Good news for people who love bad news

Thumbtack presents.

Uncertainty strikes.

I was surrounded.

The aisle and the options were closing in.

There were paint rollers, satin and matte finish, angle brushes, and natural bristles.

There were too many choices.

What if I never got my living room painted?

What if I couldn't figure out what type of paint to use?

What if

I just used Thumbtack?

I can hire a top-rated pro in the Bay Area that knows everything about interior paint, easily compare prices, and read reviews.

Thumbtack knows homes.

Download the app today.

With a Spark Cash Plus card from Capital One, you earn unlimited 2% cash back on every purchase.

And you get big purchasing power so your business can spend more and earn more.

Capital One, what's in your wallet?

Find out more at capital1.com/slash sparkcash plus.

Terms apply.

All right, Brian Walsh.

That's me.

So, you are the editor of the Future Perfect team.

You oversee the climate team.

You oversee some podcasts like yours truly.

So, top editorial leader here, one of them at five.

Yeah, you could, you could say that.

I think that's

fair to say.

Yeah.

Could you pull up the best performing Vox stories right now and we'll play a little game of good news, bad news?

Oh, boy, this is so embarrassing.

Okay.

Okay.

Publishers.

Top story.

Select pop story.

Vox.com.

All right.

Top story.

July 14th, Ian Milheiser.

The Supreme Court just handed Trump his biggest victory of a second term.

Well, I guess that's good news from someone's perspective.

True.

Okay.

July 18th, Constant Grady.

There's a bigger story behind Colbert's cancellation.

Yeah, I don't think the bigger story is that bad for the media is I'm pretty sure and bad for media freedom.

Right, right, right.

Oh, this is a good one.

All right.

July 23rd, Benji Jones, recent piece.

The government stepped in to clean up a disaster in North Carolina, then they created another one.

I edited that story along with Paige Vega, our climate editor, and I definitely that was not positive, unfortunately.

Should I keep going?

Yeah, yeah.

Do you see our story?

Going down.

Will we ever know why Brian Coburger murdered the Idaho 4?

Just going to keep on going on that one.

Yep, yep.

The real reason why everyone's so mad over the Gen Z stare.

I mean, everyone's so mad.

And they're like, oh, I love the way the Gen Z's look at me with dead eyes.

Republicans now own

America's broken health care system.

Nope.

America's fastest-growing suburbs are about to get very expensive.

I think that's a good representative sample.

Yeah, I'd say so.

For July 2025.

You know, I'm not going to try to smoke screen you here and say that everything is great in the year 2025.

In fact, it's probably quite a lot worse than it's been in most of the years I've been alive, I think.

At the same time, like, I bet if we went back to like 2010 or something like that, I bet we would find a similar kind of tone emotionally.

I mean, you're one of the people shaping media out there.

What

have you figured out?

Like, what can you tell me about good news and bad news from from that perspective from that perspective i can tell you one thing which is that audience members people will often tell you like why does the media report so why it's so negative why it's so negative you know if we just if you guys would report positive news we would we'd jump all we'd read it no they're lying that they do not they don't actually feel that way um i mean this is the problem we face right like it's important for any editorial company or person whatever you know to think seriously about what they're putting out into the world, you know, not in a kind of like woo-woo energy way, but like, you know, real things about the human, about who we are as people and where we could be going.

And I think we need that now more than ever.

Yeah.

Why, why do you think it's so easy to miss the good news or to miss covering the good news?

I think, quite honestly, one part is there is,

you know, the news often is like,

what is happening right now?

And so

usually the more positive stories, they change imperceptibly over a longer period of time.

And that probably more than anything else is why we miss them.

It seems like the good news has a lot more context and explaining that has to go into it before getting to what that good news is or being able to appreciate the scale of it.

Exactly.

Yeah.

I think that that's another part where this is hard because we're dealing with the biggest, the best good news, honestly, tends to involve lots and lots of people.

The real meaning of it is not that it's just happening to one person.

The real meaning to it is happening to many, many millions of people people over many, many years.

And that's just, you know, I don't think that fits into a narrative or a story quite as easily as a lot of the more negative stuff.

What's the mystery here?

What's unexplainable about some of these biases?

Why we lean negative even though I don't think it makes us feel good?

We know, it's funny, like we know

that like optimistic people, you know, generally turn out better, better health, live longer, really annoying, you know, all those things.

You'd think these are habits of mind that maybe would be selected or you'd want to develop more.

And you see it elsewhere.

Just, you know, I think it might be here in the media.

It's less often.

And then I wonder as well, like, is there anything that can be done to change this?

Is this just

who we are as human beings?

Is it just how our media system will generally work?

Because it doesn't feel like it's getting better.

Like it feels like if anything,

we're seeing like a darker tenor tend to win out over time.

And look, maybe that's going to, that's that's reality to a certain extent.

You know, maybe I'm the one who's wrong.

Yeah.

How do you think this negativity bias shapes what we believe is true?

You know, so much of this comes down to attention, right?

Like, what are we paying attention to?

What we notice, and what you notice then becomes your reality.

So, I think

negativity bias just makes us more likely to pick up on things that are bad, that are negative.

And

if you think of your sense of reality or truth as a product of what you're noticing, then yeah, that will be affected.

And the picture you see, it's like, you know, if you, if you're drawing a picture on the paper and you only have black, gray, and white, like it's going to look differently than if you have full colors in a way that I think is, I do, I think is ultimately counterproductive.

Is it also some what of like a confirmation bias here too?

Like once a narrative is rooted in our brains, it's like hard to shake or we're more skeptical of like a good news take on something that we're convinced is bad.

Yes, I think so.

That's absolutely true.

And I think,

you know, we tend to pay attention to whatever we saw more recently, I think, or what's available in front of us, you know, even if there are things that are more unusual, things that are actually how things usually work on a day-to-day basis, like a terrible crime or an airplane accident, anything like that, that'll be the thing that'll stick in our head, not all the stuff that went just fine.

Got it.

So it's like

the one-off holds just as much weight as like everything working well for millions of people.

Exactly.

Like we're not walking around with sort of being like, well, there was that one plane crash, but actually, you know, 3 million passengers every day land perfectly safe.

No, that doesn't work that way.

Yeah.

I mean, we have, we have the power to do our little part, maybe put some little bit more good news out into the world.

Let's bring some good news to the unexplainable listeners.

I love it.

Let's do it.

Let's do it.

All right.

I mean, you said that, you know, it's like hard to get people's attention with good news.

So we should like name this something super catchy, right?

Like, what should we call this?

I think we should call it good news.

Just simple, clean, to the point.

Look,

this is news.

And it's good.

It is good.

Put those things together.

You have good news.

It's good news.

Yeah.

I mean, I was kind of thinking like along the lines of like, what's the opposite of a sad trombone?

You know?

Barbara?

like that?

Kind of sounds like blues clues.

Exactly.

How about

you may have missed the silver lining as you fell into a pit of despair?

Poetic, but a bit long.

Yeah, it's not, it's not as catchy.

All right.

Well, stick with good news.

You make a compelling case.

Thank you.

I did make a little theme song for you.

Oh.

asking you, can you give me that?

Can you give me that good news?

I feel like I'm ready to start like a morning radio show with that.

Yeah, absolutely.

So good.

Awesome.

So

this is good news.

You are Brian Walsh.

Did you bring me some good news?

I do have some good news, and it starts with bad news first.

Of course.

Did you ever watch like the nightly news, like the local news when when you were growing up?

Yeah.

What did it usually start with?

I think I remember, yeah, definitely.

It's 10 o'clock.

Do you know where your children are?

Yeah, exactly.

And like, I grew up outside Philadelphia, which

in the 80s was definitely like every day, like every, without fail, 5.30, Larry Kane comes on the TV show or whoever.

This murder happened here.

This murder happened here.

This murder happened here.

No, there were a lot of murders happening.

Violent crime going through the 80s into the 90s was generally going up and up.

That was sort of the peak.

And I think there was a real sense of like, could this even be changed?

And then, you know, for reasons that criminologists still have, I'm sure, very detailed academic arguments in very polite language with each other on, it started to drop drastically beginning in the sort of around the mid-90s and just mostly kept dropping, kept falling and kept falling.

in the late 90s through the 2000s in the 2010s uh you know maybe occasionally increases but like in general the story of crime was just going down down down um and that became the new reality Now, what's interesting is that even during that time period,

when you asked Americans like their feelings about violent crime, like this is when we're in the middle of like a ski slope going downwards, like majority would still say that they believe crime is rising.

You know, like that to me is one of the all-time best like negativity news bias stories.

But during the pandemic or in the years that immediately followed, you had a real meaningful, huge spike in violent crime in the United States.

This was happening across the country.

And what's amazing is really just over the last about year and a half or so, I think, or a little bit further than that, the early numbers for 2025 indicate that we may be on a pace for the lowest murder rate in U.S.

history, at least in recorded U.S.

history.

That's pretty amazing.

No one can quite explain why that is, but that feels like that should be a bigger story.

I mean, certainly the media covered the increase in crime quite heavily for good reason because it was a big deal, but you don't see the same amount of attention being put on why is it coming down?

Hearing you say that this could be the lowest murder rate in recorded U.S.

history, like, yeah, that seems like a catchy headline to me.

It is.

Why would this be good news that we might have missed?

This just feels like, I mean, maybe I'm being too simplified here, but this just feels like a situation where we're less likely to report on and less likely to read a story about where a bad problem is getting less bad.

I mean, that's part of it, actually, come to think of it.

Because you can then look at this and be like, well, there's still, you know, 10,000, 12,000, 14,000 people who will be murdered.

That's not a good news story.

Right.

And that's not a very satisfying story to tell, especially in the absence of the, you know, if it bleeds, it leads.

stuff that you get when you're seeing a crime spike.

And look, you can reverse this too as well, I think.

climate change is a story where often is, I think, reported as if it is just a continuous story of things getting worse.

That is true in some ways.

The temperature is continuing to rise and it will rise for the foreseeable future.

There's an element where it is the ultimate bad news story because every year will be worse than the year before, which is something I like not to think about too often.

But I think, you know, there are positive things happening, whether that's research that indicates that the worst levels of warming now seem less likely in the future, or something else that it sort of just looked at recently is that it appears as if the first six months of 2025 resulted in the fewest people globally on record dying from extreme weather.

Oh, wow.

Yeah, I know.

I mean, it's surprising.

And that's definitely sort of the kind of thing that does not does not get reported a lot.

That is really good news.

And that's actually something that's been a long-term trend.

Like we have seen seen really impressive reductions in deaths, at least, from extreme weather, even as the economic damage from these disasters has been getting worse.

But not dying is a really important thing.

And we used to see massive casualties in big natural disaster events, like half a million people dying in Bangladesh during major cyclones.

That does not happen to the degree it used to.

And that to me is a good news story, but I don't think you'll hear people talk about that as much because, again, it does not fit into the picture of climate change as being something that is just just just getting worse.

Right.

Can I just

run and get some water?

Yeah, yeah, absolutely.

All right, thanks.

Sorry.

Good news is thirsty business.

Yeah

Support for this show comes from Robinhood.

Wouldn't it be great to manage your portfolio on one platform?

With Robinhood, not only can you trade individual stocks and ETFs, you can also seamlessly buy and sell crypto at low costs.

Trade all in one place.

Get started now on Robinhood.

Trading crypto involves significant risk.

Crypto trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Crypto LLC.

Robinhood Crypto is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the New York State Department of Financial Services.

Crypto held through Robinhood Crypto is not FDIC insured or CIPIC protected.

Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.

Securities trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Financial LLC, member SIPIC, a registered broker dealer.

As a founder, you're moving fast towards product market fit, your next round, or your first big enterprise deal.

But with AI accelerating how quickly startups build and ship, security expectations are also coming in faster, and those expectations are higher than ever.

Getting security and compliance right can unlock growth or stall it if you wait too long.

Vanta is a trust management platform that helps businesses automate security and compliance across more than 35 frameworks like SOC2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and more.

With deep integrations and automated workflows built for fast-moving teams, Vanta gets you audit ready fast and keeps you secure with continuous monitoring as your models, infrastructure, and customers evolve.

That's why fast-growing startups like Langchang, Ryder, and Cursor have all trusted Vanta to build a scalable compliance foundation from the start.

Go to Vanta.com slash Vox to save $1,000 today through the Vanta for Startups program and join over 10,000 ambitious companies already scaling with Vanta.

That's vanta.com slash Vox to save $1,000 for a limited time.

This message is brought to you by AppleCard.

Each Apple product, like the iPhone, is thoughtfully designed by skilled designers.

The titanium Apple Card is no different.

It's laser-etched, has no numbers, and it earns you daily cash on everything you buy, including 3% back on everything at Apple.

Apply for Apple Card on your iPhone in minutes.

Subject to credit approval, Apple Card is issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Salt Lake City Branch.

Terms and more at applecard.com.

All right, Brian, Brian with a Y, we're back.

Yes.

What other good news is out there that I should know about?

I really like this one, and that is driverless cars.

Okay.

A thing I know that everyone loves, but in fact, they really are good news because you know what human beings are really not actually good at?

Driving cars.

Like, we're we're really bad at it.

Like, when you get down to it, I think some of us are better.

I mean, all of us think we're good at it.

Right.

I'm obviously, I'm very good.

Everybody thinks they're above average, right?

Exactly.

It's the Lake Wobegon effect on cars, but close to 40,000 people are dying in car accidents every year.

That's a result of us speeding, which we shouldn't be doing.

Result of us driving intoxicated, which we all shouldn't be doing.

But just generally, like the human, you know, like if we're moving 70 miles an hour.

In a 2,000-pound machine.

Yeah, exactly.

Yeah.

You know, it would be great if we didn't have to do this.

I'm taking it that you do not like driving.

Do you like to drive?

I don't, but I hate being driven even more, actually.

So I drive a 2011 Toyota Prius right now that is

terminally dirty.

Full of eight-year-old Cheerios and very uncomfortable.

The shocks at this point are just like, it's like, it's like...

riding a wagon from the 1800s.

But what Waymo, which is a Google offshoot that has been doing driverless taxis for quite a while now in a bunch of cities, San Francisco, Phoenix, a few others, they've finally got together something like 56 million miles of fully autonomous driving.

And that means no safety driver at the side, like just the car doing it.

Sounds like a lot.

Is that a lot?

That's a lot.

Yeah.

I would say that's a lot.

I mean, like, it's, it's, you know, I mean, it's.

It's enough that it becomes statistically meaningful.

What they found was that just, you know, compared to what we expect, like human drivers over about that amount of driving, about that many million miles, you had something like 81% fewer deployments of airbags because of accidents, 85% fewer serious injury crashes, 96% fewer intersection injuries versus human drivers.

Those are very good numbers, I'd say.

96.

That's, you know, 96.

Solid A for Waymo.

Yeah.

So if you extend this data to be the equivalent of like the 3.3 trillion vehicle miles that are driven by humans in the U.S.

in a typical year.

Okay.

So millions to trillions.

We'd estimate that you save something like 3,04,000 lives a year.

Okay.

Now, you know, all right, a lot of caveats to go with that.

Okay.

It sounds caveat-y.

Yeah, yeah.

I, you know, this is the beginning of a story, not the end of a story.

And the way that these cars are being deployed, you know, they're deployed in warm weather cities like Phoenix, like San Francisco.

You know, these are cities that were picked, especially Phoenix, I think, that are easier to navigate.

So not running into some of the things that, you I might be running into here in the Northeast in a bad winter.

Yeah, the cow paths made into roads versus like roads that were designed as roads.

Right.

Yeah, exactly.

Yeah.

You know, it's a company-run study.

It was peer-reviewed, but you have to take that.

I think it's just one self-driving car operator.

There are others out there that may not have the same focus on safety.

But, you know, I still look at this like motor vehicle deaths are a tragedy.

They shouldn't happen.

Like, we have improved.

Like, we've gotten safer cars.

It's really us who are the problem.

Our distractedness, our just general poor driving ability.

Right.

I guess I still wrestle with

not trusting a driverless car.

Like, I wouldn't, I wouldn't go into a driverless car.

Have you ever been in one?

I've not yet, actually.

Yeah.

I would, though.

You would.

All right.

But it would also feel weird, even though I like almost certainly I'm going to be safer than I would with a human driver, even me, if I was the human driver.

Yeah.

what would it take for you to put your kid on a driverless school bus?

Oh, that's that's a

really got me.

Low blow.

Okay.

Woof.

All right.

Well, it's funny, though.

I mean, like, I actually had a thought recently.

Okay, this is a little dark, but every day I do put my kid in a school bus.

He gets sent to nature camp in Staten Island.

What would it take?

It's funny funny because then it becomes a matter of trust, right?

Not just trust in the machine, but trust in whoever is regulating the machine.

Even though, again, like, how much trust do I have in who might be regulating bus drivers?

I mean, I don't know.

Yeah.

I guess

I would have to do it a few times myself.

And then I would

try to look at the numbers and try to convince myself that, like, what do you believe?

Like, your intuition based off what you're used to doing, what you're just accustomed to versus what the data shows you, and try to go with the data.

But when you put it that way, it's really actually quite hard.

Me, I'd jump in it tomorrow.

You know, I'd be fine, but like, there is something different about staking someone else's life on that way.

Yeah.

All right.

Last good news story of the day.

What do you got?

Okay.

Cancer.

Cancer.

Yeah, no, it's funny how often the good news of good news stories start with something really bad.

And I believe there's a reason for that, which is that

that's where the progress is to be made, I think, more than anything else.

Also, that's more counterintuitive.

That's a trick in journalism.

Like, you think one thing, I deliver something else.

The little switcheroo.

Yeah, exactly.

So, what's good about cancer?

What's good about cancer is that we're getting much better at treating it, basically.

One of the stories that recently looked at general data around cancer, and

people today

of a certain age have about a one-third lower risk of dying from cancer than someone of the same age in 1990.

Cancer is very age benefit.

The older you get, generally speaking, the more at risk you are.

Because it just like takes time for cancer to be able to.

Exactly.

I mean, and it's important to know that like, because the population of the United States as a whole has gotten older from 1990,

you can see raw increases because there's more people who are falling into the age group where cancer might happen.

But then if you just look age by age, any a given age group, then yeah, you have about a one-third lower risk of dying from cancer as someone of the same age back in 1990.

And that to me is like, that's a pretty meaningful improvement.

So, just to like break that down a little bit, like going back to the, to like what, what this good news actually is.

So, even though there are more people

dying of cancer today than there were 30 years ago,

me personally, as a 34-year-old, I have less of a chance of dying from cancer this year than if I had been 35 in the 90s.

That is correct.

Yeah.

It's not like rocket science exactly of why this has happened.

The fact that we don't smoke in anywhere near the degree we did in the 1960s is a big, big, big, big, big cause here.

So part of like what was driving trends in the 90s was how much people were smoking in the 60s.

Yeah, I think so.

I think plus even in the 1990s, people were still smoking more than they do now.

Like, it's been a general decrease.

But, you know, beyond that, like, there's been really amazing improvements in certain therapies and things like immunotherapy,

like targeted small molecule drugs,

you know, things like colonoscopies have become more common.

I've had the lovely experience of going through that.

Welcome to your 40s.

Yes, exactly.

I've been hearing recently, though, about like

more younger people getting cancer or like getting like cancer in surprising ways how does this square with that

that is happening as well but i guess at the same time like one element does not cancel out the whole story you know and i guess i would not suggest that okay ignore the fact that there are rising rates of gastrointestinal cancers among people who are like younger people and people my age i now we'll see what happens with this like if this becomes a really bigger public health issue, then that really does begin to complicate the story.

But I think otherwise, I think you you see a situation where it is improving

that's part of it bad things happening within that um but that shouldn't obviate the whole story

yeah

all right well i'm feeling a little better that's good how are how are you feeling i'm feeling like by the end i was like acting as the press secretary for the concept of good news

like really spinning very hard on that one um yeah which is funny but you know it needs help.

Yeah.

It sounds like it needs somebody in its corner.

You've taken that on.

There you go.

Yeah.

How has, you know, looking for a good news story every week for your newsletter changed your approach to looking for stories?

The thing about a weekly newsletter is you do it every week and that adds up.

So, you know, like I just wait until you go to twice a week.

Oh, God.

Yeah.

I walked right into that.

Okay.

I think things that, like, what are the stories we've tell ourselves and what are the conditions that allow people people to be more resilient you know because i think things will be tough and hard and giving up doom scrolling is not an option and so trying to be more hopeful and with that hope is a reinforcing element to i think resilience um and so

i used to be someone who was very like

I don't know, like the idea of like, oh, positive attitude can make you better, healthier, so forth didn't really, I didn't make sense to me.

But now I think to a degree it does and i think uh i'm not sure i have science backed that up exactly but i think it's it's almost like an armor you can put on as you go off into the not very easy world frankly and the not very easy and a little scary future

if you want more good news from brian every week you can sign up for his newsletter on box.com.

We will also include a link in our show notes.

This episode was produced by me, Meredith Hodenot.

I also run the show.

It was edited by Jorge Just, Noam Hassenfeld makes our music, Christian Yala did the mixing and sound design, and Melissa Hirsch checked the facts.

Bird Pinkerton backed away from the platypus as Aaron Bird stepped forward.

His wings flared and smirked.

What a touching story.

But let's not forget why we're here.

It's dual time, Pinkerton.

Thanks to Brian with an I, Resnick, for co-creating the show.

If you, Brian, and all the other non-Brians out there want to share your thoughts with us, write in.

Send us a voice memo.

Tell us what you're thinking.

We're at unexplainable at box.com.

We really love hearing from you.

If you want to support the show, help us keep making it, please join our membership program.

That's at box.com/slash members.

You will get ad-free podcasts and unlimited access to box Journalism.

And if you sign up because you love Unexplainable and the things we make, please tell our bosses.

It makes a big difference.

You can also support us by leaving a nice rating or review wherever you listen to your podcasts, or just tell the folks in your life the good news of Unexplainable.

Unexplainable is part of the Vox Media Podcast Network, and we will be back in your feed on Wednesday.

This month on Explain It To Me, we're talking about all things wellness.

We spend nearly $2 trillion on things that are supposed to make us well.

Collagen smoothies and cold plunges, Pilates classes, and fitness trackers.

But what does it actually mean to be well?

Why do we want that so badly?

And is all this money really making us healthier and happier?

That's this month on Explain It To Me, presented by Pureleaf.

Support for this show comes from Capital One.

With the VentureX business card from Capital One, you earn unlimited double miles on every purchase.

Plus, the VentureX Business Card has no preset spending limit.

So your purchasing power can adapt to meet your business needs.

Capital One.

What's in your wallet?