Elizabeth Báthory with Princess Weekes

Because, like, at least the original scary story passes the Bechdel test.

Welcome to Your Wrong About.

I'm Sarah Marshall, and this is your Election Day Distraction episode, aka Me and Princess Weeks, and some questions I have had since the sixth grade about Elizabeth Bathory.

If you grew up watching history channel specials or other dubious historical content, specifically with titles about real-life vampires, then you've probably heard of Elizabeth Bathory.

She is still alleged by apparently credible sources at times to be the world's most prolific serial killer.

And I first met her in what I can only assume was a history channel special about the countess who bathed in blood in order to preserve her youth and beauty.

So, how much of that is true?

Did she torture and kill hundreds of people?

Was it a modern-day witch trial?

And how much can we ever really know about a person once legend has taken over?

This is the kind of election day distraction episode that I would want if I were asking for somebody to make one for me, and it might be that for you too, and if it is, I'm very grateful.

We talk about some pretty gratuitous hammer horror type scenarios that, in our estimation, are a little bit difficult to believe.

But this episode also does get into the very real and very painful life of serfs and of actual torture allegations of the time as well.

So if that's not something that's going to work for you today or in your distraction episode, It works for me.

That's why four years ago I was watching all the saw movies in a row, but we are all very different from each other.

Then that happens about minute 22 to minute 42, and you can just skip ahead to the historical analysis, which of course, in my opinion, is the best part.

We are joined today by the incredible writer, YouTuber, and friend of the show, Princess Weeks.

I just loved having this conversation.

And Princess has joined us for a couple of previous episodes.

If you like this one and you want to hear more, she was on this year to talk about Rosa Parks and also in the past to talk about Lizzie Borden.

There might be a trend.

She is our Liz correspondent, and I wouldn't have it any other way.

And that's it from me.

Take care of yourself.

Thank you for taking care of yourselves and each other.

I think that's what Gary Springer used to say, and now I'm saying it to you.

Thank you for being here.

We love you.

Here's your episode.

Welcome to Your Wrong About, the podcast where we look at maligned women of today and yesterday, and

really, really yesterday, and say, Did she even do anything?

And sometimes we say, Well, maybe she did do something,

but perhaps not at the scale that people act like she did.

And with me today is Princess Weeks, who is here to discuss Elizabeth, Erizabet,

Liz,

the big bathy,

the big bathory.

Thank you so much for being here.

This is a dream episode for me.

I'm so excited.

This has been one of the most trying episodes to research from a purely like, I want to find primary sources account.

I bet.

So, what came out of it, I'm both very proud of, and I think it leaves enough room for our beautiful listeners to then go on their own Elizabeth Bathory journeys to figure out how many people could she have realistically killed in a 10-year period.

And that's just a fun question, you know, for us all to think about of an autumnal evening or a beautiful spring evening in the southern hemisphere.

Exactly.

So I guess I'll start with Sarah.

What do you know about Elizabeth Bathory?

Okay, so

the genesis of this topic is that As you and I may have talked about before, I was the kind of kid who grew up watching any kind of creepy one-hour special on basic cable in the late 90s.

Did you also watch these things?

Oh, absolutely.

Yeah, I feel like I must have seen something along the lines of real vampires on the History Channel in like 1999 with like a little Vlad the Impaler and then a little Elizabeth Bathory.

And that it got into what I think of as the sort of archetypal myth, which was that she was this woman who I couldn't tell you remotely where she lived except generically in Eastern Europe or in what sanctuary, except, you know, kind of maybe around the 1500s, question mark.

Yeah.

Something like that.

Okay.

Your instincts are strong.

It's a great sanctuary.

And the story is presented by the History Channel, I think, in a very straightforward, like, yeah, this is what happened kind of a way, as far as I remember, was that she felt the need to murder hundreds of peasants in order to bathe in their blood and preserve her youth.

Yep.

As women women are wont to do.

You know, women.

Women be killing for the blood of virgins.

But yeah, I guess the story was that she had killed hundreds of people to try and preserve her youth.

I don't know where she got the idea.

And they would have B-roll of like a hot woman shot in sort of blurry close-ups, bathing in something red.

So if you look at the Guinness Book of World Records, a quite reliable source, wink, wink.

Yeah.

They list Elizabeth Bathory as the most prolific serial killer.

You know, sisters are doing it for themselves.

Ladies is pimps, too.

But they even say, like, even in their records that it's called into question how many people that she actually killed.

And despite the fact that most modern historians definitely verge on either the amount of people possible to killed or if she even did it to begin with, she has remained in the public eye like a virgin killing, bloodbath having vampire/slash werewolf hybrid, depending on the incarnation.

Garbage picking, field goal kicking phenomenon.

It's a feminine phenomenon.

And I think one of the most challenging things about doing any research about her is that over the years, that line between fiction and fact has been so blurred to a degree that even books that are cited as sources about things dealing with her do not have any direct evidence or primary sources backing that up.

So I read read a few well-cited sources.

I researched some stuff about Hungary and its witch trials.

And I just added what I hope is a reasonable dash of common sense.

And through that, I asked myself the question, what is the truth?

Well, as far as you can get when something happened hundreds and hundreds of years ago.

Yeah.

And I do think it's, yeah, it's maybe worth using this as an example of pointing out that history is always an attempt.

Yeah.

Which is nice, you you know, because if there was just like a single version of history to learn, then we would all learn the same thing and it wouldn't be the, I don't know, the strange adventure that it always is.

So, what I found is that, like, post-communism, this group of historians, folklorists, and archivists came together at the Department of Folk Beliefs and Customs at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in Budapest.

And one of their projects was to create a database of early Hungarian modern witch trials.

And they found 2,000 witch trials and what they call 20,000 bewitchment narratives, which are basically like, you know, the beginnings of certain witch trials, depending on where they were located.

And they found at the time of their publication of this evidence, documented proof of 848 executions for witchcraft before 1800.

This is 848 people in a population of either 3.5 or 5.3 million, depending on how the borders change.

And they see this as the absolute minimum because they definitely agree that records have been lost and the border of Hungary kept changing.

And within those changing borders, you had a bunch of different political machinations that were going on.

So at the time that Elizabeth Bathory is here, the Ottomans had occupied Buda, which was the capital of the city in 1541.

And so Hungary was divided into three different parts.

There was Upper Hungary, which was ruled by the Habsburgs, Inbred, Western European influence, big chins.

You had the Ottomans who ruled central Hungary.

And then you had the eastern part, which at that point included Transylvania, which was its own principality.

But then all these Hungarian noble dynasties would rule that.

latter piece of it.

And that would also include the Bathyries, who were among some of the richest landowners in the area.

But we're going to put a little pin in that and we're going to go back to this whole witch trials thing because i think this is really important context for what we're going to see later okay so they found in their research that a minimum of 4 592 accused witches were brought to trial in the kingdom of hungary between 1213 and 1800 and these witch trials tended to kind of ebb and flow like whenever there was a moment of peace like between warfare there was usually some kind of plague or something bad happening that would create all this tensions and then people would start accusing each other.

And the three central patterns of witchcraft accusations were accusations from above, where you had someone of like a higher ranking trying to accuse a lesser noble of something or someone of lesser mark of having done something.

You had accusations from below, which were like lower nobility, usually collaborating with a lot of other noble, like lower nobles trying to overtake someone higher.

Or you had the intra-class conflict between people within the same social status trying to essentially use hysteria or supernatural tm to essentially say like this person has been possessed by the devil and they need to have their stuff taken from them wow so it becomes kind of like a means of civil assets forfeiture in a way where you're like that guy's possessed someone needs his stuff and uh perhaps i'm next in line maybe yeah it's like why should we let someone possessed by the devil have things when I could have things?

I mean, that's a great question.

I ask it all the time.

But it is in that context that we have Elizabeth Bathory's, the accusations against her coming up, the kind of accusations they build up against her, and why her as a bathory and as a landowner was a good person to accuse of certain things.

But before then, I'm going to play you a ridiculous movie trailer from one of the many movies about our dear Biss Bathory.

Excuse me, Countess.

Not only the look, but the feel of my skin is incredibly different.

You have to be careful what you wish for.

What is happening?

You are giving me something beautiful.

The Countess wants fresh blood.

Bring me a virgin.

You are mad.

Blake the blood before it is wasted.

A pile of rotting corpses.

Dismembered children.

Lies.

One witness saw her copulating with the devil himself.

Everything has its price.

Why are you shaking, my love?

Do you know how long I've been waiting for you?

I almost lost my mind.

Yeah, I found this trailer.

There are so many weird movies, but this one I found was especially entertaining because it focuses on this idea that she did it for a man, which I gotta tell you.

The absolute untruth.

Because like at least the original scary story passes the Bach Del test.

Just at least we have that.

These these alternatives, I think, especially what was interesting as we go forward.

But she was already like, she had been married since she was like 14 years old.

She had like plenty of like legitimate children.

She had like absolutely no reason to need nor want male attention.

And so the idea that like her big hang up was like, I just want to be beautiful.

I'm like, I think she was okay.

Right.

It's also like,

I don't know, TikTok didn't exist exist yet.

It was a different time with regards to aging a mere four or five years ago.

Exactly.

Dating is hard, guys.

We have to all remember dating is hard.

Dating is hard.

You know, women are so resilient.

Yeah, that trailer is hilarious to me for like a myriad of reasons.

But just the biggest idea that, like, oh, because she couldn't have a young boyfriend, that's why she went.

I was like, guys, we have to do better.

Our serial, our alleged serial killers deserve better than this.

It's true.

Well, and one of the things I

love to point out as a trend about female serial killers historically, to the extent that it's possible to observe trends, is that it often in the past seems to have been motivated by money.

Where you just like in a society that deprives you of the ability to work or have full citizenship, the only access to money is through men, you know?

So like men around you sometimes just have to start having bad luck if that's the case.

Right.

Well, that's the thing about it too, is like for her, that was not her motivation because she was was so wealthy.

But we will get into that.

So, like,

you know, I think that like there's this idea, this preoccupation with like the two different archetypes of like female danger.

And I think, even to a degree, that there's this idea of like the most prolific serial killer of all time was a woman is like a thing that plays within the gender norms of as a woman, you're supposed to be delicate and safe.

And even the way in which her crimes are enacted, like the sadomasochism of it all is there to

tell us and tell the people who were the testimony against to tell them that like she has betrayed her sex by being this this violent and that is

uh

it's a lot yeah and there's like this new i i guess like a new ya book out as we're recording this about Lady Macbeth that's like oh yeah I've heard Lady Macbeth teen girl boss yeah and you're there is a degree of like it is like we're never gonna stop taking these sort of like female characters/slash archetypes out of history and sort of trying out new interiorities on them because we don't have anything left in a lot of these cases that has been passed down to us.

But

yeah, I do, it is so interesting.

I agree how like the sort of femme fatale, like very feminized idea of violence and the female is deadlier than the male, like does fit within gender norms really nicely and a really and the and within you know Christian patriarchal norms.

But I guess we will probably be exploring that as we go forward.

Absolutely.

All right.

So our Leo icon of this is Elizabeth Bathery was born on August 17th, 1560, to a very wealthy family of what was then the Kingdom of Hungary.

And her family tree consisted of like a lot of dukes, leaders, noble people.

But the most important family member she had for this time period was that she was the niece of the king of Poland, Stephen Bathery.

Oh, Steve.

and her nephew gabor bathery was the ruled the principality of transylvania so she was already from her birth like a very influential noble figure and her family was very rich and they married her to a man named count

and i apologize to all the hungarian listeners for this uh ferent nasde is what i saw some of it pronounced or was it or nashdi i think nashdi is probably the most correct we're doing our best but no guarantees

uh you guys can yell at me and I definitely apologize.

And he was a very well-respected soldier and came from the basically next highest up wealthy landowning family.

And he made himself very well known in Battles Against the Turks.

And they were married when he was 19 and she was 14.

Standard noble marriage.

She went to go live with his mother so she could get the, you know, accumulated to that kind of lifestyle.

They had several children.

But because he was always away due to his military excursions, this left Elizabeth alone as the ruler of their massive estate.

Kind of ideal.

Yeah, so it's, and from what we know, like there are letters between them that are like, they're not overly romantic, but they're very like civil, just her being like, yeah, one of our kids is sick.

Now I'm feeling better.

I just have a headache.

Like very much how you like just texting like, hey, babe, hope the front's going well.

The kids are sick or whatever, but you know, life goes on.

So it's, it's all very like like basic.

And that's how their relationship went.

He was injured and then had to return home and then eventually died January 4th, 1604 at 48.

And he left all of his money and land to his widow.

Alrighty.

Which, you know, is great.

Like, this seems like a lot of time to be

away waging military campaigns.

Is this sort of like, is it fair to say that there's like very frequent skirmishing over who owns what in this region?

Absolutely.

About who owns what, who's supposed to have control of it.

And it's going to come up a little bit later, but because of Elizabeth's family connections, she kind of gets embroiled in some kind of political anxiety happening in Transylvania because her nephew and the Palatine, which is like basically the prime minister of Hungary, are in a massive conflict later on.

So essentially, all of that stuff and all of the, you know, loss and heavy changes of like the constant battles with the Ottomans does leave it for like, there's a lot of political openings and changings up going on in the area, especially because the borders keep changing.

So that becomes an aspect of anxiety.

But unlike a lot of other women, with the death of her husband, she essentially became the owner of the largest estates in all of Hungary.

And her fortresses basically stretched all the way from the east to the southwest of the Hungarian Empire.

So she essentially got left this huge track of land that she had.

And she already, and she already had sons and daughters.

And I think at this point, her children were all married, living other places.

So she's just the ideal woman in her 40s, single, like her husband just died.

Who knows if she, you know, and now she's rich and she's being left alone.

So of course,

something has to happen.

But even though she has all this because she is still a woman the overseeing and protection of her and overall this property was left to gregory thurzo who was the palatine of hungary a palatine was essentially like the highest ranking office in hungary they kind of act as representatives of the monarchs and eventually like that role would become replaced with the prime minister so that's pretty much the length that we are talking about yeah wow yeah so this guy gregory terzoy had the luck of being born into like the wealthiest noble house in upper hungary which as we said before in the in the diagram upper hungary was the one that was ruled by the habsburgs

so he again very military renowned he defended hungary from the ottomans was loyal to habsburg and that's how he became the palatine and it was gonna be him

who when the rumor started coming around about elizabeth doing things was set up to investigate those allegations.

But there's a historian, her name is Dr.

Irma Cardo.

She basically is like a legal scholar from Hungary who has done a lot of work on the Bathory case.

And she wrote this quote that I think was really interesting.

Shortly after assuming power, Thurzo became involved in a failed conspiracy attempt on the life of Prince Gabor Bathory.

Remarkably, three important events occurred around the same time.

Gabor Bathory's assassination attempt in Transylvania, Sigmund Bathory's imprisonment in Prague, and Elizabeth Bathory's trial in Hungary.

So essentially, within a very short period of time of him becoming this ruler, you have three members of the Bathory family all having some sort of political upheaval in their lives.

It's a coup de Bathory, arguably.

Exactly.

Because I think now because her name has become so synonymous with like this mythology, it's hard to kind of see her as being like this massive power player in the world because there's so little we know about her outside of this very key part.

Yeah.

Well, it's also when you're in that kind of a story, it's like you don't think of the scary castle as existing inside of a government or like a political system.

You just think of it as a scary location lost in time.

So

I don't know.

Yeah, there's something about situating things within history that makes them

maybe less creepy, but more scary in this case.

Yeah.

And it's all this context that I think is why when historians now go look at the case, they're like, okay, it's weird that this case happened and all these other members of her family are being like either attempted, killed, or like removed from power all at the same time.

Yeah.

It's just, you know, if nothing else, it's a, it could be kind of a coincidence.

Yeah, it is interesting.

Yeah.

So now I want to pause to discuss a few things that Elizabeth Bathory is alleged to have had happen to her in her youth that we have little to no evidence for.

So these were things that when I was doing like preliminary research, I saw said by a few places, but when I went to go look about what they were sourcing, it was people who either didn't know Elizabeth or it was written like a hundred plus years after she died.

Love it.

The gospels approach.

There is a rumor that she suffered from epilepsy.

I didn't see any sources listed for this.

And the source that's listed on the Wikipedia, which, you know, is like the first place everyone looks, is a Time Life magazine article.

So, like, and, you know, that, like, not to shit on Time Life, but like, they don't always have a bunch of citations for their stuff.

Right.

They provide hours of entertainment, but it's more of a like, you know, you send away for it and your family keeps getting it until your dad has a fit and cancels it, basically, kind of a thing.

Right.

Very profit-oriented.

Yeah.

And because I think things like this are treated like pulp, I think there's also just like a lower tier of what people expect.

So, like, they're like, okay, that sounds great.

Who cares?

There's another rumor that at 13 years old, she had a secret baby with a peasant boy.

Not peasants.

Those, those peasant boys.

The source for this is listed as a book by Leslie Carroll called Royal Pains: A Rogue's Gallery of Brats, Brutes, and Bad Seeds.

Alrighty.

So basically, she lists in her book, she doesn't have citations, but she does have like a listed bibliography at the back.

And of it, she lists Valentine Penrose's biography, The Bloody Countess, as one of her sources.

This is something I've seen.

I've just seen it list in a bunch of other places.

The thing about it is that the author of this was like a Cyrillus poet.

And so,

and so, like, her work with the biography kind of skirts novel and actual fact.

And it's only 104 pages.

And I don't really see it as like a really rigorous biography.

It is worth reading because it is written in like a very Cyrillus way, but it's definitely not like a primary document.

Right.

It's like using Stephen Sondheim's Assassins for like biographical material.

Exactly.

Well, and I feel like it's like something people don't maybe necessarily expect because we venerate books so much is that that same kind of game of telephone happens like in history and academia and in publishing where it's like someone creates the illusion of a fact and then it gets spread around so much that it becomes you know feels real exactly and so what it says in the carol book is that it was rumored that in 1574 she gave birth to an illegitimate daughter fathered by a peasant boy.

The child, if there was one, was purportedly purportedly smuggled away by a trustworthy local woman who was paid handsomely to take the baby to Wallachia, which is in Transylvania.

Purportedly.

Exactly.

This came about centuries after her death.

Again, no citation for this.

Well,

yeah.

And the other thing they try to do is say that Elizabeth witnessed a lot of torture already growing up, that she witnessed like serfs, servants, and Romani people being tortured by her family.

And again, the source listed for this is Carol and their book.

And she says in, she writes in the book a story about a Romani person

being basically tortured until they die by being essentially sewn into the body of a horse.

So that both, like, both the horse, like, I don't know why the horse has to suffer.

I don't understand it.

It's a waste of a horse.

You know, it's like inhumane and racist towards the Romani person.

Horses don't grow on trees.

And also, it's

inhuman and racist.

But yeah.

But also, it's like when you have like these stories, and I don't know, it's hard to judge sometimes, right?

Because a lot of examples of human evil are like extremely flamboyant and over-the-top and unnecessary.

And the cruelty is the point.

And it isn't about, you know, any kind of pragmatism.

But it's also like there are certain stories, especially kind of in history or sort of, you know, when it,

when something is kind of in an urban legend part of the storytelling spectrum, where you're like,

sewn into the body of a horse?

Like, who's got the time?

Like, you can be 100%

evil and dehumanizing with half the effort.

And,

you know, and still have the horse, you know, like, and still have a horse.

And I just, I remember reading that and I was just like, this just sounds like, you know, like when Snow White, the stepmother, has to like dance with like the evil shoes at the end of the fairy tale.

It just has this element of like a Grimms narrative to it.

The magical punishment.

It's true.

And we love our fairy tales.

We always have.

One thing is true is that because of everything going on, like

with serfdom, serfdom was horrible.

And nobles definitely and absolutely abused and I believe to a certain degree tortured their serfs.

I can only imagine the amount of like rape and sexual assault that would have been open to them.

So it's definitely, it is definitely possible for any noble person that engaged in serfdom as a practice to have abused their, their, their people.

However, it would not be something that would get you thrown in jail for unless it was super severe.

And then I have a quote I want, I'm going to send to you.

It's from John Padgett's Hungary and Transylvania.

It was written in 1839, and it's basically

one of the well-known descriptions of Hungary that was published in English later.

And I'm going to send that to you right now.

Okay.

I apologize in advance for anything I may be about to read to the Hungarian people and their children and their children's children.

Elizabeth was of a severe and cruel disposition, and her handmaidens led no joyous life.

Slight faults are said to have been punished by most merciless tortures.

Dot dot dot.

As she washed from her hand the stain, she fancied that the part which the blood had touched grew whiter, softer, and, as it were, more young.

Imbued with the dreams of the age, she believed that accident had revealed to her what so many philosophers had wasted years to discover: that in a maiden's blood she possessed the elixir vitae, the source of never-failing youth and beauty.

If only she knew about Kay Beauty and Retinal Cream, I know.

All the lives that could have been saved.

She just needed to have snails crawl all over her face.

Like covering this, I almost feel like it's hard to take it seriously, not because it's not like horrible things being depicted, but because it just at a certain point, it's like...

Someone had to have made this.

It reminds me of reading A Little Life, where at a certain point you're like,

I've watched this little boy suffer for so long.

I guess I better start enjoying it because it's 400 more pages to go.

And so, it's definitely a lot of that, yeah, completely.

All right, so now we're going to get to the accusations, and I didn't want to make this too tedious and keep repeating allegation after allegation.

So, I'll have some summaries of like what the witnesses said.

And if you need more expansion, Sarah, I have them all highlighted so we can get to them.

Love it.

Lickety split.

So, in 1610, after years of alleged rumors, and I'm putting in air quotes for those who can't, this is not a visual medium, but because

I just also want to reiterate this, her husband definitely came home.

And the idea that she could just be walking around, like covered in like young virgin blood from like 1590 onward, I'm like, well, like who was taking care of the household?

Like this, it it doesn't all make sense.

And is it like a leave-in conditioner?

You know, you want to leave it on for a while kind of a thing.

It's also, you know, we, we don't,

the idea of bathing is actually, in a way, seems like kind of a modern concept.

Cause, like, how, how big of a tub are we filling?

But anyway, I'm getting ahead of myself.

Right.

It just, I just feel like it's so, it's so anachronistic in

how it's concepted.

But basically, Gregory Thurzo, the Palatine, would I just call him that?

I want to say Palpatine every time I say it.

I know.

I keep hearing Palpatine.

I love them.

Somehow, Palpatine has returned.

Exactly.

He went to Elizabeth's home, her castle, at New Year's Eve, and he claimed that he surprised the countess in the middle of killing another servant girl, which people think this has definitely been embellished because it was dramatized later on in a way that doesn't actually make sense.

But they said, The first sight to greet him was Elizabeth Bathory herself.

Her face and arms with rolled-up sleeves were covered in blood.

Bloodstains darkened her clothing.

Her outrageous screeching against a backdrop of demonic laughter curled his blood.

It had to be demonic laughter.

It's like, isn't it enough with the servant girls and everything?

But also my first question is like,

isn't it hard to sneak up on somebody in a castle?

Like, surely she has a designated area for doing this that isn't like the entryway.

It's truly...

outrageous and it's and it's this idea that he like cleverly snuck up on her when people pretty much say that he probably was doing this investigation in multiple steps and had already prepared an entrance for her

But he basically announced to all the members of her court that he had found her trying to kill another girl.

And he liked brought civilians to the castle.

He's like, Come on, come on, let me tell you about the crazy bitch that lives in this house.

And he brought the allegations against her and four of her servants, three of which were elderly women, which, you know, at that time, who knows what that means, but they were older women and one younger male helper.

And they were all tortured and threatened.

And when they were asked about like how long did they work with her or how long everything happened,

the young man basically said he worked there for 16 years and he saw 37 girls killed.

And then two other women, Helena and Catherine, said 50.

So at the very beginning of these allegations being held against her, the range of dead girls was from around 36, 37 to 50, which I will say, for lack of a better word, seems reasonable.

Like if you told me that within like two decades, like a like a superpowered noble killed like 50 serfs, I would be like, you know what?

I can see that, you know, like, but like that's a lot of people, but it's like thinkable as an amount that

if someone were to want to do that kind of thing, they and if if they were in a position of power, that like that feels like the number you can get away with without risking a whole uprising and rebellion.

Exactly.

Yeah.

And that's kind of the problem: is that the girls that were a part of this, like these alleged sacrifices, were both noble and poor girls, because noble girls get sent to the courts of other highbrow ladies to learn their arts and they become members of the household.

So even if you are a noble or you're a regular girl, like going to Elizabeth Bathory's castle would be considered like a massive accomplishment.

And at the time, she apparently had like a very small court.

She had like maybe 20 to 30 people who worked for her inside.

And then there were about 40 tending to the vineyards and fields.

And all the actual documentations we have of like her running the estate show that it was very well managed, like everything was very organized, like the records were being held properly.

She wasn't in any debt.

And I know that this kind of maybe sounds a little silly but i just feel like if she's this you know severely sick megalomaniac blood-soaking woman then like how could she be this good at her at her at her bookkeeping

Well, yeah, because it is reckless behavior, you know, to put it lightly.

Because the image of her like crackling maniacally,

covered in blood at New Year's Eve, or like just without any idea of anyone coming to see her.

It's just in very stark contrast to the woman that we see written in like her own letters or the bookkeeping that we know of her estates.

She wasn't, and also like

to have killed 650 girls to a certain extent means that you had to find some pretense of hiring them, which means that you would have like salary records for some of these girls, especially the noble women.

And I think the idea that she killed these noble women is especially what makes people question it because she was according to some of the names in the victim testimony either related to them by blood or by marriage yeah so these weren't just random girls that she like plucked from nowhere these were like

her relatives And was she accused of killing noble women who actually went missing?

Or like, were there disappearances to account for?

Well, that's the thing is that, is that when they went to the time to do witnesses, some of the people that they allege, like, oh, it was this girl's, you know, this daughter of so-and-so, that parent never came to trial.

And I think that if your child gets murdered by a blood-drinking countess, you're going to show up for the trial.

And also, like, they'll say that some of the bodies were burned, but like, there is not the kind of body trail you would expect for that amount of young women going missing.

Also, like, where are the declined birth rates?

Like, that's a lot of women who then never married, never had children.

Like, these are all things that have very quantifiable results, too.

Like, there are very quantifiable things that would happen in response to this kind of thing.

And there really isn't a lot of conversation about that.

It does feel like the more we talk about it, like kind of a modern idea, because it's like it's in the modern, you know, relatively modern, you know, 19th century world that we start to have.

Well, I mean, of course, there were big urban centers in the 16th century, but I imagine Elizabeth Bathory's castle being in a place where the disappearance of 650 people or so over 20 years, like you would notice that there aren't that many people around, you know?

Exactly.

And like, and it's not that long a period of time because what they allege is that she started doing it again in like 1590 and then it stopped in 1610.

Like, if you kill that many young girls in that sort of minute of time, no matter where you brought them fund, that is like decimating to like your population.

Yeah.

It's interesting too because it's like if you're accused of killing that many people it's interesting that we need there to be a functional motive for her

because

surely it's just about killing you know so why has this become such a folk legend based on the idea that she was doing it for youth and beauty because that's what women do anyway exactly So from this earlier testimony, it was just like her four servants, they kind of agreed on a few things.

So all of them agreed about certain methods of the ill-treatment.

It was a lot of of beating, piercing with like little knives and needles and stuff like that, burning.

They said that all girls had been buried, some with or without proper ceremony, which I would say then you would probably want to excavate those grounds.

But what do I know?

There's a story about a young girl being forced to suck on a log while being beaten, another one who was smeared with honey and left for days and nights on the grounds to be bitten by like ants and wasps and fleas, girls being tied to poles while like cold water was thrown on them while they were being left out the cold.

So like all of the sort of like, and all the girls are usually naked or in some state of undress.

Not at all a sexy thing to have a long trial about, right?

Right.

So it's like you have these young girls being cut up, brutalized, penetrated, and I kind of like, you know, sadomasochistic.

Tell me again about the bees part, magistrate.

Exactly.

So you said the honey was smeared all over her and then she was left out in the cold.

And she was naked.

Was she naked?

Yes, naked.

Sounds horrible.

I can't believe someone would do such a thing.

And it's very, it's very distressing to like read about it, but then also realize that there's a quick escalation in how it starts off as just like piercing and beating to like left them outside to get smeared with honey because that has nothing to do with blood.

You're not even doing the thing.

It's like, well, that's just a waste, Elizabeth.

I mean, you're supposed to run a tight ship here.

Right.

It also, that makes me think of how, like, you know, and this is not something I've researched recently.

So this is sort of a casual cul-de-sac CC.

But my understanding is that a lot of our modern ideas of, you know, scary historical tortures and scary ways to die.

I did an episode about this with Dana Schwartz a couple of years ago is kind of based on people in history reconstructing previous periods of history in order to make certain people look barbaric or to make themselves feel better about living in an age of reason, you know, like the Iron Maiden

is, I believe, kind of a Victorian concept of what those dumb middle-agers were up to.

And this feels kind of like that as well.

I mean, I realize we're talking about a contemporary source in this case, but it's also,

it feels very interesting that, like,

yeah, that escalation in torture where you imagine that if you were a serf, that like you would be familiar with beatings and you would be familiar with life being very cheap in many ways.

But it does remind me of the satanic panic in the sense that, like, you could be sort of an American woman in the 80s talking about a history of sexual abuse in the home or of sexual assault, and people would be like, Yeah, who cares?

But if Satan was involved, then suddenly it's like a big important story.

And this feels similar too, where it's like the everyday trauma gets escalated to something that's worth hearing about suddenly.

Right.

And I think that, um, and we'll, and I'll have you quote what the torture was actually like for some of the people who gave this testimony, but I definitely think there's an element of, and this is just my theory, I think a lot of what they end up doing during torture is like taking their own experiences and elevating them.

Because what is happening when you're being tortured, you're being pierced, you're being beaten, you're being, you know, whipped, and you're usually in a state of undress.

Another element I think that is happening is I think a lot of what they assign, especially like the honey and stuff like that, feels like things that they took from like propaganda against the Ottomans and kind of reapplied.

That's the thing about with like Vlad the Impaler.

It's like there's a lot of stuff that they're like, he learned how to do this from.

There's a lot of like sort of like anti-Ottoman Turkish things that you'll see get regurgitated in like the torture segment.

Don't you love how when we like go off to the movie theater to see whatever vampire thing comes out this season, we'll be like, you know, partaking in the trickle-down effect of anti-Ottoman Empire propaganda.

Like, that's what I love about culture.

I gotta tell you, my boyfriend is obsessed with the Ottoman Empire, and it's

so funny because it comes up all the time.

And you think, how often can the Ottoman Empire come up?

And the answer is quite a lot.

I bet a lot.

They were very, very impactful.

So, like, even in researching this and like knowing just even a little bit about Vlad the Impaler, you do get this idea of,

and this is my theory, that these people in the state of torture are like taking what they've heard from like people coming back from like

fighting the Ottomans and fighting the Turks, which is already going to have its own propagandizing to it and finding a way to like take what they know is barbarity from other places and superimposing it into like, well, now we have to like make it really extreme so that us being complicit in it can be forgivable.

Right.

And I guess one of the key questions here is like, did something happen?

Did she kill people?

Did they kill people?

And then did there emerge this thing of, yeah, as a

as a helper or someone accused alongside her as a servant?

Like, yeah, do you have to escalate things to sort of squirm out of it if you did help with something?

Because I think at a certain point, you can't say no.

Cause I think if there's one thing I've learned from.

knowing stuff about Anne Boleyn is that if the king wants you dead, you can't say, no, I did not have incest with my sister.

It's like,

I did not have incest with that woman.

Yeah.

Who is also my sister?

It's like, no, I have to say that, you know, it just, there's no way if the people in charge want you to be guilty for you not to be guilty.

Right.

And that's sort of the unfortunate reality of this.

Right.

We got to do an Anne Boleyn episode.

Anne Boleyn, how many fingers and more.

I mean, that's me and Mary Tudor.

I remember when I found out that I was like, I was like, she killed like 7,000 people.

And they're like, it's like 275.

And I'm like, that's still not great, but that's not what I was told.

It is so weird.

Yeah, a good strategy as a historical figure is to like have a really inflated number make you look good in comparison.

And you're like, look at me with my 275.

I know.

It's also, I think, like, especially like Mary Tudor, aka Bloody Mary, and Elizabeth Bathory have the same, almost the same thing of like, we have evidence that shows that they were definitely more nuanced people than what we get on the tin, but there is just more of an investment in the myth that it doesn't actually matter what the truth is.

Right.

But now, what I have sent you is this lovely description of what Hungarian torture tools would be like.

So if you would please tell the lovely people at home.

Oh, boy.

And these are like things that we know were actually used in reality, to be clear.

Yes.

These are confirmed things.

And you can tell, like, because they're all very painful, but also very able to do quickly.

I think that, like, you know, the thing about the rack is that it takes a long time to happen and the damage of it is so severe it makes the torture worse.

So it's better if you just, you know, you pull out their fingernails because, you know, the people can forgive that.

Stretching out your limbs till they pop is, you know, a little bit more intense.

Just a bit much.

Yeah.

Okay.

All right.

So yeah, here's, I'll read this.

Here's our, our little, our torture section.

So yeah, skip ahead a couple of minutes if you don't want to hear this part.

The chief torturer would begin by displaying the instruments of torture to the subject who would have been stripped naked and restrained.

This in itself might prompt a first confession.

The standard panoply included wooden wall and floor stocks, iron vices serving as finger screws, iron collars spiked on the inside, the boot, a wooden or metal cylinder with studs on the inside that could be tightened by the driving in of wedges.

There were also two-foot-long metal pincers and flails flails consisting of slender barbed chains attached to a wooden handle.

Next, some of the array of torture devices would be placed on the victim's body.

The mere touch of the thumb screws or the iron boot would concentrate the subject's mind.

But, if this was not enough, the various tools were put to work, starting with the agonies of crushed fingers and legs, and proceeding, if necessary, through lighted matches under the finger and toenails.

The rack, either an upright bench or a ladder on which the suspect was stretched with the aid of weights or a rectangular frame from which the subject was suspended.

And the strapato, to scourging, burning, branding, boiling, and whatever local refinements were in vogue.

Yeah, and that's the kind of thing where, like, not that I was there, but where you're like, right, this makes sense as things that human beings have figured out how to do to each other.

You don't need a lot of equipment.

You can do it in a room.

You can do it without a lot of effort on your part.

You're trying to get information or to get someone to confirm a certain story, as the case may be.

There's some kind of an alleged purpose to it.

And I don't know, that I guess the history of people doing awful things to each other predictably overlaps a lot more with the thinkable than with the gothically unthinkable.

Right.

And I think if you're already in a situation where this is happening to you, your brain can go to even darker places because why wouldn't it if you're already halfway through there?

Heck yeah.

Yeah.

So this is where a lot of the preliminary information came from.

And then eventually they collected local sources.

Many of them were people who had never actually seen anything, but either heard something from a friend of a friend.

So usually what would happen is like one person would come, say a piece of information.

There is one of the witnesses.

His name was Gregory Palace, said that he had carried the girls' bodies on a cart from one place to another, but he did not know what manner of death they had suffered.

One of the first witnesses, his name was Benedict, declared that 175 girls and women were taken out dead from the house, but he did not know the nature of their death.

One of the other witnesses, another Benedict said he had no business in the house, knew nothing, but had heard rumors.

So again, it's like everyone will be like, I came in, I saw like two or three bodies come out in a coffin and it was bad.

And that was it.

Yeah.

There was a knight, his name was Francis Torok.

He said that he had never seen her do anything before his eyes, but he knew when she was traveling after the death of her brother that she carried with her the corpses of three girls who died after torture.

And that he claimed that he heard that she inserted hot rods into their genitals.

And when that happened, someone said to him, Sir Francis, the girl you saw being tortured was strangled in the Turkish way.

Which again harkens back to my theory that a lot of what they're talking about is like also just stuff that they've heard from like people who were dealing with the Ottomans and like making shit up to be weird and racist.

Right.

And like the anxieties of a

place that feels encroached upon.

Exactly.

There were allegations that she had been given a gray cake that was, you know, given to her by sorcerers, and that she would recite the words against different figures while eating the cake, which I got to say, if that's what cake can do, local sorcerers, I will accept your magic death note case.

I think that's reasonable.

I mean, it's interesting in that she's effectively being accused of witchcraft, but just by another name in a way.

You know, these are all classic witch accusation things to be up to.

Yes.

And there was a repeated story about a German servant girl who was being publicly forced to suckle on a log.

But even that, like, people kept giving dates that differed by almost a decade.

So, like, it may have happened.

Someone may have publicly been forced to do that.

Again, how does this help us with the blood thing?

Exactly.

What's the point?

Doesn't.

I hate to tell you.

And I think what's the saddest part, I guess this is a spoiler alert, but there is never any testimony that she ever bathed in the blood of any of these people god damn it that's the only part that's fun

yeah it didn't happen until like the 1700s when some scholars wrote like the first written account of the bathory case and then mentioned the blood baths oh i love that up until then there is like no testimony that that she actually did that which i well this is just proof that storytelling is collaborative

Who owns what copyright?

You know, like, it's, I was, I kept going, like, okay, when is the blood bathing gonna happen?

And it's like, and it's like, never.

It's just a bunch of other horrible things.

And I'm just like, well, that's not what I came here for.

Right.

Because it's like, you don't have legs as a cultural figure if you just killed and tortured everyone.

You need to have done something kind of whimsical.

You need

something unique.

Exactly.

I know.

I'm sorry to disappoint disappoint you.

There were no alleged reports of blood bathings.

No, I do.

I love it, though.

Because, like, good for her.

It means that there's just a whole other person behind this fabulous history channel story we got to grow up with.

And I often suspect that that's the case, that the bigger the legend, the more the real person can hide behind it in the end.

It's interesting.

And what I heard as well is that, like, because of the whole, like, was she a female Dracula kind of thing, also is what made that entire story come up as well.

And so, from all I saw, like, there is just, there's just when she is bathing, it's like she's either dunking other women in ice water,

but there is no real report of her doing anything like that.

So, the first time it's ever put into print is in 1729, and she died

in like 1614.

So, like, over a 100 years later, they're like, and you know,

she did it.

I love that.

So it's interesting that then they're really just accusing her of being just, you know, a very prolific, but like garden variety murderer, really.

She just wants to kill everyone out of malice, I guess.

Although only girls?

Is she accused of killing men?

No, no, it's mostly women.

It's all girls.

It's all very culty witchcraft-y,

which is why I even brought up the whole witchcraft up in the beginning, because there are people who believe that this was essentially just her getting caught up in a witch hunt.

But I'm sure people are wondering where the number 650 comes from.

Yeah.

Someone's ass.

Well, the ass of

a witness who didn't give her real name but chose to be known as Susanna.

She is the one that claimed that 650 girls.

were killed.

Good going, Susanna.

It's like an auction.

Say the highest number and we'll use your statistic forever.

Yeah, it's really based off of nothing because the number just kept getting higher.

It was like, we started off 38.

Now we're at 50.

Now we're at 175.

And then she's like, 650.

And everyone was like, that's the one we're going to pick.

And it's just like the idea that she's like traveling with like two, three corpses, just like hanging out with her, go to a funeral.

And maybe even if she did travel with corpses, maybe she was taking them to a church.

Like it doesn't have to be like, there are so many other explanations because one of the things that you kind of learn as well is that Elizabeth, as like the head of her estate, was essentially responsible for like the health and legal issues of the environment, of the environment, of the area.

So, if there was like a thing or a dispute that had to be done, you would go to Elizabeth's bathroom to then get it done.

So she's like the Jack Shutie of the area, really.

Exactly.

So imagine when you look at some of the witnesses and then you see, oh, wow, this person also went to go get something like legislated by Elizabeth Bathory and she did not vote for them.

What a coincidence.

Wow.

Oh, my God.

Did this paladine, sorry, did Palpatine owe money to Elizabeth Bathory?

A little bit.

That's crazy.

So, like, one of the big theories is that while not every single witness was someone who either owed money or had some kind of legal tie to Bathory, a significant amount were.

And so you basically have another reason why people are very quick nowadays.

Not quick, but people are extra skeptical because it's like, so not only is there no real proof that any of this happened,

but there's also like proof that some of these people owed her money and that all of their debts were cleared very soon after this stuff happened.

It's all all very suspicious that's fascinating and i this is also a a class issue i would argue as well all of this stuff happened but she was actually never convicted of anything oh

what

throughout all of this she was arrested and like basically kept in like house arrest the entire time and Her servants were convicted and killed and executed for this.

Of course.

But she was never convicted of anything.

Good lord.

I would also argue that it might have also just been using her as somewhat of a political chip because there is evidence of like you can be a noble person, get called out for torture, and then still get murdered.

So, there is this Russian noblewoman named, and I apologize again, Darya Nikolavenya Saltova.

That sounded bad, but that's all I got.

I'm so sorry.

You know, that sounded at least close enough.

It sounded, it was secure.

I deeply apologize, but she was accused of torturing a bunch of her serfs.

But we have records of the victim's parents going to Catherine the Great to be like, people keep dying at this household.

We would like something to be done.

So Catherine, being Catherine, was like, okay, we're going to make sure the investigation is done.

Call Columbo.

He's on the case.

And so on.

And so they actively went to figure out how many people she killed.

And even though there's a high number, she was convicted of the deaths of 38 serfs but at the time they had gotten rid of capital punishment in Russia enlightened despot and Catherine didn't want to actually publicly kill a noble but she did

have her publicly chained on a platform in Moscow for an hour with a sign around her neck saying that she was a murderer

Just an hour though.

Yeah, just an hour.

So people could like heckle and jeer.

But you know, it's Moscow.

It's a very big city even then.

So like that's a lot.

That's a lot can happen in one hour.

That's true.

Yeah, that could be it.

And then she was imprisoned for the rest of her life in a cellar.

And then you have Giles Durace, who the Joan of Arc girls in the room might know this one, but he was a knight and a lord and a commander during the Hundred Year War and like fought with Joan of Arc.

And he confessed to being a child murderer of around 140 children.

And he was hung and no, he was hanged and burned because that's, I remember how grammar works.

works he was hanged and burned that's what's important in all this

to my research uh and even and even with him you know because he is also known as like a very prolific occultist child killer even when they do modern day research about his trials even the people who are like

Yeah, there could have been some sus things happening, but he did, there is records of him doing enough of this stuff to be guilty of it.

So like there is an ability to actually apply a level of vigor to the allegations.

Right.

You can apply it to actual, like, missing persons, whatever.

And it's, I mean, that's a case I don't know very much about, although I feel like it also has popped up in a lot of like Barnes and Noble branded true crime stuff I've gotten my mitts on over the years.

And it's like, even if that figure is inflated, it's like, right, it starts with like a very documented,

you know, something that exists on the record that wasn't invented a century after the events that took place and so on.

Yeah.

So basically, she was held in captivity until she died.

She died of natural causes.

She was buried in an unmarked grave at the castle that she lived in.

And before she died, she was able to like write her own will.

She was able to, you know, delineate all of her goods and assets to her children and other people.

So I think that that's also just in very heavy contrast to what she's accused of doing.

Because even though she's a noble woman, I think that if you are successfully convicted, which again, she wasn't, but I think if you, if you could be successfully convicted of killing 650 women, I don't think that they should just let you have a will where you're allowed to just divvy that up to everyday people.

But all of those things, for me, as someone looking outside who like

cannot know absolute truth, all this says to me that she was put into a position where she could no longer be an enforcing member of the government of her society which allowed the actual the palatine to become the head and use some of her territory getting her out of the way also you know helped with getting rid of her nephew it was just it seems very politically and economically motivated versus actual occulting well yeah i mean and then you look at like which of these things happens more often you know like

i don't know like i can believe that somebody, I'm not going to say that she's like, that we stay on a legend or anything here, right?

Because it's like, it feels like what we can say is that she came into a lot of power, that she seems to have known at least on some level how to use it and how to hold on to it because she did.

And like, could she have killed some serfs?

Yeah, why not?

I feel like everybody was back then, right?

But it's because, yeah, it does seem like the story of like a very advantageous power grab that involved sort of creating, regardless of what the original, whether there was an original germ of truth there, creating a story that was sort of based on contemporary ideas of like, what's the worst thing we can imagine a woman doing?

Right.

To get those kind of numbers, you have to be part of a gang, you have to be like an actual war criminal, or have the full backing of like a really powerful institution.

So like if she did kill people, I would say 50 to 75 is a reasonable quote-unquote number.

Very healthy number.

Yeah.

I could believe that.

I could even believe that she was an abusive person towards her staff and that maybe some of them died from maltreatment.

Oh, yeah.

Like that's absolutely possible.

Like eat the rich.

I just think that like when you look at the numbers and also how it has evolved to just be this very sexist, sadomasochistic and sometimes fun sapphic because you know sometimes we you know we reclaim it we make it fun we make it cute Carmilla etc.

Exactly.

The house of the book, House of Hunger, which was really good, is very much based on Elizabeth Bathory.

I think it just has to do with the ways in which when women do bad things or accuse of doing bad things, even if they're not convicted, like just like Lizzie Borden, the story about how it's possible for like one woman to be that bloodthirsty or be that, you know, dark is what captivates people.

And the truth ends up not mattering because it's not as entertaining.

Like if it's, if you say like, oh, she didn't kill 650 people or bathe in their blood, she was probably the victim, maybe the victim of like a big political coup.

It's like, that's not sexy.

We can't make Castlevania nocturne antagonist with that.

But if you turn her into like this vampire werewolf, you know, driven by beauty, that's something that people can understand, quote unquote, you know, like she can become like the evil stepmother from Snow White, obsessed with beauty, obsessed with youth.

Like we tell those narratives about women all the time.

Yeah.

There's just, it's just, there's no, there's no actual evidence that things are as intense as they want it to be.

And I mean, that's great because that means that, you know, 650 women never were killed.

And I do like that.

Yeah, I love that.

And like, maybe she was just a sadist and that sucks.

But it is interesting to like research a character or figure like this and realize how few sources actually exist that we have absorbed that are based on the truth.

Yeah, and to realize that everything you recognize about somebody is invented, and that, like, you, you kind of have this silhouette of somebody you thought you knew, but it's really like they're wearing a parka and you have no sense of the shape of them underneath it.

If it comes to that, maybe.

And it also occurs to me that, like, this is a story that, you know, has persisted for a lot of reasons, partly because the imagery is great, but also because it's like, you know, this sort of useful folk legend, maybe because it's like a story of a woman who was in power and how did she wield that power badly.

You know?

Too much blood drinking and sexing.

There's something really delightful to me about the fact that the part of the story I knew best is beyond a shadow of a doubt totally fabricated because it's like a very sort of patriarchal idea that

women will kill absolutely everyone just to like keep looking young.

I feel like the reality of aging is that, like, you could acknowledge that it's hard and you cannot like it, and you don't have to embrace it.

You can just sort of like, you know, give it kind of a brusque hello and

pointedly not offer it a beverage when you let it in.

But, like, it's so unlikely that you're going to just become an unhinged murderer because of it.

You know, it's just almost everybody just figures out a way to deal with it.

And I think that's really nice.

Exactly.

And also, you know, you just kind of become more chill.

Like, I feel like at that time, it's like, you know,

here I am with all of my money.

Let me just relax.

You know, like this, getting older is so fun.

Like, I love being older.

You know, I love being in my 30s.

I love like talking to younger women and being like, oh my God, yes, you're going to have so much fun in your 30s despite everything because, like, you will.

Like, life is hard, but like, there's just a lack of cares that happen the older you get.

And

I just think that's neat.

I do too.

Yeah.

Maybe my kind of final thought is that I was, and I wonder if this resonates with you.

I was talking to Megan Burbank, who has done a couple episodes with us and is also a good friend of mine, not to brag.

And she was saying that, like, there's something interesting about being in your 30s where

the social targets that you're supposed to hit as a woman in America, like they do kind of stop around 30.

Like the goal is to sort of like, speaking very generally, according to sort of mass culture, is to finish the supermarket sweep by 30 and have like the man, because, you know, of course, it's always a man according to culture.

The very general kind I'm thinking of that just seems to get injected into our brains via T V Inc and government.

And that once you've finished accumulating stuff and collecting the complete set that makes up quote unquote it all, that then the script just sort of runs out for you and you're supposed to just sort of like maintain it.

And I guess, you know, around menopause, there start being things for you to do according to sort of a cultural timeline.

But really, it's like you just kind of go off the map, and there's something kind of great about that because you're like, what should I be doing?

I don't know.

I haven't been given the assignment.

Exactly.

And I just feel like you sort of realize I'm tired.

And if I am ever going to find peace, I have to stop caring so much about what other people think.

Yeah.

And that was exactly what Elizabeth Bathory was thinking when they came to arrest her.

If they caught her in the middle of torturing a girl, doesn't that have great evidence to bring out?

Like, where did she go?

Wouldn't you, where are you?

Yeah, good point.

Where is she?

Princess Weeks, you've done a couple of episodes with us in the past.

We talked about Rosa Parks earlier this year, and we talked about Lizzie Borden

last year.

I love it.

And where else can people find you?

What have you been up to?

All of that.

Oh, yeah, I've been on so many podcasts, but mostly I've been doing my YouTube.

I had a great video I really enjoyed making called Tall, Dark, and Racially Ambiguous talking about the ways which tall, dark, and handsome and olive skinned are used in literature in a way that's supposed to signify whiteness, but to most modern audiences or diverse audiences doesn't work that same way so it was just really fun seeing people comment about like this character is called tarderic and handsome like i was i was literally just watching butte and the beast for like the billionth time and i forget that the bimbettes call gaston a tall dark strong and handsome brute and i was just like oh it's everywhere it's everywhere um so that was a really fun one and i

Yeah, I think if I could pick anything I've done recently that I've really loved is that.

I also am a co-host on the PBS Books Readers Club, which has been a lot of fun.

You can check us out there on the YouTube channel.

And yeah, just living my best life, trying very hard to just make my cat happy.

Oh my God.

Yeah.

Yeah, let's just have that be the goal.

You know, let's just make the cats happy.

Yeah, Lola deserves it.

She's a good girl.

Oh, she just came to look at me.

And that was our episode.

Thank you so much for listening.

Thank you for learning.

Thank you for being here with us.

As always, we have bonus episodes if you want to hear more.

We just put out one on the two movie adaptations of the Stepford Wives.

I got to talk to Sarah Archer about that and a whole bunch of other stuff about the speed at which we may or may not be replaced by robots.

Always an interesting question.

I had a great time.

If you know me, you know I love the Stepford Wives and I love talking about it with Sarah Archer.

So check that out if you want to.

And of course, I've mentioned before, we've got some live shows coming up.

I'm going to be doing a collaborative event with American Hysteria, my favorite moral panic debunking podcast, and with The Little Lies, Seattle's premier Fleetwood Mac Tribute Act.

And we're going to be in Portland and Seattle in December and in San Francisco and LA in January.

You can find a link with information in the show notes If you can join, we would love to just make that experience together with you and see if we can summon a ghost.

And if not, then what else we can summon.

Thank you for listening.

Thank you for making this show possible.

Thank you just for continuing down the road with us.

Thank you to Nicole Ortiz for production assistance.

Thank you to Miranda Zickler for editing.

And thank you to Carolyn Kendrick for producing.

We'll see you in two weeks.