Marc Elias: An Election War Machine

Speaker 3 She'd throw things, wander, and started hoarding.

Speaker 2 Mom's Alzheimer's was already so hard, but then we found out she had something called agitation that may happen with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. And that was a different kind of difficult.

Speaker 2 So we asked her doctor for more help.

Speaker 4 Seeing symptoms like these in a loved one, it could be time to ask their doctor about Rexulti, Rexpiprazole 2 milligrams, the only FDA-approved treatment proven to reduce the symptoms of this condition.

Speaker 4 Rexulti should not be used as an as-needed treatment. Elderly people with dementia-related psychosis have increased risk of death or stroke.

Speaker 4 Report fever, stiff muscles, and confusion, which can be life-threatening, or uncontrolled muscle movements, which may be permanent. High blood sugar can lead to coma or death.

Speaker 4 Weight gain, increased cholesterol, unusual urges, dizziness on standing, falls, seizures, trouble swallowing, or sleepiness may occur. Learn more about these and other side effects at Rexulte.com.

Speaker 4 Tap Ad for PI.

Speaker 2 I'm glad her doctor recommended Rexulte.

Speaker 4 Talk to your loved ones, doctor. Moments matter.

Speaker 6 We, the people, in order to form a more perfect union.

Speaker 8 These words are more than just the opening of the Constitution.

Speaker 11 They're a reminder of who this country belongs to and what we can be at our best.

Speaker 12 They're also the cornerstone of MS Now.

Speaker 18 Whether it's breaking news, exclusive reporting, election coverage, or in-depth analysis, MS Now keeps the people at the heart of everything they do.

Speaker 27 Home to the Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, the briefing with Jen Saki, and more voices you know and trust, MS Now is your source for news, opinion, and the world.

Speaker 33 Their name is new, but you'll find the same commitment to justice, progress, and the truth you've relied on for decades.

Speaker 38 They'll continue to cover the day's news, ask the tough questions, and explain how it impacts you.

Speaker 42 Same mission, new name, MS Now.

Speaker 44 Learn more at MS.now.

Speaker 45 Hello, and welcome to the Bulwark Podcast. I'm your host, Tim Miller, coming at you from my parents' basement again.

Speaker 46 So sorry for the YouTube viewers about

Speaker 48 whatever you want to call this background and all the glare.

Speaker 49 I'm doing my best.

Speaker 12 I also learned at dinner last night from my cousin that he hasn't listened to one second of this podcast or any politics podcast since November 7th.

Speaker 13 And I got to tell you, he seems pretty relaxed.

Speaker 54 And so I appreciate all of you for sticking around with me.

Speaker 51 And I appreciate our guest today welcoming, I think, for the first time to the Borg Podcast, partner at Elias Law Group and founder of Democracy Dockett, a pro-democracy news outlet.

Speaker 46 He specializes in voting rights and redistricting.

Speaker 37 It's Mark Elias.

Speaker 53 How are you doing, man?

Speaker 1 Good. How are you?

Speaker 51 This is first, right?

Speaker 12 Were you on Charlie back in the olden days?

Speaker 1 No, this is the first. Oh, yeah.

Speaker 1 A lot of pressure on me to make this work so you'll have me back.

Speaker 57 Okay.

Speaker 16 I think it'll be good.

Speaker 45 I wanted to start with redistricting, but then just before you popped on,

Speaker 53 I was perusing the X platform and saw this from Glenn Beck.

Speaker 48 I don't know if you've seen this.

Speaker 51 Glenn Beck says that Mark Elias has stopped posting on X.

Speaker 45 John Kerry privated his account and Peter Strzok deleted his account. Is the deep state panicking? So I just want Glenn State.
Glenn Beck is worried that you're panicking.

Speaker 45 So I guess my question for you is, are you the deep state and are you panicking?

Speaker 1 Okay, first of all, do I look panicked?

Speaker 1 So I got off of X. You know, I, I,

Speaker 1 I don't know about you. I could live happily without social media.
Like, I am not someone who is like, my God, there is another platform. Please, God, let me figure out a way to scroll some more.

Speaker 1 I got on Twitter way back in the day because there were all these bloggers. Remember the bloggers? Of course.

Speaker 1 When I found out that Twitter was called the Telfay Microblog and was like 180 characters, I was like, okay, this is like some kind of joke. So I'm like, okay, I'm going to do that.

Speaker 1 Like, well, you guys blog, I'm going to microblog. And it was like really a useful way to communicate.
And then the site went to shit.

Speaker 1 And so like, I did my little mandatory purgatory on post, if you remember them, the little tour on Mastodon, that was like a couple of weeks.

Speaker 1 Now I'm on Blue Sky, kind of, kind of, you know, doing, doing what I do there. But I got off of Twitter because like at the end of the year, just because like it was so damn like toxic.

Speaker 1 Like I could post something like I'm going to be on with Tim Miller. And it's like, oh, a gay and a kite.
You know what I mean?

Speaker 1 You know what I mean?

Speaker 1 You're grooming. Yeah, right.
It was like one, it was like one anti-Semitic slur at me after another. And like, you know, and so I'm sorry, Glenn, but this is actually not news.

Speaker 1 This happened some time ago.

Speaker 47 You are kind of a target for these guys.

Speaker 44 I don't know.

Speaker 52 I was at one point.

Speaker 9 There's something, I don't know what it is.

Speaker 48 Maybe they feel like since Trump got elected again, like the fight with the Never Trumpers is not exciting to them anymore.

Speaker 48 It's not that I don't have trolls, I do, but I feel like the venom that is targeted for you is

Speaker 60 more intense these days.

Speaker 61 Do you need a security guard?

Speaker 58 Like, what's the latest?

Speaker 58 What kind of heat are you taking?

Speaker 1 I mean, look, it's not fun. I mean, you know,

Speaker 1 there's a fair amount of hate. Some of it is because the president himself has mentioned me on a number of occasions.

Speaker 1 And a lot of it's also, Tim, because like if you think about the core of Donald Trump, you know, one of the things that always drives me crazy is the legacy mainstream media tries to figure out like what is his core belief like there is no core belief to donald trump like well him yeah

Speaker 1 his core belief is that he is the he is the most important thing in the world yeah that's the core belief yeah and you know i think the closest thing there is to a core belief is election denialism okay and like his desire to you know deny that he lost the 2020 election and of course i played a large role in that that's related to the megalomania if he is the if he is the greatest and the chosen one, then he could not ever lose, right?

Speaker 57 Yeah.

Speaker 1 Right. And so, you know, I kind of fit into that.
And then obviously I also was Hillary Clinton's general counsel in 2016. So that gave me, I guess, deep state credentials

Speaker 1 in the mega mind.

Speaker 45 The targeting of the law firms, I'm curious.

Speaker 47 And he's gone after you or like mentioned you and stuff.

Speaker 13 It seems like maybe

Speaker 63 I guess you tell me, like you might be a little more insulated for that.

Speaker 62 And it feels like the big law firms that have folded or felt pressure or the ones that have really stood up in the face of

Speaker 48 actual threat, they need to cut deals with the government, right?

Speaker 57 Like they need to represent folks, but I don't, but maybe that's not accurate.

Speaker 59 I don't know.

Speaker 12 Have you felt potential consequences to that or risks?

Speaker 1 No. So, I mean, look, the good thing about my law practice, about my law firm, is I left Perkins Cooey, which, you know, is one of the law firms that got targeted because I had actually been there.

Speaker 1 They got targeted because I was a partner there. I have not been there since 2021.

Speaker 57 Sorry, guys.

Speaker 1 Yeah, I was going to say, I feel kind of bad about, I do genuinely feel bad about the fact that, you know, I left in 2021. It was an amicable departure.

Speaker 1 And then in 2025, they're getting, you know, they're getting going through all this hell because I had been there. But when we started this firm, you know, we have 60 lawyers.

Speaker 1 And when we started the firm, we basically said we're not going to take on corporate clients. So we only represent democratic campaigns and party committees and organizations.

Speaker 1 And we do voting rights on a nonpartisan basis. And then we represent a lot of progressive and liberal and sort of center and center left organizations.

Speaker 1 So as a result, we really don't have, you know, like we don't, like we don't do work for the government. We don't do work for government contractors.

Speaker 1 So there really hasn't been a way from a business standpoint for them to

Speaker 1 target us.

Speaker 1 You know, when Donald Trump gives me a shout out of hate, it increases the security costs, but it also tends to increase demand for legal services.

Speaker 1 So it's kind of like a it's kind of like a yin and a yang.

Speaker 65 What have you thought about how the other law firms have kind of reacted?

Speaker 1 Oh, it's an absolute disgrace. It's an absolute disgrace.
You know, like George Conway and I are in a race to see who can be the most aggressively anti-big law around this.

Speaker 1 So, I mean, I think that what Paul Weiss did is an absolute disgrace. They have ruined one of the great brands in the legal profession.

Speaker 1 They have compromised their dignity. And I think the other law firms that followed, you know, some of these law firms were never targeted at all.

Speaker 1 They literally just were like showing up in the Oval Office and being like, may we please shovel free legal services to you, Your Honor, Your Highness. Like it's just an absolute fucking disgrace.

Speaker 1 And the fact is that I think the legal profession has not come down hard enough on these law firms.

Speaker 1 I think the Bar Association, you know, a lot of people praise the American Bar Association because it sued.

Speaker 1 My criticism, which I wrote about in Democracy docket, was that it's great that the American Bar Association is standing up for lawyers being targeted by Donald Trump.

Speaker 1 But the law firms that collaborated they're not victims like like like don't don't portray them as victims like they they've gone along with this and and you know anyone who says these law firms faced an existential threat yeah the existential threat is that they rather than making 10 million dollars a year on average per partner they would make eight million dollars per year on average per partner my my offer to big law is how about you know, they're like, well, we have a business and like our employees count on this.

Speaker 1 How about every firm, every partner at that, at one of these big law firms that capitulated who made more than $50 million in the last five years? How about they leave? Okay.

Speaker 1 Like they don't need the money. Like stop telling me like this is about like people's livelihoods.
How about those people leave and do the right thing?

Speaker 52 It's so funny's not the right word, but I'm laughing about it anyway, listening to you give this soliloquy because it sounds exactly like what I was saying in 2016 and 17 about the political, the Republican political consulting class.

Speaker 48 And I maybe lost a couple of friends over being opposed to Trump, but the real relationships that

Speaker 57 were fissured and broke and never really fixed were of people

Speaker 57 who were working at big Republican TV ad firms who were unhappy with my comments about, you know, just the moral cowardice that they were showing and the fact that actually

Speaker 46 they would do fine doing corporate PR and public affairs PR and even Republican Senate campaign PR, which wasn't my cup of tea back then, but fine.

Speaker 54 You know, they didn't have to do Donald Trump's super PAC.

Speaker 12 And like, they didn't need the money that badly.

Speaker 59 I've seen their beach houses, right?

Speaker 52 And I lost some folks over that.

Speaker 60 I'm wondering the Democratic lawyers at these firms, I mean, have you, what have those conversations been like with you?

Speaker 65 Have you gotten some angry phone calls or do they have shame and they know, they know that they're being bad and so they don't want to talk to you about it?

Speaker 1 Look, it's both. I mean, you know, first of all, you and George Conway and Sarah, you know, you guys are the sort of the heroes of all this, right? Because you guys gave up a lot.

Speaker 1 Like, in some ways, like, I always say this, like, I, like, what have I given up? Like, you know what I mean? Like, I was a Democrat before.

Speaker 1 Like, you guys have given up a lot in having those conversations.

Speaker 9 I'm doing all right, but I appreciate that.

Speaker 1 Yeah, no, but,

Speaker 1 you know, like, because of those conversations, yeah, like if you went back in time to when you were working for Jeb Bush, I was friends with all of the Republican lawyers.

Speaker 1 Like, I remember the Jeb primary, okay, like the Jeb,

Speaker 1 I don't mean the like electoral primary, I mean like the consultant primary.

Speaker 57 Like

Speaker 1 all of the big Republican law firms wanted to represent Jeb Bush. And, you know, like, you know, there was, as there always is, there's like a pecking order.

Speaker 1 And so if you went back in time and looked at that point, I was viewed as a very bipartisan lawyer.

Speaker 1 I was viewed as someone who worked closely on campaign finance matters with people like Michael Toner, people like Don McGahn.

Speaker 48 Yeah, Ben Ginsburg, Charlie Spees.

Speaker 1 Ben Ginsburg, yeah. Charlie Spees.
Yeah, absolutely. Like these are all people who I was, who I had.

Speaker 59 I actually apologize for lumping Ben Ginsburg in with those other names. He's acted with integrity.

Speaker 1 So anyway,

Speaker 1 yes, yes. And my relationships with Republicans obviously prayed.
So then the big loss stuff comes up. And I think a lot of them were surprised that I came as hard out of the box about

Speaker 1 this on our own side. You know what I mean? Like it's easy.
You know, everyone understands what you're punching on the other side.

Speaker 1 And so I've had some difficult conversations and I am sort of unmoved by it.

Speaker 1 I mean, the fact is, this is the thing that, Tim, maybe you have insight into because like you're more in touch with maybe your feelings, but like and other people's feelings.

Speaker 13 Like

Speaker 1 I actually believe all the stuff. that I've been saying and you've been saying and other people have been saying.
Like Donald Trump is an existential threat to democracy. He is an authoritarian.

Speaker 1 He wants to be a dictator.

Speaker 1 And so if you believe all those things, like if Marco Rubio believed the stuff he said, if Ted Cruz believed the stuff he said, if Lindsey Graham believed the stuff he said when they all ran against him, like if Democrats on my side believe all the things about what Donald Trump is doing to destroy civil society and large institutions, then like, how do you not speak up against it?

Speaker 57 No, I'm with you on that.

Speaker 10 I believe everything too. That's why it's funny.

Speaker 45 I get sometimes like from the rationalizers.

Speaker 63 This is why I'm not that great of a dinner guest for rationalizers these days because they do the things where it's like, well, if you got a call from the Secretary of Defense and they wanted your advice on something, you would help.

Speaker 3 And I was like, no.

Speaker 50 If you were at one of these law firms, you would have done it.

Speaker 44 I was like, no, I'm sorry.

Speaker 42 I mean, I'm not a perfect person. I'm a very flawed person.

Speaker 45 I've said many times in the past, like, I don't know, had Ted Cruz won instead of Trump?

Speaker 13 I actually can't say clearly what I would have done.

Speaker 45 I don't, I, my husband probably would have divorced me if I'd helped Ted Cruz.

Speaker 58 So that probably, you know, I probably would have been okay because of that.

Speaker 57 But I certainly would have gone along with people that were, that I didn't feel like were existential threats, but that had policy differences with me.

Speaker 9 But like the Trump stuff is not a close-run call for me.

Speaker 40 And that's why it's kind of astonishing to me even.

Speaker 57 And we should say there have been some prominent law firms who stood up to him and some prominent Democrats in those law firms who have, but like the number of those who haven't is like pretty, it's pretty wild to me, really.

Speaker 1 Yeah, because you have to count not just the people at the capitulating law firms. Like it's easy to count those people up because we know what firm they are.

Speaker 1 But my question is, where are the law firms that have not been targeted? Like,

Speaker 1 if you are at a law firm, let's say you're at a law firm and it's not been targeted one way or the other, it has neither capitulated nor fought, why aren't you standing up in public?

Speaker 1 Why aren't you speaking out? Like, why are you keeping your head down rather than stepping forward and criticizing what these large law firms are doing?

Speaker 1 Why aren't you forcing your law firm to take a public stand in favor of democracy?

Speaker 1 Like, the cowardice is not just the people who capitulate, but it is the vast silent number of people who say nothing. And I'm going to come back to my offer.

Speaker 1 Like, how about just the people who made more than $50 million in big law over the last five years? How about they speak up, right? We'll let off

Speaker 1 all the support staff, all the secretaries, the receptionists.

Speaker 1 We'll let off the associates who are well compensated, but not at that level. But like, where is the courage among the people who don't need the money?

Speaker 71 Hi, I'm Martine Hackett, host of Untold Stories, Life with a Severe Autoimmune Condition, a production from Ruby Studio in partnership with Argenix.

Speaker 74 This season, we're sharing powerful stories of resilience from people living with MG and CIDP.

Speaker 70 Our hope is to inspire, educate, and remind each other that even in the toughest moments, we're not alone.

Speaker 79 We'll hear from people like Corbin Whittington.

Speaker 74 After being diagnosed with both CIDP and dilated cardiomyopathy, he found incredible strength through community.

Speaker 82 So when we talk community, we're talking about an entire ecosystem surrounding this condition, including, of course, the patients at the center, that are all trying to live life in the moment, live life for the future, but then also create a new future.

Speaker 86 Listen to Untold Stories, Life with a Severe Autoimmune Condition on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaker 6 We the people, in order to form a more perfect union.

Speaker 8 These words are more than just the opening of the Constitution.

Speaker 11 They're a reminder of who this country belongs to and what we can be at our best.

Speaker 12 They're also the cornerstone of MS Now.

Speaker 18 Whether it's breaking news, exclusive reporting, election coverage, or in-depth analysis, MS Now keeps the people at the heart of everything they do.

Speaker 27 Home to the Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, the briefing with Jen Saki, and more voices you know and trust, MS Now is your source for news, opinion, and the world.

Speaker 34 Their name is new, but you'll find the same commitment to justice, progress, and the truth you've relied on for decades.

Speaker 38 They'll continue to cover the day's news, ask the tough questions, and explain how it impacts you.

Speaker 42 Same mission, new name, MS Now.

Speaker 44 Learn more at ms.now.

Speaker 63 We got waylaid there.

Speaker 48 I was planning on doing the first 20 minutes on redistricting.

Speaker 58 So everybody buckle up.

Speaker 16 We're about to get really nerdy.

Speaker 59 We've got some other fun stuff at the end, but we need to do the redistricting talk because I think that's...

Speaker 57 among the most important things that are happening right now.

Speaker 58 It's a big list of creeping authoritarian threats, but the redistricting thing could have some real implications depending on how things turn out next fall.

Speaker 48 So just at the top level, I guess, what is your take on kind of what we're seeing in Texas and across the country?

Speaker 67 And then I want to kind of dig into a couple of the specific situations.

Speaker 1 So ever since Tom DeLay and Republicans in the House in the mid-1990s, the courts have said that it is constitutional if a state wants to do mid-cycle redistricting.

Speaker 1 That doesn't mean states can automatically do it. There may be state laws against it.

Speaker 1 There may be state constitutional, but under the federal constitution, a state has to draw their new maps once a decade after the census results come out after reapportionment, but they are permitted to do it more often.

Speaker 1 So a lot of people are saying in Texas, what's happening is a mid-cycle redistricting, but that actually sells it short.

Speaker 1 Because if you look at when it's happened before, Tim, it has happened where there has been a change of control in state government.

Speaker 1 So not to defend Tom DeLay, because I would never defend Tom DeLay, but what he was doing was saying, essentially, look, the map that was drawn at the beginning of the 1990s was drawn by Democrats.

Speaker 1 Republicans are now in control. We want to draw our own map.
Okay.

Speaker 1 The thing about Texas is they gerrymandered in 2021. Like the Republicans, the map that they now think is insufficiently gerrymandered is a gerrymander.

Speaker 1 And so what they are doing is they are re-gerrymandering a gerrymander. And that is unprecedented in American politics.
And they are doing it because Donald Trump told them to do it.

Speaker 1 And, you know, like, what is the limiting principle there? You know, we already know that Missouri is saying they may do it. You know, Ron DeSantis doesn't want to feel left out.

Speaker 1 You know, so maybe he will, Ohio. Like, who knows where this ends? So I, you know, my view is that

Speaker 1 Democrats have been on record as opposing partisan gerrymandering.

Speaker 1 It was in the Freedom to Vote Act and the For the People Act, both bills that every Democrat in the House and Senate voted for, would have banned partisan gerrymandering nationwide.

Speaker 1 But those bills didn't pass. They didn't pass because Republicans in Congress opposed them.

Speaker 1 And so, you know, my view is that Democrats need to not just match what they're doing in Texas, but actually exceed what they're doing in Texas in order to put a disincentive in place that, you know, hey, Mike Lawler, that's a really great congressional district you have there in Rockland County.

Speaker 1 How do you, how would you feel if that district, you know, added 20%, you know, more Democratic performance?

Speaker 47 So I'm going to get into the Democrats' options there, but just really quick in Texas.

Speaker 54 So they're looking at trying to pick up five seats.

Speaker 67 They've released a map, a picture of a map.

Speaker 64 It looks like Greg Kazar I've had on the show, Al Green, famously was yelling at Trump, Julie Johnson, Lizzie Fletcher, who's a great congresswoman, are four of the ones they're looking at.

Speaker 49 At first, because of your point about how the 2021 map was already gerrymandered, I was like maybe skeptical.

Speaker 59 I said, well, is there a way that this could potentially, is there a backlash potential?

Speaker 48 You know, you redraw some of these districts and, and, you know, maybe add a couple, put a couple of districts in play that weren't in before.

Speaker 62 But now that we've seen this Texas map, that seems to be unlikely, right?

Speaker 67 Like, it seems like if they are successful in this, then they will be able to squeeze out four or five seats.

Speaker 46 Is that how you assess it?

Speaker 1 It is. I mean, you never, yeah, look, you, you know as well as I do, you never know how the electorate

Speaker 1 bobs and weaves and weird, weird stuff happens, uh, trends, waves, whatever. But yes,

Speaker 1 I think you're right. I think that there has been

Speaker 1 an underestimation in parts of the media and parts of the political class in just how powerful computers are right now to gerrymander maps. And I think that's what you see in Texas.

Speaker 52 That still gives them a pretty

Speaker 9 small gap.

Speaker 48 You know, if we have one of these traditional midterms where

Speaker 48 there's a backlash against the incumbent party,

Speaker 48 the Republican advantage in the House is already extremely narrow.

Speaker 57 Adding five

Speaker 48 still makes this very doable for the Democrats.

Speaker 58 If you look at their options for pushing back, as you mentioned, the Republicans might do this also in some other states, Ohio and Missouri.

Speaker 51 Democratic options aren't actually that great.

Speaker 48 And one thing I wanted to ask you about, I saw you on one of your other media hits recently that you said that cumulatively the Democrats should try to shoot for 15 to 20 seats.

Speaker 49 I'm not an expert on redistricting, but I've been reading up on it, and I just don't kind of see where those seats come from.

Speaker 37 I mean, California, potentially six, but that has some challenges.

Speaker 12 I want you to talk about the California situation.

Speaker 49 Maryland, Oregon, Illinois are the easiest ones to redistrict because there are no state laws against it.

Speaker 57 But there are only five Republicans in those states. So, you know, it's hard to get, what, more than three out of those states.

Speaker 34 Where are all these seats coming from?

Speaker 48 And is it even legally possible to do it before 26?

Speaker 1 Okay, so you have to add New York to that list, which is almost as big as California in terms of potential seats that are at play.

Speaker 1 I also put Virginia on that list, which is a little bit of leaning into what I think the outcome of the Virginia elections will be.

Speaker 1 But, you know, there are a couple of seats that could be gained in Virginia. Look, I think that the question

Speaker 1 is

Speaker 1 not whether there are challenges to doing this. There will be.
Like, there will be challenges to do it. Look, there are challenges to the Republicans doing it in Texas, right?

Speaker 1 They have to have quorum. They have to survive what will be inevitable court fights after they do it.
And so I'm not saying that, you know, in California, obviously you have the Redition Commission.

Speaker 1 In New York, there has been litigation that my law firm has been involved in, and there's been one redraw already.

Speaker 10 Because isn't the rule in New York something like there has to be two straight sessions or something where they vote for it?

Speaker 1 I think there are a variety of different ways that are being considered. I'm not going to go into

Speaker 1 all of the details. My point is that

Speaker 1 we cannot, and I'll say this as a Democrat, okay? We cannot start, as I think too oftentimes we do, by listing the myriad reasons why

Speaker 1 we can't do something, why the norms, why the rules, why the, you know, prevent us from doing something.

Speaker 1 I think we need to start with the proposition that there is something to be done and then work towards that goal,

Speaker 1 understanding that we may not achieve 20 seats, we may not achieve 30 seats, we may not even achieve 15 seats, but we will send an unmistakable message to Republicans, like that if they do this thing, we are going to do it too.

Speaker 1 And they may win more than we do. We may win more than they do.
You never know. Politics is a funny thing.
Courts are a funny thing. Like the ball can bounce a lot of different ways.

Speaker 1 But if we're not in that game, then it is simply standing by while Ron DeSantis says, well, there's no penalty to doing this, so we'll do it too.

Speaker 1 While the governor of Missouri says there's no penalty to do it, so we'll do it too. And I think that, and you know the Republican Conference of the House better than I do.
Okay.

Speaker 1 They like never consult me. And I assume at some point they consulted you.

Speaker 1 I think. It's been a minute, but yeah, sure.
Yeah.

Speaker 1 I think that if there is a way to halt Republicans from doing what they're doing, it is by put it by having incumbent members put pressure on Mike Johnson. And that is the governor.

Speaker 1 That is the potential governor on this.

Speaker 48 I mean, shame certainly isn't going to work. No.
So I think we can mark that off.

Speaker 1 So I agree with you.

Speaker 59 And when you say that, just for listeners trying to understand what you mean, incumbent pressure means that, okay,

Speaker 59 if there's a realistic plan for the Democrats to go after, say, these 15 Republican districts, then in theory, those 15 Republicans will be the ones who are in private, you know, because they don't want Donald Trump to shut them down, but in private, going to

Speaker 67 Mike Johnson, but maybe even going to the governors of some of these red states and saying, like, come on, let's dial this back.

Speaker 48 Frankly, I think that's a bank shot, but it is, it's certainly more likely than wagging your finger at them.

Speaker 57 I know we've kind of seen the high road strategy and how that plays out.

Speaker 1 Yeah, and I'll give you one example from your home state. You may know more than I do about this and tell me that this is wrong.

Speaker 1 But, you know, my law firm, we sued two states in the deep south over their violation of the Voting Rights Act in drawing districts and discriminating against black voters, Alabama and Louisiana.

Speaker 1 We won both cases. Alabama then basically crossed its arms and said, we're not going to comply.

Speaker 1 We're not going to draw a map that has two black opportunity districts.

Speaker 1 We're going to stick with, even though a court has told us we have to, we're going to refuse to do so.

Speaker 1 Louisiana complied.

Speaker 1 And why did Louisiana comply and why did Alabama not comply? I suspect, and again, Republicans don't consult me.

Speaker 1 I suspect one of the reasons why Louisiana complied is because Mike Johnson is from Louisiana and they were going to lose one of their Republican seats.

Speaker 1 And he preferred, and the Republican governor of Louisiana preferred that they pick what that configuration looked like.

Speaker 55 Rather than.

Speaker 51 And they hated Garrett Graves.

Speaker 56 I mean, like, a lot of this stuff is high school cafeteria, like, honestly.

Speaker 48 And they were like, all right, if we got to get rid of one person, we've got one guy that we're pissed off at because he was too close to Kevin McCarthy and he's been annoying.

Speaker 66 And I like,

Speaker 49 it's funny.

Speaker 67 Garrett Graves is in the sour spot where it's not like you, I didn't look at him and say, boy, what a bold truth teller fighting for democracy.

Speaker 22 I love Garrett Graves, but he was, he was, so he was just annoying enough to leadership for them to be happy to throw him overboard while not being as courageous as a Kinzinger or whatever, somebody that would get credit.

Speaker 57 So anyway.

Speaker 1 So that is what you call the bank shot, right? Like these things, this is the thing that I think the public sometimes doesn't appreciate.

Speaker 1 Like you have to make your own luck, but you also have to create a political environment that allows the dynamic to shift. Right now, the political environment around registering is really simple.

Speaker 1 Donald Trump orders it up. They do it.
I think the Democrats need to pursue a strategy that makes that a a more complicated environment for Republicans.

Speaker 48 A more competitive Democratic effort.

Speaker 88 What kind of feedback are you getting on this?

Speaker 61 And obviously, Gavin Newsom has been very vocal that he thinks that California should play hardball here.

Speaker 49 I saw a quote from Pritzker that made him seem a little bit more lukewarm.

Speaker 48 To be honest, I haven't been paying that close attention to the New York conversation.

Speaker 63 We have governors' races in New Jersey and Virginia, so that's TBD.

Speaker 49 You know, what kind of feedback are you getting from those quarters?

Speaker 1 Look, I think that most of the governors governors have been really thoughtful about this. I think that J.B.
Pritzker said all options are on the table. I think you've seen what Gavin Newsom said.

Speaker 1 I think Kathy Hochul said that it's something that she's open to looking at.

Speaker 1 I'm not suggesting that they need to commit on day one in public. I just think it's something to explore.

Speaker 1 Also, I think, look, I think House leadership, I think Hakeem Jeffries and his team and the DCC and them, I think they are taking this super seriously as well.

Speaker 1 I think that there is a recognition across the board that what Republicans in the House here are doing is so beyond the pale that it requires a response, understanding that at the end of the day, the goal would be de-escalation.

Speaker 1 If we could get federal legislation, for example, that would be great, but that you cannot just allow Republicans to do this without any consequences.

Speaker 71 Hi, I'm Martine Hackett, host of Untold Stories, Life with a Severe Autoimmune Condition, a production from Ruby Studio in partnership with Argenix.

Speaker 75 This season, we're sharing powerful stories of resilience from people living with MG and CIDP.

Speaker 70 Our hope is to inspire, educate, and remind each other that even in the toughest moments, we're not alone.

Speaker 79 We'll hear from people like Corbin Whittington.

Speaker 74 After being diagnosed with both CIDP and dilated cardiomyopathy, he found incredible strength through community.

Speaker 82 So when we talk community, we're talking about an entire ecosystem surrounding this condition, including, of course, the patients at the center, that are all trying to live life in the moment, live life for the future, but then also create a new future.

Speaker 86 Listen to Untold Stories, Life with a Severe Autoimmune Condition on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaker 6 We the people, in order to form a more perfect union.

Speaker 8 These words are more than just the opening of the Constitution.

Speaker 11 They're a reminder of who this country belongs to and what we can be at our best.

Speaker 12 They're also the cornerstone of MS Now.

Speaker 18 Whether it's breaking news, exclusive reporting, election coverage, or in-depth analysis, MS Now keeps the people at the heart of everything they do.

Speaker 27 Home to the Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, the briefing with Jen Saki, and more voices you know and trust, MS Now is your source for news, opinion, and the world.

Speaker 34 Their name is new, but you'll find the same commitment to justice, progress, and the truth you've relied on for decades.

Speaker 38 They'll continue to cover the day's news, ask the tough questions, and explain how it impacts you.

Speaker 42 Same mission, new name, MS MS Now.

Speaker 44 Learn more at ms.now.

Speaker 48 Okay, two more nerd questions on redistricting.

Speaker 12 Then I've got a couple other things.

Speaker 55 Wisconsin and Utah.

Speaker 52 Wisconsin is one of these cases where you talk about the unilateral disarmament.

Speaker 48 It's not party registration, but essentially the court went from a conservative majority to a liberal majority, just to speak plainly about it recently.

Speaker 57 And so there's the Democrats in Wisconsin, there's a Democratic governor, like want.

Speaker 67 a redistricting.

Speaker 57 The map in Wisconsin is really unfair towards Republicans. And just not doing a gerrymandered map, just doing a fair map would probably bring two seats to the Democrats in Wisconsin.

Speaker 67 But it seems like the liberal Supreme Court doesn't want to do it, wants to wait till the end of the decade. And then in Utah, you have a case where it seems like there is some judicial review.

Speaker 57 Utah is an absurd gerrymander. It's like Salt Lake City doesn't have a district, essentially, because of the pizza way that they've carved up the state.

Speaker 48 Looking at those two cases, I'm sure you're involved.

Speaker 67 What is your sense of what's happening in those states?

Speaker 1 Yeah, so we filed the case in the Wisconsin Supreme Court that the court did not take up, as you point out. We have also filed more recently now a case in Dane

Speaker 1 County Court. So rather than going straight to the Supreme Court, which we had done last time, going up through the lower courts.
And you're exactly right.

Speaker 1 I mean, the map in Wisconsin is a partisan gerrymander.

Speaker 1 It was built on the last partisan gerrymander.

Speaker 1 And, you know, it's not fair for the people of Wisconsin. And we're going to litigate that case aggressively.

Speaker 1 The Utah case is really interesting because on its face, you would assume that we have no chance in Utah.

Speaker 1 You would assume that, you know, Utah Supreme Court, Utah courts, and again, Republican operatives know more about this than Democrats, but there's actually.

Speaker 54 The Utah Republicans are a little bit of a different, like a slightly different breed than the rest of them.

Speaker 9 Yeah.

Speaker 1 They really are. And

Speaker 27 the Mormons.

Speaker 7 I've got some issues with the Mormons, but there's something in the water out there where there's just a little bit more, you know, concern about following the rules.

Speaker 1 Yeah. And I think that there has been some sense that the courts there actually are taking this quite seriously, and that there is also a

Speaker 1 concern about not just the politics of dividing up Salt Lake City, but the impact of doing so.

Speaker 1 And so, you know, I would not be, if I had to pick a surprise for people this cycle, it would be a favorable ruling in Utah from the state courts that requires a redraw.

Speaker 47 You wrote recently for Democracy Docket a pretty extensive article about what the DOJ is doing behind the scenes that is concerning about

Speaker 62 the midterms, federal involvement into kind of state election activities.

Speaker 48 Why don't you just tell us what was in that article, and then I've got some other things I want to talk to you about.

Speaker 1 One of the things that I worry a lot about is that at the same time that we are all dealing with the latest political crises of the day and the latest outrages from the White House and the grave threats that he poses to democracy, there is this right-wing voter suppression and election subversion war machine that just keeps sort of grinding away.

Speaker 1 Like the like one of the points I make is that the RNC is actually involved or the Republican Party is involved in 75 voting cases. That's like a lot of cases to be involved in.

Speaker 1 My law firm is involved in 50. There are 143 overall.
But what's happened in the last six months is that the Department of Justice has been transformed into an arm of that effort.

Speaker 1 And one of the ways it's manifesting itself is that the Department of Justice is reaching out to state after state after state to get copies and access to their full voter files, their full voter rolls.

Speaker 1 And this is quite alarming for a couple of reasons. The first is there's no reason for the Department of Justice to have these voter rolls.

Speaker 1 The Department of Justice doesn't have a role in the administration of elections in our country. The states administer our elections subject only to congressional enactment.

Speaker 1 There's no congressional enactment that requires or that would even give a reason for DOJ to have this. The second is

Speaker 1 the reach out that is coming is actually coming from federal prosecutors, right? So it's coming from people whose jobs are usually to arrest people for like distributing fentanyl.

Speaker 1 They seem to not be doing that,

Speaker 1 you know, prosecuting fentanyl drug dealers. And so, you know, I think that

Speaker 1 people need to be paying attention to this because it is at a minimum going to be used, I believe, to have the Department of Justice suggest that there was electoral malfeasance or irregularities.

Speaker 1 I think it potentially could be used more offensively than that in a very close post-election. I mean, after all, remember Jeff Clark? Remember him? Oh, of course.
Yeah.

Speaker 1 You know, this is essentially, he wanted DOJ to intervene the federal government into the vote counting and the certification in Georgia.

Speaker 1 And he was stopped by, I think it was the acting Attorney General Rosen and like basically the White House Counsel's office, as far as I could tell.

Speaker 48 Just Clark's an interesting character.

Speaker 61 An occasional Board podcast listener because he trolls me sometimes.

Speaker 48 So maybe I'm sure.

Speaker 47 Jeff is listening?

Speaker 56 He might be listening right now.

Speaker 44 Do you have something you want to talk to him about?

Speaker 12 He doesn't really like it when I call him treasonous, but he seems to be less upset about it now that Trump won again, unfortunately.

Speaker 45 One of the smallest downsides of Trump's win is these horrible people

Speaker 48 feeling like they're the victors and no longer lashing out in shame.

Speaker 53 And that's...

Speaker 57 That sucks.

Speaker 9 You want them to cry.

Speaker 67 And unfortunately, they're not.

Speaker 57 Obviously, there are more pressing issues than that. But Jeff Clark's happiness is not at the top of my list.

Speaker 1 I do have to say, if we want to keep Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice and Cash Patel and the FBI out of elections, I've suggested that every local election office take a box and label it Epstein files and put it in their office because that's like kryptonite.

Speaker 1 That'll keep them out. Like they will be like, oh, no, no, we can't go there.
We don't want to talk about that. Okay.

Speaker 12 No bad ideas in a brainstorm.

Speaker 71 Hi, I'm Martine Hackett, host of Untold Stories, Life with a Severe Autoimmune Condition, a production from Ruby Studio in partnership with Argenix.

Speaker 75 This season, we're sharing powerful stories of resilience from people living with MG and CIDP.

Speaker 70 Our hope is to inspire, educate, and remind each other that even in the toughest moments, we're not alone.

Speaker 79 We'll hear from people like Corbin Whittington.

Speaker 74 After being diagnosed with both CIDP and dilated cardiomyopathy, he found incredible strength through community.

Speaker 81 So when we talk community, we're talking about an entire ecosystem surrounding this condition, including, of course, the patients at the center that are all trying to live life in the moment, live life for the future, but then also create a new future.

Speaker 86 Listen to Untold Stories, Life with a Severe Autoimmune Condition on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaker 6 We the people, in order to form a more perfect union.

Speaker 8 These words are more than just the opening of the Constitution.

Speaker 11 They're a reminder of who this country belongs to and what we can be at our best.

Speaker 12 They're also the cornerstone of MS Now.

Speaker 18 Whether it's breaking news, exclusive reporting, election coverage, or in-depth analysis, MS Now keeps the people at the heart of everything they do.

Speaker 27 Home to the Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, the briefing with Jen Saki, and more voices you know and trust, MS Now is your source for news, opinion, and the world.

Speaker 34 Their name is new, but you'll find the same commitment to justice, progress, and the truth you've relied on for decades.

Speaker 38 They'll continue to cover the day's news, ask the tough questions, and explain how it impacts you.

Speaker 42 Same mission, new name, MS Now.

Speaker 44 Learn more at MS.now.

Speaker 48 So the context of like the broader context of what you're saying about potential DOJ interference and elections.

Speaker 45 I had Chris Murphy on, I guess, maybe last week or two weeks ago.

Speaker 58 And I was kind of surprised.

Speaker 12 I asked him an open-ended question about like what worries him the most right now.

Speaker 3 And his answer was the midterms, right?

Speaker 63 Like he's worrying about kind of a, you know, a series of different things related to redistricting, related to what you're talking about, a DOJ involvement, related to potentially post-election non-certification of certain states.

Speaker 59 He listed off a couple of other things.

Speaker 51 At some level, I have higher things on my worry list, but this is your business.

Speaker 48 I just wonder kind of if you could give us like in a scale of one to 10, like what is your, like, what are the things that worry you most about the midterms and like how high is your alert at this point?

Speaker 1 First of all, we are going to have elections. So let me start with the listener comments who are like, what is Tim Miller talking about?

Speaker 51 So it's like zero to 10.

Speaker 45 10 is democracy is over.

Speaker 50 You know, Donald Trump has now become a fascist dictator, right?

Speaker 48 Like zero is like, they're just going to let whatever happens, happens.

Speaker 51 We're going to have a fair game.

Speaker 53 Where are we

Speaker 3 on that trajectory?

Speaker 1 I would say we are someplace in the like five to six to seven range. So it's still to the good, it's still to the good, but it's not where it needs to be.

Speaker 1 And I start by saying we're not at zero because blue sky is constantly all over me.

Speaker 1 No matter what I write about elections, they're like, you, you, why are you acting like we're going to have elections? Okay, so here's the deal. Dictators love elections.

Speaker 1 Authoritarians love elections. Like Vladimir Putin loves himself a good election.
So Donald Trump is going to want elections. And by the way, he can't stop them because they're run by the states,

Speaker 1 not by him. The question is how fair and free they are, which is really what your question is.
And I think that you should break elections into three buckets.

Speaker 1 There's who gets to vote, there is who votes, and then there is how the votes are counted and certified.

Speaker 1 On the first, on voter registration, you're seeing a lot of activity by Republicans to try to limit voter registration. You know, the proof of citizenship efforts are a part of that.

Speaker 1 Maybe the collection of the voter rolls are part of that. But honestly, it's going to be very hard for Republicans to create a true constitutional crisis around voter registration.

Speaker 1 So it's worth paying attention to. There's litigation around it, but that isn't where my worry is.

Speaker 12 Can I just add one quick point on this?

Speaker 88 So we can just put a pen in that, because also I think that that is a little bit less acute of a threat.

Speaker 36 Again, just being practical here, everybody should have a right to vote.

Speaker 47 Nobody should have their votes suppressed, obviously.

Speaker 48 But as compared to like 2008, say versus now, the people who are like the most vulnerable to this are less, way less overwhelmingly Democrat than they were then.

Speaker 46 Right?

Speaker 87 Like, do you not worry that there's like a Republican backfire, like frankly, like about like they might be some voters suppressing their own voters at some level?

Speaker 1 I don't think so.

Speaker 1 I wish I, you know, I don't wish that to be the case, but I, but, but I don't, I think that there is a little wish casting when I hear people say that the most vulnerable population to voter suppression is actually based on age, it's not based on anything.

Speaker 1 It's that is like the people who are the easiest to suppress are people who have never voted before. So they are first-time registrants, and those are overwhelmingly young voters.

Speaker 1 And, you know, I'll give you an example. In 2020 in Florida, if you voted by mail and you had a 5.4% rate of rejection of mail-in ballots if you were 18 to 21.
If you were over 65, it was 0.6%.

Speaker 1 So it's the difference between one in every 20 ballots being not counted versus one in every 200. And that disparity based on age is actually a larger disparity.
There was a racial disparity.

Speaker 1 White voters had their ballots counted more than Hispanic or black voters.

Speaker 1 In other words, the rate of rejection was higher for black and Hispanic ballots, but not to the same degree as there was based on age.

Speaker 1 And that is data when you look across the board at rejected ballots, rejected mail-in ballots, people who

Speaker 1 have trouble registering, have their registration challenged. The age factor is a pretty significant one.

Speaker 1 So I think that the same technology that goes into gerrymandering, I think, is used by Republicans to understand who is impacted by various voting law changes.

Speaker 1 But to answer your original question, so that's registration. Then you have the voting process where 2021 was a big year for like voter suppression laws by Republican states.

Speaker 1 We still see some of it, and it's still important to be mindful of.

Speaker 1 But what worries me about the Department of Justice, what worries me about Donald Trump and the MAGA movement is we started all collectively, you and I and others started in 2021 talking about election deniers being in positions of election certification.

Speaker 1 Right. Yes.
And like it was a problem in 2022. It became a bigger problem.
Remember Georgia and the state board of election and the shout out from the stage.

Speaker 1 Like, we didn't see it in 2024 because Donald Trump won.

Speaker 1 But the election denier movement that is sort of like embedded itself into this process is a potentially really big problem and a really hard one to fight because it's so localized.

Speaker 1 And then, if you have the Department of Justice on top of that, giving a patina of cover or even taking the side of those election deniers, it will be a real challenge for everyone.

Speaker 55 So, to you, the highest threat is

Speaker 7 really in the post-election fights.

Speaker 62 It's the certification.

Speaker 48 Are we seating this member of Congress?

Speaker 59 And this ties to the redistricting thing, right?

Speaker 48 If they can squeeze out eight more seats or 10 more seats out of Texas, Florida, Ohio, Missouri, Democrats fail to be able to do that on their side.

Speaker 59 Democrats pick up 15, right?

Speaker 67 Like, and then, you know, Democrats have a one-seat majority, right?

Speaker 57 Like, if in that sort of situation, I think that's a real, the biggest risk.

Speaker 71 Hi, I'm Martine Hackett, host of Untold Stories, Life with a Severe Autoimmune Condition, a production from Ruby Studio in partnership with Argenix.

Speaker 73 This season, we're sharing powerful stories of resilience from people living with MG and CIDP.

Speaker 70 Our hope is to inspire, educate, and remind each other that even in the toughest moments, we're not alone.

Speaker 79 We'll hear from people like Corbin Whittington.

Speaker 74 After being diagnosed with both CIDP and dilated cardiomyopathy, he found incredible strength through community.

Speaker 81 So when we talk community, we're talking about an entire ecosystem surrounding this condition, including, of course, the patients at the center that are all trying to live life in the moment, live life for the future, but then also create a new future.

Speaker 86 Listen to Untold Stories, Life with a Severe Autoimmune Condition on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaker 6 We the people, in order to form a more perfect union.

Speaker 8 These words are more than just the opening of the Constitution.

Speaker 11 They're a reminder of who this country belongs to and what we can be at our best.

Speaker 12 They're also the cornerstone of MS Now.

Speaker 18 Whether it's breaking news, exclusive reporting, election coverage, or in-depth analysis, MS Now keeps the people at the heart of everything they do.

Speaker 27 Home to the Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, the briefing with Jen Saki, and more voices you know and trust, MS Now is your source for news, opinion, and the world.

Speaker 34 Their name is new, but you'll find the same commitment to justice, progress, and the truth you've relied on for decades.

Speaker 38 They'll continue to cover the day's news, ask the tough questions, and explain how it impacts you.

Speaker 42 Same mission, new name, MS Now.

Speaker 44 Learn more at MS.now.

Speaker 46 Two other topics.

Speaker 16 Emil Bove, a court confirmation.

Speaker 57 I just kind of want to hear you cook on the idea that the Republicans have confirmed this guy to the Third Circuit.

Speaker 1 What an absolute fucking outrage. I mean, like, let's just look at this for a moment.
Donald Trump takes his criminal defense lawyer, puts him at the Department of Justice to be like the hatchet man.

Speaker 1 Like, what, three different whistleblowers come forward and are like, this guy has said things like, you know, the court will have to go fuck itself.

Speaker 1 Like, I mean, and the Republicans just line up to vote for him.

Speaker 1 And shame on all of the people in the legacy media who, you know, just two weeks ago were doing the like, look at Tom Tillis, principled, principled man. You know, like,

Speaker 1 it's all just a bunch of bullshit. I mean, the fact is,

Speaker 1 this isn't even like the ideological federalist society era where like they were like, oh, he like, you know, wants some kakamimi legal doctrine. This is just the pure politics of Donald Trump.

Speaker 1 Like, this is just literally Donald Trump.

Speaker 44 Power politics.

Speaker 1 Power politics.

Speaker 67 Power politics, corruption. Yeah.
That's all it is.

Speaker 57 It's not ideology.

Speaker 1 It's not ideology. It's not even.
But the thing is, though, Tim, is I'm offended that it's not even dressed up in ideology. Like, it's not even.

Speaker 1 Like, the Republicans don't even feel the need to claim he's like an originalist.

Speaker 1 Yeah, right.

Speaker 32 No. He's just like, we are right always, they're wrong always.

Speaker 57 Simple.

Speaker 63 I'm going to be a judge now on the circuit court.

Speaker 57 Correct. Ludicrous.
Yeah. Totally insane.

Speaker 1 And look, this is where I don't want your audience tuning out, but this is where

Speaker 1 I think that Joe Biden and Chuck Schumer deserve a lot of credit. They put a lot of judges in place.
They filled a lot of slots. And it's going to make it harder for Donald Trump to do more of this.

Speaker 57 No, my audience is thrilled about that.

Speaker 65 I usually get

Speaker 62 complaints about my

Speaker 63 Joe Biden counter view.

Speaker 1 Do you have a counter view on judges?

Speaker 9 No, no, no, no, no.

Speaker 48 Well, I don't have a counter view on judges, but I think that there is a little bit of like a cope in discussing the Joe Biden legacy where it's like, well, you know, he didn't win the election, but he got all these things done legislatively.

Speaker 66 And I just, Trump is going to.

Speaker 59 just totally unravel all of them.

Speaker 51 Like, like the poor choices on

Speaker 63 his decision to run and the poor decisions politically have totally offset all of the accomplishments, frankly, except for judges.

Speaker 59 Like really, like in 10 years, like if you look back at the Biden legacy, it's going to be hard to come up with something besides judges that stood the test of time, unfortunately.

Speaker 57 So sorry to bring people down.

Speaker 59 All right, I lied when I said I had two more.

Speaker 63 Now I have two more.

Speaker 47 Maxwell and Todd Blanche, any deep thoughts on the Deputy Attorney General and the deal that's been cut there?

Speaker 1 People need to first take a step back and realize how

Speaker 1 absolutely bizarre. I mean, it's inappropriate, but how absolutely bizarre it is that the Deputy Attorney General is conducting an interview with a federal prisoner convicted of sex crimes.

Speaker 1 Like, normally the Deputy Attorney General is like giving keynote addresses to like various international audiences or heads of state or like convening task force.

Speaker 1 Like he's doing the work that you would expect a line prosecutor to do. And so I think we all need to ask ourselves, why isn't a line prosecutor doing that work?

Speaker 1 Why isn't this, if there needs to be an interview of Maxwell, why isn't it being done by an assistant U.S.

Speaker 1 attorney in the prosecuting office, which would be New York, the New York, Southern District of New York?

Speaker 1 And why isn't it that prosecuting attorney and two FBI agents, which is what you would have as a

Speaker 1 standard package normally? Why is it that it is Todd Blanche himself? Why is it it is Todd Blanche, the deputy attorney general, who is Donald Trump's personal lawyer?

Speaker 1 Okay, so that's that stinks to the high heavens to begin with. The second thing, though, is that he is allowing this woman who has been convicted of a crime, is serving her sentence to dictate terms.

Speaker 1 I mean, I heard this through the Republicans in the House, too. They're like, well, she wants this, she wants that.
I'm sorry. She's in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons.
Like, what do you mean?

Speaker 1 What do you mean she wants, she wants, you know, she's got demands about the wear and the timing. Like, I'm sorry.

Speaker 1 The Bureau of Prisons can move her to the Alexandria jail or the DC jail or wherever that is convenient to people who want to to interview her.

Speaker 1 I mean, they are treating her as if she somehow is sort of on an equal plane. And we know why that is.
We know why that is.

Speaker 1 They are trying to please her of all people to try to exculpate the president.

Speaker 1 The final thing I just want to add, and it's my, you know, I went all of this time without really railing about the legacy media, but like literally people are like, well, you know, we don't have any evidence that Donald Trump, this, that, and the third thing.

Speaker 1 I'm like, the dude's been found liable in civil cases. Like, like, he's on tape.
Like, what, what do you mean?

Speaker 11 We have no evidence.

Speaker 1 Like, like, what do you mean? They're like, you know, I listened to, I probably shouldn't call out another podcast, but it's a sort of a do it. All right.
So I was listening to Barry Weiss. Oh, gosh.

Speaker 1 And she had on the conservative guy from the New York Times who like writes it. No fat.
Yes. Thank you.

Speaker 1 And they were like, well, you know, know and and and actually it was a thoughtful discussion i actually didn't have i wasn't critical of the entire thing but at one point they were like well you know if

Speaker 1 if this was all true like wouldn't there be witnesses coming forward and saying like you know this is true and i'm like i'm sorry like i'm what wait what what what what are you talking about

Speaker 56 literally maria farmer tagged Trump in a report to the FBI in 1996 saying that she was abused by Epstein and that she encountered Trump. Right.
And Epstein brought her to Trump's office.

Speaker 56 And then I had Stacey Williams on the podcast last week.

Speaker 56 Stacey Williams said that Epstein brought her to Trump's office and he groped her.

Speaker 9 So it's like, yeah, no, I'm with you.

Speaker 44 This is a totally fair complaint about the legacy media.

Speaker 51 They're also scared.

Speaker 52 They're scared of the lawsuits. Is that what it is, you think?

Speaker 16 Now, every time we mention this, we have to have a caveat that

Speaker 56 just because he's in there doesn't mean that he did anything wrong.

Speaker 13 It's like, what?

Speaker 56 There have been dozens of credible accusations against him of sexual assault and harassment.

Speaker 1 Like, do you think they're afraid of the lawsuits or do you think they want to suck up to him? See, I don't buy the they're afraid of the lawsuits.

Speaker 1 I think it's that they, look, they didn't put their, you know, Jeff Bezos wasn't sitting on the stage of his inauguration because he was afraid of lawsuits.

Speaker 88 I think it's different for different people.

Speaker 59 I think that there's certain people that I watch who I will not call out because I think they're trying to do their best in mainstream media, who have a lot of bosses and stuff, and they are worried about lawsuits.

Speaker 57 And then I think that there's another category of people, which I could look at CBS who's thinking about merging with

Speaker 57 Jason Free Press.

Speaker 1 It's like the AOL Time Warner murder.

Speaker 55 Yeah, the Washington Post.

Speaker 47 We've seen the Washington Post's action.

Speaker 44 So I think that there are also some

Speaker 37 nefarious actors in this.

Speaker 20 I do have to fact-check you, though, because this is a straight shooter podcast, Mark.

Speaker 65 You said that you went this long without criticizing the legacy media.

Speaker 54 That was actually your third speaker to legacy media over the course of the podcast.

Speaker 51 So I just want to make sure we're being real honest.

Speaker 39 All right, last thing, the issue I'm most obsessed with,

Speaker 57 what you wrote about on Democracy.get, which is ICE.

Speaker 48 A dozen House Democrats sued the Trump administration on Wednesday, alleging that ICE is preventing them from conducting oversight on federal immigration detention facilities.

Speaker 57 Like what recourse, and obviously I know you focus on elections, but do you have thoughts on what recourse legal and otherwise folks have as far as oversight on this archipelago of detention centers that we're creating?

Speaker 1 Yeah,

Speaker 1 there is probably no greater long-term crisis for America from this era than this dramatic expansion of ICE and these detention centers.

Speaker 1 You know, history shows us that when you build detention centers, you fill them.

Speaker 1 When you dramatically expand the number of agents who are masked roaming the streets, grabbing people and throwing them into vans, that doesn't decrease.

Speaker 1 So it is something to be deeply, deeply worried about.

Speaker 1 I think that on the lawsuit specifically, federal law says that members of Congress have a right on an uninterrupted basis to visit and inspect ICE detention facilities.

Speaker 1 And there are really good reasons why that's the case, Tim. The fact is that you and I don't have any visibility into what's happening in those facilities.

Speaker 1 You know, you could say that about the Bureau of Prisons, but like people in prison, they can make phone calls. They can get visitors.
There are people coming in and out. So

Speaker 1 there is at least some greater accountability of what is going on there. In ICE facilities, it can really be very, very hard to know what's going on.
So Congress is

Speaker 1 our eyes and ears.

Speaker 1 And most importantly, there is a a federal law that says that no appropriated funds, no appropriated funds can be used to keep these members of Congress from conducting these inspections.

Speaker 1 And that means that the people who are preventing them are breaking federal law. They are breaking the law because they are using their salaries.

Speaker 1 They are using their time to prevent these members of Congress from going in. And it is not just a legal problem, but it is a deep moral failing of our country.

Speaker 1 It is a deep moral failing of those ICE officials who know what the law is. Like, this is not a complicated legal issue.
It's not a complicated statute. We cannot only expect

Speaker 1 that some people will keep their oath. Like, we've kind of come to the place where we're like, okay, Donald Trump didn't put his hand on the Bible.
Maybe there was a reason for that.

Speaker 1 You know, he took the oath of office and he like hovered above the Bible, right? But like, we don't expect Donald Trump to keep his oath of office.

Speaker 1 We have largely given up on the idea that Republicans in Congress will keep their oaths of office.

Speaker 1 But I would implore the government workers, the people who are in ICE, the people who are in these detention centers, understand what your obligation is as a government employee, what it is as a citizen, and meet that obligation.

Speaker 1 It is the reason I'm so hard on the big firm lawyers because they should be the shining example, but that isn't a permission structure for other people to not do the right thing.

Speaker 89 Michael IS, amen. I agree with you on all that.
Thank you so much for your work and for your advocacy. I think you're going to be welcome back.
We'll see what the audience has to say about that.

Speaker 89 I appreciate you coming to the podcast.

Speaker 89 This is summer podcasting my dad is trying to get back into his office right now so it's over i gotta be out of here i'll be seeing you soon all right great thanks everybody else we'll be back here tomorrow see y'all then peace

Speaker 89 You

Speaker 89 are

Speaker 89 the same,

Speaker 89 boy, machine,

Speaker 89 all the same,

Speaker 89 all the shame. Make a stand show your hand.

Speaker 89 Calling a high command,

Speaker 89 don't sing just a name.

Speaker 89 I'd like a bird of prey.

Speaker 89 Back is a name, come on.

Speaker 89 Give it that thing, that's fine.

Speaker 89 walks in.

Speaker 89 A better mouse show back

Speaker 89 and cover your tracks.

Speaker 89 Kick your foot through the door.

Speaker 89 Hit the deck, know the score

Speaker 89 and take it as a prize

Speaker 89 Here's my new

Speaker 89 Miss Razor name that you shouldn't forget

Speaker 89 Call up the wild Run for love

Speaker 89 and see

Speaker 89 go wild

Speaker 89 Wild shade

Speaker 89 Oh my

Speaker 89 shit

Speaker 89 Let's go

Speaker 89 it.

Speaker 39 The Bulwark podcast is produced by Katie Cooper with audio engineering and editing by Jason Brown.

Speaker 1 She'd throw things, wander, and started hoarding.

Speaker 2 Mom's Alzheimer's was already so hard, but then we found out she had something called agitation that may happen with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. And that was a different kind of difficulty.

Speaker 2 So we asked her doctor for more help.

Speaker 4 Seeing symptoms like these in a loved one, it could be time to ask their doctor about Rexulti, Rexpiprazole 2 milligrams, the only FDA-approved treatment proven to reduce the symptoms of this condition.

Speaker 4 Rexulte should not be used as an as-needed treatment.

Speaker 4 Elderly people with dementia-related psychosis have increased risk of death or stroke, report fever, stiff muscles, and confusion, which can be life-threatening, or uncontrolled muscle movements, which may be permanent.

Speaker 4 High blood sugar can lead to coma or death. Weight gain, increased cholesterol, unusual urges, dizziness on standing, falls, seizures, trouble swallowing, or sleepiness may occur.

Speaker 4 Learn more about these and other side effects at Rexulte.com. Tap ad for PI.

Speaker 2 I'm glad her doctor recommended Rexulte.

Speaker 4 Talk to your loved ones, doctor. Moments matter.

Speaker 90 Are your AI agents helping users or just creating more work? If you can't compare your users' workflows before and after adding AI, how do you know it's even paying off?

Speaker 90 Pendo Agent Analytics is the first tool to connect agent prompts and conversations to downstream outcomes like time saved so you know what's working and what to fix.

Speaker 90 Start improving agent performance at pendo.io slash podcast. That's pendo.io slash podcast.

Speaker 1 In our nation, we don't follow. We lead.

Speaker 1 We don't wait for permission. We move first.

Speaker 1 So, while others talk about AI, Booz Allen puts it in space. That's right, in space.

Speaker 1 Because real leadership, it's about building what nobody else can.

Speaker 4 Coding so we can't lose.

Speaker 1 Making America stronger, safer, faster. It's in our code.
Find out more at boozeallen.com/slash our code.