Best of the Program | Guests: Matt Kibbe & David Harsanyi | 2/5/25

So, one of the craziest, one of the craziest press conferences I have ever seen, and I so thoroughly enjoyed it, was with Donald Trump and B.B.

Netanyahu.

I talked to David Harsani about it, and I explain exactly what the president is doing.

Also, been talking about USAID for years, sounding the alarm.

It's time to gut it.

And Matt Kibbe has the fourth in his docuseries, The Cover-Up.

This one is The Smoking Gun.

It shows you exactly who was responsible for COVID-19.

And big changes are coming.

All right, let me tell you about my Patriot supply.

There is no advance notice that you get in the mail saying there's going to be an emergency.

It'd be great if there were.

Hey, just want to let you know there's going to be a market crash in a little while.

Hey, I just want to let you know, huge snowstorm coming.

But that's not what you should worry about.

There's a flood after that that is coming completely unrelated and no one will see it coming.

You don't get notices like that.

When you find out about an emergency, it's too late really to do anything about it.

You'll be standing in line with everybody else.

That's why MyPatriot Supply is there with 2,000 calories per day and 100% of your daily value of 12 essential vitamins and minerals.

The kit will keep you going when every single meal matters.

Right now, they're offering $50 off their four-week food kit.

So go to mypatriotsupply.com.

Grab yours right now.

I mean, you have to prepare for the worst and hope for the best.

Storing emergency food in your home is the right thing to do, and we still live in very, very crazy times.

MyPatriotsupply.com.

Grab yours now.

Don't put it off.

Now is the time to prepare.

MyPatriotSupply.com.

Get your four-week food kit right now.

MyPatriotSupply.com.

You're listening to

the best of the Glenbeck program.

Welcome to the Glenbeck program.

We're glad that you're here.

We have a lot to talk about.

David Harsani is with us.

David Harsani used to be with the Federalists.

He's now with Washington Examiner.

He's a senior writer.

Actually, he used to be with us for a while, and somehow or another, he escaped.

I told him we should put bars on his office door.

David Harsani, welcome to the program.

How are you?

I'm well.

Thank you for having me.

It's good to talk to you.

I love your commentary

from last night.

Might turn out the most important thing Trump said was that he was mulling over Israel's potential annexation of parts of Judea and Sumeria.

Absolutely right.

And then you talked about how you weren't sure if he was serious or not about Gaza,

but you needed a cigarette.

I felt exactly the same way.

Exactly the same way, David.

So

where do you want to start?

Let's start with that thought.

Well, it was great.

It was one of the greatest press conferences.

I certainly related to Israel of all time.

It's just amazing to hear a president talk in that way.

And, you know, maybe none of it will ever come true, but the very idea that...

You know, the idea that a president would be so pro-Israel and basically dismiss the idea that Gaza belongs to Palestinian people or that a Palestinian state must exist for peace, I think is more important than people realize.

And

talking about the West Bank, alleged West Bank that way as well

is a complete change.

I mean, it's such a drastic change from the last administration.

I don't think I've ever seen anything like it.

I think you could say that almost every day about what Donald Trump is doing.

But

when they asked him, so are you thinking about

backing israel's annexation of uh you know the west bank yeah i mean i think that he said he would talk about it in the next four weeks that's already done he i mean mike huckabee now the uh ambassador over there talks about it as judea and sumeria that's done it's already done Yeah, I mean, I think it's important, you know, history matters, right?

I think it's important for people to realize, let's talk about Gaza just for a second again, that the people there claim that they are refugees.

They're just biding their time, waiting to go back to their original homes in Tel Aviv or wherever.

Well, if there are refugees there,

why can't they be refugees in Jordan, which was cut out to be a Palestinian state originally?

Or why can't they go back to Egypt?

Or why can't they be elsewhere?

There is nothing written in stone that says they have to be in these refugee camps that are 70 years old in Gaza.

And the West Bank,

that's not, you know, we've, the media trains us to say occupied territory.

It's disputed territory.

and Israel has every right to annex areas to make a legitimate border

against people who pay terrorists to kill them, for instance, or whatever.

So these are completely legitimate things to say, and I'm just elated that Donald Trump says them.

I have to tell you, I just think he's the best negotiator ever.

I just talked about how...

You know, does he think that Gaza could be a nice Riviera?

You know,

put a nice hotel.

We'll put a nice hotel.

We'll have pools everywhere, and the Gazans can come and serve you drinks.

Does he believe that that could be done?

Sure.

Does he think he could be the guy that to develop it?

Sure.

Is that really what he's going for?

I don't think so.

I think what he's doing is breaking the Overton window.

And today, everyone's talking about that and not talking about the other thing that he broke a couple of days ago.

And that is, I think nobody should live in Gaza.

Everybody should, all the Gazans should, they should move to Egypt or Jordan.

Nobody's talking about that today.

They're all talking about, wait, he's going to build a resort?

From the Riviera to the sea, someone said.

I like that.

But

I think you're right.

You know, he does this.

Obviously, you know, it's like just a bomb went off.

And it...

You could see Jordan, Saudi Arabia, other countries immediately making statements.

I think he's trying to scare them into helping redevelop and take care of Gaza.

Let's be honest, they created this problem on purpose as a cudgel against Israel years ago, and now they don't want nothing to do with it.

They've created a monster, in essence.

So I think Donald Trump should pressure Jordan and Egypt to take some responsibility for the things they've done.

And I think this is part of that.

I can't pretend that I know what Donald Trump's thinking, but it's clear that dropping a bomb like this, but then not giving us specifics means that there's some other idea he has, I think at least, that he's trying to push and negotiate for?

I think he pushes the next best thing.

I think he thinks the first

thing is that they, and he's already said this, that they come in, they rebuild, they go someplace else, and we find a way to have good jobs and a stable area.

I think he thinks that's the best first thing.

But to get everybody to do it, He then backs it up with, okay, but if you don't want to do that, this is what I'm going to do.

And nobody wants to do the second thing.

And so all of a sudden, the first thing that was outrageous before suddenly looks very reasonable to everybody.

I think that's the way he negotiates.

Yeah.

I mean, I have to say, though, I think the first idea is pretty good.

I do, too.

The thing is this.

Everyone pretends.

I don't want to put American troops in harm's way.

So if that happens, I think that's a big problem.

But if why can't we, or the Israelis, incentivize people to go and live better lives elsewhere where they're not under Hamas, who, you know, martyrs for Hamas's cause constantly.

David, you know this.

Nobody wants them.

Every time they're taken in, there's a revolution in that state.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Well, Donald Trump can pressure people.

I mean, we can obviously, the United States can pressure countries.

Jordan and Egypt take a lot of aid from the United States to prop up their economies.

I mean, you can pressure people.

Now, I get why they don't want it, but if you disperse people into areas where they can live peacefully, I'm not saying compel them to leave.

Ask them.

Let's see how many people really want to leave.

I I bet you it will be a bigger number than people think.

You wrote the Rise of Bluenon, came out, I think, what, last November.

And you were talking about how everything they do is just projection.

The left,

we're seeing it now.

They've been talking about fascism.

They've talked about the death of democracy, how this Donald Trump is going to weaponize everything, how it's just going to be fascistic and he'll enrich his friends and everything else.

When we see USAID,

we now have proof that, yeah, that's exactly what they're doing.

And it's, I mean, the only thing they have left is to organize in the street.

And I don't think they have any credibility on that.

I think Americans are just so done with that.

What credibility do they have to complain about executive power?

I just don't even know that anyone will listen to them.

And

I just read, I mean, I think this is true, that Politico took $8 million from them and didn't disclose USAID.

So, you know, what's more fascistic than paying off organs of political journalism to attack the enemy?

And

yeah, it's a projection.

And I don't think anyone takes them seriously.

I'm not, you know, protesting in front of hostages, hospitals so that you can, you know,

because they stopped mutilating children, going and protesting for USAID, which sends money to Colombia to put on trans

plays.

I mean, I don't think the working class or anyone, any normal voter is going to be

coaxed or enticed by that kind of

political action.

So

what is their plan?

How are you going to stop this?

I mean, it felt right now feels a little like 2008, 2009 when I was at Fox.

And I said all the time, they're just overwhelming the system.

You cannot keep up with everything that they're doing.

And it's the same thing happening now, just in reverse, the other direction.

I thought the same thing.

Yeah.

Yeah.

What's their plan?

I don't think I've ever seen a party as feckless or as

without any kind of goal or aim or messaging since Republicans in 2008.

But

the C Party came and that turned around pretty quick.

So people have to be careful about it.

But I don't really see what kind of idealistic messaging the left can come up with now.

I mean, you saw at the DNC

chair election, everyone was still talking about how racist the electorate was and sexists and stuff like that.

I just don't think that has currency anymore.

No, it doesn't.

It doesn't.

David, thank you very much.

I appreciate talking to you and having you on.

Thank you so much.

Yeah, thanks so much.

Yeah, I have to tell you, I mean, on that subject,

when you talk about, you know, what are they going to do?

Listen to this from AOC.

AOC said about Elon Musk, this dude is probably one of the most unintelligent billionaires I've ever met or seen or witnessed.

Okay, you're using the word dude in the first place.

This dude just isn't smart.

And the danger and lack of intelligence and the lack of expertise that Elon has-I mean, this guy is one of the most morally vacant, but also least knowledgeable about these systems that we know of.

Okay, I just want to go through this.

So, when he was starting PayPal,

you were a a bartender.

Okay.

Then when he started SpaceX,

you were still a bartender.

Then when he started to scale up Tesla,

you were, let's say, sleeping with George Soros and the left to get money to do a job you

didn't ever do before.

You had no skill in campaigning or being,

you were a bartender, okay.

Okay,

so

the next thing is, um,

she's driving a Tesla.

She likes him until he switches over to Donald Trump.

Okay, so when he's now running SpaceX and landing, well, first, taking off the super heavy Lyft rocket,

the heaviest rocket ever launched into space, Starship, which is designed to be renewable.

When he's planning on that and launching it into space, he's planning to go to Mars.

You were planning to go to a protest.

I just,

when Mechazilla, when it comes out and grabs one of those rockets,

Where were you?

You were trying to convince people that men are actually women.

Joe Biden was sharper than ever, and Kamala would save America.

Oh, and Donald Trump was a Nazi.

I think you should rethink things.

Well, let's not forget she was also trying to figure out what a disposal was.

She had no idea.

What's this thing in my sink that makes this noise?

Right.

She had no idea.

She had no idea.

And you're coming down on.

It's the wrong.

That's the wrong target.

That's how misguided they really are.

That Elon Musk, who are you going to convince that he's stupid?

Socially awkward?

Absolutely.

Yes.

Stupid?

No.

No, I don't think so.

I don't think so.

Let me talk to you about American financing.

Right now, the average American is still finding it difficult to pay expenses every month.

In most cases, there's nothing left to pay at the end.

Most aren't getting a raise, let alone a big raise.

Wouldn't a $10,000 raise change things for you?

Listen, if you're a homeowner and you're frustrated with that endless cycle that only produces more debt and has you using your credit card to rack up more debt because you have to, and your credit card interest is 20, 25, 30%,

American Financing can show you how to put your hard-earned equity to work and get you out of that debt.

The average salary-based mortgage consultant are saving their customers, you,

$800 a month.

That's on average.

If you get started today, you might not even have to make next month's mortgage payment.

No upfront fees.

It costs you nothing to find out how much you could be saving every month.

So just call American Financing at 800-906-2440-800-906-2440 or AmericanFinancing.net.

That's AmericanFinancing.net.

Now, back to the podcast.

You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program.

We welcome Mr.

Matt Kibby.

Hello, Matt.

Hey, Glenn.

So you, I can't even imagine what this documentary cost.

It is really, really good.

And we're up to episode number four.

Yes.

The cover-up.

And this is the one where

it all is laid out crystal clear with all of the evidence.

And it was so satisfying for me to watch because we had some of this evidence when I did a special, I don't even know, four years ago.

And you could connect the dots.

You could see it, but a lot of it wasn't there.

You had to take the leap of faith that, yes, that dot and that dot, they're only missing the connecting dot that I can't prove right now.

You have all of the connecting dots.

My wife, who doesn't really get into these things usually,

we were watching it last night and she watched it.

And I can't tell you how many times she went, Oh my gosh, oh, you've got what?

I mean, Fauci,

I believe, thinks he's God.

It is astounding how long he's been involved in this and how much power he has.

Take us from the beginning of this episode.

It's almost unbelievable, right?

When you watch this,

if we didn't have the receipts, you would think

you're just going all Alex Jones here.

Yeah.

And, you know, that was like...

Which, by the way, Alex Jones is starting to make more and more sense.

Right.

Yeah.

I say that as a compliment at this point because he warned us about so much of this.

And this starts with my very first conversation with Jay Bhattacharya.

And

he casually mentioned to me on my show the first time I interviewed him that this explosion of funding for

gain of function research happened after 9-11.

And I'm like, and that stuck with me ever since.

And what Richard Richard Ebright documents in this series is the origins of Fauci's power, the origins of the money, the origins of this mad science experiment that we were going to sort of weaponize viruses, supposedly in the name of biosecurity.

And it starts with Dick Cheney, who has an obsession about

the limits.

to the government's ability to develop bioweapons agents, again, ostensibly to keep us safe.

But it's

okay, go ahead.

It's so frustrating to watch

this twisted logic.

There is no reason to do this gain of function research.

Over and over and over again, Fauci had been asked, and he never answers the question.

And all scientists agree, it cannot be you.

You do not have to do this to find an antidote to this.

And I just, that's the one thing I was left thinking.

I mean,

is this almost an Operation paperclip Nazi kind of we have the power to create this evil stuff that could wipe out all of humanity?

Let's do it.

Yeah.

It reminds me of

a more evil version of nation building, this arrogance that says we could airdrop into another country and teach them Western values and teach them about our Constitution.

And suddenly there's property rights and there's rule of law and it works.

And it doesn't work.

It's a form of central planning, right?

It's a form of hubris.

And this takes it one step further because you're trying to...

to reimagine nature itself.

You're trying to re-engineer nature.

And

it starts with Cheney, but it also, you can even go back to Richard Nixon, who signed a

bioweapons

treaty that said we weren't going to do it.

And this is what Dick Cheney was chafing against.

And DOD and these other defense agencies had an office in their

agencies that made sure that they didn't violate that treaty.

But USAID, NIAID, NIH do not have compliance offices.

So it's a money laundering scheme to do these mad science experiments that they couldn't do legally otherwise.

And now, you know, Elon is revealing all of this.

You've been talking about it for years.

It's a really, really

evil, arrogant thing that happened.

Oh, evil.

Yeah.

Evil.

You know, when you see Fauci doubling down and doubling down, because he's been called on it for years.

Yeah.

And most people don't remember it.

I mean, it was front page New York Times and Washington Post for years.

The things that he was responsible for.

I mean, the bird flew.

How many chickens did we have to kill, Pat?

What was that?

145 million.

Hunt 2022.

145 million chickens.

You want to know why the price of eggs is up?

That's why.

Henicide.

Yeah.

And so we're killing them all.

Why are we,

what happened?

If I'm not mistaken, I learned last night in watching the cover-up that that's Fauci too.

Right.

There's more experiments that we even know about, but the ones that we know about start with...

So Cheney and Fauci and Fauci gets this huge pay raise to be the czar of gain of function research.

And one of his first projects was to recreate the Spanish flu, which did not exist on the planet Earth.

They actually dug up a body and recreated it from scratch.

And then they published how to do it in a science journal.

And Congress rightfully said, are you insane?

Fauci gets called in, and this is the first of many times he says, it's worth the risk.

I've decided it's worth the risk.

And the firestorm goes away.

And then there's various wild experiments with bird flu that come very close to catastrophic leaks out of labs.

Because every time that Fauci gets called before Congress, he says, we're going to up security.

We're going to develop protocols.

We're going to really focus on safety.

But they never really do it.

No, in fact, it seems to get worse every time.

It gets worse because the program expands expands and expands.

It's like this crazy quilt of countries and universities now that are doing this kind of research.

I mean, doing it in Ukraine.

Yeah.

Ukraine.

It's

I mean, it'll be the end of us if we don't stop it.

Right.

And

that's why I'm obsessed.

And that's why Ebright is obsessed.

That's why Rand Paul is obsessed.

And

you mentioned this, but it's fascinating to point out.

Everyone's like,

why did Biden give Fauci

a

blank check going back to 2014?

And this is well documented in this episode because starting in 2015 is when Fauci and Francis Collins, the head of the NIH, started willfully ignoring the law.

against gain-of-function research explicitly on coronaviruses.

So

here is my, um,

my only question, and I think I have the answer.

Why would Fauci do this?

There was like literally almost every scientist saying, don't do this.

There's no reason for this.

And he just keeps going into the most dangerous things we possibly can.

Why?

He's if if you know his history, he's the consummate apparatchic.

And when Dick Cheney goes to him and says, I have this idea, he's like, and Fauci's answer, I wasn't there, but Fauci surely said, hold my beer, I'll do that.

If you're going to give me all that money and power, I will do it.

If I have a chance to reimagine nature, I'm up for that task.

And he's written about it.

Like, I keep quoting this article that he and his now

probably going to jail partner, David Morins wrote a piece in Cell in 2020 talking about bending modernity and reimagining how we live our lives from where we live to how we travel to how we gather.

So he has this God complex.

And I don't know if he had it when he said yes.

He might have just been being a good bureaucrat and saying, well, oh, wow, lots of money.

I could grow my power.

You're going to pay me a lot more.

But in that echo chamber over the next 20 years, where every scientist, I mean, you went from the scientific community blowing the whistle and saying, this is crazy.

It gets a little quieter every time that Fauci is caught doing something because at some point they're all on the payroll.

And if you want to stick your neck out like Richard Ebright did, you might lose all of your NIH grants.

You might lose your university position because your university is addicted to all of this gain of function funding.

So they've bought and paid for science itself and corrupted the process to the point where

we shouldn't trust the science because it is not science.

It is this mad science arrogant project.

When Fauci said

disagreeing with me is disagreeing with science, Was that a God complex or was that a I fund all the science?

So

disagree with all you want, but I control the science.

Yeah, I think it's both.

And I do think that when Rand Paul started questioning him, he had never, ever faced someone that was both skeptical and informed.

And so he's been able to BS his way past senators and congressmen because you can sort of throw a bunch of words and science-y stuff at them, and you can change the definition of gain of function research.

And virtually no one, except for a few people that have either done their research or have been following him, have any idea that he's just lying to you.

So I think it was both.

At that point, he was, in his own mind, the god of science.

But he also wasn't used to people questioning his authority.

Like I said, when I first started talking about this today, my wife and I watched it last night, and she gasped several times.

So did I.

And you won't believe it.

I mean, just talking about it here does not do this justice.

In seeing what Fauci has done and what we're dealing with now all over the world and how it is still growing,

you will be saying to President Trump and RFK and Bhattachari and everybody else, arrest this man.

Stop this right now.

Because if, like you said, you know, you know how I feel about AI.

That is, that is, we're just, it's nitroglycerin in a paint shaker.

Hey, let's give that a whirl.

This is probably closer to killing us right now because all it takes is one mistake in any of these crazy labs.

And nobody's talking about it.

Nobody is admitting it.

It's got to be,

it has to be completely exposed.

Every name needs to come out.

There needs to be punishments for it and all of it burnt in an incinerator.

Yeah.

And it'll be a lot like a nuclear weapons arsenal.

And this is something that Dr.

Ebray talks about as well.

The risk grows exponentially as you expand the program.

Because if you have a couple of universities, if you have a couple labs doing this, you know where it is.

But now it's all over the place.

And you've got all these people.

Somebody mad, somebody disgruntled, somebody just stupid, somebody makes a mistake.

Every time this program grows.

Yeah, by the way, and this is something we also talk about,

the anthrax attacks,

which conveniently happen one month after 9-11.

Well, we eventually learn, or at least are told, that it was in fact a government-financed lab that had access to anthrax

that allegedly

caused this, which paved the way for all of this funding that we're talking about.

It wasn't just the Patriot Act.

It was additional legislation that massively expanded the money that Fauci would get control of.

I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but oddly enough, the guy that was accused of doing that committed suicide before he could be prosecuted.

No, that stood out to me yesterday, too.

Yeah.

You're streaming the best of Glenn Beck.

To hear more of this interview and others, download the full show podcasts wherever you get podcasts.

Okay, let's talk a little bit about USAID, but let's go back in a time machine and show you the times that we have addressed them clearly on this program.

We start, I think, back in 2012 or 2014.

I have a picture here of an

al-Qaeda leader, and they are in a U.S.

aid tent.

Look who signed the check for the initial $200,000 payment to the Islamic Relief Agency, the United States Agency for International Development.

The more you look into USAID, the more shocked you will become.

USAID was running a top-secret espionage program to undermine Cuba and push people to dissent.

Now, let me show you how much money we're talking about.

It included a billion-dollar sovereign loan guarantee, $320 million in general assistance.

So where else beside the NIA

has money been coming from?

By far, the largest donors are from USAID and the Department of Defense.

Judicial Watch found that the U.S.

State Department and USAID had been giving millions to the Macedonian arm of George Soros's Open Society Foundation.

What for?

To train youth movements.

So, USAID, and those are always, they're known by anybody who pays attention as CIA fronts.

This is, you know, the USAID comes into a country, they start doing things, and next thing you know, we've got a revolution on our hands because that's the CIA.

So, we've been talking about this for years.

And if you've been listening to us and watching our specials, you know all about USAID.

But now, finally, finally, it's being exposed.

And

Joni Ernst

has been after them for quite a while but they've been issuing threats first they wouldn't talk to her at all

and they were saying

no we don't have a system to track or report you know any of this funding she's like wait a minute you're not tracking any of the money that goes out.

You have no way to track if it made a difference at all.

That doesn't make any sense.

Can you tell us the indirect costs?

Can you tell us what you're spending to get that money?

Remember, like Mercury One, we make a promise to you, everything we raise during

a problem,

when we've got a hurricane or something, everything that I raise at that time, 100% goes downstream to that problem.

Can't be anything else.

So how much money?

You don't track that?

Like every

charity in the world is required to track that, but you don't?

No, uh-uh, no,

we don't do that.

And then Ernst

debunked this by sending USAID a link to a publicly reported database that shows things.

And they say, well, we, yeah, okay, we track it, but we don't want to, you ready?

We don't want to violate the Economic Espionage Act.

or the Protection of Trade Secrets Act or the disclosure of

Confidential Information Act.

So

we can't do that.

We have to protect our confidential business information.

So they wouldn't talk about the partners.

They wouldn't talk about anything.

Nothing.

So

they launched an investigation.

And

again,

USAID said, nope, we can't give you anything.

Gosh darn it.

We can't tell you about any of our partners or anything at all.

Would we like to?

We would love to.

We just can't find a pencil.

If we could just find a pencil, we could write it all down for you.

Okay, so this has been going on for years, 1961.

This is a CIA

operation.

By the way, I told you last hour, the president just offered everyone in the CIA eight-month severance if you leave now.

If I had been involved in any black operation,

I'd be panicking right now.

If I were the guy who was like, look, I am not taking the fall for you, I'd be blowing the whistle right now.

I might be going to my congressman going, hey, I got to tell you what they've been doing.

Can you protect me?

Because I'll give you all the goods on that.

I would be doing that right now because they are going to open up.

You know, when.

Elon Musk described USAID and he said, you know, when you have an apple and you have a worm in it, you get the worm out.

But when you have a ball of worms, you throw it away.

And he said, that's what it is.

This is a ball of worms.

Yeah.

Yeah.

And instead of focusing on that, the media and the left are focused on how dare you shut down this agency.

I know, I know.

Who are you to do that?

By the way, we found with this according to Joni Ernst, with very limited data, they discovered that

USAID spent anywhere from 50 to 60 on the indirect cost, which ranged from rent in Paris to a fancy dinner to entertain whomever.

You'd be shut down.

Just for that.

Shut down.

40%.

40 or 50% is going to your project.

You'd shut that down.

No one would donate to that.

So how?

Just

answer this.

I love this because it couldn't happen to a nicer group of people.

Where is your moral stand?

How dare you expose

this waste of taxpayer money?

You know, if they've wasted $200,000

on just one thing,

you most likely, your whole life will never pay $200,000, $300,000 in taxes.

Your whole life, and it's just gone.

They have wasted billions of dollars and not just wasted it.

This is going elsewhere.

I said to you during the first, what was it, $50 billion that we're not sending accountants over to Ukraine to follow.

I said,

this is a slush fund.

This money is going elsewhere.

This is not doing what.

Otherwise, if you're responsible and you really believe that we needed to do these things, then you would have sent accountants with it to make sure in the most corrupt country in the world that it was going where we said, I think some of that money, you watch, it'll come back, some of that money I think came back to the United States and was paying for revolutionaries on the streets.

I wouldn't doubt that USAID money was being used to,

I don't know.

Did they need, I mean, I would think you would have to hire people to come out with Chuck Schumer on Monday after the weekend, and USAID is, oh man, they're tearing it down.

That's like tearing down the Statue of Liberty.

I got to get into the streets.

Who is saying, I got to get to Washington to protest with Chuck Schumer?

There is no moral leg to stand on here.

Oh, I'm so mad they're exposing this.

Wait.

Wait, what?

When they go after the treasury now

and they say

he has no right to expose this, wait, wait, wait.

You're more upset that people are going in and exposing it than the fact that the Treasury

has rubber stamped every single penny.

That, what was it, the IRS spents $300,000 a month on coffee cups.

Coffee cups.

How much coffee do these damn people need?

Let's buy them all ceramic mugs.

I mean, I think we, you know, wash it and reuse it.

$300,000?

What?

A month?

Come on.

Come on.

And

you're upset that that's been exposed.

Me think not.

And like you mentioned, it's been going on not just for a couple of years.

It's been going on since 1961.

Oh, I know.

I know.

And they're making a big deal out of the fact that this unelected agency is overseeing this and looking into it when it was just started by JFK.

He just, this was not started by Congress.

It was codified later, but like in the late 90s by Congress.

So

that's a sacred organization that the founders set up.

You know what I think happened in the the late 90s?

Because I am convinced that Joe Biden learned how to steal from the United States

and

get money from allies and enemies from Hillary and Bill Clinton.

So I'll bet you USAID, they're like, nobody's watching this.

Nobody is watching this store.

Why don't we just give money to these NGOs?

Our friends are all running NGOs.

Are you kidding me?

Do you know how much money we could pull off the top?

Because no one is looking.

And even with the best, even with the best intentions, which I don't give them, even with the best intentions of saying, you know what, we can just funnel some of this money to do black ops someplace else.

I think they started, well, we know they did.

I reported it in, what, 2017.

That's what they were doing in

Benghazi.

That's what they were doing in Ukraine.

They were setting these things up and then they were funneling money to the bad guys.

They were funneling money to George Soros.

You don't think you should know about that?

Chuck Schumer doesn't think you should know about that?

Which one is the fascist?

Which one answers to the people?

The one that opens their books?

Just as you are required to every tax day?

Just as every single aid organization and charity has to open their books all the time, and they go over it with a fine-tooth comb, believe me, we have to do it.

Why doesn't a government agency that is running billions of dollars through their front door and their back door,

we don't have a right to check.

We, the people, don't have a right to ask our treasury, hey, what's happening with all this money?

That ain't gonna, that's not gonna go well for them.

It's not gonna go well for them.

These things need to be released.

and released clearly as soon as we have it because what the press is saying right now is oh well there's there's conservatives that are saying that there's a waste of money, maybe a little waste of money.

You know, that happens in big government and things like that.

No, no, no, no, no.

We're saying this agency was using money at first to topple regimes that were not friendly to the United States, and they learned, and they learned they could topple the United States by using our money.

That's what USAID is.

Period.