Bill Kristol: What Does 'They' Mean?

What does Zinn really give you?

Not just smoke-free nicotine satisfaction, but also real freedom to do more of what you love, when and where you want to do it.

Why bring Zinn along for the ride?

Because America's number one nicotine pouch opens up all the possibilities of right now.

With Zinn, you don't just find freedom, you keep finding it.

Find your Zinn.

Learn more at Zinn.com.

Warning, this product contains nicotine.

Nicotine is an addictive chemical.

Hey, everybody.

I just wanted to talk to me and y'all for a little bit at the start here, and we'll get to Bill Crystal in a minute.

There are a lot of things that were making me very angry over the weekend and the fallout from Charlie Kirk's assassination.

Among them are the fact that I see almost nobody discussing the gun culture that this young man was steeped in, and that is being ignored and being considered irrelevant to this conversation for some reason.

I'm upset about how stupid the punditry is about the online subculture this killer was steeped in.

And we're going to be talking more about that this week.

I'm angry about the despicable attacks on trans people, the incitements to civil war I've seen from prominent people on the right.

Ted Cruz's creepy AI slop tributes to Charlie Kirk, RFK claiming Kirk was his soulmate.

I could go on.

There's a lot pissing me off about

how supposedly responsible leaders in the MAGA world have acted.

And I'm going to be covering all of that and more on this podcast and in the weeks ahead.

And by the way, that's one more thing that I'm angry about, that I have to steep myself in this assassination coverage

for the foreseeable future.

And that's something that makes me angry at the killer, frankly.

And before we get to all that, with Bill Crystal, there's one other thing that I'm really upset about and that really shook me this weekend.

And

I want to talk about that with you.

The number of people who I've encountered who told me some variation of Charlie had it coming is deeply,

deeply alarming and upsetting.

And it's something that has really kind of shaken me to my core.

And

before I talk about those folks, I just want to be clear about who and what I am not talking about.

I'm not talking about people who are posting their strong disagreements with Charlie, lifting up his past noxious comments or any of that.

It's perfectly appropriate to speak the truth about his role in our national discourse, to express strong disagreement with him, with the TPUSA mission.

It's a free country, or at least it's supposed to be still.

So

I have no qualm with folks expressing their political disagreements with him.

I'm also not talking about the algorithmically delivered sludge from random strangers that Elon and the Chinese are elevating into my For You page.

And I've seen some pretty fucking nasty stuff on there, but I'm not letting that get to me.

And I'm not, it's important to say, talking about the Democratic Party or Democratic leaders who have been acting extremely responsibly throughout all of this.

At times in contrast to their GOP counterparts, and certainly in contrast to how their GOP counterparts acted following the attack on Paul Pelosi and others.

So

I think that it is important that I distinguish the thing that is upsetting me about some on the left from what is happening in the leadership of the Democratic Party.

Because a lot of my criticism of the Republican Party is how leaders responded to

pressure from voters that was pushing them in a direction that they knew to be wrong.

And so, I appreciate the Democratic leaders for acting responsibly over the last few days.

But, what I am talking about, the thing that is getting me really upset, it's coming from people

that are real, that either I know or I know to be not inauthentic.

It's coming from people I follow posting things like, hey, fascist catch.

Had to unfollow a couple of people on that.

Coming from people that I follow on Instagram posting pretty gleefully.

It's coming from the people that follow the show and comment on our posts at times.

And it's coming from people

in real life that I met at a bar.

That's right.

On Friday, I was watching my friend DJ,

and there was somebody that I've met before, but don't really know that well.

And they came up to me and apropos of nothing,

told me that they have French ancestors and they know what it's like to fight the fascists.

They're happy that this fascist is dead.

Someone volunteered that to me at the bar.

And I had a couple other people say something not quite as gross, but

close to the same ballpark.

I don't know what signals I sent to the universe that led someone to decide that I was a person they should confess that they're pro-assassination to, but let me be clear.

Don't fucking do that.

I consider anyone who is pro-assassination of Charlie Kirk a foe,

even if we voted for the same person in the last election.

I know we discussed this last week, and I know that probably some folks are sick of it, and that's fine.

You can fast forward to Bill.

But I wanted to one more time explain why this is all so important to me.

Number one, just fundamentally, this is wrong.

I believe that when people ask me about what my ideology is now that I left the Republican Party, I always come back to this one phrase.

I believe that people should have an opportunity to live a life of purpose and meaning if they choose to, and that the government should do what it can to foster it and do what it can to protect people from threats to that.

Maybe another way to put it, threats to their life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

That's my North Star.

And I guess it should go without saying, but I'll say it explicitly, that you can't live a life of purpose and meaning if you get gunned down on a campus.

I also think that people should have the chance to grow and change and find that meaning.

It's kind of something that I've been thinking about.

It's striking that I, on Friday, I had David Fromm on this podcast.

Today, I had Bill Crystal.

And I wonder what some of the people leavely posting about Charlie would have said if one of them had been assassinated 20 years ago.

Because it sure seems like some people

that like Bill Crystal now

would have been at least neutral to that 20 years ago, if recent reactions are any signal.

And

that's a disturbing thought to have.

It's a disturbing thought to have.

And let me tell you, I've had a lot of people tell me they thought that they hated Bill Crystal when he was on the Sunday shows.

They watched him growing up or they watched him as they were getting involved, as they were, you know, coming into age, into adulthood, and they didn't like his views on a lot of issues.

And that, you know, because of this podcast and because of other things, they've just come to see him for what he is.

I mean, it's self-deprecating and thoughtful and a great father and grandfather and somebody who cares about this country.

And I'm not saying that Charlie Kirk was any of that, but I'm just saying that, you know, I think that it's important to allow people the space to demonstrate who they are.

Allow people the chance

to

grow and learn.

and

change.

Some people change for the worse.

Some people change for the better.

This is part of the human experience.

And I would think that people who thought that Bill Crystal was an enemy and have come to find him charming and lovable and thoughtful

might kind of think twice about the one-dimensional way in which they view a 31-year-old who got assassinated.

I'd secondly like to say that even if it wasn't morally reprehensible to support assassination or to give comfort to assassination, It is morally reprehensible, but even if it wasn't, does anybody think that this worked or helped the anti-MAGA or anti-fascist cause?

If you are that guy at the bar and you think that the right thing to do is to fight and defeat fascism in all its forms, does it seem like that happened over the last week?

Because I don't know.

I think if you're a real anti-fascist, you should be furious at the man that just empowered the fucking fascists.

From the LSU LSU game on Saturday, where I had to watch a flyover about Charlie Kirk, to reports from friends at church services about how priests were talking about Charlie Kirk, to the NFL tributes, to social media feeds.

Charlie Kirk is now a martyr.

People who had never heard of Charlie Kirk are now

hearing these hagiographies and these tributes to him.

People that had never heard of Charlie Kirk in my section around me at Tiger Stadium on Saturday were cheering and whooping and hollering for him.

It It sure doesn't seem to me like the anti-fascist cause was advanced in any way.

And you got Stephen Miller, little gollum in the White House, talking about how to use this to crack down on anti-fascist groups, on liberal groups, on activist groups that are working to oppose the MAGA cause, to advance the progressive agenda.

Now the arm of the government is planning on cracking down on them even more.

Doesn't seem to me like any anti-fascist objective was met this weekend.

Seems like the opposite.

And how about the trans folks?

Do you think that the trans roommate of the shooter thinks that this made their life or the life of trans people safer or better?

Because I fucking don't.

I really worry for the safety of that person, for their future.

I worry for all of trans folks right now.

I think that we're already in an ugly period for them, and I think that it's about to get worse.

And while TPUSA was definitely hostile to trans Americans, I don't think that what happened in Utah is going to do anything to make their lives better.

Doesn't fucking seem like it to me, at least.

The other political thing about this that makes me think about is last year when people were asking me like what, where we're going, I said one of my worries that we're going to a place similar to in Ireland with the Troubles, like not that we'd have a real civil war, but there'd be, you know, just spates of violence, of political violence cropping up in this country.

And a lot of times, this was before Trump had won again.

In my head, I was envisioning, you know, I don't know, Kamala Harris being president and that there would be spates of MAGA violence and domestic terrorism.

And obviously, we've seen some of that.

Still,

I guess the worst case scenario I can think of is a world where the MAGA nationalists are in charge, the fascists are in charge, and there are spates of anti-fascist violence, martyring them and empowering them further and creating a cycle that allows them to use their power to crack down even more.

That seems like the worst possible case scenario.

And it seems like there's some people out there on the activist left that want to careen us towards that.

Maybe not that many people, but too many people for comfort.

One more thing about why this has hit me so hard.

I genuinely believe what I say on this podcast, which is why you're getting this rant.

I genuinely believe all the reasons that I've given you about why I left the GOP, why I upended my life, why I thought that the illiberalism of Donald Trump was such a threat to this country.

I'm never offering arguments here as a pose or as some kind of

triple bank shot, clever way

to get back at MAGA.

I don't pretend to have views.

I oppose illiberalism in all its forms.

I oppose

the violent rhetoric that Donald Trump reinserted into our politics.

I oppose the ill-treatment of political foes and the dehumanization of political foes that he advanced.

I oppose the way in which they want to take away the rights of political enemies.

None of this is oppose or positioning.

Okay.

And so when I oppose illiberalism coming from Trump, I'm not going to then flip around the other side and say I love or I defend or I understand

illiberalism from the other side.

Let me just give you a specific example.

There's the case of Kilmar Brego-Garcia this year.

It's something that I was really upset about and talked about a lot.

And this notion that somebody could have their life taken from them, that they could be grabbed and sent to a foreign torture prison without due process just because the government or some people in the government did not like what he stood for.

On the right, there was a big conversation on Fox and other places among Republican politicians that I found disgusting about how, well, Kilmore Garcia beat his wife or whatever.

He was a trafficker.

He sold drugs.

He was a drug dealer.

And what I would say to that is: okay, prove it.

Prove it.

Take him to court.

We have a rule of law in this country.

If that is true, then

find legal remedies for dealing with this problem like we do in a liberal democracy.

Within the construct of a liberal democratic system, of the rule of law, of a democracy, you can't just say that guy's a wife beater, so I get to send him to a torture prison camp.

You have to prove it.

You have to go to a jury.

You have to prosecute him.

Like, whether or not he's a bad person or whether or not he's a person that's done bad things is irrelevant to an autocrat wanting to snuff out his rights.

And in some cases, if people hadn't objected, if Keebo hadn't pushed back, Republicans and MAGA and Donald Trump was happy to essentially end Kilmar Garcia's life.

At the time, nobody had gotten out of Sukkot.

It was pressure

from the courts, pressure from lawyers, pressure from activists, pressure from the media, pressure from politicians that led him to be able to get his day in court.

And this is all still ongoing.

This is a fight that's still ongoing.

My point is, it was like, it didn't, what I said at that time is it didn't matter whether I disagreed with his behavior.

He still needed to be treated as a human who has rights in this country.

Everybody on the left that I could see fully agreed with that argument.

That was an argument a lot of people advanced, right?

So it's hard for me to understand how.

you could say, unless you were faking, right?

Unless you could say, if you said,

I believe that somebody that allegedly beat his wife and sold drugs and trafficked people, you know, should not have their rights taken away from them, should not be sent to a torture prison, then I don't understand how you can flip it around and say, well, I just, I don't care that much if somebody with bad opinions got killed, got assassinated.

That doesn't work for me.

Like the inverse of that,

that doesn't compute.

Okay.

Like

Charlie Kirk had a lot of opinions I disagreed with.

We argued all the time.

I would go every Christmas, I went and argued with people at his TPUSA function, and we met and we would talk and argue and tease each other.

He had bad opinions,

some real ones.

We live in a country where people are allowed to have bad opinions freely and where they do not need to be afraid, they should not be afraid that

somebody will

do a summary execution on them because they didn't like their opinions.

So for me, these liberal democratic principles that applied to Kumar Obrego Garcia

also apply in spades to Charlie Kirk.

And I got to tell you, I don't think you are a liberal.

You might say you're a liberal, but I don't think you're a liberal if you're neutral on the topic of stochastic political terrorism.

All right.

And I don't think that you're in the pro-democracy.

No, let me correct that.

I know you're not in the pro-democracy coalition if you are neutral on someone getting murdered while practicing open debate.

Being for liberal democracy means standing up for the rule of law, standing up for people to have the ability to express their views in public on a college campus, even if their views are noxious, even if you disagree stridently with their views, even if you think that their views are a plague on the country and the youth.

It doesn't matter.

Being for democracy means you are for their ability to express them, and that you will push back on them in the public square.

You will try to push back on them at the ballot box.

You will encourage people to go out and vote against that worldview.

That is what being in the pro-democracy coalition is.

And frankly, if you want to really define yourself as being pro-democracy, it is especially true.

Especially true

that people who have views you disagree with are protected, that they are safe to express them.

As you can tell, this is something that I care very deeply about.

It is, frankly, at the core of why this exists, why this project exists, why this bulwark exists, because

my outrage and horror at

Trumpian illiberalism is what made me decide that I need to speak out against it and act out against it and organize against it, right?

At the time, I was considering maybe I just quit politics and I don't know, go be a PR guy for a corporate law firm or something, or a corporate, you know, some company's PR ma'am, right?

I was living in Oakland at the time.

I used to joke, maybe I'll go do PR for Clorox and like sell bleach wipes or whatever.

I don't know, like, screw this.

But my passion and my anger and my rage at the illiberalism and the dehumanization that we saw from Trump and from the MAGA movement is why I am here talking about this with you.

And I'm not trying to create an equivalent.

And obviously, as I said at the top, it is much, much worse when it is leaders of a movement or a party that are acting illiberally, that are dehumanizing, that are trying to undermine our democratic system.

And a gap between Democratic leaders and Republican leaders on this front is so wide that you can't even see it with the naked eye.

And yet,

I still just cannot abide anyone even feeling just the tiniest bit confused about whether I might be in a fellow a fellow traveler with them if they think it's okay to post, hey, fascist catch on social media.

I am not.

I'm not in the business of trading one form of the liberalism for another.

And

I'm never going to be.

So that's what I got for you.

Up next, Bill Crystal.

All right, everybody, inflation isn't going anywhere.

Our pockets are getting tight.

We might have some Trumpian stagflation ahead.

And everybody knows there are things you can do to reduce monthly costs and improve your finances.

But who has the time to kind of go through all their expenses and really figure it out and figure out what's worth it to cut?

Well, with Rocket Money crunching the numbers for you, this all gets a lot easier.

Rocket Money is a personal finance app that helps you find and cancel your unwanted subscriptions.

Just to be clear, not the Bulwark Plus.

Okay, that is a very valuable and key subscription.

And we all appreciate you so much.

So much we appreciate you.

If you're not a Bullwick Bus subscriber, maybe adding 10 bucks a month.

But with Rocket Money, it can do is help you balance that out by finding the worthless, dumb subscriptions you're still paying for.

It monitors your spending and helps you lower your bills so you can grow your savings.

Rocket Money shows you all your expenses in one place, including subscriptions you forgot about.

If you see a subscription you no longer want, Rocket Money will help you cancel it.

There's a dashboard that lays out your total financial picture, including bill due dates and paydays in a way that's easy to digest.

You can even automatically create custom budgets based on your past spending.

I guess it just occurs to me that as I'm reading this ad, if you're listening to this ad, you're not a Bulwark Plus member yet because

Bulwark Plus members get ad-free shows.

So that's something to think about.

My ad reads are really fun, though.

So, you know, it kind of cuts both ways.

Cancel your unwanted subscriptions and reach your financial goals faster with Rocket Money.

Go to rocketmoney.com slash the bulwark today that's rocket money.com slash the bulwark rocket money.com slash the bulwark

Hello and welcome to the Bulwark Podcast.

I'm your host Tim Miller.

It is Monday and so we're here with editor-at-large Bill Crystal.

Bill,

boy,

you know, how thrilled are you to be podcasting with me today?

Great.

You know, I'll be podcasting with you.

I've always thrilled to be podcasting with you, Tim, especially when you're upbeat, big LSU victory over the weekend.

I know that was your big tail game.

Was that the first home game you were doing this year?

It was the first home game.

It was a good win.

The defense is unbelievable.

It's like a 2011 defense.

Is that right?

I was talking to Lauren Egan, our colleague, Lauren Egan, a huge Vanderbilt fan.

She has tickets there, and they're also an undefeated star too.

So that game, you're going to go up to Nashville for that game in a month.

It's going to be a good shot.

It's going to be a shootout, October 18th.

Intra-bowl work.

Intra-bowl work tensions will rise.

You know, it'll be good.

It was not on my schedule, but yeah, no, Vandy's looking good.

So maybe I will, maybe I'll have to make an exception.

All right.

Well, from that upbeat note,

I want to say that.

I did my best.

I would like to say, I did my best to pretend to be vaguely upbeat and to be living in a normal America where we can focus on college football.

And for 45 seconds of this podcast, I'd like the record to show that.

Well, I just got about half of my annoyances out in a monologue before you came on about all things Charlie Kirk assassination.

So I just kind of want to give you the floor and wondering what you're seeing out there and

what your main reactions are.

It's very bad when someone gets murdered, assassinated.

It's very bad when the reaction is immediately polarized and politicized.

On all sides, though, I think with more culpability and impact on the right in the sense that you have the president of the United States leading that reaction and weaponizing it, you have a lot of people online on the left saying stupid and foolish and offensive things, but not really many, almost all Democratic politicians, I think, and I'd say sort of respectable liberal opinion types have been pretty responsible.

So it's asymmetrical, but not good in either way, honestly.

And

I mean, it's terrible for him, obviously, and his family and all that.

And terrible for the country.

Assassinations are a bad thing to unleash.

Someone reminded me this,

you know, you one does tend to lead to another if you look at history.

And so you just don't want to be living in a country where this becomes routine.

And it has become more common, right?

I mean, the Minnesota assassination, which people didn't talk as much about, but that was an assassination of elected officials.

That hasn't happened that often in U.S.

history and it happened.

And actually, it was kind of memory-holed pretty quickly.

In their homes, in a particularly

totally ideological motive, I mean, lists of Democrats and so forth.

No question about that motive.

It would have been nice to have had a president of the United States on the other side from these Democrats who would have denounced it, which I just do want to make that one point.

I mean, every president we've ever had would have done that.

Nixon, Carter, you don't like him, you don't like them.

Some of them were not great on everything else.

And race makes it a little more complicated, but let's just say leaving that aside, maybe.

Yeah, every president we've ever had would have felt compelled and felt it his duty.

And it would have been a real duty and a real public good to make clear that this is unacceptable.

And we have a president who didn't make that clear three months ago.

We have some people not saying it on the left now, and that's very bad.

And just to your point, like the contrast, you've got today,

like J.D.

Vance is hosting Charlie's podcast to do

a tribute to him, which is, again, is fine.

He's right.

They had a big Kennedy Center thing last night.

RFK Jr.

is talking about how Charlie Kirk was his soulmate.

It's a very strange thing to say.

And, you know, there will be a big memorial next Sunday, I think, in Arizona.

Just, again, like the contrast between that.

It would have been appropriate.

Maybe they didn't want him, but it would have been appropriate for J.D.

Vance to have offered to speak at the memorial of the, you know, Minnesota of Melissa Melissa Hortman or whatever, you know, and so I mean that that contrast is pretty, pretty noteworthy.

It'd be nice if J.D.

Vance invited on his podcast today the governor of Utah, Spencer Cox, who's been responsible in his statements.

It'd be nice if he invited on some Democrats who got out of their way to express their revulsion and horror at this murder.

Do you think he will?

No.

I don't think so.

I think we're getting the other side.

And you guys wrote in morning, shouts out Stephen Miller as kind of the locus of this effort to weaponize this tragedy against Americans.

He said this, the power of law enforcement under President Trump's leadership will be used to find you, will be used to take away your money, take away your power, and if you've broken the law, take away your freedom.

That was Stephen Miller talking about, I guess, activists, left groups, and protesters and Soros and troublemakers and kind of this whole grab bag of villains that they are trying to create out of this.

That's a pretty alarming sentiment.

You guys, what you guys wrote about.

So talk about that a a little bit.

Yeah, and the U in that sentence is kind of un, what's the term for that in grammar when there's no like reference for the, you know, for the pronoun, for the, for, for the pronoun.

I mean, we don't know who that you is.

It could be a very wide swath of people he and Donald Trump don't like or who have criticized them or who at different times have criticized Charlie Kirk or organizations that fund people who haven't been sufficiently respectful, they would judge, of Kirk's achievements after his death.

I mean, the degree to which we are looking at

Miller says this explicitly, right, a government-led onslaught against the, quote, power and the money of people who apparently haven't broken the law.

If you've broken the law, you're going to lose your freedom.

I don't know, you know, presumably there would be trials.

I don't know, you know, maybe not.

Maybe it'd just be martial law at that point.

But for everyone else, at least the government's going to go after your power and your money.

And again, that everyone else is a very broad group.

Since Stephen Miller is the person who said the entire Democratic Party is, what did he say, a domestic terrorist

just last week, right?

So, I mean, by his own account, you might say, people who are writing it as if he's going after some radical left groups and thinking deep down, well, I'm not part of that.

If you are in any way part of the opposition to Donald Trump, you are part of what Stephen Biller is targeting.

Well, while we focus on grammar for a second,

you're talking about the kind of undefined you.

And this is

what we've seen from Trump and from a lot of MAGA leaders is the undefined you and the undefined they, right?

I mean, like we, like I, this was a rant that I went on following the attempted assassination of Trump and Butler last year, uh, which was just the degree of irresponsibility among leaders at the top of the Republican Party talking about how they wanted him dead.

They wanted him dead.

Even like,

even like the more traditional old school type of Republicans who just stuck around for MAGA were doing this, right?

Like, it was, it was completely widespread.

Like, they were going after him.

They wanted to jail him.

They wanted to kill him.

And that does contribute to this notion that like we have some civil war happening in this country and that it is, you know, maybe

justified to go after this undefined they, undefined you, right?

And like that is something that just should be called out every time people see it in public because it's important to force them to actually talk about what really happened, right?

And like what really happened is not

in both those cases is extremely bad, but it's not part of some civil war, some generational struggle, right?

It's in the case of Trump getting arrested, it was specific grand juries looked at evidence and decided that he had done wrongdoing with specific people.

In the case of Butler,

it seems like just a loner kid that had too easy access to firearms and it could have been any famous person that came to his town.

In this case, we don't quite know exactly yet, but we're still going to find out more.

But even still, it's just one guy.

It's one young guy who is lived in a MAGA family in Utah.

You saw people over the weekend talking about how the college radicalized him.

Like he went to some technical college in Utah.

Like he's not, it's not like he went to Wellesley and got radicalized by the far leftists, right?

He went to Orem, Provo, Utah, then went to St.

George, Utah.

He's like one of the reddest parts of the country.

I think that in talking about it, the responsibility to do it is obviously to condemn this in all forms, but to talk about what it really is, you know, to try to identify what the real problems are that need to be addressed.

This administration doesn't have any interest in that.

They have interest in using it to go after their political foes and to try to broaden it out beyond what it really is and create a greater struggle, greater troubles, if you will, than we have now.

Aaron Powell, yeah, and to encourage fairly vigilante violence

pretty directly, I would say, almost.

And also to threaten, as we were saying, to use the force of the federal government now that Trump and Stephen Miller are in charge of that again.

So that's very different from denouncing some, you know, there could be some reckless rhetoric that might lead some people to do this.

That's sort of, I think, a reasonable thing to do if you cite particular rhetoric and

maybe there's some connection to the shooter.

Again, what's striking in the case of the murder of the Minnesota representative and her husband, and then the assault on a colleague of hers and I think it was his spouse where they were very badly wounded, that was explicitly political.

And I don't recall Democrats then saying, they might have said, you know, Trump and his people should be more careful about their rhetoric, but that was about it.

And they didn't use anything approaching the kind of rhetoric that Trump and Miller and Vance are using in this case.

And the whole MA movement seems to be on board this blaming everyone who is not part of MAGA, basically, honestly, or is not at least willing to acquiesce in MA's dominance of America.

You are not just part of the problem.

You're not just, you know, insufficiently attentive to MAGA's concerns.

You are basically a domestic terrorist.

Maybe they'll tolerate you using your rights of free speech and

holding your job and so forth for a certain amount of time.

But basically you are not a in any way a fellow american citizen maybe i overstated that a little bit but i i think the rhetoric is pretty is pretty dangerous and very dangerous and pretty appalling and that's for sort of the whole the big picture the big the big you and they as you as you correctly say and then the demonizing of particular groups obviously or subgroups is really really dangerous and and uh terrible yeah a lot there so just a couple of thoughts just briefly, I should just say, also, the way that they're going after people, I mean, they literally have a list that they're gathering of people who said wrong thoughts about Charlie Kirk that they want fired from their jobs, which shows you about how genuine the whole cancel culture fake outrage was with these guys, of course.

But yeah, they do want to punish people and target them, right?

Like there is an

effort to do that, an effort to go after them.

And I think it's the most acute on the trans issue, of course.

You mentioned it, but I guess just to give people the facts here of what we know so far, Governor Cox on ABC this weekend said that the shooter lived with a romantic partner who was undergoing a gender transition.

He said also that the roommate was aghast at the slang when speaking to investigators and was cooperating.

So I do think that's an important thing to say, at least based on what we know.

This was not like was stoking it or whatever.

Yet I don't think that that fact fact is going to stop what we all have already seen and what is all coming, which is a campaign of demonization, of dehumanization of trans people.

You posted over the weekend.

It should be needless to say, but it is perhaps at this moment worth saying that transgender individuals have the same right as anyone else's to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

It's not hard to see where this is going, I guess.

I got to say, Spencer Cox has been pretty good, and I agree with a lot of the praise of him.

He didn't need to say all this stuff on Sunday.

It's not appropriate.

He's the governor of the state.

He hasn't done his own investigation.

He doesn't know what's he or say and what's real.

He doesn't know if people are saying things to, I don't know, for whatever reason.

I'm not saying they are, but I feel like even he is not

quite following the right protocol and the norms of how one conducts a serious investigation of

this kind.

But as you say, maybe he was saying it with a certain good intention to say that the...

the roommate was cooperating and therefore shouldn't be held accountable.

But the roommate's not accountable anyway.

I mean, it's all ridiculous, right?

I mean, just as the wife of the 57-year-old murderer in Minneapolis isn't accountable, unless that person is accountable and was a co-conspirator, in which case, fine, then that will come out

in the investigation and in court, and the person might be indicted and so forth.

But this holding any relationship one has with a trans person, any person who commits a crime or has such a relationship, is now that's going to be blamed on

trans individuals, on trans rights,

or human rights

for transgender people.

I mean, it really is appalling.

And the targeting there is just so over the top.

And I will say, Charlie Kirk engaged in some of that himself.

He was not careful in what he said.

He was entitled to have his views, obviously, but he was not careful in the way he framed his objections to the extension of human rights to transgender individuals.

And you can tell they wanted this fight, obviously, from the start, right?

And like initially, it's like, oh, the bullets had trans stuff on it.

No, they didn't.

Oh, the shooter might be trans.

No, that's not true.

Oh, the roommate is trans, right?

Like, it's like you're desperate for grasping for any way to kind of demonize that community.

To your point on Cox, I just want to echo on both points.

I think that obviously compared to a lot of other MAGA leaders right now, his tone has been much better.

That said,

both on this trans issue and on like the shooter's motivations, I do feel like he's freelancing on that quite a bit.

And I think that I've seen a lot of freelancing in a lot of places, particularly from a lot of old people who could not possibly translate the like meme culture frames from the Helldivers video game that was on these bullets, right?

I mean, like, I mean, I'm getting old.

I was trying to explain it to my husband who was like, what is OWO?

Right?

Like, this person is 22 years old, is deep into internet subcultures.

And I think that we're going to learn more about what the views are.

But it was intentionally ironic and cryptic, some of what he's putting on there.

And maybe Spencer Cox knows some stuff that we don't know yet, I guess.

But I think that he's speaking in a way that's a little bit definitive about motivation when he's a person as a post-middle-aged Mormon man

that just doesn't, I just don't know how well he can translate for people what was in the head of this

young killer.

No, and he shouldn't be trying to, just to be obvious.

He's the governor of the state.

He should be reporting what is real fact facts, but not trying to put himself in the head of a suspect, presumably the alleged murderer, I guess we should say it that way, but presumably the murderer, who isn't apparently cooperating, hasn't, therefore, I gather, when Gathers spoken directly to law enforcement about his motives and didn't seem to leave a manifesto.

So how do we know?

We really, literally don't know.

And I take, I very much take your point about people my age should not be even pretending we have some the foggiest idea of what's going on in gamer world in terms of the eight levels of bizarre irony and self-referential stuff that's going on in these inscriptions in that world.

Let me just put it that way.

But even if you were a 23-year-old hipster, you wouldn't know what's in his mind, right?

Which really makes it irresponsible.

So let's, okay, we've been a little tougher on Cox.

We should come back to, yes, close the loop by reiterating that he's been better than 99% of Republicans, which of course tells you a lot.

Which tells you a lot.

They should all be at worst like Spencer like Governor Cox, you know.

Right.

Yes, absolutely.

All right.

These moments of uncertainty, it's important to think about protecting your financial future.

And for around the same price per month as one of your streaming services, you can ensure that you do that by finding life insurance at selectquote.com.

If you're new to life insurance, you're not alone.

Thankfully, I've found SelectQuote.

For over 40 years, SelectQuote has helped more than 2 million Americans understand their options and get the coverage they need, over $700 billion in coverage and counting.

As a broker, their mission is simple, to find you the right insurance policy at the best price.

They take the guesswork out of finding that insurance policy.

You don't have to sort through dozens of confusing options on your own.

Instead, one of their agents will find the right policy at the right price for you, comparing plans from trusted, top-rated insurance companies.

to find something that fits your health, your lifestyle, and your budget.

And they work for you for free.

And you're not out of luck if you have pre-existing health conditions because SelectQuote partners with companies that offer policies for people with high blood pressure, diabetes, heart disease, and other conditions.

Life insurance is never cheaper than it is today.

Get the right life insurance for you for less and save more than 50% at selectquote.com/slash bulwark.

Save more than 50% on term life insurance at selectquote.com/slash bulwark today to get started.

That's selectque.com/slash bulwark.

One other

person you mentioned, you've mentioned in the newsletter and on Twitter, says wanted to bring it up.

I I talked briefly to

from about this on Friday, kind of taking out the lens and looking at the global side of this.

I want to talk about the protests in the UK in a second, but we had Putin's Bannon, if you will.

I kind of hate that I'd give that credit to Bannon, but it's just the best shorthand, I think, for it.

Dugan, who fancies himself kind of a philosopher of some kind, wrote a substack, From Ukraine to Utah, One Global War.

You just talked earlier about

how we're seeing some of this in Stephen Miller and also the way to try to like turn

what very well might be just a mentally ill kid's

horrible choice and too easy access to weapons and all that into like some broader cultural civil war that we're saying that's not even just America, but globally.

And to directly try to tie the Russia-Ukraine war to this, I think is pretty noteworthy.

Why did you find it noteworthy enough to mention it a couple of times?

Yeah, I mean, Duga really is Putin's court philosopher.

I guess you're right.

Bannon, a combination of Bannon, and I suppose Michael Anton and some of Peter Thiel's more recondite thinking about Carl Schmidt and all this stuff.

He really is more like Carl Schmidt, if you want a historical example, the Nazi jurist who justified and provided a rationale for much that the Nazis did, but himself, before that, a distinguished professor at German universities.

And Dugan, in his own way, has written long books that some people have taken very seriously.

He's basically a fascist and therefore is totally, he's on board with Putin and Putin's on board with him.

What is striking is the, he has some qualifications about his admiration for MAGA, not quite where he would be on every issue, wants them to be on every issue, but they're in the right place.

They are the American front of this global war between, I will use terms he doesn't quite use, but he almost does, between fascism and liberalism.

Liberalism he uses, he's against it, but whatever you want to call his version of fascism.

So that doesn't mean that MAGA, everyone in MAGA is like Dugan, obviously.

It'd be nice if someone in MAGA repudiated Dugan and Dugan's endorsement.

But it's very, it is telling that that's how he sees it.

And

I think he's being

honest

in his judgment there.

Unfortunately, MAGA World has given him enough material, you might say, to work with on this.

As mentioned, there was the march

in England over the weekend.

Far-right activist Tommy Robinson, who is

kind of anti-migrant and also doesn't fully map onto America.

It's kind of anti-cop in a way, but you know, over there because they think that the cops are sort of in line with the liberal leadership and it's more like pro-military.

But anyway, he is a far-right activist and provocateur, really.

Their march drew over 100,000 people.

And I saw it in several places of people on the right, on the MAGA right, celebrating this.

Like I was also calling it like the biggest nationalist march or rally that they've seen in Europe.

There were some clashes with police officers.

I bring it up just because

I think also in the context of the reaction we've seen to Kirk.

Let me just caveat this at the top.

I'm the type of LSU fan where after a big win, I'm like, we're going to win the championship.

And after a loss, I'm like, we're never going to win again.

Like, sometimes I'm a little too emotional in reacting to recent events.

And I try to be thoughtful about

putting things into context.

I guess there's a concerning amount of momentum that I see on the illiberal right here and in Europe, certain parts of Europe at least.

And that march happening the same time you saw this kind of outpouring of support for Kirk.

It's alarming to me.

It is.

I mean, I'm not, I don't follow British politics as much as I used to.

And I, you know, someone like Robin said so loathsome, it's hard to even read about him.

But I mean, he is far right.

We're not, I mean, he's beyond Farage.

He's beyond the sort of, let's call it the equivalent almost of Trump and MAGA world here, I would say.

And is often

almost closer to like the Proud Boys or something.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Laura Loomer, Proud Boys, Fuentes, is that his name?

Yeah, Fuentes.

Yeah.

Even he's kind of like a little bitch.

Like, I don't, like, he's kind of a little wimpy guy.

Okay.

And he's very far right, but Robinson has the stochastic side.

Totally.

Like with him, yeah.

Yeah, yeah.

So, and so really right.

I mean, and 100,000 people is not good.

And Elon Musk spoke by video, hook up to it.

So he's on board with them just as he was on board with the AFD, the neo-Nazi party in Germany.

I mean, the degree of both of international coordination, or at least support for each other on the far right, and as you say, and the movement of the far right further right and the accelerationist, if you want, element of what's happening on the right is terrible.

I mean, it'd be very, very dangerous.

I mean, Robinson is basically pro-violence against migrants.

I'm going to say this, and now he'll probably sue us if this is shown on Elon.

So I'll qualify it by saying I'm not familiar with everything he said, but I think he's pretty far out there.

There's a vibe of that.

That's what the kids are saying.

The vibe gives off pro-violence against moderates.

Well, Nick Cohen, who's a very respectable, very sober center-left British columnist, wrote that this was the largest far-right march since Oswald Mosley's fascist march in London, the Union of Fascists, I think they were called, in the 30s in Britain, and explicitly pro-fascist.

And they also had a march of, I don't know, 100,000 people in London.

One forgets how popular fascism was

around the world in the 30s.

So, yeah, so if Nick Cohen said that, I'm very alarmed about it.

I think we are entitled to be too.

But again, the fact that Musk is, you know, all the ties between these groups and the relishing of

the fact that everyone's getting more extreme.

I mean, that is very dangerous, but these things have a momentum of their own.

We've talked about that before.

And it's just dangerous.

I mean, obviously, it's dangerous, you know, in so many ways, but yeah, yeah, terrible.

Hey, everybody, we are going on the road this fall, and I want to see you.

Sadly, our Toronto tickets have already sold out, so I'm plotting a return to Canada.

You guys just wait on that, but uh, there's still tickets left for our events in Washington, D.C.

and New York City in October.

Come join me, Sarah JVL, for two nights of camaraderie and joy and resistance and podcasting, and maybe some special guests at the D.C.

event.

We might give a big middle finger to the masked agents of Donald Trump Trump that are roaming the city's free streets.

And we'll be back in New York a couple times later.

First time we've been in New York in ages.

The last time we had a live New York event, it was, I can remember, because it was during the Nuggets title run.

And me and a handful of the folks who came out went and watched Jamal Murray like put up 40, I think, on the Lakers after the podcast.

It was quite enjoyable.

Maybe we'll have a similar night.

We'll see.

And if you really want more time with us and you don't want to just place a bet that you'll end up at the same bar with me after, because you never know.

You could pay for VIP tickets, they're included in the sale.

It'll give you earlier entry into the show, and you can hang with us for an intimate QA.

You can check out all the details and get tickets at thebulwark.com/slash events for more.

That's thebullwork.com/slash events.

See you all on the East Coast.

I want to do something a little constructive on this front rather than just lamenting all of it.

To me, I hope that this is a

flashpoint, kind of a series of events for liberals, and I'm using that word particularly, to

try to create a kind of a counter movement against this.

I think that for all of the accurate negative things that could be said about Charlie Kirk, this isn't really even a value judgment.

The one thing that I could say,

just without caveat, positive about him, is he put in real work to organize young people, to communicate his views, his ideology to young people, and to engage with them and get them involved.

And when I went to TPUSA last year, the article was like 90% all the gross, horrible things that I saw, but the 10% at the top was like

that.

We could use this, right?

Whatever you want to call us, the pro-democracy side, the Democrats, the liberals, whatever, any we that you find yourself identifying with could use something like this that communicates and galvanizes people against illiberalism throughout the world and these kind of far-right activities in particular.

Anyway, I don't exactly, this is something that's just been banging around my head all weekend.

I don't know exactly what that looks like, but it is something that I want to put out into the world because

I think that this is a good instigating moment for liberals to start to think about how they can actually put more effort into

a now out-of-vogue word, community organizing

young people that are open to hearing the message.

No, I very much agree with that.

I mean, I think there's different levels of different kinds of efforts, and some of them, someone like me, is more better at maybe or more familiar with, let me say, more suited to than others.

There's a kind of intellectual effort of rejuvenating liberalism, recreating it for the 21st century.

There's a, let's call it, political kind of elite effort, you might say, of bringing together different elements of the coalition so they work together and so forth.

And then there's this much more grassroots movement effort.

And I think there are always individual stuff and the yeah, they're all important and they should all be broad-based as much as possible, in my opinion.

One moment of real, like I really did very depressed this weekend as I happened on social media somewhere to notice that there's some fight.

I didn't really see what caused it.

between Chris Van Holland and Hakeem Jeffries about something or other.

And

they were staff or sniping at each other.

And I thought, I mean, really?

I think it was maybe Van Holland said everyone should support Mamdani and Jeffries should already have done so since he's from New York, and Jeffries was staffer, was like, well,

stay in your lane, or who cares about Chris Van Holland or something.

And so they're actually spending time sniping at each other on something that's utterly unimportant.

I mean, it's important, I guess, who's the next mayor of New York.

It's utterly unimportant when Hakeem Jeffries supports him.

Voters of New York City are not waiting to hear from Hakeem Jeffries on this.

I'm going to sister.

Which is the reason why I should just support him, by the way.

But I'll tell you what.

Totally.

No, I agree.

And if I were asked, I would say that.

But the idea that this is the moment to

let's have a lot of really fun intra-democratic fights and let's have the centrists attack the left and the left attack the center and young attack old.

I mean, it's not that they should suppress their opinions about various things, but there's going to be a shutdown, a fight about a shutdown in two weeks.

Maybe the members of Congress actually, who do actually have to coordinate their effort, the rest of us don't have to.

We can say whatever we want, I suppose.

Maybe they should actually work a little harder on that and not sort of

I don't know.

So I do feel like, yes, the opposition could use improving on a lot of different of these, on all these areas, the intellectual, the political, and the one you've mentioned, which is so important, the kind of organizing, I guess you call it.

Yeah, I agree with that.

And just since you mentioned Zoran,

again, like he, he was, he was a flashpoint for getting people involved, right?

In some ways, that were not specifically how I wish it would happen, but it was working and people are getting involved and excited in New York.

Now, he's going to have a real big job of trying to govern the biggest,

the biggest city in the country.

Well,

should he win?

So he's not really the person for this, but like that same notion could be channeled towards a more broad-based activation of young people throughout the country.

And it's just, you look out and like, who's doing that?

And it's hard to kind of think about that.

I mean, like, you could throw out some names, but they would feel insufficient, I guess.

And one footnote to that, my impression, I saw something quickly that he had said, I think, on at a rally or something over the weekend, was responsible about Charlie.

His was great.

I played it on the Purdue.

Oh, okay.

Well, good.

You're right.

I played it on Thursday?

Yeah, I played it on Thursday because it was really, really good.

Yeah, so all this talk about the left has gone this way.

He's the most prominent leftist, I guess, leftist Democrat running for office, not quite, well, in office, in state office, right now in America, I guess he and AOC.

And he was utterly responsible and did not say any of the things that Trump and Stephen Miller are saying, the radical left types are saying, right?

So it really does show from I now having complained about the Democrats for a while, it shows that they are so much more responsible.

And I would just say one more thing about the left, just as this is not, you know, again, as I specifically chose the word liberal because of where I identify myself, after having myself complained in the intro about how some regular Americans in my life were responding to this tragedy.

Gosh, I'm really gassing this guy up by saying this right now, but probably the two most prominent leftists to use that word, like maybe three most, are you mentioned AOC and Zoron, and then the streamer, Hassan Piker and all of their responses were extremely responsible were and Hassan is tamping down the people in his comments who are trying who are doing the opposite and they were all talking about the importance of people being able to speak in a free country and and that is really encouraging and so I just want to say that

every business has an ambition PayPal Open is the platform designed to help you grow into yours with business loans so you can expand and access to hundreds of millions of PayPal customers worldwide.

And your customers can pay all the ways they want with PayPal, Venmo, Pay Later, and all major cards so you can focus on scaling up.

When it's time to get growing, there's one platform for all business, PayPal Open.

Grow today at PayPalOpen.com.

Loan subject to approval in available locations.

A happy place comes in many colors.

Whatever your color, bring happiness home with CertaPro Painters.

Get started today at Certapro.com.

Each Certipro Painters business is independently owned and operated.

Contractor license and registration information is available at Certapro.com.

The other big news of the morning is related to China and TikTok.

Trump sent this bleat this morning.

The big trade meeting in Europe between the U.S.

and China has gone very well, all caps.

It will be concluding shortly.

A deal was also reached on a, quote, certain company that young people in our country very much wanted to save.

They will be very happy.

I will be speaking to President Xi on Friday.

The relationship remains a strong one.

Exclamation point, exclamation point, exclamation point.

Donald Trump really loves Xi.

And that is a lot of exclamation points to use when talking about how much you're friends with somebody.

Since that, Besant has now come out and said what Trump was implying by saying that they have a framework for a TikTok deal.

And I thought this was...

the most

grotesque part of all of this was this statement from Besant at the end.

They They have a deal between two private parties.

Then he goes on.

The two leaders, President Trump and party chair Xi, will speak on Friday to complete the deal.

Is that how things work here?

Like the President of the United States has to stamp off a private deal between a private company and a foreign country.

It's one of our adversaries and us.

Like Trump and Xi are the same.

Like we have

state-run deal making now when it comes to social media accounts, I guess.

Anyway, what do you make of all that?

When it comes to other corporations as well, it turns out, right?

Intel and stuff.

Yeah.

I mean, Trump is being taken to the cleaners by G, is my sense, as he has been by Putin.

And some of our Trump accommodating or acquiescing foreign policy hawks thought, okay, we can work to get him okay on Ukraine.

And anyway, at least he'll be tough on China.

That's the one thing.

He'll really be tough on China.

That's the real competitor for the 21st century, Bill.

You're a little too obsessed with the Europe stuff and some of these are NATO.

That's kind of old school.

And this Xi, he's going to really be tough.

Look how tough he was in the first term.

And he was somewhat tough in the first term.

Trevor Burrus, Jr.: Up until that last year and a half, we won the trade deal and COVID.

Right.

So the trade deal always cut against the Pompeos and the others in the administration who were authentically, I think, pretty anti-China, sometimes in intelligent ways and useful ways, sometimes somewhat silly ways.

But still, Trump's just thrown all that under the bus.

And he's now all in on a trade deal with Xi and let them have whatever chips they need to improve their semiconductors and let them have obviously no political challenge to them.

We're not going to let the president of Taiwan travel through the U.S.

I mean, yeah, it's all fake.

I mean, it's hard to know how much of the China toughness was always fake among a lot of Republicans, just a kind of bellicosity because they sort of vaguely think that if you're for American greatness, you can't just be for being a wimp.

So you, but you don't actually do anything about Ukraine, which is actually a massive brutal assault on an ally in Europe by Putin.

But, you know, we can pretend to be tough on China.

Nothing's happening there, really.

I mean, but now that's beginning to collapse.

And so, yes, Trump's getting along with the dictators everywhere.

The relationship remains a very strong one.

Hard eyes emoji.

It's just like, okay,

whatever.

I don't think that's the right posture.

What's good, Tim, is that the Republican Hawks, Senator Cotton, and all the foreign, the theorists of the anti-China side of the Republican Party, who are also pro-Trump, they'll speak out.

They're going to call Trump on this.

They're not going to just roll over.

The people who screamed and yelled about TikTok 18 months ago and who screamed and yelled about Taiwan and screamed and yelled, again, not without some reason in some cases about the balance in Asia and so forth.

They're going to call balls and strikes on this.

And I'm like, I wonder who will call.

I guess the Wall Street Journal might, do you think?

I don't know.

National Review, but any actual elected official?

No way, right?

I'm being obviously sarcastic when I say...

I mean, I don't know.

Rand, one of the libertarians, like Rand, maybe or something.

Well, they're against being hawkish.

Awesome.

No, but I mean, I'm being obviously sarcastic when I say, I mean, they're not going to, of course, they're going to work quietly, though.

Behind the scenes, they're going to really work hard to make Trump more responsible on this.

Don't believe so.

Moving on to Russia, Trump, the other news on that front is he has said

that he is willing to do sanctions, harder sanctions on Europe.

There's a sanctions bill on the hill.

Speaking of the bellicosity talk, Lindsey Graham keeps doing press conferences over on the hill about how we're about ready.

We're going to crush them.

We got the sword of Damocles hanging over Russia's head.

We're going to pass this bill any minute now.

We're just waiting for Trump to tell us we can.

We're just going to pass it.

It's been ready.

We have the co-sponsors.

Trump said he's willing to do those hard sanctions only if Europe has to do it first.

He wants to make sure Europe is getting no gas from Russia, that all of the countries are fully on board.

He can't do it unless the Europeans are willing to sacrifice themselves.

You wrote over the weekend since President Putin's invitation to Alaska by Trump, the Russian leader has ramped up attacks in Ukraine, threatened to kill any future foreign forces in Ukraine, hit Western targets in Ukraine, and unleashed a drone incursion into Poland.

And the response from Trump is once again, well, I'll be tough, maybe.

We'll see.

Let's give it another couple of weeks.

And the Europeans have been moderately tough on the Poland situation.

It's right there.

And

didn't Trump have some, what was his important contribution on social media to that?

I've not forget something last week.

It was like, let's see what happens.

It was something like, I was like,

it's really getting started now or something.

It was like, it was just a surprise exclamation.

And then when he's asked about it on the tarmac, he said something to the effect of like,

oh, well, like the drones got knocked down before they landed in Poland.

So, you know, not that big a deal.

I mean, the degree of weakness, there's been a lot of wishful thinking, in my opinion, the first eight months of, you know, well, he's not quite as he said some bad things in February with Vance and Hexeth, get those speeches in Europe and all that.

But, you know, it's not quite as weak as you think, Bill.

And it's not, there's some good things.

It's all weakness.

And that's very dangerous, too.

So he's very strong in persecuting, and I think that's a fair verb to use, people he doesn't like in launching the federal government against his enemies, his perceived enemies, his opponents, whom he

thinks of as enemies here at home, and very weak against actual brutal dictatorships abroad.

That's kind of the Trump, the Trump doctrine, right?

Attack transgender individuals who are minding their own business, 99.8% of them here at home, and do nothing against brutal dictators who are killing people abroad.

Yeah.

Okay.

Well, that's good.

That sums things up.

I think we can kind of leave it there.

I ended the pod last week with a reading of your newsletter.

That's how good it was about David Rose, who was killed.

The police officer was killed at the CDC.

So I figured we could see if you had any final thoughts or ruminations on that

before we let people go.

Well, it's encouraging that people like heroes like David Rose exist.

He's a young man.

He's almost the same age.

He was a young man.

I was the same age as Charlie Kirk.

And

so for all the talk about social media and all the talk about how horrible our politics are and they are pretty bad,

David Rose grew up in America and came from an American family and was a really admirable and heroic person, fought in Afghanistan.

And then obviously he ran to the gun, so to speak, here in Atlanta, then that assault on CTC and was tragically killed.

So there are people like there was, I was talking to Jay Nordliger on the Sunday Bullwork thing, and he's been at some college campuses, so we're just talking about that in general.

And he said he's heartened.

So for whatever that, you know, again, for all the talk, I do think the social media stuff is a little overdone.

Like it's ruining this whole job.

I don't know.

Are they so much worse than people my age or, you know, like Donald Trump or people J.D.

Vance's age, who's your age, basically?

Or, you know, I mean, it's not.

What was he heartened by?

I'm ready to be heartened.

Give me something to be heartened by.

The students he was seeing at the campuses where he had just been coming back from the campus, which is looking like J.D.

Vance getting shot on the campus instead of the

and he said a lot of the students he meets are, you know, intelligent.

They don't like Trump and Trumpism.

They don't like the radical parts of the left that you criticized earlier, and therefore, you know, actual American greatness, which means tolerance at home and standing up to bullies abroad.

But it's, it'd be nice if there were more people reflecting that, I'd say, in our, in our leadership, both political leadership, and there are some, but also, let's call it civic leadership.

You know, that's the one thing I was struck by.

I read some little thing over the weekend, if I could just close on this.

The collapse of the elite institutions is also very damaging.

And that, compounded with Trump and Miller, creates a very dangerous situation, obviously.

Well,

you had me encouraged there until that final caveat.

Sorry, you had a final caveat.

Anyway, final caveat.

But Jay Nordliger had some, but Jay Nordliger had some great conversations with students at college.

So cheer up.

So So cheer up.

I find this as well.

I go to campuses.

And I always,

because I am sympathetic to the stated notion that a liberalism is

happening on campuses, that people are shouted down, people aren't, you know, free to kind of share their views if they're wrong thoughts or whatever.

But I feel the same way when I'm on campuses.

I always ask about that question.

Kids, do you feel like you have to self-censor?

Do you feel like this?

And I don't know, maybe the people self-selecting to come see me talk are

a different category from the broader campus or the broader generational cohort, which is why it's something I'm exploring in

FY Pod and our other efforts to reach out to young folks.

But I agree with that.

And I think that there is some things that are alarming, of course, but I also am heartened when I'm hearing from actual

actual students who have to live this stuff every day.

It's just, I don't know.

It's just,

eventually it becomes too much, right?

The overwhelming amount of the negativity in your face and in your feet every day.

But we soldier on.

All right, that's Bill Crystal.

What quite an episode.

I don't know if this one's going to go in our highlight, in our Hall of Fame, you know, at the end, at the end of the process, but we did the best we could.

We'll be back Monday.

That's the good thing about this.

We get to do it again next Monday.

And who the fuck knows what's going to happen then?

We'll see y'all then.

We'll be back here tomorrow for another edition of the Bulwark podcast.

Peace.

This is my guitar.

I

This is my life.

I live the best I can.

It's part of you, and part of everything.

I know it's hard not to feel like you've been broken.

So much love is missing from the start.

I know it's hard not to feel like you're alone in

the world that's lost and spinning in the dark.

Oh, help me.

This is my voice.

I sing the best I can.

The music in my head is from my heart.

This is my chance.

The only chance I've got.

Just try to live the light into the dark.

And I know it's hard.

How to feel it keep it broken

because it seems to work the way it should

I know it's hard

But I know that I'll keep holding

Cause all I've ever seen here was cool

Oh, help me

Help me please

Oh, help me

please.

The Bull Earth Podcast is produced by Katie Cooper with audio engineering and editing by Jason Brown.

When the right team comes together at the right time, the potential is unlimited.

In the world of biotech, that time is right now.

At Unicisive Therapeutics, we've assembled an industry-leading biotech team to tackle the biggest unmet needs in kidney care.

Our lead investigational therapy is on pace to deliver a potential best-in-class profile for treating hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis.

What's next in kidney care is almost here.

Join Join us as we work to cross the finish line at unisisive.com.

A happy place comes in many colors.

Whatever your color, bring happiness home with Certapro Painters.

Get started today at Certapro.com.

Each Certipro Painters business is independently owned and operated.

Contractor license and registration information is available at Certapro.com.