Minisode: Pappas v Giuliani
A bite-sized look at the NYPD officer who sued the city for firing him over anonymously mailing racist pamphlets to charitable organizations
Sources:
https://www.nytimes.com/1998/06/17/nyregion/officer-admits-to-racist-mail-and-is-offered-deal-to-retire.html
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sotomayors-defense-of-whi_n_210795
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2358084/pappas-v-giuliani/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen and follow along
Transcript
This is an iHeart podcast.
I couldn't even believe it was real.
Join me, Tatiana Siegel, executive editor of film and media at Variety, for a four-part tale of youthful ambition, artistic integrity, and the dark side of fame.
Just like my parents talk about they knew where they were when John F.
Kennedy was killed.
Pretty much everyone I know knows exactly where they were when River died.
Featuring new interviews with Samantha Mathis, Dr.
Drew Pinski, Corey Feldman, and more.
Listen to Variety Confidential on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Coolzone Media.
Hello, listeners.
Molly Conger here.
This is something a little different.
It's not a new full-length episode, but it's not a rerun either.
It's just a tiny little bite-sized story about a weird little guy.
I'd like to try to do more of these, just a few minutes about various side characters I found in my research who didn't really warrant their own tangent in an episode, but they're interesting enough that you might like to hear about them.
Just for a few minutes.
We'll see if I manage to follow through on that, but for now, today,
here's a little treat.
I recently found myself, for normal, work-related reasons, combing through the campaign finance reports for David Duke's 1996 campaign for U.S.
Senate.
There are, obviously, some names in there that I recognize.
A donation from longtime Klan lawyer Sam Dixon.
Salary payments made to a longtime Duke associate who happens to be the son-in-law of a guy who died in a shootout with U.S.
Marshals.
Things like that.
Some of the names on those forms are stories I'll tell you eventually.
But as I was flipping idly through lists of small dollar donors,
one line caught my eye.
Not because it was a name that I recognized, but because of his profession.
Almost all of the people willingly putting their name on the record as a David Duke donor by 1996 were retired.
Line after line after line, donors list their occupation as retired.
And for those who did work, they were almost all self-employed.
But on August 27th, 1996, David Duke's campaign received a $500 contribution from a New York City police officer.
1996 was a pretty long time ago at this point.
So I was pretty sure there was no chance this man was still employed by the NYPD.
But I was curious if his fondness for David Duke ever caused any issues for him in his professional life.
That seems like a pretty safe bet, right?
But...
Honestly, it might not make him that much more racist than any given NYPD officer chosen at random.
But it turns out that officer, Thomas Pappas,
did something else in the mid-90s that almost ended up in front of the Supreme Court.
See, in the 90s, every year, the Mineola Auxiliary Police Department sent out mailings requesting donations to their McGruff the Crime Dog anti-drug program.
Most people throw that kind of thing away.
Some people will write a check and put it back in the pre-addressed return envelope to make a donation.
But every year, one envelope came back to that volunteer organization, stuffed with anti-Semitic cartoons, pamphlets with racist conspiracy theories, and materials published by a group called the National Association for the Advancement of White People.
And by 1997, the volunteer organization receiving these mailings went to the police.
After years of getting these hateful mailings, they'd hired a company to encode the reply envelopes.
If someone mailed back one of these smaller donation envelopes, they'd be able to tell exactly where the original mailing had been sent.
So when the racist flyers showed up that year, they used the tracking code to connect that envelope to a particular PO box.
And when they went to the police, they were able to determine that that PO box was registered to a New York City police officer.
And so to test their theory, the Nassau County Police sent a fake letter to that PO box soliciting donations for a charitable cause.
And he took the bait.
He stuffed the reply envelope with racist flyers and mailed it back.
Nassau County then turned the investigation over to the NYPD's Internal Affairs Bureau and they too tested the theory.
They mailed Thomas Poppas a letter asking for donations to a charitable organization and he returned the envelope full of anti-Semitic cartoons.
And when he was confronted with this evidence, he did eventually admit that he'd done it.
He tried to be casual about it.
At first, he said it was just a hobby and that it didn't mean anything.
And then later in the same interview, he said it was a form of protest because he was, quote, tired of being shaken down by charitable organizations.
And it turned out that while it had just been the one organization who finally figured out where the mailings were coming from and went to the police, He'd done this hundreds of times over the years to countless organizations.
After he admitted to the mailings in 1998, the New York Times reported that he was probably going to be allowed to retire with his pension.
But after a full investigation and disciplinary hearing and a lot of public outcry, he was found guilty of prohibited conduct and fired.
So he sued.
He filed a lawsuit in federal court, naming New York City, the police commissioner, and the mayor as defendants, which in 2000 makes the case citation Pappas v.
Giuliani.
Pappas claimed he'd been unfairly unfairly terminated in retaliation for engaging in protected First Amendment conduct.
The Southern District of New York disagreed.
Pappas was absolutely within his right to mail people racist pamphlets, but that's not the issue here.
He wasn't criminally charged for it.
And there is significant case law that allows government employers to take disciplinary action when it comes to speech by public employees.
when there is a legitimate government interest in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs through its employees.
Pappas may have had a better case here if he'd been engaged in speech that looked more like protest, if he'd made any attempt to engage in public discourse, or if he'd mailed the flyers to parties who were engaged in public activity on the issues he claimed he was protesting.
But he was just mailing garbage to any random organization unlucky enough to have sent him a pre-addressed envelope.
Quoting from the opinion, Mr.
Pappas suggests that somehow, by anonymously sending his white supremacist literature to any charity with the misfortune of soliciting a donation from him, he was commenting on perennial matters of public concern, such as taxation, political history, race, and religion.
This claim defies reason and the record.
Although the First Amendment's protection does not turn on the effectiveness of a speaker's media strategy, Mr.
Poppas' purported strategy for addressing the matter of public concern is so plainly unreasonable,
it belies his claim that addressing matters of public concern was ever his intention.
So his speech was, as the court wrote, of relatively low First Amendment value.
And then on the other side of the scale, there's the very real concern of the government employer that his activity could disrupt government business.
His activities have become a matter of real public concern.
People were very worried that this cop hated Jews and black people.
So they can't fire him for being racist, for having racist ideas.
They can't fire him for what's in his heart.
But they fired him for being racist in public, out loud, and in a way that was damaging to the department's reputation and mission.
And look, just for the sake of this legal argument, try not to laugh at the idea of the NYPD having a reputation that could be tarnished like this, okay?
So after he lost this lawsuit, he appealed the decision up to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in 2002, and they affirmed the lower court's decision with one judge on that three-judge panel dissenting.
And the dissent makes a number of arguments.
You know, he wasn't a supervisor.
He did this on his own time.
He didn't do it at work.
He did it privately.
He did it anonymously.
And most alarmingly, the dissent argues that if the department had never disciplined him in the first place, the public trust wouldn't have been damaged.
because no one ever would have known that it was a cop doing this.
That the department itself is responsible for the damage to its own reputation because I guess the proper course of action here would have been to cover up this policy violation.
The case was back in the news a few years later when that dissenting judge, Sonia Sotomayor, was nominated to the Supreme Court.
I found several op-eds citing this dissent as proof that she was a fair-minded defender of free speech, and these were largely attempts to counter right-wing attacks on her nomination.
But if you look back at the majority opinion in this case, her colleagues called her dissent a misunderstanding of the law and seriously misguided.
As Oliver Wendell Holmes said in 1892, a policeman may have a constitutional right to talk politics, but he has no constitutional right to be a policeman.
So, it turns out police departments really can fire a cop for being extremely racist in his private life.
They just usually don't want to.
Weird Little Guys is a production of Coolzo Media and iHeartRadio.
It's researched, written, and recorded by me, Melly Conger.
Our executive producers are Soby Lichterman and Robert Evans.
The show is edited by the wildly talented Roy Gagan.
The theme music was composed by Brad Dickert.
You can email me at WeirdLittleGuyspodcast at gmail.com.
I will definitely read it, but I probably won't answer it.
You can exchange conspiracy theories about the show with other listeners on the Weird Little Guys subreddit.
Just don't post anything that's going to make you one of my Weird Little Guys.
Ah, smart water alkaline with Antioxidant.
Pure, crisp taste, perfectly refreshing.
Whoa, that is refreshing.
And a 9.5 plus pH.
For those who move, those who push further, those with...
A taste for taste.
Exactly.
I did take a spin class today after work.
Look at you.
Restoring like a pro.
I mean, I also sat down halfway through.
Eh, close enough.
Smartwater alkaline with antioxidant.
For those with a taste for taste, grab yours today.
I couldn't even believe it was real.
Join me, Tatiana Siegel, executive editor of film and media at Variety, for a four-part tale of youthful ambition, artistic integrity, and the dark side of fame.
Just like my parents talk about they knew where they were when John F.
Kennedy was killed.
Pretty much everyone I know knows exactly where they were when River died.
Featuring new interviews with Samantha Mathis, Dr.
Drew Pinski, Corey Feldman, and more.
Listen to Variety Confidential on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
There's nothing like sinking into luxury.
At washablesofas.com, you'll find the Anibay sofa, which combines ultimate comfort and design at an affordable price.
And get this, it's the only sofa that's fully machine washable from top to bottom, starting at only $699.
The stain-resistant performance fabric slip covers and cloud-like frame duvet can go straight into your wash.
Perfect for anyone with kids, pets, or anyone who loves an easy-to-clean, spotless sofa.
With a modular design and changeable slip covers you can customize your sofa to fit any space and style whether you need a single chair love seat or a luxuriously large sectional Anibay has you covered visit washable sofas.com to upgrade your home right now you can shop up to 60% off store-wide with a 30-day money-back guarantee shop now at washablesofas.com add a little
to your life Offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.
How to have fun anytime, anywhere.
Step one: go to chumba casino.com.
ChumbaCasino.com.
Got it.
Step two: collect your welcome bonus.
Come to Papa, welcome bonus.
Step three: play hundreds of casino-style games for free.
That's a lot of games, all for free.
Step four: unleash your excitement.
Woo-hoo!
Chumba Casino has been delivering thrills for over a decade.
So claim your free welcome bonus now and live the chumba life.
Visit chumba casino.com.
No purchase necessary.
VGW Group Void where prohibited by law 21 plus.
Terms and conditions apply.
This isn't iHeart Podcast.