Ep. 1566 - Pop Star Makes The Case For Why Women Shouldn't Have Kids. Here's Why She's Wrong

Today on the Matt Wall Show, a pop star declares that every parent she knows is miserable and

living in hell. This is part of a broader agenda to convince women to forgo marriage and family

life. We'll talk about it.
Also, there were supposedly 200 protests at Tesla dealerships

across the country over the weekend. This is obviously not organic or grassroots,

so who is funding all this exactly? And the GLAAD Awards happened over the weekend,

celebrating anybody in Hollywood or media who helped to push the LGBT agenda last year,

which is basically all of them. We'll talk about all that and more today

on the Mountain Wall Show. While many fitness influencers offer minimal value at premium prices, FitBod provides comprehensive workout planning and tracking tools designed to help you maintain consistency and achieve real progress.
Their expert certified personal trainers have fine-tuned their approach to deliver proven exercise science and industry best practices directly to you. Plus, you can transform your fitness journey with over 1,000 demonstration videos to perfect your form and technique.
My producer Holly has been using FitBot and has noticed significant improvements in both strength and endurance. The app's recovery tracking prevents overtraining of muscle groups, helping maintain consistent progress.
She loves that it introduces new exercises progressively, teaching proper form for various movements throughout their detailed demonstrations. Plus, within seconds, FitBot can create a personalized workout based on your goals and available equipment.
The app also notices which muscle groups you've been hitting harder, so it automatically adjusts to focus on other muscle groups that are fresh and ready for action. You can keep your fitness routine engaging because the app continuously introduces variety through new exercises, rep patterns, innovative supersets, and challenging circuits, eliminating workout monotony for good.
Level up your workout and join FitBod today to get your personalized workout plan. Get 25% off your subscription or try the app free for seven days at fitbod.me slash walsh.
That's F-I-T-B-O-D dot M-E slash Walsh. Well, it's been a rather ignominious couple of weeks for liberal women on the internet.
Of course, it's been an ignominious last several decades for liberal women in general on the internet or otherwise. But these past couple of weeks have given us one viral moment after another where this demographic is thoroughly embarrassing itself.
And for the sake of brevity,

I won't even include all the many videos of liberal women vandalizing Teslas and shrieking

at their drivers. The anti-Tesla brigade is, after all, as we know, almost exclusively women

and gay men. And these two groups also make up the core of the Democratic voting base, which we'll get back to in a moment.
But leaving the Tesla chaos to the side for now, this latest rash of viral humiliation started two weeks ago with footage of an altercation between a woman and a young man on a New York City subway. The woman was upset about the young man's MAGA hat, which she demanded that he remove from his head.
She attempted to take matters into her own hands when he refused to remove the hat. But the problem is that she apparently has all the speed and agility of a baby panda.
Watch. You realize you are some Democratic city.
Oh, are you? This is a Democratic city. Everything's been going on for I don't know how long.
The Democrats were running who don't. Who knows how long.
But then Trump comes in and just hits for him. Y'all are wild.
Well, this is my style. I hope you enjoyed it.
Oh, she's going to attack her. Oh, you know, I feel sorry for those listening to the audio podcast.
You missed the glorious sight of the woman chasing the young man to steal his MAGA hat only to trip and face plant in the middle of the subway station. Thanks to some crack reporting from the New York Post, we now know that this woman's name is Alberta Testanero, and she is a, quote, luxury brand specialist, which is exactly the kind of nonsense job that you'd expect a liberal woman in New York to have.
I don't even know what a luxury brand specialist does, but I know that this woman seems like the type to do it, whatever it is. The following week, just after this, a woman who appears to be in her late 60s or 70s, I'm guessing, went viral with this public service announcement about her dating life.
Listen. Friendly reminder, as a white American woman, yeah, I will no longer be dating white men.
I'm looking for anything other than a white man. Okay? Just a heads up.
Now, I know there are a lot of young single men out there who feel incredibly demoralized by the dating scene, which I understand. And if you're in that category, I don't mean to add to your frustrations, but if you were looking for an elderly feminist grandma, if that's your type, I'm sad to say that there's one less fish in the sea available to you, unless you're not white, in which case, you know, you might still have a chance.
We'll see. At the same time, another video has been making the rounds.
This is a significantly younger woman named Zoe, telling the story of how she broke up with her boyfriend because he committed the unforgivable sin of being Republican. Listen.
I was dating this guy. We've been dating for five months.
And in those five months, I was told by my friends, Zoe, he lives in Indiana. He's a Republican.
I was like, politics don't matter to me. What was I wrong? And so I was like, it's fine.
I don't care. I'm going to get to know him first.
We'll decide later. So then we kind of start talking about it.
I'm a very liberal woman. So I am obviously like very much everyone knows that I'm a liberal woman.
My brother's gay. All my friends are gay.
Also like abortion rights. Female rights.
But anyways, so I would like always ask him. I'd be like, what? Like, what's your politics? Like, what do you, who do you, where do you lean? And he was just like, well, like socially I'm a liberal, but economically I'm a Republican.
That, okay. I'm like, well, like what makes you, you know, economically Republican? Because like, I could give you a whole bunch of facts right now that prove that you shouldn't be.
And he was like, all of his info was from his friends. And I was was like you get all your information from your redneck friends obviously you can't trust them you need

to do the research yourself and if you do the research I told him I was like I'll support you

based on your decision if you actually research it yourself like I won't care if you're a Republican

but anyways and so he was like Zoe I have much better things to do than research politics like

I have way more important things to do. Ah!

Okay, saying that to me is absolutely insane,

but go off, King.

I don't think we need to endure any more of that.

She broke up with him.

That's the end of the story,

so that's the spoiler there.

Why any man would ever date a woman like this in the first place is the greater mystery.

Everything about her is aggressively unappealing.

She's the human embodiment of nails on a chalkboard. She's the type of woman, I guarantee you, if you had the misfortune of knowing her personally, I guarantee you that she would describe herself as having a big personality, which she would also give as an explanation for why nobody likes her.
She would say, I got such a big personality. And she says that because she's loud and obnoxious and uses the F word a lot.
But in truth, she has no personality at all. She has an anti-personality.
She speaks in internet lingo. She uses the word like every five words.
She has all the mannerisms and affectations, not to mention the value system and political beliefs of every other 20-something woman on TikTok. She professes the value of doing your own research, but I can guarantee has never done anything resembling research in her life.
If she told you, I'm going to go do some research and you were to watch what that entails, it would just be her on her phone scrolling through TikTok videos. That's what research is to her, I guarantee it.
That said, she's not wrong about her basic point, which is the relationship isn't going to work. It wasn't going to work because their values are not aligned to the extent that either one of them has values at all.
But it wasn't going to work also because she is a raging narcissist and a deeply unpleasant person who, barring some kind of miraculous personal transformation, will never have a functional and meaningful romantic or even platonic relationship with another human being in her life. You know, we joke about the fact that these kinds of women are always cat ladies.
And in fact, in a follow-up video, this woman confirmed that she does have at least one cat. No big surprise there.
That's because the cat lady thing really isn't a joke. There's a reason why liberal women really do almost always end up alone with their cats.
And that's because they prefer cats because cats require almost nothing of them. Change the litter box, pour some more food in the bowl.
That's the extent of the work and effort you have to put into your relationship with your cats. Feminists love cats because cats provide some measure of affection and fellowship without needing anything in return.
No need for sacrifice or compromise or personal improvement. No real obligations.
And successful human relationships require all of those things. A relationship with your cat does not.
Now, of course, the trade-off is that you'll never have anything approaching the depth of love and companionship that you could have with another person. You'll also never have a family or children.
You will die alone, and your cherished cat will eat your carcass without a second thought. That's where it all ends for you.
Now, there is one more video in this tour. The singer Chappell Rohn, or maybe it's Chappelle Rohn, I'm not really sure.
We'll just say Chappell. Chappell Rohn appeared on the Call Her Daddy podcast.
And as we know, Call Her Daddy is the number one podcast in the world for women, which is a troubling fact because the show, like its host, Alex Cooper, is insipid and gross

and morally and intellectually bankrupt.

It's mostly just 95 IQ women sitting around

talking about sex.

There's a reason why you have never seen

a viral clip from this show.

Maybe you've seen viral clips,

but you've never seen one where it goes viral

because someone is saying something interesting

or intellectually provocative.

So very different from one of the other big podcasts, of course, the Joe Rogan podcast, which is the number one podcast in the world for men, which has those kinds of moments all the time. I mean, you see Joe Rogan clips all the time that go viral for no other reason than someone is saying something really interesting, whether you agree with it or not.
Joe frequently talks to archaeologists, astronomers, biologists, all manner of interesting people about a wide range of academic, political, and cultural topics. Alex Cooper talks to women about sex, and that is it.
That's the whole thing. So in this viral clip, Chapp why she doesn't want to have kids.
You'll never guess her reason. Listen.
I, all of my friends who have kids are in hell. I don't know anyone.
I actually don't know anyone who's like happy and has children at this age. I have like, like a one year old, like three year old, four and under and under, five and under.
I literally have not met anyone who's happy, anyone who has light in their eyes, anyone who has slept. People with kids don't have light in their eyes, says the dead-eyed consumerist zombie.
The two dullest, least vibrant women you've ever seen in your life are concerned that people with kids don't have light in their eyes. Needless to say, Chappell is completely wrong about this.
It's not entirely her fault. I'm sure she probably does have some young mothers in her life who constantly complain about their kids.
This is one of the dangers of venting and why all of us, women especially, who are much more inclined to vent, but all of us should be doing a lot less of it. You know, using somebody else as a sounding board for all of your frustrations is selfish and enormously unpleasant, and frankly, pretty boring for the person forced to listen to your litany of complaints.
But even worse, if that person is not in the same stage of life as you, you will be giving them a skewed, unfairly bleak impression of that stage of life. That's why parents should only complain, if they're going to complain at all, to each other.
But mostly they should just stop complaining. And it's not that, when I say that parents shouldn't complain to people without kids, it's not because we're hiding some deep, dark secret from the childless.
It's not like we're going to keep it to ourselves that we're all miserable so we can trick them into having kids too. No, it's that a childless person has no context.
and they probably don't understand that, although you're annoyed that your, let's say,

toddler woke you up at 4 a.m., you're still filled with deep abiding joy that you have a child to wake you up at all. And if there's a secret in parenthood, it's this, that it is possible to hold frustration and joy in your heart at the same time.
That's very possible. But that's a depth that someone like Chapel Roan has never reached and cannot understand and likely will never reach nor understand.
The point is that getting married and having kids will increase the daily annoyances and inconveniences in your life by a very sizable margin. I'm not going to deny that.
But it also increases, not just increases, but reveals for the first time a kind of meaning and purpose that you never had before. And meaningful pursuits will always, always, always increase your annoyances and inconveniences, which is why

you will never do anything meaningful in your life at all if your primary goal in life is

to avoid inconvenience.

Embrace inconvenience or live a pointless, empty, miserable life.

Those are your two options.

There's no third option.

Those are the two doors you can walk through.

Now, of course, the random opinion of some pop star wouldn't matter at all if they were being expressed in a vacuum. But unfortunately, this is part of a much larger pattern and a much grander agenda.
All the videos we've talked about are part of or a result of that agenda. And in fact, they represent the great cultural battle that will define and determine our future.
And that is the effort to convince women to abandon marriage and family life, the feminist agenda, in other words, which of course isn't new. But now it lies at the core of nearly all of our political and cultural divisions.
As most people know at this point, pretty well-known fact, that the Democrat Party's core constituency by far is unmarried women. And even in the last election, a landslide loss for Kamala Harris, she still won unmarried women by a margin of 61% to 38%.
The continued existence of the Democrat Party and their entire political program rests on this demographic. Now, I'm not saying that Chapel Roan or Zoe from TikTok are paid agents of the Democrat Party sent to go out into the world and convince women to reject marriage and family life, although who knows, they might be.
What I am saying is that we're about to see a whole lot more of this kind of messaging. This is the future of the culture war.
And it's past. And we have to be ready to fight back against it.
Now let's get to our five headlines. History, economics, the great works of literature, the meaning of the U.S.
Constitution. Did you study these things in school? Probably not.
Or even if you did, maybe it's time for a refresher. Time and technology have changed a lot of things, but they have not changed basic fundamental truths about the world and our place in it.
That's why I'm so excited that Hillsdale College is offering more than 40 free online courses in the most important and enduring subjects. You can learn about the works of C.S.
Lewis, the stories in the book of Genesis, the meaning of the U.S. Constitution, the rise and fall of the Roman Republic, or the history of the ancient Christian church with Hillsdale College's online courses, all available for free.
That's right, for free. I personally recommend you sign up for Marxism, Socialism, and Communism.
This brand new online course is unlike anything Hillsdale has produced before.

Over the course of six documentary-style episodes,

you'll hear from Hillsdale professors of history, politics, and economics

as they look at Marxist life and writings,

the misery and brutality of the Soviet Union,

the atrocities of communist China,

and the proliferation of cultural Marxism in America.

Right now, you can go to hillsdale.edu slash walsh to start.

It's free, easy to get started.

That's hillsdale.edu slash walsh to start.

He'll be right back. So right now, you can go to hillsdale.edu slash Walsh to start.
It's free, easy to get started.

That's hillsdale.edu slash Walsh to start.

Hillsdale.edu slash Walsh.

So there were mass protests over the weekend. A grassroots protest movement organically rose up targeting Tesla.

And by grassroots and organic, I mean that, of course, very powerful and wealthy people

staged these protests and paid people to show up at them. That's my theory anyway, theory of a lot of people.
And I think that there's a lot to be said for it. But we'll get to that in a moment.
Here's the always reliable CNN with their reporting of it. Hundreds of Tesla takedown demonstrations are taking place in the United States, Canada, and Europe as activists ramp up their opposition to CEO Elon Musk's efforts to slash federal government's staffing and budgets.
More than 200 demonstrations are planned at Tesla locations on Saturday as part of the Tesla takedown movement, which called for a global day of action aiming for 500 protests worldwide. And so these are 200 protests, all because Elon is cutting spending with Doge.
And

of course, simultaneously, the media also insists that Doge isn't really doing anything,

that there are no real cuts being made, that it's all a big smokescreen.

So on the one hand, they're telling us that nothing is happening. And on the other hand, they're telling us that Elon is destroying the world and democracy by cutting government jobs.
And it's difficult to understand how both of those things could be true. I mean, if he is destroying the world and if he is destroying democracy, then that's something.
He's obviously getting something. He's actually getting a lot done in that case.
He's being quite effective if that's what he's doing. So it's hard for me to understand

how Doge is doing nothing, but also there should be these mass protests and we should go out and

try to kill all the Tesla drivers. But in any case, the protests were about as unimpressive

and geriatric as you would expect. There was some footage I was going to play of protesters

doing the electric slide. They got together at one of these Tesla dealerships and they did the electric, oh, in Seattle.
And they did the electric slide. And I'm told I can't play the footage because it's been licensed by whoever.
Whoever took the footage licensed it. And the last thing they would want is for anyone to play it and talk about the footage.
Because when you have footage, you don't want people to see it, obviously. So it makes sense that you would try to stop people from playing it anyway.
So they're doing the electric slide at one of these things. And in fact, there was another article, I think it was in, I don't have it in front of me, but I want to say it was Business Insider reporting on one of these protests from someone who went and lamenting the fact that there was one demographic that was greatly overrepresented in the crowd, and then another demographic that was tragically absent.
And the overrepresented demographic were old people.

So there's a lot of old people. And they weren't seeing a lot of young people in these Tesla protests, which should probably tell you something.
But there were some other interesting tidbits. Like there's this image that you can see.
It is a protester holding a printout of all the chants.

And this was a photo, I think, taken by Jason Rance, or he's the one who posted it originally.

So they've got a printout of all the chants that they're going to do at this protest.

Chants like, Elon Musk, go to Mars. We don't want your swastikars.
And then this is a good one. Public workers work for us.
Can't say that for Elon Musk. Doesn't really rhyme, but they're doing the best they can.
Then there's the old standard, hey, hey, ho, ho, President Musk has got to go. So you got to put that in there.
Pretty lackadaisical chance here. And more to the point, I've never been to a protest where, and I've been to plenty of protests and rallies and stuff in the past.
I've never been to one where they hand out sheets of paper with all the chants they're going to do. I mean, I was just at the March for Life a few weeks ago, and there are plenty of chanting going on as people are marching.
Nobody was handing out worksheets because the chants are organic. They just kind of start up.
Somebody starts one, and then everybody catches. It's a chant, so you don't need to read a script to do a chant.
You kind of pick it up pretty quickly. Everybody catches on, and they start doing the chant.
That's how things go at a real protest, at a real, actual, grassroots protest. But these protests are not like that, which is also why, as Colin Rugg reported, the protest at a Tesla in Texas ended very abruptly at exactly noon.
And I think we have here, they all are all, this is apparently exactly at noon, right at 12 o'clock on the dot. They're all just walking away from the protest location.
Here it is. Yeah, kiss my cow.
Go back to Mexico. I respect your point of view.
I respect your point of view. Yeah, stay across the border, Pedro.
I respect your point of view. Yeah, we don't respect your point of view.
So you can see them all walking away. And there are lots of other reports from other protests where all the protesters left at the exact same time, like right at the top of the hour, whether it was noon or two o'clock or whatever.
Kind of like workers just punching out, like it was the end of their shift. Because that's exactly what's happening here, obviously.
Well, there are two things happening here. You do have a herd mentality phenomenon, very familiar on the left.
You got a bunch of mindless drones all activated to attack an enemy, even if they don't really understand why the enemy is an enemy. Leftists are very, very susceptible to these kinds of mind viruses.
We know that. The 2020s in particular have been defined by this, just one mind virus after another.
And that's why we have all these videos of dysgenic, overweight, almost always overweight, weirdos attacking Teslas and Tesla drivers. Here's the latest, by the way.
This is a report out of Arizona. And recall what I've said now a couple of times, that where this is all heading is that some Tesla owner, Tesla driver is going to get killed.
That's going to happen. And it hasn't happened yet, but we're rapidly approaching that point.
So here's the latest out of Arizona. Take a look at this.
This is video from the victim's Tesla camera. It shows a green car pulling up to a Tesla on busy Route 66, then swerving in front to box the Tesla in.
The driver then walks over to the 61-year-old woman in the Tesla and reportedly starts hitting her while she's sitting behind the wheel. At one point, the woman says she bit the man's hand.
Moments later, the passenger of the green car appears to walk over and pull the attacker away. They finally get back in their car and drive off.
We spoke to the victim today who said she was terrified and can't understand why anyone would do this. I was just stunned and I wished that I would have had someone with me that would have protected me.
I'm just appalled. I didn't buy my car for a political statement.
I bought my car because it's really fun to drive. And my politics have nothing to do with that.
And I'm ashamed of our society and what they're doing. The victim, along with the other Tesla owner who received a threatening note and text, have both now signed up for a gun safety

course at a gun range north of Flagstaff. You know, I've been saying that eventually someone's going to get killed.
One of these mutants is going to get so worked up that they go out and kill someone for driving a Tesla. It's going to happen.
And we know that. I mean, the video where somebody gets dragged out of a Tesla and killed, that's coming.
It will happen because these people are zombies. They are lashing out violently, worked into this kind of mass hysteria.
And we've already seen, as I said many times, especially in the last five years in particular, what people are capable of when they get worked up into this kind of hysteria. And it's all the same kinds of people.
Like the people in 2021 calling the cops on their neighbors for having too many family members over for a visit, you know, or calling the cops because a dad took his daughter out to the playground. Calling the police, have the police drag them away.
Like the same people are the ones wrapped up in this anti-Tesla stuff. the same people who decided all of a sudden, right, that men can have babies and became very

sure of that. Basically, just on a dime, just came to this conclusion.
It's all the same people. But that's not the whole story because you also have, as always, very wealthy people and organizations and entities behind this stuff, pulling the strings, ponying up the cash, and in many cases, literally paying people to show up.
Like you don't get people to show up to 200 Tesla dealerships across the country without paying them to do it. This is what the left does.
any mass protest movement on the left, I think we all get this now, we take it for granted, but

it bears repeating that anytime there's a quote-unquote mass protest movement on the left, I think we all get this now, we take it for granted, but it bears repeating that anytime there's a quote unquote mass protest movement on the left, always, always, always, it's going to heavily involve paid protesters. And it's just not, it's usually not this obvious with actual scripts that they're reading and all the protesters punching out at lunchtime.
And the reason why that's especially relevant in this case is that if there are a bunch of paid protesters in the mix, and I'm certain that there are, then we need to find out who is funding them because these are protests targeting a private company with the very deliberate, very explicit goal of, among other things, tanking the company's stock price. And that means that there are probably, I don't know, dozens of federal laws that are likely being broken.
And you'd think with our side controlling the DOJ, we should be able to finally dig into this and start holding these people accountable. We should.
We should be able to do that. Emphasis on should.
So this is not, yes, the random lunatics who are attacking Teslas and Tesla drivers, go find them, charge them not just with vandalism, but with domestic terrorism. That's what this is.

This is politically motivated violence that is being done to instill terror and fear in who you perceive to be your political opponents. Even though, of course, a lot of the people driving Teslas aren't necessarily conservative.
But that's what it is. Politically motivated violence designed to instill fear in your perceived political enemies.
That is terrorism to it. It is what terrorism is by definition.
So yes, we need to find those individuals and hold them accountable. But even more important, let's actually investigate and find out who are the entities that are funding this stuff.
And we've known about this for years, right? When there's a BLM protest and people are dropping off pallets of bricks to be thrown. Like, where are those pallets coming from? Who is funding this? Who's providing it? We never get any answers.
And now there's no excuse to not get any answers. So I hope we do.
All right, here's another for the polls are fake folder. Gallup reports this.
Three years into the Russia-Ukraine war, 46% of Americans believe the U.S. is not doing enough to help Ukraine in the conflict, marking a 16 percentage point increase since December to a new high in the trend that dates back to 2022.
At the same time, the proportions thinking the U.S. is doing too much, it was just 30% or the right amount, 23% for Ukraine, have shrunk.
Until now, the highest percentage of Americans who believe the U.S. was not doing enough to help Ukraine was 38%.
And so now that's gone up. Okay, so we supposedly 46% of Americans want us to give even more money to Ukraine.
Another 23% want us to keep giving the same amount. So that is 69, it's almost 70%.
Let's call it 70% of Americans who want us to continue giving the same or an even greater amount to Ukraine. And it's just impossible.
It's almost impossible to get 70% agreement on any topic these days, as we know. And we're supposed to believe that we have a 70% agreement on funding Ukraine.
And it gets better. Reading more, the article continues, the latest poll also finds a five-point increase in the percentage of Americans who think the U.S.
should continue to support Ukraine in reclaiming its territory, even if that requires prolonged involvement, this is 53% who say this, rather than ending the conflict as quickly as possible, even if that means ceding territory to Russia.

Okay, so 53% want America to remain involved to make sure that Ukraine reclaims its lost

territory.

And only 45% would rather just have the thing end,

even if it means that Ukraine loses some territory. A majority of Americans feel it's important to help Ukraine reclaim territory.
That's how strongly a majority of Americans feel about making sure that Ukraine gets its territory back, that they would rather continue a war and continue our own involvement in it. and you know

I don't buy these results at all

doesn't pass the smell test for me. Now, this is anecdotal, but all this stuff is really anecdotal.
All these polls are basically just compiled anecdotes. I have hardly ever met in my life, in the real world, one of these big Ukraine fans.
I know they're out there. I know they exist in a certain number.
I've hardly ever met them. I don't think they exist in such large numbers.
But let's just put that aside for a moment. Let's just pretend that the numbers are true.
Take the numbers at face value, just for the sake of argument. So going back to specifically this point, a five-point increase in the percentage of Americans who think the U.S.
should continue to support Ukraine in reclaiming its territory, even if that requires prolonged involvement. That's the majority of Americans, supposedly.
They would prefer that Ukraine claim back more land than see the conflict end with Ukraine losing land. I'd like for any of the people in that crowd, however numerous that crowd might be or may not be, to just explain something.
How do the boundary lines between Russia and Ukraine impact your life in any way? Let's say that Ukraine lost all that territory and didn't get any of it back. How would you ever even know it? I mean, of course, the media will tell you.
If the media didn't report it, what would ever happen in your life? what scenario would ever arise where you would go, damn, this is because Ukraine didn't get their territory back? When would that happen? Walk me through some plausible issue that you might face in your life that you could tie back, even indirectly, to the loss of territory in Ukraine. Something that would happen where you say, well, you know, this is because Ukraine's boundaries are here when they should be over here.
Now, I know you might say that, well, sure, it doesn't impact us, obviously. But just because it doesn't impact us, that doesn't mean that we shouldn't care.
What's right is right. And Russia came in and they took all this land and that's wrong.
And

so we should be opposed to it just because it's wrong. People are dying.

Okay, fine. Well, but then let me ask you this.
And I think I brought this point up before, but

just because it's a helpful example.

So there is still right now, as far as I know, a civil war in Sudan that's happening right now. It's been going on for years.
Tens of thousands of people have died, very bloody, very intense, multiple factions fighting over land in Sudan. Whose side are you on in that one? Now, if you're very clued into geopolitics, which almost very few people are, but there's maybe a small minority of the audience that could actually answer this.
I think almost everyone else, especially the people in that supposed 53%. If I were to ask them, what's your take on that dispute? How much American money and manpower do you want dedicated to fighting for the good guys in that war in Sudan? I think for the vast majority, it would be, well, there's no answer because you don't know the first thing about the Sudanese civil war.
You have no clue whose side you're on. And you don't care.
You actually don't care in the slightest about the civil war in Sudan. You really don't care.
It doesn't matter to you. The result of that war really does not concern you.
You don't care at all. You haven't thought about it one time.
And after I stop talking about it right now, you'll go back to not ever thinking about it ever again. Well, why is that? I mean, that's a war that's happening.
Lots of people are dying. There are aggressors and bad guys in that dispute too.
You'd have to look into it to decide who you think is who in that dispute. But they're there.
All the ingredients are there. So why do you care so much about this one violent dispute in the world, but not the other? And I think the answer is very simple, that the media told you to care about one and not the other.
It really is as simple as that. So I'm often called cruel and uncaring because I admittedly don't really care about the war in Ukraine.
That's been my take all along. I don't really care.
If Ukraine ceases to exist, if it continues existing, if it gets its land back, if it doesn't, I really don't care. I just don't care.
And I want the war to be over because I don't want the United States to get dragged into it. But if the war ends with Ukraine getting all of its land back or getting none of it back, I don't care.
If the war ends with Ukraine as a strong and independent nation and democracy, that's fine. If it ends with it getting conquered and subjugated, that's also fine to me.
It's not my concern. It just isn't.
It's not my country. And when you say that about Ukraine, you're called cruel and callous.
But my point is that I have the same attitude towards the war in Ukraine that you have towards a hundred other violent disputes and wars currently raging on the planet today. You don't care about almost all of them.
You don't think about almost any of them. You're already in my boat with almost every violent dispute currently happening on the globe.
You don't care about them. You just don't.
You look at most global conflict the way that I look at Ukraine. It's just that I'm consistent.
I apply that mentality to Ukraine also. You make an exception, and you make an exception because the media told you to.

It's just that.

It's just because the media said this one you should care about.

And if they flip to Sudan tomorrow, then you would suddenly care about that.

So at least be honest about it.

At least be honest.

That's my only request. All right, the White House Correspondents Dinner is coming up sometime.
I don't know when, but I guess it's coming up soon. And the media is running with a headline claiming that, I mean, Drudge had this headline for anyone who still reads Drudge, but that the White House has canceled the headlining comedian of this event because she made jokes about Trump.
Or the White House Correspondents Association has canceled her technically. So this is cancel culture on the right.
That's supposed to be the headline. Here's people with their headline.
White House Correspondents Dinner Cancels Amber Ruffin's Appearance After Comedian Jokes About Trump Administration. The article says, Amber Ruffin is no longer hosting this year's White House Correspondents Dinner, an announcement that comes shortly after the comedian publicly joked about President Donald Trump's policies.
And anyway, so that's what happened. So they canceled this comedian for jokes.
That's the claim. So they're a bunch of hypocrites.
It's cancel culture, conservative cancel culture. Well, what were these jokes exactly? What did she say that led to her being disinvited from the White House Correspondents' Dinner? Well, here is Amber Ruffin on some kind of podcast telling these hilarious jokes.
Listen. Well, maybe you could do that for the White House correspondence.
Just change it up this year. Oh my goodness.
Oh God. Okay.
So will anyone from the administration be attending? How much do you actually know about who will be in attendance? Do you get like the rundown? I'm sure that I will at some point. I know the news organizations that will be attending.
I don't think the people confirm until quite a bit later. I don't necessarily, like I'm not 100% interested in being like, ha, you're here.
Look at your stupid head. You're burned.
I care. Like you're kind of a bunch of murderers.
I mean like they were like you need to be you know equal and make sure that the that you give it to both sides and blah blah blah i was like there's no way i'm gonna be freaking doing that dude but if they want that false equivalency that the media does they want that it feels great it them feel like human beings, but they shouldn't get to feel that way because they're not. So those are the jokes, the quote unquote jokes.
You said the Trump administration are murderers, citation needed on that one, and that they aren't human beings. So should she have been canceled from the event for that? Yeah, obviously.
Clearly. These are not jokes.
This is just not a joke. That's really what you think.
And this, in fact, she even says it's the opposite of telling jokes. She's actually saying that she doesn't really want to tell jokes because they're so terrible.
She doesn't want to joke about them. So this is just blind, stupid rage.
And it's why whatever set she planned to give at the dinner Was guaranteed to be extremely lame and unfunny We know that for sure We know that first of all because she's a female comedian And second, because she's full of anger and resentment And that is just not a good starting place for comedy It's why none of these hacks have figured out how to make fun of Trump in a funny way Ten years in None of these liberal comedians have figured out how to make fun of Trump in a funny way. Ten years in,

none of these liberal comedians have figured out how to make fun of them because they're too angry. They're too hateful.
You can't tell funny jokes about somebody that

you truly just hate because humor requires a certain amount of understanding to make fun of

somebody in a funny way, which requires that you have at least some amount of empathy for them.

It's why political comedy these days is so often unfunny in both directions, by the way. Because you have to kind of understand where somebody is coming from in order to tell funny jokes about them.
You have to be able to inhabit their minds to look at the world from their vantage point so that you can then satirize it and make a parody of it. But most political humor is driven by pure resentment, which isn't funny.
It's not intentionally funny anyway, but it's not funny to listen to someone be resentful. Maybe you laugh at them for being pathetic, but there's no wit in that.
The real question is why this woman was ever invited to begin with. And I had never heard of her before, so I went to YouTube to find her stand-up.
And I actually had trouble finding actual stand-up comedy from this person, who's supposedly a comedian, which should tell you something. What I found were a bunch of segments on various late night shows and that sort of thing.
I had trouble finding a real stand-up set, which tells me this is not a real comedian. This is someone whose career was astroturfed because she's a liberal black female comedian.
And so for that reason, she just gets all these, she gets the platforms, even though she's not funny.

The closest thing I could find to a stand-up set was, just to give you an example,

this was a clip from something called The Amber Ruffin Show on a peacock.

And I don't know if that show still exists.

I never heard of it.

Nobody had ever heard of it.

Nobody knows who this person is. And yet, she had her own show.

No one has ever heard of this person.

She had her own show on NBC's streaming service, which tells you, again, the astroturf nature of these kinds of supposed comedians and entertainers. But here's the first clip that popped up on YouTube of her telling her hilarious jokes.
Let's try to bear as much of this as we can. Last Friday, Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick vowed to end tenure for public university professors who teach critical race theory in their classrooms.
He tweeted, we banned it in publicly funded K through 12 and we will ban it in publicly funded higher ed. That is just one of the most recent examples of white Americans refusal to educate students about the advantages of being white in this country.
Well, if they won't let schools teach that lesson, then I guess I'll have to teach it right here, right now in a little segment called The ABCs of White Privilege. There's a lot to learn, so let's get started.
A is for assimilation.

Assimilation is when people of color have to adjust natural things about themselves to make white people comfortable. It doesn't get any better than that.
That's basically it. So she's like Samantha Bee, but somehow less funny.
And I didn't think that was possible. Samantha Bee is, I thought in comedy, in comedy terms, she's, well, applying it to comedy.
In scientific terms, she's absolute zero of comedy, Samantha Bee is. So how can you be less funny than an alleged comedian who had like a 20-year career in comedy, Samantha Bee did, and yet never once told a funny joke.
Not one time. Nobody in the world can tell you their favorite Samantha Bee joke.
I guarantee that. You've never in your life met a single human anywhere on the planet who said, oh man, you know, this reminds me of that great Samantha Bee bit.
It's never happened. Never said anything funny, ever.
But again, her career, of course, was astroturf because she was a liberal woman and the powers that be wanted her to be funny, so they gave her a career. And now Amber Ruffin has come along and figured out a way to be less funny than her, which I didn't think was possible.
Because the thing with liberal female comedians is that they don't even understand what a joke is, which is why I find it fascinating to watch them in a certain way. In a weird way, it's entertaining.
It's entertaining in the way that it would be entertaining if a space alien from another galaxy were to land here and then for some reason immediately try to do a set at the local comedy club that same night. It would be a fascinating thing to watch because this is someone who doesn't understand the concept of a joke.
And I know you might say, well, there's no reason to specify liberal or, you know, if you're talking about female comedians, most of them aren't funny. You don't need to specify liberal in front of that.
Or if you're talking about liberal comedians, most of them aren't funny, so you don't need to specify female, which is true. But when you combine the two, liberal and female, there's just no chance.
You now have a person who cannot possibly be funny. They don't even understand the basic construction of a joke.
and yet this person was invited to the White House to be the comedian at the White House Correspondents' Dinner. Lots of reasons to cancel her, but they finally did anyway.
Let's be honest. I have a long list of things I'd rather do than maintain my gutters.
Cleaning gutters ranks somewhere between sitting through a DMV line and filing taxes. But there's an easier way.
Leaf Filter, so you never have to clean out your gutters again. Right now, get a free inspection, free estimate, and save up to 30% off your entire purchase at leaffilter.com slash walsh.
You know those cheap plastic gutter guards they sell at hardware stores? Spoiler alert, they're about as effective as using a paper towel as an umbrella. As with most things in life, you get what you pay for.
And I'd rather pay once for something that actually works than repeatedly for something that doesn't work at all. An investment in leaf filter is an investment engineer to protect your whole home.
Because nothing says I've made poor life choices quite like watching water cascade down your interior walls from clogged gutters. Every leaf filter installation comes with a lifetime no-claw guarantee.
Their patented technology keeps out everything but water. No holes, gaps, or large openings for debris to get through.
Plus, a LeafFilter Trusted Pro will clean out, realign, and seal your gutters before installing the system. Protect your home and never clean out gutters again with LeafFilter, America's number one gutter protection system.
Schedule your free inspection and take advantage of the Spring Spectacular sale with up to 30% off your entire purchase at leaffilter.com slash Walsh. That's a free estimate, free inspection, and 30% off at leaffilter.com slash Walsh.
See representative for warranty details. America's on the comeback, but the fight for truth is far from over.
While the left tries desperately keep its grip On media, education, and the courts Daily Wire is leading the charge for free speech Fearless journalism And the values that made our country great Now is the time to join us Stream my show ad-free Access premium entertainment Join a community of thinkers, not followers Watch anytime, anywhere On desktop, mobile, and TV With the Daily Wire Plus app. Don't just watch the culture war happen around you.
Be part of the movement. Subscribe now at dailywire.com slash subscribe.
Now let's get to our daily cancellation. You know, it's not every day that I find myself sympathizing with the organization that calls itself GLAAD, which is short for the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation.
These are people who, contrary to their branding, smear and defame other people for a living, including myself. They're as radical and unpleasant as any other fake nonprofit that traffics in gender ideology.
The day GLAAD is finally shut down will be a major victory for sanity and free speech and everything else in this country.

But today, I have to admit that I do have some semblance of pity for these people. And that's because I saw some clips from something called the GLAAD Media Awards, which is an annual ceremony in which they give awards to entertainers who advance the LGBT agenda in some way.
And as I saw the footage From the other day

It occurred to me that

This is probably one of the hardest award shows to pull off

Simply because the LGBT agenda in some way. And as I saw the footage from the other day, it occurred to me that this is probably one of the hardest award shows to pull off simply because it's redundant in every imaginable way.
The Oscars and Grammys have already taken place. And that means that gay men and liberal women have already convened this year multiple times to shower each other with awards based on their respective sexual identities and orientations.
Billie Eilish and that trans actor who plays the singing drug dealer have already had their time in the spotlight. And after both of those award shows, GLAAD is left to basically do the same thing.
So they are once again hosting a gay award show, except of course they have a much lower budget at the GLAAD Media Awards. And in practice, that means we get mildly entertaining moments like this one, where in a moment of inspiration, the lesbian rapper

known as Dochi, I think, decided to perform a couple of lines from one of her songs without

the benefit of a backing track of any kind. And in the process, she proved that she, of course,

can't actually sing. Watch.
The GLAAD Media Award goes to... Goes to, goes to...
You say it. No, let's say it together.
Let's say it together. Okay.
Dochi! Thank you. What? Put the money in my hands.
I mean, Gucci and I'm son of a bitch. What's up, GLIDE Awards? Now, in case you couldn't make it out, the lyrics were, put the mother effing money in my mother effing hands.
I'm in Gucci in a bonnet spending mother effing bands. Now, when she performed her song at the Grammys a few months ago, Dochi had the benefit of elaborate stage lighting, about a thousand backup dancers, a bunch of synthetic audio enhancements.
But at the GLAAD Awards, she's just a semi-literate woman screaming profanities at you, which of course she was the entire time. At the same time, there was one alleged entertainer at the GLAAD Awards who, against all odds, managed to make Dochi look like Shakespeare.
I'm talking about the actress Cynthia Erivo, who starred in the film Wicked, which is some kind of take off of The Wizard of Oz. And during the GLAAD Awards ceremony, Cynthia managed to deliver a speech that was vacuous and incoherent, even by award show standards.
Just absolute pablum from start to finish. But you wouldn't know that if you got your news from the mainstream press.
For reasons that aren't entirely clear, various media outlets have lavished the speech with over-the-top praise. CNN, for example, said that Cynthia's speech was inspiring.
They also posted the full transcript of the speech on their website, like it was the State of the Union address or something. Meanwhile, USA Today called the speech a tearjerker.
Yahoo called it powerful and so on and so on and so on. And you know what that means,

of course. We have to go through Cynthia's speech piece by piece and make fun of it.
It's just,

it's my duty. It's why this segment exists.
Yes, so we're going to extract some entertainment value

against all odds from the GLAAD Awards if we can. And to that end, behold the beginning of

Cynthia's remarks. If you're a mainstream media journalist, steal yourself because the tears are about to start flowing.
Listen. Here in this room, we have all been the recipients of the gift that is the opportunity to be more.
I doubt that it has come easy to any of us, but more. For some, the road has not been one paved with yellow bricks, but instead paved with bumps and potholes.
This is worth reading out loud one more time. And as I read this, keep in mind that somebody was paid to write it.
And then Cynthia read it. And then the entire corporate media celebrated it.
She says, quote, here in this room, we have all been the recipients of the gift that is the opportunity to be more. I doubt that it has come easy to any of us, but more for some, the road has not been one paved with yellow bricks, but instead paved with bumps and potholes.
Now, the more I read this particular passage, the more it becomes clear that there's really only one explanation for its existence. Cynthia must have hired Kamala Harris's speechwriter.
If Kamala Harris were the president today, there's no doubt whatsoever that we'd be hearing about how everyone in the room is the recipient of the gift that is the opportunity to be more. So it's a perfect Kamala-ism right there.
Then we'd be hearing about how the roads are paved with potholes, as if that's a normal part of the process of road construction. You see, when you're mixing metaphors and your IQ is below 80, you find yourself making mistakes like this.
You start sputtering out lines that, of course, make no sense whatsoever. But I interrupted Cynthia, so let's continue with her inspiring and monumental and, as the media says, powerful speech.
This is where things start getting heavy, and she begins talking about invisible people who lurk among us. Sounds, you know, kind of frightening, but here it is.
Watch. Whichever road you have traveled, how beautiful it is that you've had a road to travel on at all.
There are the invisible ones who have had no road at all. For those who have not even yet to begin to find the road, be encouraged and be patient with yourself.
It will show itself. For the person who is searching and searching and has not found it yet, this room is full of people who can and will, if they choose, and I hope they will, because I do, to be lanterns to light up your journey and your path on the way to showing the world who you are.
So let's chart this the best we can. She says, whichever road you've traveled, how beautiful it is that you've had a road to travel on at all.
There are the invisible ones who have no road at all. In other words, there are invisible ones who do not have any road to travel.
That means they have no path, period. They can't see the road because it's not there.
And additionally, no one can see these invisible ones because they're invisible. So there's no road.

They're invisible.

It's a tough situation to be in.

Circumstances are pretty dire in the metaphor that Kamala Harris, a speechwriter, has established.

But then we get this line, quote,

For those who have not yet even begun to find the road, be encouraged and be patient with yourself.

It will show itself.

Which adds a couple of layers of complexity to the situation.

Now we're told that if the invisible people are patient, then the road will show itself. And this is the same road that a second ago supposedly didn't exist at all, according to Cynthia.
But now she's implying the road will spontaneously appear for these invisible people as long as they stop being impatient. That's her message to all the invisible people who don't see the road.
She's really saying that they're the problem because they don't understand the concept of patience, I guess. But there's no point in dwelling on how Cynthia is insulting the millions of invisible people watching the GLAAD Awards.
Because just a few seconds later, she goes on to contradict herself once again. Quote, the room is full of people who can and will, if they choose, and I hope they will, because I do, be the lanterns to light up your journey and your path on your way to showing the world who you are.
And she adds that the invisible people are hoping for someone to come along and light their path. So now we're back to the idea that actually the road won't spontaneously reveal itself after all.
And that's why apparently the invisible people would benefit from various entertainers of the GLAAD Awards using their lanterns to light up the path for the invisible people. And evidently this is a path that exists, even though a moment ago we were told that those people have no road at all, whether it's paved with potholes or not.
Very crystal clear, inspiring message here. If you're an invisible person who exists in pitch black darkness, the message from the speech is that you're extremely impatient and your life depends on a gay actor lighting a lantern for you.
So good luck, I suppose. In case it's not obvious, the only person who's capable of reading a speech like this out loud without any hesitation whatsoever is a narcissist who's incapable of experiencing shame or embarrassment.
It's not just poorly written. It's also extraordinarily self-assured when it has absolutely no reason to be.
Cynthia, like everyone else in that room, has a pathological sense of superiority that is very much unearned. And at one point in the speech, she essentially admitted as much.
Like all narcissists, she can't help herself. So watch as multimillionaire Cynthia wallows in self-pity about how difficult her life is before she announces that she is superior to you in every way.
Watch. It isn't easy.
None of it is.

Waking up and choosing to be yourself.

Proclaiming a space belongs to you when you don't feel welcomed.

Teaching people on a daily basis how to address you and dealing with the frustration of reteaching people

a word that has been in the human vocabulary since the dawn of time.

They.

Them. vocabulary since the dawn of time.
They, them. Words used to describe pedantically two or more people.
Poetically, a person who is simply more. This is the one moment in the GLAAD Awards that was actually revealing and somewhat interesting.
Not how it was intended, of course, but it's kind of an incredible clip there. She says that they them is pedantically used to describe two or more people.
But then she says that they them pronouns are poetically used to describe someone who is, quote, simply more. And this is what I've been saying about the non-binary phenomenon since I first heard about it.
These are not people who are confused about their identities. This is not gender dysphoria.
And this certainly isn't about someone struggling for equality or whatever. These are raging narcissists who believe that their inner experience is so much richer and more complex than the average person.
You heard her say it. They believe that they are more than the rest of us, you know, us normal people with our boring singular pronouns, simply by declaring that their pronouns are they, them.
They have achieved transcendence. And as a result, she's now forced to educate all the morons out there who can't comprehend this, even though, you know, they, them has apparently been used, according to Cynthia, since the dawn of time.
Yes, from the moment we had the concept of time, we had the English language and they, them pronouns. This is how these people think.
They cannot comprehend that the world existed for even a moment without their delusional worldview. That's why this entire awards ceremony ultimately devolved into this unabashed display of narcissism

in which a bunch of RuPaul's drag queens told everyone in attendance to hug themselves

and recite a pledge about how amazing they are.

This literally happened. Watch.

So I want to invite every single one of you, will you hold this? To wave your hands in the air like this. Wave them up in the air.
Charge it up. This isn't TV.
I can see you. Put your hands up.
Put your hands up. Thank you.
Now wrap them around yourselves and repeat after me. I truly love and accept myself.
One, two, three. I truly love and accept myself.
That was a little depressing. Let's say it like we're at the GLAAD Awards, y'all.
One, two, three. I truly love and accept myself.
No matter what anybody has to say to you or about you, always remember to truly love and accept who you are, when you are, where you are, how you are. You are perfect today.
So there we go. The acceptance speech ended with everyone at the GLAAD Awards hugging themselves and pronouncing that they love themselves as loudly as they could.
If Cynthia's metaphors were mixed and incoherent, this one is pretty on the nose. You listen to the gender activists talk long enough, and sooner or later, it'll become obvious that they're not actually interested in acceptance or tolerance.
They're not even really committed to their fake genders exactly. They're only committed to themselves.
Gender ideology is, as I've always said, the ultimate expression of narcissism. And while Cynthia Erivo made very little sense throughout her incomprehensible rant, credit where it's due.
She expressed that particular fact very, very clearly. And that is

why Cynthia Erivo and the rest of the narcissists at the GLAAD Media Awards are today canceled.

That'll do it for the show today. Thanks for watching.
Thanks for listening. Talk to you

tomorrow. Have a great day.
Godspeed.