The Glenn Beck Program

Best of the Prorgam | 4/23/25

April 23, 2025 42m
This week, the Supreme Court takes on a parental rights case that could decide whether parents can protect their kids from LGBTQ+ and transgender lessons in public schools. Glenn heads to the White House for an exclusive sit-down with President Trump and gives the audience a sneak peek of what he'll ask the president in their exclusive "First 100 Days" interview. Plus, Glenn hears from listeners about what they would like him to ask the president. Is this America’s last shot at survival? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Listen and Follow Along

Full Transcript

Choosing a bottled Starbucks Frappuccino drink that's all flavor in just 100 calories? Easy. Choosing between creamy vanilla, double chocolate, and sea salt caramel flavors? A little harder.
Try the delicious new Starbucks Frappuccino light drinks. Look for them wherever you buy groceries.
Start with Starbucks coffee. Welcome to the podcast.
A lot of big stuff to talk to you about. We've got dyes being banned from our food supply.
We've got Supreme Court cases that are going on when it comes to what your kids are being taught. And we preview a big interview Glenn is about to do with President Donald Trump.
That interview airs tonight, 9 p.m. Eastern, I believe it is, blazetv.com slash Glenn.
Promo code is Glenn. And also, and also, we're joined by Jeffy.
Host of, of course, the podcast Chewing the Fat with Jeff Fisher.

Go there and subscribe to Jeffy's podcast.

And make sure you check out Glenn's interview with President Trump tonight.

We'll start the podcast here in a second after this commercial message.

Let me tell you about good ranchers.

You can tell a lot about the country, by the way.

It feeds itself.

And right now, America's dinner tables are filled with meat from foreign countries, shrink-wrapped, stamped, shipped from half a world away. Why? There is another way.
Good ranchers, it's a return. Return to honest meat that was born, raised, harvested right here in the United States of America.
Because when you buy from good ranchers, you're not just getting a better cut of meat. You're putting money directly into the hands of American ranchers and American farmers who still believe in doing things the right way.
Before the end of the program today, another rancher, another farm will go out of business in America. That has got to change.
Men and women who are still working the land, feeding families, feeding you and me, good ranchers, they know that what goes on your plate still matters. So go to GoodRanchers.com right now.
Subscribe and get your choice of protein for a year. Everything comes from America.
Stand with Good Ranchers because they stand with American ranchers. It's GoodRanchers.com.
GoodRanchers.com. American meat.
Delivered. Hello, America.
You know we've been fighting every single day. We push back against the lies, the censorship, the nonsense of the mainstream media that they're trying to feed you.
We work tirelessly to bring you the unfiltered truth because you deserve it. But to keep this fight going, we need you.
Right now, would you take a moment and rate and review the Glenn Beck podcast? Give us five stars and lead a comment because every single

review helps us break through big tech's algorithm to reach more Americans who need to hear the truth.

This isn't a podcast. This is a movement and you're part of it, a big part of it.
So if you

believe in what we're doing, you want more people to wake up, help us push this podcast to the top.

Rate, review, share. Together, we'll make a difference.
And thanks for standing with us. Now let's get to work.
You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program. All right.
Hello, Stu. How are you? Glenn, how are you in D.C.? I am good.
I tell you, the allergies, the trees and everything has just exploded in my throat yesterday. And so I'm not sure how long my voice will last.
And I have to save it because I'm meeting with the president a little later on this afternoon. I'm going to spend a couple of hours with him.
And that show will broadcast tonight at 9 p.m. on Blaze.
So just stick with me. All right.
Let me let's start here with POTUS or I mean with SCOTUS. A battle for the kid.
The soul of our children began yesterday in the Supreme Court. The case involves a group of parents suing the largest school district in Maryland for their right to withdraw their children from classes on days that books with gay and transgender characters themes are discussed.
The parents are suing on religious freedom grounds. In 2022, Montgomery County Public Schools added LGBTQ-themed books to their curriculum for students from pre-K through the fifth grade.
The books include things like Pride Puppy, an alphabet book about a family whose puppy gets lost at a pride parade. Love and Violet, about a girl who has a crush on her female classmate.
These are pre-K to fifth grade. And Born Ready, about a transgender boy.
Again, these books added to pre-K to fifth grade. This new curriculum is DEI for elementary children.
Now, at first, the Maryland School District allowed or alerted parents when the storybooks were going to be used in class and allowed them to have their children excused from the sessions. But the district has since stopped giving both advance notice and an opt-out policy saying it's too hard to administer.
I mean, geez, it's really, really. And it leads to lots of absences and stigmatizes some kids.
I want you to know this case is not about a few storybooks, a few colorful, you know, pictures of little puppies getting lost. It's about whether you as a parent still have a God given right to raise your children according to your faith and your values and your common sense.
Do you have the right? Because if the Supreme Court says, no, you don't have that right anymore. If the First Amendment free exercise clause doesn't protect this, your right as a parent, then what are all our rights even for? If we don't have a right as a parent to parent our children, none of the rights really even matter.
Now, the parents who are suing insist that these books, quote, promote one-sided transgender ideology, encourage gender transitioning, and focus excessively on romantic infatuation. By the way, the parents are not seeking to remove the books from classrooms or the children's libraries.
They just don't want their children to have to sit through these indoctrination sessions. Oh, that's not good enough.
You will comply. That's what it's all about.
They're not trying to erase anyone's story. They just want to not comply.

They want to shield their children from ideas that contradict their faith.

What is the First Amendment really all about?

Sounds reasonable. Sounds like basic parenting 101.

First Amendment is clear.

You cannot burden someone's free exercise of religion, forcing kids to engage with ideas that violate their family's deeply held beliefs. That is clearly, clearly a burden.
Religious liberty is in the First Amendment. It is not a second-class right.
It is a first-class right. Besides, this is basic common sense, or at least used to be.
Parents have the right to guide their kids on any sensitive topic like sex, sexuality, or yes, even gender. It's not the school's job.
It's your job, period. Now, this should be a slam dunk for the parents, but I don't even know.
I mean, if the Supreme Court doesn't see that, parents won't just be losing this case. We'll be losing even more freedom to raise our own kids.
This one is a very, very deep red crimson line in the sand that the Supreme Court cannot cross. But we'll we'll see.
Apparently yesterday, did you hear any of the arguments, Stu? Yeah, I read about them. It definitely seemed like the conservative justices were a bit skeptical of the idea that you get to force parents to keep their kids in these classes, even if they oppose it, when you're reading these books.
But, you know, of course, you never know. We've seen crazy things happen in the Supreme Court before.
What's fascinating to me is, and what's the motivation here, Glenn, you tell me, if you're going to have one of these situations where you have these books, and as you point out, they are not like, okay, there happens to be a gay character in a book about something else. Like it is like straight out, like books about why you should think these lifestyles and choices are okay.
Right? Like it is straight out what they're doing to pre-K to fifth year, fifth graders. So really, really young young this is not like uh you know some of these

situations they like to push out there like oh you don't want high schoolers to read these books it's not even what they're talking about and what could be the motivation of not allowing parents to opt their kids out here they did offer that as you noted they did offer that the first year that these books hassle

it's a hassle i love that there's no innocuous there's no innocuous uh explanation for this right it's just we want your kids to believe these things therefore we will force them to stay in class what do you mean it's hard to administer there's all sorts of things that would allow that you'd allow kids to leave class for it's not hard to administer a kid walking out and doing something else learning something different what's the motivation what's the innocuous tale here glenn there is none there is none you you go back to the Bible. Remember Sodom and Gomorrah.

And, you know, the angels come into town.

They're looking just for one person.

Just what can we find one person?

And they go in and they find one.

They find one.

And he sees the angels and he's like, come on, come on, get into the house, get into the house.

And he gets them into the house. And, you know, like, like you're not safe out there and then they start beating on the door hey let us in we saw these two guys we saw these two guys uh and uh you need to you need to bring them out here the answer was no no i tell you i'll give you my daughter just not these guys now little, you know, that's when the angels should have went, you know, I don't know if we found the right guy here, but it was a different time.
We'll give you our daughter first. Give you our daughter, just leave them alone.
No, no. You had to comply.
If you were coming in to the city, you must comply. They wanted to sodomize the angels.
No, thank you. No, I'm, you know, I'm all sodomy.
I'm all, the doctor says I'm getting too much sodomy. So, but that is what's happening again.
This, even if you don't believe in angels or you don't believe in the story of the Bible, this is a very good parable. I happen to believe it, but it's a very good parable on what was going on.
Let's just look at the Bible as just saying, what was the general thing? You could describe it any way you want, but what was generally going on? The city had been taken over by just absolute degenerates and sodomy had become such a big deal you know they actually taught my daughter uh in a catholic school at fordham university they taught my daughter that sodomy sodomy dad was just their way of greeting people you had a catholic school teach you that that sodomy wasn't bad it was just the way they greeted people hey drop your pants i want to greet you that's ridiculous absolutely ridiculous but that's just the way it was well you know what i don't want to live in a city where they drop their pants to greet you i just don't i think that's probably wrong speak for yourself you know even if that was even lots of people you have to understand you can't opt out of it you need to to make sure that you're you're participating in the traditional greetings of that society um this this is this is a this is a philosophy that has no forgiveness and you're either on board or you're not.

You're either 100% in or you're an outcast, and you will comply. This is what the left just doesn't understand.
I shouldn't say the left understands this. The average Democrat doesn't understand.
They think because the average Democrat, I think, is still kind of thinking, well, you know, I mean, I don't like all of that, but I want to be tolerant. There is no tolerance with this.
There's none. And this should show you there is no reason to force these parents or force these kids to go against their parents teaching other than you will participate you will comply that's all it is yeah i love to one of their outs on this from the left is basically to say look if you want if you don't want your kids to learn this stuff then you should homeschool or put your kids in christian schools now of course it's it's actually Christians, Jews, and Muslims.
One of the lead defendants here is a Muslim, actually, is trying to pull their kids out of this. And they have, which is a fascinating argument from the left, considering how hard they fought against school choice all this time.
I mean, they have tried to prevent it.

They've tried to prevent the rights for you to educate your own kids. And they're trying to force you to pay for that education, not once, but twice.
That's their answer. Like, if you don't want to learn what we're teaching you, then you get to pay twice as much for an education you're going to get outside of these walls? I will tell you that I talked to some people over the last couple of days up here, some of them with the Department of Education, and they are thrilled to dismantle that thing.
They are very, very excited to dismantle the Department of Education. They're on the inside, and they're like, it freaking them out and it is, we're shutting this thing down.
And it couldn't be more exhilarating, quite honestly. I mean, tell me what the Department of Education has done.
Look at how they are, they're taking on private schools and they're saying, you don't have a right to private education or you have a right, but we're not going to, we're not going to give you any vouchers. We're not going to spend any.
And look at what we're spending money on a system that is getting worse and worse and worse. And we're trapping our children into into slavery.
If your kids can't read, I mean, go back to the 1800s. Do you know that it was I believe it was the death penalty to teach someone, a slave, how to read? Did you know that? It was a crime of the highest order to teach a slave to read.
Why? Because if they can read, they can think. If they can think, they're no longer going to be a slave.
That's why. So this progressive, these people have hated, have hated the African-American forever.
It's the same people that started the Klan. It's the progressive movement that tried to wipe out every black with Planned Parenthood.
And they're still doing it and getting away with it. Is there a reason why all of the abortion clinics happen to fall in the black zip codes? Is there a reason that that's where most of them are? Gee, I don't know.
They're still doing it. They were the ones that were over in Germany telling you how to get rid of the Jews.
Yes, that was an American thing, not a German thing. That was us.
My gosh, these people have hated and hated and hated. And then the guy, Johnson, who stopped the civil rights movement, he stopped the Civil Rights Act in 1959.
He was the guy who stopped it. Then just four or five years later, he signs it in and he's proud to do it.
And then he signs the great, what do you call it? The great society bills. So we have a great society that's going to help the black man.
And what does it do? It tears their families apart. It drives

them further into poverty. It, it miseducates their children.
So they're just nincompoops. And then by the way, white people are nincompoops as well, because we get the same damn education.
Who is this hurt? This has hurt the black man more than the white man. and these people they still get away with it now ask yourself a question if if you're paying taxes and this is your country why the hell can't you say i'm not educating my kid there and i'm not paying you for that education because i think that education is evil i think that education is so evil because look what it's doing to our kids.
It's teaching them that they should be slaves. It's not teaching them how to think.
It's teaching them what you want them to think. No, not going to do it anymore.
All right, back in just a second. You never realize how dependent you really are on the power that's supplied by the grid until the grid is down.
That's when the thought hits, oh, I should have had a generator. That's why I want you to check out the Grid Doctor 3300.
Generators are really, really expensive, but you usually don't need one. But this one is solar powered, so you're not scrambling for gas cans or dealing with the roar of an engine in your driveway.
It's quiet, it's clean, it's safe to use inside your house even. This is the generator for people who want something practical, portable, and built for a world we actually live in, where blackouts are more common and infrastructure is more powerful.
This is something you could put your fridge or your freezer on, so, you know, all the meat doesn't go bad. If you want real peace of mind, something you'll actually use, go to mypatriotsupply.com.
Look at the Grid Doctor 3300. You'll be glad you did.
It's quiet, fume-free, safe to use indoors and out, totally portable, and in a world where the grid's becoming less and less reliable by the day, Grid Doctor 3300 will give you peace of mind and practical everyday use. Get yours now, myPatriotSupply.com.
That's MyPatriotSupply.com, America's trusted stores for emergency preparedness. Now back to the podcast.
This is the best of the Glenn Beck Program. All right.
Hello, Stu. Welcome to the program.
Thanks, Glenn. Big day today.
Yeah, big day. We've got, of course, an interview with the president of the united states going to be airing tonight uh on blaze tv blaze tv.com slash glenn by the way promo code glenn if you'd like to join blaze tv and save 20 bucks do you have kind of a an approach here at this point do you know what you're going to ask.
I mean, I do. I've got pages and pages of questions and notes.
But now I have to, you know, it's going to take me an hour or two just to whittle it down to the questions I think I can get in. You know, I've got, I don't know, 45 minutes or an hour with the president.
And that's from the moment he walks in to the moment he leaves uh So you don't have a lot of time and, you know, every single word counts. I know, I'm going to start with this.
I asked just for a list of the things that he accomplished in the first 100 days and we got to page 89, I'll have all of them tonight. This is the first 80, I think 89 days.
Look at that. That's a lot.
That's just a list of the accomplishments of the first 89 days. That's what it would just say that four inches thick.
I mean, this guy has made more progress than any other president or many presidents combined in the first 100 days. Nobody's done what what he's done But, you know, one of the things that I don't know how I'm going to, because I can't ask him directly.
So I kind of try to ask him several questions all the way through that'll kind of give you a sense of, are we looking for a reprieve? Is that where we're going to get a four-year reprieve if the economy doesn't

turn around fast enough because i believe the president can turn it around but if it doesn't

turn it around fast enough or if people don't understand that he is changing the entire structure

of the world and he's trying to do it in two years really um we're going to be left with a reprieve

Thank you. structure of the world, and he's trying to do it in two years, really, we're going to be left with a reprieve and not a fundamental change.
And does he think that's really possible, especially without Congress? I mean, I'm going to rail on Congress. I don't know if he'll join me on that, but I really want to know why he isn't pounding Congress into the dirt.
I mean, Congress is, they're not helpful at all. And no matter what anybody says, I've talked to enough people just the last few days here to tell you that anybody who tells you that the Senate and the House leadership is on the president's side, they don't know their butt from their elbow.
They have no idea what they're talking about. They are not on his side.
They are not working with him. And that's obvious.
I mean, they should be passing. You know, I know this is going to be, you know, he said, I'm going to pass a the largest tax cut.
Well, he's not. He's what the Congress is doing is he's actually he's thwarting the largest tax increase in American history that would come next year.

Well, the country needs a tax cut, a tax plan that will actually encourage spending on business, encourage spending on creating jobs.

I also want to talk to him about energy.

I mean, what do you think, Stu? What are the questions you want to know? I think the economy is a big one and how he's going to kind of go forward with that. We talked about having that sort of positive agenda.
I think that would be helpful. It seems like the markets are liking that today.
There's a little bit of a, maybe a little bit of an approach change over the past past couple of days and that seems to be helping quite a bit i think that's a big one i think certainly energy is a big one uh department of education the uh is is another one wait wait go back to the go back to the positive um what do you mean by that like we talked about energy going in and saying look i'm going to build all these nuclear power plants in the next three years because testimony on the Hill yesterday, day before yesterday from the president of, you know, former CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt was pretty clear. we are going to right now the cloud services if you will the compute power for all of the big, you know, computer cloud servers, they require currently 3% of all of the electricity that is used in the United States.
3%. In three years, they will require 99% of our energy.
well there's no way that can happen without us having blackouts and brownouts and, you know, the rest of the country just starving itself from electricity. That'll just collapse everything.
So a positive way to deal with this is to say, I am going to do the biggest energy push ever in American history. And he's already done it for oil and coal.
Now he just needs to say, I'm cutting the red tape. I'm going to make sure that they're safe.
But there's new technology now with with nuclear power plants. And we're going to drop them in city after city after city where there's cloud servers are going to be because if Eric Schmidt ismidt is right and i believe he is each one of these cloud servers by 2030 will need a nuclear full-size nuclear power plant themselves that's incredible it's incomprehensible but yeah as you point out instead of saying uh like an alternate approach to that would be, hey, we need to stop these AI companies from doing this.
We need to make sure that they are not taking over. That's the I would say what the left would typically do in a situation like this.
They would try to stop the companies from growing. They would try to stop them from innovating.
They would say you need to do more with less. And our I think the conservative argument there is to say, hey, we're going to give you the tools that you need.
We're going to make it easy for these companies to build nuclear power plants in a safe way, of course, but reliable energy that can fuel these things would be great. I think the same thing, you know, I think if you look at Trump's economic plan, he wants to bring, let's say, manufacturing back to the United States.
Well, there's a couple of ways that you can do that. And both of them are completely consistent with what Trump wants to do.
One of them is obviously tariffs. That's what has had almost all the attention.
I think there's a reason why the media focuses on that. I think they rather talk about the tariffs because they're not as popular.
The other side of it is incentivizing companies to come here. It's cutting regulation.
It's cutting taxes. It's making the United States into the greatest place to do business.
People will want to come here. And the Democrats have worked really hard to take that impression away from the world over the past 20 years.
And Trump, I think, in his first term, did a good job at encouraging that sort of development here. I think it went pretty well with the economy.
And I think like that just, it's just a, I think, in his first term, did a good job at encouraging that sort of development here.

I think it went pretty well with the economy.

And I think like that just it's just a I think he believes that still.

He just it hasn't been the focus as much of the messaging. And I think that could help.

This is the problem.

And I'm going to try to get him to explain this.

I can't ask him.

I don't think I can ask him directly because the president of you say, look, how much trouble we in, you know, and is this fixable? Of course, he's going to say, yeah, it's absolutely fixable.

But he he needs to articulate or somebody needs to articulate how close to the edge of the abyss we are. I mean, I, you know, Stu, you know, I have I've talked about this economic stuff over and over again.
I had a conversation with somebody who I can't say who, but they. Believe me, they absolutely know what's happening with our dollar and the economy and everything else.
Okay. An official in the government that that's, you know, that's pretty much what they do.
And I said, look, I'm trying to get my arms around this because I'm, I'm thinking about, you know, why he called it liberation day. And I think it's because he's changing the whole system, you know, that was set up after World War II and yada, yada, yada.
And I said, and I don't think people understand that if we, if he fails, this is it. This is our last chance to save America, that we're over.
And this individual put their hand on my shoulder and said, no, listen, we are over. So he said the same thing I did.
He just wanted to make sure that I understood exactly what I was saying. And I found that to be a little terrifying.
And I don't think people truly understand. This is it.
This is it. If if you if you want to have a country left, we're going to go and experience tremendous pain.
I mean, Ronald Reagan talked about this.

You know, there's going to come a time when none of the choices are good and everybody wants to eat around the edges and not take the whole pie.

You have to have the whole pie.

You're going to, you can't eat around the edges anymore.

You've got to fix the entire thing.

And that is going to be really painful and dangerous and i i don't know if i can get him to talk about that i mean how would you ask him is that do you think that's the way he sees it do you think he because it does seem like with like the types of maneuvers he's made when it comes to foreign trade for, he really does see not just something we need to tweak, right? Like an absolute monumental crisis, right? Yeah. So do, you know, because that is a big change and I think slightly different than maybe the perception was going in.
And that's, you know, something he's going to have to kind of deal with, with the American people. And it's why maybe, you know, he's having issues with, you know, some of the independents, losing support among independents.
I don't think he's going to see, you know, I don't think that's the way he runs his operation. I don't think he looks at it and says, okay, well, this isn't polling well right now, so I don't want to do it.
No, he doesn't. I think he looks at it as- He sees himself, and thank God, he sees himself as, if I don't do it, no one will.
And I think

that's true. I don't know of any- Donald Trump is completely unique.
You know, he's been forged in the fire where he wasn't in 2016. He is now.
I mean, what are you going to do to him? You try to throw him in jail. You try to throw his family in jail.
You try to destroy his business, his reputation. They've called him every name under the sun.
They tried to kill him not once but twice. I mean, what are you going to do to this guy? He doesn't care.
And so I really believe that this is so far beyond him. He knows, look, I'm here at this time for a reason, and it's to save the country in the way I believe it needs to be saved.
And so it is a complete departure from the Great Reset. But it is a Great Reset.
The world has been shaping us for this reset. I've been talking about this since 2008.
They shaped us for this reset to where they would manage the decline to a certain point and then it would kind of fall apart and then collapse into this new system that they had built. Well, he's dismantling that at the same time trying to put the system back into place that they had taken apart.
I mean, if he can pull this off, it's going to be a miracle. We'll be the first people in the history of the world to pull this off.
Um, and, uh, it's, I mean, it's an interesting time to be alive. It's going to be interesting to see how well this works out.
Um, all right, more in just a second. Stand by.
This is the best of the Glenn Beck program. Here's something I didn't think I'd ever say.
I think I spend more time in Washington, D.C. I've learned so much in the last couple of days, being able to meet with so many people.
And then, you know, in the off times, a couple of days ago, I went to the American Art Museum, Smithsonian's American Portraiture or something. What a dump that place is.
My gosh. My gosh, what a dump.
And so woke. I can't take it.
I just can't take it. And I don't know.
I think I'll talk to the president in the off air on that because I don't think anybody else cares. But he might.
It's just a nightmare. Just a nightmare thanks to steve bannon i was on steve bannon show on monday when did that air yesterday yeah i aired yesterday i went in monday to do his show and he aired it uh yesterday uh interesting really really interesting um he we disagree on things uh but uh he also agrees with me that we're in trouble economically where people need to understand where we are in the grand scheme of things.
And there is a serious mental illness problem happening on the streets of Washington, D.C. I mean, when you get into the Capitol building, it's even worse.
But on the streets, it is a serious mental illness there. I mean, I've never seen anything like it.
My wife has been with me this week and she she said that I've only heard her say this once. She said it about 10 years ago in San Francisco.
We went and people were taking a dump in the street, you know, right as we're walking. Um, and it was just very dangerous feeling.
And it was a nice section of San Francisco and, um, it doesn't exist anymore, but at that time there still was a nice section of San Francisco. And, uh, she said, I'll never come to this city again.
She said, I would never walk alone in this city. And I said, well, I'd be with you.
And she's like, nah, walking with you is like walking alone. Um, and, uh, it's a, we're walking down the streets of Washington DC and this guy starts to, uh, circle us on a bike and he's gotta be about 30 years old.
Uh, and he just, he starts circling us, you know, riding his bike around us as we're walking, and he's like, I'm going to kill me some white people today. I'm killing white people today, and I'm like, I know, I hate those white people, huh? And he just kept circling us, and you know, could be you, could be you, and he drives around, he's just like staring at me, could be you you today you never know and i thought that's either mental well it is absolutely mental illness or that is a societal thing that has caused this guy to think that that's totally cool to do that but it is it's it's really bad but the good news is the democrats are here for you there is a story in politico that i absolutely love.
Here's the headline, and I quote, there's a reckoning to be had. San Francisco Dems move to push the National Party to the center.
now that needs it that's all you need to know okay i mean the gutter in which the democrats

find themselves now if the the Democrats from San Francisco is leading, they're the ones leading the way, it's how much trouble they're in.

The story says, quote, Democrats to win by rejecting what they deride as performative politics and virtue signaling and embracing pragmatism and quality of life issues. Really? This is rich.
Democrats from the capital of left-wing lunacy now are claiming they want to drag their party back to the middle and in this story from politico they say they're now interested get this on fully staffing police departments erasing the local regulations that drive up the cost of building new housing and focusing on public schools and closing the learning gaps for black and Hispanic students in math and reading. Now, this is wild because I seem to remember that these are exactly the same people that just did the opposite.
They're the ones shouting in the streets to defund the police, burning buildings down, yanking our founding father's name off of school buildings, passing Gaza-like resolutions like they're running the UN,

turning our cities into giant performance art galleries of needles and poop. These are the ones.
And now they're like, you know what? Maybe we should have a few more cops and we should make sure our kids can read again and do math. Really? So when you were saying the defunding the policing, was that all? Were you joking about that?

Or were you defund when you were saying the defunding the policing? Was that all? Were you joking about that or are you just joking about the math and other subjects being racist? Because I'm according to the Politico story, they're also calling for imposing potential age age limits on elected officials. Why? He's sharp as a tack.
No, no, he was sharp as a tack there was nothing nothing to see there did you see the elizabeth warren uh interview she did with some that oh my gosh so good we talked about it yesterday it is that was one of the most revealing things i've ever seen i mean she actually laughs she can't stop herself from laughing at the concept that he was fine, even though she said it publicly over and over and over again.

Play that, Sarah.

Do you regret saying that President Biden had a mental acuity?

He had a sharpness to him.

You said that up until July of last year.

I said what I believe to be true.

And you think he was as sharp as you? Um... I said I had not seen decline.
And I hadn't at that point. You did not see any decline from 2024 Joe Biden to 2021 Joe Biden? Not when I said that.
You know, the... Not when I said that.
The thing is, he... Look.
Look. He was sharp.
He was on his feet. I saw him.
Live event. I had meetings with him a couple of times.
Senator, on his feet is not praise. He can speak in sentences, is not praise.
She's laughing. Fair enough.
Fair enough. Look, it is, the question is, whatever a politician says, look, what are we going to do now? Okay.
Yeah. I mean, it's a great, it's a great clip.
He does a great job interviewing her. He does.
As well, pushing her on this because it's so obvious and she's, it's so comical that she can't even keep a straight face we use that term a lot you can't keep a straight face that's a great example of it she legitimately multiple times laughs at her own public statements like it's okay like it's absolutely okay and we're all in this joke together we all get it he's sharp as a tack the guy is The guy is a Roomba stuck in the corner of the room, man, just pounding into the, I mean, for the love of Pete. Now they're saying, you know, we've got to have an age limit for, why? Weekend at Bernie's strategy with the new Bernie is, you know, maybe suboptimal right now.
This is crazy. And I want to tell you that this is what you need to know about this.

There is zero sincerity in this at all.

You have no reason to believe this is sincere from the Democratic Party at all.

But just pretend for a second that it is sincere.

It would be enormous.

It would be an enormous breakthrough.

The heavens would part.

The angels would sing if they actually de-radicalized the Democratic Party. But they have no intention to do that.
No intention to do that. Here's what's going on.
San Francisco Democrats are calling their strategy new pragmatism. What does that mean? In other words, you don't have any real principles, just a willingness to rebrand according to which way the wind is blowing.
So you can look like you just want to get things done they're not sorry for the clown show virtual signaling pop policies look how sad she is look at how much remorse she has she's laughing at how she lied about the guy who had the finger on the nuclear button nobody should laugh at that nobody nobody they are terrified of losing again. Look, anytime a politician says, look, look, they're lying to you.

San Francisco wants to be the model for Democrats to win back union workers, immigrants, young people, voters they lost because they were too busy arguing that standardized tests are hate crimes.

Good luck with that pivot, guys. Good luck.
Good luck. You can't just, as a guy who has worked with chalkboards for a very long time, you can't just wipe the chalkboard clean.
The whole country has seen your math and I'm sorry, you have to scrub

it clean. And you're busy scrubbing, but we all saw what you wrote on the chalkboard and none of

this adds up. Doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
Every idea starts with a problem. Morby Parker's

was simple. Glasses are too expensive.
So they set out to change that by designing glasses in-house

I'm sorry. Every idea starts with a problem.
Warby Parker's was simple. Glasses are too expensive.
So they set out to change that. By designing glasses in-house and selling directly to customers, they're able to offer prescription eyewear that's expertly crafted and unexpectedly affordable.
Warby Parker glasses are made from premium materials like impact-resistant polycarbonate and custom acetate. And they start at just $95, including prescription lenses.
Get glasses made from the good stuff. Stop by a Warby Parker store near you.