Best of the Program | 5/23/24
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Listen and follow along
Transcript
Introducing the you rules of value from Burger King and you rule number one: you choose food you actually want.
There's seven tasty options.
So try the five-dollar duo or seven-dollar trio.
Choose your deal.
Price and participation vary.
US-only, no substitutions, restrictions apply.
Oh, some huge news today.
I mean, this is groundbreaking.
The Justice Department has come out and
hates break it like this to you.
It's shocking.
They've just come out and said the Hunter Biden laptop is real.
Now,
we have some other shocking news on today's podcast.
I hear there was some sort of leak with the Titanic.
We'll try to get to that information from the Justice Department later as well.
You don't want to miss today's podcast, and here it is.
Let me tell you about my Patriot supply.
When it comes to your own home, you're in charge of holding down the fort.
Well,
if you're in New York, good luck with that.
Now that means, you know, being ready in case of, you know, a robber or a natural or economic disaster, holding down the fort when things really go south, and they're going to go fast.
Remember, how did, how did this the old saying, how did your company go bankrupt?
Over a long period of time, and then all of a sudden, When this happens, our country is going to be all of a sudden overnight.
I mean, you read the diaries diaries of people from, and believe me, I have no life, I did this, read the diaries of people from
Germany in the Weimar Republic when they started hyperinflation.
No one knew what the word was,
kind of like Zillian.
Nobody knew what the word even meant.
One week later,
their diaries say that
everybody is talking about hyperinflation.
It happens over a long period of time and then all of a sudden, please be ready.
MypatriotSupply.com, they've been out since 2008.
They've helped millions of Americans get ready.
They are the biggest, I think, in the world, and they're really good food.
That's why they're so huge and popular.
Their best-selling three-month emergency food kit, flying off the shelves now, and you can get it at mypatriotsupply.com.
2,000 calories every day, ultra-durable four-layer packaging, lasts 25 years in storage, and it is really good.
And you can get all the kits you need for $200 off each kit, shipping included.
You've been warned about black swans.
The sky over America is almost all covered in black swans.
One of them just has to land.
MypatriotSupply.com.
That's mypatriotsupply.com.
You're listening to the best of the blend back program.
Let's say hello to our executive producer, Mr.
Stuberge.
Hello, Stu.
Hello, Stuberge.
That's you.
I don't know if you know that.
I don't know about you, Stu, but I am gravely,
gravely concerned that we have somebody, anybody, let alone a Supreme Court justice, who would fly a flag
upside down.
I don't know what that means other than we all have to kill each other for Donald Trump,
but he did that, and now he's flown another flag at his beach house.
And he's got to stop.
Well, the upside-down flag, as we know, is a symbol of January 6th, Glenn.
That is what it is.
It was in the headline of the New York Times.
I mean, sure, down in paragraph 18, they mentioned that
dozens of groups basically have been using this for a long time to show distress for the country.
Well, I hate to point this out, but it does,
that's exactly if your ship is in trouble and you're at sea, you fly your flag upside down as a symbol that we're in distress.
We're sinking, we've been taken over, whatever it is,
we're out of refreshments,
and you fly your flag upside upside down, and it means
ship in distress.
If you fly it, this is all flag code, by the way, if you fly it upside down on your home or your building or whatever, it is a symbol that the nation is in distress.
Now,
I haven't noticed.
any kind of distress,
you know.
I just haven't noticed if there's any problems that seem like, gee,
we should concentrate on that or maybe even bend a knee and appeal to heaven.
But he did.
He apparently thinks that the nation's in distress.
Well, at least his wife did, which is seemingly who actually flew the flag upside down.
And then also...
Damn wives.
You know what I mean?
Yeah.
And then also, you know, I think in the days after January 6th, I think no matter what side of the argument you're on, the idea that the nation was in distress is probably a good take.
You know, I don't know if people remember this, but everyone,
including now some of the people that were just walking around the Capitol, they found this abhorrent.
They found what happened.
It was not the darkest day since the Civil War.
It was maybe the darkest day since the left in the 1980s set off a bomb inside the Capitol.
That was a pretty dark day, and it was akin to that.
Maybe the darkest day since a Bernie Sanders campaign volunteer tried to assassinate 20% of the elected Republicans in Washington.
Thank you.
There's a lot of dark days you can point to.
I don't know.
But it wasn't a good day.
It wasn't that dark day.
Yeah, it wasn't a good day.
Nobody was proud of what was going on.
At least I was, and all of my friends looked at that and said, that's not who we are.
And I don't care if you're a Republican or Democrat.
We were all offended by that.
But the media has made this into Republicans just loved it.
And that's just not true.
Anyway,
anyone, anyone, you know, Democrats, if you really felt the way I felt on January 6th, which I think you did,
you could have flown your flag upside down because it shows a nation in distress.
And that's clear on that day,
no matter who you voted for the nation was in distress the republic was at stake can we all agree to that now they're trying to tie that to January 6th and make that a symbol of January 6th
it is not
when you tie it to January 6th you now destroy another tradition of America.
I have flown my flag upside down before.
I don't remember what was going on in the world, but there was something going on in the world, and I flew my flag upside down for about a week.
Now, I happen to have a flagpole that's in the mountains, and nobody would see it, but my family saw it, and
I flew it upside down.
I have also committed the crime that we now know,
Justice Alito's beach house.
They also flew another flag last summer.
First of all, they flew a 2022 Phillies flag.
I don't,
I think we all are quite aware of the Phillies connection to January 6th,
but they then flew the Appeal to Heaven flag.
I'm just going to let that sit with you for a while so I understand.
Yeah, the flag that was, you know,
the design came from George Washington
and it's appeal to heaven.
You know,
so
that's
at least in the summer months to fly that.
I think we all know what he was saying, right?
Maybe appeal to heaven.
Maybe that would be it.
By the way, let me just tell you a little bit about that flag in case you don't know.
That's the flag with a pine tree.
It's white.
There's also a red one, which I'll get to in a second, but there's a white one and it says an appeal to heaven.
It has a pine tree on it.
That was the symbol of New England since the 16th century.
Why?
Because New England had big pine trees.
Why was that important?
Because they could build ships.
and build them for England or whoever and ship giant masts which were hard to find because nobody had the giant pine trees that New England had.
So they would build these masts out of the trees
and they would sell them.
So it was a big business in the first place.
So that's one reason the pine tree was there.
But also
after warring for decades, the leaders of of five nations, the Seneca, the Cayuga, the Onega, Oneida, and Mohawks,
they had been warring with each other forever.
But there was a great leader, he was called the Great Peacemaker.
He was with the Iroquois.
He convinced all of them to bury their weapons under a pine tree.
The Great Peacemaker did that.
So it is also the symbol of the tree of peace.
Isn't that
interesting?
Now, it was so crazy, that symbol, that it actually was on the
currency in the 17th century, so the 1600s.
Also, it was on the coinage produced by the Massachusetts Bay Colony, and it became the symbol of the colonial iron resistance as well as a multi-tribal support for independence.
Now where did that come from?
Because it says an appeal to heaven.
Well it's kind of interesting.
It comes from now this Stu
buckle up
because I'm about to mention a true radical
and this will tell you everything you know.
The phrase appeal to heaven is an expression of the right oh boy.
Oh no.
Yeah.
The right of revolution.
And that right of revolution and the appeal to heaven comes directly from that outrageous killer, John Locke.
Oh, wow.
You want to talk about a controversial figure?
I mean, John Locke, right?
You know, you've got to, if you, if you like John Locke, you might like the Enlightenment.
Yeah.
You might.
You know?
You might.
And then where, how, how far does that go?
So let me just, let me, let me just boil this down.
I have more.
Let me just boil this down.
This flag is first a sign of the pine tree as trade.
Okay.
It is also a sign of peace among the Indians.
It is then added to that
the appeal to heaven comes from John Locke.
And what he wrote in 1690
was
a refute of the theory of the divine right of kings.
So, I mean, everybody loves having a king, right?
Sure, of course.
So, this is an anti-king
flag.
Now, when I say anti-king, what I mean is not a, not necessarily a revolution.
You have a right to a revolution, but here's what this means.
And I quote, where the body of people or any single man is deprived of their right or is under the exercise of a power without right, in other words, the divine right of kings, I'm king, so I make up all the rights because God tells me.
If you are living under the exercise of a power without right
and have no appeal on earth, meaning you can't go to a judge, you can't go to anybody because of the divine right of kings.
I have no way to have anyone protect my right.
Then you have the liberty to appeal to heaven.
Huh.
How very controversial in the United States of America.
Now let me tell you another reason why I believe Alito has an appeal to heaven.
I always interpreted that flag as an appeal to heaven for common sense and for help, please, Lord, help us.
And it would go right along with an upside-down flag, now wouldn't it?
We're in distress.
Can we please look to God and beg for His mercy and guidance?
How unbelievably controversial is that to say, from the people who tell us democracy is about to be lost,
who fly a flag that says we're a nation in distress.
Now you may not believe in God, but a lot of us do believe in God, and a lot of us now look at these problems, this distress, and say there is no other answer but to appeal to God for mercy and guidance.
So that might be the reason he flew those flags.
Also, let me just tell you something else.
Do you know what Alito did
a couple of summers back?
Do you know what he did?
Do you know, Stu?
I mean, I know it's bad, but no, I don't know specifically.
It's horrible.
He's the guy who wrote the Dobbs decision.
Oh, no.
Okay, so there's reason number one for the attack, but also let's look at it from Alito's point of view.
That decision was leaked and led to people in the streets trying to, in front of their houses, trying to kill Supreme Court justices.
I think he might also have another reason for saying it's a nation in stress,
especially since
every single Supreme Court justice knows who leaked the decision.
Every single one of them.
Everybody in Washington who is, who was part of the Supreme Court, was part of the investigation, they all know who leaked the decision, but no one paid the price.
If there's no judge that can judge you on earth because they're unrighteous and not doing the things that they're supposed to be doing under the Bill of Rights, you appeal to heaven.
And according to that great scandalous monster, John Locke,
that's your right.
All right.
Let me tell you about real estate agents I trust.
Once upon a time, it was sort of kind of just a given that if you had a job to do, you would do it well.
You'd do it right the first time so you didn't have to do it over and over again.
I listened to my grandfather on that one after
he made me.
We were working on a chicken barn and I don't remember what I had to do, but he made me redo it three times.
And he was like, it would have been easier if you would have done it the first time right.
And I'm like, yeah, but I'm lazy.
Anyway, you don't want people like I was, you know, before my grandfather taught me that lesson.
You want somebody who knows the job, knows how to do it right, really good real estate agents when you're selling your house.
Somebody who has a big Rolodex, has people coming to their website already looking for a house like yours.
I started a business a few years ago, it is called Real Estate Agents I Trust.
We vet these people six ways to Sunday.
We have a, I think, a 10,000 agent waiting list, but we can't vet them all.
Realestateagents I trust.com.
Go there now, tell us where you're moving to or selling, and we'll help you.
Realestateagents I trust.com.
Now, back to the podcast.
This is the best of the Glenn Beck program, and we really want to thank you for listening.
All right.
Let's see.
First, let me give you some shocking news.
Really shocking news, too.
This is going to...
I don't know how they do it, but the Biden Justice Department has just come out
and announced that Hunter Biden laptop is real.
It's real.
It's real.
What?
Yeah.
Meaning that he just has a laptop.
No, no, no.
The one that has all the porn and everything, they now can verify that it's real.
Wow.
That's incredible.
I thought for sure
it wasn't.
I mean, there was only all of the evidence on earth to prove that it was real.
And I'm glad they got around to this.
They come out with something else as well, just as shocking.
And I don't please, please pull over on the side of the road because this may come as a great shock.
Not only is Hunter Biden's laptop real,
I understand from the Justice Department, now this is from inside sources, President Reagan has been shot.
President Reagan.
Yes, and we don't know.
He's on his way to the hospital.
We don't know if he's even been wounded or not, but they're taking him right to the hospital.
Well, and I kind of assume if he's been shot, maybe there is a wound.
Well, maybe.
We don't know.
We don't know.
He was just pushed into the car.
We know James Brady has been shot, and it looks pretty bad.
Looks pretty bad.
That's terrible news.
So we should read a law or something and name it after Brady.
But let's not get ahead of ourselves.
Let's see what happens.
Does this have anything to do with
the gunman's love of a Hollywood actress of any sort?
Oh, my gosh.
Look at...
This is the kind of malinformation that you get, okay?
Stu hates Hollywood, hates everything about Hollywood, and you find find out that President Reagan, for the first time, five, ten seconds into it, and you immediately blame it on a Hollywood.
You're sick, Stu.
You're really sick.
Again, the breaking news from the Justice Department.
Hunter Biden's laptop is
real.
What would we do without this government?
I mean, besides be free and prosperous.
I mean, what would we do?
Now, let me get into some,
let me get in.
Well, let me start with some kind of weird science.
You know,
the big seven, I'd love somebody who is a,
you know, a kind of a,
I don't know, an internet mole to do an analysis on this and send it to me.
But
the big seven are these corporations that are really moving the stock market.
Okay.
It's seven companies.
My guess is these seven companies are all in the the public-private partnership thing.
I don't know that.
It's just a guess.
I'd love to have some, you know, some analyst look at that
and
just provide some evidence of that, but that's my guess.
Anyway, Microsoft, oh, one of the big seven.
Microsoft came out with a new feature in their PC, and I want you to hear them describe it.
Here it is.
Cut one.
One of the dreams we've always had is how do we introduce memory, right?
Photographing memory into what you do on the PC.
And now we have it.
So it's called recall.
It's not keyword search, right?
It's semantic search over all your history.
And it's not just about any document.
We can recreate moments from the past, essentially.
Here's how it works.
Windows constantly takes screenshots of what's on your screen, then uses a generative AI model right on the device, along with the NPU, to process all that data and make it searchable, even photos.
I got to try it out.
I searched brown
leather bag.
It came up in Visual Search.
There's no place on this page that it says brown leather bag.
It just knows because it sees this brown leather bag.
There could be this reaction from some people that this is pretty creepy.
Microsoft is taking screenshots of everything I do.
Yeah, I mean, that's why it can only do it on the edge, right?
So this is like, you know, you have to put two things together.
This is my computer.
This is my recall.
And it's all being done locally, right?
So that's the promise.
So that's one of the reasons why recall works as a magical thing because I can trust it
that it is on my computer.
Okay, good.
I'm glad we can trust it.
From the company of Bill Gates,
we can trust it.
It's never going to do anything with that information.
I have terrible news for them for what people do with their computers.
This is going to be a real awakening for these poor people who think they're using spreadsheets all the time.
This is just not good news around this.
You're saying that there's some things on your computer you wouldn't want
people to know.
I mean, I want Microsoft to know it, of course.
I am definitely a huge fan of that.
But I don't know.
It just seems to me that like maybe
the obvious joke here being porn, but like, what about like your financial information?
Like, every single
I would not what could go wrong?
I go to my wife's computer and she's disreputable.
This wouldn't happen to my wife, but she's, you know, she's, you know, disreputable.
And I go on our computer and I'm thinking I want to find out what she wants, you know, for Christmas.
And so I search brown bag.
I wonder what
could possibly go wrong there.
This is not.
I don't.
No, I'm just talking purses, Stu.
That's all I'm talking about.
Of course, obviously.
That's what you're talking about.
It would not turn out well.
I would say.
No, it would not turn out well.
No.
This is just not a good idea.
This is not a good idea, I think, for anyone.
Why would anyone want this?
I don't know.
I know why Microsoft would want it.
I know why the government would want it.
Let me go back again.
This is cut 17
from the World Economic Forum's Yaval Noah Harari, which he is one of the big guys in the World Economic Forum.
He is the leader now of
AI philosophy and futurist philosophically.
I just want you to hear about what he says this kind of technology can do.
Now, this is two years ago.
What this kind of technology can do.
COT 17.
A system
that understands us better than we understand ourselves, can predict our feelings and decisions, can manipulate our feelings and decisions, and can ultimately make decisions for us.
Soon, at least some corporations and governments will be able to systematically hack all the people.
We humans should get used to the idea that we are no longer mysterious souls.
We are now hackable animals.
So what does that mean?
Well, it means they can hack you
and know what you're thinking before you even know you're thinking.
They will be able to predict, because of all of the data they have on you and all of the real-time data they have on you, they will be able to predict.
Anybody seen the movie Minority Report?
Yeah, kind of like that.
Beyond that, what he's talking about is hacking you, it will make decisions for you.
Now, I don't want anyone making decisions for me, and that's the problem right now.
The government seems to be making all of these decisions for us, telling us exactly how we have to live.
But imagine propaganda that is so subtle, so good, and so tailored to you
that you you don't know its propaganda.
So all of a sudden you're saying, you know, these 15-minute cities, you know, honey, we don't ever have to fly again.
We could sell our credits to rich people so they can fly.
That's what he's talking about.
There has to be
a law passed in Washington that protects our data.
You need to own your own data.
Now, what else could possibly go wrong?
Well, let me tell you now about
the first
head transplant.
This is an insane medical breakthrough.
In fact, let's just play part of the
video on it.
Here it is.
Introducing Brain Bridge, the world's first revolutionary concept for a head transplant machine, which uses state-of-the-art robotics and artificial intelligence to conduct complete head and face transplantation procedures, ensuring smooth outcomes and faster recoveries.
Because head transplants require high speed, precision, and efficiency, BrainBridge utilizes advanced high-speed, high-precision robotic systems to speed up the process, eliminate human error, prevent brain cell degradation, and ensure seamless compatibility.
The head transplant procedure involves removing a person's entire head containing the brain from their current diseased body, then attaching it to the body of a healthy, young, brain-dead donor.
HET transplants could provide individuals with severe medical conditions such as terminal cancer, paralysis, spinal cord injuries, or neurodegenerative diseases, the opportunity to have a fully functional body while preserving their consciousness, memories, and cognitive abilities.
The neurons neurons are the longest-lasting functional cells in the human body, and according to our estimates, the brain is capable of lasting several hundred years, provided that the rest of the body remains young.
Did you hear that?
As long as the body remains young,
the head, the brain, can last several hundred years.
All we'll need
are bodies.
Now, these will be bodies of brain-dead people, I'm sure.
We won't, I mean, you won't suddenly wake up with a, oh, I don't know, Chinese gulag body.
No, that'll never happen.
But as long as we have healthy bodies, we'll be able, no, no, no.
Some of us will be able to live forever.
How exciting is that?
Now, they said, you know, because brain, you know, brain body transplants are difficult.
No, right now, they're impossible.
You can't do that.
They've had one attempt recently in Russia, and I believe the guy went insane
and died.
The same thing that happens with monkeys.
They transplant the brains or they transplant the heads of monkeys on on other monkeys, and we can do it, but they all go insane.
But nothing to worry about there.
Science, that doesn't sound, does that sound spooky to you at all, Stu?
Not at all.
That sounds like, honestly, it honestly sounded like a promo for like an
underground promotional campaign for a sci-fi film.
Like that's it, it didn't even seem real.
Yeah.
It also sounds like a recruiting film for,
you know, organ harvesting and body harvesting, quite honestly.
Here's cut two.
The brain bridge concept involves the use of the integrated robotics platform comprised of the two autonomous surgical robots designed to perform simultaneous surgeries on two bodies side by side within a single setup.
The complete robotization of the process allows for the surgery to be performed in an environment with varying temperature and pressure.
The procedure begins by preparing the donor and recipient bodies.
The donor is a brain-dead patient who has a functional body with vital organs in good condition, while the recipient is the patient whose head will be transplanted onto the new body.
General anesthesia is administered to both the recipient and the donor.
Both patients undergo tracheotomy, with a tube inserted into the trachea to provide respiratory support and facilitate mechanical ventilation.
Our proprietary artificial plasma solution is administered to both the recipient and the donor.
This solution is designed to keep the brain and body oxygenated, prevent clotting, and allow for safe operation at low temperatures.
The recipient's head and the donor body are cooled to approximately 5 degrees Celsius to reduce potential brain damage during the detachment.
Guided by advanced real-time molecular level imaging systems, BrainBridge carefully separates the heads from the two bodies with the help of a specialized surgical technique that preserves the spinal cord and key blood vessels.
Deep incisions are carefully made around the neck to expose the necessary structures, including the carotid and vertebral arteries, jugular veins, and spine.
With the help of specialized AI algorithms, BrainBridge tracks both muscles and nerves during surgery to facilitate seamless reattachment.
Next, incisions are made in the trachea, esophagus, veins, and arteries.
The blood is then completely drained from the recipient's head to prevent climate.
How is this real?
The recipient's head is then positioned adjacent to the donated body using a mobile platform.
Brainbridge immediately connects the detached head to the circulatory system of the donor body, which helps maintain blood flow during the rest of the procedure.
It also re-warms the recipient's head and provides it with oxygenated blood.
With the help of its ultra-precision surgical instruments, BrainBridge begins reconnecting the spinal cord, esophagus, trachea, nerves, blood vessels, and other tissues.
This is not science fiction, and it is great in some degree.
But as I told you, this is eight years away, they say.
By 2030, you will not be able to keep up with the changes that are coming your way.
Everything is about to change.
This is the best of the Glenn Beck program.
So let's start with Bill Maher on Megan Kelly yesterday.
She was talking to Bill Maher about
election deniers, and here's what happened.
I'm talking about the difference between this and something fundamental, which is our democracy.
The fact that you have to respect who wins an election or else you don't have the kind of country we've always had before.
How about?
I mean, I feel like we keep going around the Roseberry
Bush about this and we're not going to make any progress.
So let's stop talking about it.
But, you know,
I just, I mean, you keep saying sort of I'm nuts because I don't see the difference between the elephant and the mouse.
And I'm telling you, I identify them differently than you do.
Hillary Clinton, of course, is the original election denier.
I'm sure you voted for her in 16.
Well, she's not an election denier.
She absolutely was the OG election denier.
First first of all she came out before the sun had risen to concede the election to trump and then spent the next four years saying he was illegitimate he was an illegitimate president she okay well first of all saying so she didn't say he was an illegitimate
tell me exactly what she said she said those exact words repeatedly
okay
oops
yeah see you know the one thing i wish megan would have had were all these clips, because I think Bill Maher
is one of these guys
that
has not listened to anything other than the mainstream media for years.
And so he's, if you do that, you don't really understand
what's happened.
in our country.
I don't even know how you make sense of things if you've been listening just to the mainstream media.
And so these people hear things
and they hear it from our point of view.
And if you have the clips, it is so easy to make the point.
You can go, no, wait a minute, wait a minute.
I understand what you're saying about Trump.
I got it.
I got it.
And yes, he said all of those things.
Let me play this for you and tell me the difference.
And they do what Bill Maher just did.
Okay.
Now, Biden crimes.
Listen to this conversation with Bill Maher and Megan Kelly.
You only get two choices.
That's right.
You get Donald Trump, a criminal,
election denier who is going to transform this country into an authoritarian place like we've never seen before, or you get Joe Biden with all his flaws.
Also a criminal.
Okay, what is his crime again?
Special Counsel Robert Hurst said he committed felonies, but he wouldn't indict him because he was a well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.
He couldn't get a conviction in front of a jury.
And what was that crime?
That was the...
Classified documents.
All over his basement, his garage, everywhere.
Well, okay, here's the difference.
Immediately, Biden, he shouldn't have had them.
Immediately, he said, oh, sorry, my bad, and gave them back.
That's why he didn't get charged with obstruction.
But Trump has two classified documents, pieces to his case.
One is you had them, and the second is you obstructed justice when we demanded them back.
So, okay, against Biden, you don't get charged with obstruction.
But number one, where's the classified documents charged against him he's also a felon
you got your story you know I
look why can't the difference be one actually had the ability to declassify documents and keep them because he'd been the president and one didn't because he should have been looking at documents only in a skiff while a sitting U.S.
Senator and clearly he stole classified documents that he wasn't entitled to and never had the ability to declassify them
yeah
maybe Maybe you know more about that than I do.
I don't remember that part of it.
See what I mean?
You don't want to mess with Megan on this stuff, man.
No, you don't.
You don't want to do that.
You don't.
But we should all be able to.
I couldn't have made that argument that fast,
you know, but she's obviously really well prepared.
And if I'm going into a debate with Bill Maher, I would be prepared for all of that.
But
we have to have
the basic facts down because what happens the reason why we are
just being destroyed is because the media is dumbing all of us down the media is teaching us to name-call
election denier a Nazi a fascist
that doesn't go anywhere it doesn't it doesn't when when he said you know he's doing fascistic things he's going to make this into a country like you haven't seen
Could we just talk about some of the things that have been passed by executive order and the number of executive orders that have been passed?
Executive orders and
what do you call them?
You know, decisions from the cabinet, when agencies make new rules, that's not the way our system works.
When they say we're going to get rid of all gas stoves,
that's not a republic, that's not a democracy.
That's an out-of-control government that
is making dictates.
We just need to get better at it because we have clearly the winning side on this.
But while I'm at
a dictatorship or a republic or as they say, a democracy,
we're not a democracy.
Democracy plays a role in the republic, and that is one vote, one man.
One man, one vote.
You have a right to express and vote.
And then the republic part comes in, where you have
elected somebody to represent you, your values, and your ideas in Washington or in the state government.
But when the people are speaking loudly and saying, this is what we want, you have to question your republic when
the only reason they don't do it is political reasons.
So let me tell you about what's happening in Idaho and Oregon.
Another right-leaning county.
Now, these counties in eastern Oregon, if you've ever driven through Oregon, it's a beautiful state, but the coastline is crazy, okay?
It is
far, far, far left people.
Always has been.
That's fine.
However, they also are people that don't necessarily relate to or like farmers.
Now, if you look at me, you recognize I like to eat.
I think there should be a few people out there that like to eat.
And our farmers are being destroyed by regulations that are coming from the state house because the population of the farmers is nowhere close to the people who are, you know, wearing Birkenstocks and hugging trees.
So to save the farms, to be able to be represented at all, they want to secede.
And I know that's a
bad word to secede, but it is constitutional.
There is a way for it to happen.
The first thing that has to happen is the counties in the state all have to vote to secede.
Now, what they're saying is they want a greater Idaho.
Idaho, especially southern and mid, is all farmers.
Idaho is in trouble because all of the crazies have moved up from California and they're occupying Boise and some of the
ski resort areas up in northern Idaho.
And that leaves probably at least half the state of farmers going, what the hell is going on?
What are you doing?
And so the farmers are losing representation, as they did in Oregon.
So all of these counties have had enough of being ruled by people in Portland.
They don't have anything in relation.
So now 13 counties, there's only only one, two,
three
counties, I think, maybe four counties left to vote to secede and become Greater Idaho.
That's the democracy.
Now,
republics are meant to slow things down and to argue and to
make sure the people,
the will of the people reflects with sanity.
It's not just some knee-jerk, we're at war, they hit me in the face, we got to go to war.
The Republic Part slows that down, but it should reflect the will of the people when if the people are sane.
There's an unbelievable case to be made for Greater Idaho.
What has to happen now is there's really one more county that really needs to vote.
The rest of them are on the edge, but one is kind of up at the top of the middle.
Do we have the map that we can show if you're watching Blaze TV of Greater Idaho?
It makes Oregon just a sliver.
It's all the coastline.
Quite honestly, it's the most beautiful part of Oregon.
And that makes that Oregon, and it makes it super liberal.
It makes Idaho the same.
A bunch of farmers that are conservatives.
What has to happen now
is
the state of Idaho, the representatives, need to vote, is this in Idaho's best interest?
And then the Oregon
legislature has to vote, is this in Oregon's best interest?
Now,
it is in Oregon's best interest
if their interest is
eating,
because all of their laws are making it extraordinarily difficult to be a farmer in Idaho.
And the people in the legislature do not understand
farmers because of the population base.
So it's in the interest of the people, and the people have spoken.
It would not make Idaho and flip it from, you know, blue to red, and it's not going to flip Oregon at all.
You might lose a representative in Oregon, but you won't lose very many because there's not a lot of people that are living in the farmlands.
Idaho is just not going to change.
It might throw in the state some balance from the progressives, which are very small in Idaho, but growing, into
a more stable state that it has always been
what's the problem with this except politics and that's where a republic no longer becomes a real republic that's why they keep calling it democracy one man one vote well they just voted and they want to secede why then are you going to use the apparatus of the republic to stop it because the two state legislatures have to vote first then it goes to congress and if anybody thinks that Congress, it doesn't become a 51st state, it just makes Idaho bigger.
And it's,
you know, West Virginia used to be Virginia, and they seceded.
It is constitutional and can happen and should be a reflection of the people.
But does anybody think it's actually going to happen?
No.
Can I say no?
Is that too defeatist?
It does seem like there's some good elements to this, but I mean, the stuff that you're describing that would have to happen,
this is not going to happen, is it?
Is this one of those things that we get
excited and interested in, but in reality, I mean, the idea that Congress is going to vote for something like this?
Come on.
I know, and I feel the same way.
I mean, you know,
you and I both know.
Roe versus Wade will never be overturned in our lifetime.
And I definitely said that about 100 times on the air.
So maybe I'm wrong.
Maybe I'm wrong.
I know.
I know.
It just moves Idaho's border 200 miles west.
And
I just don't see a reason why not to do it.
I mean, if this were.
Why would Oregon want to do it?
Let's just say, what do you mean, why would Oregon want to do it?
Why would Oregon want to give up 200 miles of their
decrease?
for their own.
The only reason to do it is they just want they want to protect the land from these evil farmers.
Because what I mean, what do you,
they don't want to destroy the land, they're making it impossible for farmers, they're making it impossible for timber, they're making it impossible, they want to preserve all but they want control, right?
Like every big government wants control, right?
So, why would Oregon want to give up hundreds of miles, square miles of their territory?
What would be the motivation for them to do this?
It's like it's not like it's costing them a ton, right?
Like, this is a productive area of the state, farm-wise.
It's going to, I mean, are you going to, they're just, they just don't like the land?
They don't like the people.
I mean, they, I guess they don't like the people.
They don't like the people as much as Republicans like their voters.
So they just,
just the,
you know, they hate them.
It's like if you have like, you know, a four-acre backyard, sometimes you just want a two-acre backyard instead.
That's basically the argument for Oregon.
I don't understand why they would do that.
I guess I'd love to have somebody who is a part of this that could make the case case on why Oregon would want to do this.
But quite honestly, I go back to democracy.
I know a republic, we are a republic, and I do not want a democracy.
But when the people are saying to the
state,
We don't want to be a part of you anymore.
We have nothing in common with you.
In fact, you're constantly in fit inflicting pain on us.
Why wouldn't reasonable people look at that and say, for them, it makes more sense?
Other than politics and greed.
Trip planner by Expedia.
You were made to outdo your holiday,
your hammocking,
and your pooling.
We were made to help organize the competition.
Expedia made to travel.