Ep. 1836 - BREAKING: Gen Z De-Gays Itself

This is Marshawn Beast Mode Lynch.

Prize Pick is making sports season even more fun.

On Prize Picks, whether you're a football fan, a basketball fan, it always feels good to be right.

And right now, new users get $50 instantly in lineups when you play your first $5.

The app is simple to use.

Pick two or more players, pick more or less on their stat projections.

Anything from touchdown to threes, and if you're right, you can win big.

Mix and match players from any sport on PrizePicks, Prize America's number one daily fantasy sports app.

PrizePicks is available in 40-plus states, including California, Texas, Florida, and Georgia.

Most importantly, all the transactions on the app are fast, safe, and secure.

Download the PrizePicks app today and use code Spotify to get $50 in lineups after you play your first $5 lineup.

That's code Spotify to get $50 in lineups after you play your first $5 lineup.

PrizePicks, it's good to be right.

Must be present in a certain states.

Visit PrizePicks.com for restrictions and

16 years from today, Greg Gerstner will finally land the perfect cannonball.

Epic Splash, Unsuspecting Friends, a work of art only possible because Greg is already meeting all these same people at AARP volunteer and community events that keep him active and involved and help make sure his happiness lives as long as he does.

That's why the younger you are, the more you need AARP.

Learn more at AARP.org/slash local.

A new study out of the UK shows that queer identity is in free fall among young people.

For reaction, we turn now to the official Michael Knoll show Gen Z correspondent.

I'm not gay no more.

Really surprising turn of events for the Libs who believed the relentless lavender propaganda of the last decade about men becoming women.

and gender affirmation and non-binary identities.

They're really surprised by this.

But

it's an even more surprising turn of events for skittish conservatives who seem to have forgotten the essential consolation of conservative political philosophy, which is that on a long enough time scale, reality eventually reasserts itself every time.

I'm Michael Knowles.

This is the Michael Knowles Show.

Welcome back to the show.

You know the government's shutdown?

Do you remember that?

They shut the government down, the Democrats, Chuck Schumer, they shut it down, and then we all just kind of forgot.

And now Schumer is saying it could be the longest government shutdown ever.

Well, now it might be impacting our military.

So we will have Congressman August Pfluger on the show coming up.

So do not go anywhere.

We will get the update, especially as it pertains to the military.

First, though, I want to tell you about Chevron.

America is built on hard work and powered by American energy.

Chevron has spent $44 billion with local businesses across all 50 states since 2022, fueling infrastructure and communities, all while strengthening local economies.

Last year, Chevron increased U.S.

production nearly 20%, powering communities and businesses from the heartlands to the coasts.

We're helping to fuel America's energy advantage, building a brighter future right here at home.

Visit chevron.com slash America to discover more.

This study is just, just a delight.

This is out of the University of Buckingham.

Eric Kaufman is the author.

Here's the executive summary.

We got all sorts of charts and graphs and numbers, but here's the executive summary.

After surging in the 20 teens and 20s,

trans and queer identities are in decline among young young Americans.

For a while there, they were just skyrocketing.

Every time you open the news, it was 5%, 10%, 25%, 30% of Gen Z identifies as LGBTQ.

And now, after that massive surge, you know, it went from one in four, maybe more, to one in three, maybe me.

It now, it seems to be declining.

The transgender share among university students peaked in 2023 and has almost halved since, from nearly 7% to under 4%.

Some of us have been suggesting that maybe the transgender identity is a social contagion and it's not some deeply rooted, essential or biological aspect of identity.

You know, the libs have always said, no, no, no, the reason that the number of trans-identifying students keeps increasing is because people now feel liberated to come out of the closet and express their true selves.

And some of us have said, I don't, I'm kind of skeptical of that.

I think it's just like a lot of people never even thought that this was a thing.

And then they're introduced to this idea.

And then some of them go along with it because of mimesis, because of the fact that we imitate each other and we're social creatures.

And that's how social contagions take hold.

That's, that's kind of what we thought.

Looks like the data are now backing that up.

The study finds the share of students identifying as not heterosexual fell by around 10 points in the same period.

And not heterosexual is a a weird category.

Actually, I had a friend in college who I remember this.

This guy would, he would pick up chicks.

You know, he was,

he was, other than some of his fashion choices, by all, all signs, was a straight guy.

But he identified as non-heterosexual.

And to my knowledge, he never did any weird stuff with dudes or anything, but he identified as not heterosexual because,

I don't know, in the late 2000s and 20 teens, that was cool.

That was fashionable.

It was kind of, it was square to be straight.

You know, you did, weirdly, I don't know.

Maybe he thought it would help him pick up chicks or something, but it's very hard to pin down what that means.

In any case, that identity has dropped precipitously.

10 points, same period.

The decline in the non-heterosexual share is concentrated in the queer or other sexual categories and to a lesser extent, bisexuality.

Okay, so you're seeing a decline in all those groups.

Today's freshmen are less BTQ plus.

So not the L, forget about the LG.

The lesbians and gays are basically flat, but the bisexual, trans, and queer plus, all the rest of the alphabet, the freshmen are much less likely to be that than the seniors are, suggesting that the decline will continue.

Who knows next year's freshmen?

Who knows the freshmen after that?

Probably you're going to see more of a decline.

The decline in BTQ plus identification does not appear to be connected to lower social media use, religious revival, a shift to the political right, or lower support for woke ideology.

So it's not just that more kids coming into school are Catholic, or sorry, or it's not just that more kids coming into school are,

you know, hardline rock ribs, Southern Baptists, or MAGA people,

or that they've put the Instagram away and that it's that TikTok that's infected.

It doesn't appear to be correlated with any of that.

It seems to be a broader social trend that the lavender mafia, at least the BTQ plus part of it, is just declining generally.

Finally, there is evidence that improved mental health has reduced BTQ plus identification, which is kind of redundant.

Yes.

I don't know if you're allowed to say it even today on social media, but yeah, if you're a guy who thinks you're a chick, you have mental issues by definition.

So if you are more mentally stable, if you have better mental health, then you're much less likely to deal with all of those social pathologies.

Okay.

Now, if you dig into this study of all the charts and everything here, the real focus is not on the L or the G or even on the T.

It's more on the Q, on the Q part, queer, which is that catch-all, specifically non-binary.

If you look here, and they compile numbers from Andover, from FHIR, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Education, Brown,

a couple of other organizations.

And you're seeing it broadly across these organizations.

Share not identifying as male or female per FHIR, you know,

various sexual orientation, gender identity.

Even here, let's just look at FHIR's numbers.

For straight, it's pretty flat.

Straight back in 2020 was 80 plus percent.

Then it dipped a little bit during the

apotheosis, and then it kind of came back up in 2025.

People are straight again.

And if you look at bisexual, it's pretty much flat, up a little bit, then down.

Gay, lesbian, pretty much flat.

If you look at queer, that's the one that was lower, it peaked, and then it declined.

Queer, non-binary.

Why is that one in particular seeming to lead the way?

I'll tell you exactly why.

Because...

The non-binary, gender queer, queer generally identity is the least sensual of the

sexual gender identities that have become fashionable in the last 10 years.

The other ones, if you're gay, if you're lesbian, if you're bisexual, if you're transsexual, trans, whatever,

those are all much more physical.

What does it mean to be gay?

It means you're a dude who likes doing certain things with other guys.

If you're a lesbian, it means you're a lady who likes Birkenstocks and Subaru cars.

No, it means that you, you know, ostensibly like doing physical things with other women.

If you're transgender, you like the idea of your body as being the opposite sex.

It's very

sense-based, you know, it's very sensual.

It's very physical.

It corresponds more to physical desire.

The non-binary ideology is just an abstraction.

What does that mean?

You're totally abstracting away from desire, from physical activity, from sex.

You're just basically saying I'm androgynous.

I'm

like a big gray blob or whatever.

So

it's all the same ideology.

The ideology that says that your physical body has nothing to do with your true self and your true self has nothing to do with how you ought to comport yourself.

It's all the same ideology.

But I'm not at all surprised that the more abstract version is leading the way in the freefall and that the trans and the queer and the L and the G are lagging a little bit behind, even if they're going to go in the same direction.

Of course, the idea is bankrupt.

Sometimes people just develop physical habits or physical addictions even or physical inclinations that

are tougher to break.

But the idea, the ideology, the abstraction, totally in free fall.

I'm also, just to put a final point on it, I'm not surprised that

this is collapsing, that the trans is basically over.

I predicted it.

on at CPAC in 2023, 2022, 2023.

I said, look, there's no compromising with with this.

It's either true or it's false.

And it happens to be false.

And so the ideology has to be eradicated from public life entirely for the good of everyone, for the good of society, also especially for the good of the people who've fallen prey to this confusion because it's really bad for them.

It's fake, it's false, and we just have to acknowledge that and move on.

That is what has happened.

That has happened because

the gods of the copybook headings rear their heads again.

Are you familiar with this poem?

You know, Rudyard Kipling.

He's great.

He's the one who wrote the poem about how much he loves cigars.

And he said, a woman is only a woman, but a good cigar is a smoke.

He's a great, wonderful poet, British poet.

And it's a very famous poem he wrote.

I'm going to read you two stanzas.

This is going to make you feel the conservative consolation.

In this world that is always shooting arrows at us, this is a great consolation.

As I pass through my incarnations in every age and race, I make my proper prostrations to the gods of the marketplace.

Peering through reverent fingers, I watch them flourish and fall.

And the gods of the copybook headings, I notice, outlast them all.

The gods of the copybook headings, those maxims that we just hold to be true throughout all ages, throughout cultures.

They just keep coming back.

You know, the old wisdom of old women say.

Then the god, I've skipped down a few stances.

Then the gods of the market tumbled, and their smooth-tongued wizards withdrew.

And the hearts of the meanest were humbled and began to believe it was true.

that all is not gold that glitters, and two and two make four.

And the gods of the copybook headings limped up to explain it once more.

Those smooth-tongued wizards feeding the marketplace, you know, of fashions and fads, they were found wanting.

And the gods of the copybook headings had to explain to people that two plus two equals four again.

And, you know, actually, men and women are different.

And a man can't become a woman.

And those things that are always true everywhere, they're still true.

And no matter how hard you try to pretend otherwise, no matter what force, sheer tyranny of will you impose upon us to make us say it, it won't be true.

And on a long enough time scale, you're going to lose.

In this case, it took about five years.

Now,

speaking of medical issues, Cheryl Hines, the wife of Bobby Kennedy Jr., just completely destroyed the ladies of the view.

We'll get to that in one moment.

First, I want to tell you about Christian care ministry.

Text Michael to 70246.

Folks.

There's no way around it.

When it comes to healthcare, people are really frustrated with how much it costs and how to pay for it.

The usual ways that we've been doing this have only gotten more expensive and more complicated and aggravating.

That is why MediShare is such a welcome relief.

It's called healthcare sharing.

It's different and it works.

More than a million Americans are now doing this and MediShare has been a great option for more than 30 years.

So

you could save thousands of dollars a year on your healthcare and be happy.

Imagine that.

If you've heard about it and you want to know more, there are two easy options.

Go to metashare.com slash Michael, M-I-C-H-A-E-L.

That is metashare.com slash Michael, M-I-C-H-A-E-L.

Or just grab your phone and send a text.

You will get the info.

That can really help you and your family out.

Text the word Michael, M-I-C-H-A-E-L to 70246.

That number again, 70246, to get the facts.

It's the word Michael.

Don't spell it like a barista.

Spell it correctly.

M-I-C-H-A-E-L.

You will get the link.

Michael to 70246.

Cheryl Hines.

Better known even than she is as Bobby Kennedy's wife.

She's better known as Larry David's wife on Kirby Your Enthusiasm.

And Larry David, who is to the left of Lennon, is just absolutely furious at any Republican over the last decade, at least.

Cheryl Hines goes on the view with all of her old gal pals from the Hollywood circles, and they're furious at her because her husband, who used to be very popular in Hollywood circles, Democrat Bobby Kennedy, is supporting the evil orange man who keeps making our country better and bringing about world peace.

And they hate her for it.

And so they really,

they're going to put the screws to her.

And

one of their biggest issues is that Bobby Kennedy Jr.

is sticking his nose in where it doesn't belong.

And he is

compromising our precious big pharma.

Even baby formula, now we're finding out there's arsenic, There's lead.

So the question is, who was running HHS when they allowed lead and arsenic in a baby formula?

How is that person not running?

The two wrongs don't make a right.

No!

Well, I'm saying Bobby is the one getting this out

for eaten.

Thank you.

Can we just clear one thing before you go?

Yes.

Okay.

Joy Behar.

That's not even the best clip from the show.

Joy Behar.

It's like, you know,

two wrongs don't make a right.

That's her answer to Cheryl Hines saying, hey, Bobby Kennedy got into this job and he's noticing that there's a bunch of poison in our food and in our medicine and stuff that really shouldn't be there.

And so she goes, yep, yeah, but two wrongs don't make it right.

Cheryl Hines goes, what are you talking about?

Two wrongs.

He's getting the poison out.

And Joy Behar goes, yeah, yeah, well, good for him.

She doesn't know what to say.

On this issue in particular,

on all all issues pertaining to science, the left really doesn't know what to say when you challenge them on it.

Because they take it as a maxim, as an axiom, that the science is on their side.

And anytime a conservative or a Republican or even a lifelong Democrat who happens to be working for a Republican, Bobby Kennedy, anytime they intervene in any way in medical science, that they have to be wrong.

But,

and this is part of the party's, you know, switching the coalitions, kind of moving about here, is it used to be that the anti-big pharma people were all on the left.

Now they happen to be on the right.

It used to be that the big corporate shills were all on the right.

Now they happen to be on the left.

And this is confusing people like Joy Behar.

So Behar goes, yeah, well, your husband is just doing stuff in pharma and that has to be bad.

And Cheryl Hines goes, well, he's getting arsenic out of baby food.

She goes, yeah, well, okay.

I mean, yeah, good for him.

That's fine.

She doesn't know how to handle that.

It's true on any medical issue, the trans thing, obviously, as we were just discussing.

But really all of them,

this is a real blind spot for the left, is they

believe their own press releases.

They really think that the right-wingers are complete idiots, just totally ignorant when it comes to matters of science.

They think people who are politically conservative, especially religious, are just total dolts.

And that, you know, it's the atheists and the secularists and the liberals who have really led the way.

And that isn't true.

It's really funny when you point out, you say, you you know,

like the Catholics, for instance, have discovered like every single thing that's ever been discovered.

You know, like even you're, you, you guys,

like the Big Bang, for instance, you're, yeah, that was a Catholic priest who theorized the Big Bang.

You're like, um, modern genetics.

Mendel, actually, you know, is the father of modern genetics.

You, uh, Copernicus was, I think, I think he was in a third order of a religious order.

Like, the list goes on and on and on.

What are you people talking about?

And so she doesn't know.

She's really weak on this.

Then

when they can't argue on the substance, they have to go back to credentialism.

And this is where Cheryl Hines really knocks it out of the park.

The Libs think they have her.

They say, well, your husband, who's the Secretary of Health and Human Services, doesn't have a doctorate.

I just, I do want to say, you know, he's not a doctor and he's not a professional.

Yes.

And oftentimes when he's talking,

oftentimes when he's speaking, he is speaking not with the best information that we can get because, you know, give you pause and are you able to say, you know, that might not actually be so, because I've got my experience and I've lived with this and I'm still here.

So are you able to have those conversations with her?

I am able to have those conversations.

And just to be clear,

90% of secretaries of HHS have not been doctors.

But they've had a science background.

There have been three.

Yeah.

No, to be honest, one of Obama's

secretaries of HHS was an economist.

The majority of them that haven't had medical backgrounds have science backgrounds.

Wait, don't do anything else.

Don't say anything else yet.

I just have to take a break.

Oh, wait, wait, wait.

Don't say anything else.

Don't say anything else

because

you just totally smacked down my point.

Yeah, well, look, your husband might be right.

And okay, fine.

It's like, I guess it's good to take arsenic out of baby food.

But like,

he doesn't have his PhD.

Yeah.

Basically, no secretaries of HHS have ever had a doctorate.

Huh.

And then, was it Sonny Hostin there was kind of prepared for that pushback a little bit and said, yes, but they've all had, you know, some kind of medical expertise.

And first of all, Bobby Kennedy, as being a medical and environmental lawyer, actually does have some expertise expertise there.

But then Cheryl Hines comes back.

She goes, one of Obama's was an economist.

Okay, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.

We got to cut this off.

We're going to go to commercial right now.

Absolutely bodying.

Great stuff.

Great, great stuff.

Cheryl Hines just bodied those ladies on the view.

Now, speaking of HHS and bioethics,

a disturbing story that I've been meaning to get to for a few days now.

And

the time is now.

Let's see.

Here we are.

National National Post, story out of Canada.

American man gets hurt from 38-year-old Ontario ALS patient who died by MAID, medical assistance in dying, also known as assisted suicide.

So Canada legalizes assisted suicide.

And

people who have even a slightly functioning sense of morality immediately said, well, this is really bad.

Assisted suicide is really, really bad.

It violates the Hippocratic Oath, first of all.

Hippocratic oath begins first, do no harm.

Assisted suicide harms, just immediately harms because it kills people.

And also, it's going to lead to all of these terrible outcomes.

It's going to pressure old people who many, many old people feel like a burden on their families and they are more prone to depression and to despair.

It's going to encourage a lot of them to kill themselves when they should not kill themselves.

They should be loved and cherished in their old age and have a sense of dignity and not be permitted or not, certainly not encouraged to fall into despair.

But it's not just old people.

It's going to be people who have serious illnesses.

They're not going to persevere.

They're not going to, even as they suffer, you know, recognize that suffering is a part of the human condition and be an example of how to suffer.

And I believe at least suffering is sanctifying.

But at the very least,

I think we have to acknowledge suffering is an inescapable part of the human condition.

And if we seek to eliminate suffering, ultimately we're going to...

eliminate human life.

And you have seen this because it's not just people who have some terribly painful degenerative illness, who, you know, you can say with nearly 100% certainty will, you know, will never recover and will be in excruciating pain toward the end, even though we have good palliative care now.

But all of a sudden, it starts to creep back.

Now it's adults who don't have, say, Lou Gehrig's disease.

It's adults with depression.

Adults with, I don't know, an eating disorder, say, who they say, I'm going to kill myself.

And the Canadian government says, that's okay.

Then it's teenagers in certain parts of the world.

Then it's the mentally handicapped.

Then it's all of a sudden, this is getting really, really dark.

Now we're harvesting the organs from these people.

Now,

and we've had conversations on this show about the organ donation market for a long time.

Lots of dubious ethics in the medical donation because it's reliant upon this scientific concept of brain, not even, it's an ideological concept of brain death, which which really doesn't come about until the 1960s or so.

And brain death is dubious because often what happens in the case of medical harvesting of organs is it's not that the person dies and then you harvest the organs and you donate them to someone else.

It's that the harvesting of the organs is what literally kills the person,

which creates a lot of ethical problems.

In any case, an American man just received a heart from a 38-year-old Canadian who killed himself.

Is this the kind of market that we want to be encouraging?

I make jokes about Canada being America's evil top hat all the time.

I don't actually want to kill them all and harvest their organs.

That's a bridge too far.

That's taking the joke a little bit too far, wouldn't you say?

Okay, if

most people, there are going to be liberals who say, no, it's fine.

It's good.

This man had a disease and he made the choice to kill himself.

And because the only moral criterion of liberalism is consent, then he has the right to do that because liberalism presumes

the idea of self-ownership, the idea that we own ourselves, which is not true, not true at all.

Because of all of that, they're going to say, well, this is fine.

What's wrong with it?

Now an American man gets a heart out of it.

I don't know.

I think more people, though, the conservatives and the moderates are going to say, hey,

suicide is bad.

and we shouldn't encourage it.

And we definitely shouldn't be profiting from it.

And we shouldn't open up markets in the organs of the people we've encouraged through the law to kill themselves in other countries.

You see how this could go wrong real fast?

But it started with such good intentions.

I'm speaking to the kind of moderate conservative or liberal who said, ah, you know, grandpa really was having a hard go of it at the end there.

And maybe it's

okay to have a medical assistance in dying, also known as suicide.

Maybe suicide's okay in some cases.

We just don't want to let it get too far.

We don't want to let the slippery slope, you know, slip down too far.

This was always there.

This was inevitable.

We were always in this place where

if you make the Faustian bargain, if you compromise on moral issues, even for good intentions,

This was inevitable.

MAID in Canada has existed for like five minutes so far.

We're already harvesting the

suicidees organs.

Not good.

I think we need to do something about that here.

Okay, now, you know that the government's shutdown?

A lot of people had forgotten.

Now we're starting to feel a little pain of it.

We are going to speak with the chairman of the Republican Study Committee momentarily.

First, I want to tell you about YAF.

It is shocking.

It is a scandal that more people have not heard of YAF's National Journalism Center.

There is not a more consequential and important pipeline from college into conservative media than NJC.

It boasts a 12-week internship training program that is fully paid and gives you access to the best reporters and personalities in the business.

It also sticks you right in a working newsroom in the first week.

You want to be at the center of the nation's biggest political stories.

NJC is the fastest way to do it.

We've had reporters here at the Daily Wire who have attended NJC and launched their professional careers immediately.

Our NJC alumni have pursued stories relentlessly.

like taking pictures from a helicopter to exposing a dodgy Texas community development marketed exclusively to illegal immigrants.

Their reporting was featured on Ben Shapiro's podcast, but more importantly, it was featured on my podcast, as well as Fox News and a host of other prominent media outlets.

This reporting from Dailywire's NJC alum has created real tangible change and put concrete wins on the board for American patriots.

It all traces back to NJC's internship journalism boot camp, which covers everything you need to break into media, whether you're interested in podcasting, video production, print reporting, or independent journalism.

More important, if you are tired of the fake news and the lib media and you want to win, get off the sidelines and get into the game.

Submit your application to the National Journalism Center today.

I am very pleased to be joined right now by Congressman August Fluger from the great state of Texas, chairman of the Republican Study Committee, here to remind us, one, that the government is in fact shut down and to get to what some of the consequences of that shutdown could be,

notably on military readiness.

Congressman Fluger, thank you for coming on the show.

Michael, thanks for having me and thanks for highlighting issues.

Unfortunately, we have to do that now.

So, Congressman, I know the conventional wisdom is Republicans get blamed for shutdowns.

Maybe that will happen in the long run.

But of all the shutdowns that have happened in my lifetime, this one, I think, is most clearly owned by the Democrats.

The Republicans have unified government.

The Republicans offered a clean, continuing resolution just to keep the government going as other issues are ironed out.

This is exclusively a Democrat shutdown.

Now, Chuck Schumer believes that the longer the shutdown goes on, the better it is for Democrats.

He said that.

It's been reported now for days.

I think for most of us, we haven't really noticed the government shutdown.

And I think a lot of people would say, this is a good opportunity to fire some people and maybe shrink the government.

Okay.

Now, however, it seems to be impacting military readiness.

Tell us about that.

Well, you're right.

And I'll get to the military readiness.

Just to answer your question, though, I mean, you heard a senior Democrat aide say, until planes fall out of the sky, we're not going to open the government back up.

So they're owning it 100%.

And how disgusting of a comment that was.

We had a clean CR.

We did our job in the House.

And now Senate Democrats under Chuck Schumer's distasteful leadership have voted eight times to not fund the government, to not fund the military.

And I'm a veteran.

I flew combat missions in Iraq and Syria.

You know, I was on active duty during several shutdowns.

They hurt readiness.

They hurt your ability to focus on the threat, on the missions, because now commanders are having to worry about where their troops, their young enlisted and young officers, how they're going to put food on the table and take care of their families.

I mean, think about the soldier who's deployed right now with a young family, maybe a baby at home.

You know, a lot of our troops are on food stamps.

And they're worried about that.

They're not worried about doing the mission.

They're worried about taking care of their family, and rightfully so.

So absolutely, it hurts mission readiness.

It hurts our focus, and it hurts our national security.

The fact that troops are on food stamps is a national disgrace, frankly.

That needs to be addressed in a different way.

But on the point of the paychecks, there is reporting out now that

the military might miss a paycheck.

These military families who,

even if they're not totally destitute,

they need those paychecks.

Is that going to happen?

What is the administration and Republicans in Congress, what are they doing to prevent that?

And what do the Democrats have to say about it?

Well, we've seen recently where President Trump stepped up, did the right thing, told Secretary Hagseth to find the money and to make sure that they get paid on the 15th of this month.

So, you know, that's

a big deal that they did that because that has not happened in the past.

But they're taking money out of other pots, out of

other sources where, you know, probably for operations and readiness and mission type money.

So it's not going to last forever.

You know,

most of our military personnel get paid on the 15th and at the end of the month.

So this isn't going to last forever.

And if Democrats keep up this theater, which it is, make no mistake, this is political theater at its very worst,

then they will miss a paycheck eventually.

I'd like to know where my Democrat colleagues are,

those that served, the veterans on the Democrat side, where are they?

Why are they not stepping up right now and rising above the noise and doing the right thing?

Because guess what

when when nancy pelosi was speaker and when joe biden was president republicans didn't shut the government down and where are they where are they right now why are they not doing the right thing i i'm i'm so disappointed in them are democrats going to object to the republicans who are trying to find money you know borrowing from peter to pay paul to to make sure that the military actually are paid are democrats going to try to impede that

i mean can you imagine you know chuck shimmer leading the charge saying that's illegal You can't pay the troops.

I mean,

what kind of idiot would do that?

But yeah, I mean, I would not put it past them.

I mean, this is exactly what Democrats do.

You fix a problem and then they find another way to lie about it, to have deceit about it, to do something completely,

well, I was going to say another word, but to do something that doesn't make any sense at all.

You know, listen, it's a family show.

We try to keep it clean.

And sometimes I'm tempted to, though.

So before I let you go, Congressman,

how long is this going to go on for?

I mean, you know, the Republicans open up with, we're going to have a clean CR, so we're not trying to cram our stuff into this continuing resolution.

But Democrats wanted to cram their stuff in.

Notably, Republicans highlighted healthcare for illegal aliens.

But okay, fine.

You know, we're in this fight now.

What is the end of this fight?

If Chuck Schumer sincerely believes that the longer it goes on, the better it is for Democrats, then

is the government going to reopen next week, the week after, two months from now?

And whenever it does reopen,

what's the deal going to be?

Well, first off, I think Mike Johnson is doing a great job.

We've done our job.

We've voted to fund the government.

It's the simplest thing.

This was a Joe Biden signed budget or an Autopen signed budget.

So this is a budget that Democrats already voted on.

So how do they now come to us and say, well, we can't vote on it now because, well, no, you actually, this was Biden's budget.

So I think there's probably one of a couple of ways.

Number one, Senate Democrats need to get over their theater and just do the right thing.

And assuming that that happens, the stalemate.

Okay, so assuming that doesn't happen, they're conflating several things.

And they're putting these ACA premium subsidies in there.

They want us to fund illegal immigrants into healthcare, which we've said absolutely not.

I mean, these are hundreds of billions of dollars in waste.

So

I think probably what ends up happening is President Trump will probably have to save the day and bring people together like he's done and make some sort of deal.

But let's make one thing clear.

The prize for Democrats opening the government is not going to be ACA subsidies.

We will negotiate on things like that when we get the government open, but they're not going to hold us hostage like this and laugh at the American people and say, look, we just, you know, we just did this political stunt and now we...

we get something out of it.

No, I'm sorry, but the American public is tired.

My district especially is just tired of the lies and tired of the games.

They want us to go to Washington and do what we said we were going to do, which is what has happened.

And I think this is the Democrats' only shot to stop Donald Trump because he is the only president who has done everything he said he would do.

Yeah, there's this problem for the Dems, which is they keep saying the people are on our side and, you know, we're going to, we're the resistance, the voice of the people.

But of course, the people voted for Trump.

And it wasn't just that he won the Electoral College, which is ultimately all that matters.

He won the popular vote.

And the Republicans have the House and the Senate and the presidency.

And because they keep winning the presidency, they have the Supreme Court.

And just at a certain point, the Democrats probably need to get the message that

most of the people are not on your side.

And I agree, this is pretty desperate.

I also agree that you can't give in to the Democrats, especially on the health care stuff, because it just rewards them.

It gives them an incentive to do this kind of thing again.

It's a real thorny issue.

And I suspect you're right that the White House is going to have to step in and twist some arms and make some carrots and sticks.

Congressman Fluger, thank you so much for coming on the show.

Thanks for having me.

I appreciate it.

God bless.

All right, we'll see.

Maybe we'll have Congressman Fluger back on two months when this government is still shut down.

Okay.

Much more to say

about assisted suicide, actually, even on the American side of it.

On a wonderful ceremony yesterday at the White House when my friend Charlie Kirk received the presidential Medal of Freedom.

There's even more poetry coming up.

October is packed with new releases on Dailyware Wire Plus, and tomorrow night's a big one.

The premiere of Friendly Fire.

Join me, Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, Andrew Clavin, unscripted, unfiltered, sexy, no moderators, nothing off limits, live at 7 p.m.

Eastern Plus, special appearances from Isabel Brown, and the first look at the Pendragon cycle.

It all kicks off tomorrow night.

Do not wait.

Join Nag at 40% off a new annual membership with code FALL40 at dailywire.com.

Every leap in American history has needed breakthrough energy.

Ignition,

We're aiming to develop multi-gigawatt power plants near data centers designed with future pathways to lower carbon intensity.

AI gets the power it needs, communities get the jobs, and the grid stays strong.

Powering AI today builds America's next superpower.

My favorite comment yesterday is from Martha C.8529, who says, I find it funny when Trump says stuff like, I was being being a little cute, lol.

It's such an unassuming way of talking.

Yeah,

I like it.

People even on the right have hated that since 2016, since he started running.

And that stuff doesn't bother me at all.

It's very familiar because

it's not high-minded.

It's not abstract.

It doesn't require multiple degrees to know what Trump is doing.

He just talks like a New Yorker.

That's how New Yorkers talk.

And

I think if more of the Republican establishment had just been familiar with that in 2016, it would have saved us a lot of rancor.

Okay, turning to electoral politics on this issue of assisted suicide, here is Abigail Spanberger, the Democrat member of Congress who's now running for a governor of Virginia.

Here is her take on assisted suicide.

I support and I would support legislation that legalizes the right to die with dignity of a person's choosing.

And that would include allowing for medical providers to provide prescriptions for life-ending prescriptions

in the cases of someone who's deemed medically

competent to make that decision, mentally competent to make that decision.

I oppose the ability of religious institutions to put their religious-based ideas on individuals and their health care choices and options.

I

believe that we should trust people to have relationships with their health care providers that lead them to make strong decisions based on their medical practices.

And I do not believe that people should have the option to

allow their own personal beliefs to dictate the type of medical care that they are providing their patients.

What?

What was that last part?

I don't believe that doctors should let their beliefs impact the medical care they're providing.

What do you go to a doctor for?

You go to a doctor for his judgment, for his wisdom, because he is the expert, because he knows something that you don't know.

What does that mean?

It's just some stupid liberal bromide.

I don't think that doctors should let their beliefs and thoughts impact what they do.

Well, then what the hell are you hiring them for?

Why?

I want them to advance my beliefs and thoughts.

Oh, okay, got it.

So it's not that you

advance some kind of neutral, objective, liberated order.

You just think that your evil ideas should supersede the medical views of medical professionals and the ethical views of medical professionals.

This is sick stuff.

This woman is a sick person, Abigail Spandberger.

She continues to endorse Jay Jones for attorney general.

I mean, they're essentially running on a ticket.

And Jay Jones is the one who was discovered to have been wishing for the murder of his Republican opponent and the opponent's kids and said that the birth of those children was breeding little fascists.

This woman supports that.

So at least she's consistent.

She supports killing babies in the womb.

She supports killing Republican babies outside of the womb.

And she supports killing grandma and people who are mentally ill and people who are sick and people who are depressed.

So, okay, I guess she's consistent.

She wants to kill like everybody.

And this is the moderate.

That's what makes it interesting to me.

Not that the Democrats have evil views.

It's that she's the moderate.

Abigail Spanberger,

when the Democrats were talking about abolishing police, Abigail Spanberger said, no, I don't think we should abolish police.

When the Democrats were trying to stop Republicans from reducing crime in D.C., Abigail Spanberger said, No,

we shouldn't reduce punishments for the criminals in D.C.

During COVID, when the libs were locking down the whole world, Abigail Spanberger was one of those who voted to end the COVID national emergency.

There were not that many Democrats who did that.

When the Democrats were saying everything Trump does is evil, Abigail Spanberger was one of the people who supported Trump's

rewriting of NAFTA, the USMCA trade deal.

She is, relative to the Democrats, a moderate.

And still,

she supports

government-promoted, government-protected, doctor-encouraged suicide

and the murder of Republicans and our children.

Not to mention killing babies in the womb and all the rest of it.

The most moderate Democrat in the country today

is like a communist compared to the Democrat Party of even 20 years ago.

That's not to say that the Republican Party has not in some ways moved to the right.

It has.

Let's say this is the right.

This is the left.

I'll describe this for you if you're only listening.

Over time, yes, the right has moved a little bit to the right.

The left has moved so, so far to the left that they would

minimize, excuse, and even celebrate the murder of the assassination of a right-wing political debater, and they would refuse to withdraw endorsements from a would-be law enforcement top official, a attorney general of Virginia, who wishes for the murder of Republicans and our kids.

Assisted suicides, or

killing the vulnerable.

That is totally kosher with these guys.

Okay.

Speaking of Charlie, speaking of Charlie Kirk, yesterday, beautiful ceremony at the White House, Charlie was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom and his widow, Erica, showed up to receive the award.

And there was this great moment of levity as Erica was you know mustering an incredible amount of strength to be able to

can you imagine you imagine a widow especially of a young husband with little kids speaking at anything at a luncheon this shortly after her husband's murder and she gets up at the white house speaking to the entire world and she manages to find a moment of levity with the president

God when it was costly, but that's what we're called to do.

Surprisingly enough, he did pray for his enemies,

which is very hard, but he did.

He did.

He did.

For those who can't see it, Trump laughs.

I mean, I saw him.

And he throws his hands and never did it in front of anyone else, but I can attest to that.

See, Grave Money is laughs.

He's really.

He also loved people when it was in condition.

You can tell he's really getting a kick out of it.

And it's really, this was a great little line from Erica, but it also shows Trump's humility, and also, I think, vindicates my view of when Trump said, Charlie said, pray for his enemies.

He wanted the best for his enemies.

I hate my enemies and I don't want what's best for them.

And yet, all these pearl-clutching Christians who said, he doesn't understand the true gospel, and he doesn't understand.

He's making a joke, guys.

It's a joke.

It's a nice little moment of levity.

He's saying, Charlie, even if he, even if he legitimately struggles with willing the best for his enemies, which might be the case, he's saying, Charlie did that.

He is better than me.

He's in heaven looking down angrily at me right now.

He's saying, I'm not worthy.

Lord, have mercy on me, sinner.

That's good.

And he's laughing here when Erica makes this joke.

It's really nice.

The even more beautiful aspect of the award, which was well deserved, was on the back of it.

Do we have a clip of it?

So if you look on the back of the

presidential Medal of Freedom, it says Charles James Kirk.

And there's a cross engraved on the back, which I think is the first time ever that a Medal of Freedom has come with a cross engraved on it.

That's really beautiful.

And, you know, if you try to see the silver lining in the storm cloud of Charlie's murder, that's it, right?

There are a handful of

good reactions amid a lot of horrible reactions, but

the real silver lining is this return to church.

I've seen it personally, you know, multiple times,

as have a lot of people, this increased concern for religious truth, and also, I think, a deeper understanding of freedom.

When the story of this is all written,

it will be significant that Charlie was wearing a shirt that said freedom.

He was wearing a shirt that said freedom.

And that word is so abused that we tend to kind of laugh at it today.

So, oh, here we go.

Another platitude about freedom in the abstract.

But that's not really how Charlie viewed freedom.

You know, Charlie, coming from a Christian perspective, understood that freedom is not just doing whatever you want, that freedom has discipline to it.

Freedom is grounded in the truth.

I think increasingly conservatives are coming to that.

He wasn't the only one who had come to that conclusion.

Increasingly, we're coming to that conclusion.

That's how we used to understand it in American history.

Then we went through a fever in the late 20th century where we started to think freedom meant doing weird sex stuff and doing a bunch of drugs and letting criminals roam the streets.

And we thought that was freedom.

It's not.

It's not.

And the gods of the copybook headings

come back again to educate us.

And

the true freedom is found in Christ.

Perfect freedom is found in Christ.

Christ says, the truth will set you free.

He says, take up my,

you know, take my yoke upon you, but my yoke is easy and my burden is light.

You know,

if you would follow me, you know, pick up your cross.

That paradoxically, that's the kind of freedom.

Because the truth sets you free, lies enslave you.

The wages of sin is death.

All sin is a kind of a slavery.

We're coming to recognize that again, that it's this kind of shallow negative view of liberty, where it's just freedom from interference so that we can go, you know,

engage in whatever deviant, aberrant desires we want and behaviors that we want, that that's kind of silly.

One, because you can never be totally free from interference because we live in society.

The only true kind of freedom involves substantive goods, you know,

and ultimately it's perfected in Christ.

And

the truth will set us free.

This is why people are ditching the false ideologies, especially the sexual ideologies, is it's a lie and it enslaves people.

That connection, this is the first time ever in the history of the Presidential Medal of Freedom that you see a connection between this word freedom and the perfection of freedom, what freedom really means.

When this story is written,

that's going to be very significant.

That's going to be that

the author of this story did a really good job pointing that out.

Okay.

There's a story I really, really want to get to because it's an excuse to read another poem.

It comes from the Washington Post

that people once again are terrified of dying alone.

It's another one of those

God's the copybook headings coming back saying, you know, we...

We went into this hyperindividualism that said we all just, we don't need anybody.

We should get divorced.

We should live on our own.

We should ignore our families.

We should ignore our friends.

We should just do whatever we want.

You do you.

Just focus on me, self-care.

Look out for number one.

And now people are returning to an age-old fear of dying alone.

But I think everyone is missing the point on this.

And I'll leave you on that cliffhanger because maybe we'll get to it tomorrow.

Today is Woke Wednesday.

The rest of the show continues now.

You do not want to miss it.

Become a member.

Use code Knowles Canada WLES at checkout for two months free on all annual plans.