SCOTUS Immigration Sweeps Ruling, Limited Epstein Files, Trump's Handling of Russia

I met someone the other day.

I never met him in person before.

I think I have a short voice.

He said you have a short voice?

Well, like every time I meet people, they're like, you look nothing like I expected.

You're so tall.

And your voice makes me think you're short.

Do I have a short voice?

Huh.

If someone said annoying voice, maybe I'd be like that.

My voice is calming.

That's what Sabrina Carpenter said.

The Supreme Court rules immigration stops based on skin color, accents, or where someone works are allowed in Los Angeles for now.

We will not stand up for armed masked goons who come into our neighborhoods.

Where does the legal battle go from here?

I'm Amartinez.

That's Layla Foddle, and this is up first from NPR News.

Remember that lewd birthday drawing for Jeffrey Epstein that was reported about and President Trump denied drawing?

Well, the House Oversight Committee has released it, and it appears to include Donald Trump's signature.

What else is in the new set of documents about Epstein that are now public?

Plus, threats of sanctions haven't worked to stop Russia's war on Ukraine, nor have President Trump's attempts at peace talks.

Things have actually gotten worse.

Why is Moscow attacking more now than when Trump came into office in January?

Stay with us.

We'll give you the news you need to start your day.

This message comes from Satva, official mattress and restorative sleep provider for Team USA, who won 231 total medals at the Olympic and Paralympic Games Paris 2024.

But could they have done even better if they were getting deeper restorative sleep?

Ron Rudson, Satfa CEO, was determined to find out.

So SATFA will provide mattresses for the LA 28 Olympic and Paralympic Games.

You can get deep restorative sleep too.

Visit SATFA.com/slash NPR and save $200 on $1,000 or more.

In a ruling Monday, the Supreme Court cleared the way for ICE and Border Patrol agents to restart aggressive immigration sweeps in the Los Angeles area.

Over the summer, a lower federal court order temporarily put a stop to those sweeps.

The judge said there was lots of evidence agents were racially profiling as they roamed the streets, arresting people for possible deportation.

For more on the Supreme Court's decision and the reaction to that decision, we're joined by NPR's Adrienne Florido, who is in Los Angeles.

Good morning.

Good morning, Layla.

So walk us through this decision.

Well, it was a brief unsigned order granting a request from the Trump administration to lift that lower court judge's restrictions on immigration enforcement raids in the LA area in Southern California.

So the government could now immediately resume these aggressive sweeps that it started here in June and that set off protests and clashes in parts of the city and that led President Trump to send in the National Guard.

Starting in June, ICE and Border Patrol agents rounded up day laborers in Home Depot parking lots, food cart vendors on street corners, people working on farms or at car washes.

And the ACLU sued, saying that agents were targeting people based solely on their skin color or on their accent or on the type of work they were doing.

They called it blatant racial profiling.

Even U.S.

citizens were being arrested.

An L.A.

federal judge told the government that it could not rely only on race and accent and occupation, and the raids pretty much ended.

So what reasons did the justices give for lifting that federal judge's restrictions?

Well, their order itself didn't give any legal reasoning, but in a concurrence, Justice Brett Kavanaugh cited an estimate that 10% of L.A.'s population is undocumented and said race can be relevant when agents are determining whether they suspect someone is in the country illegally.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissent, and she wrote, quote, we should not have to live in a country where the government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job.

This is a big win for the Trump administration, though, Layla, though it is temporary because the underlying lawsuit is still moving through the courts.

Okay, so what are rights groups, city officials saying in reaction to this?

Well, they said the court is allowing racial discrimination, but Mohammad Tajzar, the ACLU's lead attorney in this case, told reporters that the group will continue its court fight to stop these raids.

We will not stand up for armed masked goons who come into our neighborhoods, into our streets, and terrorize us in the ways that they have been doing.

He said lawyers will keep gathering evidence that immigration agents are employing unconstitutional tactics and arresting people without probable cause or reasonable suspicion that they're in the country illegally.

L.A.

Mayor Karen Bass called the ruling an attack on the people of Los Angeles, but also on every person in every city in this country.

So this ruling means these aggressive raids will, in fact, resume in L.A.

and other cities?

The Trump administration says they will resume in L.A.

President Trump's border czar Tom Homan and his Attorney General Pam Bondi both celebrated the ruling.

On social media, Bondi wrote, quote, now ICE can continue carrying out roving patrols in California without judicial micromanagement, unquote.

And the Department of Homeland Security said on social media that it's going to, quote, flood the zone.

This could also embolden the Trump administration as it expands deportation efforts in other cities.

Yesterday in Chicago, it announced what it's calling Operation Midway Blitz, and it's possible this ruling will affect that operation.

But as I said, Layla, this emergency ruling is not the final word on the underlying lawsuit challenging racial profiling in ICE arrests.

There's a court hearing in L.A.

later this month, and the case could eventually find its way back up to the High Court for a final ruling.

So more legal battles ahead.

That's NPR's Adrian Florido in Los Angeles.

Thank you for your reporting, Adrian.

Thanks, Layla.

The House Oversight Committee has released some documents handed over by the estate at Jeffrey Epstein.

Yeah, that includes more than 200 pages pages of a book made for the disgraced financier's 50th birthday more than two decades ago.

One of those pages is a lewd drawing and letter that appears to be signed by President Trump, a letter that Trump said did not exist.

NPR Stephen Fowler has read through the document released.

Stephen, are these going to be enough to satisfy the demand from people who want the release of the, quote, Epstein files?

Not at all.

I mean, this is a limited set of documents handed over by the Epstein estate.

They were answering a subpoena from the House Oversight Committee investigating how the government handled the prosecution of the convicted sex offender, who died by suicide in 2019 while in federal custody.

There is the copy of a typed letter set inside the drawing of a nude female body that appears to be signed by Trump, which includes the line, a pal is a wonderful thing.

Happy birthday and may every day be another wonderful secret.

Yeah, and I remember this was reported back in July and now we're seeing the birthday drawing.

What else did you see in the documents?

There's a lot of redacted pictures and other vulgar references to Epstein's sex life and personal life.

Notes from high-profile friends like former President Bill Clinton and lawyer Alan Dershowitz.

There was another page that had a mock-up of a check that appears to be a crude joke about Trump and Epstein and a redacted woman.

The text below the picture says Epstein was, quote, showing early talents with money and women, sells fully depreciated, and here's the redacted woman's name, to Donald Trump for $22,500.

There's also a copy of Epstein's will, address book entries, and a non-prosecution agreement by the U.S.

Attorney's Office in 2007.

All right, so what are Republicans saying about these documents, including that letter apparently signed by Trump?

A, in Trump's second term, there's been very little daylight between Republican stances and Trump's often changing views on a lot of things, including Epstein's stuff.

People like Vice President J.D.

Vance, who once agreed with Trump that the files must be released, then agreed with Trump that there were no files, then agreed with Trump that the letter didn't exist, now agree, yet again, with the president, that actually it's just all another hoax from the Democrats.

Case in point, House Oversight Chair James Comer said in a statement accompanying a release of yesterday's documents that it is, quote, appalling Democrats on the Oversight Committee are cherry-picking documents and politicizing information received from the Epstein estate.

And Democrats have been talking about the Epstein files a lot, largely because it's politically advantageous to do so.

But what's that looking like now?

Well, on the one hand, Trump campaigned on releasing the files.

It was part of his campaign message to expose powerful people hiding the truth from the public.

It's pretty easy to say he has broken that promise.

And now many voters are seeing him as a powerful person hiding the truth from the public.

Democrats on the Oversight Committee released the image of Trump's alleged letter, and the White House is insisting that letter actually proves it's not his signature and he didn't actually sign it.

Meanwhile, Democrats on the Hill have met with survivors and victims of Epstein's sex trafficking and abuse and are pushing for a fuller release of files for transparency.

It's one of the few places where Democrats have leverage against Trump's otherwise complete control of the political narrative in Washington.

All right, that's NPR Stephen Fowler.

Stephen, thanks a lot.

Thank you.

President Trump repeatedly threatens sanctions against Russia if it doesn't move toward a ceasefire or ending the war on Ukraine.

Yet the Russian response has been stepping up airstrikes against Ukraine.

In fact, Russia now carries out far more attacks than it did before Trump re-entered the White House in January.

NPR's Greg Myri recently returned to Washington after a month in Ukraine and joins me now.

Good morning, Greg.

Hi, Layla.

So President Trump, you know, he keeps warning Russia he's going to do something.

He sets deadlines that come and go.

With these stepped-up attacks, what is the president saying now?

Well, he says he's still thinking about sanctions, but he's non-committal.

Trump says he expects to speak with Russian leader Vladimir Putin in the next couple of days.

Now, it's been a month since the two leaders met in Alaska without any movement toward a ceasefire.

Trump has been threatening sanctions more or less since March, and he keeps saying he's not happy with Russia, that we'll see what happens in two weeks.

But his only real action so far has been 50% tariffs on India because it's buying Russian oil.

Now, Russia's economy is relatively weak, but oil and gas sales have allowed the country to chug along during the war.

More sanctions would further strain the economy.

It's not clear how much pain they would inflict.

Is there any sign the Russian position is changing?

Well, politically, Russia is just not budging.

The Kremlin says sanctions will not force Russia to change its stance.

And the key demand is still international recognition of Russian control over Ukrainian territory.

Militarily, Russia is just becoming more and more aggressive.

Russia is able to increase airstrikes on Ukraine because it has ramped up its own domestic drone production.

Before this year, Layla, Russia was firing perhaps a couple dozen drones into Ukraine on a typical night.

This year, the number has soared.

It first began hitting 100 or more a night, and now many hundreds.

Sunday was the heaviest assault yet, more than 800 drones.

And Russia appears capable of sustaining this pace and has ignored Trump's calls without suffering any consequences.

How is Ukraine dealing with these intensified attacks?

Well, Ukraine has to scramble every night.

Russia typically attacks three, four, five cities, and these tend to be different cities every night.

Ukraine responds with sending up helicopters, fighter jets, electronic jamming, machine guns.

And increasingly, Ukraine is making its own defensive drones that shoot down Russia's incoming offensive drones.

Now, Ukraine still takes down the majority of these Russian drones, but some get through and they are often followed by missiles which inflict even greater damage.

Now, Greg, you were in Ukraine when Trump hosted Putin last month here in the U.S., the Russian president.

How is that summit viewed in Ukraine?

And at this point, are there prospects for peace?

Well,

not really.

Ukrainians were deeply skeptical with the Trump-Putin meeting.

Ukrainians are exhausted by the war.

They are open to negotiations to end the conflict, but they just don't think Putin will make any concessions.

Now, they're even supportive of Trump's peace efforts, and they were pleased when he hosted President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House just a few days after the Putin meeting.

But the vast majority of Ukrainians believe Putin is just stringing Trump along, buying time, hoping that Russia can win a war of attrition.

Here in Washington, there's still this strong focus that Trump might might do something that could lead to ceasefire negotiations.

But in Ukraine, I just heard people saying they have to depend on themselves.

They can't count on the U.S.

or others.

That's NPR's Greg Myri.

Thank you for your reporting, Greg.

Sure thing, Layla.

And that's the first for Tuesday, September 9th.

I'm Layla Falden.

And I'm Mey Martinez.

The NPR app means that you can have public radio right in your pocket.

You'll find a mix of local, national, and international news, plus the best podcast from the NPR Network.

Download the NPR app in your app store today.

Today's episode of Up First was edited by Eric Westervelt, Megan Pratz, Andrew Sussman, Mohamed Elbradisi, and Alice Wolfly.

It was produced by Ziad Buch, Mia Dumas, and Christopher Thomas.

We get engineering support from Zoe Van Genhoven, and our technical director is Carly Strange.

Join us again tomorrow.

Want to hear this podcast without sponsor breaks?

Amazon Prime members can listen to Up First sponsor-free through Amazon Music.

Or you can also support NPR's vital journalism and get Up First Plus at plus.npr.org.

That's plus.npr.org.