Some things haven’t changed

Some things haven’t changed

February 11, 2025 27m

A series of policy changes are hitting the economy, but some aspects of consumer behavior have yet to demonstrate change. A Federal Reserve survey shows Americans still gauge future inflation at 3%. And we continue to spend 40% of our food budget on eating out and 60% on meals at home. Also in this episode, insurance and property taxes contribute to the housing affordability crisis, steel and aluminum are tariffed together but serve different markets, and only some states require vehicle safety inspections.

Listen and Follow Along

Full Transcript

Hello, listeners. Our goal at Marketplace is to raise the economic intelligence of the country, and that goes for teens and young adults, too.
The newest season of Financially Inclined, hosted by Yaneli Espinal, tackles topics like how to align your values with your money decisions, the skill of negotiating, and what you can get out of internships. Financially Inclined is presented in partnership with Greenlight, the debit card and money app for teens.
Greenlight helps teens learn to earn, save, spend wisely, and invest. Tune in to Financially Inclined wherever you find your podcasts.
This podcast is supported by Odoo. Some say Odoo business management software is like fertilizer for businesses because the simple, efficient software promotes growth.
Others say Odoo is like a magic beanstalk because it scales with you and is magically affordable. And some describe Odoo's programs for manufacturing, accounting, and more as building blocks for creating a custom software suite.
So Odoo is fertilizer magic beanstalk building blocks for business. Odoo, exactly what businesses need.
Sign up at odoo.com. That's O-D-O-O dot com.
on the program today, a tale of two metals, what we are eating and what we are drinking,

and cars and the regulation thereof.

From American Public Media, It is Monday today. This one is the 10th of February.
Good as always to have you along, everybody. So steel and aluminum, aluminum and steel.
At this point, they just kind of go together, right? The two critical industrial metals have been joined at the proverbial hip since 2018 in the first round of Trump tariffs. With a second round on the way, it's worth a note that the two metals, the industries that produce them, and the markets they serve are actually quite different.
Marketplace's Mitchell Hartman gets us going today. Let's start with steel.
The U.S. produces most of what it uses.
After Trump imposed tariffs during his first administration, domestic production rose, says Jennifer McKeown at Capital Economics. The import share of steel in the U.S.
has been falling since 2018.

It's now around 32 percent, so around a third.

U.S. steelmakers will likely benefit from tariffs on foreign competitors.

And, says McEwen,

There's quite a lot of spare capacity in the U.S. steel sector,

which means that there is scope for production to pick up again.

Rising steel prices will affect a lot of industries, starting with construction. There are a lot of worries among contractors.
Brian Turmail at Associated General Contractors of America says steel is built into what contractors charge for projects. In home building, you know, a multifamily unit, you might be costing out 50% of washers and dryers, 50 stoves, 50 dishwashers.
Aluminum is a whole different metal. We only produce about half of what we use domestically.
The vast majority of what we import comes from Canada. It's used in electrical components, appliances, and aircraft, says Richard Abulafia at Aerodynamic Advisory.
Boeing's biggest product, the 737, the structure is 90 percent aluminum. Aluminum is not cheap to make, says Gary Huffbauer at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
It requires a lot of power, which turns bauxite into the metal. Well, there's a shortage of electricity now in the U.S.
with the AI boom. So he says it's unlikely domestic aluminum makers will be able

to increase their output and compete with foreign producers, even with a 25 percent tariff on imports.

I'm Mitchell Hartman for Marketplace. Traders on Wall Street today looked around,

saw the chaos and said, yeah, we're OK with that. We'll have the details when we do the numbers.
Business owners and analysts and economists are all trying to make sense of the changes in American economic policy. You have heard some of those people on this program.
Consumers, though, are trying to digest the changing policy landscape in very personal

terms. Their jobs, their wages, and how much things are going to cost.
We got a sense of how they are feeling today with January's survey of consumer expectations out from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Marketplace's Elizabeth Troval has that story.
In January, consumers really held on to their belief that inflation isn't getting any

better or any worse. Rice University's Zach Bethune.
Consumers are dug in. So, you know,

inflation expectations are now kind of, you know, maintaining around 3 percent. That's a percent

higher than the Fed's target of 2 percent. And consumers are expecting commodity prices to

increase. Luke Pardue is with the Aspen Economic Strategy Group.
A lot of these commodity prices are forecast to rise, like housing and energy prices. And so that's one thing that I think is a bit of an underlying concern in the report.
In terms of what consumers expect from the labor market, Pardue says... They're comfortable in the positions that they have.
This sort of tight labor market has loosened a little bit. Though everything is still very wait and see for consumers like Denny Cohen-Empsey.
I feel confused. She's also an economist with Morning Consult.
It takes time, I think, for consumers to really digest the news, especially when it comes to inflation. Though there are some early indications that for some consumers, we do see that downward momentum.
She says her recent data shows when consumers think about the future, it's starting to sour their mood about the economy. I'm Elizabeth Troval for Marketplace.
Continuing with consumer-ish news, this is a big week on the earnings calendar, food and beverage in particular. McDonald's, Kraft Heinz, Coca-Cola, Nestle, and a whole bunch more are going to be reporting results.
And since food is such a big part of both our essential and our discretionary spending habits, what these companies have to say is going to tell us a lot about consumer trends. Marketplace's Kristen Schwab looks at how we are spending our food budgets these days.
Formally speaking, Eric Gonzalez is a restaurant analyst at KeyBank. Less formally, he is a regular at his local Chili's.
You know, because my kids love it. And I can get in and out of there for less than 40 bucks with my three little girls.

Chili's, yes, that Chili's, has made an unexpected comeback.

In its most recent quarter, the chain reported same-store sales growth of over 30%.

Gonzalez says it shows consumers aren't only thinking about prices.

They're focused on what those prices get them, like sit-down service or bottomless chips. And I think consumers will pay a dollar more if you're meeting some other consumer need.
He says in the last couple of years, fast food got too aggressive with its pricing, so people turned to fast casual and full-service restaurants. But consumers are compromising, says Robert Byrne, who leads consumer research at Technomic.
Consumers are still spending as many dollars as they always have at restaurants. It just translates into fewer actual occasions.
It means overall, food budgets have stayed consistent. The average American puts about 60 percent of theirs toward food at home and 40 percent toward eating out, according to David Portolatin, a food industry advisor at Circonana, he says consumers' daily eating habits can be fickle.

You know, what's going on with pricing and what happened with the weather?

But mostly?

Our share of consumption has really been very, very stable.

Breakfast, lunch and dinner are a given.

It's just up to grocers and restaurants to duke it out and see who wins each meal.

I'm Kristen Schwab for Marketplace. The huge data centers used by the big tech giants, Amazon and Meta and Google and all the rest, they are a growing part of the modern economy.
But where they get built can literally change the landscape, especially when you factor in how much electricity those places need. That gets me to a story I saw the other day in Switchyard magazine about the power demands of data centers in central Ohio.
Maya Frazier wrote it. Maya, thanks for coming on the program.
Great to be here, Kai. Would you tell me what these data centers in central Ohio look like? In the plainest terms, they're just buildings, but they're kind of monstrosities in a lot of ways.
Where I live in central Ohio, there has been just a massive boom in data center development in a town called New Albany, which is north of Columbus.

For those unfamiliar, what's inside these places? Because that's the nub of this story.

Data centers require an immense amount of electricity to run. And so much of what

sort of comprises these buildings is wires and network connections and electrical equipment. And that gets us to why we're talking to you and what really is going on in central Ohio, which is the electricity demands of these places.
Virtually everything inside it requires electricity. And the power companies are stringing them across the central Ohio landscape, as you say.
Yes, and more is coming. There's a bit of a battle over some new transmission lines, about 13 miles long, two different lines that are going to be running from a city a little bit, well, it used to be a small farm town north of New Albany, all the way to just on the outskirts of sort of the residential areas of New Albany.
It's not like the lines you see behind your house or the lines you might see in your neighborhood. I mean, the trunk of these things are as big as like a sequoia.
They're just massive. I think this is the beginning of the piece, actually.
You stood there for a while and you listened, right? I did. I had sort of heard rumors that these things crackle and I had been doing some reporting among some farmers that are sort of right in the bullseye of where these things are going to run through and talk to a lot of residents who live around these of just, what is it like?

And it's quite eerie.

I mean, I stood under them and you just, you feel this crackle and this slight hum.

It's a very unnerving feeling to be underneath these.

Tell me about the farmers and the towns that live under these wires that you spend some time with. The area between has always been a very rural area.
A lot of the farmers have been sort of feeling powerless to this development that's happened. And not only has it had an influence on the cost of farmland, but it's also influenced people who moved to this area because they were trying to escape this sort of sprawling development that's happening both with Columbus and around New Albany, where a lot of the big tech development has unfolded.
It seems likely, given the way society is going, that demand for these data centers and thus demand for electricity is only going to grow. What then happens to the communities underneath the power lines and around the data centers as that growth happens? Well, we've seen a massive increase in the price of farmland, which has made farming unsustainable for families who have farmed for generations around this area.
We've also seen very little public benefit to the development of these data centers in the area. The deals that have been made have all been negotiated by Jobs Ohio, which is the privatized arm of economic development in Ohio.

And I think that's left a lot of local people feeling like they are powerless before this massive expansion of big tech infrastructure in middle America.

Maya Frazier, writing about central Ohio, big tech and electricity.

Maya, thanks a lot. I appreciate your time.

Thanks, Kai. Coming up.
Nearly one-third of their monthly payment is going directly to property insurance and property taxes. The actual cost of being a homeowner right now.
But first, sure, why not? Let's do the numbers. Downdust rolls up 167 today, about four-tenths percent, closed at 44,470, did the blue chips.
The Nasdaq gained 190 points, that's 1%, 19,714. The S&P 500 added 40 points, about seven-tenths percent, 6,000 to end to 66.
Kristen Schwab was just telling us about consumer spending on food at home versus in restaurants. So here you go.
McDonald's beefed up 4.8%. That's despite posting disappointing quarterly revenue today.
Wendy's slid 0.6%. Coca-Cola fizzed up 1.1% today.
Brinker International, parent company of Chili's and Maggiano's, Italy, shrank two and four-tenths percent today. Here's the ticker symbol of the day, E-A-T for Brinker International.
Shares of On Semiconductor dipped 8.2 percent after posting ho-hum fourth quarter earnings. The global chipmaker reported a decline in sales and said the 2025 outlook quote remains uncertain.
That can't be good. Bond prices fell.

Yield on the 10-year T-note went up 4.50%. You're listening to Marketplace podcast is supported by Gusto.
Let your employees know you've got their back by signing up for Gusto for payroll and HR. More than 400,000 small business owners use Gusto.
They offer benefits like health insurance, employee onboarding, and more. Get your payroll taxes filed, deductions calculated, and your team paid fast.
No more pain, just the joy of running your business. Get three months free when you go to gusto.com slash marketplace.
That's gusto.com slash marketplace. Are you looking to invest in municipal bonds? For extra protection, buy bonds insured by Assured Guarantee.
It guarantees 100% of your principal and interest will be paid when due. Assured Guarantee has demonstrated its reliability and financial strength for nearly four decades.
That's why the bonds they back are one of the safest investments you can make. Visit assuredguarantee.com.
Assured Guarantee, a stronger bond. Hey, accountants.
How many cups of coffee have you had today? Tax season is your most demanding time of year. You're tracking down receipts, triple checking those numbers, and manually reconciling the unreconcilable.
That means long hours, late nights, and low energy. Most likely, there are other things you'd rather be doing with your time.
That's why you should try Bill. It's the smart way to manage your clients' AP, AR, and spend an expense.
With Bill's automation, not only can you save time, but also avoid manual errors and use custom approvals to keep things moving smoothly. You may never have to chase down a receipt and expense reports generate themselves because you have better things to do with your time than juggling spreadsheets.
Bill handles the tedious processes so you can spend more time on big picture tasks and give your coffee machine a little break. And for a limited time, when you take a demo at Bill.com

slash Marketplace, you'll get a $250 gift card of your choice. Terms apply.
Get started today.

This is Marketplace. I'm Kai Rizdahl.
Texas has gotten rid of its requirement

that cars pass an annual safety inspection. Utah, New Jersey, and Florida have already

done away with their routine safety checks. 29 states do still require annual emissions tests, but just 15 of the states in the Union and the District of Columbia oblige drivers to get a regular once-over to make sure their car is in decent shape.
Marketplace's Henry Epp looks at what that patchwork of rules means for drivers and for the businesses in the auto repair industry. Technician Max Burlow has a 2006 Subaru Forester up on his lift at Gurlington Garage, a repair shop in South Burlington, Vermont.
In the state's snowy climate, road salt does a good number on most cars and trucks every winter, so a big part

of a required annual inspection is looking at rust. Basically, if you can put your fingers through it,

that's bad. The rust on this Forester hasn't gotten to that point, but to check, Burlow taps

around on the underside of the car with a screwdriver. Yeah, so it's like flaky, you know,

there's some flakes coming off, but it doesn't like totally destroy like the integrity of it. Good enough.
Berlow also checks the lights and the windshield wipers and removes a wheel to check rust buildup on the brakes. After about an hour, he determines it gets to pass and puts a sticker in the corner of the windshield.
Good for another year. Total cost, about 84 bucks.
We catch things before they fail so you don't have breakdowns. Demony Pollitt is the owner of Gurlington Garage.
She acknowledges inspections are decent business. She says her shop does 30 to 40 a month.
And a lot of times, if something needs to get fixed, customers will get the work done there. But we are always really clear with people.
If we fail you for something, you do not have to get it fixed with us. You can bring it anywhere you want.
This process is not exactly popular with drivers like Thomas Dunbar, a high school teacher in Cabot, Vermont. He remembers one failed inspection several years ago.
It was a leased Toyota Yaris, and I took it for an inspection, and they told me that my brake pads were too thin. So he went back to the dealership, which said his brakes were fine, then to a different mechanic who passed him, he says.
But he had to pay for both inspections, the pass and the fail. It just feels like it's easy to be taken advantage of.
That was essentially the argument of state lawmakers in Texas who passed a law that did away with that state's safety inspection requirement. The law might save Texas drivers a little time, but it upended Carissa Barnes's decades-old family business, a chain of inspection stations in the San Antonio area.
They look like a Texas flag. It is a metal building painted like a Texas flag.
Just a single bay that drivers could pull into and get their inspections done really fast. We created an entire procedure and process on how to inspect it, and we can get you out in nine minutes.
At its peak, the company had 10 locations. Now they're all closed.
Barnes has shifted her attention to another business focused on vehicle registrations, but she thinks eliminating inspections was a mistake. What I'm very concerned about is that because we no longer have an annual safety inspection, cars are just going to be unsafe.
The roads will be less safe. But whether requiring an annual inspection actually reduces the number of crashes is not totally clear.
Shubhash Ishdash, an associate professor at Texas State University, studied whether inspections improve safety in 2019. We did not find any evidence that states with inspection improve safety.
But he says his study only looked at data on fatal crashes. So he says the subject needs more research.
Whether or not your state requires you to get your car checked out by a professional, it's never a bad idea, says David Bennett, a senior manager at AAA. But he says a lot of drivers tend to put off regular maintenance, replacing burnt-out headlights or worn-out tires, for example.
When you start avoiding some of those things, something's going to break down, more than likely. And then that cost is going to be more than if you just maintained it overall.
As for taking advantage of inspection customers, Demony Pollitt in Vermont says at her shop at least, it doesn't happen. Cars, especially in Vermont, have lots of problems.
We do not have to make up problems in order to do business and be successful.

There are some bad apples out there, but when your mechanic tells you your car won't pass inspection, she says, they're usually not trying to rip you off.

I'm Henry Abbott for Marketplace. Home prices in this economy are high.

We've talked about that a lot.

Also high, but a good deal less talked about?

Homeowner's insurance and, depending on where you live, property taxes.

Combined, according to new data from Intercontinental Exchange,

which owns, among other things, the New York Stock Exchange,

they say taxes and insurance are becoming ever larger chunks of people's monthly payments. Marketplace's Samantha Fields reports.
Tim Anderson and his wife bought their house in Austin, Texas in late 2019. Then the pandemic hit and home prices started rising fast.
And our property taxes and home insurance has really changed, especially in the last year. Combined, they've jumped almost $3,000.
And that kind of gave me pause. And I said, oh, well, this is something to kind of pay attention to.
Lots of people are having similar experiences all across the country. Andy Walden, head of mortgage and housing research at Intercontinental Exchange, says for the average single-family homeowner now...
Nearly one-third of their monthly payment is going directly to property insurance and property taxes, which is the highest share we've seen in the 10-plus years we've been tracking those metrics. And a growing number of homeowners are putting upwards of 50 percent of their monthly income toward taxes and insurance.
Walden says one of the biggest factors driving insurance up in particular is climate change, which is making extreme weather more frequent and intense. More than 10 percent of U.S.
homes were directly in the path of a hurricane within the last six months. And then you can look at what's going on in Los Angeles with some of the largest, most destructive wildfires that we've seen in state history out there, then you can look at the rising costs to repair and rebuild in the wake of those storms.
Because of all of that, insurers are increasingly refusing to renew homeowners' policies and raising their prices. Amy Bach at the nonprofit United Policyholders says while climate change is a big factor.
What I think is more driving the premium increases and the reduced competition across the country is the explosion in insurer tech tools that insurers are using to make their business decisions. So, for example, drone images, people's roofs and properties as a basis for dropping them.
And artificial intelligence tools that mine databases with all sorts of information about homes to give them a risk score. They are taking these tools, these risk scores, and they are using them to non-renew existing customers.
They're using them to reject new applicants. Also, the more a home is worth, the more it costs to insure.
And the higher taxes are too. Jenny Schutz at Arnold Ventures says most existing homeowners probably haven't had their taxes jump too much, even if the value of their house has.
There are a lot of ways that states and localities try to protect people against their property taxes going up. By capping how much the tax rate or dollar amount can go up each year.
But there's no such cap when homes go up for sale. So people who are just buying now are likely paying more in property tax than long-time owners.
Andy Walden at Intercontinental Exchange says all of this on top of already high home prices and mortgage rates means owning is increasingly unaffordable for many people.

Among folks that are on the lower end of the income ladder, we've started to see mortgage delinquency rates start to creep up, especially among folks that have bought over the last couple of years. For many others, home ownership is just eating up a bigger chunk of their monthly income.
Kurt Alibach and his wife bought their house near Tampa in the late 1990s. Now their home insurance is almost $11,000 a year, plus a bit more for flood insurance.
Double what it was just in 2020. And even though they're paying a lot more, they have less coverage.
I've kept the cost down by increasing my deductible, which, you know, not necessarily a great thing. Insurance costs are one of the reasons he and his wife are now planning to sell their house.
I'm still working largely because, you know, what's going to happen next with, you know, insurance here in Florida, right? You know, I can't say, hey, there's my income stream needed in retirement when my homeowner's insurance may double next year. So they're planning to leave Florida and move to Little Rock, Arkansas.
Mostly because that's where their daughter lives now, but also because housing and insurance costs less there too. I'm Samantha Fields for Marketplace.
This final note on the way out today, of which, to be honest, it is difficult to know what to make.

The Wall Street Journal reported this afternoon that Elon Musk and a group of investors have made an unsolicited offer to buy OpenAI,

once we got ChatGPT, for $97.4 billion.

Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman have a history of bad blood, so it is difficult to know what is going to happen with this one.

More chaos, probably, honestly.

Our daily production team includes Andy Corbin,

Nicholas Guillaume, Maria Hollenhorst,

Iru Ekpenobi, Sarah Leeson, Sean McHenry, and Sophia Terenzio.

I'm Kyle Rizdahl. We will see you tomorrow, everybody.

This is APM. on your schedule.
Big tech dominating our headlines. Another win for Donald Trump.
A key inflation report. These are short audio reports, five minutes or less, that bring you the latest

headlines with context 24 hours a day. Stay on top of the latest news from around the world.

Get it on your smartphone. Subscribe to Bloomberg News Now on Apple Podcasts,

Spotify, or anywhere else you listen.