Ep. 1821 - Hundreds Of Pregnant Libs Guzzle Bottles Tylenol To Spite Trump

Trump is warning that taking Tylenol while pregnant can lead to neurological problems in babies.

He is basing his warning on the findings of some of the nation's top medical institutions, as well as the drug manufacturer itself.

So naturally, pregnant liberal women are filming themselves guzzling the over-the-counter drug.

I'm Michael Knowles at the Michael Knowles Show.

Welcome back to the show.

The second Trump assassin.

Remember, it's confusing.

It was the first Trump assassin who barely missed.

Actually, he hit Trump in the air, and then he got his head blown off in Pennsylvania.

Then there was a second Trump assassin.

He was just found guilty and tried to stab himself in the neck in the courtroom.

We'll get to that in one moment.

First, though, I want to tell you about Birch Gold.

Text Knowles to 98-98-98.

When inflation jumps, when you hear the national debt is over $37 trillion, do you ever think maybe now would be a good time to buy some gold?

Whether as a hedge against inflation, peace of mind during global instability, or just for sensible diversification, Birch Gold Group believes every American should own physical gold, and they created something special.

Until September 30th, if you are a first-time gold buyer, Birch Gold is offering a rebate of up to $10,000 in free metals on qualifying purchases.

To claim eligibility and start the process, request an info kit now.

Just text Knowles, Canada WLES, to $98,9898.

Plus, Birch Gold can help you roll an existing IRA or 401k into an IRA in gold, and you are still eligible for a rebate in free metals of up to $10,000.

Join their tens of thousands of happy customers and make right now.

your first time to buy gold.

You know, I'm a little bit of a gold bug, have a fair bit of gold in my portfolio, and I've been rather happy about that for a long time, and especially in recent years, take advantage of a rebate of up to $10,000 when you buy by September 30th.

Text my name, Knowles, Candida BLES, to 98.98.98.

Claim your eligibility today.

Text Knowles to 98.98.98 today.

These liberal women.

These liberal women, they are very upset that President Trump has told them not to have Tylenol while pregnant.

So now they are guzzling Tylenol.

If President Trump said, hey,

don't drink gasoline while you're pregnant, these women would hop in their minivans, they would drive to the nearest shell station, they would ask for the leaded gasoline, take the pump, and pour it down their throats.

That is how much they hate Trump and instinctively respond negatively to anything he says.

This was part of a broader public health push.

So it wasn't only about Tylenol.

We'll get to the Tylenol.

Here is what Trump had to say about vaccines, about early childhood, about the findings of his health and human services department.

Then hepatitis B is sexually transmitted.

There's no reason to give a baby that's almost just born hepatitis B.

So I would say wait till the baby is 12 years old and formed and take hepatitis B.

And I think if you do those things, it's going to be a whole different, it's going to be a revolution in a positive sense in the country.

Okay, there have been questions for many years about the

extraordinary increase in the number of vaccines that we give kids at younger and younger ages, including, and I've talked about it on this show before, when your kid is born, the nurses will come in and they'll say, hey, we want to give your kid the hepatitis B vaccine.

And I remember the first kid.

Our eldest is about to be born.

We're talking about the vaccines and hepatitis B comes up.

And we said, well, why does my kid need the hepatitis B vaccine?

Isn't hepatitis B spread through sexual contact and like sharing needles in heroin alleys?

And the doctors and the nurses said, yes, yeah, that's true.

I said, so I don't know.

I don't intend for my newborn to go to any brothels or to shoot up any drugs.

So why does he need the hep B vaccine?

And the actual answer.

to the pregnant mothers is, well, your husband might be cheating on you.

Maybe your husband's the one who's going to the brothel maybe your husband is going to the heroin alley so because of that because your husband is an adulterer uh we're just going to assume then your kid needs to get this vaccine days after birth it seems kind of crazy doesn't it

I think so.

A lot of people share this concern that when you're injecting kids with these vaccines very, very young in increasingly high dosages, maybe that will have some effects.

In fact, President Trump addressed that.

And it's so important to me to take, see the doctor four times or five times for a vaccine.

Don't let them pump your baby up with the largest pile of stuff you've ever seen in your life going into the delicate little body of a baby.

Even if it's two years, three years, four years, you just break it up into, I would say, five, but let's say four, four visits to the doctor instead of one.

And certain things I think you should do.

We have already taken out and are in the process of taking out mercury and aluminum now.

You know what mercury is.

You know what aluminum is.

Who the hell wants that pumped into a body?

And there were rumors about both of them for a long time.

But we're having them taken out.

We're having them taken out of the vaccines.

Hepatitis B, again, that's sexually transmitted.

Okay, so he's saying, look, it's probably not good to expose your kids to aluminum and mercury, right?

And I'm not just spouting this off the top of my head.

I have my Secretary of Health and Human Services behind me, who is basing his conclusions on long-standing medical reports.

And just by the way, liberal women, you refuse to heat up a slice of pizza in aluminum foil because you're so afraid of aluminum toxicity.

You won't use normal sunscreen.

You won't use deodorant because deodorant has aluminum in them.

We all know women like this, probably many women like this.

Liberal, conservative.

It used to be only liberals really reacted this way.

So you won't use a regular deodorant because you're afraid of exposing your adult skin to aluminum, but you're going to shoot a newborn baby up with a ton of aluminum.

Make it make sense to me.

The liberals used to be the ones sounding the alarm on vaccines.

And then recently, because of the Maha movement, because of people like Bobby Kennedy, now it's a little bit more right-wing coded to have questions about big pharma.

And so as a result, these liberal women just turn on a dime and they say, no, no, no, we want to inject our kids with every needle we possibly can at two days old, simply become troll because Trump told us not to.

And this reached its peak in the press conference when Bobby Kennedy issued the department's findings about a link between Tylenol

and autism.

Important findings from our autism work that are vital for parents to know as they make these decisions.

First, HHS will act on acetametophen.

The FDA is responding to clinical and laboratory studies that suggest a potential association between acetametophen used during pregnancy and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, including later diagnosis for ADHD and autism.

Scientists have proposed biological mechanisms linking prenatal acetametophen exposure to altered brain development.

We have also evaluated the contrary studies that show no association.

Today, the FDA will issue a physician's notice about the risk of acetametophen during pregnancy and begin the process to initiate a safety label change.

This is what set the libs off.

And there are these women now.

Do we have videos of it?

Do we have videos of the women just guzzling Tylenol on TikTok in order to stick it?

Yeah, what do we got?

So we got a woman dancing around with her very pregnant belly, and she's got multiple bottles of Tylenol on the, on the counter, and she's, she's filming herself taking the Tylenol because the Trump administration said that it might be bad for babies.

This is the party that celebrates murdering babies in the womb, so it's no surprise, but this is pretty extreme.

You hate Trump so much that you are potentially going to alter the neurological development of your child just to stick it to him, just to get a few likes on TikTok.

This is pretty sick stuff.

What did Bobby Kennedy say?

He said, there are multiple studies which show a neurological detriment because of prenatal acetaminophen.

And so we've evaluated those studies.

We've evaluated the other studies that show no link.

And the FDA is going to be releasing its recommendation soon.

This is as balanced as it gets.

This is as scientific as it gets.

And these women, because it's Kennedy, who they used to like, but now they don't like because he works for Trump, because it's Trump,

they're willing to risk scrambling up their baby's brains just to stick it to him once on TikTok.

Based on what?

I'm trying to think of the most charitable read of what these women are doing.

Is it just that they're saying, well, Kennedy is wrong?

Trump is wrong.

We've taken Tylenol during pregnancy for a long time.

And so they're wrong and it's totally fine.

These women, I think, would have taken, what was that drug called in the 60s?

Thalidomide?

I'm sure I'm mispronouncing it.

There's this drug from the 60s that was a sleeping pill.

It was considered an alternative to barbiturates back when all these Americans were pill popping.

And this drug was

being promoted, heavily marketed.

as a safe alternative to barbiturates.

And it caused all of these terrible deformities in babies you could actually pinpoint the day if you took it on day 22 of pregnancy it would cause i forget leg problems if you took it on day 23 it might cause brain problems you could you could dial it in really closely caused tens of thousands of very serious deformities in babies this was heavily marketed in the united states you you think that drug companies don't ever get things wrong

You think you think just because

the government previously seemed okay okay with women taking Tylenol, and now that the party that you don't like is in power, the government opposes it, that

it can't possibly have been wrong before?

The thing these women aren't even looking at is who else is coming to this conclusion?

Because it's not just Trump and it's not just Bobby Kennedy.

Where did they

get these data from?

Turns out that the sources are not exactly on the far right.

We'll get to that momentarily.

First, I want to tell you, speaking of growing things, I want to tell you about fast-growing trees.

Go to fastgrowingtrees.com, use code NOLS.

Fall is planting season.

Did you know that many plants and trees actually do better when planted this time of the year, but you have to know where to start?

That is why I love fastgrowingtrees.com.

Doesn't matter if you live in the sunny south.

Or if the air is getting chilly where you are, their plant experts can help you find the perfect fit for your space.

Fast-growing trees has everything you need to create your dream yard with 6,000 locally grown grown varieties, fruit trees, privacy trees, flowering trees, shrubs, and more.

Order online and get them delivered to your door in just days.

Thanks to their Alive and Thrive guarantee and 14-point quality checklist, each plant gets individual care based on its specific needs so they arrive happy, healthy, and ready to thrive in your yard.

I love it.

Because by the way, I was quoted by some other people around town.

We had a deep freeze.

I got quoted for shrubs and trees and stuff like that.

You can get really ripped off if you don't go to the right people.

I trust fast-growing trees.

This fall, they got the best deals for your yard, up to half off on select plants and other deals.

Listeners to our show get 15% off their first purchase when using code Knowles at checkout.

15% off fastgrowingtrees.com using code Knolls at checkout.

Perfect time to plant.

Use Knolls to save today.

Offer is valid for limited time terms, conditions, apply.

Check out the link below or in the show notes and support the show.

Trump and Kennedy came to the conclusion on Tylenol based not on TikToks, not on tweets, not on the spasms of their own minds, based on studies from the Harvard School of Public Health, based on studies from Johns Hopkins, based on Mount Sinai, based on Columbia University, based on, here it is.

The White House is pulling these little headlines and abstracts from Johns Hopkins taking Tylenol during pregnancy associated with elevated risks for autism and ADHD.

Harvard,

using acetaminophen during pregnancy may increase children's autism and ADHD risk.

This is August 20th, 2025.

This isn't even some outdated study.

This is from three weeks ago.

Mount Sinai, same thing.

Columbia, same thing.

On and on and on.

But the kicker.

is that it's not even just all of these medical institutions.

It's Tylenol itself, Tylenol itself.

In March 7th, 2017, there's a tweet for everything, tweets at

verbatim quote: We actually don't recommend using any of our products while pregnant.

Thank you for taking the time to voice your concerns today.

This was in response to some other tweet, which has since been deleted.

There's the full sentence: we actually don't recommend using any of our products while pregnant.

President of the United States, Secretary of Health and Human Services,

all of the top medical institutions in the country and the drug manufacturer itself all say, hey, ladies, maybe don't take Tylenol when you're pregnant.

And these liberal pregnant women say, well,

sorry, unfortunately, Trump also told us not to.

And if Trump told us not to pull hand grenades and then eat them,

we would have to do that.

If Trump Trump says yes, we say no.

If Trump says hi, we say low.

Trump says goodbye, we say hello.

Okay.

The problem for the liberals right now is not their medical illiteracy.

It's not their

over-reliance on science or insufficient deference to science.

It's not any of that.

It's that they believe their own caricature of Trump.

That's what this is about.

They have created this caricature in their minds that Trump is a complete buffoon, a total idiot.

He does not listen to the advice of experts.

He's not even really the president.

He's not receiving good information.

They believe that.

That's a character that has been promoted by the late night so-called comedians and by the liberal media.

And so they believe that.

When in reality, whether you like Trump or not,

He's a pretty serious guy.

He's been very, very successful.

He's excelled in multiple industries.

He won the highest office in the land on his first real go at anything in politics.

He is surrounded by not only the top experts in the world, but the most powerful and influential people of all political parties across the globe.

He's not a total kook, okay?

And anyone with eyes and whose mind hasn't been totally poisoned by the serious public health threat of Trump derangement syndrome can see that.

You can disagree with him.

You might not like him.

You might say that

his rhetoric is inflammatory.

You might say any of these things.

He's a serious person, and you deny that fact to your own political peril because it is the constant underestimation of Trump that has led him to win the presidency on at least two occasions and to dominate American politics for 10 years.

And that is leading you to potentially give your kids brain damage because you hate him so much.

Now, speaking of people who seem to have brain damage because of their hatred of Trump,

Jimmy Kimmel.

Jimmy Kimmel

was fired.

He was canceled.

He was at least suspended for telling an egregious lie about the murder of Charlie Kirk.

He said on his show that the shooter was a MAGA Republican.

He said, I'm getting the words,

I'm saying the words imprecisely, but the point was, he said, these Republicans have been doing everything they can

to

try to

say that the shooter was not one of them.

That's what he said.

In other words, the assassin was a right-wing MAGA Republican,

which was a lie.

It was an egregious lie.

It flew in the face of all of the available evidence.

Everything we knew about this person, from the engravings on the bullets to the texts that he sent to his trans furry boyfriend,

showed that he was not on the right, he was on the left.

And as a result, he was suspended.

He was suspended after the ABC affiliates, which air his show, pulled his program.

And after the chairman of the FCC said, you know, we got to look into this.

This is really bad stuff.

The FCC, which exists to regulate the broadcast networks.

But after the audience rebelled, after the affiliates said, we don't want him anymore, ABC suspended him.

ABC

then

reinstated him.

They said, okay, Jimmy Kimmel's going to get his job back.

But

this is, again, the liberals believing their own nonsense.

The liberals really believed that the reason Jimmy Kimmel went off air is because the chairman of the FCC was trying to censor him and threaten free speech.

That was the narrative they went with.

That wasn't true.

And anyone who had a fair assessment of the situation knew it wasn't true, but that's really what they thought.

So they thought that all that had to happen was ABC says, okay, Jimmy Kimmel, you get your job back.

And that's a big win for free speech, and Jimmy Kimmel's back.

But that's not what happened.

The audience turned on him for his egregious lie.

It's not that they turned on him even for a joke, it was a lie.

He came to a punchline later about something else, and you can call that a joke if you like.

But the first part, that the shooter was a MAGA Republican, had nothing to do with comedy.

It was purely a lie.

That's why the audience turned on him.

That's why the affiliates took him off.

So ABC can say, okay, you get your job back.

The affiliates, we find out, are still going to keep him off the air.

And the affiliates include a number of different companies, including Sinclair, which owns 38 ABC affiliates.

And now we learn Nextstar will also keep Jimmy Kimmel on ice.

Nextstar has 30 ABC affiliates.

So that's not all of them.

That's not even most of them.

There are about 250 ABC affiliates in total.

That means that 27%

of the affiliates for the Jimmy Kimmel show are gone.

Jimmy Kimmel already had insanely low ratings.

He was being paid $15, $16 million a year, massive staff, massive operating budget to get insanely low ratings for anything, but especially for a broadcast comedy show.

And now, on top of that, he had a really small number of viewers in the prime demo that actually buys products that the advertisers want.

On top of that, now 27% of the places that are going to air you are gone.

So he's not really uncanceled.

What is really happening is he is being given an opportunity to persuade Nexstar and Sinclair, really to persuade the audience that Nextstar and Sinclair serve,

that he should be aired on their stations again.

He's being given potentially a second chance to get his show back, to actually get a second chance.

And then the question became, what's he going to do with it?

According to reporting from Politico, Jimmy Kimmel initially was going to double down the next night on his lie.

He didn't have a next night to double down on.

So then the question is: is he going to suck up to the affiliates, suck up to the audience, come clean, try to, or is he going to double down?

In which case, he'll definitely lose his show.

He showed us last night with this teary-eyed tribute to Charlie's widow, Erica.

A moment over the weekend, a very beautiful moment.

I don't know if you saw this.

On Sunday, Erica Kirk forgave the man who shot her husband.

She forgave him.

That is an example we should follow.

If you believe

in the teachings of Jesus as I do, there it was.

That's it.

A selfless act of grace, forgiveness from a grieving widow.

It touched me deeply.

And I hope it...

It touches many.

And if there's anything we should take from this tragedy to carry forward, I hope it it can be that.

Oh, yeah.

Yeah, is that right, Jimmy?

Jimmy Kimmel, tears pouring down his face.

Those tears brought to you, by the way, by Sinclair and Nekstar.

What is he?

That's nice that he says something nice about Erica Kirk.

But what is he saying?

Let's examine what he's actually saying.

He's saying there was this moment where Erica Kirk forgave

an unrepentant

monster.

Just forgave him, which is true.

That is beautiful grace.

She's She's not saying we all have to forget.

She's not saying that the criminal justice system can't work the way that it's going to work.

She's not saying that we have to just pretend nothing happened.

She exhibited Christian forgiveness.

In fact, that was what my speech at the University of Minnesota was largely about the other night.

You can catch that on YouTube.

That's what she did.

And so what he's saying is, I really liked this because she just forgave this guy.

And you should all do that too.

You should just forgive a person.

The biggest takeaway here is you should forgive a person.

And if you don't forgive a person for doing something wrong, you're a bad Christian.

He's saying, you have to forgive me or you're a fake Christian.

That's what he's saying.

Even if I'm unrepentant.

That's what this is about.

It's so transparent.

Do you know how I know it's transparent?

One,

because

it's quite contrary to the comments that actually got him taken off the air and contrary to the comments that he was reportedly going to make afterward.

But two,

because he went on to say this.

I don't think there's anything funny about it.

I posted a message on Instagram on the day he was killed, sending love to his family and asking for compassion and I meant it and I still do.

Nor was it my intention to blame any specific group for the actions of what it was obviously a deeply disturbed individual.

That was really the opposite of the point I was trying to make, but I understand that to some that felt either ill-timed or unclear or maybe bumpy.

And for those who think I did this point,

I get why you're upset.

If the situation was reversed, there's a good chance I'd have felt the same way.

I have many friends and family members on the other side who I love and remain close to, even though we don't agree on politics at all.

Totally tone deaf, not repentant in the least, apparently doesn't even understand what he did wrong.

He says,

I didn't, here's the teary eyed,

I did not mean to make light of Charlie Kirk's murder.

That's not why we're upset with you.

You did mean to do that.

You did.

Just the tone with which you spoke about it.

Right after the murder, you said, yeah, and then, you know, they're trying to pretend that the guy who murdered Charlie Kirk is anything but one of them.

So you were making light of it, but that's actually not why we're upset with you.

The problem is that you lied.

You said that the murderer was a right-winger, not one of you guys, not a left-winger.

You made a claim.

He says, I didn't mean to point a finger at either side.

Now we got two problems, because you obviously did mean to point a finger.

you pointed a finger at the right.

The problem is not that you pointed a finger.

The problem is not that you said one side committed the violence rather than the other.

The problem is you lied about which side it was.

And now we have a double problem.

The second problem is that you are saying that it's really neither side.

It's just a disturbed individual.

That isn't true.

He was a leftist.

He was expressing left-wing views.

He expressed them on the bullets.

He expressed them in the text messages to his transferry boyfriend.

Furthermore, prominent people on the left, people in media, people in politics, even people who aren't particularly prominent, people's coworkers, the people we went to school with, members of people's families,

dismissed the murder, excused the murder, and even celebrated the murder.

It was a phenomenon of the left, top to bottom, soup to nuts.

You lied about which side it was, and you're still lying about which side it was.

You're still lying.

You have the gall to go on air, sort of on air, because a lot of people aren't even airing your stupid show.

You have the gall to go on air the next night and lie about what you did.

Say, oh, I didn't really point fingers.

Yes, you did.

And then to say, really, it's not either side.

It's an individual.

No, it's the left.

You lied.

Admit it.

Admit it.

A message to any executives at Nexstar and Sinclair, not that I have to tell you, but if you're watching this show, not good enough.

Not good enough at all.

Now,

I want to be clear here.

I want there to be a little caveat to this.

I'm glad that Jimmy Kimmel is crying on television.

I'm glad that he's groveling.

I don't believe him.

I don't think he's sincere.

I think it's actually quite clear that he's not sincere.

He's either not sincere or he has nothing going on between his ears and he has no idea what this is even about.

But I like that he's going on TV.

I like that he's groveling.

I like that he's doing a little dance for us.

Keep dancing.

This is not good enough.

You need to take responsibility for what you did, for your actual transgression.

You need to admit the truth that is contrary to your lie, namely that the shooter was a leftist.

And you need to beg forgiveness.

You need to dance.

I want you to dance, Jimmy Kimmel.

You came out there and you did a little soft shoe to audition for Sinclair and Nexstar and for their audience.

You did.

You did your best little soft shoe routine, your little Bojangles dance.

Keep dancing.

Dance harder.

Dance, you monkey.

I want you to dance.

That's what I want to see.

We can forgive you as a matter of Christian charity.

We can pray for you.

I'm sure there are many Christians who are praying for you.

We should pray for you because you got a lot of problems.

But you don't get to keep your $16 million and you don't get to keep all of your affiliates and you don't get to keep your stupid show if you're going to behave this way.

The consequences will continue until behavior improves.

There's a little sign here that the behavior might be improving.

There's a little sign, the crocodile tears.

Hypocrisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue.

I'll take them.

We're going to need more of them.

And we're going to need you to speak too.

And we're going to need you to admit what you did wrong.

Or the consequences will continue.

Good luck doing your show when 27% of your affiliates are gone.

Good luck.

Good luck, buddy.

You're going to have to stay on ice a little bit longer.

Okay, speaking of life,

I strongly recommend that you go check out Pre-Born.

Go to preborn.com slash Michael.

If you care about life, about moms in crisis and the babies that they're carrying, this is for you.

Because I know sometimes we want to help.

We want to pray.

We just don't always know how.

That is why.

I want to share something that really moved me.

It's called Heartbeat of Prayer from Pre-Born.

It's a 30-day devotional that walks you through real stories, women facing the hardest decision of their lives, and how God met them there.

Every day, you will read a true story, reflect on scripture, and be guided in prayer.

It's simple, it's beautiful.

It helps you stand in the gap for moms and their babies right from wherever you are.

So if your heart's been stirred, maybe this is your next step.

You can get your free copy of Heartbeat of Prayer right now at preborn.com slash Michael, M-I-C-H-A-E-L.

That is preborn.com slash Michael.

It's free.

It's powerful.

It's one way you can be part of something that truly matters right now.

I personally support this organization.

I think they do absolutely incredible work.

I strongly encourage you to give whatever you can.

That is preborn.com slash Michael, M-I-C-H-A-E-L.

Don't wait till the end of the year for the write-off.

Preborn.com slash Michael.

Speaking of political violence,

there is a new report out from YouGov and The Economist, which shows how Americans think.

about political violence.

And this is really, really insightful.

I was talking about this to sweet little Elisa last night because it is a crystal ball into our political future and it doesn't look great.

The question was, is it ever justified for citizens to resort to violence in order to achieve political goals?

There's the percentage responding yes.

So if you look at the chart, I want to start at the right side of the chart.

This is 60 plus.

When you get to 60 plus, basically everyone agrees that it is not justified for citizens to resort to violence to achieve political goals.

It's just a definition of terrorism, or close to a definition of terrorism.

You see, it's less than 10%.

For the moderates, it's even lower.

For the moderates, it's like 3%.

For the conservatives, it looks like it's closer to 7% or 8%.

And for the liberals, it's a little bit higher, but it's close.

It's like 8% or 9%.

Now, when you get a little bit younger, you move back to ages 40 to 59.

Now we're seeing the same ranking.

It's It's the moderates who are the least likely to agree with the statement, followed by the conservatives, followed by the liberals who are the most likely, but it starts to get a little bit more spread out on the top end.

So for the moderate, you know, let's call it 7% to 8% of moderates and then conservatives who are a little bit younger, who say that it's justified.

For liberals, now you're looking more like 15, 16%.

So it's starting to spread out.

Then something really strange happens for the young voters.

Ages 18 to 39,

we're seeing the moderates tick ahead of the conservatives.

The young conservatives are the least likely to say that violence is justified to achieve political ends.

Looks like it's about 5%.

For the so-called moderates, it's more like 12%.

So the young moderates are more likely than 60 plus people of any political persuasion to say that

political violence is is justified.

But the scary number is the young liberals.

For young liberals, it's about 30%

say that it is justified for citizens to resort to violence to achieve political goals.

It just skyrockets, which is not surprising at all,

because political violence, at least in recent years, is a left-wing phenomenon.

Full stop.

It's usually a left.

It's been a left-wing phenomenon for much longer, and the liberals who lie about this are being exposed.

Seth Moulton, who goes on TV, the Democrat congressman, he says, you know, actually, three-quarters of political violence comes from the right.

Only 4% comes from the left.

The way that they arrive at that number is by not counting left-wing political violence, as I've discussed on this show before.

But it's not even just a recent thing.

In the 1960s, you had all the radicals, the Weather Underground, the Black Panthers.

If you go further back to the 1920s, you had the anarchists, the communists, people setting off bombs,

people shooting up government buildings.

It's usually from the left.

That's been tamped down in recent years.

Looks like the young left, much, much more comfortable with political violence.

And even the liberal media are admitting it.

The Atlantic just has a piece out.

Says, left-wing terrorism is on the rise.

That's the verbatim headline.

For the first time in more than 30 years, attacks by the far left outnumber those by the far right.

Okay.

what do we find?

It's worth reading the article, but I'll just read you a couple paragraphs from it.

We found that left-wing terrorism has increased since President Donald Trump's rise to political prominence in 2016.

Even there, they have to get this insinuation in that it's somehow Trump's fault.

Everything's Trump's fault.

Why did you make us do it?

Why did you make us shoot up the school?

Why did you make us kill people?

Why did you, oh,

it started with Trump?

Of course.

It's like an abusive husband.

Why did you make me do this?

Indeed, 2025 marks the first time in more than 30 years that left-wing attacks outnumber those from the far right.

Despite its recent increase, however, left-wing terrorism is not nearly as common today as it was in the 1960s and early 70s.

Those years

marked the height of groups such as the Weather Underground and the Symbionese Liberation Army, which coincidentally is known as the SLA, my beloved wife,

best known for kidnapping the newspaper heiress Patty Hearst.

In the 80s and early 90s, left-wing terrorism declined while jihadist and right-wing terrorism rose, particularly in the forms of anti-government and white supremacist violence.

Okay,

here I want to point out there is a faulty definition of terrorism because what The Atlantic is doing is conflating two things.

When they're talking about what's going on in the 60s, they're largely talking about political activists on the left targeting civilians to achieve political ends.

Whereas when they're talking about the 90s and the supposed right-wing anti-government militia groups or whatever, they're talking about radical groups targeting the government.

Again, I'm not justifying either of these things, but those are different.

And I think a more precise definition of terrorism is not targeting armies.

It's not targeting even governments.

It's targeting civilians in the furtherance of political ends.

And to conflate kidnapping and murdering civilians with

a bunch of

eccentric people in Waco or Ruby Ridge or something like that, the government moves in on themselves.

I think that's a kind of a dishonest comparison.

Nevertheless, it goes on.

The year 2016 was a turning point for left-wing terrorism, even as right-wing incidents remained much more common.

Trump's political assent and the expansion of the MAGA movement seem to have re-energized left-wing violent extremism, which accounted for 37 incidents from 2016 to 2024, most of them motivated by either anti-government or partisan sentiment.

By July 4th of this year, far-left extremists had already been responsible for five terrorist attacks and plots, putting 2025 on pace to be the left's most violent year in more than three decades.

And by the way, I want to see the data here.

I'm skeptical that those numbers even include all of the incidents.

To just use one example that I happened to be involved with, the Antifa attack at the University of Pittsburgh.

Was that involved?

I don't know.

We haven't even seen the data.

But even without seeing the data, a left-wing publication is admitting, yeah, terrorism is a left-wing phenomenon now in America.

Yeah.

Even without seeing the data, even with this, I think, weighted definition of terrorism, the left, we can all admit, is the party of terror right now.

By the way, this doesn't include Charlie's assassination.

They say that in the Atlantic.

They say,

we're not even counting Charlie's assassination.

There was a report, it's breaking now.

There's not much information on it.

There was shooting in an ICE facility, an immigration and customs enforcement facility.

I don't want to say anything about it.

Because we really don't have the details.

And unlike people like Jimmy Kimmel, I would like to convey the truth when it comes to these matters.

So we'll cover that more tomorrow.

But

it's not all that surprising, is it?

Okay, now speaking of left-wing terror, some good news.

The second would-be Trump assassin was just found guilty, and he did not react well to the verdict.

We'll get to that in one moment first.

My favorite comment yesterday is from Trishy Downs.

Why wouldn't Brigitte Macron just do a DNA test?

It seems a lot more reasonable and less intrusive than photographic evidence.

This is absurd.

She said, her side said they're going to present both photographic and scientific evidence to prove womanhood.

And as I pointed out on the show, and there's no mark, I'm sure she's a lovely lady in her own way.

But,

you know, we don't need to see proof of sex for any world leaders or their spouses.

We just don't.

I just don't, I don't need that.

We don't need that, okay?

Everyone involved needs to settle this case so that we don't see the photographic evidence.

In terms of the scientific evidence, I don't know.

Maybe there's a blood test or something like that too.

But no photos.

Please.

No photos.

Okay.

The second would-be Trump assassin.

You know, he was the one at the golf course

who had a rifle.

He was trying to murder Trump on the golf course.

He was just found guilty on all counts.

And when...

The verdict came in, he tried to stab himself in the neck with a pen.

Didn't work.

I don't really have much more to say about that story other than

a reminder.

I think a lot of people have forgotten that there was a second Trump assassination attempt.

Some people have forgotten that there was a first Trump assassination attempt that would have succeeded had Trump not inexplicably turned his head at the very last moment, jerked his head about 20 degrees so that only his ear was hit with the bullet.

This is something that

I think the past couple of weeks have shown and put into stark relief.

Without a miracle, without the extraordinary intervention of

that immigration chart that Trump turned his head to see, and I think most people would say without a kind of a supernatural intervention,

Trump would have been killed.

It would have been aired on national television.

He would have been murdered on a stage in Pennsylvania.

And we don't even have to imagine what that would have looked like because we all had to see what that looked like.

quite recently.

In any case, this assassin tried to kill himself and and it didn't work.

So he's going to have to face justice for his crimes

with no sign that the left-wing terror is stopping anytime soon.

Speaking of threats to Trump, this was real nasty.

President Trump went to the UN yesterday and there's a lot of great stuff from this UN appearance.

As he gets there, he gets on an elevator and the elevator just stops.

And everyone's kind of standing around, not knowing what to do.

I mean, Trump just walked up the stairs, but Trump is 79 years old.

Melania, she's beautiful, looks like she's 29, but she's of a certain age too.

An elevator stopping, if you're a 79-year-old, could cause you to fall.

I mean, that's a real threat to a person, especially to a world leader.

They walked up the stairs, though.

And we thought, okay, I guess the UN is just incompetent.

Maybe the UN needs more funding or something.

Well, then this popped up.

Before Trump arrived, the Times of London reports, to mark Trump's arrival, UN staff members have joked that they may turn off the escalators and elevators and simply tell him they ran out of money, so he has to walk up the stairs.

So this was predicted.

What are the odds?

What are the odds

that this would have been predicted by UN staff members who are of a high enough level that they're speaking to the Times of London?

that this would have been predicted and then that exact thing would have happened exactly when Trump arrived.

Doesn't take a genius to conclude that most likely that was intentional.

And that's a major security risk.

One, it could have caused Trump to fall, and it could have caused serious injury to the President of the United States.

Two,

freezing the president of the United States in position in a public place like the UN after there have been multiple close assassination attempts on his life

is an act of violence on the United States that is completely unacceptable.

And Trump kind of laughed it off, shrugged it off.

He's got a great demeanor.

He's got a great nature about him.

And he didn't make a big deal.

But the U.S.

government needs to make a big deal.

That was a major, not only insult to the United States, which funds the U.N., which is the global hegemon, that was a major security risk to a president who was already nearly killed twice

and was actually hit with a bullet one time.

And there need to be major consequences.

This is not...

Did I misspeak?

They're telling me I misspoke and said an elevator, it was an escalator, as you can see from the picture.

This was a major, major security breach.

And some low-level staffers should not take the blame for this.

There need to be serious consequences, up to and including potentially just dismantling the whole stupid thing.

Because of this, because of what Trump had to say.

So Trump shows up to the UN.

And he did not mince words.

His teleprompter also broke.

Was that an accident?

I don't know.

Either the UN is completely incompetent, in which case it should probably be dismantled, or the UN is actively undermining U.S.

interests, in which case it should definitely definitely be dismantled.

The UN, which was formed in large part with the backing of the United States, but specifically

with the backing of a communist who

infiltrated the State Department, that would be Al Gerhis, who was found out by Whitaker Chambers and Richard Nixon, and they never forgave Richard Nixon for doing so.

In any case, I digress.

Here's what President Trump had to say about the UN's perfidy:

Western countries and their borders.

In 2024, the UN budgeted $372 million in cash assistance to support an estimated 624,000 migrants journeying into the United States.

Think of that.

The UN is supporting people that are illegally coming into the United States, and then we have to get them out.

The UN also provided food, shelter, transportation, and debit cards to illegal aliens.

Can you believe that?

Wow.

On the way to infiltrate our southern border.

Millions of people came through that southern border.

Just a year ago, millions and millions of people were pouring in, 25 million altogether over the four years of the incompetent Biden administration.

And now we have it stopped, totally stopped.

In fact, they're not even coming anymore because they know they can't get through.

But what took place is totally unacceptable.

The UN is supposed to stop invasions, not create them, and not finance them.

What is the UN for?

What is the purpose of the UN?

I am not one of these people who just says, oh, it's a total waste of money and you need to get rid of the UN because it's a waste of money or because it's just a waste of time or because America has no interest in the rest of the world.

I don't think that.

I recognize that America is the global hegemon.

I have the same sense of the phrase America first as President Trump does.

which is not merely a national sense, but an imperial sense, which is why Trump wants to buy Greenland and invade Canada.

We're the global hegemon, like it or not, there's no question about it.

So we can use certain instruments to advance U.S.

interests around the world.

But that's what they're for.

That's what the UN is for, as far as the United States is concerned.

It's not there because it has any particular power in and of itself.

It's not there because we're going to pretend that the Stan countries are somehow as important and powerful as the United States.

It's not there because we think we're going to sing kumbaya with China and Russia.

That's not what it's there for.

It exists

and is seated in New York City in the United States for us

in order to advance U.S.

interests around the world.

If the UN is not doing that,

then the UN either needs to be seriously reformed or if it's beyond reform, it needs to be destroyed.

We pay for 22% of its ordinary operating budget.

We pay for 27% of its peacekeeping budget, which would be fine if it served our interests.

But if it's not serving our interests, then we need to think seriously about that investment.

And if it's actively undermining our interests,

if it is funding illegal foreigners to pour into our country and create security risks and drains on our resources and crime in our streets,

Furthermore, if the United Nations is going to personally imperil the president of the United States,

then it needs to be bulldozed and a Trump condominium needs to go up in its place.

Simple as, I'm feeling a little saucy this morning.

I guess I'm feeling saucy in part in response to the

refusal of the left to learn any lesson.

I'm just so offended by it.

Jimmy Kimmel coming out with his crocodile tears.

Let's even say they were sincere.

I want to be as charitable as I can.

Let's pretend for a moment that his tears were sincere.

And his big takeaway is: you need to forgive him, or you're a bad Christian.

How dare you?

And his big takeaway is: hey, the thing you accused me of, I didn't really do it.

I didn't pick a side.

And now, by the way, you shouldn't pick a side either.

He somehow gets the two wrong answers.

It's so offensive.

And he needs to be punished more.

Because if he's not,

then

he will only continue to undermine the public square.

If the United Nations is not punished for what they did yesterday and for what they've been doing for years funding illegal immigration, they're only going to continue to undermine U.S.

interests.

They're going to undermine their own raison debt.

We're in a bad place.

We want to get back to a good place.

Our enemies, I don't think, really want to get back to a good place, but we would like to.

And some of us think we can just skip to that.

We can close our eyes and wish and hope and just wish cast, believe that by doing nothing and pretending that the left is not doing what it's doing, that we can arrive at that nice, flourishing place of the free exchange of ideas and happy, clappy song.

But there's an intermediary step, which is you need to bring the other people along with you.

There have to be consequences.

We need to incentivize the consequences.

That is to say, that if Jimmy Kimmel keeps dancing and admits that he's wrong and does the things he's supposed to do, then maybe he can have his show back.

If the United Nations seriously reforms, if the United Nations fires a bunch of people, but more importantly, seriously reforms, then they get to keep their 22% operating budget, 27% of their peacekeeping budget.

And if they don't,

they got to go away.

They have to leave public.

They can go to private life.

All the UN workers, they can go work some private job.

Jimmy Kimmel can go work some private job.

He can go retire somewhere.

But I think we've had enough.

I think we've just had enough, and we realize that it is urgent to reassert order, lest things continue to spiral out of control.

When the Atlantic is admitting that the left is engaging in an increasing pattern of terrorism, you know the threat is serious.

The rest of the show continues now.

You do not want to miss it.

Become a member.

Use code Knowles Canada WLES at checkout for two months free on all annual plans.