Debate Reax, Taylor's Endorsement, Apple's AI Upgrades

Support for the show comes from Saks Fifth Avenue.

Sacks Fifth Avenue makes it easy to shop for your personal style.

Follow us here, and you can invest in some new arrivals that you'll want to wear again and again, like a relaxed product blazer and Gucci loafers, which can take you from work to the weekend.

Shopping from Saks feels totally customized, from the in-store stylist to a visit to Saks.com, where they can show you things that fit your style and taste.

They'll even let you know when arrivals from your favorite designers are in, or when that Brunello Caccinelli sweater you've been eyeing is back in stock.

So, if you're like me and you need shopping to be personalized and easy, head to Saks Fifth Avenue for the Best Fall Arrivals and Style inspiration.

Support for this show comes from IBM.

Is your AI built for everyone, or is it built to work with the tools your business relies on?

IBM's AI agents are tailored to your business and can easily integrate with the tools you're already using so they can work across your business, not just some parts of it.

Get started with AIAgents at iBM.com.

That's IBM.com.

The AI Built for Business, IBM.

Support for this show comes from Robinhood.

Wouldn't it be great to manage your portfolio on one platform?

With Robinhood, not only can you trade individual stocks and ETFs, you can also seamlessly buy and sell crypto at low costs.

Trade all in one place.

Get started now on Robinhood.

Trading crypto involves significant risk.

Crypto trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Crypto LLC.

Robinhood Crypto is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the New York State Department of Financial Services.

Crypto held through Robinhood Crypto is not FDIC insured or SIPIC protected.

Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.

Securities trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Financial LLC, member SIPIC, a registered broker dealer.

Hi, everyone.

This is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network.

I'm Kara Swisher.

And you are on on TV.

You are filming.

I know you're not allowed to talk about it.

Can't talk about it.

When it comes out,

I'll tell you, but I'm on a pretty big TV show.

I play myself because I'm really good at that.

And that's all I can say.

But it was hot.

It was hot.

It was fun.

The only thing is filming all day.

We can't say the name of the show, but filming all day is...

like exhausting.

Like they, for six or seven minutes, it's astonishing how many people are involved, how many camera moves.

And I just, I gotta say i couldn't do it for a living it's really um oh it's incredibly boring um so

it's boring and grueling and

i have to say everyone was amazing on set and including the hair people the camera people but um it's it's tiresome and then repeating the same lines i don't know i just not not it'll be interesting when they make your uh let's talk to something about week and then talk about your thing um your movie uh just for people reminder scott has a tv show coming up that is uh called thumblight so you'll be on the set set.

Will you be on the set a lot or not?

I know I'm going to be in the writer's room, but

I don't know if I'll be on set.

Are you going to join the Writers Guild?

Oh, well, they've asked me to represent them.

They've asked

the WGA has said we're looking for more people who have really their heads up their asses to kind of

do that.

You might not be able to be in that writer's room, my friend.

I had to join the SAG to do this because I've done so many.

Oh, really?

Yeah, because I've done, there's a number you can do.

I did Silicon Valley and The Simpsons and and one other, and then you have to join.

I have to join SAG After.

Which I did.

Which would be ironic.

I don't know.

Yeah, you might have to join the union, Scott.

And then they can, like, speaking of,

that will be ironic that day.

I'm very excited about Scott joins the Union Day.

A lot of people, when I said I joined SAG, were like, oh, now Scott Galloway can hate you.

I don't hate them.

I hate their union.

Oh, okay.

Yeah, I think essentially the same thing.

Anyway, I am a proud union member now, and I'm super excited to defend the rights of workers for better pay and better equity.

Yeah, speaking of which, let's block the deal to acquire

U.S.

steel such that they can actually maintain some jobs in the U.S.

because we're total fucking whores and want to pretend that manufacturing is coming back to Pennsylvania.

Okay, every single politician from Donald Trump to Biden is for that.

And they're all wrong.

I mean, we should talk about that.

They are all wrong.

Okay, we will.

Incredibly wrong.

It's going to destroy jobs if they don't get a bailout

Nikon Steel.

Okay, well, it's an interesting, it's a complex, interesting topic.

It's not about

that.

It's pure nationalism, jingoism, and again, more head overall unions for short-term political games.

At the expense of their workers.

I understand that.

But, you know, look, Amazon just closed several major facilities in California.

Not everyone closes things.

They don't get as much attention.

Amazon closed major facilities because they move things around at will

and they resist unions.

So, you know, it does, it plays many, many ways.

Do you know how many people U.S.

Steel employs?

How many?

Well, at the turn of the century, the 20th century, or actually World War II, it peaked at about 350,000 employees.

It's now down to 20,000.

And 4,000 are in Pittsburgh.

And this is literally the talk of the town because everybody wants Pittsburgh, right?

It's a swing state.

Everybody wants this to be seen as pro-labor.

And this is, they are literally toying with an industry and people's future.

This is a lifeline, literally a lifeline from, by the way, an ally.

I think Japan is more pro-America than many states in America right now.

Anyway, I'm beside myself, Cara.

I'm beside myself.

I see that.

As usual, union people, come talk to me now that we're together.

We'll figure out what we're going to do.

Raise minimum wage to $25 an hour.

I know.

I get that.

I know your argument.

It's got to be a fulcrum against whatever the fuck these companies want to do.

They do.

The pay of CEOs has gotten out of friggin' hand, and that's an interesting restorative.

I agree.

It's complex, is my whole point.

We're not having this argument.

I want prepared for it.

So when I got home on a red eye after my Hollywood debut, but we've got a lot to get today.

There's other things.

You're back in D.C.?

Yeah, I'm back in D.C.

And guess where I'm coming tonight?

I'm literally, I took a red eye last night in order to get to your birthday party.

And you're coming to

Aberdeen, Scotland tonight.

That is correct.

Carrie, you're going to have another stroke.

No, I'm not.

I have the things.

I've taken taken the pills.

I'm going to be fine.

I'll be good.

You are literally, I mean this sincerely.

You are the hardest working woman in Showbiz.

I mean that sincerely.

You are relentless.

I interviewed Nancy Pelosi in Austin on Sunday or Saturday.

And then I was in San Francisco for the Apple event.

And then I flew to this holiday.

And yes, I am, but I'm coming to your party.

Hell or high water.

If I went to D.C.

on a Thursday or a Wednesday night and then to Aberdeen, Scotland on a Friday night, I would need to go to like a Swiss spa with male prostitutes, calilily flowers, saran wrap, and like human growth hormone.

And I'd have to have little Swiss elves rubbing my feet and injecting me with something for two weeks.

Look, I assume that's your birthday party.

I'm assuming

this is what's happening.

I am so excited.

I am.

George Hahn is coming.

I can say that.

Gi Hahn.

Jim.

G-Man, the G-Dog, is in the house.

I'm so excited to be going somewhere alone alone with Amanda.

That's nice.

That's good.

Speaking of rich, older dudes with hot, younger wives, second wives, speaking of which?

Yeah.

Yeah, that's me.

Yeah.

With new kids, with kids that are 40 years younger than your first set.

The straight man.

The straight man.

So I am.

Think about it.

Anyway, I am.

Your benchmark, your role model are to the guys.

Yes.

The tech douchebags we all criticize.

Anyway.

They don't have more children.

They just have new hot wives.

Anyway, we've got a lot to get to today, including a major endorsement from childless cat ladies.

Speaking of ladies and what Apple and Dale did at their big glowtime event this week, which I was at, and I did see Tim Cook and some other executives there.

But let's get right to our first big story.

Former President Donald Trump says another debate with Vice President Kamala Harris probably won't happen given he believes he won the matchup on Tuesday.

What a lunatic.

Nobody thinks this, but the CNN poll has Harris winning the debate 63 to 37%.

I can't believe he got 37% given his shitty performance.

And most outlets and pundits agree, including Fox News, that Harris had a dominant performance.

And there's nobody who doesn't think that.

Trump, meanwhile, rambled about eating pets and transgender operations on illegal aliens.

And he revealed this line to me was the worst, the concepts of a plan for healthcare.

Donald, you're only been at it 11 years.

Like, we're waiting for that.

Saying he wasn't, if he was president, he'd have it, but he was president.

He didn't have it.

So one of our followers on thread said your debate prediction from earlier this week aged like Mayo in the sun.

She did great.

I was worried too.

There's no question.

The person who got it right was Louis.

Louis Swisher, who I, who tweeted with me.

Do you have children?

You should bring them on a podcast.

Oh, indeed.

They're excellent.

We get lots of emails saying how I should replace you with him.

But nonetheless, Nepopod.

Neposode.

It was an episode.

Speaking of you're cheating on me with Jessica Tarloff, so don't even speak to me about these things.

Raging Moderates, the new podcast from the Vox Media Podcast Network.

She's good.

Let me say before we get to Kamala Harris,

Scott has another podcast.

He has a side piece, so to speak.

Side pod.

You have a side pod.

And

it's called Raging Moderates.

And I'm going to tout it because that's the kind of relationship we have.

We have a Poly relationship.

And

explain what you're doing there with Jessica, who is one of who I introduced you to.

But go ahead.

Tell me.

Tell me about what it is.

I don't know if you've heard this, but I've actually been on Bill Maher several times.

I know that.

I love it because I do well.

It's a good format for me.

And because I'm a narcissist, I'm going to go home and watch the clip.

on YouTube and see all the comments about how smart I am.

And it's really rewarding to me because I'm addicted to the affirmation of strangers.

People I know and I love, I don't care that much about what they think of me, but strangers, I care too much.

Anyways.

Yes, we get that.

I went on with her and

I go on the YouTube channel and it's like, Jessica's amazing.

We love Jessica.

I literally started off hating her because every comment was about how good she is.

And she's, for those of you who don't know her, she's the sane Democrat on the five.

And basically her role is to let these four crazies just go off.

And then she kind of says something reasonable and comes with facts.

And the other four look as if they've just been walked in by their mother masturbating.

and they just literally sit there and look like what do I say and do now

I think she is sold is always like

when she gives a fact

no they're just a pause they look at each other like oh yeah anyways I think she's fantastic and so I pitched her on the idea of a show called Raging Moderates.

And what was exciting is Fox signed off on it because I'm considered Fox friendly, which I take as a sign.

I am Fox unfriendly.

Well, largely because I call Rupert Murdoch Uncle Satan.

And by the way, good luck in court, Rupert, this week.

You're going to lose.

Anyway, so did you like it?

Was it fun cheating on me?

What's interesting is it's I try and take on your role and I'm realizing how hard it is.

You kind of, you're the maestro here.

You keep it running.

You organize it and ask me questions and then respond and have your own.

And I'm trying to be you and it's been, I realize how difficult that is.

But look, this, it really should be called the Jessica Tarlov podcast because she brings all the insight.

I just sort of say, huh, a lot.

I'm Michael Barbara on this.

I'm like, huh, really?

Interesting.

And what does that mean?

But

let me have you have your time in the sun by saying you're predicting age like Mayo in the Sun.

You were quite worried about her.

We were both worried because of the stakes here, obviously, and the numbers.

Just for some things, 67 million people watched the debate, and it was all over social media.

Like, crap, what a social media opportunity for memeing and everything else with the the cats and the dogs and the

transgenders, foreign transgenders who are killing babies, et cetera.

Trump really was a terrible performance.

That's up from 51 million for Trump Biden.

So, you know, I realize you were worried, but tell me what you thought of the ABC moderators, et cetera,

the debate, whether it'll move the needle.

Tell me what you think about that.

I don't know.

Well, first off, that guy hosting it did make me question my sexuality.

That guy's beautiful.

Oh, my God.

And he's smart and he looks nice.

And

I'm like, is there any chance the next debate he'll take off his shirt?

David

Muir.

Whatever his name is.

His looks hurt him.

I thought he did it.

I thought he and his co-host, who, by the way, co-moderate, who, by the way, is also screeching hot.

All right.

I'm so glad you found him attractive.

They were very competent.

Let's try to focus on that.

I thought they were very even-handed.

I know the right is going not to be, but they were fact-checking someone who lied 33 times versus Kamala Harris's one time.

But they they did it elegantly they let him get away probably with a little too much okay so the debate let me i'm sorry let me slow wait let me tell you there's just the fun the best onion headline of all time is david muir yes my penis is as beautiful as you think now let's start the debate i saw that you forwarded that to me because you know you know how to make me happy you know how to please

you know how to please your work your work wife anyway maybe i'll invite him to your birthday party

um you have no room um so look the

this is how i would describe it i said that i thought unfortunately, she wasn't battle tested.

She hadn't been on a bait stage in four years and people were underestimating how good he is on his feet.

And the first 10 minutes, I was right.

They started with a question on the economy.

She didn't answer it at all.

She seemed a little bit shaky and nervous and wobbly.

He seemed, for him, fairly on point and focused.

And then about moment 12, it literally just all pivoted.

When the question of abortion came up, she found kind of this inner strength and

talking about a 12-year-old does not want to carry

her baby to term.

They do not want that.

A husband whose wife is bleeding out in the parking lot of a healthcare facility because she couldn't get treatment during a miscarriage did not want that.

Because he used the term want.

He says, This is what people want.

This is what people want.

And she, from that moment on, and the strategy, the people organized.

First off, what on earth was he thinking getting prepped by Representatives Tulsi Gabbard and Matt Gaetz?

You want Matt Gaetz to prepare you for a debate?

I know.

The people who prepped her fucking masterclass.

And this is what they did.

David Plus, probably.

They said, don't respond to this weirdness.

We want you to talk about policy.

We want you to use real emotion.

And here's the critical part.

Every point, you're going to spend the last 10 or 15 seconds triggering him.

And look at his crowds.

They get exhausted.

They're exhausted and tired and they leave.

Oh, I didn't inherit $450 million.

And then he would spend 50% of the remaining time, instead of focusing on policy and arguing the points, he would spend it saying,

being triggered.

What you just said.

Let me tell you about the debate.

Let me tell you about my crowds.

Exactly.

That's exactly what he said.

And it was brilliant.

It put him.

Bait hook.

It put him on his heels the entire time.

And then he just lost it.

And it's like literally every synapse that fires.

Is old stuff.

It's like when you do, have you ever taken, I remember an IQ, I took an IQ test when I was in third grade and they wanted me to skip to fifth grade.

That's me bragging.

And they would do these things now.

Just they would just say with a stopwatch, just mention as many words as possible.

Go.

That's what it felt like with him.

He just started going all over the map.

It was his greatest hits, is what it was, right?

You know, whether it was the pets being eaten in Ohio, which I can't believe he brought it up.

Seriously, you know, one of the reasons

he decides Matt Gates and tells, whatever, the babies being killed.

And then he got corrected after birth, which they corrected him immediately.

No one has done that.

Like, he keeps saying that demands are killing babies after they're born.

It doesn't work.

It seems crazy.

It's like crazy Uncle Joe kind of thing.

It was interesting

how quickly that happened, how she triggered him and it worked, but she kept doing it.

And it kept working.

That to me was really, he couldn't recover for some reason.

The Fox poll showed her winning 70 to 30.

And be clear, 70 to 30 is not, is, does not reflect how dramatic that number is because 20% of that poll,

if Trump came out, killed a puppy, threw up and passed out, 20% would say he won.

So basically anyone.

Anyone that had any reasonable chance or judgment or discretion around evaluating the debate said she won.

In a word, in a word, she and her team were outstanding.

And I can't tell you, Kare, I don't know.

I didn't realize how,

I know, people say the word triggered.

And people, whenever they read my newsletter, they fill up my comments with you suffer from Trump derangement syndrome.

I'm like, no, I suffer from democracy addiction syndrome.

I just don't, I'm just done with this bullshit of you accusing me of having some sort of psychological dysfunction because I've gotten used to this whole democracy, prosperity, and civil rights thing.

Anyways,

this was after 75 minutes.

I was 90 minutes long.

It was like 3.15 here.

I turned it off and I'm like, oh my God, I'm going to sleep so well tonight.

I don't care what she does the next 15 minutes.

She's won.

She just, I was, let's be clear.

And anyone who listens to this podcast knows this.

I am not the most rabid fan of Vice President Harris.

She was outstanding, outstanding.

She was strategic.

She was smart.

She had a real authentic emotion in her voice when it mattered.

She put him off his game, onto his heels.

She was playing offense.

I was absolutely blown away.

And what's interesting is that

and I threaded this.

An old man who was too old has a terrible disastrous debate and his party decides to distance themselves from them.

That happened for the second time.

They're not going to distance.

No, they'll start hedging.

Some of the moderates will start hedging.

Oh, they're saying it was ABC's fault.

It was this.

Look, your man sucked.

It's interesting.

The person who did say it was someone I've been trying to get on my podcast who has told me he can't come in his podcast because of Fox News, Carl Rove.

And he wrote,

it was no contest.

Mrs.

Harris came across as calm, confident, strong, focused on the future.

Mr.

Trump came across as hot, angry, and fixated on the past, especially his own.

She mastered the split screen, projecting confidence and wordlessly undercutting him by smiling while shaking her head as as he spoke.

Many undecided and swing voters will make up their minds less on any single issue and on their visceral reactions to the candidates.

Ms.

Harris did herself much good with that crowd Tuesday.

Mr.

Trump didn't.

Even more voters wanted to learn something new and reassuring about the candidates in the debate.

She proved them plenty.

Well, he didn't.

This could have been written by, and the last line that he writes here, will this debate have an effect?

Yes, though perhaps not as much as Team Harris hopes or as much as Team Trump might fear.

But there's no putting lipstick on on this peg.

Mr.

Trump was crushed by a woman he previously dismissed as dumb as a rock, which raises the question, what does that make him?

Whoa, whoa, Karl Rove.

Yeah.

And now I will endorse Kamala Harris.

It was really.

No, every debate team in high school is going to, that's going to be required re-interviewing because she was calm.

She, she, I mean, quite frankly, a lot of questions she just shouldn't answer.

But she put him on the defensive and he just came across.

I just think, you know, she's presidential, which was her goal.

All of a sudden, he's become the crazy old man, or he's become the incompetent old man.

Yeah.

So, so let me ask you, what should she do next?

What should he do next, very briefly?

Because I want to get to Taylor Swift, obviously.

I think that he needs to shore.

I can't even go.

I'm so emotionally biased against him.

It's hard for me to try and figure out what he can do other than just not be fucking crazy and stop talking about animals being eaten pets no one's coming for fluffy no one believes that saying that there are millions of you know trans criminals and she's a marx i mean it's just like come on boss talk about your economic policies stay on point

that he just can't seem to do it i think she should go on offense i think she has confidence now she has her talking points if i were her i'd be doing two to three press interviews a week now.

I think she goes on offense.

I agree.

I think that's critical.

I think she should talk to Kara Swisher, but among others, but I do think, and not just me, but local news, bloggers, influencers, weird things, people that don't like her.

She should go on Neil Friggin Camuto in a second.

She should definitely put herself in harm's way.

And I think she can handle it.

You got to go by enemy lines.

If you want to say you're combat ready, you got to go into combat.

Yeah, Pete Buttigieg does it really well.

She should take a page from that.

We'll see if she does that.

She really can't hide now.

She's got to come out and really.

So does Governor Newsom, by the way.

He's very good in enemy territory.

He was good.

He's actually better in enemy territory than friendly territory, which is interesting.

He is.

He is.

He is.

I think everyone feels good about what she did.

We'll see.

You know, but it's still incredibly close.

But one person who might move the needle is self-proclaimed childless cat lady Taylor Swift, who endorsed Kamala Harris just after the debate.

Apparently, it wasn't coordinated.

I don't know.

There was a lot of reporting on it, and it seems it wasn't.

In an Instagram post shared with her 284 million followers, by the way, she disdained Twitter.

She did not put it on Twitter.

Taylor blasted recent AI images of her falsely endorsing Trump and said she created

she wanted to combat misinformation with the truth.

And she declares, I've done my research and I've made my choice.

And obviously it was Kamala Harris.

Impact,

Taylor's Instagram post led directly to over 337,000 people visiting vote.gov on Wednesday afternoon, by Wednesday afternoon.

Trump says Taylor will pay a price for the endorsement in the marketplace.

You know, she'll get more money is what's going to happen.

And of course, Elon Musk could not keep out of it because he's a creepy stalker by saying, Fine, Taylor, you win.

I will give you a child and guard your cats with my life because he literally can't stand not being the center of attention.

And he's done this before with women, with AOC and

several others, women.

And it's repulsive.

It was repulsive.

I think this will have a big impact, actually.

And I thought it was done beautifully.

And she called herself a childless cat lady.

So she hit all the notes in

her endorsement.

Aaron Trevor Brandon: So on a gross level, I think neither the debate nor Taylor Swift's endorsement moved the needle a lot.

But on a relative basis, any movement of the needle is super important because there's just not that many votes up for grabs.

You're talking about a small number of votes in a small number of states.

And the most encouraging thing is supposedly about a third of a million people visited vote.gov as of Wednesday afternoon after her endorsement.

I think it was smart for her.

I thought I read her endorsement.

I thought it it was very elegant

and funny.

I thought it was just such a dumb move of him to put up that AI-generated fake meme of her

endorsing him.

She is a phenomena, right?

More people listen to Taylor Swift music than all of jazz or all of classical music combined.

That's how big she is.

And I think that the most authentic thing about her endorsement was it was as if she was forced to make an endorsement.

She didn't come across as political, like, I want to be heard.

I'm not going to stay in my lane.

It was as if the Trump administration backed her into her corner and forced her to clarify her views.

So

it was kind of perfect for her.

And then the thing that's most disturbing here is Trump said Taylor will, quote unquote, pay a price

for the endorsement in the marketplace.

What does that mean?

He's going to have Ted Nugent play at his granddaughter's bot mitzvah.

I mean, exactly, he's got to stop with these threats saying there's going to be long, you know, if he's basically said around election interference, he's, you know, there's going to be long-term prison sentences.

By the way, presidents don't decide prison sentences.

He's basically saying, if I don't win and you don't, you know,

the way I take these statements around election interference and all this stuff is, if you aren't willing to cheat for me and I win, I'm going to try and put you in prison.

Right.

I mean, it's just sounding so

blatantly autocratic.

Anyway, what do you think?

I think she is going to have a huge impact.

I think she did it beautifully, like you said, in a very clever way.

I think it led to a spate of others.

It was sort of like the George Clooney letter.

Tons and tons of very popular people suddenly, you know, even Linda Ronstadt did one, you know, like lots of people.

And they all have fans who respect them.

And I don't think they're lightweights and don't, you know, interestingly, the day, oh, God, the Trump spokesperson called her a teeny bopper.

It makes him seem, oh, what is a teeny bopper?

That's from the 50s, right?

Let's go get a Sunday.

like let's go down to the malt show this person oh she's a teeny bopper and then with then they put vance out creep number two

um you know on there saying oh she doesn't matter i mean i like her music but she doesn't matter and you're like would you just not say anything because you look like a friggin idiot right and i know i think people do care about grocery spritises i do think by the way inflation's down a little bit I think people do care about those things, but they also care about Taylor Swift.

And to insult her is such a mistake.

It's so.

And then one of the last thing J.D.

Mance is so dumb.

I don't even understand it.

He goes, nobody likes a billionaire celebrity.

And I was literally like, your boss is a billionaire celebrity.

Like, it was, he just, and then the Elon thing was just repulsive.

And his daughter smacked him down on that one.

That was grotesque, you know, his weird, rapey.

comments.

Yeah, the thing that really frustrated, I thought she was outstanding.

So Amelia, because I'm unhappy, I went to what I don't like.

I think both of their stated economic policies are so terrible and so populist.

Her price controls make no fucking sense.

Both of them on this

no taxes on tips is populist bullshit.

Both of them trying to protect steel because they think it's some sort of American icon when it's going to end up with less jobs if they don't let Nippon actually come in and invest.

Their economic policy so far, even I want to be clear, her

Vice President Harris has proposed a $50,000 tax credit for new businesses.

I don't like that.

I think, as a small business owner, we are the most tax-advantaged sector in America other than real estate.

And the reality is, with that kind of tax credit, you'd have too many shitty businesses being started.

It shouldn't be,

they should do away with regulations, but they shouldn't do away, they shouldn't give people $50,000 to start a business.

I think that's a bad idea and pure populism.

What do you like?

Oh, I love the child tax credit.

I like the idea of some sort sort of not a not a wealth tax, but we need to restore a more progressive tax structure, but it should be through an alternative minimum tax,

not a wealth tax, which just does not work.

But both of their economic policies are purely at this point.

Trump tariffs, everyone, you know, everyone's like, go with Harris on this because the tariff stuff is...

Goldman Sachs said this, like his policies will cause.

Yeah, that her economic plan would result in stronger.

Anyways, his tariffs, a combination of tariffs and an anti-immigration policy, it's as if you set out, if you said, the meta-goal of our economic agenda is to restore inflation to record highs, decrease the labor pool,

send wages up in specific areas where we desperately need immigrants.

And I'm going to put a tax on everything

through tariffs.

It just is.

And we'll raise the deficit by giving rich people.

And by the way, the CPI just came out.

It's the lowest.

It's a 2.5%.

It's the lowest it's been in three years.

Inflation is now almost down to its target.

Yeah.

Well, we'll see.

I think she did herself a great deal of good.

Now she's got to really, it's not very much time, but there's still enough time.

So she's got to really get people excited.

She just got people excited again.

She's good at this.

So far, she's done a great job.

Now she's got to put more meat on the bones.

I think a lot of the independent, all these, all these undecided voters are like, we need more information.

I would also argue that if she loses, it's kind of our fault in the sense that there's a group of people that feel very passionate and are willing to, you know, get emotional and talk about this.

We need canvassing.

We need, people have got to, you know, the difference between an opinion and a principle is that you're willing to sacrifice for something.

And people have got to decide if they really do believe that he or she is an existential threat to America's future.

Well, okay, fine.

What are you doing?

And are you canvassing?

Are you giving money?

Are you talking to people?

Are you signing up voters to be registered?

Are you helping to go?

I did this once in San Francisco.

You go to people and actually walk them who may not have an easy time getting to the voter, the polling stations.

It's like there is so much rhetoric.

There's so much heat.

I wonder if you're not.

Get off of Twitter or wherever

you start working.

You know what I've started to do?

It's interesting.

I find people I know are sort of on the fence, sort of Trump, Kamala Curious, I keep calling them.

And I sit and talk with them about her.

And

you can see them not wanting to vote for Trump, right?

Like they do not like Trump.

There's a group that loves him, period.

But a lot of people don't like him, right?

And they don't want to vote for him.

And if you sit, I think I've convinced 10 people to vote for her at least.

And I just keep doing it everywhere I go.

I'm like, listen, I know her.

Let me tell you the person I know.

She is much more conservative than you think.

I said, let me lay it out for you.

She, you know, she's got to bring that information to them.

But that's the thing I'm doing is I'm going around and saying, this is what I think I agree with you here.

That may be problematic, but what about this?

And when I say tariffs and stuff like that, they then go, yeah, tariffs are bad, you know.

And I was like, tariffs are communist.

I do something that's much easier and more scalable.

I say to someone, if you commit now to voting for Vice President Harris right now, right here, I will give you five seconds of uninterrupted eye contact.

Oh,

that's repulsive.

Say you'll do it for Trump and it'll work.

I've said that several times, and people just sort of pause and then try and end the conversation and walk away.

Yeah, that's a nice thing.

And as they're walking away, I say, okay, seven seconds.

Seven seconds.

Right, right, right.

That's very Elon Musk.

Anyway, we have a sweet moment of relief here.

And Trump was fucking nuts with those animals.

He's really.

Hide your dogs.

Hide Daisy.

You know who he's hanging out with all the time?

Laura Loomer.

She's a lunatic.

Even Marjorie Taylor Greene thinks she's a racist.

She insulted all these Indians.

She's with him all the time.

There are few natural resources we have been able to extract from the rest of the world that have added more value than Indian Americans or Indians immigrating to America.

It was shocking what she said.

And then Marjorie Taylor Greene then went after and said, this is racist, you know, which is sort of like, and then she went after Marjorie Taylor Greene for being a whore, essentially.

And

Trump doesn't like her and he likes me.

Lauren Boebert.

Well, I'm slut-shaming.

No, she was.

I'd like a day.

She said, no.

Raging moderates.

Let's rage.

We're moderates.

Let's rage.

So they started fighting Laura Loomer, who's heinous, and Marjorie Tellegreen, who's heinous.

Although I was on Marjorie's side this time.

And I let someone on threads, which I thought was very funny, say it's like watching Chlamydia fight gonorrhea.

That's bad.

Anywho, it's going well for the Trump campaign.

All right, Scott, let's go on a quick break.

We come back.

We'll talk about Apple bringing AI to its new models and take a listener mail question about who's really responsible for keeping kids safe online, one of our favorite topics.

Every day, millions of customers engage with AI agents like me.

We resolve queries fast.

We work 24-7 and we're helpful, knowledgeable, and empathetic.

We're built to be the voice of the brands we serve.

Sierra is the platform for building better, more human customer experiences with AI.

No hold music, no generic answers, no frustration.

Visit sierra.ai to learn more.

Support for Pivot comes from LinkedIn.

From talking about sports, discussing the latest movies, everyone is looking for a real connection to the people around them.

But it's not just person to person, it's the same connection that's needed in business.

And it can be the hardest part about B2B marketing, finding the right people, making the right connections.

But instead of spending hours and hours scavenging social media feeds, you can just tap LinkedIn ads to reach the right professionals.

According to LinkedIn, they have grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals, making it stand apart from other ad buys.

You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company role, seniority skills, and company revenue, giving you all the professionals you need to reach in one place.

So you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience and start targeting the right professionals only on LinkedIn ads.

LinkedIn will even give you $100 credit on your next campaign so you can try it for yourself.

Just go to linkedin.com slash pivot pod.

That's linkedin.com slash pivot pod.

Terms and conditions apply.

Only on LinkedIn ads.

Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start?

Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to.

Don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin or what that clunking sound from your dryer is?

With thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro.

You just have to hire one.

You can hire top-rated pros, see price estimates, and read reviews all on the app.

Download today.

Scott, we're back with our second big story.

I went to the Apple event this week, drove my little self out to Cupertino, the beautiful, and had delicious snacks there.

They have such good snacks.

At the event, Apple unveiled the iPhone 16, which is designed to run Apple's generative AI, Apple Intelligence.

Starting next month, the phones will summarize notifications, offer writing recommendations, and help you find photos and other capabilities.

We'll come over time.

That was the most interesting part to me of the AI stuff.

For requests not related to personal information, the phones will route to ChatGPT as a result of the company's deal with OpenAI and some other services.

It'll be in a private cloud, they say.

Wall Street analysts predict new features will help Apple sell 240 million phones next year, a 12% increase from this year.

Would you like to weigh in?

I have thoughts since I was there, but seeing the whole presentation and talking.

Why did you go first, Carol?

You were there.

Well, I thought I will buy this phone.

I have a 14 and I didn't buy the 15 because it was a better phone, but it wasn't that much better.

There's a couple things that I thought were interesting.

I'm not so the Apple Intelligence, they will get it right over time, right?

It'll help summarize this and that.

I don't find the ones on Google Mail or anything else very helpful.

I don't use them.

I don't use it on Microsoft whenever.

They always are asking, would you like help?

And I see what they're trying to do, but I haven't found efficacy in any of it.

We'll see how they do.

I thought the photo search stuff was great.

Like, that's one area of real friction for me is when I want to find photos.

Whereas with Cotton I make it out, such as, for example.

And it's all just natural language, what I thought was interesting.

It's not quite there yet.

Some of the stuff is in beta, but I sort of was...

encouraged by it.

They're much thinner phones, I would say, not tons thinner, but thinner.

They are, they don't, they have a new chip in them,

the A18 chip.

They have a better battery which is much longer which and more streamlined and there's two it sounds crazy actual things these these um buttons on them one's an action button on the side that i think is useful like and you can you can have like six to nine you use it for your flashlight other times it calls up whatever you use a lot uber whatever it happens to be um and then there's a camera toggle that i think is really great it's almost like a camera clicker on the side it's very sleek and i thought it was was incredibly helpful.

I know it sounds dumb, but reducing steps is something I'm very interested in on the phone because I do a lot of steps.

And I thought that was great.

I was super interested in the watch.

I have an iPhone, I mean a watch 8.

And the 10 is beautiful.

It's really quite beautiful.

And I think it's much better.

It's much sleeker.

It does a lot more.

That I certainly will buy.

The AirPods, I haven't getting an update.

And

there was an interesting thing about the hearing, turning them for mild to mid-level hearing loss, making them hearing aids was interesting.

So sleep apnea stuff, I don't happen to have that, but it's adding more capabilities to these devices and the working together of them was interesting.

I think it will get people to switch.

It's a good enough shift.

And the camera stuff,

the spatial photography was,

it wasn't like, wow, but it was like, these are very competent people making great changes.

We'll see on the AI.

I'm still, you know, I don't think anyone's, you know,

you know, putting glory all over themselves on these, on this stuff.

But I think it's just that's a slow-moving thing.

What do you think?

Oh, I

the one word perfectly describes this.

Underwhelming.

And of course, I went to my favorite source for tech reviews.

I went to Wales Online and read an article by Robert Dowling and Adam Kyler, I believe the name is.

Anyways, they summarized it perfectly.

Numerous features present in the newest model have been common among competitor brands for quite some time.

Moreover, they said the design changes like repositioning the camera lenses are not innovation.

You know, it's just

moving shit around.

And then what I thought kind of summarized it up was

it felt more like other

Why have a release when it's clear you don't have any breakthroughs, but just essentially it's just a money money grab or trying to give people a reason to upgrade.

And I felt I did what these guys are so smart.

I think what they did, which is kind of like a jiu-jitsu move, is they said there's nothing here where the bezeling is different, the camera's a little different.

That what you talked about, easy access to the pictures, you kind of improved it.

They improved it.

But this was just a definition of incremental.

But what they did that was really brilliant was they essentially did

called it Apple Intelligence and started talking about all the things that AI is going to do here.

And

that created some excitement.

But I would argue this was the most incremental

non-exciting improvements in the phone that we've ever seen.

I just think the rest of the world.

No, I think the last one was.

I think they definitely added stuff here.

Incremental is a very good way to put it.

I did see Go Geffer and he thought, what do you think?

I go, well, good stuff.

You know what I mean?

It was good stuff.

And I think some of the ideas are interesting.

I just, there's only so many, so much you can do to innovate this thing, right?

I mean, right now, actually, Huawei just came out with a new trifold phone.

Have you seen this thing?

But it's $2,800.

It has 5 million pre-orders.

That's a very different direct.

That's innovation.

The quote I like is: what's the point of making a new iPhone all the time without a major leap in technological advancements besides just blatantly wanting more money?

And that's what this was.

It's just not.

That's true.

It's and the AI stuff, shouldn't shouldn't you be able to do that with an iOS upgrade?

I just don't,

I think it's a brilliant company.

They're brilliant marketers.

This was marketing.

This wasn't innovation.

I would agree with you on that, but they cannot not keep up.

You know, Pixel, as you were noting, Google announced a Pixel phone that includes conversational virtual assistant, AI photo editing capabilities, ability to ask the company's AI complex questions.

So I think they had to keep up here.

This was table stakes.

And one of the things, you know, and again, it was little things, but again, I'm going to get it because I think the AirPods, it stops when you're conversing.

And I know some of them do and some of them don't, but they can't not keep up.

I'm fascinated by this trifold.

I definitely turned my head when I saw it.

And some of these folding phones,

who else has one?

Another, there was another half-folding phone.

I think it's Samsung.

Doesn't Samsung have one?

Samsung has it.

I don't know why I'm fascinated by these phones, but I am.

I'll probably break one.

And they're very, you know, it's interesting.

I think they have to be incremental a little bit unless they decide to completely change the phone dynamic.

Or do fewer product release events and wait till you actually have something to talk about.

Yeah, but yeah.

This is the most powerful luxury brand in the history of mankind, and it sends a very strong signal about who you are.

Everyone immediately sees what kind of phone you have.

But this event, oh my God, snooze a rama.

And the product that has been the most exciting Apple product, or let me put this way, the most underhyped that doesn't get its credit, hands down, is AirPods.

In 2022, AirPod sales totaled 15 billion.

I didn't get more recent numbers.

It's probably closer to 20 now.

If I get into, I bet I spend,

it feels like, I probably spend two, $300 a month on two things,

sunglasses and AirPods.

Because if I'm getting into a cab, it means I'm getting out without a pair of sunglasses and AirPods.

Yeah, I steal a couple from you.

Go ahead.

I now have an unopened box of AirPods that I just travel with.

I just travel with them.

Did you see them?

They're everywhere.

They're everywhere.

Anyways, I spend, I think I spend more on AirPods as I think about it than any technology.

Maybe U porn.

I don't know.

Anyways, that's why they have to be incremental.

That's why they have to.

That's why AirPods got incremental updates.

They have to keep them fresh.

I don't agree with you.

Yeah, but what I'm arguing for here is that they are running out of ideas and it's becoming like,

let's try and pretend this is some sort of breakthrough when it isn't.

Well,

I think AI, once it becomes this assistant that talks to all your devices, really will shift your relationship with all.

And they have all of the pieces, right?

This kind of thing.

And so they have to keep the pieces looking good is what they have to do.

And one of the, I have to say,

there's a the gold, the gold colored with that mesh

band, it's a beautiful watch.

It's a beautiful watch.

They own the watch business now, practically.

I know some people buy beautiful watches, but man, have they stolen that business?

And I thought they're going to own the hearing aid business or the, you know, the lesser hearing aid business.

And it really is dramatic what they've done.

in watches.

Well, it's well, speaking of things that aren't so good for Apple and also other tech companies, EU's top court hits Apple and Google with fines in the billions this week.

The court ruled that Apple must repay over $14 billion for illegally receiving tax benefits in Ireland, and that Google must pay $2.6 billion in antitrust fines for abuse of its dominant position.

Both companies have been fighting the fines for almost a decade.

The case are seen as a win for antitrust regulator Marguerite Bestiger's legacy.

Fines, that's kind of a lot of fines, Scott.

You don't like fines, but it's kind of

fines.

I i just don't think they're everything's relative though let me let me just give you an example here um

the the point of a fine is and the point of taxes is it's meant to foot to some sort of deterrence around behavior now the deterrence is a function of

um the size relative to your economic power right so i'll give you an example occasionally i'll get an alert on american express saying there's a charge for 9.99 on your amex on amazon was this you

One, if yes, two, if no.

It's not.

It's fraud.

And you know what I hit?

One, it was me.

Because for $10 and some limited fraud,

that is less of a cost to me than having to wait for a week to get another fucking credit card and having every single site that already has my card have to be re-registered.

And the credit card companies, generally speaking, do a pretty good job of cauterizing repeat fraud.

So I will lie because I have money.

Oh.

I would rather say no.

I would rather pay the 10 bucks to the criminal that figured out a way to get my card and buy something on Amazon

than

tell American Express, no, it wasn't me.

And then they shut off the card and my life goes into logistical disarray every time I try to log on to Uber.

I find that immediately when they cancel the card, I can no longer get Uber or, by the way, Wheelie, which is a better ride-hailing system.

I find it's a nightmare.

My point is, it's about incentives relative to your economic well-being.

And we're nowhere near that in terms of these fines.

Yep.

They need to be fined.

So what I do like about some of the constructs that the EU is putting in place, they're not defining numbers.

They're defining percentage of profits or multiple of

annual revenues.

But be clear, when these guys,

when we fined Meta $5 billion for refusing to comply with the consent decree, all the government did was validate to them that the smart thing to do was to ignore the government consent decree.

Yeah, well,

we'll see where it goes.

You know, it's interesting because also in this country, Amy Klobuchar,

group of Democrats led by Kay, we love her, is urging the FDC and the Justice Department to investigate whether AI summary tools are anti-competitive, which they're all doing.

I think OpenAI is about to release some more new stuff this week, too.

In a letter, the centers say AI summary features hit publishers, while platforms like Google and Meta Meta profit from content created by others.

Right now, AI summarizer often keep users in the original search platform instead of directing them to the publisher's website.

A publisher would have to opt out of being included in search in order to avoid having their content summarized.

This is another way of these companies.

It's a very good thing to be investigated.

You have to take, you have to be have to be basically stolen by them in order to be seen by others, which of course is, you know, this should be a slam dunk for regulators and for courts, but it hasn't been.

It's another version of what they're doing.

You blew my mind on this about a month ago or two months ago.

You highlighted a very obvious thing that I hadn't even thought about, and that is

basically Google is kind of the, you know,

it's the front end directory.

All right, I want to go see a dermatologist on the fourth floor of this building.

I look on, you know, their directory and it says go to the fourth floor, but I go to the dermatologist, right?

I do a, this morning I was looking at minimum wage statistics, like what industries,

by the way, minimum wage on an inflation-adjusted basis is down 40% since 1970.

Anyway, but

I go to Statista, I go to the National Bureau of Labor and Statistics, I leave Google.

And this, and you pointed this out, essentially no one's ever going to leave.

Because what they're saying is you don't need to go anywhere.

And the analogy I've used is that Google is Walmart.

We have everything, but it's a pain to sort through.

And OpenAI or ChatGPT is Williams Norse Sephora and says, we're not giving you every toaster.

We're going to attempt to give you the best answer such that you don't go anywhere.

This is literally, I don't want to call it the last nail in the coffin of traditional media, but Google does send a lot of traffic to nyt.com.

Now these guys are saying, no, you're not going to need to go anywhere.

And then I took that.

And then this is a bit of a tangent, but I think it's an interesting one.

Did you see that a former OpenAI co-founder raised a billion billion dollars for a new quote-unquote safe AI?

Yeah, he got a bunch of money.

A billion at a $5 billion market capitalization, and they're positioning it as a safer AI.

I'm like, boss, if you take $1 billion from VCs,

your priority is not safe.

And from Andreessen, that was the irony.

Mr.

Not Safe.

Give us a break.

Call it what it is, something AI.

But at $5 billion, I think that's one of the most overvalued companies right now.

Well, here's the thing.

Open AI is seeking $150 billion valuation in a funding round just i heard it was a hundred but even at a hundred now it's 150 okay even at 150 kara it's undervalued because

it's got about somewhere between depending on which source you look at 60 to 70 percent share i mean if these in my sense all the stats i see on open ai and they're turning into tick tock they're starting to sandbag their numbers all the numbers i see indicate one thing uh open ai slash microsoft ai same thing are are running away with it.

They are running away with it.

Elon Musk is trying to cheat in the

Memphis by

putting up things that are hurting the neighborhood,

gas generators.

There's an enormous cost to doing this and the energy expenses.

So he's trying to keep up by doing that.

It's crazy how many people are trying to raise money to compete.

This is $6.5 billion they're raising at a valuation of, and it's a $70 billion increase from its valuation nine months ago.

Incredible.

And by the way,

I think that's probably a good investment.

Right.

We'll see.

We'll see.

I do think this is the appropriate place for regulators to look at because they will dominate everything.

Although it's an expensive race, which is happening with these tech companies,

and they're doing all kinds of manner of things to compete with each other.

So do you want to hear my story about Peak Scott Galloway?

Okay.

Go ahead.

I'm so glad you took that question.

So in 1999, I had a shaved head, I had credentials, a good rap, and I had started a couple e-commerce companies.

I was the most, one of the most fundable people in the world.

In late 99, I went and raised 15 million from Goldman, Maveron, which is Howard Schultz's company, everyone, all these masters of the universe, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs.

And I started an e-commerce incubator called Brand Farm.

And the entire company was me and an employment contract for four years.

I'm like, I'm going to stay here at least four years and a PowerPoint presentation.

And I raised 15 million at a pre of 35.

So at the age of 32, I was worth, with a PowerPoint presentation, $35 million pre, $50 million post, which on an inflation-adjusted basis now would be, I think, about $130 or $150 million.

That's how frothy things were.

I could show up at the age of 33 with a PowerPoint presentation and raise $15 million from very credible investors and say, I am worth, my commitment to this company for four years is worth, with the capital you're going to put in, is worth $50 million.

That was, that was peak.

That's when, that's when I thought I was going to be

now I'm here with you dating Patty Stone Cypher.

What happened to me?

What happened to me?

By the way,

did you hear about Prince Harry's birthday party?

My birthday party sounds so much cooler than his.

Whose?

Prince Harry, is that his name?

Harry and Matthew.

He's having it at the same time.

I'm going to that.

You've left me.

Fucking Don Lemon Lemon texts me and says, Bitch, you didn't invite me to your birthday party.

I'm like, Don, I'd love to have you.

And he's like, I'm coming.

And then a day later, he's like, I can't.

I've got a book party.

I'm like, what?

You just wanted to be invited.

Yeah, he did.

That's it.

Delamo, you are off the list.

Scott, let's pivot to a listener question.

The question comes in via voicemail.

Let's listen.

Hi, Kara.

Hi, Scott.

My listener question

is in regard to the Child Safety Protection Act.

I'm wondering how much of the responsibility for protecting kids online falls on the parents.

You both talk so much and give so much insightful input into where the responsibility lies with all of the big companies.

I'm a teacher and we've started to take cell phones from students in school.

this year.

They've been putting them in little pouches and keeping them in their lockers for the entire day.

And I feel like at this point, teachers are having a lot of responsibility for keeping kids safe during school and keeping kids safe, at least during school hours online.

How much of the responsibility do you think is falling on parents?

And do you think that there is a lack in responsibility at this point in how much parents are monitoring their kids online?

Would love to hear your thoughts.

Thanks always.

You guys are awesome to listen to.

Oh, that's nice.

I love love hearing from a teacher.

I'm going to start with this.

You know, it's a mixed thing, like a lot of things.

I think tech companies are responsible for creating tools that parents can use and being serious about it, not, you know, not being so they have a responsibility in how they design these things.

I think, obviously, schools are going to have to be involved.

They have the kids all day, and so they have to put in systems in place with cooperation of parents to keep the phones away from kids during the day.

I'm all for

the idea of doing that for my kids for sure.

And then countries and countries and legislators all over the world have a responsibility

for doing this.

Australia, the Prime Minister, announced his government would introduce legislation for age restrictions between 14 and 16.

It's gotten a backlash from people, but I think it's not a bad idea.

There should be lots of ideas from our regulators.

But lastly, it is up to the parents, even though it's really difficult.

This stuff is addictive.

Parents are addicted themselves and it's complex and the tools aren't very good.

I'll tell you from using them.

They're just not.

They're very confusing to me and I'm very good at this.

Parents do have a responsibility to have some control over their kids and their phone usage.

It's just like anything else like television, like eating bad foods, like please don't go out with that kid.

you know, et cetera.

But teachers certainly shouldn't bear the brunt of this.

And I hate when parents start yelling at teachers about these, the cell phones.

Although, you know, a lot of parents, the only argument I find actually even slightly good is depressing, which is in case of shootings.

Kids should have their phones.

And that they certainly should.

So that's the only thing that sort of gives me pause about kids not having cell phones in schools.

But

that's...

heinous, unfortunately, in a heinous situation there.

Scott?

There's a lot of nuance here.

I would argue that at public schools or lower middle income, schools are lower middle income, the way you can tell if a school is going to be successful or not successful is a level of parental involvement.

And unfortunately, what's happened, there's no reason to have phones in schools, but parents want to be able to communicate with their kids.

And

there's this collective problem where people immediately go to, well, okay, just don't allow your kid on.

social media, on Snap.

Well, here's the problem.

Your kid ends up more depressed if he's the only one not on Snap.

So unless schools ban phones collectively, unless we have age gating that's federally mandated, we're doubly fucked.

Now,

I empathize, so I really empathize with her point as it comes to the relationship between parents and schools.

And I found myself when I was in the position on our school saying to people, calm the fuck down.

If at some point you think things are so bad, then put pressure on me as your representative to find a new headmaster.

But until then, your job is to support this person who has a PhD in education and has been teaching for 40 fucking years.

All right.

So just back the fuck off.

As opposed to these parents showing up and deciding that all of a sudden they're mini experts in education because they have kids.

Anyways, as it relates to parents, generally speaking, we overprotect offline, we underprotect online.

I would think most people would look at me and think, he probably gets it around this stuff.

Oh, lucky for him and his kids.

This is what has happened to my kids.

They have experienced

online bullying, both being bullied and being accused of bullying, hiding in the bathroom so they could be on TikTok for hours on end, severe during COVID, device addiction that sent one of my kids into a really frightening tailspin.

Device, I'm the guy, I'm the guy that's basically been railing on big tech.

You would think if anyone understood the threats, it would be me.

And unbeknownst to me, one of my kids several years ago developed a full-blown device addiction.

They have resources.

They have involved parents.

Can you imagine what it's like for a single mother?

So while I understand the parents' role on this, that is basically the go-to of people who don't have children.

Because when you have kids at this age and realize they're going through puberty and desperate for other people's affirmation, and no one including Apple, no one including Meta, no one including Alphabet has any incentive other than to get them totally fucking addicted with a casino, an arcade, a gambling, a dating, the high school cafeteria in their pocket at all times.

Unless there is legislation saying no one under the age of 16 should be on social media, and unless we as parents all bind together and say schools cannot have phones in schools, maybe a flip phone so you can communicate with them.

Fine.

None of this is going to change because I'm telling you, their addiction is greater than our parenting skills.

Right.

And we're addicted.

You know, you talked to me about this.

100%.

You know, 100%.

I had to say it to two different people this week.

I'm like, put down your fucking phone.

Put it down.

And I like my phone, by the way.

I actually am pretty good about putting it down a lot.

I feel as if I text you, I'm going to hear back from you within about three to 10 minutes.

It's on my watch because I see it on my watch.

Oh, is that what?

Is that what it is?

Yeah.

I think text, that's different to me.

That's like a phone call.

So, um, it's not the addiction nature of it, it's the that's a communication thing.

I don't find that necessarily addictive, it's being responsive in a relationship.

Like, you know, that's how well I'm glad to know that you care.

I'm glad I like to respond to you, but I think you're 100% right.

That we, two, a couple of things, Scott and I believe in completely, and we agree on.

We don't agree on every part of this, but uh, age limits.

We think go for it, Australia.

I think age limits is important.

I know there's the worry about driving dangerous activity online, and kids are going to smoke in the back of

an alley too.

But we have to have some rules.

The second thing is

you have to be a parent and think about it and think about your own addiction at the same time.

And you've got to let these schools get these cell phones out of schools and let these teachers do what they think is best and stop friggin' second-guessing them every minute of the day.

I agree with you.

I am so, so far, so pleased in letting these teachers that Clara is going to this public school.

They're terrific and they're trained.

So, anyway,

we, you know, thank you for this incredibly thoughtful thing.

And you guys, teachers are doing God's work.

I know people get slapped around a lot, and some teachers aren't good.

But boy, what a challenge in today's society to be a teacher.

Anyway, if you've got a question of your own, if you'd like answered, send it our way.

Go to nymag.com/slash pivot to submit a question for the show or call 855-51-PIVOT.

All right, Scott, one more quick break.

We'll be back for Wins and Fails.

This month on Explain It to Me, we're talking about all things wellness.

We spend nearly $2 trillion on things that are supposed to make us well.

Collagen smoothies and cold plunges, Pilates classes, and fitness trackers.

But what does it actually mean to be well?

Why do we want that so badly?

And is all this money really making us healthier and happier?

That's this month on Explain It To Me, presented by Pureleaf.

Mike and Alyssa are always trying to outdo each other.

When Alyssa got a small water bottle, Mike showed up with a four-litre jug.

When Mike started gardening, Alyssa started beekeeping.

They called it truce for their holiday and used Expedia Trip Planner to collaborate on all the details of their trip.

Once there, Mike still did more laps around the pool.

Whatever.

You were made to outdo your holidays.

We were made to help organize the competition.

Expedia, made to travel.

Charlie Sheet is an icon of decadence.

I lit the fuse and my life turns into everything it wasn't supposed to be.

He's going the distance.

He was the highest paid TV star of all time.

When it started to change, it was quick.

He kept saying, no, no, no, I'm in the hospital now, but next week I'll be ready for the show.

Now, Charlie's sober.

He's going to tell you the truth.

How do I present this with any class?

I think we're past that, Charlie.

We're past that, yeah.

Somebody call action.

Yeah.

AKA Charlie Sheen, only on Netflix, September 10th.

Okay, Scott, let's hear some wins and fails.

We've got to keep this tight because I'm going to interview Hillary Clinton in a minute, just so you know.

Oh, God, here we go.

Really?

I'm just saying.

What should I ask Hillary?

I think Secretary, I've said this all the time.

I think Secretary Clinton is the best president that ever was.

I'm just, I'm, she's literally a hero of mine.

I think she's fantastic.

I think on foreign policy, she's one of the brightest minds in the world right now.

Anyways,

wins and fails.

So look, my win is Vice President Harris.

I just imagined as she pulled into, you know, Pennsylvania, to the debate stage.

Can you imagine?

Can you imagine the pressure on her shoulders?

There are millions of women who are going to become pregnant, who will not have options, who will will not have choices if I fuck this up.

Those women are counting on me.

The West is counting on me.

Democrats are counting on me.

Non-whites, women are all counting on me.

And

in about 90 minutes, I can either be their hero or fuck it up for all of them.

I don't think people appreciate the amount of pressure these people feel and register that is placed on their shoulders.

Basically, if Vice President Harris had not stuck the landing here, I think she would probably be out of politics and we'd have Trump for another four years.

And I think that I literally think these people are superhuman.

So, and she just absolutely rose to the occasion.

And I also want to just draw a lot of attention to the team that prepped her.

Her team was outstanding.

You could just feel people going, I'm in charge charge of the split screen.

Here's what you want to look like when he says this kind of thing.

Here's what you want to look like when he says this kind of thing.

The split screen expertise here was fantastic.

You're going to go in a two-minute response.

You're going to spend exactly 72 seconds making your points and you're going to spend 18 triggering him at the end because we're going to emasculate, we're going to obviate, we're going to puncture the next 45 of his 90 when he comes back with some stupid defensive rant because he can't handle you saying that his crowds are exhausted and and um bored they were outstanding and my win and again people know this who have followed me and i've gotten a lot of shit for it fine i am not an enormous fan and have not been of vice president harris she are you now

oh i'm sold i think she deserves i mean she had my vote but uh i thought i'm so glad you said that because if you'd said i'm waiting and seeing because there's so many voters just like i really liked it, but I need more from her.

Women always have to get, she like landed it again and again and again.

And you're like, I'd like some more.

A man would have, this would have been locked up for a man.

I'm just saying.

But go ahead.

I don't know.

Whenever I've gotten a bunch of shit without that, I'm like, okay, I'm knocking on doors in fucking Wisconsin and I've given six figures to our campaign.

What have you done?

I've done a lot of stuff.

No, no, I'm not saying that to you.

I'm not saying that to you.

I'm saying it to all the people who like, give me shit because I'm not part of the cult.

Anyways,

that sounded arrogant.

So I'm going to go to my fail.

My fail is this jingoism, nationalism, ridiculousness.

It is the blocking of

acquisitions by international firms, most recently highlighted by this ridiculous politicization of what was once a great company, U.S.

Steel.

was actually the biggest company in the world at one point, employed a third of a million people, was the first company to hit a billion dollars in revenues.

And as happens with almost every industry from the end of World War II to now, when Japan and Germany, who had had their infrastructure totally leveled and had the advantage of building an infrastructure or an industry up from scratch, they are just much better at it now.

The combined market share or the total market share of the global steel industry is I think 5%

Japan, 4% the U.S.

We're not even a player in that industry anymore.

And in China, it's over half.

They control the majority of the world's steel.

The only way we can compete against China, the only way you're going to save much less grow those scant 20,000 jobs, 4,000 4,000 of which are in Pennsylvania.

We're not talking about a big economic opportunity here.

We're talking about a company that's got about a, I think it's got about

a $7 or $8 billion market cap.

I mean, essentially, this company is worth 1%

of, I don't know, or half a percent of what an Amazon is.

Anyways,

you're going to discourage, you're going to put a chill on international companies that want to invest in American companies because of this bullshit.

And nobody has the sack

to go and tell the American public, okay, this is how we create more jobs.

This is how we create more prosperity.

We create free flows of capital and we let our allies invest in our companies when they're better at shit than we are.

And they give us the right to invest in their companies when we're better at it than they are.

This is going to create jobs for everyone.

This is so,

this just drives me nuts.

It's so politically motivated.

It is so, in my opinion, a waste of resources and such a fundamental lack of understanding of basic economics and trade.

That's my favorite.

All right.

Thank you.

All right.

I have a win and a fail.

The win is, I hope the three Murdoch siblings win in this case in court.

Not just because I don't like Rupert Murdoch, but I don't like Ruben Murdoch, but he's trying to change an irrevocable trust

in the most cynical of ways in order to live past his death.

And I'm sorry, Rupert.

Someday you'll die and you don't get to run things.

That's just the way it goes.

He's 93.

He's trying to amend his trust and he's trying to do an end run around his three children and trying to put his older son in place.

He signed it away years ago and his attempts to

do this is just an old man yelling, screaming at the universe that he doesn't want to die.

And I'm sorry, he will be dying.

And so will I and so will Scott.

So this is a really important, this is a very consequential case, I think, and it's going on right now in Nevada.

A single probate judge.

They tried to keep it out of the news.

In this case, I think it should have been.

I'm sorry you don't get along with some of your children, but really, please stop.

Like, don't end your life in this way.

It's depressing to me to try to do this.

And I, you know, I understand it.

I'm not sure it's depressing.

He's banging women much hotter than him.

I think he's going to marry Britney Spears in his next life.

Anyway, there's a great piece in the Wall Street Journal, including a dinner with Robert De Niro, who

is in a business relationship with both James and Elizabeth Murdoch

around the Trebeca Film Festival?

And there's a great scene of him talking where he says, You can still love your father, but you can tell him he's wrong for doing what he's doing to this country.

De Niro called telling Elizabeth at the dinner.

She was visibly shaken after the conversation.

The actor later apologized.

I called Elizabeth and told her I was sorry, said De Niro, the journal an email.

I saw how upset she was, how badly she felt about that.

I think she does love her father, but

to put her through that, there's a less good relationship with James, but it's just grotesque.

I'm sorry.

I hope you lose, Rupert.

I hope you lose.

So, and in my

fail is Mark Duckerberg appeared at a packed thing.

He's been doing, he's decided not to talk to journalists anymore.

Talk about insulting Klamala Harris for this, but there's a thing called the Acquired Podcast, and he goes and the Times, the New York Times had a great piece about it.

It's a great pod, by the way.

It may be, but it's very nice to the people that they cover.

It's not.

He's been going going to things where he has, where he can be adored.

And that's fine if he wants to do that.

He can go to things he's being adored, but this is what he's doing now.

He's decided to go only on

podcasts where he doesn't get any pushback for anything.

And I'm sorry, you may like it, but he didn't get any pushback whatsoever.

And you have been a critic of him.

So I think you wouldn't.

I'm just saying it's a great podcast.

And some podcasts and some media decide that they're going to give people a chance to present them best sells.

Have you listened to Acquired, by the way?

I have.

I think it licks people up and down.

That's what I think.

But that's great.

Your job is there to celebrate business and help people understand business.

It's not to hold people accountable.

I guess.

I celebrate it.

It's your fail.

Go ahead.

It's my fail.

I think it's a fail.

I don't care what they do.

It's fine.

That's their business.

They can do that.

You know, look at your big brain, Mr.

Zuckerberg.

How did it get that big?

I get that it's a good thing to do that.

But what he said, and they didn't push back on it all, was some of the things they were asserting we were doing or were responsible for.

I don't think, I actually don't think we were.

And he said

the mistake was apologizing.

Honestly, take responsibility for the things you are responsible for then and talk about them with an adult.

And all reporters are not trying to get you.

It's such a ridiculous, victim-y personality disorder that most of these people have.

And he's fine to go on these things, Scott.

I'm not meaning to attack the acquired people, but

he's never going to face any real questions and scrutiny.

And that seems to be the way he's going.

But you can't, i'm whatever mark it's just tired of saying i'm sorry and then say it then start to do something about it that's my feeling you know absolutely would help address this these problems

whiskey and haggis

you're we're going to scotland we're going to scotland i'm not having haggis we're going to a nation whose brightest people all have one thing in common they've left oh my god if you're going to go stop you're absolutely going to love have you been insulting insulting the country don't insult the country.

I am Scotland's biggest fan.

I was trying to buy Rangers FC.

Happy birthday, Scott.

We're going with you're turning 50.

Is that what we're going with?

That's right.

Okay.

That's what it says on the invitation.

It goes, let's go with it.

Just go with it.

Just go with it.

You like that.

You love that, right?

You made me laugh, though.

In Scotland, though, this is a true story.

If you buy a three-year-old whiskey, you can call it Scotch.

Younger than that, it's just called bad parenting.

Oh, my God.

The worst.

Let me just say, welcome to the non-50s.

We will have pictures of the event.

We'll be talking about the event.

Things will have happened next time we see you, audience.

And by the way, thank you to every person who came up to me in Austin, in LA, in San Francisco.

And just this morning, someone chased me when I was going to get baggage claim and saying how much he loves us.

So thank you.

I've forgotten everybody's name, but you're all wonderful.

And thank you for your kind thoughts on the show.

Okay, Scott.

And they love you, Scott.

Happy birthday.

They said happy birthday.

Everyone said happy birthday to Scott.

Everyone wish Scott a happy birthday.

And when we get back, we'll have Tales from the Scottish Highlands.

Okay, Scott, that's the show.

We'll be back on Tuesday with more Pivot.

Please read us out.

Today's episode was produced by Lara Naiman, Zoe Marcus, and Taylor Griffin.

Aaliyah Jackson engineered this episode.

Thanks also to Drew Burroughs and Miles Severio.

Mishak Kurua is Vox Media's executive producer of audio.

Make sure you subscribe to the show wherever you listen to podcasts.

Thanks for listening to Pivot from New York Magazine and Vox Vox Media.

You can subscribe to the magazine at nymag.com/slash pod.

We'll be back next week for another breakdown of all things tech and business.

Kara, I will see you just south of the Arctic Circle in a place that it's known for being the homeland of golf,

whiskey, kilts, plaid, Pringle, the great fashion brand, Pringle.

Very excited to see you.

Safe travels.