How Do We Push Back on Authoritarianism? (Crooked Con)

Speaker 1 This episode is sponsored by Squarespace. Squarespace is the all-in-one website platform designed to elevate your online presence and drive your success.

Speaker 1 Squarespace provides all the tools you need to promote and get paid for your services in one platform.

Speaker 1 Whether you offer consultations, events, or other experiences, Squarespace can help you grow your business, create a professional website to showcase your offerings and attract clients.

Speaker 1 Squarespace offers a complete library of professionally designed and award-winning website templates with options for every use and category.

Speaker 1 Make smarter business decisions with Squarespace's intuitive built-in analytics tools.

Speaker 1 Review website traffic, learn where to focus engagement, and track revenue from bookings, invoices, or product sales all from one place.

Speaker 1 Every dream needs a domain. Squarespace domain makes it easy to find the best name for your business at one fair, all-inclusive price.
No hidden fees or add-ons required.

Speaker 1 Plus, Squarespace provides everything you need to bring more of your dream to life, whether that means building a website or adding a professional email service.

Speaker 1 Don't wait to claim your name, invest in your dream domain today. Head to squarespace.com for a free trial.

Speaker 1 And when you're ready to launch, go to squarespace.com/slash crooked to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain. That's squarespace.com slash crooked.

Speaker 2 Amazon has everything for everyone on your list. Like your husband who hauls out the 40-pound canister vacuum to address a single dropped popcorn kernel.

Speaker 2 He'll spend 12 minutes setting up, plugging in, and maneuvering. It's like using a fire hose to water a houseplant.
Get him a cordless vacuum.

Speaker 2 And with Amazon early holiday deals, you can save big on home electronics. Now Dustin can skip the project planning phase and go straight to tactical crumb elimination.

Speaker 1 Hey everybody, you've probably heard us talking about CrookedCon in this feed the past few weeks, just a few times.

Speaker 1 If you haven't, this was a first-of-its-kind thing for us, bringing together some of the party's leading politicians and best strategists with Crooked hosts from across the network for difficult but fun conversations about where we go next.

Speaker 1 The big event finally went down on Friday. It was incredible.

Speaker 1 We're going to be sharing some of our favorite conversations and moments with you all here. Today we're bringing you my conversation about fighting back against the Trump administration.

Speaker 1 Then you'll hear Tommy's conversation with the key strategists for Zoran Mamdani, Mikey Sherrill, and Abigail Spanberger about what they learned from their races and how we can best position ourselves for success in the midterms and beyond.

Speaker 1 Hope you enjoy them, and there's more coming soon.

Speaker 5 So one topic we thought it was important to talk about today

Speaker 5 is the fierce campaign. to fight Donald Trump's assault on democracy, the rule of law, and Americans who disagree with him,

Speaker 5 including people and organizations here at CrookedCon today.

Speaker 5 Fortunately, we have two incredibly talented and dedicated people leading the fight joining me today, Skye Perryman of Democracy Forward and my old friend and colleague Norm Eisen of Democracy Defenders Fund.

Speaker 5 So the two of you together have probably sued Donald Trump more times than anyone else in America over the last year, I think.

Speaker 5 How did you get into this particular line of work, Sky?

Speaker 3 Start with you.

Speaker 7 Suing autocrats.

Speaker 4 Yeah, yeah.

Speaker 7 Professions that did not exist some time ago.

Speaker 7 Well, it's great to be here. And I'll just say at Democracy Forward, we've always known that suing

Speaker 7 your government or suing an autocratic actor can help change behavior, and it still does. But when we started looking in 2023, actually,

Speaker 7 at early reports of Project Project 2025, we started seeing what far-right organizations were doing, and then that sort of developed more in 2024.

Speaker 7 We knew that if this administration came into office, contrary to what it said on the campaign trail, that there would be a very quick effort to dismantle so much of what means so much and serves so many people in America.

Speaker 7 And that the American people would have some tools. They could get in the streets, but the autocrat would probably start threatening them.

Speaker 7 You could vote, but there wouldn't be an election around the corner.

Speaker 7 But the ability to initiate litigation against your government when your rights are violated was a really powerful one, not just to stop terrible things.

Speaker 7 Today, we've yet again stopped the administration from trying to stonewall the SNAP funding. We've won several court orders on that.

Speaker 7 Those have real-time implications for people, but it was more than that.

Speaker 7 It's also the ability of people to stand up publicly and and say, I have rights that you cannot take away, and I'm going to force you publicly to defend what you were doing to me, what you were doing to my community, and what you were doing to my neighbors.

Speaker 7 And so that's how we started building this strategy.

Speaker 5 Norm?

Speaker 3 Well, I got my start in tough legal battles representing Favs and Tommy Vitor in the White House. That prepared me for anything.

Speaker 5 We behaved mostly.

Speaker 3 Mostly.

Speaker 3 I'm bound by attorney client privilege not to disclose those stories.

Speaker 3 I

Speaker 3 got my start

Speaker 3 fighting Trump's authoritarianism in his first term.

Speaker 3 I have the dubious distinction of being the first person to sue him first in both of his presidential terms.

Speaker 3 And

Speaker 3 Skye and

Speaker 3 I are kind of siblings in the fight against authoritarianism. She and I and our organizations co-hosted with a conservative group

Speaker 3 the largest gathering in 2024, late summer 2024 to warn because everything that has happened was right there there out in the open.

Speaker 3 And

Speaker 3 we have over 200 cases and legal matters at this point,

Speaker 3 FAVs, against Trump. It started

Speaker 3 when I applied to be a member of the Doge.

Speaker 3 I strongly favor government efficiency and effectiveness. And

Speaker 3 Katie Miller, Stephen Miller's wife, the spokeswoman for the Doge, told the New York Times, we don't want Norm, he's a Democrat. Boom, lawsuit number one.

Speaker 3 Maybe if she had a lawyer like Favs used to have, she wouldn't have said that to the New York Times.

Speaker 3 And then

Speaker 3 often working in partnership and in coalition, Skye and I, together with the ACLU, are probably the most frequent litigants, but there's a wonderful big coalition, also including Protect Democracy, Public Citizen.

Speaker 3 We

Speaker 3 have

Speaker 3 met him at every turn. Our cases have included stopping his birthright citizenship executive order.
No, Donald Trump, you don't get to choose which baby's born here.

Speaker 3 Our citizens, we stopped his effort to take over elections.

Speaker 3 we won the Lisa Cook case at SCOTUS with working with Sky we've saved tens of thousands of jobs in litigation preserved labor unions oh we got every every AmeriCorps kid rehired that was our case

Speaker 3 We don't only play defense, we go on offense. We disqualified Alina Haba.
That's been a template for cases all over the country. And we were in court today.

Speaker 3 We were deployed across all of the places where there were elections to stop those monitors, to stop attempted election subversion, and won a case in New Jersey to protect ballots.

Speaker 3 So that's been our story.

Speaker 5 It's a good story.

Speaker 5 So

Speaker 5 Here's how the Atlantic has described the work that both of you do.

Speaker 5 This backbone of the Trump resistance has as much in common with political organizing and investigative reporting as it does with legal theory.

Speaker 5 Skye, do you agree with that? And sort of, how do you think about the work that you do?

Speaker 7 I do agree with that.

Speaker 7 And one of the things we want to make sure people understand, we're in court a lot and we win a lot, but we don't believe that it's the courts that are going to save the country or that it's the courts that are going to get us to a new chapter.

Speaker 7 We believe it is the people.

Speaker 7 And the power of people to use the courts and to initiate litigation is a huge power, as I said.

Speaker 7 But what we've seen in a fractured media environment and with the underinvestment in investigative reporting, right, with the fact that we don't have as many journalists anymore that have the freedom and the economic ability to engage in deep investigative journalism, is that the cases that we are building and the stories that we are telling in our cases are actually now

Speaker 7 feeding to some degree the narratives that you see in the public square.

Speaker 7 So it used to be that you would go read the news, the lawyers would read the news, and then they would go to court with what they saw in the news.

Speaker 7 A journalist recently said to me, I feel like we're reading your court papers and we're reporting on them.

Speaker 7 So in the case that Norm mentioned, where we have sought to save as many civil servants' jobs as we can, our nonpartisan civil service, and we've blocked a bunch of them from being fired in this shutdown, there were thousands of individual pages of stories in many of those cases about the harms that people would,

Speaker 7 you know, about the harms that people would experience in the case that we at Democracy Ford are litigating with the ACLU, where we have challenged the invocation of the Alien Enemies Act, right?

Speaker 7 A case that many people didn't want us to bring because they thought we were walking into the president's trap, that immigration was some big,

Speaker 7 you know, powerful issue for him, but that we brought anyway. The stories of Mr.
Garcia and people

Speaker 7 who have been removed from this country without process, who, when you learn their stories and their backgrounds, those stories have changed the way that Americans, not just here at CrookedCon, view things, right?

Speaker 7 They've changed the way that Americans, even folks like Joe Rogan and others, are seeing the world because of those stories. So I agree with that.

Speaker 7 And I think that there's a lot of this mobilizing narrative building that's happening through the courts. And then, of course, others are amplifying, which is really great.

Speaker 3 Yeah. Nor

Speaker 3 similar impression.

Speaker 3 We brought the very first case, again, going on offense

Speaker 3 under the Federal Tort Claims Act, suing for the illegal deportation of Venezuelan to Seacot.

Speaker 3 And the story of Adrian Nerangel,

Speaker 3 he's a barber. He's not a member of Trendi Aragua.
He did a tattoo to honor his daughter,

Speaker 3 and the tattoo was misinterpreted. The next thing you knew was he was in Seacot.

Speaker 3 Those kinds of stories are very powerful drivers to shift the public narrative. I will also say

Speaker 3 Donald Trump's plan, and it was clear

Speaker 3 when we did our conference in August 2024, was to flood the zone.

Speaker 3 So Skye and I and our colleagues in this, it does take a village in this big coalition, we have met flood the zone with rule of law, shock and awe.

Speaker 3 And that narrative, Donald Trump,

Speaker 3 if you,

Speaker 3 we're going to bring a bazooka to this knife fight.

Speaker 3 And that narrative that Skye and I and our colleagues and our wonderful organizations and everyone we work with and the clients and co-council, that narrative has also sent a message to the press.

Speaker 3 You don't have to be afraid of the big bad wolf.

Speaker 3 And that has been a story that really I think

Speaker 3 has been an important one over the course of the year.

Speaker 5 Yeah, Skye, to the point you made about the suit against the Alien Enemies Act.

Speaker 5 I know that both of you guys and your organizations, like right after, like on inauguration day, or right around then, immediately started suing Donald Trump. And there were some,

Speaker 5 you know, Democrats, Democratic strategists, officials, politicians who were probably a little nervous about that.

Speaker 5 I presume because they thought, well, Donald Trump wins this victory and maybe we should look for ways to work with him instead of just fight everything he does.

Speaker 3 They had a Doge caucus. There were Democrats in the Doge caucus.

Speaker 5 And you disagreed with that. What was it like?

Speaker 5 Did you second guess the decision at all?

Speaker 5 What was the strategy like in thinking, we're going to go at it? We're going to do the legal shock and ah.

Speaker 7 Yeah, I mean, I think the decision was really about the American people, which is that the American people are not supportive.

Speaker 7 of this extreme agenda, which we could already see on the campaign trail was going to happen, but you certainly saw it in the transition period, right?

Speaker 7 This was an administration that on the campaign trail acted like they didn't know who Russ Vote was, right?

Speaker 7 They'd never heard of anybody that rhymed with Project 2025 because Project 2025 was deeply unpopular, not just with progressives and liberals and moderates, but also with conservatives, right?

Speaker 7 And so this was an administration that got into office.

Speaker 7 without leveling with the American people about what they were going to do. We could see in the transition that they were laying the groundwork to start day one with this shock and awe campaign.

Speaker 7 And the real thing for us was, how are we going to show people that you actually still get to be in charge in your country? The people get to be in charge.

Speaker 7 And what we know about this administration, and I think some were a little confused at the beginning, but people are coming along. It's good.
We love it.

Speaker 7 But we know about this administration is they know what to do with weakness.

Speaker 7 They know what to do with it. Split people off, pick people off, engage in a settlement, try to, they do not always know what to do with strength.

Speaker 7 They know what to do with weakness.

Speaker 7 They don't know what to do with strength. And so, if you could find a way to show up with the strength of the American people, it's not just the lawyers that are suing, okay?

Speaker 7 In the first days of the administration, when we went into court to stop the federal funding freeze, you want to talk about SNAP being a crisis?

Speaker 7 Think about if there was no federal funding at all in any community, meals on wheels, head start, the whole thing.

Speaker 7 We showed up with the American Public Health Association, with the National Council of Nonprofits, right?

Speaker 7 We just showed up on SNAP with the Council of Churches, with people in communities across this country that may have different interests or be committed to different things, but that are all are committed to a country and a government that needs to serve all of us.

Speaker 7 And so I think that was in those early days. You just have to have faith.
We had faith in the people. The people did not vote for Project 2025.
They may have voted for some immigration reform.

Speaker 7 Everybody wants comprehensive immigration reform, but they didn't vote for disappearances in masks,

Speaker 7 people walking the streets. And so that confidence in the people, I think, is what drove us in those early days.

Speaker 5 You both have

Speaker 5 so many cases, so many lawsuits.

Speaker 5 How do you decide

Speaker 5 which cases to publicize in a sort of a big, organized, coordinated fashion?

Speaker 3 Well,

Speaker 3 the

Speaker 3 theory

Speaker 3 of

Speaker 3 change informs that. How are we going to actually

Speaker 3 restore democracy,

Speaker 3 stop this backsliding, then go forward again in political science literature, it's called a democratic U-turn. It happens more often than you might think.

Speaker 3 Over 70% of the time in the past, the post-Cold War era, when you've had an experience like we're having, the democracy is able to recover and make a U-turn.

Speaker 3 So

Speaker 3 I

Speaker 3 attempt to,

Speaker 3 I think of it in our org, we think of it as court of law and court of public opinion. And we have very smart people

Speaker 3 we talk to

Speaker 3 who tell us this might really work. So for example, and Sky's done the same thing,

Speaker 3 we have been very focused on the Trump Epstein files because they go to, there's kind of a triad.

Speaker 3 I was talking with Ben Rhodes backstage about this, of

Speaker 3 affordability, health care, and corruption. And other than tearing down the East wing unpermitted, there's no better

Speaker 3 example of the corruption than these Trump Epstein files. We know they exist.
We know they're being hidden. So we hired some of the team.
We worked with the victims.

Speaker 3 We actually hired some of the lawyers who got the big settlements for the victims on behalf of Epstein. We started a FOIA campaign, filed the very first FOIAs.

Speaker 3 Both we and Sky are litigating Epstein issues, and we're not letting up on that. I just had a conversation.

Speaker 3 I just had a conversation with the lawyers for the victims. And let me tell you, they are mad as hell.

Speaker 3 And we're not letting up because that, so that's an example of the kind of issue you're looking for. The issues that break through and communicate the corruption to the American people.

Speaker 8 This episode is brought to you by Uplift Desk. So every day I wake up and I battle through a forest of takes.
Imagine a rainforest in your mind, and it's just me and the guys here.

Speaker 8 We're just chopping away with a machete. We're fighting our way through the discourse.

Speaker 1 And then we are presenting the world with our perfect

Speaker 8 with a better brand of discourse. And look, to battle through takes all day, you need to be active.

Speaker 5 You need to be limber.

Speaker 8 You need to be on your feet, on your toes, as they say. And your focus starts with motion.
That's why we use uplift desks in our office.

Speaker 8 And that's why the new Uplift V3 standing desk transforms your desk into a productivity engine. The V3 combines the best of Uplift's V2 and V2 commercial into one stronger, smarter frame.

Speaker 8 V3 features redesigned feet and steel reinforcements, make this the most stable standing desk yet. It assembles in minutes, no stress, no mess.

Speaker 8 The new flex mount cable manager comes with every desk to keep cords hidden and tidy. Uplift offers ultimate customization, the most extensive range of desktop styles and accessories in the industry.

Speaker 8 I love my uplift desk. First of all, it's just a really great, big, spacious, well-designed desk when you're sitting down.
And then you press a little button and it goes up.

Speaker 8 And that means that if you had a long day and you've been sitting there and your back is hurting, your neck is weird and you just feel off, you can just stand for a little while. And it feels nice.

Speaker 1 And you can do your work. It's nice to stretch your legs.

Speaker 8 It really is nice to stretch your legs. It's a great option.
Use it some of the time. You can use it all the time, but it's just an awesome desk.

Speaker 8 Transform your workspace and unlock your full potential with the the all-new Uplift V3 standing desk.

Speaker 8 Go to upliftdesk.com slash PSA and use our code PSA to get your free accessories, free same-day shipping, free returns, and industry-leading 15-year warranty that covers your entire desk, plus an extra discount off your entire order.

Speaker 8 That's uptdesk.com slash PSA. For this exclusive offer, it's only available through our link.

Speaker 1 This episode is brought to you by Magic Spoon. Magic Spoon makes high high-protein, zero-sugar cereal, and treats reinvented from your childhood.
The nostalgia. I love Magic Spoon.
I do too.

Speaker 8 I got to buy some boxes.

Speaker 9 I ran out a while ago.

Speaker 1 Oh, our pantry is just full of Magic Spoon. Good.
I got to come in and get through it all.

Speaker 1 Every serving of Magic Spoon high-protein cereal has 13 grams of protein, zero grams of sugar, four grams of net carbs. They come in nostalgic flavors like fruity, cocoa, and frosted.

Speaker 1 Magic Spoon's high-protein treats are crispy, crunchy, airy, and an easy way to get 12 grams of protein on the go.

Speaker 1 They come in mouth-watering flavors like like marshmallow, chocolate peanut butter, and dark chocolate. Both are great on the go, pre- or post-workout or as a midnight snack.
I like frosted.

Speaker 1 I like the original

Speaker 1 pretty well. I also like chocolate peanut butter.
That's pretty good. Dark chocolate, I haven't had that one yet.
Marshmallow, I haven't had that one yet either.

Speaker 1 Get $5 off your next order at magic spoon.com slash crooked or look for Magic Spoon on Amazon or in your nearest grocery store. That's magic spoon.com/slash crooked for $5 off.

Speaker 5 Norm mentioned the East Wing.

Speaker 1 Yeah. I heard that you guys are filing or have filed a suit on that.

Speaker 7 Yeah, well we've opened an investigation which will probably result in a lawsuit. We're working on some other legal remedies there.
And I think we see

Speaker 7 we see the demolition.

Speaker 11 We're on it.

Speaker 3 We're on it.

Speaker 7 And you know, we were doing that at the same time we were having to build the case to win SNAP.

Speaker 7 And you might think, I mean, there's SNAP and then there's the demolition of the East Wing and what do the two things have in common?

Speaker 7 And we really view what the president has done to the East Wing, and I think most Americans we're seeing, are viewing it this way, as a metaphor to what he is seeking to do to our country and to the people of the United States.

Speaker 7 And so we think it's a really important

Speaker 7 It's it's it's a it's really important from a legal perspective. I mean you have someone that truly does think he is a king.
I mean he says this without irony, leveling off public buildings.

Speaker 7 But it's also really important from a symbolic perspective that we are not going to allow this president to level the American people, to level our Constitution, to level our democracy without requiring a public accounting.

Speaker 7 And that's what we're doing.

Speaker 5 One thing I don't know if enough people appreciate is just how fast you guys have to move and how much work goes into this.

Speaker 5 I mean, like, I think we see Trump do something awful, seems unconstitutional, seems like he's breaking the law.

Speaker 5 And then I think we're all just used to then waking up the next day and be like, oh, there was a lawsuit filed and he's going to court.

Speaker 5 And you guys have lawyers that are just, you know, they see the executive order, they see the action, and then they're just up all night, right? How does it work?

Speaker 7 I mean, sure. I mean, we've got lawyers up all night right now because we're waiting.
We've already have five states have have gotten their full snap payments and there's going to be more tonight.

Speaker 7 And so

Speaker 7 it is around the clock thing. So I think there's a few things.
One is this is a known playbook. You know, the thing about Project 2025 is they like...
laid it all out.

Speaker 7 So there was a lot of this preparation work that Norm and I and ACLU and many of our colleagues actually in our Democracy 2025 coalition, there are over 650 organizations that are actively doing what they can do to contribute to what has been, and I'm just going to say this and we'll get an applause for it, what has been the largest and most successful affirmative litigation effort against an executive branch in United States history.

Speaker 7 I mean, that

Speaker 7 we have accomplished at this point, if you compare.

Speaker 7 And we are largely doing it without elite law firms doing their share of the pro bono work, right? Because so this has been a real collaborative effort.

Speaker 7 But what it looks like is what you think it looks like. One, there is a playbook.

Speaker 7 And so, those things we can prep for, we can plan for, we can work with each other, we can share information and make sure we know which communities are going to be affected.

Speaker 7 How can they get into court? Do they know that they can get into court? And line that up. And then you have the Trump factor, which is sort of whatever just happens on a given day.

Speaker 7 And that does require a lot of caffeine and a lot of amazing lawyers on our teams, amazing lawyers who truly do work through the night to get into court the next morning to ensure that the American people have their voices heard.

Speaker 7 And then the other thing we have, which we are really starting to focus on, and we want all of you to focus on, is what we call the kind of non-shiny object stuff.

Speaker 7 So not everything that this administration does is happening on Truth Social or at a big signing ceremony in the Oval Office or bulldozers at the White House.

Speaker 7 There are a number of things that are happening throughout the federal branches of our government and agencies, throughout the government and communities that the administration actually doesn't want to answer about, and they don't want to even say that they're doing.

Speaker 7 And so we do a lot of work to detect what those things are and then to make sure that we can also get into court, not just to challenge what's happening, but also to expose what's happening, which links back to your question about investigative journalism and making sure that people know what their government is up to.

Speaker 5 Norm, did you want to?

Speaker 3 The secret is

Speaker 3 not to sleep.

Speaker 5 Sleep in your dead, right?

Speaker 3 It has been very good. The litigation economy has been very good for Diet Coke and Red Bull.

Speaker 3 Some of the cases, we drafted our birthright complaint,

Speaker 3 which was the first of the complaints filed on day one. And then when the Supreme Court ruled, oh, you've got to have a class action, we had a class action on file two hours later.

Speaker 3 And now we're back at the Supreme Court.

Speaker 3 We drafted that complaint over the summer. of 2024.
So some of it is having cards up your sleeve.

Speaker 3 Some of it is having this incredible, as Skye says, it has been an extraordinary coalition. And I should also shout out,

Speaker 3 they operate in parallel to the democracy groups, the democracy litigating groups. The AGs have been absolutely superb litigating partners.

Speaker 3 We're often, we did a Doge case, they did a Doge case against Musk. We did an AmeriCorps case, they did an AmeriCorps case.
Sky did the snap case, the AGs did the snap case.

Speaker 3 Occasionally, we work together, we're in a case together.

Speaker 3 So, the AGs have been wonderful partners, and I think it is part of the reason

Speaker 3 that you have multiple groups that are ready at all times. You know, no one org could have met flood the zone with rule of law, shock and awe.

Speaker 3 But having a large coalition and clients and the labor movement ready to do that

Speaker 3 has made the difference.

Speaker 5 You guys have had a lot of wins. You're also facing a very conservative Supreme Court majority, much of it appointed by Trump himself.

Speaker 5 Frequently, when they offer a limited or temporary ruling in favor of Trump, it comes via the shadow docket with no opinion.

Speaker 5 I think this leads some people

Speaker 5 who casually pay attention to politics to think, well, since we don't have the court, like what's the use here?

Speaker 5 Are the courts really holding up? Because maybe we win in some of the lower courts, but then when it gets to the Supreme Court, we lose.

Speaker 5 How much of an impediment to your strategy is the Supreme Court, or have you found the Supreme Court?

Speaker 7 You want to start?

Speaker 3 Yeah,

Speaker 3 I think that

Speaker 3 the birthright case is a good example. The Supreme Court is tilting the playing field.
They haven't, it is not a sheer playing field. You don't have to do rock climbing.

Speaker 3 You got to pump your legs harder. It's terrible what they've done with the shadow docket, but you can win there.
The Lisa Cook case proves that you can be successful at the Supreme Court.

Speaker 3 I think we've learned how to bring cases to the Supreme Court. So in that birthright case, you know, there was the safety valve, multiple safety valves, including class actions.

Speaker 3 And in one of the big,

Speaker 3 this

Speaker 3 story will illustrate, I think, the

Speaker 3 how you deal with the Supreme Court in this day and age.

Speaker 3 In the tariffs case, we represent a large group of conservatives. And Favs, you and I were Obama people from early on,

Speaker 3 much earlier since we were in law school together when Favs

Speaker 3 was still enjoying his elementary education.

Speaker 3 We

Speaker 3 in the

Speaker 3 tariffs case represent a coalition of two dozen conservatives, Many people who I had fought

Speaker 3 my entire professional career. Bill Kristol, I debated the Iraq war.
He's now on my board.

Speaker 3 Joe Walsh, who founded the Freedom Caucus, he's the treasurer.

Speaker 3 So we put together this coalition and they

Speaker 3 wanted to, we filed a brief with the Supreme Court. They wanted to convey the message to the the court, this is not a

Speaker 3 liberal issue. This really is a conservative issue, and it is.
So you have to do things like that. And I think it's working.

Speaker 7 Yeah,

Speaker 7 the thing I'll just say is a few things.

Speaker 7 One is we just need to remember our history, that but for some decades in the last century and a smattering of wins in this century, the United States Supreme Court has not been an institution that has easily promoted our democracy and the equality of all people.

Speaker 7 And I say that with a love for the court and judges and a legal process and as the person that leads an organization that's in court all the time.

Speaker 7 But I do think that we need to remember that all of the fights in this country,

Speaker 7 the fight for abolition, the fight for women's rights, the fight for civil rights, the fight for LGBTQ rights,

Speaker 7 these wins were not handed down by the Supreme Court.

Speaker 7 They were hard-fought wins that went up and down the court system many times before you achieved the ultimate thing that you sought to achieve at the court.

Speaker 7 And we're trying to make sure that people understand that.

Speaker 7 And that legal work was incredibly important in shaping the law and building movements and ultimately in prevailing. But in this moment, we want folks to know a few things:

Speaker 7 everything that Norm just said, but then also,

Speaker 7 there have been about 500 cases in the last 260 or so days against this administration because of the extreme activity.

Speaker 7 The vast majority of those cases will never go to the Supreme Court, whether on the shadow docket or whether on the merits docket.

Speaker 7 And so part of the work here is to make sure that when this administration oversteps and it harms people in communities, people in communities can access a lawyer and we do all of our work pro bono, as do many of the organizations that we work with, that they can access a lawyer and that they can get into court.

Speaker 7 The second thing is, is that this administration has actually been backing off many times when we go into court.

Speaker 7 Before even a case goes up on appeal, the administration either declines to appeal it or walks away because they don't want the public pressure.

Speaker 7 That is how there is now $7 billion in the public school system this year that the president impounded.

Speaker 7 Because we and the AGs went to court and they did not, they backed off. So there's a piece of that.
And then there are the cases that will reach the court. And I think what Norm said is correct.

Speaker 7 It's bringing forward the salient voices that we know will mean something to the court. It's working to

Speaker 7 construct our cases in the best way. And then what I say to people like you guys is that the Supreme Court tomorrow upholds our rights.

Speaker 7 The next day you got to be out marching because this president and this administration is still going to find a way to violate your rights.

Speaker 7 And if the Supreme Court tomorrow does something terrible and doesn't uphold your rights, you better be out in the street marching because this administration will take that decision and try to do something worse.

Speaker 7 So, the net of it is: we all have got to be engaged. We've got to be supporting each other, building community, outmarching, doing things like this.

Speaker 7 That's what we've got to do, kind of regardless of what the court does in this moment. And that's what we are really trying to hope that people focus on.

Speaker 5 On that note,

Speaker 3 I'll be marching with a sign that says term limits for Supreme Court justices. That's my sign.

Speaker 5 Last question. People are used to being asked to march, to organize, to vote, to donate, to run for office.
Is there anything people can do to help with the legal battles that you guys are fighting?

Speaker 5 I know you're always looking for plaintiffs.

Speaker 5 What can people do?

Speaker 3 Well,

Speaker 3 I know Sky appreciates contributions to democracy forward, Forward, so I mustn't be shy about asking them for the Democracy Defenders Fund.

Speaker 3 I will say

Speaker 3 we also have

Speaker 3 a

Speaker 3 outlet. It's no crooked.
It's no pod save America, but we do have the contrarian. All profits from the contrarian

Speaker 3 go to fund the litigation also.

Speaker 3 And the most important thing you can do, I'll end where, and then let Skye have the last word, but I'll end where she began.

Speaker 3 We won't be saved without the litigation, but the litigation alone will not save us. And the ultimate salvation of American democracy, and I'm hopeful,

Speaker 3 my teacher, President Havel, when I was a diplomat in Prague, the great dissident Václav Havel told me,

Speaker 3 you Americans, you're too optimistic. Don't be optimistic,

Speaker 3 but be hopeful.

Speaker 3 And I am very hopeful because of the people power that we saw just on Tuesday growing and growing day after day.

Speaker 3 That the litigation is helping, but that ultimately the American people, every one of you, all your friends and family, get them out there in the streets,

Speaker 3 peaceful protest, and vote, vote, vote.

Speaker 7 Yep.

Speaker 7 And I'll just say the thing that I say often, I mean, you can go to our organizations and support them. We love that.
Sign up and get updates.

Speaker 7 But the number one thing that an autocrat uses is not redistricting. It's not a PAC Supreme Court.
It's not any of those things. It's people giving, it's people believing that they have no power.

Speaker 7 And so what we've been doing at Democracy Forward, in addition to the litigation, is really focusing on building community.

Speaker 7 Because when we're in community with each other, when we defy isolation, when we come to places like this and say, I'm going to get together with some folks and defy isolation, even if I want to go be alone,

Speaker 7 we can overcome.

Speaker 7 And at Democracy Forward, we've got some programs called Dinners for Democracies and Coffees for Change and ways that you can engage in your own community with those that may not be ready to get out in the streets.

Speaker 7 And then we obviously want everyone out marching and demonstrating and protesting as well.

Speaker 5 Norm and Skye, I just want to say you two and all the lawyers and everyone on your staffs that have been working so hard, you guys are heroes of this movement, unsung heroes.

Speaker 5 And I'm really glad we got to talk today.

Speaker 3 Thank you for singing.

Speaker 5 Well, because I'm

Speaker 3 singing.

Speaker 5 I'm always singing for you guys.

Speaker 5 But we are, we are, on behalf of everyone, we are just so, so grateful for all the hard work you're doing and for what you're doing to help save this democracy.

Speaker 3 So thank you so much. Thank you.

Speaker 8 This episode is brought to you by Planned Parenthood Federation of America. Please don't skip this ad.
I know you might be tempted, but this really matters.

Speaker 8 Planned Parenthood is on the front lines every day defending our rights when healthcare is under attack. And right now, they need us.
Here's why.

Speaker 8 The Trump administration and Congress have defunded Planned Parenthood. It's a devastating blow to patients to our country's already broken health care system.

Speaker 8 Planned Parenthood health centers are committed to providing care no matter what, but they need your help to do it. Whether you give a little or give a lot, your gift says something about who you are.

Speaker 8 Someone who shows up for what's right, who believes people who need care should be able to get it. Please don't wait.
Go to plannedparenthood.org/slash defend and give today.

Speaker 8 That's plannedparenthood.org/slash defend.

Speaker 1 This episode is brought to you by Z Biotics Pre-Alcohol. Got to tell you about this game-changing product we use before a night out with drinks.
You've heard it before. It's pre-alcohol.

Speaker 1 It's the best. Z-Biotics Pre-Alcohol Probiotic Drink is the world's first genetically engineered probiotic.
It was invented by PhD scientists to tackle rough mornings after drinking.

Speaker 1 Here's how it works. When you drink, alcohol gets converted into a toxic byproduct in the gut.
It's a buildup of this byproduct, not dehydration, that's to blame for rough days after drinking.

Speaker 1 Pre-alcohol produces an enzyme to break this byproduct down. Just remember to make pre-alcohol your first drink of the night.
Drink responsibly, and you'll feel your best tomorrow.

Speaker 1 It's important that you make it the first drink of the night. You don't want to be two drinks in and then be like, oh shit, I forgot the z-biotics.

Speaker 8 No, you want to take it early. And also, if you're listening and thinking, do I need this? Here's my question for you.
Are you 22 or younger?

Speaker 1 No?

Speaker 8 Try z-biotics. Yeah.
Trust me.

Speaker 1 The older you are 22 and younger. The hard it is.

Speaker 9 Look, go have your good time, kids.

Speaker 8 Okay. The adults here who are listening, you need a prebiotic before you have a drink.

Speaker 8 If you have more than one, if you're doing it on a school night, you're really, really going to be happy that you did it.

Speaker 1 Yeah. Oh, does it make you feel old? You know what's going to make you feel old?

Speaker 9 Waking up the next day.

Speaker 8 Clean up with

Speaker 8 dad.

Speaker 1 Make the most of every toast, tailgate, and touchdown this holiday season. Look at that alliteration.
Just don't forget to bring pre-alcohol along for the ride.

Speaker 1 Go to zbiotics.com slash crooked to learn more and get 15% off your first order when you use crooked at checkout. Zbiotics is back with 100% money-back guarantee.

Speaker 1 So if you're unsatisfied for any reason, they'll refund your money. No questions asked.
Remember to head to zbiotics.com/slash crooked and use the code crooked at checkout for 15% off.

Speaker 8 All right, live from CrookedCon, I'm Tommy Vitor.

Speaker 8 I'm thrilled to be joined by some of the smartest, winningest strategists in the Democratic Party who are just coming off huge election victories in New York, New Jersey, and Virginia.

Speaker 8 Alex Ball is Mikey Sheryl's campaign manager. She's also worked on the Hill, the DCCC, Emily's List, tons of campaigns.
Morris Katz was a top strategist and ad maker for Zoron Mamdani.

Speaker 8 He's also worked for Dan Osborne Senate Race in Nebraska, and a bunch of other stuff.

Speaker 8 And Samson Smiore was Abigail Spanberger's campaign manager. He has also led statewide coordinated campaigns and done a bunch of hotly contested elections.

Speaker 8 So we're going to talk about how they won, what works. what the future of the Democratic Party looks like based on these elections, and we're going to have some fun.
So first question to everybody.

Speaker 8 What's like the 60 second version of why you won? Let's start with Alex. Sure.

Speaker 4 Yeah. Thanks for having me.
Thank God we all won. This would be really bleak, but

Speaker 4 excited to be here.

Speaker 4 Yeah, I mean, I think this isn't gonna shock anyone in this room, but affordability.

Speaker 4 I think having a disciplined message and also having the right messenger is really how we got it done.

Speaker 4 I mean, we were just relentlessly focused on talking about driving down costs for New Jersey, how what was coming out of Washington was going to make matters even worse, and why Mikey was the effective, trustworthy, and competent leader to be the one to deliver going forward.

Speaker 5 Worse?

Speaker 6 I think it's two Pod Save America appearances over the course of the campaign is the key to.

Speaker 6 Now, I think, you know, similarly, a laser focus on an affordability crisis and also a real willingness to name the villains who are responsible for creating this moment of gross income inequality.

Speaker 6 And then I think just on top of that, kind of a refusal to allow ourselves ourselves to be confined by what politics has been and a relentless pursuit of investing in what politics can be, bringing young people out, immigrant communities, communicating in ways other people have disregarded, and all having that around this laser focus that government can do more, government can do better, and government can address this affordability crisis.

Speaker 11 Absolutely, and thanks for having me, Tommy. Abigail Spanberger won because she was laser-focused on costs, while Republicans in the Commonwealth of Virginia were focused on divisive culture wars.

Speaker 11 And I think that Virginians and Americans broadly are tired of chaos and division, and they want a return to normalcy, a return to the basics, and they want to focus a little bit less on politics.

Speaker 11 And in Abigail, they had a steady, pragmatic, focused leader who was laser-focused on what matters most, lowering costs, boosting the economy, and keeping communities safe.

Speaker 11 And that's one of the reasons, and I have to do a quick brag here, that we had a 15-point margin on Tuesday.

Speaker 11 The largest margin in Virginia since JFK was the president.

Speaker 11 And we won the LG, AG, and we flipped 13 state house seats, delivering the biggest statehouse majority since the 80s. And I think as of right now, we have the highest winningest margin of the three.

Speaker 11 So

Speaker 11 I'll be talking about the future of the party later.

Speaker 8 We're going to talk more shit. Don't worry.
That's just the beginning. So

Speaker 8 Donald Trump has blotted out the political sun for like the last decade.

Speaker 8 How did you guys think about the way to divide your messaging between like reacting to whatever he did that day versus what you wanted to talk about, which was obviously affordability?

Speaker 8 Jump ball here for anybody.

Speaker 11 Yeah, I'll take the first one. We were less focused on Trump and more focused on the consequences of Trump.
And what we, because again, we were laser focused on lowering costs across the board.

Speaker 11 And the times that we spoke out against Trump is when he made,

Speaker 11 when he roiled Virginia's economy. So you saw Doge federal workforce cuts that

Speaker 11 just gutted jobs across Virginia.

Speaker 11 You also saw the gutting of health care that spiked premiums for folks across Virginia and just a couple of weeks ago shuttered three rural health clinics.

Speaker 11 So from our perspective, it wasn't about Trump's personality. It wasn't about the destruction of the East Wing.
It wasn't about the latest truth social thread.

Speaker 11 For us, it was staying laser-focused on the consequences of Donald Trump to Virginia's economy.

Speaker 6 I think we took this approach of the idea that we weren't going to treat Donald Trump like the end-all-be-all of the problems that

Speaker 6 New Yorkers were facing, and that viewing his power, his election, as a result of a fundamentally broken political system.

Speaker 6 And one of the first things Ron did after the election was he went out to one of the areas that flipped most dramatically towards Trump in the entire country and interviewed people on the street who had voted for Donald Trump and talked to them about his platform, his affordability agenda, and by the end of it, persuaded many of them to support him.

Speaker 6 And we ran this campaign kind of going right at the center of what Donald Trump claims to have his kind of political brand be.

Speaker 6 He ran an entire campaign centered on lowering costs and did nothing to lower those costs. And I think you can kind of have your cake and eat it too by going at him in that angle.

Speaker 8 Alex, you guys... Like, there's a bunch of data that Nate Cohn at the New York Times wrote up that showed that you guys persuaded a bunch of Trump voters to vote for Mikey.

Speaker 8 How did, like, what did you see in your data?

Speaker 8 How did you target them? Like, how did you think about trying to get those crossover votes?

Speaker 4 Yeah, I mean, so historically, Mikey's always won over about like 25%

Speaker 4 of Republicans, 60% of unaffiliated voters. So we knew she had that crossover appeal.
I think for us, we were incredibly proactive on issues around the economy.

Speaker 4 So we saw energy rates spike this summer, and we were hot out the gate with a state of emergency where we said we were going to freeze utility costs.

Speaker 4 We got there probably three or four weeks before Jack Chittarelli did, which was just a huge misstep on his part in my mind. And we also went on office on offense on taxes.

Speaker 4 So we had our outside expenditures signaled to them to go after him for raising property taxes at every level of government.

Speaker 4 So by the time we got to the end of the summer, we saw Fox polls showing that we were leading on traits of lowering taxes, lowering costs,

Speaker 4 who you trusted most to tackle the problems of the economy, and utility costs, which are just historically traits that Democrats are not going to win on.

Speaker 4 And I think a lot of that had to do with the fact that Mikey's service background, people saw her as someone who was coming at problems from a place of service and wanting to deliver for people and not as a place of partisanship.

Speaker 4 And I think that was also kind of proven by the fact that she stood up to leaders in her own party time and again.

Speaker 4 And I think some of these Trump voters were just looking for something new and not a 30-year career politician like Jack Chidarelli.

Speaker 8 Also, I mean, you guys ran change elections, right? I mean, not necessarily the same different party with Eric Adams, but it was a change message, the look, the feel, everything about the election.

Speaker 8 You had a tougher job, in my view, which is running for a third term with the Democrat, you know, after two terms of Phil Murphy. Was that a headwind?

Speaker 11 How did you deal with it?

Speaker 4 Yeah, I think it was. I mean, New Jersey, while our federal delegation is pretty blue, we like to swap back and forth on parties when it comes to the governor.

Speaker 4 And it hadn't been since 1961 that we elected a third term of the same party. So that was certainly a headwind.
And also, you know, we had to walk a fine line.

Speaker 4 We couldn't just go out and rail on Phil Murphy because why would you want to elect another Democrat?

Speaker 4 And, you know, he had done some good things for the state in terms of funding the pension and our credit rating. So we focused on the pieces where

Speaker 4 it just came back to costs and affordability. And uh you know i think our opponent tried to talk about a change election but again 30-year career politician uh it just didn't land

Speaker 8 um morris you guys had some like unique ad strategies ad buys

Speaker 8 seem to be very digitally focused do traditional tv ads work And what did you do differently?

Speaker 6 You're asking a TV consultant, Tommy.

Speaker 3 I know, but you guys, like, I think when people think of Zoron's campaign, it's like, oh, there's the dude who walked to Manhattan, right? Yeah.

Speaker 6 So, yeah, I think that it's an all of the above. And I think so often we still have this approach of

Speaker 6 political consultants pretending that the only kind of thing that matters in a campaign is how many points are we going to have on broadcast TV over the final six weeks of a race?

Speaker 6 And I think that era is over. I think New York might have gotten there a little bit sooner than other places.
Like there's more of a social media presence in New York than there is in other places.

Speaker 6 It's more expensive to buy ads, but I think we're all headed in this direction. It's never been harder to communicate consistently with a large group of people than it is right now.

Speaker 6 And, you know, people like to ask, is it the social media? Was it the TV? Was it the field? It's like, it's fucking all of it. Like, you can't leave one part of it out.

Speaker 6 And for the ad campaign, we also did, you know, we thought a lot about the kind of emotional experience that people were going to be having.

Speaker 6 And so, you know, we first went up on TV during the Knicks playoff run with the idea and vision that, you know, at a moment of hope for the city, if you could believe that the news.

Speaker 6 Fucking Boston fans.

Speaker 11 But

Speaker 6 the idea that if you could believe the Knicks could win a championship, maybe you could believe that a 34-year-old Muslim socialist could be mayor.

Speaker 3 So sorry.

Speaker 6 But that was the general kind of vision.

Speaker 8 Sans, you guys had like how many million dollars of

Speaker 8 attack ads run against you focused on an anti-trans message?

Speaker 11 Why do you think about 40 million?

Speaker 8 $40 million.

Speaker 8 A lot of people think that the messages, the anti-trans ads run against Kamala Harris were effective. Why do you think that they were clearly not effective against you guys?

Speaker 11 Yeah, so I think that, I think a couple things. One, I think

Speaker 11 Republicans in Virginia were trying to run a tired playbook. I think they got way ahead of their skis on culture issues.

Speaker 11 They ran a campaign entirely devoid of anything focused on the economy, lowering costs, or coming up with any types of solutions to make life better for Virginians.

Speaker 11 So I do think, first and foremost, they got way ahead of their skis, and those ads fell flat. And I think that from our perspective, we knew that these were likely attacks that were going to come.

Speaker 11 We had different ads cut and ready to go to be placed as soon as we knew that that attack ad was going to be put down.

Speaker 11 But I think first and foremost, we spent a lot of time at the beginning of the campaign credentialing Abigail.

Speaker 11 former federal law enforcement officer, former CIA case officer, mother to three girls. This is not somebody who wants to hurt children.

Speaker 11 This is someone who literally, whose job it was, was to protect children. And we also credentialed her as someone who was laser-focused on the economy from the very get-go.

Speaker 11 So I think when you had the Republicans try to put these ads together, I think what the Republicans were relatively effective at in 2024 was convincing voters that

Speaker 11 these were issues that Democrats really cared about and that they're out there proactively campaigning on, which just wasn't the case.

Speaker 11 From our perspective, by laying down a really solid foundation of us being laser focused on the economy, on strengthening jobs, on lowering costs, and on keeping communities safe, those ads that they ran fell relatively on flat ears because it just wasn't believable by the time that they put down this deluge.

Speaker 11 Another thing, just from a media strategy standpoint, you know, Morris touched on this. A lot of times people are looking, I don't know, how many points

Speaker 11 are you running on broadcast TV at the very end? We took it and we stretched it.

Speaker 11 We started our paid media strategy much earlier than most campaigns do, certainly the earliest that has ever been done in Virginia before.

Speaker 11 And part of the reason for that was to lay down that strong foundation of Abigail as someone who's a federal law enforcement officer, former CA case officer, who's laser-focused on lowering costs and on making your life a little bit better.

Speaker 11 So that when Republicans did come at us with those culture war issues, there's already a lot of inoculation that was done there. So, I mean,

Speaker 8 what tactics did you guys try that were new, that you think worked?

Speaker 1 And what sort of

Speaker 8 campaign tactics of the past need to go, in your view?

Speaker 11 I'll give you one.

Speaker 8 Please. It's a little spicy.
Spice it up.

Speaker 11 Questionnaires need to be jettisoned from the party.

Speaker 8 Can you tell folks here what these questionnaires are?

Speaker 3 You can clap it on. Sure.

Speaker 11 So,

Speaker 11 and

Speaker 11 I do want to confirm,

Speaker 11 there's a lot of awesome national and partner groups who do have a place in our party. And I think that questionnaires largely come from a position of good faith and trust.

Speaker 11 And questionnaires, oftentimes very simple, easy ones that just want to,

Speaker 11 they get sent to candidates for candidates to fill out that talks about different positions to take. And on its face, that's fine.

Speaker 11 But the problem is when we have these highly, highly intensive questionnaires that go to candidates, that, especially when you're looking at state house candidates, ones that don't really know much better, and what they see is a potential endorsement, potential door knockers, potential campaign contributions, and they say, All I have to do is go down and just check yes in all of these boxes.

Speaker 11 Sure, sounds great, easy. But then what happens, and we saw this in 2024 with probably the most notorious campaign ad that existed, the they them ad,

Speaker 11 that you get backed into a corner and you set your candidates

Speaker 11 up for

Speaker 11 not for success. So, what I would say is, if you are someone who works at

Speaker 11 a national organization, leads a national organization, I would look very hard at doing away with questionnaires and look more into coming at it from a position of candidate interviews.

Speaker 11 That was something that we did on our end. We filled out the questionnaires that we wanted to.
We filled them out the way that we wanted to.

Speaker 11 But we also worked very closely with the state house caucus to make sure that candidates were not getting backed into a corner unnecessarily. So that's one tactical change that I would say.

Speaker 11 And I think it's a pretty easy one, too.

Speaker 8 Any tactical things you guys want to talk about?

Speaker 4 Yeah, I mean, I don't like talking about this with Morris right here, but influencers are a thing.

Speaker 4 And we just got them in New Jersey.

Speaker 4 So it was really this untapped market that campaigns in New Jersey just haven't used. I mean, New Jersey's pretty old school.

Speaker 4 And I think we did some really innovative things for the state in terms of building up an actual political influencer class.

Speaker 4 There's about like 35 of them that have kind of formed their own ecosystem in the state. We do events with them.
We give them special access.

Speaker 4 And really, unfortunately, the media in New Jersey is very much dying. And we really struggled with legacy media taking

Speaker 4 our

Speaker 4 momentum seriously. I can't tell you how many headlines there were that Mikey Sherrill has a momentum problem.
She has this problem. She has that problem.

Speaker 8 Why was the polling so often New Jersey? And are there any specific people you want to dunk on that tweeted about your demise over the summer now?

Speaker 4 It'll take too long.

Speaker 4 You know, there was definitely some polling that was right. Like,

Speaker 4 our independent expenditure had us at 12 points in the last couple of weeks. We are inching towards 14 points.

Speaker 6 RCP was like 30.

Speaker 11 We're inching towards 16.

Speaker 3 All right.

Speaker 4 But no, there was a ton that were incredibly off. And it was clear in the methodology that they were off.
We had one poll that had us plus one, but

Speaker 4 it had Chitterelli winning black voters 60-40. We won black voters 95-5.

Speaker 4 We outperformed Harris in Essex County that has a large black population by eight points.

Speaker 4 We won back Latino voters in Passaic County to win that county by 15 points that Trump won by three, and yet we had a problem with Latino voters. So it was ridiculous.

Speaker 4 But if you looked at the data, you saw that Mikey was winning on affordability, she was winning on utility prices, she was winning on taxes, And Jack was underwater every single time.

Speaker 4 And yet it was neck and neck.

Speaker 4 And it was anyone's race.

Speaker 4 So I don't know, but I mean, there's just so many like random people in like their parents' basement running polls these days and putting them on the internet.

Speaker 6 So I'll say Atlas Intel missed it big time.

Speaker 3 I'll meet at fuck Atlas Intel.

Speaker 8 That's the headline coming out of this thing. Fuck Atlas Intel.
I think we had this exact conversation on the pod.

Speaker 8 Morris, you are infuriatingly young for being as successful as you are, as is Zoron, who's 34 years old, right?

Speaker 8 Your opponents tried to make age a weakness. How did you think about like making it a strength?

Speaker 8 Like obviously there's internet fluency, but like how did you guys deal with people who are like, can a 33, 34 year old really run straight?

Speaker 6 So coming from you guys.

Speaker 3 Dude, I'm washed.

Speaker 6 I'm 45.

Speaker 6 No, I think we... it fit into the message framework.

Speaker 6 And I think oftentimes you try to run every campaign with the same universal message framework and it's kind of the boilerplate like consultant approach and we were running a change campaign and Zoran looked like change and he felt like change and I also think he fit into this moment uniquely for a city in which there's so many young people who love this city who can't imagine a future in it because they can't afford to raise a family here.

Speaker 6 They can't afford to buy a home here. And having someone who kind of was of the age group that is dealing with, frankly, an existential crisis in the city

Speaker 6 fit nicely.

Speaker 6 And we were never, you know, I think Zoran mentioned in his speech that he was like, you know, I'm young, I'm Muslim, I'm a Democratic Socialist, and worst of all, I refuse to apologize for any of those things.

Speaker 6 And that was kind of the ethos of the campaign.

Speaker 10 The 2026 Chevy Equinox is more than an SUV.

Speaker 12 It's your Sunday tailgate and your parking lot snack bar.

Speaker 10 Your lucky jersey, your chairs, and your big cooler fit perfectly in your even bigger cargo space.

Speaker 10 And when it's go time, your 11.3-inch diagonal touchscreen's got the playbook, the playlist, and the tech to stay a step ahead. It's more than an SUV, it's your Equinox.

Speaker 10 Chevrolet, together let's drive.

Speaker 10 Clorox, toilet wand, it's all in one.

Speaker 10 Clorox, toilet wand, it's all in one. Hey, what does all in one mean? The catty, the wand, the preloaded pad.

Speaker 10 There's a cleaner in there,

Speaker 10 inside the bag.

Speaker 4 So, Clorox toilet wand is all I need to clean a toilet?

Speaker 9 You don't need a bottle of solution

Speaker 9 to get into this toilet revolution. Clorox clean feels good.

Speaker 7 Use as directed.

Speaker 8 Yeah, along those lines, I mean, you know,

Speaker 8 Spanberger and Mikey Sherrill, like that, they are the types of kind of backgrounds in bios that the Democratic Party loves.

Speaker 8 You know, like 2006, Rahm Emanuel would have recruited the shit out of both of them to run,

Speaker 8 right?

Speaker 8 National Security, military members, CIA. Zoran was not the plug-and-play.

Speaker 6 Are you saying Rahm Emmanuel wouldn't have recruited Zoran Montane?

Speaker 8 Zoran was not like your plug-and-play candidate, right? He's like, interesting background. His parents are academics.
He's a younger guy.

Speaker 3 How did you think about that bio? Was it liberating to not have to kind of play a part?

Speaker 6 I think this applies to Zoro, but I also think this applies nationally right now.

Speaker 6 If like, you know, some of the kind of Senate stuff happening with Grand Platinum or Iowa, with other places, I was like, there are no people, I think, right now, who have a worse read on what electable means and like less of a pulse on voters than the Democratic establishment in DC.

Speaker 6 And the Mamdani coalition is not just, I think, what it's easy to be kind of viewed as on social media and other places. You know, over 10% of Trump voters voted for Zahran Mamdani.

Speaker 6 Zoran flipped multiple neighborhoods that went for Donald Trump in a general election with more votes than Donald Trump got in those very places. He reshaped the electorate.

Speaker 6 He won back immigrant communities that had left the party just a year ago. And that wasn't...

Speaker 6 I think, you know, it sells voters short to pretend that they're not going to be able to see past someone named Zoran Mamdani. And it's a lesson that we seem like we're just not able to learn.

Speaker 8 Yeah, I noticed that myself.

Speaker 8 So Democrats, we constantly fight about whether the way you win is turnout versus persuasion.

Speaker 8 I would argue it is a false choice, but certainly in a campaign, you have a finite number of resources and you have to allocate them. in the way you think is most likely to help you win.

Speaker 8 How did you guys think about that kind of allocation and whether you need to just turn out the base or convince all these crossover voters that you got.

Speaker 5 Jump ball here.

Speaker 11 I'll say something that sounds really obvious, but I think it's a little less obvious to folks.

Speaker 11 Driving turnout gets you one vote. Persuading a voter gets you two because you have taken it from the other side and put it into yours.

Speaker 11 I would say that from our perspective, our victory was a combination of persuasion and turnout. But Morris touched on something that I think is important.

Speaker 11 And I think that our victories across the board were not just landslide victories, but coalition redefining victories. Across the board,

Speaker 11 across the board,

Speaker 11 we had Abigail Spamberger flipped counties that went for Trump in 2016, 2020, and 2024. If you look at, we are looking at

Speaker 11 the overperformance compared to 2024. And broadly, we overperformed almost every county across Virginia when you compare it to 2024.

Speaker 11 But most interestingly, the precincts that we overperformed 2024 the most by are also the ones with the highest percentage of Latino voters.

Speaker 11 In addition to that, Abigail brought back in a huge swath of non-college white voters to the table, and that was by visiting rural Virginia, right?

Speaker 11 We were just in, she was just in Lee County last week, which fun fact

Speaker 11 for folks that are less familiar with Virginia geography, is so far into the southwest of the Commonwealth that it's actually to the west of Detroit.

Speaker 11 She was just out there last last week in a diner, and I know that that sounds basic, but a lot of it was just us showing up and us showing up with a message of lowering costs.

Speaker 11 And that led to what, in my opinion, was a shattering of the Trump coalition that he has put together.

Speaker 11 You know, people have reported that he made inroads with communities of color, with black and brown voters, with non-college white voters, obviously.

Speaker 11 And what we went out there and did, and I think what we all went out there and did, was shatter apart that coalition and take a bunch of people back into our frame because they're tired of the chaos, the division, the culture wars, and they saw a Democratic Party that was actually united under one message, which was lower your damn costs.

Speaker 6 Yeah,

Speaker 6 I think, obviously, I agree that it's kind of a false choice. And we were dealing with in New York, you're capped on what you can spend because of public matching funds.

Speaker 6 And so we were just getting, like, it's $8 million, which is nice, but in the New York media market, it goes very quickly.

Speaker 6 Yeah, and we had about $45 million spent against us.

Speaker 3 So a little

Speaker 6 undermatched or overmatched.

Speaker 6 But I think it speaks to a broader issue kind of in the party of if you have the right message, you're not having to choose between turning people out and persuading people.

Speaker 6 It's the same thing that excites all those people.

Speaker 8 Did anyone care that Chuck Schumer didn't endorse?

Speaker 3 Who?

Speaker 8 Fair answer.

Speaker 8 Alex, you guys also, I mean, speaking of breaking the Trump coalition, you guys had considerable success winning back Latino voters. The Democratic Party had lost.

Speaker 8 Was that something that was part of a wave? Was that part of deliberate targeting and choice? Like, how did you approach it?

Speaker 4 Yeah, there's a lot of signs coming out of 24 that we were going to have a lot of ground to make back,

Speaker 4 particularly with Latino voters. I think like all of the national press was watching Passaic County in particular because there's a large Latino population there.

Speaker 4 So we did invest heavily on the ground, hiring people from the community to go and talk to their neighbors, but we also spent a lot of money

Speaker 4 on Spanish broadcast, cable, digital, mail, all of it. And I think New Jersey is a really bilingual state.

Speaker 4 So you could try to get away with just doing general population messaging, but it's not enough.

Speaker 4 And I think our opponents in both the primary and the general made a mistake by not making that investment.

Speaker 4 And I think also we tried to over-prescribe what we think some of these constituency groups want to hear from Democrats. But we didn't change our message.

Speaker 4 We talked about affordability and we knew that that was the message that was going to resonate because that's what we were hearing from people on the ground as Mikey went in and talked to these voters, sometimes in some broken Spanish, but

Speaker 4 connecting with them with where they were. And I think it went a long way.

Speaker 8 So when I think back to the OA campaign, I like remember the good days you don't really remember, but I remember like where I was when I first saw the Reverend Wright video, which imploded our race for like four months.

Speaker 8 It was like my JFK being shot moment.

Speaker 3 You guys have,

Speaker 8 sort of, do you guys have like...

Speaker 8 A worst moment, a biggest mistake you made on the campaign that you're now emotionally able to talk about in hindsight?

Speaker 11 I'll say one thing. It's less a mistake than one thing that really scares me about the future that we saw on our end.
And that is these fake AI videos. Yeah.

Speaker 11 We saw a lot of them and

Speaker 11 I won't name names, but there was one that the Republicans put out and it was just a ridiculous AI video.

Speaker 11 I won't get into the details, but we had a couple top national level Democratic consultants and operatives call me and say, what the hell kind of video are you guys putting out there?

Speaker 3 This is ridiculous.

Speaker 11 Because it was meant to look like it was from our campaign. And the other thing is it was put on X, and people know that at Grok is the AI bot that you can tag and ask questions about tweets.

Speaker 11 And people are asking Grok, is this really a campaign ad? And he was coming back saying, yes, this is in fact an ad that the Spamberger campaign put out and put out there.

Speaker 11 And that was something that scared the shit out of me because it's something we as the campaign had absolutely no control over.

Speaker 11 So we had a digital team that quickly reached out to Twitter and said, hey, like, or X, and said, said, hey, please readjust Grok. This is totally false.

Speaker 11 We did political calls on IRA to make sure that people knew that this is a ridiculous ad and we're smart people and we never put something like that out.

Speaker 11 But that is something just looking into the future of campaigns that I think that, one, there's hopefully some kind of legislation to

Speaker 11 help,

Speaker 11 but also that we as campaign and campaign workers need to be prepared to help candidates and campaigns respond to.

Speaker 8 That's terrifying.

Speaker 6 That's also why we need a younger consulting class.

Speaker 3 They're like, look at this ad.

Speaker 6 Oh, my God.

Speaker 11 I also won't name the ages of the people that reached out to me either.

Speaker 6 Yeah, I can guess.

Speaker 6 Mine, which is like a half-cheat,

Speaker 6 but it is, I think, obviously it's all worked out well. But I won't forget seeing so many in the Democratic establishment, the Democratic donor class, embrace Andrew Cuomo in the primary.

Speaker 6 And seeing someone who everyone universally demanded resigned from office

Speaker 6 just two and a half, three years prior, who covered up the murder of seniors in nursing homes, who sexually harassed his staff and then intimidated and bullied the victims, was then being funded by Donald Trump's biggest donors, and seeing so many fall in line behind him because it was politically convenient,

Speaker 6 I think is just a real, real indictment in a lot of ways. And I'm glad we won.
I'm glad we're moving past it. But I think that kind of that looms large.

Speaker 8 It's gross.

Speaker 8 Alex, any trauma?

Speaker 4 I too will talk about mistakes other people made.

Speaker 8 You guys are all like, I just care too much. You know, that was my mistake.

Speaker 4 The bedwetting that happens in our party has got to stop.

Speaker 4 Like the Republican side, like while their candidate was like continuing to underperform and frankly like lose on things that he should have been winning on,

Speaker 4 they were so rock solid in their support of him on Twitter, on Fox News, in the New York Post. They were all aligned.
And I get who owns all of those media sources, and it's like all the same people.

Speaker 4 And so we don't have that luxury. But I will just say, like,

Speaker 4 our enthusiasm could have taken off a bit more if people in our own party stopped being unnamed strategists who want to talk about all the issues we're having.

Speaker 4 Whereas, like, I will give credit to the Republicans because they are all on the same page, and we need to do the same thing, or else we're going to just keep getting in our own way.

Speaker 8 Name names, Alex.

Speaker 4 You can't. They're unnamed things.

Speaker 8 I know, I know, I know. Cowards.
Morris, for a while it seemed like Zoron was running to be U.S. ambassador to Israel.
It was like all you guys talked about.

Speaker 8 I noticed on like election day, maybe the day after, Jonathan Greenblatt, the head of the ADL, he went on Morning Joe and he said that he's going to hold Mamdani accountable.

Speaker 8 And he launched something called the Momdani Monitor. and then something, a tip line to track anti-Semitic incidents in New York.

Speaker 8 Curious what your reaction to that is, like how Zoron wants to work with groups like the ADL to like, you know, have conversations with people about the legitimate problem of anti-Semitism, but not play into this idea that Greenblatt is promoting that Zoron is going to lead to a spike of incidents.

Speaker 6 I mean, to be clear about Greenblatt for a second, this is someone who's lied repeatedly about Zoron throughout the race, that he didn't go to synagogues when he'd gone to multiple synagogues, that he wasn't meeting with rabbis when he was meeting with rabbis.

Speaker 6 That has really flamed or fanned the flames of division across the city.

Speaker 6 I think that there's a bit of a kind of social media issue around this issue specifically, where Zoran will be at oppressor about free buses. And he's going to get asked eight questions about Israel.

Speaker 6 And then those are going to be clipped and kind of fed into an algorithm that's meant to feed division. And then it's, well, Zoran, why are you always talking about Israel?

Speaker 6 And it's like, well, no, I'm trying to talk about free buses. And then it becomes this kind of echo chamber.

Speaker 6 But I think he's been relentlessly clear throughout the race of the urgency to fight anti-Semitism and with a deep kind of commitment to it, a list of policy proposals to do just that.

Speaker 6 And I think what you also saw is a lot of Jewish New Yorkers showing up across the city who reject the kind of Cuomo-backed notion that criticism of a genocide is the same as anti-Semitism.

Speaker 6 And I think that was far more dangerous.

Speaker 3 All right.

Speaker 8 I could have gone on for twice as long, but we've got five minutes left, so I'm going to do what I called my brain-dead cable news lightning lightning round.

Speaker 11 Who is the face of the Democratic Party?

Speaker 11 Mikey Sheryl.

Speaker 8 Mikey Cheryl.

Speaker 6 Tommy Vittor.

Speaker 3 Truck Shamar.

Speaker 11 Abigail Spanberger and all Democrats who are committed to lowering.

Speaker 3 There you go.

Speaker 8 What's the winning strategy, DSA or CIA?

Speaker 8 You don't really have to answer these.

Speaker 8 All of your campaigns were successful, but which one was correct?

Speaker 3 This is just a bit. I should like to say that

Speaker 3 this is a good bit.

Speaker 3 All three, easily. But like,

Speaker 3 this is the, like, you guys all want to.

Speaker 6 You rank them on your favorites from one through three.

Speaker 3 Oh, this sucks.

Speaker 3 I love you all. I mean,

Speaker 8 like, this is the fight, right? Like, the Democratic Party, you saw it on Twitter. The Twitter warriors warriors were out with their,

Speaker 8 you know, shields and swords election night being like, we got to go left. We got to go right.
I mean, obviously the middle ground is state by state, but I don't know.

Speaker 8 Do you have a theory of the case?

Speaker 4 I mean, I think they're just applying labels to completely different electorates. Like we all had landslide victories.

Speaker 4 Sure, we all talked about affordability, but we all did it in very different ways.

Speaker 4 So to say that we all have to follow the same blueprint, I mean, it just doesn't, it doesn't really make sense or match up at all.

Speaker 6 I think, like, we should be a big tent party.

Speaker 6 And I think, like, this is a great example of it's like, we should be a party that can elect Zoom Mandani in New York and Mikey Sherrill in New Jersey, and Abraham Spanberger in Virginia.

Speaker 6 And I think too often we use the big tent as it's like it is a big tent that can go as far to the right as you want it to go, but there's a very

Speaker 6 rigid edge on the left.

Speaker 6 And I think it doesn't have to be like that.

Speaker 11 And I think, too, one thing that's really important, because I agree, I'm not big on the labels. I know I've always thought of Abigail as a pragmatist.

Speaker 11 She's been put into moderate or centrist buckets before, but always thought of her as a steady pragmatist.

Speaker 11 But I think one thing that's different this cycle that hasn't always been the case over the last 10 to 15 years is that regardless of the spectrum of the Democratic Party that you are from, we are all united behind the inherent challenges facing Americans, and that is that life is too expensive.

Speaker 11 And regardless of where where on the political spectrum you're from,

Speaker 11 and the big tent of our party comes down to the kind of approach and ideas and the way that you message lowering costs.

Speaker 11 And that can look like it's a lot different in Bedford, Virginia versus Bedstein, but as long as you are united around the need to lower costs, I think that we can have

Speaker 11 a big tent party.

Speaker 4 Can I also, I agree, and I would also add that we're all united in the fact that government has a role in lowering costs for people and delivering for people.

Speaker 4 And that's the difference with the other side, I think.

Speaker 8 The last question I wrote down was MJ versus LeBron, but I don't know that's going to play anything.

Speaker 3 LeBron.

Speaker 8 Okay, that's it for our panel. I just want to say thank you to Morris, Alex, and Samson.

Speaker 8 These guys are not only just coming off massive winning campaigns, they're also now doing the transition, which is doubly hard because you have to staff up the entire government.

Speaker 8 So I'm really grateful to all of you. First of all, for kicking ass, because this whole thing would have sucked

Speaker 8 if we hadn't won, but also for being here and being really thoughtful and smart

Speaker 8 and successful. So thank you all.

Speaker 3 Thank you.

Speaker 3 Thank you guys.

Speaker 1 If you want to listen to Pod Save America ad-free and get access to exclusive podcasts, go to cricket.com slash friends to subscribe on Supercast, Substack, YouTube, or Apple Podcasts.

Speaker 1 Also, please consider leaving us a review. That helps boost this episode and everything we do here at Crooked.
Pod Save America is a crooked media production.

Speaker 1 Our producers are David Toledo, Emma Illich Frank, and Saul Rubin. Our associate producer is Farah Safari.
Austin Fisher is our senior producer. Reed Sherlin is our executive editor.

Speaker 1 Adrian Hill is our head of news and politics. The show is mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick.
Jordan Cantor is our sound engineer, with audio support from Kyle Seglin and Charlotte Landis.

Speaker 1 Matt DeGroote is our head of production. Naomi Sengel is our executive assistant.

Speaker 1 Thanks to our digital team, Elijah Cohn, Haley Jones, Ben Hefcote, Mia Kelman, Carol Pelavieve, David Tolls, and Ryan Young.

Speaker 1 Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.

Speaker 10 The 2026 Chevy Equinox is more than an SUV.

Speaker 12 It's your Sunday tailgate and your parking lot snack bar.

Speaker 10 Your lucky jersey, your chairs, and your big cooler fit perfectly in your even bigger cargo space.

Speaker 10 And when it's go time, your 11.3-inch diagonal touchscreen's got the playbook, the playlist, and the tech to stay a step ahead. It's more than an SUV, it's your Equinox.

Speaker 10 Chevrolet, together let's drive.

Speaker 4 Hey, welcome into Walgreens.

Speaker 3 Hi there. Hey.

Speaker 4 All right, hon, I'll grab the gift wrap, cards, and, oh, those stuffed animals the girls want.

Speaker 13 Great, and I'll grab the string lights and some.

Speaker 13 How about I grab some cough drops?

Speaker 10 This is not just a quick trip to Walgreens.

Speaker 7 I'm fine, honey.

Speaker 13 Well, just in case, you know what they say.

Speaker 3 Tis the season.

Speaker 10 This is Help Staying Healthy Through the Holidays.

Speaker 9 Walgreens.