135. How to Grow a White Rhino

55m
Thomas Hildebrandt is trying to bring the northern white rhinoceros back from the brink of extinction. The wildlife veterinarian tells Steve about the far-out techniques he employs, why we might see woolly mammoths in the future, and why he was frustrated the day the Berlin Wall came down.

Listen and follow along

Transcript

It's Stock Up September at Whole Foods Market.

Find sales on supplements to power up for busy weeks.

Plus, pack your pantry with pasta, sauce, and more everyday essentials.

Enjoy quick breakfast for less with 365 by Whole Foods Market seasonal coffee and oatmeal.

Grab ready-to-heat meals that are perfect for the office and save on versatile no antibiotics ever chicken breasts.

Stock up now at Whole Foods Market, in-store and online.

What does it mean to live a rich life?

It means brave first leaps, tearful goodbyes,

and everything in between.

With over 100 years' experience navigating the ups and downs of the market and of life, your Edward Jones financial advisor will be there to help you move ahead with confidence.

Because with all you've done to find your rich, we'll do all we can to help you keep enjoying it.

Edward Jones, member SIPC.

March 19th, 2018 marked the death of a northern white rhino named Sudan.

He had been the last surviving male northern white rhino.

Today there are only two northern white rhinos alive, Najeen and her daughter Fatu.

My guest today, Thomas Hildebrandt, is part of a team of veterinarians and researchers using state-of-the-art science to try to keep the northern white rhino from extinction.

So we have 30 of these embryos and we recently could show that these embryos when we bring them back in a sorry gate then they can grow to babies.

Welcome to People I Mostly Admire with Steve Levitt.

The conversation you're about to hear at least for me was incredibly fascinating, but it did get quite detailed.

So let me provide a little bit of background before we jump in.

Najeen and Fatu, the two living northern white rhinos, live in a wildlife sanctuary in Kenya protected 24 hours a day by armed guards.

Although there are no longer any male northern white rhinos, researchers do have sperm samples from four males who've died.

Unfortunately, neither of the two living rhinos are able to give birth.

I'll hope it's not lost, however, because Thomas and his colleagues have pioneered an IVF technique for these animals, which involves a patented device used for oocyte and ovum pickup.

As a little biology lesson, an oocyte is a cell in an ovary.

It's a precursor to an ovum.

An ovum is a mature female reproductive cell that can create an embryo once it's fertilized by a male cell.

Where things get really crazy though is that a researcher named Shinya Yamanaka shared the 2012 Nobel Prize in Medicine for his discovery that skin cells can be reprogrammed into stem cells.

And that opens up possibilities that seem like science fiction.

As you can hear, Thomas speaks with a German accent.

If you'd like to read a transcript of the episode while you're listening or afterward, you can find it on this episode's page on our website at freakonomics.com slash rhino.

So you're a leading expert on animal reproduction.

And perhaps the most challenging and high-profile case you're working on is the northern white rhinoceros, a species that is on the verge of extinction unless you and your partners can pull off something extraordinary.

There are only two surviving northern white rhinos, and they're both female, which creates some obvious problems.

Yes, for sure.

The most challenging task we took on.

We worked with the northern white rhinos at the beginning of 2000, and we watched one individual after the other die.

It was very depressing at that time.

And in 2012, there was a big breakthrough because Yamanaka got the Nobel Prize for technology.

He turned ordinary skin cells into plural potent stem cells that are cells which can be transformed in any kind of cell of the body, including making sperm and eggs.

And that gave us a completely new hope because we have banked many individuals which were deceased.

We had them in our biobank and now we could work with these individuals again.

And so a completely new program starting in 2015 developed a kind of master plan how species can be saved under such severe conditions like the northern medrino.

So in humans, we've gotten quite good at IVF in vitro fertilization.

There's an egg and a sperm and the lab technician fertilizes the egg outside the body and then you put that embryo back into the womb to grow.

You have females and you probably have some bank sperm.

In principle, you could do IVF on the northern rhinos.

It's exactly one of our strategies.

We already have generated 30 first-class embryos with this technology.

However, to save a species, that really means you have to have enough genetic variation.

And therefore, we need a stem cell way

to actually guarantee a wide genetic diversity of the newly created population.

So we hope maybe in twelve to fifteen years we will be capable to reintroduce the first northern white rhinos back to the wild.

So you have just the sperm from the one male?

No, actually we have sperm from four different males from Saud, from Sudan, from Sunni and Angalifu.

But Sudan and Saud are directly related to Fatu, so we don't use them.

So we go every three months to Kenya and perform an oocyte collection.

We go through the rectum because otherwise we can't really approach the ovaries.

So it's a completely different technical challenge in rhinos than in humans or horses.

So also in humans, when you do IVF, you have to give all sorts of hormones.

You do the same in rhinos, or you can just go and harvest the eggs at the right time of the year.

No, we developed a very specific hormone protocol using similar hormones like in humans, but our stimulation time is actually longer.

So it's a hormone which is produced in a hypothalamus and in a special part of the brain and this hormone stimulates then the piturity gland and the piturity gland then gives the signal to the ovaries for more follicles because going every three months to kenia is quite a challenge.

It's a very expensive operation.

The hormonal stimulation has no impact on the quality of the eggs and that's quite good.

And how do you figure something like that out?

Trial and error, or take the northern rhinos.

There are obviously very few of them.

You couldn't have done very much experimentation.

So, you used elephants or something to give the general idea going, and then you switched over to rhinos.

I'm just trying to get a sense of how you even

start to develop a protocol.

Actually, the elephant is a good example.

I worked in my early career quite a lot with elephants.

I developed the artificial insemination technique for elephants without surgical approach.

And we produced more than 50 babies with this technique.

But to develop something for the northern white rhinos, we started with carcasses.

So if any zoo reported a dead rhino, I went there and tested these things on a dead animal.

And then I optimized things until everything was perfect.

Then we used it on a live animal.

And we're talking about this in a very scientific way, but I imagine the actual process is very hands-on and you're the actor right you're the one who's actually going in and taking the eggs could you just describe what that experience is like yes it's not only the northern bed rhino we work with komodo dragons or we work with sumaton rhinos everything starts with respect for the patient so every step we do is so that we don't do harm to the animal and if i'm not really certain if this is possible then we will not perform this procedure so we are a team of usually five people.

We have two anesthesiologists who take care of the anesthesia from the beginning to the end.

The animal is pre-anesthesized and then it receives the full anesthetic dose and then it goes down and the procedure takes about one and a half hours and after that it stands up and starts to eat again.

So then we have the team in the back which is responsible for cleaning the rectum.

So the intestine is cleaned about 2 meter 50 deep inside the animal.

Then after it is cleaned, we disinfect this part with a special disinfectant.

Then we apply the patent device for the ovum pickup, which I developed together with a colleague.

And then we have at the end of this procedure about two to three liter of fluid, which then had to be checked for the oocyte.

And sometimes in Kenya it gets very hot in the container where we perform perform that.

So this last part is also very challenging.

And after everything is found, we pack each oocyte in a special container and then we organize the paperwork with the Kenyan authorities.

Anesthesia on animals like this must be at least as much hard as science.

It's different than humans in that you don't get to do it very often and probably don't have that great of information about what the animals need.

Is that in and of itself a challenge?

Yes, you have to know that a wild patient is a kind of black box.

It does not fill out the survey if there's any underlying diseases.

Was a breakfast large?

Was a breakfast small.

So all these information are missing.

So we have to be prepared for the unknown, unexpected.

My colleague Frank Goertz, I worked with him more than 35 years.

He came up with this ingenious idea to have four different components in an anesthetic fluid and use that in a drip form so that the rhino is plasticized.

And the procedure itself is not very painful and not very challenging procedure.

The oven pickup has no much impact on the patient and therefore the anesthetic protocol can be very gentle.

However, if something comes up, the heart rate goes down.

everything of these life parameters are measured.

We even have the blood pressure measured.

And if anything comes up, we always decide instantly to interrupt the procedure and wake up the patient.

I saw a video, I think it was you, performing some kind of CPR on a rhino.

And I have to say it was one of the craziest things I've ever seen.

And it seems impossible to me that it actually worked.

Can you describe that event?

Yes.

The situation was so that there was a zoo veterinarian responsible for the anesthesia and he miscalculated the dose.

We were only there for a semen collection of this bull because he hasn't produced any baby.

Then it turns out he fell into a deep sleep and then it was very clear that he is about to die.

And therefore I decided to jump on the thorax chest and really ventilate by jumping on this gigantic body.

And then my colleague went to our car and found a specific antidote.

I jumped for about five minutes, but we could overbridge this time and the animal woke up very nicely.

Surprisingly, a half year later, the two females which were not pregnant for years were impregnated by this bull.

So he may was afraid to have another of these procedures.

The other explanation some of my students gave is that he got a little bit brain damaged and then he liked the females.

And do you think the jumping on him that actually helped?

Yeah, no, you can massively move the chest of a rhino by jumping.

You don't break the ribs.

That is impossible.

And oh, he woke up very fine.

It is so important to have all these life parameters measured.

Otherwise, anesthesia can be full of surprises.

And working with the last of their kind, you should not have any surprises.

So we've talked a lot about collecting eggs.

How do you collect semen?

That seems like a challenge as well.

You have actually three options.

One, which is most common in livestock industry, is you train your wild wild animal to an artificial vagina and then you collect the semen out of the artificial vagina.

That is nearly impossible.

The other technique which works quite well is the massage.

So you can massage an elephant bull, then you can easily massage the spot where the nerve complex for the prostate sits, and then you get an erection and finally an ejaculation.

And you're talking about massaging from the inside.

You stick your arm inside the elephant and do that.

That's interesting.

That sounds a little bit ugly, but avoiding a full anesthesia is always better.

Elephant bullets have often big tasks.

And if the elephant goes down too quickly, it breaks the task.

And doing semen connection

is not really a dream job for a veterinarian, but it works quite well.

And is that your job too?

Or are you able to allocate that to the graduate students?

No, no.

I developed that.

My American colleague from Springfield Zoo, Dennis Schmidt, and I did a lot of these procedures.

Because you also have to understand where the sensitive structures are.

Because if you induce some pain to the bull, then a bull can break your arm with a tail because it is very powerful or it kicks you.

I lost a disc not from an elephant bull, but from a female which I examined in such ways.

So she was sitting on me.

So that was not so nice.

But coming back to the semen collection, there's another technique, for example, in big cats and tigers.

The anesthesia itself opens the sphincter, which normally keeps the sperm in a duct system, and then you can get that out with a cassette.

And the last one is electroejaculation.

It's a technique which is used in the livestock industry, but also in handicapped men when they have the desire to have kids.

You stimulate, like you would do that manually, with a massaging technique.

You stimulate the special nerve net which is located next to the prostate and then the semen usually comes out through the penis.

For this technique I developed a special probe which is optimally adapted to the anatomy of the rectum of a rhino and elephant.

We were talking before about collecting the eggs and we have these eggs but right now you're not doing IVF because the only sperm you have is from essentially the father, right?

No, we do IVF quite successfully.

Our embryos we produce are all relatively related because the mother is always Fatu and the father is in 50% SUNY and in 50% Angalifu.

You have to know that Fatu and Nargene both have severe uterine pathology.

Nargine has ovarian tumor, so she is not part of the active program.

Fatu has a lot of tumors in her uterus, so-called fibroma.

However, the ovaries are still functional, and therefore we can harvest these eggs for making embryos in vitro.

So we have 30 of these embryos, and we recently could show that these embryos, when we bring them back in a surrogate, the southern white rhino, then they can grow to babies.

The embryo transfer itself is also very challenging.

We tested these frozen embryo in sorrow in Kenya and it implanted and it has grown to a baby of 70 days.

But then, unfortunately, we lost our sorrogate due to a Clostridium infection.

A lot of rain in this region, and below this surface, there were very ancient bacteria, which, because the area where our rhinos lived, it was old cattle land.

And these nasty bacteria were freed and they intoxicated our rhinos and they died.

Wow.

Just to be clear, so the reason you put the embryos into the southern white rhinos is because the two female northern white rhinos, their reproductive systems just don't work.

So you need to find a surrogate mother to carry these embryos.

And the northern white rhino and the southern white rhino are similar enough.

that the biology works out.

Exactly.

In the 80s, there was actually a hybrid between a southern white and a Northern Belle rhino.

So that is already an indicator that the uterine environment of a Sausen-Weld rhino would be suitable for a Northern White Rhino embryo.

We needed the proof of concept before we could touch our valuable embryos from the Northern Wide Rhino.

But we will do that in the next weeks or months.

And we need relatively soon a group of Northern White Rhinos so that we can also preserve the social heritage from Naginod Fatu, because we need the transfer of the language of the Northern Wide Rhinos, the behavior.

You make a great point.

I mean, it's one thing to have the genetics and to be a rhino and look like a rhino, but if you don't have a mom to teach you what a rhino does, then in some sense, you're left with something very different than a rhino culture.

What's the timetable?

How long will the two females likely live?

So, Najin was born in 1989, and her daughter Fatu was born in 2000.

Nadine is 35.

We hope that Nadine can stay with us hopefully another five to ten years and Fatu can stay with us maybe another

15 years, 15 to 20 years.

And the gestation period of the rhinos is quite long.

You don't get that many chances if you only have one surrogate going.

Is that true?

Yes, therefore, we have six soul gates dedicated to the program.

We have one teaser bull and six potential females.

The pregnancy length is on the long end, it's sixteen months.

And the baby, when it is born, is only forty-five kilograms.

There is a lot of brain maturation during the pregnancy.

So the baby is relatively competent when it is born, and therefore it can also quickly learn the language of the northern vitriino, the behavior, the experience, what to eat, how to avoid enemies and predators.

We'll be right back with more of my conversation with wildlife veterinarian Thomas Hiltbrand after this short break.

People I Mostly Admire is sponsored by LinkedIn.

As a small business owner, your business is always on your mind.

So when you're hiring, you need a partner who's just just as dedicated as you are.

That hiring partner is LinkedIn Jobs.

When you clock out, LinkedIn clocks in.

They make it easy to post your job for free, share it with your network, and get qualified candidates that you can manage all in one place.

And LinkedIn's new feature can help you write job descriptions and then quickly get your job in front of the right people with deep candidate insights.

You can post your job for free or choose to promote it.

Promoted jobs attract three times more qualified applicants.

At the end of the day, the most important thing to your small business is the quality of candidates.

And with LinkedIn, you can feel confident that you're getting the best.

Post your job for free at linkedin.com slash admire.

That's linkedin.com slash admire to post your job for free.

Terms and conditions apply.

People I Mostly Admire is sponsored by Mint Mobile.

From new shoes to new supplies, the back-to-school season comes with a lot of expenses.

Your wireless bill shouldn't be one of them.

Ditch overpriced wireless and switch to Mint Mobile, where you can get the coverage and speed you're used to, but for way less money.

For a limited time, Mint Mobile is offering three months of unlimited premium wireless service for 15 bucks a month.

Because this school year, your budget deserves a break.

Get this new customer offer and your three-month unlimited wireless plan for just $15 a month at mintmobile.com/slash admire.

That's mintmobile.com/slash admire.

Upfront payment of $45 required, equivalent to $15 a month.

Limited time, new customer offer for first three months only.

Speeds may slow above 35 gigabytes on unlimited plan.

Taxes and fees extra, see Mint Mobile for details.

To protect your brand, all the content your company creates needs to be on-brand.

Meet Adobe Express, the quick and easy app that empowers marketing, HR, and sales teams to make on-brand content.

Now everyone can edit reports, resize ads, and translate text.

Brand kits and lock templates make following design guidelines a breeze.

And generative AI, that's safe for business, lets people create confidently.

Help your teams make pro-looking content.

Learn more at adobe.com slash express.

You had mentioned earlier that a colleague had developed this incredible technique for taking skin cells and turning them into stem cells.

Yes.

The moonshot is that you'd be able to do that with rhinos.

Are you working on that in parallel to the surrogacy plant?

Yes.

We have quite a strong team exclusively working on this aspect due to the fact that we have 12 nearly unrelated cell cultures from deceased animals.

So they provide our genetic backbone to actually restore also the genetic diversity in our future population.

And what they already achieved is that they could transform these skin cells into stem cells using special factors, bring back the cell into the embryonic stage, and then these stem cells can be transformed in a heart-beating cell, cardiomyocytes, and nerve cells, but also in the precursor cells for making the gametes.

And that's called primordial germ cells.

They migrate migrate into the gonuts.

The invasion of these primordial germ cells are really the base for making sperm and eggs.

That is work in progress but we already achieved a big step to make these stem cells which have the potential to turn into oocyte and sperm producing cells.

That sounds like science fiction.

It's hard to believe that's actually the state of our technology.

And all of this you're describing this is happening right now with the northern northern white rhino cells?

Yes.

In biology, we have these general laws and what is working in a mouse should in principle also work in a rhino or a giraffe or in a whale.

However, then there is a specific component which each species brings into the game.

A skeptic might say, why do we care so much about the northern white rhino?

There's also a southern white rhino and there's all sorts of other kinds of rhinos.

Is it really important or no?

Yeah, the northern white rhino and the southern white rhinos are separated for more than 200,000 years by the rift valley, which is a geologic formation which rhinos can't really cross.

And that means the northern white rhino adapted to an environment which is completely different to the environment of the southern white rhinos.

And the northernmate rhinos were also used in the arenas of the Romans.

The people from Nubia, they moved northern white rhinos to the Mediterranean Sea and then they moved them into the gladiator games, fighting gladiators in arenas.

So they're also very nice pieroglyphs with the northern white rhinos.

So what we have right now or what we observed is the last northern white rhinos were only found in Congo and a little bit in South Sudan.

But this species were very widespread over the northern part, central and northern part of Africa, and played a very important ecological role.

It provides feces for a lot of insects.

The feces is very poorly digested and provides an enormous nutrient base for a lot of insects.

And if these insects don't find this feces anymore, then they might lower in number and declining.

And then the bats which eat the insects, they migrate to different areas, to urban areas, and take all their nasty germs with them.

We know that HIV was born in Central Africa, Ebrulla was born in Central Africa, and by migrating bats, which have no more the insects which lived from the feces of the rhinos, then we have the next disease eggs.

So, I think this is very difficult to model such changes.

But we know if we take out a two and a half ton massive animal which dominated this area, it will have a severe effect on the structure of the ecosystem.

And therefore it is very important to bring it back.

What would you say the closest parallel in the United States is to the northern virino in terms of the role it plays in the ecosystem?

Yeah, I would think it's the bison.

Two animals which live exclusively from plant material and they distribute a lot of seeds.

They produce fertilizer for the land, bacteria which enrich the soil, they provide the material for the insects, they make little avenues and pathways for other animals.

These are very important ecofactors, and if you take them out, like the bison was taken out in the beginning of the 20th century and nearly got extinct in North America, it has dramatic impact on the entire landscape and it will be not better for the next generation.

So I think we should not ignore how complex nature actually is and when we take out one element then like a house of cards we can collapse.

We can't see that in the beginning but then we will see the result.

What's the annual budget for saving the northern Ryrano?

Are you rolling in money or you scratch around doing everything you can to get just a few dollars here and there?

That is a very good question.

Actually, when we met in 2015 with all these international experts, we found out that all our plants will be very costly and none of us had any budget.

In 2018, we published a paper in nature communication, which was extremely well received in the academic world.

And based on this publication, the German science ministry gave us a grant of 4 million Euro for three years.

And that was actually the beginning of a very effective research program.

And that program ended in 2022.

Unfortunately, COVID kicked in between, which made the work very difficult, flight tickets very expensive.

The science ministry was very happy with the progress of our program, but they had no money either.

So we got another 2 million until 2026.

That is the deadline where the government, the money will be finished.

And it is hopefully not the end of the program.

Doing such a thing like rescuing the northern Vedraino is very expensive.

Wait, you just said you spent like a million dollars a year in science.

I would not call that expensive.

I think a standard lab at the University of Chicago for somebody working on something nobody cares about costs over a million dollars a year.

I don't know.

In the scheme of things, this is such small money.

Okay.

Yeah.

The money is actually determined the speed of our progress.

So if we would have more resources, that would be a game changer.

We are relatively happy with what we have.

We are a little bit disappointed about how money is used.

For example, flying as a space tourist into space, what we could do with such money.

And I think our approach repairing a habitat, a very complex ecosystem in Central Africa by bringing back a very important keystone species, the northern vitrino, is something for the next generation because Central Africa is a birthplace for a lot of nasty diseases.

And if this ecosystem is more disturbed in the way that the northern vitrino is missing and there's a shift in the society of the different species, then that would be much more expensive to fix some of these problems coming out of there.

The interesting aspect is everyone we talked about this program believe we are swimming in money because we were so successful.

But that's not the case.

It's interesting that your justifications for doing this are very much economic.

It's about how this will help humans.

It seems like a more basic reason to do it because it's just the right thing to do.

These are amazing animals.

They're going to disappear forever.

It's like a human responsibility to do everything we can to try to keep these species alive, which regardless of whether there's ever any direct benefit to humans.

I'm sure you believe that, but have you found that message doesn't sell?

Yeah, that's very emotional.

And yeah, the human is the primary cause for the extinction of the northern wildliner.

So we have the capability to rewind this process, and we should do that.

But actually, this kind of position will not be successful in a funding scheme.

So we have to bring arguments why this has really a priority instead of developing a new ash tree in a luxury car or something like that.

It's really bitter that we have to argue like this and that the support is slow.

We really dedicate our life to this operation.

Everyone in this program works really hard with personal engagement because we all believe this is a very important mission and we have to be successful.

They're huge environmental nonprofits.

Have they not gravitated to your cause?

Environmentalists are suspicious of technological solutions and human interventions.

Have you found resistance among these groups that have a lot of money and could give you some?

Do they resist you in some way?

Yes, we approached many of them and haven't really had any success.

There was one very important donor.

Her name is Albertal.

She was in love with Northern Vitrinus and she visited us in Kenya and she supported us with half a million dollars, which was really incredible how fast that went.

But otherwise, this funding organization, we approached all of them.

And so far, there's no reflection or the return answer.

That's not their funding scheme.

So it is a very well-respected program.

But if it comes to funding, it's more on a side edge.

And in the bigger picture, it's not just about the northern white rhinos.

I assume everything you're learning here would be widely applicable, especially the Yamanaka techniques.

It seems like if you can make these amazing science fiction transformations of cells, the application of that is so far-reaching.

It's really surprising to me that project wouldn't be the darling of the funding agencies.

I'll give you another example.

I'm also a scientific advisor for Colossal, the company which wants to do the extinction in several species, including the mammoth, and they raised in a very short time incredible amount of money.

So the mammoth is selling much better than the northern white rhino.

I don't consider that as conservation.

It is a very interesting scientific exercise, but that what we try to achieve with the northern white rhino is really a conservation approach because the habitat is still there, we still have the last of the kind, two females, and we can maybe provide a new solution in 10, 12 years.

People really like the story, but that does not transform into money or resources.

So let's talk about the woolly mammoth.

Okay.

So there is incredible funding, as you said, behind this idea to bring back the woolly mammoth that has been extinct for a long time.

The reason that's being funded is because there's a profit motive.

There's a Jurassic Park at the end of it.

Why are people willing to fund that?

Yeah, the mammoth is an icon.

Ice Age is run by the mammoth.

I think the mammoth is causing more imagination than actually a rhino, even if it is another white rhino.

I would put it side by side by flying to the moon, because the mammoth is a very attractive animal from the appearance, what you can't really say to a rhino, or at least for many people.

And that is a selling point.

And the other point is it is the majority of the mammoths is extinct for 10,000 years.

There are small population on Siberian islands until 3,000 years ago.

But you find them as drawings and caves from the early man.

And so I think not only we are still fascinated by the mammoths, our first generation humans, they were already fascinated.

Is the approach to bringing back the woolly mammoth, is that the Yamanaka approach, the same one that you're trying on the rhinos, or something different?

It is similar approach.

They want to use the pluripotent stem cell technology.

And what they also use is another Nobel Prize-winning invention.

It's a gene editing CRISPR-CARS 9.

So they want to, at least the American group, wants to rewrite the genome of the Asian Asian elephant, which is relatively closely related to the mammoth, and make it cold resistant, hairy, and transform it with the major features to a mammoth-like creature.

I see.

So that's not truly bringing back a mammoth.

That's creating something that looks like a mammoth, but really isn't.

So we know exactly what made a mammoth compare to an Asian elephant.

And so the scientists at Colossal identified these differences and they plan to rewrite the genome in cell culture so there is no animal involved.

And if the cells are mammoth-like cells, then they use Yamanaka technology to transform the pleuriport and stem cells to make oocytes and sperm and then put them, the embryos, into real elephants.

Or use an artificial womb, but that's not decided yet.

And so the budget for this is in the hundreds of millions of dollars, right?

Yes, it is.

Yeah.

And is that philanthropy or is it someone who thinks at the end of the day there's a market for this?

Do you know what motivates them?

Yeah, it's economic motivation.

Because there is long-term investment into something which might be relevant for the future as a technology which can be sold.

So it's not that one person wants to see the Mahmoud and spend all the money on that.

No, it's really an investment group which supports Colossa.

What do they expect expect to be paid for in the long run?

Tourism or something different than that?

No, this gene editing technology, safely gene editing, because you can also treat diseases, human diseases with that.

Aaron Powell, but there must be a much more direct way to work on human cells than by trying to reconstruct a woolly mammoth.

There's an enormous amount of investment going on in CRISPR and this gene editing.

And recently, they had their first approved product for sickle-cell anemia.

But I don't know.

Something sounds fishy here to me, that the idea behind the Willie Mammoth is to make money.

No, I'm sure it's to make money.

I just, I want, I just, I'm having trouble with their business model.

And I could understand if you're saying, look, we want to bring back Willie Mammoth, and we're going to start a Jurassic Park kind of thing.

And that would make total sense, but it doesn't sound like at least outwardly, that's what they're talking about.

You're working on that project, right?

You're involved.

Yes.

Is there conflict ever between the scientists and the money people as this unfolds?

No, in the moment, not because the money people are really, really lay back.

They don't really request anything.

And they know also that it's a very thin line to do something like the recreation of the mammoth regarding ethical standards and the opinion of the wide audience.

So I think they really have a high interest to develop a nice image of their company.

So they are quite successful.

But on the other side, there are forces which hate biotechnology per se.

And so they have to deal with that.

And therefore, Colossal is supporting a lot of conservation projects besides the mammoth activity.

They are also very active in helping to protect Baquito, a kind of dolphin or small whale in the sea on the western coast of Mexico.

They are also working with the Sumatra Mino a little bit.

So there are some additional activities because they are so well equipped with money that they use this feature to develop a nice image.

And I'm mainly interested in their technology progress to see if something of that can be utilized in our program.

And we already found a very interesting way because I mentioned we have these 12 cell lines which we want to utilize to make new individuals out of these cell lines.

However, 12 is not really a large number and it might be that the genetic diversity we can achieve with that is not sufficient because with climate change our population which we create will be well challenged in the future with a lot of environmental changes and therefore we need a broad genetic background.

What we came up with Colossal is we go to the museums and to private collections to people which have hunted northern white rhinos maybe 100 years, 200 years ago and have that at their houses or in a museum.

And then we will analyze these genetic information of these specimens and see how different these old specimens are actually to what we have in our tanks.

And if it turns out that there are some genetic pattern completely missing in our current biomaterial, then we would use our biomaterial with a colossal technique to rewrite these cells and bring the ancient ancient material or the information from the ancient material into these cells so that the mesium specimens gets a completely new function.

Because the amazing thing about living things is that the building blocks of the DNA is so simple that in principle, if you can go and find this 200-year-old stuffed rhino and pull the DNA out of it, then with the right techniques, we could reproduce the DNA that the rhino had.

Yes, exactly.

That is our idea.

We use information generated from the old spacements.

We use computer tomography to find the most dense spot in the bone because then the DNA is best preserved in this region.

And then biopsy this bony material and sequence that information and use it for our genetic enrichment of our cell culture and then with Yamanaka's technique making at the end gametes out of it.

You're listening to People I Mostly Admire with Steve Levitt and his conversation with Thomas Hildebrandt.

After this short break, they'll return to talk about Thomas's experience the day the Berlin Wall came down.

When life brings the blah, add more Yabba-dabba-doo with some tasty fruity pebbles.

Early morning meeting?

Blah.

Someone brought the pebbles.

Yabba-dabba-doo.

Run errands?

Blah.

Head to the store for Pebbles.

Yabba Dabba Doo.

Fruity Pebbles.

Less blah.

More, Yaba Daba Doo.

Pick up Pebble cereal today.

Yaba Daba Doo and the Flintstones and all related characters and elements.

Copyright and trademark, Hanna-Barbera.

The growing demand for content means more chances for off-brand work getting out there.

Adobe Express can help.

It's the quick and easy app that gives your HR, sales, and marketing teams the power to create on-brand content at scale.

Ensure everyone follows design guidelines with brand kits and lock templates.

Give them the confidence to create with Firefly generative AI that's safe for business.

And make sure your brand is protected, looks sharp, and shows up consistently in the wild.

Learn more at adobe.com slash go slash express.

This is Marshawn Lynch.

You and I make decisions every day, but on Prize Picks, being right can get you paid.

So I'm here to make sure you don't miss any of the action this football season.

With Prize Picks, it's good to be right.

Download the Prize Picks app today and use code Pandora to get $50 in lineups after you play your first $5 lineup.

That's code Pandora to get $50 in lineups after you play your first $5 lineup.

Prize picks, it's good to be right.

Must be present in certain states, visit prizepicks.com for restrictions and details.

I've been so focused on Thomas Hildebrandt's research that I haven't taken the time yet to understand the path that led him to be a cutting-edge veterinarian.

Let me fix that now.

Did you know from a young age that animal reproduction was your thing?

My wish for being a veterinarian I made when I was six and I never changed that.

You already knew you wanted to be a vet at the age of six?

Yes.

But you didn't grow up on a farm, right?

You grew up in East Berlin.

Yeah, I grew up in an urban environment.

But my relatives, they lived in the countryside.

From my father's side, before he was an engineer his family is a fourth generation butcher family and so I spent my summer holidays always in the countryside and working in this slaughterhouse and looked at the anatomy of the animals which I found very impressive.

But on the other side I picked sick animals and raised them and leased them again.

So I always had the desire to be a veterinarian, to do something for the animals.

You were in your twenties when the Berlin Wall came down.

Was that a joyous event for you or frightening?

What was your view on East Germany?

At that time, I had an experiment running in the East Berlin Zoo.

That was an embryo transfer in yaks, in hornless yaks.

And so I stimulated the yaks and flushed out the embryos and transferred these embryos into cattle.

My location where I lived was directly opposite to all the streams of people which want to see the western side of Berlin.

So it was really a challenge to not go to the western side because I had to run my experiment and to go to the zoo, which really caused a lot of traffic congestion.

And that I hated, especially some of my students, for this desire to go to the Western world because in veterinary medicine we had a lot of very strong communist people.

And after the wall went down, they were all next day at the Western side and just for the hundred Deutschmark you got or the bananas which thrown from the trucks.

So they completely lost their philosophy.

I hated that because I always have a very strong personal plan and never changed my opinion so quickly.

So history was being made all around you and you were in your lab trying to make this yak experiment work.

Yes.

And fretting about the traffic.

Yes.

Is that what you're saying?

yeah that was the situation yeah yeah so the yaks were stimulated i had to flush the embryos out and that was in strong conflict with the major movement of all hundreds thousands of people went through berlin because that was the only place where the wall was open at that time yeah

my understanding is you were not a big fan of the East German government.

You had gotten into trouble before, right, for political stuff?

Yes.

Tell me about that.

Yeah, so I was always quite gifted at school, so I I had the best marks, so it was really clear that I would get a position at the University of Veterinary Medicine.

However, I was a rebel and I questioned the political decision very openly during my high school time, and that didn't really reflect very well.

So I was banned from university for five years because of my political position, which was clearly stated is not the political position of the working class, what I I demonstrate, and therefore I have not the right to enter the university.

That was my resume I got from the high school.

And then I worked in a dairy farm.

I worked in animal pathology to open up animals.

I found that very interesting, but got very low money for that.

And finally, one of the professors at the pathology department recognized how skilled I was, and then he helped me to enter university again.

Aaron Powell, it's interesting because looking back, those five years where you were banned from going straight into the university probably were incredibly useful and transformative for what you turned out to be.

You never would have chosen it yourself.

But I wonder if you wouldn't have achieved nearly as much if you had stayed on the straight and narrow path.

Yeah, I have to say that gave me really mental strength to follow a task which seems to be impossible, but it was ways in line.

I think I could not stand one more year in this hope to get finally access to the university.

Partly have broken me at that time.

I was tottering.

I was really mentally not in the best condition.

But I still had the dream to one day to study veterinary medicine.

Next year I was the best student, got all these honors and everything.

It was completely crazy that the year before I was not allowed to go to university.

Two years later I was the student which was shown to all these events and got all the awards.

That was strange.

So given what you just said, I'm surprised even given your commitment to science, that when the wall went down you weren't right there, one of the ones breaking it down.

You lost your political interest along the way?

No, actually not.

Actually, I was also not really happy that East Germany went down in such chaos because it was my home country.

I I didn't like the communists, but I liked the people.

And what then happened was really a sold out of our nation, which I didn't really like that.

Because the people in East Germany were different than people now in Germany.

Friendship had a much higher value because nobody really had a lot of money.

If you don't deal with the secret service or with a strong communist, then the family issues were very high and had a

really high value.

And that really

got sold for money over the next 20, 30 years.

There was also the idea of some of my students when we discussed that before the wall went down if he should not escape via Hungary or Czech Republic.

And I never was in favor of that because I thought if we would all escape, who could do such changes?

That was my opinion.

I say that also quite openly, which was not well received either at that time.

Then finally, East Germany was incorporated into the new Germany, and then science and traveling was suddenly possible.

And I went to America, stayed there for half a year at Washington, D.C., working with the zoo elephants at the National Zoo.

And then from there, I slowly discovered the world and worked with a huge variety of different species.

I know that everyone in Germany has the right to see the files that were kept on them by the former secret police in East Germany, the Stasi.

Have you gone to look at your files?

No, I haven't.

It was not brave enough.

Because if you identify that some person on your family or your good friend had a connection to the Secret Service.

You just didn't want to know.

You'd rather not know.

No, because what is the value of that?

No, that might destroy

inside the family that there was this split caused by the Secret Service.

So

I don't want that.

I have a friend, an older man, who lived in Hungary, and

he went and looked at the Hungarian version of those files.

And the only thing that they had on him was that one day in high school, he was whistling, and a teacher asked him what he was whistling.

And he was whistling somewhere over the rainbow because he had seen the Wizard of Oz.

And the teacher reported him to the authorities as watching American movies.

And that was the sin that was put into his file.

Okay.

Now I'm pretty sure I had a big file.

Or I still have a big file because these five years I underwent separated from university, there were always encounters from the Secret Service.

So that there must be a big file, that's for sure.

So do you feel personally a lot of pressure going back to the Northern Rhinos?

Do you feel the responsibility for that species rests on your shoulders?

Yes.

It's a task which is really important for me.

I'm now 60, and I want to solve that when I finally retire.

So it is something which has to happen and it will happen.

I'm very sure, because all signs, all progress we did, they're pointing in the right direction.

Yeah, that's something I want to fulfill.

That is really a personal mission.

But it is infectious.

My colleagues think the same.

So I infected them.

Let's end with a prediction.

Let's say 2099, how many white northern rhinos are there on the planet?

I would think 50.

50?

That would be your goal?

50 by 2099.

Fantastic.

You and I won't be here to see that, but hopefully someone will be keeping track and we'll be able to raise a toast to all your efforts if that comes true.

Thank you very much.

To have them, that is the biggest award I can imagine.

To see a calf of a northern veterino which was believed to be impossible with this material we have two infertile females but I think we can achieve that and we will achieve that.

I find what Thomas and his colleagues are doing to be remarkable.

And it's pretty clear to me based on this conversation that Thomas is a much better veterinarian than he is a fundraiser.

So if you'd like to help support the research or just learn more about it, check out the website biorescue.org.

So this is the point in the show where I welcome my producer Morgan on

to talk about listener questions.

Hi, Steve.

So at the end of our last new episode with Conrad Wolfram, who's a mathematician and someone who is advocating for a new math curriculum, you did a little listener poll.

You asked listeners to send an email with three pieces of information.

Their gender, whether they considered themselves a math person, and whether they were for or against replacing the traditional math curriculum with Conrad's new curriculum.

And we got a lot of responses.

Oh my God.

I think we must have gotten 500 or more responses.

It was remarkable how many people wrote and not just answered the questions, but gave really thoughtful and interesting opinions on the topic.

So it really was wonderful and encouraging the response we got.

So you have tallied up the responses we got from listeners.

I have not been looking at the tallied responses.

So you're going to tell me what our listeners said.

I'm not going to tell you.

I'm going to quiz you.

First, I have to make a confession.

I ran out of energy after about 300.

It was a lot of work and the trends were so clear that I knew that there's no chance that my conclusions would be different.

I even tested the statistical significance of some of the conclusions and found out that they were already with 300 observations, highly statistically significant.

So I did stop data collection there.

Early on, I even was thanking everyone who wrote, but my patience for that wore thin pretty quickly.

So if you wrote in, I apologize if I didn't acknowledge my thanks for you doing that.

Okay, let's start this quiz.

What percent of the respondents were male?

90%.

No, come on.

It's always exactly the same it's always 70 on every survey we've done we've gotten about 70 male and that happened again okay it's another little harder what percent say they're math people i think overwhelmingly people who listen to the show would say they're math people you're more right on that than i would have been about 70 of the men categorized themselves as math people and about 60% of the women did.

And at this point, we should highlight this is not a very scientific poll, right?

It's obviously made up of people not only who listen, but people who listen to the end and they're willing to take the time to write it.

So who knows what kind of biases are going on?

This is more about interest.

But I was actually heartened by the fact that so many people considered themselves math people.

So at least in this very selected sample, I found that to be an encouraging result.

Okay.

What percent of the people overall across all of these categories were in favor of adopting Conrad Wolfram's new curriculum relative to what we're using now.

I am also going to say that it's most of the respondents and I'll say maybe 80%.

99%.

Oh my gosh.

Is that like one person who was not in favor?

There were four people in the 300 that I looked at that were not in favor of adopting this curriculum.

In many ways, it's not surprising.

If you got to the end of this podcast, you probably liked it and you probably thought this was a good idea.

I'm sure the people who really hated what Conrad had to say were gone after minute seven.

It was interesting because one of the very first people who wrote in was a no.

And then it was a hundred or a hundred and fifty more before I got another no.

So I hadn't expected it to be so heavily skewed.

Okay, last question.

Of the four people who said no,

how do you think they broke down?

Oh my gosh.

I think they were were all math people.

And I think it was

three men and one woman.

Almost.

It was all math people and they were all men.

As we've tried to push data science as an alternative to traditional math, we have found that almost everybody is supportive.

The one set of people who really fight it are a small group of male university level math professors.

I was just surprised that so few of the people who identified as being math people weren't threatened by what Conrad's really radical curriculum would imply for math.

Now, I also think it's true that the kind of people who've been fighting the data science movement, I don't think very many of them listen to my podcast.

I think that's a pretty safe bet.

Thank you to everyone who replied to our poll.

If you have a question for us, or if you have a question for Thomas Hildebrand, we will try to get that question to him and maybe have him answer it on a future listener question segment.

Our email is pima at freakonomics.com.

That's p-i-m-a at freakonomics.com.

We read every email that's sent and we look forward to reading yours.

In two weeks, we're back with a brand new episode featuring ornithologist Richard Prum.

Now, you might think you're not really interested in birds, but if there's anyone that can change your mind about it, I'm telling you, it's Richard Prum.

And then in in the late 90s, there were some discoveries of fossil dinosaurs from China that were really revolutionary, and they had fuzzy stuff that people called dino-fuzz.

Some people wanted to call it feathers, and it certainly conflicted with the main hypothesis.

They didn't function in flight at all.

But my theory was very congruent with that.

As always, thanks for listening, and we'll see you back soon.

People I mostly admire is part of the Freakonomics Radio Network, which also includes Freconomics Radio, No Stupid Questions, and The Economics of Everyday Things.

All our shows are produced by Stitcher and Renbud Radio.

This episode was produced by Morgan Levy, with help from Lyric Bautich and mixed by Jasmine Klinger.

We had research assistance from Daniel Moritz Rabson.

Our theme music was composed by Luis Guerra.

We can be reached at pima at freakonomics.com.

That's pima at Freakonomics.com.

Thanks for listening.

So, Mike.

Don't say that.

No, it's important.

No, no.

No, no, I have to say it.

The Freakonomics Radio Network, the hidden side of everything.

Stitcher.

I choose to work where everyone can see how busy I am.

I choose pedal palette.

I choose the freshest of beats.

I choose to never burrito and drive.

Whatever you choose, choose transit and do your part to spare the air.

This episode is brought to you by Nordstrom.

When fall is finally here, you're ready for a wardrobe refresh and Nordstrom has you covered with the best of fall fashion.

Stay ahead of the hottest trends and discover new favorites from top brands like Reformation, Veronica Beard, Favorite Daughter, Free People, Mango, Madewell, and more.

And the best part, free shipping, free returns, and easy in-store pickups.

So get ready to shop in stores on Nordstrom.com or download the Nordstrom app today.

This is Marshawn Lynch.

You and I make decisions every day, but on prize picks, being right can get you paid.

So I'm here to make sure you don't miss any of the action this football season.

With Prize Picks, it's good to be right.

Download the Prize Picks app today and use code Pandora to get $50 in lineups after you play your first $5 lineup.

That's code Pandora.

To get $50 in lineups after you play your first $5 lineup, PrizePicks, it's good to be right.

Must be present in certain states.

Visit PrizePicks.com for restrictions and details.