Trump Rushes to Stop Past from Surfacing after Law Signed

Speaker 1 Men need a store that has the right thing for their thing, like a Kenneth Cole suit made with ChoFlex fabric to keep them cool at their cousin-in-law's third wedding in the middle of July.

Speaker 1 Whatever the thing, men's warehouse has the clothes for it. Love the way you look, men's warehouse.

Speaker 2 The holidays mean more travel, more shopping, more time online, and more personal info in more places that could expose you more to identity theft.

Speaker 2 But LifeLock monitors millions of data points per second. If your identity is stolen, our U.S.-based restoration specialists will fix it guaranteed or your money back.

Speaker 2 Don't face drained accounts, fraudulent loans, or financial losses alone. Get more holiday fun and less holiday worry with Life Lock.
Save up to 40% your first year. Visit lifelock.com/slash podcast.

Speaker 2 Terms apply.

Speaker 3 With stays under $250 a night, Verbo makes it easy to celebrate sweater weather. Book a cabin with leaf views or a home with a fire pit for nights with friends.

Speaker 3 With stays under $250 a night, find a home for your exact needs. Book now at Verbo.com.

Speaker 4 Saks Fifth Avenue makes it easy to holiday your way. Whether it's finding the right gift or the right outfit, Saks is where you can find everything.

Speaker 4 From the perfect Chloe bag for your hard-to-shop for sister to a Prada jacket for a fancy holiday dinner.

Speaker 4 And if you don't know where to start, Saks.com is customized to your personal style so you can save time shopping.

Speaker 4 Make shopping fun and easy this season and find gifts and inspiration to suit your holiday style. At Saks Fifth Avenue.

Speaker 1 We are now seeing what Donald Trump's plan is to cover up the Epstein files, to cover up his dark past, notwithstanding the law that requires the Epstein files to be released in 30 days.

Speaker 1 So we're seeing two things develop right now, and I'm sure we'll see more.

Speaker 1 But I want to cue you in on what Trump and his DOJ are doing to try to avoid producing these Epstein files and avoid information coming out.

Speaker 1 So the first thing, Trump is coordinating with Ghelane Maxwell and Elaine Maxwell's lawyer so that Ghylaine will invoke her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and no longer testify before Congress.

Speaker 1 She previously delayed her deposition that was supposed to take place in August, saying she was appealing to the Supreme Court. She lost that appeal.

Speaker 1 Now she's still going to say she wants to invoke her Fifth Amendment right because she's going to assert what's called a habeas corpus petition that she found new information that she needs to assert to get a new trial.

Speaker 1 The new information she's going to assert is that Donald Trump and others in the regime said this is all one big hoax, which she's now going to use to try to invoke the fifth and reopen her case.

Speaker 1 So that's one thing that's happening.

Speaker 1 And also the MAGA Republicans in the House of Representatives are complicit in that because they're saying, why would we even take Elaine Maxwell's deposition to the minimum security facility in Texas if she's going to invoke her Fifth Amendment right?

Speaker 1 It'd be a waste of taxpayer dollars to even talk. talk to her and get her on video while she invokes the fifth.

Speaker 1 Nope, we need to get her on video and see her invoke the fifth if that's what she's going to do, because she spoke to Donald Trump's former personal lawyer, turn number two at the DOJ, the Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, and she lied through her teeth every step of the way.

Speaker 1 What else would we expect with a convicted child sex trafficker and lifelong liar in Ghelane Maxwell and Donald Trump's former best bud who's angling for a pardon? So that's number one.

Speaker 1 I've talked about that before, but here's what else is taking shape right now.

Speaker 1 So on Friday, and this didn't really get picked up anywhere in any meaningful way, or no one really made the right connections.

Speaker 1 The Department of Justice filed a renewed expedited motion to unseal grand jury transcripts relating to Geelane, Maxwell, and Epstein.

Speaker 1 So they filed first in the federal court in the Southern District of Florida. They will soon be filing most likely in the federal courts in New York.

Speaker 1 Previously, when the DOJ sought the grand jury transcripts relating to Epstein and Gheelane, all three courts, because there were grand jury proceedings in Florida and two in New York, all three judges denied turning over the grand jury transcripts because it's against the law under federal rule six, which is the rule regarding grand jury secrecy, to turn over this testimony.

Speaker 1 And all of the judges in their orders, which I'll go over for you in a moment, they all said, we're not sure why you as the DOJ are asking us for the grand jury transcripts.

Speaker 1 Number one, federal courts are not allowed to turn that over. You should know that, DOJ.

Speaker 1 But number two, these grand jury transcripts just related to a single FBI agent who testified for a very short period of time, who did not have any real meaningful involvement in the case.

Speaker 1 And this was mostly things that were already public knowledge based on what happened in the trial. This isn't the files.

Speaker 1 And what the federal judges said is that you have the terabytes and terabytes of information. Turn over.
those files.

Speaker 1 Why are you asking the federal judge to turn over grand jury transcripts which involve grand jury secrecy issues, when it's not even new material? So why would we turn this over anyway?

Speaker 1 You have all of the information. So the federal courts all rejected this idea of turning over the grand jury transcripts because it's against grand jury secrecy.

Speaker 1 So now what the DOJ is doing, and this is part of their delay tactics, they now went back to the federal courts and they said, look, we've got this law. It's called the Epstein Transparency Act.

Speaker 1 Trump signed it into law. Now, can you please turn over the grand jury transcripts?

Speaker 1 The Epstein Transparency Act has nothing to do with the grand jury transcripts, but what the DOJ is going to want to do, it's the sleight of hand.

Speaker 1 They're hoping that you don't know the way the law works. So they're going to say, well, look, we asked the federal judges to release the grand jury transcripts yet again, and we were denied.

Speaker 1 So we're fighting for our ability to get it released. And the courts aren't releasing it.
And of course, we know these aren't the Epstein files, right?

Speaker 1 I mean, they want us to believe that the court has the Epstein file.

Speaker 1 The grand jury transcript is going to be like, what, 50 pages, 60 pages of an FBI agent testifying to hearsay that just involves the charges against Gee Lane and Jeffrey Epstein that everybody knows publicly because they were charged publicly.

Speaker 1 So I think it's important to point out that that's one of the plans that the DOJ has.

Speaker 1 And then I think when the federal judges deny it and say they don't have the legal power to turn it over, then the DOJ is going to maybe try to appeal that, maybe go to the Supreme Court.

Speaker 1 Hopefully this causes in their view, not hopefully for us, but what the DOJ is planning, maybe they can stretch this out for a few months, a year, and then delay, delay, delay.

Speaker 1 And ultimately, if they're denied, they're going to say, see, that becomes precedent for why we can't turn over the Epstein files because the federal judges said they can't turn over the grand jury transcripts.

Speaker 1 So if we have to interpret the law, the Epstein Transparency Act, the federal courts are telling us that they can't turn over the transcripts, so we can't turn over the files.

Speaker 1 That makes zero sense, though, and they're relying on people not knowing the way the law works because they're going to try to throw these judges under the bus. You see what I'm saying?

Speaker 1 So what we have to realize is, no, the grand jury transcripts are not the files. They're not even a fraction of a fraction of a fraction.

Speaker 1 It's just some FBI agent who testified against Ghylaine and Jeffrey Epstein, but had no no clue and did not testify about all the other men, the financial transactions.

Speaker 1 That had nothing to do with the grand jury, which is going to be, what, an hour or so in lane.

Speaker 1 So let me just go through these filings so you actually can hear what's going on, because I want to cue you into the plan so we get ahead of what the Trump fascist DOJ regime is doing right here.

Speaker 1 Okay, take a look right here.

Speaker 1 This is what was just filed. You see, it was filed November 21, 2025.

Speaker 1 United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, United States expedited motion to unseal grand jury transcripts and modify protective order. It's like, why are you doing that?

Speaker 1 The DOJ, you have the terabytes of Epstein files.

Speaker 1 And y'all realize when I say terabytes, that means the DOJ has enough files that if you were to print them all out, right, they're electronically stored, they could fill up massive skyscrapers, like many massive skyscrapers.

Speaker 1 And they have audio, and they have video, and they have surveillance footage, and they have wiretaps in addition to the emails, right?

Speaker 1 Think about the Epstein email estate, the Epstein estate email dump that was done like last week or two weeks ago, right? 23,000 emails.

Speaker 1 23,000 emails compared to terabytes would be like a very, very small amount. Like it's not even close.

Speaker 1 So we want the information and the DOJ is trying to say, no, no, no, we want the grand jury transcripts. We don't care about the grand juries.
Why we don't want those?

Speaker 1 Give us the Epstein files in your custody and control. So here's what the DOJ says.

Speaker 1 At the direction of the Attorney General, the Department of Justice files this expedited motion asking the court to unseal the grand jury transcripts and to modify any protective order associated with the grand jury investigation referenced above.

Speaker 1 The Department of Justice previously petitioned the court to unseal the grand jury transcripts associated with the above-referenced grand jury investigations because of extensive public interest regarding the basis for conclusions and a July 6, 2025 memorandum.

Speaker 1 The court denied the petition, concluding that neither federal rule of criminal procedure 6E nor precedent authorized unsealing the grand jury materials.

Speaker 1 After the court entered its order, Congress nearly unanimously passed and the president signed into law the Epstein Files Transparency Act on November 19, 2025.

Speaker 1 Subject to certain enumerated exceptions, the act requires the Attorney General, no later than 30 days after enactment, to make publicly available all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials in the possession of the Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Office that relates to nine topics such as Jeffrey Epstein and Ghylaine Maxwell.

Speaker 1 Okay, so what does that have to do with the court's grand jury transcripts? You need to produce Pambondi, what's in your custody and control.

Speaker 1 But do you see how they're trying to now shift the burden to the court and basically say, this is the court's fault?

Speaker 1 Then they go on and say, in light of the Act's clear mandate, the court should authorize the Department of Justice to release the grand jury transcripts and lift any pre-existing protective orders that would otherwise prevent disclosure.

Speaker 1 To the extent permitted by the Act, the Department of Justice will work with the relevant United States Attorney's Office to make appropriate redactions of victim-related and other personal identifying information.

Speaker 1 Because of the Act's 30-day deadline, the Department of Justice requested expedited ruling on this motion. And the court's likely going to look at them and say, what are you talking about?

Speaker 1 This is not what the act says. The act says, turn over the files in your custody and control.
Why are you going to the court? If you have the files, turn the files over.

Speaker 1 Let me just show you and explain to you what the courts have said before. Because as I've said, previously, three federal courts rejected.

Speaker 1 previously over the summer when the Trump regime tried to do this. So let's take a look right now at what Judge Richard Berman.

Speaker 1 He's a federal judge in New York who was presented with the same issue by the DOJ. And here's what he said.
He says, the government is seeking this disclosure.

Speaker 1 It's unusual for the government to seek to unseal grand jury material.

Speaker 1 A significant and compelling reason to reject the government's position in this litigation is that the government has already undertaken a comprehensive investigation into the Epstein case and not surprisingly, has assembled a trove of Epstein documents, interviews, and exhibits.

Speaker 1 And the government committed that it would share the Epstein investigation materials with the public. And then it goes on and cites what the Attorney General had previously said.

Speaker 1 The government's 100,000 pages of Epstein files and materials dwarf the 70-odd pages of Epstein grand jury materials. The government's Epstein files are, it says sui generis.

Speaker 1 They are investigatory and not subject to the federal rule of criminal procedure 6e. The government is the logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the the public of the Epstein files.

Speaker 1 By comparison, the instant grand jury motion appears to be a diversion from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the government's possession.

Speaker 1 The grand jury's testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct.

Speaker 1 That's why here on the Midas Touch Network, I read from the court opinions so you can hear what the federal judges are saying. This is a diversion and the grand jury testimony is a hearsay snippet.

Speaker 1 The agent doesn't even have direct knowledge versus the actual underlying documents. You know, it's wild.

Speaker 5 We talk all the time about heart health, gut health, brain health, but almost never about the most underrated organ in your body, your liver.

Speaker 5 It's doing over 500 functions every single day, filtering unwanted elements, supporting digestion, helping with energy, and we usually don't think about it until something is wrong.

Speaker 5 So what if we actually supported it before problems started? That's where dose for your liver comes in. Dose for your liver is a clinically backed liver health supplement.

Speaker 5 This isn't just another capsular powder. Dose is a liquid supplement.
You take it as a daily two-ounce shot and it tastes like fresh squeezed orange juice.

Speaker 5 Dose cleanses the liver of unwanted stressors that are slowing your liver down and promotes daily liver function so your liver can do its job. Zero sugar, zero junk, zero calories.

Speaker 1 Your liver is your body's filter.

Speaker 5 It processes everything you consume and performs over 500 daily functions, energy production, digestion, fat metabolism, vitamin storage. And when it's overworked, you feel it.

Speaker 5 And when you drink DOS Daily, you're going to reduce sluggishness, ditch those midday crashes, support your metabolism, and even aid your digestion. You can trust DOS.

Speaker 5 It's got real results with two double-blind placebo-controlled studies showing its positive impact on liver enzyme levels. Ready to give your liver the support it deserves?

Speaker 5 Head to dosedaily.co slash MIDIS or enter MIDAS to get 35% off your first subscription. Hey, your body does so much for you.
Let's do something for it.

Speaker 5 That's D-O-S-E-D-A-I-L-Y dot CO slash MIDAS M-E-I-D-A-S for 35% off your first month subscription.

Speaker 1 And then it goes on to talk about how in February, the government, as noted, was prepared to release their Epstein files to the public back in February 2025.

Speaker 1 But then on July 6, 2025, the government announced it would not make the files available to the public. So you have that one.

Speaker 1 And then you have this ruling by Judge Paul Engelmeier. And Judge Paul Engelmeier, he also denied the release of the grand jury transcripts and says the following.

Speaker 1 The government's invocation of special circumstances to release these fails the threshold, fails at a threshold level.

Speaker 1 Its entire premise that the Maxwell grand jury materials would bring to light meaningful new information about Epstein and Maxwell's crimes or the government's investigation to is demonstrably false.

Speaker 1 The court, after receiving the government's motion to unseal, ordered it to provide materials to substantiate its claims that the Maxwell grand jury materials contained undisclosed information of a significant historical or public interest.

Speaker 1 Specifically, the court ordered the government to submit the grand jury transcripts and exhibits for an in-camera review, meaning just the court would review it because it's otherwise secret, with the positions the government proposed to redact highlighted.

Speaker 1 And it ordered the government to file a submission identifying the portions of the transcripts and exhibits, if any, that are not today matters of public record, including based on Maxwell's month-long jury trial on the charges returned by the grand jury.

Speaker 1 The government's submission in response to the court's orders were telling.

Speaker 1 They belied the government's claim in its motion to unseal that the Maxwell grand jury materials contain significant undisclosed information about Epstein's and Maxwell's crimes or the investigation into them.

Speaker 1 Two features of these materials, which were not disclosed in the government's motion, are noteworthy.

Speaker 1 The court reports these here at a level of generality that does not disclose the substance of grand jury proceedings. First, the grand juries in this case were not used for investigative purposes.

Speaker 1 They did not hear testimony from any first-hand witness to any events at issue. They did not hear testimony from any victim, any eyewitness, any suspect, or even records of any custodian.

Speaker 1 The grand juries met instead for a very limited purpose of returning an indictment, and that was it. Each grand jury received evidence on a single day.

Speaker 1 On that day, it heard testimony from one person, a law enforcement agent who, acting as a summary witness, testified to information obtained in the government's investigation to support the charges in the proposed indictment.

Speaker 1 The agent responding to tightly structured questions from the the Assistant United States Attorney provided highly abbreviated hearsay accounts of the statements of select witnesses.

Speaker 1 The agent led the jury through a PowerPoint of exhibits.

Speaker 1 At the end of the testimony, the agent testified that he or she had not disclosed all that he or she knew, but had only responded to the AUSA's questions.

Speaker 1 Afterwards, each grand juror voted to return the proposed indictment. Second, the evidence put before the Maxwell grand juries is today, with only very minor exception, a matter of public record.

Speaker 1 The government admitted as much in response to the court's order. It goes on to say, and because the government

Speaker 1 proposes to redact the witness identities, the exception it noted does not reflect information that the public would learn were the grand jury transcripts unsealed.

Speaker 1 The court's review confirmed that unsealing the grand jury materials would not reveal new information of any consequence. Can I repeat that?

Speaker 1 The court's review confirmed that unsealing the grand jury materials would not reveal new information of any consequence.

Speaker 1 In response to the court's order, the government supplied the court with a binder highlighting any information the government had been unable to determine is public.

Speaker 1 Only scattered words, clauses, and occasional sentences are highlighted. These items are far and few between.

Speaker 1 In other words, the court caught the government lying by claiming that there was new information here.

Speaker 1 It was short, it barely had anything new at all, and it was things that we all knew from the Ghillain-Maxwell trial itself and from the allegations

Speaker 1 against Ghillane and Jeffrey Epstein. So there was nothing new there.
What does Pam Bondi want to hide? Notable, Pam Bondi refusing to answer this question from Senator Whitehouse in the hearing.

Speaker 1 And I'll tell you what Pam Bondi is going to do when she's called to testify again before the Senate and the House. I can't answer that.

Speaker 1 There's an ongoing investigation because she's going to say Trump ordered an investigation into Democrats out of the Southern District of New York from the U.S.

Speaker 1 attorney there by the name of Jay Clayton. Clayton was never a federal prosecutor before.
He's now the main federal prosecutor of the Southern District of New York. Sound familiar?

Speaker 1 Trump brings people with no prosecutorial experience, who've never been federal prosecutors to lead these offices. And now Pam Bondi is going to say, oh, well, there's an ongoing investigation.

Speaker 1 I can't comment on anything. And they're going to not release the Epstein files on that basis.
Here's what White House asked her. Play this clip.

Speaker 6 Let me ask you something else. There's been public reporting that Jeffrey Epstein showed people photos of President Trump with half-naked young women.
Do you know if the FBI found

Speaker 6 those photographs in their search of

Speaker 6 Jeffrey Epstein's safe or premises or otherwise? Have you seen any such thing?

Speaker 7 You know, Senator Whitehouse, you sit here and make salacious remarks, once again, trying to slander President Trump left and right, when you're the one who was taking money from one of Epstein's closest confidants, I believe.

Speaker 7 I could be wrong, correct me, Reid Hoffman, who was with Jeffrey Epstein on multiple occasions. And the senator sitting right next to you tried to block the flight logs from being released.

Speaker 7 Yet you're grilling me on President Trump and some photograph with Epstein? Come on.

Speaker 6 The question is,

Speaker 6 did the FBI find those photographs that have been discussed publicly by a witness who claimed Jeffrey Epstein showed them to him?

Speaker 6 You don't know anything about that.

Speaker 6 Okay.

Speaker 1 By the way, here's what Senator Slotkin said with Trump trying to create all of these distractions this past weekend by saying he was going to kill or he wanted to hang to death Democratic lawmakers who said that our military should not follow unlawful orders.

Speaker 1 Play this clip.

Speaker 8 One of the things that he's been doing by repeating it and talking about it is trying to distract us from the big stories of last week, which were the Epstein files and then the economy.

Speaker 8 And I took note yesterday at nine o'clock at night. He's tweeting that there's no inflation.
The economy is the best it's ever been.

Speaker 8 It was kind of amazing considering that the American public isn't stupid. It actually reminded me of Joe Biden, right? Joe Biden tried to tell us for a year that the economy was great.

Speaker 8 Now, this president, who ran on lowering costs for Americans. But you changed the subject with that video as well.
Sure.

Speaker 1 Now, here is what Bondi said before last week wrapped up. During a press conference, she said a number of notable things.

Speaker 1 When she was asked about what we're learning out of SDNY, the federal court office there, the federal courthouse there, she said, I can't answer that ongoing investigation. Exactly what I told you.

Speaker 1 She's going to continue to say to avoid releasing the files. And then you'll see right here, she keeps on saying, we'll release what we're required to under the law, under the law, under the law.

Speaker 1 And what she's going to try to do is use the federal court saying that they can't turn over the grand jury transcripts as her own precedent, even though she's conflating things to say, the court said we can't turn it over.

Speaker 1 So we, the prosecutors, can't turn it over because there's ongoing investigations, there's national security issues, the information is classified because we didn't need a law for these files to be turned over.

Speaker 1 Okay. Trump has the absolute authority to turn it over without the Epstein Transparency Act.

Speaker 1 So even with this law being signed, it doesn't really change the fact that Trump had the ability to turn it over before. But I want you to see the sleight of hands that they're doing.

Speaker 1 Here's what Bondi says. Let's play.

Speaker 8 New investigation by the Southern District of New York U.S. Attorney prevent the department from releasing all of the remaining files.

Speaker 7 So we have released 33,000, over 33,000 Epstein documents to the Hill, and we'll continue to follow the law and to have maximum transparency.

Speaker 7 Also, we will always encourage all victims to come forward.

Speaker 1 What are the next steps, Madam Attorney General, for the DOJ regarding what we assume President Trump will sign into law with the Epstein files? Is this going to be on the Justice Department website?

Speaker 1 What are you doing here over the next 30 days, as we understand it?

Speaker 7 We will continue to follow the law with maximum transparency while protecting victims.

Speaker 1 When you say follow the law, then Attorney General, do you mean that you will provide all the files by 30 days?

Speaker 7 We will follow the law. The law passed both chambers last evening.

Speaker 7 It has not yet been signed, but we will continue to to follow the law again while protecting victims, but also providing maximum transparency.

Speaker 1 Madam Attorney General, the DOJ statement earlier this year saying that the files would not release mentioned the fact that the review of the documents and the evidence did not suggest that any additional investigation of third parties was warranted.

Speaker 1 What changed since then that you launched this investigation?

Speaker 7 Information that has come for information.

Speaker 7 There's information that new information, additional information, and again, we will continue to follow the law to investigate any leads.

Speaker 7 If there are any victims, we encourage all victims to come forward, and we will continue to provide maximum transparency under the law.

Speaker 8 Excuse me. Madam Attorney General,

Speaker 9 the issue with the new information that you just indicated, is the department seeking information perhaps from the Epstein estate because Mr.

Speaker 9 Blanche did not have that information when he interviewed Delane Maxwell? What new information, and would you limit the new investigation to just those named persons that the President talked about?

Speaker 9 Or is this a broad, open-ended investigation?

Speaker 7 I would refer to the Deputy Attorney General's post that he put out on X, and

Speaker 7 we're not going to say anything else on that because now it is a pending investigation in the Southern District of New York.

Speaker 1 Well, now you fully understand the dynamic here, right? So we're not going to get confused. We're not going to be tricked.
That's why we do the Midas Touch network this way.

Speaker 1 So we all know what their games are, right? We're all prepared. We're all armed with the knowledge.
And they don't talk about this stuff on corporate news. So we're preparing you for that.

Speaker 1 So tell others what's going on so that they know when

Speaker 1 the regime tries to implement these plans because they and the Republicans are covering up for the child sex trafficking ring. That's what they are, the PPP.
They're the pedo protection program.

Speaker 1 And it's sick and disgusting, but yes, the Donald Trump regime and the MAGA Republicans, their main focus is covering up child sex trafficking ring at the largest scale imaginable.

Speaker 1 We'll keep you posted every step of the way, but hit subscribe. Let's get to 6 million and thanks so much for watching.

Speaker 1 Hey, Midas Mighty, it's Ben Bretton Jordy, and we just want to thank you for being the backbone of this movement.

Speaker 1 This year tested us more than ever, but together we proved that pro-democracy voices don't just compete, we win.

Speaker 1 We took on the entire MAGA machine, won a Webby for Podcast of the Year, the Midas Touch Podcast, and you were with us every step of the way.

Speaker 1 And trust us, what we're working on next is bigger, bolder, and built for 2026. Let's keep this momentum going, spread the word.
We are just getting started. Shout out to the Midas Mighty.

Speaker 10 Transform your home during Blinds.com's Black Friday Super Sale. Get up to 50% off site-wide, plus huge doorbuster deals on popular styles.

Speaker 10 Go DIY and do it all 100% online or choose white glove service with expert design help and professional installation. Both backed by blinds.com's 100% satisfaction guarantee.

Speaker 10 Blinds.com's Black Friday Super Sale is here. Save up to 50% site-wide and get a free professional measure.
Limited time offer rules and restrictions apply. See Blinds.com for details.

Speaker 11 Since 2011, American Giant has been making everyday clothing with extraordinary effort. Not in far-off factories, but right here in the USA.

Speaker 11 We obsess over fabrics, fit, and details, because if you're going to wear it every day, it should feel great and last for years.

Speaker 11 From the cut of a hoodie to the finishing of a seam, nothing is overlooked. Our supply chain is tight-knit and local, which means less crisscrossing the country and more care in every step.

Speaker 11 The result is durable clothing, t-shirts, hoodies, sweatpants, and denim that become become part of your life season after season.

Speaker 11 This isn't fast fashion, it's clothing made with purpose by people who care as much about how it's made as how it fits. Get 20% off your first order with code STAPLE20 at American-Giant.com.

Speaker 11 That's 20% off your first order at American-Giant.com with code STAPLE20.