Reid Hoffman on Trump, Elon, Peter Thiel and Lina Khan

Speaker 1 Support for On With Carraswisher comes from Saks Fifth Avenue. Saks Fifth Avenue makes it easy to holiday your way, whether it's finding the right gift or the right outfit.

Speaker 1 Saks is where you can find everything from a lovely silk scarf from Saint Laurent for your mother or a chic leather jacket from Prada to complete your cold weather wardrobe.

Speaker 1 And if you don't know where to start, Saks.com is customized to your personal style so you can save time shopping and spend more time just enjoying the holidays.

Speaker 1 Make shopping fun and easy this season and get gifts and inspiration to suit your holiday style at Saks Fifth Avenue.

Speaker 3 Adobe Acrobat Studio, so brand new. Show me all the things PDFs can do.
Do your work with ease and speed. PDF spaces is all you need.
Do hours of research in an instant.

Speaker 3 With key insights from an AI assistant. Pick a template with a click.
Now your prezzo looks super slick. Close that deal, yeah, you won.
Do that, doing that, did that, done.

Speaker 2 Now you can do that, do that, with Acrobat. Now you can do that, do that with the all-new Acrobat.

Speaker 3 It's time to do your best work with the all-new Adobe Acrobat Studio.

Speaker 4 Or never wanted in the first place. Sure, you can probably list the reasons for staying, but are they actually just excuses for not leaving? Let a career coach from strawberry.me help you get unstuck.

Speaker 4 Discover the benefits of having a dedicated career coach in your corner. Go to strawberry.me slash unstuck to claim a special offer.

Speaker 1 Hi, everyone, from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. This is on with Kara Swisher, and I'm Kara Swisher.

Speaker 1 Today, I'm interviewing Reed Hoffman live at at the Masters of Scale Summit in San Francisco.

Speaker 1 Reed's Twitter bio says he's an entrepreneur, investor, and strategist, which is both accurate and a massive understatement.

Speaker 1 In 1997, and I actually met him back then, Reed created Social Net, an online dating site that was arguably the first online social network.

Speaker 1 He was one of PayPal's first employees, which makes him part of the so-called PayPal Mafia, and that includes PayPal founders and early employees like Peter Chiel and Elon Musk.

Speaker 1 But Reed was one of the good ones. He really has been one of the most important and influential investors and entrepreneurs around, and he's moved himself into the political space.

Speaker 1 After he co-founded LinkedIn, he was again a founding investor in OpenAI and a co-founder of Inflection AI with Mustafa Suleiman, whom I recently interviewed.

Speaker 1 Go back and listen if you haven't already. He sold LinkedIn to Microsoft for over $26 billion in cash.
He sits on the board of Microsoft and is still a VC partner at Greylock Ventures.

Speaker 1 In his spare time, he's an author and podcaster, and he runs the Masters of Scale events and podcasts. Of course, Hoffman is now one of the biggest and most influential Democratic mega donors.

Speaker 1 He's been contributing to Democratic candidates and causes before former President Trump ran for office, but he ramped that up significantly once Trump came on the scene.

Speaker 1 He even helped fund Eugene Carroll's legal battle with Trump and has been noticeably outspoken about the threat posed by Trump, something many other business leaders leaders have not had the courage to do.

Speaker 1 He's also got a very big influence among Silicon Valley, especially young startup leaders.

Speaker 1 Everyone talks about Elon Musk, but I think Reed is one of these people that also has equal influence, just in a different, kinder, and more decent way.

Speaker 1 He is a decent man, and I really like talking to him. We disagree on a lot of things, including his continued support for Peter Thiel.

Speaker 1 Many, many years that has changed recently, but he's willing to take a debate, and I really appreciate that. And I hope today will not disappoint.

Speaker 1 Our expert question for Reed comes from Teddy Schleifer, a journalist who covers billionaires and their influence in American politics at the New York Times.

Speaker 1 And I should note, an excellent reporter I hired at Recode when he was just a young and upcoming reporter.

Speaker 2 Now he's in the big time.

Speaker 1 Let's get to it.

Speaker 1 Sit down.

Speaker 1 Hi, everybody. Thank you.
I'm so excited. We're going to put this on the on podcast just so I've asked Reed to be super pithy because I've only got a short time.

Speaker 1 So let me start talking about, we have to talk about the election. We're going to talk about AI and blah, blah, blah.
But I think it's impossible not to talk to Reed.

Speaker 1 He's one of the most significant mega donors, I think that's what they call you people, for the Democrats.

Speaker 1 I call them backstage, the anti-Elon, and I think it's true, actually.

Speaker 1 Reid is sort of the very opposite of, couldn't be more opposite in many ways. But you penned...

Speaker 1 You know, I like him, but it is still a very low bar. In any case.

Speaker 2 So you're so subtree.

Speaker 1 It's you and Satcha Nadella down there with Tim Cook every now and then. So you penned at Op-Ed for Bloomberg where you said, American business and commerce rely on the rule of law.

Speaker 1 Companies can't thrive where erratic, vindictive, autocratic influences are courts and justice department. I'm assuming you're talking about Donald Trump,

Speaker 1 but he gets plenty of support among the business community.

Speaker 1 He recently spoke at the Economic Club of Chicago, got applause, even though he spewed a lot of nonsense when he attacked the press and they said there was a peaceful transfer of power in 2020.

Speaker 1 Explain the appeal to business leaders, despite chaotic autocratic tendencies. He's just talking about getting rid of income tax.
He's talking about tariffs.

Speaker 1 Every economist is like, this is a disaster waiting to happen.

Speaker 2 So I think there's a good and there's a bad. And I don't mean good, I think that zero of them should support Trump.
Right.

Speaker 2 The reasonable is kind of the question of, look, I haven't really studied the history of fascists or the history of how these things break. And so I come up with self-justifications.

Speaker 2 Like one of the things I've heard from some of the people who are supporting Trump is like, oh, yeah, he's talking about tariffs, but he won't do that.

Speaker 2 He's just talking about that as part of doing it. And that's the classic, like what Hindenburg said about Hitler.
That's correct. Which is like, oh, no,

Speaker 2 this is just the populace. He's not going to do anything.
It's like, no, no, generally speaking, you should take someone seriously. So that's the good side.
The bad side is,

Speaker 2 you know, grifter crony capitalism. It's, I'm buying something for myself.
Right.

Speaker 1 And he is the greatest coin-op president in history in that he's viable and they can do what they want. What do they want?

Speaker 2 Yeah. What they should do is now when they have a dictionary reference of Bagman, it should say C reference Donald J.
Trump.

Speaker 1 Right. So why does that get them something? What do they want precisely? And some of them have many, many billionaires in tech and finance spoke out against Trump after January 6th.

Speaker 1 They reversed themselves. Steve Schwartzman comes to mind.
You've said that business leaders who spoke out against Trump but support him don't have integrity,

Speaker 1 but they need to address their flip-flopping. How do you get them to do that? They just say, I need the money or more money.

Speaker 2 Well, in terms of getting them to say, well, why did you agree that January 6th was a kind of a, you know,

Speaker 2 a treasonist prompting and incitement of insurrection? And now you're like blithly ignoring it, address it. That's what truth and integrity is.

Speaker 2 You might say, I've now changed my mind for the following reason. I'm explaining why I've changed my mind versus I'm buying my way into a position of influence.

Speaker 1 They go quiet. The ones that don't agree go quiet.
They tend to go quiet. And what do you say to them?

Speaker 1 Even if you know, I mean, just recently, Bill Gates has apparently given $50 million to Kamala Harris. Jamie Dimon, somehow it leaked out that he's for Kamala Harris somehow.

Speaker 1 The leak's name is Jamie Dimon, in case you're interested.

Speaker 2 I think by definition that's not a leak, but yes.

Speaker 1 Private people say.

Speaker 2 I was like, give me a break.

Speaker 1 He called up the reporter. That was it.

Speaker 1 I'm just, I'm giving you the secrets of the trade here.

Speaker 1 So

Speaker 1 then we have people like Ben Horowitz, who made a big deal about donating to Trump, now is donating to Harris. What happened there?

Speaker 1 And do you think he's hedging his bets, or he actually is trying to help Harris win, or he's hoping that he'll be on both sides of the trade?

Speaker 2 Well, I think there are people who are hedging their bets and are being very public about it. I don't actually think that's not Ben.
I think Ben is being principled. I think

Speaker 2 he has a, because I've talked to him, he has a set of legitimate concerns about the application of rule of law and process to crypto, which he believes that the Biden administration has not done a particularly good job of.

Speaker 2 He was dismayed by Biden's performance in the first debate.

Speaker 2 But, you know, now that it's Harris, he's known Harris for a long time. And so he's following his stillest principles about what is good governance.

Speaker 2 And so, and, you know, to his credit, it isn't most people, once they kind of make a public declaration, they just kind of stay there versus take the,

Speaker 2 I am switching. And I think, you know, that's to Ben's point of honor.

Speaker 1 I would say she has a lot of big tech tech leaders.

Speaker 1 It's not just, I mean, I think when you think about it, Trump's got Elon and Peter Thiel, who are very arguably fantastic entrepreneur, fantastic investor.

Speaker 1 And then the cliff falls off and you get to Winklevoss rather quickly, right?

Speaker 1 You do.

Speaker 1 Let's be clear. With you guys, it's you, it's Gates, it's Melinda Gates.
It's like, it's a lot of interesting things. You know, it's all kind of the no coastal A players.

Speaker 1 But what does she need to do to shore up her support in the tech industry? I think she probably has a lot. I've told you backstage.
I find her conservative, actually, compared to a lot of Democrats.

Speaker 2 Look, I think she has a lot of support.

Speaker 2 I think that articulating kind of, and by the way, she's the first presidential candidate in history who, in her acceptance speech, referenced the importance of entrepreneurs and founding, right?

Speaker 2 That is a great thing. That is very noteworthy.
I think that's the first step on, well, look, I care about a broader society.

Speaker 2 I care about what happens with people across the entire country and all communities.

Speaker 2 But I also recognize that the creation of new businesses and new industries and new technologies is part of how we improve it for everybody and what that engagement is. And, you know, look,

Speaker 2 she is on path to doing that already. She obviously hasn't had a tremendous amount of time during the campaign

Speaker 2 because what do I and everyone you just mentioned want? We want her to win the election. Right.

Speaker 1 And then?

Speaker 2 Well, and then,

Speaker 2 look, for example, the process that she led with the executive order on artificial intelligence was a great example of intelligent governance.

Speaker 2 First, call in the set of the relevant companies and push them very hard to a set of voluntary commitments. It's not that, oh, what do you want to do? It's like, no, can you do more? Can you do more?

Speaker 2 Could you do something about this? Could you do something with this?

Speaker 2 Then, once you get those, you look at them and say, okay, now which of these can we then make the rule of the road for the industry?

Speaker 2 And then make it very focused, not an amorphous, you know, like, oh, here there'll be some penalties for if you do wrong, which is very innovation quelling.

Speaker 2 But instead, no, no, you must have red team in. You must do the following kind of monitoring.

Speaker 2 You must have some of this kind of reporting and you must be in dialogue with us so we can learn about what are the right things to do to prevent bad things.

Speaker 2 That would be what I would expect on the kind of regulation front.

Speaker 2 And then in the, okay, how do we help all American industries, you know, because the tech industry is one of our great global exporters.

Speaker 2 How do we have that industry help all of them in the American industries

Speaker 2 to help our country be more prosperous and have more jobs?

Speaker 1 We'll be back in a minute.

Speaker 3 Adobe Acrobat Studio, so brand new. Show me all the things PDFs can do.
Do your work with ease and speed. PDF spaces is all you need.
Do hours of research in an instant.

Speaker 3 Key insights from an AI assistant. Pick a template with a click.
Now your Prezo looks super slick. Close that deal, yeah, you won.
Do that, doing that, did that, done.

Speaker 2 Now you can do that, do that, with Acrobat.

Speaker 3 Now you can do that, do that with the all-new Acrobat. It's time to do your best work with the all-new Adobe Acrobat Studio.

Speaker 2 All right, remember, the machine knows if you're lying. First statement, Carvana will give you a real offer on your car all online.
False. True, actually.
You can sell your car in minutes.

Speaker 4 False? That's gotta be.

Speaker 2 True again. Carvana will will pick up your car from your door, or you can drop it off at one of their car vending machines.

Speaker 4 Sounds too good to be true.

Speaker 2 So true. Finally caught on.
Nice job. Honesty isn't just their policy.
It's their entire model. Sell your car today, too.
Carvana. Pickup fees may apply.

Speaker 5 These days, every business leader is under pressure to save money, but you can't crush the competition just by cutting costs. To win, you need to spend smarter and move faster.
You need Brex.

Speaker 5 Brex is the intelligent finance platform that breaks the trade-off between control and speed with smart corporate cards, high-yield banking, and AI-powered expense management.

Speaker 5 Join the 30,000 companies that spend smarter and move faster with Brex.

Speaker 5 Learn more at brex.com/slash grow.

Speaker 1 So, one of the things you got a little bit in trouble for was this idea that

Speaker 1 you wanted Federal Trade Commission Chair Lena Kahn out. She's not helping America in her job, and she's doing, I would hope Vice President Harris would replace her.
Talk about, oddly enough, J.D.

Speaker 1 Vance is someone called a conservative. He likes her.
And talk about what happened there with the FTC thing.

Speaker 1 I don't think it's wrong for you to ask for what you want, but it was sort of spun into you're demanding it as a condition.

Speaker 2 Well,

Speaker 2 so the reason I made a comment is I wanted to make sure that when I talk As I always do, but in this case, talking to the business community about making the argument about why Harris is unequivocally the better president for business out of these two choices, that I wasn't just arguing a partisan playbook, that I actually recognized.

Speaker 1 Read the progressives.

Speaker 2 And so

Speaker 2 it was like, look, I think

Speaker 2 in

Speaker 2 one particular thing, in tech M ⁇ A and so forth, Lena Kahn is actually being pretty destructive to American industry.

Speaker 2 And, you know, because her actions quell venture investing, which then means there's less startups that are doing competition, et cetera.

Speaker 2 It was said from a viewpoint of a Silicon Valley investor and entrepreneur, not as

Speaker 2 progressives who wanted to say, oh,

Speaker 2 it's a person on the Microsoft board who's opposed to it. It's like, no, actually, in fact, I never speak for Microsoft on these things, and it's Silicon Valley.

Speaker 2 So I made that comment once on one business television program. Never to

Speaker 2 anyone in the White House, including Kamala Harris or Joe Biden or any of those, to kind of say, look, I'm a truth teller.

Speaker 2 And when I'm telling you that actually, in fact, Harris is much better for business investment, it's because it's true.

Speaker 2 But then, of course, it got blown into a whole story because it's like, oh, it's making a condition for his support. And I'm like, well, since they don't know about it other than your news program,

Speaker 2 it's a pretty bad

Speaker 2 condition.

Speaker 1 No, you should have done it quietly. It's not going to work.
That's right. That's how you

Speaker 2 having a condition.

Speaker 1 Yeah, that's not your image from my perspective.

Speaker 1 But the idea of that's something you would push for, Nina, being.

Speaker 2 Well, look, I actually rarely push for things,

Speaker 2 and I try to never push for anything that has anything to do with my own economic advantage because I think that's corrupt governance. I think that's grifter capitalism.

Speaker 2 I think that's crony capitalism. It's precisely the reason why I am resolutely opposed to a Trump administration.

Speaker 1 If you paid him enough, he'd probably do that for you.

Speaker 2 I've literally never argued for anything that because it has an economic advantage to me.

Speaker 2 Now, if I'm asked about what one should be doing in an FTC position around antitrust, I would give very different advice than what Lena Kahn happens to be doing. Right.
And who are you?

Speaker 1 Has she asked you?

Speaker 2 No.

Speaker 1 No, she hasn't asked you yet.

Speaker 2 I would be surprised.

Speaker 1 Would you want to be in a Kamal Harris administration?

Speaker 2 Well, I wouldn't want to be, frankly, in any administration just because I think I'm better used to society as an investor and a creator and all the rest.

Speaker 2 And

Speaker 2 the government

Speaker 2 job has bureaucracy constraints that is a little bit more difficult for people like me. Right.

Speaker 1 So no Postmaster General for you.

Speaker 2 Okay. Yes.

Speaker 2 Well, I think that would be the definition of going postal, but yes.

Speaker 1 Yeah, that's not you they're describing. It's someone else.
Old friend of yours. Speaking of which,

Speaker 1 speaking of another old friend of yours, Peter Thiel, one of your fellow PayPal co-founders, you and I have long had arguments about him. I'm like, he's not your friend, Ray.

Speaker 1 And of course, you're like, oh, I'll be nice to him. I'm like, don't be nice to him.

Speaker 2 He'll night you.

Speaker 1 It went on for years. Finally, he took my advice.
You no longer talked to him because of his support for Trump, which you consider a moral issue.

Speaker 1 You actually said this at an Allen and company conference in front of Thiel himself.

Speaker 1 Elon attacked you and essentially said you were on Jeffrey Epstein's client list and insinuated the real reason you support Harris. Can I give you a quick line? Sure.

Speaker 1 Every accusation is a confession with these people. Okay.

Speaker 2 Excuse it.

Speaker 2 It's true.

Speaker 1 It's so true.

Speaker 1 It works perfectly on many things.

Speaker 1 But David Sachs also implied that you're somehow to blame for the Trump assassination because you've made an unfortunate I repeated Peter's word at a private conference. Yeah.

Speaker 1 And what's it like when they're resorting to personal attacks? What is going on with all of you? Like, you didn't really.

Speaker 2 With all of you? I mean, not you. You didn't do it.

Speaker 1 But, you know, I'm rubber your glue kind of thing. But what is happening instead of arguing about ideas? Why are they doing this to you and what impact does it have on your life?

Speaker 1 And I'm not even beginning to say, you know, Elon's attacking you. Peter's David, you know, the second, the third banana, David Sachs, is attacking you that way.

Speaker 1 I'm being generous with third banana.

Speaker 2 Well, look, I think what makes American democracy special in history and special that we want to return to is essentially peaceful transitions of power.

Speaker 2 It's again another reason why I'm completely opposed to Donald Trump, who like incites January 6th insurrection, who exhibits a denialism about 2020, which according to any person with any honesty and integrity was a fair election.

Speaker 2 And, you know, all of this as kind of part of the problem. And part of what folks don't realize is you want to be speaking against any violence in politics whatsoever.

Speaker 2 And so one of the

Speaker 2 problems that you get when

Speaker 2 you become the target of a bunch of

Speaker 2 kind of MAGA crazies who are spreading, you know, basically

Speaker 2 lies and defamation around Epstein or other other things, is you get a bunch of like crazy people sending you hate mail and threats and other kinds of things, and that that is the end result. And

Speaker 2 the real question for the people who incite it, whether it's you know, Elon or other people, is how much are they doing it knowingly, and how much are they doing it kind of ignorantly?

Speaker 1 Have oh, no, stop. No, they're so nice, they're not doing it ignorantly, they know just what they're doing, just FYI.
But, um, but

Speaker 1 come on, at some point, you have to be like, maybe this this person's just an asshole.

Speaker 1 So

Speaker 1 you did, but how much responsibility do those tech companies have when it comes to weaponized disinformation that you're talking about, including it yourself and whoever?

Speaker 1 You recently called out Elon Overt on X. This week on Meta, you had the word Hitler.

Speaker 1 You got thrown off the service for a second because they still haven't figured out content moderation yet, particularly well.

Speaker 2 Well, I mean, this is one of the

Speaker 2 scale AI systems and so forth.

Speaker 1 I get it. They actually threw my wife off for saying Hitler's a bad guy.
She's like, I stand by my feeling on this.

Speaker 2 And of course, they freaked out. It's controversial.
Yes, I know.

Speaker 1 Well, they got freaked out when they realized it was my wife. They actually threw off because it became a thing.
They're like, oh, no, the wrong wife.

Speaker 1 But what responsibility do tech companies have for

Speaker 1 this?

Speaker 2 So,

Speaker 2 one,

Speaker 2 I think we do a very good job at LinkedIn,

Speaker 2 just to be clear. So I think it's possible to do well.

Speaker 2 And then two, I tend to think, look, what we need to do is we need to say that one of the key things, especially in democracies, is you want your media ecosystem to be a learning ecosystem by which you learn things that are true.

Speaker 2 So if someone's, for example, spreading information willfully and badly about like vaccines are terrible and,

Speaker 2 you know,

Speaker 2 aren't effective and

Speaker 2 which, you know, we know that vaccines, flu, other things are actually extremely effective and are part of how we

Speaker 2 have instituted our longer lives now.

Speaker 2 You want to make that not endemic and easy to assault a civilian populace through information warfare. And so the question is, how do you do that? Right.

Speaker 2 And by the way, I think it's a problem we need to work on.

Speaker 2 You know, one of them.

Speaker 1 I mean, they've been working on it for years. They keep getting it wrong.

Speaker 1 How did that become controversial is the thing. Or that they wanted, they seem to be backing away more than look leaning forward

Speaker 2 my point of view is that

Speaker 2 and and i think there's intelligent argument around this but my point of view is that any uh and i think the same thing applies to social media companies also should apply to like cable news absolutely shoes shows and so forth um is that to say look you should have a uh here is what our our principles of information and truth are.

Speaker 2 Here is how you can hold us accountable to.

Speaker 2 And so if you're actually signing up for accountability and you violate what you say you're signing up for, then you're legally accountable.

Speaker 1 Well, Rupert Murray, I've paid a billion dollars.

Speaker 2 Yes. Exactly.

Speaker 1 But Facebook didn't.

Speaker 2 Well, but Facebook was not saying we're signing up for saying that we are

Speaker 2 a source of true information.

Speaker 2 They are.

Speaker 1 They're a source of information.

Speaker 2 Well, but there's a source of information, but like they're like they could say,

Speaker 2 look, as you know this as well as anyone on the planet, they say individuals are signing up for what they're saying themselves. We are simply the conveyors of that.
I've heard that. I've heard that.

Speaker 2 Yes, once or twice.

Speaker 1 Once or twice, but they're more than that.

Speaker 2 Would you agree?

Speaker 2 Well, my view is, is if I, in an information source, you don't want to say, look, if someone's out there spreading, let's take an easy one, like destructive anti-vax information,

Speaker 2 then

Speaker 2 you should as a platform,

Speaker 2 it's not legally required, required to do this, but you should as a platform

Speaker 2 try to essentially make that less of a meme across your platform because it's destructive to the health of the group and it's wildly inaccurate.

Speaker 1 We'll be back in a minute.

Speaker 2 Every day, millions of customers engage with AI agents like me. We resolve queries fast.
We work 24-7 and we're helpful, knowledgeable, and empathetic.

Speaker 2 We're built to be the voice of the brands we serve. Sierra is the platform for building better, more human customer experiences with AI.
No hold music, no generic answers, no frustration.

Speaker 2 Visit sierra.ai to learn more.

Speaker 8 Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start? Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to.

Speaker 8 Don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin, or what that clunking sound from your dryer is? With thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro.

Speaker 2 You just have to hire one.

Speaker 8 You can hire top-rated pros, see price estimates, and read reviews all on the app. Download today.

Speaker 8 Support for the show comes from Crucible Moments, a podcast from Sequoia Capital.

Speaker 8 We've all had pivotal decision points in our lives that, whether we know it or not at the time, changed everything.

Speaker 8 This is especially true in business.

Speaker 8 Like, did you know that autonomous drone delivery company Zipline originally produced a robotic toy?

Speaker 8 Or that Bolt went from an Estonian transportation company to one of the largest rideshare and food delivery platforms in the world? That's what Crucible Moments is all about.

Speaker 8 Hosted by Sequoia Capital's managing partner Rolof Boeta, Crucible Moments is back for a new season with stories of companies as they navigated the most consequential crossroads in their journeys.

Speaker 8 Hear conversations with leaders at Zipline, Stripe, Palo Alto Networks, Klarna, Supercell, and more.

Speaker 8 Subscribe to season three of Crucible Moments and catch up on seasons one and two at cruciblemoments.com on YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. Listen to Crucible Moments today.

Speaker 1 One of the things that you're thinking about is Trump might win, in fact. And I'll ask you that, and then I'm going to get to AI.
But

Speaker 1 you, it may be the administration of J.D. Vance, or as Rachel Maddow calls him Peter Thiel's failed intern.

Speaker 1 You donated money to help Vance's opponent. What do you, you know, he may be the president, too.
There's a lot of chance that that could happen.

Speaker 1 So what do you imagine would come from a Trump administration? Are you personally worried about your fate?

Speaker 2 Well, I think, I mean, look, you have a president who in his first term demonstrated a willingness to use

Speaker 2 the instruments of state for his own political power, whether it's anything from threatening to withhold aid from foreign countries unless they produced probably false information that would advantage him politically,

Speaker 2 or retaliatory against companies that he felt weren't sufficiently laudatory and with his program, which is a classic kind of fascist maneuver. And now you'll have

Speaker 2 potentially a second administration. So you'd think that the abuses of the instrument of state, which we as Americans should be completely and morally, politically,

Speaker 2 Americanly opposed to, will get substantially worse.

Speaker 1 So are you worried personally?

Speaker 2 Yeah, I would say

Speaker 2 I have the unfortunate expectation of

Speaker 2 various of the Magists

Speaker 2 abusing the instruments of state to be retaliatory.

Speaker 1 So it's you and Cuban, right? Yes. Yeah, you and Cuban.
Mark Cuban. Every episode we get an expert question to answer a question.

Speaker 1 This is from Teddy Schlieffer, who covers billionaires like yourself and political influence like yourself.

Speaker 9 Hey, Reed, it's Teddy Schleifer here from the New York Times.

Speaker 6 When you got really involved in politics after 2016, I had heard you really felt like the party was just too outdated, too slow, the tech stack was too weak.

Speaker 9 I wonder, you know, now eight years in, what kind of grade grade you would give the Democratic Party's kind of technologist donors at fixing those problems?

Speaker 6 Do you think that you've done an A-plus job, a B-plus job, a C-plus job?

Speaker 9 Because, you know, some people today fear that the Democratic Party is backsliding and that Republicans in some way or another are at least leaping the Democrats with things like TikTok and influencer content.

Speaker 9 How is the party doing on tech and digital?

Speaker 2 Well, as one of those people, I'm giving myself a grade. I give myself a B.
I'm still working towards the A.

Speaker 2 A.

Speaker 2 I give myself a B. Right.
They give us a B. Right.
But we're working.

Speaker 1 What are they missing?

Speaker 2 Well, among other things, I mean, we do, we have some efforts going in the various social media areas. We have some efforts going on, kind of how do you organize a coherent set of

Speaker 2 relationship campaigning and

Speaker 2 having accurate databases. If you send someone a knock on a door, that they're actually somebody that

Speaker 2 wants to talk to you, et cetera. That kind of stuff, I think we're still working on it.
And

Speaker 2 it's one of the places where if you're more top-down fascist control, it's easier to do it better.

Speaker 2 When you're more inclusive on the Democratic side, which is a good virtue, it's slower and harder to do it.

Speaker 1 Although, as you said, the Dave Batista art

Speaker 2 is fantastic. If you haven't seen the Dave Batista

Speaker 2 ad on Trump, go look at it at YouTube. I laughed out loud.

Speaker 1 All right, two very quick questions on Anne, and we'll finish up. The last time we did an interview, you were asking the questions.
Thank you.

Speaker 1 I said that AI companies are shoplifting and they scrape copyrighted material to train their models without paying for it. And you said, basically, like someone reading a book.
Please expand on that.

Speaker 1 Clearly, a lot of copywriters, like myself, disagree.

Speaker 1 And there's evidence to suggest if generated models are like people who read books when it comes to write or create, they might also be poorly disguised plagiarists.

Speaker 2 Well, if they are doing plagiarism, that's a different issue on the training side, because that's a question of what gets reproduced.

Speaker 2 And so if things get reproduced that say, hey,

Speaker 2 here is writing from Kara Swisher that you can have

Speaker 2 for free for me versus paying for, that would be a problem. If you said, and here's something Kara Swisher said when it's lying about what you said or hallucinating, then that can be a problem.

Speaker 2 And those are problems that there should be accountability. That's a different issue than

Speaker 2 should

Speaker 2 computer processes that have legitimate access to a digital copy of a particular piece of work

Speaker 2 and read it, should they be able to do that? I think the answer is yes, the same way that a human being can.

Speaker 2 But those are three separate issues. So two of them I have strong agreement on.
The general reading of things.

Speaker 1 Now, of course, if you say we have a new copyright law and the new copyright law has a robots.txt file and the robot.txt.txt file says a robot can't look at this without approval of mine then fine but that the law needs to say that so last question about ai you recently wrote the digitalist uh is that the digital digitalist paper and it you use gps systems as a metaphor two things give me a really contrarian view you have about ai right now i'm neither an alarmist nor uh nor a cheerleader i would say i'm kind of wait and see i'm expecting the worst and hoping for the best i think is the way i look at it but let's end by explaining the metaphor and spell out your vision for ai as an informational GPS.

Speaker 2 So one, I think we're in a cognitive industrial revolution. I think the same way the industrial revolution gave us physical powers,

Speaker 2 transport,

Speaker 2 motion, manufacturing, construction, et cetera, AI is giving us cognitive powers. And so

Speaker 2 the metaphor to try to make that is like a cognitive GPS, which is how do you navigate a landscape of learning or doing work or communicating and that kind of thing.

Speaker 2 And that becomes an aid, like a GPS is an aid, like the way that we, like literally everyone in this room has used GPS on their phone with the maps to figure out how to get somewhere or how to get back, et cetera.

Speaker 2 And it's that kind of thing, but in a broader mental space. And then

Speaker 2 what I would say for a contrarian view is maybe in this audience, because contrarian always is contrarian against one.

Speaker 2 Actually, in fact, I think human institutions change more slowly than technologists expect them to.

Speaker 2 So the, oh my God, all these jobs are going to change in two or three years, I don't think it's going to be like that fast.

Speaker 1 And the last question, obviously, how confident are you about the bet you've made versus the bet Elon Musk has made?

Speaker 1 With the presidency, I mean.

Speaker 2 Confident that I'm

Speaker 2 that I'm making the right bet for the country? A hundred percent.

Speaker 1 Okay.

Speaker 1 And confident of the outcome of that?

Speaker 2 Well,

Speaker 2 reading all of the polls and everything else, it very much looks like a jump ball. So my advocacy is everyone, you know, call whoever you know in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, et cetera, and

Speaker 2 get them to vote.

Speaker 1 But you will not be behind Kamala Harris on a stage jumping up and down, is that correct?

Speaker 1 Like a dipshit, as

Speaker 2 Tim Walk says. I'm happy to provide entertainment, but differently.

Speaker 2 Okay.

Speaker 1 Not a dipshit.

Speaker 2 Thank you so much.

Speaker 1 On with Karis Wisher is produced by Christian Castro Rousselle, Kateri Yoakum, Jolie Myers, Megan Burney, and Kaylin Lynch. Nishat Kurwa is Vox Media's executive producer of audio.

Speaker 1 Special thanks to Kate Gallagher and Claire Hyman. Our engineers are Rick Kwan and Fernando Aruda, and our theme music is by Trackademics.

Speaker 1 If you're already following the show, you clearly have a voting plan and you're dragging someone else along. Do it.
If not, look up your polling place now and get there. It's a privilege to vote.

Speaker 1 It is a privilege and an honor. And do it, or else I'll be very angry at you.
Go wherever you listen to podcasts, search for On with Karis Wisher and hit follow.

Speaker 1 Thanks for listening to On with Karis Wisher from New York Magazine, the Vox Media Podcast Network, and us. We'll be back on Thursday with more.

Speaker 10 Support for the show comes from Train Dreams, the new film from Netflix.

Speaker 10 Based on Dennis Johnson's novella, Train Dreams is the moving portrait of a man who leads a life of unexpected depth and beauty during a rapidly changing time in America.

Speaker 10 Set in the early 20th century, it's an ode to a vanishing way of life and to the extraordinary possibilities that exist within even the simplest of existences.

Speaker 10 In a time when we are all searching for purpose, Train Dreams feels timeless because the frontier isn't just a place, it's a a state of being.

Speaker 10 Train Dreams, now playing in select theaters and on Netflix, November 21st.

Speaker 7 Support for this show comes from Volkswagen. As the U.S.

Speaker 7 gets ready to host soccer's biggest moment on a worldwide stage, Volkswagen is helping people discover new turfs and new ways to play the beautiful game right here in the U.S.

Speaker 7 From deaf and power wheelchair soccer to beach and futsal, Volkswagen is actively supporting all the communities and teams within the U.S.

Speaker 9 soccer ecosystem.

Speaker 7 They're supporting talent from across the U.S. soccer extended national teams and are focused on helping to give these less widely known forms of soccer a platform moving forward.

Speaker 7 From the pitch to the sand and everything in between, welcome to RTUF.