Why Does Donald Trump Want Greenland?

On the Embedded Podcast.

No, no.

It's called denying us freedom of speech. It's misinformation.
Like so many Americans, my dad has gotten swept up in conspiracy theories. These are not conspiracy theories.
These are reality. I spent the year following him down the rabbit hole, trying to get him back.
Listen to Alternate Realities on the Embedded Podcast from NPR. All episodes available now.
This is Christina from Glen Ellyn, Illinois. We are in

the middle of false spring here in the Midwest. Yesterday, I was in a t-shirt and today it's

snowing. This podcast was recorded at 12.20 p.m.
on Wednesday, March 27th. Things may have changed

by the time you hear this, but I am really hoping we get back to warmer weather by the end of this podcast. My heart goes out to you.
Me too. I hate that fall spring.
But you get all the promise and the sunshine and then you've got to get out the winter jacket again. The spring of deception.
Hey there, it's the NPR Politics Podcast. I'm Susan Davis.
I cover politics. I'm Deepa Shivaram.
I cover the White House. And I'm Greg Myrie.
I cover national security. And today on the show, a look at why President Trump is so interested in annexing Greenland.
This is not a new idea. Trump floated it during his first term.
But what's different this time is just how seriously the Trump administration is talking about such a move. The vice president, second lady, and other administration officials are headed to Greenland to visit a U.S.
military base in the northern part of the country. Greg, let's start with the big picture here.
Why is the U.S. so interested in acquiring Greenland? Well, I think we could point to three reasons.
One is minerals. Greenland has a lot of them.
It's the biggest island in the world. It's got a lot of stuff that has not been mined.
Things like cobalt, nickel, lithium. Now, these are things we use in batteries, cell phones, electric vehicles, so civilian and military uses.
This is the thing that seems to animate Trump the most. He does bring this up when he talks about Greenland.
A second thing would be Arctic seaways. Climate change means there's less ice in the Arctic.
Some of the previously unnavigable sea lanes are now opening up. Russia is considered the real leader in this.
So the U.S. is somewhat concerned for security reasons.
Number three is the military presence. Really interesting history here.
The U.S. has had a military base in Greenland since World War II.
After the Nazis seized Denmark, Greenland, which was a colony of Denmark at that time, was defenseless, all on its own. The U.S.
set up a base there during World War II. That base is now in the far northwest in the Arctic Circle.
It is largely a radar system that would detect the launch of nuclear weapons from Russia or China, which would travel over the Arctic. And perhaps the U.S.
would be interested in expanding it. Greg, I have a specific question about the minerals.
Is there also potentially a China nexus there as the U.S. seeks to be less reliant on China for those kinds of resources? Oh, absolutely.
China has been very aggressive in getting access to rare earth minerals, both inside China and in other parts of the globe, making deals and mining deals in particular around the world. The U.S.
seems to have lagged behind in a number of places. So this is a place that's really untapped.
Again, Greenland is absolutely massive, and a lot of that has not been mined at this point. It has a lot of these key minerals.
So catching up with China or not being as vulnerable and dependent on China would be a big part of the equation. Deepa, just yesterday, President Trump was talking about acquiring Greenland in the Oval Office.
This is what he said. We need Greenland for national security and international security.
So we'll, I think we'll go as far as we have to go. We need Greenland and the world needs us to have Greenland, including Denmark.
Denmark has to have us have Greenland. Important note here, Deepa, neither Denmark nor Greenland want the U.S.
to take control of the island. How does this attitude from Trump align with other attitudes towards foreign policy and sort of the relationship with other countries in the world? Yeah, I would say like just off the bat, I mean, foreign policy in a Joe Biden administration, for example, or a different administration, you know, a lot of it happens behind the scenes.
So much of the negotiations and the handshakes and the deal breaking all happens like in a very not public sphere, right? And in a Trump administration, it's like all of it happens right out loud. And so you're seeing this sort of like back and forth, if you want to call it that, in a very public setting.
And it's just interesting because Trump, like you said, has been talking about taking Greenland for a while now. And it's something that he's just made so, so public.
Like even in his first address, the joint adjust to Congress that happened earlier this month, he said something along the lines of, you know, we're going to have it one way or another when he was talking about Greenland. And it just has been this shift of like, okay, we're not really sure if he means this.
And then he never stopped talking about it. And now he's really sort of shifted his tone to make it really about international security, talking about Russia and China, talking about how it is a need to, you know, keep troops safe and keep the region safe.
And that has been the expanded rhetoric that he's been using. This is a topic that has come up again and again and again.
You could say he can't let it go. Greg, there's something to me very contradictory here in that the concept of this is sort of American expansion.
And that seems to run very counter to the sort of America first isolation argument that the Trump administration ran and won on. And also at the same time, an administration that's taking a much more hostile position towards European allies.
Yeah, absolutely. And as you say, it is hard to sort this out.
As soon as Trump came into office, he again continued his criticisms of Europe and NATO, saying Europe and NATO are not contributing enough. They need to provide for their own security.
And what got a lot of attention was when Vice President Vance went to the Munich Security Conference last month and gave a very harsh speech directed toward Europe. And it wasn't just about security cooperation between the U.S.
and Europe. He talked about their immigration policies and was very critical of their democracies, of their security.
And yet at the same time, Trump and Vance are talking about this expansionist approach to Greenland, that they want Greenland, which again is a semi-autonomous part of a European country. So it's kind of, well, which is it? Do you want to distance yourself from Europe and leave Europe and its own security to its own devices? Or does the U.S.
want to become more involved by annexing Greenland, as Trump keeps talking about? So it's somewhat a mixed message. And J.D.
Vance has kind of been at the center of this message as well as Trump. All right, let's take a quick break and we'll talk more about this when we get back.
This message comes from NPR sponsor Shopify. No idea where to sell? Shopify puts you in control of every sales channel.
It is the commerce platform revolutionizing millions of businesses worldwide. Whether you're a garage entrepreneur or IPO ready, Shopify is the only tool you need to start, run, and grow your business without the struggle.
Once you've reached your audience, Shopify has the internet's best converting checkout to help you turn them from browsers to buyers. Go to shopify.com slash NPR to take your business to the next level today.
And we're back. And Deepa, let's talk a little bit more about the details of this trip.
Can you say what we know about the itinerary and what the intent of it is? Yeah. So basically this all unfolded in the past five days, I would say.
On Sunday, the White House announced that Second Lady Usha Vance was going to travel to Greenland with one of her young sons. And they were going to go on a cultural trip, essentially, like look at Greenlandic heritage and go to cultural sites.
They were going to attend the national dog sled race in Greenland, which is a really big deal. It involves like 400 dogs.
And that sort of came across as like a, okay, we're just kind of going to see the sites trip. At the same time, Mike Waltz, who's the president's national security advisor, was going to go to visit a U.S.
military base as a separate thing. There was going to be a U.S.
delegation coming. All of this was happening without really an invite from, you know, political leaders in Greenland or Denmark.
And the Greenlandic prime minister, you know, reacted and said it was very aggressive of U.S. officials to come visit.
They did not take it well. There was a lot of negative reaction to all of it.
And the vice president, J.D. Vance, posted a video on social media and that sort of upended things.
And he said that he was going to visit with his wife. They were no longer going to the dog race.
They're going to visit a Space Force base in Greenland and meet with service members there on Friday. And so that's the current itinerary.
It's sort of shifted from this cultural visit to simply going to the U.S. base there.
I mean, protocol is a side issue here, but Deepa, I do think it's worth noting that it is very unusual for the U.S. to announce a visit to a country to which they have not been invited to.
Normally, there's a ton of protocol and pomp and circumstance around these types of international trips. No, this is like, I think, safe to say very upside down.
This is not how it's typically done. If you visit, if, you know, when we as reporters travel with the president or vice president to a different country, just in terms of, you know, what's going to happen when they're on the ground, there's all these logistics down to who is greeting, you know, the president or vice president and their team on the tarmac when Air Force One or Air Force Two arrives.
There's a lot of detail and planning that goes into it, including an invitation from the host country. In this case, it's not exactly clear what the invites were, I will say.
The president said earlier this week that people in Greenland were asking the U.S. to come and asking U.S.
officials to come. He was saying they're asking us.
We're not telling them or anything. It's not really clear who those invites were coming from, but I did confirm from the vice president's office that Second Lady Usha Vance received, quote, multiple invitations to attend the dog sled race.
The head of the dog sledding association had asked her to wave the flag to open the race. And so that was an invite.
Whether there were more invites than that is a little bit unclear. But in the context of all of this, you know, this is happening and people in Greenland are not happy that the vice president and second lady are coming.
Greg, one of the things I'm stuck on here is that it's kind of funny in a way that annexation is the focus because it's not like the U.S. doesn't have a very long history of creating military treaties with allies to basically get the result that Trump is seeking from the idea of buying Greenland.
Like, aren't there other ways? Absolutely. You know, there's been that base there for decades.
The U.S. has military bases all over Europe.
And officials in both Denmark and Greenland, journalists, others say that Greenland is open to an expanded U.S. presence.
In fact, they've even raised other issues where they would welcome more U.S. involvement, mining, as we mentioned, but tourism, fishing.
So there's absolutely no opposition to U.S. presence or expanded presence in Greenland.
But Denmark and Greenland say it should be done in a way that's mutual and that shouldn't be done through pressure, this talk of annexation. So that's the real head scratcher here.
And then it kind of mirrors what we're also seeing with Trump talking about Canada becoming the 51st state or reclaiming the Panama Canal, this sort of sense of taking over places that are absolutely friendly and cooperative and have a longstanding good relationship with the United States. I mean, historically speaking, The U.S.
has expanded its territory over the years. So the concept of it isn't entirely new.
But the idea of this, to me, I just think about in the modern context, it raises just so many issues of acquiring an island and having to represent its people. Like, from my vantage point, you're like, does that mean that Greenland would get representatives in Congress, right? Do they have to be, you know, offered Social Security benefits? Do they have to provide them health care? Like the logistics of a modern day land acquisition and the people that inhabit it are not as simple as I think maybe Trump is making it out to seem like, oh, we'll just annex Greenland and everything will be great.
Yeah, that all just sort of ended really with World War II as European powers gave up their colonies and those became independent nations. And in fact, that's what happened here.
Greenland was long a colony of Denmark. And then I believe in the 1950s, again, shortly after World War II, it became this semi-autonomous place.
It runs its own affairs domestically. Denmark is still responsible for foreign policy and defense in Greenland.
But Trump seems to be really talking about something that's from a bygone era. Deepa, I wish you were going to get to go as pool on this trip because it was- Dude, I wish that too.
I was really gunning for the dog sledding portion as well. Like, send me to Greenland.
That's a great story. I don't know what to watch for next in this saga.
And I think saga is the right word to describe this. But I imagine that one thing to be watching is how the U.S.
continues to sort of deal with Denmark in a diplomatic sense. Like, will they be invited here for a White House state dinner, for instance? Yeah, I was going to say, honestly, hard to say.
And especially as, you know, we've been talking about in this podcast, the way the Trump administration facilitates their foreign policy is not often something that you can pinpoint or predict because the way Trump interacts is just so different than how foreign policy is typically done, like we mentioned earlier. So I don't know, to be honest with you.
And I could see this going both ways where it somehow gets a little bit more receptive and friendly. We've seen leaders in Denmark respond to the updated itinerary, if you will, from J.D.
Vance and Usha Vance. And they're okay with the fact that they're visiting the U.S.
military base rather than going to the dog sledding, you know, competition. But it could also, you know, really go the other direction.
And I feel it could get maybe, you know, more contentious and more aggressive. So we'll just have to wait and see.
And I'll just make a related point. Today, France is hosting 30 European countries and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky to talk about supporting Ukraine, the future of Ukraine.
Now, in the past, under the Biden administration, this would have probably been the monthly meeting led by the U.S. to talk about Ukraine.
But Europe is already responding to Trump's calls for it to take care of its own defense. So this is a meeting with all of the major European nations and the Ukrainian leadership.
But the U.S. is not part of it.
So we're already seeing real world consequences based on Trump's statements about

how he plans to deal with Europe. Yeah, it's pretty remarkable.
All right, we'll leave it

there for today. I'm Susan Davis.
I cover politics. I'm Deepa Shiveram.
I cover the White House. And I'm Greg Myrie.
I cover national security. And thanks for listening to the NPR Politics Podcast.
When Malcolm Gladwell presented NPR, The ThruLine podcast from NPR. These days, there's so much news, it can be hard to keep up with what it all means for you, your family, and your community.
The Consider This podcast from NPR features our award-winning journalism. Six days a week, we bring you a deep dive on a news story and provide the context and analysis that helps you make sense of the news.
We get behind the headlines. We get to the truth.
Listen to the Consider This podcast from NPR. Making time for the news is important, but when you need a break, we've got you covered on All Songs Considered, NPR's music podcast.
Think of it like a music discovery show,

a well-deserved escape with friends,

and yeah, some serious music insight.

I'm gonna keep it real.

I have no idea what this story is about.

Hear new episodes of All Songs Considered

every Tuesday, wherever you get podcasts.