Best of the Program | Guest: Gina Carano | 2/8/24

and Alyssa are always trying to outdo each other.

When Alyssa got a small water bottle, Mike showed up with a four-litre jug.

When Mike started gardening, Alyssa started beekeeping.

Oh, come on.

They called a truce for their holiday and used Expedia Trip Planner to collaborate on all the details of their trip.

Once there, Mike still did more laps around the pool.

Whatever.

You were made to outdo your holidays.

We were made to help organize the competition.

Expedia, made to travel.

All right, great podcast today.

We cover the trial that was going on in front of the Supreme Court about whether you can keep Trump off the ballot in states like Colorado.

But also, we had Alan Dershowitz join us.

He talked about it.

Gina Carano is on with us today talking about her battle in court,

backed up by

Elon Musk.

I mean, I think the guy's turning into a real superhero, quite honestly.

And so much more, all the news you need on today's podcast coming up in 60 seconds.

Look, if you're living with pain, I want you to try.

I know you probably think I tried everything because I did.

I tried everything.

How can we break this?

I'll do anything, Doc.

How do I make this pain go away?

Well, thankfully, I found Relief Factor and I really didn't think it would work for me.

And it changed my world.

I got my life back.

So if you're dealing with what I was dealing with, pain every day, maybe today's the day you should give it a try.

Relief Factor is a daily supplement and helps your body fight that pain, 100% drug-free, developed by doctors to help reduce or eliminate pain.

Over a million people have tried Relief Factor's Quick Start Kit.

70% of them have gone on to order it again and again.

I happen to be one of them.

Relief Factor.

Get your three-week quick start kit.

Comes with Relief Factor's Feel Better or your Money Back Guarantee.

So visit ReliefFactor.com or call 1-800-4 Relief.

That's 1-800, the number 4 relief.

ReliefFactor.com.

Here's the podcast.

You're listening to the best of the Blenbeck program.

So, you know, you gotta love those people that just hate fascism so much that if a reporter goes in and gets the other side, you put them on a kill list, don't you?

I mean, I think that's great.

Nobody's even seen the interview yet.

They don't even know what the questions were to putin it's not posted until what five o'clock tonight i think yeah but wait wait wait wait but does it matter pat does it not does it matter not to the left questions are no it doesn't and does it matter to you i mean he still has a right to go oh of course i mean it matters to me personally i mean i'm hopeful that he's going to ask some tough questions of putin but but should he be able to as a journalist go over there and interview him yes a million have done that why is it okay for mike wallace and barbara walters and all the rest to have done it?

But now, all of a sudden, it's off limits to Tucker Carlson.

It's unbelievable.

Members of the European Parliament are calling for sanctions against Tucker Carlson.

Man, I mean, that's real accomplishment there.

You know what I mean?

Yeah.

And the European Parliament's coming after you.

Carlson posted a video on X announcing that he was going to do the Moscow interview with Putin.

And the former prime minister of Belgium said the block could consider imposing a travel ban for serving as a mouthpiece for Putin.

He doesn't know that.

They don't know that yet.

You haven't heard the interview.

And he's a journalist.

My gosh, where were you when everybody was hyping up Hitler?

So it drops tonight.

And here's how I'm going to watch it.

And I would like to get your opinion, Pat, on...

on what to look for in this interview.

First of all, we know Megan Kelly has talked about, and you know this going in, and Tucker's smart enough to know this.

Putin is very good at propaganda and he's a KGB guy, okay?

So he knows how to manipulate people.

And he knows that there are people looking for an American dictator in America.

They're tired of, I told you, I told you this.

This is how communists take over.

They infiltrate the government and then they activate the people that are on the streets, grassroots, to cause all kinds of problems until the people in the middle are like, somebody has got to stop this, and that's when the top comes down.

So there are people that are looking for a dictator just to make all this stop.

I am not one of them.

I think this is the worst possible scenario.

But Dugan would be pushing, Alexander Dugan, if you don't know who he is, listen to some of the old shows or just look him up.

A very dangerous guy, very, very dangerous.

He would be pushing Putin to talk about our immorality, transgenderism, our loss of faith.

Tucker has got to keep this on the rails.

This is not about America.

We could talk about that all day long, but I don't want to hear that from Vladimir Putin.

We're here to talk to you about the American involvement in this war in Ukraine, not our internal policy.

But

Tucker will have lost control of the interview if he allows Putin to go on about America's immorality more than once.

You can let him say that once, and then you got to say, Mr.

Putin, this is not about America.

We have our own problems, but I don't think it's appropriate to talk to you about our internal policy.

I'm here to talk to you about NATO, even the American war machine, if you want to call it that.

I want to hear why you're in Ukraine.

Are you willing to look for peace?

What would that look like?

So look for Putin to spin this whole thing into transgenderism

and what's happening in our schools

because

that then is propaganda.

We know who Putin is.

We know how he stops drugs on the streets.

We know how he treats media members who speak out about him in a negative way.

They usually fall from their apartment window or they go up to a higher floor and then jump from that, or I'm sorry, fall out of that window.

Happens all the time.

He has to talk about a peace deal, even the drones that have come from Ukraine, from us, NATO, all of that.

Tucker also says, We've been lied to.

I want to know about what

we know our problems.

Now let's hear solutions

to the war and what the truth is on war.

That's what I'm looking for tonight from Tucker.

I hope that's what he does.

If he keeps it on track like that, it'd be a great interview.

It'd be a great interview.

Because

nobody's ever heard from Putin why the invasion took place in the first place.

Why did you invade at this time?

What are you talking about?

These, the Nazis that are involved in Ukraine?

Explain that to me.

Who's a Nazi in Ukraine?

Are you saying Vladimir Zelensky is a Nazi?

No, there is, you know, because we did this when Trump was being impeached, and remember that huge chalkboard I did, Pat?

It had all of this in it.

There are Nazis,

and the Ukrainian government has been

funding them on the border for security.

There are some some really really bad guys there's nobody that's good in this i mean nobody nobody that's a good guy uh in this uh either side uh zelensky or putin uh i personally just they should work it out the the reason why i think putin did this is because we refuse to say no we've made a promise from the very beginning it wasn't written down but we're people of honor we will not allow Ukraine

into NATO.

We won't let Ukraine be overrun by you, but we're also not going to let them into NATO.

That's all that Putin was asking for at first.

And that was violated.

I mean, that's just a fact.

Oh,

that's just a fact.

And so they went back on that promise that we weren't going to allow them into or invite them into NATO.

And we did that.

So

that was a problem of our making.

So

there's an article out by me, an op-ed out by me on Blaze Media about being a fascist.

If you're on the side of freedom, you cannot be a fascist.

Let me explain this.

Fascist is the label of choice from the left to silence any and everybody.

You're a fascist, you're a fascist.

And when you hear fascist, you think of concentration camps, as you should, because those are usually a product of fascism in the end, because you have to get rid of your political opponents because they are standing in the way of progress.

So, unless you're in a free state, you can't have people who disagree with you.

That's really important.

What's happening with Tucker Carlson in the EU?

What's happening?

What do they want to do to Tucker Carlson?

You're in a free state.

You have a First Amendment right to be able to have unfettered access to the press, and the press can ask whatever it is they want.

The first definition of freedom is being able to speak your mind.

So the first thing that you'll notice about fascism is it has to silence the voices that disagree.

Okay?

I will invite and have invited anybody and everybody on this program.

They're choosing not to.

That's fine.

That's up to them.

But don't try to silence me.

I'm not trying to silence you.

If there is fascism in the country, it is coming from the left.

And

you should not throw the word fascist around.

It's never really fit in the United States up until recently, maybe in the last 15 years we've started moving towards that.

First, I thought we were moving towards communism, but we're not moving towards communism.

The difference between communism and fascism, communism is collective.

So it's, we're all in this together, and the individual doesn't matter.

We have to do what's right for the collective.

But communism takes that a step further and says, therefore, the state shall own and run everything.

And they'll tell you where you're going to work, what you're going to do, all of it.

Fascism is different.

Fascism allows the people to own their own property, own their own things with the illusion of running them.

Okay.

And so the state gets involved every step of the way.

And this is why fascism eventually falls apart, because you start to get into price controls and everything else, and you start just telling these companies what they can and cannot make.

And

the government can't central, centralized power never works.

You can't have central command for, you know, some sort of capitalism, if you could even call that.

Now, the reason why I'm bringing this up is because yesterday, Janet Yellen was asked by

Ayanna Presley.

She asked Janet Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury, if racism posed a threat to the American financial system.

Well, yes, of course, said Secretary Yellen.

Financial institutions perpetuate and benefit from racism, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

So Yellen said it could be, and it is one of the factors that Dodd-Frank told us to take into account considering designations.

So what her point was, why Presley brought this up, was because is racism a problem that the Treasury is looking at?

The Treasury should not be looking at racism.

The Treasury should be looking at basic laws for finance.

So Presley said there's a drugstore in Walgreens,

and Walgreens in Roxbury, Massachusetts,

they closed and they said it was because of crime.

But that's life-threatening, and it's based on racial discrimination and economic grounds.

Okay?

So

what she's saying is Walgreens, even though they said they cannot

open their doors because they're robbed every day and no one can have business,

Presley says the government should consider that racism and therefore tell Walmart or Walgreens exactly what to do.

I'm sorry, you're not closing down there.

You have to keep it open.

That's fascism, gang.

That is fascism.

One more story.

The feds now want to card you to use the internet.

U.S.

lawmakers' motivation for online ID and age verification and tech CEO support for these measures is a significant shift in privacy and your anonymity online.

What they're talking about now, and it was, you know, suggested first by Mark Zuckerberg, it would be great, wouldn't it?

That

you have to have a digital ID that will allow you on the internet.

So whenever you do that, now positively, absolutely, everything

is monitored on what you do.

You do have

a right to privacy.

You know,

if everybody is tracking what you do, what you look at, AI can put together,

well, for instance, if you're looking up a bunch of different drugs, AI can put together and go, oh, he's making crack cocaine, or, oh, he's trying to find out where he can buy this to kill his wife and bury her in the backyard.

And you'd say, that's good.

But if you're in fascism and you have giant overlords that are watching over you on everything,

you can't come up with a better mousetrap.

You can't have government watching your every move.

This is fascistic.

Again, the government in bed with big tech.

All right, back to the podcast in just a second.

Sadly, our economy has become dominated by businesses that cater to the woke mob.

I love people who say we're fascist.

If we're fascists, we want the government to co-opt the corporations.

Which side has done that?

There is one company.

that is fighting the fight on our side.

For the past 10 years, they have offered nationwide coverage with access to all three of the major networks, equipping you with the same coverage you've always had, but without sending your money to leftist causes.

You like free speech, religious freedom, life, Second Amendment?

Then you should switch now to Patriot Mobile and send a loud message.

Do you hear us now?

Go to patriotmobile.com slash Beck or call 972 Patriot, 972Patriot, patriotmobile.com slash Beck.

Use the offer code Beck and you'll get free activation when you switch today.

Patriotmobile.com/slash Beck.

Back to the podcast.

This is the best of the Glenn Beck program.

Mr.

Pat Gray joins me again for the vacationing Stuberge, who seems to be on some sort of, I don't know, French schedule or something, but glad to have you here, Pat.

Good to be here.

Yeah.

Very excited.

So

we're just,

I was just talking Pat off the ledge during the break.

He was,

I mean, I thought, I thought, you know, if Putin was behind him, he could push him right out the window right now and Pat would be dead because he was on the ledge

and saying there's no hope.

Well, we were just watching

Molly Hemingway speak about the things in her book, Rigged, how the media, big tech, and the Democrats seized our elections.

Right.

And here's what we were listening to for Blaze News at the top of the hour.

Listen.

Instead of having having election administration that is rigorously nonpartisan and impartial under the law, we have allowed the private takeover of government election offices by partisan oligarchs and their armies of activists who use those offices and their authorities to tilt the election toward favored candidates.

Instead of voters being able to vote for the candidate of their choice, powerful interests backed by wealthy oligarchs are working to remove the most popular candidate and the ruling party's chief opponent from the ballot in a move reminiscent of Soviet Russia.

And if that weren't enough, instead of the top candidates chosen by the people being able to fully engage in a vigorous campaign heading into an election, we have one side actively attempting to throw its opponent in prison and bankrupt his family.

Again, reminiscent of Soviet Russia.

Hmm.

So Pat wasn't feeling real optimistic after that.

No.

No, because what she said is

true.

True.

That is happening.

Yeah, it is.

It is happening.

But here is the thing.

First of all, it hasn't happened.

If the election is close, you can throw it.

One way or the other, you could throw it.

If the election is, you know, five to ten points out, you can't throw that without being very, very obvious.

This is this, what we're looking at as an election.

We don't even even know if this is going to be the election.

We don't know if Joe Biden is even going to be the candidate.

I think there's growing evidence that he's not.

And the oral arguments that are being heard right now in the Supreme Court, in fact, can we bring this up?

By altering the Constitution's qualifications for federal office.

This is live in the Supreme Court.

Is no different from a state residency law that requires members of Congress to inhabit the state prior to Election Day when the the Constitution requires only that members of Congress inhabit the State that they represent when elected.

In both situations, a State is accelerating the deadline to meet a constitutionally imposed qualification and is thereby violating the holding of term limits.

And in this situation, a ruling from this court that affirms the decision below would not only violate term limits, but take away the votes of potentially tens of millions of Americans.

I welcome the case.

So

this is the President's attorney.

President Trump.

You didn't

spend much time

in the argument with respect to whether or not Section 3 is self-executing.

So would you address that?

And in doing that,

your argument is that it's not self-executing, but then in that case, what would the role of the state be,

or is it entirely up to Congress to implement the disqualification

in Section 3?

It is entirely up to Congress, Justice Thomas.

And our argument goes beyond actually saying that Section 3 is non-self-executing.

We need to say something more than that, because a non-self-executing treaty or a non-self-executing constitutional provision normally can still be enforced by a state if it chooses to enact legislation.

The holding of Griffin's case goes beyond even that by saying that a state is not allowed to implement or enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment unless and until Congress enacts implementing legislation allowing it to do so.

So under Griffin's case, which we believe is correctly decided, the Anderson litigants disagree with us on that point.

But if this court were to adhere to the holding of Griffin's case, there would not be any role for the states in enforcing Section 3 unless Congress were to enact a statute that gives them that authority.

Counsel.

Okay.

So let me explain what they're talking about.

They're talking about, and by the way, I want to get back to Pat's hope.

First of all, there's hope here.

Second of all, more importantly,

I do know the one thing I know about God is that there is no waste in his

doings.

There's nothing wasted.

I wasted most of my life, but he took all the bad things that I did and turned them around on me to where it's actually helped me now that I'm on the right track.

So there's no waste.

Every loss is another

step closer to his vision being executed.

And you have to remember that because at the end, you'll look at this and go, how did that happen?

How did that happen?

And the answer will be God.

Okay, now, section three, this is the 14th Amendment of the U.S.

Constitution.

No person

shall be a senator, representative of Congress, or elector of president and vice president, or hold any office, civil or military under the United States or under any state, who has previously taken an oath as a member to Congress or as an officer in the United States or as a member of any state legislature or as an executive or judicial officer of any state to support the Constitution of the United States shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.

But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each house remove such a disability.

So the Constitution says, if you have given aid and comfort, or you've engaged in an insurrection, and they're saying that Donald Trump engaged in an insurrection.

However, nowhere, nowhere in any law in the United States are you guilty until proven innocent.

You have to, you can make the charge, but that doesn't make it true.

And of all of the litigations,

everything that is being filed in court, how many of them?

7,000 different court cases coming against him?

Not one

is charging him with insurrection.

Not one.

Or rebellion or giving aid and comfort.

Not one.

Why?

Because they know they can't win that.

So the argument, one of the arguments is the state can't say this.

First of all, it has to be charged.

And then the Constitution says that if that's who he is, if that's what they did, then he can't serve.

But Congress can vote to remove that should they care to.

This was all because of the Civil War.

This is an old-timey law that has never applied since the Civil War.

Just want you to know.

It was set up for the Confederacy.

Yes.

So they wouldn't retake power in the United States.

And they're trying to use it against Donald Trump, a guy who they just throw out the word insurrection about, and then that's supposed to scare all the states to take him off the ballot.

But it's not to support

anybody.

This is all coordinated.

There's a billion dollars at least behind all of this stuff, and it's very well coordinated.

They're trying to

cause chaos.

That's the first thing.

They're trying to challenge everything to it impossible to be a supporter of Trump or to be Donald Trump or to ever want to be like Donald Trump and stand against the machine.

They're trying to make it absolutely impossible and teach everyone, we are going to tie you in court until you're either in jail, dead, or broke, but we'll break you.

That's what the state is trying to do right now.

And when I say the state, I actually mean the leftist organizations and the, and Molly had it right, the oligarchs that are part of this cabal to change the way America works.

And this is going to have far-reaching ramifications.

This is not good.

Not good.

That's why.

That's why the Supreme Court needs to rule correctly on this

for a change.

I mean,

it's been tough.

Even with the so-called conservative court,

some of the decisions they made are far from conservative.

Right.

So they're arguing now Trump should be removed from the ballot because of his alleged role in recruiting, inciting, and encouraging a violent mob.

Wow.

Wow.

Then they told the Supreme Court in the brief: the president, former president, fails to even acknowledge the most damning evidence against him.

Take me into a court of law.

So Trump, his counter is officer of the United States.

He did not engage in insurrection.

Only Congress can enforce Section 3.

That's what he was saying, just making that case a minute ago.

The amendment only prohibits holding office rather than appearing on the ballot.

And that,

the ruling, violates Colorado's election code.

It says he can't serve.

It doesn't say he can't run.

No prosecutor has attempted attempted to charge president trump with insurrection under uh the u.s code in the three years since january 6 2021 they don't think that that this is going to be the strongest case i think it is but i'm not an attorney um

but they think that it will be on

uh he

the section three the amendment only prohibits holding office not running and being on a ballot.

They think that that's the one that they're going to do because they want to make it very, very narrow so it doesn't affect anything but this case.

Can we listen in a little bit more?

I did away with it later, but

that has nothing to say with respect to what Section 3or.

Can we get to the issue, which is, I think,

one that I go back to that I started with,

and very briefly,

what sense does it say

that states can't enforce Section 3 against their own officials.

I think

logically, those are two separate issues in my mind.

Can states enforce the insurrection clause against their own officeholders, or can they enforce it against

federal officials?

Or can they enforce it against the president?

Those are all three different questions in my mind.

And the answer to all three of those questions turns on whether this court agrees with the holding of Griffin's case.

If Griffin's case is the proper enunciation of the law, then a state cannot do any of the things Your Honor suggested unless Congress gives it authority to do so.

So a non-precedential decision that relies on policy, doesn't look at the language, doesn't look at the history, doesn't analyze anything than

the disruption that such a suit would bring, you want us to credit as precedential.

Because Congress relied on Griffin's case when it enacted the Enforcement Act of 1870 and established a constitution.

So, Mr.

Mitchell, if I may interrupt, but just to clarify, I mean, this sounds like your reply brief, where it sounds like you're not making a constitutional argument, you're really making a statutory preemption argument.

And is that what you're doing here?

You're not saying that the Constitution

of this rule.

It's the kind of combination of Griffin's case plus the way Congress acted after Griffin's case that gives you the rule?

That's exactly right, Justice Kagan, because we have implementing legislation.

Congress took up the invitation provided by Griffin's case and established writs of quowaranto in the 1870 Enforcement Act, later repealed them.

The only enforcement legislation that's currently on the books is the Insurrection Criminal Statute, Section 2383.

And when Congress made all of these decisions, the initial enactment of the Enforcement Act in 1870, the repeal of the quowarranto provisions in 1948, all of those were made with Griffin's case as the backdrop.

Well, the understanding was that these congressionally established remedies would be exclusive of state court remedies.

So there's not an express statement of preemption in these statutes, but there didn't need to be because Griffin's case provided the backdrop.

And if I could just understand the argument a little bit better, suppose that we took all of that away.

You know, suppose there were no Griffin's case and there were no subsequent congressional enactment.

What do you then think the rule would be?

So in just as a matter of first principles without Griffin's case, it's a much harder argument for us to make because normally,

I mean, every other provision of the 14th Amendment has been treated as self-executing.

What we would argue, and that's hypothetical that Your Honor has suggested, is that there are practical considerations unique to Section 3 that counsel in favor of a rule similar to what Chief Justice Chase spelled out in Griffin's case.

And it goes to, I think, the policy concerns he talks about, where this was a case, Griffin's case.

So they really seem to be pressing.

Now, again, we've heard the two liberal judges, but they are pressing the Trump

lawyers lawyers quite hard.

You're listening to the best of the Glendeck program.

I don't think I need to really do a long introduction, so I'm not going to.

Actress, former MMA fighter, Gina Carano, how are you?

I'm good.

Thank you so much for having me.

You bet.

I have to tell you,

I am so glad to see that you are standing up and fighting back against Disney and Lucasfilm for what happened to you.

Can you just describe quickly that whole scene?

Well, quickly.

I know, I'm sorry.

No, it's okay.

I actually, it was really interesting because for the longest time, for the last couple of years, I was just,

you know, just distraught, you know, trying to rebuild my life, running into all sorts of

you know,

problems of trying to, you know, recreate my career.

And finally, you know, I was like, you you know, I had to just like give it to God and say,

all right, you know, you've got me in life.

I'm going to keep going.

And I have to let this go and give it to you.

And, you know, whatever justice I get,

you know, I know you're working behind the scenes for me.

And then it was almost as soon as I did that, I got an email from a lawyer

that was hired by Elon Musk, an ex to inquire about my case.

And

then I was just so excited, and I emailed him back like immediately.

And,

you know, we started going through all of, you know, I just educated them and I sent them everything I have to date.

And I have a lot more to send them.

And they are, they're wonderful.

And they are just excited.

And they couldn't believe they were, they were kind of like dumbfounded about

how this happened.

So

that's the quick version.

So you, I mean, you've worked with everybody, Michael Douglas, Fastbender,

Cheni Tatum, Bill Paxton, Antonio Banderas, Robert De Niro,

Ryan Reynolds.

Have you had any support from these people?

Or are they afraid to come out?

Or how would you describe

what you're co-working?

Well, that's not my friends.

They're not my friends.

Your co-workers.

They're incredible incredible people that I've worked with you know I've never had a an issue with anybody with anyone whatsoever

you know as far as actors go or crew goes or for that matter I've not just I've just not had an issue on sets ever I get along with everybody but yes to answer your question there has been many

people who I have worked with and who I haven't worked with that I've run into not only just very well-known actors but also very well very well-known producers And actually, people who are still working in Disney and Lucasfilm actively, you know, have, you know, they all have shown so much support every single time I've seen

any of them.

And

to be very honest, I've not had one person from this industry come up to me and say, you know,

I deserved that.

They're all saying the complete opposite.

So it's just been kind of mind-bending that

Lucasfilm and Disney

couldn't see that as well.

When they contacted you, I assume they contacted you with this, or maybe they just said, ah, it's over for other reasons.

But when you found out that you were being cut out of everything and your career was over because of a tweet that was exactly the same that your co-star

tweeted, except toward the other side, did you point that?

I mean, you had to have gone, guys, wait a minute, hold it.

They didn't contact me this is uh this is very interesting i think it just shows what the company was at the time a couple years ago they they didn't even contact me to let me know they were letting me go they didn't contact me to let me know that um there was about to be paparazzi stalkers and people flooding outside my house that i found all of that out just like everybody else did over the internet oh my gosh the fact that you know and it did it was awful it was um you know i've been trying to put on a really brave face for the last couple

years, but I mean, I cannot begin to even describe.

I couldn't leave my house for seven days.

I was being stalked.

I was being harassed.

I was, they were coming up to my, I had to keep all of my blinds closed.

And I had actually lost all hearing.

I don't know.

It's a very interesting.

random thing.

I lost all of the hearing.

As soon as I was canceled, my hearing like got clogged and I could only hear like 5%.

Was that kind of like

this is a horrible name for it, but hysterical blindness when you are in so much

trauma that

it really, yeah, it really felt like that.

Like it felt like, you know, either that or God just put earmuffs on me.

Wow.

And I just was like, you know, and so I really had to sit there in my head and I

really had to sit there in my head and just go over things and it was it was quite um it was torturous until I finally was just like okay

I just gave it to God and you know I just it's just it was just such an intense time and you know for them not to even warn me you know I didn't have I didn't live in a gated community so I was out there

and and that wasn't you know you think that somebody would have you know just call me and tell me hey thank you for all your work and everything and we're just no longer going to work with you and then they put out the statement about the denigrating people off of their religious and cultural beliefs and being abhorrent.

And I was just like, this is,

I just, it was just, at the worst time possible, they really kind of, you know, they definitely put my life in danger at that moment.

So what do you hope happens with this lawsuit?

I mean, I'd love to see the discovery on all of the emails going back and forth.

That'll be nice.

Yes.

Yeah.

I hope that

I hope that this makes a change.

I hope that

it makes a change in this industry and it makes a change in people's hearts.

You know,

the post that I got fired for originally, or what they said I got fired for,

was never supposed to be what

the media and all of them twisted into.

It was supposed to be, you know, do not demonize your neighbor.

You know, we need to look at each other as human beings because the internet is one thing, but when you get outside and you get around people, there is so much love and there's so much, you know, it's not the internet.

The internet is

false.

It's a lot of people hiding behind, you know, brave ideas and false accounts.

And when you get in, when you get to be around people, there is, you know, we all bleed, you know, red.

We're all just kind of on this earth together.

And so I hope that the outcome for this

case is just to make, you know, everybody kind of be a truly, truly inclusive

industry in Hollywood and make it that much difficult to do what happened to me to happen to the next person.

Yeah, you know,

I don't think people understand that

it's happening to people like you and

people all over the country who are in

visible places.

And I don't think people really understand if they do it to people like you,

why would they hesitate to do it to a nobody?

And

that's the scariest thing is they're not coming after the nobodies alone.

They're coming after names like Elon Musk, who I think they're trying to do the same thing to.

Oh, yeah.

Yeah.

We definitely,

when they try to smear him as anti-Semitic, I was like,

that's exactly what they did to me.

They try to smear you as all of these key words,

racist, anti-Semitic, transphobe.

And, you know, it's just any, it's really, they're just trying to, you know, squash down anybody who has,

you know, the ability to reach people to just

tell them, yeah, let's communicate.

Let's think, you know, critically.

Let's, you know, not just listen to what the news is telling us.

And let's, you know, let's communicate with each other because we have to, because everything is.

Everything is owned now by people who want to just grab more control.

It's really crazy.

It is.

I've never seen, especially with Disney, I've never seen such a wrecking ball taken, you know, to their own corporation like Disney has taken the wrecking ball to everything that they own and everything that they touch.

I mean, this is just

a shame because you just,

we grew up with Disney and it doesn't seem like it would be that hard of a fix.

You know, it doesn't seem like, hey, you know what?

We messed up here.

You know, they're so good at telling everybody how to apologize and get on their knees and say sorry.

It's like, you know, lead by example in this case.

It wouldn't be hard to be like, to look at my case and say, hey, you know what?

We did wrong there.

Let's make it right.

And, you know,

and then let's start reaching out to, you know, really inclusive, like all, all people.

It doesn't mean that they have to follow any type of political, you know, side.

They could just really include and appreciate the fan base that they had

that has just been completely betrayed by them.

So I don't understand in those meetings how it's just not like, you know what?

We did wrong.

Let's face up to it.

Let's do something right here.

And let's get, you know, let's get our,

you know, our conservative viewers back.

It seems like it would just be a no-brainer.

I don't know if they could at this point.

I mean, once you've violated my family, I mean, beyond what they did to you,

they, you know,

they're trying to

teach my children principles that I don't agree with at all.

And they've lost that trust that parents had, oh, it's Disney.

It's safe.

It's not safe.

And that's going to take them a long time to recover that.

And a good step forward would be to

correct this with you and others that they have wronged.

So,

you know, when this happened to you,

nothing's impossible, though.

You know, like, I know

if they keep going down this route, they're just going to be considered evil.

You know, I have a massive ball to rock to push back up a mountain to get back a career, but I'm not looking at that saying, okay, I'm at the bottom again.

I'm not going to do it.

You know, we have to constantly rebuild ourselves, and so do companies.

So if they started now, you know, they could start pushing that rock back up instead of it just tumbling.

It's just tumbling down the hill.

Yeah.

Well, you are going to be, you are going to be,

you're going to be fine in the end, especially since, you know, when this happened, we weren't really ready

as the conservatives.

And I don't want a bunch of conservative films or, you know,

films.

I just want good films.

You know what I mean?

And, and can we have them say decent things about society and try to help us be better people?

But if you look at the films now, Angel is really, I think, leading the way on this.

If you see some of the stuff that's coming, and I think we're right on the cusp.

I started the Blaze, you know, before

Amazon and HBO were online, we were doing digital streaming at the Blaze, and it was a nightmare.

Now,

12 years later, things are happening to where there is a community.

You give it another five years and we're not going to have to worry about Hollywood.

You know, and it really just breaks your heart.

You know, I feel like so many people have come before me and fought this battle and nobody was paying attention.

So I really am honored to be in a position where people are paying attention right now.

And to give respect to those people that came before me, those actors and everybody that was trying to break down the barriers for so long,

you know, it breaks my heart that, you know, they didn't get justice.

And so,

you know,

yeah, I feel pretty fortunate to be in a situation to help with that because, yes, in five years, it's going to be even better.

And I'm excited to have just been at the beginning of this, just how I was at the beginning of women's mixed martial arts.

I feel like I get to be

part of breaking ground here.

And so I really hope this case is,

I hope, I hope people pay attention to it and blow it out of the water and just make sure that, you know, we're going to make it easier for the next generation and the people, the younger people behind me.

I have such great respect for you.

Thank you so much for coming on.

You're welcome here anytime.

Best of luck to you.

You bet.

Thank you so much, Glenn.

You bet.

Gina Carano.

Attention, all small biz owners.

At the UPS store, you can count on us to handle your packages with care.

With our certified packing experts, your packages are properly packed and protected.

And with our pack and ship guarantee, when we pack it and ship it, we guarantee it.

Because your items arrive safe or you'll be reimbursed.

Visit theupsstore.com slash guarantee for full details.

Most locations are independently owned.

Product services, pricing, and hours of operation may vary.

See Center for Details.

The UPS store.

Be unstoppable.

Come into your local store today.