Tucker’s War With Fox

Building a business may feel like a big jump, but OnDeck small business loans can help keep you afloat.

With lines of credit up to $100,000 and term loans up to $250,000,

OnDeck lets you choose the loan that's right for your business.

As a top-rated online small business lender,

OnDeck's team of loan advisors can help you find the right business loan to fit your needs.

Visit OnDeck.com for more information.

Depending on certain loan attributes,

your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lendau.
I'm Priya's epic John Lovett. I'm Tommy Vitor.
On today's show, Joe Biden gets some rough polling as he prepares for his debt ceiling showdown with Republicans. Donald Trump offers no defense as a jury decides the rape and defamation case against him.
Tucker Carlson goes to war with Fox News. And Dianne Feinstein is still MIA as Clarence Thomas scandals pile up.
Then later, the host of Pod Save the UK, Nish Kumar, talks to Tommy about King Charles' coronation and a whole bunch of other stuff. We talked coronation.
We talked about politics. They just had a bunch of elections.
What does that mean for the Labour Party? There's a lot of shared challenges right now between the Labour Party and the UK. That's pundit hacking up a bone.
It's the Labour Party in the UK and the Democratic Party over here. And we, you know, misery loves company.
So we talked about it. So Tommy talks to Nish and all of you should check out the very first episode of Pod Save the UK.

It's up now.

The number one podcast in the UK. The number one podcast in the UK.
It is funny. It is insightful.
It is a joy to listen to. Please go subscribe wherever you get your podcasts and check out the first episode.
All right. Let's get to the news.
Joe Biden got a suboptimal poll from the Washington Post and ABC over the weekend that has him losing to Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis among all adults by seven points, 49 to 42 percent for Trump and 48 to 41 percent for DeSantis. That's if you push leaners, people who are leaning one way or the other.
The president's approval is at a record low of 36% in the poll, which is down from 42% in February. And 63% say he doesn't have the mental sharpness to serve effectively as president.
That's up from 43% in 2020. Not great news in the poll for Trump either.
A majority think he's a liar who should face multiple criminal charges. Though about a quarter of all independents who support charging Trump said they would still vote for him over Biden.
That's a, I'd like to talk to some of those people. Yeah, the people that he should be in jail and president.
I'm really just dumbfounding. That's your independent swing voter for you, you know? And we love him.
God love him. God love him.
God love him, yeah. Make the world go around.
You think they're listening? Anyway, great news. No, any evidence this is an outlier?

I feel like you just recited some.

Does anyone want to unskew the poll?

Yeah, but first of all, we should stipulate that we don't yell at polls here.

They're inanimate objects.

They did nothing wrong.

They did nothing to you.

They're just data sets.

Yeah, look, here's what I would also say.

You know, unskew so you can sleep at night, but spend all day thinking that they're pretty real.

But if we were to yell at some polls, it is weird that 56% say that Trump should face criminal charges, but 49% say they'd vote for him. That doesn't, that seems challenging to make work.
Other sort of, I don't know. I wouldn't say it unskews the poll, but gives you reason to believe that it's less, it's, you can step a little bit, you can step back off the ledge a tiny bit is that it says he's 26 he has 26 approval among uh under 30 uh 42 among non-whites 41 among urban residents 46 amongst those with no religious affiliation uh these would be people that may not approve of the job Joe Biden is doing right now, but

these are, uh, don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative types.

That was my one sign for hope.

What do you got?

That's, I'm looking for something here.

It's, it's a very bad poll.

Trump's winning young people.

Biden's winning old people.

That doesn't make a lot of sense either.

It's all just sort of weird.

Here's, it's confusing.

Here's what to do.

Third in the average.

Yeah.

Third in the average.

Okay.

Five 38.

Five 38 it. Well, yeah, we were going to do that after after the conversation but we still got stuff to do before the mattress ads so the average has biden's approval it's steady around 42 43 percent uh so no no sudden upticks or or downticks in the approval rating for biden so it's it's a little higher 36% in this poll.
Though, you know, the Quinnipiac poll, in terms of like high quality polls, first of all, there haven't been many for 2024 yet. But the Quinnipiac has them at like 37.
The Wall Street Journal, NBC one had them at 42. So it's in the range.
The difference is that Biden's horse race number is higher in those other polls than it is here. And Trump's is higher.
Now they did push leaners at the regular poll was like, I think Trump only got 45 or 46% when they didn't push leaners. And 45, 46% is what Trump has received in the last two elections.
Yeah, the other, you said that this doesn't have a lot of good news for Trump either, which is true, but it sort of fits with where Trump always is, which is just he always has very bad polling that kind of fits with where this was at. The one thing that I pulled out that I did think was worth talking about is it said 33% say Trump is honest, 63% say he's not.
That is where Trump has always been on the honesty mark. But Biden is only at 41% saying that he's honest and trustworthy, while 54% say he's not.
In the lead up to 2020, that was, if not flipped, close to it. And that has been dropping pretty steadily.
And to me is like a really, like put aside the actual kind of horse race numbers, the comparisons, all the rest. The fact that there's been that drop in honesty and trustworthiness when that is, I think think, one of his big selling points and one of the ways he's sort of ridden sort of waves of disapproval was alarming to me.
I got to check with Obama because I do think that for a lot of presidents, their honest and trustworthy numbers tend to go down over the course of the eight. Do you have an AI thing ready? Oh, no, no.
I would imagine if I just had a soundboard. You had the face that you have when you're ready to introduce a bit to us, which I was really excited.
Yeah, I mean, look, it has been steadily going down and that is probably just a result of people just being disappointed with the difference between what a candidate sounds like and what a president sounds like, which is of course true. But like, you look at Obama over eight years and even when his disapproval dropped, there were certain metrics of his sort of personal likability that kind of stayed buoyant, which was a protection against people like Mitt Romney, for example.
And I don't know, that was just nerve wracking to me. So easily could be a bad sample, bad poll, or could be right, we don't know.
The RCP average has Trump leading by one with this poll in it. So either way, it's going to be a close fucking race.
That's a long time. A lot of undecideds.
Trump is once again around 45, 46, right? When you don't push leaners, which is always where he's been. And if it's just Trump and Biden, then, you know, probably a little better for Biden.
But again, we get third parties in there and suddenly it could be 2016 and Trump doesn't have to get much higher than 45 or 45 percent. That RFK junior magic.
Or fucking no labels and whether they're going to Joe Manchin or Kyrsten Sinema or someone else. And a lot of the drop in here is not just independents, but Democrats.
Yeah, that's and that one that one's probably most easily fixable. I will say it's hard to, you know, the 60 percent saying he's not doesn the acuity viewing Trump as being more kind of up to the job.
Yeah, as you say, that made me a little more nervous than the honest and trustworthy ones even. I don't like either.
Yeah. I mean, instead of just complaining about what we don't like about this poll, that's easy enough to do.
Well, that part's over. We got any advice? Any advice for the Biden campaign as they look at these numbers? I think that ultimately Joe Biden is going to have to say,

things are better,

but they're not perfect.

I know you don't love me,

but these guys are crazy.

Like, look over there.

They're going to destroy the economy

with the debt ceiling.

They're going to do nothing

to stop guns, gun violence.

They're going to take

your freedoms away.

The key is the choice.

It's Joe versus the wackos.

And when we don't have a Republican nominee yet, it's very hard to do that. Yeah, I think that's right.
I mean, I think Trump, it's, you know, I think like the political press and a lot of people that are very engaged are paying attention to the ongoing legal machinations, but there's nothing compared to a campaign. And he really is out of the limelight in a lot of ways.
And you see that kind of even in this poll, like, just like places where his just approval rating has gone back up, like he had this sort of immovable approval on the economy that basically stayed pretty high up until the pandemic and then started dropping. And now it's kind of back up to where it was pre pandemic.
And all of this is a really and it's the it's I hate to say it like absence makes the heart grow fonder and it sucks but oh you said with trump with trump yeah yeah i think i can't tell i mean i think that i feel like opinions about trump are pretty hardened but that the that the campaign is going to hinge on reminding people how awful he is right which is Which is not hard to do. Sometimes he just opens his mouth and does it.
There's plenty of, like you said, legal issues that he's dealing with that will, again, shine a light on who he is as a person. I think for Biden, Tommy's right that it's all a choice.
It's all about why Trump is crazy. It's all about why the Republicans are extreme.
But in terms of his own personal style, I think like I think I think Biden's got to really flood the zone with being in people's faces all the time. Like, I think that I think that stepping back when you're the challenger to Donald Trump and Donald Trump's president and you don't really Biden's just the alternative to what you don't like right now, I think that works.
I think it's tougher when you're the incumbent, as Joe Biden is. And if there's a lot of people who they only hear from Joe Biden when there's some right-wing TikTok of him seeming old, then they're going to have a bad opinion of him, right? And I think the only way to combat that is Joe Biden out there all the time, showing some energy, being loose, being with people, right? He's really good one-on-one with people, whether it's town halls, whether it's meeting people on rope lines.
Like, I think all of this, if I was running a campaign, this is what I would, and I'm sure the Biden people are thinking about all this, like, this is what I would do. We were just talking about the Correspondent Center speech last week, and his delivery was really good, and he was having fun.
And also when he's in fighting mode, too, when he's talking about Donald Trump, talking about the threats of democracy, he tends to have a lot of energy there, too. I think that reminds people that he's got a fighting spirit, too.
I think there's ways to help combat the perception that he is too old. Yeah, I'm sure they're very frustrated because I think the economy has added 13 million jobs or just shy of 13 million jobs since he took office.
Unemployment is at record lows, like three and a half percent. You're reading all these announcements about companies literally opening manufacturing plants in Georgia and other places because of tax credits in the IRA, but he doesn't seem to be getting any credit for it.
So I agree with you, he's got to be out more. I do think it's good advice, but I think there's limits to how many people are actually going to hear about these stories just because of the way the media works.
So hard. So, you know, that's why it's just a volume.
I'd be like big shoes, big shoes. It's, it's, it is, it's quantity at some point, right? Because it is so getting attention, even when you're president United States in this media environment, it's just harder, you know? Yeah.
And doing a typical event where you're just going and touting some manufacturing jobs, like it's just, that won't get you the attention anymore. You got to keep, and I think it's not only what Joe Biden has done, but that he continues to show this like fighting spirit on behalf of working people.
He did this today. On Monday, he announced new regulations with Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg that would require airlines to compensate customers beyond a ticket refund if there's a delay or canceled flight.
Love this. Love this.
This is good stuff. They should do some fun stuff with us to, again, really get it some attention.
I love the fee stuff. People aren't going to know that.
Now, the problem is it's not going to take effect for like months, if years. Sure.
It's going to be through the rulemaking process. The rulemaking process.
I love it. It's a great idea.
Integrated character IP life enhancement via airlines. Gated communities, infinite freedom.
Don't just give me a voucher. Fork over some extra cash.
I love that. Go to an airport.
Why didn't we do more of this? Going after these terrible, monopolistic companies is a great idea. Do it every day, Joe.
We did a passenger bill of rights, but it didn't quite go as far as this. We did the, if airlines overbook and that you get kicked off a plane because of the overbooking, then they have to pay you like double the money.
And we said they couldn't leave you on the tarmac for more than eight hours or something. So, you know, there was that jet flight that went fully kind of Lord of the Flies.
But Biden out there fighting against corporations on behalf of working people over and over again. That's good stuff.
Yes. That's good stuff.
And just, you know, let's get him out there meeting people between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m.
That's the sweet spot. Get him out there.
Sun shining, birds chirping, ice cream in his hand. And he should be joking about his age all the time.
Yeah. He did it at the Correspondent Center.
He should do it some more. I'm older than the trees.
He said something about his 280-year career. That's great.
The other day, which is really fun. Do that.
It's funny. I like it.
All right. Donald Trump still has a few bumps on his road back to the White House.

New York Times reports that in the classified documents investigation,

special counsel Jack Smith has obtained cooperation from a secret witness

who worked at Mar-a-Lago, and he's also issued a new wave of subpoenas,

including for records related to Trump's business dealings with Saudi Arabia.

His name?

Juan Jr.

With a little mustache. Juan Jr.
You get it. You get it.
That's funny. Also, after the leader of the Proud Boys and three others were convicted of seditious conspiracy, Congressman Jamie Raskin told Jen Psaki over the weekend that Trump could absolutely face the same charges.
And jurors have just heard closing arguments in the rape and defamation case brought by the writer E. Jean Carroll against Trump, who not only turned down a second last minute chance to testify, but presented no defense in the case whatsoever.
None. Well, just so people understand.
So the reason there was this second chance to testify is that when he was opening up a golf course in Scotland, he did the thing he always does, which is I could testify, happily testify, love to testify. And was like okay he said i'm coming back home i gotta go back home to testify i have to leave the country early i have to leave ireland earlier wherever i just had to go testify and the judge is like okay you weren't gonna do that and then the judge's like okay tell me by 5 p.m if you're gonna want to testify and they're all of course not what are you crazy very strange uh so the jurors did get to watch video of Trump's deposition from October, which we have some clips from.

Let's listen.

And when you're a star, they let you do it.

You can do anything.

Grab them by the pussy.

You can do anything.

That's what you said, correct? Well, historically, that's true with stars.

It's true with stars that they can grab women by the pussy?

Well, that's what it's if you look over the last million years, I guess that's been largely true. Not always, but largely true.
Unfortunately or fortunately. When you said in that video that Ms.
Leeds would not be your first choice, you were referring to her physical looks, correct? Just the overall not. I look at her.
I see her. I hear what she says, whatever.
You wouldn't be a choice of mine either, to be honest with you. I hope you're not insulted.
I would not, under any circumstances, have any interest in you. I'm honest when I say it.
It's just such an awful human being. Unfortunately or fortunately.
I mean, a lot of these are things he said before, but he just compounds it any way he can by just being the most disgusting human being in these depositions you know it's things he said before but i will just say i know that we're all a nerd to this now because we've had a lot of years of donald trump but let's remember when the access hollywood tape comes out and donald trump actually gives the remember the the live on air apology he does that is you know and he this is not what i meant blah blah now it's just like january 6th

he's long gone past, oh, I didn't say that. Oh, that was just a joke.
And now he says, oh, no, what I said was true. What I said was true.
And it was good. It was good.
That's what you do get to do that if you're a celebrity. Well, he makes it worse and he insults the lawyer and she's, yeah, it sounds awful.
We'll leave the legal consequences of Trump's actions to juries of his peers. It does seem like the political consequences of all these cases could be a bit more damaging for Trump than the hush money case.
But what do you guys think of all these developments that have popped up recently? There's a lot of, I mean, certainly this conversation we're having right now reminds you there's just a ton of legal uncertainty swirling around him as a person around the campaign. And the fact that DeSantis and all the other opponents can't seem to get it together to leverage not just what he actually did, but the kind of political risk is, you know, another indictment of how bad they are running against him.
Yeah. I'd also just say that deposition interview footage always looks bad.
Really bad. It always a feel to it.
It has a feel to it, as does all kind of hidden camera footage always kind of feels bad. I don't know what the impact of this specific case will be a year and a half from now, but what are his two lowest moments as a candidate and president? I'd say one of them is around the excess hollywood table let's say the three lowest moments one is access hollywood second is the health care vote and the third is the insurrection you'd probably say those are the three i definitely include trying to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power 100 i don't even mean obviously but i mean in terms of like the public the public reaction to him where you, like we just talked about how robust and like how stable his polling always is.

And like, what are the things that managed to kind of like pull that clothesline down a little to weigh it down?

It was Access Hollywood.

It was health care.

And it was the insurrection.

And this is as bad as that ever was, even though we are all fucking desensitized to it.

I realize that this is incredibly hackish of me.

But when I saw that deposition footage, my first thought was ads.

Democratic super pack. If I was a Democratic super back out there, I would throw some of that deposition footage in an ad and test it first.
You know, test it in front of voters, focus groups, see how it goes. But I would bet, particularly after talking to Celinda Lake on this show a couple weeks ago, that this would break through.
She said that this case is breaking through, and a lot of her research, especially among women, especially among young women, says something about our society, of course, that it's not getting as much coverage as the Hashmani case. I realize it's a civil lawsuit, not criminal, but it's pretty big deal if a jury decides that a former president is a rapist for the first time.
Yeah. I mean, I think it's getting less coverage because it's just different phases of the trial.
I mean, similarly, in the Mar-a-Lago case, I've always wondered whether people would really care whether or not he took classified documents. But when you start to read about how the FBI is looking, they're talking to his staff to see if they were directed to hide or move things after the subpoenas came through, or if they deleted footage of what happened, that feels like a big deal.
I mean, like Jack Smith is flinging subpoenas like a blackjack dealer down there. Like the whole staff has now been subpoenaed.
Both of the calamaris, who can forget the calamaris? It's a double calamari. Matthew Calamari, senior and junior.
I think the plural calamari is calamari. I think you might probably.
Here's my favorite. I think one of them is a calamaro.
My favorite anecdote from this New York Times story about the Mar-a-lago case was among the information they have gathered in interviews concerned his habit of flushing material down toilets according to a person familiar with the matter and i just like love the idea of some very serious fbi agent like asking questions like number one so this goes down the sugar as well it's a yellow let it mellow okay number two uh tommy can you give us give us your take on the potential Saudi connection here? It was just sort of slipped in as like paragraph 20 of the New York Times story. It's like, oh, by the way, there's a subpoena for Trump's business dealings with the Saudis over their golf venture.
Yeah, I don't know what to make of that. And I've never really believed that.
You want to red string it for us? Yep. They never really believed that Trump took a bunch of classified documents to sell them to some other country or anything like that.
But if you were looking for a way to trade this information to, let's say, the Saudi government for cash, it does seem like having the live golf tournament host a bunch of matches or whatever they're calling them, they call it something different, at his clubs would be a great way to launder that money. Great way to get his beak wet.
Unbelievable. We didn't even also talk about the fact that they've given immunity to a bunch of the fake electors.
Oh, yeah. Which, like.
In Georgia. Yeah, those people, you know.
They all got immunity deals. They got immunity, so what do they know? And why are we giving, and where.
Finney Willis isn't giving out immunity for free. And what those people did was very serious, very illegal, and very wrong.
And so, you know, who are the people you're going after? There's not very many above the electors that aren't named Donald Trump. As Tommy pointed out, one person who's still not taking advantage of any of this is Ron DeSantis, who's busy dealing with more of his own bad press.
ABC obtained video of Tiny D's debate prep sessions from his 2018 race for governor. or an advisor suggested that when he gets to the podium, he should write the word LIKABLE in all caps at the top of his notepad.
You can also see Matt Gaetz telling DeSantis to tone it down during prep, and DeSantis struggling with how to avoid pissing off Trump's voters. Let what I do is I do what I think is right.
I support his agenda in terms of what he's been able to do. If I have a disagreement, I talk to him in private.
I think when you walk up there, if you have a pad, you have to write in all caps at the top of the pad, likable. And I do the same thing because I have the same personality.
We're both aggressive. I do the same thing.
Do you guys think it's a good sign for your political prospects when the person advising you on likability Is Matt Gaetz Matt Gaetz is dressed like he's gonna go sell Nitrous balloons at a Dave Matthews concert He's wearing like Nirvana t-shirt And a two tight t-shirt Matt Gaetz is telling you to tone it down This fucking guy Matt Gaetz is like here's how to be likable Take it from me Matt Gaetz It's not advice. It's such pretty good advice from Matt Gaetz.
The whole thing seems kind of normal and more reasonable. And I don't know, even DeSantis kind of seems smarter about politics, but he comes off as very angry about everything.
That fucking voice of his. You might say he comes off as a little sanctimonious.
He comes off like the Mars attacks aliens. Ag, ag, ag.
The other, it reminded me of something, which is um the way which they're trying to corral this fucking humorless stale voiced whiny awful personality uh uh candidate to being a likeable politician when when i was a first when i was first um working on the hill uh i worked for senator named john corazon much more likable Ron DeSantis, but he was just, he was like a finance guy. Public speaking was not his forte.
And they like, very early on, they wanted him to come up with jokes or have like be funny. And they brought me into a kind of speech prep.
And I just remember realizing how far we were from jokes because one of the pieces of device was, it'd be helpful if you stopped rolling up the speech and using that to scratch your beard while you're talking. Write that one at the top of the notepad.
That's what that reminded me of. But like saying write likable on your notepad is so goddamn funny.
It's terrible advice. You can't just be like, you can remind yourself to be likable.
You are or you are not. When George H.W.
Bush was running against Bill Clinton, Bill Clinton was obviously more likable and more compassionate and more able to relate to people. And so there's a famous moment where George H.W.
Bush says something about grocery prices and he goes, message, I care. And that was the that was not the part that was subtext.
He was supposed to stay. That was like saying your name here.
Yeah. I think there was something revealing when when Gates is telling him, oh, you were too aggressive in what you just said.
What he was referring to is during debate prep. Remember back in the 2018 race at one point, DeSantis says, all right, Florida, don't monkey this up by voting for Andrew Gillum.
And everyone took it as a racist statement. And so in debate prep, they hit him with that.
They hit DeSantis with that. And he basically was like, yeah, I was pretty hot in response to that.
But what I learned from Kavanaugh is you can never even show a hint of weakness on these things or even seem apologetic at all. You've got to just go hard and seem angry.
And that's the only way to do because otherwise our base will think that we're weak and that is the lesson that all of them have learned yeah that is the whole lesson of the trump era never apologize act like an asshole and you can get through it it's just but he sounds so whiny so he's a big whiner and he's resting dumb face and the whole thing i mean yeah the it yeah, it's a weird debate staff. I mean, Matt Gaetz is running your debate prep.
That's just a strange decision. Yeah.
And now he's for Trump. So, yeah.
Well, I mean, that must worry them. I mean, these kinds of tapes leaking, I don't know if I've ever heard of that happening before.
That's a pretty big breach. Like debate prep is like kind of like an inner circle kind of sacred space.

That shit doesn't leak.

So in Gates goes from DeSantis guy to Trump supporter sycophant.

DeSantis had a big split with Susie Wiles, who was running his campaign at the time.

She's now working for Trump.

I would be sitting there thinking, oh, my God, what else are they sitting on?

That's cool.

Yeah. Pandora makes it easy for you to find your favorite music.
Discover new artists and genres by selecting any song or album, and we'll make you a personalized station for free. Download on the Apple App Store or Google Play and enjoy the soundtrack to your life.
Dogs deserve the best, and that means fresh, healthy food. Unlike other brands, Ollie offers five flavors that are as nutritious as they are delicious, all made in U.S.
kitchens without harmful fillers or preservatives. Head to ollie.com, tell them all about your dog, and use code HAPPYPUP to get 60% off's dangerous, but do it anyway.
As a parent, you can't always be in

the car, but you can stay connected to their safety with Greenlight Infinity's driving reports.

Monitor their driving habits, see if they're using their phone, speeding, and more. These

reports provide real data for meaningful conversations about safety. Plus, with weekly

updates, you can track their progress over time. Help keep your teen safe.
Sign up for Greenlight

Infinity at greenlight.com slash podcast big week in dc joe biden has his first debt ceiling meeting with the four top leaders in congress at the white house today just in time a couple weeks away from default yeah janet yollett is just it's just uh just white knuckling on a toilet somewhere just fucking anxiety for fucking days. She's not.
Why, is she on a toilet? Janet Yellen hasn't had a solid shit in two weeks. Oh my God.
I'm just saying she's anxious. You can't hear that on any other podcast.
No other media. You're not getting that on MSNBC.
Oh my God. This comes after 43 Republican senators signed a letter over the weekend saying they will not support a debt ceiling increase without substantial cuts of the kind the House passed.
Meanwhile, Kevin McCarthy and leadership aides are trying to tamp down expectations within their caucus about what would constitute a win for Republicans, since his most extreme members are saying they won't vote for anything less than the House bill. Are we just headed for a either default or a less crazy version of the House bill? Is it still possible at this point for Biden to get a clean increase? Is any kind of deal possible? What do you guys think? I would say, first of all, I think to get 43 Senate Republicans together to say anything close to this, it had to be vague and purposefully vague.
So what they say is they're united behind the House Republican conference in support of spending cuts and structural budget reforms as a starting point for negotiations on the debt ceiling. That leaves a lot of room to maneuver.
And they won't vote for cloture on any bill that raised the debt ceiling without substantive spending and budget reforms, which also gives you a lot of space. Fifty Shades of Grey.
The starting point was fan fiction about Twilight. You can go very far from your starting point.
It's just something to think about. Though it was vague, but still, they didn't get Romney, Collins, or Murkowski to sign on to that letter.
They didn't, you're right. I don't know.
They got 40. I feel like they got above 40 and they patted themselves on the back.
I think what the Republicans have done, which is smart here in the Senate, is they're like, we cannot leave, at least at this point, we can't leave McCarthy out to dry. He got this pass through the House.
We've got to lock arms with McCarthy. We can't have any daylight between the Senate and the House Republicans.
Otherwise, we're not going to get anything out of Biden. To me, that seems what that letter is about.
I would say it's getting this off. This says where the Senate Republicans are.
I don't know that this is something that puts any more pressure on Biden than what he already was facing. But I think publicly it answers the mail on what McConnell's been getting asked over and over again.
Yeah. I'm just still caught up on that, you know, previous comment about the secretary of the treasury.
I mean, I guess good news, bad news, good news. You can't really get much worse than a $1.5 trillion debt limit extension for less than a year for $5 trillion in cuts.
So baby steps to better. Who knows? I still don't see a path forward though reason i mentioned the um on the mccarthy side what we saw in playbook today that he's telling he's tamping down expectations is there were some senior republican aides in the house who were like if we just get uh if we just get the unspent covid funds and permitting reform that's a win and i'm like yeah oh no don't get that yeah that'd be horrible we can't get that it's a reminder it's a reminder that like with the house republicans some of them play crazy some of them aren't crazy and some of the ones that play crazy are just like a little bit nervous with some of the ones that are hey like i'm visiting this asylum i don't i don't fucking live here with you people uh but uh yeah i do think though like i don't see a clean increase happening at this point because forget about the 43 Republican.
You also get Joe Manchin. You're dealing with the Senate.
Forget about the House at this point. This getting a clean increase through the Senate seems like it's very difficult at this point.
I also think a lot of this is semantics. Like, I don't know what like if like, for example, we don't know what's going to come out of a conversation with McCarthy and Biden tomorrow.
But one thing potentially is some sort of a framework that is a short term debt ceiling extension with some kind of cap on spending that kicks you to a negotiation over government shutdown. Plus that Biden gets to call that a clean raise to get you to the field to the to the negotiation.
Two track strategy. Right.
And so but like did Biden get a clean debt limit increase in that case? Yes. No.
I think the semantics fall apart when you tie it to another negotiation. We need a bipartisan coalition of reporters, TV broadcasters, podcasters to come together and say, we're sick of talking about this.
It is so boring. It makes us want to die.
Please just fix it so we don't have to talk about it. You know who's going to help us with that? Our audiences.
People keep saying it. People keep saying it's boring.
I'm interested. I think the gamesmanship is kind of interesting.
I think it's fascinating. It's a lot of game theory stuff.
Yeah, it's game theory. It's real negotiations.
It's real snakes. Happened to my friends.
I think what's also exciting to me about a two-track strategy is you get to do something that's, I think, classically American, which is you kick the can down the road and raise the stakes, which is a classic American move. Kick the can, raise the stakes.
Procrastinate and make it worse. We're at season six and everyone's lost the plot.
It's Westworld all over again. It's Westworld all over again.
Westworld all over again. It's all again.
Anyway. Your mind is the scene of the crime.
Speaking of entertainment. Different thing.
Axios reports that Tucker Carlson is about to go to war with Fox News in order to get out of his contract which is basically paying him 20 million dollars to not work for any competitor or himself until 2025 uh tucker's apparently thinking about starting his own media venture uh he's approached elon musk about working together of course um and a friend said that when it comes to fox tucker quote knows where a lot of bodies are buried and is ready to start drawing a map. I don't, they keep saying this thing that like, what, what fucking bodies over there? What, what do we not know about this heinous right-wing fascist organization? It's gotta be actual bodies.
Like, is it actual corpses? Because it, because it actually, what it feels like, what Fox News feels like right now. Do they bury Roger Ailes under the, under the newsroom? Like, how, how it's felt watching this over the last, like, six months months is like a graveyard after a hurricane and all the bodies have kind of come fully up already.
Like what bodies are left? I'm crushing it today. I'm crushing it today.
Here's what I know. What do you know? Every generation needs a hero.
Your Ellsbergs, Daniel. Oh my God.
Your Brockoviches, Aaron. All right.
You could be that, Tucker. Serpico in a bow tie.
Tell the truth. The way in which Aaron Brockovich, Serpico, and Ellsberg are so different and just different analogies.
Tell the truth. Tell your truth, Tucker.
Tommy, I have a different take. Oh, wow.
I want Fox News to win this one. You've always been a Fox fan.
No, no, no. Because to Lovett's point,

what else is Tucker really going to do to Fox

that they haven't already

done to themselves

through various depositions

and discovery processes

over the last several months?

But if Fox can somehow

stop Tucker from having

a platform for the next two years,

I think that's a win

for all of us.

I think that's great.

Yeah, that's where I'm at too.

I want Fox to just hold the line

on this non-compete joke. you murdochs keep the faith jokes aside i think what i'm most interested in in all of this is which uh mainstream media outlets are willing to uncritically print everything tucker's lawyer says bodies are buried i got bare knuckle brawlers standing by to fight allies friends sources close to tucker everyone is offering tucker money i mean the amount of posturing going on in these news stories that are just going unquestioned is uh notable yeah i one of the one of the reports was said that daily wire was like i'm i've been waiting for the fucking tucker carlson uh tucker carlson caravan and the ben shapiro caravan those places those people should meet in the middle.
Look, Tucker Carlson will wind up on a Rumble or a Daily Wire type outlet. I think the question really is whether his non-convee prevents him from going to...
60 Minutes. New York Times calm.
Cancel culture run amok this week in the New York Times. Pamela Paul and Carlson having a conversation doing one of those chats I was watching CBS Sunday morning because I'm 75 years old this weekend how do you even get that thing do you have rabbit ears and they had George Will doing a puff piece on Henry Kissinger and I was like what era am I living in you saw that too I did not see it no I saw Tommy tweet about it.
Sorry to do that to you. Anyway.
Yeah, I agree. Anything that keeps Tucker Carlson quiet for a while, I'm for.
But you know what? Go at each other. Burn the whole conservative ecosystem.
My point is just like quiet is going to be arranged because I do think he's going to have a podcast on Rumble or something like that. He's going to do something.
It's a question of whether he's on Newsmax or he's a non-compete. Tweet a video and Elon will just like, you know, juice it, juice it, promote it.

All right.

Finally, the list of Clarence Thomas scandals just keeps getting longer.

Harlan Crowe didn't just secretly pay for private jet rides, luxury yacht trips in the

home of Clarence Thomas's mother.

The latest ProPublica bombshell says that Crowe also paid the private school tuition

for Thomas's grandnephew.

And the Washington Post reports that Federalist Society goon Leonard Leo paid $25,000 to Ginny Thomas

through Kellyanne Conway's polling company and asked that the paperwork have, quote,

no mention of Ginny, of course.

Can the Senate Judiciary Committee do anything about these scandals,

or any of the judicial nominations that are stuck in committee? Of course not, because Dianne Feinstein is still absent. Jake Tapper made a point about this to Dick Durbin over the weekend.
Let's listen. All due respect, sir, you and your fellow Democrats were very ginger and very polite when it came to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and not pushing her to retire when you had a Democratic majority in the Senate.
How'd that work out for you? How'd that work out for Roe v. Wade? Well, I can tell you that you can play these out and try to guess what the Supreme Court opinions resulting from it will be.
The bottom line is, though, we have in the past had members of the Senate, I can think of a handful as I'm sitting here, Democrats and Republicans, who've been absent because of medical conditions for lengthy periods of time. I want to treat Dianne Feinstein fairly.
I want to be sensitive to her family situation and her personal situation. And I don't want to say that she's going to be put under more pressure than others have been in the past.
What is going on? I will say this. So first of all, Dick Durbin is the person that has set off this.
It was Dick Durbin's comments to CNN that set off the calls for Dianne Feinstein to retire. It was him telling a reporter, hey, I'm not going to be able to move judges through this committee.
We're deadlocked in a bunch of shit.

This is creating a real problem that set off the firestorm of people calling for her to

retire.

So he's there's a I'm sensitive to the fact that clearly he is reacting to what the Feinstein

people have been saying, which is she's not going to be forced out.

He's trying to be delicate.

But that being said, yikes.

Yeah, I mean, yeah, I agree with all that.

I, I, I agree with all that. Probably people would have noticed.
That's why the nominations were holed up. They can count the votes on the committee at some point.
Yeah, for sure. He went out there, but I'm saying he went out there and kicked it out.
Well, he did in a very Dick Durbin way. Look, all of this is in a very Dick Durbin way.
The velveteest of velvet gloves is that he is approaching all of this i mean this went viral because of jake's question not because of durbin's answer i get that these people are all collegial and they're all friends in the center i get it i get it you don't want to be nasty to someone who you've served with for years but like fucking there's a lot at stake here there's a lot at stake well he goes on to say in that interview that when Feinstein put out in her statement that nothing is being held up, that he just doesn't agree with that, that her absence is being felt on the committee. They can't do these subpoenas for Harlan Crow or for Clarence Thomas.
It is slowing down the nomination process. So he is saying that.
I mean, look, I don't know why I'm defending Dick Durbin. Nobody's been...
Biggest Dick Durbin defender here. I don't know.
I'm surprised by myself. Diane Feiniennes should fucking retire.
The reason, like Durbin's answers, Durbin's sort of letter to the chief justice of the Supreme Court about ethics, inviting him to come to the committee was very frustrating and seemed incredibly feckless because it was. Sadly, the RSVP, no.
Right. Not only the RSVP, no.
Will not attend. He sent a scathing response.
It was basically like, how dare you even ask me? Strict Scrutiny did a great episode on all these sort of ethics issues that you should listen. But the biggest challenge is because Feinstein isn't there, he can't issue a subpoena.
They can't do anything. And so listen, setting aside the whole Dianne Feinstein of it all, no one individual lawmaker's hurt feelings should take precedent over the work that we all send in there to do.
And like the suggestion otherwise, this silly forced collegiality, she's 89 years old. Several years ago, there was a round of stories about her asking the same question at a hearing verbatim twice in a row.
That's when people really started talking about this stuff. I think the saddest part of this also is now we are now in, we've been in weeks and weeks of stories about a lot of people calling for her to retire, a lot of people questioning whether she's mentally fit and certainly whether or not she has the sort of physical stamina to ever return to the Senate.
Through that entire period of time, she said, I will return, but will not give a date. That is really sad because it tells you that her health condition is very serious, that she cannot return to the Senate.
So it is all very like it is obviously human and it is somebody who is afraid to have their final moments in public life be defined by their illness and calls to resign. That is obviously sad.
But one person's ego and the staff's desire to protect that person's ego is not more important than confirming justices, getting these subpoenas out the door and having full representation for California in the Senate. It's ridiculous.
And this I hate this isn't even potentially the worst of it. Like, you know, Dianne Feinstein's making an argument that, oh, look at how many judges they confirmed.
And, you know, this argument is like we're getting through all the judges that can be confirmed right now. And but down the road, there's going to be a roadblock.
Of course, there's going to be a roadblock with her without her on the committee. And then, of course, there's the Supreme Court stuff.
But as Amy Klobuchar mentioned, when she first talked about this, we need for the debt ceiling to potentially. Right.
If if if we get if we get either Joe Manchin or Kyrsten Sinema, one of them to not be an asshole, and we required like, you know, 51 Democrats to be there or 50 Democrats to be there, plus Kamala Harris, and we don't have Dianne Feinstein, that could be a real fucking problem. Or it just sets one card against us even further of having to need every vote.
Ro Khanna tweeted about how because Senator Feinstein was absent, the Senate overturned a Biden rule that would cut pollution from heavy duty trucks and cause all of us to breathe in worse air. I mean, that's a real, that has happened in the past.
And yeah, it's not just about confirming judges. I mean, they can spin this all they want, but that's not the extent of the problem.
Yeah. More broadly on these Clarence Thomas revelations, it's now like multiple stories about Clarence Thomas in ethics.
There was a story about Justice Neil Gorsuch selling a law firm to a big, selling real estate to a law firm that had a bunch of issues before the court. There's questions about Roberts's wife placing lawyers at big firms and maybe earning $10 million.
I think what we're learning is that maybe decades and decades of really chummy coverage of supreme court that you know ends up in book deals and people being friends has not really served us very well and maybe we need a little more adversarial worker subtreating nina totenberg and not subtweeting take that nina totenberg i'm with you know, I know. We got to go a little harder with these folks.
These people got to reform the court. That's the only way out.
They're not going to make ethics rules for themselves. They're clearly not embarrassed by any of the reporting.
They don't feel shame on this stuff. They feel like they're above the law because the way that we've set up the system right now, they really are we have you know 60 votes in the senate to pass some reforms or to expand the court or to put in place term limits or we or we have enough we have enough senators to get rid of the filibuster we can do it with a few more yeah or if we have enough centers get rid of the filibuster and like you know i mean again i would love it if diane feinstein could come back and we'd actually could subpoena justice roberts or thomas and then have them yeah and then have them be you know answer for themselves on national television great um but real change we got to fucking change the court the uh the clarence thomas story about the tuition is i thought pretty funny because the only defense that it's not a gift for clarence thomas is that it was actually a gift to the child which is really funny to think about a billionaire giving a suitcase full of cash some kids so he he can go to school.
Like, as we all know, it's the child who pays tuition at school. Well, I think that was, and Crow's statement in response to the story was like, how could you turn like his love of education into something political? And I believe there's some- Oh, his love of education.
Education, yeah. It's all- Education and Nazi memorabilia.
And I believe that Thomas did disclose when someone else paid for part of this kid's tuition. So this is just the most amazing thing about the Thomas revelations is it's even forcing reporters from The New York Times to be like, yeah, I looked at it.
No, no, no, if, and, or, but it's pretty illegal. They have no way to, they can't spin it into a they said, he said, they said.
Every defense of. He said, they said, they said.
Sure. Sure.
Every defense of Crow giving all this money to Clarence Thomas in a variety of ways has fallen apart. For example, Crow gave an interview with the Dallas Morning News where he recounted how he first met Clarence Thomas.
And it was Crow offering Clarence Thomas a ride home on his private jet. That's how they met.
They're just PJ buddies. They're PJ buddies.
They're PJ buddies. During that flight, we found out we were kind of simpatico.
I bet you did. Billionaire says.
I bet you did. That's a direct quote.
I bet you did. Yeah.
You know, the other thing too- Saw my copy of Mein Kampf fall out of my bag. Okay.
He's a collector. He's a collector.
It was a statue of Hitler. LA dad defined over there.
It was a little like, you know those Statue of Liberty ones they sell at like the airport in New York? It was a Hitler. It was a statue of Hitler.
LA dad defiant over there. It was a little like,

you know those Statue of Liberty ones they sell at like the airport in New York?

It was a Hitler.

Little Hitler.

Thawed out of his pocket.

It was a paperweight for history.

I just, yeah, I got this at an auction.

The funny thing too is like,

it's like, oh, so you caught a ride

on a billionaire's private jet

and then you had a great discussion with him,

paying for the privilege of being on that private jet

with your conversation,

you know, like earning your keep

I love you. billionaire's private jet and then you had a great discussion with him paying for the privilege of being on that private jet with your conversation you know like earning your keep as an interesting guest aboard this private jet it's gross i say it's gross rbg should have retired and and you know what i'll tell you something else i'll tell you something else i got we got all shit got shit for that i call them i wasn't one of these ginger people no i'm just saying i'm sexist for calling Feinstein to resign.
I'm sexist for calling for RBG to resign. Listen, I have a position here.
You look for a third to make it a trend? I'll call on old people to resign all the time. Can you find some old dude? Chuck Grassley.
Chuck Grassley's got to get out of there. Strom Thurmond.
Let me just say, I'm just saying, I remember whenever you even hinted at the idea that RBG should retire, you were properly properly for for uh for notorious rbg you were castigated at the time i'm just saying you look back at it okay and well hopefully our producers can find some clips of you uh calling for the rbg return you can find it olivia you can find it go to the archives when we to the archives. To the archives.

When we come back, Pod Save the UK host Nish Kumar talks to music. Discover new artists and genres by selecting any song or album and we'll make you a personalized station for free.
Download on the Apple App Store or Google Play and enjoy the soundtrack to your life. Dogs deserve the best and that means fresh, healthy food.
Unlike other brands, Oli offers five flavors that are as nutritious as they are delicious. All made in U.S.
kitchens without harmful fillers or preservatives. Head to Ollie.com, tell them all about your dog, and use code HAPPYPUP to get 60% off your welcome kit.
With a bonus, you'll get a storage container for a mess-free experience. And it comes with a 30-day money-back guarantee if your dog doesn't lick the bowl clean.
Did you know 39% of teen drivers admit to texting while driving? Even scarier, those who text are more likely to speed and run red lights. Shockingly, 94% know it's dangerous, but do it anyway.
As a parent, you can't always be in the car, but you can stay connected to their safety with Greenlight Infinity's driving reports. Monitor their driving habits, see if they're using their phone, speeding, and more.
These reports provide real data for meaningful conversations about safety. Plus, with weekly updates, you can track their progress over time.
Help keep your teens safe. Sign up for Greenlight Infinity at greenlight.com slash podcast.
All right, it's been a wild week in the United Kingdom, which is why I am so excited to welcome the co-host of Pod Save the UK to the show. Nish, it is so great to see you.
You are number one in the UK on Apple Podcast Charts. Are you drunk with power right now? I'm drunk with power and I'm drunk with alcohol, Tommy.
I don't know how much you know about British culture, but when things go well, we get incredibly drunk. And when things go badly, we get incredibly drunk.
I love that. Let's all get pissed.
Also, I want to clarify to all listeners in the UK that I'm wearing this hat with Pat the Patriot on it, not to be a troll, but because I need a haircut. So just get that on the table.
Okay. King Charles had his coronation bash over the weekend.
A lot of the stories I saw in the run-up to saturday basically argued that nobody cared first coronation since queen elizabeth the second in 1953 there's a poll that said 64 of adults had no real interest in the ceremony did you end up watching and do you think 64 of the country really just tuned this thing out i mean i think that there is there remains like a section of the public for whom the royal family are an incredibly important part of their of their lives and i i don't know if i can speak to 64 i mean i think in terms of who watched it it would probably be more than that just sort of out of sheer curiosity i i think whether you care or not there are a lot of people that just tuned in i mean literally because they sort of took over all the tv channels you know like a super villain does in a movie when they're threatening images of like bbc broadcasters kicking down your door and shoving a tv in your face to make you watch like i love the bbc but god they love these these royal events i couldn't agree with you more strongly on both of those things absolutely love the BBC, but God, they love these royal events. I couldn't agree with you more strongly on both of those things.
Absolutely love the BBC, but yeah, they go hard. They've got a perma boner for the royal family and for coverage of the royal family.
It's relentless. This is why I love your show so much, because you guys had this really thoughtful academic on, and you were talking about federal the monarchy and i want to i want to ask you more about that in a second but you teed it up i think saying but it's more difficult than just getting rid of these cousin fuckers right which you know that kind of candor is the show for me but before we get to that there were a bunch of arrests of peaceful protesters what what happened there when did london decide to outlaw peaceful protest on the streets? This government has kind of the sort of larger background to this is the government has passed a bill that specifically makes it more difficult to protest in this country.
And some of that protest bill was on the back of some of the kind of climate protests that have been happening all over the world but specifically in britain some of the climate protests that have been happening uh the government have passed a bill um some of the terms of which allow police to set an appropriate level for protest which i mean i don't think anybody thinks a good idea but some of the new powers given to them in this protest bill seem to have been used on protesters it's weirdly not actually just protesters that have been arrested there were three people were arrested in Soho on Saturday on a conspiracy to commit public nuisance and it transpires that those people were volunteers for a program run by Westminster City Council to distribute rape alarms to women who might be vulnerable travelling on their way home. And the reports that come out today suggest that arresting officers claim that they were acting on some intelligence, that those people were planning to set rape alarms off and throw them at the horses to make the horses go crazy.
And this could not come at a worse time for the Met Police, whose reputation in terms of handling particularly female members of public is, you know, is an absolute all time low. And with huge amounts of justification.
so yeah it was a it was a very very it's that's a very specific thing that's worth keeping an eye on um as the days develop as to any whether any charges are going to be brought um they've arrested uh yeah some protesters they even arrested a journalist who was filming the protest and who sort of filmed himself being arrested in a kind of weird sort of Blair Witch found footage horror nightmare of being arrested simply for that. You can see all the footage he's sort of saying to people, well, I'm a journalist and the police are just sort of going, no, we'll crack on with this.
Yeah, we'll arrest you anyway. Yeah, every time we talk, I realize how similar our nation's problems are.
Getting that balance right of allowing protesters to do their thing has been a real challenge for us the last couple of years, too. So the monarchy has existed for a very long time.
That doesn't mean it's going to be around forever. On last week's Pod Save the UK, you and Coco had this great conversation with a scholar, and you to this Labour MP about what it would take to get rid of the monarchy.
Now, the only kings we have here in the US are Elvis, LeBron and Berger. So help us understand how do we get rid of this family that just like won't go away? And let me say, as a representative of the United Kingdom, we would like to thank His Majesty the king uh several of his embassies uh have uh opened throughout our country and uh we we remain grateful um it's the interesting thing about having a conversation with someone like immediately amelia hadfield who's a politics professor that we talk to on the show is that the mechanism for removing the royal family moving to a republic is very complicated and would require um almost certainly a referendum which is i think at this point if you told the british people that they could either have a referendum or repeatedly be smashed uh with a cricket bat in the genitals they would say well bring on the bat cricket's the most English of games let's crack on with this just because I think we may be referendumed out but for people like Clive Lewis who was the Labour MP that we spoke to I think one of the most important things in the short term is actually a reform of the royal family because the Guardian has done a lot of really amazing reporting in the last couple of weeks to show the extent to which the windsor family has essentially i mean they've sort of basically actively been fighting to prevent scrutiny into their financial affairs um and prince charles's net worth is sort of estimated to be in the 1.8 billion pound region but the truth billion yeah but the truth is oh my god but tommy that's also an estimate because they have fought any attempts to kind of really get full clarity on how much they earn um just to set this in context we know every single thing that every one of our MPs who, like the royal family, are public servants earns.
We have the right to know that. We know, for instance, that our former health secretary, as we discussed when we had the chat on the bonus episode of the show, our former health secretary was paid £320,000 to go on a reality TV show where he ate bugs for a while.
But we have the right to know that. We have the right to know how much, say, Gary Lineker is being paid, who's a kind of presenter of football highlights on the BBC and who found himself kind of mired in a political row after he criticised the borders and migration bill.
Because he works for the BBC, we know how much the BBC pays him because the idea is we pay that money. And so the idea that the royal family is able to be opaque about his finances when they take money from the public purse is something that I think in the short term, I think a lot of people, regardless of how they feel, about the ongoing institution feel should happen so pretty urgently yeah sounds like our supreme court seems like there's some uh some transparency needed here before we move on have you seen this twitter theory that uh people who believe that megan markle actually did attend the coronation despite saying she was sticking around in california there was a-year-old man named Sir Carl Jenkins.
Apparently, he's a composer. He's got long white hair.
He's got a mustache. He's got glasses.
Your classic disguise getup. And many

people are saying that Meghan Markle just snuck in, dressed like this 79-year-old white dude.

Care to comment? Yes. Look, I'm afraid carl jenkins is an extremely talented composer unfortunately he has chosen a mustache and haircut and glasses combination that makes it look like sasha baron cohen is doing some sort of bar out style prank movie it is deeply unfortunate uh and he did uh he was pictured uh at the coronation and yeah i understand that there is a theory that megan mark that people are saying megan markle if anything it would be fitting that the most high profile member of the royal family who is a person of color had to disguise themselves as a white man to get into the coronation If anything, there'd be something like deeply apt about that.

But... of the royal family who is a person of colour have to disguise themselves as a white man to get into the coronation.
If anything, there'd be something deeply apt about that. But I'm pretty sure even if Meghan Markle tried to get in heavily disguised, there'd be some sort of alarm that would have been set off.
I think they might have put a chip in her. And if she'd set foot anywhere near the crowd, a bunch of alarms would have gone off and the Metropolitan Police would have thrown her in jail with the other, you know, criminal elements, such as people trying to give women rape alarms.
I love this because, you know, the absurdity of this theory did not stop the New York Post from writing it up. So that's how I read all about it.
So I understand the New York Post is, I believe, at least philosophically, the bastard child of the Sun newspaper in the United Kingdom. And I guess both of those newspapers have had a tenuous relationship with the truth of the past.
Oh, oh, tenuous at best. OK, so back to a little more serious stuff.
So England just had some local elections. Yes.
In the US, I think it'd be the equivalent of kind of like a city council or mayoral type position. But they're always looked at as a bellwether ahead of the next national elections.
The conservatives did quite poorly. I think they lost around a thousand local council seats.
The Labor Party gained about 500, the more centrist Lib Dems and the Greens independents they want to. A lot of analysts are wondering, given how bad a run the Tory party, the conservatives have had from Theresa May to Boris Johnson's party scandals and handling of COVID to Liz Truss nearly sinking the economy with a budget um should Labour have done better what do you think how are you analyzing this kind of what we just saw well the first thing I want to say is uh just briefly on liz truss and it is good to be brief on her as fit befits her time in office she if she was at the coronation and it's this weird spectacle that i guess an equivalent is you guys having one-term presidents at the inauguration and i guess it's the equivalent of this but she's going to be at all of these events And she was at the fucking coronation for longer than she was prime minister.
Like it was absolutely obscene that she got a ticket. But yeah, the Conservative Party lost 1,061 seats.
And there have been a lot of reports that they have encountered on the doorstep a lot of hostility to the legacies left by Boris Johnson and Liz Truss and that Rishi Sunak hasn't been able to detoxify the immediate legacy of his two predecessors and you're like yeah of course he hasn't because it was like six months ago like amazingly people in the United Kingdom are able to remember things that happened less than a year ago and less than a year ago a lady who from what i can tell huffed a bunch of crystal meth read margaret thatcher's wikipedia page and then built a policy platform off of it nearly tanked the british economy and wiped 30 billion pounds off the public purse so that still continues to damage the Conservative Party I mean as to whether Labour should have done better I mean there was some sort of hasty expectation management from the Labour Party in the immediate lead up to the local elections and they were sort of trying to say well you know if the Conservatives lose sort of 600 to 700 seats that's a good night for us obviously the figure is a thousand which were some of the harshest predictions that people were saying would happen i think for labor the mood at the moment coming out of the labor party is beyond euphoric um and kirstarmer has said that these local election results are evidence that the party is ready for power. But people who understand these things more than I do have been warning that the results are not completely clear cut.
They've got a way to go before they can be confident about that. Yeah, I've seen a lot of comparisons to 1997 when Tony Blair had this massive victory and that was preceded by doing even better in local elections.
But boy, my big takeaway from your answer there is, my God, am I jealous that you have an electorate that remembers things that happened six months ago? We're working on 30 days, man. A couple of years ago, Trump was like, yo, storm that Capitol and kill some people.
And we're like, oh, he seems like a decent guy. But I mean, to your broader point of like, okay, what will the Tories do to blunt whatever momentum labor has? It does seem like, like in the United States, immigration is a big emotional issue for conservatives.
As we speak, people in Washington are very concerned about preparing for a potential surge of migrants to our Southern border because Joe Biden has to get rid of this sort of pandemic era rule that would essentially force everyone to be expelled. But for you guys, I mean, look, the last time I checked, and correct me if this has changed, the UK is an island.
You can't just kind of like stroll up to London from another country. I genuinely, I would love for you to come and explain that to some of the people that live here tommy well help me understand this how the tories made this such an issue as far as i could tell there is a section of people in the united kingdom who believe that the country is connected via airport style travelators that just bring a ceaseless stream of job-stealing immigrants into the country it's become but the thing the key thing with it is that like the u.s republicans the sort of the tail is kind of wagging the dog here the conservative party is being led by a small section of its electorate um conservative voters uh actually said that the, a poll of conservative voters found that stopping the votes was actually the kind of second most important issue to conservative voters ahead of cutting NHS waiting times.
And that is... Stop the votes or the migrants who are coming from, I believe, France crossing the channel's right.
So people are making crossings of the English Channel from France. And they've turned Stop the Boats into our caravan of migrants.
It's the bogeyman. And the phrase Stop the Boats sort of fits into this kind of campaigning pattern of the Tory party and the Brexit campaign you can boil everything down to three words take back control stop the boats get Brexit done these are the sort of key slogans and and I think Sunak is sort of hoping that stop the boats is his version of that that he can sort of animate the conservative vote but I'm not sure how it's going to play in terms of winning over swing voters because ultimately you know every element of the country is struggling you know you can't see a doctor and there's going to be more train strikes over the weekend this uh the threat of more strikes from the nurses threat of more than the doctors, because public sector pay is still in real terms

to recover from 2008, really.

That's how long standing a lot of these problems are.

And those problems are kind of as prevalent

in the private sector.

So with the whole country grinding to a whole,

I think I just feel like there's a lot of people

that are going to think, why the hell are you talking to me about boats when I can't see a doctor? Yeah, that seems right. I mean, it is remarkable how much scar tissue there is in both countries, the US and the UK from 2008 and the financial crisis and everything that kind of came after.
So there's this new book out called Johnson at 10. It's about Boris Johnson's time as prime minister.
Some of the excerpts are unbelievable. It says he referred to himself as the Fuhrer.
It's probably not something I'd call myself. He called himself the king.
I think you already have one of those. It describes him as having no vision for how to govern, talks about fights with his wife, his top advisor, Dominic Cummings, this like Karl Rove, Steve Bannon creep.
Are these revelations seen as explosive? And do you think there's any chance it will change opinions about Boris Johnson? Because over here, there's a book a minute about Donald Trump with some new revelation, and his approval rating is at 42% in perpetuity. I don't think this is going to change anybody's minds.
I think it is a really valuable, look, I think ultimately all of these things are really valuable historical documents. So the book's written by a guy called Sir Anthony Seldon, who's been writing about British prime ministers for 40 years.
And he's actually a head teacher as well. So the whole thing, it plays like this kind of report card you get uh when you leave when you leave office and the thing with boris johnson is so much of his kind of incompetence is kind of priced in um i get a lot of stick here from various people including a a lot of journalists for drawing parallels between Johnson and Trump.

But there is a huge amount of common ground between the two men, you know, not just the like repeated uses of racist language, not just the building of their brands through the media and kind of the use of celebrity cultivated by entertainment television

that they've then leveraged into political power. Our countries are both stuck in this weird place where we threw our leaders overboard, you know, Trump and Boris Johnson, but they won't go away.
It's like you threw a party. That drunk guy is still there.
He keeps turning up the music he's hitting on your girlfriend like what do we do here how do we get them to take the hint you have any ideas that we could borrow because i think you guys have done a little bit better job but but rishi sunak the current uh tory prime minister hasn't for example thrown johnson out of the the party itself no i mean he's where possible he's sort of trying to distance himself from johnson which is very difficult to do because he was boris johnson's chancellor so notionally he was the second most powerful person in that government so it is extremely difficult for him to distance himself from that. But I think the similarities between the two projects, I mean, which doesn't it doesn't feel like you should even call it a project.
But between the two shit shows, one of the key similarities, I think, is both of them kind of approach to scorched earth policy to their own parties. So either you got in line or you were bounced out.

And what that means is they've created sort of power vacuums in the Republican Party in the Conservative Party. And so you've got this situation where, you know, potentially dissenting voices were purged.
And so you're now left in a situation where everybody involved in the party was very much signed up and part of it and so it's very difficult to distance themselves from those leaders i mean the only thing that's going to help uh here i think is getting them out of office but as we've seen in america you know you did vote him out you got rid of him you survived an attempted coup day. is weird how often i think do you remember that time when like some nazis tried to steal america like it's it it comes to me in waves it was a really strange thing late at night lots of waves yeah it was a terrible thing and uh it's just it's deeply frustrating that a big chunk of the country doesn't look at that memory or think about that history and think, that was really bad.
Let's not do that again. That's all I'm asking.
Yeah. But if you have the kind of apparatus of a media machine, you know, that regardless of, you know, all of those revelations in the Vanity Fair article about Rupert Murdoch and his contempt for Trump didn't stop him from eventually completely signing up to it wholesale.
And Trump was this kind of careering freight train that Murdoch forgot he was responsible for setting off from the station. You know, it's the same thing in this country.
You know, the Daily Mail, the Sun newspaper, which is a Murdoch paper, they all have done such an aggressive PR job. And even the day Boris actually officially left office, the Sun and the Mail both had headlines to the effect of how could the Conservative Party do this? So they were trying to take root that sort of betrayal narrative as he was leaving office in an absolute cloud of disgrace, because it's not just the parties that caused Johnson to go there was also a conservative called Chris Pinscher who'd been accused of sexually harassing various people who worked for the conservative party and Johnson was warned about this and when he was warned about it he he said Pinscher by name Pinscher by nature and then gave him a fucking.
So it wasn't even just the parties. It was a total kind of cloud of disgrace he was removed from office in.
But if you then have newspapers essentially telling the country that this person was turfed out for no good reason, you end up in a situation that you guys are in as a country where you have this like lunatic who mismanaged covid caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people then tried to kind of lead a fascist coup and people are still thinking well maybe 2024 yeah exactly exactly well uh nishkumar that is why pod save the uk is so critical because you are the leading edge of the spear that is going to take down the Murdoch Empire. We heard it here first.
I don't believe he could be killed, Tommy. I don't believe he could be killed.
He's very old. The guy in succession died.
Spoiler alert. That's, I think, because Jesse Armstrong is not just a great writer, but a deeply moral man.
And I think he's hoping Logan Roy is some sort of voodoo doll, that if he gives a heart attack to it, it might take down Murdoch. I'm just going to not comment on that.
Nish, thank you so much. It was great talking with you.
And everyone subscribe to Pod Save the UK. It is a fantastic show.
We have so many shared problems.

I think there are shared solutions. We'll hear

about both, but also you're just going to laugh a lot.

So I think we all need to laugh so we don't

cry. Thanks, Tommy.
You're the best.

Thanks to Nish Kumar for joining us today and

we'll talk to you guys later. Thanks to the

calamaris too. Thanks to the calamaris as well.
Pod Save America is a Crooked Media production. The executive producer is Michael Martinez.
Our producers are Andy Gardner-Bernstein and Olivia Martinez. It's mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick.
Jordan Cantor is our sound engineer with audio support from Kyle Seglin and Charlotte Landis. Thanks to Hallie Kiefer, Madeline Herringer, Ari Schwartz, Andy Taft, and Justine Howe for production support.
And Thank you. other community events.
Find us at youtube.com slash at Pod Save America. Make a station crafted just for you.
Best of all, you can listen for free. Download Pandora on the Apple App Store or Google Play

and start hearing the soundtrack to your life.

The last thing you want to hear when you need your auto insurance most

is a robot with countless irrelevant menu options,

which is why with USAA Auto Insurance,

you'll get great service that is easy and reliable

all at the touch of a button.

Get a quote today.

Restrictions apply.

USAA!