
Lawfare, China, and State Education
Listen to Victor Davis Hanson and cohost Jack Fowler. They discuss gangs and immigration, admired cop killers, why to avoid basing financial decisions on politics and ideology, stock market logic, the US being allowed to deport Khalil, illegals on social services, and school officials influence on our children.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Listen and Follow Along
Full Transcript
If you've been with us at all over the last six months or so, you are probably familiar with one of our favorite new brews, Wired2Fish Coffee. As you may know, their coffee is delicious and smooth, but more importantly, the company has amazing commitment to give back.
Wired2Fish Coffee gives back 25% of profits, 25% to conservation, clean water, and things like missions and evangelical outreach. From river cleanups and initiatives for fish habitat to programs that give people in slums clean water and spread the word about Jesus, Wired2Fish Coffee is in it to make the world a better place.
They also have just launched a medium roast decaf, and for avid coffee lovers, their much-loved brew is now available in two-pound and five-pound bags. Join us and enjoy your coffee while making a difference in the world, and join a community of like-minded coffee lovers.
Subscribe and save today and enjoy discounted coffee and free freight or just give this great brand a try with discount code JUSTNEWS or JUSTTHENews. For 10% off your first order, head over to Wired number two fish coffee today and make this year a year
you align your coffee with your values.
hello ladies hello gentlemen welcome Hello, ladies. Hello, gentlemen.
Welcome to the Victor Davis Hanson Show. I'm Jack Fowler, the host.
You are here to listen to the man who will dispense wisdom as he does four times a week through this podcast, and that is Victor Davis Hanson, who is the Martin and Ely Anderson Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution and the Wayne and Marsha Buskey Distinguished Fellow in History at Hillsdale College. And he's the possessor and owner of a website, The Blade of Perseus.
The web address is VictorHanson.com. You should go there regularly.
You should subscribe. And later in this episode, I'd like to tell you why you should.
What else? Victor's a farmer. He is a military historian.
He's a classicist. He's a philologist.
He's everything. He's everything and then he's nothing.
You're more of an everything than some people that have everything, my friends. Hey, there's so many new viewers and listeners to this podcast.
We do four times a week. Welcome.
Welcome here. Thank you.
Please hang around. Not for the co-host here, but for the man with the wisdom.
So, Victor, today it's Saturday, April 12th. That's when we're recording.
This episode will be up on Tuesday, April 15th.
Begin this show.
I want to wish our friends, our brothers and sisters in Abraham a blessed Passover as it begins today. Plenty of things to talk about, Victor.
Lots of them have to do with Illegal immigrants
Criminal illegal immigrants
Terrorists who are about, Victor, lots of them have to do with illegal immigrants, criminal illegal immigrants,
terrorists who are receiving welfare here in the U.S. We have some language issues.
We have a nasty
principle to get your views on, and maybe a few other things, Biden, sleepwalking, Trump and big
law, endless topics. But we'll get to them right after we come back from these important messages.
We'll be back to our show in just a moment. But first, an important message for anyone concerned about their financial future.
Have you seen the headlines? The Department of Government Efficiency has uncovered a staggering $115 billion in government fraud, with investigators suggesting this is just the tip of the iceberg. Financial analysts are now confirming what many suspected.
The previous administration's economic success was largely artificial, propped up by funneling trillions through NGOs and creating an economic mirage. As this corruption is exposed, experts predict we're heading toward a short but deep recession when this false economic support evaporates.
What does this mean for your retirement savings? Throughout our history, when governments manipulate economies and currencies collapse, physical gold has been mankind's most reliable store of value. Shouldn't you consider protecting part of your retirement with an asset that governments can't create with keystrokes or devalue through corruption? American Alternative Assets is offering a free wealth protection guide to help safeguard your financial future from the coming economic
correction. Call 8332-USA-GOLD or visit victorlovesgold.com today for your free guide and learn why now may be the perfect time to add precious metals to your portfolio.
That's 833-287-2465 or victorlovesgold.com. Protect what you've earned before the fraud economy collapses completely.
If you're like me, you have a lot of product on your bathroom counter. Well, I have found the secret serum and it's Vibriant Super C Serum.
The ingredients in this one bottle can replace your day creams eye creams night creams neck creams wrinkle creams and even dark spot reducers made in the usa with the highest quality ingredients including vitamin c hyaluronic acid vitamin b5 and vitamin e super c serum deliversplify your skincare routine, get a healthier complexion, and minimize wrinkles and age spots with vibrance. I just began using Super C Serum last week and I love it.
My skin feels so much better, soft, moist, and fresh. And by the way, it smells beautiful like the orange blossoms outside my kitchen door
give it a try and you'll love it too and if you don't find it better than your current skincare routine you'll get a full refund go to vibrance.com victor to save up to 37% off and free shipping That's Vibranc, V-I-B-R-I-A-N-C-E, Vibranc.com slash Victor. And we'd like to thank Vibranc for sponsoring the Victor Davis Hanson Show.
We're back. Victor, plenty to talk about today, as I said at the outset of the show.
By the way, it's gloomy here where I am in Milford, Connecticut. I know it's sunny and lovely there.
It's always sunny in California, Jack. Yeah, exactly.
It's always sunny and it's always bleak at the same time. Don't you have those, what do they call those, Hawaii, those pineapple, what is it, the Pineapple Express or whatever brown and gavin and nancy pelosi and kamala harris there there are rain clouds well i hope you uh when we're finished here you get outside get a little vitamin d as you continue your um improved health or improving health i'm getting the doxacillin out of my system all right And I had a lot of very nice people that gave me all these recommendations how to get rid of a post-flu sinus infection.
And not one of them said it was wise to take antibiotics. They all said this particular herb, this particular vitamin, this particular massage, this particular steam, this particular.
You know what they did? I went out and bought a Navage system. You ever heard of those things? Oh, yes, I do.
Yeah. This is a nose meant for a Navage, I think.
So you see that I'm thinking of all the alternatives to get back. I saw somebody send a comment on YouTube about gargling with, I think it was hydrogen peroxide.
I'm not sure, but. Somebody wrote me that.
He said if you put whiten... That was about a month ago.
When I had the flu, if you put whitener on your teeth, those strips, it'll kill your flu. Well, there you go.
All right. Who knew that fluoride was bad? It was good for you.
My father said smoking, that's why he never got the flu, the tobacco. Because he smoked? Yeah.
Two packs a day plus. He never did get the flu, by the way.
Terrific. I'm not recommending that.
I have never smoked in my life. I remember the first time I smoked, I was like six, I picked up a lit butt on the sidewalk.
They were everywhere to be had in the Bronx. I tried cool, like three cool cigarettes in my life.
And that was about it. Well, you're too cool for cool.
Okay, Victor, here we have a headline. We have two illegal judicial matters for your opinion.
And one, let's start off with the top of the supreme court which says the trump administration needs to facilitate release of salvadoran citizen this was a i think an i nothing unsigned opinion that came out yesterday friday your thoughts on this victor yeah i'm mystified by this whole thing because um there is a fred, and it is a criminal statute, that if you come into the country without permission, that is illegally, and then you continue to reside here illegally, and you haven't obtained refugee status, then you're subject to deportation. And a force multiplier of that would be if you had committed a crime or you were a member of a designated gang, so to speak.
So all of these people, in theory, are subject to deportation. I don't understand that.
So then now what the left is doing, they're cherry-picking cases. In one case, an ex-gang is ex.
But he says if he goes back home to Latin America, a rival gang will kill him, which suggests to me that he might still have gang affiliations or he had long affiliations with a gang. But the point I'm making is they cherry-pick these particular cases and then they make an argument.
This person is essentially a legal resident or, you know, a U.S. citizen almost.
But they're not. They're just guests.
And they've been here a long time. And it's not hard to apply for a green card.
So there's many culpabilities in these people. They come illegally.
They reside illegally. they don't apply for a green card.
So there's many culpabilities in these people. They come illegally, they reside illegally, they don't apply for a green card, they just exist.
And then a new administration comes in and says, the prior one broke the law by not enforcing the law. We're not going to do anything different, we're just going to enforce the law.
And then everybody goes hysterical. And we always get back to this existential question as, why did he let in 12 million people? Why did he every single day break the law and not enforce federal immigration law and have Mr.
Mayorkas get up there with a straight face and lie to us that the border was secure? Once in a while, he would say that they were whipping people or all these terrible things, the border patrol. Why, why, why? Was it to grow government and then put everybody on entitlements and higher taxes, redistribution? Was it utopianism? They don't believe in 21st century, they're globalists, they don't believe in borders? or was it more mundane, as people have people have suggested that under the post-covid election balloting laws in many states it's almost anybody can get a mail-in ballot and this was the idea that their message was not appealing to 51 percent of americans so they were going to change the demography new democratic majority demography is destiny, all the slogans they use.
So it's inexplicable why they can't just say to this person, you came into our country, we did not invite you, you didn't take the trouble to do it legally, then you didn't register as a illegal alien and apply for a green card, and now we decided to follow the law.
Does this mean that every single one of the 12 million people is going to have a lawsuit?
And you know what is even weirder is that all this utopianism, do they really think
the United States, $37 trillion in debt, running a $2 trillion deficit with a $1 trillion trade
deficit, do they really think we have the resources, we can bring more judges, we can have more jury, we can just do this for 12 million people? So what I'm getting at is this abstraction that all these justices have. It has no correlation with the real world.
I just wish they would come to the San Joaquin Valley and go to a waiting room, a judge would. Let's say one of the judges, a district court judge, or even a circuit court judge says, you know, Joe X, we're going to go through all this.
And I just wish that when he went to his cardiologist, there were 40 people in the waiting room, half of whom did not speak English from all over the world, had never been to a doctor. And then he would just be there with all the other people that are trying, waiting for three months to get an appointment, four months, six months.
Or I wish he'd just go to a grocery store and stand in line while every single person who doesn't speak English has three or four EBT cards. Or I just wish he would try to live in an environment with 40% of the auto accidents the person leaves the scene of the accident in Los Angeles County, for example.
I just wish they would do that one day. And then they would see the abstraction is not connected to the reality.
Between the dream and the reality is to this, Elliot, comes the abyss. I think, Victor, in a lot of ways we live on memories of even things from two generations ago.
College is still Sis Boomba, Homecoming Day. We think about movies, we still see.
And the melody lingers on the judiciary and i know your mom was a was a judge you've talked about her many a time and we still think judges like judge hardy you know they're sober and i i wonder if there was an ideology scale how badly the judiciary would compare to the rest of these institutions and organizations that are that are really dangerous to america it's lost a lot of its reputation here's how the american federal and state judiciary work for all practical purposes if you can't get a law passed in a state legislature or in the u.s congress and if you disagree with, then you go get the register of all the federal and state judges, and you look at their decisions. And when you find one, anywhere in the United States, that has a record, and this is most five times more common with liberals than conservatives, then you target that judge.
He feels like he has a chance to be known for a landmark decision that will shock people and cement his liberal fides among all of his progressive friends and associates. And that's how the judiciary works.
Why we're talking, I mean, Fannie Willis is really looking at some serious charges, you know, that she's been held in contempt.
She's got to turn over all the records now that she hid about her contacts with the federal special prosecutor, Jack Smith. We've mentioned many times on this podcast that Nathan Wade, her paramour and lead prosecutor, was at the White House Council on the same day that Jack Smith was appointed, on the same day that Michael Colangelo went left to go work eventually for Alvin Bragg.
So, and then we look at Latita James. She is, did you see this latest report? I don't know if it's been confirmed or alleged, but people have argued that she, there's a deed that she bought a home and said that was her primary residence.
It was not her primary residence.
She said that for tax.
She's got problems.
Jack Smith has got problems because he seems to have been the beneficiary of, what, tens of thousands of dollars of legal fees that he didn't report.
I don't know if he reported his income tax or not, but he didn't report it on a conflict of interest form. And again and again and again, this is beyond, you know, Mershon or Ingoron or any of those judges being biased.
So the judiciary system has collapsed. It really has.
It's sort of got the same reputation it did in the 1860s when, you know, a Dred Scott decision. Nobody it was so crazy.
Nobody even followed it and vice versa. So it's so politicized, the judiciary and activist judges.
And the ultimate culprit is the law school. The faculty are about 95 percent leftist.
and they have this critical legal theory that says that the Constitution is a construct of old white men and most of prior Supreme Court decisions, and therefore it's a fluid mechanism that should reflect this Marxist binary between victim and victimizer. That's pretty much what they think.
So I'm not optimistic about the American judiciary system. I really am not.
It's really scary to see what some of these judges, when they can fine Donald Trump $400,000 and try to take him out, it's just, or Jack Smith can try to move up the schedule in a way no federal prosecutor had done to make sure he could synchronize the most sensational parts of his proposed prosecution with the 2024 homestretch campaign. It's really scary, it is.
I don't even need to get into the buffoon Fannie Willis. well there's a there's a force multiplier to this with the
with the many of the pardoning, not pardoning boards, but parole boards. I want to ask you about that in a sec, but when we come back, Victor, just in a moment, but first I just want to give our listeners, particularly our new listeners, an important message for anyone who's concerned about their financial future.
Have you seen the headlines? The Department of Government Efficiency has uncovered a staggering, I think it's now up to $150 billion in government fraud. I just checked out their doge tracker with investigators suggesting this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Financial analysts are now confirming what many suspected. The previous administration's economic quote-unquote success was largely artificial, propped up by funneling trillions through NGOs and creating an economic mirage.
As this corruption is exposed, experts predict we're heading toward a short but deep recession when this false economic support evaporates. What does this mean for your retirement savings? Throughout history, when governments manipulate economies and currencies collapse, physical gold has been mankind's most reliable store of value.
Shouldn't you consider protecting part of your retirement with an asset that governments can't create with keystrokes or devalue through corruption? American Alternative Assets is offering a free wealth protection guide to help safeguard your financial future from the coming economic correction. Call 8332-USA-GOLD or visit victorlovesgold.com today for your free guide and learn why now may be the perfect time to add precious metals to your portfolio.
That's 833-287-2465 or victorlovesgold.com. Protect what you've earned before the fraud economy collapses completely.
And we thank the good people from American Alternative Assets for sponsoring the Victor Davis Hanson show. So, Victor, we are going to get back to federal judges and illegals and important decisions.
But the other day in the New York Post, if you want to be disheartened about law and order in America, I suggest people subscribe to that paper. I mean, it's a terrific newspaper.
Well, there was a piece earlier in the week that there's a cop killer, convicted cop killer, who's up for parole. And there have already been over 40 convicted cop killers who've been paroled in New York State.
So this is like, I mean, it's not that it's one thing to kill Jack Fowler and then that that that's any less worse than killing a police officer. But we've always as a society held that killing cops was was, you know, really you've crossed the line that you should be executed for that.
Yes. Well, that all changed.
That all changed post George Floyd. Remember what the lie was.
The lie was that the police were open season on black males.
And then the Harvard economist, and this got him in trouble with Claudine Gay, Roland Fryer, came out with a seminal article based on his research. They said that black males who came in contact with police, that the numbers of contacts versus the fatal shootings of Amarn suspects was no different, and actually in total numbers, and roughly the same percentages than white suspects.
And that got him basically on the wrong side of Claudine Gay, and they hounded him and hounded him and hounded him and tried to think of everything they could do. But there was no evidence, even in that hysterical period, that police were inordinately targeting people of color and shooting them while on.
It didn't matter. Defund the police started, and then people started to look at the police as their enemies, and it was okay.
You can see, Remember in that weird period of 2020 to 22, there'd be New York cops and they'd surround them when they go to a yard. They get on top of the car and hit.
They would fire. Nobody did anything because that was.
And then they defunded. And now there was just an article today, I think it was in the New York Post, Jack, that Greenwich Village is just the most left-wing area of Manhattan, is furious that there's not enough law enforcement and people are camping out on their steps and robberies and assaults.
So that's where we are, and the left did that. Everything the left touches turns to dross, whether it's the border or law enforcement, they destroy everything.
And they always have, if anybody reads any history and their ultimate manifestations. It's really, really scary.
And that's what got Donald Trump elected. Donald Trump's not doing anything he didn't promise.
He said he would crack down on crime, He would support the police, close the border and deal with China.
Sounds like he's doing it. He is.
I just want to make a footnote. I mentioned China that our friend David Bonson in his blog, I think it's called Dividend Cafe.
He has a very astute article.
And basically, I don't want to, it's a long, long article, but it's,
don't let your, it's a long,
long article, but it's don't let your ideology or your politics cloud your investment strategy or the way that you react to market volatility. But look at what the agenda is and what the climate before Trump was, and the climate before Trump was that China's predatory commercial trade, financial, military trajectories was not sustainable for the West.
In other words, it was running up huge deficits. It was trying to dump products, steal, and someone had to deal with it.
And that deal, whoever it was, it didn't matter. The U.S.
president had a rendezvous with that problem. And whoever chose to be that president sooner or later, it had to be sooner than later, was going to create market volatility because we're nearly, well, a third of our trillion- deficit is with china alone and they supply computers and apple phone everything so that was going to be a disruptive event and he and that's where we are right now that somebody tried to put the bell on the proverbial one mouse put the bell on the cat right and that's what this volatility is about.
But if we can endure that, China, and this is my own, this isn't Mr. Bonson's, who I, you know him better than I do.
Yeah, we're very good friends. Yes.
I read his book and blurred, but I've always admired him. I've spoken for him.
He's a very sober and judicious person. And I really have a great deal of admiration.
So the article, everybody should take a look at. It's by the Bonson Group, and David in particular wrote it.
It's Dividend Cafe, thebonsongroup.com. But it's not a political argument.
It's just keep rational, make your decisions not on the basis whether you're pro-Trump or anti-Trump but that there were situations that are being addressed that are going to create market volatility but they probably had to be addressed and you can disagree on the methodology but that's what's going on it's going to be a large readjustment and it reminds me of that article when I was in high high school, I read The Sun Also Rises. Now it's everybody says about bankruptcy when they ask in The Sun Also Rises, how did he go bankrupt? And he said, everybody's quoting it now.
It's kind of like end of the day and all that stuff. But gradually and then suddenly.
and what I'm meaning by that aphorism is if you get in a trade war
and I don't want to get in a trade war. Nobody listening wants to get in a trade war with China.
But if Donald Trump tries to lessen the $300 billion plus, big plus, trade deficit and the predatory practices.
It's going to be a rough ride. But gradually, China is going to lose that war.
And then it's going to be sudden. They're going to lose it big time because we are in a constitutional society.
And we have mechanisms to vent public disapproval. Donald Trump will survive.
He won't be, if everything goes to proverbial inferno.
Dreck.
Yes.
We have the midterms.
We have mechanisms to vent public.
They don't.
So if one third of their trillion dollar surplus is with the U.S.
and that starts to be cut down, they're going to have a third of those export factory workers with nothing to do. And this is at a time when they have demographic and pre-existing economic problem.
They're going to have a lot of social tensions. That's number one.
Number two, they have 300,000 almost now again students. And they're here for a purpose, to get bachelor's, master's, and PhDs.
They're all briefed when they go back to China by the PLA intelligence. One percent, maybe 3,000, are actively engaged in espionage.
But pretty much they're basically to absorb Western technology, STEM, business, and go back. If you were to curtail that number, that would be deleterious for them.
They just, it would. And in addition to that, they list companies on the New York Stock Exchange that by any fair measure do not comply with transparency rules.
And we just sort of wink and nod and let these companies on there. There's no reason they have to be on there.
People have suggested. I think Maria Bartoloma mentioned that.
So there are all of these levers that would escalate and would be far more. We don't want to go there.
Nobody wants to go there. We want to cut a deal.
And we don't need to get rid of $300 billion trade deficit all at once. We can build down.
but it had to be addressed
because they're using that foreign exchange
to buy luxury houses here, to buy farmland here, to create new businesses. They look at the world market.
They say, this, this, this product, this particular service, we can go in and destroy. We're going to build a factory, have the the government subsidize the loss pour the product into this particular country and then take over that particular commodity market and they have to be told they can't do that and they're also using this huge amount of foreign exchange to build five nuclear weapons per month to build five or six ships of all sizes every six months, even more rapidly.
And they're arming at a fantastic rate because they're flush with foreign exchange. And so there's a lot of things.
I get back to that 2003, I think it was, people can correct me if I'm wrong, but Warren Buffett's newsletter to investors, I went back and looked at it. It was a voice in the wilderness.
He was very upset that people suggested he approved of what Donald Trump did. And I think he almost said that trade deficits didn't matter now.
But this was a time when the trade deficit was like 98 million, 98 billion, excuse me me it was even less than that and it was not 300 plus billion it was about a quarter maybe 15 and he was saying this is not sustainable the drain and foreign exchange and what the chinese do with that profiteering. So what I'm getting at is everybody, by reading this Bonson and seeing what he's at and seeing what's-his-name has taken a—have you noticed that, Jack? He's taken a completely different role.
Who, Scott Besson? Yeah, Scott Besson. He's really articulate.
He's very calm. He's not trying to sabotage the MAGA agenda.
What he's trying to do is explain what Trump is trying to do to bondholders and stockholders. And he's had a pretty good effect.
And he ran a big, I think he was what made George Soros, unfortunately, rich. Because he was the head of theos Fund for years.
And even though he was center right, but he made Soros a lot of money. But he's a very wise investor, and people on Wall Street respect him.
Well, panics are part of the history of Wall Street, and panics are based on fear. And if someone could dispel the fear rightly, you want that.
Well, watching this volatility, I am starting to get a different perspective on the Great Depression and the 2008 meltdown because it was the same hysteria. And in 2008, it was subprime mortgage.
In the Great Depression, it was buying stocks on the margin that were not performing, and global problems with debt from World War I. But my point is that these bondholders, and once they start saying, oh, nobody wants the bonds, and I'm stuck with them, I've got to unload them, and then I'll take a loss, but maybe I won't, they won't, you know, I don't know what they were thinking.
They're going to collapse or something, or the market's going to collapse. Oh, my gosh, I'll have to jump out of a window like my great-great-grandfather or something.
But the point I'm making is that they didn't look at the, they didn't look at the facts. They didn't say to themselves, inflation is at 2.6 in the March report.
100,000 jobs were created that were not there in the economists' mind. They said there would be this, I don't know, 135, 145, maybe 150,000 new jobs, and it exceeded it by almost 100,000.
And oil prices and energy prices are down.
And although Elon Musk is not going to make by any means,
I never understood the trillion dollars.
He may make two, he's up to $150 billion in cuts.
He may make, I don't know, $250, $300 billion,
but that's the first time anybody's done that.
And that's what Wall Street was always saying, that this is unsustainable, these deficits and debt. So what I'm getting at is when you look at all that, there was not a lot of reason to panic, especially given our position vis-a-vis our neighbors.
There's another one thing, and that is the Europeans, everybody should be very careful of because deep, deep, deep, deep. Can I say deep again? Deep down inside, they are furious at China.
They remember that China sent flights into Europe as they did the United States for about two weeks when they knew people had COVID and they would not let them fly anywhere. Yeah, they had a pipeline to Italy where they...
Exactly, exactly. And they know that China never came clean and said 50, 80 million people died because this was the virus, this is why we created it, this is when we created it, this is how it got out, and here's the people who were involved and they're missing.
And here's what happened. They will never say that because they're culpable.
And they know what they do in trade. And they bully the Philippines and Taiwan and Japan.
They know all that. And they know that they have wiped out industrial centers in Europe.
And they understand that all that. They also know, Jack, that when they are running a third of a trillion dollar, their deficit with China of the whole EU community, 30-something nations, is about what ours is with China.
So they know that. But one of the ways they get back is they say, well, we're afraid of China.
We have no military. They're the rising sun.
The United States has spent. But one of the ways we're back is they say well we're afraid of china we have no military they're the rising sun the united states is spent but one of the ways we're going to on the foreign exchange will run almost the same amount of debt with the united states so china gets a 300 plus billion dollar surplus with us we get a 200 plus billion surplus with the united states we'll build the biggest volkswagen factory biggest car factory in the world in Germany for export to the U.S., etc.
But deep down inside, they understand what China is doing to them, and they would like someone, i.e. the United States, to confront China and make it stop its mercantile policies and reduce this predatory approach to trade, belt and roll.
But they're not going to say that. And the question we're all looking at now is, and I don't have the answer, but maybe the listeners do.
Maybe you do, Jack. Maybe Sammy does on our next one.
But the question is this. If Donald Trump still persists in trying to hold China account, what will be the attitude of the Europeans? Will it be A, secretly, we're really happy that he's doing this because we are the same victims as the United States.
And now they are calling them account. So stealthily, we're going to support the United States.
And one way we can support the United States is be reasonable on either no tariffs or reciprocal tariffs and help them. Or this is really interesting.
The United States is losing its relationship with China vis-a-vis. There's some transparency there.
And we're going to jump in and try to have new relationships with China. Now, that would be disastrous given what China's plans are for Europe in the not too distant future.
Or are they going to say not secretly for or not secretly against, but openly for the United States. Because what China, more importantly, if there is a reduction in Chinese exports to the United States, or their price too high, it only helps us.
And we will lower our tariffs, but we will get a bigger product into the United States to replace some of the things, even though we can't make iPhones cheaply. So there's all these, and I don't have the answer to what their attitude is going to be.
I know they don't like the United States, and they hate Trump. And they like the bi-coastal elite, which are identical to the European establishment.
EU, Strasbourg. There is one last wild card in this matrix, and that is Europe is sitting on a MAGA volcano.
And we saw that in Romania. We see that in Poland.
We see that in Germany. We see that in France.
And they don't know what to do with it. But there is a populist conservative backlash, which is echoing or synonymous or equivalent to what's happening in this country.
And so the ultimate people who run Europe, we don't really know who they're going to be. It depends on how successful they are by stripping these people of the party.
if they't participate in coalitions in germany or their their their candidates are disqualified in romania or they're persecuted in poland or in france yeah they're they're law fared all this is going on and um just a final thought trump didn't have to do any of this.
He could have played Biden.
He could have played Obama. He could have played George W.
Bush. He could have just said, you know what? I didn't create this huge $37 trillion debt.
I'm just going to spend $1.5 trillion, not $2 trillion. Probably the country won't be broke.
it'll go from 125 percent of gdp the aggregate national debt to maybe 135 it got that point once in world war ii i'll let the next sucker deal with it i'm not going to deal with it because why would i do it i can have a pretty good economy and with borrowed money and nobody's going to object he could have done that on same thing with everything well that's why we're that's why we're at where we're at because yeah that's not what the next sucker do it yeah they voted for a counter-revolution and they should stick with it well victor i have a question or two more on this uh from you china and uh its demographics but you know what let's let me ask you. And then we'll get back to some lawfare or big law and some other domestic matters when we come back from these important messages.
Are you feeling stuck in your career or lacking employment at the moment? Experiencing symptoms of job dissatisfaction? You might be suffering from a common condition known as career stagnation. But don't worry, there's a solution, monster.com.
Monster.com offers a comprehensive suite of career-boosting tools designed just for you. Our free resume review and AI interview prep tool will help you stand out from the crowd.
Need more guidance? Dive into our career advice articles for expert
tips and insights. And don't forget to check out our salary tools to ensure you're getting paid what you're worth.
Side effects may include a new job, increased confidence, and a brighter future. Consult Monster.com today and take the first step towards your new career.
Ready for your next job opportunity? Visit Monster.com now. We are back with the Victor Davis Hanson Show recording on Saturday, April 12th.
Passover blessings to our brothers and sisters in Abraham. This episode is up on Tuesday, April 15th.
We're just a few days away from the demisesquicontennial, I don't know the word, but the 250th anniversary of Lexington and Concord. Yes.
Maybe the great Sammy Wink will discuss that with you on the actual anniversary day episode. Victor's website, The Blade of Perseus, you'll find it at victorhanson.com.
Please do subscribe. Why? Because Victor twice a week writes an exclusive article for The Blade of Perseus and once a week does an exclusive video.
Meanwhile, in addition, there are links galore to Victor's other appearances, the archives of these podcasts, his books, etc. If you're a fan of Victor's writing, you will want to subscribe.
$65 a year, which is discounted from $6.50 a month. But do the monthly plan if you want.
But do subscribe, victorhansen.com. And also, Victor's on X, at VD Hanson.
He's at The Daily Signal, I know. He's American Greatness.
He's writing weekly. Once a month now, I think a piece for the free press.
Victor is, I don't know how many hours in a day you have, Victor. I just have to mention, you mentioned David Bonson before, just to be open.
We are extremely close. David has my, he handles my money.
I love him. David's mindset is pretty old school.
Dividends matter. Companies that pay dividends are not speculative as much as, you know, let's bet on this stock as opposed to one that is paying you off.
But he's a very dear friend. Victor, I just thought before we get back to maybe the thoughts on big law and the judge ruling on, I want to get your thoughts on Mahmoud Khalil and the federal court decision on him.
With China, well, two things. One, to me, it always seems forgotten in these discussions is India.
It's just like the most massive country and friends with the U.S. and probably the entity that will be decisive in these longer-term global fights.
India is now in Washington because they have I think they have a hundred billion dollar surplus with us or more and they have high tariffs and they've also I'm kind of out of my lane as far as the Hoover economists I shouldn't be talking about economics I got kind of a subtle message about that from one person.
But nevertheless, they have 5% GDP growth.
And China has six, so why haven't trade deficits ruined their GDP?
But my point is, they have a very long border with China, as does Russia.
I think Russia's border is 2,000.
Russia, during the czars, appropriated a large chunk of China in the Mongolian area, Mongolia, etc. And the Chinese think that it really belongs to them.
So my point is, I think people forget that one of the reasons that Donald Trump has been so complimentary of Modi and likes him and India, and one reason that he wants to settle the Ukraine war is he wants to Henry Kissinger China. And that means that Russia and India be no better friend to China than they are to the United States or no worse enemy, et cetera, et cetera, and triangulate against China and tell those countries, in the case of India and Russia, you've had border disputes that have gone to violence with China, and we know what they would like to do to you.
And we have two oceans, so this is something that you should be aware of and join us to.
And the thing is, if you look at all of the economies that matter, if you look at the Indian economy and the EU economy and the United States economy and the Japanese and South Korean economy, I think the 20 trillion dollars of, I think it's over a hundred and something trillion dollar aggregate economy. China's only about 15%.
It's still only two-thirds of our 30 trillion. So my point is that there are resources of everybody.
I'm not trying to persecute China if they just said, hey, bam, bam, bam, you've got to follow the rules.
You can't steal technology.
You can't break patents.
You can't dump market.
You have to respect copyright.
You can't do all of this that you're doing.
Then I think they would.
Well, layered onto that, Victor, is the demographic nightmare that it's, I mean, the world's, well, the world's enduring. It's got one of the, yeah, it's like i mean the world's and well the world's it's got one of the yeah it's like south korea it's one person you know they have some propaganda have you seen these things on the internet that china is running well they have a picture of a chinese sewing factory you know with all these i've seen bad americans yeah well yeah but the they substitute all the Chinese female workers For big fat Americans And they're like 350 pounds And they have a bag of chips and coke at the table And they can hardly move And then the Chinese One of them was translated This is what America thinks they can do And the worst one is I want to give a message to my friends in china if you want
to run propaganda and you think that one of your ex-students who's back in china that lived in the united states five to ten years knows the united states and can give you sophisticated i taught hundreds of Chinese students at Pepperdine, at Cal State. And I know they don't, in that four-year period, any more know about the United States than I would about China.
Even my... Fang Fang.
My Fang Fang encounter. Hey, man.
Hey, dude. The valley girl talk.
But, I mean, by encounter, somebody was in the room when she showed up to complain about a column I wrote about China. Said she was a consul personnel from the embassy.
Could she meet for 20 minutes? But anyway, my point is they have a video out, Jack, of Mao Zedong. And it looks like it's around 1953 because he's in a harangue against Dwight Eisenhower, who came into office on January 20th, 1953, when the Korean War was static.
Both sides were pretty much where the DMZ at the 38th parallel was. And Ike did not want to go as MacArthur did.
Ridgway didn't want to go either. He was now in Japan taking MacArthur's place as pro-consul.
But my point is he wanted to settle it, kind of like Trump. And people thought we were going to lose Korea.
Then when we went back and lost Seoul and we went back in. and in 1951, got Seoul, went back across, and then the question is, well, now we can go back in way up to the Yellow River like MacArthur did.
No. So we're not going to do that.
But my point is that Eisenhower did not have a reputation for being very bellicose. His famous farewell address about the dangers of the military-industrial complex became iconic.
So here you have it. Think about what they're thinking of, Jack.
We're going to put out a video of the world's greatest mass murder who killed between 50 and 70 million and outdid Stalin and Hitler and Tamerlane and Genghis Khan and Attila. The worst mass murder in the world, yelling at a U.S.
president that did not want to expand the war and left warning the country about the dangers of never-ending wars and military deaths. That's not going to persuade anybody.
Who would think that that would be effective propaganda anywhere other than the Communist Party elite? Or maybe some faculty. Oh, excuse me.
Yes, it'll be at Columbia, too. Yeah.
So, well, Victor, I just want to take a moment for our sponsor, Open Phone. Open Phone is the number one business phone system that streamlines and scales your customer communications.
It works through an app on your phone or computer.
So no more carrying two phones or using a landline. With OpenPhone, your team can share one number and collaborate on customer calls and texts like a shared inbox.
Plus, with AI-powered call transcripts and summaries, you'll be able to automate follow-ups, ensuring you'll never miss a customer interaction again. OpenPhone is offering our listeners 20% off your first six months at openphone.com slash Victor.
That's OpenPhone. I'm going to spell it.
O-P-E-N-P-H-O-N-E dot com slash Victor. And if you have existing numbers with another service, OpenPhone will port them over at no extra charge.
Open Phone, no missed calls, no missed customers. And we thank the good people at Open Phone for sponsoring the Victor Davis Hanson show.
Victor, back to America, back to illegals. Let's talk about, get your thoughts anyway, Judge Rules, Columbia protester Mahmoud Khalil can be deported this was yesterday Friday April 11th the federal judge in Louisiana hey I'm glad he ruled how he did but you know again it's up to one man to make a decision as you've been talking about before but anyway your thoughts on that well there was a bigger landscape around that remember that the interim columbia president promised uh the doj doj and the state department that they would comply with um the trump administration's strictures about 400 million dollars in federal money and by the way as, as everybody said, I don't know why Columbia with a $15 billion endowment needs any federal money.
1950s maybe when they were doing research for the government. But they're not doing that now.
They have some valuable health stuff. But most of it is just.
Anyway, my point is that they violated that. She talked out of both sides of her mouth and they caught her and resigned.
So there's not a lot of goodwill anywhere in the United States right now for Colombia. They just understand that they stick their tongue in the government.
They think they're sacrosanct, that they can do whatever they want. And so they're having these anti-semitic protests they're still wearing masks but khalil the question is and the person the go-to person on this is marco rubio he's enough he's he has a he's like scott basant he has an ability to um boil things down into a very succinct convincing convincing two or three lines.
He just basically always says, when I write somebody in my house and they crap all over the floor or destroy my dinner table, do I just sit there and say they have a legal right to come in because they're an American? No. American resident? No.
I ask them to leave. So this guy came over here ostensibly to get an education, take advantage of the security and safety and prosperity of America, which he felt he could not enjoy in his native, I guess, either Algeria or Morocco or in Lebanon, places that he grew up or the West Bank or Gaza.
And what does he do? He immediately joins DeVest, Colombia, and becomes a point man to explain and demand their positions and they're committing violent crimes. And then he is disseminating literature of a State Department designated terrorist organization, Hamas.
And all he had to do was say, I'm Mr. Khalil.
I want to get my master's degree in blah, blah, education or whatever it was when I get to the United States. But in addition to that, I'm very interested in joining the divest group of students that are demanding that Columbia University sell anything that has anything to do with Israel, stock, bond, anything.
And I also want to participate in numerous demonstrations, and I want to pamphleteer the Hamas position on October 7th. That's all he had to do.
And they would have said, you know what, I think I'll take a break on this one. See you, wouldn't want to be you.
Well, that's what, it's very simple. We don't have to cater to people who don't like the United States and don't then praise a terrorist designated organization.
We don't have to. Just, if I keep going back to that, i had a visa for two and a half years in greece if i had written an article and said when i was there it was a very anti-american climate there had been a dictator papadopoulos who'd been there since 67 he was put in i think it's fair to say with the agency of the cia he was a strong anti-communist, but he was a dictator.
And the socialist government was overthrown. And then when I was there, he was kicked out.
And they put a really tough guy named, they didn't think he was tough enough, Yanidis. And he was even more right-wing.
And they were trying to homeport a big carrier. And there was just protest every day.
And I went down in November and I was a stupid kid. Just turned 20 and they were at the Polytechnion.
And about four of us watched a tank, a patent tank, just smash the gate and go right into the Polytechnion. And I think there were 17 or 18 people killed during that series of protests.
My point is this. Had I done one of two things.
Had I said I was going to join the students at the Polytechnion and being a big spokesman for their anti-American, I would have been deported by the dictatorship. Contrarily, had I joined the students, if I had joined the government and said this is a necessary crackdown and I support it and I've been very loud about that, when that government was overthrown in June and I was still in Greece, I would have been deported by the new socialist government.
So the point is, if you are a guest in some country and you're there to study archaeology and classical languages, and you divert from that express purpose on your visa, and you get actively involved in controversial positions, contrary to half the country, what do you think is going to happen? You're not a citizen. You're a guest.
And so what do these people think is going to happen when they come over here and after October 7th start praising Hamas and they take it to the next level? What were the Stanford people thinking that they were going to go into the president's and ransack it and cause $20,000 or $30,000 worth of damage.
Did they think that was fine? What did they think they were going to do when they were supposed to have a tent no more than 24 hours and camp out there for three or four months? Why, why, why? So it's not a question of any of this protest, civil rights, First Amendment. It's just a question.
Did you keep your promise as a resident and come over to the country and go through a brief audit as a student? And no one would let you in if they knew that you were going to be an advocate and a promoter of either violence or the interest of a terrorist organization. That's what basic human nature, Victor.
If you invited me to your house or I showed up, as people want to show up at the Hanson house, and you and Mrs. Hanson were hypothetically having an argument of some kind, and I got involved in it, I took a side while there.
You would think if there was a documentary of this, people would think that guy Fowler is an idiot.
They probably think that anyway.
I mean, we don't tolerate that just in normal interaction.
That's a very good point.
About eight years ago, a film crew came.
I won't mention them.
I've had a lot. I used to have one every month to come out here and film for various things but this particular crew came out and they said we they wanted to be in a particular ag building and then they said i don't like this building and then one of the guy goes wow this is really old and then the next thing um they said let's move everything and go to The barn I said well the barn And they go in there, they said, let's move everything and go to the barn.
I said, well, the barn. And they go in there and they said, wow, there's a woodpecker up there.
We can't do that. And I was following them around.
And then they said, let's go outside. And then they said, wow, there's all this jet noise.
I said, the Fresno Airport is 30 miles away. We're on the flight path.
And then they said, no, we're, and I said, no, we're not going to do any of this.
You're a guest.
You came here.
I explained that, you know, you wanted to be outside and have an agricultural background.
I said there would be noise.
You didn't get it.
And now you're ordering me.
So this is what we're going to do.
We're going to do it right here, right now. And then you're going to leave.
Now, if you don't want to do that, please leave. And they got really freaked out.
What do we do? I said, you didn't do anything other than be a rude guest. And I'm a rude host.
That's the only time that had ever happened. But when people come to your house or to your country, they can't order you and tell you what they can do.
You can do whatever you want as the owner of your country.
And they're not citizens.
They're guests.
I know that residents have the same rights under the Bill of Rights, but not as a visa holder.
You don't have to go through everything.
You just don't have to issue a visa.
And when I say don't issue a visa, don't renew it or cancel it. Either one.
And I think everybody understands that. But we created a climate in this international western community where we praise radical Islamic groups and quasi-terrorist and nominal, I mean, openly terrorist groups, and they become a cause celeb, and then they think they are going to be immune from any consequences, and then as soon as there is a moderate consequence, nobody's putting him in jail, nobody's saying that he can't, he can write, he can say anything he wants.
He just can say it over in Gaza because we don't have to extend that.
He's a piker compared to some others because they're more than cause celebs.
They are welfare recipients.
I want to get your thoughts on that.
And big law, maybe another topic, because we're rounding a stretch here, rounding a turn into a homestretch on this episode. But we'll do that when we come back from these final important messages.
We are back with the Victor Davis Hansis hansen show victor um this this is i it's not shocking nothing shocking anymore headline doge terror watch list migrants secured medicaid after release into u.s a bombshell report by doge revealed that migrants on the federal government's terrorist watch list were able to secure Medicaid after being released into the United States by Joe Biden's administration. 6,300 of Biden's migrants paroled into the U.S.
interior with no immigration status were either on the terrorist watch list or had criminal records and yet still rewarded work permits and social security numbers. I mean, Khalil is nothing compared to these.
Well, got to watch my mouth. It used to be that if you were here illegally and you were residing illegally, most states would not allow you to have Medicaid or what we call in California Medi-Cal.
And liberal, far left, progressive California in 1994 had this 187. And they voted overwhelmingly not to extend these types of services to illegals.
And you know what? It was almost automatically declared unconstitutional by a federal judge. In California federal judiciary, the judges study the ballot propositions in advance, so then when they see one that they don't like, I guess they talk to colleagues because they have a pre-prepared rejection or overturning the will of the people.
But to take California in this response, we're not even talking about criminal aliens. In California, we're short over $7 billion of Medi-Cal funds that went to illegal aliens.
I mentioned before, before 50 of all the births are on medical and 40 of all the residents in california are on medical and gavin newsom virtue signaled that during covet he was allotting an extra half billion dollars to to illegal aliens this is even worse, though, because these are criminal illegal aliens.
And so when people come across the border, 12 million of them, many of them in their
home countries have never been to a doctor.
I had a doctor.
I won't mention anything about him, but he would tell me how difficult it was to have
somebody come illegally into the United States from the southern regions of Mexico. And then where do you start with a complete workup, blood, cholesterol, everything? And the, you know, everything from teeth to, you know, this is a humanitarian.
But the accruing Medi-Cal cost never covered his cost, his real cost in time or the insurance companies. I mean, the actual cost of the services.
So what happened is a lot of the labs, a lot of the doctors just wouldn't take it anymore, Medi-Cal, because the return was so long and so much paperwork and below the actual market cost, and yet it was increasing and increasing and increasing, and then the left was saying, how dare you do this? But they didn't give them any mechanism to how to address the problem. And it also was an incentive, say, for Mexico.
Mexico's idea was, if I have a lot of very poor people that have never gone to a doctor, and we export them, I'm quoting Mr. Obrador, the former president, almost literally when he said, I think it's a beautiful thing.
I think it is a beautiful thing that 40 million people came into the United States, and he was talking about illegal. I don't think it was quite that high.
But his whole point was that the United States and then they need massive subsidies of health, education, food, housing, etc. And that's a wonderful thing.
And for the poor American citizen that has to compete for those services, it's terrible. And so when you see somebody on the left that makes that argument, oh, how dare you say it? You should just say to them, how many, why not take all of Venezuela? Why don't we take all of Argentina? Or why don't we, I don't know, why don't we just put a health clinic in Malibu, right in the middle of Malibu, right on the beach.
Just take one. The government can buy one of those $40 million homes.
Say this is the Malibu Medi-Cal clinic. And anybody's going to get free care.
And by the way, you can park anywhere you want along. Yeah, just like the clinic at Martha's Vineyard.
Martha's Vineyard. That would last.
So what I'm getting at, everybody, is the whole liberal ideology is based on the fact that the Democratic Party is transmogrified into a party of the high professional classes, the wealthy, the investor class, and they are exempt from the consequences of their own politics and ideology. And that's why they have that ideology.
Their biggest fear in the world, I got so much money, I'm so successful, I got such a title, I got so many degrees. I got to live to 95.
Most of them are agnostic or atheist. I got to live to 95.
And that means global warming. And I got to feel good about myself.
I got to do that that but i don't want anything to i don't want any reality to intrude on my privilege so all the consequences of my programs are going to fall on people in east palestine or hanford california but not me and that's pretty much sums up the democratic party yeah they they would not want an illegal alien criminal to be in their neighborhood. They would not want their child to sit next to him in the waiting room to get an ear infection treated.
But they don't care if it's someone else. Well, Victor, one of the big components of that elite is big law.
and it just of late seems to be coalescing that this is a target. And part of the coalescing and the focusing has been Donald Trump and his executive orders.
I think he's gone now after about his fourth firm,
Sussman Godfrey. And these folks are, I don't know if they're terrified, but they are, from our perspective, mine anyways, conservative, they should be targets.
They are at the controls of so much that is going wrong with our country and our world. And Donald Trump is taking them on through these executive orders, removing their security clearances, which means a big loss of money.
I think one of the firms was predicting they came to terms with Trump. But it's going to cost them $1.
1.2 billion dollars i mean they're the landing pad they're like big tech they're the landing pad for left-wing bureaucrats or political appointees to go to with law degrees after they're done and they get security clearances they get invited to national security briefings and then they market that that. And in addition, they intrude into politics.
And the locus classicus is Perkins Coie. They partnered with the DNC to transmit Hillary Clinton's payoffs to Christopher Steele.
Then they basically got the money from the DNC, and then they gave it to Fusion. Then they gave it to Christopher Steele.
And the FBI was also paying, you know, another informant to spy on Donald Trump. And there were no consequences.
And so what Trump is saying is you have a perfect right to practice law. Go to it.
We're just not going to extend any of the traditional federal privileges to you. And you're going to be subject to all the laws and protocols of every other law firm in Nebraska and Kansas and North Dakota.
But the idea that you're a bunch of insiders and we're going to give you security clearances or federal grants, we're not going to do that. We're not going to put you on boards.
We're not going going to do any of that and that's a lot of the stuff that they market their blue chip and by the way you and i know lawyers and i'm thinking of cleta mitchell one of my best friends and one of the nicest people in the world who was ostracized by her law firm for just listening on a call that Donald Trump made to the registrar. He didn't say
create... by her law firm for just listening on a call that donald trump made to um right the registrar he didn't say create 10 000 votes he said find them i know they're there somewhere and that happens all the time you talk to candidates and close races they always call up officials and say darn it i i know those that you didn't get that precinct and it's up to the registrar to you know what? We either didn't and we're working on it or you don't call me.
But that's not a criminal offense. And she tried to make that into a racketeering, Rico, da-da-da-da-da.
But my point is that anybody that was on that call, even if they said anything, and they were working for big law, they were basically fired. And they didn't really say, we're firing you for being on it.
We just says, oh, maybe our big corporate clients won't go to us because of your name. So we're going to just end your career.
And that's what they did. They were bullies.
They act like they're victims now, but they were knee deep in the January 6th, all of that stuff. If you worked in the first Trump administration, they were not going to give you a job in any of those firms? Absolutely.
They had an informal boycott, almost a racketeering method of operation, that if you were in these big blue-chip New York and Washington law firms, and you were MAGA or Trump or something, they colluded to make sure your corporate career was over with. No one who defended January 6th people or no one who advised Donald Trump was going to get a job in any of those.
And most of them, if the few who were already working were going to be terminated not by any oh we're firing you because you were on a phone call even though you didn't say a word but we're firing you because we're afraid all our clients will not have business with us if you're here that's that's the roost they used well victor i have one more quick topic before we conclude today's episode and it has to do
I'm That's the ruse they used. Well, Victor, I have one more quick topic before we conclude today's episode.
And it has to do, I'm interested in your thoughts on, I will call her nasty, God forgive me if I'm too hardcore there, The nasty principal at that Columbus, Ohio high school where there was supposedly a a threat of, of a bombing and,
and police came to investigate the bomb threat and the principal stopped them.
And I,
I,
as a politically by may,
I kind of feel like,
well,
good,
because this is your,
I think you're emblematic of what's,
what the left is all about.
But this is warped, just warped.
If there is something dangerous going on in a school and you are a play-acting, not a play-acting principal, a real principal, but stopping cops from doing their job, there's something really, really wrong with our education. K-12
educational. You don't believe the principle
should be have the right to raise our children?
It's a really old topic in
Western literature. Plato's Republic, you know,
his whole idea was
of nepotism or that
children that look like their parents or
they were actually genuine children from
their parents would get preferential
treatment or they would be
subject to the vagaries of a good
or children that looked like their parents or there were actually genuine children from their parents would get preferential treatment or they would be subject to the vagaries of a good or bad parent however if you had the state if you mix them up and no one knew who their parents were and the state they would have a uniform utopian education and that tradition is it was very entrenched even though plato was supposed conservative it was very entrenched on the extreme right and left and that was kind of the idea of when hitler went into poland you know they looked at all these aryan looking blonde and blue-eyed kids and they thought you know what we're losing a lot of Germans. We're going to lose a lot of Germans.
So they just kidnapped them and gave them to members of the Nazi party so that they could be raised as good little Nazis. And then Adidas Huxley's Brave New World, the same idea that you're going to have a state come in and take over the parental role.
That's always been a dream, especially of the left. And you can see that issue with transgendering and all of that stuff.
The state in the form of the teachers, I don't know what the status is in California, so I shouldn't opine on it, but I don't think, there are school districts that whatever the particular student under 18 believes his or her gender is, they will be assumed to be that gender in school regardless of the parents' volition. So, yeah, and that's kind of that utopian idea of the state taking over parenthood.
And that's what the left would really want.
I have, just as a footnote, I have kind of ambiguous views on the Department of Education because on the one hand, there was no need for it, and it's been hijacked by the left.
But if it was run right for four years and it tried to tell school districts like California
you know,
Thank you. but if it was run right for four years and it tried to tell school districts like california or new york or chicago illinois or connecticut you should have a mandatory civic education we don't care how you do it just here's the guidelines but then i start thinking i think no it'll be like no child left behind as soon as trump leaves or something so it's probably to abolish it but everybody conservatives should realize if you abolish the department of education which we should do these individual states will get the federal monies and block grants and half of them are going to be delighted because there's no restrictions on what they'll do with the money.
And I guess the only remedy is you can move. But expect that.
I've just noticed among the left, they shout and shout about the Department of Education, but they feel that they might even be able to go further to the left if there was no federal oversight of left wing, though it is. Well, I think that California would be teaching, you know, let's give the land back to Mexico.
Except under the, is it the French Laundry? Well, there would be enclaves, the Malibu, the Berkeley Hills, Presidio Heights in San Francisco, Brentwood. Yes, those are exempt.
Well, Victor, a few weeks ago, you actually was last week. We ended the show.
Not in the end of the show. You talked about Jasmine Crockett and picking cotton.
And, you know, we've come to the end of this particular episode where we read comments. A couple of things here.
First of all, I always say, I've said, and I was honest, we read all the comments. Well, you know what? There are just too many comments to read now on just one YouTube posting of this show.
It was like 800, and within a day, within a day.
Staggering.
So we appreciate the people that do comments, which give it the old college try. So, and I have a few that are in response to what you said about Jasmine Crockett.
I want to read these. So I go one.
MRS, me, 33, size 7LF, whatever. I hope I got the right.
Writes, I don't understand Jasmine Crockett with her cotton fields. I'm white.
My dad was born in 1923. He grew up picking cotton.
My mom spent much of her youth picking pinto beans. It's not only people of color who have to do these things.
So that's one. The second from 68 Orange Crate 26, Professor Hansen's point regarding the devastating effect of lessness bureaucracy on the average American is among his most poignant.
Jasmine, who picked more cotton, you or me? Priceless. And then finally, from Quick Deuce, read the stabbing.
Except me, the actual. Oh, the stabbing.
The stabbing is not about the cotton. This is about the teenage murderer or alleged murderer.
Yes. In Frisco, Texas.
Football player, yeah. Football, right.
Well, the track meet. Was that track meet? Read the stabbing.
Back in the day, if there was going to be a brouhaha, it was after the game, in the parking lot. Noses got bloody.
Knuckles may have been busted. Perhaps a tooth or two dislodged, but everyone left the parking lot alive and went home, not to a hospital ER.
Why are things different in the last 30 or more years? Is it the video games or is it the media? When the media makes these bad things a big deal, is that right? That's an open question there, but certainly things are quite different. When I was in high school, we had a rivalry with a Swedish town where my family was actually from actually from kingsburg my father's side my mother was from selma but during the the big game between the two at one year i think it was my junior year they said this i won't mention the name that all these names are still here but this guy was he's he's incredible he was the one of their biggest guys but then we had a guy who was really tough and mean and they they said, they're going to square off in a Salma parking lot at 4 o'clock on Friday before they game, before they suit up.
And so everybody ran out there, right? And there must have been 500 people. And they thought, this is going to be the knock-down, drag-out fight.
And Salma's going to win in Kingsburg. And then they walked out there.
They started and they kind of liked each other. They said, and basically they smiled and said, I'll see you in two hours on the field.
They hugged it out. Yeah, they hugged it out.
It was really good to see that. And I remember that.
But they did all that stuff and nobody brought a knife and stabbed somebody in the heart and then said he was a victim and raised i don't know two or three hundred thousand dollars for that over three hundred thousand already this is that's my mind but remember rush limbaugh made a big thing you remember that years ago a woman got killed by some mountain lion yeah and there was a fundraiser for the for the cubs of the mountain lions something about about the left. Remember, it's anti-humanist.
The hard left believes if humans were just disappeared, then all of this natural, wonderful, peace-loving nature would come by. As somebody who fought nature for most of my life for me, it's not necessarily a wonderful thing.
Well, the great man on that is Wesley Smith, who writes occasionally still for National Review. I like what I'm talking about.
Oh, he's terrific. And he covers all these things.
Like there's an effort to make the Great Lakes equivalent to people, various mountains and ranges. Lakes are people, too.
This is the way of the life. way of the life it's funny about nature just to any when you pick grapes you put them on a tray to dry into raisin paper tray but we you know we have a boulevard before it's all been sold off now i only have 40 acres but we used to have 135 here and this avenue i live on goes right in the middle of it.
So you'd put people you hire to pick grapes on the row next to the road, right? Because they can get hit or killed, and it's dangerous. And nobody wants to pick there, so they would have us pick two siblings and cousins.
We would pick along the road, and it's know, it's pretty hard. It's like 105 degrees, and you're underneath this grapevine, and you have a steel pan.
You've got to pick all the grapes, and you've got to move out and not get run over, and then pour the grapes on a tray, and you've got five cents a tray. If you were really good, you could make 200 if you were that.
Anyway, I was was six and seven when i started i did that from six all the way till i was like 16 but the point is my grandfather would come out he was they always called him mr davis he wore a railroad suit you know those bit overalls and he had all these accoutrements he had little cuff things that held his his his sleeves a blue work shirt underneath. He had boots, and he had a big straw hat, and it was all a little scarf around his neck.
It was all about how he was Welsh, so he had all of this white skin he'd burned. But anyway, he was in his 70s, and he would come and he'd say, Now, you're going to confront all sorts of things.
I remember when I was six under this vine, so be careful. There's wasp nests.
There's black widow spiders that love to be in the grapes. So when you get the grapes, push it down.
And when you turn around, there'll be cars that are getting close to the road. So we did all that, and I thought, and we were all, ah, don't tell us what to do.
So the first day I picked grapes i i was on there and i looked up and there was a huge red hourglass on the bottom of a black spider looking at me and then i thought oh my god and then i moved away in my pan i poured and i had inside one of the bet were two of those huge blue mud daubers, those huge hornet type. And they were in there.
And then, this is even worse, as I got to the next one, because the vine was, you know, somebody was picking in the other row. In those days, we had what they called an outhouse, and you were supposed to go down and use it they didn't have porta potties but there
were two outhouses but as i got in to the next one i looked down there was human feces under the vine and i my pan was in it and this was just after i told my grandfather don't worry this will never happen that was my first 20 minutes of picking it's all uphill from there but the next 10 years were just as bad.
Hey, you've been terrific today
as ever. Thanks for all the wisdom you shared.
I do want to say the thank you to the folks who get Sybil Thoughts. That's the free weekly email newsletter I write for the Center for Sybil Society.
It comes out every Friday. It's also up on Philanthropy Daily, which is the website of the center.
How do you get it? You go to sybilthoughts.com. Sign up, and you'll start getting it right away.
What do you get? You get 14 recommended readings, great articles. I've come across the previous week that I just think good people will enjoy.
And I think people are enjoying it. I get a lot of emails from folks on that.
So thank you for doing that. Again, it's free and we are not selling your name.
Again, again, VictorHanson.com. That's the Blade of Perseus.
Also, I should mention, if you're on Facebook, VDH's Morning Cup. And we have a very good, friendly group of folks at the Victor Davis Hanson Fan Club.
It's about 65,000 or so people. That's all on Facebook.
So, yeah, if you're there, join it. And by the way, Victor, I noticed on X, I think you're at the cusp of maybe just over 700,000 followers.
That's a lot of people. Yeah, that was good.
I think when we inherited, I had an inert account on Twitter that everybody got at Hoover. And we had never really, I never put new content.
But now with all these videos and stuff, we got new content. And about every week or so so I try to write a short X and my daughter does it
even though she has three children. So it's up, it went
from 150 to 700,000. Yeah, that's
terrific. Up, up, up.
Okay. Thank you everyone for listening.
Thank you for watching. We will be back soon with another episode of the
Victor Davis Hanson Show. Bye-bye.
Thank you everybody for listening. Thank you for watching.
We will be back soon with another episode of the Victor Davis Hanson Show. Bye bye.
Thank you everybody for listening and watching. crews wired to fish coffee as you may know their coffee is delicious and smooth but more importantly the company has amazing commitment to give back wired to fish coffee gives back 25 percent of profits 25 to conservation clean water and things like missions and evangelical outreach from river cleanups and initiatives for fish habitat to programs that give people in slums clean water and spread the word about Jesus, Wired2Fish Coffee is in it to make the world a better place.
They also have just launched a medium roast decaf, and for avid coffee lovers, Their much-loved brew is now available in two-pound and five-pound bags. Join us and enjoy your coffee while making a difference in the world.
And join a community of like-minded coffee lovers. Subscribe and save today and enjoy discounted coffee and free freight, or just give this great brand a try
with discount code JUSTNEWS or JUSTTHENews. For 10% off your first order, head over to
Wired2FishCoffee today and make this year a year you align your coffee with your values.