Code Galore, No More Instagram for Kids, and Friend of Pivot Jim Bankoff

58m
Code has begun! Scott helps Kara prep for her conversations with Elon Musk, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, Netflix Co-CEO Ted Sarandos, and many more. Plus, Facebook puts Instagram for Kids on pause, and what are the implications of China's crypto ban? Then, Friend of Pivot, Chairman and CEO of Vox Media, Jim Bankoff.
Stay tuned to the Pivot feed to hear full interviews from Code!
You can find Jim on Twitter at @bankoff. Tell him how much you love the Pivot team.
Send us your Listener Mail questions, via Yappa, at nymag.com/pivot.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Listen and follow along

Transcript

Support for this show comes from Nike.

What was your biggest win?

Was it in front of a sold-out stadium or the first time you beat your teammate in practice?

Nike knows winning isn't always done in front of cheering crowds.

Sometimes winning happens in your driveway, on a quiet street at the end of your longest run, or on the blacktop of a pickup game.

Nike is here for all of the wins, big or small.

They provide the gear, you bring the mindset.

Visit Nike.com for more information.

And be sure to follow Nike on Instagram, TikTok, and other social platforms for more great basketball moments.

Attention, all small biz owners.

At the UPS store, you can count on us to handle your packages with care.

With our certified packing experts, your packages are properly packed and protected.

And with our pack and ship guarantee, when we pack it and ship it, we guarantee it.

Because your items arrive safe or you'll be reimbursed.

Visit the ups store.com slash guarantee for full details most locations are independently owned product services pricing and hours of operation may vary see center for details the ups store be unstoppable come into your local store today

hi everyone this is pivot from new york magazine and the vox media podcast network i'm kara swisher

And a dog is in the city of angels.

That's right.

You're welcome.

You're welcome.

Here we are at Code.

Here we are.

Here we are at Code.

I'm actually in a studio in West Hollywood taping this because I just did an interview with Monica Lewinsky.

Sorry, I'm late.

How about you?

It's good, except this place smells like pot.

So I'm in like a hot.

You say that like it's a bad thing.

I feel like I'm going to be very light for code.

Well, lunch is at noon.

Lunch is at noon.

We're going to talk about everything.

We're going to chat about some of the big headlines.

First up, Facebook is pulling the brakes on Instagram for kids.

The head of Instagram, Adam Masseri, announced on Monday Monday that Facebook will pause the project in quotes.

The app has been targeted toward children younger than 13.

Scott, I'm just going to let you go.

Well, just before we even jump into that, just being in Los Angeles, you know, there's an app.

I mean, this is really wild.

There's an app in Los Angeles that you can download and you can have drugs delivered to your house, real time.

And it's not age-gated.

You can have drugs delivered to your house, even if you're under 18.

And you know what the app's called?

What?

Instagram.

Get it?

But here's the thing.

I know, just for all, I don't know how to get young women off of Instagram and to not have more suicidal thoughts, but I do know, I do know how to get young men off of Instagram.

How?

You porn.

Oh my God.

I'm just bringing it today.

I'm just bringing it.

I am so no, give me a cogent answer of them doing this, pausing it.

Give me a cogent answer.

Well, it's just fucking ridiculous.

They want...

okay, great.

And in other news, Ralph Lawrence decided to stop clubbing seals to make fur collars.

I mean, big fucking deal.

It's ridiculous this was even ever even.

And by the way, paused?

Paused?

Yeah.

This isn't, this isn't what should be going on.

This shouldn't be, they've decided to pause disseminating something that is clearly, we know that it's bad for youth.

The government should be doing what it has done with every other substance or material that has ended up being bad for young people.

They either age-gate it or they regulate it.

We age gate alcohol and tobacco.

We put NC17 on porn, but yet we've decided to celebrate Instagram's putting a pause on Instagram kids.

Well, good for fucking them.

Regulators, get off your ass.

Do something.

I agree completely.

I mean, it's amazing.

They're just, of course, they said they're going to consult people, right?

They're not calling us, are they?

Yeah.

They're not going to call us.

Yeah, I'm sure they're going to be very thoughtful about what we think.

You know what?

They should have us in there to yell at them.

That would be very,

we wouldn't go though.

That's what they need.

We wouldn't go, would we?

No, we wouldn't go.

That's what we need.

Anyway, second thing.

What do you think?

I think it's bullshit.

They should never do it.

They should drop the project.

They should stop fucking with us and not do it.

They have not shown the requisite responsibility to create a safe service for adults.

They shouldn't be doing it for children.

Thank you.

You know, I mean, the entire public relations department and Nick Clegg of Facebook, they're the modern day, they're the modern day Joe Camel.

Ignore the cancer.

It's fun.

It's cute.

Yeah.

It's just

stay the fuck away from our kids.

This is tobacco.

That's it.

Get away from our kids.

It's just

it gives you insight that they even contemplated this.

That, okay,

who thought, oh, yeah, that's a good idea.

If they were more responsible, I would be, okay.

All right, I'll listen to you.

But, and I want you to make sure you're incredibly safe.

Snapchat had said it.

I'd be like, okay.

But Snapchat's not saying it.

The rest of them aren't saying it because they know the difficulties.

Anyway, I think whatever.

You don't get any claps from us, Facebook.

The other thing is Pfizer's CEO says we should return to normal life within a year with the help of annual COVID booster shots.

Others do not agree.

There's all sorts of approvals waiting, including for kids five to 12, which look like they're coming right away.

So what do you think about this?

Well, there's been certain, I've had a a really nice weekend here i love los angeles i grew up here i went to ucla to to you know go around my own stomping grounds which is amazing i went to did a hike in runyon canyon i just love los angeles but the image the image that really struck me was um i'm staying in the hotel next to the hotel we're having the conference and i looked down and i saw this like line i'm like what is it a supreme store or something at 7 30 in the morning and i realized they were all in waiters uniforms and the there must have been an hour-long wait for the entire staff at the hilton And they were in line.

And I figured out, oh, they're in line to get tested.

You know why?

Kara Swisher.

Go ahead.

And it's really funny.

A kid I grew up with, this really nice kid that I bonded with named Brent Seals has had a total scrappy entrepreneur has a ticket selling company.

And then he pinged me this morning and said, I'm doing the testing at Code.

And I thought, God, that's an agile entrepreneur for you.

You know, live events get canceled.

Now he's in testing.

Anyway, but the thing that just struck me, Kara, there's just no getting around it.

This is really sad.

It's sad that we're still here.

None of us expect it to still be here.

And what you have is a nation that is blessed with an unbelievable supply chain.

We are very innovative.

We're producing the best vaccines in the world.

And then we, but we have the second most vaccine hesitancy in the world, just behind Russia.

And I keep hearing all these people when these conservatives get, get.

get COVID.

I'm like, and then you see people on Twitter saying, you know, thoughts and prayers.

I'm like, well, trust me on this.

The prayers work much better when you're vaccinated.

Yeah.

And we're doing it because

we're testing for instant infectiousness.

And if you're infectious, you can't come.

I mean, you know who pushed me?

Mark Benny off on this issue.

Mark started texting me.

I mean, he's very.

So we're doing masking, text, testing, and vaccination requirement.

And I know I can get it.

More than that, if you leave the property, when you come back, you've got to be tested again.

I'm like, I'm stuck here.

Indeed, I gotta be tested.

You're stuck with me, Carrie.

We're together for the next together.

So we're going to talk about that at Code with Andy Slavet from the White, who worked for the White House, who we've talked to before, and also Nancy Messenier.

So we'll talk about that in a second.

Lastly, China banned crypto.

The market doesn't seem to care.

What do you think about this?

This is really interesting and that it's, it's, quite frankly, it's probably a proof point for the strength of cryptocurrencies.

And so

basically.

Yeah, I looked like every time there's been a hit to crypto, it looks in retrospect as if it was a buying opportunity.

The interesting thing here is that it's it's uh the beneficiaries are decentralized exchanges, DTX, Sushi, and Uniswap.

And that is

an exchange like Coinbase, for example, it's centralized and it's a platform and it can be tracked.

And it's those platforms in China that are being shut down.

But if you have...

a cold storage hardware wallet and you go through Uniswap or a decentralized exchange, effectively you're off the grid.

And

those require smart contracts to execute the trade.

So you're seeing Ethereum bounce back and you're seeing these decentralized decentralized exchanges

not only bounce back, but reach new highs.

So

it's sort of playing into a little bit the narrative behind crypto.

And this is the power of it.

It's its decentralized nature that a government, a central bank,

can't, you know, or unfortunately the IRS or the FBI can't track these flows.

What they're trying to do, and I think there's, I mean, there's a lot of play here, and that is China's crackdown is really interesting.

Games, antitrust, monopoly power,

data, teens, tutoring, and now they're going after crypto.

And I, and you look at all these things and you say, it's really interesting that the things they're going after, but they're trying to, they're also trying to play finance.

They're trying to launch their own stable coin.

And I think America should do that as well.

I think America should do that as well.

But I think it's fallacy.

Eagle coin, the eagle coin, I guess.

Eagle coin, yeah, something, right?

Yeah.

So we're going to have Gary, speaking of regulating cryptocurrency, we've got SEC chair Gary Gensler at Code this week.

Is talking to him, and we will definitely ask about this.

It's a big topic, but you're right.

It really, the bounce back, except in China, obviously, the crypto exchanges there are feeling hurt is really interesting.

It's interesting to see how it plays out.

I mean, I heard a very interesting theory or viewpoint from someone and said that America's lax or either call it poor regulation around entrepreneurship or just terrible oversight.

We've been overrun, depends how you want to frame it.

But you might see a flow of human capital or innovation capital out of China into the U.S.

But a lot of people say, no, China has decided not to subvert national interest, economic interest.

So I just think it's, I think it's the biggest story that's getting the least coverage.

And that is what China has decided to do.

You know, people would say to me, well, Scott, you complain about this shit all the time.

What would you do if you had a magic wand?

And quite frankly, that's what China is.

China doesn't have a magic wand.

It has an autocratic fist.

And they've just said, we've done a lot of analysis.

This is bad for kids.

This is bad for income inequality.

This is bad for economic instability.

And they've come in with a handful of social unrest.

Yeah.

So they've got a bigger problem with that.

But quite frankly, all of this kind of adds up to one thing, and that is crypto is bigger than China.

And if China kicked out...

Crypto is bigger than China.

What's something to say?

If China kicked out Apple or China kicked out Nike, you'd see a much more severe reaction in their stock than you've seen in Bitcoin and Ethereum.

And this probably plays to Ethereum because of smart contracts.

Absolutely.

I find it really interesting.

It's going to be.

Anyways,

but right now, I would say all of this kind of is a bit of a confirmation of the power.

of cryptocurrencies.

And one thing Gensler said, he said that he compared all of these altcoins or what I've referred to as shitcoins as wildcat banking when there were too many banks kind of starting their own currencies.

And the question is, is that the right analogy or are all these coins just different stocks and or trading cards?

We decide that trading cards, baseball cards, have value.

And is it really fair to call them wildcat banks?

So I think that interview tomorrow with Gary Gensler is going to be fascinating.

Yeah, we'll ask him that.

All right.

So let's start with our first big story.

I think it's our only big story today.

We're recording this on the first day of code.

Let's go through the list of speakers and the things we're going to do.

For those who don't know what code is, it's my conference I've had at first with Walt Mossberg.

Now I do it by myself, and I have helped with people like Scott Galley and many others.

Thanks for that.

Thanks for that.

I get to hear you say, like, oh, maybe I shouldn't say it's mine with the dog on the hill.

But it is.

I am.

It is.

You're right.

But the dog is going to do a lot.

And by the way, the dog and I are going to have our own conference in Miami together.

That's our conference.

Lil Sunshine, Lil Latin.

But let me just tell you.

Hello.

This is my house.

Anyway.

Oh, you think?

This one's mine.

Like

every cousin in the world is here.

Like every Swisher in the world is here.

No, there's only my sister.

The Sultan of Wokestan has arrived.

God.

My mother, my son, and my brother are here.

Everybody else stayed at home of my giant clan.

Dr.

Swish, Bane, and Lucky.

Lucky's looking.

He is here.

I'm interested to see Lucky's fashion.

Okay, good.

I'm so glad.

But let's not talk about my mother.

Let's talk about the speakers.

So, first of all, you're talking to Sam Harris.

Then you're also giving a presentation.

Why don't we talk about what you're doing first?

First off, the thing I was just saying to the team, I'm intimidated.

I used to punch these decks out like there was no one's business.

And this is the first live presentation I think I've done in 18 months.

And I don't want to disappoint you.

So I've been spending a lot of time on it.

And

I think we have trouble processing everything that's happening.

And I love Daniel Kahneman's.

theories around slow and fast thinking.

And when you're overwhelmed with information and you have to process it really fast, i.e.

a crisis, you know, you go fight or fly to friend or enemy.

And I think we've taken a lot of concepts, whether it's crypto,

whether it's online trading, you know, whatever it might be.

And I think we have a tendency to go very binary and say, this is overhyped or underhyped.

So my presentation is what things are underhyped and what things are overhyped.

And I'm trying to figure, I'm going through everything from healthcare to crypto to different

unicorns and trying to say, is this, you know, space travel, is this underhyped or overhyped?

So anyways, title of of my presentation is Underhyped, Overhyped Question.

Good.

Okay.

And Sam Harris, what are you going to say?

Neuroscientist.

Very interested in psychedelics, correct?

Yeah, I'm just an enormous fan of Sam.

I think he's courageous and a very interesting thinker.

And

we're going to talk a little bit, you know, he's really into this notion of flow and micro-dosing.

And he's, you know, he's cataloged pretty meticulously his own experience with cyclosobin.

Is how are they called?

Cyclosobins.

Psylosobin.

Psylosobin.

I don't know.

And

so we're going to talk a lot about that.

So anyway,

he lives here, so it'll be nice to speak to him and explore that stuff.

I'm fascinated by that stuff.

Have you ever thought about doing one of these supervised, a lot of all my, not all my friends, most of my friends have done some of these super advice trips where they have get like a massive dose of, I don't know if it's ketamine or MDMA, and then somebody asks them questions and they kind of unlock all the things in your life and you address, you kind of of address things that you haven't addressed.

And I'm not exaggerating.

I think the majority of the people I've talked to have done it have describe it literally as a life-changing experience.

Yeah, it's very, that's why we have a whole day of it at Code, just so people know we have a mind and body thing.

And one of the panels is all on psychedelics.

We're very interested in that as a business and as a sort of replacing.

problems with opiates and things like that.

Appealing to bear.

And severe depression.

And I'm a big believer in suppressing things.

Like Like, I know I got some shit to deal with, but I'd rather just keep it suppressed.

I think that's one of my core competences is I just keep it.

No, don't.

Don't do that.

Keep it suppressed.

I'm very self-actualized.

I don't need to deal with it.

I don't bury anything.

Are you?

No, I don't bury it.

Uh-uh.

No.

Okay.

Although, one time.

Well, I'd suggest you bury a little bit more.

I suggest you.

No, I'm not burying anything.

You're for a little bit more.

Let's go through it.

Let's go through some of the speakers.

I'm resting my voice, so I want your comments.

This really is a fucking ad for code.

Am I getting paid for this?

No, you are.

This is a fucking commercial.

Talk about it.

Stop it.

I want questions.

I want questions.

Mark Benioff.

Mark Benioff.

Well, I'm really interested.

So I think the thing I find fascinating about Mark, I mean, okay, Mark is one of the wealthiest men in America and has kind of redefined CRM and SaaS.

He is the king of SaaS.

And so there's a lot of interesting questions around him going up against Microsoft and productivity.

But I find the more interesting thing is that Mark Mark Benioff, I don't think he'll be remembered for CRM or Salesforce.

I think he'll be remembered for what I'll call breaking the code of the white guy.

And that is these tech CEOs generally have a code where they don't go after each other.

And he was the first one to say, you know what, Jack Dorsey, you should pay your taxes in San Francisco and stop hiring lobbyists to not pay our fair share.

And he's come out and said that Facebook are cigarettes.

And he said it before.

He said that to me, to Kara Swisher.

Yep.

And

I would put a wrinkle in that.

I think there's actually some very positive, when regulated, I think social media is and can be positive, but they spend all of their time and innovation covering up the negatives.

I think it's not actually tobacco.

I think it's really more opioids than it is tobacco.

There's some effective uses for it.

There's some effective uses for it.

Opioids can be very helpful in certain supervised applications.

But anyway, back to Mark.

I think Mark will go down as someone who, you know, you need in every to real to make real change, a key component, a key actor in real change is what I call class traders.

And that's people, Teddy Roosevelt.

Teddy Roosevelt turned on the people who elected him.

He was elected by the big railroad companies and their money.

And then he turned around and said, you're bad for America.

I'm breaking your ass up.

Thanks for putting me in the White House.

And now I'm breaking you up.

And Mark Benioff.

Excellent question.

Mark Benioff is a class traitor.

He's broken the code of the white guy.

And I think that's what he's going to be remembered for.

And I think he'll be remembered as a positive force in history around this shit.

I like this question.

All right.

Next one.

Marguerite Vestiger.

Speaking of regulating these people, she's come all the way from Europe.

Obviously, she is, I'm trying to pronounce her name correctly.

I just didn't.

Margaret Vestier.

But Marguerite de Vestier.

Marguerite de Vestier.

Vestier.

Anyway, what what should I ask her?

Well,

I'm excited.

I think I told you once.

I spotted her on an Amtrak train knitting and I was staring at her.

She's the knitter, I told you.

I was staring at her so much.

I'm like, this woman's probably going to think I'm stalking her.

So I went over and introduced myself and I took a picture with her and she couldn't have been more gracious.

I just find her incredibly impressive.

The question you need to ask her, though, is quite frankly, has GDPR, have the things they've done

in Europe, have they they worked?

Because a lot of people would argue all they've done is cemented and actually played to big tech's favor, that it's the smaller, medium-sized media companies that have had to incur all the costs and the bigger companies have actually extended their lead.

So, you know,

has what Europe done, what they've done in terms of regulation, has it worked or has there an element of it backfired?

And then the next thing I would ask is, if America doesn't regulate these companies, what does she think they can do in Europe?

What will happen?

Does she ever see a European nation kicking one of these companies out?

Because I would...

Or arresting.

Arresting.

Well, my understanding is that there's certain executives at Facebook that are reticent to fly over UK airspace for fear their plane will be coming to your down and they'll be arrested, but for refusing to testify or

anyways, but I would,

you know, has what I like her, but has what she and Europe done, has it worked?

i'm not sure it's worked kara i'm not sure it hasn't made that's a good question i'm totally using you as a you know like

cramming for the exam essentially there you go so you know aria manuel you're paula gabriel i used to look at her test when i was in eighth grade i used to look over and like say wait what is i was gonna ask a few more aria manuel

Oh gosh, their company makes no sense as a public company.

Their stock's off and it should be.

Like, how is there any synergy there there between professional bull riding and managing Brad Pitt?

I just don't,

I don't understand WME as a public company.

What is the story there?

And what are they going to use the proceeds for?

Do they think they're going to roll up?

I mean,

there's certain endemic or things about the company itself.

And then I would, you know, what is the changing role?

of talent management in streaming.

I'd just be very curious.

He's got,

he's at the helm of the bobsled in terms of the changes here and he sees the capital flows.

I would want to understand from him.

I'm like, okay, winners and losers.

What do you think happens to the cable bundle?

Is the decline been overestimated?

What do you think happens to live sports and live events?

I mean, he really does see kind of the flows of what people are spending money on and where the talent is going.

So I would go down two tracks.

One, WME as a public company makes no sense to me.

Tell me why it does.

And then two,

and then two give us your winners and losers in the world of content and talent because he really is at the forefront um

and also i would just be i mean if you have enough time he's kind of famous for a management style that is very yep uh what i'll call night and i'm quite frankly i i think that management style is underrated i think being honest and i'll call it terse but i don't think that i think there's a hallmark channel version of business and then there's what business is and i'd be curious if and how his management style has changed over the last decade.

I think he's going to say something bad on stage.

I think he can't help himself.

We'll see.

We're good.

Isn't that what we're doing?

Good.

Yeah.

Oh, no, it's good.

I always enjoyed talking to him.

A couple more.

Ted Sarandos.

He's the co-CEO and chief content officer of Netflix.

This is going to be a good one.

Well, Netflix has stalled a bit.

Its stock has lost its trajectory.

I mean, it's still an amazing performer over the last five or 10 years, but I don't, you know, it's kind of Disney Plus has come in.

There's a massive capital coming into the place.

Apple TV, I'd be curious.

I mean, the problem, I'd say, who are your, who does he see as competitors?

But he'll lie and say, oh, our competitors are everything and everyone.

Yeah.

Tell me.

I would want to know.

I think it's going to be difficult for them to extend.

Do they believe it'll be difficult for them to continue to maintain their momentum without going vertical?

Every company that's gone over a trillion dollars, which is what Netflix needs to do to attract investment capital, has one thing in common.

They've gone vertical, whether it's Amazon going into fulfillment, whether it's Apple going into into their own microchips and their own retail.

Netflix, in my view, needs to go into the device business.

And because at 17 billion in content, I mean, I guess it could go to 20 or 30 billion, but it strikes me that they need to, you know, do, are they, do they have any plans?

What vertical?

Well, a device.

It strikes me that one of these players, I mean, Apple, Apple is already starting to sweep DMs.

And I think a lot of it, I'll be honest, like Ted Lasso, I think Ted Lasso is a cute show.

If it wasn't owned by a Monopoly that stuck it in front of my face because of my national monopoly power, I think it could have easily been forgotten.

I think it could have easily gone absolute fuckingly nowhere.

The Queen's Gambit could have been screened on Mars and we would have found it.

That shit was genius.

Ted Lasso is cute.

And he's now competing against a company.

that can put content in front of a billion people and get decent, cute content at the Emmys.

And I mean, he's now competing with folks that are vertical.

I don't, I wonder if and how they plan to go vertical.

He's not going to, but the problem is not going to say anything because he's a public company.

Well, I hope so.

We'll see.

All right.

I have three more.

Quick.

Lisa Su, head of AMD.

Obviously, they did that deal with China many years ago and some other things about making things.

And now the company's roaring.

At the same time, we have a chip problem across the world.

Obviously, I have to talk to her about China.

Anything else?

Well, the fastest means to grow your economy is through intellectual property theft.

And the intellectual intellectual property theft of the next decade that could have a huge impact on the U.S.

and probably more of a strategic impact on Taiwan is China's in the midst of incredible IP theft around, what is it, DRAM or DRAM?

I think it's a real threat to our national security and probably to their company is that

my feeling is basically China is in the midst of building up their own.

chip and microprocessor industry and like what can be does she see it as a threat and what can be done about it i think this is really serious um that that if china does what they did to apparel or to siemens or to cell towers or to you know they basically just through

what people don't realize is they think that our covert um espionage efforts are about spies killing each other and stealing nuclear codes.

No, they're not.

It's much more boring.

It's about stealing trade secrets from companies.

Right.

Right.

That's where the majority of the espionage takes place.

And China is better at it and more brazen.

And I think it's a real problem when they start becoming when they basically take tens or hundreds of billions of dollars in research and just steal it from the US and China and start producing their own microprocessors.

I think it's a real threat to her firm.

Anyways, curious what you're saying.

And she was saying

she's probably worried about being disappeared.

Thanks for my

belief in my ability to elicit.

No,

I believe you can ask great questions.

I just think.

Anyway, I'm sorry.

Go ahead.

All right.

Satcha Nadella at a Microsoft.

Speaking of cybersecurity.

How the fuck have they escaped any big tech scrutiny?

They were the bad guy.

They've gone from Darth Vader to like Luke Scott.

How have they pulled off the ultimate acrobatic move and become the bad guys to the good guys?

Like, what is it about his leadership style and what they've done that's gone, that's give

no company, no company in history has done a better job of starching their hat white.

And it's just amazing.

Microsoft, most valuable company in the world for a while, now second most valuable.

And nobody ever talks about them as a monopoly.

Nobody ever talks about their externalities.

They've done an amazing job at that.

And I would ask them, it's arguably everybody talks about IBM's renaissance, Apple's renaissance, Microsoft's renaissance.

I mean, it's just, there's just no getting around it.

It's just, I mean, they never went, they never did poorly, but for 10 years, the stock went flat.

And then it's been an unbelievable performer.

I would love to know what are the two or three things.

I mean, despite missing social, despite missing search, despite missing mobile, they continue to just

perform.

And I would love to just know, I would,

he's got, it's going to be tough for him to be very honest about his own company, but I'd have to kind of love to ask the same question in the same vein as Aria Emmanuel.

I would love to know.

I think Satya Nadella is a very deep, smart, practical thinker.

I'd love to know, Satya, what technologies are overhyped and underhyped in your view?

And like, is it voice?

Is it AI?

Is it driverless technology?

Like, what is underhyped and overhyped in your view?

I'd love to get his, his, his take on stuff.

Good ones.

All right.

Last one.

By the way, Scott and I.

I didn't know you were going to do this.

This is, I'm doing this literally.

I know.

That's what I want.

I need help.

I need help.

So, um,

by the way, Scott and I are going to do a mind and body panel with all kinds of psychedelics and body people.

That's going to be fun on the third day.

But last but not least.

I did not know that, quite frankly.

I did not know that.

But anyways, I'm looking forward to it.

I'm looking forward to it.

That means your co-host canceled.

And they've said, okay, bring in Scott.

No, you were always the co-host.

Last but not least, you keep asking me and going, should Stephanie Rule do this instead of you?

No.

Should Stephanie Ruhl do this instead of you?

Other than talent and being much hotter than me, she has nothing on me.

She has nothing.

All right.

There's plenty of other speakers like Jason Kylar, Chris Krebs, all kinds of people coming.

Casey Means, we got Nancy Messignier.

All kinds of people coming.

But last but not least, Elon Musk.

Elon.

Elah.

Yeah.

I mean, I would ask him a lot.

One, cryptocurrency is

so powerful and it plays such a huge role.

And he plays such an outsized role now.

He's moving markets.

Does he feel any additional responsibility to maybe have more impulse control?

around tweeting things when he can take markets up or down?

Or does he just like, well, that's just who I am and that's just part of it?

He said two or three years ago that there'd be a million autonomous Teslas on the road within 12 months.

I haven't seen one.

You know, I would ask some hard questions.

And then, but also, I would also give him some softballs.

Like, what, what, I forget what it was called, Discovery 4.

He totally like...

I mean, he just showed up with a fucking elephant gun of space tourism, sending people around the earth three times versus this ridiculous, like,

send people up to the height of where a citation 10.

And then what Virgin and Amazon did was literally they brought a squirt gun to a gunfight.

And he is killing it around,

I think SpaceX is just performing like crazy.

And the other thing, and this is part of my presentation, you know what I think is really underhyped?

You know what changes the world?

It's not going to Mars, which isn't space exploration.

It's space execution.

You know who he's going to change the world is with the boring company.

And that is there are.

The richest people in the world who've had the most impact have done one thing.

They've all built time machines.

Amazon Prime is a time machine.

Netflix is a time machine.

If your kids only watch Netflix, they save 11 days a year in commercials.

Healthcare is going to build a time machine and give a woman who's managing her child's diabetes eight of the 12 weeks back a year that she spends managing that kid's diabetes.

If we can create from a 10 minute, from a 80 minute commute to a 10 minute commute, the most crowded corridors in the world, he's going to give thousands of years back to humans.

And not only that, if you start transporting, what we've learned through COVID is the future is not about us getting around the world faster.

It's about bringing the world to us faster.

And if you build these tunnels, I think the really exciting thing about them is through, and it's boring, but the boring shit is what moves your older value.

It's moving goods through so you can get your

stuff in 10 minutes instead of 48 hours.

I love when people make fun of it.

The boring company is hugely underrated.

I'd like to know more about it and what his vision is for it.

This was good.

This is excellent.

I like this.

We should do our own conference.

Oh, we are.

Yeah, we are.

Except it's in Miami.

If you think I'm fun and out of control here, oh my gosh.

Wait till we get to South Beach.

We see a little Salsadog.

We see a little El Pero.

That's right.

I know.

That's right.

That's right.

All right.

A lot of sunblock.

Scott, let's go on a quick break.

When we come back, we're going to talk to a friend of Pivot continuing this ad, Jim Bankoff of Vox Media.

Who's Jim Bankoff?

Who's Jim Bankoff?

I don't know.

Oh, wait, he's our boss.

He's our boss.

We don't care.

Yeah.

As a founder, you're moving fast towards product market fit, your next round, or your first big enterprise deal.

But with AI accelerating how quickly startups build and ship, security expectations are also coming in faster.

And those expectations are higher than ever.

Getting security and compliance right can unlock growth or stall it if you wait too long.

Vanta is a trust management platform that helps businesses automate security and compliance across more than 35 frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and more.

With deep integrations and automated workflows built for fast-moving teams, Vanta gets you audit ready fast and keeps you secure with continuous monitoring as your models, infrastructure, and customers evolve.

That's why fast-growing startups like Langchain, Ryder, and Cursor have all trusted Vanta to build a scalable compliance foundation from the start.

Go to Vanta.com/slash Fox to save $1,000 today through the Vanta for Startups program and join over 10,000 ambitious companies already scaling with Vanta.

That's vanta.com slash vox to save $1,000 for a limited time.

Support for Pivot comes from LinkedIn.

From talking about sports, discussing the latest movies, everyone is looking for a real connection to the people around them.

But it's not just person to person, it's the same connection that's needed in business.

And it can be the hardest part about B2B marketing, finding the right people, making the right connections.

But instead of spending hours and hours scavenging social media feeds, you can just tap LinkedIn ads to reach the right professionals.

According to LinkedIn, they have grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals, making it stand apart from other ad buys.

You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company role, seniority skills, and company revenue, giving you all the professionals you need to reach in one place.

So you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience and start targeting the right professionals only on LinkedIn ads.

LinkedIn will even give you a hundred dollar credit on your next campaign so you can try it for yourself.

Just go to linkedin.com/slash pivot pod.

That's linkedin.com/slash pivot pod.

Terms and conditions apply only on LinkedIn ads.

Okay, let's bring in our friend of Pivot, Jim Bankob.

Jim is the CEO and co-founder of Oxmedia, and and that makes him our boss, kinda.

He joins us today to discuss the state of the industry as we head into code.

Jim, welcome.

Welcome.

So good to be here.

So good to be here.

My first time on Stay Tuned with Preet, and I couldn't be more excited.

Little CEO humor.

I mean, Pritz?

Pritra.

You mean the guy?

You bring in Prit, you do a full spread in the Wall Street Journal.

You bring in the dog.

And like, I didn't meet you for a year.

You like threw your number seven person at me to go have coffee.

I'm not better, though.

I'm not better.

Hey,

I noticed that when you brought that awesome prof G podcast over the box media podcast network, all of a sudden Anderson Cooper shows up.

Was that happening before Big Dogs?

Was that happening before Big Dog?

We're very close.

We're very close.

All right, let's get to some questions.

No, this is a legitimate question.

So I would say the analogy here is you're Phil Jackson and Karis Michael Jordan and I'm Scottie Pippen.

Aren't we really your boss?

Your turn.

You know what?

Absolutely.

I am here to serve.

100%.

And Scott Pippin, who's Michael Jordan.

Well, I mean, Cara's Michael Jordan, and you're Scottie Pippen.

Clearly.

And your name is Scott, so that's appropriate.

But in all seriousness, I am honored to be on the Pivot podcast.

You guys are, I am, I am not only,

you know, involved as a colleague, but I love the show.

So let's go.

Let's do it.

Okay, enough of that shit.

All right.

My real question here.

Okay.

All right.

So you're, we've been using this term helm of the bobsled.

So ad supported media and vox still is technically ad supported media or a lot of it is and that is we got new york magazine we got podcasts which seem to be one of the few ad supported mediums that is actually growing what is your observation around advertising what what mediums i mean is there is this is there really a future in ad supported media even even if it's digital even if it's podcasts like what are you seeing out there what are the trends so absolutely there's a future in ad supported media.

I'll start off by saying the best media businesses are multi-revenue stream and Vox media is multi-revenue stream.

But since your question was about advertising, I won't talk to you about the subscription stuff that we do and the licensing stuff that we do.

But we want an overview, Jim.

We need an overview.

Yeah, well,

as it relates to advertising, the advertising market is growing and digital is continuing to take share from the billions and billions that still haven't migrated from broadcast and cable and even print and other forms.

And so it's digital is a growing pie.

I think the issue is that if you are subscale, it's harder to do it well.

If you can't make the investment, and that's for a few reasons.

Advertisers don't want to spread their money across a lot of smaller sites.

It's in smaller properties.

It's a pain for them.

But also, if you're subscale, you can't afford to invest in quality, whether that's quality ad products or quality measurements or whatever.

So, our strategy has been to carve out a big segment where we think we can win, which is IP or intellectual property-driven, creatively-driven, high-quality advertising.

And we've grown big because of that.

And I think other people have other strategies, but it's working for us.

We've seen great growth.

The pandemic year for everyone was flat to down, but we've roared back.

And the other thing about advertising, quite honestly, is it's a cyclical.

And, you know, as the market has gotten better, you know, through as the economy has gotten better more generally, advertising has rebounded.

And we're certainly seeing that.

All right.

So you're not down on it.

It's not for everyone, but I'm not down on it for sure.

But is this all headed to kind of a, just logically, you think, well, this is headed towards a Netflix model.

Do you see in one year, three years or never, that Pivot will be hind a wall or that all of the Vox podcasts will be behind a wall and we'll be charging five bucks a month?

Because because those revenues are valued at a multiple of revenues versus the business we're in which is valued at a multiple of EBITDA.

Will that happen?

Will it take longer than we think?

It just seems if you look at scripted content and video, that's where it's headed.

Why has that not happened with audio and podcasts yet?

I think that again,

the best businesses have dual revenue streams, or maybe even more than that.

If you look at, you know, we're three of us remember the good old days of cable and Liberty Media and John Malone and all that stuff, you know,

subscription fees and advertising fees together.

And that's where I think it's going.

And that's where I think podcasting is going too.

So,

you know, and I think it's an opportunity for the talent, you guys, for creators to benefit from both of those revenue streams.

And, you know, what we're focused on is creating.

a quote-unquote platform where we could help creators by giving them promotion, monetization, infrastructure, all the things you need to be successful.

And I think it's going to be a great business.

We're obviously like really long on podcasting.

We have the Vox Media Podcast Network and we're going to keep doing it.

All right, but he didn't answer his question.

Is it moving over to subscription?

There will be more subscription, but

it's not going to pivot entirely to subscription.

There will be advertising and subscription.

And by the way, I take issue with the premise that logically everything is moving to a Netflix model.

Like ad supported podcasting is growing.

It's profitable.

It is, you know, it, there's a big long tail.

And if you're not, you know, if you're not one of the more successful ones, like any other industry, it kind of consolidates around the top, but, but it works.

You know, it works for creators.

It works for businesses.

So, so no, I don't think it's inevitably going to a Netflix model.

I do think it's going to a dual revenue stream model.

And we're excited to be part of that.

I joked around about, I joked around about like, stay tuned with Preet to start off, but you know, Preet has upwards of Cafe media which is you know the company that we acquired um that is led by preet they have um tens of thousands of paying subscribers in addition to a big flagship model uh podcast that that is ad support yeah so tens of thousands paid paid subscribers

tens of thousands paid subscribers

but pause there what's the difference in content and podcasts that warrants people or or catalyzes people to pull out their credit card versus endure an ad from athletic greens or zip recruiter more focused more niche.

You know, I think even Netflix has, you know, Netflix has its share of blockbusters, but Netflix, I think, is particularly strong because it has,

you know, it appeals to hundreds or if not thousands of different particular interests.

And what, and what

you can do the same thing in podcasts.

I think the large, broader ones are going to be ad supported.

And then the more micro-targeted ones lend themselves to subscribers.

And have a fan base.

Right.

And have more of a fan base.

One of the things that i think a lot of people think about is the impact of the pandemic on your business um i'd love to sort of you know running a business obviously there's the remote work part the creation part but in general what is it what has been the impact and how do you feel now even though we're not quite out of it we had to do a lot of stuff at code around COVID, obviously.

We canceled last year.

That's one part of your business.

You have remote issues.

Talk a little bit about managing in a pandemic.

Yeah, I'm glad you brought it up, Kara.

And it's,

you know, we're definitely, you know,

it rages on in Delta variant, and we are taking it incredibly seriously here at Code.

We're taking it incredibly seriously at Vox Media in terms of office.

And, you know, there's a lot of decisions to be made.

And I guess to, you know,

aside from things that people have already talked about, like

making sure that everyone is safe is paramount.

And we take, you know,

we're focused primarily on that.

But the interesting thing is different people in our employee base, and we now employ, I don't know about 1,300 plus full-time people, people have different needs, people have different opinions on things, and we are working hard to listen, but also make some decisions so that we can move forward.

They expect us to lead.

And we're trying really hard to gather as much information so that we can do that.

So for us, that means we're in a position where we can provide our employees with flexibility at this stage.

Do you think everyone has to do that?

Is that what every employer is going to have to do?

I think information economy employers

where it's not literally essential to always have in-person collaboration.

are probably going to have to lighten up around coming and forcing people to come to the office.

You know, I recognize there's value in that.

And I've heard a lot of the discussions on Pivot and elsewhere about, and I agree that there is value in that, particularly for

creativity, for innovation, getting human connectivity in person is important.

Having said that, that's not every day.

And that's not every person.

It doesn't have to be a one-size-fits-all model.

And I think what we're going to have to work our way through collectively is understanding

a finer cut at this.

It's It's not as simple as everyone's back in the office because I say so, but it's not as,

it's also not as easy as do whatever you want.

I think we're going to have to figure out the in-betweens there.

And different companies have different needs.

And

IT is going to help us get through this.

But

it's going to vary from company to company and employee base to employee base and individual to individual.

So you both both develop organically and acquire podcasts.

And there are, I think, something like now 1.2 million podcasts.

And I would venture that 1,000 generously, it's probably 100 of those or 0.01%,

are self-sustaining economically.

If you really did the hard economics on them.

What is there an algorithm or what's the criteria filter that you look at and say, we need

three or four of these boxes to be checked for what will ultimately be a successful podcast?

What makes a successful podcast when you look at something?

You know, you're right.

It's a hits-driven business.

It's not dissimilar from so many other creative endeavors, for better or worse.

If you look at the top songs on Spotify, or if you look at the top shows on Netflix, you know, it's definitely that kind of thing.

And, you know, it's to answer your question, though, it's a hard thing to answer because

if we had that specific formula, we would be, you you know, everyone would be doing it.

We'd be doing it all day long.

So, like other creative endeavors, there has to be spark.

But generally speaking, it's around relevance.

It's around rapport.

There are different types of podcasts that your audience and you know, there are interview shows, there are talk shows that are scripted.

So, you know, the format is less important.

It's more about like the relevance.

And, you know, it's been said before, it's such an intimate medium.

The other thing about it is that

it, you know, podcasting on like, say, a website or even a TV show requires an investment of time.

And so it's harder for new podcasts to break in, is one thing I've found.

Like,

you know, we find our favorites.

I have my favorites like Pivot, but

we don't, you know, they take an investment.

And even if I go from 1x to 1.5x, it's still going to take me, you know, half an hour to listen to a podcast.

And there are only so many you can fit in.

And so I think, you know, the good ones have to keep innovating and staying good.

And then the new ones, I think it's going to be an increasingly higher bar to break in and grow an audience.

One more question.

So you manage, you said 1,300 people, and we have a really young, what do I call information age workforce.

When you observe people,

are there certain characteristics that you observe and you think that person is going to do really well?

Like what advice can you give to young people in terms of the things, the qualities, the competences they should double down on?

Because you think that's what is kind of the elements that seem to succeed in a company like ours.

Great, great question.

You know, the workforce has changed so much since I entered it.

I, you know, I, and in a lot of positive ways, you know, I, I had to endure unpaid internships that, that allowed, you know, a lot of people of privilege to excel when, you know, and things like that.

So the workplace is changing in a positive way.

I tell people sometimes, if a friend asks for an internship for their child, I tell them, like, about the hardest way for your child to get an internship is going through me, because, like, you know, we, we're, we're gonna, we're gonna go through a rigorous process to get people in the door.

But, um, so I think things have improved a lot.

Um, but to answer your question about what it takes to be successful, that probably hasn't changed a lot.

And, and what I like to tell people is think like your boss thinks, and

what problems are they trying to solve?

And what, you know, I'm the CEO of this company.

Like, let's think about the problems that I have to solve.

And in addition to being very good at the job,

in addition to,

I don't think like, I don't

think about anybody.

In addition to like being as masterful as possible at the thing that you were hired to do, whether it's be a producer for a podcast or be a copy editor or be a salesperson or an IT professional, whatever it is, you have to master that, but then also think about the bigger problems that are trying to be solved

and collaborate

to get there.

That's one thing I'd say.

Yeah, that was a nice way of saying how do you deal with all the millennials, which is Scott's persistent question, usually.

So the last question I have, because we got to get going, because I got to get ready.

I got to get my hair did for code to make you some dough.

Sorry, go ahead.

I'm so excited for code.

There, I said it.

All right.

Okay.

There.

Okay.

SPAC.

We would like some money.

So you see media companies attempt to go public via SPAC with mixed success.

What is your next move?

Jim, Jim.

I just want to say this is really important because

Professor G is sort of interesting, but if I get tens of millions from the SPAC, I'm fucking fascinating.

Make me fascinating, Jim Bankoff.

How do we get there?

If we get there, can I come on the boat?

Yeah, 100%.

Yes.

He already has a boat.

That's not true.

I don't know.

I got seasick.

Anyways, I'm sorry.

All right, whatever.

So

we've worked really hard at Vox Media to put ourselves in a position where we can determine our own fate.

I think there have been a lot of companies that have,

as there always have been, that have resorted to different kinds of financing to kind of get while the getting is good.

And some, and sometimes that, and you can say the same thing about SPACs that you could say about an overheated venture market or anything else.

Like,

but we're going to do what creates and realizes

the most value and the most potential to grow the kind of company that we want to grow.

Of course, we're going to treat our shareholders well, but we're going to treat our other stakeholders, employees, advertisers, partners, et cetera, well in that process.

And we're going to use financing as as a means to do that.

And so, if the SPAC market is the right way to do that, we'll look at the SPAC market right now.

You should be a public market CEO because you just said nothing.

You just absolutely said

nothing.

I was just thinking.

I'll give you some more tea on this.

I think there are a lot of companies that are using SPACs because they have to, because

they have to do an acquisition or because they have to get out somehow.

We're not one of those companies.

The bloom is off the SPAC rust.

And so like, you know, do we, do we find value in the right kind of liquidity?

Yes.

Do we find value in the right kind of currency so that we can continue to pursue more and more ambitious acquisitions in addition to the organic growth?

Yes.

Like we will be doing those things.

And, you know, if

a standard IPO gets us there, great.

If a SPAC gets us there, great.

If some other form of financing gets us there, great.

But we're not in a a position you know we're a profitable company like we don't we don't have to like

we'll speak on that

so we'll be we'll be opportunistic in terms of capital uh year-on-year revenue growth 2020 2021 we're not disclosing that we're a private company but up and to the right and you know meaning meaning

20 40

meaningfully up meaningfully up meaningfully and we're profitable ebita margins good good same better worse same better than media companies um

they're they're strong and they're growing and

they're growing while we are still importantly investing in our business, investing in our people

and investing in the technology that enables us to be more efficient.

Where does most of our growth come from, organic or acquisitions?

Most of our growth comes from organic.

But

when we look to do acquisitions, we look to

not only acquire new properties, but also new capabilities that will

help us grow.

And

our biggest one to date was New York Media.

That was a home run.

New York Mag, Vulture, Intelligencer, Strategist, et cetera.

It's just a home run in terms of more weight in the advertising market, but also a new subscription revenue stream with New York Mag Digital, an e-commerce powerhouse with the Strategist.

So we're going to continue to look for opportunities that not only grow us in both.

So in other words,

we got to get going because I really do have to get to the stage.

I got to get going.

So you're buying answers or something.

I got to get to the stage.

Elon is waiting for me.

All right.

You two are going to kill it.

I can't wait.

Listen, you need to make a prediction.

It can't be code.

It would be great.

All right.

Well,

an obvious one is consolidation is going to accelerate.

We're going to be an acquirer.

We're not the only one.

So

look for that to happen.

I'd say another thing, though, and this will go contrary to Scott's Netflix's Netflix's inevitable thing is I think the rise of advertising supported VOD, A VOD as it's called, you know, right now, YouTube kind of dominates that market, but YouTube is not a substitute for say linear cable.

American households are not going to be able to buy five different subscription things, you know,

and they're going to

turn to services like Roku, like Pluto,

Amazon.

You know, and I think that's that's going to be a viable market.

I think you'll, you know,

the Peacock strategy with the paid options makes sense.

Well, you know, I think

Peacock could be one.

You know, Roku could be one.

We're going to see how it shakes out.

But, you know, the ad supported, you know, it's a big country and not, you know, as I said before, not everyone has the income to buy,

to kind of rebundle things on their own.

So.

All right.

All right.

Perfect.

All right.

This is great.

Your hair is on point.

I think he's one of the more handsome media executives.

Oh, thank you for saying that, Scott.

Yeah, he is a handsome executive.

You know what?

The thing is, Jim, my only doubt that you're going to get us to the promised land is you're just too fucking nice.

You know, fuck, fuck off.

Yeah.

And have a great day.

You're learning.

Let's end on that.

Let's end on that.

All right.

Thank you.

I think I will get rich.

All right.

One more quick break.

We'll be back for wins and fails.

Chronic migraine is 15 or more headache days a month, each lasting four hours or more.

Botox, Anabotulinum toxin A, prevents headaches in adults with chronic migraine before they start.

It's not for those with 14 or fewer headache days a month.

It prevents on average eight to nine headache days a month versus six to seven for placebo.

Prescription Botox is injected by your doctor.

Effects of Botox may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms.

Alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness can be signs of a life-threatening condition.

Patients with these conditions before injection are at highest risk.

Side effects may include allergic reactions, neck, and injection, site pain, fatigue, and headache.

Allergic reactions can include rash, welts, asthma symptoms, and dizziness.

Don't receive Botox if there's a skin infection.

Tell your doctor your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, including ALS Lou Gehrig's disease, myasthenia gravis, or Lambert Eaton syndrome, and medications, including botulinum toxins, as these may increase the risk of serious side effects.

Why wait?

Ask your doctor, visit BotoxchronicMigraine.com, or call 1-800-44-Botox to learn more.

Support

not just about reach, it's about reaching the right people in the right context.

And LinkedIn is where business actually gets done.

You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company role, seniority skills, and company revenue.

So you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience.

It's why LinkedIn Ads generates the highest B2B ROAs of all online ad networks.

Seriously, all of them.

You can spend $250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn Ads and get a free $250 credit for the next one.

No strings attached.

Just go to linkedin.com slash Scott.

That's linkedin.com slash Scott.

Terms and conditions apply.

Okay, wins and fails.

Scott, I'm just going to have you do them because my voice needs resting.

So I don't want to pollute my win with a fail.

My win is Angela Merkel stepping down after 16 years.

I think that unfortunately, I hope she doesn't mark the end.

I hope she just marks the pause in what is an unhealthy, well, I think there's been an unhealthy transition in our leaders from character to charisma, where we've gone after sort of these charismatic, loud, you know, in a digital world of Twitter, it's more about how loud and persistent you are versus the veracity or the character of your comments.

And I think Angela Merkel reeks of character.

And if you look at, if you look at Germany through the last 16 years, I mean, America has been a bit of a shit show.

Asia has been an emergent China.

If Europe had been an aggressive shit show with nash, I mean, there are components of Europe that have been a problem, but the engine of Europe, we talk about the United Kingdom because inherently we just want white people who, to talk about white people who speak English is

thinking they'd set the tone.

Germany is the engine of Europe and it's been a stable,

remarkable, you know, it's been a remarkably consistent grower of its middle class.

It's been a liberal society that's managed to grow its economy.

I love the fact that she is not an ideologue, that she has, she herself is quite conservative, but she didn't get in the way of gay marriage.

She understood that she wanted to go where Germany wanted to go.

The majority of people who are not, who have immigrant parents has exploded there, which I think is a good thing.

I think she represents

a real steady hand, a real ballast for Europe over the last 16 years.

I think she's, and not only that, she started, she started, I like the fact, you know what she did?

She got a PhD in quantum chemistry.

And she's, she represents this terrible word that I don't think is terrible.

She represents intellectualism.

She represents very smart.

I think she definitely led, as someone said on Twitter, this 16-year tenure was an example of steel with grace.

I would agree.

That said, her the center-left Social Democrats won the biggest share.

And her outgoing center-right union bloc was very close, but Social Democrats are now in charge.

And a seat held by Merkel since 1990 was run by a candidate in the other party.

She was born in 1993.

So I think it's very healthy, but

change is afoot in Germany for sure.

Yeah, but

just my win.

A quantum chemist has been the most stable hand of 16 years in the last century.

And I think she's led a remarkably honorable life.

She could have left after eight years and gone on board to gone to work for a private equity firm.

Agreed.

But her heart is with me.

Let's give it up for Angela Merkel.

Chancellor.

Angela.

We love her.

That's my win.

All right.

I agree with you.

Good one.

Okay.

No fails.

I'm not going to have any wins.

The win is going going to be you on stage with me at Cohen.

Oh,

that's what it's going to be.

I'm being nice.

That's awesome.

And thank you for answering my questions.

Don't be nervous about the speakers.

It's really helpful to me.

That was my win is getting good questions out of you.

Anyway, we're going to take listener questions on Friday's show as usual.

Record yours at nymag.com slash pivot.

Okay, that's the show.

We'll be back on Friday to take apart what we are going to make in the next few days.

We're making content, especially Scott Galloway and many others.

We're going to be on stage.

So we're going to have a lot to talk about.

Scott, read us out.

Today's show is produced by Lara Naiman, Evan Engel, and Taylor Griffin.

Ernie Intertot engineered this episode.

Thanks also to Drew Burroughs, my man coming to me with LA.

Next to me, Tol and Handsome, giving me some street cred when I go running on San Vicente later.

Make sure you're subscribed to the show on Apple Podcasts.

Or if you're an Android user, check us out on Spotify or frankly, wherever you listen to podcasts.

If you like the show, please recommend it to a friend.

Thanks for listening to Pivot from New York Magazine and Vox Media.

We'll be back later this week for another breakdown of all things tech and business.

I love LA.

I'm staying at the Waldorf Astoria, and this morning I met two actors and I asked them for more coffee.

I asked them for more coffee.

Let's get on it.

Let's get on it, Kara.