Twitter’s New Anti-Harassment Policy, Chris Cuomo’s Suspension, and Stacey Abrams is Running for Governor

Support for the show comes from Saks Fifth Avenue.

Sacks Fifth Avenue makes it easy to shop for your personal style.

Follow us here, and you can invest in some new arrivals that you'll want to wear again and again, like a relaxed product blazer and Gucci loafers, which can take you from work to the weekend.

Shopping from Saks feels totally customized, from the in-store stylist to a visit to Saks.com, where they can show you things that fit your style and taste.

They'll even let you know when arrivals from your favorite designers are in, or when that Brunello Cacchinelli sweater you've been eyeing is back in stock.

So, if you're like me and you need shopping to be personalized and easy, head to Saks Fifth Avenue for the Best Fall Arrivals and Style inspiration.

Most AI coding tools generate sloppy code that doesn't understand your setup.

Warp is different.

Warp understands your machine, stack, and code base.

It's built for the entire software lifecycle, from prompt to production.

With the powers of a terminal and the interactivity of an IDE, Warp gives you a tight feedback loop with agents so you can prompt, review, edit, and ship production-ready code.

Trusted by over 600,000 developers, including 56% of the Fortune 500, try Warp free or unlock Pro for just $5 at warp.dev slash top code.

Hi, everyone.

This is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network.

I'm Kara Swisher.

And I am changing my name.

Why?

I am the explorer of the oceans of my rage and anger.

I am the dog Cousteau.

My new name.

My new name.

Where did you?

That's right.

Do you realize how far I have evolved?

Okay, let's look at Scott's major influences, TV.

All right.

All right.

Yep.

Lovely.

The first show I ever watched was I Dream of Genie.

Okay.

Genie Getting Your Ball.

Yes, Jeannie.

And then we got cable, and you know what I watched that?

What?

More, I Dream of Genie.

Then I evolved the threes company, then Charlie's Angels.

I am the fucking Alan Alda of podcasting compared to my upbringing.

This is me, too.

I watched all those shows.

Love Bo, Love American Style.

Do you remember them?

Do you remember all those things?

It was a, it was, it was.

Come and knock on my door.

We've been waiting for you.

Oh, my God.

Dog Cusco.

All right.

In any case, thank you for that trip, everybody, just tell you how old we are.

Today, we're going to unpack Twitter's confusing new policy.

A star anchor is getting suspended indefinitely at CNN.

We'll take a listener question about Tesla.

And also, today, the day we're taping, is Dr.

Jeffrey Swisher's birthday.

So I want you to say happy birthday.

Dr.

Swish.

He is his birthday.

He's a great brother.

I posted lovely pictures of him when he came to Hong Kong when I had a stroke.

He flew right over, took care of me.

He's a great brother.

Happy birthday, Jeff.

Yeah.

He deserves it.

He likes being

Twitter.

What if he was governor and needed your help?

You would just ignore his calls?

No.

Sorry, couldn't help it.

Couldn't help it.

Couldn't help it.

You know what he wanted let me virtue signal about other people's families here's what he wanted and let's see if you get the reference he wanted a vagina tunnel for his birthday what two new things oh

success oh god that was good

congratulations you've just been born into the world of kendall roy i'm sorry kendall's having a breakdown kendall is having a breakdown

keep watching keep watching i don't know

you little saucy mint i'm a saucy dog i am teasing

anyway jeff swisher's birthday wish him a happy birthday on Twitter.

Everybody.

You know,

he's in my speed dial.

If I end up in jail, I call Preet.

And if I end up in the hospital, I'm calling D.

Swish.

You should.

He's a very good person.

Very smart man.

He's a wonderful man.

He's a wonderful man.

Anyway, but first, the UK's competition watchdog has a mandate for Meta sell off Giphy.

Ooh, Giphy's really important.

That's a really cool company.

The Competition and Markets Authority said that Meta's acquisition of Giphy would reduce competition between social media platforms.

Obviously, these are GIFs.

Meta says it's considering an appeal in the next four weeks.

What does Meta need Giphy for?

Why not?

Of course, you know, Twitter's got its version of things where you can pick GIFs, GIFs, or whatever you call them.

So what do you think?

What do you think?

Oh, in other news, South Africa

wants me to be general consul of Australia.

What difference does it make with the UK?

I don't understand

how a foreign country regulates the breakup of an entity that's domained somewhere else.

If they don't do this, does this mean they can inhibit their business?

I don't know what this means.

Low-hanging fruit, I guess.

But, you know, they should be focused on the big things.

Meaning, this is just little stuff.

I mean,

there is an overall look at all their,

in the European Union, there's one going on.

There's a bill that's moving slowly to completion that Marguerite Vestiger is pushing, is sort of hip-checking into existence, which would look at that.

But looking at acquisitions over time is what a real smart group of lawmakers need to do that, not take, you know, shoot off Giphy or whatever.

It's probably going to be around Instagram or WhatsApp or something significant.

So, whatever, UK.

UK's been tough on Facebook, though.

You know that.

How about it?

How about it?

Whatever.

They've been tough on Facebook comparatively.

Anyway.

It's done a lot of good, too.

Yeah.

It's done a lot of good.

Let's have the new CEO of Instagram.

Go tell me.

Maybe like Jack Darcy leaving Twitter, it will happen someday.

Jesus Christ.

And your Twitter spaces thing, what a bunch of sycophants you invited on.

Not only roommates, but sycophants.

They are too.

Talking about, well, maybe Jack decided to go do crypto.

He was fucking fired.

All right, okay.

Let me get that.

You know, I got into a beef on Twitter about you saying that with someone.

I forget who it was.

But he was calling you.

He said, I shouldn't be affiliated with you.

And I said, I said, I mean, first off, that is good judgment, but I'm right on Jack Dorsey.

I know, but he was all up in my grill about your thoughts on Jack Dorsey.

In any case, would a guy who is treating a company like a 70 CEO treated a golf course swing by on Wednesday and on Sundays?

Life is complex.

Some of the things he's done are good.

This is not that complex.

Hold on, sir.

Hold on.

I have a good friend at Twitter who's a senior executive though.

Yeah, okay.

Very talented guy.

A ton of options.

Okay.

A ton of options professionally.

Could have gone to work for Google, Snap, the New York Times, Pinterest.

And over the last five years, he has not increased his wealth, nor has any one of the 5,000 employees.

You are a fiduciary for other people's economic well-being, not for your own raging narcissism using a company as your plaything.

And I can't get over the number of apologists for this bullshit behavior.

Anyways, sorry, go ahead.

It's not a plaything.

Oh, my goodness.

It's more cost-effective.

It was a total plaything for Jack.

The total plaything is not your thing, is it?

It isn't.

It was not a plaything.

It was only a plaything.

10% of his time.

No, I get that part.

There he lost me.

But what he made is really, nobody else made that.

He invented it.

Good for him.

All right.

Well, it's pretty good.

It's pretty good.

He got a billion dollars for it.

Does that mean that 20 years, 15?

Okay, just a quick stat, quick fun stat.

All right.

In 2000, I know business is business.

Hold on.

In 2013, when Twitter went public on the day of the IPO, it closed at $45.

Yeah.

Do you know what it is today?

$42.

I know I wrote this in my name a tech company that is trading below its IPO price.

I got it.

I got it.

Oh, but he's got beard oils, and he's a thoughtful guy that speaks in high

tongue.

He's moved on to block.

That is weird.

Who do you work for?

Block.

I work for block.

HR.

Remember the ads?

Speaking of old people, remember the ads?

HR Bach?

Shh.

You know,

there was a lot of people.

It was EF Hutton.

Oh, you're right.

Oh my God.

You're so old, you're losing it.

Listen to me.

You're losing your cultural references.

Listen to me.

Here's someone you're going to have a hard time insulting.

Stacey Abrams says she's running for governor of of Georgia.

Gangster.

Here's an announcement.

That's the job of governor, to fight for one Georgia, our Georgia.

And now it's time to get the job done.

In her last run, Abrams lost to Governor Brian Kemp by just 1.4 points.

Kemp will likely run again, but without the support of Donald Trump.

Donald Trump is after him, trying to get Herschel, was it Herschel Walker?

I don't know, whatever.

No, he's trying to get him to run for senator.

But Donald Trump is after Kemp, which is interesting.

Georgia, under Kemp, implemented a strict new voting law since the last time she ran, could make it harder for people to vote.

She's been running a group that tries to fight that and it was quite effectively during the Senate races, which she is lauded for, creating,

getting Ralph Warnick, for example, in office.

Trump obviously is still mad at Kemp for not delivering Georgia, and he half-joked about supporting Abrams as revenge.

I think he likes Stacey Abrams.

Is he crazy enough to do it?

I don't know.

Tell me what you think.

I really like Stacey Abrams.

I love Stacey Abrams.

I think she's the real deal, as they say.

Trevor Burrus, There are so many people.

I mean, what's the definition of being a citizen or the definition of character?

It's doing the right thing when no one's looking or helping people who will never even know you help them.

Stacey Abrams is one of those people.

Why?

Because without her, without her, the Republicans would control the Senate.

And none of this shit, whether it was child tax credit, any voter, any attempt to push back on these mendacious voter laws masquerading as

it shouldn't masquerade as anything other than poorly poorly veiled racism we owe that to Stacey Abrams

who did a put on a master class around voter turnout in Georgia where we flipped not one but I believe we flipped both or did we hold on to one anyway Stacey Abrams people Stacey Abrams is someone regardless of whether or not she wins here should go down as someone who has added a great deal of value to the comments I think she might win I think she's gonna be president

that's my feeling I will I will support her will you support her support

president or you can

I have interviewed her many times, and I have to say, I interviewed way before she got famous.

I was so wildly impressed, and I've interviewed a lot of people.

This was when she was just head of the Georgia Senate.

I had never been more wildly impressed by someone.

And it wasn't like, you know, how someone just convinces you and they're surfacy.

This woman has got layers, like layer after layer after layer of intelligence that's just beyond.

And she's also odd and weird with her Star Trek thing and her writing of romance.

I just find her fascinating.

She is who she is.

And I like that about her.

I think she's, but very strategic, and she has a really smart team around her.

And I think, you know, I think what she has to avoid is looking like an elite.

She has a very interesting needle to thread.

Also in election news, by the way, speaking of which someone you probably can say bad things about, Dr.

Oz is running for Senate in Pennsylvania, even though he lives in New Jersey.

Why can't I say bad things about him?

Oh, you can.

I'm just kidding.

I'm saying you can't find a good thing to say about him.

He is a

quack.

Yeah, go ahead.

100% I'm going to support Mehmet Oz.

I'm going to give money to the campaign, and I will put my name on it despite the immense amount of shit I'll get, including from your brother.

I have known Mehmet Oz and his family for over 25 years.

Oh, no.

He's a good man.

He's a great husband.

He's a great father.

And not only that, we need more centrists on both sides.

I'm a huge fan of Mehmet Oz.

Count me as a supporter.

I don't know.

He's Trump-leaning.

No, no.

We're going to really part ways on this one.

He has peddled so much snake oil and his stuff around COVID was very problematic.

And I'm not like speaking like this.

It was, I don't know what happened to him.

I have to say.

I don't know what happened to him.

And I don't think.

By the way, he doesn't live in Pennsylvania.

As someone who was born in Pennsylvania, my family is.

Neither does Senator Clinton.

I mean,

you know what?

I don't like, I don't love any of it.

I don't love any of that.

I don't love any.

It's opportunistic.

And his like bear hug of Trump is gross.

Like he did, he's not a Trump.

What choice do they have, Karen?

They do have a choice.

They do.

They're a Republican.

It's not bear hug Trump.

It has not been a bear hug.

It's been a mild hug.

He was not the Trump endorsed candidate.

First, let's throw that out there.

Two,

and let me be clear, on the junk science stuff and the attempt to grab attention because he was running a show every day, he fucked up.

And I think he knows that and he's paid a price for it.

And if we're going to continue to look at every frame of everyone's life and cancel them based on one stupid decision, this is a guy.

I'm not canceling him.

I think he's a consistent oath.

We need more doctors.

We need more health care professionals.

We need more centrists and moderates on both sides of the aisle.

We need people with character

to demonstrate professional excellence.

I wish someone's fucked up.

He's paid a huge price.

That doesn't mean

he shouldn't serve in public.

You know who I'm going to give money to if you're giving money, even though you're richer than me.

I'm going for John Fetterman.

I'm going for John Fetterman.

That's why

I love John.

I did a great interview with him.

I think he's also the real deal.

Say more.

I don't know.

He is the lieutenant governor of Pennsylvania, and he's got that.

Speaking of cool beards, he's got one.

He's just great.

He's a Bernie Sanders supporter.

He's more to the left, but he's not.

He's really, he's fantastically interesting

character, longtime Pennsylvanian.

Really, the working class are really attracted to him.

He's very,

got a really interesting family.

He's also a family man.

Just a fascinating guy and very much trying to help the town he lives in in Pennsylvania.

Again,

I just, John, I think you would like, take a gander at John Fetterman.

Just do that.

The other guy's running is the centrist.

I'm on T Moz and bring it on, everybody.

I'm on T Moz.

In any case, with Dr.

Oz, TV stations in Cleveland, New York, and Philadelphia announced they'll pull his show to comply with FCC's equal time rule.

I just,

you know what?

The right-wing person's going to get the get the nod, I suspect.

Next, David Marcus is leaving Meta.

I like David Marcus.

He was running their cryptocurrency efforts, Diem and Libra, and he previously oversaw Messenger.

He's been in payments for a long time.

He was,

I like David, and I think he was quietly agonized.

That would be my guess about him.

He was over to the side, not dealing with a lot of the other stuff, and oversaw some really interesting stuff, although,

you know, didn't get as much attention.

But I suspect it's the beginning of more people leaving.

Yeah, you know him, I don't, but they put out, he put out this press statement, and I'm like, okay, so you were there for six years, worked on something, and it never launched.

That's got to to be frustrating.

Wasn't the focus.

Yeah.

I like David.

He's a very canny person and I

suspect he was like one of those people you talk about, which is, where do you work?

Where do you work?

You know, in Silicon Valley.

He's got, he's an entrepreneur.

He'll, he'll do just fine.

Here's the, I think the cloud.

I mean, let's be honest, anyone who's still at Facebook has made rationalizations for damaging the Commonwealth and massively increasing teen depression.

They have kind of, I don't want to say sold their soul, but just come

to an agreement.

And I empathize with this, that I need to make a living,

or maybe I think I can change this organization for the better, fine.

But what is probably really going to be damaging to them is that I think a lot of people are coming to the conclusion that after its incredible stock run-up, that the stock just might come under pressure over the next six to 12 months.

And that I think probably a lot of executives who look at their opportunities say, well, I'm going to go find

the next gig where I can run a stock from 10 to 300 as I did here.

Yeah, David's an entrepreneur.

It'll be interesting.

I mean, what do you say?

Like, for example, people at the Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch, like, they do great work at the Wall Street Journal.

Are they facilitating that?

You know what I mean?

It's one of these things, unfortunately.

Awful people own laudable things.

We left because of that,

but me and Walt, but it still is, I don't begrudge anyone who's.

That's some other of all false analogies, the Wall Street Journal.

No, no, no, no.

No, but it was something when you say when people are at a company and a part that has nothing to do with the other part, what he was doing had nothing to do with.

We're very disputatious today.

I see this is happening.

It's because you love Dr.

Oz.

I can't believe this.

I can't believe this.

Maybe I will cancel you.

Anyway, David Marcus, we'll see great things from him, I suspect.

CEOs and insiders have sold $69 billion of their stock since January, making 2021 a record-breaking year.

Four supersellers are behind more than 35% of all sales.

Guess who?

But these are regular sales, though.

Musk, Bezos, Zuckerberg, and the Waltons.

um they've got all this cash musk sale is not regular remember on stage when he told you he would be the no we're not arguing about this he he he was accurate in what he was saying he was accurate he had to sell in any case he didn't have to do his dumb poll that is correct um so uh so what what what do you think about all this selling it's just take your take your money bug

almost every metric that comes out almost every every piece of financial data whether it's valuations price earnings multiples or the amount of money being sold or the percentage of companies that are unprofitable going public.

We're setting new records or

the chart looks dramatically like where we were in 99 and 2007.

And here's the thing.

CEOs are generally very bright people who understand the company really well.

There are planned sales where you're just diversifying and getting liquidity.

But there are also sales, though, where insiders say the stock's trading at a healthy valuation.

And it's just good financial planning right now.

I tell a lot of management teams that I'm on the board of, even if we're doing a private raise, take some money off the table because this might not be the top, but it is a very good time to sell.

And usually it's not a good forward-looking indicator of market performance when insiders are selling.

And that's one thing they have to disclose.

But

it's just striking how reminiscent all of this is of 99 and 2007.

No.

Oh, well, okay.

Well,

when guys and gals like us say that,

watch out, that usually means the market's going to go up another 40%.

The key question is, is this, we know 2000 is coming.

The question is, is it 1997 or 1999?

Right?

It's, anyways, we'll see.

No one cares what she does.

She doesn't look at it at all for years, for decades, just lets it sit.

That's smart.

That's a good investment.

And hopefully, it'll time it right when I've decided to retire, which is never at this point.

So it doesn't really matter.

I just have to keep earning.

So, time for our first big story.

Twitter unveiled a new anti-harassment policy this week that left users very confused.

I was quite confused.

In a vague statement, Twitter said it would, quote, not allow the sharing of private media, such as images or videos of private individuals without their consent, unquote.

The announcement immediately raised questions about how the social network could handle images of everything from concerts to police brutality.

A Twitter spokesman clarified a few points.

Consent is assumed until someone reports their own image being used maliciously.

Public figures will still be fair game and likely include police officers.

Very confusing.

And now i can't be posting all those embarrassing pictures of scott galloway that i have um

it's possible this is like i i just it's i see what they're what the goal is but how unenforceable can you make something

i i literally read this statement and i thought this feels as if it was written by someone who is working at the firm 10 of their time i just couldn't i just couldn't

do you get this i get i get the idea of safety as people putting malicious pictures up they have

to do it on on a case-by-case basis.

They're a media company.

They should have an editorial board to make decisions.

Anyways,

all I did when I read this policy, it seems to me this statement is like PR hell, where they got a bunch of lawyers and a bunch of their comms people in a room and said, okay, here's something that sort of makes sense.

And now let's all shape it into something that makes no sense.

I just couldn't understand what they were trying to get to here.

I did not get it.

I think it's quite confusing.

And it said it will leave images up if it, quote, adds value to the public discourse being shared in public interest or relevant community, but it didn't defy any of those terms.

It's typical of these people.

We don't know what the rules are.

We don't.

It's like, can you stop at this stop sign or not this stop?

It's the stop button, but it's not a stop sign, Kara, kind of thing, which I blow through them all.

But how will Twitter balance social concerns here?

And why are they deciding?

It just wades them into.

I don't know.

They should just like, if people complain about maliciousness, they should have an investigative editorial team that deals with it and makes calls as best as they can.

This seems very confusing.

So I don't know.

I don't know.

I don't know what to say.

They have to deal with safety.

Safety is important.

But I, and again, you don't want to begrudge people feeling unsafe on that platform.

I've been one of the big pushers about that issue.

But it's really weird.

It was not well done, not well done.

Right after Jack was leaving, there might be some weird timing here.

You know what Paul, you know what my favorite policy was?

The New York Times,

when social media was burgeoning and they were trying to figure out what their policy for their journalists in terms of the use of social media.

They still don't have.

Nobody has a good number.

I thought the policy was great.

The policy was use your common sense.

Oh, yes.

Yes.

I love that.

But then when it got into practice, very confusing.

Very confusing.

It is.

It's very confusing.

Once you give people a little bit of like, hey, get out there and show your, show yourself, it creates a problem.

It's a pushback.

Washington Post had a real problem around

tweets and this and that.

So it's an ongoing problem, but this policy does not help the situation.

All right, Scott, let's go on a quick break.

When we come back, we'll talk about the trouble at CNN and take a listener mail question.

Support for this show comes from IBM.

Is your AI built on everyone or is it built to work with your business data?

IBM helps you integrate and govern unstructured data wherever it lives, so your business can have more accurate AI instead of just more of it.

Get your data ready for AI at IBM.com.

That's IBM.com.

The AI Built for Business, IBM.

Support for Pivot comes from groons.

If you've ever done a deep internet dive trying to discover different nutrition solutions, you've likely had the thought, surely there's a way to improve my skin, gut health, immunity, brain fog without offending my taste buds.

Well, there is.

It's called groons.

Groons are a convenient, comprehensive formula packed into a daily snack pack of gummies.

It's not a multivitamin, a greens gummy, or a prebiotic.

It's all of those things and then some for a fraction of the price.

In a Groons daily snack pack, you get more than 20 vitamins and minerals, 6 grams of prebiotic fiber, plus more than 60 ingredients.

They include nutrient dense and whole foods, all of which will help you out in different ways.

For example, Groons has six times the gut health ingredients compared to the leading greens powders.

It contains biotin and niacinamide, which helps with thicker hair, nails, and skin health.

They also contain mushrooms, which can help with brain function.

And of course, you're probably familiar with vitamin C and how great it's for your immune system.

On top of all, groons are vegan and free of dairy nuts and gluten.

Get up to 52% off when you go to groons.co and use the code PIVOT.

That's G-R-U-N-S dot C-O using the code PIVOT for 52%

off.

Scott, we're back with our second big story.

CNN has suspended anchor Chris Cuomo indefinitely, whatever that means.

Newly released documents show the close level of coordination between Chris Cuomo and the team defending his brother, then-Governor Andrew Cuomo, from accusations of sexual harassment.

Chris Cuomo used his resources as journalists to gather information on Andrew's accusers.

The younger Cuomo discussed his suspension on his radio show, Let's Play a Clip.

It's embarrassing, but I understand it.

And I understand why some people feel the way they do about what I did.

I've apologized in the past.

I mean it.

It's the last thing I ever wanted to do was

compromise any of my colleagues and do anything but help.

I know they have a process that they think is important.

I respect that process.

So I'm not going to talk about this anymore than that.

Well, I'm so sorry.

He's embarrassed and it hurts him, but he misbehaved.

The documents came from, apparently, from these documents, but there's going to be an internal investigation, not an outside one.

They're doing it internally at CNN.

It came from the Attorney General's investigation, and it seems like he did a little more than he told his bosses that he did, which is a problem.

I think apparently, Jeff Zucker's furious.

We should mention that Scott has a show on CNN Plue launching next year, but is not, I don't think you were involved with it.

You're on, you've been on Anderson Cooper show.

Anderson Cooper's show is going to be made longer, and they'll find someone to go in that slot, maybe Jake Tapper, who in an interview with me complained about Chris Cuomo's behavior months ago, said it was a real problem, created a real problem for people there.

So, Scott,

what do you think?

I mean, I know he's defending his brother, but eash, gabish.

I don't know.

Well, I mean, there's literally absolutely no upside to me saying anything about this, only downside.

But like, that's good.

Yeah, I don't think it should.

I would love to know what you think.

Well, look,

I'm not that close to the situation.

And as someone who's not a journalist, I don't, I can't,

I don't think I can speak thoughtfully to what is the right decorum in terms of a journalist in conflicts.

Yeah,

I know enough to know that this is not kosher.

What I would say is that

I totally empathize.

I don't know Chris Cuomo.

I like him and I like his show.

What I would say is that when it comes to family, I'm not going to say he did the right thing.

I empathize with what he did.

I also think that CNN is doing the right thing.

I think it's possible that occasionally you have just a bad situation that involves bad decisions.

I think Chris Cuomo has handled this well.

I think he's acknowledged the problem and is trying to to take responsibility.

In a certain way, I understand why he did it.

When your sibling calls and needs help, I think you

correctly maybe lose some judgment filter here.

It's family.

And I think people say, well, it's the governor or it's the guy who did this.

It's your brother calling you.

Anyway, I don't,

but I don't, you should take this before I get canceled.

I get my show canceled again before I get there.

I think he should be fired.

I think this is ridiculous.

He seemed to have sort of downplayed it, and then these documents come out, and he embarrassed Jeff Zucker, who had been his big supporter.

I know he's the most popular thing on that channel, but nonetheless,

is that right?

Is his show?

I believe so.

He's more popular than AC.

I believe so.

But he's one of the top ones.

In any case, look, look.

This is just if he was, like someone pointed out on Twitter, if he was an intern, he'd be gone.

Like anyone else, he'd be gone.

Like gone, gone, gone.

And

to underplay it like this to his bosses and underplay it to the public.

He was helping.

This is like not a little helping.

It's not like he could have done anything in those emails to say, you know, this is really problematic for me.

I'm not going to talk, but good luck.

And I support you as a brother.

He could have done that, but let me check that.

Let me find out when the story is coming in.

Let me do this.

And then he put it in emails, which you're like, are you, you're also dumb, right?

So I just feel like

it is fair to expect a journalist to set that aside with the family.

You can support someone emotionally.

It's sort of like Kavanaugh sitting behind his friend, sorry, Joel Kaplan sitting behind Kavanaugh at the hearings.

He shouldn't have done it.

I know he's his friend.

He could like, he can pat him in the back room, you know, and be there for him.

But he is also a Facebook executive and it looked terrible.

So I mean, again, I get it, but I don't get it.

This guy has, this guy, you know, CNN is caught up in all kinds of scandals around several of their anchors.

So it seems like this guy should go.

And I know internally at CNN, they're horror of the other journalists.

They put the other journalists in a terrible position.

They become a target for the right,

et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

And it's just,

you know, even though they point out at Fox, Sean Hannity can campaign at Trump rallies and nothing happens to him.

Well, guess what?

Those are Fox News's rules.

So whatever.

And I don't think it's like as

Tucker Carlson, let me just finish.

Tucker Carlson was saying, you know, he's being taken out by the woke mom.

Bullshit.

Look, Tucker Carlson wouldn't know an ethic if it fell on top of his, you know, his, his, his blockhead, speaking of blocks.

But this is so clear that anyone below this guy would have been fired in a New York minute and has been.

So what I will say is, and this is my limited experience so far with CNN, is they take...

So I've worked with a lot of networks and CNN standards are very high.

Agreed.

Whenever I go on a show, whenever I cite data, they immediately say, you know, they ask me and my team for references and they fact-check all the data.

And when I've gone on other networks,

it might be just a resource issue.

CNN has famous, famous checking.

Amanda, my wife worked there, used to work there, and they had this system for stories that she did.

She was an editor that was really so impressive.

Like they're fact-checking, they're legal.

It's an insult to the people who do that there, I think, that he would try to be this oily

and try to squeeze out of this.

I get it.

I mean, again,

he's a good brother, but oof, oof, wrong side of this thing completely.

Wrong side of this thing.

And I think I find that the media is obsessed with each other.

I mean, I don't want to say this isn't a big story, but the media just obsesses over each other.

Does America really care?

No, but I think it's just, look, like, we shouldn't go, oh, Fox is messy, therefore we can be.

Like, no.

Agreed.

No.

I don't care what they do about that.

Agreed.

It just, there is an issue, though.

I do get it.

I think it's great that we on the left, and including media networks that want to be fair and balanced.

And I actually think the Wall Street Journal does a pretty good job also of being trying to be balanced and have pretty good standards, but distinct of their ownership.

But it just strikes me that,

I don't know, there's something about it's like the crazies on the far right and the journalists is like, we've given up on them.

But the people in the middle who are moderates, we can save them.

Let's throw them into the purity fog.

No, it's not purity.

Scott, come on.

This is, he lied.

He lied to his bosses.

No, it's not purity.

There's a thing called journalistic ethics that we try to hew to, and we are always successful.

But boy, is this a violation?

Like, it's enormous, enormous violation of that.

Well, okay.

Let me go back to my initial statement.

I empathize with him, and I think CNN is right.

You know,

to your point, they have standards, and they're clear about their standards.

And he clearly, it feels like, crossed the line.

Well, they have to do an investigation, and that's what they should do.

I wish it was independent, but fine.

But, you know, I remember, you know what I remember on the last point on this is when the Washington Post had that mess around Janet Cook, I was a young, I was in college at the time.

They did, what a screw-up that was, right?

That was a terrible screw-up.

This fake story, etc.

This is like journalistic history that I did not take this class.

And I'm sorry, what happened?

She wrote a story about a kid that was given crack by his

mother's boyfriend.

It was all made up.

The whole thing was made up.

And it was a gripping story.

Boy, I read the whole thing when I was in college.

And they ended up doing this and it ended up it was all bullshit it was all right they drove her around she couldn't find the place it was fiction

i have to say it was gripping but they did an investigation if you ever want to read something amazing they did this long investigation of it and i was i thought that they didn't inter i think it was they didn't have an outside person either but boy was it really a good it was a good read and i read it in journalism ethics class essentially and so it's it's worth reading it's incredibly long what happened and they really showed what happened And I thought it was, look, the press doesn't always get it right, but it's not a purity test.

It's like doctors.

You hew to see, like, if you like, keep leaving instruments in people, you need to be looked at.

Like, it's not, oh, don't be so pure about people leaving instruments in people, but I'm sorry, leaving.

Well, I'm saying you're doing this purity test thing.

It's like, let's attack, like, like, because we, it's not purity.

Leaving instruments and people.

Well, you know, doctors.

Are you getting enough sleep?

Are you getting enough?

Leaving instruments in people?

You know what I'm saying?

Like, we, we, we expect scalpel.

Oh, it's in his torso.

That happens a lot more than you think, in case Dr.

Swisher will tell you.

But I'm saying everyone should have standards for their work.

And in this case, it looks like he violated them.

And if so, and maybe you can run that show and you and Anderson could be, like, do a little handoff.

It'll be great.

It was a little bit of win-win.

I don't know if you saw last night, but AC360 went two hours.

Hello.

I know.

It's all

Scott.

And by the way, you could be the host.

You could be the host.

Because no one expects purity from you.

I can almost guarantee that will never happen.

That would be so cool.

That would be, I would, because I know what you're, you know what you're doing?

I am not meant for live TV.

I think it would be.

I am not meant for live TV.

AI have a face for podcasting.

By the way, I have met Chris Cuomo.

He is very handsome.

He's very handsome.

That counts for a lot.

Okay.

He is very handsome.

We're going to move on.

And with a listener question, we're not agreeing today.

This is a non-agreement day, which is good.

Totally, Jack.

Listen to me.

Let's pivot to a listener question.

This one came via email.

You got, you've got.

I can't believe I'm going to be a mailman.

You've got mail.

Is Elon Musk becoming a liability for Tesla?

I have several friends who would like to buy a solid electric car, but are not willing to give a dollar to Musk and his bro culture.

Musk has tweeted vulgar statements about U.S.

elected officials, and he, as a stance, have attacked U.S.

auto regulators.

He is also at a point that he is over-promising and under-delivering.

Cybertruck, Tesla, semi-full self-drive.

If I were an investor, I would be seriously worried about an unfiltered menace in Musk and what is happening with President G and the CCP.

Now that the production of Tesla cars is at a mature stage, is he the future of the company?

Oh, I'm letting you take this one.

You have a car, so you tell me, Scott, tell this person.

So we have a Model X Falcon, and it's interesting to spend $120,000 on a product, and then the CEO starts calling you names on Twitter.

I've never had that happen before.

But you love it, right?

You love it.

You know what?

Initially, I thought, all right, my initial response was going to be zero fucks given, but I do actually kind of enjoy it.

You always said, as long as people are punching down, that's okay.

Anyways, but look,

I do a prediction stack every year and I just can't help it.

One of my predictions this year, I think in 2022, and let's bring on the flying monkeys and their in their Tesla box.

Here you go.

If Tesla goes down 50%,

it will still be overvalued.

And what's so interesting is, so the lesson here, total addressable market is a huge component of valuation.

What is the TAM of a company's opportunity in a marketplace for growth?

And essentially, Rivian,

Lucid, and Tesla, the kind of the assumption, if you were to call them automobile companies, if their TAM was the auto market, you would say that these three companies are going to produce every EV, vehicle, and EVs.

They're going to go from 1% or 2% to 80% in the next 20 years.

So instead, they're very smart.

They have this massively impressive sleight of hand where they say, no, our TAM isn't the automobile market, much less the EV market.

It's climate change.

We're in the business of climate change.

And the valuations these companies have managed to,

I'm a believer in markets.

And one of the things about markets and fundamentals is eventually they reattach to something called fundamentals.

And when these companies begin to reattach to fundamentals, you're going to see just an unbelievable recalibration and step down.

I said that at 100 bucks a share.

I want to acknowledge it's now at 1,100 bucks a share.

I couldn't have been more wrong.

By the way, something really funny.

I just put a deposit on a Rivian.

I think more competition is coming in.

The amount of money here.

Deposit on a Rivian.

Wow.

Why?

And it was hilarious.

This really funny Twitter handler called VC Braggs goes, put out my tweet and said, I put out a screenshot of my confirmation on it.

And they put out a thing that said, rest in peace, Rivian, and a picture of me in a Rivian or a picture of me ordering a Rivian.

But look,

the marketplace, a $1.1, whatever it is, trillion-dollar market cap company that just seems so outsized here is attracting all sorts of sharks, ranging from Tim Cook to Jeff Bezos.

And you got to think at some point,

at some point, that puts pressure, margin pressure on the company.

So to their credit, what Tesla has accomplished is incredible.

Tesla is now this year probably going to outsell Mercedes, which is just staggering.

But is it worth five or ten times what Mercedes is worth?

You know, I think you're high on your Jack Dorsey situation.

I think you're going to

see that you won on that one.

But as to his and Apple acquires Peloton.

Yes, I know.

Apple acquires Peloton.

That is going to happen more than this is.

So as to his, let me just answer the question of the listener.

As to his vulgar statements and

his stands, I don't know what to say.

This is him.

He's not changed.

So if you don't like that, don't you can like choose not to buy things of companies you don't like.

It's a great car.

He's going to make overpromising and underdelivering.

I I don't think so.

I think he's delivered a lot more than most people.

Of course, you know, he's he's he's like a, I wouldn't call him P.T.

Barnum because that's not quite right, but he's like, he gets, he like, it's, it's good to like think big.

It's good to think big.

And so Cybertruck, Tesla Sammy, good for him.

I don't care.

Agree.

It's fine just to be like lots of people have been like that.

He's not cheating.

Good for good for business.

Good for business, good for the planet, a visionary, stock wildly overvalued.

We can hold all of those thoughts in our head at the same time.

Look, they are what they are.

And it's a long time.

and no a 50 year old man with seven kids acting like an eight year old that's been a good business strategy because it creates a lot of awareness for his products what he's like it's not it's not a strategy he's like that he is 100 like that so it's been an amazing strategy but i mean i agree it's hythanic but

i mean what

he is literally in the public discourse as evidenced by this conversation every day which creates tremendous awareness i mean can you name this who's the ceo of ford yeah

do you know it's um It just changed.

Exactly.

I mean, Mary Barrow

at GM, right?

General Motors.

Mary Barrow, right?

Look, it's the strategy on Ford.

And unfortunately, I just don't think it serves as a good role model for upcoming entrepreneurs.

It's like,

just be famous.

It's sort of the Kim Kardashian.

Although, look, she's got some accomplishments you may not like are the same thing with Elon.

Kim?

No, I think Kimson and I think the Kardashians are underrated.

Yeah, I have all along thought that.

I think they're smarter than people think.

And we're going to get pushed back on that, but I don't care.

So, one of the things he does, like, he recently told employees at SpaceX that the company faces bankruptcy due to production displays.

He did this at Tesla.

He gets.

Did you get that?

What's going on?

He gets that.

He gets all worked up.

He did that.

Remember a couple years when he was exhausted and then he cried at the New York Times and was talking about that the companies.

I think he did an interview with me kind of right after when he got some sleep where he's like, I just get all up in people's grill.

And this, it's his, that's a tactic of his for sure.

And I think it's genuine again, but he sleeps on the floor of the production facility, et cetera.

He's an intense dude, people.

So if you don't like his jam, don't buy his car.

I don't know what.

But just going back to the business side of this,

I look at Tesla, and I think there's all sorts of well-capitalized, great companies coming for that.

High that he has grown dramatically.

Whereas, whereas, I think SpaceX is highly differentiated.

And if you look at essentially, if you look at satellites, the number of satellites that we're going to need to launch, it's going to go from like 3,000 to 50,000 over the next 10 years.

And

what

I, what Tesla's differentiation is quickly eroding.

I think SpaceX has massive modes in differentiation, specifically if you look at the cost per kilogram to put stuff into orbit.

SpaceX is just killing it.

So I, and this is going to be another one of my predictions, I think within, I don't know what the time frame is, I think SpaceX is going to be worth more than Tesla.

Interesting.

That's a good position.

We'll get to that in a second.

Let me just say, this guy isn't a real entrepreneur.

Everyone, you know, there's all these people who are like, you know, he's all

no.

And he can't control.

You said it.

You know something you said?

I'm sorry to interrupt you, but I'm going to quote you.

You said something that really struck me, and I let my emotions get in the way of kind of a rational thought.

You said, you said once, I think about a year ago, you said, it's not like he's invented a photo sharing app.

You know, he's trying to put people on Mars.

He's trying to create electric cars.

He is doing very important work.

Nobody liked Edison.

Let's try to keep that in mind.

What an asshole he was.

Is that right?

Total asshole.

I didn't know that.

Totally.

Go back and really look at stuff.

And also hyped everything.

But, you know, the light bulb.

So thanks, Edison.

Like, and the movie camera and this and then that.

So

Edison was just, he is so much like Edison.

It's crazy.

It's not, you know, not as tinkery, of course, but still.

Edison was terrible about doing stuff like this and always doing sneaky stuff.

Anyway, you can read some very good biographies of him.

Anyway, that was a good question.

Send us more.

If you've got a question you're curious about, go to nymag.com/slash pivot and submit it to the show.

All right, Scott, one more quick break.

We'll be back for for predictions.

Support for this show comes from OnePassword.

If you're an IT or security pro, managing devices, identities, and applications can feel overwhelming and risky.

Trellica by OnePassword helps conquer SaaS sprawl and shadow IT by discovering every app your team uses, managed or not.

Take the first step to better security for your team.

Learn more at onepassword.com slash podcast offer.

That's onepassword.com slash podcast offer.

All lowercase.

Support for Pivot comes from groons.

If you've ever done a deep internet dive trying to discover different nutrition solutions, you've likely had the thought, surely there's a way to improve my skin, gut health, immunity, brain fog without offending my taste buds.

Well, there is.

It's called groons.

Groons are a convenient, comprehensive formula packed into a daily snack pack of gummies.

It's not a multivitamin, a greens gummy, or a prebiotic.

It's all of those things and then some for a fraction of the price.

In a Groons daily snack pack, you get more than 20 vitamins and minerals, 6 grams of prebiotic fiber, plus more than 60 ingredients.

They include nutrient-dense and whole foods, all of which will help you out in different ways.

For example, Groons has six times the gut health ingredients compared to the leading greens powders.

It contains biotin and niacinamide, which helps with thicker hair, nails, and skin health.

They also contain mushrooms, which can help with brain function.

And of course, you're probably familiar with vitamin C and how great it's for your immune system.

On top of all, groons are vegan and free of dairy, nuts, and gluten.

Get up to 52% off when you go to groons.co and use the code PIVOT.

That's G-R-U-N-S dot C-O using the code PIVOT for 52%

off.

Okay, Scott, give us this week's prediction.

You just sort of gave it, right?

SpaceX?

Or maybe not?

Oh, there's so much.

SpaceX, well, this is like probably a three to five year.

I think SpaceX ultimately ends up being worth more than Tesla.

We were talking about CNN.

I think that within 12 months, the new discovery plus as it's envisioned is going to be either broken up or taken over.

This thing's just going to be so ripe, it's going to fall off the tree.

And I actually think in the next 90 days.

Falling off what tree?

To what hand?

To what ground?

Well, if you look at the new Discovery Plus as it's envisioned, it just doesn't make any sense.

It's just not going to survive as an independent company because the shareholder base is used to the dividends and the steady growth of an analog digital company or an old media company that's ad supported, which is steady cash flows.

And the costs they're going to, the investments they're going to need to make to move to streaming, their shareholder base isn't going to to be able to stomach.

It'll throw up in an earnings call.

The stock will get hammered.

And it's the only media asset in the world right now that has these assets.

I mean, come on, HBO, CNN,

that is in play because everything else is dual-class shareholders.

So it's just going to every shark in the world.

So Twitter, as you said last week.

Well, and that's my next, I'm making a lot of predictions.

Within 90 days, Kiera.

Within 90 days,

there's going to be an offer for Twitter because

all this bullshit with Jack and Elliot kind of ossified the company or put it into a period of stasis.

Now that they have a new relatively owned CEO from internally, the stock's down.

It's just a fucking dinner bell.

Ding, ding, ding.

Ding, ding, ding.

Da-da-da-sto.

Can I read you something?

Okay, go ahead.

And why not take a gander given the huge trove of data that Twitter sits atop globally and its unique worldwide digital distribution system?

While the company execs have been unable to grow the business, many think a link with a larger entity would spur Twitter's potential.

Guess who wrote that?

And guess when?

Kara Swisher.

Kara Swisher, 2016.

Same thing.

And when Salesforce and Google,

the jungle cat.

I'm just saying, you could write that sentence.

The Sultan of Calarama.

That sentence could be written today.

Let me introduce you to my seventh wife.

I'm sorry, go ahead.

I'm just saying the same sentence could be written today.

This has been an issue since way back when with this company.

Always.

Anyway, good.

It's time for Twitter to command the space it occupies.

It's been a disaster for Cheryl.

Stand up straight, Twitter.

Stand up straight.

Speaking of standing up straight, one thing we want to say, we had a lot of responses to our interview with John McWhorter.

We love hearing from our listeners.

Some people were upset.

Let's talk about what we hope to gain from our guests.

And Scott, you can weigh in in a second.

Hosting people doesn't mean you agree with them.

And I very openly disagreed with him.

I disagreed with his definition of cancel culture.

I disagreed with his supposed targets of cancel culture.

I disagreed with his conclusions.

And Scott was much more in agreement with him,

but had a really great discussion.

We've had lots of smart people on the show, and smart people can disagree.

Even Scott and I, like today, frequently disagree.

We're very obstreperous today.

Now, there was a review in

the Washington Post which said, and I thought it was quite good.

I think you should go read it.

McWhorter never engages in any of the actual cultish movements that are threatening American democracy.

He likewise never engages in actual religions, the ones that...

get tax breaks and Supreme Court justices who hold power to take away human rights from pregnant people and civil rights from the LGBTQ community.

McWhorter managed in the course of 200 pages to claim the woke are perpetrating a reign reign of terror, a phrase he uses twice, but devoted only three paragraphs I counted to the actual insurrectionists who attacked the Capitol and tried to overthrow the government.

Again, you can debate that opinion, but it's good to do so.

One thing that we can agree on, how our society balances free speech, justice, and accountability, is an unresolved issue and deserves debate.

So we'll keep debating smart people on this show with curiosity, courage, kindness, and questioning.

Scott, what do you say to all this?

Well, my question is more for you, and that is, do you feel the need to issue these non-apology non-apology apologies when we offend conservatives?

Yes.

Why are we apologizing?

Because I actually get because we had a centrist on the show?

Well, some people don't think he is.

So I just, I think it's good debate.

They've been people pushed back on us.

We should say we're trying to have really interesting debates on the show.

It's not an apology.

It's not an apology by any means.

It's an answer.

But why do we need to clarify?

It's not a clarification.

We're not saying we shouldn't.

We liked having on the show.

We thought he was great.

It's not a clarification.

And by the way,

that post review.

Yeah, I felt it it was unfair.

It basically said something to the effect of that he has elevated the term racist to a compliment.

I have never heard him in any way.

I agree.

I felt that.

I mean, and by the way, that's fine.

They're allowed to do that and we can discuss it.

But I don't, and here's the thing:

centrists are really vulnerable because if we had some total whack job from the write-on, we would just write them off.

But when a centrist comes on, oh, no, again, throw them into the purity field.

No, no, we would discuss it.

That is not true.

John McWhorter, this is an important dialogue.

I agree.

I agree.

Let me reassure you even if we have John McWhorter on your master of fine arts book club is gonna invite you no I do not you know what once again you act like I spent a lot of time in political debates I think we respond to lots of letters I think it's good I'm just I'm trying to support your whole point Scott and as usual you're cutting me off of the knees but it's not you are making well no I'll say we we are making Professor McWhorter's point right now we're not there needs to be more tolerance and less sensitivity around robust dialogue here Scott,

then we agree.

Your dog Cousteau is taking you down in this shark cave.

You're trying to pull out all kinds of words on me to try.

What was the one you used back there?

You purity.

Purity test on Chris Cuomo.

Sultan of Calorama.

He lied to his bosses and he committed journalistic malpractice.

It is not a purity test.

Thank you.

Thank you.

This is just to show you, just to show you, this is what you're going to get here.

We do not agree on things

and yet we endure.

And I'm staying at his apartment this weekend in New York and I'm going to trash the place.

I'm going to put Claire on the couch with grape juice.

That's my plan.

Good segue.

That's pretty cool.

Good segue.

You got out of that.

You got out of that house with that fun house.

I am not in any danger.

Anyway, well, you know, I have a climbing wall.

Claire, Claire.

Claire Seyong.

I have a climbing wall.

I have to be honest with you, Amanda's a little worried that your apartment is like a danger zone for children.

That there could be sharp edges.

A lot of sharp edges.

I like that northern European

danger for children.

I was like, didn't you like his other house?

She loved your house, by the way, in Florida, but she's worried about that.

And I said, do not worry, but I'm bringing all the soft things you put on edges of tables just to stick them there.

No, no, no.

Just wrap Claire and bubble wrap and everything's good.

Anyway, I appreciate it.

And

I will take pictures from there.

I'll do woke pictures from there.

Like, I'll have all the woke people in and we'll drink your expensive champagne.

Anyway, we'll be back on.

That's the show.

That's the obstreperous show for today.

We'll be back on Tuesday for more.

Read us out, Scott.

Today's show was produced by Lara Naaman, Evan Engel, and Taylor Griffin.

Thanks also to Drew Burrows and Mia Silverio.

Ernie Ingertott engineered this episode.

Make sure you subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts or be an Android user.

Check us out on Spotify or frankly, wherever you listen to podcasts.

Thanks for listening to Pivot from Box Media.

We'll be back next Friday for another breakdown of all things tech and business.

What is our job in the media?

What is our job in academia?

It's to provoke a debate such that we damage that muscle in between your ears and regardless of where you end up, you make better, more thoughtful, more empathetic decisions.

We're going to keep doing that.

We're going to keep doing that.

Dog Cousteau.

This month on Explain It To Me, we're talking about all things wellness.

We spend nearly $2 trillion on things that are supposed to make us well.

Collagen smoothies and cold plunges, Pilates classes and fitness trackers.

But what does it actually mean to be well?

Why do we want that so badly?

And is all this money really making us healthier and happier?

That's this month on Explain It To Me, presented by Pureleaf.