Roundup: Bolton In Court, Zelenskyy In Washington, Military In The Caribbean
This episode: voting correspondent Miles Parks, justice correspondent Ryan Lucas, White House correspondent Franco Ordoñez, and senior political and editor correspondent Domenico Montanaro.
This podcast was produced by Bria Suggs and edited by Rachel Baye.
Our executive producer is Muthoni Muturi.
Listen to every episode of the NPR Politics Podcast sponsor-free, unlock access to bonus episodes with more from the NPR Politics team, and support public media when you sign up for The NPR Politics Podcast+ at plus.npr.org/politics.
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy
Listen and follow along
Transcript
Support for the following message comes from Sutter Health, where doctors and nurses care for 3.5 million Californians, offering everything from primary and maternity care to advanced heart and cancer treatments.
Learn more at Sutterhealth.org.
Hi, this is Mary Beth.
Tom, Marty, Anna, Terry, Louise.
After growing up on our mother's childhood stories from a time in Ireland, we're here in Galway for our first visit.
This podcast was recorded at
1:20 p.m.
on October 17th, 2025.
Things may have changed by the time you hear this, but we'll still be drinking in the wonderful music.
Beautiful sights, inspiring history,
and all the Ishkabaha we can get.
Slatcha!
Enjoy the show!
Wow.
What are those words?
Do you know those words?
I don't know.
I want some Ishkabaha.
Sounds like a fun trip.
I just want a Guinness.
You know, it's Friday.
I was going to say, yeah,
that's what I was ready for.
I know.
Apparently, Ishkabaha is water of life in Irish.
Okay.
Now you know.
Hey there.
It's the NPR Politics Podcast.
I'm Miles Parks.
I cover voting.
I'm Ryan Lucas.
I cover the Justice Department.
And I'm Domenico Montanaro, Senior Political Editor and Correspondent.
And today on the podcast, we are wrapping up another busy week in Washington, starting with the indictment this week of former National Security Advisor John Bolton, which is why you are here, Ryan.
You cover the Justice Department.
Can you talk us through just the basics of this indictment?
What is Bolton charged with?
What does the Justice Department say he did?
So Bolton is facing 18 counts in all.
Eight counts for the transmission of national defense information, the remaining 10 for the retention of national defense information.
And what the indictment says is that when Bolton served as President Trump's national security advisor during the first term, so in 2018, 2019, that Bolton would often take handwritten notes on yellow notepads about his daily activities.
So meetings that he'd have with U.S.
intelligence officials or with military officials, meetings that he would have with foreign leaders or foreign intelligence services.
So we'd take notes on those.
And the indictment says that he would then type up these diary-like entries on a regular basis into an electronic form.
material that included classified information and then send those diary-like entries via a commercial messaging app and his AOL and Gmail accounts to two family members, family members who had no security clearances.
In total, the indictment says Bolton sent more than a thousand pages of information, and in those thousand pages, there was, the indictment says, highly classified information.
What kind of evidence does the Justice Department say they have for all this criminal activity?
Well, look, this is a 26-page indictment.
It's not going to provide all the evidence that the Justice Department has, but it certainly has a lot of details in it.
It provides examples of what it says says is in some of these documents.
It says one document, for example, reveals intelligence about foreign adversary plans to attack U.S.
forces.
A document reveals a covert action planned by the United States.
Another document reveals human intelligence using sensitive sources and methods.
This is like the crown jewels of what the U.S.
spy agencies do.
A covert action program.
and intelligence collected on the leader of an adversary's military.
So very sensitive information, all told.
You may recall that Bolton wrote a tell-all memoir from his time in the Trump White House.
There was a fight back in the day about whether there was classified information in there or not.
The Justice Department tried to sue him.
Ultimately, the book was published.
The indictment says that none of the classified information in the charged accounts appears in that book.
There's one more thing that I'll mention from this indictment that's very interesting, and it is that after he left the Trump White House, Bolton's personal email at some point was hacked by people who the department believes have ties to the Iranian government.
And the indictment says that those hackers did gain access to the classified information that he was sending over his personal email.
Got it.
Well, I mean, what is Bolton saying about these charges?
Has he made any public comments since the indictment came out?
He'd put out a statement last night after he was indicted, and he is very much trying to frame this as part of Trump's vengeance campaign.
Bolton said that he's a target by a weaponized justice department that's going after those who Trump deems his enemies with charges that Bolton says, quote, were declined before or distort the facts, end quote.
He says that this is just an effort by the Trump administration to intimidate Trump's opponents.
And he says he looks forward to this legal fight, to defending what he calls his lawful conduct and exposing what he says is Trump's abuse of power.
Well, I feel like it's time to bring up the sort of elephant in the room, which is that Bolton has been very critical of President Trump since he left the first Trump administration.
We can just hear a little bit of what Trump had to say about this indictment yesterday.
I think he's a
bad guy.
Yeah, he's a bad guy.
It's too bad, but that's the way it goes.
That's the way it goes, right?
Domenico, can you remind us a little bit more of the history between these two?
Well, you know, Bolton was somebody who appeared a lot on Fox News, was known as a pretty hawkish member of the sort of right-wing foreign policy community, someone that Trump saw a lot.
He brought Bolton into his inner circle, made him his national security advisor during his first term, but they had a falling out.
And Bolton went on to write a book about Trump.
Trump tried to block the release of that book.
Trump wound up calling Bolton a boring old fool.
And Bolton had revealed some things in his book that obviously made Trump pretty upset.
And, you know, look, there were a lot of people who were in Trump's inner circle in that first term who then wound up having a falling out because they disagreed with how Trump conducted himself in office.
Well, then the obvious question, Ryan, is this indictment indictment comes on the heels of indictments against James Comey and Letitia James, the Attorney General of New York, who are also people who Trump perceives as enemies.
How does this indictment against Bolton compare with those other indictments?
Well, look, Trump obviously campaigned in 2024 on seeking vengeance against his perceived enemies.
In the case of James Comey and Letitia James, Trump publicly called on the Justice Department to prosecute them.
Shortly afterwards, they were charged.
Comey was charged with false statements to Congress.
Letitia James was charged with bank fraud and false statements.
We know that career prosecutors had serious doubts about the strength of the evidence in both of those cases.
They were overruled by a new acting U.S.
attorney who was put in place, handpicked, by President Trump.
This woman, Lindsay Halligan, has no prosecutorial experience.
She had once worked as a personal attorney for the president.
That is all a very unusual process.
That's not how these things normally go down.
That series of events fed concerns that this was about political retribution and not about the facts and the evidence of the case against them.
With Bolton, this is a different U.S.
Attorney's Office.
It is led by a career prosecutor.
They were working with the National Security Division at the Justice Department.
This is the normal process for these sorts of things.
I will also add that the investigation into John Bolton is a long-running investigation.
It was underway, well underway, during the Biden administration, so it's not something that just started after Trump came back to office.
And this is a 26-page indictment.
The indictment against James Comey was a page and a half.
The indictment against Letitia James was four pages and basically another sentence.
The indictment against Bolton is full of detailed allegations.
So these are very significant differences between the case against Bolton and the indictments that we saw against Comey and Tish James.
Ultimately, Bolton is going to have his day in court.
He did plead not guilty in his initial appearance in court today today in Maryland.
We'll see how it plays out.
You know, and I think Ryan has made this point before, but I think that this is why the independence of the Department of Justice is so important, because you want to have legitimacy behind these cases, political legitimacy.
And as it is, a lot of people think that Trump has gone too far on his targeting and his retribution campaign of political foes.
You know, a recent YouGov poll, for example, found that six in ten people thought that Trump should not pursue charges against political foes, and a majority of people believed that he is in fact doing that.
And, you know, in a case like this, that may not be something that's as seemingly clearly political as the James Comey case or Letitia James, that can undermine the credibility of a case that may have some legitimacy.
Well, we can leave it there for now.
Ryan, thank you so much for your reporting.
Thank you.
All right, let's take a quick break.
More in a moment.
Support for the following message comes from Sutter Health, where doctors and nurses care for millions of Californians with breakthrough cancer treatments, advanced heart and brain care, and nationally recognized birth centers.
Sutter is bringing on new doctors and specialists to make getting care easier in more communities across California.
Learn more and find a doctor at Sutterhealth.org.
This message comes from Amazon Business.
With Smart Business Buying, get everything you need to grow in one familiar place, from office supplies to IT essentials and maintenance tools.
Ready to bring your visions to life?
Learn how at Amazonbusiness.com.
This message comes from Charles Schwab.
When it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices like full-service wealth management and advice when you need it.
You can also invest on your own and trade on Thinkorswim.
Visit Schwab.com to learn more.
This message comes from the Council for Interior Design Qualification.
Interior Designer and CIDQ President Siavash Madani describes his fundamentals of interior design.
I think interior design is about responsibility.
It's not just the way a space looks or the way a space photographs.
To me, better design means functional, safe, accessible, and inclusive design.
Learn more at cidq.org/slash npr.
And we're back.
And NPR White House correspondent Franco Ordonez is here with us.
Hi, Franco.
Hey, how are you?
I'm good.
So we are going to talk about a few different foreign affairs topics that have popped up this week.
I want to start with the news about the war in Ukraine.
Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky is at the White House today.
What are we expecting to come out of that visit?
I mean, it is a big meeting.
The two leaders are expected to talk about the U.S.
providing Ukraine with tomahawk missiles, which Ukraine wants to use to fire deep into Russia.
They've done a good job of kind of attacking Russia and kind of disrupting their economy.
And Trump has actually been kind of warming to the idea.
He's talked about it a few times.
And Trump Trump is also warming up to Zelensky in recent months.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has kind of backed away from the negotiating table and kind of backed away from some of the assurances that he gave Trump about
meeting with Zelensky and kind of slowing down the attacks or at least leading towards a potential peace deal.
But Putin yesterday actually threw kind of a curveball into the mix.
He had a call with Trump yesterday, and now Trump and Putin are going to meet in Budapest, Hungary.
This will be after some high-level leaders meet next week to talk about a potential end to the war.
So I can't imagine Zelensky is necessarily happy about that, considering that he wants these Tomahawk missiles.
And I can only question whether Trump is going to want to provide more missiles if he has kind of this carrot of a potential peace in front of him that Putin just gave him.
You know, I mean, Putin is one of those people, you mentioned curveballs.
It's like he throws, we're in the Major League Baseball playoffs here, and he throws a lot of secondary pitches, sliders, cutters, sinkers, screwballs, whatever it is to get other people off balance.
Because, you know, President Trump puts a lot of faith in his personal relationships, and he's continued to say often that he has this great relationship with President Putin.
And the reason why Trump, it seems, wants to like Putin is because Trump really respects absolute power.
So he wants Putin's sort of friendship and respect, and he wants Putin to go along with what he wants him to do.
But as the world knows, people who've seen Putin for many years, this is somebody who does not exactly go along with what others want.
to have happen and he's happy to tease and say he might go along with something and drag something out and then nothing really winds up coming from it that's outside of what his end goals are.
Well, Franco, it wasn't that long ago that President Trump met with Vladimir Putin in Alaska, and there were big hopes coming out of that meeting that there was imminent peace or some big development coming in this conflict.
That didn't really happen.
How does this moment compare to that meeting in August?
Yeah, I mean, I think it feels very similar.
Clearly, I will say that the threat of arming Ukraine with tomahawk missiles caught Russia's attention.
Putin is coming back to the negotiating table, reaching out to Trump.
So Trump's got some leverage.
He's using it, and it seems like he's using it effectively.
But as you kind of point out, the meeting in Alaska did not result in any significant steps towards peace, despite all the high expectations.
Remember, Trump had called for a ceasefire and said he'd be mad if there wasn't a ceasefire after the meeting.
After the meeting, he talked about Putin and Zelensky meeting and getting together, which was a huge deal.
Lots of headlines.
That didn't happen either.
so while of course this meeting with Putin is a very very big deal I think it is gonna come with some skepticism and questions about whether Putin is playing Trump because of what happened last time let's just remember that before he announced the Alaska meeting Trump was supposed to you know slap Russia with more economic sanctions so Putin, as kind of like Domenico was saying with the curveballs and the slide balls, he knows what he's doing and he's coming to the table and or coming to at least the pitcher's mound, you know, right at the last minute and making a difference.
And at least Trump seems to be reacting.
Well, I want to move to another part of the world now, Venezuela, where the United States involvement there, we're getting more and more information seemingly every week.
The United States conducted a military strike on a fifth boat in the Caribbean that the administration, the Trump administration says was carrying drugs, though the administration has provided no evidence to support that claim.
And Trump also confirmed this week that he had authorized a covert CIA operation in Venezuela.
Franco, get us up to speed here.
What are experts that you've spoken to saying about the administration's actions there?
Yeah, I mean, the experts that I'm talking to are questioning whether Trump is actually gearing up for some kind of military action in Venezuela and that this is looking less like a counter-narcotics operation and more like a effort to have regime change and to kind of overthrow the Venezuelan leader, Nicolas Maduro.
I mean, there is already an incredible amount of military hardware in the Caribbean.
I'm talking about destroyers, Navy ships, helicopters, and many, many sailors and Marines.
And it's so much military hardware that all the experts I speak to say it's much more than needed just to fire on a few votes.
And now, as you point out, Trump says he's authorized the CIA to conduct covert operations in Venezuela.
Now, the White House will tell you that Trump campaigned on a promise to stop drugs, and he'll do anything that is needed to do that.
He'll take any necessary steps.
But Venezuela is not necessarily a drug capital.
It's not producing fentanyl, which is the big drug that's a problem here in the United States.
And that drug usually comes via land through Mexico.
So I think that is one of the big reasons why so many of the experts, diplomats, foreign officials are seeing this more as regime change.
And let's also, just one more point, remember that in the first Trump administration, Trump tried to topple Nicolas Maduro.
He put a lot of political capital into getting Maduro out, you know, supporting another leader, even inviting that leader to the State of the Union.
So some of the experts I talked to see this potentially as some unfinished business.
We should also note that.
Maduro in Venezuela is widely considered to be an authoritarian leader.
His last election was considered by independent observers to have been fraudulent.
But, you know, the United States becoming involved via the CIA in another country is a whole, I mean, that is a can of worms.
What has the domestic response been at this point?
Yeah, I mean, I think there's a split clearly among Republicans who don't necessarily want to go in and have this kind of interventionist policy.
A lot of the MAGA base certainly don't want that.
And there's a lot of Republicans on Capitol Hill who quietly are upset because they see a lack of transparency in what the U.S.
actions have been when it comes to, you know, these droning these boats in the Caribbean that the Trump administration says are carrying drugs or any of the other actions that the Trump administration is taking.
But, you know, Republicans in Congress have been largely enabling of the Trump administration and don't want to talk out about any of that publicly.
Well, last thing before we go, Franco, I do want to talk a little bit about Gaza because there have obviously been some major developments there in the last couple of weeks.
At the beginning of this week, the living hostages were returned to Israel and the ceasefire began.
Where do things stand there now?
Yeah, I mean, it's a very big deal, the deal that Trump brokered.
Let's be real clear about that.
But it is also a very fragile deal.
It's a fragile ceasefire.
I mean, violence has already broken out in Gaza.
There's actually video that was distributed by Reuters, which appeared to show a public execution by Hamas as Hamas seeks to maintain control of Gaza.
Now, a big part of the agreement that the United States brokered was the disarming of Hamas, and Hamas doesn't seem to want to disarm.
And Trump earlier this week said that if Hamas doesn't disarm, that they will disarm Hamas.
And just yesterday, in response to these public executions, Trump issued a very pretty clear warning on his social media site.
He said, if Hamas continues to kill people in Gaza, which was not the deal, we will have no choice but to go in and kill them.
Very strong words and another way that Trump is trying to use his muscle to get his means.
But what does that mean, right?
I mean, the U.S.
military, he says, is not going to go in.
Does that mean letting Israel go back in?
Does it mean drones, which obviously would be using the U.S.
military?
Well, it presents this complicated issue, right, where Trump clearly wanted to take a major win, reasonably so, for getting the hostages back and getting this ceasefire deal done.
But
does taking credit for that then put him on the line for how this goes for the next couple of weeks or months as well?
Aaron Powell, well, look, clearly, the United States is a pivotal figure and like maybe the key country, you know, and has been for a long time when it comes to potentially brokering peace between Israel and the Arab world.
I mean, there's no question about that, right?
And no doubt about it, this was Trump's first major accomplishment, being able to get most of these hostages released.
But Gaza and Israel and this crisis is not exactly out of the woods.
As Franco noted, this is a fragile peace, even though Trump wants to say that this is potentially something that's generational and is going to lead to long-term peace.
There's no real evidence that that's going to be the case.
All right, well, it's time for one more break.
When we come back, it's time for Can't Let It Go.
This message comes from NPR sponsor Pete and Jerry's Eggs.
inviting you to tag along with one of their organic pastor-raised hens as she heads out for her day in the pasture.
She and her friends start to roam and forage hunting for tasty organic snacks.
And with 108 square feet per hen, there's plenty of space for everyone.
Under the open sky, they can hear songbirds nesting in the trees.
They bask in the sounds of nature as they prepare to lay their rich, delicious eggs.
And when the sun starts to set, the crickets begin to sing.
Time to catch one last squiggly snack before bedtime.
To learn more about Pete and Jerry's organic pastor-raised eggs and the certified humane farms where their hens roam, visit peteandjerry's.com.
Support for this podcast and the following message come from Humana.
Employees are the heartbeat of your business.
That's why Humana offers dental, vision, life, and disability benefits designed to help protect them.
Award-winning service, expansive networks, and modern benefits.
That's the power of human care.
To learn more about Humana's plans for companies of all sizes and benefits budgets, visit humana.com slash employer.
And we're back, and it's time for Can't Let It Go, the part of the show where we talk about things we just cannot let go of, politics or otherwise.
Dominica, why don't you start us off?
Well, we were talking a lot about foreign policy, so I want to talk about another piece of foreign policy, I think, kind of, and about immigration and the country of Terenza.
You guys know about Terenza?
Not familiar.
Okay.
Well, there was video that went viral of a woman who arrived at JFK Airport in New York with a passport from the country of Terenza.
It had biometrics, it had all kinds of stuff that looked real.
Apparently, the customs agent was quite confused and didn't know where it was.
She said that it was in the Caucasus.
Turns out this entire thing is fake.
That it was basically reflected in old urban legend, The Man from Tarid, about a traveler who arrived in Tokyo with a passport from this non-existent country and then vanished.
And U.S.
reality show TV clips from a reality show called Airline from like 2004, 2005, which had followed basically Southwest Airlines staff around.
And I got to tell you, this thing was so hard to unravel that it took me a a good several minutes after my daughter told me about this story.
And I just thought, oh my God, we are going to have to be really, really, really cautious and careful about videos that we see that seem to be real when it comes to politics.
I saw that as well.
At first, I thought, is this like some AI thing?
This is crazy.
Yeah.
So she did not get let into the country?
Or you're saying this real?
Oh, I thought you meant, oh my God, so the entire thing never happened.
The entire thing never happened.
Somebody put together a video using old footage from this reality.
Made it look real.
And then a Facebook post was made out of this and it went viral.
So, did your daughter know that this never happened?
We were talking about what should I do for Can't Let It Go.
I was going to talk about how
my back hurts from taking them to the ACL Music Festival and how that's a young person's game.
And we just decided that this was way more interesting.
Okay, yeah, it's pretty good.
I am noticing your posture is a little
hunched right now.
You know, I'm in pain.
I do have some salon paws on.
Group.
Nothing says I'm old, like salon paws and an AOL account.
Yoga.
Franco, what can't you let go of?
Well, I love talking sports with Dominico because he's always kind of fired up about them.
This one is not about MLS soccer, by the way.
Oh, right.
This one's about tennis.
And if you're a professional tennis player or a professional, any athlete, you should be careful about who you kiss.
And that's because...
I thought this was about soccer because there was a kissing scandal in that.
Well, this is another kissing scandal.
A professional tennis player was given a four-year suspension for taking methamphetamines.
Oh, okay.
And his excuse was that he kissed someone,
and that's how he caught it.
And this was not AI John.
Methamphetamines.
So we don't know whether that's true or not, do we?
Well, he
didn't inhale meth from somebody he kissed.
It's just an excuse.
I don't know.
I don't know.
Well, I'm open-minded.
You know what?
Guilty.
Innocent until proven guilty.
I'm going to defend Miles here a little bit.
Who knows how to do that?
Did that happen to you too?
Oh, who knows how you...
I did play tennis, but when I was growing up, I was ranked.
Were you really?
I was.
Miles, how about you?
Well, so mine also, I had the same thought as you did, which is like Dominico's here.
We have to do a sports.
Can't let it go.
But actually, it was a moment that happened here at the NPR newsroom yesterday where I was working and plugging away on a story.
and I heard a voice and it was Domenico from across the newsroom and he says Miles you love the Tampa Bay Rays which is true Tampa Bay Rays are like my favorite team of all time and he says Miles you love the Tampa Bay Rays would you give up pizza forever for them to win the World Series and I said absolutely without missing a beat yeah like yes a hundred percent added he added to well that's what I was gonna say so then that inspired me The last 24 hours I've been keeping a list on my phone of other things I would give up for sure.
You've been keeping a list things?
Well, I just, I just started every time I thought of one.
This is your Santa wish.
Exactly.
I would definitely give up pizza for the Tampa Rays to win a World Series.
I would definitely give up alcohol.
I would become a vegetarian.
Vegan is like right on the borderline.
I would give up international travel.
I would work every holiday for a decade.
I don't think I want to work every holiday for the rest of my life, but I would do it for a decade if I was sure that they were going to win the World Series.
And then the thing that kind of got us debating, and I'm curious your take on this, finger or toe, would you give up one of those extremities?
And I have to say.
Well, but we don't know about Franco's allegiances.
We don't, actually.
I ain't given up no finger or not.
You're not giving up.
No, nothing.
No, no.
Well.
What would you give up, Dominico?
I already said that if I went under and I didn't feel it, that I would give up a finger or toe for a guarantee for the New York Mets to win the World Series.
Absolutely.
All right.
That's all for today.
Our executive producer is Mathoni Maturi.
Our producers are Casey Morrell and Brea Suggs.
Our editor is Rachel Bay.
Special thanks to Krishna Devcalimer, Dana Farrington, and Anna Yukonanov.
I'm Miles Parks, I cover voting.
And I'm Frank Ordonez, I cover the White House.
And I'm Domenico Montenaro, Senior Political Editor and Correspondent.
And thank you for listening to the NPR Politics Podcast.
Do you think people would notice if I just said, I'm Franco Adornez?
Yes.
Yes, they would notice.
I don't know if they would.
This message comes from NPR sponsor Pete and Jerry's Eggs, Eggs, inviting you to tag along with one of their organic, pastor-raised hens as she heads out for her day in the pasture.
She and her friends start to roam and forage, hunting for tasty organic snacks.
And with 108 square feet per hen, there's plenty of space for everyone.
Under the open sky, they can hear songbirds nesting in the trees.
They bask in the sounds of nature as they prepare to lay their rich, delicious eggs.
And when the sun starts to set, the crickets begin to sing.
Time to catch one last squiggly snack before bedtime.
To learn more about Pete and Jerry's organic pasture-raised eggs and the certified humane farms where their hens roam, visit peteandjerry's.com.
This message is sponsored by DSW, the birthplace of the humble brag.
Full of all kinds of shoes that get you at prices that get your budget.
And when there are never-ending options for every style, mood, occasion, and budget, there is unlimited freedom to play.
And that's something to brag about.
So go ahead, stock up on fresh sneakers from your favorite brands, or try those boots you always secretly knew you could pull off.
Find the shoes that get you at prices that get your budget.
DSW, let them surprise you.