Sam Stein and Francis Fukuyama: A Coming Deportation Blitz?

Speaker 1 is Matt Rogers from Los Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang. This is Boen Yang from Los Culturalistos with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang.
Hey, Bowen, it's gift season.

Speaker 2 Stressing me out.

Speaker 1 Why are the people I love so hard to shop for? Probably because they only make boring gift guides that are totally uninspired. Except for the guide we made.

Speaker 1 In partnership with Marshalls, where premium gifts mean incredible value, it's giving gifts. With categories like best gifts for the mom whose idea of a sensible walking shoe is a stiletto.

Speaker 1 or Best Gifts for Me that were so thoughtful I really shouldn't have. Check out the guide on Marshalls.com and gift the good stuff at Marshalls.

Speaker 3 Get ready for Malice, a twisted new drama starring Jack Whitehall, David DeCovney, and Carice Van Houten.

Speaker 3 Jack Whitehall plays Adam, a charming manny infiltrates the wealthy Tanner family with a hidden motive to destroy them.

Speaker 10 This edge-of-your-seat revenge thriller unravels a deliciously dark mystery in a world full of wealth, wealth, secrets, and betrayal.

Speaker 9 Malice will constantly keep you on your toes.

Speaker 3 Why is Adam after the Tanner family?

Speaker 8 What lengths will he go to?

Speaker 13 One thing's for sure: the past never stays buried, so keep your enemies close.

Speaker 3 Watch Malice, all episodes now streaming exclusively on Prime Video.

Speaker 1 Hello, and welcome to the Bulwark Podcast. I'm your host, Tim Miller.
We are going to get real academic in segment two. We're going to get really deep, you know, talk about a lot of,

Speaker 1 you know, types of theories you have to be well read on when it comes to history to really process.

Speaker 1 And so, before we get to all that, I thought we'd do a little bit of rank politics with somebody who's a little bit more surface level, the managing editor of the Bulwark Sam Stein. How are you doing?

Speaker 15 Good, man.

Speaker 1 thanks for sneaking me in before uh francis fukuyama and after bill crystal was paul wolfowitz not available did you sandwich that you always wished that you would be in the middle of a crystal fukuyama sandwich yeah it's um what does your mother think what does what does your doctor think about that she's a little she's a little worried uh

Speaker 15 this is not too thousand this is not her sweet 2002 Sam Stein here.

Speaker 1 It is. It is the sweet Samstein.
You're giving us a little bit of, I don't know,

Speaker 1 kind of lefty sucker in between Frank and Bill. But we're going to get dark first.
I want to talk about some immigration stuff with you.

Speaker 1 There's a Fox News report that is, I would say, pretty alarming. It goes like this.
Four senior DHS and Trump admins sources tell Fox that a mass removal of ICE leadership is underway.

Speaker 1 With up to 12 field office chiefs being replaced in an effort to increase deportation numbers. They're told the move is being spearheaded by stank breath Corey Lewandowski.

Speaker 1 Among the cities that are going to have new ICE leadership, Los Angeles, Phoenix, Philly, Denver, El Paso, San Diego, Seattle, Portland, my home city of New Orleans.

Speaker 1 The report goes on, they're told there's significant friction within DHS, with Tom Homan on one side preferring to prioritize criminal aliens and the worst of the worst, while Christy Noam, the dog killer, Corey Lewandowski, and Border Patrol Commander Greg Bavino are preferring to use aggressive tactics to arrest anyone in the U.S.

Speaker 1 illegally. The latter group is winning out.
How does it make you feel that Tom Homan is the moderate, the moderating force inside this administration right now?

Speaker 15 Speaks well of kava.

Speaker 15 You have enough kava. Yeah.
It calms your worst. Get some of that Teziki.

Speaker 1 Yeah. Yeah.

Speaker 1 You don't have the bloodlust of migrants anymore if you've had a good Teziki bowl.

Speaker 15 Yeah, you eat a little hummus. You say, you know what? Maybe immigrants aren't so bad.
They created this great food.

Speaker 15 No,

Speaker 15 when I read this thing, I don't know if you had the same experience, but it was like a real journey because you start off, you're like, oh, they're changing things up.

Speaker 15 Clearly, they think they've gone too far. And then you're like, oh, wait, Corey Lewandowski wanted this.
Oh, shit. And then you're like, oh, it's actually going to get worse.

Speaker 15 They didn't think they've gone far enough. It's hard to imagine how they can make it more inhumane than it currently is.
I know you've been following this pretty closely.

Speaker 15 Every time I pop up on some social media platform, you see these videos that are just utterly heart-wrenching. The latest one was this woman who had gone into an elementary school.

Speaker 15 I followed her there. Her child is like holding on to her.
Her son is holding on to her, trying to stop her detention and likely deportation. And the agents are just like pulling them apart.

Speaker 15 It's like this incredibly tragic scene.

Speaker 1 You're like, why?

Speaker 15 What is the point?

Speaker 1 Did you see the one with yesterday with the ICE agent pointing the gun at the person saying, you're dead, liberal?

Speaker 15 And so I had approached this thinking, well, that, you know, clearly things are getting out of control and they've been empowering these ICE agents.

Speaker 15 There's been reports that these people are not qualified and that they're not even physically capable of the job.

Speaker 15 And then you get this report from last night, which is that actually, no, they think the ICE agents are not the right ones for the job because they're not doing enough deportations and detentions and that Border Patrol needs to take their place.

Speaker 15 And so you follow these immigration experts online and they're just very anxious about what's to come. And that makes me anxious, obviously.

Speaker 1 you know i looked at it and um i had a broadly similar kind of reaction you do stop short when you read that tom homan is the person being like let's chill out a little bit uh if you know anything about tom homan hey let's let's calm down to me i looked at it it kind of the more i thought about it it kind of makes sense when you look at really all the cities except los angeles and portland how so it's unclear what's happening in those but the other cities i had been thinking about this you see these videos but they're all kind of coming from the same places right like we haven't seen a ton of videos of in Phoenix, for example.

Speaker 1 I was thinking about Denver, particularly. Obviously, being from Denver, I consume a lot of Denver news.
There's been a couple examples here in New Orleans.

Speaker 1 You know, to me, it seems like probably what is happening is you have these offices, you have these regional offices, and

Speaker 1 in any organization, you have some people that are just like trying to do the job, right?

Speaker 1 And like, whatever you think about like the choice of working for ICE right now, something I would not do, like you're obviously going to have a range of types of people, and you're going to have one people that's like, hey, I'm in charge of the whatever Seattle ICE office.

Speaker 1 And like we're focused on the job that we are given, which is going after criminals, going after the worst of the worst. I'm going to tell my agents to do that.

Speaker 1 We're going to try to keep some discipline in this office. Right.

Speaker 1 And then, and like in Chicago, where you have Bovino and the Border Patrol people coming in, you have the behavior being completely different.

Speaker 1 In Los Angeles, actually, in one of these articles that I read, some of the reporting internally was that, I guess, supposedly there was like a struggle in the Los Angeles office where the, it was the border patrol agents actually that were more aggressive.

Speaker 1 Yeah. And like who the ICE office was relatively speaking, like trying to, you know, to focus more on actual named targets of criminals.

Speaker 1 And so you read it like that and you're like, oh, wait, no, what we're in for is like the bad things that we've seen in relatively, in a number of bad incidents, but like relatively isolated geographically.

Speaker 1 Like they're trying, they're bringing that to everybody, everybody. Like the worst shit you've seen in Chicago, like there, it's coming for you, Denver, is basically the, I think, the message.

Speaker 15 Well, I'm glad that you clarified you wouldn't join ICE in this moment. I think that eliminates a personnel option for the president that he was considering.

Speaker 1 Unless it's part of my twink filtration program. Have you, have you heard about my twink filtration program? No.

Speaker 1 I'm looking for 22-year-old Twinks around the country to join ICE, get the bonus, and then be agents from within reporting out. Kind of like a secret police inside the police.
A twink filtered.

Speaker 1 Yeah, a filtration of ice. It's just an idea.

Speaker 1 Okay, there's lots of types of resistance right now in this moment. And I don't know if people have thought creatively enough with undermining ice from within.
But anyway, sorry.

Speaker 1 Where are we going with that?

Speaker 15 It's a smart role, a play idea.

Speaker 15 You can see it not working.

Speaker 1 You can see some potential holes.

Speaker 2 I'm not going to run that one out.

Speaker 15 Yeah.

Speaker 15 So I guess my basis, if what you say is right, and I kind of agree with with you, I suppose, because we've been, you know, and you know this too, we've been hearing rumors about stuff about to happen in Denver for months, right?

Speaker 15 Like you and I have been getting that and we've been chasing that and

Speaker 15 it hasn't. I mean, maybe I don't want to.

Speaker 1 Sure, there have been like four chainsaw instruments. Yeah, right.

Speaker 15 Like it's not Chicago. Let's put it that way.
Yeah, right.

Speaker 15 So like my basis for this is Adrian's reporting on the ground in Chicago, which is, you know, he's been there and it's just like, it feels like, you know, not a nightmare, but it's like real deliberately manufactured civic unrest where the communities are pitted against the federal authorities because that's their only means for survival or at least protecting themselves.

Speaker 15 And it's like you kind of step back and you think, how do we get to a place where community organizers are trying to educate community members about self-defense from the federal government?

Speaker 1 But that's where we're at.

Speaker 15 And I suppose if you play this out logically, that's where a number of different cities are going to end up.

Speaker 15 I don't know.

Speaker 15 Maybe you have different thoughts about this, but like

Speaker 15 anecdotally, when I talk to a lot of folks who have soured on Trump,

Speaker 15 one of the things they often mention is this stuff. Like they don't, I think people are generally discomforted by all the imagery, all those videos.
They don't like it.

Speaker 15 I'm not sure why Trump and his mace, basically Stephen Miller and Corey Lundowski feel like this is something that they have to do.

Speaker 15 It doesn't seem to be politically popular and it doesn't seem to be good for business. So I'm not sure what the end game is here other than rank

Speaker 15 philosophy and ideology around anti-immigrants.

Speaker 1 Yeah, I just think they're like, he's motivated by two things. Ideologically, it's tariffs and immigration, right? Like, honestly, like a lot of the other stuff is

Speaker 1 more malleable. The one he's not motivated by ideologically is

Speaker 1 what's happening with the boats in Venezuela. Do you have any thoughts on that?

Speaker 1 Just like on the Venezuela side of this, i've been saying on the pod that like i've been trying to understand the rationale for this and it's and everybody like all eyes turn back to marco that like this is like a marco pet project issue and one of the things i've said on the pod a couple times recently is like one thing that i that i haven't heard trump say which is kind of surprising is that like i want the oil and um i'm saying that and i was reminded a sense an audio of him on the campaign trail in 24 where he where he does say that where he's basically like you know there biden had an opportunity just sleepy joe and we should have gone i i would if it was me i would have gone in there we could have taken the oil and i don't know we we're bringing the ship into the caribbean now um there's a story apparently about a cia operation that may have went wrong in there based on the washington post and venezuela i don't know like it seems all signs to me seem like they're pointing to war in venezuela regime change war and stealing the oil the oil was what caught my eye too uh because he talked about that in like various different uh capacities so you know if you remember, it's like his main criticism of the Iraq war was that we left without taking the oil, right?

Speaker 15 Like he has this.

Speaker 1 And I've been noting that he hasn't been saying that this time. And so I thought that was noteworthy.
And then I'd forgotten.

Speaker 15 He hasn't said it in recent months.

Speaker 1 Not that I have seen. I mean, I don't watch every single Donald Trump clip.

Speaker 1 But

Speaker 1 this one was sent from 2024 from the campaign trail, and I thought was noteworthy that it was on his mind.

Speaker 15 So

Speaker 15 my general view of this was that this was a Marco project. And there's been contemporaneous reporting that not everyone's on board, right?

Speaker 15 You have the Rick Renelle faction who thinks that they can maybe resolve this differently.

Speaker 15 The fentanyl stuff, I think, is bullshit, honestly, because if you just look at it, fentanyl is not coming from Venezuela. It seems like that's pretextual.

Speaker 15 But then I grapple with the ideas, does he really want to do kind of 1940s, 1950s style regime change in Venezuela? Is that really what he wants to do? And if he does, why is he doing it so overtly?

Speaker 1 The one thing that

Speaker 1 The one thing that he has been consistent about for a long time is

Speaker 1 he wants to kill the drug dealers. And he's been saying that for a long time.

Speaker 1 And I think maybe.

Speaker 15 But he also talked about bombing cartels in Mexico, and he hasn't done that. So why Venezuela drug boats?

Speaker 1 I think this is why. Because he thinks that he can just do it.

Speaker 1 Right?

Speaker 15 Without repercussions.

Speaker 1 Yeah. Probably.
Right. And it's like, okay, he can get his killing drug dealers fixed.
And remember he used to praise Duterte about this? Oh, yeah.

Speaker 1 Like in the first term, about how he just kills the drug dealers. Yeah.
I don't know. Maybe it's that, like, his answer to Phil Wegman on this was pretty like much just blunt.

Speaker 1 He's just like, I just want to kill the drug dealers. I feel like that explanation could live in concert with Mark, this being a Marco ideological project where Marco's like, hey, grandpa, Mr.

Speaker 1 President. Like, you can identify an elephant on a piece of paper.
You're extremely smart. You want to kill drug dealers.

Speaker 15 I believe it was a giraffe.

Speaker 1 You can identify the giraffe. And I also want you to kill, you can get your rocks off killing the drug dealers, and I can get my regime changed.
Anyway.

Speaker 15 Sorry, can we talk about the cognitive test for a second?

Speaker 1 Sure.

Speaker 15 He's like, it starts out really easy. You know, it's like lion, giraffe, camera.
And then it gets hard.

Speaker 1 Cursing, man, camera, TV.

Speaker 15 Is that really how it starts out?

Speaker 1 I do.

Speaker 15 I want one time for a reporter when he says that to be like, if it's so easy, would you just, you know, take one in public?

Speaker 1 Yeah, something like that. I want to see it.
Let's do an LSAT. Let's see how that goes.

Speaker 1 All right, as the weather cools and boys, it's getting chilly here in New Orleans, only a high of 72 today. I'm swapping in the pieces that actually get the job done.

Speaker 1 Something warm, durable, and built to last. And Quince delivers every time with wardrobe staples that'll carry you through the season.

Speaker 1 Quince has the kind of fall staples you'll actually want to wear on repeat, like 100% Mongolian cashmere from just 60 bucks, classic fit denim, and real leather and wool outerwear that looks sharp and holds up.

Speaker 1 By partnering directly with Ethical Factories and top artisans, Quince cuts out the middleman to deliver premium quality at half the cost of similar brands.

Speaker 1 I've got a new Quince item, a new fall item.

Speaker 1 You know, I don't like to brag. I don't need to wear it right now because I'm in a very temperate climate.
But I have to go up to New York and DC over the coming month.

Speaker 1 And the last time I was in New York, I was wearing a cable-knit sweater that I've had for a a long time, it's looking a little ratty. And I got a lot of compliments.

Speaker 1 A friend's girlfriend texted to say I look gayer than ever in that

Speaker 1 cable knit sweater. And I took that as a compliment.
And so I went ahead and got another one from Quince, tried that on. It's looking nice.

Speaker 1 You can keep an eye out for that next time you see me in studio at MSNBC.

Speaker 1 Maybe you need a cable knit sweater in your life or something similar. Go check it out.
Later up this fall with pieces that feel as good as they look.

Speaker 1 Go to quince.com/slash the bulwark for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns now available in Canada too. What's up, Canada? That's q-u-in-ce-e.com slash the bulwark.

Speaker 1 Free shipping and 365-day returns, quince.com slash the bulwark.

Speaker 1 All right. I want to talk to you with you about the Democrats.

Speaker 1 We'll go deeper on this on the next level tomorrow, but I did want to mention it for some folks who want to get really dorky on this memo.

Speaker 1 The memo's called Deciding to Win. It's from a group of center-left Democrats who are offering what they think was the problem with the party.

Speaker 15 Fairly non-controversial name for the memo.

Speaker 1 Deciding to win. People do want to win.
Yeah. So anyway,

Speaker 1 there are a few things that were noteworthy about it that I liked. Should we go with lose? Yeah.
Deciding to lose.

Speaker 1 I mean, obviously, in all these things, it's like people put out memos that advance their factional priorities.

Speaker 1 It's like these guys obviously want the party to move to the middle. But if you're taking that at face value, there are a couple of interesting things that caught my eye.

Speaker 1 I'm curious what caught your eye.

Speaker 1 Number one was they looked at like platforms and website issue websites and like names that are mentioned. Here are the words that have been up over the last 10 years.

Speaker 1 This is different identity terms, like white, black, you know, climate, guns, justice, democracy, equity. Word usage that's down.
Jobs, economy, middle class, work, veteran, crime. That seems bad.

Speaker 1 That seems like a mistake in retrospect. Regardless of where you are ideologically, whether you're a socialist or a free market capitalist centrist, Frank Fukuyama,

Speaker 1 I think it seems bad that they're talking more about justice and equity and climate than middle class and work and crime.

Speaker 15 For sure. I mean, so let's just make it clear.
It's the percentage increase that's up. I'm not sure it's like the aggregate total that's up on mentions, but that's bad.

Speaker 15 And I think Josh Bierrow has been pointing out obsessively that they keep opening these meetings and platforms with land acknowledgements. And I'm not saying there's nothing wrong.

Speaker 15 There's nothing wrong with acknowledging that, but I don't think you need to lean into it so aggressively if you're the Democrats, just a piece of advice. I think this memo,

Speaker 15 okay, there's a few thoughts I have about the memo. One is that

Speaker 15 I think it's valid 100%. I think people have to understand it's the perceptions of Democrats that have changed.
Like people

Speaker 15 view Democrats as more liberal. They believe that Democrats' priorities are more liberal.

Speaker 15 It might not be that Democrats are prioritizing more liberal stuff, although I think they are, but it's the perception of the party that has changed in a very bad direction if you want to win elections.

Speaker 15 And frankly, the perception of voters is really what matters. It's like it doesn't really matter necessarily if you are emphasizing certain things.

Speaker 15 It's if voters believe you are emphasizing those things. And that's the distinction I think this memo really gets at.

Speaker 15 But there is something kind of ironic, I suppose, if you think about it, which is, you know, say the party, the state of the party is that it's perceived as too liberal.

Speaker 15 But then if they break down the sort of prescriptions that they offer, or at least the analysis, the kind of approach that they're offering is a little bit actually more Bernie Sanders-ish, right?

Speaker 15 It's like, oh, look what's really popular: emphasize economic issues, emphasize economic justice.

Speaker 1 You know, 2015, Bernie Sanders. Bernie gets away.
There's some shorthand on the internet.

Speaker 1 Dave Weigel called him out about this, where like people are like, Bernie had it right, focusing on economics and being more in the middle on immigration and crime and energy.

Speaker 1 He moved left on immigration. Bernie did the same thing as everybody else did about decriminalize the border and everything in 2020.
So 2016, 2015, Bernie.

Speaker 15 2015, 2016, Bernie. That's a super liberal dude, right? But that is the kind of emphasis that this memo gets at.

Speaker 1 He goes to the right of Hillary on guns and immigration, got attacked for it.

Speaker 15 He was kind of a classically liberal skeptic of immigration, which is you want, you know, tight border control because we want to give jobs to Americans.

Speaker 15 There's two other things I just would add. One is that there's like this Dobbs fallacy here.

Speaker 15 And by that, I mean that what happened in my estimation is that after 2022 and the success that the party enjoyed running on Dobbs in that election, there became this belief among Democrats that they really should and had to lean into abortion rights as a matter of electoral

Speaker 15 significance, right? As something that could actually win them campaigns. And I think that just sort of petered out.

Speaker 15 I noticed a data point where it was 13% of respondents said it was in their top three priorities, abortion, but 31% believe Democrats had it in their top three priorities.

Speaker 15 That's a huge gulf right there. So that's one thing.
And the other thing is that,

Speaker 15 and I want to be generally accepting of the memo, but I do think there's parts where you can criticize it.

Speaker 15 They attribute to the Democrats some positions that I don't actually think Democrats actually held.

Speaker 15 So they say one of the most unpopular positions Democrats held was to abolish the police and to abolish prisons. That's not actually what Democrats argued.
It's not.

Speaker 15 I mean, they said abolish private prisons.

Speaker 1 Some of them did, but not all prisons.

Speaker 15 So I just want to just couch a little bit there.

Speaker 1 Like I said, I'll go deeper

Speaker 1 in the next level.

Speaker 1 I do think that what they write that I like about what it does and does not mean to be moderate is something that I just do want to call out because I feel like a lot of times when they're moderate right now, people like use the word moderate to describe like Democrats who are establishment, who are moderate in temperament, who are moderate in tone.

Speaker 1 And the authors of the memo are like, none of that helps at all.

Speaker 1 They're like, when we're telling you to be moderate, we're saying take some heterodox positions and go after the establishment. on certain things.
Today,

Speaker 1 I think that's a noteworthy position.

Speaker 15 Let me ask you, can I ask you a question about that?

Speaker 15 It's totally noteworthy. I get it and

Speaker 15 I appreciate it. But what good does it do to take heterodox positions if you can't break through and convince the public that you are a heterodox, right?

Speaker 15 Like, doesn't some of this really come down to, I mean, like, again, it's all about the perceptions of the party, and perceptions really matter.

Speaker 15 And you could be the most heterodox, moderate Democrat, but if you can't reach people and convince them that you're genuine, you're going to get painted by a conservative and the conservative media complex as a liberal, no matter what.

Speaker 15 No matter what.

Speaker 1 Yeah, right. So you have to demonstrate that you're genuine.
I mean, this is what you have to annoy the Democrats sometimes, which is, I think, the key thing that people miss.

Speaker 1 Like Jared Golden, it works for Jared Golden in Maine because he annoys the Democrats sometimes. He annoys me sometimes with some of the stuff he does.

Speaker 1 But like, okay, so I don't, like, I can't get inside his soul and tell you whether or not it's genuine.

Speaker 1 I'm just saying that, like, he, he, both his presentation and the way he looks, but also the way he talks at times says, like, I'm against the party on this and that.

Speaker 15 My point, I guess, put it this way. Let's say Andy Bashir were to announce tomorrow he's running for president, most like, you know, middle-of-the-road Democrat you can imagine, right?

Speaker 15 There's no doubt in my mind that he's going to get painted as like a pro-trans, release the criminals, open the borders Democrat, right?

Speaker 1 And it's just going to happen. Might be something that I should propose to him.
I don't know. We're going to have a chance to talk about Andy Bashir more later.
But I would say this.

Speaker 1 My advice to answer your answer to this question, if Andy Bashir called me, or if I can tell you this because I get these calls a lot from Democrats in red states, they're like, What should I do?

Speaker 1 And I say the same thing. I'm like, pick something that you're on the side of MAGA on culturally.
I don't care what it is. I genuinely don't.
And talk about it a lot.

Speaker 1 Like, don't just like, don't just like put it on your website. Like, talk about that a lot.
Like, have three things that you talk about and have.

Speaker 1 Two of them be how Trump is hurting working class people and how Trump's and how everything's too expensive and it's Trump's fault and it's the tariffs. And then have the third thing be, I don't care.

Speaker 1 You love automatic weapons or like whatever.

Speaker 1 You think that gay people are bad i don't i don't like you can attack me if you want i don't care whatever i like i'm not saying i support those policies i'm just saying like that's the way to do it is to like you you convince people you're genuine by by being genuine and talking about a lot i think that's right i think the only addendum i would add is that you better include a land acknowledgement before you attack

Speaker 1 last thing on the memo is that uh one thing that they mentioned and we'll put a link to it in the show notes people want to read all of it unpopular gop policies which speaks to your point on dobs it speaks to both of our pet issues at the moment.

Speaker 1 So I'm sure we're happy to talk about it. Three most unpopular GOP issues Dem should talk about.
One is banned birth control. Three is ban IVF.

Speaker 1 And then there are a bunch of other abortion-related ones in the top 10. The number two issue, launch a national Trump-branded cryptocurrency.

Speaker 1 People do not like that the president has his own fucking currency and the Democrats should talk about it. Everybody should talk about it.
It's outrageous. And people don't talk about it because

Speaker 1 the Democratic public officials and journalists don't understand what it is, so they don't talk about it.

Speaker 1 But people don't like it, it's corrupt, it's bad, it's gross, and everybody should talk about it.

Speaker 1 One more thing on the Democrats want to talk about our friend, a friend of the show, Karine Jean-Pierre, was on last week. She did an interview with Isaac Schottner of the New Yorker yesterday.

Speaker 1 That has been, we'll also put that link in the show notes. People want to read it for themselves.

Speaker 1 Her answers are not that compelling. Isaac is very left, a lefty, and

Speaker 1 asking her about

Speaker 1 the arguments that she's making. I'm wondering what you've made of

Speaker 1 this,

Speaker 1 her book tour, and what it says about, if it says anything. Is there anything that actually matters about it besides just kind of like looking at a car crash? No, I think there is.
So go ahead.

Speaker 1 You go.

Speaker 15 I'm curious what you think. I mean, it's first of all, if you haven't, if you read the Isaac Chartner thing,

Speaker 15 what I would recommend is press Control F and then type in the word wait because she says it about, you know, 14 times. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.

Speaker 15 But you know, it's not a really good sign for the state of the interview. I know Corine and I've worked with Corine prior to her time entering public service when she was sort of a commentator.

Speaker 15 Look, I think some of the perception of her is off, right? Like she's she's smart. She's thoughtful.

Speaker 15 This iteration of her, I, you know, clearly is, you know, hitting some real roadblocks because it's kind of an indefensible position, right?

Speaker 15 It's like we all saw with our own eyes what Joe Biden was going through.

Speaker 15 And if you believed in your heart of hearts that he was capable of doing the job and that he was up to the task, as you are arguing in your book and as you are now defending on the book trail, you do have to answer for why you didn't make that case more forcefully, why you didn't put him out more regularly, why you couldn't answer basic questions about it in real time after the debate stumbles.

Speaker 15 That was her job. And frankly,

Speaker 15 I know this sounds like a little harsh, but it's true. Like a lot of people believe she failed miserably at it.
And,

Speaker 15 you know, I think when she's on this book tour and as she's going through this stuff, like I think people want to see more accountability and self-reflection around this stuff rather than just the defensiveness that she exhibited to Isaac.

Speaker 1 Yeah, so we basically agreed. So this is what the part that matters.

Speaker 1 Not I don't her book tour and I don't, you know, she's making an argument and I don't I don't think it's that compelling, but people can decide for themselves themselves about whether they think the Democrats have been unfair to black women, queer people, and then Joe Biden.

Speaker 1 To me, the ineffectiveness of it matters in this sense. Objectively speaking, the Biden administration's communications was horrible from the president on down.

Speaker 1 And I say this also as somebody who has been on a campaign, so we had horrible communications where I was in charge. Sometimes it's not the communications director's fault.

Speaker 1 Like sometimes you have limitations, but like even still,

Speaker 1 you have to acknowledge it, right?

Speaker 1 Like, and I've always said many times, I don't think I'd be a very good press secretary because my facial reactions and like, you know, there's a job, not everybody, every job is for everybody.

Speaker 1 And like

Speaker 1 for two years,

Speaker 1 she was the press secretary for an administration that was really struggling to communicate its successes from the president to the vice president to her.

Speaker 1 And during that time, from basically January of 23 through the debate, CNN debate, like most of the Democrats just kind of whispered that they thought it sucked behind the scenes and didn't do anything about it.

Speaker 1 Like there are a couple of examples, like Axelrod would talk about it on CNN.

Speaker 1 Some people would talk about it, but like, and to me, that is a cultural problem where you feel like, oh, we can't, you know, whatever.

Speaker 1 We can't just be honest about our own failings because you cannot succeed in something if you cannot accept when you're not, when you're failing.

Speaker 1 And I think that people were afraid to criticize the administration and afraid to criticize her for various reasons. And I just think that this should be a big lesson is that like,

Speaker 1 you know, probably in retrospect, there should have been a five-long fire. much earlier than the CNN debate about how the Biden administration was communicating.
And I think this tour just like,

Speaker 1 just, it just lays that bare is all I'm saying.

Speaker 15 It becomes self-evident self-evident at a point that the reason they couldn't survive the Biden debate performance was because they had failed at communicating and presenting him prior to the debate.

Speaker 15 Had this really been a one-off, we would have known it, right? Because he would have been out there more. He would have been doing more interviews.

Speaker 15 He wouldn't have skipped the Super Bowl interview, things like that.

Speaker 15 And that would, and that's on him and it's on people like Karine who were in the comms department because they didn't create enough faith, trust, transparency in the administration.

Speaker 1 And apparently, they didn't even believe that. They believe their own bullshit, right? Again, which is why this stuff needs to be

Speaker 1 cropped, right? Like this idea that, like, what she was expressing to me that he was out there a lot. It's just like, come on, like, that's just not true.

Speaker 1 And so, either you're lying or you believe that. It's actually scarier if you believe it.

Speaker 15 And I will just say this: and this is obviously self-serving, so take it for what it is. But

Speaker 15 there are so many more benefits that go unstated for a politician of any variety to be out there in the public doing interviews all all the time. It hones your skill.

Speaker 15 It gets a familiarity with the voters and the viewers with you. It makes you a better politician.

Speaker 15 It means that the stumbles don't matter as much as we know with Trump because everyone knows they see him stumble all the time and spout bullshit. And like, we just move on.

Speaker 15 I just think the age where you can micromanage and protect a politician and just skirt the public are so clearly in the past. And people need to just get with the program.

Speaker 1 Final topic: Donald Trump, the president, has lost UFC fighter Bryce Mitchell. This one was weird.

Speaker 15 This guy seems psychotic. I don't know.

Speaker 1 I don't know.

Speaker 1 Everyone can judge for themselves. I would like to listen to Bryce's explanation for why he's off the Trump train.

Speaker 16 I want to let y'all know I'm not with Donald Trump no more. I don't support him.
I don't like him. I think he's a corrupted leader.
And I agree.

Speaker 16 Yeah, it took me a while to come to that conclusion, but I finally am coming to it. I do not like the guy at all.

Speaker 1 Me neither.

Speaker 16 The first thing for me was he didn't release the Epstein files. They're even acting like they didn't exist.
And, of course, they're sending Israel and Ukraine all of our tax dollars,

Speaker 16 just like the numb nuts before him did.

Speaker 16 Putting America last. And now he's blaming the beef farmers for the price of beef.
Hey, I'm not biased, man. He talked a good game.
He tricked me. I was fooled.
I admit it. Good for you, Christian.

Speaker 16 Let me tell you how bad I think this is, though. This is really this bad, guys.
I want y'all, if you're a Christian, I want you to get into Revelation 13:3.

Speaker 16 And I want you to read that verse. Yeah, about the Antichrist, about the one who was fatally wounded in the head.
Then he was miraculously healed.

Speaker 16 And the whole world marveled at him and said, no man can make war with him. Yeah, I do think that Donald Trump is that beast of Revelation 13.3.

Speaker 1 Okay, I mean, I was with him. He was making a good argument.

Speaker 1 You know, he's my compelling case. Hard turn there.
The dog shows up, and then Trump is the Antichrist. He's the beast of Revelations.

Speaker 1 Sam?

Speaker 15 I'm more of an Old Testament guy, so I can't really weigh in on that. This guy has some fairly

Speaker 1 controversial statements in his past.

Speaker 1 I was going to bring this up, so now you mention it.

Speaker 1 I think it's worth mentioning. Just in case you're getting too excited about Bryce's comments,

Speaker 1 he has, being an Old Testament guy, this might bother you. He has suggested that Hitler had some points.
He's saying that greedy Jews were destroying Germany and turning everyone there into gays.

Speaker 1 They were gaying out the kids.

Speaker 15 Did he say gaying out?

Speaker 1 Was that this called?

Speaker 1 They were gaying out the kids. They were queering out the women.

Speaker 1 They were queering out the dudes in Germany. Hitler was.
And taking care of that.

Speaker 1 Oh, no, Hitler took care of it.

Speaker 1 The Jews were ganging out the kids. It was like a twinkfiltration in pre-Nazi Germany.
The Jews were ganging out the kids. So, some hits and some misses, I guess, for Bryce Mitchell.

Speaker 1 Say a few misses there. I'm going to go with a couple misses.
No, so you don't,

Speaker 1 you know, I think

Speaker 1 here's what I want to bring up. Okay.

Speaker 1 Trump, and this was not in the deciding to win memo, and it should have been.

Speaker 1 Trump got all of the psychopaths on his side in 2024 like the craziest loons in the country the brain like all aligned you know there was a crank alignment there was a psychopath alignment behind donald trump there were some i guess far left cranks that decided to vote for jill stein but like like if you took the psychopath like pie of the country is like 90 trump 8%

Speaker 1 Jill sign, third party, 2% Kamala. And it's important to kind of

Speaker 1 get that pie back towards even. You know, you want to have an even disbursement of psychopaths.
And so it's encouraging that Bryce, I think, is getting off the train. I think.

Speaker 15 Well, you didn't, I don't think you read the full deciding to win memo because right here under voters want Democrats to prioritize, they have revelations 13.3. It's at 47%.

Speaker 15 Yeah,

Speaker 15 they actually kind of

Speaker 1 there was, there was the horseshoe theory, right?

Speaker 15 I mean, like the RFK Jr. cranks, like, you know, all these weirdos and the Tulsi fangirls and boys were just gravitating to Trump.

Speaker 15 And I will just say, again, to tie this back to my last point, I think part of the reason they gravitate to the guy is because he just went and appeared on their platforms and talked to them and hung out with them.

Speaker 15 And they're like, okay, cool. I like this guy.
Or at least he's open to me.

Speaker 15 And I'm not saying, look, I'm not advising anyone in the Democratic Party to go and sit down with our dear friend Bryce Mitchell and talk revelations or anything like that.

Speaker 15 I think maybe platforming someone who doesn't like my people that much is a bad thing. But, you know, be open to different platforms.

Speaker 1 Okay, I'm not platforming, but I would just throw it out there, my final thought is, hey, if you're a listener and you're like, boy, how do I get through to

Speaker 1 nephew Tristan, who has been sending some pretty weird things on the family group chat

Speaker 1 and has gone full mega, maybe just shoot him over at Bryce and be like, hey,

Speaker 1 it might be possible that you've been fooled and Trump is the Antichrist.

Speaker 1 No, not throwing, not saying for sure, but you might want to consider that.

Speaker 15 Sorry, what's the nephew's name again? Because I want to check it out.

Speaker 15 Tristan, I want you to check out this

Speaker 15 Instagram from Bryce, but don't Google anything else he said. Okay.
Just keep it at this.

Speaker 15 Promise me to not Google. But check this one out.
That's how I would appreciate it.

Speaker 1 Pretty good.

Speaker 1 All right. That's Sam Stein.
I appreciate you, brother. Up next,

Speaker 1 hard right turn from trumping the Antichrist and gaying out our children to Frank Fukuyama. Stick around.

Speaker 3 Get Ready for Malice, a twisted new drama starring Jack Whitehall, David DeCovney, and Carice Van Houten.

Speaker 3 Jack Whitehall plays Adam, a charming manny infiltrates the wealthy Tanner family with a hidden motive to destroy them.

Speaker 10 This edge-of-your-seat revenge thriller unravels a deliciously dark mystery in a world full of wealth, secrets, and betrayal.

Speaker 9 Malice will constantly keep you on your toes.

Speaker 3 Why is Adam after the Tanner family?

Speaker 8 What lengths will he go to?

Speaker 13 One thing's for sure, the past never stays buried, so keep your enemies close.

Speaker 3 Watch Malice, all episodes now streaming exclusively on Prime Video.

Speaker 17 We know no one's journey is the same. That's why Delta Sky Miles lets you do it your way.

Speaker 17 From earning miles on reloads for coffee runs, shopping, and things you do every day, to connecting you to new places and experiences, A Sky Miles membership fits into your lifestyle, letting you do more of what makes you, you.

Speaker 17 It's more than travel. It's the membership that flies, dines, streams, rides, and arrives with you.
Every great journey deserves a great story.

Speaker 17 And when you have a membership that's as unique as you are, there's no telling how your story will unfold or where that journey will take you next.

Speaker 17 Sky Miles is the membership that will be here for all your big and small moments. The membership that's there for every solo adventure or family trip.

Speaker 17 The membership that comes with the power of partnership from brands you love. The membership that moves with you.
Learn more at delta.com/slash skymiles.

Speaker 1 All right, he's a senior fellow at Stanford Center on Democracy Development and the Rule of Law, host of the Frankly Fukuyama podcast.

Speaker 1 He also writes the Frankly Fukuyama column at Persuasion on Substack. His most recent book is Liberalism and its Discontents.
It's Frank Fukuyama. What's up, Frank?

Speaker 2 Well,

Speaker 2 my little world is fine. The world around me is boiling.
But, you know, other than that, everything's great.

Speaker 1 Yeah, that's a big, other than that. That's a big caveat.
But we're doing the best that we can in this world, you know. My interest was piqued.

Speaker 1 We talked a while ago about your last book. I mean, shit, I was living in San Francisco then.
Liberalism is discontent. I went and re-listened to that yesterday.

Speaker 1 And so I'm interested in getting back into a conversation about liberalism and why it's out of vogue. But first, my interest was piqued about your article, The Real Cause of Populism.

Speaker 1 And you went through the various different explanations for the recent global wave of populism and came to an answer of some sort of what you think it was.

Speaker 1 And just for folks who haven't read it, I just want to read through, you basically listed nine explanations that you hear for why

Speaker 1 Trumpism is on the rise everywhere. And here they are.
I'm just going to go through them real quick. One, economic inequality brought by by globalization.

Speaker 1 Two, racism, bigotry on the part of the population that have been losing status.

Speaker 1 Three, broad sociological change that have sorted people by education and residence and resentment against the dominance of elites and experts.

Speaker 1 Four, the special talent of individual demagogues like Trump. Five, the failures of mainstream political parties to deliver growth, jobs, security, and infrastructure.

Speaker 1 Six, dislike or hatred of the progressive left's cultural agenda. Seven, failures of leadership of the progressive left.
eight, human nature, nine, social media and the internet.

Speaker 1 You went through all of those and settled on social media and the internet,

Speaker 1 which I find appealing to my priors. But before we get that, I want to kind of just go through some of the ones you eliminated.
Why do you not think it is I'll combine two and three?

Speaker 1 This is this idea of racism, nativism on the behalf of people who are losing status.

Speaker 2 Why did you eliminate that? Well, look, there's no question that racism and nativism plays a role in the MAGA coalition. It's really founded on wanting to close off the United States to immigration.

Speaker 2 So there's no question that. So just to back up a little bit, all nine of these factors are there.

Speaker 2 I'm not saying that they're not important, but the question is what's the relative priority of these different ones.

Speaker 2 You know, what struck me is the way that African-American young men and Hispanic young men switched to voting for Trump in the last stages of last year's election.

Speaker 2 And, you know, he actually disguises his racism, you know, and he has black supporters. And I think that you've got to explain why this bundle of attitudes and policies is appealing to

Speaker 2 non-white people.

Speaker 2 And so I don't think that the fundamental driver of this is that, because, you know, I think actually Americans have grown fairly acceptant of of you know the fact that they live in a multiracial society and the hardcore people that really don't like that you know they're they're going to keep hating but i don't think that that explains why there's a sudden upsurge of this stuff in the middle of the second decade of the 21st century what about the sorting because when i look at your answers

Speaker 1 you know something that i say a lot to people when i get asked about this like why the rise of trump now why is it working is at to is to the point of your article that like this is a global phenomenon there are trumps everywhere there are

Speaker 1 There's a Brazilian Trump and an Indian Trump and a Hungarian Trump and a French Trump. There are Trumps everywhere.
And, you know,

Speaker 1 at least directionally. And maybe this is just more about your kind of globalization.
And there's something that, you know, about the fact that the assorting between educated

Speaker 1 urban dwelling elites versus

Speaker 1 less educated, you know, more rural or ex-urban or small town dwelling, you know, non-elites who are losing status. And that is really what is driving this.

Speaker 2 What would you say to that? Well, I don't think it's a driver.

Speaker 2 I think it's more of an effect rather than a cause that people have voluntarily sorted themselves, you know, based on their global attitudes. That may be driven by, you know, other deeper factors.

Speaker 2 So if you live in a big city, you're used to living in a multi-ethnic, you know, fairly diverse place.

Speaker 2 You've got lots of job opportunities because most of the economic economic growth is being driven in large urban areas.

Speaker 2 And so I think you're naturally going to be open, more open to a liberal perspective than if you live in a small town where everybody is the same religion, the same ethnicity, and the like.

Speaker 2 So I think that there's no question that there's a correlation between

Speaker 2 your place of residence. Population density is actually one of the one of the biggest correlates of whether you're going to vote populous.
And that's true. It's true in Russia.
It's true in Hungary.

Speaker 2 It's true in India.

Speaker 2 It's true in the United States. But as I said, it's more a reflection of an underlying kind of

Speaker 2 attitude and position in the world and your openness to a more diverse globalized world.

Speaker 1 Aaron Trevor Brandon, the other one that

Speaker 1 a lot of folks in my formal world on the right will say the answer is just was basically your six and seven categories. Progressive left's cultural agenda went too far too fast.

Speaker 1 And there's, this is just simply, you know, the populist right wave is just a backlash to that. What do you say to that?

Speaker 2 Well, again, in the last stages of the election, you know, when Trump was running all of those anti-transgender ads, you know, it definitely had an effect.

Speaker 2 So again, I'm not denying that that was important.

Speaker 2 And I personally know a lot of people that were kind of on the fence in the election that really hated that, you know, particular aspect of what the Democrats were offering.

Speaker 1 Really? You personally know people that looked at Trump and Kabbalah and their choice came down to youth sports and access for transitional.

Speaker 2 No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, I definitely know a lot of people that really hated

Speaker 2 what they thought the Democrats stood for on these cultural issues. Right.
Yeah, so it's the other way around.

Speaker 2 But again, you know, why this issue ended up being as powerful as it was, it seems to me, was not the intrinsic impact.

Speaker 2 So, how many transgender people are there altogether? How many people that voted on that basis actually

Speaker 2 had transgenderism affect their lives? And so, again, there's another factor that makes this stand out and go viral as

Speaker 2 something that motivates people to vote in a certain way. And that, again, brings you back, I think, to the internet, which has this incredible ability to magnify certain issues that

Speaker 2 are really just understood anecdotally, but then all of a sudden they become big, overwhelming things that you read about and hear about all the time.

Speaker 1 Aaron Powell, so that takes us to where you landed. I mean, I guess...

Speaker 1 The most compelling answer to me that the phones have exacerbated all these other issues, right? And I guess that's really the point.

Speaker 1 It's not as if any of these other factors are not factors, but the phones were just an exacerbating effect.

Speaker 1 Is the point you make in the article, which is basically there were worse economic times than this last decade. There were times where racism was more acute than this past decade.

Speaker 1 There were times where, you know, the left, the cultural left, was changing things more quickly than in the last decade. And like the only thing that is unique about the last decade is the phones.

Speaker 1 And so we have to.

Speaker 1 consider that when trying to explain why right-wing populism re-emerged now versus in 1970 or 80 or 90.

Speaker 2 Yeah, I mean, there's two things that you need to explain. So the first is timing, right? That

Speaker 2 in fact, for people that think that inequality and economic conditions are the drivers, I think that's a little bit crazy because in a certain sense, you know, we've never been better in terms of economic growth.

Speaker 2 You know, the last election happened at a time of very, very low unemployment. You did have inflation, but it was nothing like the inflation that everybody experienced back in the 1970s.

Speaker 2 And I just don't think that that's an adequate answer of why, in this kind of prosperous, generally peaceful time, people adopt this extreme language.

Speaker 2 You know, if you listen to people on the right, like this Michael Anton Flight 93 article that got

Speaker 2 a lot of MAGA kicked off back in 2016, he's saying we're in a civilizational crisis. Our way of life is

Speaker 2 about to end. If we don't storm the cockpit and take over the plane, we're all going to die.

Speaker 2 In 2016, why would anyone believe that you're in that kind of an extreme situation?

Speaker 2 I think that you have to kind of build up an alternative world that really doesn't correspond to the empirical world in order to get to that level of hysteria. So the timing is important.

Speaker 2 The other thing that I think really needs to be explained is the particular character of of right-wing politics today.

Speaker 2 It used to be, as you're well aware, that Republicans and conservatives had basically this Reaganite agenda, you know, low taxes, deregulation, privatization, but embracing globalization and internationalism.

Speaker 2 Today, that's completely off the table as far as the Republican Party is concerned. And if you say, what is it that binds conservatives together today, it really is conspiracy thinking.

Speaker 2 It is this belief that if you take the red pill, you see that the world around you is not what it claims to be.

Speaker 2 All the legacy institutions, the media, universities, the scientific establishment are actually being manipulated by elites behind the scenes.

Speaker 2 And I think that that's kind of the unifying characteristic of

Speaker 2 the right today. And again, how can you believe that vaccines are actually harmful?

Speaker 2 How can you believe, you know, I've heard conservatives say this, that more people died from the COVID vaccine than died from COVID.

Speaker 2 It's just totally, it's totally crazy assertion, but people believe it nonetheless.

Speaker 2 And I just don't think that that could have happened before the rise of the internet and this ability of people to directly communicate with

Speaker 2 large masses of people in a way they couldn't before.

Speaker 1 You're around a lot of smart conservatives conservatives at Stanford, educated conservatives. It's the breeding ground of a lot of the

Speaker 1 tech right thinkers.

Speaker 1 Hoover is out there. So you must talk to

Speaker 1 people that would bristle at this notion that the only thing that unites the right is conspiratorial thinking. Like what explains?

Speaker 1 I won't embarrass you and name any of the Stanford conservatives. Like what explains what some of the smart, temperate folks, how does does that match your theory?

Speaker 1 How do they respond when you make an accusation like that?

Speaker 2 Again, you know, you have to fall back on some of the other causes.

Speaker 2 So a lot of the smart Stanford conservatives don't believe that there are tunnels in Washington, D.C., and that children are being tortured and, you know, sacrificed, this sort of thing.

Speaker 2 Obviously, they don't believe that.

Speaker 2 I think that a lot of them were initially Reagan Republicans, and they were kind of shocked by the tariffs and a lot of Trump's policies, but they've made their peace.

Speaker 2 I would say that it's probably that cultural issue that has driven a lot of them. They just don't trust the Democratic Party and they really dislike what the Democrats have to offer.

Speaker 2 And they've made their peace with Trumpism as the

Speaker 2 lesser of two evils.

Speaker 1 But do you think they've been brain poisoned by the Internet or is there something else apply? Well,

Speaker 2 it's interesting how many of them are not willing to to say in a full-throated manner that the 2020 election was actually a legitimate, free, and fair election.

Speaker 2 And then if you query them,

Speaker 2 they'll say things like, well, there were a lot of questions about the way that the polling was, I mean, the polls were manipulated and so forth.

Speaker 2 You know, they kind of satisfy their...

Speaker 2 what's left of their intellectual integrity by pointing to discrepancies and we're not completely sure whether this was the case, But, you know, they're much more open to it than they would have been, I think, before the internet.

Speaker 1 Aaron Powell, Jr.: Here's the most depressing thing about this thesis, which is kind of why I don't want it to be right, is that if it's true, things are only getting worse, not better

Speaker 1 with AI, because there's no,

Speaker 1 I mean, to the degree that the internet or phones or social media are a reality distortion machine, and they are in a certain way.

Speaker 1 And what's coming with AI and what's already here is that on steroids, I think that a lot lot of people are going to struggle to know, to literally know what's real and what's fake.

Speaker 2 Yeah, unfortunately, that's true. And I think that there's been this struggle to try to regulate the internet that has been a losing battle so far.

Speaker 2 When Trump was first elected, there was a lot of pressure on the big internet platforms to moderate content, to downplay disinformation, hate speech, and so forth.

Speaker 2 They tried to do that, but it produced this furious reaction that actually affected us here at Stanford.

Speaker 2 We used to have a Stanford Internet Observatory that was actually a bunch of academic researchers and a lot of graduate students looking at things like vaccine denialism and election denialism and how that spread.

Speaker 2 And then the moment that the Republicans got the House in 2022, Jim Jordan was authorized to run a committee that it claimed was looking at weaponization of the Internet, but in fact, they were the ones that were weaponizing.

Speaker 2 And effectively, they shut that whole operation down.

Speaker 2 You know, the university didn't want to have to deal with getting its faculty and a lot of students subpoenaed and dragged to Washington to testify.

Speaker 2 It's a totally fake charge, but the result is that nobody can do content moderation, at least not in the United States. Europeans continue to try to do a little bit of that.

Speaker 2 And I think the prospect of that is going to be more necessary, as you say, with the rise of fake videos and kinds of stuff that AI can do.

Speaker 2 And so, again, we're back to protections offered by these internet providers that really are not going to be adequate to protect American democracy.

Speaker 1 Aaron Powell,

Speaker 1 do you have a hope for that?

Speaker 1 Do you have a plan or a hope? Because I don't really.

Speaker 1 And the hope, the only hope is this kind of blind faith that, like, well, the next generation will be able to learn, you know, adapt in ways that people have adapted in the past to other technological advances.

Speaker 1 But I just find that to be kind of wish casting, really.

Speaker 2 Yeah, I think it is. Back in 2020, I ran a working group, Stanford Working Group on Platform Scale.

Speaker 2 And we had this idea for something we called middleware. So the problem is not just fake news.
I think given our First Amendment, you really can't regulate the quality of speech.

Speaker 2 I mean, you got two choices right now. Either you can let the big tech platforms do the regulating, and their main interest is not American democracy, or you can let the government do it.

Speaker 2 And I think nobody wants the government to declare what's true and false.

Speaker 2 And so, what we thought was that the main problem is the concentration of power in these big platforms, and that you've got to dilute that power in some way.

Speaker 2 And the idea of middleware is that you'd have a third-party provider that would actually do the content moderation, and you, the user, could actually turn the knobs and dials to tailor your feed to what you preferred.

Speaker 2 So it doesn't get rid of fake news, which I don't think you can do, but it actually allows you to

Speaker 2 reduce the power of the platforms to decide what it is you hear.

Speaker 2 The thing that's going on that I think is really scary is the concentration of power. in these platforms.
So

Speaker 2 Elon Musk bought Twitter not because it was a great business proposition. He saw it as a route to political power.
And that's exactly the way he used it.

Speaker 2 He changed the political orientation, moved it way to the right, and then used that to help Donald Trump win the election.

Speaker 2 What's going on, I don't think, has received nearly enough attention is what the two Ellisons, Larry Ellison and his son David, are doing to amass another empire.

Speaker 2 This time, they're going to, you know, they're bidding on TikTok, and they've already got Paramount.

Speaker 2 They're trying to get Warner Brothers Discovery, which means HBO, CNN, a lot of other media channels.

Speaker 1 And I think that they're gonna have TikTok and some control over TikTok, at least

Speaker 2 it's kind of an unbelievable level of media power.

Speaker 2 We don't know exactly how they intend to use that power, but it's just not a good idea to have it in the hands of people that, you know, whose views are probably quite conservative and leaning towards MAGA.

Speaker 2 And so I think that you've got to think about that concentration of power issue as one of the first agenda items if you really want to reduce the threat.

Speaker 2 But again, that's not going to get rid of fake news and it's not going to get rid of conspiracy theories. Yeah, right.

Speaker 1 And I hear that the media, I mean, I'm for some sort of mediation idea and giving people options and dials to control what they receive. But to me, that like...

Speaker 1 Like a lot of the answers to AI, whenever I asked anybody about this, I was asking Cuban about this kind of stuff too. And it's like, all of the solutions feel like stuff that the top 20%

Speaker 1 of the country that is most capable, highly educated, that is younger, that understands the platforms, they'll be able to use the dials.

Speaker 1 And the less educated, you know, the folks who come from, you know, not as privileged backgrounds, older people, like won't know how to do it.

Speaker 1 And so, you know, you'll end up kind of with a bifurcated issue.

Speaker 1 The one weakness in the phone argument that I just wanted to ask you about, and I want to move on, is

Speaker 1 I periodically over the past few years have been paging back through Umberto Echo's Ur Fascism book, basically that like, you know, that looked at what the attributes of Mussolini's fascism are.

Speaker 1 And ironically, I didn't know this before you were to be on. Today, Bill Crystal's writing about Mussolini in our morning newsletter and the parallels to now.

Speaker 1 Obviously, there were no phones then, and there are quite a lot of parallels between, you know, not... Again, not like outcomes, but like the appeal of fascism then and now.

Speaker 1 And I'm just wondering how that intersects with your with your argument.

Speaker 2 Yeah so technology played a role in the rise of European fascism. You know the new technology at that time was the radio.

Speaker 2 And both Mussolini and Hitler made extensive use of the radio to reach mass audiences in a way that the older types of technology like daily newspapers really couldn't.

Speaker 2 And so there was an analogue to what's happening.

Speaker 2 But again,

Speaker 2 you know, my argument is not that there aren't other discontents that are driving the rise of this kind of political movement. It's the particular character and the timing, like why now?

Speaker 2 You can understand Italian and especially German fascism perfectly well in economic terms.

Speaker 2 Germany had suffered this catastrophic defeat in the First World War. Then it had hyperinflation.

Speaker 2 Weimar was a very weak political system. It didn't seem to address any of the economic grievances that German citizens had.

Speaker 2 And so you know, the economic argument was so much more powerful as a driver of why Europe turned to the right in the 1930s.

Speaker 2 And we just don't have anything remotely comparable to that explaining why you're getting Donald Trump in the 2020s.

Speaker 3 Get Ready for Malice, a twisted new drama starring Jack Whitehall, David DeCovney, and Carice Van Houten.

Speaker 3 Jack Whitehall plays Adam, a charming manny infiltrates the wealthy Tanner family with a hidden motive to destroy them.

Speaker 10 This edge-of-your-seat revenge thriller unravels a deliciously dark mystery in a world full of wealth, secrets, and betrayal.

Speaker 9 Malice will constantly keep you on your toes.

Speaker 3 Why is Adam after the Tanner family?

Speaker 8 What lengths will he go to?

Speaker 13 One thing's for sure, the past never stays buried, so keep your enemies close.

Speaker 3 Watch Malice, all episodes now streaming exclusively on Prime Video.

Speaker 17 We know no one's journey is the same. That's why Delta Sky Miles lets you do it your way.

Speaker 17 From earning miles on reloads for coffee runs, shopping, and things you do every day, to connecting you to new places and experiences, a Sky Miles membership fits into your lifestyle, letting you do more of what makes you, you.

Speaker 17 It's more than travel. It's the membership that flies, dines, streams, rides, and arrives with you.
Every great journey deserves a great story.

Speaker 17 And when you have a membership that's as unique as you are, there's no telling how your story will unfold or where that journey will take you next.

Speaker 17 Skymiles is the membership that will be here for all your big and small moments. The membership that's there for every solo adventure or family trip.

Speaker 17 The membership that comes with the power of partnership from brands you love. The membership that moves with you.
Learn more at delta.com slash skymiles.

Speaker 1 You mentioned the discontents. I want to go back to your book, Liberalism and its Discontents.

Speaker 1 Just stepping back, I think it's important to do definition of terms here when we're talking about liberalism because

Speaker 1 I grew up thinking I hated liberalism because it was defined in my brain, in the American sense, as like tax and spend, big government leftist or whatever was synonymous with liberalism.

Speaker 1 And that is, you know, not certainly not how it's meant in the global sense.

Speaker 1 And I think increasingly, because those on the left are adopting the term progressive, the word liberal is kind of coming back to its original roots. And so I'm trying to reclaim it personally.

Speaker 1 I've gone from being an anti-liberal to a radical liberal, an extremely pro-liberal.

Speaker 1 At the moment that I'm trying to take it back is when it's maybe the least popular, the most out of vogue, it's been.

Speaker 1 And this weekend, actually, I was with some younger folks who are on the left, and they

Speaker 1 were using liberal as like a slur. They were

Speaker 1 attacking me for being a liberal. I was like, that's a bad thing.
Obviously, we have this rise of the liberalism on the right that we've just been talking about.

Speaker 1 How do you explain that right now, like this question of why there is so much discontent over liberalism in this moment? So, define the term and then explain why you think there are discontents.

Speaker 2 So, yeah, I'm completely with you on this attempt to reclaim the term liberal and to wear it proudly. But you have to define it very carefully.

Speaker 2 So, my definition of classical liberalism is that it is a system that limits state power. And it does that through a rule of law, which means that the rulers can't just do whatever they want.

Speaker 2 It does it through constitutional checks and balances that put obstacles in the way of the unbridled use of power. So, that's really the core.
You can have all sorts of different social policies.

Speaker 2 You can do more redistribution, you know, more social security, more health care, as long as the government is fundamentally limited.

Speaker 2 And I think that the thing that holds all these populist groups together is actually opposition to liberalism defined in that sense.

Speaker 2 Victor Orban, Narendra Modi, Donald Trump, all get up and say, I was elected. I have legitimacy.
I'm trying to do what the people want.

Speaker 2 And here are all these judges, these rules that are holding me back. You know, this is particularly true in the case of a builder like

Speaker 2 Donald Trump, who's had to deal with this mountain of rules and regulations.

Speaker 2 And I'm just going to blow this whole system up. So they're not contesting the democratic part of liberal democracy.

Speaker 2 They're contesting the liberal part that says that they ought to operate within a framework that limits their power. They don't want to limit their power.

Speaker 2 And if you define liberalism in that way, I think that you'll get more buy-in from people who I mean, there are people on the left for example who think that global warming is such a big crisis that we basically have to have a kind of dictatorship to impose you know pro-climate policies but that's a pretty small part of the progressive coalition the illiberal instructor worry about on the left is so maybe just kind of reframing what you're what you're saying like A big part of liberalism for me is just accepting that you live in a society with people who have different views and priorities as you, right?

Speaker 1 That you all live together in one society. There are basically rules and frameworks.
And so, if someone breaks a rule or breaks a law, they should be punished.

Speaker 1 But otherwise, as long as they're acting within the rule of law, then you just accept other people with different religions, values, and views.

Speaker 1 I think that there's an increase of people on the left that don't really like that, actually, too. Yeah, I mean, obviously,

Speaker 1 on the right, the people that don't like that are running the country, so it's more acute, but I notice it at least hearing from folks on the left. And I think that is the part that worries me.

Speaker 2 Yeah. So, the

Speaker 2 fundamental virtue in liberal societies right from the beginning was the virtue of tolerance. So as you said, we live in a diverse society.

Speaker 2 People are going to be different from you, and you have to allow them to be different up to the point where they're using violence or attacking the liberal framework as a whole.

Speaker 2 And I think that one of the distortions of liberalism is that many progressives wanted to put the power of the state behind a kind of aggressive tolerance, Like, you have to accept, you know, trans people, and if you don't, you know, we're going to punish you.

Speaker 2 And that's the point where, you know, it's no longer tolerance of difference. It's actually kind of enforced conformity.
And that's. Make me the cake.

Speaker 1 Make me the cake that I want. Yeah.

Speaker 2 And that's, you know, it's legitimate to dislike that and say, you know, the power of the state should not be used to enforce these kinds of social norms.

Speaker 2 And that's something that progressives need to back away from.

Speaker 1 Aaron Powell, why do you think,

Speaker 1 and this goes to kind of your book, what is undergirding why liberalism is out of vogue right now in the manner in which you defined it and why it's being attacked from both sides? I mean, is it

Speaker 1 something that harkens back to your more notable, your more famous work about the end of history?

Speaker 1 Is it that people are bored and decadent, want something to fight against?

Speaker 1 I forget exactly, you might remember your quote better than but something about, you know, if people can't struggle for something, they'll struggle against it. Is it that?

Speaker 1 Is it boredom and decadence, or is it some failure of liberalism that has caused the discontent?

Speaker 2 I guess there are a couple of different answers to that. I'm going to publish a memoir next year.

Speaker 2 The title of that is In the Realm of the Last Man,

Speaker 2 a memoir.

Speaker 2 And The Last Man refers back to my first book, The End of History and The Last Man.

Speaker 2 And The Last Man is the creature who emerges at the end of history when you have a liberal democracy that produces peace and prosperity.

Speaker 2 And I think our liberal democracy in the United States, those in Europe, you know, Northeast Asia, have all done pretty well. They've produced peaceful, secure societies overall.

Speaker 2 There may be a little more inflation, a little bit more, too much immigration, various things that people complain about. But, you know, basically life has been pretty good under liberal democracy.

Speaker 2 And I think that a lot of people

Speaker 2 don't find that enough because there's something deep inside the human soul that wants to struggle. That a world without struggle, without higher aspirations, produces a life not worth living.

Speaker 2 And you know, you look at the encampments that we had in American universities after October 7th, a couple of years ago.

Speaker 2 So there's all of these very privileged kids, like the ones here at Stanford, Harvard, Columbia, other places, they're kind of the most privileged people in the society.

Speaker 2 And they want to live in tents and stop going to classes to protest on behalf of a people that are half the world away from them.

Speaker 2 They have really no organic connection to. And you say, why are they doing this?

Speaker 2 And I think it really has to do with the fact that in their lives, apart from getting into Stanford or Harvard, they've not struggled for anything.

Speaker 2 You know, they don't have a vision of a better world, a much brighter future that used to animate people on the left who at one time believed in the, you know, the Marxist promise of a communist utopia.

Speaker 2 So there are no more utopias left. And so I think that that energy has gone into creating artificial struggle.
And that's true on the right as well.

Speaker 1 Just really quick, just to get that right. So

Speaker 1 you're not suggesting that, I mean, obviously, you know, the folks that are in Gaza are experiencing real struggle. So that's not artificial struggle.

Speaker 1 You're saying that people are creating an artificial are trying to find things to struggle against because liberal democracy has like basically worked.

Speaker 2 Aaron Ross Powell, I'm not saying anything about Gaza. You know, I mean, it's a horrible situation for them.

Speaker 2 But I think that the question is why American students at elite universities have taken up this one issue as their own.

Speaker 2 And that, I think, really does have to do with the, you know, the absence of bigger aspirations and struggles in their lives. And I think a lot of the people on the right that dress up in camo

Speaker 2 and carry AK-47s around

Speaker 2 also want to believe that they're revolutionaries, like the original American patriots, and that they're struggling to preserve a way of life that they think liberals are taking away from them.

Speaker 2 And so I think on both ends of the political spectrum, you get this

Speaker 2 desire to break out of peace and prosperity, know, that we really want a kind of higher vision of what our society ought to look like, and it's not providing us outlets for doing that.

Speaker 1 Aaron Ross Powell, so that argument is just more of a generational cycle argument. I mean, I now have your exact quote in front of me.

Speaker 1 I do want to read it for folks, which is: experience suggested if men cannot struggle on behalf of a just cause because that just cause was victorious in an earlier generation, then they will struggle against the just cause.

Speaker 1 They'll struggle for the sake of struggle. The argument then is basically

Speaker 1 a combination of civil rights, right for man,

Speaker 1 women's rights, gay rights, right? Like you have that there was a success that was achieved. Not a total success, not equality for everybody, not a perfect world, but like a basic success of

Speaker 1 those efforts from whatever,

Speaker 1 mid-1960s through Obama, basically.

Speaker 1 So once it felt like those things had been achieved, people then start grasping for, okay, well, I have to fight against something.

Speaker 1 And the only something to fight against was basically the liberal world order. And you have to come up with a reason why that was actually not good and not sufficient.
You have to oppose it.

Speaker 2 I think that's right.

Speaker 1 And okay, so, but based on that, then it's kind of like, well, there's not really anything that we could have done.

Speaker 1 Like, had the liberal world order been a little bit more fair and done a little bit more to fight against economic inequality, that probably would not have impacted just this more

Speaker 1 human reaction, at least in your frame. What would you say to that?

Speaker 2 Well, that generational explanation actually leads to a kind of pessimistic conclusion.

Speaker 2 The people that are most eager to live in a liberal society, you know, as I've described it, are people that live under a dictatorship,

Speaker 2 that live in poor, you know, corrupt, tyrannical countries.

Speaker 2 And so in Eastern Europe, you know, in 1989, everybody had been experiencing that for a couple of generations, and they were desperate to join Europe because for them that represented individual freedom and they celebrated the fall of the Berlin Wall.

Speaker 2 Today, you've had another couple generations go by where they've experienced peace and prosperity. I mean, Poland is a great example of this.

Speaker 2 There's no country in the EU that has been more economically successful than Poland. Its per capita GDP is now higher than the average for...
the EU as a whole.

Speaker 2 And it's been peaceful up until the Ukraine war started.

Speaker 2 And yet you had the rise of this right-wing law and justice party that, you know, was complaining about the EU as a dictatorship that had been imposed on them. And it's just crazy.

Speaker 2 But I think you have to see it in terms of the fact that you now have a couple of generations of young Poles that have grown up with no experience of Communism.

Speaker 2 They don't understand what the alternative to the European Union is, and therefore they can have fantasies that there's a better world, you know, when after the EU is abolished.

Speaker 1 Okay, so we just need a full mega dictatorship and then we need to overthrow it. Yeah.
And then the light will come at the end

Speaker 1 when I'm a grandfather, as long as I'm alive and avoided the gulag.

Speaker 2 All right.

Speaker 1 Well, that's typically bulwark uplifting material. Okay, but Tim, just

Speaker 2 before you get off that, I mean, I think the major hope in this country is that a lot of MAGA policies are actually going to be very, very counterproductive.

Speaker 2 You know, tariffs and cutting off any flow of outsiders into the United States. It's going to lead to a much poorer, less innovative, less creative country.

Speaker 2 And at a certain point, people begin to realize that there's a cause and effect relationship between those policies and outcomes that are not as disastrous as living under a communist dictatorship, but the country just isn't working as well.

Speaker 2 So let's hope for that.

Speaker 1 Okay, yeah. A little AI bubble pop and some failed tariff policy,

Speaker 1 and we can turn this thing around. I'm just curious.

Speaker 1 I referenced your kind of stanford conservative friends earlier i've had you and bill crystal now on back-to-back days both outflanking me on the left on various things and um do they think that you've lost your mind like do you get that from conservatives because everything you're saying to me like makes like makes sense and seems almost obvious like based on what's happening but it's important to challenge your priors and i'm wondering if you have anybody in stanford from the right who thinks you're you've gone you've got internet pilled yourself

Speaker 1 blue pill

Speaker 2 I'm sure that there are, but...

Speaker 1 Nobody's made a compelling countercase, do you?

Speaker 2 Yeah.

Speaker 2 By and large, the people that have really gone after me are the genuine MAGA types.

Speaker 2 And I think that the sort of educated conservatives,

Speaker 2 you know, I think that they've been conflicted over the past few years because they really recognize that Donald Trump is not fit to be president and so forth.

Speaker 2 They just think that, well, we don't have a choice right now because, you know, the Democrats and and the left are so bad. So that's not a reason for, you know,

Speaker 2 going after me.

Speaker 3 Get ready for Malice, a twisted new drama starring Jack Whitehall, David DeCovney, and Carice Van Houten.

Speaker 3 Jack Whitehall plays Adam, a charming manny infiltrates the wealthy Tanner family with a hidden motive to destroy them.

Speaker 10 This edge-of-your-seat revenge thriller unravels a deliciously dark mystery in a world full of wealth, wealth, secrets, and betrayal.

Speaker 9 Malice will constantly keep you on your toes.

Speaker 3 Why is Adam after the Tanner family?

Speaker 8 What lengths will he go to?

Speaker 13 One thing's for sure, the past never stays buried, so keep your enemies close.

Speaker 3 Watch Malice, all episodes now streaming exclusively on Prime Video.

Speaker 17 We know no one's journey is the same. That's why Delta Sky Miles lets you do it your way.

Speaker 17 From earning miles on reloads for coffee runs, shopping, and things you do every day, to connecting you to new places and experiences, a Sky Miles membership fits into your lifestyle, letting you do more of what makes you, you.

Speaker 17 It's more than travel. It's the membership that flies, dines, streams, rides, and arrives with you.
Every great journey deserves a great story.

Speaker 17 And when you have a membership that's as unique as you are, there's no telling how your story will unfold or where that journey will take you next.

Speaker 17 Skymiles is the membership that will be here for all your big and small moments. The membership that's there for every solo adventure or family trip.

Speaker 17 The membership that comes with the power of partnership from brands you love. The membership that moves with you.
Learn more at delta.com slash skymiles.

Speaker 1 Well, we'll test that theory right now then. I don't really have a question.
I just kind of want to put a quarter in the machine and hear what you think about Zoron Mamdani.

Speaker 2 Well, I think his rise is unfortunate because I think that for the Democrats, a correct reading of the 2024 election is that they needed to move to the center.

Speaker 2 that the problem was not that they were insufficiently redistributionist, but that they were perceived as being too much in that direction.

Speaker 2 And so, you know, you need somebody more like an Abigail Spanberger, you know, to carry the torch for the party. But I think that the energy in the party, to the extent there is energy, is really

Speaker 2 being borne by people like Mondani, AOC, you know, even Bernie Sanders still are headlining

Speaker 2 a lot of the big rallies.

Speaker 2 And I sort of worry that the Democratic Party is going to repeat the cycle that the British Labour Party went through when their first candidate to oppose the Conservatives was Jeremy Corbyn, somebody from the far left of their party.

Speaker 2 And they had to lose another election before it's sunk in that they actually needed to move to the center rather than further to the left.

Speaker 1 Yeah, they had to get slaughtered.

Speaker 1 Who would you vote for if you were in New York?

Speaker 1 Okay,

Speaker 2 I'll just say I'm a big fan of the abundance movement, right?

Speaker 2 I think you need to have a positive agenda for how the country is actually going to look if you're in power.

Speaker 2 And one of the big problems of all the Democrats up to this point is that they haven't articulated that. I think someone like Josh Shapiro could take on that mantle.

Speaker 2 You know, the way he fixed I-95 after the tanker truck blew up, you know, represents, I think, this feeling that, you know, the existing rules are too constraining.

Speaker 2 You need a leader that's willing to bend the rules when there's a... real cause for doing that.
But so far, nobody has really stood up.

Speaker 2 In fact, there's a Build America caucus in the House that's led by Josh Harter from California. It's bipartisan, but a lot of Democrats in it.

Speaker 2 But no big candidate has actually taken up that agenda because it's become toxic to the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. And so they're not even willing to use the word abundance.

Speaker 1 You know who is an exception to that? Zoron Mandani.

Speaker 1 The interesting thing about Zoron to me, and I noticed you didn't tell me who you're going to vote for, so I'm not letting you off the hook on that. But the interesting thing to Zoron for me is that

Speaker 1 I was literally just before I got on today watching some clip of him from two years ago, like not a long time ago, from September 2023. And he like,

Speaker 1 sounds like

Speaker 1 he's in Zuccotti Park or something. You know, he's like using very kind of activist left rhetoric about the global struggle.

Speaker 1 He used the word struggle actually in this thing about the global, the struggle against imperialism and

Speaker 1 the IDF and all this sort of stuff. And the contrast between the way he talks about all that stuff then, two years ago, versus now is pretty noteworthy to me.

Speaker 1 And like when he came on my show, he specifically talked about abundance and talked about how if you're going to be a left populist, like government has to work.

Speaker 1 And if government can't work, if there's too much red tape, and if government, you know what I mean, if we're not giving people services they want.

Speaker 1 And so he's like, I want to steal some stuff from Ezra and Derek. And it just is savvy to me.

Speaker 1 How will he actually be mayor? Because he's going to win. I've no idea.
Will he be the socialist lefty Bel de Blasio? Or will he try to do practical

Speaker 1 abundancy?

Speaker 1 What is it? Sewer socialism type stuff.

Speaker 1 We will all find out, I think, inevitably. But it's interesting that he's made that progression.
I wonder what you think about that.

Speaker 2 Well, so.

Speaker 2 It's nice that he's rhetorically taking that position.

Speaker 2 The problem is a structural one in the Democratic Party, that the real core of the party are in what they call the groups, meaning they're advocacy groups that often are at a community level.

Speaker 2 A lot of them are environmentalists, feminists, you know, so forth. And they pres, uh, it's it's a it's a thicket that is a real problem for any Democrat that wants to move to the center, right?

Speaker 2 They send around questionnaires saying, on our particular issue, you know, do you stand with me?

Speaker 2 And up to this point, you know, every major Democratic candidate has had to check off, yes, I'm pro-abortion, I'm pro-this, I'm pro-that.

Speaker 2 And And the test for Mom Dani will be: if he's serious about abundance, he's going to have to go up against these groups. There's going to be a huge fight.

Speaker 2 If you want the government to do big things, you have to go up against all of these local community action groups that don't want to have to listen to the government. You know,

Speaker 2 they've sharpened their teeth on resisting mandates coming from above. And I think that's going to be a problem for any Democrat that tries to go down the abundance route.

Speaker 1 So you're saying you're a Curtis Sleewell voter.

Speaker 1 Mr. Beret.
You're saying you're the beret, man. It's okay.
You live in San Francisco. We'll let you off the hook, I guess.
I lied. I will let you off the hook.
It's a tough one. It's Zoron for me.

Speaker 1 It's with closing my eyes, I think, is how it is, just because, I mean, Andrew Cuomo, it's kind of hilarious to me that they've left Andrew Cuomo as the alternative, you know, given how horrific of a job he did as governor of New York, one of the worst Democrats, is now the one that's supposed to appeal to the Senate.

Speaker 1 Right. All right, last topic.
On the internet, I noticed that there is

Speaker 1 been some interest. And I don't know in what venue you said this, but you said your favorite movie was Blade Runner.
And I saw several tweets about this.

Speaker 1 Young people

Speaker 1 were happy to learn that. And so I want you to give them a little more.
What is it about Blade Runner that makes that your favorite movie?

Speaker 2 So Blade Runner is based on a story

Speaker 2 from the 1930s, actually, about basically androids and in the original story do androids dream of electric sheep that was the title it was a darker future in which the androids actually didn't have empathy and the movie Blade Runner actually reversed that that these machines actually could develop

Speaker 2 this very basic human quality of having empathy for other people. And that's kind of the tragedy of the fact that they're all destroyed

Speaker 2 by the end. And I always thought that that was a kind of hopeful vision of what technology might lead to in the future.
Plus, which I just thought that at the time that it was made,

Speaker 2 the whole setting of the movie, like it's in Los Angeles and it never stops raining. You never see the sun come out once.
Everything is in Asian character.

Speaker 2 At that time, people worried about Japan rather than China. And everything has become Japanized because of the social transformation.
I just thought that all of that was a brilliant

Speaker 2 commentary back when the movie was made, I guess in the 1980s, about the sort of changes that America was experiencing.

Speaker 1 Do you have a recent favorite?

Speaker 2 Well, I like

Speaker 2 science fiction. My favorite writer is Neil Stevenson, who wrote one of the most brilliant novels, again, back in the 1980s.

Speaker 2 It's sort of a parody of the libertarian trends that were taking place then. But he's written a couple of recent ones, like

Speaker 2 Termination Shock, in which a single rich oil guy in Texas takes on global warming to the detriment of, you know, the country of India.

Speaker 2 You know, I guess what I like about science fiction in general is that it projects trends into the future and develops what the politics of that future would look like in speculative ways, but I think ones that actually are very useful in thinking about are present.

Speaker 2 The one thing I would say that I

Speaker 2 feel bad about is that science fiction when I was young was all about space travel. You know, you have these big space odysseys, Star Wars, and so forth.
It's much, much darker.

Speaker 2 The typical science fiction movie these days is some kind of apocalypse. It could be environmental, it could be, you know, viruses,

Speaker 2 the whole zombie movie genre is about

Speaker 2 robot apocalypse, this sort of thing. And I think it's a kind of way of taking the temperature of people's attitudes towards technology and whether they find it inspiring or

Speaker 2 threatening. And I think right now, everybody sees technological change as threatening.

Speaker 1 Well, that leads me to my final question then. So, Frank Fukuyama, how likely do you think it is that we're going to have AI-driven apocalypse?

Speaker 2 Oh, yeah, so that's something I've actually spent a lot of time reading a lot of the more apocalyptic views,

Speaker 2 Stuart Russell and Nick Bostrom and so forth. I think that a lot of those fears are really overdrawn

Speaker 2 because just the underlying technology is

Speaker 2 going to be, I just think it's going to be less powerful, or at least it'll be less powerful for a very long time than they are positing.

Speaker 2 And so I think that the real thing we need to worry about is not autonomous robots, you know, leading a robot uprising against humanity. I think it's more bad people using robots to hurt other people.

Speaker 2 That's the real threat that we ought to be focusing on.

Speaker 1 The books, Liberalism, and its Discontents, The End of History and The Last Man, there are a bunch of other ones. You can go check them out.
And we'll have you back next year with the memoir.

Speaker 1 That's very exciting. Okay.
All right. Thanks so much.

Speaker 2 Okay, thanks, Tim.

Speaker 1 All right, y'all. That was a banger, doubleheader.
I've given you plenty of content today.

Speaker 1 covered a lot of ground thanks so much my buddy Sam Stein and to Frank Pukuyama we'll be back tomorrow for another edition of the podcast we'll see you all then peace

Speaker 1 The Bullwark Podcast is produced by Katie Cooper with audio engineering and editing by Jason Brown.

Speaker 1 This is Matt Rogers from Lost Culture Eastas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang. Get ready for your next TV obsession, All's Fair.

Speaker 1 Starring Kim Kardashian, Naomi Watts, Nisi Nash-Betts, Tayana Taylor, with Sarah Poulson, and Glenn Close, a team of fierce female divorce attorneys leave a male-dominated firm to start their own.

Speaker 1 Filled with scandalous secrets and shifting allegiances, both in the courtroom and within their own ranks, these ladies know that lawyers are a girl's best friend.

Speaker 1 Don't miss All's Fair, now streaming on Hulu and Hulu on Disney Plus for bundle subscribers. Terms apply.
This is Matt Rogers from Los Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang.

Speaker 1 This is Bowen Yang from Los Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang. Hey, Bowen, it's gift season.

Speaker 2 Ugh, stressing me out.

Speaker 1 Why are the people I love so hard to shop for? Probably because they only make boring gift guides that are totally uninspired. Except for the guide we made.

Speaker 1 In partnership with Marshalls, where premium gifts meet incredible value, it's giving gifts.

Speaker 1 With categories like best gifts for the mom whose idea of a sensible walking shoe is a stiletto, or best gifts for me that were so thoughtful I really shouldn't have.

Speaker 1 Check out the guide on marshalls.com and gift the good stuff at Marshalls.

Speaker 15 In our nation, we don't follow, we lead. Real leadership is about building what nobody else can, coding so we can't lose, making America stronger, safer, faster.
It's in our code.

Speaker 15 Find out more at boozeallen.com our code.