe the last five people on the site and you.
And because we're addicted, I admit it. I wish I was not, but I am.
But, you know, I mean, things are getting ugly over there.

Speaker 2 So we're stacking. We're on our substack notes.
I'm gramming bulwark stuff now. We've got a bulwark Reddit.
You know, we've got to diversify because like it's even more than a freak show than it was.

Speaker 2 And it's like the guy just doesn't understand. And we can all sound like the blue check stuff is kind of a little bit fart-sniffing.

Speaker 2 Like the guy just doesn't understand what the purpose was of all of these things, right? Like there was a reason why you verified people, right?

Speaker 2 it's so that people couldn't get imitated there was a reason why that you tried to fight the fake bots so that people got you know real information even if it was wrong like information from legitimate sources right from people giving their real opinions right he's going to turn the thing into like the craigslist scam pages you know where you can't even buy tickets on craigslist anymore because everybody on there is a scammer because there's no there's no controls

Speaker 2 like Elon, you know, because he's in his little SpaceX bubble, just doesn't understand that.

Speaker 2 And he thought the whole thing was about like his pissing match with Taylor Lorenz and he's like about to lose $50 billion over it. It wasn't really a great business deal.

Speaker 4 It's a terrible business model, especially when the heart of the business model is that you have millions of people, some of them actually talented, who are providing you with free content all the time.

Speaker 4 And what do you do? You find a way to piss them off and drive them away. There are people out there who are giving you stuff for free all the time.
You pay nothing for them.

Speaker 4 This is a brilliant model that he's decided to dump on from a great height.

Speaker 2 That's what can I say.

Speaker 4 I have a problem here today with you, Tim. Uh-oh.
There's just so much stuff. I know.
Where do we start? We talk about Rhonda Sandis and the shitty week that he's had, a terrible week that he's had.

Speaker 4 We have a new Wall Street Journal poll showing that, once again, he's dropped double digits behind Donald Trump.

Speaker 4 By the way, this Wall Street Journal poll has an interesting data point about the new Republican Party.

Speaker 4 55% of Republicans say that fighting woke ideology in our schools and businesses is more important than protecting entitlements from cuts.

Speaker 2 The funny part about that is, do you know what was behind that poll, Dana? This is the Wall Street Journal's own. Like, that's such a weird thing to ask people.
Like, what do you care more about?

Speaker 2 The wokes or entitlement cuts? It's like these guys are trying to nudge Trump into stop talking so much about maintaining entitlements entitlements because

Speaker 2 there's still a handful of doctrinaire free market conservatives out there that want there to be entitlement cuts.

Speaker 2 So it's like, we're going to do this poll comparing the woke versus the entitlement cuts.

Speaker 2 It comes back, but still a quarter of the Republican Party, they do care about protecting entitlements, they found out, even though it's not what they wanted.

Speaker 2 And half of the party is now obsessed with the woke. Did you see the clip of Ron DeSantis? Like where he says woke seven times in like 10 seconds.
We're going to stop the woke in the streets.

Speaker 2 We're going to stop the woke in the air. We're going to stop the woke in the schools.

Speaker 2 It's just like, what are you talking about?

Speaker 4 Well, he's got his mantra.

Speaker 4 And the problem is, the 86th time you've heard that speech, you're going to go, okay, Ron, can we just move on? Can we just move on from your fight with Disney?

Speaker 4 Which is one of the most mind-boggling, stupid things that I can ever think about.

Speaker 4 Like, in what political world, in what room full of political geniuses does someone say, hey, you know what, we can slingshot our way to the presidency by going after the happiest place on earth.

Speaker 2 I want to get to the Disney thing in one second, but I just want the 55%.

Speaker 2 This is just a fundamental problem that Republicans have gotten themselves into being very online.

Speaker 2 Like, there was this period of time that was, I think, right, and I'm going to write something about this.

Speaker 2 Where you go back to the 2020 primary early, where the Democrats, like their staffers were so online, they're like obsessed with these random progressive hobby horses that like 22-year-old progressives really care about, but nobody else does.

Speaker 2 And it hurt, I think, a lot of Democratic campaigns. And like, that was a common criticism of Democrats.

Speaker 2 And I think there's been a readjustment on that, not maybe as far as maybe it could be, but a certain level of readjustment. Republicans now have the inverse of this.

Speaker 2 59% of the base is obsessed with the woke in the schools. And like every swing voter has no idea what you're talking about.

Speaker 4 You don't ask them to define it.

Speaker 2 Yeah, well, they can't define it. But what about swing voters?

Speaker 2 I mean, I just, there are certain people in my life that I think about who are like former Republican types who are not, you know, super, you know, daily bulwark readers or listeners, like all of our good fans that like, you know, have other interests in life and are casual, you know, Romney Biden voters.

Speaker 2 Right. Like, they don't even know what you're talking about.
Like, literally can't defy it, don't understand it. And your whole stump speech is.

Speaker 4 Speaking in tongues.

Speaker 2 Yeah, this whole stump speech.

Speaker 2 And it's like, it's like you would go to a stand to hear Ron DeSantis and halfway through he starts speaking in Chinese like John Huntsman did on the debate stage that one time when I was working for him with my head in my hands, right?

Speaker 2 It's like, what are you like, we don't even know what you're talking about. And yet he he feels like he has to do this.

Speaker 2 Well, now, I think probably because he believes that, but also because half of the party in this Wall Street Journal poll, like, that's what they care the most about. So you're completely beholden.

Speaker 2 Yeah.

Speaker 4 So this week in my morning shots yesterday, I ran through.

Speaker 4 a bunch of the headlines, you know, how bad they are, you know, people backing away from him, the way, you know, his trip to Washington sort of blew up in his face.

Speaker 4 More of his congressmen from Florida are endorsing against him.

Speaker 4 It just, and you can feel the conventional wisdom turning against him, including the recognition of something that we have talked about endlessly for months here at the bulwark, which is the fact that Ron DeSantis does not simply play an asshole on television.

Speaker 4 He is one. He's got a personality problem.
He's not likable. He's not warm and fuzzy.

Speaker 2 But also.

Speaker 4 Now this dawning recognition that, you know, the guy doesn't have very good political instincts.

Speaker 4 And he's kind of locked into this commitment that, and I wrote yesterday that, you know, he has to fit in with the lizard people. You know, I am a lizard person.

Speaker 4 I, you know, will fight the same people. I hate the same people.
I'm going to diss the same people. I'm going to punch the people in the face that you actually hate.

Speaker 4 But he just doesn't have the skill to pull it off. I mean, it's like an ill-fitting suit, right?

Speaker 4 So he just thinks that he has to, you know, tell gays to, you know, shut the fuck up, you know, bully college kids who wear a mask. He has, you know, signed the, you know, a six-week abortion ban.

Speaker 4 He's, you know, bitch slapping liberals all over the place and, you know, showing that he doesn't care about gun control or, you know, he's going to go after drag queens and, and by God, he's going to go after Disney World.

Speaker 4 And I think a lot of the rest of the country, including Republicans, is going, what are you doing, man?

Speaker 2 I mean, who are you?

Speaker 4 It's not happening for him, is it? So here's my question to you. Is he going to blow up on the launch pad? I feel almost embarrassed to ask the question because it's clear he's running.

Speaker 4 But is there a chance now? that Ron DeSantis is going to look around and go, this is just not happening for me. What do you think?

Speaker 2 I don't think so because

Speaker 2 there was a report yesterday that one of its big donors, Robert Bigelow, I think, is also really obsessed with space aliens, whatever it's worth.

Speaker 2 Maybe there's a connection there between Lizard Manron and the space alien obsession, but he's like, I'm going to put 20 million into a super PAC and I might even put in more.

Speaker 2 There's a certain type of big Republican donor who sees him maybe rightly, even as weakened as he is, maybe this is still the correct analysis that he's like their only out of Trump. Yeah.

Speaker 4 What is their plan B to plan B?

Speaker 2 Yeah, right. I mean, Yunkin or Kemp, it's like, could one of those people emerge? You know, maybe.
I don't know. The other people on the fields definitely are not.

Speaker 2 And so I think that he'll have the money.

Speaker 4 I'd like to see Glenn Young's DMs right now.

Speaker 2 Glenn, really, please. Yeah.

Speaker 2 So,

Speaker 2 you know, I think that a lot of the money folks will stick with him. He surrounds himself with a very tight inner circle, as all these stories report.

Speaker 2 And I think that the people around him still very much want him to run. And the people he's hearing from very much want him to run.

Speaker 2 It's consultants who want money from him and it's donors who want to give money so there's a lot of incentives pushing him in the other thing and this really cuts both ways for him is that what ron de santis still has better than any of the guys in 2016 or gals he has this elevator pitch against Trump that like in theory could work and that there's some data that still shows that it could work, right?

Speaker 2 Like, yeah, exactly. And he's still winning in Michigan.
There's still some of these early states. Murphy wrote about Iowa this week in the bulwark.
In theory, it could work.

Speaker 2 And in practice, we're seeing a lot of reasons why it's not, as you wrote in the newsletter. But in theory, it could work.

Speaker 2 And it's this pitch of, hey, I have the same enemies as you, and I know how to beat them, right? Trump doesn't. Now, can he actually make that argument against Trump successfully?

Speaker 2 Not a lot of evidence of that right now, but it feels like he'll want to get in and try.

Speaker 2 And so, you know, my assessment is I think a big lesson that everyone should learn from 2016 and 2012, a lot of your political campaigns get baked in before you're even a candidate.

Speaker 2 You know, this happened to Jeb. We did that.
I have regrets. We did that stupid Megan Kelly interview where he got all pretzeled up over Iraq before he was even a candidate.

Speaker 2 You know, we weren't going to win anyway, but like you see this in many campaigns where

Speaker 2 you don't have the infrastructure around there to support you. I just don't think that Ron DeSantis realized, I think he's in this little, his little Tallahassee bubble.

Speaker 2 I don't think he realized that the thing that was appealing was that elevator pitch and that all these little details that he adds onto it just make a different group of people think he's weird or wrong, right?

Speaker 2 It's like he felt like he had to do this little Florida legislature session where it's like, oh, we're going to expand, don't say gay, which is despicable.

Speaker 2 We're going to do the six-week abortion ban, which is like much less popular than the 15-week or whatever they had before. You know, we're going to go after Disney.

Speaker 2 And each one of those things, like he thinks it's helping him with a certain part of the base, but it's actually hurting him with another group, right?

Speaker 2 Whether it's swing voters, certain cases, Trump people in other cases. He's just lost his North Star.
He could get it back. I don't think he's.

Speaker 2 So anyway, the short answer is I don't think he's going to blow up a launching pad because he still has that North Star.

Speaker 2 But man, I mean, it has been about as bad as it could be given the place that he was and, you know, the competition here. Let's be real.

Speaker 4 This is Charlie Sykes, host of the Bulwark podcast.

Speaker 4 Thanks so much for listening to this show, where every day we try to help you make sense of the political world we live in and remind you that you are not the crazy one.

Speaker 4 If you enjoy this podcast, I'm sure you're going to find my free morning shots newsletter a great companion for understanding what is happening to us.

Speaker 4 And every morning as I prepare for this show, I share with my readers what's trending and what to pay attention to, including my latest writing and essays on the events of the day.

Speaker 4 To sign up for my free Morning Shots newsletter, go to thebullwork.com slash morning shots. That's thebullwork.com/slash morning shots.
And I look forward to seeing you in your inbox soon.

Speaker 4 You sent me this morning a new South Carolina poll of Republicans, and you're seeing a little bit of bad news for Donald Trump. Explain.

Speaker 2 Yeah. Well, again, and this is another reason why you get the Sanders in the race.
Now, it's just one poll, so we get a caveat this, but it's interesting.

Speaker 2 It's a South Carolina, which is Trump absolutely needs to win. It's a credible firm that is doing this poll.
And here's the question.

Speaker 2 Now, Trump's winning in this poll, but the more interesting thing underneath was, how would you rate your support for Donald Trump these days?

Speaker 2 I love those kind of poll questions. Very open-ended.
This is not like they're trying to do it. Okay.

Speaker 4 Taking the temperature.

Speaker 2 Yeah, taking the temperature. 47%, my support for him is strong as ever.
So that's good news, right? He's got this big base. 11%, I never liked him in the first place.

Speaker 2 21%, I used to like him, but now I wish he would just go away. 20%, I still like him, but yes, less than I used to.

Speaker 4 Really?

Speaker 2 I just looked at that and I'm like, man, you got 32%

Speaker 2 that like wish you'd go away. Now, 20% of those people liked him.
And maybe if you liked somebody at one time, you can always try to win them back, right?

Speaker 2 And I'm sure they'll talk themselves into it if it ends up just being Trump or Biden. But like, that is a massive negative number that exceeded where he was in 2016.

Speaker 2 And I just look at that, and my big takeaway is sometimes we just get down in our navels.

Speaker 2 And I know we've talked about this a lot on this podcast, but it just bears mention because nobody else fucking mentions it. That 20%, I still like him, but less than I used to.

Speaker 2 Had Tucker, Laura, Hannity, had all of them had the courage of their own real views in the text that we've seen from Dominion?

Speaker 2 Had the Republican electeds electeds all stood up and been stronger after January 6th, you could get that 32 number up. This was doable.

Speaker 2 Like, there's this fait a complete attitude out there among the pundit class, among Republicans. It's like, oh, this is a cult.
And yeah, there's a lot of people in a cult, 47%. That's not nothing.

Speaker 2 But you could have got it. Like, half-party was and is gettable.

Speaker 2 And it's just, they're getting the wrong signals, you know, and it's like, and like, when you see a number like 32, you're like, man, they were a little bit closer to being out of the woods, I think, than people realize.

Speaker 2 Had there been an actual concerted effort to get out of the woods.

Speaker 4 Well, I mean, and this is the key, you know, crack don't smoke itself. And, you know, the, you may have luscious fruit hanging in the tree, but but it's not going to pick itself, right?

Speaker 4 I mean, someone's going to have to go and do it. And so far, everybody's going, maybe it'll fall on its own.
Maybe it'll go. Maybe we don't need to actually touch the tree.

Speaker 4 Maybe we should, hey, or maybe let's let Chris Christie go and he'll shake the tree and then it'll fall off the tree. Or maybe there will be

Speaker 4 a meteor that will hit the tree and knock the fruit down because it's there, but we've seen this before and no one wants to touch the stuff.

Speaker 2 Or maybe I could kind of casually mention to voters that if they reached into the tree, they could get the fruit, but I'm not going to say the name of the fruit. You know what I mean?

Speaker 2 It's like, you know, DeSantis out there being like, well, my hardest attack on Trump is going to be that he is, I have some sense that there's been some chaos from other leaders out there.

Speaker 2 And it's like, who are you talking about? Like, you, I think that's right. Like, maybe that wouldn't have worked, but I guess anytime I look at that poll, I just think, but nobody tried.
Nobody tried.

Speaker 2 And here we are. We're seeing this all again with DeSantis, where he's like, I'm not going to try.

Speaker 2 My strategy is going to be, I'm going to go hard on all these issues and hope that people come over to me. And like, that's the Ted Cruz strategy.
And we're just walking down that same path again.

Speaker 4 That's very interesting. Okay.
So one more point on DeSantis. It is interesting, all of these members of his congressional delegation are now coming forward and saying, yeah,

Speaker 4 he never talks to me. He never writes to me.
He pays no attention to me. And then you had that very weird Marco Rubio video.

Speaker 2 Just really quick before the Rubio video, the one example of the guy that didn't talk to him, Stuby. Yeah.
I'd be saying his name wrong.

Speaker 2 He got injured. He got like seriously injured.
And DeSantis didn't call him.

Speaker 2 He didn't send him a text. He didn't send him an email.
He didn't have Casey, you know, write a nice note with a cookie bouquet.

Speaker 2 It's like a Republican member of Congress from your own state got into a serious injury. You're thinking about running for president, even if you're not.
You're the governor.

Speaker 2 And that just shows a lack of humanity and egotism

Speaker 2 that is really alarming. If you're on the bull camp for DeSantis, that he can recover from this.
It's like, this is a weird fucking person that does not have basic human interaction skills.

Speaker 4 Well, he just doesn't like people. Yeah.

Speaker 2 There you go.

Speaker 4 I mean, yeah, I mean, that's part of the problem.

Speaker 4 I mean, you can change your position on a lot of different issues, but if you basically, at bottom, don't like people, don't like interacting with people.

Speaker 4 Weird people don't like to be shit about people.

Speaker 4 That's a little harder to finesse, right? I mean, you can hire people who can pretend to care about all of those things.

Speaker 4 But, you know, and again, I apologize in advance for saying this, but it does appear that Trump gets this. He's constantly writing notes.
He's calling people. He does that kind of schmoozing thing.

Speaker 4 And it doesn't change the fact that he's a sociopathic authoritarian nightmare, but he's one with a Sharpie who I'm sitting here with a note that he wrote me back in 2016.

Speaker 4 You know, he writes to people. It's, and forget it, I'm not going to even go into it.
Okay, so Marco does this weird video. And I have to say that I'm, this is an indication of how weird I am.

Speaker 4 I'm watching him do this video from his office or his study or whatever. And I keep waiting for him to stop stop and reach for a bottle of water and chug that down.
I just, it's.

Speaker 2 I thought you were going to come out of his ears, which somehow continue to grow.

Speaker 4 No, no, okay, well, but whatever. So he's complaining about how we just can't get any

Speaker 4 gas down here in southern Florida. You know, why aren't they doing anything about it? And it's like, okay, first of all, you're a United States Senator Marco, who is they?

Speaker 4 But it certainly was not a love note to Ron DeSantis.

Speaker 4 I mean, if the last thing that Ron DeSantis needs this week, which was a a terrible, horrible, very bad, absolutely creptacular week, is a United States senator from his state basically saying, yeah, it's like, why are things so effed up here in your home state?

Speaker 2 What's going on there? I think that this was a hilarious video.

Speaker 2 If you haven't watched it, you just got to pull up Marco's video thing because at first it's like he talks for like a minute and he's been like, they aren't doing it. He says the word they five times.

Speaker 2 It's like, who's they? Are you talking about the DeSantis administration? Are you talking about the Biden? Like, you're the sender.

Speaker 2 You know, so he's talking, we haven't had gas for four days. Lines are long, and like they are out there saying that it's the people's fault for wanting gas.

Speaker 2 And no, the people, it makes sense for the people to get gas. I'm like, who is the straw man you're arguing against? I don't even know who you're talking about.

Speaker 2 So it's a very weird video, but it's telling about our politics. The semaphore article comes out this morning.
And as soon as I saw it, I just was like, it just works on so many levels. DeSantis,

Speaker 2 they asked Marco, I guess, in the hall, in the Senate, you know, if you think about endorsing between DeSantis and Trump. And Marco's like, no, I'm not going to do that for a while.

Speaker 2 And it's like, well, you know, have you talked to DeSantis about it? And Marco says, I haven't talked to DeSantis in months. It's like, what?

Speaker 2 You haven't talked to the governor of your own.

Speaker 2 It's like, first, how fucking weird is Ron DeSantis? Like, you're not even checking in with him? He's a governor. You're the senator of the same state.

Speaker 2 You would think that you would be for him for president. Like, that's very strange.

Speaker 2 And then it's like, yesterday, you see, there's this problem in South Florida that no one is dealing with about how there's this gas shortage.

Speaker 2 And your response is, I'm going to send this weird Twitter video not like hey maybe i should call ron

Speaker 2 and or see if he's going to do something about this

Speaker 2 i mean it's just like it it shows the performative asininity and like the whole wwe-ness of our politics right now that like that that just doesn't even occur to a marco and a ron anymore yeah there are people who like handle things like this there are phone numbers that you can call if you are a united states senator to deal with retweets is the priority here that is the point of being a senator, right?

Speaker 2 Getting the most retweets, I think. Because we're all so online.

Speaker 4 Hey, I have to mention you're not my party this week. I haven't had enough bandwidth to be able to deal with all of this,

Speaker 4 you know, new third-party buzz, the no-labels folks. By the way, they're emailing me.
They're sending me all this stuff.

Speaker 4 You know, these are the folks that are trying to get on the ballot to have a sort of an independent.

Speaker 4 And I don't know what they've contacted you, but it's like they, you know, it's like, Charlie, if you want to sit down and talk about our plans, it's like, yeah, no, I just understand

Speaker 4 that almost everything you're saying is completely delusional when it is not completely counterproductive. So you did a whole piece on not my party.
You're not a fan of the third-party buzz.

Speaker 2 I mean, in theory, there are third-party things I like. You know, the McMullen thing didn't work out, but I thought it was worth a try.

Speaker 2 You know, I think that there have been certain places, certain states, certain times where third parties work. The problem is, is that Donald Trump is the leading candidate in 2024.

Speaker 2 and we need to deal with that. And I think that if you're not in politics, the no-labels people, we'll get to them in a second, like are just

Speaker 2 egomaniacs and want to raise money from gullible donors and

Speaker 2 potentially have notarious motives. But I think might just be stupid.

Speaker 4 This doesn't distinguish them from many others.

Speaker 2 That's true, but they have that common disease that is easy to identify for those of us who've been around.

Speaker 2 But if there are regular people out there, and I get questions from them when I do events, and I understand that's like, why couldn't we have a third party? Like, Biden is old. Like, Trump is insane.

Speaker 2 Like, shouldn't we have a better option than these two guys? And, like, that does make sense on one level.

Speaker 2 So I wanted to do a longer video for Net My Party, like, explaining why actually it's the inverse of that. And that in our system, a third party is strongest when the two parties seem similar.
Right.

Speaker 2 And, you know, Perot didn't win any states, but the closest he got is the year that Clinton runs as a Southern Democrat, that, you know, DLC Democrat and H.W.

Speaker 2 Bush is running as a, you know, fairly moderate Republican, right?

Speaker 2 And it's like, oh, we don't feel represented, the more populist kind of Trumpy type voters back then and then, you know, random folks that Perot added onto the side.

Speaker 2 So like that made sense because the stakes were low.

Speaker 2 You know, it's like, if you were like, eh, if put gun to my head, I would have voted for H.W., but like, whatever, if it's Clinton, like you can go for a Perot, let's give it a shot.

Speaker 2 If the stakes are existential, if you are a Democrat or a never-Trumper who like looks at Trump and says, our democracy could end if it's Trump, well, you're logically not going to want to throw your vote away for a third-party person.

Speaker 2 If you were a deranged Trumper who thinks that the election was stolen from Donald Trump and that Joe Biden has dementia and is running a pedophile ring, well, you're not going to want to throw away your vote on a third-party person

Speaker 2 when that risk is on the other side.

Speaker 2 So our negative partisanship has made it such that this is, even though it might seem like a time where a third party would be strong, it's actually the worst time to try to run a third party.

Speaker 2 And obviously, if Trump's on the other side, like anything that creates additional risk of a disastrous Trump second term is a bad idea. So I wanted to kind of lay that out for folks.

Speaker 2 The no-labels thing, I think, is particularly pernicious on this front. I'm not quite as panicked as some other people about this because I find the no-labels people to be utterly incompetent.

Speaker 2 And I'm just, I'm not really certain, talk about blowing up on the launching pad. I think that they might be blowing up on the launching pad a lot more realistically than DeSantis.

Speaker 2 But I'm glad other people are monitoring that and, you know, keeping the heat on. But it'd be a different thing if the no-labels people said, hey, we're coming to you and we've got a plan.

Speaker 2 We found the guy that can take votes from Donald Trump or the woman. Then, okay, great.
Come to me with that. But I don't think that person exists.

Speaker 4 At least not now. No, I don't see it.
And it does seem to be kind of an ego-driven type thing where they've created their own little grift bubble.

Speaker 4 Okay, so as I've said many times in the past, I hate talking about mass shootings. I hate getting into the doom loop.
But this week, I have to say,

Speaker 4 this week feels extraordinary. Look, I understand, before we get into this, I mean, I understand that there are hair trigger shootings that take place in places like Chicago every single week.

Speaker 4 I get it. I understand that there were 35 people of all races who were shot in Chicago last weekend.
This goes on all the time. And yet, this week felt different.

Speaker 4 I mean, the whole ringing the wrong doorbell, getting shot, making a wrong turn, getting shot and killed, getting in the wrong car and getting shot.

Speaker 4 Your basketball rolls into your neighbor's yard and somebody shoots at a six-year-old girl. I mean,

Speaker 4 it feels like we're in this new chapter, or maybe we're just noticing what's happening with our, you know, hair-trigger American carnage. And it also feels like it's more than just about guns.

Speaker 4 It is about guns. But, you know, it was interesting.
I was listening to a lot of the commentary on this. And unfortunately, everybody, and you know, Tim, you've been doing this a long time.

Speaker 4 Everybody falls back on to their, you know, their priors and they keep going back to their same arguments. And I'm going, like, okay,

Speaker 4 it is about the guns, it is about racism, but it's also about other things that may be even worse than that.

Speaker 4 The fact that we have created this culture of paranoia, of fear, of distrust with guns that results in this kind of, I'm seeing somebody that I don't know, they're in my driveway, I'm going to kill them.

Speaker 4 And this apparently has been happening more.

Speaker 4 You know, I mean, I know part of it is, I have a family that lives in southern Maryland, you know, and I might get lost someday. I might turn into the wrong driveway.
Am I going to get killed?

Speaker 4 Are they going to get killed? Can you imagine being in politics or doing something else where you go door to door?

Speaker 4 And if you have the wrong color or you're wearing the wrong clothes or you have the wrong hair.

Speaker 4 And we have all of these laws on the books that seem like a great idea, you know, stand your ground, or the castle doctrine, that basically says that if you shoot and kill somebody in your house, the presumption is you've acted in self-defense.

Speaker 4 So the actual killing is objective. Whether or not you'll be held accountable for it is completely subjective now.

Speaker 4 So this week of American carnage, I guess it does turn out, by the way, that an armed society is not a polite society, that more guns does not equal less crime, and that more good guys with guns is the way to go because,

Speaker 2 damn,

Speaker 2 I'm done. Yeah, I mean, I've got two big thoughts on this.

Speaker 2 The first on just the societal part, because I wrote about this after the Tennessee shooting, I had a great conversation with Gloria Johnson on the next level about this, one of the Tennessee three, but we didn't kind of get into this as much as I wanted to.

Speaker 2 Thank you. We didn't get as deep on this part as I wanted to.
It's just like figuring out a way to turn the temperature down.

Speaker 2 Because she represents Gloria, like a decently conservative district, district, actually.

Speaker 2 The two Justins are in the deep blue parts of Nashville and Memphis, respectively.

Speaker 2 And just talking to her about the community, and there is a lot of tenseness and anxiety in these communities right now, you know, about the other political side.

Speaker 2 And I was happy to hear that like she hasn't felt unsafe at this point. But you see this with other people where they're like,

Speaker 2 you know, things are so hot that I'm worried that, you know, somebody's going to pop off. I mean, some of these shootings that you've discussed are just random, but the other kind of politicized

Speaker 2 efforts like what we saw in Texas with Greg Abbott situation, the guy that drives into the Black Lives Matter protest.

Speaker 4 And Abbott's making that much worse, of course.

Speaker 2 Yeah, exactly. So who is out there that's lowering the temperature?

Speaker 2 And this is, I hate everybody's like, oh, don't both sides us, but I do worry, like, as I was doing my sub stack, I was doing an Ask Me Anything, like driving through Texas.

Speaker 2 And I had some of our more, you know, liberal or progressive, you know, readers that were like, oh, be safe. I'm worried about you in Texas.
And that makes me sad, right?

Speaker 2 That people would feel that way.

Speaker 2 There's really wonderful people all over the country. And that we are so focused now on the threats and the danger among us.
You have Trump out there saying that the real enemies are within,

Speaker 2 not without. Obviously, he is exacerbating that way more than any Democratic politician.

Speaker 2 But I worry about this across the board, just like everyone trying to figure out how to turn the temperature down. Now, that's not going to solve the gun problem, though.
Like, that is just not.

Speaker 2 And the gun thing, like, this is, we've gone round and round on this. I'll just say briefly, like, I always considered myself like a technocratic, pragmatic conservative, right?

Speaker 2 Even when I was a conservative, I was like, you know, like, we need to be practical here.

Speaker 2 And I just don't know how you can look at the stats about American gun deaths and say that, like, this system is working and like the answer is more guns. Like, it's just not.

Speaker 2 Like, our gun death levels are on par only with like third world countries where there are wars.

Speaker 2 like we're on par with yemen you know like it's crazy and that you can have a kid like ralph yarl go into a guy's driveway go up to their door and get shot that's an unfathomable event in sweden you know it's an unfathomable event and that should be an unfathomable event anywhere and it's not here just because of the proliferation of guns and now we're in this place and looking at tennessee and the aftermath where you can't even discuss forget reforms about getting less guns out there you can't even discuss ways to license, to curb it.

Speaker 2 You can't do anything. I mean, there was the, was it Louisville? It was in the Kentucky shooting.
There's so many mass shootings, I can't remember anymore.

Speaker 2 The Kentucky, the Louisville mayor is like, the gun that was used in the shooting is going to be back on the street because by law in Kentucky, we have to auction it off.

Speaker 2 It's like, what? Like, that is madness.

Speaker 4 This is the madness that we're having this proliferation of senseless random killings, and no one is exempt.

Speaker 4 Now, between the mass shootings and, you know, ringing the wrong wrong doorbell, it can be your kid, it can be you, it can happen to anyone.

Speaker 4 We are having this massive crisis, tens of thousands of people getting killed. As you point out, a level of violence that makes us look like Yemen.

Speaker 4 And yet there is this complete total disconnect where one legislature after another is thinking, yeah, let's disseminate more guns. Let's make it easier to carry guns openly.

Speaker 4 Let's make it easier for people to shoot people and have defenses for all of this.

Speaker 4 And so you have the 16-year-old Ralph Yarl who's who's shot by this 84-year-old white guy who apparently was mainlining Fox News and various paranoia things.

Speaker 4 What a surprise, least surprising story of the week.

Speaker 4 But then you have the New York story, this 20-year-old, you know, white girl who's shot and killed by a 65-year-old because she and her friends pull into the wrong driveway.

Speaker 4 In Texas, you have these cheerleaders who are in their cheerleader outfit who are shot because they made a mistake and tried to get in the wrong car.

Speaker 2 By the way, which I've done a million times with Ubers these days, like in the Uber world, an Uber car pulls up, you're like, oh, that's my Uber, and you open the door.

Speaker 4 Okay, so that does not necessarily appear to be racially oriented. In Charlotte, North Carolina, this is, I think, one of the worst.
Little girl has her basketball roll into the neighbor's yard.

Speaker 4 Group of kids go to fetch it. This guy comes out, Robert Louis Singletary, and starts shooting at the six-year-old girl and her father.
I mean, what the hell?

Speaker 2 Did you see the one in Florida with the two dads driving and they get into a road rage incident and they shoot at each other and they both have their daughters in the car and both of their daughters get hit?

Speaker 4 It's like... Standing their ground.
Standing their ground.

Speaker 2 As horrible as these ones where they're shooting strangers are, is there ever a story that more clearly debunks the notion that you are safer by carrying a weapon than the idea that these two redneck dads shot at each other while their daughters were in the car?

Speaker 2 It's unimaginable. You know, but this is what happens.
Like you have guns everywhere and you get your temper hot. Sometimes it's going to happen.
Things are going to escalate.

Speaker 4 Well, especially when you put the guns in the hands of people who have no background checks, no training whatsoever, and then are encouraged to regard everybody else as a danger.

Speaker 4 So this was the guy, the grandson of the man that shot Ralph Yarl, says, you know, I feel like a lot of people of that generation, the older generation, are caught up in this 24-hour news cycle of fear and paranoia perpetuated by some other news stations.

Speaker 4 And he was fully into that, sitting and watching Fox News all day, every day, blaring in his living room. And I think that stuff really kind of reinforces this negative view of minority groups.

Speaker 4 It doesn't necessarily lead people to be racist, but it reinforces and galvanizes racist people and their beliefs.

Speaker 4 Okay, it's not all about race, but in this particular case, you get this guy who's sitting and he's watching, you know, this American carnage, one story after another, you know, this nightmare world.

Speaker 4 They're coming to get you. They are dangerous.
And then there's a knock at the door, and he goes to the door, and there's a black man who is gigantic. He's actually five foot eight.

Speaker 2 140 pounds. You could have done a sociology experiment on this.
He told the cops the guy was six feet. It's like, no, actually.

Speaker 4 Smoking black man, five foot eight,

Speaker 2 140 pounds. I mean, that's like, that's like just skin and bones.

Speaker 4 And he's invading his castle. Actually, he doesn't even open the door.
So the guy starts shooting through the glass. I mean, it's just, holy crap.
Okay, so here's an interesting little factoid.

Speaker 2 So I was listening to Lawrence O'Donnell last night.

Speaker 4 He had an historian on, a historian of the old west.

Speaker 4 And he said, you know, it's a myth that in the wild west that people walked around, you know, in the towns like Tombstone with, you know, all kinds of guns.

Speaker 4 In fact, back then, if you came into a town like Deadwood or Tombstone, you would have to surrender your guns.

Speaker 4 You would have to go to the marshal's office or the sheriff's office and sign in the guns and you'd get a receipt because none of these towns actually wanted to have heavily armed people scaring off the business people.

Speaker 4 These little towns wanted to become actual cities.

Speaker 4 They were capitalists and they knew that people wouldn't be coming into the town to make their weekly or monthly deposits if they thought they were going to be robbed.

Speaker 4 So in fact, they had very strict gun rules. In fact, he showed a sign from like the 1880s and you can see the sign saying, you know, weapons strictly forbidden.
You're not allowed to do it.

Speaker 4 So this whole notion of everybody walking around packing heat was really after the fact where a lot of these towns were figuring out how do we market ourselves to the tourists, you know, we'll have the shootout in the okay corral and we'll reenact it eight times a day.

Speaker 2 The reality was that even in the old trimness and all the lost cause stuff, you know, that all those, all these Confederate statues like weren't exactly

Speaker 2 like the night.

Speaker 4 It's sort of retrofitting the history.

Speaker 4 But I thought it was really interesting that the people in the West, if you would have told them about our open carry constitutional carry laws now, they'd say, you're out of your mind.

Speaker 4 Are you people crazy? The whole essence of civilization is that you do not want people walking around with guns, threatening other people, making them feel unsafe.

Speaker 4 So I really thought that was an interesting historical tidbit, and you can look it up.

Speaker 2 I'm going to defer to the experts on that.

Speaker 4 You can look it up. Okay, you and I have not had a chance to weigh in like everyone else has on the whole question of the Fox settlement.
I am of two minds on all of this.

Speaker 4 I do understand that Dominion made the right business decision. Their lawyers had a job to do.
They did it. They did it well.
It's a... big load of money.
It will have an effect.

Speaker 4 And SmartMatic is coming up. SmartMatic is saying that we want even more money from Fox.
There are other lawsuits out there. But I just don't think this changes the trajectory of disinformation.

Speaker 4 I don't think that this was a victory for democracy. And I am disappointed that we are not going to have a six-week festival of Fox's deplorability.

Speaker 4 But I understand that there are the people who say, no, glass half full. This is good.
This is the way it's supposed to work. Where do you come down?

Speaker 2 I'm more glass half full on it. it uh you know i mean it's nice that lachlan murdoch's you know great-grandchild will have a couple milli less you know um after our the estate tax

Speaker 2 um a smaller pony

Speaker 2 only four polo ponies not not five what

Speaker 2 rah rah i know i was just joking but uh look the dominion guys god bless them i really think you know had fox just dealt with them the right way early you know they could have gotten out of this with a lot less money and i think that the dominion guy ended up being out for blood because they were being slandered, John Poulos.

Speaker 2 And I think they did the Lord's work, really, with this discovery. And just an unbelievable amount of information has come out about Fox.
You know, they have to do what's right for their business.

Speaker 2 $780 million plus. Good for them for getting that.
So I'm glad to have full on it. I don't think there was going to be anything that happened at trial that changed the trajectory of Fox.

Speaker 2 The Fox had a chance to change their own trajectory after January 6th. They chose not to do so.
They chose to go the other direction and double down to credit out Newsmax.

Speaker 2 As Rupert Murdock famously said in that email, which we'll always have now, it's not about red or blue, it's about green.

Speaker 2 And for them, they needed to tack to the MAGA right to protect their right flank. And they were always going to do that.
You know, sure, it would have been nice to see Tucker sweat on the stand.

Speaker 2 But in the grand scheme of things, I think Dominion did the Lord's work, and I'm happy they got their payout.

Speaker 4 Well, I'm happy they got their payout. I mean, but I will admit to you, I wanted it to be more, and I wanted to see a trial, but that's just me.
I wanted the festival of the

Speaker 2 I understand that.

Speaker 4 I wanted the Festival of Schadenfreude. But I do think that this whole question of, okay, you know, would the trial have changed the audience? Would it have peeled people off from the audience?

Speaker 4 And that's certainly possible if the trial would have been like the January 6th committee. But let's go back to the January 6th Committee.
I think they did an absolutely masterful job.

Speaker 4 I think that they documented it. They did everything they possibly could.

Speaker 4 And yet, it's hard to find that they had that much of an effect on Republican opinion.

Speaker 4 So I'm not sure that this would, not because the Fox News audience does not hear about this or know about this, it's that they don't really care about it. They don't care.

Speaker 4 The heart wants what it wants. They wanted what Fox gave them and continues to give them.
And that's the heart of it, right?

Speaker 2 Yeah. And here's how propaganda works, by the way.
It's about the old George W.

Speaker 2 Bush line from that funeral about, you know, judging yourself by your best intentions and your enemies by your worst examples. This is how propaganda works.

Speaker 2 The people that watch Fox, that are daily Fox viewers, their brains have been consumed by every negative thing that a liberal has ever done, real or imagined, exaggerated to the 10th degree. Right.

Speaker 2 And so, if you have been conditioned to believe that Joe Biden is really a socialist that might be complicit in a pedophile ring that is on the take from China, and that MSNBC and CNN and the New York Times and Washington Post all lie with impunity, okay, then if you learn that Fox also lied a couple times, it's easy to say to yourself, well, at least they're on my side.

Speaker 2 The other side is so horrible, right? It's back to the third-party conversation. It's this negative partisanship all the way down, right?

Speaker 2 And so if these viewers have been conditioned, they don't, it's not like the old days in the 80s where they might have had a rush or whenever Rush started, late 80s, early 90s, but they still got, you know, Tom Brokaw at night.

Speaker 2 You know, like these people don't have that. They're in a total bubble where the only information they receive is that the liberals are evil.

Speaker 2 And so once you've decided that the liberals are evil, it becomes very easy to justify it. So even if they do learn about the Tucker emails or whatever, you know, they come around.

Speaker 2 I don't know how to fix that. I think that's an unsolvable problem.
And I just, I don't think the trial would have fixed it.

Speaker 2 But maybe it would have helped on the margins, but, but, you know, that's the, that's the main issue here.

Speaker 4 Okay, so we have to do something extremely unusual now.

Speaker 2 Okay.

Speaker 4 I have to acknowledge that you were right and I was wrong.

Speaker 2 Oh, I don't know what this is about, but I'm very thrilled to hear.

Speaker 4 I discussed this with Kara Swisher on yesterday's podcast. The whole issue of the don't say gay bill.

Speaker 4 I thought that perhaps you and other critics had gotten out over your skis a little bit by saying, you know, that it was this draconian attempt to don't say gay, when in fact it was simply saying that we don't teach this for first, second, and third graders.

Speaker 4 This is very young children. And you got a whole bunch of blowback.
Kara got a whole bunch of blowback. And I'm sitting there thinking, okay, maybe there was a little bit too much hype.

Speaker 4 But, and this is my mea culpa, this week you had the folks down in Florida say, hold my beer. We're going to take, don't say gay, and we're going to make it apply

Speaker 4 through K-12, you know, through all of grade school, all the way through high school, including 18-year-old college seniors. And it's like, wait, how many times, Mr.

Speaker 4 Miller, were we assured by the smart people that no, no, no, no, no, this is simply about age appropriateness. So you were right.

Speaker 2 I was wrong. Thank you.
I will be a gracious winner in this one.

Speaker 2 And if you go back and read my very first article about Don't Segue, which was in February, I believe, of last year, the premise of that article.

Speaker 2 was that when I first heard about this bill, I was like, come on. Yeah.
That was my first instinct too. It was just like yours.
I was like, come on.

Speaker 2 Like, they couldn't really be trying to push something through that is this backwards, this draconian, this on the nose. Yeah.
In 2022, when I wrote that, there's just no way.

Speaker 2 And the reason why I think I was out in front on this and Shapiro, Ben Shapiro, and all these other assholes ended up coming from me in the National Review was because I called, you know, from my Jeb days, I know a lot of Tallahassee folks.

Speaker 2 So I called around and I was like, what is true here? Is what the activist groups on the left saying true? Or is what, you know, the people that are, you know, shining DeSantis Turtles true?

Speaker 2 And to a person, they were all like, no, this is going to pass. It's as bad as they say.
And they did end up modifying one element of it to be a straight shooter here from no discussion about gays.

Speaker 2 That's where the don't say gay moniker originally came from, to no instruction.

Speaker 2 So, I mean, this is a very marginable improvement, right? To this say that now a kid doesn't have to worry if they talk about whatever, gay stuff, that they're going to get in trouble.

Speaker 2 But still, a teacher now in 11th grade, I don't even know how you can you not talk about loving versus virginia even forget gay stuff like how do you not talk about sexual orientation in high school like can you not talk about the don't ask don't tell bill how do how do social studies teachers do their work how do english teachers that have you know that want to read books that have any kind of discussion of sexual orientation teach those books like you can't it was preposterous down to first grade and the thing that always got me is I know because I have a five-year-old, I know kindergartners.

Speaker 2 I just took Tulu's actually into a new school yesterday for the first time to visit it. And other kids look around and it's like, oh, hey, they're two dads.

Speaker 2 And when I leave, you better believe one of those little, spunky little kids went to their teacher and said, hey, what's the deal with that?

Speaker 2 Is the teacher not just supposed to say, hey, some families have two dads? Like, that would be illegal in Florida. That would be the textbook definition of instruction.

Speaker 2 And that is outrageous and wrong. And anyway, I hope people understand the seriousness of it.

Speaker 4 It's also delusional. And Julian Sanchez makes a really, really good point on the recent bills that they are delusional.

Speaker 4 He said, look, the delusion here is even more ridiculous by the expansion that students in 2023 can somehow be shielded from the existence of these topics until the parents deign to breach them.

Speaker 4 They can't, obviously, they can't. It's ludicrous.
It's like, look around at the world.

Speaker 4 Do you honestly think that you are now going to shield high school students from ever hearing about these things?

Speaker 4 This is a great sub stack by Freddie DeBoer who says, yes, indeed, kids are going to learn about LGBTQ issues sooner or later.

Speaker 4 It is pointless to try to keep them from finding out about the existence of homosexuality, of gay love, of gay marriage, of trans people, and gender nonconformity. They're going to find out.

Speaker 4 They have smartphones, usually much younger than they should.

Speaker 2 They're curious.

Speaker 4 The world is always a click away. It is foolish to try to prevent them from learning about this stuff.

Speaker 4 And he says, look, I acknowledge that some of the reporting, you know, might have distorted and exaggerated what the bills call for. But now,

Speaker 4 you know, what Florida is saying is we're going, you know, all the way on all of this. And again, it's like, who are you trying to fool here?

Speaker 4 It's all of this confusion of actually dealing with a problem with this need to wave your hands and engage in this sort of, you know, non-virtue signaling of Ron DeSantis saying the word woke, you know, 20 times in seven seconds or whatever it was.

Speaker 4 But, and yet, what, 55% of Republican voters now say it's more important to do shit like this than it is to protect entitlements from being caught.

Speaker 4 Whatever. What a world, Charlie.
Here we go. So you are going to get off this podcast and you are going to go meet your family and move into your new house in New Orleans.

Speaker 2 I'm moving in, baby. It's happening.
Thank you guys for being along the ride with me.

Speaker 4 Congratulations. Have a great weekend.
And maybe

Speaker 4 sit back, open a beer, you know, go on Netflix or whatever, and

Speaker 4 you can download,

Speaker 4 you can order, you can stream streetcar named Desire.

Speaker 2 I got NBA playoffs on the docket this weekend, but I will, in July, I will, I'll make it a priority.

Speaker 4 All right, thank you, Mr. Miller.

Speaker 4 And thank you all for listening to this weekend's Bulwark podcast. I am Charlie Sykes.
We will be back on Monday, and I'll be actually podcasting from an undisclosed location in a different time zone.

Speaker 4 And we'll do this all over again.

Speaker 4 The Bulwark podcast is produced by Katie Cooper and engineered and edited by Jason Brown.

Speaker 2 Gas, groceries, eating out?

Speaker 5 It all adds up fast. With the Verizon Visa card, you get rewarded every time you spend.
Get 4% in rewards on gas, dining, and at grocery stores.

Speaker 5 And you can put those rewards toward your Verizon bill or on new tech like a smartwatch and earbuds. Apply today at Verizon.

Speaker 5 Application required subject to credit approval must be a Verizon mobile account owner or manager or Fios account owner. See Verizon.com slash Verizon Visa card for terms or restrictions.

Speaker 5 The Verizon Visa Signature Card is issued by Synchrony Bank pursuant to a license from Visa USA Inc.

Speaker 2 This is Martha Stewart from the Martha Stewart podcast. Hi darlings, I have a little seasonal secret to share.
It's the new Kahlua Duncan Caramel Swirl.

Speaker 2 Kahlua, the beloved coffee liqueur, and Duncan, the beloved coffee destination, paired up to create a treat that is perfect for the holidays. So, go ahead, treat yourself.
Cheers, my dears.

Speaker 6 Must be 21 or older to purchase. Drink responsibly.
Kahlua Caramel Swirl Cream Liqueur, 16% Alcohol by Volume, 32 Proof. Copyright 2025 imported by the Kahlua Company, New York, New York.

Speaker 6 Duncan trademarks owned by DDIP Holder LLC. Used under license.
Copyright 2025, DDIP Holder LLC.

Speaker 4 Ah, greetings for my bath, festive friends. The holidays are overwhelming, but I'm tackling this season with PayPal and making the most of my money.
Getting 5% cash back when I pay in 4.

Speaker 4 No fees, no interest. I used it to get this portable spa with Jets.
Now the bubbles can cling to my sculpted but pruny body. Make the most of your money this holiday with PayPal.

Speaker 2 Save the offer in the app. Ends 1231.
See PayPal.com/slash promo terms. Points can be redeemed for cash and more paying for subject to terms and approval.
PayPal Inc. and MLS 910-457.