The eureka moment | The Lab Detective Ep2

Speaker 1 AI agents are everywhere, automating tasks and making decisions at machine speed. But agents make mistakes.

Speaker 1 Just one rogue agent can do big damage before you even notice.

Speaker 1 Rubrik Agent Cloud is the only platform that helps you monitor agents, set guardrails, and rewind mistakes so you can unleash agents, not risk. Accelerate your AI transformation at rubric.com.

Speaker 1 That's R-U-B-R-I-K.com.

Speaker 3 Hey, Ryan Reynolds here, wishing you a very happy half-off holiday because right now, Mint Mobile is offering you the gift of 50% off unlimited. To be clear, that's half price, not half the service.

Speaker 3 Mint is still premium unlimited wireless for a great price.

Speaker 5 So that means a

Speaker 2 half day.

Speaker 3 Yeah? Give it a try at mintmobile.com/slash switch.

Speaker 6 Upfront payment of $45 for three month plan equivalent to $15 per month required. New customer offer for first three months only.
Speed slow under 35 day device and networks busy.

Speaker 6 Taxes and fees extra. See Mintmobile.com.

Speaker 7 Get it together this holiday season and make gifting easy with Pura's Black Friday sales.

Speaker 7 Take up to 30% off site-wide, including beautifully curated gift sets for everyone on your list, sleek and modern diffusers for home and car,

Speaker 7 and premium long-lasting single cents that make the perfect stocking stuffers.

Speaker 7 Less time shopping, more time enjoying. For a limited time only at Pura.com.

Speaker 8 The Observer.

Speaker 5 Last time on the lab detective.

Speaker 9 There's that, it's a mere second of non-belief. It's a, you know, it's sort of like, I don't believe this is happening.
This is ridiculous.

Speaker 10 The assumption was that if there was more than one of these deaths in a family, that you were sort of basically looking at a woman who was having babies and then killing them.

Speaker 9 The whole thing was circumstantial. It was not one ounce of actual evidence.
They relied on the diaries as to create a so-called window into my mind.

Speaker 9 So 2003 was when I was convicted and put inside.

Speaker 5 So you're mourning your children and then you're in prison. That must have just been horrific.

Speaker 5 What was it like when the door shut?

Speaker 9 I am not sure how to answer that. You led downstairs, the door clangs.
I said it's all very cold.

Speaker 9 It's I.

Speaker 9 I pretty much just switched off. It was all just a days, and you're just walking around going through the process.

Speaker 5 It's a big news story in Australia when Kathleen Folbig is convicted in 2003. The trial generates reams of coverage and headlines that stick.

Speaker 1 Australia's worst female serial killer, Kathleen Folbig, has broken down.

Speaker 5 By now, Kathleen's been labelled Australia's worst female serial killer, Australia's most hated woman. And how were the other prisoners with you?

Speaker 9 To begin with, when you go into a prison for something like that,

Speaker 9 it's dangerous. Yeah, there's no other word for it.

Speaker 9 Because, you know, other inmates, if they were to get their hands on you, are likely to want to do some serious damage because, you know, you get called a child killer.

Speaker 9 That's you're on the lowest rung other than a pedophile.

Speaker 5 For her own safety, Kathleen is isolated from the other women in prison. She's all alone, left to grieve for her children and come to terms with her new reality.

Speaker 5 The only certainty is that she'll be spending most of the rest of her life in prison. Did you have a sense of despair yourself or did you

Speaker 5 were you determined to fight for justice?

Speaker 9 I'd always been determined. Yeah, I was always like, you know, you got this wrong.
I said, so that was basically how I live my life. Did I go and crow and constantly say so?

Speaker 9 Not whilst I was inside no, because it falls on deaf ears, no one wants to know.

Speaker 5 Throughout the trial, Kathleen maintained her innocence and her lawyers had plans to appeal the conviction, but it felt futile. Kathleen didn't see the point in making a noise about her case.

Speaker 5 She was just focused on surviving.

Speaker 11 I will never forget the look on her face as she was being put into that prison ban. I still, even as I talk to you, I see that face.
It was broken.

Speaker 11 And when you feel that, because you know that person,

Speaker 11 I just could not imagine not reaching out to her and saying, what do you need? How can I help you? I see you.

Speaker 11 I see you.

Speaker 5 Amongst the many people who'd watched Kathleen's life unravel in public was someone who'd known her since she was very young.

Speaker 5 an old school friend called Tracy Chapman, who just couldn't believe that she was a murderer.

Speaker 11 I wrote her a one-page letter or whatever it was and I sent it to the jail.

Speaker 5 Tracy was determined to prove Kathleen's innocence and she stuck with her until eventually they reached the lab detective.

Speaker 9 My best friend Tracy Chapman, she decided to become the advocate for it all.

Speaker 9 Big decision for her because it sacrificed a lot in her life to do so. And as far as she was concerned, what was being presented was not right and not correct.
She was just as determined as me

Speaker 9 to

Speaker 9 help get me out and do what needed to be done.

Speaker 5 I'm Rachel Sylvester and from Tortoise Investigates. This is the lab detective.

Speaker 5 Episode 2, The Eureka Moment.

Speaker 11 I mean, we all knew she'd lost the children, but Not once did that meet my mind with suspicion, so I was horrified.

Speaker 5 Tracy first met Kathleen when they started school together. They were kind of opposites.

Speaker 5 Kathleen was a bit of a tomboy. She told me she always looked messy in photographs.
Tracy, on the other hand, was pristine and blonde.

Speaker 9 She had Coke bottle glasses because her sight was really bad.

Speaker 11 Oh, I was always pretty insecure because a lot of kids used to pick on me. I had really thick glasses, so I get called names like four eyes a lot.

Speaker 5 Tracy was bullied at school and she didn't have the confidence to stand up for herself. So one day Kathleen decided to do something about it.

Speaker 9 I don't like bullies. I never have and I think I just marched up and was pretty much like going to leave the girl alone.

Speaker 11 Kath, yeah, she would definitely go over there with the hands on the hips and stand there and tell them off.

Speaker 9 You know what I'd say? So we were pretty much inseparable after that.

Speaker 5 And you felt she had your back?

Speaker 11 Yes, absolutely. I always felt like she had my back.

Speaker 5 It was a case of opposites attracting. It wasn't just their personalities that were different.
They lived just across the train tracks from each other, but the contrast in their home lives was stark.

Speaker 5 Tracy had a busy loving home filled with siblings.

Speaker 5 Kathleen's family was much more complicated and traumatic. When she was a toddler, her father fatally stabbed her mother, and she ended up in care.

Speaker 5 By the time she met Tracy, she was living with cold and cruel foster parents. And Kathleen was drawn towards the loving family unit she didn't have.

Speaker 9 So I used to love going over there. Oh yeah, I think I spent more time over there than I did in my own house.

Speaker 5 As is often the way, they drifted apart as they got older, but they'd still hear things about each other through the grapevine.

Speaker 5 And the foundations of the friendship they'd built in those formative years were solid.

Speaker 5 So it didn't matter that when Tracy watched Kathleen being led away in handcuffs, they hadn't spoken in a few years. She felt compelled to to do something.

Speaker 5 And now Tracy was able to stand up for Kathleen.

Speaker 5 And what made you so sure she was innocent?

Speaker 11 Well, I just, I know people are going to give you a serve on this one, but I asked her,

Speaker 11 I asked her straight up. And I asked the really hard questions.
I asked her to explain the diary entries. I asked to explain the state of mind.

Speaker 11 I asked her to explain why people would think you were guilty enough to have a detective investigate you. I asked all of those questions

Speaker 11 and she answered them one by one.

Speaker 5 What did she say?

Speaker 11 She was really straight up about it. And the thing that got me over the years, it was consistency.

Speaker 11 You know, I always said, and it was over the 20 years I've said this, she had to be, she either had to be a savant or she was telling the truth.

Speaker 5 After Kathleen received that letter from Tracy, they started speaking on the phone almost every day.

Speaker 5 Apart from her lawyers, Tracy was almost the only person supporting Kathleen beyond the prison gates.

Speaker 5 At the time, Tracy was working as an environmental manager. She was a wildlife rescue volunteer and she had her own family to look after.

Speaker 5 Even so, she didn't just want to be a shoulder to cry on over the phone. She wanted to do something more significant.
So she started speaking with Kathleen's solicitors.

Speaker 5 She found out they had a stack of boxes full of documents to do with a case, some of them they'd never managed to get through.

Speaker 11 I went into a raving panic because I just thought if you can't actually, even though you were a solicitor at trial and stuff, if you can't actually get to that, who knows what's in there that might be the answer.

Speaker 5 So Tracy wants to dig.

Speaker 11 I've always said with this case, the devil's in the detail. And it absolutely is.

Speaker 11 So anything that people might have kind of skimmed over over at times, if you look at it again, then there's usually something there. So I was annoying and I said, do you want me to come in?

Speaker 11 And I only work four days a week full-time.

Speaker 5 Tracy offers to come in on Fridays, her day off. She says she could spend the hours that her child is in nursery going through all the documents.
But her offer is politely declined.

Speaker 11 I just remember him saying, like, it doesn't work like that.

Speaker 11 That's really lovely of you, but it doesn't work like that. So I was sort of like, okay, what do I do? What do I do?

Speaker 5 Instead, she reads and researches a lot.

Speaker 5 She has no legal qualifications at all, but she starts asking questions about anything and everything related to the case. She learns how the justice system works and how to get people to listen.

Speaker 9 You know, we always say and joke now that she's pretty much an expert in every field.

Speaker 9 Like, she's an expert in Jenny, she's an expert in legal, she's an expert in this, she's an expert in that, because she learns and

Speaker 9 she took it all on board.

Speaker 5 Tracy made it her full-time mission to prove Kathleen's innocence.

Speaker 5 For years she beavered away exploring things that might exonerate her friend, updating her all the time, trying desperately to keep Kathleen's morale up.

Speaker 9 When I was in Sydney prisons those phone calls were only six minutes long

Speaker 9 and of course you had to, there was a bit of competition for the phone because you only had so many of them.

Speaker 9 So Tracy and I would have six minutes and be talking incredibly fast in six minutes.

Speaker 5 Tracy would fill her in on who she'd been speaking to and what the strategy was.

Speaker 9 I just had to do my thing day by day and you know, get on with doing time, so to speak.

Speaker 9 But yeah, so there's a market difference between what I could know and what I could do inside as to what everyone else was doing outside.

Speaker 5 So, when did people first start raising serious questions about your conviction?

Speaker 9 Probably not. I think I would have spent,

Speaker 9 I don't think it was until nearly 2012, maybe. So, you know, I'd already spent pretty much 10 odd years.

Speaker 5 For years, Tracy's campaign seemed to be going nowhere. Even though multiple women had been exonerated in the UK for similar crimes, there was no quick fix for Kathleen.

Speaker 5 She lost her appeals, and for almost a decade, there was very little movement on her case.

Speaker 8 And I can vividly remember having a conversation with a lawyer who was a colleague about the Folbig trial, where, you know, he commented on Australia's worst female serial serial killer and saying to him, well, hang on a second, you know, it might not be that simple.

Speaker 8 And he responded with a degree of bafflement, it's fair to say, to my suggestion that her guilt may not be as manifest as the press was reporting it to be.

Speaker 5 This is Emma Cunliffe.

Speaker 5 She's a professor of law at the University of British Columbia. And she wrote a book called Murder, Medicine and Motherhood.
It's all about Kathleen's case.

Speaker 8 I began

Speaker 8 my work thinking actually in many ways that the Folbig case was different

Speaker 8 because Kathleen Folbig had kept diaries about her experiences of her children's life, her ambivalence about them and her grief and bereavement at their deaths.

Speaker 8 which contained passages that I found difficult to understand, troubling.

Speaker 8 I felt that perhaps Kathleen Folbig's case was different and perhaps she was guilty where these other mothers appeared to have been wrongly convicted.

Speaker 8 And so I really set out on the research with this puzzle, with the question of, you know, was this in fact the case that Roy Meadow was concerned about?

Speaker 8 Was this the case where a mother had murdered her children and almost gotten away with it?

Speaker 5 She was curious about why Kathleen was still in prison. when so many other women had had their convictions overturned.
And just why did you think that?

Speaker 5 What was it that made you realise that that might not be as simple?

Speaker 8 The ways in which the press was reporting the trial and in particular the evidence about Kathleen Folbeck's mothering

Speaker 8 seemed

Speaker 8 to fit too neatly into a set of stereotypes about suspicious and dangerous mothering, but without any real proof.

Speaker 8 And what I mean by that is no one one could point to any instance where Kathleen Folbig had harmed a child.

Speaker 8 No evidence was found of physical harm to the children on autopsy and these children were examined very carefully after their deaths.

Speaker 5 So did you feel that the prosecution had misrepresented the evidence?

Speaker 8 I feel that the prosecution

Speaker 8 used

Speaker 8 misogynistic tropes to

Speaker 8 ridicule and diminish the behavioural evidence that suggested that Kathleen Folbeck was innocent of the crimes with which she was charged.

Speaker 8 And so, for example,

Speaker 8 a number of friends of Kathleen Folbeck were called to testify at her trial. They testified uniformly, positively, about her motherhood and about her relationship with her children.

Speaker 8 The Crown Prosecutor referred to those women in his closing address as the girls from the gym, and suggested that they couldn't possibly have any idea of Kathleen Folby's true motherhood.

Speaker 8 Similarly, he

Speaker 8 suggested that the prospect of natural explanations for the deaths of four children in the Folbig family could be analogised to the prospect of pigs flying.

Speaker 5 The more she dug into into the case, the more she recognised similarities with the trials in the UK and the attitudes of the pediatrician and expert witness Roy Meadow that had become pervasive in those cases.

Speaker 8 And I was concerned that that dogma lacked a good medical research basis.

Speaker 5 The dogma Emma is referring to is Meadows' Law. the idea that one infant death is a tragedy, two is suspicious, and three is murder unless proven otherwise.

Speaker 8 I think it's really important to identify that Rome Meadows' papers were extremely controversial within their own field.

Speaker 8 So at the time when Meadow was publishing his papers, there was an active debate playing out, for example, in the British Medical Journal, in The Lancet, about the appropriateness of his reasoning.

Speaker 8 And there were pediatricians and pathologists who pointed to the dangers implicit in the Meadows dogma and to the risk that innocent mothers might be wrongly accused of murdering children.

Speaker 8 And that is, of course, exactly what played out. So while that debate was playing out actively in the medical research, the courts were another story.

Speaker 8 The challenge

Speaker 8 was that what was playing out in courtrooms in England, in Canada and in Australia, was quite disconnected from the medical debates that were playing out in the medical research journals themselves.

Speaker 8 And yet I think it's a compelling human need for us to find an explanation. And so, we had a situation in these cases where the prosecution was offering a compelling and a unitary explanation.

Speaker 8 These children have been murdered. And the best that defence could do was say, Well, we're not so sure they have been, but nor can we explain how they died.

Speaker 8 And I think that just as a matter of psychology, that was not a compelling alternative explanation for juries.

Speaker 5 She describes Meadows' law as a shapeshifter.

Speaker 8 What I I mean is that the concept of rarity and the prosecutor's fallacy that it enables continues to appear in other cases elsewhere across the common law world today. And so

Speaker 8 what I mean by prosecutor's fallacy is a line of reasoning that says that because infant death is rare in contemporary society, the existence of recurrent infant death is intrinsically suspicious.

Speaker 8 So it's a logic that takes the rarity of these events and turns that into a basis for suspicion rather than thinking about the rarity of these events as requiring very, very careful analysis and the prospect that we may not yet have solved all the medical problems that face us.

Speaker 5 Emma's book explores how the criminal justice system, medical knowledge and expectations of motherhood all work together when a woman is charged with killing her infant children, and how that combination sometimes leads to disastrous results.

Speaker 5 She takes Kathleen's trial as a detailed case study and concludes that, like Sally Clark and Angela Canning's, she's been the victim of a terrible miscarriage of justice.

Speaker 8 When the trial judge wrote his sentencing judgment, he was very careful, in fact, to emphasise the medical evidence that suggested that a pattern of infant deaths could not possibly be natural and to really kind of locate the significant evidence that led to conviction as being the medical evidence.

Speaker 8 The work of Dr. Carolla Vinuesa and the team that she assembled offered an alternative explanation for the deaths.

Speaker 5 By the time Emma's book is published in 2011, Kathleen's been in prison for eight years.

Speaker 5 The book lays the groundwork for serious doubt over her convictions.

Speaker 5 In the background, Tracy's still working away trying to free her friend. And more people have joined her campaign.

Speaker 5 But ultimately, it takes a phone call in 2018 for there to be a breakthrough.

Speaker 8 The idea of losing four children and then being wrongly accused of having killed those children is simply unbearable.

Speaker 5 A young lawyer lawyer called Dave Wallace is at home watching an ABC News documentary about the Kathleen Folberg case.

Speaker 13 I knew about that case dating back to when I was in law school in 2008, 2009.

Speaker 13 And my father's actually a statistician, so he always grumbled about that case from what he'd heard about the statistics involved in it.

Speaker 13 And I hadn't really thought much of it after finishing law school and working as a lawyer.

Speaker 5 But then he watches the film.

Speaker 2 Kathy,

Speaker 2 did you kill Carla? No!

Speaker 2 Did you kill Catherine? No.

Speaker 5 Did you try? It features the first in-depth interview with Kathleen from prison and raises serious questions about whether she's guilty.

Speaker 8 Essentially, the logic of the prosecution case falls apart.

Speaker 5 Emma Cumvliff is one of the experts interviewed in it.

Speaker 5 And Dave is gripped. He's working as a lawyer, but his passion is science.

Speaker 13 And so when I saw that 2018 story, my immediate thought was, oh,

Speaker 13 the nature of genomic or genetic testing has progressed a lot since when Kathleen's trial occurred in 2003.

Speaker 13 There's potentially a genetic explanation for the deaths of the children.

Speaker 2 I wonder if they've looked at that.

Speaker 5 By the time Dave was watching that documentary, it had been 15 years since the human genome had been sequenced for the first time.

Speaker 5 This landmark moment allowed scientists to create a genetic map of an individual.

Speaker 5 And since 2003, the price of testing had dropped enormously, making it possible to analyse somebody's whole genome for under a thousand pounds.

Speaker 5 That hadn't been an option during Kathleen's trial. Now it was.

Speaker 5 Dave wondered whether anyone had considered doing a whole genome sequencing of Kathleen and her children. He had no idea if that would even be possible.

Speaker 5 And even if it was, there would likely be hurdles.

Speaker 5 Could samples be taken from a prisoner? Did DNA even exist for children who'd died years previously?

Speaker 13 It was kind of idle curiosity watching the TV. And I kept thinking about it and then I decided I'd reach out to Kathleen's then lawyers and just ask the question.

Speaker 13 And I thought that's sort of essentially where it would end. I didn't realise that that was going to be the start of, you know, a five-year journey into getting involved with the case.

Speaker 5 The lawyers were interested. It wasn't something they'd explored, but they needed to find an expert.

Speaker 13 And most scientists that I reached out to were, you know, they thought it was maybe interesting, but didn't want to be involved in the legal matter.

Speaker 13 You know, either they'd heard from other colleagues that had done legal work and found it really unpleasant and scarring experience and didn't want to go anywhere near

Speaker 13 They thought it was, you know, politically too hot a topic for their careers and didn't want to risk it.

Speaker 5 Dave had been a student in the immunology department at the Australian National University.

Speaker 5 So he had one other idea, to call the leading geneticist there, Carola Venuesa, hoping she would take his call.

Speaker 13 I said, look, I don't know if you remember me. I studied in a lab near yours.
a number of years ago. There's this legal case, would you be interested in it?

Speaker 13 And she did remember me, So Carolla was the first one to jump at it.

Speaker 3 Hey, Ryan Reynolds here, wishing you a very happy half-off holiday. Because right now, Mint Mobile is offering you the gift of 50% off unlimited.
To be clear, that's half price, not half the service.

Speaker 3 Mint is still premium unlimited wireless for a great price.

Speaker 5 So that means a half day.

Speaker 3 Yeah? Give it a try at mintmobile.com/slash switch.

Speaker 6 Upfront payment of $45 for three month plan equivalent to $15 per month required. New customer offer for first three months only.
Speed flow after 35 gigabytes of networks busy. Taxes and fees extra.

Speaker 6 See Mintmobile.com.

Speaker 1 AI agents are everywhere, automating tasks and making decisions at machine speed. But agents make mistakes.

Speaker 1 Just one rogue agent can do big damage before you even notice. Rubrik Agent Cloud is the only platform that helps you monitor agents, set guardrails, and rewind mistakes.

Speaker 1 So you can unleash agents, not risk. Accelerate your AI transformation at rubric.com.
That's r-u-b-r-i-k.com.

Speaker 7 Make holiday gifting easy with Pura's Black Friday sale. Take up to 30% off site-wide, including curated gift sets, diffusers for home and car, and single cents that make perfect stocking stuffers.

Speaker 7 For a limited time at Pura.com.

Speaker 5 So can you just start by explaining a little bit about yourself? Why did you become a scientist? And were you always very curious as a child?

Speaker 12 Look, it's difficult to know. I first did medicine and

Speaker 12 I had some working experiences in Ghana, in India.

Speaker 12 And

Speaker 12 part of the frustrating thing as a doctor is that, you know, you see at the time, for example, I mean, quite a few, very young children suffering from severe infections with malaria, right?

Speaker 12 Cerebral malaria, meningitis, quite a lot of them dying as well. And, you know, medicine didn't have the answers.

Speaker 12 We just didn't understand why children succumbed to these infections and also why the vaccines didn't work. So I did feel intrigued that perhaps, you know, science could have some of the answers.

Speaker 5 Her father was a religious man, an austere lawyer who came from a long line of Spanish judges. He believed in serving society and he instilled in Corolla a strong sense of duty.

Speaker 5 She felt compelled to right wrongs.

Speaker 5 And speaking to her, you can feel that drive, that determination to work out whether science might hold the key to unlocking a mystery. And how would you describe what you do?

Speaker 12 Look, a lot of what we do, I do...

Speaker 12 Part of it is very fundamental, very basic, trying to understand how the immune system works.

Speaker 12 But then we also have, you know, a little bit more of a

Speaker 12 translational angle in that we look at children with severe diseases like lupus for example.

Speaker 12 We sequence their genome, the 20,000 genes in the genome, and we try and find if we can identify a single gene variant, a letter in the three billion letters in the human genome that might explain the disease in that child.

Speaker 5 These investigations can uncover novel causes of of disease. They can piece together how a gene works and how a particular variant or mutation changes the function of the gene.

Speaker 5 Once you've done that, you can look at new forms of treatment, even cures, for previously life-threatening conditions by editing the gene.

Speaker 5 It's groundbreaking work, and it turns out there are also implications for the legal system.

Speaker 5 Do you almost think of yourself as a detective rather than a doctor?

Speaker 12 It's a good question. Sometimes I think I would have liked to be a detective.

Speaker 12 But you could say it has a bit of an aspect of doing detective work, right? Trying to find these variants in the... It's like a needle in a haystack, right?

Speaker 12 A single letter change in these three billion letters or, you know, one gene amongst 20,000 genes. And it's very satisfying when you actually identify the cause of a disease

Speaker 12 in a child or in a family that, you know, know might have lost children to a severe disease.

Speaker 5 And normally you're doing that detective work for medical reasons.

Speaker 5 How is it different when you're transferring it to a criminal case?

Speaker 12 Well it is very different.

Speaker 12 I actually did not realize it was going to be so different when I first

Speaker 12 accepted to help in this Australian case. There is a different understanding in the courtroom about uncertainty uncertainty or certainty than there is in science.

Speaker 12 In science we like to deal with uncertainty. In the court things turn out to be quite different, particularly in the area of genetics.

Speaker 5 Carolla had been living in Australia since 2000, but Kathleen's case hadn't been on her radar. It wasn't until that call from Dave Wallace that she became involved.

Speaker 5 And what intrigued you about the case? Did you think there was something suspicious about it?

Speaker 5 Look,

Speaker 12 first of all, I was already primed because just a few weeks before, the month before, we had been referred a case of a family where four children had died, all of them in the first year or two of life and within a few years of each other.

Speaker 12 And, you know, we had managed to find a genetic cause for this disease.

Speaker 12 And

Speaker 12 you know, the beauty was that because of

Speaker 12 having a genetic diagnosis, the couple, which was quite young at the time, was able to have

Speaker 12 a live fifth child through pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

Speaker 2 So,

Speaker 12 I mean,

Speaker 12 for us, then, for deaths in a family, yes, it's quite rare, but it could be genetic, right?

Speaker 5 Corolla had realized that a parent can pass a dangerous gene to their child without even realizing they have it.

Speaker 5 That can then lead to a sudden and unexplained infant death when the gene is activated in the child.

Speaker 5 Dave sent her pathology reports, death certificates and medical records from the Folbig case.

Speaker 5 And as she skimmed the documents, she noticed various details that made her think there could be an innocent explanation for the children's deaths. There was enough there to take it seriously.

Speaker 5 So how did you start investigating Kathleen's case? What did you do first?

Speaker 12 So when we first were contacted, then by the formal lawyers of Kathleen, because Dave Wallace was not even working for the case, he was interested, he contacted Kathleen's lawyers, Kathleen lawyers then contacted me and we had a discussion of how to go about it.

Speaker 12 Now the lawyers told us it was going to be very difficult to access DNA from the children and

Speaker 12 we then thought well there is a chance because some of the causes of sudden unexpected death in childhood are cardiac or are conditions that are inherited, there's a chance that one of the parents could carry a variant that could be pathogenic.

Speaker 12 So we decided to start with the mother.

Speaker 12 We thought it was important to take first a clinical history because it's easier to justify, even from a research perspective, the exercise of sequencing if there are any symptoms in an individual.

Speaker 5 This is a big undertaking, and no one's paying Corolla for her to do this research. All her time will be pro bono.
So she asks her trusted colleague to help. He's a geneticist called Todor Arsov.

Speaker 2 One afternoon I remember vividly Carola rang and asked whether I had heard anything about this case.

Speaker 5 They talked about how they would go about their investigation and decided that Todor should visit Kathleen in prison. the first step to uncovering potential evidence.

Speaker 5 So one day he takes the ferry past the harbour in Sydney out to to Silverwater Correctional Facility.

Speaker 2 And I remember, you know, having all of these thoughts going through my head, you know, what am I going

Speaker 2 into? What am I going to see? You know,

Speaker 2 I tried not to read too much around this because I didn't want to have any preconceived idea.

Speaker 2 I just wanted to treat this as if it were a patient or somebody that I've seen for the first time and they're coming through the door and I'm, you know, completely unbiased and trying to, you know, learn what happened.

Speaker 5 He has to go through the process of getting inside the prison, but before long, it's just him and Kathleen in a small room.

Speaker 2 I mean, I didn't know what to think of a person that had spent the last 20 years in a jail. What would that be like?

Speaker 5 He starts asking questions about the health of her children, her family, and her own medical history.

Speaker 5 And as they're talking, she tells him about an incident that happened when she was in high school, and a clue reveals itself.

Speaker 2 She described this situation where there was a swim race and she fainted during the swim race.

Speaker 2 And that is quite interesting, you know, because when these things happen with physical exertion, it sometimes is a telling sign.

Speaker 5 It turns out this wasn't an isolated event. When Kathleen was pregnant, she'd fainted.
In prison, she collapsed in the shower, falling face first into the ground.

Speaker 2 So there were these unusual episodes.

Speaker 5 Tudor made one more crucial visit to Kathleen.

Speaker 5 This time he took with him a simple swab kit, not much more than a little wooden stick with some cotton wool on the end of it.

Speaker 5 And with that he took saliva samples from Kathleen and swabbed the inside of her cheek. The next step was to send it off to a technician in Corolla's lab.

Speaker 5 When the samples arrived, arrived, they extracted her DNA and put it through a genetic sequencing machine.

Speaker 2 And then, you know, I just remember calling Carola then and we had this very long conversation saying, well, look, I mean, it looks as if there may be something, you know.

Speaker 2 A few months later, we had the sequences.

Speaker 12 And then we met. I remember we were told on the 30th of October 2018 that the sequences were ready.
They had gone through the pipeline.

Speaker 12 And, you know, the day later, it was a weekend and we met in my house.

Speaker 5 Corolla and Tojo wanted to comb through the results together so they could compare notes immediately. They sat at the kitchen counter in Corolla's home and both opened the DNA file on their laptops.

Speaker 5 They were searching for anything unusual, genetic mutations that might suggest disease.

Speaker 5 This might be a complete wild goose chase. They had no idea whether they were going to find anything that might help explain the children's deaths.

Speaker 12 Both Toro and I decided to run the sequencing or the analysis independently so that we wouldn't miss anything. So each of us put our own list of candidate genes together.

Speaker 12 And this took going through the literature, finding out all of the possible causes of sudden unexpected death. And of course, they come under different fields.

Speaker 12 Some could be cardiac, but you know, this epilepsy, sudden death in epilepsy. There could be metabolic disorders, mitochondrial disorders.

Speaker 12 So that took a lot of digging up and reading because a lot of these areas were outside of our areas of expertise. But somebody had to put all these lists of genes together.

Speaker 12 So each of us put this list of genes, which more or less were around just over 300, right? Around 350.

Speaker 2 I mean, this is a little bit of art, you know, there is no one way.

Speaker 2 You know, when you face the genome, it's, you know, a lot of information, a lot of data that you need to go through in some way so everybody developed their own I suppose way of doing things and we just you know sat down and decided to do it do it each of us on our own laptops again just so as we wouldn't miss anything and then we were sitting next to each other and everybody you know mining through the list that we thought was inclusive and then you know we would go one gene oh but you know but this or you know but that or she would suggest another gene, and I would kind of go ahead and, oh, but you know, this something doesn't fit in.

Speaker 12 You know, within

Speaker 12 potentially, probably just 10 minutes, I remember looking at each other and saying, have you seen this, right? Both of us were looking at this variant in calmodulin.

Speaker 2 And then there was a little bit of silence, and we were both, you know, busy.

Speaker 2 We just turned to each other saying, What about Caltu?

Speaker 2 It was just count to, but that was the word.

Speaker 12 CAM2.

Speaker 12 Because it was one of perhaps three dozen genes that had already been proven to be linked with sudden cardiac death in infancy.

Speaker 5 It was an astonishing lead. The genetic test had revealed a mutation in the Calmodulin 2 or CAM2 gene that helps keep the heart working properly.

Speaker 5 If this variant had been passed on to the children, it could explain their deaths.

Speaker 2 The Eureka eureka word was calm2, calbodulin2 gene.

Speaker 12 So for us that was very intriguing. It was probably the best thing we could have found, right? Because it meant that it could be very harmful.

Speaker 5 So did you look at each other and you realized you had the same gene on your list of potential suspects?

Speaker 12 Yes, and that from the ones that we had scrolled through, it was the only novel variant.

Speaker 5 The two scientists searched the medical literature looking for any mention of the mutation they'd just discovered. They found nothing.

Speaker 9 And they came back and said we found something that was like,

Speaker 9 wow, okay now we're getting somewhere.

Speaker 5 This wasn't unusual. New genetic variants are created all the time and often these new mutations are the most dangerous.
They're like a surprise attack that evolution hasn't had a chance to weed out.

Speaker 5 Carolla and Todor had no idea whether their discovery was significant for Kathleen's case, but they knew they had to dig deeper.

Speaker 5 The next step was to try and discover whether Kathleen's children had inherited the genetic mutation that they'd found. This was going to be complicated.

Speaker 5 It meant finding DNA samples from children who died decades ago.

Speaker 2 That was not very straightforward. Didn't just happen.

Speaker 5 They knew it would be possible to extract DNA from two of the children.

Speaker 2 So it was subject to negotiations and conversations.

Speaker 2 But ultimately there were biological samples kept from tissues in the freezer from two of the children and so we could extract DNA from those.

Speaker 5 But for the other two that wasn't the case. The only thing they could think of was to try and track down the blood from the heel prick samples which had been taken from the babies at birth.

Speaker 5 They had no idea whether it would be possible to find these for Kathleen's children or whether they'd be in a good enough condition to extract DNA.

Speaker 5 And without that, their discovery about the genetic mutation in Kathleen would do nothing to prove her innocence.

Speaker 5 Coming up in episode three.

Speaker 12 So I remember thinking, well, what can we do? We need to do something about how the legal system deals with complex science in the courtroom.

Speaker 9 So I did have quite a bit of despair after that because I just sort of thought I've got nowhere to go now and I'm stuck.

Speaker 12 I still know that in most countries anything that looks unusual still could lead to an accusation of murder.

Speaker 5 The lab detective is reported by me, Rachel Sylvester. It's written by me and the producer Gary Marshall.
Fact-checking is by Ada Barumi. The music supervisor is Carla Patella.

Speaker 5 Sound design is by Rowan Bishop. Podcast artwork is by Lola Williams.
The executive producer is Basha Cummings.

Speaker 14 Hi, this is Joe from Vanta. In today's digital world, compliance regulations are changing constantly, and earning customer trust has never mattered more.

Speaker 14 Vanta helps companies get compliant fast and stay secure with the most advanced AI, automation, and continuous monitoring out there.

Speaker 14 So whether you're a startup going for your first SOC2 or ISO 27001 or a growing enterprise managing vendor risk, Vanta makes it quick, easy, and scalable.

Speaker 14 And I'm not just saying that because I work here. Get started at Vanta.com.

Speaker 7 Get it together this holiday season and make gifting easy with Pura's Black Friday sales.

Speaker 7 Take up to 30% off site-wide, including beautifully curated gift sets for everyone on your list, sleek and modern diffusers for home and car,

Speaker 7 and premium long-lasting single cents that make the perfect stocking stuffers.

Speaker 7 Less time shopping, more time enjoying. For a limited time only at Pura.com.

Speaker 8 Dear Career Ladder, you've had your moment.

Speaker 16 You're linear and one-dimensional.

Speaker 7 Ambition doesn't just go up anymore.

Speaker 15 It zigs and zags and squiggles.

Speaker 16 We're CEOs, executives, founders. We're advising companies launching side hustles, taking breaks, defining our next act.

Speaker 16 Ambition on our terms, the possibilities are endless.

Speaker 2 Chief, lead on.

Speaker 8 Join us at chief.com.

Speaker 17 Hannah Burner, are those the cozy Tommy John pajamas you're buying?

Speaker 15 Paige DeSorbo, they are Tommy John. And yes, I'm stocking up because they make the best holiday gifts.

Speaker 17 So generous.

Speaker 15 Well, I'm a generous girly, especially when it comes to me. So I'm grabbing the softest sleepwear, comfiest underwear, and best-fitting loungewear.

Speaker 17 So nothing for your bestie.

Speaker 15 Of course, I'm getting my dad, Tommy John. Oh, and you, of course.

Speaker 17 It's giving holiday gifting made easy.

Speaker 15 Exactly. Cozy, comfy, everyone's happy.
Don't wait. Shop Tommy John's biggest savings ever and get 50% off site-wide at tommyjohn.com/slash comfort.